Richard Dean Anderson's Height
6ft 0in (182.9 cm)
Peak height was 6ft 1.75in (187.3 cm)
American actor, best known for starring in TV series MacGyver and Stargate SG:1. He said in a 1998 New York Post he was "about 6-foot-2"
. This photo was taken at a London Film & Comic Con, I had about 0.3-0.4 inch more sneaker than Richard that evening.
5ft 8 Rob and Richard
You May Be Interested
Add a Comment 63 comments
Average Guess (25 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.25in (186.1cm)
Current: 5ft 11.77in (182.3cm)
F97 said on 11/Aug/17
Looks a legit 6 footer to me
even said on 22/Jul/17
a weak 6 footer
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jul/17
6ft1½ is the lowest I'd argue peak
said on 12/Jul/17
Rampage... : He's not in "horrendous awful shape", he is just overweight these days. That's what I was referring to in my earlier comment, in the MacGyver days he was slim and the other actors were shorter (and/or overweight... think Dana Elcar and Bruce McGill) which made him appear taller. I just watched a couple episodes of MacGyver during the last week so I have the appearances still very clearly in my head.
Actually, I wonder how tall Dana Elcar was? IMDB says 6' but you know IMDB... Anyway, in one of the MacGyver episodes I saw, Anderson and Elcar were standing side by side and the difference between them was not much, about an inch (I would say LESS than an inch), definitely not 2 in. The fact that Anderson had huge tall hair and Elcar was bald deceives you at first, but then you look at their eye level.
Editor Rob: you could say with Dana that he didn't seem any taller than 6ft 1.5, maybe Dana during the MacGyver era was about 6ft, maybe having lost a fraction...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jun/17
No I think he was near 6ft2 in the MacGyver days and is maybe a fraction over 6ft today if measured. As you can see he's in horrendous awful shape and possibly has back problems causing him to hunch.
Slim 181 cm said on 24/Jun/17
Looks 182 in photo, a mans receding hairline can make him look taller.
182 now, 186 prime
RichardSpain said on 21/Jun/17
Maybe he was 6'2 with his footwear.
I think he was a solid 6'1" barefoot in peak not more.
Nowadays seems around 5'11 or 5'11.25" I agree with Bugsy
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jun/17
Shanks looks an honest 6ft even today. Browder could be a bit under it though
Bugsy said on 20/Jun/17
DEFINITELY less than 6 ft in this picture, I would say 5'11.25 is fair. Looks 5 inches shorter than Judge does in his pic.
Don't buy him being more than about 6'1" back in the day either. He's a tall guy but mostly he just looked tall because in MacGyver he was very slim and all the other actors were significantly shorter. (Don't forget the boosting hair either! :) )
Brad said on 17/Jun/17
I don't recognize him, I guess he was older than I thought.
said on 15/Jun/17
Rob i just saw your comment on michael shanks, that he might be nunder 6 foot now? He is 46 years old and very good shape. Why do you think he is shorter now. Have you seen him and thought he looked shorter now?
Editor Rob: well he came by the stall we were at, as did ben browder...I thought Browder seemed more 6ft than Shanks!
Kourosh 5'9.5 (176cm-177cm) said on 15/Jun/17
said on 15/Jun/17
How would Richard look like compared to 6 footers like Ben Browder and Michael Shanks. Dif they look about the same height when you met them?
Editor Rob: Shanks in 2017 may be heading a little shy of 6ft.
I do think Anderson will still measure 6ft, but he might look not much over 5ft 11 to people.
said on 14/Jun/17
How did he look up close compared to a legit 6ft guy like Mark Selby for instance?
Editor Rob: he looked under six foot walking and standing, but had less sneaker, so I could see him 6ft. He is aged 65 in this photo.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jun/17
He's losing at least 2cm in the photo
berta said on 14/Jun/17
yeah in the photo he rallyh looks like he is about 181,5 but as i said when measured he doesnt fall under 183.well maybe but i think he can be somemhwre in the range of 182,5-183,5 and probably on the higer end of it. But when he walks he can look under it
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jun/17
Possibly could clear 6ft if measured
Danimal said on 13/Jun/17
Looks closer to 5'11"-5'11.5" with you Rob. If he was able to straighten out his back/neck, it's possible he could hit 6'0.5"-6'0.75". He was close to 6'2" in the 80's.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Jun/17
Looks awful today
World Citizen said on 13/Jun/17
Looks no more than 5 ft 11.25 here.
said on 13/Jun/17
By looking at this peak he looks around 5 ft 11.5 inc...
Do you know why Rob he did lost so much height?
187 cm as peak is fair
Editor Rob: as I mentioned below, he has had knee issues and back issues which knocked his height down.
Peter 179cm said on 13/Jun/17
About 182cm accounting for footwear and posture.Don't know about his peak height
berta said on 13/Jun/17
he really looks to have lost height. but i would maybe go for a little lower peak height. He can be a guy that was barely 187 and today maybe 183-183,5. He looks 6 ot flat but you never now with a little older guys if they can streath up for a measurement. barely 187 to strong 183 guy - lost about 3,5 cm is my guess
said on 13/Jun/17
He looks more a decent 5'11 than 6' with you, considering the footwear difference of course... 5'11-5'11.5, maybe, to be generous.
Was this guy really near 6'2 at his peak, Rob? Even if he really is near 6' today, that's still quite a big amount to lose at 67...
I don't really know him, although I've heard about his MacGyver show more than once!
Editor Rob: seems a big amount to lose by age 65...but I think at mid 50's he was still 6ft 1.
But Richard has said he's had several knee surgeries and back surgeries, so I believe he's lost more than average by mid 60's due to those issues.
Nik said on 13/Jun/17
Yes I would say he is 6'0" on the nose!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Jun/17
Wow....that low today?!
And much heavier. Hardly recognisable
Mincer said on 13/Jun/17
He looks really different, I didn't recognize him.
said on 9/Mar/17
Definitely shorter than Michael Shanks who is listed 6 ft flat
berta said on 21/Feb/17
was he really as tall as tom hidlestone at peak? i think that if you take away 1/4 of the listing it is better
TK said on 10/Feb/17
187 at peak
berta said on 6/Feb/17
the black guy was always about 2 cm taller wasnt he? and he does look at best 6 foot 2 with rob but more like 187. Maybe dean was never taller than 186?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Oct/16
Definitely doesn't look this today
Frank R said on 24/Jun/16
In one episode of MacGuyver, Pete Thornton (Dana Elcar) said "I'm looking for my missing friend. He's about 6'1"..." If Anderson was 6'1.75", why wouldn't Pete have guest-imated 6'2" instead of 6'1"? Even if it was a mistake by the writers you'd think that Anderson would have "corrected" the error for authenticity, since actors don't generally want to be perceived as "shorter" on screen than they really are.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Mar/16
He did look 6ft2 in MacGyver so this height for his peak is fair.
Luigi said on 21/Mar/16
John Anderson, the actor played his uncle Harry Jackson, was 6 foot 2 for IMBD.
In the episode PHOENIX UNDER SIEGE, Richard Dean seems a little bit smaller than John.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Nov/15
186cm today possibly
JayZ said on 8/Sep/15
Tall guy in his youth,long arms and legs..probably nearer to 6ft these days.Great actor.
jackie said on 2/Sep/15
he is tall so shut up and no john Anderson is not related to him Anderson is a common name
Andrew M said on 30/Nov/14
Actually I thought he could have been taller. Guess it's his co-stars, like Dana Elcar. Didn't his real dad guest-star as his uncle in an episode of MacGyver? He lived alone in the desert and kept calling him "Bud"! When was it revealed his actual name was Angus MacGyver? I used to call him "The Man With No First Name", as I never heard it in "MacGyver". Still, we didn't get all the episodes here in the UK, did we?!
Ted said on 27/Oct/14
I think he has shrunk a lot. He was slouched a bit but I took a photo with him today and he was about 5'11 or under 6'. He looks about 1.5 inches shorter than me in the photo. .
Hypado said on 8/Jul/14
Richard Dean Anderson is A legit 187cm GUY
One of my favourite actors ever.
said on 2/Jan/14
I know he looks 6'1.5 area but do you think he was 6'1.25 peak?? He was shorter than weak 6'2 Christopher judge by 1/2 inch. It is possible he looked big back in the 80s/90s due to his slim build?
[Editor Rob: there is a chance Judge has lost half an inch down his sofa because he really did dominate at 6ft 2 easy on stargate early seasons but in person last few times he looks struggling with 6ft 2. Anderson definitely in photos with friends looks 184-5 range last year, but maybe he's not standing as well today as the past.]
said on 23/Dec/13
Nearer 6ft1 today, Rob?
[Editor Rob: quite likely]
Yaspaa said on 30/Oct/13
You're boring, sugars.
sugars said on 29/Aug/13
No he is not!! I am 5'11 and a half and trust me, he walked right by me and he is at tops 5 ft. 7 or 8. There is no way he is near 6'0 ft. I just saw him at the Fan Expo here in Toronto.
XistenZ said on 25/Jul/13
Think he's 184.5cm peak. In episode 'D.O.A.: MacGyver' he got described as "a little over 6 feet."
Frost said on 1/Jun/13
I've met him a few times, and he's a good 6'1 and 3/4".
Jimbo said on 30/Dec/11
Said himself in an episode of McGyver he was 6'1, I would say a very solid 6'1 186cm.
avi said on 25/Nov/11
yes strong 6'1 not over 6'1.5
Mohammed said on 1/Jul/11
Only time he's been 6'2 is the second he steps out of bed in his youth. Probably 186 cm now, peaked at 187.
Observant said on 27/Feb/11
He always looked about 1 - 2 cm shorter than Christopher Judge, so 186 - 187 is fair.
MacGyverFan said on 8/Jan/11
He is described as around 6'1 in MacGyver.
456 said on 2/Aug/07
he only looks like hes wearing lifts because in sg1 there wearing boots all the time which add abit to there height, but in mcgyver he wears converse which are flat so its about right.
hb45 said on 6/Feb/07
Personnally, I don't think he wears lifts. Anyway, not in McGyver, where he was jumping and running all the time, which would be hard to do with lifts. I think he's genuinely tall, and 188cm seems good to me.
rider said on 21/Jan/07
he wears lifts ,you can tell by the way he walks on screen ,it's VERY similar to all the other lift shoe wearers ,like arnie, sly, kurt russell, i'd say 6ft max !
Big Dave said on 7/Jan/07
I think that he is 6'1.5, just a bit shorter than he is listed here. He looks about 1.5 inches taller than Michael Shanks And about 1.5 inches shorter than Chris Judge, particularly in the earlier Stargate series. I think he needs to be down graded slightly to 187cm.
[Editor Rob: I think probably right, whether he has lost 1cm or just always is 187 not sure on]
Editor Rob said on 8/Sep/06
Described in 1986 chicago times "strapping 6-foot-2"
Boobula said on 15/Dec/05
Anderson is not more than 1 inch taller than Michael Shanks, when Shanks is standing straight. Sometimes he does look a couple inches taller next to Shanks, but that's because Shanks is a terrible sloucher. In scenes where they are next to each other and Shanks takes a rare erect stance, you can clearly see there's no more than an inch between them. Shanks claims that he is six feet even, which he looks. In any event, it's extremely unlikely that he's taller than that, since actors almost always round up their heights or tack on a full extra inch.
Also, the tv show MacGyver had a couple references to Mac's height. One has been mentioned, another one was MacGyver being identified as 6'1" on an ID card of some sort, if I remember correctly.
d said on 3/Dec/05
in a macgyver episode, Pete thorton was describing him to somebody and called him "a little over 6 feet"
Big Dave said on 20/Apr/05
This looks accurate to me. I have been watching Stargate for years and he is definitely a good two inches taller than Michael Shanks.
Mr. R said on 18/Apr/05
I go back with RDA into the 70's when he originated the role of Dr. Jeff Weber on General Hospital. He was listed at 6-2 then, and I still think he's pretty close to it now.
Smoke said on 17/Apr/05
Yeah, he is indeed suprisingly tall! At first glance you definately don't notice him to be a particularly tall guy, infact in my first guess I thought he was something like 5'10", but then you see him next to other people and he really does look 6'1"-6'2". Not sure if he's still quite 6'2", but he definately had to have been close to this at his peak.
Chicky said on 17/Apr/05
In Stargate, Teryl Rothery (Janet Fraiser) had to wear her 'big' shoes when she was in a scene with Rick, because she is only 5 foot 2. Also, he is definetaly a couple of inches taller then Michael Shanks, who is 6 foot, and is a bit smaller then Chris Judge, who is around 6 foot 3. I'd say that 6 foot 2 is right on the money