CelebHeights.com Home :: :: Bookmark :: Faq
Ringo Starr Height
Ringo Starr's height is 5 ft 6 in (168 cm)

UK Beatle drummer. Even a 1964 newspaper joked when someone questioned if he was 5ft 4 and wore lifts "there seems to be no reliable figure on Ringo's height, despite the efforts of statisticians and entomologists everywhere"...I think 5ft 6 max in 60's now.

Met Ringo Starr? Add a comment below about their height.

Add a comment about their height

Your Comment:
Marc says on 19/Nov/11
i herd on the radio that george is 5ft10 john 5ft10 1/2 paul 5ft11 witch makes sens cus hes the tallest and for ringo they said hes 5ft6 and half so....
Mae says on 10/Sep/11
I think that's a reasonable height for ringo
Scott says on 13/Aug/11
I don't believe Ringo is this height. Why does he look taller than mccartney in this picture? Click Here I'd say about 5'8" is fair.
Music says on 6/Jul/11
Next to Dhani Harrison (5'6 1/2'') Ringo is just a bit taller. So maybe 5'7'' is most accurate.
donkey says on 14/May/11
John, Paul, George relativley the same 5'10-11 closer to 5'11 with the cuban heeled boots
ringo 5'6
with the cuban heeled boots on ringo almost looks 5'8-5'8.5
avi says on 7/May/11
yes 5'6. 5'5.5 min. in The magic Christian with Peter Sellers. (a supposed 5'8 guy)he is 2 inches shorter.
Ezio says on 23/Feb/11
me says on 14/Dec/10
There is not way John and George was only 5.8. I think John was about 5.10 and George was 5.9.5. Their frame just doesn't suggest 5.8. You have no idea how short 5.8 is.

5'8 is extremely short now? LOL. While I do agree they were over 5'8, seeing someone's frame on TV isn't always a good indicator of height.
mark says on 27/Jan/11
I met Ringo once. I stand 5'10 and ringo was at least four inches shorter.
guyfrommars says on 26/Dec/10
Kimber: Those bios in the early 1960s were highly exaggerated. And I guess 5'8" was his height in those Cuban heeled Beatle boots.
cecil noriega says on 19/Dec/10
Why does everybody think George was shorter than paul and john.
He wore converse sneekers all the time after 1967 ( only half inch heels)
He was definitely their height. call it 5-11 or 5-10.
Ringo definitely 5-6 ish.
Ian Fawn-Meade says on 16/Dec/10
Stood in line at Heathrow passport control behind he and Barbara Bach. My wife was 4 11", and she was about the same height. They were a noticeably tiny couple, he was probably no more than 5' 4"
me says on 14/Dec/10
There is not way John and George was only 5.8. I think John was about 5.10 and George was 5.9.5. Their frame just doesn't suggest 5.8. You have no idea how short 5.8 is.
Russ says on 13/Dec/10
I think john and George were only about 5'8, I'd say Ringo was no taller than 5'6
Kimber says on 4/Dec/10
Ringo's wife Barbara Bach is 5'6". If you look at their wedding photos from 1981 they are about the same height however she is wearing heels and it he is wearing dress shoes. So I would say he has to at least 5'7" or 5'8". I have heard that in a 1963 Beatles' bio he was listed as 5'8" and 134 pounds. Of course now that he's 70 years old he's probably closer to 5'6" now. In the end it doesn't really matter how tall he is, what matters is that he's a rock-n-roll icon and has lived an extraordinary life! As MrsRStarkey said Good Things Come in Small Packages!!!
Star Heights A-Z
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R
S T U V W X Y Z
Random Photo
Latest Star Heights
Latest Heights
Latest Comments
Paul Gascoigne
Michael Urie
Suzi Quatro
Phil Morris
Patrick Stump
Eve Myles
Beth Behrs
Robert Maschio
Popular Articles
Justin Bieber
Tom Cruise
General Height
Rob Paul
Brad Pitt
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Sneakers
Sylvester Stallone
Shoe Lifts
Photos and Perspective
Heel Height Truth
Elevator Shoes
Celebs my Height
Height Challenge
Search CelebHeights
 
CelebHeights.com © Rob Paul, 2004-2011
Using this site you are agreeing to its Terms

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters, pictures, films.

Photos of 'Fans with Celebrities' on this site are © to their respective owners and should not be used or linked to without permission.