Vegas says on 25/Jan/12
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Jan/12
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter...
________
thats 2000 Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Jan/12
Peak height was 188cm(6"2). Just look at the clips
from 10-15 years ago. He was easily the same height
as Shane McMahon and slightly taller than Steve Austin.
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter... The Truth says on 16/Dec/11
Wears lifts and is clearly shorter than 6'2 Shane Mcmahon, 5'11 - 6'0 i say dicksock says on 6/Dec/11
tell-em says on 18/Oct/11
dicksock, ive read your comments, you aint confident or correct, you are a stubborn, stubborn goofball. You never admit that you are wrong,
____________
Ok, I stopped reading your comment after this remark. If you really think this way then you don't know what you're talking about. NO ONE on this site admits his mistakes more than me; NO ONE. I once had Sheamus at 6'1"-6'2" when I first saw him. Vegas quickly corrected me and I admitted my error. But I guess that doesn't count. I once had Andre at 7'-7'1", but I after review more evidence, my estimate for Andre has changed to closer to 6'11". I used to think Andre lost a lot of height by the late 80s. After studying the subject more for myself and seeing evidence presented by other posters, I admitted my mistake. I used to think Vince McMahon was 6'2", but after seeing endless amounts of evidence I now think he was around 6'1". All the evidence in the world points to Vince being 6'1" at the most. If you are too stubborn to admit that, that is your problem. As I said in a recent post on Hulk Hogan's page; Trolls...Will they ever cease? NCL says on 26/Oct/11
Here's a real interesting interview about Vince's life and such:
Click Here tell-em says on 18/Oct/11
dicksock, ive read your comments, you aint confident or correct, you are a stubborn, stubborn goofball. You never admit that you are wrong, which most of the time u are, and you insult everyone, when you are wrong, which is all the time. That qualifies you as a big baby, and a joke. i saw your vids, replied, and i posted a video, and they show my accurateness and shows how wrong you are. its funny you say you guessed people's height correctly when you can't do it here. lol. Ras says on 18/Oct/11
If Vince is 6'0" tops then Donald Trump is 6'1" tops. dicksock says on 17/Oct/11
tell-em says on 10/Oct/11
blind tool. of course its true. but you think vince is 5'10 or 5'11". lol. thats ridiculous.
Whatever loser. I don't think Vince is 5'10". I have said on numerous occasions that Vince McMahon was 6'1" tops and is around 6' today but probably a little under because he's shorter than 6' John Cena on a regular basis. You are the blind one if you can't see that. I have proven this for a fact. Even Rob questions whether or not Vince wore/wears lifts. "people" like you make me sick. I am very confident in all of my estimations. I've accurately guessed more people's heights in real life than you can imagine. tell-em says on 12/Oct/11
heres vince mcmahon in regular boots next to hbk w/ casuals. mcmahon has over an inch on hbk, but due to footwear advantage. probly .5 more than hbk. still shows vince at 6'0.5" and hbk at 5'11" range. Click Here tell-em says on 12/Oct/11
heres vince mcmahon in regular boots next to hbk w/ casuals. mcmahon has over an inch on hbk, but due to footwear advantage. probly .5 more than hbk. still shows vince at 6'0.5" and hbk at 5'11" range. tell-em says on 10/Oct/11
blind tool. of course its true. but you think vince is 5'10 or 5'11". lol. thats ridiculous. dicksock says on 5/Oct/11
tell-em says on 4/Oct/11
dicksock, shawn michaels was always a 5'11-5'11.5" man. vince mcmahon has always been taller than him. i have vince at 6'0.5" and in that vid of dx and vince,look at vince's leg and posture. hbk has shoe and posture advantage, which is why he looks taller.
That is just not true. Chris says on 5/Oct/11
From all the pics others posted,I would suggest that Vince is no more than 6'1".Maybe when he was younger he may have been around 6'2",but not today. tell-em says on 4/Oct/11
dicksock, shawn michaels was always a 5'11-5'11.5" man. vince mcmahon has always been taller than him. i have vince at 6'0.5" and in that vid of dx and vince,look at vince's leg and posture. hbk has shoe and posture advantage, which is why he looks taller. dicksock says on 3/Oct/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 26/Sep/11
188cm in his prime
186-187cm today
So Vince was as tall as Tony Atlas and is still taller than John Cena?
Rob: Why don't you have a "peak height" and "current height" for Vince? He is clearly and I mean 100,000% clearly not 6'1.5" and never was. You have 6'2" for HHH and 6'1.5" for Vince, yet HHH is currently like 3"-4" taller. 6'0.5" max John Cena is taller! His peak height should be 6'0.5"-6'1" and his current height should be 5'11.5-6'0".
Here is 6'-6'0.5" John Cena with the supposedly 6'1.5" Vince:
Click Here
Click Here
PLEASE WATCH ROB AND SEE THE TRUTH Legend says on 1/Oct/11
This guy is no more than 5'10.75 today. I'm telling you guys. Believe it. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 26/Sep/11
188cm in his prime
186-187cm today Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 26/Sep/11
Vince McMahon is 186cm-187cm Vegas says on 26/Sep/11
vince has the footwear advantage in this one as hbk is in slippers and vince is in doc martin type boots Click Here dicksock says on 26/Sep/11
He doesn't look any taller or even as tall as Shawn Michaels in 1997:
Click Here
Here are some others:
Click Here
Click Here
Yes, I know Michaels has a footware advantage in the last video I posted. However, he doesn't have that much of one and he is coming out taller than Vince anyway. Take away the advantage and they'd be about the same height. But, Rob I guess you'll keep on saying Vince is/was 2" taller than Shawn despite this evidence that proves otherwise. Honestly, I've seen a prime Vince look like a solid 6'1" and I've seen him look 6' or less. To me, his height is harder to pin down than Andre's or Hogan's. I doubt he was ever over 6'1" legit. Now he is shorter than 6'0.5" John Cena on a regular basis. Vince is a solid 5'11" now. James says on 8/Sep/11
In reality......
Vince McmMahon 6'0.5 (184cm)
Donald Trump 6'1.5 (187cm) Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 19/Aug/11
Weirdly, Vince looks taller than 187-188cm Donald Trump in these
Click Here James says on 18/Aug/11
Triple H might measure at 187cm today. Danimal says on 17/Aug/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 16/Aug/11
Triple H is 6ft2.5(189cm) because he's 3in taller than 181-182cm or 5ft11.5ish HBK.
HBK WAS 5'11" in his prime (same height as Bret Hart). He was even billed this height in the 1980's. James says on 16/Aug/11
Well he does look shorter than cena these days but yet only looks 1.5 shorter than triple h.... maybe Triple H is more like 6'1-6'1.5 range? Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 16/Aug/11
Triple H is 6ft2.5(189cm) because he's 3in taller than 181-182cm or 5ft11.5ish HBK. Mamun says on 16/Aug/11
I can't see this picture !
Regards
SUPERMUN Danimal says on 15/Aug/11
hs2011 says on 8/Jul/11
Doesn't look over 6'0" flat today and is possibly a smidge under. Looked legit 6'1"+ at his peak, so would've been slightly taller than Cena.
+1 Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 13/Aug/11
Every bit of 6ft2 in his prime.
Closer to 6ft1 now. Terryman says on 8/Aug/11
Rob 02:10 Click Here onwards thats not half an inch of a difference between vince and Triple h James says on 26/Jul/11
If Triple H is still 6'2 then he looked i think maybe 184cm in comparison? tell-em says on 19/Jul/11
lol. and people think triple h is 6'1.5". how moronic can u get? Vegas says on 19/Jul/11
looking at him next to hhh last night his height loss has been greatly exaggerated on here, measured up to trips exactly like 1995, 97 and 2000 James says on 15/Jul/11
is looking under 6ft next to cena hs2011 says on 8/Jul/11
Doesn't look over 6'0" flat today and is possibly a smidge under. Looked legit 6'1"+ at his peak, so would've been slightly taller than Cena. tell-em says on 8/Jul/11
hes never been over 6'1". Vegas says on 8/Jul/11
whats people estimates on this womans height, 1985, she enters the shot at 1min 15sec Click Here James says on 7/Jul/11
Yep shorter than cena last night.
Maybe 5'11 1/2 next to Cena? Danimal says on 7/Jul/11
tell-em says on 5/Jul/11
mcmahon looked 5'11" next to john cena last night.
Incredible how much height he's list in the last few years. The man was in the 6'1"-6'2" range up until the 1990's. tell-em says on 5/Jul/11
mcmahon looked 5'11" next to john cena last night. James says on 3/Jul/11
184cm today
185-186cm prime Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 30/Jun/11
188cm prime
185-186cm today JBJ says on 28/Jun/11
Vince has definitely lost height. He isn't taller than Cena either. There either the same height or Cena is half an inch taller. James says on 26/Jun/11
Shane McMahon 185cm
Steve Austin 184cm
Kurt Angle 178cm Terryman says on 26/Jun/11
1,83.5 meters wore lifts in his earlier career! Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 24/Jun/11
Angle is probably in wrestling boots
Shane McMahon 188cm
Steve Austin 186cm
Jury Angle 178cm Terryman says on 24/Jun/11
around 2006&2007 when ever vince macman and john cena came face to face there was hardly a difference in height between them! James says on 18/Jun/11
go to 2:09 on this video. Shane McMahon looks higher than 182cm next to 178cm Kurt Angle.
Click Here James says on 18/Jun/11
go to 2:09 on this video. Shane McMahon looks higher than 182cm next to 178cm Kurt Angle. Vegas says on 15/Jun/11
The Ben says on 7/Jun/11
Just saw the final tough enough
Its seems pretty certain that Andy is 6'5
______________
andy played in the nfl and was measured 6'4 6/8th barefoot at the combine Click Here wwe bill him at 6'5, its not like wrestling fans will be able to tell 6'4.75 from 6'5 on tv anyway James says on 15/Jun/11
proportionally even in his prime vince didn't look 6'2. i suspect as well he's a lift wearer cause his height keeps fluctuating all the time Vegas says on 14/Jun/11
Danimal says on 14/Jun/11
Started to lose serious height by the mid 2000's, when HHH appeared to be noticeable taller than McMahon on Larry King
___________
thats march 2000 and hhh is noticeable taller than vince, vince is 54 in this clip Click Here Click Here
1993-94 with shane Click Here
january 1992 and hennig is noticeable taller than vince (hennig was also clearly taller next to gorilla monsoon in 1994 than vince was in 1997 and hennig was clearly shorter than 6'3 nfl listed steve jordan around same time), 40secs Click Here Danimal says on 14/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 11/Jun/11
I think Vince is still around 6ft1 at age 64...it has a been a good few years since I watched wrestling and Vince still looked a fair bit taller than guys like John Cena and HBK.
In earlier years he looked taller than Steve Austin and similiar to Triple H and Shane McMahon so I've no problem believing he was 6ft2 at one point.
Started to lose serious height by the mid 2000's, when HHH appeared to be noticeable taller than McMahon on Larry King, where as in the 1990's, they were the same height.. McMahon stood his ground well with tall men until the new millennium. Danimal says on 14/Jun/11
Alex says on 11/Jun/11
I can buy 6'1 1/2 peak. He was always a bit taller than Austin in the late 90s from what I remember? Today looks 6'0-6'0 1/2
I can go as high as 6'2" in the 1970's/1980's. By the 1990's, he was still over 6'1".. Today he looks to be around 6'0". James says on 13/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 13/Jun/11
Vince McMahon is 6ft1 range now. Probably 185-186cm. At peak he was 188cm
NEVER 188cm at his peak more like 185-186cm. Today he is under 6'1. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 13/Jun/11
Vince McMahon is 6ft1 range now. Probably 185-186cm. At peak he was 188cm Vegas says on 13/Jun/11
i think ryan is taller than 6'3, he looked taller in person than batista (though as i said before i was more than 10 feet away from ryan while right next to batista), he was also listed 6'6 on uk gladiators and a good 2 inches taller than brutus magnus whom i have stood next to, magnus looked ~6'3 in person Click Here
would like to see a staredown between barrett and ryan, both men had roughly same height on 6'2 pro bodybuilding listed zeke jackson James says on 12/Jun/11
sorry i meant to say mason ryan looks shorter than wade barrett James says on 12/Jun/11
Vegas says on 12/Jun/11
james, it depends, the three wrestlers that off my head look bigger in person than on tv are mick foley, rene dupree and eric escobar (who was in wwe for short time in 2009), they are taller in height and bigger in mass than i thought they would be,dupree and escobar are easily the weight they are billed at, on the other hand kane looks bigger on tv (at least mass wise, he can pass for 290-300 on tv) than he does in person, drew mcintyre is another, he looks an average guy on the street mass wise (obviously taller) and not close to his billed 250-260lb in person, i saw mason ryan walking around in a wife beater and he looked like something out of a comic book
How tall do you think Mason Ryan is? 6'3? he looks shorter than drew mcintrye XistenZ says on 12/Jun/11
Click Here At 1:55 Stone Cold looks taller. Vegas says on 12/Jun/11
james, it depends, the three wrestlers that off my head look bigger in person than on tv are mick foley, rene dupree and eric escobar (who was in wwe for short time in 2009), they are taller in height and bigger in mass than i thought they would be,dupree and escobar are easily the weight they are billed at, on the other hand kane looks bigger on tv (at least mass wise, he can pass for 290-300 on tv) than he does in person, drew mcintyre is another, he looks an average guy on the street mass wise (obviously taller) and not close to his billed 250-260lb in person, i saw mason ryan walking around in a wife beater and he looked like something out of a comic book Alex says on 11/Jun/11
I can buy 6'1 1/2 peak. He was always a bit taller than Austin in the late 90s from what I remember? Today looks 6'0-6'0 1/2 James says on 11/Jun/11
Vegas says on 11/Jun/11
James says on 10/Jun/11
looks 5'10.5 (179cm) today
_______
maybe these guys are made of wax and are melting under the hot tv lights, rock has shrunk, big show, vince down to 5'10, james look at the photo i posted of vince and legit 6'4 dan marino on 7/Apr/11 and thats feb 2011, then look at the video i posted day before with shawn michaels and thats april 2011, i would bet vince isn't below 6ft as of right now
Okay fine Vegas. It's just the impression he gives off so i am probably wrong about Vince's height. I am guessing wrestlers probably appear taller in real life than they do on TV? Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 11/Jun/11
I think Vince is still around 6ft1 at age 64...it has a been a good few years since I watched wrestling and Vince still looked a fair bit taller than guys like John Cena and HBK.
In earlier years he looked taller than Steve Austin and similiar to Triple H and Shane McMahon so I've no problem believing he was 6ft2 at one point. Vegas says on 11/Jun/11
James says on 10/Jun/11
looks 5'10.5 (179cm) today
_______
maybe these guys are made of wax and are melting under the hot tv lights, rock has shrunk, big show, vince down to 5'10, james look at the photo i posted of vince and legit 6'4 dan marino on 7/Apr/11 and thats feb 2011, then look at the video i posted day before with shawn michaels and thats april 2011, i would bet vince isn't below 6ft as of right now Brad says on 10/Jun/11
How does his body survive after massive steroid injections starting in your 40's? James says on 10/Jun/11
looks 5'10.5 (179cm) today. Not sure about his peak? miko says on 9/Jun/11
Vince has abused roids for 20 years and is well over 60.
He's gone from a weak 6"1 to a very weak 6"0. Vegas says on 9/Jun/11
James says on 8/Jun/11
that his body looks worn out cause of all the wrestling injuries he has sustained in his carrier.
___________
what wrestling injuries?? vince wrestled only a few matches, i would bet under 50 in total from 1999 to 2010 and that includes tag matches, vinces name is nowhere to be found on the list of guys who wrestled the most matches in wwf/e from 1980 to 2009 so its pretty clear he wrestled less than bobby lashleys 270 matches Click Here
any major injuries vince suffered didn't happen during a match, he tore both his quads climbing into the ring to resolve the 2005 rumble winner e.g, if you are in a match with the boss you are going to be extra careful not to hurt him Danimal says on 9/Jun/11
The Ben says on 7/Jun/11
Just saw the final tough enough and Vince looked shorter than 6ft Luke robinson.
Austin Looked 6'1 but vince looked 5'11.
Its seems pretty certain that Andy is 6'5
Vince consistently looked 6'1"-6'2" in his prime.. He has lost serious height (minimum 2") and I don't think it's all due to age (mid 60's). tell-em says on 8/Jun/11
marino must be 6'3" cuz vince aint 6'1"
" James says on 8/Jun/11
I know this sounds crazy but these days Vince can look under 6ft like 5'11.
only 5 years vince looked taller and more muscular than he does now in 2011 and you can tell by looking at him that his body looks worn out cause of all the wrestling injuries he has sustained in his carrier.
Personally i find 6'1.5 very hard to buy for Vince even at his peak. Maybe in lifts he would be that tall? The Ben says on 7/Jun/11
Just saw the final tough enough and Vince looked shorter than 6ft Luke robinson.
Austin Looked 6'1 but vince looked 5'11.
Its seems pretty certain that Andy is 6'5 Vegas says on 7/Jun/11
orton and jake roberts Click Here Danimal says on 6/Jun/11
Cranberries (6 ft. 3.25 evening, 17 years) says on 19/May/11
Why does everyone seem to think that Randy Orton is 6'4.5"? Why on Earth would they underbill him? My guess is he's between 6'3" and 6'4", closer to 6'3".
I agree James says on 6/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 3/Jun/11
Cena wears 4cm converses which is the reason he'd look similiar to guys like Triple H and Shane McMahon
Barefoot 184-185cm
Converses 188-189cm
Does he wear them all the time? You don't for sure that cena is wearing 4cm converse in the video with shane. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 3/Jun/11
Cena wears 4cm converses which is the reason he'd look similiar to guys like Triple H and Shane McMahon
Barefoot 184-185cm
Converses 188-189cm James says on 1/Jun/11
can't deny cena and shane looks similar in height. hardly anything at all between them. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 1/Jun/11
If Shane is only 184cm, then Vince is 182cm max maybe even 181cm James says on 31/May/11
i have watched the clips Shane looks no taller than 185cm maybe even 184cm. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 29/May/11
You check the clips, James he's a solid 6ft2 James says on 26/May/11
Sorry Shane is not much over 6'0 Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 24/May/11
If he's taller than his dad, and similiar to Triple H then he must be over 6"1 James James says on 22/May/11
Orton looks 6'2/6'3 to me.
Vince looks similar in height to cena so no more than 6' for him today. Vegas says on 20/May/11
thats the tallest i have ever seen vince look and thats feb of 2011, marino is a legit 6'4 Click Here marino and 6'5.5 barefoot measured jason taylor Click Here
there is vinces footwear to put tellem mind at ease, they ain't cowboys Click Here Cranberries (6 ft. 3.25 evening, 17 years) says on 19/May/11
Why does everyone seem to think that Randy Orton is 6'4.5"? Why on Earth would they underbill him? My guess is he's between 6'3" and 6'4", closer to 6'3". James says on 18/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 17/May/11
Shane McMahon and Triple H look pretty evenly matched heightwise. Both look around 2 inches taller than 6"0.5(184cm) John Cena. So they're both between 6"2 and 6"3.
Vince McMahon was 6"2 at his peak if you at old clips of him beside Steve Austin.
Wrong Shane is not over 6'1. Vegas says on 18/May/11
hhh is taller than shane and has always been taller than shane, hhh was 1.5 inches taller than vince in 1996, trips 6'2, shane 6'1 and vince 6'0.5 peak (today maybe 6ft flat) Click Here Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 17/May/11
Shane McMahon and Triple H look pretty evenly matched heightwise. Both look around 2 inches taller than 6"0.5(184cm) John Cena. So they're both between 6"2 and 6"3.
Vince McMahon was 6"2 at his peak if you at old clips of him beside Steve Austin. James says on 15/May/11
Okay 6'2 (188cm) for Triple H maybe not 187cm James says on 13/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 11/May/11
Shane McMahon is 6"2/6"2.5 I'd say...around the same as Triple H
Look at him in the video compared to John Cena that i posted on the 9th of May..... if thats a 1.5-2 inch difference then i am a monkeys uncle.
So
John Cena 6'0.25 (184cm)
Shane McMahon 6'1 (185cm)
Triple H 6'1.5 (187cm) tell-em says on 13/May/11
triple h is a strong 6'2". nothing under 6'2". Vegas says on 12/May/11
shanes shorter than hhh, he is shorter in that video i posted from 1999 and he is shorter than hhh in the hollywood walk of fame ceremony in march 2008 Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 11/May/11
Shane McMahon is 6"2/6"2.5 I'd say...around the same as Triple H tell-em says on 10/May/11
shane was never 6'2". 6'1" yes. vince was a weak 6'1" peak. hs2011 says on 10/May/11
Road Warrior Animal claims 6'1" in his autobiography and says he was the same height as Vince McMahon in 1985. James says on 9/May/11
I don't think Shane is 6'2 at all more like 6'1
here with 184cm john cena
Click Here
So Shane is probably 6ft1 (185cm) Vegas says on 4/May/11
if vince was 6'2 in the 1990s then hhh was over 6'3, shane edged out vince in the 90s and he never been billed more than 6'2, you see trips, vince and shane side by side here in 1999 Click Here
btw with the high camera angle viscera looks over 7ft in some of the wide shots directly behind vince, shows how much of a role the camera angle plays James says on 4/May/11
i'd say 184cm maybe today? tell-em says on 3/May/11
lol. vince wasn't taller than 6'0.5-6'1" roddy piper. they were the same height. go watch piper's dvd. they were identical height. Danimal says on 2/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 1/May/11
He might be 6"1 flat today..
Looks to have lost significant height since the 1990's.. He used to be taller than 6'1"+ Roddy Piper (in Roddy's prime).. Today, he looks to be a little over 6'0".. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 1/May/11
He might be 6"1 flat today.. tell-em says on 30/Apr/11
i agree with dicksock. Viper says on 29/Apr/11
LOL, dicksock you are hillarious. 6-4.5 for Randy Orton and 6-2.5 for HHH is loony tunes stuff. Vegas says on 28/Apr/11
here is a decent shot of vince and 6'2 nfl listed william perry from early 1986 just prior to wm2 Click Here Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 28/Apr/11
Randy Orton 6"4.5(194cm)
Edge 6"3.5(192cm)
Triple H 6"2.5(189cm) dicksock says on 24/Apr/11
James says on 24/Apr/11
LOL HHH is not 6'3 he's 1.5 inches shorter than 192cm Randy Orton.
You can "lol" all you want you ignorant troll. Randy Orton is at least 6'4.5" and HHH is at least 6'2.5". Orton is most likely a tad under 6'5" and HHH is right around 6'3". Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 24/Apr/11
I'd say Vince McMahon at his peak would only have been 1cm shorter than Triple H...
Triple H 189cm
Vince McMahon 188cm(peak) James says on 24/Apr/11
LOL HHH is not 6'3 he's 1.5 inches shorter than 192cm Randy Orton. dicksock says on 21/Apr/11
I just don't get how Rob has Vince at 6'1.5" and HHH at 6'2". There is obviously more than half an inch between them. Vince should be listed at 6' now and 6'1" max for his peak height. HHH should be listed at 6'3". Viper says on 15/Apr/11
LOL at 6-1.5 now. That was his peak James says on 14/Apr/11
Vince can look just under 6'0 these days Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 14/Apr/11
Would 6"2(188cm) peak and 6"1.5(187cm) be plausible, Rob?
[Editor Rob: there is a good chance he's lost a cm in height, whether 6ft 2 peak I'm not as sure of. ] tell-em says on 9/Apr/11
vince is in cowboy boots and closer to the camera. James says on 8/Apr/11
Shawn Michaels has not been 182cm since 1998 when he injured himself at Wrestlemania.
So it makes sense today possibly.....
Vince McMahon 6'0 (183cm)
Shawn Michaels 5'11 (180cm) Vegas says on 7/Apr/11
recent shot of vince and 6'4 nfl listed dan marino Click Here Vegas says on 4/Apr/11
vince and shawn saturday night Click Here
thats John Laurinaitis who gives vince the ring, by all accounts ~6'3 from people who have met him James says on 30/Mar/11
6' 1/2 today and 6'1 flat peak Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 26/Mar/11
Rob could Vince be 6ft1 flat nowadays and 6ft2 peak?
[Editor Rob: he could be half an inch shorter today than whatever he was 20 years ago.] Mike... says on 23/Mar/11
...this si precisely why most comments on this site are to be taken with a grain of salt. 2 people say he's nowhere near 6'1, but then go on to say maybe he's 6'0. 6'0 is nowhere near 6'1?? Newsflash; It's a couple pairs of gel inserts away from 6'1. lol Viper says on 23/Mar/11
Mexican Mentor list actually had Billy Gunn at 6-2 James. Viper says on 23/Mar/11
He might be 5-11 now If hes the same height as Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels Vegas says on 23/Mar/11
2009, rob has rourke at 5'11 Click Here dicksock says on 23/Mar/11
miko says on 18/Mar/11
Vince is knowhere near 6"1 in 2011. He looked the same height as Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels last year. I'd put him at 6"0. Maybe 6"1 peak.
I agree. miko says on 18/Mar/11
Vince is knowhere near 6"1 in 2011. He looked the same height as Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels last year. I'd put him at 6"0. Maybe 6"1 peak. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 17/Mar/11
Looking 185cm now James says on 22/Feb/11
Vegas i have always wondered how tall billy gunn was? He is listed down at 6'5 (196cm) but i think he's 6'3 or 6'4 at most. Frank says on 21/Feb/11
Too me Vince looks alittle taller than Arnold Vegas says on 21/Feb/11
vince was about the same height as arnie 12 years ago on smackdown though it looks like arnie has the footwear advantage because he is in boots, rock had arnie by about 2 inches on the same show Click Here
i used to have a number of photos backstage from that show, billy gunn had arnie by about 4 inches, hhh was taller than arnie James says on 20/Feb/11
Could be 183cm these days? Looks very similar in build and height to Arnold Schwazzenegger. dicksock says on 19/Feb/11
James says on 13/Feb/11
Vince looks 6'1 at most with the rock
That's because he was 6'1" at the most and more likely in the 6' range. James says on 13/Feb/11
Vince looks 6'1 at most with the rock miko says on 13/Feb/11
Vince is lucky if he's over 6"0 today, was the same height as Bret Hart last year. Vegas says on 13/Feb/11
rock and vince about 10-11 years ago, i see a solid 2 inches there at 35secs on ward Click Here Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 13/Feb/11
188cm peak...around 185-186cm now though Vegas says on 11/Feb/11
barrett sure looks a solid 6'5 on tv, he was easily 2 inches taller than sheamus, had a full head on mene gene, 3 inches taller than 6'3 college football listed alex riley, 3 inches easy on 6'2 pro-bodybuilding listed Ezekiel Jackson and looked just as tall next to chris jericho as ~6'5 barefoot big ben roethlisberger did Anonymous says on 11/Feb/11
Vince peak height was 186 cms and his son is 187 cms. Wade Barrett is 192-193 cm James says on 7/Feb/11
Yeah 6' is a realy possiblitly for Vince today. Viper says on 2/Feb/11
Vince did look 6-1.5 with Frank and he was supposedly wearing thin loafers. Either way hes looking 6-0 max today, and sometimes maybe a hair under that. James says on 2/Feb/11
Towered by 6'5 Wade Barrett
Click Here dicksock says on 23/Jan/11
Vegas says on 23/Jan/11
rampage shane never looked 6'3 next to hhh, in 1999 hhh in sneakers was clearly taller than a dress-shoe wearing shane
correct dicksock, between 1980 and 2010 bret wrestled more matches than any other wrestler despite the fact that he has been retired over 10 years, he wrestled over 2400 matches for wwf alone between 1984 and 1997, undertaker is the only other guy to wrestle at least 2000 matches since bret debuted in wwf, to put that into perspective hulk hogan only wrestled 1400 matches for wwf/e in all his time there, but yet bret despite being in bad shape still looks the same height today that he did back in the mid 80s
Yes, and don't forget the hundreds of matches he had pre 1980 in Stampede Wrestling. And his matches were basically the most intense/fast pace for his era. Vegas says on 23/Jan/11
rampage shane never looked 6'3 next to hhh, in 1999 hhh in sneakers was clearly taller than a dress-shoe wearing shane
correct dicksock, between 1980 and 2010 bret wrestled more matches than any other wrestler despite the fact that he has been retired over 10 years, he wrestled over 2400 matches for wwf alone between 1984 and 1997, undertaker is the only other guy to wrestle at least 2000 matches since bret debuted in wwf, to put that into perspective hulk hogan only wrestled 1400 matches for wwf/e in all his time there, but yet bret despite being in bad shape still looks the same height today that he did back in the mid 80s dicksock says on 23/Jan/11
Danimal says on 21/Jan/11
Here we have a 6'1"+ Vince McMahon in 1997 with 5'11" Bret Hart. This goes to show how much height Vince has lost since the 1990's (and he was already in his early 50's here). Watch at 3:53 onwards: Click Here
You can't use that video to compare heights. Vince is way closer to the camera. When Bret came back to the WWE, he and Vince were the same height. Why would Vince have lost height? He has always been in great shape and has never wrestled even a part time schedule. Bret on the other hand wrestled his butt off as much as anyone in wrestling for over 20 years and has been plagued with health problems. But Vince has lost more height than him?! What a joke. According to your logic, Vince should be a solid 6' and Bret should be a weak 5'10" at best. That is just absurd. Bret and Vince were both in the 6' range in their primes and are still very close to that height. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 22/Jan/11
The WWE claim him to be 6"3 which is absurd...but I do agree with 6"2
His son Shane could be close to 6"3 though tell-em says on 21/Jan/11
vince was only 52, he hadn't lost anything. of course 6'0" vince is gonna look taller than a 6'0" bret hart when hes closer to the camera. Danimal says on 21/Jan/11
Here we have a 6'1"+ Vince McMahon in 1997 with 5'11" Bret Hart. This goes to show how much height Vince has lost since the 1990's (and he was already in his early 50's here). Watch at 3:53 onwards: Click Here tell-em says on 11/Jan/11
thats some damn good convincing evidence of vince mcmahon looking 6'0". that makes sense too me. Vegas says on 10/Jan/11
i know gonzales is closer to the camera but the height difference between monsoon and gonzales there is massive, alot of people on here thought monsoon was 6'6 legit when i started here, have to laugh at heenan just staring up at gonzales the whole time in awe dicksock says on 10/Jan/11
Here is a video from 1993:
Click Here
Pause at 2:08 and you can see about 2" bewteen 5'10" Jerry Lawler and Vince McMahon. There looks to be no more than 2" between them throughout the video. If you take away his poofy hair, he looks about 3" shorter than 6'3" Lex Luger. He looks a little shorter than 6' Macho Man, though Randy was probably wearing cowboy boots. If you pause at 9:13, you can clearly see 6' Bret Hart and Vince looking the same height. At 11:00, Bret looks a little bit taller. But, he was a bit closer to the camera. Also, in the second part of this video, you can see Gorilla Monsoon was no more than 5" taller than 5'11" max Bobby Heenan.
Rob, I urge you to take a look at this evidence. I don't see how you can have Vince McMahon at 6'1.5" and Bret Hart at 6'. I've already posted proof of Stone Cold CLEARLY looking taller than Vince. Here it is again though:
Click Here
If you pause at 4:25, there is a great shot of Austin looking 3" taller than McMahon! Now I'm not saying Austin is 6'1" and Vince is 5'10". I'm saying I have a very hard time believing that Vince is the taller of the two.
Austin: 6'1"
McMahon: 6'
Bret Hart: 6'
Gorilla Monsoon: 6'4"
Bobby Heenan: 5'11" Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 23/Dec/10
6"2(188cm) peak
6"1.25(186cm) today Sam Rick says on 23/Dec/10
Vince or anyone who can get a hold of Congratulations you made what seemed as a Barbaric sport a success but I have a few tips of advice as we are in a new decade the leave of superstars such as Shawn Michaels who should be a hall of famer 2011 and Dave Batista hall of famer 2013-2015 and some getting injuries such as you're son-in-law Triple H and the Undertaker you have introduced young talent eg Wade Barrett,Drew McInytre, Daniel Bryan and Kaval.And the rising of young superstars to Fame eg.Kofi Kingston,JOHN MORRISON,and meat heads like the Miz and Dolph Ziggler.BUT I think Triple H should come back at Wrestlemania 27 in an Extreme rules match with Sheamus and send him of a strechter and given at most upto 3 years and retire the Undertaker should make his streak 20-0 but he gets beaten by a young superstar to make it 20-1 and leaves.And I think these superstars should main event
1.SHEAMUS:THE 1ST IRISH BORH WWE CHAMPION AND 2010 KING OF THE RING HE SHOULD BE VILLIAN ON MOST OCCASIONS AND A HERO ON FEW.AND IRELAND WILL HAVE TO WATCH WWE.
2.KOFI KINGSTON-THE 1ST GHANAIAN BORN CHAMPION HOLDER HE HAS BECAME A HERO TO CHILDREN IN THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES TO EXPLOIT THEIR TALENTS AND HAS UNIQUE SYTLES AND AMAZING MIC SKILLS AFRICA(GHANA) WILL HAVE TO WATCH WWE.DEFINITELY HERO (I.C AND USA CHAMP AGAIN THEN WHC or WWE CHAMP).
3.EVAN BOURNE:HE has wowed us will his skills and his looks that for female fans should play a villian on few occasions but hero and could make a good USA AND WWE CHAMP.
4.JOHN MORRISON:JUST LIKE EVAN.
5.JACK SWAGGER:NEVER A FACE AND GIVE HIM A MANAGER AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE ALL AMERICAN AMERICAN A USA champ.
6.CODY RHODES:GIVE HIM SINGLES GOLD(MOSTLY USA Champ). A GO FROM HEEL SLOWLY TO A FACE
7.CURT HAWKINS:HERO
8.ZACK RYDES:VILLIAN
9.DANIEL BRYAN:HERO
10.CHRIS MASTERS:HERO AND SOMETIMES VILLIAN
11:YOUSI TATSU:EUROPE-SHEAMUS AFRICA-KOFI KINGSTON ASIA-YOUSI AS THE I.C CHAMP.
12.DOLPH ZIGGLER:WELL I DONOT LIKE HIM SO I CAN'T SAY MUCH.
13.STEPHANIE McMAHON:to rule any brand as a face.
14.SHANE McMAHON:ANY BRAND BUT AS A HEEL
RETURN THE HARDCORE,CRUISERWEIGHT,AND WORLD TAG TEAM TITLES.WELL THIS THE BEST I CAN THINK OF TO MAKE WWE LIGHTYEARS AHEAD OF T.N.A I HOPE YOU LIKE IT AND SUPPORT IT AND FORGIVE SPELLING MISTAKES AND My grammer. dicksock says on 15/Dec/10
Danimal says on 29/Nov/10
dicksock says on 29/Nov/10
Lou: 6'4"-6'5"
Vince without lifts: 5'11.5"-6'0.5" with lifts: 6'1"-6'2"
This is when I stopped reading. My God, he was as tall as LEGIT 6'1"-6'2" men in the 1970's and 1980's (Tony Atlas, Bob Backlund, Roddy Piper, etc) and he had NO reason to wear lifts at that time, seeing he was a NOBODY interviewer/commentator (pre-1997). He was 6'1"-6'2" in his younger years and YES, closer to 6'2" than 6'1". As for today, he is shorter. Looks to have lost over an inch since his prime. I peg him at around 6'0" today.
There is zero evidence of him being 6'1.5" much less 6'2". There has been endless amounts of proof of this. You refuse to admit it because you are delusional. I can kind of understand you clinging to 6'1", but 6'2"...give me a break. He is shorter than 6'0.5" max John Cena today. He is about 6' tall max today and was never above the 6' range except when he wore lifts. James says on 14/Dec/10
Triple H is not over 6'2.
The way I see it
Triple H 6'2
Vince McMahon 6'0 Stefan says on 14/Dec/10
Vince is 1,84/85 (6-0,5/0,75) today.
Please, compare with Triple H, Rob. I see 2,5 " difference.
Click Here James says on 13/Dec/10
Always a chance the NFL guy might be 6'3.5? Vegas says on 13/Dec/10
james i don't think he was over 6'1
here is curt hennig with 6'3 nfl listed steve jordan early 1990s Click Here jordans listing Click Here
vince with hennig the best part of 20 years ago (january 1992), so vince is mid 40s Click Here
184-85 for his peak and 183-84 for today imo (though i have to admit he looks under 6ft in those photos with big show in afghanistan taken a few days ago), you can't compare vince to a normal average 65 year old male, there are few 60+ year olds that appear on muscle on fitness Click Here James says on 12/Dec/10
Well Vegas I would queston 187cm at his peak though. More likely 186cm than 187cm peak. So 184cm now and 6'1.25 peak. Vegas says on 12/Dec/10
Danimal says on 12/Dec/10
He's easily lost at least 1" since his peak height.
_________________
easily?? who are you comparing too?? he looks same height next to hbk in 2010 as in 1993, he looks same height next to bret hart in 2010 as in 1993, he looked same height next to jim duggan in 2009 as back in the 80s, looked same height next to jerry lawler in 2010 as 1993, same height next to a cowboybootless jesse ventura in 2009 as a cowboybootless ventura looked to him in the mid 80s
this is 2006, i can post photos of vince and shane going back to the 80s Click Here
James 183cm is a possibility, 184cm is more likely, but given how well vince looks after himself (this is a guy who is better built than most of the roster) i don't think he lost over an inch, my uncle is roughly ten years older than vince, worked really hard back-breaking labour in his teens/20s, roughly same height as vince, he also keeps himself in great shape, i hadn't seen him for 5-6 years till recently and he has lost barely anything Danimal says on 12/Dec/10
He's easily lost at least 1" since his peak height. James says on 11/Dec/10
well Vince obviously is not 6'1.5 today
Click Here
Vegas do you think 183cm for Vince is a possiblitly nowadays? Vegas says on 11/Dec/10
James says on 10/Dec/10
6'0.5 (184cm) now
___________________________________
surely you need to upgrade hhh from 6'1.5 then, he was more than an inch taller than vince at the hollywood walk of fame ceremony 3 years ago, he was more than an inch taller than vince nearly 11 years ago on snl, 6 secs onward Click Here James says on 10/Dec/10
6'0.5 (184cm) now
6'1.25 (186cm) peak James says on 9/Dec/10
Frank says on 9/Dec/10
James it was December of 1993
Well he is bound to have shrunk since 1993. Frank says on 9/Dec/10
James it was December of 1993 James says on 8/Dec/10
Frank says on 7/Dec/10
James his shoes looked normal but if he is really 6ft he must of had lifts because he looked close to 2 inches taller than me
What year did you take the pic with him Frank? the 90's? If it was in the 90's then he is probably shrunk now in 2010. I think maybe peak 186cm and today 183-184cm. Frank says on 7/Dec/10
James his shoes looked normal but if he is really 6ft he must of had lifts because he looked close to 2 inches taller than me James says on 6/Dec/10
I do remember with Frank Vince looked taller than the listing here but i think frank said he was wearing lifts in his photo?
With the Rock looks 5'11.5 or 6ft. James says on 5/Dec/10
nah he looks a little under 6'1 with Donal Trump. he was never 6'2. Vegas says on 5/Dec/10
from about a decade ago, vince and the rock Click Here
rampage, vince might have hit 6'2 in shoes but not barefoot, curt hennig whom its been proved was under 6'2 himself was taller than vince side by side in dress-shoes in the late 80s/early 1990s Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 5/Dec/10
Around 6"1 today...
Peaked at 6"2(188cm) Vegas says on 2/Dec/10
LEGIT 6'1"-6'2" men such as bob backlund??
backlund was 5'11 range, barely taller than british bulldog in the early 1990s, same height as bret and shawn and shorter than vince, camera angles in the late 70/ early 80s, made him look taller than vince at times like here but that wasn't the case Click Here James says on 1/Dec/10
I don't think Vince was over 6'1 at his peak. Today about 6ft even? Frank says on 30/Nov/10
Dibiase must have wore lifts when he wrestled he looked taller than Donald Trump whos atleast 6ft 2 Anonymous says on 30/Nov/10
atlas was taller than vince Click Here Anonymous says on 29/Nov/10
dibiase and ventura are billed 6'1 and 6'2 respectively Click Here Click Here Danimal says on 29/Nov/10
Frank says on 22/Nov/10
Vince looked alittle taller than Arnold.. I know people who met Arnold and some told me he was 5ft 10 and some told me 6ft 1 I believe he wears Lifts
Lou Fereigno was listed @ 6ft 5 and hes about 6ft 2.5
Frank, Arnold couldn't have worn lifts when he was barefoot for years as a professional bodybuilder (that was his peak, not his King of Queens appearances)... Danimal says on 29/Nov/10
Frank says on 23/Nov/10
Lou is sometimes in that show King Of Queens and i met The Big Black guy who plays Deacon i believe He told me hes 6ft 5 and Lou is Shorter than him so Lou was never 6ft 5
Frank, Lou's appearances on King of Queens in not a young and prime Lou. We have an older Lou who actually looks like he lost height since his prime. I firmly believe he was a shade over 6'4" at his peak and is just shy of 6'3" today. Danimal says on 29/Nov/10
dicksock says on 29/Nov/10
Lou: 6'4"-6'5"
Vince without lifts: 5'11.5"-6'0.5" with lifts: 6'1"-6'2"
This is when I stopped reading. My God, he was as tall as LEGIT 6'1"-6'2" men in the 1970's and 1980's (Tony Atlas, Bob Backlund, Roddy Piper, etc) and he had NO reason to wear lifts at that time, seeing he was a NOBODY interviewer/commentator (pre-1997). He was 6'1"-6'2" in his younger years and YES, closer to 6'2" than 6'1". As for today, he is shorter. Looks to have lost over an inch since his prime. I peg him at around 6'0" today. d wade says on 29/Nov/10
this my list to the wreslers real height
Giant gonzales 7,6
Great Khali 7,1
Big show 7,0
Andre the giant6,10
Kevin nash 6,9
Kane 6,8.5
Undertaker 6,7.5
Sid vicious 6,7
Hulk hogan 6,4
scott hall 6,4
Vince 6,0
bret hart 5,11
mean gene 5,6 dicksock says on 29/Nov/10
If I had to chooose his height, I guess I'd choose his shortest, which is 6'0". So 6'0" barefoot and around 6'1.5" in his lifts. Lou's dad says he's 6'5", so he was probably around that height. Deacon could be closer to 6'6" and Lou could have lost at least .5". Plus, I've never seen a staredown betweeen them. Lou was never under 6'4".
Lou: 6'4"-6'5"
Vince without lifts: 5'11.5"-6'0.5" with lifts: 6'1"-6'2"
Arnold: 6'1.5"
Hogan: 6'5.5"
Andre: 6'11.5"
Jesse Ventura: 6'3.5"
Jim Duggan: 6'3"
Ted Dibiase: 6'3.5"
Stone Cold: 6'1"
Jake Roberts: 6'5"
Scott Hall: 6'5.5"
Big John Studd: 6'6.5"
Nash: 6'9" and 6'10" in WWF (he just looked taller in WWF as he was no taller than Tyler Mane in WCW; the difference was probably in the footware.)
Big Show: 7'
Warrior: 6'1.5"
Gorilla Monsoon: 6'4"
Macho Man: 6'0.5"
King Kong Bundy: 6'3.5"
Piper: 6'1"
Bret Hart: 6'0.5"
One Man Gang: 6'6.5"
Sid: 6'7.5"
Undertaker: 6'8"
Kane: 6'8"
I think I'm pretty close with this list. I can't imagine I'm off by more than .5" on anyone. Although, some may think Andre peaked at 6'9.75"...or Vince at 6'2"...(sorry Danimal for ripping you off; I know the ... is your trademark) Frank says on 24/Nov/10
Vegas Vince i believe is a lift wearer so he can appear close to 6ft 2 @ times Vegas says on 23/Nov/10
lou was 6'3 range peak, he was clearly shorter than 6'4 and 6'5 guys in his 20s/early 30s
6'2 was vinces billed height danimal, he wasn't 3 inches taller than bret hart or 5 taller than your 5'9 davey boy smith
how can vince have been 6'2 if he was clearly shorter than 6'2 jim duggan in the 80s and clearly shorter than curt hennig who himself probably didn't reach that mark?? Frank says on 23/Nov/10
Lou is sometimes in that show King Of Queens and i met The Big Black guy who plays Deacon i believe He told me hes 6ft 5 and Lou is Shorter than him so Lou was never 6ft 5 James says on 23/Nov/10
Frank says on 22/Nov/10
Vince looked alittle taller than Arnold.. I know people who met Arnold and some told me he was 5ft 10 and some told me 6ft 1 I believe he wears Lifts
Lou Fereigno was listed @ 6ft 5 and hes about 6ft 2.5
Funny you mentioned Lou Ferringo because apprently Arnie was audtioning for the role of the incredible hulk and they stood lou and arnie side by side and there was a very big height gap between the 2 bodybuilders so lou got the role. Frank says on 22/Nov/10
Vince looked alittle taller than Arnold.. I know people who met Arnold and some told me he was 5ft 10 and some told me 6ft 1 I believe he wears Lifts
Lou Fereigno was listed @ 6ft 5 and hes about 6ft 2.5 James says on 22/Nov/10
Vince looks similar in height to Arnold Schwazenneger. Danimal says on 21/Nov/10
Anonymous says on 20/Nov/10
Peter says on 19/Nov/10
I saw arnold way back in 1992 he was 6'2.5" barefoot that time,I can say this because I am 6'1" and he was almost 1.5"-2" taller than me.Guys his correct height now is 6'2".This guy is a tall man.Every inch/centimeter of a bodybuilder is recorded.His peak height was 6'2.5" now more of a 6'1.5"-6'2" guy.
You can say this because you are obviously making it up. I have seen Arnold up close countless times. I attend the same church (St. Monica's Church in Santa Monica, CA). I am 6'1.5" - 6'2" in shoes. The top of Arnold's head is roughly even with the bridge of my nose. How could he possibly be 6'2.5" barefoot when he's only 5'10" shod? He is not a tall man. As I posted earlier, official body building stats are bogus.
6'2" peak and has fallen below 6'1" today at 65 years of age (looks more compressed these days).. As for Trump, he was between 6'2" and 6'3" at his peak (he's also in his mid 60's and most men by that age have lost at least 1").... Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Nov/10
188cm is fair for his peak, James.
could be 6"1 today, but not under. James says on 20/Nov/10
Trump could still be 6'2 but not 6'2.5 or 6'3. maybe when he was younger.
to be fair i think vince could be 184cm today. 186cm peak? Anonymous says on 20/Nov/10
trump doesn't look 6ft 3 with 7'1 shaq Click Here Frank says on 19/Nov/10
Trump is taller than 6ft1 .5 everyone who has seen him said he appears closer to 6ft 3 I assume he is 6ft 2 to 6ft 2.5 Rampage(-_-_)Clover says on 19/Nov/10
He peaked at 6"2
185-186cm today. Alex says on 9/Nov/10
Frank, I never had an official measurement out of bed but I tried by marking a wall and I've gotten 6'0.75 and 6'1 a few different times. Yea I'll measure slightly over 6'0 until the evening. Frank says on 8/Nov/10
Alex you always measure altittle more that 6ft and you said your just about 6ft 1 in the morning Vegas says on 8/Nov/10
years of wrestling injuries?? what are you talking about james. vince has wrestled but a handful of matches, his first match was in like 1999
the only injury i know vince suffered in ring was a quad tear Click Here
vince is still in great shape, i doubt he has lost much if any height even at his age, i could buy half an inch though but shouldn't be more than that, jack palance was another who kept himself in great shape into his 70s and his height stayed the same, i remember in 1994 (in his mid 70s) he was the same height as chevy chase and palance was listed 6'3 in the 1960s Alex says on 7/Nov/10
Frank, yea I think me and Cena would be pretty much the exact same height. Within 1/4-1/2 inch difference. Cena has claimed both 6'0 and 6'1. I think hes a strong 6'0 like myself. James says on 7/Nov/10
6 even today at 65 and after years of wrestling injuries. Frank says on 7/Nov/10
Alex i agree with that and i also wonder how you would match up against John Cena |
