How tall is Brad Pitt - Page 19

Add a Comment6851 comments

Average Guess (1395 Votes)
5ft 10.62in (179.4cm)
Physics Enemy said on 16/Nov/11
Rob, here's a thought; why not take your stadiometer to these conventions and ask celebs whether they'd like to get measured? Tell 'em you'll need to knock off the 2mm error.

You could have got Tyson, Gazza etc measured since they don't lie. If you bump into Pitt/Stallone/Cruise/Bieber, blackmail them into getting measured. Tell them you're a big news reporter for a paper. Force them!
Dmeyer said on 16/Nov/11
CAN look taller than 5'10.75 Clooney than 6' Norton than 5'11.5 malkovish nô 5'9 or
5'10 m'en could do that
Dmeyer said on 16/Nov/11
I agrée With Rob Pitt wears 1.5-6 in cuban a lot but hé does wear dons
Type once in while
adz said on 16/Nov/11
Dural just ended the discussion. Lets never ever talk about it again haha. The downgrading on this site has made this website worse, it should be called downgradcelebheights.com. Rob has Dural changed your mind and Brad is 5ft 9?
Editor Rob
it's more believable to me an argument in the 5ft 10-11 range than 5ft 9.
Physics Enemy said on 16/Nov/11
Why would a guy who was 180.34 cm barefoot at night have a complex about his height? He'd be routinely estimated close to 6' 1", even close to 6' 2" in Hollywood. I mean look at 5' 9.75" Vin Diesel for instance.

He's 5' 9.25", he just about edges out Paltrow.
Dmeyer said on 16/Nov/11
There is nô way Pitt is under 5'10.25 in, évén after 7 weeks With nô sleep
Dural said on 16/Nov/11
Thanks tell-em, I ended it again...



dmeyer, with hair like this?

Click Here

Why does it even matter how tall he is with don's on his feet? Pitt doesn't wear don's.
Editor Rob
I don't know, my Don's have vanished from my cupboard recently, and Pitt was in Glasgow a few months ago...
Physics Enemy said on 16/Nov/11
He's 5' 9.25" DMeyer, you upgrade everybody, but downgrade yourself!
Dmeyer said on 15/Nov/11
If 6'2 With thick haïr then defenetly 6'1-1.25 dons on
Physics Enemy said on 15/Nov/11
Greenbolt, I'm 5' 9.5" barefoot in the evening, not 5' 9".
Dmeyer said on 15/Nov/11
In brad mesures in dons shoes With thé stadiometer just touching his haïr hé could be 6'2-6'3
Editor Rob
possibly 6ft 2 with thick hair
Greenbolt said on 15/Nov/11
Physics Enemy says on 9/Nov/11
Yes I definitely should avoid small footwear, else I look a flat 5' 9". That's short amongst the young generation.


25th percentile in the U.S. for the younger generation is about 5'8''. You're under average, but I don't think there's any way you're short, even in smaller footwear(assuming you live in the U.S.) You're a very decent height, not a bad height at all!
tell-em said on 14/Nov/11
dural just ended this discussion. pitt is a 5'9" man.
truth said on 14/Nov/11
5ft9.75 at worst.
dan said on 14/Nov/11
is it possible to be 5-9 to 5-10 but have short legs? could the upper torso and neck be the factor in someone reaching 5-10?
Godred said on 14/Nov/11
Still 5`10 flat max.
johno said on 14/Nov/11
Click Here

Brad is not 5'9 or 5'10, 5'11. He's clearly close to 6'2 :)
johno said on 14/Nov/11
Click Here

Brad pitt with the 5'9 dermot.......................Realms of utter stupidity
Shaun said on 14/Nov/11
Rob are you going to ban truth, his posts really irritate me and others I'm sure.
Editor Rob
he needs to watch some posts.
Silent d said on 13/Nov/11
180cm next to 169cm angelina jolie. He always looked tall. In kalifornia next to 184cm david duchovny he looks 180cm and sometimes a little taller. 180cm. Never doubted him.
Derek d said on 13/Nov/11
elte says on 13/Nov/11
Was shooting a movie with him. He is definitely reaches 6'.

In lifts? Reaching 6 ft means nothing. He could do that at only 5'9.
truth said on 13/Nov/11
type in NICK CAVE MUGSHOT
and compare the bottom scene to nicks
mugshot

Click Here


i mean compare him to nick cave

BRAD is only wearing 1 pair of shoes in the scene

because that is a OLD HOLLYWOOD TRICK
standing on one foot errect automatically makes you
1.5 inches taller
for example if you are 5 foot 8
and you stand on 1 foot you will hit 5 9.5
no problem

and that is exactly what brad is doing in this scene

and look at nick caves mugshot
you can clearly compare and see
that brad lands in the
170 centmeters to 175 max

instead of 175 centimeters to 180

the truth is all in his early roles no one knew
he was going to be that famous
so hiding his height wasnt an issue
at the time untill his name became a
house hold 7 wonders of the world



last thing sometimes for celebs shoes they make the left
shoe about 1.5 heal and 1 .5 lifts

and the right shoe 1.5 heal and 2.5 lifts

so while taking photos the actor can lean on
one foot with no problem and gain an
extra inch
and i swear ive seen brad do this in countless
photos

he is the master of illusion that is why he is so
talented
if someone else was in brad pitt shoes they
would have not survived
just hand it to this man and call him 5 foot 8
5 foot 9
he pulled it off hats to him

other belive he is more fine believe so i use to think
he was 6 foot 2
then i thought he was 6 foot 1
then i thought 6 foot
then 5 foo11
then i was convinced he was 5 foot 10 and half
then i thought he was 5 foot 9 and half

now i firmly with my opinion believe he is below average
elte said on 13/Nov/11
Was shooting a movie with him. He is definitely reaches 6'.
Dmeyer said on 13/Nov/11
Clooney is nothing under 179cm or over 180cm Pitt. Is similar height
truth said on 13/Nov/11
well all i know is back in the 80s when you see shoes that
brad is wearing is across the tracks are simple shoes
just to give him a 1.5 boost so he could look
1 inch taller than rick because brad was the older
brother in the movie

and rick is a genuine 5 foot 9 guy

i am telling you a hour in to the movie across the tracks
brad is barefoot while rick was in vans and they were standing
face to face

brad was 2.5 inches shorter than rick who is barley 5 foot 10 in shoes
it is kind of clear to me why hollywood tried so hard to keep this mans
height under wraps because he is definietly below average
at the end of the day


another ex
liv tyler is 2 inches taller than gwen
and liv tyler is the exact same height as don cheadle

so if liv tyler is 5 foot 8 and gwen is 2 inches shorter
and brads shoulders are even with gwen that only
suspects me to believe he is 5 foot 9 nothing more
Dural said on 13/Nov/11
Here's Rick Schroder with 6'4.75" Michael Jordan, 5'9.25" Lance Armstrong and 6' Wayne Gretzky. He appears to be a bit shorter than Lance Armstrong, but is further from the camera.

Click Here

Wasn't Rick Schroder measured 175cm on the dot (a hair under 5'9") at some point of the day when he was 17? He looks about 5'9" to me anyway.

Here's Pitt with 5'9" David Bowie. In the first pic, both are in military posture, 2nd pic only Pitt - they are the same height.

Click Here
Click Here

Bowie with 5'8.5 listed William H. Macy at the same event

Click Here

Now look at David Bowie with 5'9" Dermot Mulroney and 6' Edward Norton

Click Here

Dermot Mulroney and Brad Pitt without lifts

Click Here
Click Here

Dermot Mulroney and Brad Pitt with big lifts

Click Here

Dermot Mulroney and Brad Pitt with small lifts?

Click Here
Click Here

Norton and Pitt (without lifts, but more heel)

Click Here
Click Here

Norton and Pitt (with big lifts - at the same event he towered over Mulroney)

Click Here
Shaun said on 13/Nov/11
Please ban truth.
Gaga-183.2cm-185.1cm said on 13/Nov/11
We all know "truth" poster in this page is older poster "anon" right?we all noticed that ,ANON!!!!
truth said on 13/Nov/11
everyone here talks about his surgeries and lifts and that he is height concsious

what i think is that hollywood is evil
and turned his below average man
in the worlds perfect man for the public eye

brad has had a
nose job
ear job
chin job
hair implant
face lift
and god knows how many countless more
i bet the list just goes on

well hollywood would only touch a person like this
only if the person hated himself and would sell their
soles for fame
i mean would hollywood ever put ROB LOWE, BRUSE WILLIS, under these surgeiries just
to be famous for the public eye and the vision that hollywood wants to engrain in our
minds that this is the most beuatiful man and if you can not match up to him then good
riddens

when the truth is brad hates himself and that is why he underwent
all those surgeries and wears those lifts

brad was an experiment for hollywood to see what
they can do the below average man in our societys
standards

it really saddens me because

i have fading hair
i have a 3 time broken nose
i am 5 foot 8
i could in deed need al those surgies but
guess what ? i am happy wiht my self
my height my features event though they
are flawed
i am sorry i can never call this guy the worlds
hottest man i dont think ever
and his reall height is
5 foot 7 and half to 5 foot 8 and half
deal with it

hollywood would never put the classic 5 foot 9 man
all these harsh circumstances for fame sorry i jsut
cant see that
dan said on 12/Nov/11
I stand corrected.. go to 2:14 seconds in the comfortably numb across the tracks video and pause it.. shroder's proportions look at least 2" taller then brad Pitt has extremely short knee to ankle length
dan said on 12/Nov/11
truth.. go ahead and produce the scene where pitt is barefoot and shroder is taller by 2"
Physics Enemy said on 12/Nov/11
His evening height is identical to Rob's out-of-bed height after 9-10 hr sleep.
Dmeyer said on 12/Nov/11
If hé looks 181cm With cubans it means hé is 6'0.25 With them on so 5'10.75 is possible a legit 5'11 Will look 182 With cuban
Mystery said on 12/Nov/11
Brad Pitt: 177,5 cm ~5'10
George Clooney: 177 cm ~ 5'9 3/4
Matt Damon: 174 cm ~5'8 1/2
Tom Cruise 171 cm ~5'7 1/4
Leonardo DiCaprio: 180 cm ~5'11
Sylvester Stallone: 172 cm ~5'7 2/3
Mark Walhberg: 170 cm ~5'7
Robert Downey Jr: 170,5 cm ~5'7
Vegas said on 11/Nov/11
truth says on 11/Nov/11
type in yahoo or google pics
rick SCHRODER AND MICHAEL JORDAN
compare rick to a 6 foot 3 and half jordan
compare rick to wayne gretsky
__________

6 foot 3 and half jordan ok, so that makes kobe same height then Click Here

that makes obama how tall, certainly can't be 6'1......... 8mins 10secs Click Here
Voiceless Dental Fricative said on 11/Nov/11
He's 5'10. Possibly with a bit of change. When forcing his posture in his wedged-up chunckies he can pull off looking close to 6'
Shaun said on 11/Nov/11
6'3.5" Michael Jordan?? Rob why do you let these trolls post here?
Shaun said on 11/Nov/11
Click Here

Rick taller eh?. Lifts in running shoes in an athletics films. LOL. This site really attracts some freaks who'll come up with any explanation in the world to downgrade anybody!!
truth said on 11/Nov/11
type in yahoo or google pics
rick SCHRODER AND MICHAEL JORDAN
compare rick to a 6 foot 3 and half jordan
compare rick to wayne gretsky
and compare rick to lance armstrong

that is exactly how pitt would look to all
those gentlemen in regular shoes no lifts
because i think rick is taller than pitt


now type in brad pitt rick srhoder on yahoo or google
you will see pics of brad and his shoes standing next to
rick a a clear shot just look those are lifts but small lifts
just to make him 1 inch above 5 foot 9 to make him
look 1 inch above average LMAO
the rest of his movies after acroos the trakcs made him look
3 inches taller than 5 foot 10 when the guy is barely
5 foot 10 in shoes or even lifts just look
Click Here

LOL those were lifts in across the tracks
those were the same lifts in the PRINGLES
commerical

TROLLS

there is a scene hour into across the tracks brad is
barefoot and rick was in sneaks and rick was 2 to 2.5
inches taller than barefoot brad

so let me do the math if rick is barelly 5 foot 10 to 11 in sneaks
and brad is 2.5 inches shorter barefoot
that lands pitt at 5 foot 8 to 9 max not even 5 and half

those were lifts but very little 1.5 lifts that got him
1 inch to half inch taller than rick

how ever rick looks next to micheal jordan, wayne g , and lance armstrong
is axactly like how pitt would look
but rick isnt height concious

just a few examples
dmeyer said on 11/Nov/11
his cuban give max 1.4-1.5 in and if he looks over 5 ft 11 than he is about 5 ft 11
dmeyer said on 11/Nov/11
rob you mean he looks aleast 5 ft 11.25 when in cubans wish already means he is no less than 5 ft 10.75 since they give just 0.4-0.5 in over normal shoes
Editor Rob
yeah I think he can pull of looking 181 range when he dons the big cubans.

if he wears something like converse he's going to look smaller than typical 5ft 11 man, but he rarely wears thin sneakers, only in his backyard!
Shaun said on 11/Nov/11
I'll agree that in Across the Tracks he looked average and very slight of build and looked more 5'9" than 5'11" but he as I say was at least an inch taller than Schroder... They were both long fully grown in 1989 when that film was shot.
Shaun said on 11/Nov/11
Well I doubt Rick Schroder is under 5 ft 9. And Pitt was actually at least an inch taller than him in Across the Tracks that's genuine, there was no camera tricks or lifts in sneakers in that film. So that immediately puts anything under 5'10" out. Rob has Schroder at 5'9.5" and if he is that height Pitt is actually very close to this listing and at worst 5'10.5".
Shaun said on 11/Nov/11
In that Jolie photo he's looking 6' range in my opinion. Still inches taller than Jolie in big heels. If he's not 5'11" I think he must surely be a decent 5'10", 5'10.5" for both Pitt and Clooney I think is somewhere in the ball park. The lowest possible I can see for both Pitt and Clooney is 177cm. They both look close to 180 to me, well closer to 180 than 175 cm anyway. A flat 5 ft 9 is ridiculous.
Rav 5ft 9 said on 11/Nov/11
@physics enemy
pitt a flat 5'9 is highly unlikely
Dmeyer said on 11/Nov/11
Rob when brad has a 1.5 in heels do you think hé apears 5'11.5 like 6'0.5 With them on
Editor Rob
he can pull off looking above 5ft 11 when he wears the cuban style heel.
Dmeyer said on 11/Nov/11
Lets say Brad shoes give 1.4-1.5, and jolie get 3 in, it is a 4 in heels but thé front is slim , théy should give 2.8-3.1 in ,so 1.6 davantage Pitt looks 3 in taller, so 4.6 in taller realy she is 5'6.5 that makes him 5'11 ,apart from his 1.5 in heels thé shoes dosnt look lifted , jolie should be 5'9.5 heels on Pitt about 6'0.25-0.5 in minus 1.4-5 in thats 5'11
Physics Enemy said on 10/Nov/11
Average height men with good proportions, lean builds and especially with big footwear can look borderline tall, Shaun. I could easily pull off looking 6' if I was a cheater and wanted to do that. I'm telling you for a fact that in flat trainers I look taller than Pitt. He's just a skinny average height guy.

Pitt, Clooney, Di Caprio, Damon, Vin Diesel etc are all just average height guys using footwear/builds/proportions to fool people into higher listings.

ACG - It was meant semi in-jest, I wasn't being totally serious. ;-)
Godred said on 10/Nov/11
still think 5`10 barefoot max, probably closer to 5`9.
Shaun said on 10/Nov/11
Rob, no idea how tall this makes him. but here is a good comparison shot from behind with Angelina, and you can see the shoes he's wearing.

Click Here
Editor Rob
she's probably got nearly 2 inch footwear advantage
dmeyer said on 10/Nov/11
in the above pics pitt is 3cm over clooney his shoes dont look to give over 0.6-0.75 in considering the footpose he dosnt even have a 0.5 in lifts clooney could be just 179cm that means 182cm in shoes so 5 ft 11 179 to 181cm is arguable from those shot not 178 or 182
Shaun said on 10/Nov/11
He had an inch on Rick Schroder, no lifts, plain sneakers. Whatever Schroder is add an inch, I'm pretty sure on that. He was definitely taller than Schroder in Across the Tracks.
Shaun said on 10/Nov/11
Well Physics if you look taller than Brad Pitt then that's quite something as Pitt can often look near 6', inflated footwear/posture perhaps but he does pull off looking above average and actually in a lot of photographs he tends to be on the taller side next to quite a lot of men and women. As Rob says he can look a legit 182cm quite a lot, far more than he does 5'9", even a flat 5'10". I could imagine than his height varies between 180 in the morning and 177 at night. I think somewhere in that range is more likely.
ACG said on 10/Nov/11
Physics Enemy says on 9/Nov/11
Great pics Dural. There is no chance he's even near 5' 11". He looks shorter than I do. I'm 5' 9.5" and I look taller. I think he's just a flat 5' 9" guy. This listing is bordering on insane.

Can anyone really imagine that Pitt is 0.5-0.75" shorter than DMeyer? DMeyer would destroy this guy, DMeyer is genuinely a big guy. Pitt is shorter than me. I should call Pitt out, we can battle it out under Rob's stadiometer.


Wow, you're really daft, aren't you? Wouldn't it be great if at only 5'9.5 you were taller than THE Brad Pitt? Let's make Brad a measly flat 5'9" so you can feel superior in at least some way to one the richest, most famous, and envied actors in Hollywood!

Srsly, get a grip, dude.
LAN Jiao said on 10/Nov/11
pitt can look 5'11.5 in ocean twelve when fits on lifts.
Chameleon said on 10/Nov/11
Dural cheers.

Like me and others said for a long time, Pitt is NOT even 5'10. 180cm listing is an insult to legit 180+ guys like myself.
Dmeyer said on 10/Nov/11
Looking at Pitt near 5'6-6.5 jona Hill hé CAN defenetly pull off looking 182-3cm same near 179bloom But hé CAN also look 5'9.5_10 With paltrow
Physics Enemy said on 9/Nov/11
Great pics Dural. There is no chance he's even near 5' 11". He looks shorter than I do. I'm 5' 9.5" and I look taller. I think he's just a flat 5' 9" guy. This listing is bordering on insane.

Can anyone really imagine that Pitt is 0.5-0.75" shorter than DMeyer? DMeyer would destroy this guy, DMeyer is genuinely a big guy. Pitt is shorter than me. I should call Pitt out, we can battle it out under Rob's stadiometer.
Dmeyer said on 9/Nov/11
Delphonic do not Forget Pitt footwear havé very flat front unlike Nike shoes or work boots thé outside heels is 1.2-1.5 in usualy wish mean hé get 1-1.3 because of pivoting reason. If a Guy wears a 1.5 in heeled shoes With slim front it gives nearer 1.3 plus thé 1.5 in lifts inside are going slightly up from 0.5 to 1.5 in only thé Back of thé lifts hors thé 1.5 Mark so you get about 1 in instead 1.5 so 1.3 plus 1 in that 2.3 in now many Times Pitt shoes dont gave thé 1.5 in heels and also nô room for 1.5-2 in lifts , conclusion wearing a Nike shoes With a 1 in lifts and get about 2.2 in you get same as advertized 3-3.5 in elevators also Pitt shoes are very stylish and dont havé huge so they CAN. Look good but i think Pitt get 1.75-2.1 in from his elecators With is raughly 0.5-1 in over normal 1-1.1 in shoes from people around him , hé dosnt wear thé type of shoes Cruise does near Cameron dias 1.5 in plus 2 in giving him about 2.4 in Pitt Gets nearer 2 inches and at Times just normal 1.5 in cubans to get a boost
dmeyer said on 9/Nov/11
thanks physics enemy
Dural said on 9/Nov/11
Just look at his proportions...

Click Here
Click Here

Pitt with Jennifer Aniston, most likely without his lifts

Click Here
Click Here

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

standing on higher ground and still doesn't manage to look 5'11

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Physics Enemy said on 9/Nov/11
You're massive to me DMeyer because you're 6foot with a good build. You wake up at 6' 0.5"! Yes I definitely should avoid small footwear, else I look a flat 5' 9". That's short amongst the young generation.
nice guy said on 9/Nov/11
look guys i know that brad is an awesome actor and all but dont lie to yourselfs saying ridiculous things like pitt being 180cm flat ...next to paltrow both barefeet and pitt with small camera advantage was extactly the same height! dont juge heights based on pics in which he wears shoes cos they are lifts, that boost him from 176cm to 181-183cm..i wouldnt be surprised if he was like only 173/174cm nowadays, since he was young on that pic with paltrow and yet only her height
Dmeyer said on 8/Nov/11
184-185 cm shoes i meant 179-180 barefeet
dmeyer said on 8/Nov/11
i think strong 5 ft 9.5 like you shouldnt complain you can either wear normal 1-1.25 in shoes , or wears 1.5 dress shoes or elevators and be 5'11 but you height is fine , just dont wear shoes under 1 in to not look 5 ft 9 range
dmeyer said on 8/Nov/11
physics enemy you are absolutly not shoes at lowest 5 ft 9.5 thats is average , do you mean massive beause i am 228-230 pounds at 5 ft 11.5-11.6 , for some reason people see me bigger than wath i am people in the 5 ft 11-6ft range realize i aint realy tall but most people 5 ft 8-10 range see me as big guy i was 293 pounds 6 month ago now 228-230 pounds i wonna go to 215 in the ben stiller pics i am about 240 pounds
dmeyer said on 8/Nov/11
do you mean brads elevators are smaller than don's type
Gene said on 8/Nov/11
I was on that set in the kananaskis and on the jesse james set- now, no extra was allowed to be more then 6 feet in cowboy boots- NO ONE- in fact during the extra calls in Canmore, lots of guys were turned away immediately for being too tall. Brads 5'9- and all these guys have it written in their contracts that they will NOT be shown up by a taller, more handsome extra-
delphonic said on 8/Nov/11
dmeyer says on 8/Nov/11
rob i think brad measures 6 ft 0.25 with cuban 1.5 in heels on , and 184.5 185.5 cm like 6 ft 0.75-1 in his top footwear don's type , people seem to forget that if pitt is 6 ft 1 inch in his best shoes that gives about 2 in or tops 6cm that steel makes him near 5'11 but i think 5 ft 10.5 is possible thaugh
[Editor Rob: when you put something like dons on, they are huge shoes, no doubt. Up close the heel is like 1.4 inches, or very close...and you get about 2 and 1/3rd inch out of them in total.]

Really? Just 2 to 2.3 inches max out of huge custom high top elevator boots?? I can get 2 inches out of low top Nike Shox with a gel heel insert and some odor eater inserts! Tons of shoes and boots give 1.5 inches straight from the store. And many cowboy boots, construction boots or well heeled dress boots give 2 inches without even adding additional lifts. And you think Pitt's expensive custom built high top mega-elevators only give 2 to 2.3 inches??? Wow!
Editor Rob
2 1/3rd out of the dons shoes I'm talking about. Obviously with boots you can push that a bit higher
dmeyer said on 8/Nov/11
rob i think brad measures 6 ft 0.25 with cuban 1.5 in heels on , and 184.5 185.5 cm like 6 ft 0.75-1 in his top footwear don's type , people seem to forget that if pitt is 6 ft 1 inch in his best shoes that gives about 2 in or tops 6cm that steel makes him near 5'11 but i think 5 ft 10.5 is possible thaugh
Editor Rob
when you put something like dons on, they are huge shoes, no doubt. Up close the heel is like 1.4 inches, or very close...and you get about 2 and 1/3rd inch out of them in total.
Physics Enemy said on 8/Nov/11
You're massive DMeyer, I wish I was as tall as you.
Physics Enemy said on 8/Nov/11
I'm 5' 9.5" at night Dmeyer, 5' 10.25" - 5' 10.3" in the morning, depending on sleep. I'm short.
Dmeyer said on 8/Nov/11
Brad is defenetly 184-185cm shoes on including lifts
Dmeyer said on 8/Nov/11
Brad is defenetly 184-185cm shoes on
Derek d said on 7/Nov/11
Dural says on 19/Oct/11
@Clay
Troy was shot in 2002- Nov.2003

Here's an interesting pic from the set. You can clearly tell his foot position.

Click Here


This goes to show how pointless it is to say, "Oh, there's no way they could be in lifts for that scene because he was running through the blah blah etc..." Actors like Pitt and Stallone simply don't give a ****. Brad in that Troy photo performing a highly intricate fight scene on uneven terrain and is jumping around. Yet still is in huge lifts. Never disregard lifts with these guys. Ever.
Derek d said on 7/Nov/11
jackrc says on 7/Nov/11
Brad is definitely 5'11" met him when he shot Legend of the Falls in Calgary. My girlfirend is a reporter and she interviewed him. I'm 5'7" and we were both in running shoes. He had at least 4 inches on me.

Have to factor in the lifts he was wearing, Assuming he was. High probability since he was filming a movie. Did you look at his shoes?
nice guy said on 7/Nov/11
@jackrc
dude never heard of elevator shoes !? ..his shoes may look like normal running shoes but they have hidden lifts inside of them..check out the pics of Paltrow (5'9 claim) next to pitt postet by delphonic at the bottom of this page...exactly the same height .. pitt is 176cm tops what better prove can there be than showing him without shoes!
Dmeyer said on 7/Nov/11
Phisycs how Tall are you at night depending on wall i am 181.5-181.9 night but m'y homé walls arent good égainst doors i am 181.6-8cm , i aint under 181.5 or over 181.8 at lowest lowest i Ever. Measured is 181.5cm i Will mesure at m'y parent at night theyr wall are Mush straighter
Chameleon said on 7/Nov/11
nice guy said it all!
jackrc said on 7/Nov/11
Brad is definitely 5'11" met him when he shot Legend of the Falls in Calgary. My girlfirend is a reporter and she interviewed him. I'm 5'7" and we were both in running shoes. He had at least 4 inches on me.
nice guy said on 6/Nov/11
Shaun says on 27/Oct/11
Click Here

For all those who think Clooney is 5'9". Here he is barefoot next to 6'2"-6'3" Randy Gerber and 5'9" Cindy Crawford.
Defintely NOT under 5'10" in fact he's looking real close to 5'11". 5'10.5" for Clooney seems about right. Question is is he the same height or taller than Brad. I'm convinced now more than ever that Clooney is a strong 5'10".
quote end

dude you just proved that clooney is infact 5'9 ..in that pic he has a huge camera advantage and cindy crawford probably rounded up her height...so when she is 174 or 173 she rounds up to 175cm/5'9...now i'm sure of it: clooney is 5'9 and as for pitt he is nowhere near 180cm flat...maybe in his lifts but barefoot he is 176cm max
Physics Enemy said on 6/Nov/11
DMeyer - Rob is 175.2-3 out-of-bed (good sleep) and 173.1 at his low (without stadiometer error). Rob could easily put 174 cm for his height and nobody would have a problem with it. Rob is a 5' 8.5" guy in many respects.

Likewise, you could put 6' and nobody would have a problem with it, since you're 6' 0.5" out of bed and 5' 11.6" at your low.
Dmeyer said on 5/Nov/11
181cm 181.2cm morning 179cm 179.3cm evening averaging at 180cm is possible for Pitt like you Rob 175cm morning 173cm evening some people CAN call you 174cm
johno said on 5/Nov/11
177cmmm says on 4/Nov/11
Look at the photos with george clooney and Cindy Crawford

Click Here

Cindy is 175cms and looks taller than clooney in some pictures.

IMO 176 evening clooney 178 evening Pitt.
178 morning and 180 morning
___________________________________________________________________________

The last few pictures show, that crawford and clooney are within 0.5inches in height however, notice clooney thicker sandles then crawfords flats. Crawford and clooney would be the same height.

Mamun noticed crawford looked 5'9 but i don't know whether she was barefoot or she had minor heels on, and he was guessing how tall she would be with them off. Vaj stated that she told him shes 5'8 and that statement wasn't necessarily meaning, evening height more rather average height , so that could mean anything ie 5'8.25, 5'8.5, 5'8.75. So it comes down to, is mamums estimation of her or, what she stated her height as to vaj more correct, probably both, in between ie 5'8.5 - Very fair

I wouldn't really put clooney anything over crawford but i give him 5'9 average height and pitt's height on clooney would be negligible, max 0.5 inches.

Crawford 5'8.5
Clooney 5'9 average height
Pitt 5'9 - 5'9.5 (Pitt and clooney, both nothing over average height)
177cmmm said on 4/Nov/11
Look at the photos with george clooney and Cindy Crawford

Click Here

Cindy is 175cms and looks taller than clooney in some pictures.

IMO 176 evening clooney 178 evening Pitt.
178 morning and 180 morning
Physics Enemy said on 4/Nov/11
You don't need to go by your lowest height DMeyer, I don't think that's true height. You could even argue 6ft based on it being (just over) midway between your lowest and highest. But 5' 11.75" is definitely fair for you.
LAN Jiao said on 4/Nov/11
brad pitt might not compete with his look alike 5-10 guy pearce
Dmeyer said on 3/Nov/11
I think i CAN be as low as 5'11.5 at lowest but id. I Seat on a coush or dont work Mush i am 5'11.65-75
Giraffe said on 3/Nov/11
De l'eau says on 2/Nov/11
@Giraffe hahaha!!! You make me laugh!!! Have you ever seen Snatch? There is no way in hell Statham is taller than Pitt.

---

Well the thing is on set with Pitt you'll never know, when everyone else is in sandals Pitt is in boots(packing god knows what). In a mental asylum he was in high heel dress shoes, while others were in slippers...
Physics Enemy said on 3/Nov/11
DMeyer, I'd class you as 5' 11.75" to be honest. Your lowest height is still above 5' 11.5". You're a legit 5' 11.75" around lunchtime. That's fair for you. Stop downgrading yourself!
jake, 1.82 m said on 2/Nov/11
Under 5' 9" claims for Damonn are ridiculous, as are under 5' 10" claims for Pitt.
Physics Enemy said on 2/Nov/11
I'm sure Brad's been 5' 10" out of bed, Legend. Fairly sure anyway.
De l'eau said on 2/Nov/11
@Giraffe hahaha!!! You make me laugh!!! Have you ever seen Snatch? There is no way in hell Statham is taller than Pitt.

Pitt definetly cannot be 5'11" now since I've seen the Curious Case of Benjamin Button. His character wasn't the only one who seemed to be shrinking. It seemed as someone had forgotten their lifts...
dmeyer said on 2/Nov/11
i met garett headlund i am about 5 ft 11.5 and there was a 5 ft 9.5 guy over there and garett said brad was taller than him but shorter than me so near 5 ft 10.5-11 seems right
dmeyer said on 2/Nov/11
i think his height range is more 5 ft 10 to 6 ft 0.25
Physics Enemy said on 2/Nov/11
Wouldn't 5' 9.5" for Pitt and 5' 7" for Stallone be correct then, Shaun?
Shaun said on 2/Nov/11
His height ranges from 5'9.5"-6'1". Like Stallone ranges from 5'7"-6'. Only explanation is lifts.
Shaun said on 2/Nov/11
Yeah he did look 5'10" in Snatch Dural. Must be in big lifts to pull off 6'0.5" range next to Statham in the SPike pic.
dmeyer said on 1/Nov/11
matt damon look no more than 10-12 cm under 189cm afflack and he loks 1.5 in taller than 174cm potente , all evidance putt him 5 ft 9.5-10 under 5 ft 9.25 is none sens
Giraffe said on 1/Nov/11
Shaun says on 31/Oct/11
Well, Pitt at least was taller than Statham who she was dating at the time...

---

Or maybe Kelly is hinting that Brad is shorter than Jason? LOL..
Dural said on 1/Nov/11
Shaun says on 31/Oct/11
johno says on 30/Oct/11
Click Here

Heres a interesting view f rom kelly brook when she met brad pitt and what she thought of pitts heigh, although she doesn't state his height.

Well, Pitt at least was taller than Statham who she was dating at the time...

------------
About an inch in Snatch...

Click Here

... and 3.5in at the Spike TV's "Guys Choice" Awards

Click Here
Dmeyer said on 1/Nov/11
There is Max 0.5-1cm between clooney and Pitt i have seen pics of clooney wearing boots 1.2-3 in type while Pitt has 0.9-1in so max 1cm more for Clooney and george looks taller
LAN Jiao said on 1/Nov/11
much possible clooney stand just 176cm , especially next to 5'11 stacy keibler she dwarf clooney a little. pitt is less chance at 5'10 but solid 5-9.5 and matt damon we know his between 173-174cm.
Shaun said on 31/Oct/11
johno says on 30/Oct/11
Click Here

Heres a interesting view f rom kelly brook when she met brad pitt and what she thought of pitts heigh, although she doesn't state his height.

Well, Pitt at least was taller than Statham who she was dating at the time...
johno said on 30/Oct/11
Shaun says on 27/Oct/11
Click Here

For all those who think Clooney is 5'9". Here he is barefoot next to 6'2"-6'3" Randy Gerber and 5'9" Cindy Crawford.
Defintely NOT under 5'10" in fact he's looking real close to 5'11". 5'10.5" for Clooney seems about right. Question is is he the same height or taller than Brad. I'm convinced now more than ever that Clooney is a strong 5'10".

_____________________________________________________________________

I think you need to check the rest of the album
johno said on 30/Oct/11
Click Here

Heres a interesting view f rom kelly brook when she met brad pitt and what she thought of pitts heigh, although she doesn't state his height.
178 said on 30/Oct/11
I think Pitt is 178 cm (5' 10.25").

Clooney could be 177 cm (5' 9.75").

Matt Damon I've changed my mind on. I've seen more of this guy, including some barefoot shots with Don Cheadle. I reckon he could be 176 cm (5' 9.25") instead of 5' 8.75".
Legend said on 29/Oct/11
He's never been 5'10
pauly e said on 28/Oct/11
dmeyer says on 22/Oct/11
today he can look 5 ft 10.5-6 ft in the 80-90 can look 5 ft 10-10.5 alot

What does that tell you? He's packin....
Shaun said on 28/Oct/11
truthman says on 27/Oct/11

Most ugliest shoes i've seen in my life.

Click Here

Got nothing on Bono's platforms.
Dmeyer said on 28/Oct/11
Pitt wears Max dons type 2.3-4 in range and most likely 1.6 dress shoes or 2-2.2 in elevators if hé is 5'10 hé should look 5'10.5-75 in range when in cowboy type and 5,11.25 when in dons type and hé look more 5'11.5 when in thick dress shoes ans 6' when in elevators so hé has to be nô l'essai than 179
Shaun said on 28/Oct/11
Yeah Dural Lightbody does look more like a 6'2" and change range similar to Tom Welling but the Nicholas Hoult pictures seem to indicate he is actually that tall, but looks quite a bit off as being as tall as that to me..
De l'eau said on 27/Oct/11
Just watched the curious case of Benjamin Button, and from what I saw is either Pitt lost height or he's always been below 5'9". I swear I didn't see tall or tallish at all, and I have a friend who 5'11" and he looks a lot taller than Pitt. He couldn't have been 5'8" compared to all the people you would compare him to in the movie...
Dural said on 27/Oct/11
@Shaun
Gary Lightbody with 5'9.5" listed Paolo Nutini

Click Here

He's tall, but 6'4" is pushing it.
Shaun said on 27/Oct/11
The yacht photos have now convinced me Clooney aint under 5'10" and is actually close to 5'11". Mamun has met Cindy Crawford and confirms she is a legit 5'9". Clooney always looks about 2 inches taller. Now BP somehow mostly pull off looking taller than Clooney. in my view if he were 5'9" flat he'd need massive lifts to look taller than Clooney. He has to be 5'10" range at least to pull off the advantage I think.
Shaun said on 27/Oct/11
Click Here

For all those who think Clooney is 5'9". Here he is barefoot next to 6'2"-6'3" Randy Gerber and 5'9" Cindy Crawford.
Defintely NOT under 5'10" in fact he's looking real close to 5'11". 5'10.5" for Clooney seems about right. Question is is he the same height or taller than Brad. I'm convinced now more than ever that Clooney is a strong 5'10".
truthman said on 27/Oct/11
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP says on 27/Oct/11
Brad Pitt and Gwyneth Paltrow:
Click Here
Granted not the best picture to judge height from, since he has footwear advantage and is closer to the camera. That said, he doesn't look that much taller than Paltrow IMO. If Paltrow is 175 cm, my guess for him is 178cm.

Most ugliest shoes i've seen in my life.
dmeyer said on 27/Oct/11
my best friend met both leo dicaprio and pitt not together thaugh and thaught leo was tall like 5 ft 11.5-6 ft leo was barefeet at a pool , and he met brad on the set of benjamin button and thaught he was a skinny 5 ft 10 he then met bard at cannes festival and thaught he was 5 ft 11.5-11.75
halo said on 27/Oct/11
(at)Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP

look at the shoes, looks like a 3-4 cm give for pitt. i think the guy is not more than 176.
Shaun said on 27/Oct/11
@Dural

Click Here

Nicholas Hoult is supposed to be a strong 6'2". Rob has him at 6'2.5". Lightbody does actually look a solid 6'4" in comparison.
Shaun said on 27/Oct/11
Sorry Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP that photo is atrocious to judge height from. A sloping pavement and have you seen the height of Pitt's boots! He could pack a 3 inch lift inside those!!
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 27/Oct/11
Brad Pitt and Gwyneth Paltrow:
Click Here
Granted not the best picture to judge height from, since he has footwear advantage and is closer to the camera. That said, he doesn't look that much taller than Paltrow IMO. If Paltrow is 175 cm, my guess for him is 178cm.
Legend said on 27/Oct/11
He's 5'9.5 and I sincerely don't know how someone could examine the Paltrow pics and think otherwise. Please tell me.
jake, 1.82 m said on 26/Oct/11
Pitt is somewhere 179-180 cm. Clooney is 178 cm flat is what I meant.
jake, 1.82 m said on 26/Oct/11
Pitt is somewhere 179-180 cm. Clooney is 177-178 cm .
Dural said on 26/Oct/11
Spielberg doesn't look much shorter than Paltrow, both in sandals. She must be somewhere between 5'8.25" and 5'9". BP is no more than an inch taller than Gwyneth Paltrow anyway.
Dural said on 26/Oct/11
Shaun says on 24/Oct/11
@Johno

Click Here

Paltrow with Gary Lightbody who Rob has listed at 6'4".

----------

Rob has him at 6'4" because that's what he claims, he's nowhere near 6'4" in reality.
Dural said on 26/Oct/11
@c-mo

and he never looks 6'1" btw..
Dural said on 26/Oct/11
@c-mo

Please take a look at their shoes, Pitt has 1.5 heels and Bruce is basically barefoot jet he still manages to look an inch taller.
Giraffe said on 26/Oct/11
c-mo says on 25/Oct/11
Click Here ---- bruce willis is 182cm and they look almost the same

---

Check out brads high heel footwear at 0:20... lol with those long inner pants to hide the heels, who is he fooling?

Bruce is in slippers at 4.38...

Brad has at least 2 inch footwear advantage. The guy is not even 5'10.
Shaun said on 26/Oct/11
Still think 5'10 ish is nearer what he is.
Chameleon said on 26/Oct/11
Shaun dont get me wrong im not trying to downgrade him, but in Kalifornia he didnt look it either. With Paltrow? Nope.... I'll stick to 177cm at max.
TruebloodFan said on 25/Oct/11
@lorne says on 24/Oct/11

'Pitt has never wore 4 inch heels in his life. Hell, I don't think Cruise has pulled out 4 inchers, since you would need goth style platform boots. Get over it...'

agreed. 4'' is Sly's territory, not Pitt'n'Cruise's.
c-mo said on 25/Oct/11
Click Here --- leo is about 182cm (ok this pic is old it could be that he was 179cm or something in this pic which would make sense since brad looks a little bit taller which also could be because of shoes though)


Click Here ---- bruce willis is 182cm and they look almost the same

i thought that brad is more 178cm - 5'10 but meanwhile i believe he is 180-181cm ....anything below 179cm at the deepest night after a hard day seems very unlikely to me ....no surprise that he can look 6'1 in lifts....i also dont understand why so many here want to downgrade him ...him being shorter wouldnt make your life better
Derek d. said on 25/Oct/11
satchy says on 23/Oct/11
looks huge next to 6ft 2 mr Chris Pratt
Click Here

Huge? Your link doesn't even work, but I'm guessing you saw the picture of them standing side by side. The picture must be flawed. Check this better one out.

Click Here

He looks rather small if you ask me.
Shaun said on 25/Oct/11
Chameleon says on 25/Oct/11
He's not 5'10 as hes owned by Tarantino and Duchovny to much to be 5'10.

How about all the times he has looked taller than legit 5'11"-6' ers? I love how the way people always pick his lowest apparances and are that certain that is eactly how short he is. Lifts or not this guys frequently pulls off looking 182cm legit range. To me he almost always pulls of looking real close to 6'. So assuming he is 5'9" is a bit extreme. I'd never trust one photo for judging height.
Voiceless Dental Fricative said on 25/Oct/11
@Shaun, I think Speilberg may just be wearing flip-flops in that picture.
Chameleon said on 25/Oct/11
He's not 5'10 as hes owned by Tarantino and Duchovny to much to be 5'10.
lorne said on 24/Oct/11
Michael says on 23/Oct/11
Pitt has always been around 5' 9.5". He recently looked 5' 11" in all the ceremony awards as he is on big lifts. In "high-heels" with a 4" advantage, he stands at about 6' 1".

Pitt has never wore 4 inch heels in his life. Hell, I don't think Cruise has pulled out 4 inchers, since you would need goth style platform boots. Get over it...
Rob G said on 24/Oct/11
I agree with around 5'10" estimates for Pitt.
IMO he is definitely not 5'11", barerfoot picture with Platrow and him being owned by Duchowny say as much.
I'd say Pitt is a legit 5'10"er, who, when in lifts, can pass for a 6footer and "in effect" gives an illusion of a 6'1" guy.
Maximus Meridius said on 24/Oct/11
Rob will you ever put pictures of celebs under the stadiometer any time soon.
yh said on 24/Oct/11
Edward Norton 181cm

Pitt 179cm

Clooney 178cm

Damon 176cm
Shaun said on 24/Oct/11
Yeah Alex as much as I hate Bieber he is 5'5" ish nowadays I think.
Shaun said on 24/Oct/11
Well Rob has Schroder at 5 ft 9.5 in. Pitt was definitely around an inch taller as there is a scene they had a fight and they were standing toe to toe. 5'10.5"? More chance Schroder is 5'9" and Pitt 5'10".
Shaun said on 24/Oct/11
Physics Enemy says on 22/Oct/11
So Pitt grew taller since the late 90's then. Those 5' 9" appearances are out of date now.

Since mid 90s. 1994 ish yup he looks 1-2 inches taller, nearer 3 inches taller in the 2000s. Although he was an inch taller than Rick Schroder in Across the Tracks and he's supposed to be 5'9". In cross the Tracks he was in flat sneakers and looked 5'9.5"-5'10" to me.
Shaun said on 24/Oct/11
@Johno

Click Here

Paltrow in flats with 5'7"-5'7.5" Spielberg in sneakers. She's not under 5'9", the very lowest she could possibly be is 5'8.5".
Shaun said on 24/Oct/11
@Johno

Click Here

Paltrow with Gary Lightbody who Rob has listed at 6'4".
Giraffe said on 24/Oct/11
satchy says on 23/Oct/11
looks huge next to 6ft 2 mr Chris Pratt
Click Here

---

His footwear that day:

Click Here

All those years in lifts and he still hansn't master the art of twinkle toes. Pig foot much?
Michael said on 23/Oct/11
Pitt has always been around 5' 9.5". He recently looked 5' 11" in all the ceremony awards as he is on big lifts. In "high-heels" with a 4" advantage, he stands at about 6' 1".
dmeyer said on 23/Oct/11
evrybody knows that elevator shoes that are not huge give 2-2.4 in over barefeet pitt looks 6 ft in them when he stands near guys who have 1-1.1 in shoes he get 2-3.5cm advantage so if he looks 183cm minus 2to 3.5cm he is 179-80.5cm
dmeyer said on 22/Oct/11
today he can look 5 ft 10.5-6 ft in the 80-90 can look 5 ft 10-10.5 alot
Alex said on 22/Oct/11
Shaun, yea he has and had looked 5'10 range too. Hes 5'9 and some change at least. 5'9 1/2 is my guess for him
george555 said on 22/Oct/11
Pitt could be 6'1 out of bed, and 6'0 in the morning, 5'11 in the evening
Physics Enemy said on 22/Oct/11
Legend & Viper - To nail this guy's height, I think he's 176 cm, 5' 9.3".
Physics Enemy said on 22/Oct/11
So Pitt grew taller since the late 90's then. Those 5' 9" appearances are out of date now.
johno said on 22/Oct/11
Click Here

Mike myers head is tilted forward but the difference seems 2.5 inches there and with myers head more straighntened, would be more straightened, the difference would be more 2.

Myers 5'7
Pitt 5'9 - 5'9.5
johno said on 22/Oct/11
Click Here

Heres brad pitt with the 5'7 listed mike myers. Although the camera angles are not the best, the difference seems 2 inches and maybe 2.5.

In the entire set of photos from Cannes, its very difficult to make direct comparisons since there is alot of camera angle differences.

Mike myers 5'7
Brad pitt 5'9 - 5'9.5
Alex said on 22/Oct/11
Justin Bieber is more than 5'3 now. He looks to have def grown some
johno said on 21/Oct/11
Shaun says on 20/Oct/11
johno says on 19/Oct/11
and oh, i don't believe paltrow is 5'9. I think she more a weak 5'8. Brad doesn't really have that much height over her

LMAO at weak 5'8". See the Gary Lightbody page and link. Weak 5'8" my ass. She has 3 inches on Steven Spielberg barefeet for crying out loud!!

___________________________________________________________________________

She hardly dwarfs matt damon nor robert downey junior in her 4 inch heels, whilest they are standard footwear and these guys are hardly even average in height. She doesn't even have 2 inches barely on them in her 4 inchers. Its very unlikely she is 6'1 in them.

Shes shorter then brad pitt by an inch and taller then cameron diaz by the same amount.

And with the 5'11 flat for leo-mania, i could argue in the 5'10 range for him. Possibly seems shorter then that with mark wahlberg. He is shorter then tom hanks and seems at 2-3 inches shorter then billy zane in the pictures i posted of them on billy zane's height page. Billy is listed at 6'0.5, looks 5'11.5 in that pic unless you believe billy's forehead is 5-5.5 inches in length.

I definently do not believe leo-mania is 5'11 or above. Most likely in the 5'10 range like the above reporter suggests and possibly could look lower as the above reporter insinuates and with other celebs

Paltrow 5'8 weak
RDJ 5'7 - 5'8
Brad pitt 5'9 - 5'9.5
matt damon 5'8
mark wahlberg 5'7
Leo-mania 5'10 - 5'10.75 ( Can be slightly lower then 5'10 )
lorne said on 21/Oct/11
Physics Enemy says on 20/Oct/11
Those pictures are horrible to gauge height from Shaun. They prove nothing at all. Interesting that Leo's on the higher side of the beach ... he must have known he'd be photographed. Leo's not over 5' 10". A young Leo is 5' 8" MAX with Glenn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

...Stop. Just stop. If you are saying Leo is 5ftf^(%ing8, then you are either just trolling, or are completely deranged. Either way, stop man. Next thing ya know, you will be saying Vince Vaughn is 6ft flat!!!
Voiceless Dental Fricative said on 21/Oct/11
His driver's license listed him at 5'4. That was issued 1.5 years ago however.
Chameleon said on 21/Oct/11
Indeed Shaun Pitt could be 5'9 as he also was owned by 6'0 duchovny in Kalifornia. and hes owned by Tarantino.
Shaun said on 21/Oct/11
Click Here

With 6'5" listed Armie Hammer (he had an easy 4 inches on Clint in the photo I saw). More than Leo is 6' than 5'10" in my opinion.
Shaun said on 21/Oct/11
Yeah I could definitely buy 177cm for Gisele Physics but no lower than 180 for Leo. I think 181-82cm is actually legit similar height to Justin Timberlake who also claims 6'1". Leo looks about 5 inches shorter than 6'5 Armie Hammer in the J.D . Edgar trailer. He could be 6'4.5". I used to think DiCaprio was 5'9" or 5'10" and Matt Damon 5'8".
Shaun said on 21/Oct/11
Pitt on the other hand could look as low 5'9"-5'9.5" in his early 90s films. In Thelma and Louise he looked 5'9".
Shaun said on 21/Oct/11
I could buy Leo at a flat 5'11, no less.
Shaun said on 21/Oct/11
OK pictures taken in sand and on slopes are indeed horrible to gauge height from, agreed. But Dicaprio is not under 5'11". Pitt on the other hand...
Mathew said on 20/Oct/11
Gisele didn't think Leo was taller than her. Under 5'10" for Leo is probably too short, but I could definitely see him at 5'10.5".
Physics Enemy said on 20/Oct/11
Just get this guy under a stadiometer and prove his height. Call him out.
Physics Enemy said on 20/Oct/11
There's an article on the Internet stating Gisele is 177 cm Shaun. I just checked her page. 177 would make much more sense to me. Even 176 perhaps.
Physics Enemy said on 20/Oct/11
I'm not sure on 5' 10.5" for Bundchen, Shaun. That's very tall for a woman.
Physics Enemy said on 20/Oct/11
Those pictures are horrible to gauge height from Shaun. They prove nothing at all. Interesting that Leo's on the higher side of the beach ... he must have known he'd be photographed. Leo's not over 5' 10". A young Leo is 5' 8" MAX with Glenn.
tell-em said on 20/Oct/11
pictures in the sand are incredibly lousy, man. those pics don't prove a thing.
dan said on 20/Oct/11
if you think Dicaprio is under 5-10 you must be high
Derek d. said on 20/Oct/11
Shaun says on 20/Oct/11
Click Here

Still think Di Caprio's under 5'10? He is clearly taller than Gisele Bundchen.

Haha. He's like 5 feet closer to the camera. Someone 5'7 would still look taller than her in that picture. I don't really see much of a debate with Leo's height. He always looks a consistent 5'11.5. Never really short. I think other actors height's fluctuate next to him cause they wear lifts sometimes.
Shaun said on 20/Oct/11
johno says on 19/Oct/11
and oh, i don't believe paltrow is 5'9. I think she more a weak 5'8. Brad doesn't really have that much height over her

LMAO at weak 5'8". See the Gary Lightbody page and link. Weak 5'8" my ass. She has 3 inches on Steven Spielberg barefeet for crying out loud!!
Shaun said on 20/Oct/11
Click Here

Still think Di Caprio's under 5'10? He is clearly taller than Gisele Bundchen.
Shaun said on 20/Oct/11
Click Here

OK Leo's much higher on the slope but look at body proportions, he looks taller than Gisele. He looks a legit 182cm in my view. Rob has her at 5'10.5" on here.
Shaun said on 20/Oct/11
Physics Enemy says on 19/Oct/11
To be fair Viper I do agree with most of your listings. 5' 3" Bieber, 5' 9" Pitt, 5' 7" Stallone, 5' 11.5" MAX Zane, 5' 10" Vin Diesel and likely what you believe Di Caprio is (I think just below 5' 10" OR 5' 10" MAX).

Good god we're back with the Viper worshipping again. If Leo Dicaprio is 5'9.75" Gisele Bundchen is 5'7". See the beach photographs.
177cmmm said on 19/Oct/11
@ Dan

look before: Click Here

after Click Here

Sure he would prefer to look younger but It does not really matter. Some people age in such away that they are constantly "good looking" as opposed to..

this: Click Here
johno said on 19/Oct/11
and oh, i don't believe paltrow is 5'9. I think she more a weak 5'8. Brad doesn't really have that much height over her
johno said on 19/Oct/11
178 says on 18/Oct/11
Hey, does anyone remember when 'Brad Pitt' apparently posted on this very page stating that he was 5' 11"? That was celebheights.com at its most entertaining!

Was there any follow-up to that Rob?

[Editor Rob: remember anybody can post, on some occasions though (lesser names) it might be true, but bigger names just take it as a bit of fun, normally I delete those comments, unless something matches up ]
_____________________________________________________________________________

I am pretty sure Rob that you have one or two famous names popping on here. Everyone has the internet and everyone cares about thier appearance, especially celebs. If people can discuss plastic surgery, breast size etc and have celebrities take note, i'm pretty sure height can also be a key concerning trait.

Anyway, for me Brad pitt is a flat 5'9
dan said on 19/Oct/11
Shaun.. Across the tracks was filmed in 1989 and was released in 1991 Click Here As far as the jaw goes, go back and look at pitt throughout the different stages of his life where he was at different weight.. you'll see his jaw looks bigger and smaller according to how thin, regular, or bulky he looks..
Physics Enemy said on 19/Oct/11
To be fair Viper I do agree with most of your listings. 5' 3" Bieber, 5' 9" Pitt, 5' 7" Stallone, 5' 11.5" MAX Zane, 5' 10" Vin Diesel and likely what you believe Di Caprio is (I think just below 5' 10" OR 5' 10" MAX).
Dural said on 19/Oct/11
@Clay
Troy was shot in 2002- Nov.2003

Here's an interesting pic from the set. You can clearly tell his foot position.

Click Here

With lifts he was still about the same height as 5'10"ish Sean Bean in Troy.

@Shaun
He had plastic surgery after "A River Runs Through It" in 1991 or 1992.
I'm not sure about the jaw thing, but it looks really different, could be his age or not.
Antonio said on 8/Jul/09
I don't know what you looking at, strause. They are obviously not the same size. Here is a pic that paul left out. I see a 2.5 - 3.0" advantage for Pitt.

Click Here

I believe Tom is 5-7, and I stand-by my original estimate for Brad, 5-10.
Original said on 8/Jul/09
Kidman and Pitt is same height in a photo. Pitt looks 2.5 inc taller than 5'7.5/5'7.75 Cruise.
Around 5'10, maybe 5'9.75.
strauss said on 8/Jul/09
Great photos from PAUL! Pitt and Cruise look to be the same size! Nicole Kidman appears to be the tallest in the trio photo. By her own admission, she said she always wore 'flat' sole shoes in publicity photos with Cruise. Lastly, Paul's footwear photo shows both actors wearing the ugly elevator shoes and the extra baggy pants. No star in Hollywood could find a tailor that BAD, unless he was trying to hide his short stature. Pitt is lucky to be 5'9".
177cmmm said on 8/Jul/09
I think he is 5 9 after looking at the pictures paul submitted
Paul said on 7/Jul/09
Brad Pitt standing with Tom Cruise. Looks around two inches taller to me:

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Their shoes:

Click Here
Haze said on 7/Jul/09
5'9 is to low. 5'10 max though. stands as stiff as a board and his shoes are packing heat. dont be fooled.
Anonymous said on 7/Jul/09
The growth hormone thing is plain stupid.The guy filmed "A river runs through it"in 1993 ,the same year than Kalifornia, and at least that you are blind, you can realise he just spent more time in the gym and he let his beard grow.No growth hormones involved on that, thats for sure.
He also filmed Cool World in 1992 ,another movie filmed around the time when Kalifornia was filmed.He had no beard no muscles an was thin and lean.
Hes just very good creating a character.
177cmmm said on 7/Jul/09
Vibram maybe between the movies he used growth hormone to get really buff and then he got the other side effects like a beard and maybe an inch in height.
Vibram said on 7/Jul/09
Growth hormones or not, It was highly unusual transformation he went through in late 1991 through 1992 when Kalifornia was being filmed. I wonder if Across The Tracks was filmed a few years before it's release in 1991? Like filmed in 1988? It's sometimes the case, though production usually begins about 18 months before release on most films. There is no evidence to support that though, and it was most likely filmed between 1990 and early 1991.
TELLEM said on 6/Jul/09
5'10 on the dot
Anonymous said on 6/Jul/09
In the Kalifornia movie he had worked out and he let his bear grow.Thats why he looked rugged , it was a preparation for his character ,who was supposed to be a serial killer.He wasnt allowed to look childish or youthful.
But if you look at the movie A river runs Through it" from the same year he was back to his youthful looks again.
Is obvious that he was a late bloomer.He probably have grown taller.He is like Dicaprio.Do you remember the photo that glenn had with dicaprio when he was 19? Dicaprio looked like 5.10 , and most people would argue that at 19 most people is done growing.Years later DiCaprio has grown more than an inch and other argue he grown 2 inches.
And the youthful looking is a genetic issue.People shoudnt be amazed.Im almost 28 and people allways give me no more than 23 or 24. I have no wrinkles at all.
Some people develop more wrinkles than others , specialy on the forehead ur under their eyes.
The high school height it doesnt matter. Is useless to know a real height.I was done growing at 15 or 16.Other friends of mine whose Ive seen years later on the street ,and were shorter than me they are taller than me by more than an inch.
By the way ,there is a magazine ,published on here , where a pitts friend told the reporter that pitt was short and then he shot up to 5.11.
I doubt that pitt has paid this guy to prepare what he had to say.
Clay said on 5/Jul/09
Sonny, 6'1 for Pitt is lunacy. He wears massive lifts and elevator shoes, look at him next to Benicio and other tall guys, he's about 5'9 and can look 5'11.5 or even 6 foot with lifts. He only towers over small people.
Conrad said on 4/Jul/09
Re Antonio says on 29/Jun/09:
Look were his eyelevel is at the Pitt-Penn photo. Pitt looks much taller than Peen tbh.
klem said on 4/Jul/09
Thats just the way it is some guys look realy young for their age, I also look younger than I realy am judging by face, I am 22 1/2 and I got guessed 19 all the time and I cant realy grow a real beard or mustache yet, I shave once a week or so... Other than that pshysicaly body wise I am naturally pretty solid built so I dobn't have problems with that.
So Brad can also be like that.
Anonymous said on 4/Jul/09
Clooney is most certainly not 5 11 since he is shorter than Pitt, and even Pitt's 5 11 is debatable as I can see from your posts.

I think Pitt is 180 cm though: he has the built for it and there is no way the guy comes across as a shorter guy. That said, if Clooney is 177 cm, then things make a little more sense. Clooney never looks to be very tall anyways, and Brad looks at least 1.5 inches taller than his friend. Both are taller than Depp, Cruise and Penn, but it seems the greatest actors of that generation fall somewhere in between 170 to 180 cm range.

I do not think Cruise is any taller than 172cm, and Depp is 174-75. Not sure about Penn though.
Strauss said on 4/Jul/09
Vibram,the reason for the extremes in Brad Pitt's appearance is what a good make-up artist can do! I took my daughter to Burt Reynold's Biography book signing in Palm Beach Gardens about 15 years ago. When we got to our turn it was evident that Burt was wearing 'a lot' of pancake type makeup. It made his face look like he had burnt orange, dull reddish earthtone coloring. It looked strange and unnatural. The amazing thing was on a 6 o'clock news report of his appearance he photographed great thanks to the makeup! He wore cowboy boots which made him 6' btw. I'm sure Brad knows the same tricks. I know he's been photographed at different Botox Docs!
bam said on 4/Jul/09
vibram, its called working out and growing a beard.
Doug said on 3/Jul/09
I seriously doubt Growth Hormone, Testosterone supplements Vibram but it was strange how extremely late he developed. When I watched across the tracks I had to keep looking to see if the 1991 date was legit as I though no way in hell is this guy 28! He didn't look as if he could grow any stubble, then in two years he appeared with an impressive beard and manly rather scruffy appearance in Kalifornia.
Doug said on 3/Jul/09
Exactly Vibram I couldn't get over how much he changed between 1991 in Across the Tracks and Kalifornia in 1993. He definately looked only 17 or 18 at age 28 and he did have the voice of a teenager and then suddenly he looked a lot older within 2-3 years.
TELLEM said on 3/Jul/09
vibram, you, like a lot of ppl on here seem to exaggerate an actor's weight, or appearance constantly. the man didn't change 180 degree turn. stop exaggerating.
Vibram said on 3/Jul/09
Scott, Pitt did look young in his 20s, even at 27/28 he played a 18-year-old in the film "Across The Tracks" (1991). His voice even sounded 'teeny', had no visible stubble and looked like he was still filling-out in build. Just 2 years later in "Kalifornia" he well over his 29 years - looked 35 easily. Very strange for a guy to look 18 one minute then 35 the next (within 2 years). Growth Hormone, Testosterone supplements?
strauss said on 3/Jul/09
Maybe it's me, but Paul's photo of Pitt and Jolie looks like his right shoe is stepping on Jolie's left toes! Could Pitt's shoes be a 'Doctored photo'?
Scott said on 3/Jul/09
Speaking from experience - as a male you can certainly continue growing until at least 20.

There are plenty of examples of premiership footballers growing beyond their teens: Paul Merson, Cristiano Ronaldo etc.

Summary: high school height is unfortunately not a reliable indication to final adult, mature height for Brad Pitt. All it proves is he is at least 5'9+.

As a footnote, I would speculate from experience that someone like Pitt who is very youthful looking is MORE likely to continue growing in height beyond his teens. At my school the most physically mature looking males stopped growing earliest.
Doug said on 2/Jul/09
TELLEM why do you keep coming up with silly posts? I am not Pitt, not every guy grows after 16. A lot do, a lot don't. I think he has grown an inch or two since he left high school yes but he is obviously not 6'1!!!
TELLEM said on 2/Jul/09
Doug says on 2/Jul/09
Strauss, don't go by high school measurements. I was 5'9" until I finished school and had 4 inch growth spurt at 17.

so your saying brad pitt could be 6'1?
mcfan said on 2/Jul/09
I still think there is evidence that Brad uses 1-inch lifts that make it not-so-obvious. That photo of him barefoot with his ankles high suggest there is something in his shoe. I agree he looks 5'11, not 5'10, but having seen that shot of the ankle, leads me to believe he not only wears elevator shoes at times, but 1-inch inserts in his regular shoes.
Sonny said on 2/Jul/09
I am shocked, I thought he would be around 6-3 as he towers over everyone around him. I'm not buying it, he must be at least over 6-1.
Doug said on 2/Jul/09
Strauss, don't go by high school measurements. I was 5'9" until I finished school and had 4 inch growth spurt at 17.
Leung said on 1/Jul/09
Rob I think you need to monitor the comments from 177cmmm more closely because some his stuff is just plain offensive.
klem said on 1/Jul/09
Even if he hits 180cm in the morning he is not a legit 5-11 guy because
1. He is 178cm or 5-10 in the evening and most of the day.
2. 180 cm is closer to 5-10.75 nit even 5-11.

IMO he is a legit 5-10 guy.
Strauss said on 1/Jul/09
Paul,that's a great photo of Pitt's shoes. Up close or far away they are enormous and look to be size '12'. It's comparable to Stallone's 'sneakers' that are monstrous. Jolie is kinda tall, isn't she? Paltrow is quite tall from what I've heard around 5'10' or '11'. The photo of her and Brad a while back is quite revealing.ACG's statement that Pitt was quite short in high school is what I found in several Missouri chatrooms and related sources. It's true about growth spurts in the 15 to 20 year old range. Again, I would love to see a class of 1980,1981, & 1982 Kickapoo High Yearbook to see if any full,standing photos of Pitt exist. I've heard his brother isn't that tall, about 5'8" or so. Does anyone know? It doesn't really mean much. Sean Penn's late brother was quite tall I hear.
Doug said on 1/Jul/09
In Kalifornia in 1993 Pitt was about 3 inches shorter than 6'0.5" Duchovny I thought.
Doug said on 1/Jul/09
Well in the early 90s he looked no more than 5'9" or 5'10. I couldn;t get over how he only looked about 17 in Across the Tracks yet he was 28 at the time. He suddenly semed to mature around Kalifornia and Interview with the Vampire time 1993-1994 when he seemd to grow a bit and broadened a bit even though he has always been skinny. Even at 30 he looked like a 20 year old. 5'9" is certainly not out of the question if he takes off the lifts and stands relaxed rather than the usual posture but today I think it highly unlikely given that he was taller barefoot than Paltrow and consistently looks around 6' in shoes with out many people suspecting. I think 5'10" is more likely.
Rob G said on 1/Jul/09
I think a legit 5'11" for Pitt is out of question, unless someone is willing to argue that Pitt wakes close to 6'0". However a weak 5'11" like 5'10.5" midday is possible, so as is 5'10".
Anonymous said on 1/Jul/09
He was 18-1/2 at graduation. it is quite unlikely that he grew too much after that. If the 5'9 year book thing is true, I would say he is most definitely not 5'11 now.
177cmmm said on 1/Jul/09
who cares how tall he is look at the picture paul has look how skinny his wife is :( shes going to die
John S said on 1/Jul/09
If you look at the picture that Paul put up "Brads shoes that evening":
Look at the outline of his feet in those boots. The top of his feet are sloped so high. Kinda like feet would look if you had lift hidden inside of your shoes.
I noticed that as soon as a looked at his shoes. Def lifts inside.
Paul said on 30/Jun/09
Antonio - Good pics of Pitt and Penn.

Brad's shoes that evening: Click Here
Ali said on 30/Jun/09
If Pitt states his height at 5'11, then you know for sure
he is smaller. That's how things go in Hollywood.

I think he is 5'10 max and probably even shorter.
Clooney is 176cm I think. Both wear lifts, but Pitt
wears bigger lifts.
Will said on 30/Jun/09
That just proves that he was 5'9 in high school, most people graduate high school at 18, its not uncommon for a male to continue growth until he is in his mid-twenties. Great find though.
TELLEM said on 30/Jun/09
5'9? that was his high school years. he could have upped an inch after 18. hes 5'10.
ACG said on 30/Jun/09
Strauss- Pitt was a very late bloomer. He was very short(5'5" to 5'6") in 10th grade, from what I remember hearing.

So it's very possible that Pitt was 5'9" during his senior year, but grew afterward.
Strauss said on 30/Jun/09
The only way to verify Pitt's height is to uncover paper trails from his early life and career. It's apparent Pitt's solid mid-western upbringing means he'd be truthful and accurate in providing his correct 5'9" correct height. This past week I'm investigating a rumor that Pitt's actual height is listed in his 'Kickapoo High School' yearbook ,Sport's Banquet Award Program, and several other hometown sources. I called the town library and high school library because they almost always have a copy under lock and key. The source informed me other people inquire about Pitt's statistics quite often. His 5'9" heightis listed in the 1982 yearbook. Seth Poppel(yearbook dealer) will provide a copy of Pitt's statistics for a fee. Now that Brad is famous he can purchase the best elevator shoes money can buy, which makes it nearly impossible to determine his true height by comparison and forced perspective with other known celebrities. Brad Pitt is still 5'9" all day long, thanks to the fine surgical team of Drs. Conrad Mummy and Irving Shaftmeister,MDs who have opened their 'Back Door Home Visits'practice in Malibu and Beverly Hills. LOL. BTW Brad has been known to visit Plastic Surgeons in LA because his smoking habit has caused premature wrinkles.
Paul said on 30/Jun/09
bam says on 25/Jun/09
paul these pictures should make your day...

Haha, bam, you made my day. Those pictures prove that a liftless Pitt is no more than 1.5" taller than 5'8.25" Casey Affleck. And Pitt *still* has footwear advantage in the photos.
Ronald said on 29/Jun/09
You guys are just brutal. I say lets not fight over whether he is 5 9 or 5 10. Lets give him anywhere from 5 -9 t0 5 10 (but now 5 10) and be done with. My goodness, has there been a single celebritys height which has been resolved over here.
Antonio said on 29/Jun/09
The other Pitt/Penn photo that didn't work (down below).

Click Here
TELLEM said on 29/Jun/09
sean penn isn't 5'8. hes 5'7.5. go to his page and you'll see hes much shorter than jack nicholson.
delphonic said on 29/Jun/09
Sean Penn is 5'7" in reality people, so consider that in these comparisons with Pitt and Clooney.
Antonio said on 29/Jun/09
Sean Penn(Rob: 5-8.25 & Frank2: Penn 5-8) with Clooney. As you can see, Clooney is no taller than 1.5-2.0" above Penn. Compare these pics with the Pitt/Penn pics down below.

It tells me that neither Pitt nor Clooney are 5-11.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
James said on 29/Jun/09
Adam 5'10ers I am guessing don't feel the need to slouch in photos or in person unlike guys that are 6'4.
adam said on 29/Jun/09
Pitt is 5-10 and wears lifts that boost him up to 6-1. And remember Pitt`s posture -it is just about perfect in every pic because he thinks his height all the time.
Strauss said on 29/Jun/09
In 1986 Pitt worked as a chauffeur for Embassy Limo.in LA. He wasn't 25 yet, so he couldn't get a CDL to become California eligible for liability insurance in vehicles that carry more than 10 people (Buses). Where the big bucks are. He hadn't hit it big yet so he kepted an application on file for his CDL testing when he became eligible. He listed his actual height as 5 feet 9 inches. weight as 168 lbs. His former Boss at Embassy is a VP at the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills.
Rob G said on 29/Jun/09
Leung, I don't no about legit 5'11" for Pitt, but as his morning height it is ok
Doug said on 29/Jun/09
In Hollywood a 5'10" guy will regularly be listed as 5'11". In Hollywood a 5'11" guy will be listed as 6' and so on. That's the way it works. With women it is often 2 inches, e.g a 5'6" woman like Jolie will be listed like 5'8" and so on. Only if the actor is very tall are they listed as they are barefoot or even lower. Why do you think most of the celebrity heights here are lower than what the actors are formally listed at? Most of the celebs give their height in shoes, particularly if they are under 6'. Why would Pitt claim his exact barefoot height and other less height concious celebs exaggerate and add inches? I think 5'10" makes perfect sense and it looks right next to 6'2" Eric etc.
Doug said on 29/Jun/09
Google image Pitt and Clooney at splendicity.com. In some pictures Clooney looks at least two inches taller. If Pitt is a legit 5'11" then in those photos Clooney is 6'1.5" which is absurd. Clooney looks to have a footwear advantage though but I doubt he would gain that much height over Pitt. Pitt doesn't appear to be in lifts in the picture and it really shows. Now see the pics of where Clooney looks 5'9" next to a legit 5'11" David Beckham and you'll find it very hard to think Pitt is legitamtely a 5'11" like Beckham. People think he is a legit 5'11" and close to 6' because he wears lifts and has immaculate posture so most people don't even notice the "effect" he has. The CLinton pics also show that a real 5'11" is out of the question. See how CLooney looks in comparison to Obama. Only about two inches shorter. Now see how CLinton looks to Obama then see how Pitt looks compared to Clinton. It all doesn't add up.
Antonio said on 29/Jun/09
Here is Pitt with Sean Penn, who is listed at 5-8.25 on this site. Both guys appear to be standing straight, and both are most likely packing lifts. As you can see, there is no more than a 1.5" advantage for Pitt. In order for Brad to be 5-11, the difference would have to be 2.75" and it is clear that it is not. Is there a chance that Sean has a 1.25" lift advantage over Brad, in order for these photos to make sense for a 5-11 Pitt? No way, because Pitt is 5-10.

Still not convinced?




Click Here
Click Here
Haze said on 29/Jun/09
i still think hes closer to 5'10 that 5'11. i think maybe frank was fooled by his footwear. but he has seen him in person and i havent. but i dunno. after looking at photos i just cant see him taller. its only a .5 to 1 inch difference. so i guess it dont really matter
Leung said on 28/Jun/09
Frank2 is correct, Pitt is a legit 5
Midget said on 28/Jun/09
I'M with Frank2 on this one, Pitt hits 180cm at some stage during the day,every day, even if it is just his morning height.May shrink down to 178.5cm or 179cm maybe.
Ali said on 28/Jun/09
Doug, I mean his eyes. And the area around his
eys.

When I watched Troy, the skin under his eyelids was
really weird. As if it was totally gone inside and
then filled with something to make it more normal.
Dural said on 28/Jun/09
No Doug, not only his teeth also his ears and acne scars - type brad pitt ears in google images. Concerning height I stick with 5'10".
Anonymous said on 28/Jun/09
I agree Rob G. its real tough to decipher a half inch, so my main basis for believing he is 5'10.5 is that he looked 5'10ish in the early nineties and most people round up their height.
Rob G said on 28/Jun/09
To be fair Pitt is not a 5'10" flat guy, but IMO 5'10.5" suits him well, close enought to 5'11" as he probably is in the morning, not over though
Doug said on 28/Jun/09
Ali, you mean the weird big jaw line? Apparently the only cosmetic surgery he has had is on his teeth. If you look at old pictures of him I think its natural, a very distinctive trait. His jaw looked a lot more prominent in the mid to late 90s though, I don't know if anybody noticed that it doesn't look as chiselled as it did in the 1990s. Usually a big jaw is a result of too much growth hormone, which is why guys with acromaly like Great Khali have that iron looking jaw. Perhaps too much growth hormone went on his jaw and not his legs lol.
delphonic said on 28/Jun/09
Hey Frank2 - Good lifts like Pitt wears don't "appear to be lifts". That's the point. Like Ali said, Pitt looks natural with lifts because they balance out his shorter legs and make him "appear" to be balanced and proportioned like 5'11".

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.