Sandy Cowell said on 31/Mar/23
Dee’s shoe heels make a sizeable difference to her height here. You wouldn’t think she’s only 5ft3! The average guesses reflect this.
5ft4 peak and 5ft3 today. 💐
Canson said on 18/Mar/22
@Christian: I wonder if she really lost an inch from her peak
ChristianPerkins said on 18/Mar/22
JohnMoore-162cm said on 16/Jun/20
in the 80's she looked about 5ft4 1/2" .. peak height : 5ft4 1/2"
Sandy Cowell said on 29/Jan/19
I KNEW it was Dee the other night in the 1983 Stephen King horror film 'Cujo', playing Donna Trenton, a young Mum who's having marital difficulties. Then suddenly there's a huge, rabid dog on the loose, who becomes that way after chasing a little animal down its lair and getting an unexpected nip!
She's been in so many horror films, and if I'm wondering to myself, "Is that Dee again?", horrors being of particular interest to me, then usually I'm right!
I'd say 5ft4.5 back in the early 80's, and nowadays - 5ft3.25.
I saw 'Cujo' at the pictures in '83, and screamed the whole place out when the dribbling St Bernard suddenly appeared at the car window! Now, I just laugh!
FrankR1 said on 3/Dec/18
Dee Wallace’s slender frame (plus heels) makes her appear 5’7” to 5’9” in a number of films. I’m surprised to see her listed as under 5’5”.
berta said on 3/Nov/18
she was a very good looking woman when she was young. Still is for her age.
Jordan87 said on 21/Feb/17
She was quite a Looker back in the day.
Sandy Cowell said on 1/Dec/16
I knew it! I just knew it! I saw Dee Wallace last night as I was observing what was on the TV! She was in 'The Hills Have Eyes' - which really MUST go up Rob! I've seen the film many times, but as it includes animal cruelty, I go out of my way to time my toilet visits to coincide with the bits I don't like!
Actually, I was going to put 5ft4 as that was the height she was when the aforementioned film was made. Oh good - I can see that there's space to put both her current height and her original one!
So here goes...
said on 24/Nov/13
Rob, Don't you think she looks shorter than 5'4, given the 1.25 inch more footwear than you. She comes to you eye level, which is 4 inches shorter I guess. Than there is the footwear. I think deducting that we get 5 feet and 2.75 inches.
Don't you agree?
I can believe she's lost a bit of height today yeah, not sure she'd be barely 5ft 3 though.
Arch Stanton said on 29/Nov/12
Resemblance is uncanny she looks almost identical to my mum here, almost want to give her a hug here and say "Hello mum". Hehe!
Shaun said on 11/Aug/12
Gosh she looks like my mum in this picture!
gregory lehmann said on 19/May/11
gregory lehmann said on 16/May/11
Dee is 5'3",just like Drew Barrymore.
mcfan said on 8/Jul/09
Wow! Was she that short? I never would have guessed. I recognize 'ole Sybil Danning on the right. Still looks pretty hot.
Jlee said on 10/Feb/09
hey rob! remember that girl that's five seven and looks way shorter than you? comparing that to this, this chick is about the same height! LOOKS it! agree that it looks that way on the pic?
Franco said on 6/Sep/07
Viper says on 2/Aug/07
Man, you are a Howling freak Franco. Which Howling is your favorite?"
definetely PART-1 , part 2 and onward was entertaining but never as good as Part1.
i do own a collection of 1000 horror movies some are extremely rare to find too. ;)
Viper said on 2/Aug/07
Man, you are a Howling freak Franco. Which Howling is your favorite?
Franco said on 31/Jul/07
both excellent movies (especially THE HOWLING, which i own all 7 parts on dvd) :D
great actress and she does look 163-164cm indeed, so spot on.
Glenn said on 14/May/06
Never mind ET.THE HOWLING! thats one you have I wish I did.she always does conventions.but I dont.I hate them.