How tall is Henry Cavill

Henry Cavill's Height

6ft ½ in (184.2 cm)

Jersey born Actor best known for playing Superman in Man of Steel/Batman vs Superman. Other notable film appearances include Mission Impossible: Fallout, Immortals and The Man from U.N.C.L.E. On TV he played Geralt of Rivia in The Witcher and Charles Brandon in The Tudors. At age 20, he was being listed in the Spotlight directory as 6 feet 1 inches.

How tall is Henry Cavill
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of Amy Adams
Amy Adams
5ft 3 ½ (161 cm)
Height of Ben Affleck
Ben Affleck
6ft 2 ¼ (189 cm)
Height of Brandon Routh
Brandon Routh
6ft 2 ½ (189 cm)
Height of Gal Gadot
Gal Gadot
5ft 9 ¼ (176 cm)

Add a Comment1842 comments

Average Guess (369 Votes)
6ft 0.45in (184cm)
Slim 6'1.5 said on 7/Jun/21

Yeah Henry does look about 2 inches taller than Jamie dornan
Slim 6'1.5 said on 30/May/21

Henry is a rock solid 184 dude so yeah he could edge you by 1.5 inches

You would be looking at his nose I think face to face
Hong said on 27/May/21
Click Here Here's Henry with 5ft10.5 listed Jaime Dornan.
5'11Man said on 25/May/21
Is he much taller than me?
Iam 182Cm out of bed,180.5 night
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/May/21
Can pull off 185cm a lot.
Dom5'11.5 said on 13/May/21
Cant see him under 184cm, probably 184-184.5cm before lowest before bed
Slim 6'1.5 said on 19/Apr/21
@Celebheights 6'1.5"

Sorry for those offensive posts on the Harry styles page a few years back, I didn’t mean to offend you 👍
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 20/Mar/21
Certainly ain’t below 6’0
Eusebiu (185 cm) said on 19/Mar/21
He is very height concious and has a very good posture, especially when taking photos with other celebrities. His body proportions, on the other hand, are not in his advantage due to short arms and stocky build which can make him look shorter. Judging by his photos with other celebrities, I see him around John Cena's height (184 cm), respectively between Chris Evans (183 cm) and Stephen Amell (185 cm) - so, Rob's listing is spot on - 184,2 cm.
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 9/Mar/21
By Benedict Cumberbatch:

Click Here
slim 6'1 said on 13/Feb/21
I think just a flat 184 is right for him 👍
Genau said on 9/Feb/21
Rob is 6ft0 5/8 possible?
Editor Rob
yeah, you wouldn't be too surprised if he could measure that mark...
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 8/Feb/21
6’0” or a bit over isn’t unreasonable. I don’t think a single photo with Kieran where the ground is invisible proves that he’s under it. Ray Fisher could be 6’2”, and I see about 2” inches between Henry Cavil and Ray.
berta said on 8/Feb/21
he is somewhere from weak 184 to weak 185 guy. i think little over 184 is what he would measure. 184,4 ish
Vincent Caleb said on 17/Jan/21
I agree with the listing, but I’ll vote a quarter higher to bring it to exactly 6’0 1/2”.
Sonnecker said on 14/Jan/21
The picture with John Cena have no consistence...Cena himself is 184 cm probably, but in the picture you cannot see their legs and the position of their feet, or their level. And it's taken from low to the high. Considering other Cena's full body pictures with other people, I really doubt he's taller than Henry Cavill!
Example: if you see another pic of Cavill with Miles Teller, C. looks 3/4 cm taller, and Teller is a strong 6 footer; but you have to consider Miles' more relaxed posture.
Broussard077 said on 11/Jan/21
bird in box said on 10/Jan/21
6' and a half. no more no less.
ALEXIZ/180cm said on 10/Jan/21
183 cm max.
slim 6'1 said on 7/Jan/21
186 first thing straight out of bed 👍
tony t. said on 2/Jan/21
I always get this guy and Matt Bomer confused.
slim 6'1 said on 1/Jan/21
Strong six footer
6ft said on 27/Dec/20
With that comment, we are closing Henry Cavill case.

6 ft Charlie Hunnam (whose height confirmed by Rob) with John Cena: Click Here

Henry Cavill with John Cena: Click Here

Henry Cavill with Chris Evans (who is more likely between 5ft 11 and a half and 5ft 11 ¾):
Click Here
Click Here

6ft fits just perfectly for Henry Cavill, although sometimes he is using big heeled shoes (as you can see with Miles Teller and other ones), he is a strong 6 footer. I guess people trying to claim him as 6ft1 because they underestimate 6ft claim for males and Cavill generally wears big heeled shoes in events and looks taller than other 6 ft guys like Miles Teller and more.

Curious George said on 26/Dec/20
Hey Rob, what do you think Cavill’s sitting height would be around 12pm? My guess is low 90s.
Slim 6'1" said on 24/Dec/20
Def not two inches between Cavill and Affleck!
RoastBeef said on 22/Dec/20
Hey Rob,
Would you say his wingspan is shorter than his height?
Editor Rob
I would not be surprised if 2cm shorter.
QM6'1QM said on 7/Dec/20
Slim 6'1" said on 5/Dec/20

Yep, definitely classic leather boots (similar type).
And Cavill is not taller than John Cena!
Slim 6'1" said on 5/Dec/20
@ QM6'1QM

Do u know what footwear they’re wearing?
QM6'1QM said on 3/Dec/20
To Slim 6'1@ said on 21/Nov/20, TheBat said on 18/Nov/20, J2Frenzy said on 18/Nov/20, Canson said on 16/Nov/20 and Rob ...

Charlie (who'd meet and photo with Rob) and Cena (self-claimed six footer): Click Here
Cavill and Cena: Click Here

He also was shorter than Ray Fisher about 2 inches.
So I'm still claiming 6ft for a Cavill.
I mean here came natural proves.

What do you think ?!
Slim 6'1@ said on 21/Nov/20
Good listing, I would say 184.0 is likelier over 184.5
TheBat said on 18/Nov/20
I feel the 6’0.5” listing for Henry is totally fine. No need to upgrade or downgrade.
J2Frenzy said on 18/Nov/20
I’m of the opinion that he’s 6’0 5/8, but I’ll go with 6’0.5 since it won’t let me guess that
Canson said on 16/Nov/20
I think looking at him, this is the most appropriate listing perhaps. If anything, I’d buy 6’0 3/8 before 6’0.75”
Jake said on 16/Nov/20
Highest and lowest you’d argue for him, Rob?
Editor Rob
6ft 0.75 high, 6ft 3/8th low.
Vsquad said on 14/Nov/20

God I always forget about that photo of Cavill with Amell. Still shocks me that Amell edges him out. Cavill was wearing a regular dress shoe that day so it's not like he was disadvantaged or anything, at least compared to the shoes Amell regularly wears.
J2Frenzy said on 6/Nov/20
Anyone got heights for some of the other Witcher actors?
Slim 6'1@ said on 5/Nov/20
Grizz, very interesting but we can’t see their footwear✔️ Thanks for sharing anyway I’ll look further into it
Canson said on 2/Nov/20
@Slim: Tatum looked surprisingly tall at times in Coach Carter. Then off camera or in other movies or pics not so much
grizz said on 2/Nov/20
Slim 6'1@ said on 31/Oct/20
184 legit unlike Tatum and gosling

On Stephen Amell's site
Slim 6'1@ said on 31/Oct/20
Solid 184cm like John Cena and Bradley Cooper

Well, something doesn't add up. One of them most definitely isn't solid 184.
Click Here
Slim 6'1" said on 2/Nov/20
Affleck and Cavill don’t have a 2 inch difference more 1.5-1.75” inch difference
Slim 6'1" said on 2/Nov/20
As listed rock solid 184cm 👍
Abode6 said on 1/Nov/20
Near 6’1” is very believable. Tall dude, big dude.
Slim 6'1@ said on 31/Oct/20
184 legit unlike Tatum and gosling
Slim 6'1" said on 24/Oct/20
Looked 184 in enola Holmes
Slim 6'1" said on 24/Oct/20
As listed, no need for a change
QM6'1QM said on 23/Oct/20
He is 6ft tall!
Vsquad said on 23/Oct/20
Henry looks shorter next to Gal Gadot than Chris Pine does.

Don't know if that has to do with Gal's heel choice when she's with either of them or not.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 19/Oct/20
Cavill look at least 9cm shorter than Lee Kwang Soo on Running Man.
Progking said on 13/Oct/20
He gives off a good 6'1 impression but I think he is just proof that 6'0-6'0.5 is quite a tall height already. In Enola Holmes recently he looks right at 6'0.5
TheDon1528 said on 24/Sep/20
around my height at 6'0.5"
Alanna said on 23/Sep/20
Looks like this is Enola Holmes
6'3 Julian said on 21/Sep/20
@Eshan Jabar maybe not. He does seem to have big shoulders which can increase armspan
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Sep/20
Similar to pine & reeves
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Sep/20
184.5 give upgrade 186.5-187 out of bed
Ehsan Jabar said on 15/Sep/20
What do you think Henry's armspan is? Most likely between his height and shorter?
John Bricker said on 5/Sep/20
He is an inch taller than 5"10 3/4 Chris Evans
Felipe said on 31/Aug/20
Henry Cavill and Patrick Dempsey.

Click here: Click Here
Click here: Click Here
6footTom said on 11/Aug/20
@Arko Mallick

He looks closer to 184cm next to Evans.
Slim 6'1" said on 8/Aug/20
either that or the flat 184 is perfect
Slim 6'1" said on 7/Aug/20
a quarter inch upgrade could be hidden u never know...
Slim 6'1" said on 7/Aug/20
4.5cm between henry and ben is too much

henry is 184 and ben is 186-187
Slim 6'1" said on 3/Aug/20
Not that much shorter than Ben Affleck
Jug said on 24/Jul/20
He is probably quite close to 6 3/4 compared to Momoa who seems to be a legit 6'4. People make so much commotion about his height because he is playing Superman. Otherwise it would not be an issue. He is a handsome man for sure but I just don't like him as Superman. Could be because the movies are so damn dark and depressing.
Jordan87 said on 22/Jul/20
Cena admitted he was 6'0. Even if he lied to make himself shorter ( Very Low Chance LOL! ), and if he was 6'0.5, it puts Cavil at 6'0 tops!
QM6'1QM said on 22/Jul/20
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jul/20

6ft1 mark really biggest joke for a Cavill!
Read my post below (16 Jul/2020), John Cena taller than Henry.
Also he looks strong 3inch on Jared Leto, who's around 175 cm for sure.
grizz said on 19/Jul/20
@Vsquad. That's a really weird photo. Cavill looks chubby while Affleck looks athletic. While they were critiqued in BvS for quite the opposite body images.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jul/20
Looks 6ft1 too often to be anything less than this
QM6'1QM said on 16/Jul/20
Kebapsever said on 14/Jul/20

Arko Mallick said on 4/Jul/20

Vsquad said on 6/Jul/20
Yeees of course!

Guys, man who's reached 185 cm have more longer legs and thin body (Mark Gatiss or Joe Alwyn, CR7, Eric Dane and other ...).

1. Cavill and Cena: Click Here
2. Cena and Hunnam (strong 6ft on photo with Rob): Click Here
After all, do you see Cavill like 6'0.75" ? :)
There is no way to be taller flat 184 cm for him anyway, bro!
Davidjr said on 15/Jul/20
I give him a 180.3 cm tall or 5 foot 11 inches he's not tall that I expected I think he was 184 cm tall or 185 cm but he looks more shorter like 2 inches behind or below of that mark
Brandon Mouth said on 15/Jul/20
@Vsquad Yet another nail in the coffin for Henry Cavill's listed height. It shows Cavill's hips are higher than Affleck's hips, but his shoulders and head are lower? That and all the other comments without a doubt show Cavill is wearing lifts. Cavill's height should be lowered. He looks to be around 5'11"-5'11" and a half.

@Arko What 6'1" man has hips 3 inches higher than a proven 6'2" regular man like Affleck but then the 6'1" inch mans shoulders are lower and his head is over an inch lower?
Kebapsever said on 14/Jul/20
He’s at least 6’(3/4). I would give him 185cm.
Vsquad said on 6/Jul/20
@Arko Mallick

Nope. Henry had major footwear advantage over Affleck that day -

Click Here

Ben likes to wear flat sneakers even on press tours. Henry had footwear advantage over him a lot of the time.

Henry is 6'0.5 (184) maximum.
Arko Mallick said on 4/Jul/20
Henry Cavill is a solid 6'1" (185 cm) Click Here he is a inch shorter than 6'2 1/2" Ben and much taller than Gal Gadot and Zack Snyder
QM6'1QM said on 20/Jun/20
Jam Cherry said on 18/Jun/20

Try it again: Click Here ;)
Jam Cherry said on 18/Jun/20
@QM6’1QM I think idk cause I can’t access to ur link since I got no insta !
Anton_186 said on 16/Jun/20
Rob, is he strong 6’0,5”, what do you think?
I think he can shrink to 6’0,25” - 6’3/8” range at his low.
Editor Rob
I don't know if goes down to 0.25, I would think he is still close to 184 at tea-time.
Chinybobs said on 16/Jun/20
Good actor no so good superman. Routh is comic book superman. Reeves is GOAT
QM6'1QM said on 9/Jun/20
Jam Cherry said on 4/Jun/20

No. He have just really good posture and take a look on this picture: Click Here
Ben - 188 cm territory.
Henry - 183 cm.
Jason - 193 cm.
It's looks like true to me and Cavill also been a little bit shorter than John Cena who's legit 6'0.

What do you think ?!
Vexacus said on 6/Jun/20
He's 5'11.75 at least. I'm not sure , but in Jersey some strange things happens so It's not impossible the limb lengthening. But I'd say it's unlikely. He has the bad luck to have small hands. My arms are not so longer , but my hands are a little buenas hands making my arm span is 2 inches longer than my height.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 5/Jun/20
Rob, do you rule out 6'0.75" for Cavill?
Editor Rob
6ft 1/2 or 6ft 3/4 I think are more believable than 6ft to 6ft 1/4 range.
Jam Cherry said on 4/Jun/20
Cavill is closer to 185 cm
Man of Reason said on 3/Jun/20
For the people saying there’s no way Cavill could’ve done limb lengthening, watch this video Click Here it explains how safe the procedure actually is.

I can definitely imagine Cavill having gone through an earlier version of this procedure maybe in his mid-20s.

Most people that do limb lengthening only get it done in both the femurs because it’s cheaper that way, but you can also get it done in both the femurs and tibias, so it’d look completely normal and proportional.

From looking at Cavill’s proportions, I’d say he probably did about 8cm in the femurs, and 3-4cm in tibias, which would make his original height about 5’8” (173cm).

The average wingspan for males who are 5’8” is 5’10”, and I can see Cavill’s arm span being within that range.

But everything I just wrote about Cavill’s proportions is just a personal theory, so take it all with a grain of salt.

At the end of the day, we’re all human, we’re all different, worrying about short arms or torsos is a waste of time, and yeah I know I’m one to talk, but I hope you all get what I mean.

Who cares what we look like, be happy, be healthy, be kind, and live your life the way you want, I’m sure that’s what Cavill is doing anyway.
Editor Rob
Cavill filmed his first movie barely turning 18, he was already taller than Joe Mantegna in it.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 2/Jun/20
I might've overreacted just a tiny bit, but the point of my argument stands. Sorry, but to insinuate that Cavill had leg lengthening surgery, just because his armspan's a few inches shorter than his height, is laughable. It's as if it's impossible for a person to naturally have a span that's shorter than their height. MMA fighter Jon Jones is only 6'3"-6'4", but has a 84" (7'0") wingspan, but no here has ever questioned that he might've had arm lengthening surgery. The whole "surgery" thing is brought up only when a celeb seemingly has disproportionatly short arms/disproportionately long legs, but never brought up when it's the opposite. Common sense is that some people just have different proportions for parts of their bodies. Not to say that that there aren't any who had LL surgery, but the population of those who had it, is extremely small in number.
HeightRealist said on 1/Jun/20
The ratio between upper body and legs looks weird because he wears lifts! Henry Cavill is not 184cm. 181cm max. I saw one of his interviews and he sat down on a chair and his knees were very high. Als notice the length of the lower leg compared to his upper leg. All clear signs of wearing lifts.

You have to understand that 181cm is a nice height except if you are Superman who should be like 6'3. So hoe do ypu solve it? You wear lifts.

I am quite surprised Rob had him this high. There was a guy here eho is 6'0 who posted pictures of himself with Cavill and Cavill was about an inch shorter. Time for a downgrade.
184guy2 said on 1/Jun/20
@Rob , how long do you think his armspan is ? Mine at roughly the same height is 6'2 and I wish was a bit longer
Editor Rob
I think his shoulder width and upper physique makes it seem shorter than it is, though I'd think he might have a shorter span than height...
Vsquad said on 31/May/20

I know your comment was made a month ago, but just on the Cavill "limb lengthening" discussion - it would be appreciated if you didn't result to insulting other commenters here for simply making observations and having a discussion. It's a topic that isn't really discussed a lot, maybe brought up every now and then. But just let people discuss it without resorting to calling it conspiracies and people ridiculous. That's all.
Vexacus said on 31/May/20
He has short arms and small hands . His arm span maybe is in the 5'11 range. He's a solid six footer.
Fruti said on 27/May/20
People pointing out to his torso/leg proportion have had a look at this pic of Shaq?

Click Here
Editor Rob
If Cavill's armspan was near 4 inches longer

I think 99% of men would happily trade their own physique and looks for Henry's 😄
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 5/May/20
🎈💪🎁🎂 Happy Birthday Henry! 🎂🎁💪🎈

A Very Happy Birthday to Henry Cavill, who today celebrates his 37th Birthday.

6ft and half-an-inch.

Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 29/Apr/20
I wonder what your wingspan is? Mine's around 6'4.5", which is barely on the shorter side for someone my height. But it's weird, because I've always been told that I have long-ish arms for my height. Maybe it's because my shoulders aren't all that broad, as thin shoulders run in my family. Hand length also affects your overall wingspan, but I'd say my hands are average.
190.5/189.5 said on 28/Apr/20
This guy's posture is so erect that he looks shorter than he is...somehow good posture actually has a counterproductive effect on how tall he appears. 6 feet and change though, for sure.
Canson said on 27/Apr/20
@Johm Diamond: I also have long arms, broad shoulders and get guessed taller than I actually am. But some of that is disingenuous in that it’s someone else lying about their height. I even once had a lady who was sitting down when I walked in a restaurant ask me if I was 2” taller than I actually am because her brother is the height I am. Also had a very old guy ask if I was 3” taller than I am when I was standing in front of I am. I told him what I was and turned out it’s because he wasn’t as tall as he thought
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 25/Apr/20
This whole "limb lengthening" conspiracy theory for Cavill is BS. Anyone can have parts of their bodies, where it's out of proportion. What's next, did Peyton Manning have forehead lengthening surgery, just because his forehead's big for his head size? Or did Shaq have feet enlargening surgery because he has big feet for his height? Lol. Some posters on here are just ridiculous.
John Diamond said on 24/Apr/20
His proportions are a little irregular however It isnt unusual to be disproportionate. I'm 6'2" with an arm span of 6'6", so I got long arms and fairly broad shoulders. Some people ask silly questions like if I'm 6'3 or 6'4" but it's just an illusions because of my large upper proportions. Henry is around the 6 foot mark, either above or below.
growtallerguru said on 19/Mar/20
Robert Son I agree about his proportions... but i don't think he's had limb lengthening done ever. He doesn't have any scars on his legs in pictures i've seen. And also, I have the same proportions as him. I am 6 feet tall exactly and my wingspan is 5'10". My inseam is a 33. People, more often than I like, comment on how short my arms are in comparison to my legs and my height overall. So it is possible to just be born with crap proportions. I'd say Henry is anywhere from 6'0.5" to an actual 6'1", but having shorter arms makes you look shorter overall. Noone ever guesses that my height is 6 foot, they always guess around 5'10" which is my wingspan.
Carlos Yz said on 18/Mar/20
@Robert Son

I agree, Cavill’s proportions certainly look odd. I actually knew someone who’d done limb lengthening about 5 years ago, and you’d never know he’d done it because of how active he are. He swims and runs without an issue. I guess recovering from the surgery varies for some people, but exercising a lot probably helps with that.

Also I’m not trying to expose Cavill if he did or didn’t do it, but I found these two photos and it looks like he either hurt his knees, or those are his scars from the surgery?

Click Here

Click Here

Either way, people shouldn’t dismiss the possibility of him having done the surgery based on the fact that he runs and is super fit. Hundreds of thousands of people have done the surgery, and if recovery wasn’t possible no one would even consider it.
S E said on 18/Mar/20
Barefoot, 183.5-184
Giant Monk said on 17/Mar/20
I am 5’1 barefoot and Henry is 1 inch taller at best when I had my Nike’s on, so he’s 5’3 at most. There people, happy?
Vsquad said on 13/Mar/20
@Robert Son

The contrast between his arms and legs does look odd. His suit jackets always drape too long over his arms/hands. Like grizz said though, he does events like marathons and such which might be impossible to do if he had LL, so perhaps it really is just his natural proportions.

There's a chance he did get them in the early 2000s, who knows.
berta said on 10/Mar/20
him and John cena back to back who would win? i Think both could be over 184 flat but not 185 guys
grizz said on 10/Mar/20
@Robert Son, I highly doubt he's done limb lengthening, it's an extremely excruciating procedure after which you can't do much with legs except walk and jog at a slow pace. We all know how active Cavill is so that settles it.
It's just the way he was made. Not everyone has the chance of getting monkey wingspan, some have to work around with t-rex wingspan.
Robert Son said on 8/Mar/20
Does anyone else notice how short Cavill’s torso and arms are? It looks like his legs make up 80% of his height, and I’d guess maybe a 5’9 or 5’10 wingspan, nothing greater than that. Look at these two photos

Click Here

Hopefully the link works... When I saw these, I had no doubt that Cavill must’ve done limb lengthening, his proportions just look way too unnatural.
Jordan87 said on 2/Mar/20
Click Here

Momoa is easily 4" taller. Momoa is not over 6'4" as we all Know.
grizz said on 26/Feb/20
@TheBat, he's shorter than Stephen Amell, so that's a no-no
TheBat said on 24/Feb/20
6'0.5" at the least. Probably 6'0.75" when standing straight.
QM6'1QM said on 24/Feb/20
Caaq said on 23/Feb/20

Do you mean 6'1 without shoes/before the bed or on board in shoes ?!
Caaq said on 23/Feb/20
I would like to know what mark would he cover if he stood in front of a height board in shoes. Regular shoes give about an inch n anothee inch for hair. Someone who covers 6 3 would be a fair 6 1. I think henry cavill is a definite 6 1. Sometimes he even looks 6 2
QM6'1QM said on 20/Feb/20
John Titor said on 19/Feb/20

He should measure 183cm range, but not taller. By the way, he did look shorter or same height as John Cena (legit 6ft tall). I think real true so close to us on photo w/David Gandy (187-188 cm): Click Here.
John Titor said on 19/Feb/20
Heights are so strange. David Gandy who is listed as 6'2" barely looks much taller than a lot of photos of him with a 6'0" person. This leads me to believe he is a weak 6'2" at best. Yet in in this photo with Henry Cavill (while Gandy is slightly closer to the camera) you can still see Gandy has much larger feet, leg length, and body length compared to Cavill and while Gandy does have a good athletic body, Cavill is generally a much wider stocky guy but in the photo Gandy looks much bigger in body mass which is an indicator he is much taller with a much greater frame. Cavill appears no taller than 5'11". Cavill also at his largest weighs around 195lbs or less and people with that stocky body type who are close to 6'1" would easily weigh over 200lbs unless they had an ultra low bodyfat percentage of under 10% which Cavill does not have. A stocky guy who isn't (ultra steroid lean) and carrying some bodyfat at close to 6'1" seems unheard of weighing so little.

Click Here
Avi (184cm) said on 18/Feb/20
Click Here
Click Here

I don't know if this helps, but it looks accurate to the heights for Jason Momoa and Armie Hammer. Just imagine if Henry stood next to Hugh. He looks generally like 6 foot and a half.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Feb/20
Peak Arnold would’ve had a good 2cm on Cavill
Felipe said on 29/Jan/20
Hey, guys!
We can't see their feet, but Cavill looks taller than Arnie in my opinion.
What do you think?
Click here for the image: Click Here
Jkiller said on 15/Jan/20
Between 184-185cm
Brandon 6'0" | 182.88 cm said on 13/Jan/20
He's definitely 6'0.5" bare minimum. Long legs of a 6 footer, really stocky upper body that can make him seem shorter. Tall, large guy though.
6footTom said on 31/Dec/19
@Bobby 5ft 10in (178cm)

Honestly, I thought Geralt looked 6'1" tops in Witcher 3. Walking around the crowds in Novigrad, I noticed that Geralt really didn't look any taller than the regular male NPCs. Honestly, I thought Cavill gave a slightly taller impression on the show than Geralt did in the game.
Fjolly nea said on 29/Dec/19
If momoa is 191.5/192.5 Cavill is 184-185 cm. Weak 6’4 and weak 6’1.
Gaspergoo said on 29/Dec/19
This is hands down the best website in the world for height accuracy.
al001 said on 27/Dec/19
Watching him in the Witcher he looks like how I feel at the same height. Taller than the large majority of people but not stand-out tall.
Bobby 5ft 10in (178cm) said on 27/Dec/19

Geralt on the Witcher 3 seems as though he'd be 6'2 tops, but Cavill is close to 6'1. It's hard pinpointing Geralt's height because I feel as though he could be anything from 6'0-6'2. So, even 6'1 is fair to say and Cavill ain't much shorter than that. He has similar proportions to the game character too.
Bobby 5ft 10in (178cm) said on 27/Dec/19

No, he's not that short. He's comfortably taller than 5'10-5'11 guys. Additionally, he holds up well next to 6'2.25 Ben Affleck in BvS. Also, on The Witcher, he regularly can pass off as 6'1 tops. He simply has below average proportions for his height, but I doubt he would wear lifts at his height.
Bobby 5ft 10in (178cm) said on 26/Dec/19
@Rob Paul

Hey Rob, do you think you could add that Henry Cavill is also portraying lead protagonist, Geralt of Rivia, on the Netflix show, The Witcher, based on a series of books by Polish fantasy writer, Andrzej Sapkowski.

On the show, I think Cavill can pull off a big 6'0 to flat 6'1. I think even 6'0.75 is a fair shout for him.
Editor Rob
Yeah I'll mention that and fallout.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Dec/19
I think Cavill is arguably 6ft0⅝ and that’s if Kimmel is 5ft11 flat (which would be the worst case)
Beej said on 26/Dec/19
He REALLY likes a good heel AND looks like he wears lifts. I say 5'10.5 -11.
Israel-6'2 said on 26/Dec/19
I don't know why cavill has such short arms, I'm 1.89, my friends 1.83 / 1.84, all arms pass level
Gaspergoo said on 25/Dec/19
6 to 6'1seems about right. Decent height for a leading man and he doesn't come across as being short onscreen.
Brandon 6'0" | 182.88 cm said on 24/Dec/19
Oddly short arms and small hands for a 6'0.5" male. His wingspan must only be 5'11"/6'1" range. His stocky proportions are great for building large muscle though!
Johan 185 cm said on 23/Dec/19
chito said on 20/Dec/19
He's just a 6 footer.. Im now watching the witcher in netflix and i can see how geralt in the witcher 3 game was noticeably a lot taller than the geralt here, lol!


The show is based on the books not the games. However the witcher 1 and 2 were more respectful of the source material. Witcher 3 they made him better looking and taller.

In the books they are described as being stocky and 5'9" range comes up alot, also Geralt is ugly.

I had hope that Zach McGowan would get the role but they went for the big name, I can't blame them for that. Also Henry is classically handsome, ALOT of women are watching the show purely for him.

The show has quite a tall cast so I am not surprised that a 6 footer doesn't stand out.
wingwalker said on 23/Dec/19
Not sure here. He can pull of looking like he is 185, but he always stands *perfectly* straight when posing with other people and in all the pictures where footwear is visible he has some help from there. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he had small lifts there for red carpet occasions.
Dream said on 22/Dec/19

It’s not like a regular dress shoe, anyways. Actually, if you look at the top of their heads, the head curve of Henry is higher than Kellan’s head curve and big hair. In those photos I posted, Henry isn’t wearing big dress shoes, and the top of his head is higher than Kellan’s Head, not to mention Kellan has more hair.

This is why I don’t go ‘just’ by eye levels, and the pictures of Peyton Manning and Kobe Bryant are another prime example. Kobe has such an high eye level, but Peyton’s head curve, is higher than the top of Kobe Bryant’s head.
Vsquad said on 21/Dec/19

A lot of people have said that Geralt is 5'11 - 6'1 in the games (just like Cavill)... and that he isn't supposed to be really tall. So I don't know what there is to laugh about.

That being said, I'm watching the Netflix show right now and Cavill doesn't look as tall as I thought he would.
chito said on 20/Dec/19
He's just a 6 footer.. Im now watching the witcher in netflix and i can see how geralt in the witcher 3 game was noticeably a lot taller than the geralt here, lol!
Vsquad said on 19/Dec/19

Bradley Cooper's custom shoes (with the block heels similar to Cavill's) aren't cowboy boots either, but they still give him a crazy amount of height. Anywhere from 3.5 - 4.5 cm. Look at him next to Ben Affleck wearing them -

Click Here

Also again, compare Affleck's regular heel to Bradley's. There is a difference there that extends beyond just 1 cm. Bradley should not be looking that close in height to Ben. It's the same thing with Cavill and Kellan's footwear.

That picture you posted of Henry and Kellan doesn't work in favor of your argument for Cavill's height. If anything, those photos of them at the Immortals party work in favor of boosting Kellan's height. I don't believe Kellan is above 184 cm, but those photos are showing that

1) he edges out Luke Evans, who's much closer to the camera and also listed at 6ft


2) he barely if at all looks shorter than Cavill even with footwear disadvantage. And it doesn't matter that Cavill is farther from the camera, because Kellan is as well.

I know you also post this photo a lot as proof of Cavill being taller -

Click Here

But Cavill is literally only 1 step further from the camera than Kellan. Even if he stepped forward, he wouldn't look much taller than Kellan if at all even with his footwear advantage. Like I said, the only thing those photos of them at the Immortals party show is that Kellan is pulling off looking taller than listed, even though he's just wearing a regular dress shoe -

Click Here

Even if we go with the idea that Luke Evans isn't really 6ft and that's why Kellan looks taller, then that also works against your argument of Henry being taller because that would mean that Kellan is closer to 183 flat just like Rob listed, and yet Cavill-- even in his big shoes, still isn't able to pull off looking much taller than him.

Also, Cavill isn't slouching in any of those photos... That position he's making where he's wrapping his arms around the others should actually be helping him, but they don't seem to be.
Dream said on 17/Dec/19

Those heels, while they look big, they aren't. If Cavill was wearing something like, cowboy boots, then I can see why. However, even if you want to admit Henry has the footwear advantage, it's really no more than say a 1 cm or so. Cowboy boots? I see why. Dress shoes? Not so much. Kellan is still wearing boots, whether you like to admit it or not. They're not big boots, but they certainly aren't converse shoes, either, unlike Richard Osman and Bo Burnham.

The reason why I pick those videos is because usually, the other pictures are in a distorted angel. There are also other pictures of Henry and Kellan.

Click Here

The top of Henry's head is higher than Kellan in other pictures as well, despite slouching and being further away from the camera.

So, let's say I put everything. You still wouldn't believe a darn thing. Yes there's context, but neither of them are wearing converse shoes.
Vsquad said on 15/Dec/19
Here's the first picture that I posted (but didn't show up on link) -

Click Here

Again, I don't know why you choose to ignore the obvious heel advantage on Cavill's shoes. And also again, Kellan's boots just have a regular heel like I said (if you really want to compare).

Here's Cavill wearing it with Luke Evans (also in a regular dress shoe) -

Click Here

His heel compared to Luke's is completely impossible to ignore. Same with everybody he stands next to with them on.
Editor Rob
Cavill certainly had a noticeable advantage, Luke had not even 3/4 inch heel, Cavill over an inch style.
Dream said on 15/Dec/19
If you also think, I'm going by eye-levels, you're seriously mistaken.

Click Here

Eye levels are just deceiving, like ear levels. The top of their heads is the best way to measure someone.
Vsquad said on 14/Dec/19

Oh! So your 5 second evidence is from the comic con where Cavill was wearing his famously larger heels that I was talking about before -

Click Here

He wore those heels in some of your favorite "proof" photos like with Miles Teller -

Click Here
Click Here

And as for Kellan, his boot at that comic con just has a regular 2.5 - 3 cm heel, heck it looks like even less. Unlike Cavills which are literally flaunting themselves in your face (but you choose to ignore it of course).

I've seen your comments where you try to downplay Henry's footwear advantage, and act like it barely if at all helps him (even though it clearly does). Which is as ridiculous as your backstock of 5 second video evidence that consists of people walking past each other for split seconds, standing on uneven grounds, etc. Btw, being sarcastic about it isn't gonna get you out of the absurdity of your reliance on them.

"I guess, pictures are more reliable than videos"

Clear pictures where we can see them standing, where we can see their footwear AKA context is more reliable than your cherry-picked videos. Yes!

So, no mate - we'll have a real talk once you stop disputing evidence that Cavill has footwear advantage in all of those photos you keep posting, when you stop using 5 second videos as "proof" and stop getting so insecure when someone suggests Cavill isn't as tall as you think.
Dream said on 13/Dec/19
oH iT's oNly fIvE sEconDs, hErE, fRoM 0:30-0:35. iT's nOt eNouGh evidEncE tO sAy bO bUrNhAm iS tAlLeR tHaN peTE hOlMes. -- Click Here

oH iT loOkS LiKeS 0:20-25 sEcOnDs iSn'T eNouGh to sAy the RoCk lOokS taLler tHan mIchAel pHelPs, bY thE tOp oF tHeiR hEaDs -- Click Here
Dream said on 13/Dec/19

Fine. You want evidence? Here -- Click Here

at 0:27, Cavill's top head is well higher than Kellan. Also, Cavill was only wearing dress shoes. You wanna argue footwear? Kellan also has boots on. They're both standing. Their postures look more than decent. Ground is even too. Oh, you wanna argue it's only for a few seconds again? At least they're standing and the camera isn't shaking, at all.

Rob has met Kellan Lutz and confirmed 6'0.25" for him.

Nice job trying to shame me, there. I guess, pictures are more reliable than videos.

We'll have a real talk, once you're done bringing up the past. Truthfully, I've learned not to exaggerate as much.
Vsquad said on 5/Dec/19

Henry is standing taller, angling himself sideways, closer to the camera and is raising his eyes slightly. Kimmel's the one at a disadvantage there. You could argue he looks 180 and Cavill looks 184.

In his 2 other visits with Kimmel, he barely managed to pull off looking 2 cm taller than him.

And again, I'm 6'0 and my brother is 5'11. That is literally how we look together. If I can blur out our faces, I'll post a photo to show you.
Vsquad said on 5/Dec/19

Him being further away from the camera doesn't do anything for him (advantage or disadvantage-wise) from those photo angles. Stop cherry-picking the most awkward photos, my god.

And lmao there you go again with the Kellan Lutz comment. Like I said, your only evidence is - "that one, short video where he stands next to [X-Person] for 2 seconds. I swear that confirms he's taller than them!!". And I didn't say Cavill was wearing lifts, I said it was those black high-heeled dress shoes that he always wears. They would give him anywhere from 3.5 - 4.5 cm in height (which isn't enough to make you walk awkward like you're suggesting). Those shoes give Henry to have a full 1-2 cm advantage over anyone he stands next to who are wearing a regular 2-2.5 cm dress shoe.

Again, why don't you provide some consistent evidence like how Rob does, instead of cherry-picking the most awkward photos and 2 second video captures.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Dec/19
Kimmel is worst case scenario a solid 5ft11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Dec/19
I see more than an inch there, Vsquad. If Kimmel is 181cm then Henry could in that photo be argued to be 185cm
Dream said on 5/Dec/19

Also, I forgot to mention, he looked well taller than Kellan Lutz, in one proper video of the wonder con, where they were standing, briefly. I showed it before, but i check to see where it is. Oh and Rob has met Kellan Lutz and confirmed 6'0.25 for him.

If Cavill was wearing lifts, he would've been walking so awkwardly, like Wladimir Klitschko. However, he was walking fine, without ever being awkward.
Dream said on 5/Dec/19

Pretty sure Cavill is well further away from the camera, which is why, I posted it.

Good try slandering though.
Vsquad said on 4/Dec/19
Henry was pictured with 5'11 Jimmy Kimmel again recently. It looks more like a solid inch difference here than it has in the past -

Click Here

That's pretty much how I look with my 5'11 brother.
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 3/Dec/19
Henry Cavill looks to be slightly over 6’0” by Kieran in the recent photos by him, and that is considering the fact that Henry is wearing bigger shoes. Has Kieran ever verified his height through a measurement video though? That would put this case to rest to some extent...
Vsquad said on 2/Dec/19

Lol how are those "pretty good photos"? They're all leaning, you can't even see the ground they're standing on, you can't even see their footwear, etc.

Like seriously, how do those awkward photos prove that Henry is this super strong 6ft guy, I don't understand...
Vsquad said on 2/Dec/19

Once again, you are posting the most awkward photos/evidence to even be capable enough to properly gauge Henry's height with others. From what I recall from your strange list of "proof" there is:

- That 2 second clip of Henry with Dominic Purcell where they're on uneven ground (which you so admantly claim as hard evidence, which is really weird)

- Multiple photos where Henry is wearing his black higher-heeled boots compared to others

- And photos like what you just posted where you can't even see the ground their standing on, what footwear they're wearing, etc.

Just please start posting convincing evidence and then maybe we'll consider what you're saying. But so far you haven't posted anything of the kind. Henry is not this almighty-strong 6ft guy that you keep claiming him to be.
Nik said on 1/Dec/19
It would be great to see a recent photograph of Henry and his 4 brothers! 👌
TheBat said on 30/Nov/19

Pretty good photos. Henry is 6'0.5" at the lowest. He's most like a bit above but not quite 6'1".
Dream said on 29/Nov/19
And look at Cavill with 6’5.5” Ralf Moeller

Click Here
Click Here

Clearly taller than 6’0” flat.
TheBat said on 28/Nov/19
6'0.5" is totally fine.
Philip S said on 27/Nov/19
He's exactly 6' tall - just like me. Funny enough my wife had a celeb crush on him, too - I guess it's the height? (Or the jawline, although that doesn't explain why she likes me lol)
grizz said on 24/Nov/19
Juby, thanks for the news! Well, I stand corrected then, he's comfortably past dead-on 6 feet.
Nevertheless, I do believe that Cavill still isn't full 6'0.5, 6'0.25 is my guess for him.
Vsquad said on 22/Nov/19

Henry clearly has the footwear advantage with the boots he's wearing, whilst Kieran's adidas don't even give him an inch.

That being said, I think if they were wearing equal footwear Henry may still edge him by close to a full cm, if not a full one.
Vsquad said on 22/Nov/19
I saw a different photo of Kieran and Henry's first picture together from a different angle on Instagram. The ground Kieran was standing on was actually sloped, while Henry was disadvantaged. So... yeah.

The photo was on @henrycavillnews profile I believe. I can't bother digging it up again but it's there, you'll just have to dig all the way back to last year to find it lol.
Juby said on 21/Nov/19
Click Here

From the new Men'sHealth magazine:
"As the six-foot-two, roughly 200-pound Cavill wanders around, he points out some of his favorite Superman story lines(...)" - @Rob, can You add this note to his profile here?
Juby said on 21/Nov/19
"Kieran said on 5/Nov/18
Hi guys! I met Henry last may at the Durrell Challenge in Jersey. He is extremely nice, friendly, humble, handsome and many more, but that's not the subject lol
I'm 183cm and I had I think 2cm of footwear, big running shoes.
Here's the pic: Click Here"

Here are the new pictures of Kieran with Henry. One year ago he looks 3-4 cm taller than Henry. Now he looks deffinetly shorter. If he's really 183 cm, than Henry must be at least 184 cm.
Click Here
Israel-6'2 said on 14/Nov/19
in batman vs superman, it looks like 1.86 with the superman boots, affleck should easily reach 6'3 with the batman boots, rob would this measure be the tape measure? because I'm sure that in the doctor's office they go down 3 cm, in the tape I get easily 1.89, but in the army, even with 1cm sneakers, I reached 1.87
Editor Rob
I think Affleck actually measured 6ft 3.5...but it was in shoes at the Doctor's office.
K.A 188 ! said on 10/Oct/19

Do you have any other picture of you with Cavill?
TheBat said on 4/Oct/19

Definitely looks 6'0.75" with Russell.
Dream said on 2/Oct/19
5'10" is ridiculous.

Look at him with 6'1.5" Mark Strong.

Click Here

I seriously doubt a 5'10" guy could look that tall with someone who constantly edges out Colin Firth and Gerard Butler and sometimes, Tom Hiddleston.
Importer said on 2/Oct/19
@Big B
2inchers ? Those give a solid inch of height, in the best case scenario 3cm.
185 said on 15/Sep/19
Both Henry and Chris are taller than Sebastian, though in some picture Chis didn’t look taller than Henry could look next to Sebastian. So if i could go for the lowest guess for Henry, i think that would be the same as Chris, 6ft and nothing less.
Jackson said on 14/Sep/19
Rob has Russel Crowe at 5’10 1/2”

Click Here
185 said on 14/Sep/19
@Big B
That's a crazy guess. You should bring up some evidence that he's that range or if he wearing lift. If he actually close to 5'10 that would put Ben Affleck and Ray Fissher at 6ft even, Jason Momoa not even 6'2. Gal at 5'6-5'7, and Ezra Miller at 5'8-5'9.
Big B said on 13/Sep/19
Closer to 5'10 than over 6'. Quite a few of these are way too charitable. It seems you guys go way over said persons actual height to short-changing them. In other words, you give some too much benefit of the doubt. It wouldn't surprise me if some of these guys wear lifts in the shower - they're always sporting at least two inchers. Even in sneakers.
Gyro said on 12/Sep/19
I will say though, that if you put Henry Cavill next to Sebastian Stan compared to Chris Evans with Sebastian Stan, there would be a true 1 inch difference as I'm describing.
Gyro said on 12/Sep/19

You're overestimating Evans' hair giving him an advantage, and Cavill's hair isn't as flat as you seem to assume. At best the difference is 1 cm, but its still too hard to tell.

If you were going to gauge a difference between them, then compare their eye levels (which again, is also barely a 1cm difference). But even then, Henry is trying to stand as ridiculously straight as possible to beat out Evans... which isn't working regardless.

If it was really a one inch difference or near 1 inch, then it would be more noticeable than what your implying.

1 cm is the ceiling in those photos.
Jackson said on 7/Sep/19

All you have to do is zoom into the top of their heads in the picture with Cavil and Evans. And to me it does seem very clear cavil is the taller man. I’m serious just zoom in and you’ll see it’s almost an inch. Evans hair makes it seem like they’re closer than they are.
Gyro said on 7/Sep/19
I wouldn't say he's "clearly" taller than Evans. But yeah Evans definitely has a slight footwear advantage in those photos, maybe 5-ish mm, so the vote would have to go to Cavill out of the two.

I recently saw Cavill's new movie Night Hunter/Nomis. He looks damn tall in it, however, there was a quick shot in the movie where he walks past 6'1 Nathan Fillion, and Fillion clearly edged him...

I swear that the visual difference between a 6'0 and 6'1 guy is somehow way more noticeable than a 6'0 and 5'11 guy. It makes no sense considering the difference in cm is the same.
185 said on 7/Sep/19
he looks comfortable taller than Chris and Chris definitely has a bit more footwear
Jackson said on 5/Sep/19
Ah look it’s more proof Henry’s over 6’0” ... this listing of 6’0.5” is perfect. He’s clearly taller than 6’0” Evans.
6footTom said on 4/Sep/19
In that picture? No, he barely edges him out.
185 said on 30/Aug/19
I can see Henry definitely an inch taller than chris in that picture.
183.5 said on 29/Aug/19
Too be honest he looks almost below Chris Evans here, who is just about 6 foot. Both wear the same dress shoes aswell.

Click Here
Editor Rob
It can depend on angle, I would think Henry Might be a bit taller and maybe Evans heels is a bit thicker, like 0.2 inch.
185 said on 27/Aug/19
Yes, we can’t count on that video because it could be the ground and they stand too far from each other. But infact, we shouldn’t trust in just one picture too, that guy kieran can look an inch taller clearly, and yes, in the recently picture with henry, he look an inch shorter, but i think that maybe half and inch since henry footwear look bigger than kieran. The first instagram picture. Click Here
In this picuture, henry look really tall here, yes henry has a better posture than the 6’4 guy but i think the different here is just about 3 inches.
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 26/Aug/19
Why does Kieran’s physique, along with his facial structure look different in those photos compared to last year, if that’s actually him? I’m sorry, but I’m a bit skeptical, unless some drastic weight loss made him look younger....
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 26/Aug/19
Is that the same Kieran who linked the photo that made Henry look under 6’0” tall? Henry is wearing thick dress shoes in those photos that make him appear even taller than he actually is, while Kieran is in tennis shoes with a slightly smaller than average heel.
Jordan87 said on 26/Aug/19
@ 185cm,

NO that is not the same dude pictured.
Jordan87 said on 26/Aug/19
@ 185

Look at the 1st picture again. ( I don't count the second picture because they are messing around)

So in the first Picture, Gracie is lifting his foot slightly ( Correct) but also LEANING and dropping posture, fact. He is not standing straight.

The vid that Dream is referencing is completely ridiculous and you know it.
185 said on 25/Aug/19
Is this Kieran you are talking about, i can see half an inch different between them.
Click Here
185 said on 25/Aug/19
I can see the 6'4 man lift his left feet in both picture, a bit in the first picture and alot in the second picture, and henry is bending his knee in both picture.
Though Henry is not 6'1, he's not bellow 6ft.
Jordan87 said on 23/Aug/19
@ Dream,

They don't stand exactly next to each other for starters at 2;14, Its for a split second and they both start backpedaling. Are you kidding me? Stop doing that to yourself.

You think that 2:14 split second clip is to be taken seriously, but wont dare DARE touch these pictures?

Click Here
Jordan87 said on 23/Aug/19
Fact 1: Kieran admitted he was 6'0, not Over it and was photographed as taller than Henry.
Fact 2: Henry wears ( At Times) Footwear which gives him an Advantage.
Fact 3: Roger Gracie is listed at 6'4". He had Henry by Over 4" easily.
Fact 4: There are certain people on this site as posters that feel they somehow gain Something by adding height to a celebrity they like.
Fact 5: Posters feel that if you dare take an inch off their celebrity crush, you are somehow a hater.

Henry is a Good, Humble man. But he is not over 6'0 tall, he us slightly under it.

Good Day :)
185 said on 22/Aug/19
@Johan 185 cm
I think i'm a late bloomer too, grew alots from late 15 to late 17 but i don't think i grew any since then.
Johan 185 cm said on 19/Aug/19
Just want to add to the growth comments.

I grew from 6'0" to 6'1" between my 18th and 21st birthdays. A long time ago so not sure how and over what time period it was but growing after 16/17 is pretty common for a guy less so for women.

I have an old friend from High School who was 5'9" at 17 and he grew to 6'3" by 20. I haven't seen him in a long time but he was a late bloomer. It does happen.
Importer said on 16/Aug/19
Click Here
This is a deleted scene from the justice league movie. In the very first clip, pay full attention to his legs and feet whilst he’s walking!
6footTom said on 16/Aug/19
@K.A 188 !

Maybe Kieran was standing on higher pavement? Even with footwear taken into account, Cavill was struggling to look 6'0" if Kieran is indeed that height himself.
K.A 188 ! said on 9/Aug/19
But the question is how come that guy who used to comment as 6foot Kieran was taller than him? Really don't know.
Public Enemy said on 8/Aug/19
Current 184 cm
Rory said on 4/Aug/19
It's one thing claiming someone wears lifts without evidence it's another assuming they've had height enhancing surgery lol, don't get carried away.
Animus said on 23/Jul/19
Someone who has the potential to become a Hollywood actor is not likely to have had confidence low enough to have height-enhancing surgery, in my opinion. Honestly, I think people seriously considering that kind of procedure have bigger problems than can be dealt with through external means.
Dream said on 22/Jul/19
I think this listing is fine. Henry Cavill actually looked taller than Dominic Purcell. (2:14 seconds) -- Click Here

And Rob has met Dominic Purcell -- Click Here
Importer said on 20/Jul/19
What if he had surgery. So what
Israel(6'2) said on 20/Jul/19
Rob, do you have a history of wrong measurements by doctors? At home with the tape I easily have 1.88,6 / 7 in the evening, in the doctor, with sneakers 1cm I get 1.88 in the afternoon, which one is right?
Editor Rob
When the Doctor sees me coming, he starts to sweat.

You can bet he won't be measuring me wrong 😈

But seriously, for one clinic I did get my height taken but I didn't even bother about it - this was early 20's and my interest in height was minimal. The next time I remember going for a pre-op in mid 20's and this time I remembered the measurement because the nurse said 173cm and I was happy the NHS were using metric 😸

It all depends really if the device at the Doctor is installed correctly (if attached to a wall) or actually doesn't have any error with it...
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 20/Jul/19
If what you're saying is true, then most likely he just had a late growth spurt. I highly doubt that he wears lifts, let alone had leg lengthening surgery.
Piers said on 19/Jul/19

Yeah a lot of people don't like talking about it, but his arm length compared to his leg length does have me suspicious about him getting surgery. I really don't know anyone with a difference in ratio like that.

I don't think its as simple as "different people have different proportions" like some people say whenever the topic is brought up. He could have easily had something done when he was younger.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jul/19
BurtsDog that is totally not true
BurtsDog said on 14/Jul/19
The Count of Monte Cristo began filming in August of 2000 and was released in January of 2002. At the start of filming, Henry was already 17 1/2 years old. Most males reach their full height between 16 and 17. In the movie, it is very clear that Jim Caviezel who is 6' 1" towers over Henry. Jim is a good 4 to 5 inches taller than Henry. What appears to have happened is that Henry either had some kind of unusual growth spurt late in life, or he wears inserts, or he had shin extension surgery on his legs. This would explain why his legs appear long but his arms appear short.
TheBatMan said on 12/Jul/19
Everyone has logic here that's not the problem but the conclusion is wrong when there is incomplete or inaccurate information or personal bias. Since no one really know the pinpoint answer, I'd say the strongest argument based on all the available information is that he looks about 5'11" 3/4 give or take a 1/4 based on the BAREFOOT Gracie pics (this one is hard to deny), the John Cena point, the story about the guy who wears lifts, Henry Cavill's financial interest in inflating his height, his profession and role as an action star, some other optical observations. There's only one comment I disagree with. That is, if you're the only one saying something then how can we take that seriously? Throughout history there's often only one or a few persons to know of a truth or a reality at first. Many scientists and explorers faced the same criticism. Maybe even the founder of a site about height who people thought would never catch on but it did. I know of a group of people in history where only one person was saying something for years and then only a few were saying it. The whole nation viciously and criminally attacked that person in every way you could imagine. Today, that ENTIRE NATION only repeats what that one person said as the only truth.
TheBat said on 24/Jun/19

I agree. Henry has a better chance of being 6'0.5" guy than Channing and Michael Jai White who're both probably 6'0.25". 6'0.5" is the lowest I'd go with for Henry.
Importer said on 9/Jun/19
Long story short : One can add an easy 1inch Inside shoes without being noticable at all.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 21/May/19
Cavill is def stronger 6'0.5" than Bradley Cooper, Michael Jai White and Channing Tatum.
Jug said on 18/May/19
I think he might be this height exactly. He might be like a strong 6 ft 1/4, something like that. 6 ft 1/2 or 3/4 in the morning.
6footTom said on 12/May/19
@Hi There

It's not that hard to tower over Tom Cruise, especially since he likely wasn't wearing his lifts in order to make Henry look as imposing as possible.
Dream said on 6/May/19
After seeing several pictures of Cavill and Ralf Moeller, I think this is a great listing.
Dream said on 6/May/19
Rob, weird photo.

Click Here

Why does Cavill hold up so well with 6’5.5” Ralf Moeller? He’s even behind the camera.
Dream said on 6/May/19
Rob, weird photo.

Click Here

Why does Cavill hold up so well with Ralf Moeller? He’s even behind the camera.
Editor Rob
It would be interesting to see a proper pose, sometimes selfies can be hard for heights.
TheBat said on 15/Apr/19
I wouldn't say Henry wears lifts, we don't know for sure. Also, maybe Kieran is a bit taller than he actually is. But I don't know for sure since I haven't met him or Henry. In every other photo I've seen, Henry towers over Tom Cruise even when Tom wears lifts. And he's similar to John Cena the more I look at that photo of the two.
Guest66 said on 13/Apr/19
The only question is how on earth he was looking so much visibly shorter than that 6’0” guy Kieran. I understand it was only 1 photo and you can’t really judge height from 1 single picture, but man does it rule out anything close to 6’0.5” for him if it’s true, I mean he struggled to look 5’11” range there with Kieran. A potential lift wearer ?
Hi There said on 24/Mar/19
He really towered over Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible, I thought he was like 6'2. Surprised to see he's in the 6' range, although 6'0.5" is approaching 6'1.
K.A 188 said on 21/Mar/19
Rob,I usually agree with you but.... On cavill I doubt if he is 184.2 he looks more like 183.5 in my opinion ,mind you he is very very height conscious always standing as straight as possible just look at his picture with 182 Chris Evans he looks he only looks 1.5 cm taller and that's because he was standing in an unnatural straight way while Evans had a normal loose posture. He has short arms to which don't help to give a taller impression, never really liked him as superman I mean facially he does look like the Clarke Kent but he lacks the presence that guys like welling and routh had, and lol I can't even compare him to the best christopher reeves. He is a comfortably tall guy but everyone in the justice leage movie seemed to be taller than him even W. woman (gal gadot) was close to his height and Ezra miller to. Anybody portraying superman should have bulked up as much as possible so as to look big on screen it does NOT makes at all that batman (affleck) looked bigger and in better shape than superman .I have nothing against Cavill he his an overall cool guy with his on charm but definitely NOT the best superman.
Jordan87 said on 19/Mar/19
@ Sotiris Graves,

"Not more than 5'11.5"."

That's about accurate. 5'11.5", maybe he scrapes 6'0 in the EARLY Am, doesn't last long.

Gracie, Fisher, KIERAN, and Hammer ( at times) make henry a Sub 6er.
Sotiris Gravas said on 17/Mar/19
Cavill and Robert Maillet (poor posture), footwear visible... Click Here

Maillet and 6'1" Jim Duggan (poor posture )... Click Here
6'1" Will Smith and Cavill... Click Here

Maillet and Kevin Nash (2015)... Click Here W/ Jim Duggan... Click Here

That pic w/ 183cm Kieran , as well as, say, pics w/ 5'10.5" Russell Crowe, confirms my suspicions that he's a lift-wearer when need be.

Not more than 5'11.5".
Jed said on 8/Mar/19
I don't think the Armie Hammer comparisons mean anything. He could easily be wearing a 1-1.5" lift, Hammer's footwear may be giving him 2cm less anyway, and I don't think Hammer is the 6'4.5 he's listed as on here.

I used to be a collegiate rower. Every year we'd trial literally 200-300 kids. Every young athlete with an ego would rock up, we'd get them to give their heights and weight etc beforehand. During the second round we then measured them with a stadiometer. All 3 years I came away with 3 observations:

1) Despite being 6'1 myself, and experiencing years of guys significantly shorter than me claiming 6'-6'1, and frequently looking around bars / night clubs and thinking, whilst extremely drunk, how short most people are, 6' flat is much taller than I thought. Every young man north of 5'10 seems to think they're 6'. In reality most the real 6' guys seem to think they're 6'1 - 6'2. When you're stood in a room full of barefoot 5'10.5+ men your perspective of height is warped forever.

2) Height delusion is pandemic. The average difference between given heights and measured heights was almost 1.5 inches. I don't think it's lying, I think through a combo of dodgy doctor's measurements and people basing their height off what others say (I've been told 'I must' be 6'2 - 6'3 more times than I can count by guys both taller and shorter than myself) things have become warped.

3) A legit 6'5 is huge. A legit 6'8 is absurdly tall. I rowed with kids this height, and I would have sworn they were both significantly taller.

I think it's more than likely that Cavill is 6' flat (at most) and simply has good posture and wears lifts (maybe because he's superman, or maybe because so many other actors wear them). A 5'11.5 - 6' dude in lifts is going to look very tall. In the picture below with Kieran, I suspect that what happened was he wasn't in a position to wear lifts because he needed functional trainers to run in. He probably had some of the smaller sole (Nike Free Run style) trainers on, whilst Kieran maybe had the larger sole (Asics or Nike Pegasus).
Jackson said on 5/Mar/19
Russel Crowe is listed on here at 5’10.5” and Henry looks at least 2 inches taller...

Click Here
Rory said on 3/Mar/19
I think 186 out of bed, 183.5 lowest after a mammoth workout and 184 in mid afternoon. The pics with Keiran are interesting but I don't think one picture alone determines someone's height, you need a more holistic approach looking at many pictures/videos etc which almost always point to Cavill clearing 6ft. I have changed my own mind slightly though, I used to think he was 6ft0.5-0.75 I now think he's more 6ft0.25-0.5.
Matt232 said on 3/Mar/19
Henry must have some pretty good lift hiding skill and he must wear it all the time if he was anything below 6ft. Guy look his listed height in most pictures, give or take maybe half an inch, you have to downgrade a whole lot of celebs if he wasn't this height.
Jordan87 said on 27/Feb/19
@ Jackson,

Any Fool can realize the AVG Guess came long before Kieran's Picture came around. ( I know this is hard to grasp for you, but we are all pulling for you).

I don't KNOW FOR SURE IF have more credibility than " Anyone". I know I have more credibility than YOU however, you have made sure of that. Made it easy for me.

Following your posts? You are doing very well at following mine. Actually your the best at it so far on this site.

And for the record, I wasn't the one who lied. That was you so :)
Jackson said on 27/Feb/19

“Boo boo kitty ”? Well I had suspicions you were into men... but that finally proves it.
Jordan87 said on 26/Feb/19
@ Rising-174cm ,

I am one of the few talking about the Gracie Pics b/c certain people Here are major fans of Henry ( I am to an extent, the guy is an awesome Human Being) and do not want to talk about those Gracie pictures and especially not Kieran Pic ( That is a def no no for some Posters here, they rather lie).

I don't mind debating this with you, since you are not a Liar -Shout out to Jackson the BOO BOO Kitty ;)

As Far as Fisher, I tend to place Ray at around 6'1.75" to 6'2 most of the times. Rob's pic with him and the footwear advantage to ray really puts away him being over 6'2 ( IMO) .

AS Far as the Fisher pics you posted, I see a solid 2" between Ray and Henry ( Which is where we disagree). Henry of course has the hair Advantage but when I really zoom it in, I see ray Having 2" Solid on him rather than the 1.5". Fisher to me is a WEAK 6'2 which is why I list Henry at 5'11.75" Most of the time. This is not to say the man cannot' be 6'0, but over it ? I still think that's very very unlikely and nothing really since has shown me he can be over it ( when comparing him to celebs that either have Mug shots or Pictures with Rob).

With Hammer, I have seen him look his " eye Level" as well as Look " Above it" in certain Events. The Problem is how we judge his hairline to by Honest. Either you are making an error in where his actual Hairline starts and ends, or I am making the error when it comes to the Hammer pictures.
Jackson said on 26/Feb/19
Awww I’m so scared. You must wake up every day thinking you’ve got more credibility than anyone. Kinda creepy if you follow my every post but hey go ahead. Your obsession shows. And ik it hurts that Cavills listed at 6’0.5” but it’s gona be ok. Average guess supports that as well.

Rising174cm said on 25/Feb/19
@Jordan: lol that's bound to happen with delays for approving comments, but considering you're among the only posters I've seen talk about the Gracie comparison, it doesn't hurt to have both of us post pictures. In general, I see a solid 4" between them so compared to Gracie, Cavill looks a flat 6'0" or even a fraction under. I don't agree on Hammer, though. Assuming Armie is 6'4" minimum and his eye level is 5'11" minimum, I see Henry at about Rob's listing and never below 6'0". Granted, those photos are just one event, but the difference was fairly consistent at other events.

As for Fisher, the best comparisons I've seen of Cavill and Fisher are the Justice League photocall and I see just about 2" between them in these pics: Click Here Click Here Click Here and only about 1.5" in these pics: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here The difference is almost always in that 1.5"-2" range. Even if it were more like 2.25" in a photo like this: Click Here it still wouldn't be more than 2" when Fisher's boots are taken into consideration so even if you just give Ray a flat 6'2", Henry still looks at least 6'0" with him, but if anything I'd guess slightly less than a 2" difference so Rob's listings add up with each other in this case.

But I get your thinking on this. Basically that Henry appears shorter than a man who only claims 6'0" and appears [arguably, imo] under 6'0" with a man who is only listed 6'4" with both in bare fee. And of course, this is assuming Kieran is exactly the height he claims and Roger is exactly his listed height. In particular, an athlete being rounded up to the nearest inch is standard practice and it's completely common in all sports, including MMA to add an inch or two, while men who claim 6'0" are very often shorter, but very few intentionally claim they're shorter than they really are. Not that either are shorter than believed, but this does make your point all the more compelling and I'll definitely concede that it's not at all unreasonable to conclude from this that Henry is slightly under 6'. Our main difference is I think this is the exception and outside of these two and a few photos I commented on where Henry looked 5'11" range with Jesse Eisenberg, I think Henry looks 6'0" or taller in almost every other comparison I've seen and he's even passed for 6'1" at times so I'm still going with what he looks to me in the vast majority of comparisons I've seen so far.
Jordan87 said on 25/Feb/19
@ Jackson

" Wait so anytime someone posts your going to swiftly remind them of the travesty I committed. "

No, Not anyone. Just when YOU post, thus further ruining your credibility :)
Jackson said on 23/Feb/19

Wait so anytime someone posts your going to swiftly remind them of the travesty I committed. I actually said you said he was 5’11” not 5’11.75”

Oh my what a liar I am lol. What ever will I do. Hahahahaha.
Jordan87 said on 22/Feb/19
@ Jackson,

Keep Ignoring the fact that you lied BC I will keep reminding people every time I promise !!! :)

No After Kieran's Picture came out and you burned your Cavill Posters and your Therapy Sessions doubled up, did you at least order som "Man from Uncle Stuff" ?...... LOL!
Jackson said on 20/Feb/19

Awe you probably get lots of boo boos. Banging your head into the wall knowing Cavill will never be downgraded to the 5’11.75” you desire. I know it drives you crazy that the average guess and poster on here doesn’t agree with your 5’11.75” guess. It’s gona be okay.
Jordan87 said on 19/Feb/19
@ Jackson,

"Are you really trying to be taken seriously saying things like “boo boo” yikes. I’ll let that speak for itself."

It's better than Lying, which is what you did Chief. Anyone can look back and see what you are trying to do. You are ornery b/c Cavill looked Sub 6'0 in a bunch of Photos ( One of Which is next to a Self Proclaimed 6'0 Man) . I have him at 5'11.5"-5'11.75, and you say I put him at 5'11 even though that's nowhere to be found by Me.

I also tend to direct Juvenile terms and Insults to people who act as Such :).

So Again, Either you made a " Boo Boo"....or you straight up lied. Either way, bad for you!
Jordan87 said on 19/Feb/19
@ Jackson,

"Are you really trying to be taken seriously saying things like “boo boo” yikes. I’ll let that speak for itself."

It's better than Lying, which is what you did Chief. Anyone can look back and see what you are trying to do. You are ornery b/c Cavill looked Sub 6'0 in a bunch of Photos ( One of Which is next to a Self Proclaimed 6'0 Man) . I have him at 5'11.5"-5'11.75, and you say I put him at 5'11 even though that's nowhere to be found by Me.

I also tend to direct Juvenile terms and Insults to people are act as Such :).

So Again, Either you made a " Boo Boo"....or you straight up lied. Either way, bad for you!
Jackson said on 15/Feb/19

Are you really trying to be taken seriously saying things like “boo boo” yikes. I’ll let that speak for itself.
Jordan87 said on 14/Feb/19

Dude...The point of my last post was to literally show you how you put words into my posts. I never said that he was 5'11.

All you did was make a huge error stating I said he was 5'11. Whether I think other posters are stupid is not and cannot be proven.

WHat can be proven is you made a Huge Boo Boo lol...Which Only a stupid person would make lol.
Jackson said on 14/Feb/19

Cavill at 5’11.5” or 5’11.75” no try again! And George Reeves at less than 6’1.5”? Where have you been??

See what I did there... acted like your stupid and only my opinion matters.. figuring it out yet? That behavior is childish. Not everyone thinks Cavill is under 6 foot. The average guess supports that.
Jordan87 said on 13/Feb/19
@ Jackson,

"Not everyone thinks Cavill is 5’11” like you.... you don’t need to act like anyone who thinks Cavill is 6’0.5” is stupid."

When did I say Cavill was only 5'11"? ...... Saying I said that is in fact stupid. 5'11.5 to 5'11.75" is what I normally guess him at. Never said 5'11 flat. What you said is stupid, sorry to say.
Jackson said on 12/Feb/19

Not everyone thinks Cavill is 5’11” like you.... you don’t need to act like anyone who thinks Cavill is 6’0.5” is stupid.
Jordan87 said on 11/Feb/19
@ Jammes,

George Reeves at 6'1-1/2"? No Try Again.

And Cavill at 6'0.5" is not happening , where have you been?
Jammes said on 8/Feb/19
Here are all the Superman/Clark Kent Actors
Dean Cain is 5'11 1/2
Tyler Hoechlin is 5/11 1/2
Geard Christopher from the 80s superboy show is listed as 6'0(can anybody confirm that?)
Henry is 6'0 1/2
George Reeves was 6'1 1/2
Tom Welling is 6'2 1/2
Brandon Routh is 6'2 1/2
Christopher Reeve 6'3 1/2

Christopher,Tom and Brandon are the most accurate height wise. Supes is about 6'3 in the comics I believe
Jordan87 said on 4/Feb/19
RIsing- 174cm,

Yes, Seems like we both posted pictures with Gracie and the same time without knowing the other would do it lol.

Anyway, I think Henry can look 6'0 at times, but to me he looks under 6'0 more times than he looks over it I Will tell you that. This is what I tend to list him at 5'11.75", and Kieran was the Dealbreaker for me.

Gracie for the most part like you said makes Cavill look under 6'0. Hammer its 50/50, and there are a few pictures floating around of Cavil and 6'2 TOPS Ray FIsher where henry is looking a bit more than 2" below him.

All these guys are hard to peg that don't actually have pictures with Rob but I still gather that Comparing Cavill to People we know have a picture with Rob, or a Mugshot, or in the worst case a picture with Kieran, Henry to me falls below 6'0, not above it. ( If I were a betting man)
Rising174cm said on 4/Feb/19
@Jordan: This is the only photo from the event where I can see Henry as much as 4"(max) shorter than Armie or not much more than an inch above Armie's eye level: Click Here So assuming Armie is 6'4" with a 5'11" eye level, then I can see Henry possibly as short as a flat 6'0" there, but no shorter. You can see Armie's eye level is only slightly above the low part of Henry's hairline and just for reference, Rob's hairline is about 1.5" below the top of his head, iirc so 6'1" in shoes is still the lowest I can see Henry there. The difference is closer to 3" in some of the other photos so I agree the angle and who is getting favored likely changes, but I don't believe Henry has a footwear advantage. I initially thought he might since he looked to have Chelsea boots, but I've seen him wear dress shoes just like that and the heel on his shoe is smaller than Armie's heel if anything. As for Gracie, I see him about 4" taller than Henry in those photos so about 6'0" there if Gracie is 6'4", though unlike the Armie pic, I'd probably guess slightly over 4" in those 2 pics rather than slightly under if not 4" exactly and as I said, I can see more 4.5" between them in this other pic: Click Here so I at least agree Henry can look under 6' with Gracie, but over 6' in this one: Click Here. That's a valid point since whether Gracie is a legit 6'4" remains unknown, especially without a page here, though as I said, he generally looks taller with Henry than Armie does so I'd be pretty surprised if he were less. We're not that far apart on the Gracie comparison, but may have to just agree to disagree on the Armie one.
QM6'1QM said on 1/Feb/19
Expert opinion, Rob, who has best posture: Henry Cavill or Mark Gatiss ?
Editor Rob
I think Henry might generally have a very good posture, I think he tends to hold himself near measured height better than many might.
Jordan87 said on 1/Feb/19

I think With those Pictures I see it as Hammer has a 6'0 Eye Level in Shoes( His Mug Shot). Cavill is def a bit taller than his eye level, but not by much. So this is to say, Henry could be as high as 6'0.5" ( only in some of the pictures) but that is in shoes, so he is looking 6'0 at best barefoot and actually under 6'0 if you use some of the other Pictures. For some Reason in some pictures from the same even Henry looks taller or shorter next to Hammer, yet they seem to have equal posture so It must Be Angles.

This Is Henry next to 6'4" Listed Roger Gracie. That's 6'4 listed, not proven. Henry doesn't make the 6'0 mark at all. He's something like 5'11.5 there.

Click Here
Click Here
Rising - 174 cm said on 31/Jan/19
As for Gracie, I don't know about under 6', but assuming he's 6'4" flat and nothing over that, he does make Henry appear barely 6' in these photos since I see about 4" between them: Click Here Click Here and in this one: Click Here Actually, Cavill could look just below 6' to a flat 6' in that third pic depending on how far Gracie's eye level is from his head since he's barely above it. Though this last photo is the exception with more like 3.5" than 4" difference: Click Here but in general, I more or less agree from these. In fact, Gracie looks taller with Cavill than Hammer does.
Rising - 174 cm said on 30/Jan/19
@Jordan: I don't see it at all with Armie. If Henry's head were more than a little lower, it wouldn't be much above his hairline, which would just be bizarre, but forget about that. There's very little margin of error judging where Armie's eye level is and the lower lines that start from Armie's eye level(and higher eye at that) only reach Henry's hairline in 2 of the 5 pics and just barely at that. Assuming you're correct about Armie's eye level height, that would still put Henry at 6'0"-6'0.25" barefoot at worst with Armie because there's no way his hairline is less than an inch from the top of his head. Henry might have 1/4" footwear advantage, but nothing more than that. And if we agree Fisher is roughly 6'2" give or take no more than 1/4" then I can't see how Henry would be nowhere near 6' since I don't remember an event where Ray had more than 2" on Henry. In fact, I've definitely seen them look less than 2" apart. Though I do have to concede he looks clearly under 6' with Kieran as I said before.
Jordan87 said on 29/Jan/19
RIsing- 174cm,

The 3 I posted I think are the same as In the 5 you posted except for one ( I think- Looks slightly different but from the same even, could be wrong.)

If you look at all of them however, the top of Henry's Head is a bit higher than Armies Eye Level in some of them ( Not All). You are getting faked out by his hair.

The Red mark where you put his supposed Top of head is nowhere near that my friend. His hair is messing things up for you.

Problem is again, Armies eyelevel without shoes is about 5'11-5'11.25, and the way I see it Henry is at most 1/2" Above that and has a bit more in the show Department.

With Gracie he looks much shorter than 6'0 ,Same with Fisher. I still Think Hammer's pics work against Henry if you considered Hammer has a 5'11.25 eyelevel tops. ( As Proven by his mug shot).

Kieran's Picture too obsvouslyt works agaisnt him.
Rising - 174 cm said on 26/Jan/19
@Jordan: I agree Armie wouldn't be barefoot in his mugshot, but we don't know his shoes were an inch. They could have been 1/2" to 3/4" range. But Henry is very easily above Armie's eyes in all of those photos. Here's all 5 again with lines added: Click Here Their hairstyles make it difficult to tell where the top of their heads are so you could argue Henry's head is a line lower or higher, but that still puts Henry's head easily above Armie's eyebrows with the 3rd photo being the only one it's not above by much and putting a line from Armie's eyes is more clear and shows Hammer's eye level is below Cavill's hairline except for the 3rd and 4th photos where it's still not much above it, especially the 4th. Cavill's hairline should be more than an inch below the top of his head and more like 1.5" below it. So it'd be conservative to say Cavill is an inch above Hammer's eye level. On a side note, Hammer's mugshot is more evidence he's closer to 6'4" flat than 6'4.5".
Jordan87 said on 25/Jan/19
@ Rising,

Your Pictures with Hammer proves Henry is under 6'0, I'll explain why.

Click Here

Armie Hammer's Mugshot. He has a 6'0 Eye level and thats WITH SHoes. Notice Cavill doesn't come much past Hammer's eve level in any of the pictures you posted . Cavill in shoes is around Armie's Eye Level which is closer to 5'11 without his shoes. ( I highly doubt Armie Hammer was barefoot during his mug shot. Again his eye level is 5'11, and Cavil is not much past it.)
Rising - 174 cm said on 24/Jan/19
@Jordan: Yes, he looks 5'11" max in the photo with Kieran, but I don't believe one photo alone proves he's under 6' when most of the evidence places him at least 6'. One of our big differences is that you sometimes give more weight to one photo than I do. they're outside making ground level an unknown. Also while any shoe difference would be less than the height difference, how much their footwear added is still unclear. I'll give you that it's an odd photo where he does inexplicably look barely 5'11" and I've seen a couple like that of Cavill and Jesse Eisenberg, but Cavill looks easily over 6' with Armie Hammer too. Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Another photo from that event of Cavill and Hammer plus 5'10.25" listed Guy Ritchie: Click Here Ritchie's shoes look probably half an inch thinner and he has loose posture as opposed to Cavill and Hammer who stand like they're in the military. Even so, Cavill still looks like he'd be around 2" taller barefoot, which adds up with how Cavill looks with Crowe. Actually, seeing Cavill with Hammer was one of the things that convinced me Hammer is closer to 6'4" flat than 6'4.5" or possibly 6'4.25" max. I'm not even sure there's a full 4" between them. And I don't recall seeing Ray Fisher with more than 2" on Cavill either. This is assuming Ray is a flat 6'2" as opposed to the 6'2.25" Rob lists him. Both are possible, but I don't think Ray has more than 2" on Cavill. The only way I can see Cavill under 6' is if he wears lifts. It's not impossible because his Stallone posture makes him seem height conscious and being at least 3" shorter than the iconic Christopher Reeve may make him want to live up to people's expectations of Superman, but I haven't seen anything to say he actually wears lifts.
Jordan87 said on 22/Jan/19
@ Rising- 174cm

"but nothing under 6' either."

He is under 6 foot. Kieran Squashed any chance of Cavill being over 6'0 my friend. Maybe he is 6'0 in the early am hrs but Keiran was clearly taller than Henry and reports his own height at 6'0.

Cavill also looked SAUB 6'0 many times. Hammer, Gracie, and Ray Fisher pretty much had me giving him a struggling 6'0. 5'11.75 something like that, Than Kieran came and really did it for me.
Rising - 174 cm said on 13/Jan/19
Actually, in most photos, I see about 2" between Cavill and Crowe: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Though Cavill looks 3" shorter than Michael Shannon in that last pic, but in some photos, Cavill can look more than just 2" taller than Crowe: Click Here Click Here Click Here I guess that's Cavill's military posture, his Chelsea boots and perhaps a subtle camera advantage, but it still makes it tougher to see much less than 2" between them. Crowe at 5'10.5" seems accurate so sometimes Cavill can seem this listing, but other times I think maybe just 6'0"-6'0.25". I doubt over this listing and certainly not 6'1", but nothing under 6' either. He seems taller than a guy in that 182 cm range like Jensen Ackles.
6footTom said on 12/Jan/19
Cavill appears to be a pretty height conscious guy in photos. I noticed that whenever he's standing beside actors who are taller than him, he tends to extend his posture to the max and even tilts his head up a bit to minimize the height difference.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.