Julian Assange's Height
6ft 2 (188 cm)
Australian programmer and journalist, known as editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks. On a dating profile he once listed his stature as "Height: 6' 2" (1.87m)"
You May Be Interested
Add a Comment16 comments
Average Guess (22 Votes)
6ft 1.92in (187.8cm)
sergio cede?o said on 17/Apr/19
worked in the embassy of Ecuador for some years I am 6,3 and I ran into assange a few times and it seemed maximum 187 cm I think it needs a rebate
said on 15/Apr/19
Rob, how tall could Slavoj Zizek be? (0:33)
None of the two have a straight posture, but Slavoj looks noticeably shorter than Assange.
At least 4 inches shorter
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Feb/18
The 187cm mark would make sense...most guys would convert/round that to 6ft2
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 25/Jan/18
Downgrade to 187.
Matthew Robinson said on 16/Aug/17
I'd give him the 6'1.75". Seems like a good guess.
Vicki d. said on 21/Apr/17
He stood under a presumably standard height door. So, yes, I think he is taller than 6'2".his head was close to the height of the door.
Roger said on 23/Nov/16
He looks at least 3 inches taller than Michael Moore in the embassy photos. Assuming Michael Moore has dipped a little below the 6ft mark I'd say 6'2 was a conservative estimate.
said on 22/Oct/16
Rob, how likely is 187cm for him?
Editor Rob: generally about 6ft 2 is ok for him.
Guanzo said on 21/Oct/16
6 ft 1.75 = 1.87
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Oct/16
One of the more honest 6ft2 guys
said on 17/Oct/16
Isn't he taller actually? To me he always seemed to be 6'4" or even more! One good image for reference: Click Here
Does he really look only 6'2" to you compared to a 6'8" guy in the photo?
Editor Rob: I think he looks at most 6ft 2 with that guy.
MrTBlack said on 16/Oct/16
I know he's probably unaware but 187cm isn't 6'2". But yes does look more 6'2" than 6'1.5"
S.J.H said on 16/Oct/16
He look taller than most 6'2 actors. Must be a true 6'2er and his not a celebrity like them
Arch Stanton said on 16/Oct/16
Creepy guy, does look 6'2.
HonestSlovene said on 16/Oct/16
This sounds about right.
said on 16/Oct/16
if he listed himself @ 1.87, why did you give him full 6'2?
Editor Rob: because it could have stored in the database just the feet/inches and displayed the cm beside it.