Add a Comment2649 comments
Average Guess (808 Votes)
5ft 11.23in (180.9cm)
5ft 11.23in (180.9cm)
Rising174cm said on 25/Jan/21
@Rob: I agree. Also, I'm sure you've seen the Catch Me if You Can Events with Tom Hanks, full photos with 5'7.5" directors like Spielberg and Ridley Scott and the video where Obama looked a good 2" taller than Leo. I always saw right around 2" between Tom Hardy and Leo.
Editor Rob
@Rob: I agree. Also, I'm sure you've seen the Catch Me if You Can Events with Tom Hanks, full photos with 5'7.5" directors like Spielberg and Ridley Scott and the video where Obama looked a good 2" taller than Leo. I always saw right around 2" between Tom Hardy and Leo.
Editor Robyes
I have seen those, and also the clip with Elon Musk again made him look 5ft 11ish, 11.25 at most really...there's literally little chance he's near 6ft barefoot.
I have seen those, and also the clip with Elon Musk again made him look 5ft 11ish, 11.25 at most really...there's literally little chance he's near 6ft barefoot.
Broussard077 said on 25/Jan/21
Close to 6 foot
Close to 6 foot
Rising174cm said on 22/Jan/21
It's highly likely those 5'11" and 175 figures came from Leo, imo. It's also likely he then increased his claim to 6 foot later on. He certainly wouldn't be the first 5'11" actor to do that! Remember Burt's law: there are NO 5'11" actors.
Editor Rob
It's highly likely those 5'11" and 175 figures came from Leo, imo. It's also likely he then increased his claim to 6 foot later on. He certainly wouldn't be the first 5'11" actor to do that! Remember Burt's law: there are NO 5'11" actors.
Editor Robwhen you see President Joe a few years ago with Leo it's easy to imagine 5ft 11 flat for him there.
Luci paura said on 18/Jan/21
5'11 amd three quarters I think.
5'11 amd three quarters I think.
Luci paura said on 18/Jan/21
Looks too tall for 5'11, maybe a weak 6 ft.
Looks too tall for 5'11, maybe a weak 6 ft.
slim 6'1 said on 16/Jan/21
Got edged by djimon hounso in blood diamond despite him wearing boots
Got edged by djimon hounso in blood diamond despite him wearing boots
slim 6'1 said on 16/Jan/21
It’s clear somewhere between 180-181cm
It’s clear somewhere between 180-181cm
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 16/Jan/21
@keko190 you can round it either way
@keko190 you can round it either way
keko190 said on 14/Jan/21
Hello Rob. Nobody or most of men would never claim a shorter height that what he really is. Thi is obvious. Leo always looked a 5'11 guy. He could be 5'10 3/4 and he just rounded up and claim 5'11.
Hello Rob. Nobody or most of men would never claim a shorter height that what he really is. Thi is obvious. Leo always looked a 5'11 guy. He could be 5'10 3/4 and he just rounded up and claim 5'11.
keko190 said on 14/Jan/21
Hello Rob. The man himself claim he is 5'11. Some years ago said "at 5'11 and 175 lbs I can bench 205 pounds". If he really is 5'11.25 he would claim a higher mark or 6 foot. Why did you list Leo at 5'11.25.?
Editor Rob
Hello Rob. The man himself claim he is 5'11. Some years ago said "at 5'11 and 175 lbs I can bench 205 pounds". If he really is 5'11.25 he would claim a higher mark or 6 foot. Why did you list Leo at 5'11.25.?
Editor Robhe could have said it but the quote wasn't a direct "I'm 5ft 11 and 175".
Former contributor Glenn said that Leo told him he was "around six foot".
assuming Glenn was being honest and didn't make it up that's a different claim from Leo.
Former contributor Glenn said that Leo told him he was "around six foot".
assuming Glenn was being honest and didn't make it up that's a different claim from Leo.
ajax509 said on 12/Jan/21
@Editor Rob
Why don't put his "5 ft. 11 in. and 175 lbs." claim to his description above? shorturl.at/rCJ57
The statement is from the year 2000, so DiCaprio was already fully grown.
Editor Rob
@Editor Rob
Why don't put his "5 ft. 11 in. and 175 lbs." claim to his description above? shorturl.at/rCJ57
The statement is from the year 2000, so DiCaprio was already fully grown.
Editor RobI added it to the first paragraph.
ALEXIZ/180cm said on 9/Jan/21
180 cm max.
180 cm max.
Vincent Caleb said on 8/Jan/21
5’11” for DiCaprio, maybe 5’10.5-.75” Pitt.
5’11” for DiCaprio, maybe 5’10.5-.75” Pitt.
Rising174cm said on 8/Jan/21
At least around 1 cm to a half inch over Pitt, imo.
Berlin photocall: Click Here Click Here Note that Brad has about 1 cm more footwear yet Leo can look 3 cm taller with better posture in the first pic and still 1 cm taller in 2nd despite Brad's camera advantage. Video also confirms Leo was taller: Click Here
London premiere: Click Here Click Here Leo looks about half an inch taller, which video again confirms: Click Here (@ 4:29) and Pitt's heels are definitely a fraction thicker: Click Here Click Here
Cannes photocall: Click Here Click Here The one event Pitt doesn't have a noticeable footwear advantage and winds up shorter than Leo even if you include his hat, which must add at least 1 cm.
Berlin premiere: Click Here Click Here Leo looks about 2 cm taller even though Brad's 1.3" range heels will give him a fraction advantage.
London photocall: Click Here Again, Leo is taller even if you include Brad's hat despite around 1 cm less footwear than Brad.
LA premiere: Click Here Leo is taller in that full pic as well as video: Click Here (11 and 27 seconds) Pitt again had a fraction heel advantage: Click Here Click Here
So my Brad and Leo estimates don't really add up since I'd have thought at least 2 cm from these events(only Pitt looking as tall at Cannes red carpet, albeit with thicker heels made me revise this) though Leo at 181 and Pitt at 179 is entirely possible. Comparing them to everyone else, I'd guess Leo at 5'11" and Pitt at 5'10.75", but that doesn't match up since the difference must be a minimum 1 cm, imo.
At least around 1 cm to a half inch over Pitt, imo.
Berlin photocall: Click Here Click Here Note that Brad has about 1 cm more footwear yet Leo can look 3 cm taller with better posture in the first pic and still 1 cm taller in 2nd despite Brad's camera advantage. Video also confirms Leo was taller: Click Here
London premiere: Click Here Click Here Leo looks about half an inch taller, which video again confirms: Click Here (@ 4:29) and Pitt's heels are definitely a fraction thicker: Click Here Click Here
Cannes photocall: Click Here Click Here The one event Pitt doesn't have a noticeable footwear advantage and winds up shorter than Leo even if you include his hat, which must add at least 1 cm.
Berlin premiere: Click Here Click Here Leo looks about 2 cm taller even though Brad's 1.3" range heels will give him a fraction advantage.
London photocall: Click Here Again, Leo is taller even if you include Brad's hat despite around 1 cm less footwear than Brad.
LA premiere: Click Here Leo is taller in that full pic as well as video: Click Here (11 and 27 seconds) Pitt again had a fraction heel advantage: Click Here Click Here
So my Brad and Leo estimates don't really add up since I'd have thought at least 2 cm from these events(only Pitt looking as tall at Cannes red carpet, albeit with thicker heels made me revise this) though Leo at 181 and Pitt at 179 is entirely possible. Comparing them to everyone else, I'd guess Leo at 5'11" and Pitt at 5'10.75", but that doesn't match up since the difference must be a minimum 1 cm, imo.
Rising174cm said on 8/Jan/21
@Canson: I tend to agree, although Leo was taller than Alec Baldwin: Click Here Baldwin was more 5'11" flat peak, but that still means Leo is looking above 5'11".
@Canson: I tend to agree, although Leo was taller than Alec Baldwin: Click Here Baldwin was more 5'11" flat peak, but that still means Leo is looking above 5'11".
Original said on 8/Jan/21
I'm pretty sure that Pitt is more than 1cm shorter than Di Caprio, I actually think the difference is bigger than most people would say (both without shoes), I guess it to be around 3cms rather than 1-1.5cm.
Di Caprio (often with bad posture) I can see somewhere around 180.5 (5'11), Pitt around 177.5... can be 181-178 too.
I'm pretty sure that Pitt is more than 1cm shorter than Di Caprio, I actually think the difference is bigger than most people would say (both without shoes), I guess it to be around 3cms rather than 1-1.5cm.
Di Caprio (often with bad posture) I can see somewhere around 180.5 (5'11), Pitt around 177.5... can be 181-178 too.
slim 6'1 said on 7/Jan/21
I agree with will in some movies he easily cleared 5’11” and in some others he struggled with it so that’ll put Leo in 181 territory 👍
I agree with will in some movies he easily cleared 5’11” and in some others he struggled with it so that’ll put Leo in 181 territory 👍
Canson said on 6/Jan/21
@Rising: yea I’d give him 180/180.5. He could make 5’11 flat and 5’11.75. I’d give Pitt about 1cm less
@Rising: yea I’d give him 180/180.5. He could make 5’11 flat and 5’11.75. I’d give Pitt about 1cm less
Rising174cm said on 5/Jan/21
Agreed about looking 180 cm with Hanks even if Hanks was the height he's listed, though I think he was probably 182 cm. Here's a full photo from a different event in 2003: Click Here 181 cm is possible, but 181.5 is pushing it.
In context, it seems the 5'11" and 175 pound figures came from him: "At 5 ft. 11 in. and 175 lbs., he claims he can bench-press 205 lbs. 'This is the biggest I've ever been,' he says." Click Here Interestingly, that was changed to 180 cm and 80 kg for this version of the same article: Click Here
Agreed about looking 180 cm with Hanks even if Hanks was the height he's listed, though I think he was probably 182 cm. Here's a full photo from a different event in 2003: Click Here 181 cm is possible, but 181.5 is pushing it.
In context, it seems the 5'11" and 175 pound figures came from him: "At 5 ft. 11 in. and 175 lbs., he claims he can bench-press 205 lbs. 'This is the biggest I've ever been,' he says." Click Here Interestingly, that was changed to 180 cm and 80 kg for this version of the same article: Click Here
Yoff said on 5/Jan/21
Rob do you think his morning height is 6 feet flat? If he has proper posture and stood up really straight?
Editor Rob
Rob do you think his morning height is 6 feet flat? If he has proper posture and stood up really straight?
Editor RobI'm sure he hits that mark early in the morning.
slim 6'1 said on 4/Jan/21
181 area is still likely
181 area is still likely
juanmi178 said on 2/Jan/21
If Hanks was 182-183 peak then Leo is clearly a 180 guy nothing over 180.
If Hanks was 182-183 peak then Leo is clearly a 180 guy nothing over 180.
Slim 6'1" said on 31/Dec/20
Nothing under 180cm
Nothing under 180cm
Slim 6'1" said on 30/Dec/20
181.5 is possible for Leo
181.5 is possible for Leo
Rising174cm said on 30/Dec/20
Hanks had about an inch on DiCaprio back in 2002: Click Here I'd probably guess Hanks was more 182 cm as well.
Hanks had about an inch on DiCaprio back in 2002: Click Here I'd probably guess Hanks was more 182 cm as well.
juanmi178 said on 30/Dec/20
Animus said on 29/Dec/20
why you upgrade an own claim by Hnks himself. He was 6'0 max not a mm over the mark. Why you say 184 cm?
He was 182-182,8 cm so 6'0 max. 184 cm is 6'0.5. Stop upgrading heights please. This makes Leo 180 max
Animus said on 29/Dec/20
why you upgrade an own claim by Hnks himself. He was 6'0 max not a mm over the mark. Why you say 184 cm?
He was 182-182,8 cm so 6'0 max. 184 cm is 6'0.5. Stop upgrading heights please. This makes Leo 180 max
Animus said on 29/Dec/20
I see that some recent posters have tried to argue 182cm for DiCaprio. Well, if you do a quick Google search of him and Tom Hanks from their 'Catch Me If You Can' press tour, you'll see that would have to mean that Hanks (in his prime) was 184cm. Given that the consensus view on this site is that Hanks was a legitimate 6'0 in his prime but no taller, that drastically reduces the chances that DiCaprio is 182cm. I don't he could have looked like that next to Hanks and have been 1cm short of the magical, mystical 6'0 (use of irony... may occur).
Alright, so, 5'11¾ is close to impossible for DiCaprio. 5'11½ is more possible but I'd give it pretty low odds.
Here's the probability distribution I'd give for DiCaprio's height:
5'11¼ - 50%, 5'11⅜ - 25%, 5'11⅛ - 15%, 5'11½ - 4.5%, 5'11 - 4.5%, 'outside of 5'11-5'11½' -
I see that some recent posters have tried to argue 182cm for DiCaprio. Well, if you do a quick Google search of him and Tom Hanks from their 'Catch Me If You Can' press tour, you'll see that would have to mean that Hanks (in his prime) was 184cm. Given that the consensus view on this site is that Hanks was a legitimate 6'0 in his prime but no taller, that drastically reduces the chances that DiCaprio is 182cm. I don't he could have looked like that next to Hanks and have been 1cm short of the magical, mystical 6'0 (use of irony... may occur).
Alright, so, 5'11¾ is close to impossible for DiCaprio. 5'11½ is more possible but I'd give it pretty low odds.
Here's the probability distribution I'd give for DiCaprio's height:
5'11¼ - 50%, 5'11⅜ - 25%, 5'11⅛ - 15%, 5'11½ - 4.5%, 5'11 - 4.5%, 'outside of 5'11-5'11½' -
juanmi178 said on 29/Dec/20
@Rob yes probabLy I'm wrong he is still very young. His posture makes meme think he lost 1/8 but I guess I'm wrong. Anyways to my eyes he was always a classic 180 guy or weak 5'11. His young days lanky or slim appearance could make people think he was a bit over 5'11
@Rob yes probabLy I'm wrong he is still very young. His posture makes meme think he lost 1/8 but I guess I'm wrong. Anyways to my eyes he was always a classic 180 guy or weak 5'11. His young days lanky or slim appearance could make people think he was a bit over 5'11
juanmi178 said on 27/Dec/20
@Rob I think Leo lost 1/8 inch what do you think? His posture is not as good aswell. I think he was 180.5 cm in his peak 5'11 or a hair over 5'11. Nowadays 5'11 or 180.0 standing tall. 3 mm or 1/8 inch is possible even being so young. Who knows..
Editor Rob
@Rob I think Leo lost 1/8 inch what do you think? His posture is not as good aswell. I think he was 180.5 cm in his peak 5'11 or a hair over 5'11. Nowadays 5'11 or 180.0 standing tall. 3 mm or 1/8 inch is possible even being so young. Who knows..
Editor RobI wouldn't have thought Leo has lost anything noticeable...
mid 40's is an age that some guys will have lost a few mm, but I don't know if Leo would be one of them.
mid 40's is an age that some guys will have lost a few mm, but I don't know if Leo would be one of them.
juanmi178 said on 27/Dec/20
@Rob I think Leo lost 1/8 inch what do you think? His posture is not as good aswell. I think he was 180.5 cm in his peak 5'11 or a hair over 5'11. Nowadays 5'11 or 180.0 standing tall
@Rob I think Leo lost 1/8 inch what do you think? His posture is not as good aswell. I think he was 180.5 cm in his peak 5'11 or a hair over 5'11. Nowadays 5'11 or 180.0 standing tall
Animus said on 27/Dec/20
I see that some recent posters have tried to argue 182cm for DiCaprio. Well, if you do a quick Google search of him and Tom Hanks from their 'Catch Me If You Can' press tour, you'll see that would have to mean that Hanks (in his prime) was 184cm. Given that the consensus view on this site is that Hanks was a legitimate 6'0 in his prime but no taller, that drastically reduces the chances that DiCaprio is 182cm. I don't he could have looked like that next to Hanks and have been 1cm short of the magical, mystical 6'0 (use of irony... is possible).
Alright, so, 5'11¾ is close to impossible for DiCaprio. 5'11½ is more possible but I'd give it pretty low odds.
Here's the probability distribution I'd give for DiCaprio's height:
5'11¼ - 50%, 5'11⅜ - 25%, 5'11⅛ - 15%, 5'11½ - 4.5%, 5'11 - 4.5%, 'outside of 5'11-5'11½' -
I see that some recent posters have tried to argue 182cm for DiCaprio. Well, if you do a quick Google search of him and Tom Hanks from their 'Catch Me If You Can' press tour, you'll see that would have to mean that Hanks (in his prime) was 184cm. Given that the consensus view on this site is that Hanks was a legitimate 6'0 in his prime but no taller, that drastically reduces the chances that DiCaprio is 182cm. I don't he could have looked like that next to Hanks and have been 1cm short of the magical, mystical 6'0 (use of irony... is possible).
Alright, so, 5'11¾ is close to impossible for DiCaprio. 5'11½ is more possible but I'd give it pretty low odds.
Here's the probability distribution I'd give for DiCaprio's height:
5'11¼ - 50%, 5'11⅜ - 25%, 5'11⅛ - 15%, 5'11½ - 4.5%, 5'11 - 4.5%, 'outside of 5'11-5'11½' -
Rising174cm said on 27/Dec/20
Leo is 5'11" - just as he was described in that 1999 magazine profile, though as I just showed on Brad Pitt's page, Leo is at least half an inch taller than Pitt. On occasion, Leo can even struggle with 5'11" as he really only looked 3" taller than Spielberg and Ridley Scott - both 5'7.5" - and 182-183 cm Tom Hanks had an inch on him. There was also that video where Obama had a solid 2" on Leo, though Leo does look a full 2" taller than Tom Hardy.
Leo is 5'11" - just as he was described in that 1999 magazine profile, though as I just showed on Brad Pitt's page, Leo is at least half an inch taller than Pitt. On occasion, Leo can even struggle with 5'11" as he really only looked 3" taller than Spielberg and Ridley Scott - both 5'7.5" - and 182-183 cm Tom Hanks had an inch on him. There was also that video where Obama had a solid 2" on Leo, though Leo does look a full 2" taller than Tom Hardy.
juanmi178 said on 26/Dec/20
Shane Barrios said on 24/Dec/20
Leo is 5'11.75-6'0 with shoes. He always was a typical 5'11 guy or a tad under 5'11. typical solid 180. 5'10 7/8 5'11 max
Shane Barrios said on 24/Dec/20
Leo is 5'11.75-6'0 with shoes. He always was a typical 5'11 guy or a tad under 5'11. typical solid 180. 5'10 7/8 5'11 max
juanmi178 said on 26/Dec/20
Shane Barrios said on 24/Dec/20
Lol and lol yeah right... We believe you. Leo 6'0 ok....Broad shoulders?? pushinhg 6'2? man I think you saw another guy . Good try
Shane Barrios said on 24/Dec/20
Lol and lol yeah right... We believe you. Leo 6'0 ok....Broad shoulders?? pushinhg 6'2? man I think you saw another guy . Good try
juanmi178 said on 26/Dec/20
Shane Barrios said on 24/Dec/20
Lol and lol yeah right... We believe you. Leo 6'0 ok....
Shane Barrios said on 24/Dec/20
Lol and lol yeah right... We believe you. Leo 6'0 ok....
Shane Barrios said on 24/Dec/20
I met Leo while working at Slim Goodies in New Orleans. He asked me if he and his company could eat out back in the closed off garden area. Of course I said yes. When he stood up he was definitely without a doubt a 6 footer. With his Nike airs and tall broad shoulders he looked to be pushing 6’2”. I’m a short 6’1” and he seemed a tad taller. I was wearing Vans and those are flat as can be. I bet he and I are the same height. He’s not five foot something. That’s for sure...
I met Leo while working at Slim Goodies in New Orleans. He asked me if he and his company could eat out back in the closed off garden area. Of course I said yes. When he stood up he was definitely without a doubt a 6 footer. With his Nike airs and tall broad shoulders he looked to be pushing 6’2”. I’m a short 6’1” and he seemed a tad taller. I was wearing Vans and those are flat as can be. I bet he and I are the same height. He’s not five foot something. That’s for sure...
juanmi178 said on 22/Dec/20
Hi @Rob. So do you think there's only 6 mm between Leonardo Dicaprio and Brad Pitt? I always see Dicaprio taller by a good 1 cm and maybe 1'5 cm. If Leo is 181 cm then Brad is 180 cm max. 180 cm on inches is 5'10.75.
My opinion: Leo 180.5 cm Brad is a strong 179 guy. Peak weak 180
Editor Rob
Hi @Rob. So do you think there's only 6 mm between Leonardo Dicaprio and Brad Pitt? I always see Dicaprio taller by a good 1 cm and maybe 1'5 cm. If Leo is 181 cm then Brad is 180 cm max. 180 cm on inches is 5'10.75.
My opinion: Leo 180.5 cm Brad is a strong 179 guy. Peak weak 180
Editor Robarguably 1cm between them, you could make the case Pitt is just under 5ft 11 and Leo a solid 11.25
Vincent Caleb said on 19/Dec/20
@Miss Sandy Cowell:
I thought Leo lost supporting actor to Tommy Lee Jones that year?
@Miss Sandy Cowell:
I thought Leo lost supporting actor to Tommy Lee Jones that year?
Slim 6'1" said on 18/Dec/20
Sandy, Leo is very talented and Gilbert grape was a great movie 👍
Sandy, Leo is very talented and Gilbert grape was a great movie 👍
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 12/Dec/20
What a remarkable performance Leonardo gave in 'What's Eating Gilbert Grape?' It's no wonder the 18-year-old Leo won Best Supporting Actor. Having just seen the end of the film, one can't fail to think, "Is that really the same guy as the actor from Quentin Tarantino's 'Django Unchained' and 'Once Upon A Time in Hollywood'?" 🤭
What a versatile actor he is. 🏆
Leo turned 19 at the end of 1993, the year Gilbert Grape was made, so will have doubtless been 18 while the movie was shot. He clearly had more growing to do as he wasn't as tall as Johnny Depp's 5ft9.... yet! Ergo, Leo put on a late growth spurt.
I'm giving him 5ft11.5. Six foot is chalked up for him in the synopsis of his film and personal details which I perused my way through not ten minutes ago. I can believe he's that at his absolute tallest, or near to that height. 😄👍🎄
What a remarkable performance Leonardo gave in 'What's Eating Gilbert Grape?' It's no wonder the 18-year-old Leo won Best Supporting Actor. Having just seen the end of the film, one can't fail to think, "Is that really the same guy as the actor from Quentin Tarantino's 'Django Unchained' and 'Once Upon A Time in Hollywood'?" 🤭
What a versatile actor he is. 🏆
Leo turned 19 at the end of 1993, the year Gilbert Grape was made, so will have doubtless been 18 while the movie was shot. He clearly had more growing to do as he wasn't as tall as Johnny Depp's 5ft9.... yet! Ergo, Leo put on a late growth spurt.
I'm giving him 5ft11.5. Six foot is chalked up for him in the synopsis of his film and personal details which I perused my way through not ten minutes ago. I can believe he's that at his absolute tallest, or near to that height. 😄👍🎄
Antoine said on 9/Dec/20
Rob, if you had to choose one height for Leonardo Dicaprio, would you go with 180 or 181 ?
When I look at photos with Barack Obama, I think his height is well under 6 feet, even below 181...
What do you think Rob ?
Editor Rob
Rob, if you had to choose one height for Leonardo Dicaprio, would you go with 180 or 181 ?
When I look at photos with Barack Obama, I think his height is well under 6 feet, even below 181...
What do you think Rob ?
Editor Robstill would say nearer 181 than 180
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 7/Dec/20
Click Here When Pitt confidently puts on his 1.5" footwear next to Leo making an illusion of 5'11 3/4 when Leo is abit loose in posture.
Click Here Rare to see Pitt gave up lift in picture with Leo.
Click Here When Pitt confidently puts on his 1.5" footwear next to Leo making an illusion of 5'11 3/4 when Leo is abit loose in posture.
Click Here Rare to see Pitt gave up lift in picture with Leo.
Original said on 4/Dec/20
Around 5'11-5'11.25 seems right (from 5'10.75" to 5'11.5" in fact)
Around 5'11-5'11.25 seems right (from 5'10.75" to 5'11.5" in fact)
Clif booth said on 2/Dec/20
Rob ,When do you think leo finish his growth ?
Editor Rob
Rob ,When do you think leo finish his growth ?
Editor RobI think till 21 he still put on height
darui said on 27/Nov/20
If peak time Hank’s was 6 feet tall then I don’t see leonardo being less than 182cm which is what most 6 footers actually measure and is the beginning of “tall”
If peak time Hank’s was 6 feet tall then I don’t see leonardo being less than 182cm which is what most 6 footers actually measure and is the beginning of “tall”
Soda machine said on 26/Nov/20
Weak 6-0 imo. Close I’d say.
Weak 6-0 imo. Close I’d say.
Slim 6'1@ said on 21/Nov/20
Edged brad Pitt so he’s nothing under 180cm
Edged brad Pitt so he’s nothing under 180cm
Jack Daniels said on 17/Nov/20
Hi Rob. Camila Morrone is described between 5'7" and 5'9" on internet. Why don't believe 5'7" ? Beside Mr Dicaprio she looks no more than 5'7" I think.
Hi Rob. Camila Morrone is described between 5'7" and 5'9" on internet. Why don't believe 5'7" ? Beside Mr Dicaprio she looks no more than 5'7" I think.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 12/Nov/20
I Believe Leo once measure 5'11 3/4 in the morning and rounded up claiming 6'0 since then. Flat 181cm not more.
I Believe Leo once measure 5'11 3/4 in the morning and rounded up claiming 6'0 since then. Flat 181cm not more.
Heightist999 said on 12/Nov/20
Looking at him with 184-186 cm measured Obama, anything above 181, is for sure, out of the question.
Looking at him with 184-186 cm measured Obama, anything above 181, is for sure, out of the question.
Slim 6'1" said on 11/Nov/20
hed edge brad pitt 182cm
hed edge brad pitt 182cm
Slim 6'1@ said on 4/Nov/20
183.5-184 out of bed, doubt he’s shrunk much if not at all
183.5-184 out of bed, doubt he’s shrunk much if not at all
Slim 6'1@ said on 4/Nov/20
Got him at 181.5-182.
Got him at 181.5-182.
Jack Daniels said on 30/Oct/20
Pics between Mr Dicaprio and Mr Albert de Monaco shows about 1 cm in favor of Albert (I find 181 cm and 183 cm for Albert which could be his lowest and highest height when he was young) When he was with Leo, he probably shrink a little bit (age 59 in 2017). Other photos they are equal height. Leo could wakes up at 5'11"25 and shrink to 5'10.5"?
Pics between Mr Dicaprio and Mr Albert de Monaco shows about 1 cm in favor of Albert (I find 181 cm and 183 cm for Albert which could be his lowest and highest height when he was young) When he was with Leo, he probably shrink a little bit (age 59 in 2017). Other photos they are equal height. Leo could wakes up at 5'11"25 and shrink to 5'10.5"?
Slim 6'1" said on 25/Oct/20
Weak 6 footer DiCaprio, he edged Brad Pitt by 1cm
Weak 6 footer DiCaprio, he edged Brad Pitt by 1cm
6'3 Julian said on 17/Oct/20
Does he have lots of over-inflating fan girls? One girl I know said Leo is, in her words, “your height and could easily take you in a fight’. When I told her “Nah he’s like 5’11, maybe half an inch over” she tried to convince me I was only 6’0
Does he have lots of over-inflating fan girls? One girl I know said Leo is, in her words, “your height and could easily take you in a fight’. When I told her “Nah he’s like 5’11, maybe half an inch over” she tried to convince me I was only 6’0
Slim 6'1" said on 16/Oct/20
181-182 guesses are wat he should be getting, flat 5´11 is lowballing him
181-182 guesses are wat he should be getting, flat 5´11 is lowballing him
berta said on 15/Oct/20
i feel dicaprio is somewhere in the 181-182 range. i think 181,5 is close to what he measure.
i feel dicaprio is somewhere in the 181-182 range. i think 181,5 is close to what he measure.
Matthew Burkhardt said on 13/Oct/20
Looks taller than Brad Pitt, so could be 6'. His wax figure in London looks tall too. The other waxen celebrities look taller than heights listed here. Do you think Tussaud's is adding extra wax Rob?
Editor Rob
Looks taller than Brad Pitt, so could be 6'. His wax figure in London looks tall too. The other waxen celebrities look taller than heights listed here. Do you think Tussaud's is adding extra wax Rob?
Editor RobSome people do go along and have dimensions taken for figures, some don't.
cmillz said on 13/Oct/20
People don’t have a clue of what 6’0 looks like if they think Leo is anywhere near it.
People don’t have a clue of what 6’0 looks like if they think Leo is anywhere near it.
cmillz said on 12/Oct/20
@Jtm
Maybe 5’10.5”
@Jtm
Maybe 5’10.5”
Kebapsever said on 11/Oct/20
We could give him 5’11,5, but rob you know the best if you think he’s 181cm then so be it.
We could give him 5’11,5, but rob you know the best if you think he’s 181cm then so be it.
VitoCheng said on 9/Oct/20
Leo is 181
Brad is 179.5
Leo is 181
Brad is 179.5
Slim 6'1" said on 5/Oct/20
I still feel that 182cm can be argued for him
I still feel that 182cm can be argued for him
Sam94 said on 29/Sep/20
I'd guess 181,5.
I think 5'11.5 is a fair listing, but no more than that!
I'd guess 181,5.
I think 5'11.5 is a fair listing, but no more than that!
Jtm said on 29/Sep/20
solid 5'10 guy without help.
solid 5'10 guy without help.
Original said on 28/Sep/20
5'11.25"
5'11.25"
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 25/Sep/20
Sometimes Leo 181cm listing look to be his lowest.
Sometimes Leo 181cm listing look to be his lowest.
TheDon1528 said on 24/Sep/20
I agree with the listing
I agree with the listing
Slim 6'1" said on 24/Sep/20
He’d def edge Matthew McConaughey
He’d def edge Matthew McConaughey
Slim 6'1" said on 24/Sep/20
A solid to strong 5’11”
A solid to strong 5’11”
Slim 6'1" said on 24/Sep/20
Leo is somewhere between 180-182.5cm
Leo is somewhere between 180-182.5cm
Slim 6'1" said on 24/Sep/20
Anthony b, I’d guess u as 183-184 barefoot
Anthony b, I’d guess u as 183-184 barefoot
Anthony B said on 22/Sep/20
I'll say his height is accurate so I possibly edge him out.. hey rob I got measured at 186 cm in slides...how tall would I be without them? Just curious thanks in advance
I'll say his height is accurate so I possibly edge him out.. hey rob I got measured at 186 cm in slides...how tall would I be without them? Just curious thanks in advance
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Sep/20
181.5-182xm at his evening low.
181.5-182xm at his evening low.
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Sep/20
Got that feeling he’s 182
Got that feeling he’s 182
TheBat said on 18/Sep/20
Leo’s nothing below 5’11”. He’s almost an inch taller that 5’10.5” Brad Pitt.
Leo’s nothing below 5’11”. He’s almost an inch taller that 5’10.5” Brad Pitt.
Hulk.23 said on 24/Aug/20
Strong 5’11 so 5’11.25 is ok but nothing up. I think if he will meet a 5’11.5-11.75 guy like me then he will be edged by him
Strong 5’11 so 5’11.25 is ok but nothing up. I think if he will meet a 5’11.5-11.75 guy like me then he will be edged by him
Animus said on 21/Aug/20
@Jeffrey Pedal
I'd say 200lbs range is fair; he looks heavier than 190lbs. I won't post them here, but certain pictures reveal that he's got a little gut going for him.
@Jeffrey Pedal
I'd say 200lbs range is fair; he looks heavier than 190lbs. I won't post them here, but certain pictures reveal that he's got a little gut going for him.
Alex1.1 said on 16/Aug/20
If Obama is 6.1ft look at this video. Leo looks a good 2 inches+ shorter. 5.10 or 5.11ft for Leo.
Click Here
If Obama is 6.1ft look at this video. Leo looks a good 2 inches+ shorter. 5.10 or 5.11ft for Leo.
Click Here
The French Dude said on 10/Aug/20
5'11!, never looked taller than that to me
5'11!, never looked taller than that to me
Slim 6'1" said on 6/Aug/20
5’10.5” & under impossible but so is 6’+
5’10.5” & under impossible but so is 6’+
Jtm said on 6/Aug/20
DiCaprio and Pitt are not exactly the tallest actors out there. They both looked shorter than Henry Thomas.
DiCaprio and Pitt are not exactly the tallest actors out there. They both looked shorter than Henry Thomas.
TheBat said on 5/Aug/20
Easily 5'11.25" (181 cm).
Easily 5'11.25" (181 cm).
Ebibs said on 2/Aug/20
It is two cm shorter than Christopher Nolan. Look, you will understand
It is two cm shorter than Christopher Nolan. Look, you will understand
Slim 6'1" said on 30/Jul/20
Probably be similar to Dmeyer
Probably be similar to Dmeyer
Slim 6'1" said on 30/Jul/20
182-182.5 at his low
182-182.5 at his low
Slim 6'1" said on 30/Jul/20
100% sure he’s taller than brad Pitt, 1995 golden globes or 1996 I can’t remember now he looked taller standing next to him
100% sure he’s taller than brad Pitt, 1995 golden globes or 1996 I can’t remember now he looked taller standing next to him
Slim 6'1" said on 30/Jul/20
Just missed out on the mighty 6’ mark, 181-182 is a really credible guess for him
Just missed out on the mighty 6’ mark, 181-182 is a really credible guess for him
John Bricker said on 27/Jul/20
He is 5”10.5
He is 5”10.5
Kieran S said on 12/Jul/20
Perfect listing for him
Perfect listing for him
Pierre said on 9/Jul/20
177/177.5 ,weak 5"10'
177/177.5 ,weak 5"10'
Flippy said on 26/Jun/20
i would say 178-180 for him
i would say 178-180 for him
Pierre said on 24/Jun/20
Barack /Leonardo Click Here
Click Here Click Here Click Here = Orlando Bloom /max 5"11.75' Madds Mikkelsen
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here =Leonardo /Orlando
Barack /Leonardo Click Here
Click Here Click Here Click Here = Orlando Bloom /max 5"11.75' Madds Mikkelsen
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here =Leonardo /Orlando
QM6'1QM said on 22/Jun/20
I don't know guys, but he gives me impression of 2in difference between him and Obama: Click Here
Please, open Google and find some other pics.
I don't know guys, but he gives me impression of 2in difference between him and Obama: Click Here
Please, open Google and find some other pics.
Joseph177 said on 21/Jun/20
183 cm right out of bed. 181 at night. He looks 1 inch taller than Orlando Bloom.
183 cm right out of bed. 181 at night. He looks 1 inch taller than Orlando Bloom.
madhair said on 17/Jun/20
@Pierre said on 15/Jun/20
How tall do you think Leo was in 2000 178 or 179 in cm? I find interesting your guess on this site
@Pierre said on 15/Jun/20
How tall do you think Leo was in 2000 178 or 179 in cm? I find interesting your guess on this site
Pierre said on 15/Jun/20
@rkv Leonardo 6"0' means Robert Knepper around 5"10.5'/5"10.75' that seems to myself simply impossible.
5"10' range
@rkv Leonardo 6"0' means Robert Knepper around 5"10.5'/5"10.75' that seems to myself simply impossible.
5"10' range
radical said on 15/Jun/20
saw him in Miami just before the quarantine. he's at least 6'1 was wearing just flat sneakers. Very tall looking.
saw him in Miami just before the quarantine. he's at least 6'1 was wearing just flat sneakers. Very tall looking.
rkv said on 14/Jun/20
rob, don't hesitate on this listing. Revolutionary Road was on cable tonight, he looked 6'0 again. he's a little maturer, looks aged from that size. i remember in the comments you said you wouldn't be surprised at a 6'0 measurement. 182 feels safe, 181's looking ridiculous.
rob, don't hesitate on this listing. Revolutionary Road was on cable tonight, he looked 6'0 again. he's a little maturer, looks aged from that size. i remember in the comments you said you wouldn't be surprised at a 6'0 measurement. 182 feels safe, 181's looking ridiculous.
Jeffrey Pedal? said on 12/Jun/20
Rob he is quite fat today, near the 200 pounds?
Editor Rob
Rob he is quite fat today, near the 200 pounds?
Editor Robfrom some beach photos he does look like he could be 190 range.
Pierre said on 7/Jun/20
@Jam Cherry = Bradley Cooper wear sometimes advantageous shoes he's 5"11' range barefoot .Here with 5"9.5' max Brad Pitt probably wearing advantageous shoes = Click Here
@Jam Cherry = Bradley Cooper wear sometimes advantageous shoes he's 5"11' range barefoot .Here with 5"9.5' max Brad Pitt probably wearing advantageous shoes = Click Here
Richie said on 6/Jun/20
@Jam Yes you are spot on regarding Pitt but i noticed in their last movie, "Once Upon A Time In Hollywood", DiCaprio wore two inch heels as opposed to Pitt's flat shoes yet DiCaprio was barely taller than him which is how i figured 5'10" flat though i stand to be corrected of course.
@Jam Yes you are spot on regarding Pitt but i noticed in their last movie, "Once Upon A Time In Hollywood", DiCaprio wore two inch heels as opposed to Pitt's flat shoes yet DiCaprio was barely taller than him which is how i figured 5'10" flat though i stand to be corrected of course.
Jam Cherry said on 6/Jun/20
@Richie Brad Pitt wears lifts I’ve seen instances when he looks taller to Bradley Cooper too lol Bradley and Leo photos Leo is like roughly 1.5-2 cm shorter to Bradley so Bradley is like 184 cm and Leo is 182-182.5 cm
@Richie Brad Pitt wears lifts I’ve seen instances when he looks taller to Bradley Cooper too lol Bradley and Leo photos Leo is like roughly 1.5-2 cm shorter to Bradley so Bradley is like 184 cm and Leo is 182-182.5 cm
Pierre said on 27/May/20
@BT = Next to Robert Knepper 5"8.75' Prince Albert never looks a full 5"11',I buy 5"10.5' not 5"11'.In your second pic Matthew Gray Gubler wear high shoes that are reminds me a lot elevator shoes ( that could explain the new difference of height with Prince Albert....)
@BT = Next to Robert Knepper 5"8.75' Prince Albert never looks a full 5"11',I buy 5"10.5' not 5"11'.In your second pic Matthew Gray Gubler wear high shoes that are reminds me a lot elevator shoes ( that could explain the new difference of height with Prince Albert....)
Pierre said on 27/May/20
@BT = Prince Albert's shoes are always looking classic shoes and Prince Albert next to lots of celebrities looks always the same height = clearly a bit under 5"11' .Then the probability he wear advantageous shoes only when he stands next to Leonardo and classic shoes next to other celebrities seems to me very slim.(You can find comparisons celebrities/Prince Albert I posted more or less recently in this page or at Brad Pitt's page).(I have not a idea on the real height of the guys you talk about in your last comment )
@BT = Prince Albert's shoes are always looking classic shoes and Prince Albert next to lots of celebrities looks always the same height = clearly a bit under 5"11' .Then the probability he wear advantageous shoes only when he stands next to Leonardo and classic shoes next to other celebrities seems to me very slim.(You can find comparisons celebrities/Prince Albert I posted more or less recently in this page or at Brad Pitt's page).(I have not a idea on the real height of the guys you talk about in your last comment )
Richie said on 26/May/20
DiCaprio is slightly shorter than Brad Pitt and Ray Liotta, both of whom are around 5'11" these days, i would say DiCaprio was 5'10".
DiCaprio is slightly shorter than Brad Pitt and Ray Liotta, both of whom are around 5'11" these days, i would say DiCaprio was 5'10".
BT said on 24/May/20
@Pierre: Prince Albert is hard to pin down. I think he arguably could have lost a half inch somewhere between 2011 (age 53) and 2015 (age 57). At least that explains why he looked about 5'11.5 with Matthew Gray Gubler and Thomas Gibson in 2011 Click Here and noticably shorter than that with Gubler in 2015 Click Here.
In 2017 (age 59) he looked similar to Kyle MacLachlan Click Here and maybe close to 1 inch shorter than 50 Cent Click Here. Looking only 5'11 with Knepper in 2007 (age 49) when he was supposedly over 5'11 is strange, as Knepper's footwear didn't look like it would give him that big of an advantage. Maybe Prince Albert has slipped a small lift in his shoe from time to time and was never much over 5'11?
@Pierre: Prince Albert is hard to pin down. I think he arguably could have lost a half inch somewhere between 2011 (age 53) and 2015 (age 57). At least that explains why he looked about 5'11.5 with Matthew Gray Gubler and Thomas Gibson in 2011 Click Here and noticably shorter than that with Gubler in 2015 Click Here.
In 2017 (age 59) he looked similar to Kyle MacLachlan Click Here and maybe close to 1 inch shorter than 50 Cent Click Here. Looking only 5'11 with Knepper in 2007 (age 49) when he was supposedly over 5'11 is strange, as Knepper's footwear didn't look like it would give him that big of an advantage. Maybe Prince Albert has slipped a small lift in his shoe from time to time and was never much over 5'11?
Dmeyer said on 23/May/20
can look anywere 180-182 cm not 179 or 183
can look anywere 180-182 cm not 179 or 183
Jam Cherry said on 23/May/20
@Nik I’m not sure somewhere between 181.5-182 cm
@Nik I’m not sure somewhere between 181.5-182 cm
Pierre said on 19/May/20
Robert Knepper listed 174.6 cm /Prince Albert 2007 = Click Here Click Here
Rob/Robert = Click Here
Leonardo /Prince Albert 2015 = Click Here Click Here
By this comparison Leonardo is 177.6 to me(around 5"10') if Prince Albert has not lost some fraction between 2007 and 2015 .
Robert Knepper listed 174.6 cm /Prince Albert 2007 = Click Here Click Here
Rob/Robert = Click Here
Leonardo /Prince Albert 2015 = Click Here Click Here
By this comparison Leonardo is 177.6 to me(around 5"10') if Prince Albert has not lost some fraction between 2007 and 2015 .
cmillz said on 18/May/20
5’10.5” no taller
5’10.5” no taller
HeightRealist said on 17/May/20
I'm in a good mood. I'll give him 179cm. Definitely under 180cm.
I'm in a good mood. I'll give him 179cm. Definitely under 180cm.
Mark Koelling said on 16/May/20
Seems 182 to me
Seems 182 to me
Nik said on 8/May/20
@ Jam Cherry - How tall are you?
@ Jam Cherry - How tall are you?
berta said on 8/May/20
in movies like blood diamond he looked legit 182. and beside legit 180 cm brad pitt he also looks 1,5 cm taller. i think leo is a fraction over this listed height.
in movies like blood diamond he looked legit 182. and beside legit 180 cm brad pitt he also looks 1,5 cm taller. i think leo is a fraction over this listed height.
Jonny Clewett said on 5/May/20
Good listing, exactly my height 👍
Good listing, exactly my height 👍
Jam Cherry said on 1/May/20
181.5 cm or 5’11.5”
181.5 cm or 5’11.5”
shortishdude said on 1/May/20
5'11 on the nose. His posture is not good and sometimes can look a weak 5'10 guy.
I think he was 5'11 in his 20's and about 5'10.5 range nowadays.
Currently 179 cm and 180 in his best day
5'11 on the nose. His posture is not good and sometimes can look a weak 5'10 guy.
I think he was 5'11 in his 20's and about 5'10.5 range nowadays.
Currently 179 cm and 180 in his best day
Animus said on 26/Apr/20
Rob, do you have a screenshot of Brad Pitt giving his height and weight and lying about his age?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you have a screenshot of Brad Pitt giving his height and weight and lying about his age?
Editor RobI included it in a video about Brad.
Go to about 1:10 to see it.
Go to about 1:10 to see it.
Nik said on 20/Apr/20
@ Roxxo - He's well above average!
@ Roxxo - He's well above average!
TheBat said on 15/Apr/20
My mom who I have measured at 5'9" flat met Leo in LA many years ago. She told me he looked 5'11" range while next to him.
My mom who I have measured at 5'9" flat met Leo in LA many years ago. She told me he looked 5'11" range while next to him.
DarkPower729 said on 8/Apr/20
I'd say he looks like a tall guy in most of his films but is definitely on the low end of that. He probably starts the morning off around 5'11.75" (182.2cm) so just shy of 6ft and ends the day around 180.7cm (5'11.125"). As far as the listing goes, I think that's fair and it's not wholly unreasonable for him to claim that he's 6ft, although were I him I'd stick to 5'11.5".
I'd say he looks like a tall guy in most of his films but is definitely on the low end of that. He probably starts the morning off around 5'11.75" (182.2cm) so just shy of 6ft and ends the day around 180.7cm (5'11.125"). As far as the listing goes, I think that's fair and it's not wholly unreasonable for him to claim that he's 6ft, although were I him I'd stick to 5'11.5".
houss said on 1/Apr/20
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 11/Jan/20
LOVED him in 'Django Unchained' - so funny! 🤣
5ft11.5.
Great acting from leo , but his character "Marvin" was so mean , you remember that "d'artagnan" scene 😷😩😫😵
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 11/Jan/20
LOVED him in 'Django Unchained' - so funny! 🤣
5ft11.5.
Great acting from leo , but his character "Marvin" was so mean , you remember that "d'artagnan" scene 😷😩😫😵
Pierre said on 1/Apr/20
Sonnecker said on 27/Mar/20
Considering posture (not the greater one), Leo could be more 182 than 181.
He's clearly not known for being a lift wearer, and he doesn't seem to care too much about "height image".
182 cm is spot on for me. But 5'11" 1/2 or 3/4, I'm more in doubt....
@Sonneker = here is how tall looks 50 Cent a 181/182 guy next to Prince Albert = Click Here = and 50 cent not particularly straight.Leonardo never looks 50 Cent's height when both are around same distance to the camera like in this pic.Other = Click Here
Sonnecker said on 27/Mar/20
Considering posture (not the greater one), Leo could be more 182 than 181.
He's clearly not known for being a lift wearer, and he doesn't seem to care too much about "height image".
182 cm is spot on for me. But 5'11" 1/2 or 3/4, I'm more in doubt....
@Sonneker = here is how tall looks 50 Cent a 181/182 guy next to Prince Albert = Click Here = and 50 cent not particularly straight.Leonardo never looks 50 Cent's height when both are around same distance to the camera like in this pic.Other = Click Here
Pizzaman said on 1/Apr/20
DiCaprio having a hard time with Dutch women. Now, Dutch women are giants, but a full 6" man in dress shoes would not look like this.
Click Here
DiCaprio having a hard time with Dutch women. Now, Dutch women are giants, but a full 6" man in dress shoes would not look like this.
Click Here
Sonnecker said on 27/Mar/20
Considering posture (not the greater one), Leo could be more 182 than 181.
He's clearly not known for being a lift wearer, and he doesn't seem to care too much about "height image".
182 cm is spot on for me. But 5'11" 1/2 or 3/4, I'm more in doubt....
Considering posture (not the greater one), Leo could be more 182 than 181.
He's clearly not known for being a lift wearer, and he doesn't seem to care too much about "height image".
182 cm is spot on for me. But 5'11" 1/2 or 3/4, I'm more in doubt....
Pierre said on 25/Mar/20
Original said on 14/Mar/20
Actually 181 is a very good listing and 182 would be a better listing than 180.
Again = Leonardo /Prince Albert without bad angle of camera,about same posture = Click Here
Click Here =this Ronaldo 6"1' in terrible posture losing something like two inches again looking a good inch taller than Prince Albert
Prince Albert 5"10' range again by this comparison and Leonardo a bit shorter than him...Even if I make a small mistake in my comparisons the result is Leonardo around 5"10'/5"10.25' no more
Original said on 14/Mar/20
Actually 181 is a very good listing and 182 would be a better listing than 180.
Again = Leonardo /Prince Albert without bad angle of camera,about same posture = Click Here
Click Here =this Ronaldo 6"1' in terrible posture losing something like two inches again looking a good inch taller than Prince Albert
Prince Albert 5"10' range again by this comparison and Leonardo a bit shorter than him...Even if I make a small mistake in my comparisons the result is Leonardo around 5"10'/5"10.25' no more
Original said on 14/Mar/20
Actually 181 is a very good listing and 182 would be a better listing than 180.
Actually 181 is a very good listing and 182 would be a better listing than 180.
Vsquad said on 6/Mar/20
I saw The Departed again recently and Leo actually looks pretty tall in that movie, even though the cast wasn't filled with many towering actors.
I saw The Departed again recently and Leo actually looks pretty tall in that movie, even though the cast wasn't filled with many towering actors.
Jkiller said on 5/Mar/20
181cm is a good listing.
181cm is a good listing.
Black said on 4/Mar/20
what is the lowest height leo? 181? 180?
what is the lowest height leo? 181? 180?
Mark SJ said on 28/Feb/20
@Hijoputamos
Did Brad really lie about his age? When was this?
Editor Rob
@Hijoputamos
Did Brad really lie about his age? When was this?
Editor RobWhen brad gave his height and weight in a magazine, he also wrote down an age and knocked 2 years off his real year of birth.
Peter175 said on 26/Feb/20
I know Brad has less shoe in that new tarantino movie, but on the red carpet there's a difference of height that is kinda noticable. I would have guess its at least half an inch, not to mention Brad usually wears suspect footwear.
Its obvious that leo is taller but its not a full inch
I know Brad has less shoe in that new tarantino movie, but on the red carpet there's a difference of height that is kinda noticable. I would have guess its at least half an inch, not to mention Brad usually wears suspect footwear.
Its obvious that leo is taller but its not a full inch
Panchsfhool said on 22/Feb/20
1.81 sounds very good
1.81 sounds very good
Jack Daniels said on 22/Feb/20
Hi ! Today I've been to the Grevin Museum in Paris. (Wax celebrities statues). I was surprised by the height of Mr Brad Pitt and Mr Dicaprio (both appears to be above 6'1" (in dress shoes). Mr Clooney appeared to be my size (5'10" and 3 quarters just after sleeping). Mr Nicolas Cage appeared to be 6ft. Mr Obama is more than 6'1" in the Grevin more 6'2". Mr Trump around 6'1". I dont know if all these celebrities went to the museum to be measured for their statues. I know that the french celebritied did, but american celebrities ??
Hi ! Today I've been to the Grevin Museum in Paris. (Wax celebrities statues). I was surprised by the height of Mr Brad Pitt and Mr Dicaprio (both appears to be above 6'1" (in dress shoes). Mr Clooney appeared to be my size (5'10" and 3 quarters just after sleeping). Mr Nicolas Cage appeared to be 6ft. Mr Obama is more than 6'1" in the Grevin more 6'2". Mr Trump around 6'1". I dont know if all these celebrities went to the museum to be measured for their statues. I know that the french celebritied did, but american celebrities ??
TheBat said on 18/Feb/20
Leo is a legit 5'11.25" (181cm). Nothing below 5'11" flat.
Leo is a legit 5'11.25" (181cm). Nothing below 5'11" flat.
Hijoputamos said on 11/Feb/20
Rob, he wrote 5ft11 so what? He also wrote his age and lied...
This upgraded Pitt’s rating is affecting Leo’s in a good way
Rob, he wrote 5ft11 so what? He also wrote his age and lied...
This upgraded Pitt’s rating is affecting Leo’s in a good way
Original said on 11/Feb/20
181 is about right imo even tho he could look a bit less due to his relaxed posture and ausence of lifts compared to others etc. 183 out of bed is also a good guess.
181 is about right imo even tho he could look a bit less due to his relaxed posture and ausence of lifts compared to others etc. 183 out of bed is also a good guess.
Jack Daniels said on 10/Feb/20
Hi Rob, how can you say that Mr Dicaprio is 6ft ? (Even top of the bed)...Beside Hanks, Obama, he's clearly shorter. The difference with Pitt can be explain if Pitt began to lose a fraction of height. Pitt himself said 5'10" (I think evening height) and another day 5'11" (I think top of the bed)...
Editor Rob
Hi Rob, how can you say that Mr Dicaprio is 6ft ? (Even top of the bed)...Beside Hanks, Obama, he's clearly shorter. The difference with Pitt can be explain if Pitt began to lose a fraction of height. Pitt himself said 5'10" (I think evening height) and another day 5'11" (I think top of the bed)...
Editor RobI've never seen Pitt's claim of 5ft 10 on an audition form, but of course everybody can see he wrote 5ft 11 as his height.
Leo I would think edges him out, and could measure around 6ft range out of bed.
Leo I would think edges him out, and could measure around 6ft range out of bed.
Bwk said on 5/Feb/20
Do you think he's probably 6'0'' flat out of bed Rob?
Editor Rob
Do you think he's probably 6'0'' flat out of bed Rob?
Editor RobYeah, I think it's very likely he isn't less than six foot at least out of bed.
Jtm said on 4/Feb/20
slouching doesn't make you look that much shorter. I have tried slouching before and then looking as tall as possible and is still not noticeable.
slouching doesn't make you look that much shorter. I have tried slouching before and then looking as tall as possible and is still not noticeable.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Feb/20
DiCaprio is definitely the more robust 5ft11er than Pitt
DiCaprio is definitely the more robust 5ft11er than Pitt
Emil said on 3/Feb/20
@Chris Junior Hernandez 1990
Leo is a sloucher so maybe that's why. I cant see him any lower than 5'11.25, he's solidly above average and tallish even
@Chris Junior Hernandez 1990
Leo is a sloucher so maybe that's why. I cant see him any lower than 5'11.25, he's solidly above average and tallish even
Bob da cob. said on 2/Feb/20
5-11.5 imo
5-11.5 imo
Peter175 said on 29/Jan/20
Him and Pitt look reasonably close together wearing the same shoes but Leo probably has .5 inch on Brad or so.
In the new tarontino film he wears cowboy boots so he looks over an inch on pitt. Barefoot its not much over half inch if any
Him and Pitt look reasonably close together wearing the same shoes but Leo probably has .5 inch on Brad or so.
In the new tarontino film he wears cowboy boots so he looks over an inch on pitt. Barefoot its not much over half inch if any
Daycringeothon said on 24/Jan/20
CDS said on 21/Jan/20
Good Call. Besides lots of young boys 14-19 years old have that lanky body frame. Generally they get told they look taller but it’s just the skinny build. Once you get time to fill out that stops.
CDS said on 21/Jan/20
Good Call. Besides lots of young boys 14-19 years old have that lanky body frame. Generally they get told they look taller but it’s just the skinny build. Once you get time to fill out that stops.
CDS said on 21/Jan/20
That teletext UK report does actually make sense IF that report was prior to say, 1997-ish? Didn't Leo have a bit of a late growth spurt? He grew a few inches, as it very visibly showed, AND used in the plotline, of the '93 film, "what's eating Gilbert grape"...
That teletext UK report does actually make sense IF that report was prior to say, 1997-ish? Didn't Leo have a bit of a late growth spurt? He grew a few inches, as it very visibly showed, AND used in the plotline, of the '93 film, "what's eating Gilbert grape"...
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 18/Jan/20
This paragraph make no sense: "On Teletext UK, a journalist once said "He stands no more than 5ft 10ins (if that)" it makes every single actors that involved acting with Leo a major 1.25" downgrade, Johnny Depp would cry out loud. LOL.
Editor Rob
This paragraph make no sense: "On Teletext UK, a journalist once said "He stands no more than 5ft 10ins (if that)" it makes every single actors that involved acting with Leo a major 1.25" downgrade, Johnny Depp would cry out loud. LOL.
Editor RobWell it was just a journalist's guess. It seems too low for him of course.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 11/Jan/20
LOVED him in 'Django Unchained' - so funny! 🤣
5ft11.5.
LOVED him in 'Django Unchained' - so funny! 🤣
5ft11.5.
berta said on 9/Jan/20
i Think he was a legit 180 guy. maybe 180,5 and today he is exactly 180. dicaprio have pulled of 6 foot many times. i Think that he could be Close to 5`11 and 1/2 . in photos there seem to be 1,5 cm beetween them
i Think he was a legit 180 guy. maybe 180,5 and today he is exactly 180. dicaprio have pulled of 6 foot many times. i Think that he could be Close to 5`11 and 1/2 . in photos there seem to be 1,5 cm beetween them
Tall Sam said on 8/Jan/20
I got the impression that Pitt was wearing more boosting footwear at the Golden Globes, maybe a big heel in dress shoes rather than lifts but they may have been a high quality pair. Di Caprio usually looks even or slightly edges Pitt. On the same night, Pitt looked bizarrely tall near Bradley Cooper who is certainly a bit of a taller guy barefoot than Pitt.
Editor Rob
I got the impression that Pitt was wearing more boosting footwear at the Golden Globes, maybe a big heel in dress shoes rather than lifts but they may have been a high quality pair. Di Caprio usually looks even or slightly edges Pitt. On the same night, Pitt looked bizarrely tall near Bradley Cooper who is certainly a bit of a taller guy barefoot than Pitt.
Editor RobPitt's shoe is at least 1 inch, but nothing like the old cuban heel he once wore.
Roxxo said on 6/Jan/20
He has average height.
He has average height.
Sean said on 5/Jan/20
Seeing them at the Golden Globes tonight presenting together, comparable footwear, Brad Pitt is taller.
Can that be right?
Seeing them at the Golden Globes tonight presenting together, comparable footwear, Brad Pitt is taller.
Can that be right?
Nik Ashton said on 5/Jan/20
@ Sean William Winter - He’s taller than that!
@ Sean William Winter - He’s taller than that!
Sean william Winter said on 1/Jan/20
looks 5'10 1/2
looks 5'10 1/2
actionboy said on 28/Dec/19
@Rob good listing on Dicaprio and Brad's but honestly I see more than just a 1/4 inch difference between them. I always see 1/2 difference. If Leo is 180 range Brad is 179. I've never seen a full 5'11.25 (181)Leo, neither in his 20's. I think Dicaprio was a full 180, max 5'11 and Bradd a very strong 5'10.5 guy.
Editor Rob
@Rob good listing on Dicaprio and Brad's but honestly I see more than just a 1/4 inch difference between them. I always see 1/2 difference. If Leo is 180 range Brad is 179. I've never seen a full 5'11.25 (181)Leo, neither in his 20's. I think Dicaprio was a full 180, max 5'11 and Bradd a very strong 5'10.5 guy.
Editor RobI can see how you'd put Pitt just under 5ft 11 and DiCaprio 5ft 11 3/8ths, it's feasible they could measure that range.
Keith 5'10 said on 27/Dec/19
Which is more likely Rob? DiCaprio being 5'11.5" or Brad Pitt at 5'10.75"?
Editor Rob
Which is more likely Rob? DiCaprio being 5'11.5" or Brad Pitt at 5'10.75"?
Editor RobCould be a 50/50, I can see the argument for both options
Ashly sammoud said on 22/Dec/19
Leonardo di Caprio è alto 184 cm
Leonardo di Caprio è alto 184 cm
Daycringeothon said on 10/Dec/19
Dicaprio current height on stadiometer mid-day (179.8-180.4cm) that’s being fair.
Pitt current height on a stadiometer mid-day (178.5-179.5) I don’t know why I’m even bothering.
The stadiometer is pretty reliable in general but there are comments on the General Height section contracting this.There is a debate about the variance even with a stadiometer being off based on a specific model. Let’s say for whatever reason (posture during measurement). This even happens among tall people getting measured (183cm+) for men mid-day and (172cm+)for women.
Dicaprio current height on stadiometer mid-day (179.8-180.4cm) that’s being fair.
Pitt current height on a stadiometer mid-day (178.5-179.5) I don’t know why I’m even bothering.
The stadiometer is pretty reliable in general but there are comments on the General Height section contracting this.There is a debate about the variance even with a stadiometer being off based on a specific model. Let’s say for whatever reason (posture during measurement). This even happens among tall people getting measured (183cm+) for men mid-day and (172cm+)for women.
CDS said on 8/Dec/19
@sitemaster Rob: this should probably go in the brad Pitt thread, but since it was mentioned in this thread (it seems the brad and Leo threads have practically merged since the Tarantino film last summer LOL), you mentioned that you changed brads listing to 5'11" 13 years ago? What did you have him listed at before, just out of curiosity?
Editor Rob
@sitemaster Rob: this should probably go in the brad Pitt thread, but since it was mentioned in this thread (it seems the brad and Leo threads have practically merged since the Tarantino film last summer LOL), you mentioned that you changed brads listing to 5'11" 13 years ago? What did you have him listed at before, just out of curiosity?
Editor RobI think he had a 1/4 inch downgrade 3 times within the first year.
Daycringeothon said on 7/Dec/19
Arnie never really looked consistently over 184cm even in his peak Blockbuster movie days. I think the 186cm figure is probably mid day height when he was winning the Mr. Universe titles. In Predator he never seemed above 185cm (idk why I’d hate to guess posture, and his taller co-stars.) i have a 1978 Guinness Book of Records which says at the time Arnold Schwarzenegger had the largest non-obese chest at 58”. It also lists him at 6’1.25” 186cm.
Arnie never really looked consistently over 184cm even in his peak Blockbuster movie days. I think the 186cm figure is probably mid day height when he was winning the Mr. Universe titles. In Predator he never seemed above 185cm (idk why I’d hate to guess posture, and his taller co-stars.) i have a 1978 Guinness Book of Records which says at the time Arnold Schwarzenegger had the largest non-obese chest at 58”. It also lists him at 6’1.25” 186cm.
Ian555 said on 4/Dec/19
Rob do you think DiCaprio could pass for 5’ 11 1/2”? There are times where I feel he could look as tall as that and he seems to have a very languid and relaxed posture in a lot of pictures.
Editor Rob
Rob do you think DiCaprio could pass for 5’ 11 1/2”? There are times where I feel he could look as tall as that and he seems to have a very languid and relaxed posture in a lot of pictures.
Editor Rob11.25 up to 11.5 I think he can appear, not 6ft or a flat 5ft 11. Ultimately, it wouldn't be much of a shock if he managed 5ft 11 and 3/8ths on the stadiometer.
Rick S said on 3/Dec/19
I think he's close to 5'11" but no more than that. My cousin has the exact same build as Leo and he's 5'10". People who are 5'10" always look tall with shoes on, especially boots.
I think he's close to 5'11" but no more than that. My cousin has the exact same build as Leo and he's 5'10". People who are 5'10" always look tall with shoes on, especially boots.
Shayz said on 2/Dec/19
Two inches taller than pitt in recent film
Two inches taller than pitt in recent film
Animus said on 2/Dec/19
In the early 2000s, DiCaprio frequently seemed like a 5'11½ guy with his youthful posture. With Liam Neeson and Daniel Day-Lewis he could look reasonably close to 6'. Now, in the late 2010s, he often looks just 5'11. He is in his mid-40s, has gained weight and doesn't stand as well as he once did. It's reasonable to assume that he's been a 5'11¼ guy all along and he's simply starting to appear shorter as he grows older. However, with that being said, he did stand reasonably well during the press tour for "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" and seemed to regain some lost territory.
In the early 2000s, DiCaprio frequently seemed like a 5'11½ guy with his youthful posture. With Liam Neeson and Daniel Day-Lewis he could look reasonably close to 6'. Now, in the late 2010s, he often looks just 5'11. He is in his mid-40s, has gained weight and doesn't stand as well as he once did. It's reasonable to assume that he's been a 5'11¼ guy all along and he's simply starting to appear shorter as he grows older. However, with that being said, he did stand reasonably well during the press tour for "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" and seemed to regain some lost territory.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 27/Nov/19
Leo is closer to 181cm than Jimmy Kimmel listed the same. Kimmel is more 5'11 and Leo stronger 5'11. Brad Pitt is probably 5'10 3/4 nothing more.
Leo is closer to 181cm than Jimmy Kimmel listed the same. Kimmel is more 5'11 and Leo stronger 5'11. Brad Pitt is probably 5'10 3/4 nothing more.
jeremy5ft8 said on 26/Nov/19
@Rob have you ever changed these listings? I never see changes and you don't mind people's guess. I'm reading the mayority are not agree on these pages:
Click Here
Click Here
I' also guess 1'5 cm shorter than listed.
Arnold was max 185 Brad 178.5 and Leo 180.
Matt Damon 175ish- weak 176.
Editor Rob
@Rob have you ever changed these listings? I never see changes and you don't mind people's guess. I'm reading the mayority are not agree on these pages:
Click Here
Click Here
I' also guess 1'5 cm shorter than listed.
Arnold was max 185 Brad 178.5 and Leo 180.
Matt Damon 175ish- weak 176.
Editor RobArnie has current height lowered every 5 years as he shrinks, but Pitt was changed to 5ft 11 13 years ago and sat on it since then.
Daycringeothon said on 22/Nov/19
I think Dicaprio and Pitt are both 1.5cm shorter than listed. Dicaprio 179.5-180cm average through the day excluding morning height. He can look 5’10” though quite often. Pitt at most 178.5cm -179cm. Pitt never looks above 5’10” you just have to ignore his footwear.
I think Dicaprio and Pitt are both 1.5cm shorter than listed. Dicaprio 179.5-180cm average through the day excluding morning height. He can look 5’10” though quite often. Pitt at most 178.5cm -179cm. Pitt never looks above 5’10” you just have to ignore his footwear.
DarkPower729 said on 17/Nov/19
Strong 5’11” (180.5cm) at night, weak 6ft (182cm) in the morning. 5’11.5” or 181cn is a reasonable claim
Strong 5’11” (180.5cm) at night, weak 6ft (182cm) in the morning. 5’11.5” or 181cn is a reasonable claim
Rich Paul said on 13/Nov/19
I’d bet he’s no more than 5’10’’.
I’d bet he’s no more than 5’10’’.
Animus said on 8/Nov/19
@Herfer
Brad Pitt is about 182cm in the morning, so yes.
@Herfer
Brad Pitt is about 182cm in the morning, so yes.
ajax509 said on 7/Nov/19
@Herfer
Yes, Brad could potentially measure a full 181cm (first thing). I'd be shocked if he'd measure less than 2cm taller than myself.
@Herfer
Yes, Brad could potentially measure a full 181cm (first thing). I'd be shocked if he'd measure less than 2cm taller than myself.
Herfer said on 2/Nov/19
ajax509 said on 15/Oct/19
Do you think Brad Pitt is taller than you? I'm 177.5 first thing in the morning
ajax509 said on 15/Oct/19
Do you think Brad Pitt is taller than you? I'm 177.5 first thing in the morning
Pierre said on 17/Oct/19
@ajax = imo there is not bad height or good height each height has its advantages
@ajax = imo there is not bad height or good height each height has its advantages
ajax509 said on 15/Oct/19
@Pierre Nice Height! I'm 178.9cm first thing in the morning.
@Pierre Nice Height! I'm 178.9cm first thing in the morning.
Pierre said on 14/Oct/19
@ajax509 =I'm around 6"0' after sleeping and around 5"11.25' before sleeping and you?
@ajax509 =I'm around 6"0' after sleeping and around 5"11.25' before sleeping and you?
ajax509 said on 13/Oct/19
@Pierre Between, how tall are you?
@Pierre Between, how tall are you?
Pierre said on 13/Oct/19
@Dmeyer =By good pics in same postures and neutral angle of the camera like the pics i posted recently here or in Brad's page Leo is never even close to 50 Cent.Difference= around 2 inches.
@Dmeyer =By good pics in same postures and neutral angle of the camera like the pics i posted recently here or in Brad's page Leo is never even close to 50 Cent.Difference= around 2 inches.
Dmeyer said on 12/Oct/19
if you look well at all pics leo can look just 1cm smaaller than 50 cent near prince Albert
if you look well at all pics leo can look just 1cm smaaller than 50 cent near prince Albert
Pierre said on 11/Oct/19
@Rising 174 I can not agree the pics i took for comparisons with Leo / Prince Albert / 50 Cents were made in the same period 2015/ 2017 !....and Leo is clearly shorter than Prince Albert while 50 Cents is clearly taller than Prince Albert both by good pics very close one to the other one with regular floor neutral camera etc etc.........Leo is never even close to the 182 cm of 50 Cent!
@Rising 174 I can not agree the pics i took for comparisons with Leo / Prince Albert / 50 Cents were made in the same period 2015/ 2017 !....and Leo is clearly shorter than Prince Albert while 50 Cents is clearly taller than Prince Albert both by good pics very close one to the other one with regular floor neutral camera etc etc.........Leo is never even close to the 182 cm of 50 Cent!
Johnnie said on 10/Oct/19
@ajax so, it’s easy for you to post pics in prince albert’s favour.
From all the evidence we have, Prince Albert is at best half an inch taller than fognini. Half an inch shorter at short.
Fabio fognini is shortest than 5’10 listed (legit) Valentino Rossi.
Absolutely NO WAY for Albert to reach anything more than weak 5-11.
Same for di Caprio.
@ajax so, it’s easy for you to post pics in prince albert’s favour.
From all the evidence we have, Prince Albert is at best half an inch taller than fognini. Half an inch shorter at short.
Fabio fognini is shortest than 5’10 listed (legit) Valentino Rossi.
Absolutely NO WAY for Albert to reach anything more than weak 5-11.
Same for di Caprio.
Rising174cm said on 10/Oct/19
The camera is behind Fognini who is clearly closer than Pince Albert so that's not a good angle to compare them. ajax posted a much better picture as you can see from his first photo where it's straight and they're pretty much side by side yet Prince Albert still looks 1.5 to 2 cm taller even though he's standing a bit further from the camera. It's also possible Prince Albert dropped another fraction of height in the 4 years since many of those photos were taken with Leo. If Fognini is more like 177 cm than 178(and I don't know if this is the case) then Prince Albert still appears 179-180 cm in comparison so it's possible that is his height in 2019 and it'd still be possible for him to be a more solid 180 range guy in 2015.
@Pierre: Prince Albert is only 57 in a lot of the pics posted with Leo and he was 46 with Selleck so he could have lost some height, but how much in that decade? Those photos of Selleck and Obama are not useful for comparing. I do believe Selleck was a weak 6'3" at best by 2012 and probably 190 cm as opposed to 192 cm peak, but we're talking about 2004 when Selleck was still at or near his peak of 6'3.5". I do not think Mikkelsen and Bloom have the same posture either, but even ignoring this for a moment, Bloom has flat sneakers while Mikkelsen has a decent heel and Mikkelsen is 182 cm so when you consider an easy 1 cm footwear difference, Bloom still looks around 178 cm in comparison. As it is, Rob has Bloom 179 cm and he was supposedly measured 179.5 cm for his wax figure so many would even say I'm downgrading him by giving him 178 cm.
As for Jamie and Leo, this is an easy one. Notice I pointed out Leo and Jamie have similar flat sneakers in my photo while in the 1st, 2nd and 4th photos you posted, Leo is wearing the same type of sneaker he wore in my photo while Jamie has Adidas which are noticeably thicker so a footwear advantage explains some of that and Jamie may have even put an extra lift inside. As for the 3rd photo you posted, that one is completely useless for comparing height since Jamie is so much closer to the camera that Leo is in the background! I only posted full photos of the two side by side in similar footwear. As for Tom Hardy, once in a while he looks 5'8" range or about 174 cm as with Mario Lopez who is no taller than 174 cm himself, but Rob saw Tom Hardy in person years ago and said he appeared closer to 5'10"! Obviously he's not that tall, but it certainly suggests he's an honest 5'9" man which most believe he typically looks. Even if Hardy were only 5'8.75", Leo would still look 5'11" in comparison.
The camera is behind Fognini who is clearly closer than Pince Albert so that's not a good angle to compare them. ajax posted a much better picture as you can see from his first photo where it's straight and they're pretty much side by side yet Prince Albert still looks 1.5 to 2 cm taller even though he's standing a bit further from the camera. It's also possible Prince Albert dropped another fraction of height in the 4 years since many of those photos were taken with Leo. If Fognini is more like 177 cm than 178(and I don't know if this is the case) then Prince Albert still appears 179-180 cm in comparison so it's possible that is his height in 2019 and it'd still be possible for him to be a more solid 180 range guy in 2015.
@Pierre: Prince Albert is only 57 in a lot of the pics posted with Leo and he was 46 with Selleck so he could have lost some height, but how much in that decade? Those photos of Selleck and Obama are not useful for comparing. I do believe Selleck was a weak 6'3" at best by 2012 and probably 190 cm as opposed to 192 cm peak, but we're talking about 2004 when Selleck was still at or near his peak of 6'3.5". I do not think Mikkelsen and Bloom have the same posture either, but even ignoring this for a moment, Bloom has flat sneakers while Mikkelsen has a decent heel and Mikkelsen is 182 cm so when you consider an easy 1 cm footwear difference, Bloom still looks around 178 cm in comparison. As it is, Rob has Bloom 179 cm and he was supposedly measured 179.5 cm for his wax figure so many would even say I'm downgrading him by giving him 178 cm.
As for Jamie and Leo, this is an easy one. Notice I pointed out Leo and Jamie have similar flat sneakers in my photo while in the 1st, 2nd and 4th photos you posted, Leo is wearing the same type of sneaker he wore in my photo while Jamie has Adidas which are noticeably thicker so a footwear advantage explains some of that and Jamie may have even put an extra lift inside. As for the 3rd photo you posted, that one is completely useless for comparing height since Jamie is so much closer to the camera that Leo is in the background! I only posted full photos of the two side by side in similar footwear. As for Tom Hardy, once in a while he looks 5'8" range or about 174 cm as with Mario Lopez who is no taller than 174 cm himself, but Rob saw Tom Hardy in person years ago and said he appeared closer to 5'10"! Obviously he's not that tall, but it certainly suggests he's an honest 5'9" man which most believe he typically looks. Even if Hardy were only 5'8.75", Leo would still look 5'11" in comparison.
Pierre said on 7/Oct/19
Sorry,correction in my comment(Rafael Nadal/David Cameron not James)
Sorry,correction in my comment(Rafael Nadal/David Cameron not James)
Pierre said on 7/Oct/19
@ajax = I personnally have never seen 1.5 inches Tennis shoes,Tennis shoes to me are even lot's of time a bit under an inch then no advantage.Fognini looks around the same height as Leonardo next to Prince Albert.Is he really a full 5"10'...It seems to me official heights of Tennisplayers are generally a bit rounded up...Rafael Nadal next to James Cameron looks under his official height
@ajax = I personnally have never seen 1.5 inches Tennis shoes,Tennis shoes to me are even lot's of time a bit under an inch then no advantage.Fognini looks around the same height as Leonardo next to Prince Albert.Is he really a full 5"10'...It seems to me official heights of Tennisplayers are generally a bit rounded up...Rafael Nadal next to James Cameron looks under his official height
ajax509 said on 7/Oct/19
@Johnnie It's easy to fool people by searching pics in Fognini's favor!
Remember, Fognini has footwear advantage (~1.5" Tennis shoes)
Click Here
Click Here
@Johnnie It's easy to fool people by searching pics in Fognini's favor!
Remember, Fognini has footwear advantage (~1.5" Tennis shoes)
Click Here
Click Here
Johnnie said on 4/Oct/19
Click Here
This is Prince Albert of Monaco in spring 2019. He was not even as tall as weak 5’10 italian tennis player Fabio Fognini.
If Di Caprio struggles to match prince Albert’s height, you just have to do your math...
Click Here
This is Prince Albert of Monaco in spring 2019. He was not even as tall as weak 5’10 italian tennis player Fabio Fognini.
If Di Caprio struggles to match prince Albert’s height, you just have to do your math...
Pierre said on 2/Oct/19
Comments Rising on 28/sep/19=
But the pics of Prince Albert/Tom Selleck were made in 2004 then Albert has maybe lose height by the years,my pics to compare Prince Albert/Leonardo/50cent/Robbie williams are always in around the same period,with only something like two years between the different pics.Here is later(2012) Tom next to Barack (6"1')= Click Here Click Here he slouch here but i doubt he's as tall as the 6"3' mark if straighter .
I really doubt Orlando Bloom is as tall as Rising guess him,here is Orlando next to Mads Mikkelsen in around the same postures and same distance to the camera = Click Here And Rob next to Mads = Click Here .I think he looks sometimes taller because he wear sometimes advantageous shoes
In all the pics Rising choose Leonardo /Jamie Foxx Leonardo always looks a lot taller than him but this is not always the case = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I doubt Tom Hardy is as tall as 5"9'.
Comments Rising on 28/sep/19=
But the pics of Prince Albert/Tom Selleck were made in 2004 then Albert has maybe lose height by the years,my pics to compare Prince Albert/Leonardo/50cent/Robbie williams are always in around the same period,with only something like two years between the different pics.Here is later(2012) Tom next to Barack (6"1')= Click Here Click Here he slouch here but i doubt he's as tall as the 6"3' mark if straighter .
I really doubt Orlando Bloom is as tall as Rising guess him,here is Orlando next to Mads Mikkelsen in around the same postures and same distance to the camera = Click Here And Rob next to Mads = Click Here .I think he looks sometimes taller because he wear sometimes advantageous shoes
In all the pics Rising choose Leonardo /Jamie Foxx Leonardo always looks a lot taller than him but this is not always the case = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I doubt Tom Hardy is as tall as 5"9'.
Rising174cm said on 28/Sep/19
Regarding DiCaprio's "short" appearances, he still didn't look 3" taller than Obama. He looked like a weak 5'11" or 5'10.75" if Obama is 6'1" as widely believed. Strangely, Leo didn't look taller than 5'10.5" with Ridley Scott and Spielberg if they're 5'7.5" as Rob lists them and Leo really didn't look taller than 5'11" flat promoting Catch Me If You Can if Tom Hanks was 6'0" as listed or 182-183 cm range. As for Prince Albert, Rob estimated him at 5'11"-5'11.5" range and that looks plausible since he actually looked at least 6 feet 15 years ago with Tom Selleck, who was 6'3.5" peak: Click Here Click Here Leo looking about the same height as a 5'11"-5'11.5" man makes perfect sense. Also, we Leo was clearly taller than 179 cm Russell Crowe.
Tom Hardy is mentioned, well Hardy is widely viewed as an honest 5'9" man and if that's true, Leo looks as tall as listed: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here And in these other photos, I actually see more like 2.5": Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Similarly, Leo also looked more than 2" taller than 5'9" Jamie Foxx when both wore similar footwear: Click Here Click Here Click Here Of course, most think Jamie is at least an honest 5'9" man, possibly a fraction over.
More importantly, why is there still talk of Leo being only 5'10" even after all the photos showing him more than just an inch taller than 5'10.5" listed Orlando Bloom at Cannes earlier this year? Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Actually, if Bloom is 179 cm then DiCaprio is taller than 181, but I've suspected Bloom was closer to 5'10" flat for years. Regardless, Leo is still at least 5'11" in comparison.
Regarding DiCaprio's "short" appearances, he still didn't look 3" taller than Obama. He looked like a weak 5'11" or 5'10.75" if Obama is 6'1" as widely believed. Strangely, Leo didn't look taller than 5'10.5" with Ridley Scott and Spielberg if they're 5'7.5" as Rob lists them and Leo really didn't look taller than 5'11" flat promoting Catch Me If You Can if Tom Hanks was 6'0" as listed or 182-183 cm range. As for Prince Albert, Rob estimated him at 5'11"-5'11.5" range and that looks plausible since he actually looked at least 6 feet 15 years ago with Tom Selleck, who was 6'3.5" peak: Click Here Click Here Leo looking about the same height as a 5'11"-5'11.5" man makes perfect sense. Also, we Leo was clearly taller than 179 cm Russell Crowe.
Tom Hardy is mentioned, well Hardy is widely viewed as an honest 5'9" man and if that's true, Leo looks as tall as listed: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here And in these other photos, I actually see more like 2.5": Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Similarly, Leo also looked more than 2" taller than 5'9" Jamie Foxx when both wore similar footwear: Click Here Click Here Click Here Of course, most think Jamie is at least an honest 5'9" man, possibly a fraction over.
More importantly, why is there still talk of Leo being only 5'10" even after all the photos showing him more than just an inch taller than 5'10.5" listed Orlando Bloom at Cannes earlier this year? Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Actually, if Bloom is 179 cm then DiCaprio is taller than 181, but I've suspected Bloom was closer to 5'10" flat for years. Regardless, Leo is still at least 5'11" in comparison.
Daycringeothon said on 21/Sep/19
After looking at General Height comments about men’s heights. Particularly Western Europe. The most accessible pant inseams are between 30”-32” for grown men. For example you could be actually 5’8” with a 32” inseam (that is actually long for such a person). Then having the right proportions and you can almost get away with calling yourself 5’10”, 5’11”. A guy actually 5’10” with less optimal proportions and having a 31” inseam could look “short”. So a man 5’7”-5’8” while “short” on paper with the right proportions and inseam can look “average height”.
After looking at General Height comments about men’s heights. Particularly Western Europe. The most accessible pant inseams are between 30”-32” for grown men. For example you could be actually 5’8” with a 32” inseam (that is actually long for such a person). Then having the right proportions and you can almost get away with calling yourself 5’10”, 5’11”. A guy actually 5’10” with less optimal proportions and having a 31” inseam could look “short”. So a man 5’7”-5’8” while “short” on paper with the right proportions and inseam can look “average height”.
Pierre said on 17/Sep/19
No Leo is not even close to the height of 50 Cent by good angles of the camera.178 max
Click Here Click Here
Click Here Click Here
No Leo is not even close to the height of 50 Cent by good angles of the camera.178 max
Click Here Click Here
Click Here Click Here
Dmeyer said on 16/Sep/19
180,5cm and pitt 179-179,5cm 0,5cm loss at 55 is ok
180,5cm and pitt 179-179,5cm 0,5cm loss at 55 is ok
Dmeyer said on 16/Sep/19
ducaprio can defenetly look 180cm with 177cm damon with 185 obama is widest range is 179-182 5'10,5-11,5
ducaprio can defenetly look 180cm with 177cm damon with 185 obama is widest range is 179-182 5'10,5-11,5
Dmeyer said on 16/Sep/19
ducaprio can defenetly look 180cm with 177cm damon with 185 obama is widest range is 179-182 5'10,5-11,5
ducaprio can defenetly look 180cm with 177cm damon with 185 obama is widest range is 179-182 5'10,5-11,5
Pierre said on 12/Sep/19
In add = Robbie Williams and very weak 5"11' David beckham = Robbie is probably more a strong 5"11' than really 182
In add = Robbie Williams and very weak 5"11' David beckham = Robbie is probably more a strong 5"11' than really 182
Pierre said on 12/Sep/19
Click Here =Prince Albert and Robbie Williams listed 182 Click Here Click Here
Again Prince Albert Leonardo = Click Here Click Here
Click Here =Prince Albert and Robbie Williams listed 182 Click Here Click Here
Again Prince Albert Leonardo = Click Here Click Here
Pierre said on 11/Sep/19
Daycringeothon said on 10/Sep/19
I wouldn’t be surprised if Pitt measures 5’8 3/4”-5’9” with loose posture barefoot 10 hours after waking. It’s entirely possible taking into account “loose posture”.
@ Daycringeothon =Imo you're close to the reality ,i guess Brad around 5"9' during the day
Daycringeothon said on 10/Sep/19
I wouldn’t be surprised if Pitt measures 5’8 3/4”-5’9” with loose posture barefoot 10 hours after waking. It’s entirely possible taking into account “loose posture”.
@ Daycringeothon =Imo you're close to the reality ,i guess Brad around 5"9' during the day
CDS said on 11/Sep/19
It hasn't been mentioned on here for some time, and it probably belongs in the Pitt thread, but per daycringeathon s comment below, there was reported that German motorcycle license application, where brad was measured with the electronic measuring device, and the result? Just under 5'9". I can't imagine he's that low, and who knows if that's even true, but per most instances, the "downgraders" are closer to the real height I've found...
It hasn't been mentioned on here for some time, and it probably belongs in the Pitt thread, but per daycringeathon s comment below, there was reported that German motorcycle license application, where brad was measured with the electronic measuring device, and the result? Just under 5'9". I can't imagine he's that low, and who knows if that's even true, but per most instances, the "downgraders" are closer to the real height I've found...
Daycringeothon said on 10/Sep/19
I wouldn’t be surprised if Pitt measures 5’8 3/4”-5’9” with loose posture barefoot 10 hours after waking. It’s entirely possible taking into account “loose posture”.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Pitt measures 5’8 3/4”-5’9” with loose posture barefoot 10 hours after waking. It’s entirely possible taking into account “loose posture”.
Pierre said on 30/Aug/19
@CDS = To my eyes Prince Albert is a little bit taller than Leo (take in consideration the hairs) .My guess = Prince Albert around 5"10.5' Leo around 5"10',i don't guess more than 5"10' for Leo.
@CDS = To my eyes Prince Albert is a little bit taller than Leo (take in consideration the hairs) .My guess = Prince Albert around 5"10.5' Leo around 5"10',i don't guess more than 5"10' for Leo.
Pierre said on 30/Aug/19
@CDS = Prince Albert and 6"0.75'Barack = Click Here
Barack closer to the camera than Albert but Barack isn't perfectly straight
@CDS = Prince Albert and 6"0.75'Barack = Click Here
Barack closer to the camera than Albert but Barack isn't perfectly straight
Pierre said on 30/Aug/19
ajax509 said on 30/Aug/19
@Pierre
Travolta is wearing lifts in the shot with Curtis Jackson.
Lol And Snoop Dog ?Lifts too?
ajax509 said on 30/Aug/19
@Pierre
Travolta is wearing lifts in the shot with Curtis Jackson.
Lol And Snoop Dog ?Lifts too?
Pierre said on 30/Aug/19
@Ajax= lol i just see your second pic he's around the same than he first in fact = Albert slouching Leo staighter than him.Choose the good pics!
@Ajax= lol i just see your second pic he's around the same than he first in fact = Albert slouching Leo staighter than him.Choose the good pics!
Pierre said on 30/Aug/19
@CDs = i don't know the height of Prince Albert but i think this is not very important in fact = 50 Cent is listed 182 here not 6"0' and i doubt he's taller than this mark,you can see Snoop Dog tower him in my pics.Snoop is listed 192.4 here (6"3.75').
@Ajax = lol take the good pics not the pics with Leo straight Albert slouching on his left side and so Leo easily closer to the camera ....in my pics both have same posture we can see the whole bodies, good angle of the camera Leo is clearly a little bit shorter than Prince Albert.....And clearly not closer to the 182 cm of 50cent!That's why he looks so short next to Barack then the angle of the pics i posted was not very bad....
@CDs = i don't know the height of Prince Albert but i think this is not very important in fact = 50 Cent is listed 182 here not 6"0' and i doubt he's taller than this mark,you can see Snoop Dog tower him in my pics.Snoop is listed 192.4 here (6"3.75').
@Ajax = lol take the good pics not the pics with Leo straight Albert slouching on his left side and so Leo easily closer to the camera ....in my pics both have same posture we can see the whole bodies, good angle of the camera Leo is clearly a little bit shorter than Prince Albert.....And clearly not closer to the 182 cm of 50cent!That's why he looks so short next to Barack then the angle of the pics i posted was not very bad....
CDS said on 30/Aug/19
Per pierres pics below, do we know how tall prince Albert is? 6' 50 cent easily edges him out by an inch or 2, yet Albert and Leo look about dead even.
Per pierres pics below, do we know how tall prince Albert is? 6' 50 cent easily edges him out by an inch or 2, yet Albert and Leo look about dead even.
ajax509 said on 30/Aug/19
DiCaprio with Albert
Leo looking taller Click Here
roughly same height Click Here
That's the difference with same distance, stance and angle!
DiCaprio with Albert
Leo looking taller Click Here
roughly same height Click Here
That's the difference with same distance, stance and angle!
ajax509 said on 30/Aug/19
@Pierre
Travolta is wearing lifts in the shot with Curtis Jackson.
@Pierre
Travolta is wearing lifts in the shot with Curtis Jackson.
Pierre said on 30/Aug/19
Leonardo /Prince Albert de Monaco/ 50 Cent 182 cm =
Click Here = Same distance to the camera same posture neutral angle of the camera .Other = Click Here
Click Here = Same distance to the camera same posture neutral angle of the camera .Other = Click Here =50 cent slouching here
50 Cent and John Travolta 181 cm = Click Here Click Here
50 Cent and Snoop Dogg 192.4 cm = Click Here Click Here Click Here
Leonardo clearly under 5"11' to my eyes ,5"10'max
Leonardo /Prince Albert de Monaco/ 50 Cent 182 cm =
Click Here = Same distance to the camera same posture neutral angle of the camera .Other = Click Here
Click Here = Same distance to the camera same posture neutral angle of the camera .Other = Click Here =50 cent slouching here
50 Cent and John Travolta 181 cm = Click Here Click Here
50 Cent and Snoop Dogg 192.4 cm = Click Here Click Here Click Here
Leonardo clearly under 5"11' to my eyes ,5"10'max
Pierre said on 28/Aug/19
@CDS = Kevin Costner maybe even more strong 6"0' /6"0.25' because it seems to me he wear sometimes cowboy shoes like probably the last pic i posted Kevin/Bill(Paxton)
@CDS = Kevin Costner maybe even more strong 6"0' /6"0.25' because it seems to me he wear sometimes cowboy shoes like probably the last pic i posted Kevin/Bill(Paxton)
Pierre said on 28/Aug/19
@CDS = Kevin Costner /Bill Paxton when around same shoes apparently = Click Here Click Here Click Here others = Click Here
Bill Paxton /5"10.25' Josh = Click Here
My guess = Bill Paxton around 5"11' Kevin Costner = around 6"0.5'
@CDS = Kevin Costner /Bill Paxton when around same shoes apparently = Click Here Click Here Click Here others = Click Here
Bill Paxton /5"10.25' Josh = Click Here
My guess = Bill Paxton around 5"11' Kevin Costner = around 6"0.5'
Pierre said on 28/Aug/19
@CDS = i don't know if Sean Bean is really 5"10.5' it's just a supposition,in reality when i watch some pics of him i see him shorter than this mark but... these are just pics....
@CDS = i don't know if Sean Bean is really 5"10.5' it's just a supposition,in reality when i watch some pics of him i see him shorter than this mark but... these are just pics....
stylus said on 27/Aug/19
Logan M Barringer said on 25/Aug/19
lol !! Leo 6'0? lmao. He is 5'10.75 with luck Tom Hardy is a weak 5'9 guy
Logan M Barringer said on 25/Aug/19
lol !! Leo 6'0? lmao. He is 5'10.75 with luck Tom Hardy is a weak 5'9 guy
Pierre said on 27/Aug/19
Comparisons Leonardo /Tom Hardy = Click Here Click Here
Now Tom Hardy/Chris Pine = Click Here Click Here Click Here
Now James Corden /Chris Pine = at around 0:51 Click Here
Finally James Corden / 5"8' Michael Douglas = Click Here
My guess = James Corden very weak 5"7' Chris Pine 5"11' range Tom Hardy weak 5"8' Leonardo around 5"10'
James Corden tiptoeing next to Samuel Anderson in poor posture Click Here Rob strong 5"8' next to Samuel Anderson in good posture = Click Here
Comparisons Leonardo /Tom Hardy = Click Here Click Here
Now Tom Hardy/Chris Pine = Click Here Click Here Click Here
Now James Corden /Chris Pine = at around 0:51 Click Here
Finally James Corden / 5"8' Michael Douglas = Click Here
My guess = James Corden very weak 5"7' Chris Pine 5"11' range Tom Hardy weak 5"8' Leonardo around 5"10'
James Corden tiptoeing next to Samuel Anderson in poor posture Click Here Rob strong 5"8' next to Samuel Anderson in good posture = Click Here
CDS said on 26/Aug/19
@Pierre: I'm curious as to your input in the Kevin Costner thread?
@Pierre: I'm curious as to your input in the Kevin Costner thread?
CDS said on 26/Aug/19
Thanks for those pics, Pierre. Wow! You know, I actually didn't even think Sean bean was that tall, I had him pegged more at around 5'9", from all the shows I've seen him,in over the years. See the 2005 film, "north country", where he looked a tad shorter than 5'9.5" woody harrelson.
Thanks for those pics, Pierre. Wow! You know, I actually didn't even think Sean bean was that tall, I had him pegged more at around 5'9", from all the shows I've seen him,in over the years. See the 2005 film, "north country", where he looked a tad shorter than 5'9.5" woody harrelson.
Logan M Barringer said on 25/Aug/19
@Rob looks exactly 3 inches taller than Tom Hardy when they worked on The Revenant. If Tom Hardy is near 5'9" flat that the site claims than Leo would be about 6'0" flat.
@Rob looks exactly 3 inches taller than Tom Hardy when they worked on The Revenant. If Tom Hardy is near 5'9" flat that the site claims than Leo would be about 6'0" flat.
Pierre said on 25/Aug/19
Sean Bean listed 5"10.5' and Billy Zane = Click Here
Click Here
Click Here =Billy Zane and 6"2.5' Brandon Routh (Click Here with Rob)
Leonardo and Billy Zane Titanic scènes probably same shoes = Click Here
Click Here =here Leonardo closer to the camera Billy slouching a little bit
Click Here
Sean Bean listed 5"10.5' and Billy Zane = Click Here
Click Here
Click Here =Billy Zane and 6"2.5' Brandon Routh (Click Here with Rob)
Leonardo and Billy Zane Titanic scènes probably same shoes = Click Here
Click Here =here Leonardo closer to the camera Billy slouching a little bit
Click Here
Pierre said on 25/Aug/19
rumka said on 24/Aug/19
Such a long discussion when he is clearly 179-181cm tall. There could be small differences. He has the perfect height for a movie star.
He's not clearly 179/181,it's always clearly debatable to my eyes.Tom Cruise is max 5"7' and he has the perfect height for a movie star too...
rumka said on 24/Aug/19
Such a long discussion when he is clearly 179-181cm tall. There could be small differences. He has the perfect height for a movie star.
He's not clearly 179/181,it's always clearly debatable to my eyes.Tom Cruise is max 5"7' and he has the perfect height for a movie star too...
Animus said on 25/Aug/19
@CDS
You said it yourself. He generally looked within half an inch of Olyphant; sometimes the same, sometimes a little shorter. That qualifies as "similar" in my book.
@CDS
You said it yourself. He generally looked within half an inch of Olyphant; sometimes the same, sometimes a little shorter. That qualifies as "similar" in my book.
stylus said on 25/Aug/19
179cm guy said on 22/Aug/19
Before posting any photo watch firts floor and who has the advantage.. Leonardo is clearly on advantage and higher floor angles. He looks more than 2 inches shorter than Djimon Hounsou
179cm guy said on 22/Aug/19
Before posting any photo watch firts floor and who has the advantage.. Leonardo is clearly on advantage and higher floor angles. He looks more than 2 inches shorter than Djimon Hounsou
rumka said on 24/Aug/19
Such a long discussion when he is clearly 179-181cm tall. There could be small differences. He has the perfect height for a movie star.
Such a long discussion when he is clearly 179-181cm tall. There could be small differences. He has the perfect height for a movie star.
CDS said on 23/Aug/19
@stylus: that's what I thought about Leo. That his own 5'11.25" measurement was right out of bed.
@animus: Leo clearly looked, maybe not a full inch, but maybe about a half to 3/4 inch shorter than Timothy olyphant in OUATIH...
@C-MO: I THINK Leo had reached full height by the time he did "titanic", but he admitted to wearing lifts in the film. However, if you look at a few films he did just a few years prior to "titanic", like "what's eating Gilbert grape" for instance, I don't think anyone would deny that an 18 yr old DiCaprio looked no more than 5'9" or less even . I think he clearly had a late growth spurt...
@stylus: that's what I thought about Leo. That his own 5'11.25" measurement was right out of bed.
@animus: Leo clearly looked, maybe not a full inch, but maybe about a half to 3/4 inch shorter than Timothy olyphant in OUATIH...
@C-MO: I THINK Leo had reached full height by the time he did "titanic", but he admitted to wearing lifts in the film. However, if you look at a few films he did just a few years prior to "titanic", like "what's eating Gilbert grape" for instance, I don't think anyone would deny that an 18 yr old DiCaprio looked no more than 5'9" or less even . I think he clearly had a late growth spurt...
CDS said on 23/Aug/19
@stylus: that's what I thought about Leo. That his own 5'11.25" measurement was right out of bed.
@animus: Leo clearly looked, maybe not a full inch, but maybe about a half to 3/4 inch shorter than Timothy olyphant in OUATIH...
@stylus: that's what I thought about Leo. That his own 5'11.25" measurement was right out of bed.
@animus: Leo clearly looked, maybe not a full inch, but maybe about a half to 3/4 inch shorter than Timothy olyphant in OUATIH...
Guest66 said on 22/Aug/19
@stylus, Trust you ? Like you've personally measured him.
@stylus, Trust you ? Like you've personally measured him.
179cm guy said on 22/Aug/19
Rob, would you say that this is a picture that gives the impression of DiCaprio being more of a weak six-footer than a strong 5'11 next to 6'1.5 Djimon Hounsou ( Click Here )? I know Leo has the hair advantage but I can't see there being more than two inches max between them here.
Editor Rob
Rob, would you say that this is a picture that gives the impression of DiCaprio being more of a weak six-footer than a strong 5'11 next to 6'1.5 Djimon Hounsou ( Click Here )? I know Leo has the hair advantage but I can't see there being more than two inches max between them here.
Editor Rob5ft 11.5 at times did suit dicaprio, he can still sometimes look it
stylus said on 22/Aug/19
@Rob well 5-10.75 or 180 cm on the nose is the absolute most I can give for Leo but 181 cm is a solid tall man and in my opinion Leo has always looked between 5'10 and 5'11 but never 5'11 or over. Overall Rob is so good you have created this page being the only or offcial about heights. We thank you because is good to have always tools out there searching for the truth! and of course at the same time is a pagr where you just can have fun and reading funny comments!
@Rob well 5-10.75 or 180 cm on the nose is the absolute most I can give for Leo but 181 cm is a solid tall man and in my opinion Leo has always looked between 5'10 and 5'11 but never 5'11 or over. Overall Rob is so good you have created this page being the only or offcial about heights. We thank you because is good to have always tools out there searching for the truth! and of course at the same time is a pagr where you just can have fun and reading funny comments!
Pierre said on 22/Aug/19
ajax509 said on 20/Aug/19
@Pierre It's easy to fool people when consistently pointing out pics in Barack's favour! In each of the photos he's the one closer to the cam.
lol when he's closer to the camera this is not a lot and you can compare their heights.You go to explain me Leonardo is just an inch shorter than Barack with yours same pics with camera low and Leonardo a lot closer to the camera...Click Here = in this pic i posted on 16 august is Barack closer here?Lol Why don't you post this pic then? Then who's fooling here ?...
ajax509 said on 20/Aug/19
@Pierre It's easy to fool people when consistently pointing out pics in Barack's favour! In each of the photos he's the one closer to the cam.
lol when he's closer to the camera this is not a lot and you can compare their heights.You go to explain me Leonardo is just an inch shorter than Barack with yours same pics with camera low and Leonardo a lot closer to the camera...Click Here = in this pic i posted on 16 august is Barack closer here?Lol Why don't you post this pic then? Then who's fooling here ?...
stylus said on 21/Aug/19
@Rob Dicaprio was 179 cm or a solid 5'10.5 guy. He was very slim by 1995-1999 so he looked taller. Trust me he is not a 5'11 guy but close. 5'11.25 is maybe right after bed Rob! in 2019 must be downgrade I see it too high
@Rob Dicaprio was 179 cm or a solid 5'10.5 guy. He was very slim by 1995-1999 so he looked taller. Trust me he is not a 5'11 guy but close. 5'11.25 is maybe right after bed Rob! in 2019 must be downgrade I see it too high
Animus said on 21/Aug/19
He looked quite similar to Timothy Olyphant in "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood". 181cm is still the best bet in town for DiCaprio.
He looked quite similar to Timothy Olyphant in "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood". 181cm is still the best bet in town for DiCaprio.
c-mo said on 20/Aug/19
I highly doubt leo was anything less than 178cm in titanic . do you really think he was 5'9 there ? he was already 23 years old or so
I highly doubt leo was anything less than 178cm in titanic . do you really think he was 5'9 there ? he was already 23 years old or so
ajax509 said on 20/Aug/19
@Pierre It's easy to fool people when consistently pointing out pics in Barack's favour! In each of the photos he's the one closer to the cam.
@Pierre It's easy to fool people when consistently pointing out pics in Barack's favour! In each of the photos he's the one closer to the cam.
CDS said on 17/Aug/19
Thanks for the pics of Leo and former president Obama, Pierre!
Uuuhhh, Rob, thinking about a downgrade by now??😂
Thanks for the pics of Leo and former president Obama, Pierre!
Uuuhhh, Rob, thinking about a downgrade by now??😂
Pierre said on 16/Aug/19
Click Here =even when Barack slouch he looks two inches taller than Leonardo.
Click Here =here in around the same posture Leonardo looks around a complete forehead shorter than him.
Click Here = around the same posture
Click Here Click Here
Click Here =even when Barack slouch he looks two inches taller than Leonardo.
Click Here =here in around the same posture Leonardo looks around a complete forehead shorter than him.
Click Here = around the same posture
Click Here Click Here
CDS said on 15/Aug/19
@Pierre: we agree on Willis, but that's a little lower than I might guess for brad and Leo though. You could be right though. I certainly agree about brads systematic lift wearing, and I think Leo to an extent, especially in his movies, which again, he has even admitted to...
@Pierre: we agree on Willis, but that's a little lower than I might guess for brad and Leo though. You could be right though. I certainly agree about brads systematic lift wearing, and I think Leo to an extent, especially in his movies, which again, he has even admitted to...
Daycringeothon said on 15/Aug/19
Makes sense Dicaprio grew a little after titanic. I think 5’9” range is a good bet then and a few years after that 5’10 5/8”-5’10 3/4” late afternoon. 5’11 3/8” as an average late morning height around that time.
He can still look 5’11” range with normal shoes I guess Obama is 6’1 7/8”-6’2 1/8” in normal shoes.
Makes sense Dicaprio grew a little after titanic. I think 5’9” range is a good bet then and a few years after that 5’10 5/8”-5’10 3/4” late afternoon. 5’11 3/8” as an average late morning height around that time.
He can still look 5’11” range with normal shoes I guess Obama is 6’1 7/8”-6’2 1/8” in normal shoes.
Pierre said on 13/Aug/19
@CDS =My guess = Bruce Willis 5"10.25' Leonardo 5"9.75' Brad 5"9.25', shorter than Leonardo because in reality Brad wear almost systematically some helps in his shoes to my eyes.Leonardo to me looks around 3 inches shorter than 6"0.75' Barack not just around 2 inches.Georges(Clooney) around the same height as Leonardo
@CDS =My guess = Bruce Willis 5"10.25' Leonardo 5"9.75' Brad 5"9.25', shorter than Leonardo because in reality Brad wear almost systematically some helps in his shoes to my eyes.Leonardo to me looks around 3 inches shorter than 6"0.75' Barack not just around 2 inches.Georges(Clooney) around the same height as Leonardo
CDS said on 12/Aug/19
I forgot to mention too, that when "titanic" came out in 1997, on tv's "siskel and ebert", film critic , gene siskel said Leo was 5'9", but like I said, I suspect he had grown since then.
I forgot to mention too, that when "titanic" came out in 1997, on tv's "siskel and ebert", film critic , gene siskel said Leo was 5'9", but like I said, I suspect he had grown since then.
CDS said on 12/Aug/19
@Pierre: wow, that says even more about Leo's height than timothys. I know he (olyphant) was a tad taller than Bruce Willis in, "live free or die hard", but unlike the members of this site, I always put Bruce more in the 5'10" to 5'10.5" zone, especially considering how much shorter he looked than tom hanks in "bonfire of the vanities". Back to Leo's height though lol. Lets say timothy is somewhere between this site's listing and pierres guesstimate, that still puts Leo at about where i pegged him, between 5'10" and 5'11". And that's still counting for a height growth since age 22-23, since back when he was 18-19, he really did look no more than 5'9", which this site's own description has for him...
@Pierre: wow, that says even more about Leo's height than timothys. I know he (olyphant) was a tad taller than Bruce Willis in, "live free or die hard", but unlike the members of this site, I always put Bruce more in the 5'10" to 5'10.5" zone, especially considering how much shorter he looked than tom hanks in "bonfire of the vanities". Back to Leo's height though lol. Lets say timothy is somewhere between this site's listing and pierres guesstimate, that still puts Leo at about where i pegged him, between 5'10" and 5'11". And that's still counting for a height growth since age 22-23, since back when he was 18-19, he really did look no more than 5'9", which this site's own description has for him...
Pierre said on 12/Aug/19
@CDS =If Jimmy Fallon and Tymothy had around the same heels Tymothy is max 5"11' for me.Watch in google pics "Leonardo Dicaprio Barack Obama"=Leonardo never looks even 5"11' next to him.
@CDS =If Jimmy Fallon and Tymothy had around the same heels Tymothy is max 5"11' for me.Watch in google pics "Leonardo Dicaprio Barack Obama"=Leonardo never looks even 5"11' next to him.
CDS said on 9/Aug/19
@Pierre: so what is your official estimate for Timothy olyphant?
@Pierre: so what is your official estimate for Timothy olyphant?
Pierre said on 8/Aug/19
@CDS = Click Here =here Tymothy Olyphant next to Jimmy Fallon watch at around 5:05 = very similar to Jimmy Fallon maybe a little bit shorter.I don't know if Jimmy had a help with his shoes this day;small memory reminder= Jimmy Fallon and Stephen Colbert apparently in same shoes = watch the first 17 seconds = Click Here = they look very similar Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here .and now Stephen next to Barack 6"0.75' = Click Here Click Here
@CDS = Click Here =here Tymothy Olyphant next to Jimmy Fallon watch at around 5:05 = very similar to Jimmy Fallon maybe a little bit shorter.I don't know if Jimmy had a help with his shoes this day;small memory reminder= Jimmy Fallon and Stephen Colbert apparently in same shoes = watch the first 17 seconds = Click Here = they look very similar Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here .and now Stephen next to Barack 6"0.75' = Click Here Click Here
cmillzz said on 8/Aug/19
@CDS
I doubt Pitt dips under 5’10. Maybe at worst 5’10 flat at an extreme low.
@CDS
I doubt Pitt dips under 5’10. Maybe at worst 5’10 flat at an extreme low.
CDS said on 6/Aug/19
@Greg: how is 5'9.75" for Pitt trolling?? I said that's barefoot, end of day height. That would make him easily 5'10.5" to 5'10.75" out of bed, easily a solid 5'11" or over in a basic pair of shoes. Look at his early, pre-lift, work, and that's exactly what he looks like. You can argue pre- and post- lift for a lot of actors... Ryan gosling, Robert Downey, Jr., Mr. DiCaprio himself... Especially after an actor has risen to a certain level of stardom...
@Greg: how is 5'9.75" for Pitt trolling?? I said that's barefoot, end of day height. That would make him easily 5'10.5" to 5'10.75" out of bed, easily a solid 5'11" or over in a basic pair of shoes. Look at his early, pre-lift, work, and that's exactly what he looks like. You can argue pre- and post- lift for a lot of actors... Ryan gosling, Robert Downey, Jr., Mr. DiCaprio himself... Especially after an actor has risen to a certain level of stardom...
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 31/Jul/19
@Johno said on 26/Jul/19
A bit shorter than Jimmy Kimmel.
Lol. More like in opposite.
@Johno said on 26/Jul/19
A bit shorter than Jimmy Kimmel.
Lol. More like in opposite.
c-mo said on 31/Jul/19
Importer said on 26/Jul/19
@c-mo if only I felt that way...
----------------------
humans always want more but I am sure with what I said 5'11 - 6'0 is where its at . perfect height
Importer said on 26/Jul/19
@c-mo if only I felt that way...
----------------------
humans always want more but I am sure with what I said 5'11 - 6'0 is where its at . perfect height
Hijoputamus said on 30/Jul/19
@CDS, bang on
@CDS, bang on
CDS said on 28/Jul/19
Just seen "once upon a time in Hollywood", awesome movie! What I took away, height wise, the difference between Leo and brad. Leo looked around an inch taller most of the movie. The tricky part about it was the shoes. Leo's clearly had a thicker exterior heel, was wearing cowboy boots. Brad was wearing these moccasin type suede boots, that while appearing not to have much of an exterior heel, just looking at those. They could very easily have a thick interior lift built in. So I would highly doubt, based on brads track record, he's going to appear in a movie with Leo, without some sort of footwear boost. That being said, that tells me , my previous guess is probably pretty close still. Btw, Leo looked about an inch shorter than Timothy olyphant, listed here as 5'11.75', which I must admit, surprises me. I would've actually pegged him as taller than that, more in the 6'-6'1" range. But all that being said, it reinforces what I previously guessed. Leo- somewhere between 5'10" and 5'11", and brad, 5'9.75", both end of day, barefoot heights.
Just seen "once upon a time in Hollywood", awesome movie! What I took away, height wise, the difference between Leo and brad. Leo looked around an inch taller most of the movie. The tricky part about it was the shoes. Leo's clearly had a thicker exterior heel, was wearing cowboy boots. Brad was wearing these moccasin type suede boots, that while appearing not to have much of an exterior heel, just looking at those. They could very easily have a thick interior lift built in. So I would highly doubt, based on brads track record, he's going to appear in a movie with Leo, without some sort of footwear boost. That being said, that tells me , my previous guess is probably pretty close still. Btw, Leo looked about an inch shorter than Timothy olyphant, listed here as 5'11.75', which I must admit, surprises me. I would've actually pegged him as taller than that, more in the 6'-6'1" range. But all that being said, it reinforces what I previously guessed. Leo- somewhere between 5'10" and 5'11", and brad, 5'9.75", both end of day, barefoot heights.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.