How tall is Leonardo DiCaprio - Page 2

Add a Comment2349 comments

Average Guess (406 Votes)
5ft 11.15in (180.7cm)
JJJ said on 27/Feb/18
Click Here:

With Billy Zane in Titanic who is supposedly 183cm.
Dmeyer said on 27/Feb/18
When i met him he has 1-1,5cm more shoes and à hat and walked quickly by me and he seemed 6ftish minus 0,5in shoes plus 0,5in haïr and hat about 5'11 probably he is defenetly not 5'10 or 6ft since he looked over 5'11 and 6 FT plus shoes haïr and hat he would have looked near 6'1
Animus said on 18/Feb/18
Actually, I have seen one source claim he was 140lbs range during Titanic, but that seems very low for 181cm.
Animus said on 18/Feb/18
Rob, what do you think he weighed in the heyday of Titanic? 150lbs range?
Editor Rob
140-150 is possible.
Dmeyer said on 10/Feb/18
I use to believe hé was 5'11,5-11,75 now i think 5'11-11,25 in person fooled me for near 6ft
Dmeyer said on 8/Feb/18
I am starting tout believe 180,5cm is possible he Can look anywere 5'10,5-11,5 but with 177 Damon AT the 186 radio Guy he Can look 180cm , Can look 179 180 and 181 somethimes 182 , with Obama looks 178-9cm with Hanks 180,5-181
Original said on 8/Feb/18
5'11
Vexacus said on 3/Feb/18
He's 5'11.25 barefeet , 6 ft with regular shoes , all my respect to Jack Dawson .
Warren said on 2/Feb/18
Just the typical round face. He was late bloomer and has long legs, 180-181 range for sure
tobo said on 28/Jan/18
180m. his big head makes him looks short.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 25/Jan/18
I disagree @don Julio. 5’11” is too close to 5’10”.
Don Julio said on 18/Jan/18
Forget 6 feet, 181 cm is ideal male height Leo reps it so well, a solid 181 guy is as good as 6 feet, most women think 6 feet is 179 these days. Easily 6 feet in fancy shoes, no doubt Leo stands at a strong 5'11"
Animus said on 15/Jan/18
His lanky frame can make him seem taller than 181cm, like he is more in the 182cm range. However, it's been established quite conclusively that he's in the 5'11-5'11½ range. I do wonder if he is a strong 181cm, like 181.3cm - in other words a 1cm taller than a prototypical 5'11 man. That's probably the most I'd argue.
Flyin said on 13/Jan/18
Yes, very strong listing I think. Years ago did we have 182cm here.
Don Julio said on 12/Jan/18
Rob have you seen The Basketball Diaries and What's Eating Gilbert Grape. I think Leo never got to 5'11" in these movies yet even though in Basketball Diaries he was 19 when they filmed I think, possibly late grower because he was like a little over 2 inches taller than Mark Wahlberg and he already fully grew and I believe Wahlberg was a legit 5'8" then. They were basically wearing converse the whole movie so it was easy to tell. In What's Eating Gilbert Grape, Leo was same height as Johnny Depp. Depp looked 5'9.5" during that time of age for him I think or at least 176 and Leo was same height he was like almost 18 I think so he had to have grown 2 inches when they filmed Romeo and Juliet in 1996. At 17-18 he was 5'9" area, 19-20 he was 5'10" area and 20-21 he reached his peak, which I think is between 5'11 1/4" to 5'11 1/2" that's 5'11 3/8"/181.25-.3 and I have seen most of his movies but I think I should re watch to focus more on his height and even watch the bad ones too. I will update my opinion when I have completed my full analysis and Leonardo DiCaprio's height.
Editor Rob
Not watched it for donkey's years, but I do think in 18-21 range Leo did do a Bieber and gain a bit of height.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 12/Jan/18
Same height as Vin Diesel.

@King of the hill, he wore lifts in the aviator and boots in blood diamond.
Guest66 said on 9/Jan/18
Totally agree with 180cm at worst 182cm at best for him.
King of the hill 91 said on 9/Jan/18
I dont thing he has much lift really 182 cm i have said for ages
King of the hill 91 said on 9/Jan/18
Its hard to say his height i am a big fan very big my favorite actor what is the lowest and most tallest he could be to you leo i have all your movies i love blood diamond i could go 182 .5cm maybe weake 183cm early morning or flat 182 cm i stated for ages
King of the hill 91 said on 9/Jan/18
What range do you have him at mate
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 8/Jan/18
King, I’m not him but 180 at worst and 182 at best. Even though he stands with horrible posture. He still has the proportions of a tallish man that can’t be faked with lifts.
King of the hill 91 said on 6/Jan/18
Rob what is the lowest and most you would list him
Alp said on 6/Jan/18
Looks tall on the "beach" . İmo close to 6 ft in his 20's
Anonymous said on 2/Jan/18
Funny thing about DiCaprio is that he hit puberty so late. He was like 19 before he hit his growth spurt and his voice changed which you can see in movies like this Boys life and what’s eating Gilbert grape. This may be y many perceive him shorter. I’d say he is a solid 5’10.
King of the hill 91 said on 31/Dec/17
Jamie fox has bigger boots he isnt under a strong 180cm 181cm to 182 cm but 182 cm he rdally could be
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 31/Dec/17
he looks 6' next to ioan gruffudd. who robs listed at 181 5'11.5"
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 30/Dec/17
@animus, Leo could very well be 182cm.

The guy stands with such bad posture, it’s as if he sleeps while standing up....
Animus said on 28/Dec/17
A good question to answer would be to determine in what movie DiCaprio started looking his current height. It's probably around 1995 in "The Quick and the Dead", "The Streets of New York" or "Total Eclipse".
Jack Daniels said on 28/Dec/17
Hi kids I'm back! For me Mr Leonardo is 5'11", maybe 5'11" and a quarter. He's shorter by one inch with Tom Hanks (6ft). He's clearly shorter when he's standing beside 6'1" guys (in Titanic for example). Personally, I'm 5'10" and three quarters (179,5 cm) when I get up morning, and shrink to 5'10" and a half late in the morning, 5'10" during the rest of the day. People sometimes think I'm 6ft or near, because I'm thin and always standing straight, particularly on photos.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 27/Dec/17
Click Here
Animus said on 26/Dec/17
People who claim that DiCaprio looks 5'11 or 5'11½ need to know that it's perfectly consistent with being 5'11¼. You can't really distinguish between people who are less than 1cm apart. I'm sure Rob would agree.
HonestSlovene said on 26/Dec/17
He's in that 180-182 cm zone and has 2 cm on Pitt, 3 cm on Clooney and 4.5 cm on Damon. 1 cm shorter than Hanks and Norton.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 25/Dec/17
Pretty much looked identical to Ioan Gruffudd, I guess 5’11.5” would suit him good, not sure about footwear though.
Slippin said on 25/Dec/17
5'11 1/2 I have seen 90% of his movies and for sure that he is a mid 5'11 guy.
Kourosh said on 23/Dec/17
@Real Cavil

you need help.

go to a therapy. if this is how you react on height debate god helps you on more important issue.
Jann said on 22/Dec/17
6'0"
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 22/Dec/17
Cavill, I understand your 5’10” guess for Leo though, he stands with horrible posture and doesn’t have any upper body muscle. Robs listing is fine though.

we have a photo with him Glenn Cunningham next to Leo, not sure why rob hasn’t put on top of the page yet.
Editor Rob:
I always wondered why Glenn said Doc Martin's gave him almost 2 inches and he measured converse at an inch...he may well be admitting surreptitiously to a half inch lift.

Possible lift-wearers are better kept on joke sites like Youtube or Twitter.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 22/Dec/17
Real Cavill, another visitor was discussing politics and swearing and threatening other users, he got himself banned. Just a heads up mate.

You’ll thank me later.
Real Cavill said on 21/Dec/17
@KousKous said "stop this downgrading nonsense by some of the users in here." Valid opinions you don't agree with are nonsense eh? So anyone saying Leo is 5'11" or under is nonsense?

You're right I let my emotions overtake me. I tried to make a blind man see but didn't realize he's holding his hands in front of his eyes. That became more evident with your insults and the fact that you actually defended yourself using another name which is very sad. Evil seals its own heart. Yeah don't waste your energy on me because you will gain nothing since you believe in nothing. To someone like you, anything that is not material based is a waste of time so follow your material ways if you think it will earn you success in the end. For some reason you also seem to think you're wanted or needed for something to happen. You're not.
Kourosh said on 20/Dec/17
@Real Cavil
you aint emotional while write me an essay to impose your feelings on me.
i told you what i meant. I wouldn't waste my energy on somebody like you not worth it.

Leo Fanboy? lol like i said dont be emotional kid.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 19/Dec/17
It's a real shame we can't just get along for a moment and learn from each other. I now understand why a lot of visitors quit this site. Most users have no manners.

@real cavill, i very much doubt you're spiritual minded, you hate another visitor. @kourish knows leo is a legit 5'11" ranger (180-181). anything more or less is wrong.
Real Cavill said on 19/Dec/17
@Kourosh....There you go again trying to shame people. It's all in black and white so don't lie. You said people are saying "nonsense". Who the hell are you to call good opinions nonsense? Because you think you are smarter than other people that's why and you think thats some kind of modern thing.

Yeah I'm being emotional because you're a DIC-tator telling people they're nonsense and to stop being emotional? I guess you're a robot you sound like one. Being emotional doesn't change the facts of someone's answer. In fact, emotion is just as important as logic because people often get a gut feeling that ends up being true. That feeling can be coming from the third eye or "spiritual eye". That's my quote, but you will steal it just like you did the emotional line. That's why you messed it all up because you simply copied what you heard and didn't think, so you didn't see the faultiness of your logic.

Under 180cm is nonsense? You need thicker glasses Leo fanboy.
Kourosh said on 18/Dec/17
@Real Cavill am i stopping anyone to express their opinion? what makes you think like that? i just simply said anything below 180cm is nonsense and some come here just try to downgrade for no reason but feel free to post it.

So, no hard feeling and stop being emotional.

Peace out.
Real Cavill said on 16/Dec/17
@Kourosh......Why are you trying to stop people from expressing a reasonable opinion? Did anyone say Leo is 5'3"? He looks 5'11" because he probably is. I may even go as far as saying 5'10.75". You think because people downgrade they must be up to some nonsense? Maybe because you think like that then you believe everyone thinks like that.
MAD SAM said on 15/Dec/17
182 cm surely
Slim 186 said on 14/Dec/17
hes got 176 damon by 5 cm here: Click Here

i think his old listing can be re-argued.
Ted said on 8/Dec/17
Never anything over 182cm.
Slim 186 said on 5/Dec/17
@Ediit e Rob, who would give the edge between Leo and Brad?
Editor Rob: I think they can look within a small fraction, but brad I feel is the man with a more optimal posture...I still would say DiCaprio has the better chance of edging Pitt out if it came down to a proper measurement.
King of the hill 91 said on 4/Dec/17
179cm no way to low jamie has bigger boots 180cm strong lowest to 182 cm
Grit said on 4/Dec/17
I see 5'11.5
Warren said on 4/Dec/17
No under 179, looks probably 5'11 flat with Obama(183-185cm)
Brad said on 2/Dec/17
As listed.
Bobby said on 30/Nov/17
Was he ever 6ft in his 20s? He's always been listed as 6ft.
Kourosh said on 20/Nov/17
no less than 5'11.5
stop this downgrading nonsense by some of the users in here.
Anonymous said on 19/Nov/17
Absolutely 1.79
Real Cavill said on 19/Nov/17
Looks 5'11". The best proof was that pic with him and Tom Hanks posted here by MM. In that pic he looks 5'10" but we can list Leo at 5'11" for now because we couldn't see the footwear.
Jeremy said on 17/Nov/17
Weak six footer
King of the hill 91 said on 13/Nov/17
181cm maybe weake 182 cm
Nino said on 13/Nov/17
Click Here

Max 1.80 no more. In titanic he looks 5.9/5.10 in all scenes with billy Zane.
Anonymous said on 12/Nov/17
How much Leo weighs? Google says 75kg - 165lbs which imo is bs, that's skinny for his height.
Dillinger said on 10/Nov/17
Let me be sceptic about this listing.
goo.gl/YJtof7
21 years old Leo with Pitt in 1995.
Slim 184 said on 8/Nov/17
Rampage 🍀, he did get beaten up a bit while filming “the revenant” but I’m not sure if it knocked a mm off him.
Sacred said on 6/Nov/17
I think he is 6 feet in Inception.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Nov/17
You don't lose height at that age unless you've had injuries.
Slim 6' said on 2/Nov/17
Frost said on 1/Nov/17
@slim you think he lost height?
**********
A mm or 2 isn’t impossible.
Frost said on 1/Nov/17
@slim you think he lost height?
Slim 6' said on 29/Oct/17
5’11.5” in his 20’s is entirely possible.
c-mo said on 27/Oct/17
@Tim no he is not 5'9 but more like 5'7
Soije said on 26/Oct/17
Has anyone visited Madame Tussauds in Vegas to see his wax figure? It's freakishly tall, like over 6 feet tall, same with Andre Agassi. I have no idea what to believe. On the flip side, Michael Jordan, Dwayne Johnson, and Arnold Schwarzenegger were not as tall as expected. Shaq was though.
Grit said on 25/Oct/17
180
Tim said on 24/Oct/17
atleast he looks in the 5'9 zone because he has a bad posture when he walks. He is 5'10 and with luck was 5'10.75
Tim said on 24/Oct/17
today is in the 5'9 zone with luck 5'10 maybe he was 5'10.75 nothing over this marck
Peter175 said on 24/Oct/17
He really is well below 6 foot. Cant believe I thought he was honest with his claim.

Barely above 5'11
Alex2401 said on 23/Oct/17
Looks solid 6 maybe 183cm
Melyst said on 20/Oct/17
What makes the feeling everyone say a Little over 5'11 and no a flat 5'11? To me looked 5'11 at best I say he was 5'10.5 5'11 righter after bed
King of the hill 91 said on 11/Oct/17
Weake 182 cm range his old listing
Dmeyer said on 8/Oct/17
Late pics hé look 3-4cm over 175cm Fox so CAN look 5'10,75 180cm
Slim 6' said on 7/Oct/17
Robs listing is fine guys, he's a bit taller than 5'11"/180 listed brad pitt: Click Here
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 30/Sep/17
Leo's face doesn't actually appear to be small to me. It's just very stocky, which makes it look a lot smaller than it really is. It was slightly smaller than Tom Hank's face was, however (who has a head that's easily in the 10" inch range). Maybe his face is in the 9.7" inch range?
hardguy said on 29/Sep/17
5ft 11.14in (180.7cm)
robson said on 26/Sep/17
Barefoot, solid 5'11 but nothing more,he is like 182 morning and 180-181 at average,maybe even 179 late evening.In that picture with Jaimie Foxx 2017 he even looks for 178-9 but I can belive Jaimie has 0.5inch higher shoes so clear 5'11 is accurate at least.
Edimar1.84 said on 25/Sep/17
This guy is 5ft11.5, he is not 1.81 at night and at morning probaly 1.83.
Spencer said on 23/Sep/17
5'11" 182 morning.
Yati said on 23/Sep/17
@Tonyx...that picture of Leo with Jamie Foxx. Foxx is wearing lifts for days!
Guest66 said on 21/Sep/17
That pic is one the examples where Leo can look 5'10 range against 5'9 Foxx. But no matter what, Leo is at least 180cm.
Rising - 174 cm said on 20/Sep/17
I don't see Leo more than a weak 5'11" there with 5'9" Foxx, even considering the Adidas Foxx is giving might give him near 1 cm advantage, but on other occasions, Leo in similar shoes as he's wearing there has looked over 2" taller than Foxx: Click Here I'd like to see video of that recent Telethon to see what the actual difference looks like. Foxx can pass for 176 cm these days as well.
Slim said on 18/Sep/17
Tonyx said on 14/Sep/17
Leonardo with Jamie Foxx in 2017.
Click Here
************
Leo looks 5'11.25" there.
Tonyx said on 14/Sep/17
Leonardo with Jamie Foxx in 2017.
Click Here
Slim said on 12/Sep/17
Only if 5'11.38" was a listing.... he is closer to 180 than 182/183 but he is closer to 5'11.5" than 5'11.25" barely, I think his old listing was ok and his downgrade was unnecessary.
Rising - 174 cm said on 11/Sep/17
Leo looks 5'11" flat at best with Hanks and honestly under it with Spielberg. Tarantino has the oddest posture I've ever seen which can literally make 5'9" Kurt Russell look as tall as him. I doubt Orlando Bloom is much over 5'10" as well.

5'11"-5'11.25" is fine, imo, bit 5'11.5" is pushing it.
Peter181cm said on 10/Sep/17
He is 1.81m or 5'11.25 at the best..
But he not 1.83m or 6' ;)
Original said on 9/Sep/17
Looks 5'11 1/4 with Tom Hanks. I think he is ~183 out of bed and 180,5/181 at night.
Animus said on 7/Sep/17
He's definitely closer to 5'11 than 6'0, let's establish that. The question is where he falls in the 5'11-5'11½ range. Standing poorly Leo can seem no more than a weak 5'11. Standing well under optimal conditions he can seem a good 5'11½. One thing about Leo's height is for sure and that is that he never seems like a six-footer in normal footwear (i.e. sneakers/trainers).

Taking all this into consideration listing DiCaprio at 5'11¼ seems the most balanced and accurate.
Slim said on 5/Sep/17
I agree, such an unnecessary downgrade, his skinny-fat body and low eye level can make him look shorter, but truth is the guys 181.5. He looks identical to watanabe, maybe even a quarter inch away, not sure about footwear though.
MM said on 5/Sep/17
@Willes188

I only gave you an excuse for the Chris Rock picture, I just corrected all your other idiotic estimates based on YOUR ''evidence''. I did say that 5'11.5 is possible, but on your first comment you said he looks 6 feet, which is plain wrong.

Does your boy look 6 feet here too, with Tom Hanks, who claimed to be 6 feet even at his peak height?
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Doesn't look 5'11.5 either.

Does he look 6 feet here, with a guy between 6-6'1 range?

Click Here

F*ck No. He even looks a weak 5'11 in this pic.

Learn to be objective, fanboy. Dicaprio usually looks 5'11 to 5'11.5, with a little above AND below exceptions, hence this 5'11.25 listing. He is nowhere near 6 foot flat.

Have fun!
Willes188 said on 4/Sep/17
Ken Watanabe has at most 1.5-2cm on DiCaprio not a full inch. All the other pictures are just you having bad excuses, I always deliver on evidence like the ones I posted, and it proves that 5'11.5 is a better listing.
Slim said on 4/Sep/17
Rob?

Jack Lowden: 5'11.5"
Leonardo DiCaprio: 5'11.5"
Christopher Nolan: 5'11.5"

I honestly don't know who's be taller by the mm though.
Editor Rob: they could all measure within a 1/4 inch...
MM said on 3/Sep/17
@Willes188

1) Looks 1 inch shorter than Tarantino but has camera advantage

2) Looks 1 inch taller than Crowe

3) Does look 6 foot with Rock, but footwear and pavement aren't visible, plus it's a close shot.

4) Orlando Bloom is potentially more of a 5'10 guy than 5'10.5, plus he doesn't have a good posture. Dicaprio looks 3 cm taller than him, so as listed.

With Watanabe he looks exactly as listed, 1 inch smaller than him.

I don't think you could argue anything over 5'11.5 for Dicaprio. He could well be 5'11.5 though.
Slim said on 31/Aug/17
Leo's a late bloomer like me, lol.
Sorry will but Leo at 6' would put tom hanks at 6'0.25"+.....
Willes188 said on 30/Aug/17
With 6'1 Tarantino Click Here


With 5'10 Chris Rock Click Here


With 5'10.5 Russel Crow Click Here


With 5'10.5 Orlando Bloom Click Here


With 6'0.25 Ken Watanabe Click Here


With 6'0 Clint Eastwood and 6'4.5 Arnie Hammer



Looks 6ft
James said on 29/Aug/17
I think he is a solid 6 feet
mickey said on 29/Aug/17
strong 5'11. 5'11.5ft
Slim said on 29/Aug/17
Ok Willis, a good picture with Obama he looked 181 range, it's just that Obama has a long skinny face(high eye level) and Leo has a short fat face(low eye level)
Click Here
highlysuspect said on 28/Aug/17
Clooney was never taller than 5'10.5". Now looks 5'10" flat
Pitt 5'11" max
DiCaprio 5'11" max as well. Might be a hair taller than Pitt
Norton peak definitely 6 foot
Hank peak 6 foot too
McConaughey 5'10.75"
Bale Peak 6 foot
Willes188 said on 28/Aug/17
Slim no 188 is fine for now since that's my lowest height.

Good picture with Putin, proves that strong 5'11 (5'11.5) is bang on
Slim183 said on 26/Aug/17
Definitely taller than Vin Diesel.
Jtm said on 26/Aug/17
I doubt blanchett is a full 5'8 let alone a strong 5'8. Look how short she looks with Tim Robbins in heels and also the picture az posted march/15. His footwear looks questionable in that picture. Obama isn't over 6'1 and DiCaprio is more than 2 inches shorter.
Anonymous said on 25/Aug/17
Leo and Putin(169cm by Rob)
Click Here
Slim183 said on 22/Aug/17
How about 186 Obama 20s and 30s(1980s and 1990s) and 184.8 today?
Rising - 174 cm said on 22/Aug/17
I see 5'11"-5'11.25" with Cate, but I can't see Obama as high as 6'1.5", especially with Kobe and Jordan. He really didn't look much different than Trump. I don't think I saw the comment you're referring to on the Taylor Lautner page?
MaskDeMasque said on 21/Aug/17
In the films i've seen him in, i've never seen him as a solid 5'11. I think 5'11 flat is spot on.
Slim183 said on 21/Aug/17
Rising - 174 cm, lol, I take it you saw my comment on the Taylor Lautner page.

Willies188, if ur 189 I'd recommend updating ur nickname, just browse in incognito mode or clear ur history.

Also keep in mind, Leo has a short broad face, aka low eye level and may be why he can look shorter, this is why I judge from the top of the head and not the eye level.

He does look 5'11.5 next to strong 5'8" listed Cate Blanchett. Also Obama was more of a 6'1.5 guy not sure how much he's lost due to stressful job.
Slim183 said on 20/Aug/17
Id 5'11.5 him.
Rising - 174 cm said on 19/Aug/17
@Slim183: I'm just disagreeing that 5'11.5" was a better listing. I think this is closer since the more I look at Leo, the more he looks around the 5'11" mark to me. Btw, off topic, but seems you were 181 not long ago! Unfortunately, my height will only change in the other direction.
Willes188 said on 19/Aug/17
Rob, his shoe size is said to be 12us by the majority of internet sources, do you think that's accurate?

It's interesting how shoe sizes can differ as much as they do, I'm wearing a size 9.5us myself at strong 6'2
Editor Rob: it's a quite big foot for 5ft 11-6ft men, maybe 1.5 sizes above what you might expect.

I had a quick look at his feet though, and they didn't look that much bigger than average, so it's not out of proportion.
5'11.25 at noon. said on 18/Aug/17
Between 0.5 to 1 inch shorter than Chris tucker I'd say he's 5'11.25
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 18/Aug/17
HonestSlovene said on 9/Aug/17
IMHO:

Norton: 5'11.75"-6'0"
Hanks: 5'11.75" peak, 5'11.5" now
DiCaprio: 5'11.25"-5'11.5"
Pitt: 5'10.75" peak, 5'10.5" now
Clooney: 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" now
Damon: 5'9.5"


Edward Norton: 6'0", although he did look shy of it with Tom Hiddleston. To be fair, however, Tom was probably standing up straighter.
Tom Hanks: 6'0" in his peak, and 5'11 1/2" today. His posture can make him appear taller, just as his proportions often make him appear shorter. He did appear to be 6'1"-6'2" in Forrest Gump, however.
Leonardo Dicaprio: 5'11 1/2", and he really doesn't look any shorter than that.
Brad Pitt: 5'11"
George Clooney: 5'10 3/4", and maybe 5'10 1/2" today? He's shorter than Matthew McConaughey though.
Matt Damon: 5'9 3/4"-5'10" after seeing some more photos of him.
Slim183 said on 18/Aug/17
Rising174, lmao if u think Leo is 5'11.5 max, why are you even arguing? It's just confusing.

I don't mean to start an argument.
JJ said on 17/Aug/17
Rob, how much does he look shorter than Chris Tucker by looking at this picture?
Click Here
MAD SAM said on 17/Aug/17
Cmon guys his height is equal to that of Kelly Rohrbach
He's nothing more than 5'10
Click Here:
Rising - 174 cm said on 17/Aug/17
I disagree, Leo honestly looked more 5'10.5" with Spielberg and Ridley Scott. Tom Hanks had him looking maybe 5'11" flat during events for Catch Me If You Can if Hanks was still 6'0" himself. Obama had Leo looking more a weak 5'11" late last year as he had Leo by a solid 2". In the photo above, I'd say Leo looks more a solid 5'11", say 180.5 cm. I'm fine with 5'11"-5'11.25" range, but I think 5'11.5" would be a max for him.
Slim183 said on 17/Aug/17
5'11.5 was a tad better listing though, but like the Arnold page, this will be endlessly debated as some see Leo as 5'11 flat, wether as some see Leo at 5'11.5
Rising - 174 cm said on 16/Aug/17
Leo can look both over and under 5'11" so this listing is fair.

@HonestSlovene: I'd guess for those guys

Norton: 5'11.75" peak and maybe down to 5'11.5" now
Hanks: 6'0" peak and closer to 5'11" these days, maybe 5'11.25". 5'11.75" peak is also possible of course.
DiCaprio: 5'11", maybe 5'11.25" as listed
Pitt: 5'10.5". I see no evidence he's lost anything, but 5'10.75" is about as likely.
Clooney: 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" current
Damon: 5'9.5"

So we're pretty close with our guesses.
Junior said on 16/Aug/17
@Andy

He can't be only lost 1cm in a day. He should be 182cm morning out of bed, 180cm in evening/night.
Slim183 said on 16/Aug/17
5'10.75 is harsh, I would argue 5'11 minimum. Leo would edge out guys like brad, Scott Eastwood, and fassbender for sure.
Andy said on 14/Aug/17
I have seen all his movies I grew up watching him turn into the big star he is now. I believe hes 181cm in the morning out of bed, 180cm in evening.
Willes188 said on 13/Aug/17
Slim he is obviously taller than 6'2 range, the 6'4 as listed wouldn't shock me. This just proves that DiCaprio could have been better with the previous 5'11.5 listing.
Original said on 13/Aug/17
180,5 at night.
Leo said on 13/Aug/17
Leo and Ben Stiller(June 94)
Click Here
Slim 182 cm said on 11/Aug/17
For starters, that guy doesn't even have a listing on here, he's probably nowhere near that mark, probably 6'2 range and finally we don't even know their shoes, so it doesn't really mean much.
Willes188 said on 11/Aug/17
Norton is one of the most solid 6fters in Hollywood...
Wayne said on 10/Aug/17
Next to 6'4" french animator Denis Brogniart Click Here looks a legit 6' here
Slim 182 cm said on 9/Aug/17
I doubt pitt has lost more than an eighth of an inch ATM.
A weak 5'11 would be great for pitt, it would explain why he looks a strong 5'10(178) with half an inch of footwear, and a weak (182)6' with 2 inches of footwear. Nortons slouch kinda makes him look shorter+ he did break his back a few years back, Wouldent surprise me if rob saw norton before his injury and gave him a 6'0.25 upgrade. But no more than 183.5 absolutely maximum.

But I wouldent judge nortons height from fight club as pitt wore boots, stood with millitary posture and may have had the camera angle advantage.

Click Here

All those guys are great actors btw, yes even Pitt and Clooney who they say are overrated for their looks and whatnot.
HonestSlovene said on 9/Aug/17
IMHO:

Norton: 5'11.75"-6'0"
Hanks: 5'11.75" peak, 5'11.5" now
DiCaprio: 5'11.25"-5'11.5"
Pitt: 5'10.75" peak, 5'10.5" now
Clooney: 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" now
Damon: 5'9.5"
Slim 182 cm said on 7/Aug/17
Pretty confident Leo would edge out/hold his own against 75% of white men. From North America to Europe/South Africa and at Aus/nz. look at his barefoot pics, it's so clear There's a 181.61 possibility.
Slim 182 cm said on 7/Aug/17
Lovely, I'd give the 181.61 upgrade, I actually think Leo claims his out of bed/morning/bust a gut height.

Brad: 5'10.75
Leo: 5'11.5
Dmeyer said on 7/Aug/17
rob do you agree leo is 181cm at night and not under if he is then at worst 5'11 1/8
Editor Rob: on a bad day he may well not measure much over 5ft 11, but I think he would generally manage to creep over 5ft 11 for most measurements, even at 10am he may well be 5ft 11.5 range.
HonestSlovene said on 5/Aug/17
I feel this listing is spot on for him, even 0.25 higher would be possible however I wouldn't go outside 5'11"-5'11.5"/ 180-181 cm because that is what he generally looks (upper average/tallish).
Slim 182 cm said on 4/Aug/17
To be fair Leo wears sandals and actually walks barefoot at the beach and when he played with his water guns... wether as brad pitt never goes barefoot or wears sandals, he's always wearing shoes or boots, brad looked 177 next to Tarantino in one photo then 183 in another... if brad was really in the 5'11 range, he'd inflate it to 6', being obsessed with height he is so 179 is a goer for him, and Leo is taller compared to Clooney, McConaughey and Crowe. So saying Leo is 179 is just as ridiculous as his 183 claim. 181 is fine for Leo.

Overall when you compare Leo and Brad to Cate Blanchett and Jonah Hill, there's no doubt Leo is stronger and longer than Brad...
teehona said on 3/Aug/17
5'10 without shoes, 5'11 with shoes.
justbringit said on 3/Aug/17
Rob how likely is between 5'11.25" and 5'11.5" range?
Editor Rob: at night I can't see it, but I did for a good while think anywhere in that range was very possible and he's ended up on the 11.25 as it seems overall a good fit.
Grey said on 3/Aug/17
Accurate
Richardspain said on 3/Aug/17
Obama 185cm nowadays. 186 in peak.
DiCaprio 180cm in the morning and 179 in the afternoon.
Brad Pitt is 179cm too.

I'm six footer barefoot (183cm) in the morning and the people who is 185cm/186cm is only a bit taller than me and sometimes i am not unlike or distinct than they.

And if you see Leo and Obama next to is crearly that Leo isn't a solid 6 footer he is less than that. They are differents!!

So Leo maybe is range 179-180 not more.

182 MAXwith footwear

I am 6 feet in the morning and 6'1 with boots or shoes but i say to friends/people etc.. i am 182 cm!!

He claims 6 foot hahaha Don't lie brother!
Johnny said on 2/Aug/17
@Rob is 5ft 11 flat possible?

With 6ft 0.5 Kyle Chandler Click Here
With Jon Bernthal(wwhom you have met) Click Here Click Here Click Here
Editor Rob: I wouldn't go to 5ft 11 flat, although at times he might look it...I feel he could stretch up over it for a 181cm reading.
Slim 182 cm said on 29/Jul/17
Even if I wanted dicaprio to be 182+, it's impossible. This is probably his highest available listing. He might measure 5 mms more if he's lucky.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
183.2cm out of bed
ArjunaKorale said on 26/Jul/17
Leo is strange actor in terms of height - many people I know believe him to be shorter than 6 ft or even 5 ft 11.5 inches tall. I think it has got to do with his 'small-made' or 'petite' features' - Leo seems to have a small head, seems to be fine boned & is slim & v boyish looking. A few years ago, I read somewhere (perhaps IMDB site) that Leo was 5 ft 11.5 " (182 cm) tall & when I told my wife, she just laughed saying, 'No way in hell, more like 5 ft 10 max!' Other friends state anywhere from 5 ft 9 to 5 ft 11 for Leo - of course, just coz they all believe that, doesn't mean that they are right. My guess is a flat 5 ft 11 (i.e. 180 cm) for Leo & I'm not going even a cm over that.
Animus said on 25/Jul/17
Rob, so when you list DiCaprio at 5'11¼", does that mean in your listing system that he would be 5'11" right before bed? Or would he hit 5'11" at an extreme low when his back is hurting etc?
Editor Rob: I still think he is a little over 5ft 11 in afternoon range.
Guest66 said on 24/Jul/17
Daniel, are you trying to say that he has lost some height? At his age ? He maybe doesn't look as lanky as he did 20 years ago, but he hasn't lost any height.
Danieltiger said on 21/Jul/17
178-179 cm skinny guy looking taller in his 20's strong 5'10 in the pass today strong 5'9. Compared him next to Mario Lopez please . Look at him at the Oscars today is in the 5'9 range. biggest lol ever if they say he is 5'11
Danieltiger said on 21/Jul/17
Am I the only one here that thinks he was 5'10 and today string 5'9? 5'11 and over = lol
even said on 20/Jul/17
5 foot 11 inches at a minimum .
Slim 182 cm said on 17/Jul/17
Richardspain, it's reasonable as DiCaprio wore boots in blood diamond, yet was edged out by djimon hounso who was wearing flip flops or was barefoot, and in "the beach" when barefoot he didn't exactly look above 181 next to Tilda swinton who's like 179 range.
Richardspain said on 17/Jul/17
Only difference between Brad- DiCaprio is that Brad is 179cm if he is very tired.

Leonardo usually is 180cm. He claimed 6 feet it is funny!!! Neither footwear is 6 feet this guy. DiCaprio with footwear will be 181 max and luck!

Brad and DiCaprio have very similar height. They aren't more than 180cm or 5'11 they are a bit taller than Clooney and Dammon ( 177/178cm)
Slim 181 cm said on 16/Jul/17
Hijopotamus, I meant to say: brad as 5'11.5(182) out of bed and 6 foot Leo out of bed.
But 180 brad evening and Leo 182 evening. whoopie Doo.
Slim 181 cm said on 15/Jul/17
Leo and Vin need to switch listings asap. Seriously I don't see the guy below 180 ever. Did I forget to mention I've watched 14 of his movies?
Hijopotamus said on 15/Jul/17
Slim, you are incredible looool
In here you rank pitt as a 183 guy?
So with regular shoes he reaches the 6ft mark?
So with the tricky shoes and lifts he wears he must be 6'2, right?
You are too funny
Brad is 5'10 max and Leo 181 cm
Agreco4l said on 14/Jul/17
5'11" range, not quite 6 feet.
Slim 181 cm said on 11/Jul/17
Willes188, pitt has definitely crossed 5'10.75 but was ever 5'11.25? He did look one next to geena Davis at the Thelma and Louis premiere, and even held his own against norton, dwarfed anthony Hopkins too many times. And dwarfed 177 rick Schroeder in across the tracks. As for DiCaprio, he's lowest would be 5'10.75 and highest 5'11.75. I agree with robs listing of DiCaprio, but after seeing a pic of Leo and brad, I do believe they're very similar in height. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if either was 182 and 183 respectively. Remember rob considers all and pins the most likely outcome.
Willes188 said on 9/Jul/17
DiCaprio 181.5cm or 5'11.25-5'11.5

Pitt 180.5cm or 5'11-5'11.25


There's 0.25 inches between them, it's hard to notice any difference at times but i think DiCaprio would measure taller based on my studies on their height compared to other celebs and their body structure/frame. Both guys doesn't go below 5'11 even at night after a long day of using their bodies to the fullest.
Slim 181 cm said on 8/Jul/17
Flat 5'11 at worst, 5'11.5 at best.
Slim 181 cm said on 8/Jul/17
Willes, Agree to disagree. I wonder if Leo measured 181 cm but divided 181 by 2.5 instead of 2.54, then converted the answer to feet+inches, it's a possibility.
Willes188 said on 7/Jul/17
Could be 11.25 but not below
Slim 181.5 cm said on 6/Jul/17
Zenit99, we can't even see their footwear!
even said on 5/Jul/17
solid 181 cm
Slim 181 cm said on 5/Jul/17
RichardSpain, technically 5"11.25 is 180.975
😜
So have you changed your mind now?
RichardSpain said on 29/Jun/17
I don't believe he is a solid 181 cm. To me he seems 180cm max during the day.
Slim 181 cm said on 26/Jun/17
Anything less than a strong 5'11 is a joke.
5'11.25 - 5'11.5
Slim 181 cm said on 25/Jun/17
Willes188, Definitely closer to flat 5'11 than 6'0.
Zenit99 said on 24/Jun/17
Leo looks tiny next to 188 cm Elon Musk. The guy cannot be more than 178 cm. Click Here

Here is Musk next to Obama: Click Here
Willes188 said on 23/Jun/17
I'd say 181.5cm. He can look anywhere from 180 to 183cm, so right in the middle
Slim 181 cm said on 21/Jun/17
Rampage- being 5'11.5 is WAY better than being 5'9.5.
Ted said on 21/Jun/17
No more than 5' 11'5''.
msj said on 20/Jun/17
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/17
In all honesty though, there's nothing impressive about him height-wise.


Proportions > height

i feel like 5'11 guys have the perfect proportions thats why there have been more sex symbols/sexiest men alive/ladies men at that height than any other height


leo's height is above average and taller in most countries
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/17
In all honesty though, there's nothing impressive about him height-wise.
Slim 181 cm said on 19/Jun/17
Rob, please compare Leo's and brad's eye level, to my mind they're the same:
Click Here
My opinion still stands from my last post.
Amy said on 18/Jun/17
People will make this guy out to be a solid 6 foot he is over 5"11 comfortably and a bit taller than some of the other 181cm guys out their but I don't buy 183cm+ he is 5"11.5 tops but can easily look that mark at times. My guess is 181cm as listed.
Lorne??? said on 17/Jun/17
Billy Costigan, nice screen/user name :)
Gregorovich said on 14/Jun/17
I have never met him, but in all these photos, he looks close to 6 foot but has suspicious footwear. 5'11" max for me.
justbringit said on 14/Jun/17
I'm pretty convinced that he is 5'11"5 or at least a strong 181cm,he seems to edge out nolan by a very small fraction even tho they seem close and generally looks taller than other 181cm guys like gylenhaal and radnor
Slim 181 cm said on 13/Jun/17
Rampage, Leo's morning height could be 182. I'd say 6 cm between him and djimom hounso.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jun/17
Johnny, he was wearing boots while Dimijon was in sandels and there was 1in between them. Really I thought he looked a strong 6ft. Obviously he's nowhere near that barefoot.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jun/17
Johnny, he was wearing boots while Dimijon was in sandels and there was 1in between them.
Slim 181 cm said on 8/Jun/17
Leonardo: 181.5 cm.
Brad: 179.5 cm.
Billy Costigan said on 5/Jun/17
Hey Rob, besides 5ft 11.5, did you have him listed as anything else before this?

Also, in my humble opinion, 5ft 11.5 was the best fit for Leo. He always looks somewhere between 180 and 183.
Morningheight 181.5cm said on 4/Jun/17
I'd say he's in my height range.
Animus said on 3/Jun/17
He is roughly two inches shorter than Barack Obama. Therefore, he must be closer to 5ft11 than 6ft. He could be slightly above 181cm, but he's probably not 5ft11½ (Tom Hanks was clearly taller back in the Catch Me If You Can-days and he wasn't taller than 6ft.)

If I recall correctly, he looked taller in Blood Diamond because he wore boots. And the rumor has it that used a small lift in The Aviator in order to better approach the stature of Howard Hughes.
Johnny said on 2/Jun/17
@Rampage did he look 6ft next to Djimon Honsou? I don't think so.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jun/17
I thought overall 5ft11½ was the best fit. He's gone from looking 5ft11 flat in Titanic and The Beach to a decent 6ft in Blood Diamond and The Aviator...
Anon said on 1/Jun/17
Leo was listed as 5'11.5 for a long time Rob, why the downgrade? Do you still think he looks 5'11.5 in some pictures but less than that in most? ..I can't imagine he's started losing any height yet at the age of 42. I think people tend to start losing height only in their late 40's or early 50's. Though in special circumstances Bodybuilders like Arnold Schwarzenneger for example I believe was already down to 6'1 flat by the time he appeared in Terminator 2 at the age of (43 during filming not 42).
Editor Rob: overall I think over 5ft 11 is still a best estimate, but maybe 11.5 seemed just a little bit much, though you could still make a case for it.
RichardSpain said on 29/May/17
I see only a solid 180cm. I don't believe that Dicaprio be 181 cm or more. 180 cm to him and I am very generous.
James B said on 22/May/17
Would easily edge out brad pitt
Hijopotamus said on 21/May/17
A real 5'11" ish man. Leo can wear flip flops or walk with no shoes no problem. He doesnt go to the beach with tricky boots like Brad Pitt.
James B said on 18/May/17
A strong 5'11 with classics movie star looks so fair to say he must content with his life.

Always been a fan of him as an actor and next to Tom hanks one of the greatest actors to grace Hollywood.
RisingForce said on 17/May/17
I really can't see anything below a solid 5'10" for Crowe, and 179 seems likely. I think he claims his height in shoes, so he'd be 5'10.25" at worst and never drops below 5'10". Leo did look shorter than 182 cm Christian Bale did with Crowe, though so somewhere around 5'11" seems right.
berta said on 14/May/17
to mw hw is withwr 181 ore 182. 180 is to short and 183 is to tall. i think the average guess may be a little low
Original said on 13/May/17
@Leo2001 Yeah that's true in TITANIC he looked solid 5'11 there. 180-181.
Namor said on 12/May/17
Not saying he is but is it possible that he's 182 cm? Be pretty cool if he was lol his mum is really small yet he's way taller than her he's her clone in appearance
Mike said on 11/May/17
Leo's one of those guys you always think is shorter until you see him out in the open. It's like he has a short guy's head and face on a tall guy's body.
BT said on 8/May/17
@Leo2001: I think he's always looked like a typical 5'11 guy, the 5'11.25 mark is arguable but the 5'11.5 always seemed generous imo.
Spencer said on 7/May/17
181 tops . He looks a flat 5'11 to me
Leo2001 said on 6/May/17
@RisingForce
Good pictures with Spilberg
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Leo looks a flat 5ft 11.
jtm said on 6/May/17
I would bet russell crowe is really 177 cm. That supports the 5'10 for DiCaprio.
RisingForce said on 5/May/17
Ralph Macchio did seem to grow an inch in his mid 20s, but he looked and sounded even younger than Leo. I'm a bit skeptical Leo grew at all, especially seeing him clearly shorter than Tom Hanks, who was likely 182 cm at the time, but he can give a taller impression than he use to. After Glenn told Leo he looked taller than he expected or something like that, Leo remarked "it's the period shoes." I don't know what that means, though. I don't think he wears elevators, but maybe he meant shoes he was wearing to film a period film? If you look at Leo with 5'7.5" Ridley Scott on Ridley's page, Leo can look 5'10" range, just like he did with Spielberg. I certainly think he's taller than that as anyone can look shorter or taller than they are, but it suggests to me Leo is simply a solid 5'11". There was a 1999 Time Magazine feature called "A Visit with Leonardo DiCaprio" that described him as 5'11". It makes sense that he was slightly taller than 5'10.5" Russell Crowe. Maybe Leo was still giving his height as 5'11" at that time and now gives it as 6 feet?
Leo2001 said on 4/May/17
@berta titanic was filmed in 96...Leo was born in late 74,he as like 21-22.
I think he was not grow after.

With Billy Zane(lsited 6ft0.5)in 97.
He looks like 5ft 11-.5 like now.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
berta said on 4/May/17
did he grow anything after titanic? he was like 23 years old back then but looked like 16 in titaninc i would have guessed 180 cm. in recent years i think either 181 ore 182
justbringit said on 24/Apr/17
this would be the lowest i would argue for tbh,i also doubt i would go as far as 5'11.75" but i definately think that 5'11.5" is a real possibility.What do you think rob?
shiva 181 cms said on 18/Apr/17
@ rising force I'd agree that he's 182 at most
shiva 181 cms said on 18/Apr/17
He looked almost an inch shorter than Tom thanks whose 6' roughly, and also usually looks 5'11-11.5 , 5'11.25 seems spot on
Animus said on 15/Apr/17
He is definitely closer to 5'11" than 6'; that much is clear from seeing him in "The Wolf of Wall Street". 5'11.25" is a good listing, because he can occasionally look like a weak six-footer.
Dejavu said on 8/Apr/17
I don't think he is anything under 5'11. Matt Damon looks 177cm next to leo
RisingForce said on 8/Apr/17
Hanks shoes seem completely normal. Since when has Hanks been known to wear lifts at premieres? If anything, Leo is a more likely lift candidate than Hanks. 181 cm isn't a bad listing for Leo and 5'11.5" is possible, but the most he could be.
Canson said on 7/Apr/17
@Honest Slovene: I agree with what you said but Johnson thinks outside of the box differently than most

@Willes188: none of us have ever met Dicaprio I don't think. Rampage could be right who knows. He's good at estimating but nobody is perfect. I bet if he were saying this guy were 178-180 you would not think as highly as you do of him. You take whatever or whomever makes someone taller
HonestSlovene said on 7/Apr/17
@Johnson Obama 185 cm, Di Caprio 181 cm is more realistic IMHO. Nearly all of your posts are upgrades of the current listed heights on this site (not sure why is that).
trumpslave said on 7/Apr/17
Hanks had lift advantage in that premiere just look at the shoes.
Leo clearly is 5ft11.5 or 182 cm and Obama is 186 cm or maybe even 187 cm in his youth
Johnny said on 5/Apr/17
In the "The Revenant" premiere photos Leo looks closer to 5ft 11 flat with Poulter, Gleeson and Hardy. He does not look 5ft 11.5 there. In that event they were standing on flat ground with similar footwear.
Johnson said on 5/Apr/17
Obama 186 Di Caprio 182.5... no less than that
Willes188 said on 5/Apr/17
Rampage is right and everyone else doesn't have a clue as usual


181-183cm
S.J.H said on 5/Apr/17
Click Here Obama look 6cm taller than Leo. Leo is 5'10.5 max and possible just 5'10 and Obama look nothing over 6'0.5 with 6'4.75 kobe bryant
RisingForce said on 3/Apr/17
He's more 180 cm, 5'11" flat. Look at the full shot below with Tom Hanks at the Catch Me If You Can photocall. Hanks was 183 cm max, possibly 182 cm, but about an inch taller, as shown again here, despite Leo being closer and Hanks' stance wider: Click Here And here he looks no more than 3" taller than 5'7.5" Spielberg: Click Here He also looked at least 2" shorter than 6'1" Obama in the recent video and struggled to even look the full 5'11" with 5'9.5" Damon and 5'8.5" Jack Nicholson. He does look a solid 6 feet in shoes though if Cate Blanchett is 5'10.75" in those heels. Looked pretty much exactly 2" taller than 5'9" Tom Hardy: Click Here Leo at 5'11" is taller than Pitt because Pitt is more 179 cm or 5'10.5" barefoot and looks at least an inch taller than that at 182, even 183 cm because of his extra heels and perfect posture.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Apr/17
He can really look across that 181-183cm zone
Heylo said on 1/Apr/17
Like some said earlier, he looks upper average consistently in movies, sometimes even tall and that is only possible if you're around his listed height. A 5'10 guy would look average almost all the time, a 5'9 guy would look average but kind of shortish at times and a 5'8 guy is lower average but can quite often be perceived as short while At 5'7, you are definitely short in movies almost all the time and not many people will question it.
CS said on 1/Apr/17
@Johnny I weigh about 70 kg last I checked.
King of the hill 91 said on 1/Apr/17
181 cm or 182cm weake
HonestSlovene said on 1/Apr/17
In majority white European countries roughly 177-178 cm is considered average, so Leo at 180-181 cm is average/tall, meaning average height that can look tall at times.
Nik said on 1/Apr/17
He's at the very gateway of being tall and noticeably above average.
crazypeoplethesedays... said on 1/Apr/17
1.81 here. Feel nothing more than an avarage height. + for !!whaat
Willes188 said on 1/Apr/17
Weak 6ft or very strong 5'11, the downgrade was extremely unnecessary. He has 1.5-2cm on Brad Pitt
Johnny said on 1/Apr/17
@CS How much do you weigh? I am around 85 kg(187 lbs).
Leo2001 said on 31/Mar/17
Strong 5ft 11 like Nolan
Click Here
Keith said on 30/Mar/17
6 foot 183cm
CS said on 30/Mar/17
@Johnny same here. It's because once you hit the 180 cm mark you are definitely above average and people will see you as taller than the average guy even if it's not a huge difference the way something over 6 feet would be but it's still enough of a difference.
Nik said on 29/Mar/17
I am short by about 1.75 inches though!
Johnny said on 29/Mar/17
I am the same height as Leo, many people call me tall. 5ft 11 range is not a very tall height for a man but I have to admit I feel above average.
Nik said on 28/Mar/17
@Johnson

👍

Nobody has ever seen me as short and I am 5'7.25" - 5'7.5"! Although if pushed yes I am short as opposed to being tall or bang on average.
Original said on 27/Mar/17
OK Hes 5'11.
Johnson said on 27/Mar/17
I am 5'9 and I feel solid average. I became obsessed with height because people tend to think 5'9 as shortish but nobody has ever saw me shortish...
HonestSlovene said on 27/Mar/17
@Whaaat Then you aren't 180 cm, plain and simple.
Whaaat said on 26/Mar/17
I'm 1.80 and I feel low average in modern world and Short compared to teens. With my boots 3 cm I'm 1.84 and only at 1.84 I'm starting to feel solid. 1.82 isn't solid. Look these teens now. 6'2 and 6'3 everywhere.
CS said on 26/Mar/17
I know a guy who I believe is right around Leo's height (181 cm, 5'11.5 max) and he claims 6'1 lol. He's kind of a funny case though as sometimes he wears bigger than average footwear but he often hunches his shoulders so he can sometimes appear a bit shorter (talking about the guy I know).
Johnson said on 25/Mar/17
I see here solid 5'10 as tall in the street. People around me say "that tall guy" about someone who is 178
Johan said on 25/Mar/17
"Tallish" applies to men who can look tall without actually being tall. It perfectly sums up the strong 5'11" range.
Sam said on 24/Mar/17
Never bought the 6'1 estimates for Leo but 6'0 is believable on film, would measurer nearer 5'11 in person. And, I don't see what's wrong with using the term tallish, which is simply another word for above average. Leo looks above average but he's not the classic definition of tall. He's in the grey area. Tall starts nearer 6'0, there and past that is the threshold and the more you are over the 6'0 mark the more you can comfortably claim be to be tall.
mister_lennon said on 24/Mar/17
181-182.
Chris said on 23/Mar/17
More chance of the 6" than gyllenhall. I think 5"11.5 is fair. Kate wins let surprisingly called him 6"1
jason said on 23/Mar/17
whaat so your saying that solid is 183 and 182 isn't solid? that's only 1 cm difference. solid in north america starts at 5-11 because at this height you are taller than 70% of men.
James said on 22/Mar/17
@Whaaat Wrong 1.83 is tall, above average is a synonym with tall, I mean tall is "above average" by definition. 1.78-1.80 is not short but average I don't know why do you create that story that anything below 1.81 is short for a man.

@Peter175 Leo doesn't look tall at all, Leo is barely 5' 11" flat, an average height.

@jason The term "tallish" doesn't exist, try to find it on a dictionary. Only celebheights geeks use that term. It's so ridicoulous like saying "shortish". Most people only classify others as "short", "average" or "tall". 5' 11" flat is considered "average" not tall.
Whaaat said on 21/Mar/17
Whatever u say guys. Above average and solid height starts at 1.83. Tall 1.87. Anything below 1.81 is short for a MAN. Think about it
Peter175 said on 21/Mar/17
He looks tall honestly. I would have guess 183 at least
jason said on 20/Mar/17
whaat your dumb. 180 is tallish in western clountries and tall in asia. at 180 you will never be labeled short and will sometimes be called tall depending where you are

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.