Add a Comment2348 comments
Average Guess (447 Votes)
5ft 11.21in (180.9cm)
Nik said on 1/Apr/17
He's at the very gateway of being tall and noticeably above average.
crazypeoplethesedays... said on 1/Apr/17
1.81 here. Feel nothing more than an avarage height. + for !!whaat
Willes188 said on 1/Apr/17
Weak 6ft or very strong 5'11, the downgrade was extremely unnecessary. He has 1.5-2cm on Brad Pitt
Johnny said on 1/Apr/17
@CS How much do you weigh? I am around 85 kg(187 lbs).
said on 31/Mar/17
Strong 5ft 11 like Nolan
Keith said on 30/Mar/17
6 foot 183cm
CS said on 30/Mar/17
@Johnny same here. It's because once you hit the 180 cm mark you are definitely above average and people will see you as taller than the average guy even if it's not a huge difference the way something over 6 feet would be but it's still enough of a difference.
Nik said on 29/Mar/17
I am short by about 1.75 inches though!
Johnny said on 29/Mar/17
I am the same height as Leo, many people call me tall. 5ft 11 range is not a very tall height for a man but I have to admit I feel above average.
Nik said on 28/Mar/17
Nobody has ever seen me as short and I am 5'7.25" - 5'7.5"! Although if pushed yes I am short as opposed to being tall or bang on average.
Original said on 27/Mar/17
OK Hes 5'11.
Johnson said on 27/Mar/17
I am 5'9 and I feel solid average. I became obsessed with height because people tend to think 5'9 as shortish but nobody has ever saw me shortish...
HonestSlovene said on 27/Mar/17
@Whaaat Then you aren't 180 cm, plain and simple.
Whaaat said on 26/Mar/17
I'm 1.80 and I feel low average in modern world and Short compared to teens. With my boots 3 cm I'm 1.84 and only at 1.84 I'm starting to feel solid. 1.82 isn't solid. Look these teens now. 6'2 and 6'3 everywhere.
CS said on 26/Mar/17
I know a guy who I believe is right around Leo's height (181 cm, 5'11.5 max) and he claims 6'1 lol. He's kind of a funny case though as sometimes he wears bigger than average footwear but he often hunches his shoulders so he can sometimes appear a bit shorter (talking about the guy I know).
Johnson said on 25/Mar/17
I see here solid 5'10 as tall in the street. People around me say "that tall guy" about someone who is 178
Johan said on 25/Mar/17
"Tallish" applies to men who can look tall without actually being tall. It perfectly sums up the strong 5'11" range.
Sam said on 24/Mar/17
Never bought the 6'1 estimates for Leo but 6'0 is believable on film, would measurer nearer 5'11 in person. And, I don't see what's wrong with using the term tallish, which is simply another word for above average. Leo looks above average but he's not the classic definition of tall. He's in the grey area. Tall starts nearer 6'0, there and past that is the threshold and the more you are over the 6'0 mark the more you can comfortably claim be to be tall.
Chris said on 23/Mar/17
More chance of the 6" than gyllenhall. I think 5"11.5 is fair. Kate wins let surprisingly called him 6"1
jason said on 23/Mar/17
whaat so your saying that solid is 183 and 182 isn't solid? that's only 1 cm difference. solid in north america starts at 5-11 because at this height you are taller than 70% of men.
James said on 22/Mar/17
@Whaaat Wrong 1.83 is tall, above average is a synonym with tall, I mean tall is "above average" by definition. 1.78-1.80 is not short but average I don't know why do you create that story that anything below 1.81 is short for a man.
@Peter175 Leo doesn't look tall at all, Leo is barely 5' 11" flat, an average height.
@jason The term "tallish" doesn't exist, try to find it on a dictionary. Only celebheights geeks use that term. It's so ridicoulous like saying "shortish". Most people only classify others as "short", "average" or "tall". 5' 11" flat is considered "average" not tall.
Whaaat said on 21/Mar/17
Whatever u say guys. Above average and solid height starts at 1.83. Tall 1.87. Anything below 1.81 is short for a MAN. Think about it
Peter175 said on 21/Mar/17
He looks tall honestly. I would have guess 183 at least
jason said on 20/Mar/17
whaat your dumb. 180 is tallish in western clountries and tall in asia. at 180 you will never be labeled short and will sometimes be called tall depending where you are
S.J.H said on 19/Mar/17
Lol. If 180cm is short therefore 90% of the world men is legitmate shorty. From a real 5'11 onwards is tall in all europe countries and 5'10 is tall in asia. Leo is just under 181cm and over 177cm he is average in america and consider tall, maybe..
Whaaat said on 18/Mar/17
Anything below 1.80 is short for men. I mean really even 1.80 itself is short. In modern world. Im 1.80 myself. Anything solid starts from 1.83. Tall is from 1.87 and above
said on 12/Mar/17
Leo gains the ground advantage at one point, but he looks a solid 2 inches shorter than Obama in the video: Click Here
I'd say 180 cm, probably a flat 5'11", but it wouldn't surprise me if he fell just short and sometimes used slightly thicker footwear
6'1.5 said on 10/Mar/17
@Peter rob has jonah at 5'6.25" so now I highly doubt Leonardo is this current listing. Hell it might even be just over his morning height. But I'm gonna be generous and say he's 5'10.75"
S.J.H said on 6/Mar/17
If leo came out one day say he is only 5'10 he lie all the time being 6'0 and some people will still believe he is 5'11-6'0
Guest66 said on 3/Mar/17
It is true, he does give a upper average height impression in most of his movies, and he looks tallish compared to most of his actor coworkers as well. It's a trait of someone who is actually close to 6 feet in my opinion.
andre said on 1/Mar/17
Rob why in the titanic movie he looked like a 5ft7 5ft8 guy ?
he was shorter then most actors
why he looked like 5ft8?
6 foot 17 yrs still growing said on 21/Feb/17
Is it me or dicaprio eye level is way lower than average? .. he looks nearer 5 ft 11 than 6 most of the time 5 ft 11.25 is a good figure for him overall
6'1.5 said on 19/Feb/17
I cant see him taller than 5'11" next to 6'0.5" bradley cooper
CS said on 18/Feb/17
Very good point Brandon. If this guy was average range that wouldn't happen. I've noticed that too, admittedly moreso after I started frequenting this website but it's definitely an important observation in my opinion.
Brandon said on 18/Feb/17
He always has a strong height presence in his films....not super tall by any means, but he always stacks up very well and usually on the taller side to his cast mates. Could be that he works with a lot of shorter actors, but he always looks solid. On the upper edge of average.
said on 17/Feb/17
Here is DiCaprio with 5'5 Jonah Hill. Click Here
He looks 4 inches max taller than him which would put Leonardo at 5'9 which probably is his real height. Pretty average height guy to be honest.
Pat said on 16/Feb/17
5'9 at the absolute most
S.J.H said on 16/Feb/17
Haha maybe true. The journalist wouldn't have prank the world that leo is only 5'10 but i'm going with 5'11 not more may account him in footwear
Sammy said on 12/Feb/17
You all are crazy, this man is no more than 5'10....
King of the hill 91 said on 12/Feb/17
A strong 180cm Nothing less what do you think rob
Arthur said on 6/Feb/17
No way Hanks wasn't 183 cm at his peak. The difference looks more like an inch than 3 cm. Leo looks 5'11-5'11.25 in that photo, certainly not ''180 cm max''
Anonymous said on 5/Feb/17
He looks about 6 ft to me,I think he is at least 5'11.5"
Peter 179cm said on 5/Feb/17
@ Guest66 Hanks looks 3cm taller in that pic,both have equal postures although Hanks shoes look thicker...Still that would put Leo at 180cm max since there's always the possibility Hanks was "only" 182 in his peak.
Danny said on 3/Feb/17
Every single shot next to 6' tall actors (and models) cleary shows Di Caprio is shorter than that. It makes me laugh when when every now and then someone claims he is 6' - yeah, maybe in shoes.;)
jams said on 2/Feb/17
he is 6ft, no more no less.
Johnny said on 2/Feb/17
@Rob please add Django Unchained at the top....he was amazing in that movie!
said on 31/Jan/17Click Here
I find this to be an interesting shot, Rob how tall Leo looks here in your opinion?
Editor Rob: at that time, Hanks could still look near 6ft.
HonestSlovene said on 29/Jan/17
Yeah he is a typical solid 5'11 range guy. Both 6'0" and 5'10" estimates are off.
fabrizio said on 29/Jan/17
rob what do you thinks of leonardo di caprio?shorter of 6ft tall tom hanks in catch if you can and 6ft1 obama i think he is strong 5'11' you agree with me?
CS said on 28/Jan/17
I guess I can see why some people think of him as shorter at times. I even know of some people who have seen films of his and thought he was around 5'10.
But when you actually look at eye level, which has proven to be highly trustworthy, there's no way this guy is anything under 180 cm.
Sandy Cowell said on 27/Jan/17
@ Johnny - Hi! I've taken heed of what you've just said, so I will take in Leo's height compared to Tom Hardy's next time I see 'The Revenant'. I have many other films to see, including 'The Wolf of Wall Street', and I can do some checking out and comparing along the way! Cheers! 🍻
Johnny said on 26/Jan/17
@Sandy Cowell these people are just trolls....look at Leo next to Tom Hardy whom Rob has seen from a distance and thinks he is at least 5'9" Leo always looks a couple of inches taller than him......so he must be minimum 5'11" range....
Sandy Cowell said on 25/Jan/17
I arrived at this page completely open-minded as to Leo's height. If I'd had to hazard a guess, then I would have gone for 5ft11, but having read a few comments, including one from Gerald written a couple of days ago, it has made me revise my thoughts! There is no greater evidence than getting a report from someone who has met the person in question, and as Gerald has met him, my guess is going to go down accordingly.
I saw him on the Ellen De Generes show in the earlier half of last year, and it was on that show that I decided he is definitely not a 6 footer.
I will go for the lower height possibility that was in my head when I came to this page, and that is 5ft10.
My favourite performances of his are the roles he played in 1) 'Django Unchained' and
2) 'The Revenant'.
In the first film, we saw him play a nasty piece of work, evil to the core, lacking in any human compassion and with the most terrible, violent temper. Never had I seen him play someone like that before, and his performance was very convincing - great stuff! Then of course, he was fantastic in 'The Revenant', the actual plot of which was much better than I expected! It was riveting from start to finish and the scenery was breathtaking! It was this film he was discussing with Ellen, who'd seen it and was raving about it, and rightly so! If I'm honest, when I first got hold of my copy, I searched straightaway for the bear attack, but there is so much more going on, including a villainous, callous character that Leo has to face, played by Tom Hardy.
I think Mr DiCaprio has really excelled himself of late, so who cares if he's a bit shorter than expected?
Harold said on 25/Jan/17
He is maybe 5'11 with shoes on
BT said on 25/Jan/17
5'11 flat is a good mark for him, he can look a tad under or over it.
roan said on 24/Jan/17
I agree with 5'9....he is not a tall guy whatsoever
Gerald said on 23/Jan/17
5'11? Yeah right! I have met Leonardo DiCaprio...He is barely 5'10...I am 5'10.5 and he was shorter than me! Look at him barefoot in the scene when he is fighting with Margot Robbie in Wolf of Wall Street, he is like 4 inches taller than her and she is like 5'5...
berta said on 23/Jan/17
to me leo is 181 and pushing 182.
said on 23/Jan/17
@Rob how tall does he look next to Obama here? Click Here
Editor Rob: in that still he can seem a weak 5ft 11.
Johno said on 22/Jan/17
Yeh well he certainly has height on Mr Cunningham that is for sure but with the comparison with Leo and Jenny, i reckon there is less than 2-inches between Leo and Jenny.
said on 21/Jan/17
I recently watched "The Man in the Iron Mask" and I soon realized 1.81 is too high for Leo.
Nick Diaz and Nate Diaz are both of them fighters and oficially listed as 6 ft. Well, Dicaprio doesn't look over 5' 11" next to them.
This pic refute the 1.81 listing IMO:
Peter 179cm said on 20/Jan/17
5'10.75-5'11 range is more likely,he's a good example of a solid 180cm guy.Although i wouldn't be surprised if he's 179 at night since he has looked sub-5'10 in some pics with bad/relaxed posture.He's probably 181-182 out of bed though,that's the only reason i would argue 5'11.25 for him-a morning range!...
said on 19/Jan/17
The man is no more than 5'9.5. Please people, stop embarrassing yourself.
Martin, simply look at Leo with the Height Troll G
, who is likely in Portman Elevator Boots.
said on 16/Jan/17
Rob, what would you think his out-of-bed/before-bed heights are?
Editor Rob: 6ft to a solid 5ft 11 range, I currently would still go with that.
Guest66 said on 12/Jan/17
Gauntlet, Honestly I don't see any significant difference when he is suited or wearing normal footwear on these shots with Hill, to me he still manages to look at least 5'11" flat on them. On the other hand he looked noticeably shorter than those 5'11.5"-6'0" mma fighters.
said on 11/Jan/17
When standing tall, what do you think is the most someone could argue for Leo ?
Editor Rob: Rory, I feel you can still make a case for Leo looking 5ft 11.5 to people.
Joel said on 11/Jan/17
Rob how Tall do you think Leo is in the Wolf of Wall street?
Johnny said on 11/Jan/17
I think the lowest that can be argued for Leo is 5'11" range....If anyone looks at The Revenant premiere photos...he kinda looks 5'11" flat compared to 6'1" Domhnall Gleeson and 6'2" Will Poulter...
said on 10/Jan/17
Guest66, I think the pattern in those pictures is that he doesn't wear costume shoes with lifts. Here is other pics:
With 5'10 Gisele Bundchen and she looks to be bare foot, not Dicpario tho.
With 5'6,25 Jonah Hill (Suitpic)
Jonah Hill again, but without those lifts
berta said on 10/Jan/17
he had pretty mutch on tom hardy height wise. no shorter than this
Guest66 said on 9/Jan/17
Gauntlet, those are interesting shots indeed, he is looking sub 5'11" on each of them, coincidence?
Johno said on 8/Jan/17
Yeh Gaunlet, with them MMA fighters he does look around the ballmark you state.
King of the hill 91 said on 8/Jan/17
177cm tom hardy 182cm he wont have lost yet he looks a weake 182cm maybe flat rob
said on 7/Jan/17
His height is obvious in these pictures:
With 6'0 Nate Diaz:
With 5'11.5 - 6'0 Royce Gracie:
With 5'9 - 5'10 GSP:
With 5'9 Kelly Rohrback:
With 5'10.5 Erin Heatherton
The Suitpictures are irrelevant!
He is clearly 5'10.
Sam said on 6/Jan/17
He's been listed as 182cm before and I think Rob and many others agree that would probably be his most, wouldn't be 183cm, so 181cm seems like a good compromise. I wouldn't put him lower than 5'11.
mr manson said on 2/Jan/17
Weird i met Leo in 2005 he was about 5'9 ..i guess he grew the last few years
said on 1/Jan/17
Hey Rob, you don't seem so convinced about his current listed height. If so, can you tell me what makes you think he is taller than this?
Editor Rob: 181 I think is fine for him, at times he could appear a bit shy or even closer to 182.
Joel said on 1/Jan/17
Definitely 182cm he is closer to 6 foot than he is 5"11.
Sam said on 30/Dec/16
I thought he looked 12/13 when he had his first interview at 16, I think he was even more behind Bieber physically, so its not surprising he grew a noticeable several inches after.
hr said on 21/Dec/16
5'11. why do folks think he is 6'1
lolo said on 21/Dec/16
5'11.5 (182cm) peak
5'11.25 (181cm) now?
Johno said on 18/Dec/16
I wouldn't put him at 5'11 and over.
Steve said on 13/Dec/16
Sometimes can look a tad under 5'11 but can also look a tad over. Probably just a solid 5'11.
Gaza2121 said on 13/Dec/16
Nope. Rob has seen Tom Hardy in person and says he's 5'9" minimum. Leo and a good 2 inches on Hardy so that puts him at least 5'11". 5'9" is a joke.
Garrett said on 12/Dec/16
Look at Leo in wolf of Wall Street. He is in bare feet one of the scenes and he looks about MAX 4 inches taller than Margot Robbie! She is like 5'4! That means his true height is 5'9! All of you people saying 5'11 need to look again LOL
Randy said on 9/Dec/16
Oh then you are wrong hahaha
Gaza2121 said on 6/Dec/16
Randy, actually that was meant for Tom Hardy haha. I agree with Leo's listing actually.
Randy said on 5/Dec/16
Gaza you are completely right
Spencer said on 2/Dec/16
Looks about 4.5 inches taller than Winslet in Titanic. I don't think he is anything over 5'11. Hanks looks an incher taller in Catch Me if You Can. He is slightly above average height for a man.
Gaza2121 said on 2/Dec/16
Trey, pics or it didn't happen.
Trey said on 29/Nov/16
No way he is any taller than 5'9. I have literally met him and he short
said on 28/Nov/16
According to photographic evidence, I was exactly the same height as my older brother, 175cm or 5'9, when I was 17 years and 8 months old. I grew to be 181cm or 5'11.25 by the time I was 19. Growing 3 inches between 17-20 seems plausible to me.
Editor Rob: physically DiCaprio was behind the curve and underdeveloped. It's not a huge surprise, a bit like a Bieber, looking 15 when he's about 18-19.
Johno said on 27/Nov/16
I have seen guys gain height at 18; my mate went from around 5'6.5-5'7 at 18 and half years to 5'9 at 22 and his younger brother i believe gained even more; honestly he is around 6'0 now but i reckon he went from 5'8 to 6'0 between the ages of 18 to 23? Somewhere like that. These late height growth spurts seem to run through families.
Both of them however, did not seem have gone through advance puberty by the age of 18; they looked really young. Honestly, like 14-year olds at 18-19 and basically teenagers in their early 20s so i guess the onset of puberty has something to do with it. Speaking anecdotally, if you look very young at 18, you got some chance to grow and what i mean by growth is, at least 2-inches and up to 4-inches that i have actually witnessed. If one of your older siblings has goon through similar growth pattern spurts, then chances are, so can you.
Another mate was around 5'8-ish at 16-17 and now he is 5'11-ish.
I am not so sure Brad Pitt went through the same process though. First of all, he looked like a normal guy, going through regular puberty and looked mature and developed enough; nothing like Dicaprio and Ralph Macchio and secondly; any material growth beyond the usual years looks to be rare. I am not prepared to give Pitt that verdict of confidence.
said on 26/Nov/16
So rob :
By your reply to giorgi !
You're saying he gained more than 3 inshes from 18 - 20 ?
Editor Rob: depends on the exact filming dates of This Boy's Life, but certainly from age 17-21 he gained 3 inches
Johnson said on 26/Nov/16
@James I agree most guys stop growing up at the frame 14-17 years old. Others can extend 18-19. 20-21 is less common. Mistakes in measurement are very usual that is why we need several tests
spainmen191cm said on 25/Nov/16
Well thats your opinion, in my case Im 20 right know and im almost 6ft4 (6ft3.5-75 at night) In 3 months I will be 21. And I was a late bloomer at 14 I was pretty short, but then I started to sprout up. Also at 18-19 I was 6ft2.75, so I grew almost an inch after that age. The majority of men stop around 18 but there is a small percentage that grow till 21-22 look at Ralph Macchio!
said on 24/Nov/16
Rob, how tall do you think he was in This Boy's Life? I think he didn't look more than 5'7" next to Ellen Barkin.
Editor Rob: Giorgi, he probably was roughly 5ft 8 at nearly 18 and gained around 18-20 range.
James said on 23/Nov/16
@Spainmen191cm Men stop growing in height when they are between 18 and 19 years old. I don't know if someone exceptionally could grow until 20 but definetely no more. The idea that people still grow in height until 21 is a myth not based on rigorous scientific evidence. But you are suggesting DiCaprio could have been growing after 21!! After 21 is impossible to remain growing in height. So yes, DiCaprio was already fully grown in Romeo and Juliet. I think some people get confused and think they have grown after 20 because they have been incorrectly measured on other occasions.
For example, when I was 20 years old I was once measured as 1.83. When I was 25 I was measured as 1.84. Does it mean I grew after 20? Nope, I was incorrectly measured as 1.83 that's the reason.
spainmen191cm said on 21/Nov/16
Rob, do you think that in Romeo and Juliet film, when he was 21-22, was fully grown?
hm said on 20/Nov/16
he looks a few inches shorter then 6'4 John Kerry for that film "Before The Flood" I'm guessing he wore lifts for that too?
HonestSlovene said on 20/Nov/16
He does look more 5'11.5 than 5'11 flat (though he can often look that as well) but never seems 5'11.75" or even 6'0" flat. Not to mention the sub 5'11" claims for him are also extremely ridiculous. 5'11.25" is probably his absolute low (5'11.5" regular low) and he hangs at 181-182 cm range during the day IMHO. A weak 5'11.5".
said on 18/Nov/16
@Rob what was Big G's estimation of Leo's height?
Editor Rob: Johnny, at least six foot range
Dmeyer said on 17/Nov/16
Looks about 4cm on 177cm damon
Truth said on 17/Nov/16
People are blinded by their love for him. He's 180cm max
S.J.H said on 15/Nov/16
@Daniel said on 11/Nov/16
Like the journalist who met Leo in person said that he was not over 5'10. Might be a myth if not Tom Hardy would be 5'8 no more and that would put nathan jones at 6'8 not 6'9 - 6'10
trumpslave said on 12/Nov/16
Leo definitely is 182 cm just look at his pictures with matt damon he is way taller than him and in the pictures with tom hanks he is wearing very flat shoes and tom clearly is wearing high heel shoes
Daniel said on 11/Nov/16
He can't be over 5'10
Ryan said on 8/Nov/16
Y'all are trippin...he is 5'9 and a half max!
Dionisio Rojas said on 5/Nov/16
Definitely 1.80-1.81 no more!. Nice to see that heights are getting more accurate!!!
Animus said on 4/Nov/16
He often seems taller than a flat 5'11", but it's hard to argue 5'11.5" seeing him next to Tom Hanks. Hanks could look a full inch taller than DiCaprio back in the day, which is close to impossible, if they have similar footwear and are separated by only half an inch. (I don't think Hanks consistently wore thicker shoes than DiCaprio and I don't think DiCaprio's posture is that awful.)
5'11.25" is probably the best listing for DiCaprio, but I think it's close to his absolute low - he often looks 5'11.5".
said on 4/Nov/16
Rob, can you tell exactly how many cm heels is she wearing?
Editor Rob: Giorgi, who do you mean? Cate? If so, 7cm at least, possibly a little bit more as it is a highish angle.
Anon said on 2/Nov/16
5 feet 11 3/8 inches...he didn't look to much shorter than Obama, looked 5 11.5 inches
Cristofer said on 31/Oct/16
1.82 day 1.80 night
CS said on 31/Oct/16
@Chris there's photos of Leo with Obama where Leo looks 5'11 and other photos where Leo looks 5'11.5. This listing is a great middle point and honestly out of all the heights Leo looks, the average does come out somewhere pretty close to 181 cm. This listing is fine and probably as accurate as we are going to get.
Chris said on 31/Oct/16
Solid 6'1 Obama cleared him 2 inches, 180cm flat is a better shout Rob!
Tiago said on 30/Oct/16
He is just a typical 5'11 guy, no more
Brandon W. said on 29/Oct/16
Check out pic with UFC fighter Nick Diaz 6ft
said on 28/Oct/16
Rob, did he wear lifts in "The Aviator" to play the 6ft3 Howard Hughes? He looks over six feet with John C. Reilly.
Editor Rob: I believe he slipped a little lift in his shoes for that role.
CS said on 27/Oct/16
Rob how much do you reckon he weighed in Titanic? How about now?
josh jeffords said on 25/Oct/16
Just watched departed again leo is much taller than a clearly under 5 10 mat damon.
Both are shorter than the aging alec baldwin and way taller than little marky mark.
Quick math says leo is weak 5 11 down to strong 5 10 damon is a strong 5 8 .5 max.
This is the tallest I ever remember leo looking he usually look 5 10 if that.
Weird build and not great posture/fitness seem to make him look smaller.
He looked a weak 5 10 in blood diamond with the 6 2 cast members.
Even smaller in Quick and the dead only time hackman looked 6 2.
Justbringit said on 24/Oct/16
Tbh in the most recent pics I see in this site he looks taller than 5'11 more like 5'11.5"
said on 19/Oct/16
Next to 191 cm John Kerry.
How would you measure him based solely on this photo, Rob?
Editor Rob: he could be in the 3 inch range under Kerry there.
S.J.H said on 19/Oct/16
Obama is def 2" taller than leo. Leo is just a decent 5'11 guy. For anyone wanted to say obama is higher than 6'1 to bring up leo height then they should refer to see how 186ish tony parker edge out obama easily a 1/2' close up
said on 17/Oct/16
@Rob what do you think of this photo? Leo looks the same height as Tarantino. Click Here
Editor Rob: Quentin could just be losing a good 1-2 inches in posture there, Leo is standing pretty decent in comparison.
shiva 181 cms said on 16/Oct/16
His listing his nailed on he looks 5'11 as well as 5'11.5
shiva 181 cms said on 16/Oct/16
His listing his nailed on he looks 5'11 as well as 5'11.5
177-178 cm guy
said on 16/Oct/16
Hey Rob. How much taller does Obama look than Leo in this video at the beginning. A bit over an inch?
Editor Rob: from the clip you could still make an argument he looked 5ft 11.5
177-178 cm guy
said on 16/Oct/16
@Bobby Leo looks at least 5'11" in these pictures of him next to Obama if he's actually 6'1":
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 13/Oct/16
With Morgan Freeman:
Leo is closer to the camera, but I still only see two inches between them.
Bobby said on 12/Oct/16
Are we really going to question the fact that di Caprio is no longer quite 6'0? The picture I saw of him next to Obama shows a least a three inch difference in my opinion, it's possible he is closer to 5'10.5 but in Hollywood, he is 6'0 feet tall.
Sam said on 11/Oct/16
Looks to be in the upper 5'11 range, which I always figured was the start of weak-tall.
Dmeyer said on 11/Oct/16
Hé can realy look 5 ft 10,75 up to 5 ft 11,75 , mostly 5 ft 11-11,5 ,
Johan said on 10/Oct/16
If Leo is 180 max then Orlando bloom is no more than 177 cm. Gets listed at 179 cm.
yaniv maor said on 9/Oct/16
exactly 180cm ...slouching makes him look sometimes like a 178cm
Peter 179cm said on 6/Oct/16
@ D There's more chance he's 179-180cm than 181-182 range,though...Various pictures suggest that, i mean look at him with 175 Mario Lopez he barely even pass for 5'10 next to him ( 177-178 range).The max i'd give him is 180cm range so basically 5'11 or a fraction under it.
justbringit said on 6/Oct/16
i have to say that i don't agree with 5'11 for him i think he is taller than that in fact i would say at least a solid 5'11.25 or maybe even 5'11.5"
D said on 2/Oct/16
Peter, if Leo is 1.79 I can assure you that Damon is 1.75 and Pitt is 1.76.
Peter 179cm said on 1/Oct/16
He barely looks 177-178cm next to officially listed 185 Obama who might actually be 184 at his low. I would guess at most 180cm for Leo after various pictures. He might be 181 in the morning,but by dinner-time no more than a strong 179/weak 180.
S.J.H said on 1/Oct/16
I watch Titanic twice i have see a proper 5'11 for leo not more. The 0.25 is a myth or just a morning height
Johno said on 30/Sep/16
I suspect the difference might be greater than 2-inches there Hello.
said on 30/Sep/16
Hey rob : i have two questions about leonardo ...
1 : do you think that leonardo dicaprio grow some inshes or cm's afte the age 18 to his mid 20's ?
2 : if first question is yes !
Then how much do you think he gained ?
Thank you rob
Much love from libya <3
Editor Rob: from 18 to 21 he did gain something, how much I am still not exactly sure, at least an inch anyway.
said on 30/Sep/16
Saw a picture of him next to Obama, looked a good two inches shorter than him, no idea what the footwear situation was.
Allen said on 29/Sep/16
I think this listing is accurate. Though he has a bad posture that at times he looks more like 179-178cm. But if he stands straight and keeps his good posture he definitely is 181cm. Very accurate listing in my opinion.
BT said on 29/Sep/16
Imo he looks 5'11 flat mostly, at times it's a toss-up between that and 5'11.25 for me.
said on 27/Sep/16
Here is Mario Lopez with Beckham
Here he is with Leo,
Beckham would be taller than Leo.
what!!!?!!! said on 21/Sep/16
lol, Rob is being polite at everyone, even boosting their self-confidence. Really nice guy
said on 20/Sep/16
So Rob §t 181,4cm m'y low with exelent posture and high eye level i wil look § ha§r taller
Editor Rob: in photos of you and Leo, I'm sure people would probably guess you as being taller of the 2.
said on 19/Sep/16
Hey Rob, if I'm around 5'11 flat at my low (used to think I was 180.8 cm but now I've measured a few times and 180.4 is closer) and have generally good posture, how do you think I would look next to Leo?
Editor Rob: may be hard to tell a difference really, if you had good posture I doubt he'd look taller.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Sep/16
@D: Exactly....it's not always determined by genetics.
I think if Leo hits 5ft11 flat it's after a very long day on his feet. Anything under that is unlikely.
CS said on 18/Sep/16
@dmeyer by that logic would you say people who are thin can appear anywhere from a quarter inch under their true height up to a half inch above their true height? Seeing as Leo is 5'11.25 but can appear that range you listed.
Dmeyer said on 18/Sep/16
5 ft 11-11,75 is the range he Can apears
said on 18/Sep/16
Rob on Bad days i aint under 181,3cm so i could be 1cm taller than leo as you say h§ could be 180,3cm on a Bad day , on normal day. Am near 181,5 and he is 181 so maybe just 0,5cm
Editor Rob: I think you probably have an overall better posture than Leo, I'm sure you meet him you'd look a bit taller.
D said on 17/Sep/16
I know a guy who grew from 1.76 at 18 to 1.81 at 22 and still growing. Its all how well you eat, sleep how much you walk daily and mostly genetics
said on 15/Sep/16
Rob do you think h§ dosnt dip under 181cm or could h§ drop to 180,6-7cm after § long day or after § 1hour walk or weight lifting , i think 5 ft 11,25 is his very low and will be 11,5 on a relaxing day
Editor Rob: after a long day on set and dehydration he could be just 5ft 11, but then anybody has a potential to dip a little under their usual low on bad days
greg said on 14/Sep/16
bull crap he is a late bloomer! he didnt grow over 3 inches past 19, thats insane...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Sep/16
He has said he was late bloomer
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 11/Sep/16
Wait, he was 19 during it. He gained 10-11 CM at 19+.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 11/Sep/16
He seemed 171-172 CM by Johnny Depp in What's Eating Gilbert Grape, and he was 18 during that time. He also looked nothing like he does now.
sabot said on 3/Sep/16
Listing is spot now. Thumbs up.
said on 31/Aug/16
Hey Rob, whatching the photos when Leo was 16-17 years old, he seemed to be around 5ft 7in. Do you think he grew about 4 inches at age of 17?
Editor Rob: at 17-20 he gained a few inches.
S.J.H said on 22/Aug/16
Good job to big rob. Leo is never 5'11.5 or 6'0 range. Truth he is 5'11 and 5'11.25 still acceptable. Like i say before christopher nolan was not even shorter than leo. People who watch Titanic will believe me he statued at 180ish
said on 19/Aug/16
Even if Leo isn't standing totally straight in this picture with Clint Eastwood, I think it's pretty clear that he isn't a six-footer and probably is closer to 5'11":
CS said on 18/Aug/16
@Leo is 182. 1 cm difference can be hard to notice in photos. I mean sometimes it's evident but other times it's very hard to tell the difference. Just look at Rob's photo with Jeremy Renner and you'll see what I am talking about. 1 cm height difference can look identical at times.
truth said on 18/Aug/16
@Leo is 182 cm The camera is slightly tilted to Leo's favor, if it was straight then 181.5-182 cm for Chadwick and 181-181.5 cm for Leo, he just edges him out.
Leo is 182
said on 17/Aug/16
Hey Rob, what do you make of this photo? Chadwick and Leo look about equal, I heavily disagree with 181 cm being Leo's height, it's just too short compared to how he actually looks.
Editor Rob: they can look very similar I think
CS said on 14/Aug/16
I agree with the comments regarding Hanks and DiCaprio in Catch Me if you Can. They looked different enough for this listing to fit DiCaprio better but also close enough for DiCaprio to not really be under this mark. Unless of course Hanks was really 5'11.75 peak. Nonetheless both guys are in the 5'11-6' range with Hanks being closer to the 6 ft mark and DiCaprio being closer to the 5 ft 11 mark.
said on 13/Aug/16
Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks:
181 cm seems to be a good listing
Spencer said on 12/Aug/16
He looks 5'11 in Catch Me if You Can. Walken and Hanks both look about an inch taller.
Tom said on 12/Aug/16
Probably no more than 5-10.
Johan said on 12/Aug/16
Yes, I think this is as close to the truth as well get without actually measuring the guy. However some celebs will be affected by this. Orlando Bloom for instance is noway only 2 cm shorter than Leo. Its at least 3cm.
Ian said on 11/Aug/16
Hes 5'9 in titanic
truth said on 11/Aug/16
Either listing 5'11.5 or 5'11.25 is fine for him anyway.
Brad said on 10/Aug/16
He's 5 foot eleven and a half.
Dmeyer said on 7/Aug/16
i agree rob peak hanks was 0.5-0.75in taller than leo , and 5 ft 11.75-6ft hanks evening height not 6 ft 0.25 or 11.5 , today leo at 181cm can look a hair taller than 5 ft 11.5 today hanks with weak posture
rakesh said on 5/Aug/16
He is about 5feet 9inches legit no joke
said on 4/Aug/16
I agree with rob that there is less than 1in between Léo And Hanks if you consider posture/footwear
Editor Rob: 3/4 inch maybe, at times I think it could look a bit less.
It could be argued Hanks was just under 6ft but I think the 6ft mark is ok for him peak.
Dmeyer said on 4/Aug/16
If you look well at dicaprio Hanks pics , i the récent ones Hanks is barely as tall , but back in the days , when they stand with equal posture in some pics they looks nearly identical , of course in some leo can look 2cm smaller in others near 3cm but i those Hanks has an hogan type shoes with à near 4cm heels , many cuban heels will give 1,4-1,7in while hogan 1,4-1,6in while Léo has à typical 1-1,1in , in others Hanks have a 1-1,1in while Léo 0,7-0,8in plus Hanks like to stand well , i usé to have a friend who is 5 ft 11 i am 5 ft 11,5 hé stands relax And i stand tall with 0,5in more shoes And then i suddenly apear 1,25in kind of like Pitt And Clooney 179 And 180 Guy plus better posture footwear, And the différence is more noticable , i think there is à very big chance Hanks was no more than 182,5cm peak especialy if Léo is 181 And Jude Law 178 , if you look at pics of leo/watanabe , leo/Hanks And Léo/Cooper you can see that Cooper is the tallest near Léo then watanabe then Hanks
justbringit said on 3/Aug/16
I think that leo is pretty much at the start of tall range.I could see hi being up to 5'11.5" but 5ft 11.25in seems ok also
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Aug/16
Looked 184/185cm in Blood Diamond wearing boots.
dmeyer said on 3/Aug/16
Afternoon i can go from 181,6 to 181,3 so afternoon height is fine
Tardis said on 3/Aug/16
There's no way Leo is this low, but it's what ever people shorter than him want to believe, I guess.
Puma said on 2/Aug/16
If Caprio is 181 cm, Jon Bernthal is 179.
I watched the wall street.
Clearly 2 cm differance.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/16
Wasn't expecting this....but it's fine I guess. Probably hits it at his low.
said on 1/Aug/16
rob when you list someone you mean they are 180.5-181cm night , they dont dip under 5'11 and are likely a fraction more but if someone is in that 181-181.5cm zone you will list them 5'11.5 , anyway leo can look anywere 5 ft 11-11.75
Editor Rob: I'm thinking in most cases around afternoon is fine, most won't drop that much more, a small fraction.
It's not impossible a guy like Leo shrinks near a full inch, he could go from 183 to 181
Dmeyer said on 1/Aug/16
181 would make sens whi he looks noticably shorter than 183cm Hanks , whi he can look just 3-4cm over damon , also 181cm is enaugh to look 6 ft in décent shoes And being thin ,
Dmeyer said on 29/Jul/16
181cm fits him well but that is his evening height hé wakes at 6 ft or 6 ft 1/8
Dmeyer said on 28/Jul/16
So at à low of 181,4cm i am à hair taller , 181cm looks right , if hé was 181,5cm hé would have looked closer to Hanks height 10 years back
truth said on 28/Jul/16
Spot on Rob.
said on 25/Jul/16
Wow. I never thought I'd see the day he'd be downgraded. This listing fits him as well.
Editor Rob: Never say Never...but in this case you had to register to vote on that votesy page, so it at least was a good indication of the general opinion.
said on 25/Jul/16
@Rob why did you downgrade him?
Editor Rob: Since I was 50/50 over whether he is near 5ft 11 or really 11.5, I put up that poll and thought the general average guess might fall in the 11.25 range...
177-178 cm guy said on 24/Jul/16
Finally he's downgraded. This listing fits Leo well IMO.
Dejavu said on 23/Jul/16
I think he really gained some height and weight in his late teen. He looked 5'10.5 max and now he looks a strong 5'11 to 6'0.
Mike said on 19/Jul/16
He still is 5'10, look at him in revolutionary road....he is not much taller than kate
S.J.H said on 18/Jul/16
Leo is 180cm and this listing could only fit him not long out of bed
Johno said on 15/Jul/16
I am not much of any height difference between him and latest girlfriend, Nina Agdal who is listed at 176 cm.
CS said on 13/Jul/16
He definitely gained some height between 18 and 21 considering he was 5'10 range around the time of What's Eating Gilbert Grape.
James Edward Crowley Maximus Meridius
said on 11/Jul/16
Rob is It possible Leo grew half an inch when hé was 25 26 i havé heard hé didn't start puberty until hé was 18 19 hé was a very late bloomer hé was during 24 25 during the filming of beach hé could havé been 5ft 11in at the start of the filming and 5ft 11.5in when filming ended he may havé grown half an inch are you going too upgrade him too 6ft 0in at some point he looks 6ft 0in that's the height he is listed as online he must grew half an inch at 24 25 and grew half an inch again when he was 25 26 that means he grew a full inch in one year he may havé still growing in beach he wasn't finished growing yét very late bloomers usually grow for longer.
Editor Rob: I don't know if he did after 21, I think between 18 and 21 he did get something.
truth said on 11/Jul/16
Looks like an exact 4 in difference. I guess Cooper forgot his lifts this day because I always pegged him at a strong 6'0/ 183-184 cm and Neeson at a strong 6'4 / 193-194 cm.
said on 10/Jul/16
Here's a good photo of him by Liam Neeson:
6'1" is definitely possible for him.
jtm said on 9/Jul/16
anyone that thinks cooper is 6'1 needs to look at the picture on liam nesson's page.
CS said on 6/Jul/16
Bradley Cooper looks 6'1 to me which actually helps Leo's case if Bradley is indeed a bit higher than what he is listed.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 6/Jul/16
I think this listing is spot on
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Jul/16
Leonardo DiCaprio - 5ft11½(182cm)
Bradley Cooper - 6ft0¾(185cm)
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 5/Jul/16
Bradley Cooper was near 6'1" in person, and he appeared to be at least 6'1" (if not slightly higher) by Ashton Kutcher.
CS said on 4/Jul/16
@Mat probably not until Leo starts shrinking lol.
Pucko said on 4/Jul/16
Closer to 181cm then to 183cm, but both 5'11.25 and 5'11.5 works good for Leo. I think we can close this case now Rob
said on 4/Jul/16
With Ben Affleck who is anywhere from 6'2"-6'2 1/4" in person (6'2 1/2" shouldn't be completely ruled out either)
Even if you factor in that there is uneven footwear, there is no more than 2 1/2" between them.
Will said on 3/Jul/16
He really is 5'10 max MAX
Mat said on 2/Jul/16
Editor Rob: I don't know how good Leo's posture is, Cooper looks a guy with a better overall stance.
You are never going to downgrade him, are you?
Roy said on 2/Jul/16
There is no way he is less than 5'11. That's that.
said on 1/Jul/16
Editor Rob: there could be a good 3cm at least between them.
So Rob, if you see at least 3 cm between them, shouldn't you give Leo 181 cm or Bradley Cooper 185 cm?
Editor Rob: I don't know how good Leo's posture is, Cooper looks a guy with a better overall stance.
Johan said on 1/Jul/16
cmon weak 5'10? He is 183 cm in shoes as we see from that pic. They look like 2cm style but lets just say that they are an inch that still puts him at 180.5cm about so a proper 5ft 11 guy.
Ryan said on 30/Jun/16
He is 5'9.75
Jeff said on 30/Jun/16
Closer to 5'11.5 than 5'10
truth said on 30/Jun/16
5'10 is just as bad as 6'0, 5'11 and some spare change is perfect.
said on 29/Jun/16
Rob, do you really see only 1 inch between these 2? Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I personally see 1.5 inch difference, maybe 2 inch when Leo is slouching.
Editor Rob: there could be a good 3cm at least between them.
Dan said on 28/Jun/16
He is 5'10 flat
said on 27/Jun/16
Rob, would you say Leo is at the start of tall range?
Editor Rob: it's probably around the start yeah...
truth said on 27/Jun/16
@c-mo He looks no more than 5 cm taller than her in the picture above. Also his shoes are no more than 2.5 cm and her heels are about 6 cm. So she is standing there at 179 cm in heels and he is 183-184 cm in shoes, barefoot he is 181 cm or a weak 5'11.5. Might be less but no more than 1 cm.
@Johan Pitt is roughly 2 cm shorter, 179-180 cm. Might be 5'11/180 cm but imo this height is one of the more optimistic guesses. 5'10.5 to 5'10.75 is most realistic for him.
Truth said on 26/Jun/16
He's shorter than listed. He's not over 180
177-178 cm guy said on 24/Jun/16
5'9.75" is a joke. Leo usually looks 179-181cm range in pictures.
Eric said on 23/Jun/16
@Jeff Wrong bro!!
Jeff said on 22/Jun/16
He's above average height but never a six footer. Therefore, 5'11 - 5'11.5 is best for him and get over it people!
Eric said on 21/Jun/16
said on 20/Jun/16Click Here
Next to Jonah Hill . You can compare with the pic on Brads page. Its true he can look anything between 1-2 cm shorter than Leo. Not much in it if you look at Jonah's eyelevel with lines. Leo looks also 1 inch or so shorter than 6'0.5" Bradley Cooper in recent pics so it might actually be possible that Pitt is 5'11" like you said CS.
CS said on 19/Jun/16
@Johan pretty sure it's only 1 cm.
Pitt ~ 180 range
DiCaprio ~ 181 range
Pat said on 19/Jun/16
He is 5'9.75
Jim said on 18/Jun/16
Leo is 5-10 at max, end of story, probably 5'9.75
giant said on 18/Jun/16
he was shorter than ex girlfriend Toni Garrn. Toni is around 6'0". He is clear 5'9.75", max 5'10". never 5'11"+. same height with ex girlfriend Gisele imho.
Johan said on 17/Jun/16
2cm taller than Pitt so its either 179 > 181cm or 180>182 cm . I think the former.
Mike said on 17/Jun/16
Yes he is 5'9-5'10 that's it! He is not 5'11
Alxr37 said on 16/Jun/16
yeah Leo's 5'10 but bieber needs a upgrade to 5'9 lol Leo is probably 5'11 at worst
said on 16/Jun/16
Seems 5'11," maybe 5'11.25."
Here he is with 5'10" Matt Damon and 5'8" Mark Whalberg. However, due to lighting and the cut of their suits, its difficult to judge their footwear and if any of them are wearing lifts.
Jeff said on 16/Jun/16
Whoever thinks Leo is 5'9.75 is a hater
the Slav said on 16/Jun/16
Mike, no way is he that short. He's a solid 5'11
Mike said on 16/Jun/16
He is 5'9.75!! HE is not 5'11
tiny said on 13/Jun/16
George said on 12/Jun/16
He's 5'10 jeezus
an anonymous peach
said on 10/Jun/16
Rob, would you say he was at his full height in What's Eating Gilbert Grape?
Editor Rob: I think he still gained a bit near age 20
CS said on 10/Jun/16
5'11.25 - 5'11.5 at his low
said on 10/Jun/16
Rob at 181,3-181,5cm night me , its very likely Léo is no taller than me And possible à couple of mm shorter
Editor Rob: it may well turn out he is not taller than you.
Dmeyer said on 10/Jun/16
She is about 5'11 shoes on hé looks 6ft 0,25 shoes those look like to give 0,75 so bang 5ft 11,5
c-mo said on 9/Jun/16
you might be right . it would be good if leo would stand next to people who have a pic with rob here . or even better if rob would meet leo :)
Mat said on 8/Jun/16
I have actually asked Rob in the past about here heels, and he estimated them at 2.8 inches, that's 7 cm. You may look in the comments below and find it, it was a few months ago. he has also estimated a 1.5 inch difference between them, so you are wrong. I think you are counting dicaprio 's hair. she comes up to his hairline.
Dicaprio has never seen 6 foot in his life. he is at best a weak 182 and even that's pushing it. 181 is the most possible for him, and 180 as a low guess.
truth said on 7/Jun/16
He has probably lost nothing yet, he is only 41 y.o. for christ sake. 180 - 181 cm guy.
c-mo said on 7/Jun/16
4cm seems a little too low of a difference between them on the pic . really looks more like 5-6 cm to me because the top of her head seems to be in the middle of his forehead
his face is just lower (low eyelevel) I think thats why you think that there is only 4cm difference
and her heels seem to be rather in the 8-9cm range rather than 7 ...look at the heel height page here
said on 7/Jun/16
Rob, if I'm about 180.8 cm at night (just measured a few hours ago) and I stood by Leo would people be able to spot a difference in height between him and I?
Editor Rob: you may well look close enough that people view you both as same height.
Mat said on 5/Jun/16
if you think there is a 6 cm difference between blanchett and dicaprio you are brain damaged. he's at most 4 cm taller than her. she's wearing 7 cm heels. so 173+7=180 cm.
he is 4 cm taller so 180+4=184 cm. substract 3 cm and he is 181 cm. see? you can't really prove anything. mind you blanchett has claimed ''about 5'8'' which to me sounds like an almost 5'8. i know she's listed 173 cm but i'm just saying.
c-mo said on 3/Jun/16
call me crazy but I think he is rather 184cm
why ? let me explain :
look at the pic . Cate Blanchett is 173cm . she is wearing about 8cm heels on the pic . lets be optimistic and say that leos shoes give 3cm
blanchett 173cm + 8cm = 181cm
she comes up to leos forehead at the point where it is about 6cm distance to the top of the head . so 181cm + 6cm = 187cm . now subtract the shoes of leo and we get 184cm .
anything below 183cm is very unlikely IMO . anything less than 182cm seems impossible . some here said he is 178cm xD lmao
CS said on 3/Jun/16
@Saqib was there ever a time Leo regularly worked out? I can't recall seeing photos of him buff or at least toned.