Add a Comment2649 comments
Average Guess (808 Votes)
5ft 11.23in (180.9cm)
5ft 11.23in (180.9cm)
CS said on 19/Sep/16
Hey Rob, if I'm around 5'11 flat at my low (used to think I was 180.8 cm but now I've measured a few times and 180.4 is closer) and have generally good posture, how do you think I would look next to Leo?
Editor Rob
Hey Rob, if I'm around 5'11 flat at my low (used to think I was 180.8 cm but now I've measured a few times and 180.4 is closer) and have generally good posture, how do you think I would look next to Leo?
Editor Rob may be hard to tell a difference really, if you had good posture I doubt he'd look taller.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Sep/16
@D: Exactly....it's not always determined by genetics.
I think if Leo hits 5ft11 flat it's after a very long day on his feet. Anything under that is unlikely.
@D: Exactly....it's not always determined by genetics.
I think if Leo hits 5ft11 flat it's after a very long day on his feet. Anything under that is unlikely.
CS said on 18/Sep/16
@dmeyer by that logic would you say people who are thin can appear anywhere from a quarter inch under their true height up to a half inch above their true height? Seeing as Leo is 5'11.25 but can appear that range you listed.
@dmeyer by that logic would you say people who are thin can appear anywhere from a quarter inch under their true height up to a half inch above their true height? Seeing as Leo is 5'11.25 but can appear that range you listed.
Dmeyer said on 18/Sep/16
5 ft 11-11,75 is the range he Can apears
5 ft 11-11,75 is the range he Can apears
Dmeyer said on 18/Sep/16
Rob on Bad days i aint under 181,3cm so i could be 1cm taller than leo as you say h§ could be 180,3cm on a Bad day , on normal day. Am near 181,5 and he is 181 so maybe just 0,5cm
Editor Rob
Rob on Bad days i aint under 181,3cm so i could be 1cm taller than leo as you say h§ could be 180,3cm on a Bad day , on normal day. Am near 181,5 and he is 181 so maybe just 0,5cm
Editor Rob I think you probably have an overall better posture than Leo, I'm sure you meet him you'd look a bit taller.
D said on 17/Sep/16
I know a guy who grew from 1.76 at 18 to 1.81 at 22 and still growing. Its all how well you eat, sleep how much you walk daily and mostly genetics
I know a guy who grew from 1.76 at 18 to 1.81 at 22 and still growing. Its all how well you eat, sleep how much you walk daily and mostly genetics
Dmeyer said on 15/Sep/16
Rob do you think h§ dosnt dip under 181cm or could h§ drop to 180,6-7cm after § long day or after § 1hour walk or weight lifting , i think 5 ft 11,25 is his very low and will be 11,5 on a relaxing day
Editor Rob
Rob do you think h§ dosnt dip under 181cm or could h§ drop to 180,6-7cm after § long day or after § 1hour walk or weight lifting , i think 5 ft 11,25 is his very low and will be 11,5 on a relaxing day
Editor Rob after a long day on set and dehydration he could be just 5ft 11, but then anybody has a potential to dip a little under their usual low on bad days
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Sep/16
He has said he was late bloomer
He has said he was late bloomer
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 11/Sep/16
Wait, he was 19 during it. He gained 10-11 CM at 19+.
Wait, he was 19 during it. He gained 10-11 CM at 19+.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 11/Sep/16
He seemed 171-172 CM by Johnny Depp in What's Eating Gilbert Grape, and he was 18 during that time. He also looked nothing like he does now.
He seemed 171-172 CM by Johnny Depp in What's Eating Gilbert Grape, and he was 18 during that time. He also looked nothing like he does now.
sabot said on 3/Sep/16
Listing is spot now. Thumbs up.
Listing is spot now. Thumbs up.
Greg89 said on 31/Aug/16
Hey Rob, whatching the photos when Leo was 16-17 years old, he seemed to be around 5ft 7in. Do you think he grew about 4 inches at age of 17?
Editor Rob
Hey Rob, whatching the photos when Leo was 16-17 years old, he seemed to be around 5ft 7in. Do you think he grew about 4 inches at age of 17?
Editor Rob at 17-20 he gained a few inches.
S.J.H said on 22/Aug/16
Good job to big rob. Leo is never 5'11.5 or 6'0 range. Truth he is 5'11 and 5'11.25 still acceptable. Like i say before christopher nolan was not even shorter than leo. People who watch Titanic will believe me he statued at 180ish
Good job to big rob. Leo is never 5'11.5 or 6'0 range. Truth he is 5'11 and 5'11.25 still acceptable. Like i say before christopher nolan was not even shorter than leo. People who watch Titanic will believe me he statued at 180ish
Animus said on 19/Aug/16
Even if Leo isn't standing totally straight in this picture with Clint Eastwood, I think it's pretty clear that he isn't a six-footer and probably is closer to 5'11":
Click Here
Even if Leo isn't standing totally straight in this picture with Clint Eastwood, I think it's pretty clear that he isn't a six-footer and probably is closer to 5'11":
Click Here
CS said on 18/Aug/16
@Leo is 182. 1 cm difference can be hard to notice in photos. I mean sometimes it's evident but other times it's very hard to tell the difference. Just look at Rob's photo with Jeremy Renner and you'll see what I am talking about. 1 cm height difference can look identical at times.
@Leo is 182. 1 cm difference can be hard to notice in photos. I mean sometimes it's evident but other times it's very hard to tell the difference. Just look at Rob's photo with Jeremy Renner and you'll see what I am talking about. 1 cm height difference can look identical at times.
truth said on 18/Aug/16
@Leo is 182 cm The camera is slightly tilted to Leo's favor, if it was straight then 181.5-182 cm for Chadwick and 181-181.5 cm for Leo, he just edges him out.
@Leo is 182 cm The camera is slightly tilted to Leo's favor, if it was straight then 181.5-182 cm for Chadwick and 181-181.5 cm for Leo, he just edges him out.
Leo is 182 said on 17/Aug/16
Hey Rob, what do you make of this photo? Chadwick and Leo look about equal, I heavily disagree with 181 cm being Leo's height, it's just too short compared to how he actually looks.
Click Here
Editor Rob
Hey Rob, what do you make of this photo? Chadwick and Leo look about equal, I heavily disagree with 181 cm being Leo's height, it's just too short compared to how he actually looks.
Click Here
Editor Rob they can look very similar I think
CS said on 14/Aug/16
I agree with the comments regarding Hanks and DiCaprio in Catch Me if you Can. They looked different enough for this listing to fit DiCaprio better but also close enough for DiCaprio to not really be under this mark. Unless of course Hanks was really 5'11.75 peak. Nonetheless both guys are in the 5'11-6' range with Hanks being closer to the 6 ft mark and DiCaprio being closer to the 5 ft 11 mark.
I agree with the comments regarding Hanks and DiCaprio in Catch Me if you Can. They looked different enough for this listing to fit DiCaprio better but also close enough for DiCaprio to not really be under this mark. Unless of course Hanks was really 5'11.75 peak. Nonetheless both guys are in the 5'11-6' range with Hanks being closer to the 6 ft mark and DiCaprio being closer to the 5 ft 11 mark.
James said on 13/Aug/16
Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks:
Click Here
Click Here
181 cm seems to be a good listing
Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks:
Click Here
Click Here
181 cm seems to be a good listing
Spencer said on 12/Aug/16
He looks 5'11 in Catch Me if You Can. Walken and Hanks both look about an inch taller.
He looks 5'11 in Catch Me if You Can. Walken and Hanks both look about an inch taller.
Tom said on 12/Aug/16
Probably no more than 5-10.
Probably no more than 5-10.
Johan said on 12/Aug/16
Yes, I think this is as close to the truth as well get without actually measuring the guy. However some celebs will be affected by this. Orlando Bloom for instance is noway only 2 cm shorter than Leo. Its at least 3cm.
Yes, I think this is as close to the truth as well get without actually measuring the guy. However some celebs will be affected by this. Orlando Bloom for instance is noway only 2 cm shorter than Leo. Its at least 3cm.
Ian said on 11/Aug/16
Hes 5'9 in titanic
Hes 5'9 in titanic
truth said on 11/Aug/16
Either listing 5'11.5 or 5'11.25 is fine for him anyway.
Either listing 5'11.5 or 5'11.25 is fine for him anyway.
Brad said on 10/Aug/16
He's 5 foot eleven and a half.
He's 5 foot eleven and a half.
Dmeyer said on 7/Aug/16
i agree rob peak hanks was 0.5-0.75in taller than leo , and 5 ft 11.75-6ft hanks evening height not 6 ft 0.25 or 11.5 , today leo at 181cm can look a hair taller than 5 ft 11.5 today hanks with weak posture
i agree rob peak hanks was 0.5-0.75in taller than leo , and 5 ft 11.75-6ft hanks evening height not 6 ft 0.25 or 11.5 , today leo at 181cm can look a hair taller than 5 ft 11.5 today hanks with weak posture
rakesh said on 5/Aug/16
He is about 5feet 9inches legit no joke
He is about 5feet 9inches legit no joke
Dmeyer said on 4/Aug/16
I agree with rob that there is less than 1in between Léo And Hanks if you consider posture/footwear
Editor Rob
I agree with rob that there is less than 1in between Léo And Hanks if you consider posture/footwear
Editor Rob 3/4 inch maybe, at times I think it could look a bit less.
It could be argued Hanks was just under 6ft but I think the 6ft mark is ok for him peak.
It could be argued Hanks was just under 6ft but I think the 6ft mark is ok for him peak.
Dmeyer said on 4/Aug/16
If you look well at dicaprio Hanks pics , i the récent ones Hanks is barely as tall , but back in the days , when they stand with equal posture in some pics they looks nearly identical , of course in some leo can look 2cm smaller in others near 3cm but i those Hanks has an hogan type shoes with à near 4cm heels , many cuban heels will give 1,4-1,7in while hogan 1,4-1,6in while Léo has à typical 1-1,1in , in others Hanks have a 1-1,1in while Léo 0,7-0,8in plus Hanks like to stand well , i usé to have a friend who is 5 ft 11 i am 5 ft 11,5 hé stands relax And i stand tall with 0,5in more shoes And then i suddenly apear 1,25in kind of like Pitt And Clooney 179 And 180 Guy plus better posture footwear, And the différence is more noticable , i think there is à very big chance Hanks was no more than 182,5cm peak especialy if Léo is 181 And Jude Law 178 , if you look at pics of leo/watanabe , leo/Hanks And Léo/Cooper you can see that Cooper is the tallest near Léo then watanabe then Hanks
If you look well at dicaprio Hanks pics , i the récent ones Hanks is barely as tall , but back in the days , when they stand with equal posture in some pics they looks nearly identical , of course in some leo can look 2cm smaller in others near 3cm but i those Hanks has an hogan type shoes with à near 4cm heels , many cuban heels will give 1,4-1,7in while hogan 1,4-1,6in while Léo has à typical 1-1,1in , in others Hanks have a 1-1,1in while Léo 0,7-0,8in plus Hanks like to stand well , i usé to have a friend who is 5 ft 11 i am 5 ft 11,5 hé stands relax And i stand tall with 0,5in more shoes And then i suddenly apear 1,25in kind of like Pitt And Clooney 179 And 180 Guy plus better posture footwear, And the différence is more noticable , i think there is à very big chance Hanks was no more than 182,5cm peak especialy if Léo is 181 And Jude Law 178 , if you look at pics of leo/watanabe , leo/Hanks And Léo/Cooper you can see that Cooper is the tallest near Léo then watanabe then Hanks
justbringit said on 3/Aug/16
I think that leo is pretty much at the start of tall range.I could see hi being up to 5'11.5" but 5ft 11.25in seems ok also
I think that leo is pretty much at the start of tall range.I could see hi being up to 5'11.5" but 5ft 11.25in seems ok also
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Aug/16
Looked 184/185cm in Blood Diamond wearing boots.
Looked 184/185cm in Blood Diamond wearing boots.
dmeyer said on 3/Aug/16
Afternoon i can go from 181,6 to 181,3 so afternoon height is fine
Afternoon i can go from 181,6 to 181,3 so afternoon height is fine
Tardis said on 3/Aug/16
There's no way Leo is this low, but it's what ever people shorter than him want to believe, I guess.
There's no way Leo is this low, but it's what ever people shorter than him want to believe, I guess.
Puma said on 2/Aug/16
If Caprio is 181 cm, Jon Bernthal is 179.
I watched the wall street.
Clearly 2 cm differance.
Rob?
If Caprio is 181 cm, Jon Bernthal is 179.
I watched the wall street.
Clearly 2 cm differance.
Rob?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/16
Wasn't expecting this....but it's fine I guess. Probably hits it at his low.
Wasn't expecting this....but it's fine I guess. Probably hits it at his low.
Dmeyer said on 1/Aug/16
rob when you list someone you mean they are 180.5-181cm night , they dont dip under 5'11 and are likely a fraction more but if someone is in that 181-181.5cm zone you will list them 5'11.5 , anyway leo can look anywere 5 ft 11-11.75
Editor Rob
rob when you list someone you mean they are 180.5-181cm night , they dont dip under 5'11 and are likely a fraction more but if someone is in that 181-181.5cm zone you will list them 5'11.5 , anyway leo can look anywere 5 ft 11-11.75
Editor Rob I'm thinking in most cases around afternoon is fine, most won't drop that much more, a small fraction.
It's not impossible a guy like Leo shrinks near a full inch, he could go from 183 to 181
It's not impossible a guy like Leo shrinks near a full inch, he could go from 183 to 181
Dmeyer said on 1/Aug/16
181 would make sens whi he looks noticably shorter than 183cm Hanks , whi he can look just 3-4cm over damon , also 181cm is enaugh to look 6 ft in décent shoes And being thin ,
181 would make sens whi he looks noticably shorter than 183cm Hanks , whi he can look just 3-4cm over damon , also 181cm is enaugh to look 6 ft in décent shoes And being thin ,
Dmeyer said on 29/Jul/16
181cm fits him well but that is his evening height hé wakes at 6 ft or 6 ft 1/8
181cm fits him well but that is his evening height hé wakes at 6 ft or 6 ft 1/8
Dmeyer said on 28/Jul/16
So at à low of 181,4cm i am à hair taller , 181cm looks right , if hé was 181,5cm hé would have looked closer to Hanks height 10 years back
So at à low of 181,4cm i am à hair taller , 181cm looks right , if hé was 181,5cm hé would have looked closer to Hanks height 10 years back
truth said on 28/Jul/16
Spot on Rob.
Spot on Rob.
CS said on 25/Jul/16
Wow. I never thought I'd see the day he'd be downgraded. This listing fits him as well.
Editor Rob
Wow. I never thought I'd see the day he'd be downgraded. This listing fits him as well.
Editor Rob Never say Never...but in this case you had to register to vote on that votesy page, so it at least was a good indication of the general opinion.
Johnny said on 25/Jul/16
@Rob why did you downgrade him?
Editor Rob
@Rob why did you downgrade him?
Editor Rob Since I was 50/50 over whether he is near 5ft 11 or really 11.5, I put up that poll and thought the general average guess might fall in the 11.25 range...
177-178 cm guy said on 24/Jul/16
Finally he's downgraded. This listing fits Leo well IMO.
Finally he's downgraded. This listing fits Leo well IMO.
Dejavu said on 23/Jul/16
I think he really gained some height and weight in his late teen. He looked 5'10.5 max and now he looks a strong 5'11 to 6'0.
I think he really gained some height and weight in his late teen. He looked 5'10.5 max and now he looks a strong 5'11 to 6'0.
Mike said on 19/Jul/16
He still is 5'10, look at him in revolutionary road....he is not much taller than kate
He still is 5'10, look at him in revolutionary road....he is not much taller than kate
S.J.H said on 18/Jul/16
Leo is 180cm and this listing could only fit him not long out of bed
Leo is 180cm and this listing could only fit him not long out of bed
Johno said on 15/Jul/16
I am not much of any height difference between him and latest girlfriend, Nina Agdal who is listed at 176 cm.
I am not much of any height difference between him and latest girlfriend, Nina Agdal who is listed at 176 cm.
CS said on 13/Jul/16
He definitely gained some height between 18 and 21 considering he was 5'10 range around the time of What's Eating Gilbert Grape.
He definitely gained some height between 18 and 21 considering he was 5'10 range around the time of What's Eating Gilbert Grape.
James Edward Crowley Maximus Meridius said on 11/Jul/16
Rob is It possible Leo grew half an inch when hé was 25 26 i havé heard hé didn't start puberty until hé was 18 19 hé was a very late bloomer hé was during 24 25 during the filming of beach hé could havé been 5ft 11in at the start of the filming and 5ft 11.5in when filming ended he may havé grown half an inch are you going too upgrade him too 6ft 0in at some point he looks 6ft 0in that's the height he is listed as online he must grew half an inch at 24 25 and grew half an inch again when he was 25 26 that means he grew a full inch in one year he may havé still growing in beach he wasn't finished growing yét very late bloomers usually grow for longer.
Editor Rob
Rob is It possible Leo grew half an inch when hé was 25 26 i havé heard hé didn't start puberty until hé was 18 19 hé was a very late bloomer hé was during 24 25 during the filming of beach hé could havé been 5ft 11in at the start of the filming and 5ft 11.5in when filming ended he may havé grown half an inch are you going too upgrade him too 6ft 0in at some point he looks 6ft 0in that's the height he is listed as online he must grew half an inch at 24 25 and grew half an inch again when he was 25 26 that means he grew a full inch in one year he may havé still growing in beach he wasn't finished growing yét very late bloomers usually grow for longer.
Editor Rob I don't know if he did after 21, I think between 18 and 21 he did get something.
truth said on 11/Jul/16
@Celebheights 6'1.5
Looks like an exact 4 in difference. I guess Cooper forgot his lifts this day because I always pegged him at a strong 6'0/ 183-184 cm and Neeson at a strong 6'4 / 193-194 cm.
@Celebheights 6'1.5
Looks like an exact 4 in difference. I guess Cooper forgot his lifts this day because I always pegged him at a strong 6'0/ 183-184 cm and Neeson at a strong 6'4 / 193-194 cm.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 10/Jul/16
Here's a good photo of him by Liam Neeson:
Click Here
6'1" is definitely possible for him.
Here's a good photo of him by Liam Neeson:
Click Here
6'1" is definitely possible for him.
jtm said on 9/Jul/16
anyone that thinks cooper is 6'1 needs to look at the picture on liam nesson's page.
anyone that thinks cooper is 6'1 needs to look at the picture on liam nesson's page.
CS said on 6/Jul/16
Bradley Cooper looks 6'1 to me which actually helps Leo's case if Bradley is indeed a bit higher than what he is listed.
Bradley Cooper looks 6'1 to me which actually helps Leo's case if Bradley is indeed a bit higher than what he is listed.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 6/Jul/16
I think this listing is spot on
I think this listing is spot on
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Jul/16
Leonardo DiCaprio - 5ft11½(182cm)
Bradley Cooper - 6ft0¾(185cm)
Leonardo DiCaprio - 5ft11½(182cm)
Bradley Cooper - 6ft0¾(185cm)
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 5/Jul/16
Bradley Cooper was near 6'1" in person, and he appeared to be at least 6'1" (if not slightly higher) by Ashton Kutcher.
Bradley Cooper was near 6'1" in person, and he appeared to be at least 6'1" (if not slightly higher) by Ashton Kutcher.
CS said on 4/Jul/16
@Mat probably not until Leo starts shrinking lol.
@Mat probably not until Leo starts shrinking lol.
Pucko said on 4/Jul/16
Closer to 181cm then to 183cm, but both 5'11.25 and 5'11.5 works good for Leo. I think we can close this case now Rob
Closer to 181cm then to 183cm, but both 5'11.25 and 5'11.5 works good for Leo. I think we can close this case now Rob
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 4/Jul/16
With Ben Affleck who is anywhere from 6'2"-6'2 1/4" in person (6'2 1/2" shouldn't be completely ruled out either)
Click Here
Click Here
Even if you factor in that there is uneven footwear, there is no more than 2 1/2" between them.
With Ben Affleck who is anywhere from 6'2"-6'2 1/4" in person (6'2 1/2" shouldn't be completely ruled out either)
Click Here
Click Here
Even if you factor in that there is uneven footwear, there is no more than 2 1/2" between them.
Will said on 3/Jul/16
He really is 5'10 max MAX
He really is 5'10 max MAX
Mat said on 2/Jul/16
Editor Rob: I don't know how good Leo's posture is, Cooper looks a guy with a better overall stance.
You are never going to downgrade him, are you?
Editor Rob: I don't know how good Leo's posture is, Cooper looks a guy with a better overall stance.
You are never going to downgrade him, are you?
Roy said on 2/Jul/16
There is no way he is less than 5'11. That's that.
There is no way he is less than 5'11. That's that.
Mat said on 1/Jul/16
Editor Rob: there could be a good 3cm at least between them.
So Rob, if you see at least 3 cm between them, shouldn't you give Leo 181 cm or Bradley Cooper 185 cm?
Editor Rob
Editor Rob: there could be a good 3cm at least between them.
So Rob, if you see at least 3 cm between them, shouldn't you give Leo 181 cm or Bradley Cooper 185 cm?
Editor Rob I don't know how good Leo's posture is, Cooper looks a guy with a better overall stance.
Johan said on 1/Jul/16
cmon weak 5'10? He is 183 cm in shoes as we see from that pic. They look like 2cm style but lets just say that they are an inch that still puts him at 180.5cm about so a proper 5ft 11 guy.
cmon weak 5'10? He is 183 cm in shoes as we see from that pic. They look like 2cm style but lets just say that they are an inch that still puts him at 180.5cm about so a proper 5ft 11 guy.
Ryan said on 30/Jun/16
He is 5'9.75
He is 5'9.75
Jeff said on 30/Jun/16
Closer to 5'11.5 than 5'10
Closer to 5'11.5 than 5'10
truth said on 30/Jun/16
5'10 is just as bad as 6'0, 5'11 and some spare change is perfect.
5'10 is just as bad as 6'0, 5'11 and some spare change is perfect.
Mat said on 29/Jun/16
Rob, do you really see only 1 inch between these 2? Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I personally see 1.5 inch difference, maybe 2 inch when Leo is slouching.
Editor Rob
Rob, do you really see only 1 inch between these 2? Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I personally see 1.5 inch difference, maybe 2 inch when Leo is slouching.
Editor Rob there could be a good 3cm at least between them.
Dan said on 28/Jun/16
He is 5'10 flat
He is 5'10 flat
CS said on 27/Jun/16
Rob, would you say Leo is at the start of tall range?
Editor Rob
Rob, would you say Leo is at the start of tall range?
Editor Rob it's probably around the start yeah...
truth said on 27/Jun/16
@c-mo He looks no more than 5 cm taller than her in the picture above. Also his shoes are no more than 2.5 cm and her heels are about 6 cm. So she is standing there at 179 cm in heels and he is 183-184 cm in shoes, barefoot he is 181 cm or a weak 5'11.5. Might be less but no more than 1 cm.
@Johan Pitt is roughly 2 cm shorter, 179-180 cm. Might be 5'11/180 cm but imo this height is one of the more optimistic guesses. 5'10.5 to 5'10.75 is most realistic for him.
@c-mo He looks no more than 5 cm taller than her in the picture above. Also his shoes are no more than 2.5 cm and her heels are about 6 cm. So she is standing there at 179 cm in heels and he is 183-184 cm in shoes, barefoot he is 181 cm or a weak 5'11.5. Might be less but no more than 1 cm.
@Johan Pitt is roughly 2 cm shorter, 179-180 cm. Might be 5'11/180 cm but imo this height is one of the more optimistic guesses. 5'10.5 to 5'10.75 is most realistic for him.
Truth said on 26/Jun/16
He's shorter than listed. He's not over 180
He's shorter than listed. He's not over 180
177-178 cm guy said on 24/Jun/16
5'9.75" is a joke. Leo usually looks 179-181cm range in pictures.
5'9.75" is a joke. Leo usually looks 179-181cm range in pictures.
Eric said on 23/Jun/16
@Jeff Wrong bro!!
@Jeff Wrong bro!!
Jeff said on 22/Jun/16
He's above average height but never a six footer. Therefore, 5'11 - 5'11.5 is best for him and get over it people!
He's above average height but never a six footer. Therefore, 5'11 - 5'11.5 is best for him and get over it people!
Eric said on 21/Jun/16
5'9.75 son
5'9.75 son
Johan said on 20/Jun/16
Click Here
Next to Jonah Hill . You can compare with the pic on Brads page. Its true he can look anything between 1-2 cm shorter than Leo. Not much in it if you look at Jonah's eyelevel with lines. Leo looks also 1 inch or so shorter than 6'0.5" Bradley Cooper in recent pics so it might actually be possible that Pitt is 5'11" like you said CS.
Click Here
Next to Jonah Hill . You can compare with the pic on Brads page. Its true he can look anything between 1-2 cm shorter than Leo. Not much in it if you look at Jonah's eyelevel with lines. Leo looks also 1 inch or so shorter than 6'0.5" Bradley Cooper in recent pics so it might actually be possible that Pitt is 5'11" like you said CS.
CS said on 19/Jun/16
@Johan pretty sure it's only 1 cm.
Pitt ~ 180 range
DiCaprio ~ 181 range
@Johan pretty sure it's only 1 cm.
Pitt ~ 180 range
DiCaprio ~ 181 range
Pat said on 19/Jun/16
He is 5'9.75
He is 5'9.75
Jim said on 18/Jun/16
Leo is 5-10 at max, end of story, probably 5'9.75
Leo is 5-10 at max, end of story, probably 5'9.75
giant said on 18/Jun/16
he was shorter than ex girlfriend Toni Garrn. Toni is around 6'0". He is clear 5'9.75", max 5'10". never 5'11"+. same height with ex girlfriend Gisele imho.
he was shorter than ex girlfriend Toni Garrn. Toni is around 6'0". He is clear 5'9.75", max 5'10". never 5'11"+. same height with ex girlfriend Gisele imho.
Mike said on 17/Jun/16
Yes he is 5'9-5'10 that's it! He is not 5'11
Yes he is 5'9-5'10 that's it! He is not 5'11
Alxr37 said on 16/Jun/16
yeah Leo's 5'10 but bieber needs a upgrade to 5'9 lol Leo is probably 5'11 at worst
yeah Leo's 5'10 but bieber needs a upgrade to 5'9 lol Leo is probably 5'11 at worst
J.B. said on 16/Jun/16
Seems 5'11," maybe 5'11.25."
Here he is with 5'10" Matt Damon and 5'8" Mark Whalberg. However, due to lighting and the cut of their suits, its difficult to judge their footwear and if any of them are wearing lifts.
Click Here
Click Here
Seems 5'11," maybe 5'11.25."
Here he is with 5'10" Matt Damon and 5'8" Mark Whalberg. However, due to lighting and the cut of their suits, its difficult to judge their footwear and if any of them are wearing lifts.
Click Here
Click Here
Jeff said on 16/Jun/16
Whoever thinks Leo is 5'9.75 is a hater
Whoever thinks Leo is 5'9.75 is a hater
the Slav said on 16/Jun/16
Mike, no way is he that short. He's a solid 5'11
Mike, no way is he that short. He's a solid 5'11
Mike said on 16/Jun/16
He is 5'9.75!! HE is not 5'11
He is 5'9.75!! HE is not 5'11
tiny said on 13/Jun/16
5'9.75"-5'11"/177-180cm
5'9.75"-5'11"/177-180cm
George said on 12/Jun/16
He's 5'10 jeezus
He's 5'10 jeezus
an anonymous peach said on 10/Jun/16
Rob, would you say he was at his full height in What's Eating Gilbert Grape?
Editor Rob
Rob, would you say he was at his full height in What's Eating Gilbert Grape?
Editor Rob I think he still gained a bit near age 20
CS said on 10/Jun/16
5'11.25 - 5'11.5 at his low
5'11.25 - 5'11.5 at his low
Dmeyer said on 10/Jun/16
Rob at 181,3-181,5cm night me , its very likely Léo is no taller than me And possible à couple of mm shorter
Editor Rob
Rob at 181,3-181,5cm night me , its very likely Léo is no taller than me And possible à couple of mm shorter
Editor Rob it may well turn out he is not taller than you.
Dmeyer said on 10/Jun/16
She is about 5'11 shoes on hé looks 6ft 0,25 shoes those look like to give 0,75 so bang 5ft 11,5
She is about 5'11 shoes on hé looks 6ft 0,25 shoes those look like to give 0,75 so bang 5ft 11,5
c-mo said on 9/Jun/16
@Mat
you might be right . it would be good if leo would stand next to people who have a pic with rob here . or even better if rob would meet leo :)
@Mat
you might be right . it would be good if leo would stand next to people who have a pic with rob here . or even better if rob would meet leo :)
Mat said on 8/Jun/16
@ c-mo
I have actually asked Rob in the past about here heels, and he estimated them at 2.8 inches, that's 7 cm. You may look in the comments below and find it, it was a few months ago. he has also estimated a 1.5 inch difference between them, so you are wrong. I think you are counting dicaprio 's hair. she comes up to his hairline.
Dicaprio has never seen 6 foot in his life. he is at best a weak 182 and even that's pushing it. 181 is the most possible for him, and 180 as a low guess.
@ c-mo
I have actually asked Rob in the past about here heels, and he estimated them at 2.8 inches, that's 7 cm. You may look in the comments below and find it, it was a few months ago. he has also estimated a 1.5 inch difference between them, so you are wrong. I think you are counting dicaprio 's hair. she comes up to his hairline.
Dicaprio has never seen 6 foot in his life. he is at best a weak 182 and even that's pushing it. 181 is the most possible for him, and 180 as a low guess.
truth said on 7/Jun/16
He has probably lost nothing yet, he is only 41 y.o. for christ sake. 180 - 181 cm guy.
He has probably lost nothing yet, he is only 41 y.o. for christ sake. 180 - 181 cm guy.
c-mo said on 7/Jun/16
@Mat
4cm seems a little too low of a difference between them on the pic . really looks more like 5-6 cm to me because the top of her head seems to be in the middle of his forehead
his face is just lower (low eyelevel) I think thats why you think that there is only 4cm difference
and her heels seem to be rather in the 8-9cm range rather than 7 ...look at the heel height page here
@Mat
4cm seems a little too low of a difference between them on the pic . really looks more like 5-6 cm to me because the top of her head seems to be in the middle of his forehead
his face is just lower (low eyelevel) I think thats why you think that there is only 4cm difference
and her heels seem to be rather in the 8-9cm range rather than 7 ...look at the heel height page here
CS said on 7/Jun/16
Rob, if I'm about 180.8 cm at night (just measured a few hours ago) and I stood by Leo would people be able to spot a difference in height between him and I?
Editor Rob
Rob, if I'm about 180.8 cm at night (just measured a few hours ago) and I stood by Leo would people be able to spot a difference in height between him and I?
Editor Rob you may well look close enough that people view you both as same height.
Mat said on 5/Jun/16
@ c-mo
if you think there is a 6 cm difference between blanchett and dicaprio you are brain damaged. he's at most 4 cm taller than her. she's wearing 7 cm heels. so 173+7=180 cm.
he is 4 cm taller so 180+4=184 cm. substract 3 cm and he is 181 cm. see? you can't really prove anything. mind you blanchett has claimed ''about 5'8'' which to me sounds like an almost 5'8. i know she's listed 173 cm but i'm just saying.
@ c-mo
if you think there is a 6 cm difference between blanchett and dicaprio you are brain damaged. he's at most 4 cm taller than her. she's wearing 7 cm heels. so 173+7=180 cm.
he is 4 cm taller so 180+4=184 cm. substract 3 cm and he is 181 cm. see? you can't really prove anything. mind you blanchett has claimed ''about 5'8'' which to me sounds like an almost 5'8. i know she's listed 173 cm but i'm just saying.
c-mo said on 3/Jun/16
call me crazy but I think he is rather 184cm
why ? let me explain :
look at the pic . Cate Blanchett is 173cm . she is wearing about 8cm heels on the pic . lets be optimistic and say that leos shoes give 3cm
blanchett 173cm + 8cm = 181cm
she comes up to leos forehead at the point where it is about 6cm distance to the top of the head . so 181cm + 6cm = 187cm . now subtract the shoes of leo and we get 184cm .
anything below 183cm is very unlikely IMO . anything less than 182cm seems impossible . some here said he is 178cm xD lmao
call me crazy but I think he is rather 184cm
why ? let me explain :
look at the pic . Cate Blanchett is 173cm . she is wearing about 8cm heels on the pic . lets be optimistic and say that leos shoes give 3cm
blanchett 173cm + 8cm = 181cm
she comes up to leos forehead at the point where it is about 6cm distance to the top of the head . so 181cm + 6cm = 187cm . now subtract the shoes of leo and we get 184cm .
anything below 183cm is very unlikely IMO . anything less than 182cm seems impossible . some here said he is 178cm xD lmao
CS said on 3/Jun/16
@Saqib was there ever a time Leo regularly worked out? I can't recall seeing photos of him buff or at least toned.
@Saqib was there ever a time Leo regularly worked out? I can't recall seeing photos of him buff or at least toned.
Saqib said on 3/Jun/16
He doesn't look like he has worked out in the last 20 yrs to keep himself fit. Its possible that leo may have lost 1-2 cm
He doesn't look like he has worked out in the last 20 yrs to keep himself fit. Its possible that leo may have lost 1-2 cm
Allen said on 2/Jun/16
@truth
Yeah. As far as I know Leo never wears lifts and he really does look 5'11.5. Though he has a bad posture lately still doesn't look less.
@truth
Yeah. As far as I know Leo never wears lifts and he really does look 5'11.5. Though he has a bad posture lately still doesn't look less.
CS said on 30/May/16
@Saqib from what I've gathered I think Rob believes Brad is a strong 180 guy, so quite possibly a few millimeters over it but not enough to tip the mark to 181. And Leo he believes is a strong 181 guy. He's listed at 182 cm because 5'11.5 is 181.6 cm and that rounds to 182 cm as I'm sure you know. However Rob has said he wouldn't put 181.0 cm past Leo so there still definitely is a chance. The closest case scenario is Brad is a smidge over 5'11 and Leo is 5'11.25 and the farthest case scenario is Brad is a tiny bit under 5'11 (about an eighth of an inch) and Leo is a smidge under 5'11.5. Their difference in height if you just say for simplicity "about a centimeter" is pretty close to the height difference a friend and I have.
Btw, I see Brad and Leo being roughly the same height in that pic. You can't see the footwear in that pic but they look roughly the same half inch (centimeter) range there to me.
@Saqib from what I've gathered I think Rob believes Brad is a strong 180 guy, so quite possibly a few millimeters over it but not enough to tip the mark to 181. And Leo he believes is a strong 181 guy. He's listed at 182 cm because 5'11.5 is 181.6 cm and that rounds to 182 cm as I'm sure you know. However Rob has said he wouldn't put 181.0 cm past Leo so there still definitely is a chance. The closest case scenario is Brad is a smidge over 5'11 and Leo is 5'11.25 and the farthest case scenario is Brad is a tiny bit under 5'11 (about an eighth of an inch) and Leo is a smidge under 5'11.5. Their difference in height if you just say for simplicity "about a centimeter" is pretty close to the height difference a friend and I have.
Btw, I see Brad and Leo being roughly the same height in that pic. You can't see the footwear in that pic but they look roughly the same half inch (centimeter) range there to me.
truth said on 27/May/16
@Allen Bromance for Leo I see? ;) Anyway, 5ft11/180cm or 5ft11.25/181cm is most likely, he could be 5ft11/182cm also, but that would be earlier in the day...
@Allen Bromance for Leo I see? ;) Anyway, 5ft11/180cm or 5ft11.25/181cm is most likely, he could be 5ft11/182cm also, but that would be earlier in the day...
Mat said on 26/May/16
Rob, how much are you convinced that Leo could be a flat 5'11? I don't think you really are
Editor Rob
Rob, how much are you convinced that Leo could be a flat 5'11? I don't think you really are
Editor Rob I think while a chance, there is a greater chance of 11.25.
Allen said on 25/May/16
He is a true 182 cm guy. He has never looked less.
He is a true 182 cm guy. He has never looked less.
Saqib said on 25/May/16
Rob do you think leo is same height as brad pitt or is he taller?
Editor Rob
Rob do you think leo is same height as brad pitt or is he taller?
Editor Rob I think if you measured them you'd find Leo might have a better chance of stretching up a bit taller than he can look, whereas Pitt looks like he generally maintains a very close standing->measurable height.
c-mo said on 25/May/16
Rob how tall do you think he was in Romeo and Juliet ?
Editor Rob
Rob how tall do you think he was in Romeo and Juliet ?
Editor Rob I think by then he looked near his final height at around 21
James B said on 24/May/16
Rob I get the impression hanks was in lifts with dicaprio.........
Editor Rob
Rob I get the impression hanks was in lifts with dicaprio.........
Editor Rob for some reason Hanks never struck me as a bloke who would wear lifts, but it's the dependable and reliable guys you sometimes have to keep a closer eye on.
Johno said on 23/May/16
For me Saqib; the difference is not quite 2-inches but then again, Leo has some hefty formals on there so the difference could be a full 2-inches.
Mr Bachan for me seems to be hovering around the 6'0 mark; he is in his 70s, Leo looks 5'10, 5'10.25 in comparison.
For me Saqib; the difference is not quite 2-inches but then again, Leo has some hefty formals on there so the difference could be a full 2-inches.
Mr Bachan for me seems to be hovering around the 6'0 mark; he is in his 70s, Leo looks 5'10, 5'10.25 in comparison.
the Slav said on 22/May/16
5'11.75 is the tallest he can be
5'11.75 is the tallest he can be
Saqib said on 18/May/16
I am new here so I have questions.
1) when i post a comment, after how much time will it appear on the comment's section?
2) why do celebrities and other people irl lie about their height? I never understood this.
3) how can i cure my obsession with heights?
Editor Rob
I am new here so I have questions.
1) when i post a comment, after how much time will it appear on the comment's section?
2) why do celebrities and other people irl lie about their height? I never understood this.
3) how can i cure my obsession with heights?
Editor Rob hopefully within a day.
Celebs, want others to think of them in good light. Being tall is a positive trait, so many might add an inch or two.
For me, the positive is telling the truth, regardless of the actual height.
To cure an obsession, sometimes it takes effort and spreading interests so that your day is filled with a variety of tasks.
But in some cases, being hyper-focused on a topic isn't necessarily a bad thing...it's how humans have progressed, by having people who devote inordinate amounts of time to solving problems and inventing solutions.
Celebs, want others to think of them in good light. Being tall is a positive trait, so many might add an inch or two.
For me, the positive is telling the truth, regardless of the actual height.
To cure an obsession, sometimes it takes effort and spreading interests so that your day is filled with a variety of tasks.
But in some cases, being hyper-focused on a topic isn't necessarily a bad thing...it's how humans have progressed, by having people who devote inordinate amounts of time to solving problems and inventing solutions.
Saqib said on 18/May/16
How tall is leonardo dicaprio and johnny depp in these pics?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob
How tall is leonardo dicaprio and johnny depp in these pics?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob at that age he looked maybe an inch taller
Johno said on 16/May/16
Click Here
The other picture; it did not publish in my previous comment. Even when Mario's dodgy posture, their eyelines clearly match, there is hardy any height difference there.
Click Here
The other picture; it did not publish in my previous comment. Even when Mario's dodgy posture, their eyelines clearly match, there is hardy any height difference there.
James said on 16/May/16
Rob, what do you think is the difference between Leo and Tyrese Gibson in this picture?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, what do you think is the difference between Leo and Tyrese Gibson in this picture?
Click Here
Editor Rob he does appear at least an inch taller, I don't know if he is losing anything more than a fraction in posture?
Z187 said on 15/May/16
In his bio it says he's 5'11.5" (half an inch taller than one of his model gfs that I can't remember) .. Can't blame him for rounding up by a cm... Who would really bother saying I'm 5'11 and a half ?
In his bio it says he's 5'11.5" (half an inch taller than one of his model gfs that I can't remember) .. Can't blame him for rounding up by a cm... Who would really bother saying I'm 5'11 and a half ?
Johno said on 14/May/16
@Mat, in their movie they looked nearly 2-inches apart and similarly, the same in those pictures you supplied.
Hanks is a 5'11, 5'11-range sort of guy. Quite clearly he has some height on Leo thus me it is improbable that he is anywhere near 6'0 by a country-mile; although i think people can still argue in the 5'10-range for me; i have him at a flat 5'10 but he can look a 5'10-range to; although at times he can often look pretty stout and average. A tall-average sort-of guy for me.
Hanks 5'11, 5'11-range
Dicaprio nearly 2-inches shorter
@Mat, in their movie they looked nearly 2-inches apart and similarly, the same in those pictures you supplied.
Hanks is a 5'11, 5'11-range sort of guy. Quite clearly he has some height on Leo thus me it is improbable that he is anywhere near 6'0 by a country-mile; although i think people can still argue in the 5'10-range for me; i have him at a flat 5'10 but he can look a 5'10-range to; although at times he can often look pretty stout and average. A tall-average sort-of guy for me.
Hanks 5'11, 5'11-range
Dicaprio nearly 2-inches shorter
Johno said on 14/May/16
TJE said on 11/Apr/16
@Johno
In the wider shot, yes, but in Leo's closeup it's more 2 inches. When Leo picks his head up, Mario is looking straight into his nose indicating so.
Hence, Leo's a 5'11 range guy who frequently slouches; look at him with Matt Damon, Christopher Nolan, even Cate Blanchett on the top, who's a strong 5'8 in heels. He always looks 5'11 min
Better yet with 5'3 Martin Scorcese:
Click Here
Once you look into it more, you will realize that the 5'10 assessment is bogus.
Also, it's not those who "estimate higher" that go off topic. It's actually the opposite. In fact, most commenters that estimates higher are barraged with ad homs by other commenters. The site's riddled with such scenarios. You will also notice people who think every single celebrity wears 3 inch lifts populating the most popular pages. These people can get quite volatile if scrutinized.
In fact, you are amongst the people who both underestimate celebrities and veer off topic, albeit more levelheaded.
-------------------------------------------------------
2-inches? For your benefit, i don't think your not that daft and believe you probably know what 2-inches difference looks like, Rob has got some illustrations for you to view. Let me post a few pictures of a 5'8.75, Mario Lopez and a Mr Dicaprio. The comparions are pretty clear and the difference is clear to see.
Click Here
Click Here
Now ------------ where are those phantom 2-inches? I cannot even see 1-inch; i can barely see 0.5-inches and if we were to correct Mario's posture ....... You get the picture; no wait ------- you don't.
Why does Mr Dicaprio's height so 'miniscule' next to a 5'8.75-5'9.25? Infact, i believe Mario's height ranges from 5'9.25 in the morning, to 5'8.5 at night.
Together with the video i already posted, there is another comparisons of them two for you to realise that height difference between is hardly 0.5-inches let alone 2-inches as your saying; that is pretty crazy and i refuse to believe your this incompetent when it comes height, so why do you state 2-inches for this A-lister? If you want to argue near 6'0 or 2-inches; you really ought to use different media or pictures for example, not create space out of nowhere; for pictures and videos where such information was not recorded.
I think Leonardo could wake up at 5'10.5-ish in the morning but individuals can lose upto to an inch in height during the day, so i believe he averages 5'10-ish or near there throughout the day. I believe his lowest is lower then these parameters though. This is why maybe that reporter barely even saw 5'10 for Mr Dicaprio when they met him.
In terms of height users. No, i believe height cynics get it harder then height inflators; the term, "troll" is brandished oh-to-easily and that is pretty ad-homien if you ask me and once you see this term used by one username, you all of a sudden see a flurry of them in quick succession, thus you can see why i am pretty cynical at times.
Mario Lopez 5'8.75, 5'9
Leonardo Dicaprio in comparison [0.5-inches taller than Lopez], let us give him 5'10.25 [Gave him phantom height due to possible, quite clearly way off the 5'11-range]
TJE said on 11/Apr/16
@Johno
In the wider shot, yes, but in Leo's closeup it's more 2 inches. When Leo picks his head up, Mario is looking straight into his nose indicating so.
Hence, Leo's a 5'11 range guy who frequently slouches; look at him with Matt Damon, Christopher Nolan, even Cate Blanchett on the top, who's a strong 5'8 in heels. He always looks 5'11 min
Better yet with 5'3 Martin Scorcese:
Click Here
Once you look into it more, you will realize that the 5'10 assessment is bogus.
Also, it's not those who "estimate higher" that go off topic. It's actually the opposite. In fact, most commenters that estimates higher are barraged with ad homs by other commenters. The site's riddled with such scenarios. You will also notice people who think every single celebrity wears 3 inch lifts populating the most popular pages. These people can get quite volatile if scrutinized.
In fact, you are amongst the people who both underestimate celebrities and veer off topic, albeit more levelheaded.
-------------------------------------------------------
2-inches? For your benefit, i don't think your not that daft and believe you probably know what 2-inches difference looks like, Rob has got some illustrations for you to view. Let me post a few pictures of a 5'8.75, Mario Lopez and a Mr Dicaprio. The comparions are pretty clear and the difference is clear to see.
Click Here
Click Here
Now ------------ where are those phantom 2-inches? I cannot even see 1-inch; i can barely see 0.5-inches and if we were to correct Mario's posture ....... You get the picture; no wait ------- you don't.
Why does Mr Dicaprio's height so 'miniscule' next to a 5'8.75-5'9.25? Infact, i believe Mario's height ranges from 5'9.25 in the morning, to 5'8.5 at night.
Together with the video i already posted, there is another comparisons of them two for you to realise that height difference between is hardly 0.5-inches let alone 2-inches as your saying; that is pretty crazy and i refuse to believe your this incompetent when it comes height, so why do you state 2-inches for this A-lister? If you want to argue near 6'0 or 2-inches; you really ought to use different media or pictures for example, not create space out of nowhere; for pictures and videos where such information was not recorded.
I think Leonardo could wake up at 5'10.5-ish in the morning but individuals can lose upto to an inch in height during the day, so i believe he averages 5'10-ish or near there throughout the day. I believe his lowest is lower then these parameters though. This is why maybe that reporter barely even saw 5'10 for Mr Dicaprio when they met him.
In terms of height users. No, i believe height cynics get it harder then height inflators; the term, "troll" is brandished oh-to-easily and that is pretty ad-homien if you ask me and once you see this term used by one username, you all of a sudden see a flurry of them in quick succession, thus you can see why i am pretty cynical at times.
Mario Lopez 5'8.75, 5'9
Leonardo Dicaprio in comparison [0.5-inches taller than Lopez], let us give him 5'10.25 [Gave him phantom height due to possible, quite clearly way off the 5'11-range]
michael smith said on 13/May/16
I see that Jennifer Connelly is at eye Leonardo DiCaprio level with a similar footwear, so do you think that there is 13 cm of diffrence?
I see that Jennifer Connelly is at eye Leonardo DiCaprio level with a similar footwear, so do you think that there is 13 cm of diffrence?
Mat said on 13/May/16
@Editor Rob: generally at that time Hanks could look at least half inch taller, possibly 2cm taller.
I see 2 or 3 cm. Maybe you should either give Hanks a little bit more then, or finally give Leo 181 cm. A friend of mine is a half inch taller than me and we usually look indentical.
@Editor Rob: generally at that time Hanks could look at least half inch taller, possibly 2cm taller.
I see 2 or 3 cm. Maybe you should either give Hanks a little bit more then, or finally give Leo 181 cm. A friend of mine is a half inch taller than me and we usually look indentical.
jtm said on 12/May/16
DiCaprio's footwear in the picture with blanchett looks really suspicious to me.
DiCaprio's footwear in the picture with blanchett looks really suspicious to me.
jtm said on 12/May/16
since when is a 5'11 described as being short? 5'11 is above average height.
since when is a 5'11 described as being short? 5'11 is above average height.
Dmeyer said on 12/May/16
The Guy is not less than 181cm night so 5ft11,5 is à fair listing propbably wakes 183-183,5
The Guy is not less than 181cm night so 5ft11,5 is à fair listing propbably wakes 183-183,5
Flyin said on 11/May/16
Still beats 5"8 in heels with modest shoes. Looks like my brother with his wife. 6"0 and 5"8. I think he is a very strong 5"11. Solid posture here as well. Wish I was that tall for longer than half an hour.
Still beats 5"8 in heels with modest shoes. Looks like my brother with his wife. 6"0 and 5"8. I think he is a very strong 5"11. Solid posture here as well. Wish I was that tall for longer than half an hour.
Mat said on 11/May/16
Check this Rob. Don't you think that's more than 1 inch difference between him and Hanks?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob
Check this Rob. Don't you think that's more than 1 inch difference between him and Hanks?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob generally at that time Hanks could look at least half inch taller, possibly 2cm taller.
ARGH said on 10/May/16
Leo ain't 6 feet. No 6 foot man is described as being short.
He's 5'11.
Leo ain't 6 feet. No 6 foot man is described as being short.
He's 5'11.
Tommy said on 10/May/16
He's never outside of 5'11- 5'11.5 range
He's never outside of 5'11- 5'11.5 range
CS said on 10/May/16
c-mo said on 8/May/16
yes and no ...it depends on the person and also the activity level of the day you know what I mean ? some will lose height quicker than others etc.
imo out of bed height and like 1 hour after is inflation but after that is claimable . I am 178.3 or when I get a lot of sleep like 10h+ 178.5cm fresh out of bed in the first 1-2 minutes ...after 1 hour I am 177.4cm or something around that . after 2-3 hours I am around the 177cm mark give or take 2 mm or so and I see no reason why I shouldnt claim this height ? even though I fall to 176.3 cm 5-6 hours after out of bed and fall to 176cm at night. several hours of a day I am 176.8 to 177.5cm range ...I mean come on
like I am 2.3 to 2.5 cm taller than 176cm out of bed and 2-3 hours after waking up I am 177cm so why should I claim my lowest ? what benefit does that bring to anybody lol ....especially since people guess me 180cm constantly and I have a higher than average eye level ....I mean the 177cm IS MY HEIGHT TOO in the end and a part of me and not even my out of bed height so there is 0% reason for me to claim 176cm especially since many 172cm guys claim 176cm ...I know a guy who is 170cm or so and on a dating profile he listed himself as 176cm even though he looks a lot shorter next to me .
if you guys want to go by night height thats your desicion but for me it is nonsense
------------------------------------------
I understand that tbh and I think in your case it's perfectly fine to say 177 cm. I think the discrepancy can come depending on how much an individual shrinks. And like you even said it does depend on the person as well as the activity level of the day, I completely agree. There are no hard and fast rules, just a general idea of how people shrink but based on your case I believe 177 cm is fine to say. I'm basically agreeing with you.
c-mo said on 8/May/16
yes and no ...it depends on the person and also the activity level of the day you know what I mean ? some will lose height quicker than others etc.
imo out of bed height and like 1 hour after is inflation but after that is claimable . I am 178.3 or when I get a lot of sleep like 10h+ 178.5cm fresh out of bed in the first 1-2 minutes ...after 1 hour I am 177.4cm or something around that . after 2-3 hours I am around the 177cm mark give or take 2 mm or so and I see no reason why I shouldnt claim this height ? even though I fall to 176.3 cm 5-6 hours after out of bed and fall to 176cm at night. several hours of a day I am 176.8 to 177.5cm range ...I mean come on
like I am 2.3 to 2.5 cm taller than 176cm out of bed and 2-3 hours after waking up I am 177cm so why should I claim my lowest ? what benefit does that bring to anybody lol ....especially since people guess me 180cm constantly and I have a higher than average eye level ....I mean the 177cm IS MY HEIGHT TOO in the end and a part of me and not even my out of bed height so there is 0% reason for me to claim 176cm especially since many 172cm guys claim 176cm ...I know a guy who is 170cm or so and on a dating profile he listed himself as 176cm even though he looks a lot shorter next to me .
if you guys want to go by night height thats your desicion but for me it is nonsense
------------------------------------------
I understand that tbh and I think in your case it's perfectly fine to say 177 cm. I think the discrepancy can come depending on how much an individual shrinks. And like you even said it does depend on the person as well as the activity level of the day, I completely agree. There are no hard and fast rules, just a general idea of how people shrink but based on your case I believe 177 cm is fine to say. I'm basically agreeing with you.
Celebheights 6'1.5"/187 CM said on 9/May/16
Out of bed: 6'0 1/4"
Before bed: 5'11 1/2"
5'11" is ridiculous.
Out of bed: 6'0 1/4"
Before bed: 5'11 1/2"
5'11" is ridiculous.
James said on 8/May/16
Rob, is 180 cm just below 5'11?
Editor Rob
Rob, is 180 cm just below 5'11?
Editor Rob yeah a little bit
CS said on 8/May/16
177-178 cm guy said on 7/May/16
Here's Leo next to Chadwick Boseman who is listed at 5'11.5" on this site:
Click Here
---------------------------------
Leonardo definitely fits his listing in that pic.
177-178 cm guy said on 7/May/16
Here's Leo next to Chadwick Boseman who is listed at 5'11.5" on this site:
Click Here
---------------------------------
Leonardo definitely fits his listing in that pic.
c-mo said on 8/May/16
CS said on 6/May/16
c-mo said on 5/May/16
yes I go by noon/lunchtime height mostly
I think early morning and also night heights are not the best options to be neither listed nor claimed . I neither see our out of bed height as the height we should claim nor the height we are at night after being awake for 13-14+ hours and having have done several activities like working/sports etc on top of it during the day
I give you an example . if you are 180.3cm out of bed , 179,2 cm being awake for 2-3 hours , 178.6cm after being awake 5-6 hours , 178cm flat at night .....then the height you should claim is 179cm ...NOT 178cm or 180cm
----------------------------------
I understand what you are saying. The only thing though is that typically your lunchtime/noon height is only a few mm or so more than your night height. Rob's posted a graph before demonstrating this, I think it honestly gives a great deal of validity to our night height. I do get what you are coming from though... I think we both can agree though that our early morning/out of bed height definitely is an inflation, like you said.
-------------------------------------------
yes and no ...it depends on the person and also the activity level of the day you know what I mean ? some will lose height quicker than others etc.
imo out of bed height and like 1 hour after is inflation but after that is claimable . I am 178.3 or when I get a lot of sleep like 10h+ 178.5cm fresh out of bed in the first 1-2 minutes ...after 1 hour I am 177.4cm or something around that . after 2-3 hours I am around the 177cm mark give or take 2 mm or so and I see no reason why I shouldnt claim this height ? even though I fall to 176.3 cm 5-6 hours after out of bed and fall to 176cm at night. several hours of a day I am 176.8 to 177.5cm range ...I mean come on
like I am 2.3 to 2.5 cm taller than 176cm out of bed and 2-3 hours after waking up I am 177cm so why should I claim my lowest ? what benefit does that bring to anybody lol ....especially since people guess me 180cm constantly and I have a higher than average eye level ....I mean the 177cm IS MY HEIGHT TOO in the end and a part of me and not even my out of bed height so there is 0% reason for me to claim 176cm especially since many 172cm guys claim 176cm ...I know a guy who is 170cm or so and on a dating profile he listed himself as 176cm even though he looks a lot shorter next to me .
if you guys want to go by night height thats your desicion but for me it is nonsense
CS said on 6/May/16
c-mo said on 5/May/16
yes I go by noon/lunchtime height mostly
I think early morning and also night heights are not the best options to be neither listed nor claimed . I neither see our out of bed height as the height we should claim nor the height we are at night after being awake for 13-14+ hours and having have done several activities like working/sports etc on top of it during the day
I give you an example . if you are 180.3cm out of bed , 179,2 cm being awake for 2-3 hours , 178.6cm after being awake 5-6 hours , 178cm flat at night .....then the height you should claim is 179cm ...NOT 178cm or 180cm
----------------------------------
I understand what you are saying. The only thing though is that typically your lunchtime/noon height is only a few mm or so more than your night height. Rob's posted a graph before demonstrating this, I think it honestly gives a great deal of validity to our night height. I do get what you are coming from though... I think we both can agree though that our early morning/out of bed height definitely is an inflation, like you said.
-------------------------------------------
yes and no ...it depends on the person and also the activity level of the day you know what I mean ? some will lose height quicker than others etc.
imo out of bed height and like 1 hour after is inflation but after that is claimable . I am 178.3 or when I get a lot of sleep like 10h+ 178.5cm fresh out of bed in the first 1-2 minutes ...after 1 hour I am 177.4cm or something around that . after 2-3 hours I am around the 177cm mark give or take 2 mm or so and I see no reason why I shouldnt claim this height ? even though I fall to 176.3 cm 5-6 hours after out of bed and fall to 176cm at night. several hours of a day I am 176.8 to 177.5cm range ...I mean come on
like I am 2.3 to 2.5 cm taller than 176cm out of bed and 2-3 hours after waking up I am 177cm so why should I claim my lowest ? what benefit does that bring to anybody lol ....especially since people guess me 180cm constantly and I have a higher than average eye level ....I mean the 177cm IS MY HEIGHT TOO in the end and a part of me and not even my out of bed height so there is 0% reason for me to claim 176cm especially since many 172cm guys claim 176cm ...I know a guy who is 170cm or so and on a dating profile he listed himself as 176cm even though he looks a lot shorter next to me .
if you guys want to go by night height thats your desicion but for me it is nonsense
truth said on 7/May/16
yeah 5ft11-5ft11.5 is more or less his range.
yeah 5ft11-5ft11.5 is more or less his range.
truth said on 7/May/16
@cmo/Dmeyer ah so now I understand how height is listed here, thanks guys.
@cmo/Dmeyer ah so now I understand how height is listed here, thanks guys.
177-178 cm guy said on 7/May/16
Here's Leo next to Chadwick Boseman who is listed at 5'11.5" on this site:
Click Here
Here's Leo next to Chadwick Boseman who is listed at 5'11.5" on this site:
Click Here
aaron zamora said on 7/May/16
Am I really the only one waiting for Leo to get downgraded?
Am I really the only one waiting for Leo to get downgraded?
CS said on 6/May/16
c-mo said on 5/May/16
yes I go by noon/lunchtime height mostly
I think early morning and also night heights are not the best options to be neither listed nor claimed . I neither see our out of bed height as the height we should claim nor the height we are at night after being awake for 13-14+ hours and having have done several activities like working/sports etc on top of it during the day
I give you an example . if you are 180.3cm out of bed , 179,2 cm being awake for 2-3 hours , 178.6cm after being awake 5-6 hours , 178cm flat at night .....then the height you should claim is 179cm ...NOT 178cm or 180cm
----------------------------------
I understand what you are saying. The only thing though is that typically your lunchtime/noon height is only a few mm or so more than your night height. Rob's posted a graph before demonstrating this, I think it honestly gives a great deal of validity to our night height. I do get what you are coming from though... I think we both can agree though that our early morning/out of bed height definitely is an inflation, like you said.
c-mo said on 5/May/16
yes I go by noon/lunchtime height mostly
I think early morning and also night heights are not the best options to be neither listed nor claimed . I neither see our out of bed height as the height we should claim nor the height we are at night after being awake for 13-14+ hours and having have done several activities like working/sports etc on top of it during the day
I give you an example . if you are 180.3cm out of bed , 179,2 cm being awake for 2-3 hours , 178.6cm after being awake 5-6 hours , 178cm flat at night .....then the height you should claim is 179cm ...NOT 178cm or 180cm
----------------------------------
I understand what you are saying. The only thing though is that typically your lunchtime/noon height is only a few mm or so more than your night height. Rob's posted a graph before demonstrating this, I think it honestly gives a great deal of validity to our night height. I do get what you are coming from though... I think we both can agree though that our early morning/out of bed height definitely is an inflation, like you said.
c-mo said on 5/May/16
CS said on 3/May/16
@c-mo when you state your estimates for people, are you thinking of their average height? Like the average of their night height and morning height.
--------------------------------
yes I go by noon/lunchtime height mostly
I think early morning and also night heights are not the best options to be neither listed nor claimed . I neither see our out of bed height as the height we should claim nor the height we are at night after being awake for 13-14+ hours and having have done several activities like working/sports etc on top of it during the day
I give you an example . if you are 180.3cm out of bed , 179,2 cm being awake for 2-3 hours , 178.6cm after being awake 5-6 hours , 178cm flat at night .....then the height you should claim is 179cm ...NOT 178cm or 180cm
CS said on 3/May/16
@c-mo when you state your estimates for people, are you thinking of their average height? Like the average of their night height and morning height.
--------------------------------
yes I go by noon/lunchtime height mostly
I think early morning and also night heights are not the best options to be neither listed nor claimed . I neither see our out of bed height as the height we should claim nor the height we are at night after being awake for 13-14+ hours and having have done several activities like working/sports etc on top of it during the day
I give you an example . if you are 180.3cm out of bed , 179,2 cm being awake for 2-3 hours , 178.6cm after being awake 5-6 hours , 178cm flat at night .....then the height you should claim is 179cm ...NOT 178cm or 180cm
Rick said on 5/May/16
He looks no more than 5'10 in wolf of wall street
He looks no more than 5'10 in wolf of wall street
CS said on 3/May/16
@c-mo when you state your estimates for people, are you thinking of their average height? Like the average of their night height and morning height.
@c-mo when you state your estimates for people, are you thinking of their average height? Like the average of their night height and morning height.
CS said on 3/May/16
Rob has said Leo's range is roughly 5'11" - 5'11.5" so there's no doubt in my mind he's somewhere in that zone. Of course he can sometimes appear shorter like dipping down below 5'11" and other times appearing taller like approaching 6'0" but everyone appears taller or shorter than they actually are at times. That's just how it is.
Rob has said Leo's range is roughly 5'11" - 5'11.5" so there's no doubt in my mind he's somewhere in that zone. Of course he can sometimes appear shorter like dipping down below 5'11" and other times appearing taller like approaching 6'0" but everyone appears taller or shorter than they actually are at times. That's just how it is.
James B said on 3/May/16
When will you give him 181cm rob?
Editor Rob
When will you give him 181cm rob?
Editor Rob by the time I do he might be shrinking ;)
c-mo said on 2/May/16
easy 182cm . maybe 183cm
I dont get people here who think he is 5'10
easy 182cm . maybe 183cm
I dont get people here who think he is 5'10
Original said on 26/Apr/16
5'11.25/5'11.5
5'11.25/5'11.5
Tommy said on 22/Apr/16
Funny how people are commenting about a man who will probably never get married or have any kids in his entire life
Funny how people are commenting about a man who will probably never get married or have any kids in his entire life
Dmeyer said on 17/Apr/16
At rampage with respect , if rob list him 5ft 11,5 181,6cm means rob think the absolute max possible is 182cm And absolute minimum 180,5cm so you could do an à b c , like 184/182cm 183,5/181,5cm And 183/181cm
At rampage with respect , if rob list him 5ft 11,5 181,6cm means rob think the absolute max possible is 182cm And absolute minimum 180,5cm so you could do an à b c , like 184/182cm 183,5/181,5cm And 183/181cm
Tommy said on 15/Apr/16
Rob, do you think his long hair makes him look taller?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think his long hair makes him look taller?
Editor Rob he brushes it back, but it doesn't have a lot of volume, so won't add that much.
TJE said on 15/Apr/16
@jtm
Because people slouch. It's just how it is. Most people aren't walking around at full height and Leo's no exception.
@jtm
Because people slouch. It's just how it is. Most people aren't walking around at full height and Leo's no exception.
Mat said on 14/Apr/16
Everyone here knows that by the end of 2016, Dicaprio will be downgraded to a 181 cm listing. He is going to be the most famous 181 guy in all of celebheights xD. It is just a matter of time really. I wonder if he will ever be downgraded to 180 though, cause he looks it sometimes... Anyway, 180 or 181, it's one of the two really, unless we measure him we won't know for sure. But we do know he is not 182 ;-)
Everyone here knows that by the end of 2016, Dicaprio will be downgraded to a 181 cm listing. He is going to be the most famous 181 guy in all of celebheights xD. It is just a matter of time really. I wonder if he will ever be downgraded to 180 though, cause he looks it sometimes... Anyway, 180 or 181, it's one of the two really, unless we measure him we won't know for sure. But we do know he is not 182 ;-)
Mat said on 14/Apr/16
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/16
Rob, where would Leo fit in?
A) 185cm/183cm
B) 184.5cm/182.5cm
C) 184cm/182cm
D) 183.5cm/181.5cm
E) 183cm/181cm
--------------------------------
Why are you doing this ABCD **** in every single page? Admin lists him at 5'11.5, which is a weak 182 cm, so why are you asking if he is 183 cm or 182.5? That's just a waste of time and stupid. If Admin thought Leo was 183 he would have listed him 6 feet even. The question is whether Dicaprio is in the 181-182 zone or the 180-181 zone or even -though less possible, in the 179-180 zone. Oh, and the average loss for above average heights is more 2.5 cm range than 2 cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/16
Rob, where would Leo fit in?
A) 185cm/183cm
B) 184.5cm/182.5cm
C) 184cm/182cm
D) 183.5cm/181.5cm
E) 183cm/181cm
--------------------------------
Why are you doing this ABCD **** in every single page? Admin lists him at 5'11.5, which is a weak 182 cm, so why are you asking if he is 183 cm or 182.5? That's just a waste of time and stupid. If Admin thought Leo was 183 he would have listed him 6 feet even. The question is whether Dicaprio is in the 181-182 zone or the 180-181 zone or even -though less possible, in the 179-180 zone. Oh, and the average loss for above average heights is more 2.5 cm range than 2 cm.
jtm said on 14/Apr/16
why is this slouching excuse used so often here?
why is this slouching excuse used so often here?
TJE said on 11/Apr/16
@Johno
In the wider shot, yes, but in Leo's closeup it's more 2 inches. When Leo picks his head up, Mario is looking straight into his nose indicating so.
Hence, Leo's a 5'11 range guy who frequently slouches; look at him with Matt Damon, Christopher Nolan, even Cate Blanchett on the top, who's a strong 5'8 in heels. He always looks 5'11 min
Better yet with 5'3 Martin Scorcese:
Click Here
Once you look into it more, you will realize that the 5'10 assessment is bogus.
Also, it's not those who "estimate higher" that go off topic. It's actually the opposite. In fact, most commenters that estimates higher are barraged with ad homs by other commenters. The site's riddled with such scenarios. You will also notice people who think every single celebrity wears 3 inch lifts populating the most popular pages. These people can get quite volatile if scrutinized.
In fact, you are amongst the people who both underestimate celebrities and veer off topic, albeit more levelheaded.
@Johno
In the wider shot, yes, but in Leo's closeup it's more 2 inches. When Leo picks his head up, Mario is looking straight into his nose indicating so.
Hence, Leo's a 5'11 range guy who frequently slouches; look at him with Matt Damon, Christopher Nolan, even Cate Blanchett on the top, who's a strong 5'8 in heels. He always looks 5'11 min
Better yet with 5'3 Martin Scorcese:
Click Here
Once you look into it more, you will realize that the 5'10 assessment is bogus.
Also, it's not those who "estimate higher" that go off topic. It's actually the opposite. In fact, most commenters that estimates higher are barraged with ad homs by other commenters. The site's riddled with such scenarios. You will also notice people who think every single celebrity wears 3 inch lifts populating the most popular pages. These people can get quite volatile if scrutinized.
In fact, you are amongst the people who both underestimate celebrities and veer off topic, albeit more levelheaded.
007 said on 11/Apr/16
Leonardo looks between 5'10.75" to 5'11.25"(180-181cm) with Jonah Hill( 5'6.25").
Click Here Click Here
Leonardo looks between 5'10.75" to 5'11.25"(180-181cm) with Jonah Hill( 5'6.25").
Click Here Click Here
Tommy said on 11/Apr/16
Rob, how much taller do you think he is next to Kate Winslet?
Editor Rob
Rob, how much taller do you think he is next to Kate Winslet?
Editor Rob typically she has worn heels when being seen with Leo, but when wearing heels I think leo looked roughly 3 or a bit more inches taller
Johno said on 10/Apr/16
TJE, i am just a commentator on here, policing is not my job. All my comments are here plain to see and you will notice that i don't initiate anything. Although, i do see some users ridiculing others in the aim to veer off topic and i hope others start to notice this pattern; it is mostly users that go for higher height estimates. As i said before, fixed user names would be ideal but i am fine as it is.
My post was not a rebuttal; it was just me posting content for other users to see and judge Leonardo's height ---- the content is pretty much on topic and it is not doctored by me thus, instead of ignoring it ---- simply click the link.
You will notice that Leonardo looks virtually the same height as Mario Lopez ...
TJE, i am just a commentator on here, policing is not my job. All my comments are here plain to see and you will notice that i don't initiate anything. Although, i do see some users ridiculing others in the aim to veer off topic and i hope others start to notice this pattern; it is mostly users that go for higher height estimates. As i said before, fixed user names would be ideal but i am fine as it is.
My post was not a rebuttal; it was just me posting content for other users to see and judge Leonardo's height ---- the content is pretty much on topic and it is not doctored by me thus, instead of ignoring it ---- simply click the link.
You will notice that Leonardo looks virtually the same height as Mario Lopez ...
truth said on 10/Apr/16
Mario Lopez is 5ft9 and he looks 2 inches shorter than Leo (eye level is at the tip of his nose). 5ft11 would be the fairest estimate imho.
Mario Lopez is 5ft9 and he looks 2 inches shorter than Leo (eye level is at the tip of his nose). 5ft11 would be the fairest estimate imho.
TJE said on 9/Apr/16
@Johno
Lol tf are you on about? You forget to take your meds this week? Please keep your conspiracy theories to yourself, mate.
Your hypocrisy is astounding since you go around this site constantly veering off subject and police other commenters in the same breath. Also, your follow up post only proves that you made your "rebuttal" out of pure insecurity.
You've essentially just trolled yourself. Congratulations. Goodbye now.
@Johno
Lol tf are you on about? You forget to take your meds this week? Please keep your conspiracy theories to yourself, mate.
Your hypocrisy is astounding since you go around this site constantly veering off subject and police other commenters in the same breath. Also, your follow up post only proves that you made your "rebuttal" out of pure insecurity.
You've essentially just trolled yourself. Congratulations. Goodbye now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/16
Rob, where would Leo fit in?
A) 185cm/183cm
B) 184.5cm/182.5cm
C) 184cm/182cm
D) 183.5cm/181.5cm
E) 183cm/181cm
Editor Rob
Rob, where would Leo fit in?
A) 185cm/183cm
B) 184.5cm/182.5cm
C) 184cm/182cm
D) 183.5cm/181.5cm
E) 183cm/181cm
Editor Rob I think ultimately D-E zone is where he might end up, the general consensus could fall around 5ft 11.25 overall.
Johno said on 7/Apr/16
Click Here
Here is an interview between Mario Lopez who is between 5'8.75-5'9 and Leonardo Dicaprio and it is glaringly obvious -------- they look the same height !
It is quite surprising that he looks the same height as a 5'8-range, 5'9 man and Mario tends to bend or duck his head often. He stands eye-to-eye to Dicaprio and thus me giving Leonardo a phantom 1-inch should reduce any possibility of error or under estimation.
Leonardo Dicaprio with my phantom 1-inch added to his height still does not look above 5'10 and you understand why his ex-girlfriend was insinuating that he was short but i don't consider 5'10 short in any capicity.
Mario Lopez 5'8-range, 5'9
Leonardo Dicaprio; looked the same height as Lopez plus Phantom inch is 5'10.
Click Here
Here is an interview between Mario Lopez who is between 5'8.75-5'9 and Leonardo Dicaprio and it is glaringly obvious -------- they look the same height !
It is quite surprising that he looks the same height as a 5'8-range, 5'9 man and Mario tends to bend or duck his head often. He stands eye-to-eye to Dicaprio and thus me giving Leonardo a phantom 1-inch should reduce any possibility of error or under estimation.
Leonardo Dicaprio with my phantom 1-inch added to his height still does not look above 5'10 and you understand why his ex-girlfriend was insinuating that he was short but i don't consider 5'10 short in any capicity.
Mario Lopez 5'8-range, 5'9
Leonardo Dicaprio; looked the same height as Lopez plus Phantom inch is 5'10.
Johno said on 7/Apr/16
TJE ----- is that some sort of condition. At times i believe Rob should actually fix usernames on here and that way you won't see all of a sudden multitude of comments on here from a single or dual source. By labelling me, "Height183" will not serve as a good deflection or pre-emptive defense against a possible counter accusation.
Although, with user names fixed, you will probably see a good slow down of these random correspondences to Rampage or his often conversations to himself; anyway .....
TJE ----- is that some sort of condition. At times i believe Rob should actually fix usernames on here and that way you won't see all of a sudden multitude of comments on here from a single or dual source. By labelling me, "Height183" will not serve as a good deflection or pre-emptive defense against a possible counter accusation.
Although, with user names fixed, you will probably see a good slow down of these random correspondences to Rampage or his often conversations to himself; anyway .....
Hasselbaink said on 7/Apr/16
If Tom Cruise is 5'7 then i can't see Dicaprio being 5'11.5 next to him in this photo Click Here What do you think?
If Tom Cruise is 5'7 then i can't see Dicaprio being 5'11.5 next to him in this photo Click Here What do you think?
TJE said on 6/Apr/16
@Rampage
Lmao Johno must be Height183 reincarnated.
Please go away Height183, we all know you have nothing of value to say on the subject matter.
@Rampage
Lmao Johno must be Height183 reincarnated.
Please go away Height183, we all know you have nothing of value to say on the subject matter.
Tommy said on 6/Apr/16
This 5'11.5 listing is the highest he can ever look
This 5'11.5 listing is the highest he can ever look
Johno said on 5/Apr/16
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Apr/16
Johno, what you like is to bully and denigrate other visitors to this site because their opinions differ to yours. In some ways, your as obnoxious and dislikable as Andrea
------------------------------------------------------------------
You are something else; it seems Andrea sounds like a smart individual and pretty reasonable and pleasant to me and so do many users who have perfectly valid opinions but honestly why cannot you let people have their own height opinions without bringing commentary on the person's supposed character into question? Keep it strictly height related? This is what i have increasingly noticed about height inflators, it is almost like they have a personal affiliation with the celebrity's height category. I do hope other users notice this set pattern; it is silly.
Keep the topics strictly about height and stop crying.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Apr/16
Johno, what you like is to bully and denigrate other visitors to this site because their opinions differ to yours. In some ways, your as obnoxious and dislikable as Andrea
------------------------------------------------------------------
You are something else; it seems Andrea sounds like a smart individual and pretty reasonable and pleasant to me and so do many users who have perfectly valid opinions but honestly why cannot you let people have their own height opinions without bringing commentary on the person's supposed character into question? Keep it strictly height related? This is what i have increasingly noticed about height inflators, it is almost like they have a personal affiliation with the celebrity's height category. I do hope other users notice this set pattern; it is silly.
Keep the topics strictly about height and stop crying.
Ricky said on 4/Apr/16
He looked 5ft11 range at visit Medan and Aceh Indonesia in march 2016
He looked 5ft11 range at visit Medan and Aceh Indonesia in march 2016
BT said on 4/Apr/16
@datguy: The votesy page currently has 30 (out of 66) people saying 5'11 and 17 saying 5'11.25, so yeah, most people would agree with you on that. It's been well documented over the years that he mostly does look nearer 5'11 than 5'11.5. I'm sure Rob will change the listing eventually ;)
@datguy: The votesy page currently has 30 (out of 66) people saying 5'11 and 17 saying 5'11.25, so yeah, most people would agree with you on that. It's been well documented over the years that he mostly does look nearer 5'11 than 5'11.5. I'm sure Rob will change the listing eventually ;)
datguy said on 3/Apr/16
leo appears 5'11-511.25 WAY more. than 5'11.5 he should get a downgrade rob he hardly ever appears this height and I'm sure most people here would agree with me
leo appears 5'11-511.25 WAY more. than 5'11.5 he should get a downgrade rob he hardly ever appears this height and I'm sure most people here would agree with me
CS said on 3/Apr/16
I never really thought about Leonardo's height until I found out about this website. Looking through a lot of photos of Leo and I have to say Rob's range of 5'11" - 5'11.5" is spot on. The shortest he can look IMO is 5'10.5" and the tallest is 6'0" so 5'11" - 5'11.5" is pretty accurate with 5'11.25" being the sweet spot perhaps.
I never really thought about Leonardo's height until I found out about this website. Looking through a lot of photos of Leo and I have to say Rob's range of 5'11" - 5'11.5" is spot on. The shortest he can look IMO is 5'10.5" and the tallest is 6'0" so 5'11" - 5'11.5" is pretty accurate with 5'11.25" being the sweet spot perhaps.
zaq said on 2/Apr/16
looks like he grew a bit since 19 when filming with depp looked to be 5'7-5'8 in that movie
looks like he grew a bit since 19 when filming with depp looked to be 5'7-5'8 in that movie
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Apr/16
Johno, what you like is to bully and denigrate other visitors to this site because their opinions differ to yours. In some ways, your as obnoxious and dislikable as Andrea
Johno, what you like is to bully and denigrate other visitors to this site because their opinions differ to yours. In some ways, your as obnoxious and dislikable as Andrea
Allen said on 1/Apr/16
Leo never wears lifts! And he is on the tall side as it seems. Looks from 178 to 182.
Leo never wears lifts! And he is on the tall side as it seems. Looks from 178 to 182.
Aaron Zamora said on 1/Apr/16
So far 5'11 (180) cm is what everyone think Leo measures. When will you downgrade him, Rob? That voting page has been there for a while already.
Editor Rob
So far 5'11 (180) cm is what everyone think Leo measures. When will you downgrade him, Rob? That voting page has been there for a while already.
Editor Rob I think it's worthwhile to keep that vote open for a long time to get more votes.
Aza said on 28/Mar/16
Rob has Kate Blanchett at 173 cm. Her shoes look to give 5 cm making her look 178cm. Think the listing is pretty close. Could argue for 181cm or 182 cm as am not 100% sure on his footwear.
Rob has Kate Blanchett at 173 cm. Her shoes look to give 5 cm making her look 178cm. Think the listing is pretty close. Could argue for 181cm or 182 cm as am not 100% sure on his footwear.
Mat said on 27/Mar/16
Click Here
Rob, how tall does Leo look here? 5'10.5?
Editor Rob
Click Here
Rob, how tall does Leo look here? 5'10.5?
Editor Rob with cooper he can look right on 5ft 11
Aaron zamora said on 26/Mar/16
Is there a chance of Leo being 5'10.75? Who do you think is taller him or Jake gyllenhal?
Is there a chance of Leo being 5'10.75? Who do you think is taller him or Jake gyllenhal?
Johno said on 26/Mar/16
End of discussion? What like end of thread for all time? The whole point of these threads is to discuss; tbere is no end to anything.
Are you insinuating that the 6'1 estimate at 16 as stated in this article is correct? What is he now ---- 6'2?
Alternatively, if you believe 5'11 is his lowest and i believe, a 5'10-range could be his lowest, then i would like my odds of being correct ----- i really, really like them.
End of discussion? What like end of thread for all time? The whole point of these threads is to discuss; tbere is no end to anything.
Are you insinuating that the 6'1 estimate at 16 as stated in this article is correct? What is he now ---- 6'2?
Alternatively, if you believe 5'11 is his lowest and i believe, a 5'10-range could be his lowest, then i would like my odds of being correct ----- i really, really like them.
Jeff said on 25/Mar/16
To me, the current listing fits him more than just 181cm
To me, the current listing fits him more than just 181cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Mar/16
Thank you!
End of discussion, Johno
Thank you!
End of discussion, Johno
Jeff said on 21/Mar/16
Rob, he's listed at 6'1 here, maybe you wanna add it to your description? :) Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, he's listed at 6'1 here, maybe you wanna add it to your description? :) Click Here
Editor Rob there's not really a need now, if he had claimed 6ft himself
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Mar/16
Rob, what are the chances of Leo measuring 5ft11 flat?
Editor Rob
Rob, what are the chances of Leo measuring 5ft11 flat?
Editor Rob I wouldn't put my house on it, but there is of course a chance.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Mar/16
Rob, how likely is 5ft10 flat for Leo and just under 6ft for Zane?
Editor Rob
Rob, how likely is 5ft10 flat for Leo and just under 6ft for Zane?
Editor Rob I think Zane could look above 6ft and DiCaprio sub 6ft nearer5ft 11...but I wouldn't want to argue only 5ft 10-10.5 for Leo, that doesn't add up as much as 5ft 11-11.5 range might.
TJE said on 20/Mar/16
This listing's held out for quite a while.
IMO Leo's a strong 181 guy when up straight. 181 right before bed. Maybe an irregular listing would suit him like 5'11.375 or 5'11.3-4.
Thoughts, Rob?
This listing's held out for quite a while.
IMO Leo's a strong 181 guy when up straight. 181 right before bed. Maybe an irregular listing would suit him like 5'11.375 or 5'11.3-4.
Thoughts, Rob?
Johno said on 14/Mar/16
@Alexmahone, you must be one of them career upgraders, there seem to be alot of them random ones on this board.
There are a couple of hundred celebrity heights and i only comment on a few of them and out of them few, only handful i am more then inch out and they happen to be the ones i take an interest in and they happen to be A+ listers; a majority of my estimates are within agreement of Rob's.
It seems to me your metric system is a bit out; 5'11.5-6'0 translates to more then 180cm ----- "Are you mad?"
Leo is no more then 5'10 at best, possibly 5'10.5 if yoi push it but near 6'0 as your probably insinuating? Come on now, i can't take you seriously.
Leo 5'10 average
Billy Zane 5'11.5-6'0
@Alexmahone, you must be one of them career upgraders, there seem to be alot of them random ones on this board.
There are a couple of hundred celebrity heights and i only comment on a few of them and out of them few, only handful i am more then inch out and they happen to be the ones i take an interest in and they happen to be A+ listers; a majority of my estimates are within agreement of Rob's.
It seems to me your metric system is a bit out; 5'11.5-6'0 translates to more then 180cm ----- "Are you mad?"
Leo is no more then 5'10 at best, possibly 5'10.5 if yoi push it but near 6'0 as your probably insinuating? Come on now, i can't take you seriously.
Leo 5'10 average
Billy Zane 5'11.5-6'0
AlexMahone said on 11/Mar/16
This Johno guy is the greatest downgrader ever in this board. He downgrades everyone with 4-5cm. No Johno DiCaprio is not 5'10. He's only 5'3". (Billy Zane is under 180cm? Are you mad?)
This Johno guy is the greatest downgrader ever in this board. He downgrades everyone with 4-5cm. No Johno DiCaprio is not 5'10. He's only 5'3". (Billy Zane is under 180cm? Are you mad?)
Tommy said on 8/Mar/16
Billy Zane can't be under 6'1 when he clearly looks taller than Leo.
Billy Zane can't be under 6'1 when he clearly looks taller than Leo.
Allie said on 7/Mar/16
Congrats on him for winning the Oscar! Although I don't think it should've been for the Revenant, it was long deserved none the less. Anyways, 181 cm's my bet.
Congrats on him for winning the Oscar! Although I don't think it should've been for the Revenant, it was long deserved none the less. Anyways, 181 cm's my bet.
120 said on 7/Mar/16
I think he could fit with 181 cm
I think he could fit with 181 cm
Jack Daniels said on 7/Mar/16
I think Leo is 5'11" maybe 5'11.25" in the morning. Many photos shows that.
I think Leo is 5'11" maybe 5'11.25" in the morning. Many photos shows that.
Around 5'9 said on 7/Mar/16
I think he's 2/3 of an inch under 6'0. Probably 180cm at night time. Great job winning Oscar Leo.
I think he's 2/3 of an inch under 6'0. Probably 180cm at night time. Great job winning Oscar Leo.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Mar/16
His claim is honest enough. He probably would be 6ft earlier in the day
His claim is honest enough. He probably would be 6ft earlier in the day
LOL2 said on 4/Mar/16
hollywood is crazy if 5'11 men are wearing lifts
hollywood is crazy if 5'11 men are wearing lifts
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Mar/16
Sorry Johno but those are all well off...DiCaprio is 5ft11 range, Zane is over 6ft and can look near 6ft1. Hardy is no less than 5ft9 and may very well be a fraction over it. Lopez is around 5ft9 also
Sorry Johno but those are all well off...DiCaprio is 5ft11 range, Zane is over 6ft and can look near 6ft1. Hardy is no less than 5ft9 and may very well be a fraction over it. Lopez is around 5ft9 also
Tommy said on 3/Mar/16
Rob, do you think he got taller after Titanic?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think he got taller after Titanic?
Editor Rob I wouldn't have thought so
Alex said on 3/Mar/16
I dont know, he looks the same height as 6'0( 183cm) Nick Diaz. Maybe 1 cm shorter, but not more.
I dont know, he looks the same height as 6'0( 183cm) Nick Diaz. Maybe 1 cm shorter, but not more.
Johno said on 3/Mar/16
@Rampage, whilst i agree with you on there being around 2 inches or so between Leonardo and Billy Zane; i do not agree on Billy Zane being 6'1 ----- it was quite evident by Mamun's pictures that Billy did not look more then 5'11.5-5'11.75 next to him thus, in comparison to Zane, making Leo look less then 5'10 next to him.
With Leonardo in the 5'11-range would make Mario Lopez most definently 5'10.5-5'11 and Hardy 5'10 and make him basically the same height as his co-star in Catch me if you can, Tom Hanks --------- Tom had a few inches on him. In all fairness, i would be quite surprised if he measured more then 5'10.
Tom Hanks 5'11-5'11.5
Hardy 5'8-5'8.5
Mario Lopez 5'8.75, 5'9
Billy Zane 5'11.5, 5'11.75 ------ 6'0?
Leonardo, not more then 5'10
@Rampage, whilst i agree with you on there being around 2 inches or so between Leonardo and Billy Zane; i do not agree on Billy Zane being 6'1 ----- it was quite evident by Mamun's pictures that Billy did not look more then 5'11.5-5'11.75 next to him thus, in comparison to Zane, making Leo look less then 5'10 next to him.
With Leonardo in the 5'11-range would make Mario Lopez most definently 5'10.5-5'11 and Hardy 5'10 and make him basically the same height as his co-star in Catch me if you can, Tom Hanks --------- Tom had a few inches on him. In all fairness, i would be quite surprised if he measured more then 5'10.
Tom Hanks 5'11-5'11.5
Hardy 5'8-5'8.5
Mario Lopez 5'8.75, 5'9
Billy Zane 5'11.5, 5'11.75 ------ 6'0?
Leonardo, not more then 5'10
Idk said on 1/Mar/16
Picture with the Diaz bros does a good job of showing you actual 6 footers next to Leo. Clear to see that there is more than .5 inches between them, more like 1.5
Picture with the Diaz bros does a good job of showing you actual 6 footers next to Leo. Clear to see that there is more than .5 inches between them, more like 1.5
Dmeyer said on 1/Mar/16
Hé is for sûre not 1mm under 180,3cm/5'11 in person because of solid 0,5in more shoes hé looked about 6ft hé is defenetly 6ft And change with normal 1in shoes on , the Guy isnt outside 5 ft 11-11,5 zone
Hé is for sûre not 1mm under 180,3cm/5'11 in person because of solid 0,5in more shoes hé looked about 6ft hé is defenetly 6ft And change with normal 1in shoes on , the Guy isnt outside 5 ft 11-11,5 zone
hijopotamus said on 1/Mar/16
Leo seems to be a 181-182 languid terrible sloucher.
Leo seems to be a 181-182 languid terrible sloucher.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Mar/16
You could argue a strong 5ft11 for Leo and a weak 6ft1 for Zane...
You could argue a strong 5ft11 for Leo and a weak 6ft1 for Zane...
Sean95 said on 29/Feb/16
On the votesy poll I tried to click 5'11.25 but it took 5'11 flat for some reason
On the votesy poll I tried to click 5'11.25 but it took 5'11 flat for some reason
Steve said on 29/Feb/16
I tried on some of the Titanic costumes in 1999, I was 177 cm and 82 kg or 5'9.5 and 180 lbs. I could barely fit into Billy Zane's costume let alone Leo's,both were super skinny, the only one that fit properly was the one for Bernard Hill (Captain Smith). Billy is probably just over 6 ft and was always taller than Leo in that Movie, something doesn't add up. Maybe he's counting the 2 inches of hair that's usually sticking up.
Click Here
I tried on some of the Titanic costumes in 1999, I was 177 cm and 82 kg or 5'9.5 and 180 lbs. I could barely fit into Billy Zane's costume let alone Leo's,both were super skinny, the only one that fit properly was the one for Bernard Hill (Captain Smith). Billy is probably just over 6 ft and was always taller than Leo in that Movie, something doesn't add up. Maybe he's counting the 2 inches of hair that's usually sticking up.
Click Here
Aaron zamora said on 29/Feb/16
Now that he won an Oscar I'm sure that his name on here is going to make up on the list. Congrats to Leo great actor. Well deserved.
Now that he won an Oscar I'm sure that his name on here is going to make up on the list. Congrats to Leo great actor. Well deserved.
Johno said on 27/Feb/16
Click Here
A snap of both Leonardo and Mario Lopez. I also watched their interview, their eyelines are roughly the same but Leo's forehead appears to larger, i can give Leo a 0.5-inches over Leo. Mario's footwear appear 0.25-inches thicker then Leo's, thus Leo may have 0.75-inches over Mario.
Rob has Mario at 5'9 thus, Leo appears 5'9.75 next to Mario.
I have Mario at 5'8.75, that makes Leo arouns 5'9.5 standing next to Mario.
However, alot of height users have Mario at the lower end of 5'8, this makes Leo appear no taller then 5'9 in comparison ----- Leo is not 5'9 but a 5'10 estimate would be fair. I can give a bit away and Leo would not appear more then 5'10 next to Mario. He also does not have 2-inches on Tom Hardy, betweem 1.5-2 inches; Hardy nearly always has normal flat shoes on [The man is confident in his own skin].
Mario 5'9, 5'8.75, 5'8-ranger
Leonardo 5'10/weak-5'10
Hardy 5'8-5'8.5
Click Here
A snap of both Leonardo and Mario Lopez. I also watched their interview, their eyelines are roughly the same but Leo's forehead appears to larger, i can give Leo a 0.5-inches over Leo. Mario's footwear appear 0.25-inches thicker then Leo's, thus Leo may have 0.75-inches over Mario.
Rob has Mario at 5'9 thus, Leo appears 5'9.75 next to Mario.
I have Mario at 5'8.75, that makes Leo arouns 5'9.5 standing next to Mario.
However, alot of height users have Mario at the lower end of 5'8, this makes Leo appear no taller then 5'9 in comparison ----- Leo is not 5'9 but a 5'10 estimate would be fair. I can give a bit away and Leo would not appear more then 5'10 next to Mario. He also does not have 2-inches on Tom Hardy, betweem 1.5-2 inches; Hardy nearly always has normal flat shoes on [The man is confident in his own skin].
Mario 5'9, 5'8.75, 5'8-ranger
Leonardo 5'10/weak-5'10
Hardy 5'8-5'8.5
184.3cm (Night) said on 26/Feb/16
I think him and Nolan could be both 5'11.25". He never looks 6 foot and a true 182cm guy can pull that off at times easily. I just can't buy 5'10 though, the pic right here with Blanchett puts that to bed.
I think him and Nolan could be both 5'11.25". He never looks 6 foot and a true 182cm guy can pull that off at times easily. I just can't buy 5'10 though, the pic right here with Blanchett puts that to bed.
ElDuderino said on 25/Feb/16
5'10 - 5'11 with mario lopez
5'10 - 5'11 with mario lopez
Aaron zamora said on 25/Feb/16
@dinny I don't think Nick is the full 6' but Leo does have a poor posture and Nick is fronter of the camera. I think his brother Nate would edge Nick out.
@dinny I don't think Nick is the full 6' but Leo does have a poor posture and Nick is fronter of the camera. I think his brother Nate would edge Nick out.
177-178 cm guy said on 25/Feb/16
@Johno Look at him with legit 5'11" Nolan and tell me he's shorter than 5'10":
Click Here
179-181cm is normally the range he looks.
@Johno Look at him with legit 5'11" Nolan and tell me he's shorter than 5'10":
Click Here
179-181cm is normally the range he looks.
ax said on 24/Feb/16
I met him a couple times. My friend dated him. 5'10". Interesting person.
I met him a couple times. My friend dated him. 5'10". Interesting person.
5'11 said on 24/Feb/16
Rob, doesn't he look like a solid 5'11" guy more often than 5'11.5"?
He rarely looks taller than Nolan who is listed at 5'11.25". In some pics, Nolan edges him out. You'd expect the opposite if Leo were a solid 5'11.5".
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, doesn't he look like a solid 5'11" guy more often than 5'11.5"?
He rarely looks taller than Nolan who is listed at 5'11.25". In some pics, Nolan edges him out. You'd expect the opposite if Leo were a solid 5'11.5".
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob I think his range can look anywhere over 5ft 11-11.5
Dinny said on 24/Feb/16
Leo is 5'10.75
Here is a picture to prove it: Click Here
Both of these guys are 6 ft. They are Nick Diaz and Nate Diaz. Leo looking 1.5 inches shorter with his hat on. It's time for a downgrade rob, please, the evidence is clearly there.
Leo is 5'10.75
Here is a picture to prove it: Click Here
Both of these guys are 6 ft. They are Nick Diaz and Nate Diaz. Leo looking 1.5 inches shorter with his hat on. It's time for a downgrade rob, please, the evidence is clearly there.
Dmeyer said on 24/Feb/16
I think he might be 181cm at his very low after à long day on his feet or after running and 181,5 on a good day , in person we might be à few mm of each other ,
I think he might be 181cm at his very low after à long day on his feet or after running and 181,5 on a good day , in person we might be à few mm of each other ,
Aaron zamora said on 22/Feb/16
Rob, how tall do you think Leo was in the titanic movie?
Editor Rob
Rob, how tall do you think Leo was in the titanic movie?
Editor Rob he could look 5ft 11-11.5 range, certainly no six footer
Len said on 22/Feb/16
Has never looked taller than 5'10".
Has never looked taller than 5'10".
James B said on 20/Feb/16
A true example of a legit 5'11 man. Actually just goes to show you that a 5'11 man can pull of looking tall since I don't think people realise what 5'11 really looks like in reality since 5'9.5 range guys claim it.
A true example of a legit 5'11 man. Actually just goes to show you that a 5'11 man can pull of looking tall since I don't think people realise what 5'11 really looks like in reality since 5'9.5 range guys claim it.
Len said on 19/Feb/16
Yet another 5'10" actor who claims 6'.
Seems to be a very common thing. Is 6' magical or something?
Yet another 5'10" actor who claims 6'.
Seems to be a very common thing. Is 6' magical or something?
MaskDeMasque said on 17/Feb/16
If Leo is 5'11.5, then Hardy needs an upgrade to 5'9.5. Personally i can see 5'9 maybe 5'9.25 for Hardy and 5'11 maybe 5'11.25 for Leo.
If Leo is 5'11.5, then Hardy needs an upgrade to 5'9.5. Personally i can see 5'9 maybe 5'9.25 for Hardy and 5'11 maybe 5'11.25 for Leo.
Mat said on 17/Feb/16
@177-178 cm guy
Damon is a weak 5'10
@177-178 cm guy
Damon is a weak 5'10
Johno said on 17/Feb/16
@177-178 cm, yes with a 5'10 Matt Damon he can look 5'11, with a 5'11 Matt Damon he would look like 6'0 but that is if the difference is 1-inch between.
The difference looks more rather 0.5-0.75 inches thus, with a 5'10 Matt Damon he can look 5'10.5-5'10.75. With a 5'11 Matt Damon he can look 5'11.5-5'11.75 -------- however ....
With a 5'9.5 Matt Damon he can look 5'10-5'10.75. With a 5'9 Matt Damon he can look 5'9.5-5'9.75. With a 5'8-range Matt Damon ????? Let us just say he does not look above 5'10.
He never had an inch on Jamie Foxx in Django but who knows ---- Foxx maybe 5'10? Or 5'10.5? Certainly then Leo would be 5'11. However, most agree Foxx is 5'9 so i am afraid 5'10 sounds like the best option.
Leo 5'10 tops [Tops !!!]
@177-178 cm, yes with a 5'10 Matt Damon he can look 5'11, with a 5'11 Matt Damon he would look like 6'0 but that is if the difference is 1-inch between.
The difference looks more rather 0.5-0.75 inches thus, with a 5'10 Matt Damon he can look 5'10.5-5'10.75. With a 5'11 Matt Damon he can look 5'11.5-5'11.75 -------- however ....
With a 5'9.5 Matt Damon he can look 5'10-5'10.75. With a 5'9 Matt Damon he can look 5'9.5-5'9.75. With a 5'8-range Matt Damon ????? Let us just say he does not look above 5'10.
He never had an inch on Jamie Foxx in Django but who knows ---- Foxx maybe 5'10? Or 5'10.5? Certainly then Leo would be 5'11. However, most agree Foxx is 5'9 so i am afraid 5'10 sounds like the best option.
Leo 5'10 tops [Tops !!!]
Jeff said on 17/Feb/16
He looks more than a flat 5'11 most of the time. 182cm is spot on
He looks more than a flat 5'11 most of the time. 182cm is spot on
amaterasu said on 16/Feb/16
Rob, majority is thinking that he is 5'11" flat, but I found this Click Here and here he is looking no less than 182cm if Billy Zane is indeed 184cm. So maybe he doesn't dip below 5'11.5" mark.
Editor Rob
Rob, majority is thinking that he is 5'11" flat, but I found this Click Here and here he is looking no less than 182cm if Billy Zane is indeed 184cm. So maybe he doesn't dip below 5'11.5" mark.
Editor Rob at times he pulls off 182, then in other photos doesn't look outwith 180-181cm range...ultimately he may well end up 181cm.
177-178 cm guy said on 16/Feb/16
@Johno Here's a group picture of him next to Matt Damon and Mark Wahlberg. If Damon is 5'10" then Leo is at least 5'11":
Click Here
@Johno Here's a group picture of him next to Matt Damon and Mark Wahlberg. If Damon is 5'10" then Leo is at least 5'11":
Click Here
NBAer said on 15/Feb/16
With 175 Hardy,Leo looks about 180-181
With 175-176 Jamie Foxx(aka Django),he still looks about 180 minimum
So,imo Dicaprio is a guy who would measure in the 180-181cm range evening time barefoot,meaning:closer to 180 at his lowest,and maybe closer to 181 at his normal low height.In other words,Leonardo Dicaprio is a legit 5'11 guy on the worst case scenario...
With 175 Hardy,Leo looks about 180-181
With 175-176 Jamie Foxx(aka Django),he still looks about 180 minimum
So,imo Dicaprio is a guy who would measure in the 180-181cm range evening time barefoot,meaning:closer to 180 at his lowest,and maybe closer to 181 at his normal low height.In other words,Leonardo Dicaprio is a legit 5'11 guy on the worst case scenario...
Jeff said on 15/Feb/16
Dicaprio generally looks anywhere between 1 to 2 inches taller than director Innaritu: Click Here Click Here He can also look 3 inches taller on some occasions. My bet is 5'11.5 as listed. He doesn't have Pitt and Cruise's posture and can also look 6ft quite a fair bit when he stands straight
Editor Rob
Dicaprio generally looks anywhere between 1 to 2 inches taller than director Innaritu: Click Here Click Here He can also look 3 inches taller on some occasions. My bet is 5'11.5 as listed. He doesn't have Pitt and Cruise's posture and can also look 6ft quite a fair bit when he stands straight
Editor Rob the ongoing visitor opinion seems to be 5ft 11-11.25...which is a range he can look. 5ft 11.5 is probably the top end of a range for him.
Johno said on 14/Feb/16
The fact that he looked exactly the same height as Mario Lopez is rather worrying for Leo.
When i state 5'10, i am being pretty open. I certainly would not state this height for a $64,000 question if i was only allowed to be 0.25 inches out ---- my estimate would be a bit less optimistic in that scenario.
5'10 [Don't be surprised if happens to be lower]
The fact that he looked exactly the same height as Mario Lopez is rather worrying for Leo.
When i state 5'10, i am being pretty open. I certainly would not state this height for a $64,000 question if i was only allowed to be 0.25 inches out ---- my estimate would be a bit less optimistic in that scenario.
5'10 [Don't be surprised if happens to be lower]
177-178 cm guy said on 11/Feb/16
Whoops I meant Johno. My bad
Whoops I meant Johno. My bad
177-178 cm guy said on 11/Feb/16
@S.J.H I highly doubt Leo is 5'10" max. The shortest he has looked is 5'10.5" and most of the time he seems to be 5'11".
@S.J.H I highly doubt Leo is 5'10" max. The shortest he has looked is 5'10.5" and most of the time he seems to be 5'11".
S.J.H said on 10/Feb/16
Honestly Leo is no way taller than 5'11 and this is the max 2inches he look taller than a legit 5'9 joseph gordon levitt and sometimes they even look 1.5" strong in height difference. Lowest 179cm and max 180cm for Leo
Honestly Leo is no way taller than 5'11 and this is the max 2inches he look taller than a legit 5'9 joseph gordon levitt and sometimes they even look 1.5" strong in height difference. Lowest 179cm and max 180cm for Leo
Mat said on 9/Feb/16
Rob, has Dicaprio ever looked under 5'11 to you?
Editor Rob
Rob, has Dicaprio ever looked under 5'11 to you?
Editor Rob anybody at times can appear shorter/taller, so sometimes you can see him looking maybe barely 5ft 11.
Dmeyer said on 9/Feb/16
Looks 3in on sly easy
Looks 3in on sly easy
Johno said on 8/Feb/16
On the contrary, the movie Django was an excellent movie to make height comparisons between Foxx and Leonardo, they both had on Western Boots and both looked similar in height.
In the promos, in some events, Leo was a few inches taller then Foxx and Walts and that was rather silly, but in some dress events Foxx looked taller. Foxx is not a short man, strong 5'9. Leo is not a short man, probably one of the tallest average-normal men but not tall --- a legit 5'11 is tall. That 5'10 height that reporter gave Leo was probably fair and certainly don't believe he is taller then this, he is probably shorter still.
Jamie Foxx strong 5'9
Leo Max 5'10
On the contrary, the movie Django was an excellent movie to make height comparisons between Foxx and Leonardo, they both had on Western Boots and both looked similar in height.
In the promos, in some events, Leo was a few inches taller then Foxx and Walts and that was rather silly, but in some dress events Foxx looked taller. Foxx is not a short man, strong 5'9. Leo is not a short man, probably one of the tallest average-normal men but not tall --- a legit 5'11 is tall. That 5'10 height that reporter gave Leo was probably fair and certainly don't believe he is taller then this, he is probably shorter still.
Jamie Foxx strong 5'9
Leo Max 5'10
Allie said on 7/Feb/16
Does Leo really look 182 cm with Toni Garrn who claims 6'0 herself?
I think he's a solid 181.
Does Leo really look 182 cm with Toni Garrn who claims 6'0 herself?
I think he's a solid 181.
Johno said on 6/Feb/16
Leonardo is not one of the tall guys. With Jamie Foxx, the one where he has lifts on he can look near 2 inches taller. Alot of the pictures they look the same height and at times Jamie Foxx the taller one.
In Django, they were all wearing cowboy boots including Leonardo and Leonardo was exactly the same height as Jamie Foxx.
Jamie Foxx is 5'9.
Leonardo is not one of the tall guys. With Jamie Foxx, the one where he has lifts on he can look near 2 inches taller. Alot of the pictures they look the same height and at times Jamie Foxx the taller one.
In Django, they were all wearing cowboy boots including Leonardo and Leonardo was exactly the same height as Jamie Foxx.
Jamie Foxx is 5'9.
Da Vinci said on 5/Feb/16
Why does everyone loathe Leo's height? He's a solid 182 cm but nobody seems to want to accept that lol
Why does everyone loathe Leo's height? He's a solid 182 cm but nobody seems to want to accept that lol
Moke said on 4/Feb/16
Offtopic, but
-How old is that picture? Looks very young to me.
Offtopic, but
-How old is that picture? Looks very young to me.
BT said on 3/Feb/16
@5ft 9.25: I did not. I have seen enough pictures of Leo with either of them, standing side by side, to see that he does not look 4.5in taller than Waltz or 2.5in taller than Foxx. Heck, a bunch of them has already been posted several times. I have seen this picture posted before, and I have posted it once already myself, but it seems like people overlook it, so I will post it again: Click Here Scroll further down the page and have a look at the full body shots of Leo with 5'9 Hardy and 6'2 Poulter as well. He looks 5'11 flat more often than near 5'11.5. 5'11.25 is an ok shout, he could well measure near that, but I would not argue he was 5'11.5 when Hardy and Foxx claim 5'9 and Waltz claims 5'7 - it does not match up.
@5ft 9.25: I did not. I have seen enough pictures of Leo with either of them, standing side by side, to see that he does not look 4.5in taller than Waltz or 2.5in taller than Foxx. Heck, a bunch of them has already been posted several times. I have seen this picture posted before, and I have posted it once already myself, but it seems like people overlook it, so I will post it again: Click Here Scroll further down the page and have a look at the full body shots of Leo with 5'9 Hardy and 6'2 Poulter as well. He looks 5'11 flat more often than near 5'11.5. 5'11.25 is an ok shout, he could well measure near that, but I would not argue he was 5'11.5 when Hardy and Foxx claim 5'9 and Waltz claims 5'7 - it does not match up.
Dmeyer said on 3/Feb/16
To me it isnt hard to see 6cm taller than 175cm hardy
To me it isnt hard to see 6cm taller than 175cm hardy
5ft 9.25 said on 2/Feb/16
@BT
If you argue based on the movie "Django unchained" you're off. Camera angle and footwear deceived you.
IMO evening heights:
DiCaprio 5'11.25
Foxx 5'9
Waltz 5'6.75
But personally I think DiCaprio would edge out Cumberbatch so I'm still happy with 5ft 11.5
@BT
If you argue based on the movie "Django unchained" you're off. Camera angle and footwear deceived you.
IMO evening heights:
DiCaprio 5'11.25
Foxx 5'9
Waltz 5'6.75
But personally I think DiCaprio would edge out Cumberbatch so I'm still happy with 5ft 11.5
5ft 9.25 said on 2/Feb/16
I would downgrade Leo. 181cms should be a fair evening height for him.
I would downgrade Leo. 181cms should be a fair evening height for him.
177-178 cm guy said on 1/Feb/16
Hey Rob. Would you say that this is just a two inch difference or a little bit more?:
Click Here
Editor Rob
Hey Rob. Would you say that this is just a two inch difference or a little bit more?:
Click Here
Editor Rob it can be 2 inch range, more if he has looser posture.
Mat said on 1/Feb/16
Rob, what do you think of the difference between Poulter and Dicpario?
Click Here
Click Here
I feel Dicaprio is 181 cm
Editor Rob
Rob, what do you think of the difference between Poulter and Dicpario?
Click Here
Click Here
I feel Dicaprio is 181 cm
Editor Rob he can look near 3 inches shorter
BT said on 31/Jan/16
@Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM: So Jamie Foxx claims 5'9 but is really 5'10, and Christoph Waltz claims 5'7 but is really 5'8? DiCaprio looks at best 2 inches taller than Foxx and 4 inches taller than Waltz, so the 183 over 180 cm argument is pointless. He's most likely around 5'11 flat or a tad over, and that's not "wanting him to be shorter" (@Sean), that's just what he looks.
@Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM: So Jamie Foxx claims 5'9 but is really 5'10, and Christoph Waltz claims 5'7 but is really 5'8? DiCaprio looks at best 2 inches taller than Foxx and 4 inches taller than Waltz, so the 183 over 180 cm argument is pointless. He's most likely around 5'11 flat or a tad over, and that's not "wanting him to be shorter" (@Sean), that's just what he looks.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 30/Jan/16
I would guess that he's 183 CM over 180 CM (I'm not saying that he's either by the way). 182 CM is definitely fair for him.
I would guess that he's 183 CM over 180 CM (I'm not saying that he's either by the way). 182 CM is definitely fair for him.
Sean said on 30/Jan/16
Everyone, stop wanting him to be shorter so that you guys feel better about yourselves. Leo is a man who's above average height and get over it!
Everyone, stop wanting him to be shorter so that you guys feel better about yourselves. Leo is a man who's above average height and get over it!
John said on 29/Jan/16
More like 181cm rather than 182 or 183 for Dicaprio.
More like 181cm rather than 182 or 183 for Dicaprio.
Idk said on 29/Jan/16
He is 180 and hardy is 174-175
He is 180 and hardy is 174-175
Alessandro said on 28/Jan/16
In the "Wolf of Wallstreet" he stays right on the spot (maybe half an inch under) of 6', although with high shoes.
Barefoot i think that he is no more than 5'10.75/11 in the morning (:
In the "Wolf of Wallstreet" he stays right on the spot (maybe half an inch under) of 6', although with high shoes.
Barefoot i think that he is no more than 5'10.75/11 in the morning (:
tk said on 28/Jan/16
I think that most of the times, he seems a bit over 5'11''. My guess is close to Rob's, at 5'11.25 - 5.11.5''
I think that most of the times, he seems a bit over 5'11''. My guess is close to Rob's, at 5'11.25 - 5.11.5''
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.