Add a Comment2649 comments
Average Guess (807 Votes)
5ft 11.23in (180.9cm)
5ft 11.23in (180.9cm)
berta said on 28/Jan/16
if he is 180 then hardy is 173
if he is 180 then hardy is 173
TJE said on 27/Jan/16
There's honestly no need for the poll. Ad populum isn't much of a reason to change a listing; we're better off just discussing it on here.
There's honestly no need for the poll. Ad populum isn't much of a reason to change a listing; we're better off just discussing it on here.
ElDuderino said on 27/Jan/16
Yeah he definitely looks a full inch shorter than Garrn
Yeah he definitely looks a full inch shorter than Garrn
Aaron zamora said on 27/Jan/16
Rob, how long will you keep the voting open for Leonardo's height? So far 5'11 is the winner it has a total of 55% don't you think that it's time for a downgrade?
Editor Rob
Rob, how long will you keep the voting open for Leonardo's height? So far 5'11 is the winner it has a total of 55% don't you think that it's time for a downgrade?
Editor Rob I might put a link to it at the top and let it run a while.
Allie said on 26/Jan/16
180-181 cm. Toni G destroys those 6ft claims haha.
180-181 cm. Toni G destroys those 6ft claims haha.
Mat said on 26/Jan/16
Rob, how much is the visual diffrence with Blanchet in the pic? She should be 5'11 in the pic with those heels. If Dicaprio is wearing lifts I think it can be explained.
Is this a 1.5 inch or 2 inch difference? If it's 1.5 difference then a case can be made for 5'11.25 for Dicaprio (if he is not in lifts), and that's if his shoe gives 1.25 in. Unless she is not 5'8.25 and she is a flat 5'8 as she claimed. What do you think Rob?
@Dmeyer no way that's a flat shoe he is wearing, it's about an inch definitely.
Editor Rob
Rob, how much is the visual diffrence with Blanchet in the pic? She should be 5'11 in the pic with those heels. If Dicaprio is wearing lifts I think it can be explained.
Is this a 1.5 inch or 2 inch difference? If it's 1.5 difference then a case can be made for 5'11.25 for Dicaprio (if he is not in lifts), and that's if his shoe gives 1.25 in. Unless she is not 5'8.25 and she is a flat 5'8 as she claimed. What do you think Rob?
@Dmeyer no way that's a flat shoe he is wearing, it's about an inch definitely.
Editor Rob maybe in 1.25-1.5 range,there's probably almost 2 inches in footwear difference.
Dmeyer said on 26/Jan/16
5 ft 11 and change get called 6'1 in the us a lot , 5'10.5-11 claim 6ft usualy , the worst lyers are extras on movie sets on average 1.5in round up , guys 6ft and up usualy are honest enaugh
5 ft 11 and change get called 6'1 in the us a lot , 5'10.5-11 claim 6ft usualy , the worst lyers are extras on movie sets on average 1.5in round up , guys 6ft and up usualy are honest enaugh
Editor Rob said on 26/Jan/16
Saw him described over 6ft in one article (Telegraph)
"When the 16-year-old DiCaprio - by now 6ft 1in after a sudden growth spurt"
Saw him described over 6ft in one article (Telegraph)
"When the 16-year-old DiCaprio - by now 6ft 1in after a sudden growth spurt"
Dmeyer said on 26/Jan/16
even if they give just 2.5in she is 5'11 with the shoe he has to be a bit over 6ft wearing flat shoes so about 5'11.5
even if they give just 2.5in she is 5'11 with the shoe he has to be a bit over 6ft wearing flat shoes so about 5'11.5
Mat said on 24/Jan/16
Rob, how much do Blanchet's heels give in the picture above? Less than 3 inches? If they are 3 inches, then only 5'11 would be hard to argue for him.
Editor Rob
Rob, how much do Blanchet's heels give in the picture above? Less than 3 inches? If they are 3 inches, then only 5'11 would be hard to argue for him.
Editor Rob I'd say in 2.8-3 range.
Mat said on 23/Jan/16
Rob, you mentioned that Leo wore lifts in the Aviator? How do you know? Do you think there's a possibility he generally wears a small lift and he is 5'10 range in reality?
Editor Rob
Rob, you mentioned that Leo wore lifts in the Aviator? How do you know? Do you think there's a possibility he generally wears a small lift and he is 5'10 range in reality?
Editor Rob he told Big G he had special shoes!
Dmeyer said on 23/Jan/16
he walked by me and from the lidl i saw he cant be outside 5'11-11.5 range
he walked by me and from the lidl i saw he cant be outside 5'11-11.5 range
guest said on 22/Jan/16
I'm looking for that WOWS mugshot pic with the height chart. It was in the movie and the pic was mentioned on here. They could place the chart at any level they wanted. I don't see though why they'd make him shorter in it at all because he was tall in the rest of the film.
I'm looking for that WOWS mugshot pic with the height chart. It was in the movie and the pic was mentioned on here. They could place the chart at any level they wanted. I don't see though why they'd make him shorter in it at all because he was tall in the rest of the film.
datguy said on 21/Jan/16
Paul he looked shorter because Jon Bernthal had the footwear advantage...
Paul he looked shorter because Jon Bernthal had the footwear advantage...
The Exorcist said on 21/Jan/16
Might be a bit bold of me here, but I put the The Wolf of Wall Street as Di Caprio's best movie, and possibly Scorsese's best movie also. It's at least as good as Goodfellas and Casino for me. Excellent movie!
Anyways, he's 5'11" minimum, 5'11.5" maximum. 5'11.25" would be a safe call.
Might be a bit bold of me here, but I put the The Wolf of Wall Street as Di Caprio's best movie, and possibly Scorsese's best movie also. It's at least as good as Goodfellas and Casino for me. Excellent movie!
Anyways, he's 5'11" minimum, 5'11.5" maximum. 5'11.25" would be a safe call.
Paul said on 20/Jan/16
@datguy
How can a 181cm guy be shorter than a 180cm (5'11) guy?? Unless you don't know how to convert centimeters and inches, your explanation makes no sense.
@datguy
How can a 181cm guy be shorter than a 180cm (5'11) guy?? Unless you don't know how to convert centimeters and inches, your explanation makes no sense.
Arch Stanton said on 20/Jan/16
Rob I don't know if you want to ADD The Revenant. An excellent film. The problem with Leo is that he's really so on top of the Hollywood machine that almost eveyr year now an Oscar nominated film appears and there's only so many films you can mention haha! You could probably replace Shutter Island or something with The Revenant as it is Oscar nominated.
Rob I don't know if you want to ADD The Revenant. An excellent film. The problem with Leo is that he's really so on top of the Hollywood machine that almost eveyr year now an Oscar nominated film appears and there's only so many films you can mention haha! You could probably replace Shutter Island or something with The Revenant as it is Oscar nominated.
amaterasu said on 20/Jan/16
Come on Rob, you know that 5'11.25" is calling you ! He is exactly same height with Nolan, and you have Nolan here at 181cm.
Come on Rob, you know that 5'11.25" is calling you ! He is exactly same height with Nolan, and you have Nolan here at 181cm.
Dmeyer said on 19/Jan/16
5ft 11.5 at noon 5'11.25 night a solid 181cm weak 182cm
5ft 11.5 at noon 5'11.25 night a solid 181cm weak 182cm
datguy said on 19/Jan/16
Seems 181 cm to me. He was shorter than Jon Bernthal (listed at 5'11) in The Wolf Of Wall Street and doesn't look much more than over 2 inches taller than Tom Hardy.
Seems 181 cm to me. He was shorter than Jon Bernthal (listed at 5'11) in The Wolf Of Wall Street and doesn't look much more than over 2 inches taller than Tom Hardy.
John said on 18/Jan/16
There js a scene in Wolf of Wallstreet where he is literally standing next to a height chart after being arrested. He is wearing a full suit and is therefore in shoes. His shoes arent shown unfortunately.
He is exactly 6ft in this shot. He cannot be taller than 6ft based on this evidence and is therefore 178cm to 180cm range unless he is wearing lifts or extremely thin soled shoes. He is slightly taller than average in height and certainly not a short guy.
There js a scene in Wolf of Wallstreet where he is literally standing next to a height chart after being arrested. He is wearing a full suit and is therefore in shoes. His shoes arent shown unfortunately.
He is exactly 6ft in this shot. He cannot be taller than 6ft based on this evidence and is therefore 178cm to 180cm range unless he is wearing lifts or extremely thin soled shoes. He is slightly taller than average in height and certainly not a short guy.
Sean said on 16/Jan/16
5'11 flat. Not more or less
5'11 flat. Not more or less
Mat said on 16/Jan/16
Editor Rob: yes he can look about 5ft 11 there, domnhall is looking taller than he has in the past with good posture there.
You mean Poulter :p
So, since Dicaprio looks 5'11, mind adjusting his height a bit? Also, Inaritu who does look 1.5 in shorter than Dicaprio in their pics, has always footwear disadvantage over Leo. Maybe you should check it out yourself. Poulter is not over 6'2 by the way.
Editor Rob
Editor Rob: yes he can look about 5ft 11 there, domnhall is looking taller than he has in the past with good posture there.
You mean Poulter :p
So, since Dicaprio looks 5'11, mind adjusting his height a bit? Also, Inaritu who does look 1.5 in shorter than Dicaprio in their pics, has always footwear disadvantage over Leo. Maybe you should check it out yourself. Poulter is not over 6'2 by the way.
Editor Rob I mean Domnhall, I think he can look under 6ft 1 at times
Grant said on 16/Jan/16
Nevermind I was getting domhall confused with will poulter
Nevermind I was getting domhall confused with will poulter
Grant said on 16/Jan/16
Looking at the picture with domhall, they both seem to be standing up straight, could domhall be 6'2.5?
Looking at the picture with domhall, they both seem to be standing up straight, could domhall be 6'2.5?
Mat said on 16/Jan/16
Click Here Rob, isn't that a 3 inch difference?
Editor Rob
Click Here Rob, isn't that a 3 inch difference?
Editor Rob yes he can look about 5ft 11 there, domnhall is looking taller than he has in the past with good posture there.
Elduderino said on 14/Jan/16
Looks about 5'11 in Shutter Island next to Ruffako
Looks about 5'11 in Shutter Island next to Ruffako
The Exorcist said on 13/Jan/16
@HeightObsession: I saw Leo's wax figure at Madame Tussauds in D.C, and it was six-foot for sure. But don't take any wax figure's height as a genuine representation of a celebrity's true height as they're almost all wrong. You will see this if you google images of celebrities with their waxworks. Most of them are shorter.
I do agree that Leo is 5'11", maybe 5'11.25". But that is solely on judging photos...the ones which are good for judging height.
@HeightObsession: I saw Leo's wax figure at Madame Tussauds in D.C, and it was six-foot for sure. But don't take any wax figure's height as a genuine representation of a celebrity's true height as they're almost all wrong. You will see this if you google images of celebrities with their waxworks. Most of them are shorter.
I do agree that Leo is 5'11", maybe 5'11.25". But that is solely on judging photos...the ones which are good for judging height.
Mat said on 13/Jan/16
Rob, how tall would Innaritu be? over or under 5'10? He is listed 184 on the net. Mind making a page?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, how tall would Innaritu be? over or under 5'10? He is listed 184 on the net. Mind making a page?
Click Here
Editor Rob 5ft 10 range is probably reasonable.
jtm said on 13/Jan/16
inarritu is probably 177cm and dicaprio doesn't even look a full inch taller.
inarritu is probably 177cm and dicaprio doesn't even look a full inch taller.
HeightObsession said on 12/Jan/16
Leo is not 5'11.5. My boyfriend is definitely exactly 5'11.5. He stood next to him at Madame Tussauds London and he was about a half inch or less shorter than my boyfriend at about the same heel height. I would give Leo 5'11.25 the most but I think 5'11 is the most accurate.
Leo is not 5'11.5. My boyfriend is definitely exactly 5'11.5. He stood next to him at Madame Tussauds London and he was about a half inch or less shorter than my boyfriend at about the same heel height. I would give Leo 5'11.25 the most but I think 5'11 is the most accurate.
TJE said on 12/Jan/16
Alejandro González looks 2 cm shorter than Leo. I reckon he's 179 range.
Alejandro González looks 2 cm shorter than Leo. I reckon he's 179 range.
James B said on 12/Jan/16
Claiming 6ft and 'being' 6ft are 2 different things
Claiming 6ft and 'being' 6ft are 2 different things
Mat said on 11/Jan/16
Rob, he has greatposture right? I've never seen him slouching. Do you think he is height aware?
Editor Rob
Rob, he has greatposture right? I've never seen him slouching. Do you think he is height aware?
Editor Rob at times he does, but sometimes he isn't standing as great like a pitt or cruise would.
bodwaya said on 11/Jan/16
ROb at the golden globes he looked taller then the director of Reverent who claims hes 6 foot.
Editor Rob
ROb at the golden globes he looked taller then the director of Reverent who claims hes 6 foot.
Editor Rob I doubt the director is that tall, he'll be sub six foot for certain.
whoa said on 10/Jan/16
181 tops. Maybe when he was younger he appeared taller as he was so thin. He looks 179 now. The tall girlfriends dont help
181 tops. Maybe when he was younger he appeared taller as he was so thin. He looks 179 now. The tall girlfriends dont help
BT said on 10/Jan/16
@Editor Rob: Don't you think it's time to change Leo's listing to 5'11.25 if not 5'11? He has always looked like a typical 5'11 guy. I can see a case for 5'11.25, but he's obviously not 5'11.5 at his low. He's 2 inches taller than self-proclaimed 5'9 guys Jamie Foxx and Tom Hardy, and 4 inches taller than self-proclaimed 5'7 Christoph Waltz, at least that trumps almost all other evidence for me...
Click Here
Click Here
@Editor Rob: Don't you think it's time to change Leo's listing to 5'11.25 if not 5'11? He has always looked like a typical 5'11 guy. I can see a case for 5'11.25, but he's obviously not 5'11.5 at his low. He's 2 inches taller than self-proclaimed 5'9 guys Jamie Foxx and Tom Hardy, and 4 inches taller than self-proclaimed 5'7 Christoph Waltz, at least that trumps almost all other evidence for me...
Click Here
Click Here
Dejavu said on 9/Jan/16
I think Leo is 181-182.
I think Leo is 181-182.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jan/16
He was at least 2in on Tom Hardy...gotta be in the 5ft11 range
He was at least 2in on Tom Hardy...gotta be in the 5ft11 range
jtm said on 3/Jan/16
still think he's 5'10.
still think he's 5'10.
177-178 cm guy said on 1/Jan/16
At least bring him down to 5'11.25" Rob. He really doesn't look any taller than 5'11" most of the time.
At least bring him down to 5'11.25" Rob. He really doesn't look any taller than 5'11" most of the time.
gian92 said on 31/Dec/15
not over 5'11 near Tom Hardy
not over 5'11 near Tom Hardy
cole said on 25/Dec/15
Nothing over 5'11 flat if Tom Hardy is 5'9 flat.
Nothing over 5'11 flat if Tom Hardy is 5'9 flat.
Johno said on 24/Dec/15
As the journalist described him, 5'10.
As the journalist described him, 5'10.
MD said on 23/Dec/15
With 5'9" Tom Hardy:
Click Here
He's always been closer to 5'11" flat than halfway to 6'0".
With 5'9" Tom Hardy:
Click Here
He's always been closer to 5'11" flat than halfway to 6'0".
176.2 cm (5ft 9.37in) said on 22/Dec/15
Can accept his claim (out of bed). In the evening/night he is probably nearer to a flat 5'11 than 5'11.5.
Personally I prefer honest celebs.. A good example is Pierce Brosnans who adds 6ft 2 'on a good day'..
Can accept his claim (out of bed). In the evening/night he is probably nearer to a flat 5'11 than 5'11.5.
Personally I prefer honest celebs.. A good example is Pierce Brosnans who adds 6ft 2 'on a good day'..
Kati said on 20/Dec/15
I happened upon the Revenant premiere and Leo looked normal height to me (5'9"-10") which is right because his "actor height" is 6'0". That's a formula we use in LA and take off 3 inches. Those photos of Tom Hardy and the ones from the event I attended confuse me because he looked teeny tiny. I'm 5'3" he didn't seem that much bigger.
I happened upon the Revenant premiere and Leo looked normal height to me (5'9"-10") which is right because his "actor height" is 6'0". That's a formula we use in LA and take off 3 inches. Those photos of Tom Hardy and the ones from the event I attended confuse me because he looked teeny tiny. I'm 5'3" he didn't seem that much bigger.
S.J.H said on 18/Dec/15
Theres some camera angle make leo taller than modest 5'11 christopher nolan. In atually fact leo is more like 5'10.75 or 5'11
Theres some camera angle make leo taller than modest 5'11 christopher nolan. In atually fact leo is more like 5'10.75 or 5'11
ElDuderino said on 16/Dec/15
Is 5'11.5 his mid day height or his height before bed?
Is 5'11.5 his mid day height or his height before bed?
Dmeyer said on 13/Dec/15
Hardy has à air max 95 that gives near 1,4in 2,5cm so 1cm 2,5cm shoes leo is wearing so leo is about 6cm taller 181-2cm
Hardy has à air max 95 that gives near 1,4in 2,5cm so 1cm 2,5cm shoes leo is wearing so leo is about 6cm taller 181-2cm
MaskDeMasque said on 11/Dec/15
In those photos, Leo is 2 inches taller. He's 5'11.
In those photos, Leo is 2 inches taller. He's 5'11.
amaterasu said on 10/Dec/15
Don't forget that Tom is wearing sport sneakers, and because of the body weight the sole is compressing. While Leo is wearing dress shoes with a solid heel, so Tom doesn't really have any footwear advantage.
Don't forget that Tom is wearing sport sneakers, and because of the body weight the sole is compressing. While Leo is wearing dress shoes with a solid heel, so Tom doesn't really have any footwear advantage.
Nam said on 9/Dec/15
@Carl B if you look at the shoes Tom Hardy's wearing, they give him a bit of extra height.
@Carl B if you look at the shoes Tom Hardy's wearing, they give him a bit of extra height.
176.2 cm (5ft 9.37in) said on 8/Dec/15
@Carl B
Lifts and downgrade Leo half of an inch and we know why..
@Carl B
Lifts and downgrade Leo half of an inch and we know why..
Carl B said on 7/Dec/15
Can anyone explain these pics of Leo and 5'9'' Tom Hardy? I thought they were interesting.
Click Here
Can anyone explain these pics of Leo and 5'9'' Tom Hardy? I thought they were interesting.
Click Here
BT said on 17/Nov/15
@Rampage: 5'11.5 is 181.6 cm, which technically is nearer 182 than 181 cm. I don't think DiCaprio would measure nearer 182 than 181 cm though. Somewhere between 180 and 181 looks quite possible.
@Rampage: 5'11.5 is 181.6 cm, which technically is nearer 182 than 181 cm. I don't think DiCaprio would measure nearer 182 than 181 cm though. Somewhere between 180 and 181 looks quite possible.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Nov/15
"Leonardo DiCaprio's Height is 5ft 11⅜in (181.292cm)"
Brushes 5ft11½ (which technically is not 182cm but about 3mm below it). Can also look barely 5ft11 (5ft10⅞) at times.
"Leonardo DiCaprio's Height is 5ft 11⅜in (181.292cm)"
Brushes 5ft11½ (which technically is not 182cm but about 3mm below it). Can also look barely 5ft11 (5ft10⅞) at times.
dmeyer said on 11/Nov/15
I agree at 5'11.5 i am usualy taller than all kids under 14 also women and taller than a lot of older men , thats huge amount of people
I agree at 5'11.5 i am usualy taller than all kids under 14 also women and taller than a lot of older men , thats huge amount of people
James B said on 9/Nov/15
said on 3/Oct/15
Rob I'm 5'11.5 it seems I'm taller then most people so I would say my height perfect
[Editor Rob: it's above average, so really you shouldn't have any feelings of shortness through life, nor much worry about height.]
No feelings of shortness at 5'11.5 in life? not sure if i agree with that, i mean go to some of my local bars and I think you would feel on the short side at 182cm amongst some since this weekend I must have seen 3 or more guys who were close to or on 6'5 at my local.
Editor Rob
said on 3/Oct/15
Rob I'm 5'11.5 it seems I'm taller then most people so I would say my height perfect
[Editor Rob: it's above average, so really you shouldn't have any feelings of shortness through life, nor much worry about height.]
No feelings of shortness at 5'11.5 in life? not sure if i agree with that, i mean go to some of my local bars and I think you would feel on the short side at 182cm amongst some since this weekend I must have seen 3 or more guys who were close to or on 6'5 at my local.
Editor Rob relatively speaking - the amount of times you will feel short should be incomparable to the amount of times you blend in as being above average when nearly 6ft.
And you will be taller than 99% of women and 99% of kids 13 and under...that's a massive chunk of the public.
And you will be taller than 99% of women and 99% of kids 13 and under...that's a massive chunk of the public.
dmeyer said on 28/Oct/15
i agree in france average is 5 ft 9.25 and when i am wearing 1-1.25 in shoes and am 6 ft 0.5or a lidl more i feel on the tall side also in america people 20-50 are about 5 ft 9.5-10 in so at 5 ft 11.5 is decently above average , of course people 18-30 are nearer 5 ft 10-10.5 and then 5 ft 11.5 is barely 1-1.5in above
i agree in france average is 5 ft 9.25 and when i am wearing 1-1.25 in shoes and am 6 ft 0.5or a lidl more i feel on the tall side also in america people 20-50 are about 5 ft 9.5-10 in so at 5 ft 11.5 is decently above average , of course people 18-30 are nearer 5 ft 10-10.5 and then 5 ft 11.5 is barely 1-1.5in above
Anonymous Height Researcher said on 27/Oct/15
Gx79 said on 3/Oct/15
Rob I'm 5'11.5 it seems I'm taller then most people so I would say my height perfect
[Editor Rob: it's above average, so really you shouldn't have any feelings of shortness through life, nor much worry about height.]
Actually these 5'9 statistics were taken from 1950's and 1960's army census where the average person was 5'9 roughly and 160 pounds, now the average is 200 LB and 6 Feet tall rob.
Editor Rob
Gx79 said on 3/Oct/15
Rob I'm 5'11.5 it seems I'm taller then most people so I would say my height perfect
[Editor Rob: it's above average, so really you shouldn't have any feelings of shortness through life, nor much worry about height.]
Actually these 5'9 statistics were taken from 1950's and 1960's army census where the average person was 5'9 roughly and 160 pounds, now the average is 200 LB and 6 Feet tall rob.
Editor Rob In the UK the average is still 5ft 9, it's not increased much and neither has it in America.
Spencer said on 26/Oct/15
5'11.5 morning..5'11-5'11.25 for the majority of the day I think. 181 cm
5'11.5 morning..5'11-5'11.25 for the majority of the day I think. 181 cm
Filippo said on 17/Oct/15
How can he be listed this tall when he is clearly a few cms shorter than Toni garrn?! She is listed from 5'10 to 6'. So, her maximum height is 183, and I'm not even considering the fact the all the model agencies lie about measurements. Leo is 1.80 on the dot as his absolute maximum. More likely a shade under that mark.
How can he be listed this tall when he is clearly a few cms shorter than Toni garrn?! She is listed from 5'10 to 6'. So, her maximum height is 183, and I'm not even considering the fact the all the model agencies lie about measurements. Leo is 1.80 on the dot as his absolute maximum. More likely a shade under that mark.
Idk said on 15/Oct/15
Lol he is not 6'1. Strong 5'11
Lol he is not 6'1. Strong 5'11
Spencer said on 13/Oct/15
I think he's more 5'11 than 6 feet. Hanks looked near an inch taller in Catch me If you Can and Hanks looks 6 even.
I think he's more 5'11 than 6 feet. Hanks looked near an inch taller in Catch me If you Can and Hanks looks 6 even.
Gx79 said on 3/Oct/15
Rob I'm 5'11.5 it seems I'm taller then most people so I would say my height perfect
Editor Rob
Rob I'm 5'11.5 it seems I'm taller then most people so I would say my height perfect
Editor Rob it's above average, so really you shouldn't have any feelings of shortness through life, nor much worry about height.
Gregor said on 29/Sep/15
Looks 5'11.75
Looks 5'11.75
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Sep/15
5ft11½(182cm) is still a fair guess. He can pull off looking the full 6ft at times.
5ft11½(182cm) is still a fair guess. He can pull off looking the full 6ft at times.
BT said on 15/Sep/15
Personally if I were to be arguing 5'11.5, it would only be because of his tendency to not stand his best at all times. Other than that I'd say 5'11 flat looks nearer the mark. Perhaps that's why he's listed 5'11.5, because there is that doubt about his posture at times.
Personally if I were to be arguing 5'11.5, it would only be because of his tendency to not stand his best at all times. Other than that I'd say 5'11 flat looks nearer the mark. Perhaps that's why he's listed 5'11.5, because there is that doubt about his posture at times.
Joanna said on 15/Sep/15
Leo is 6'1,but he slouches terribly.That's why he looks shorter.He needs to straighten out his back.
Leo is 6'1,but he slouches terribly.That's why he looks shorter.He needs to straighten out his back.
Jon said on 15/Sep/15
Rob, thank you for your response! Btw, just not to be groundless, below attached I copy a picture which proves that Leo - just like almost anyone and anything out there - is around 180 cm mark. Here, next to his girlfriend, Toni, who is a legit 6' model:
Click Here
It is beyond any doubt she is at least 2-3 cm taller than he is.
Best regards and thank you again, Rob, for this awesome site!
Rob, thank you for your response! Btw, just not to be groundless, below attached I copy a picture which proves that Leo - just like almost anyone and anything out there - is around 180 cm mark. Here, next to his girlfriend, Toni, who is a legit 6' model:
Click Here
It is beyond any doubt she is at least 2-3 cm taller than he is.
Best regards and thank you again, Rob, for this awesome site!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Sep/15
Rob, how likely is 5ft11 flat?
Editor Rob
Rob, how likely is 5ft11 flat?
Editor Rob you could argue that mark, 5ft 11 up to 11.5 is all arguable, sometimes he looks anywhere over that range.
dmeyer said on 9/Sep/15
Can look anywere 5'11-11.75
Can look anywere 5'11-11.75
Jon said on 7/Sep/15
The difference on every single picture between Toni and Leo is an inch, at least. This would put Leo on a 5'11'' mark he most often looks. Admin, don't you think it's high time to downgrade Leo to 180/1 cm mark? Seriously, there's no evidence to show he is 182 cm when next to a legit 183 Toni he is at least 3 cm shorter.
Editor Rob
The difference on every single picture between Toni and Leo is an inch, at least. This would put Leo on a 5'11'' mark he most often looks. Admin, don't you think it's high time to downgrade Leo to 180/1 cm mark? Seriously, there's no evidence to show he is 182 cm when next to a legit 183 Toni he is at least 3 cm shorter.
Editor Rob I've said for a few years 181cm for Leo is very arguable, 5ft 11.25 may ultimately be the best fit.
Jake: 1.84 m- 1.85 m said on 5/Sep/15
I really believe 5ft 11.5in is a good listing for Di Caprio.
I really believe 5ft 11.5in is a good listing for Di Caprio.
Betty said on 31/Aug/15
He is tall he is almost 6'0 so not bad
He is tall he is almost 6'0 so not bad
Allie said on 26/Aug/15
Man, Toni G's actually 183cm tall. Look at her with Karlie Kloss. Whose a legit 6'1er. And she's taller than 5'11 Karolina Kurkova.
Man, Toni G's actually 183cm tall. Look at her with Karlie Kloss. Whose a legit 6'1er. And she's taller than 5'11 Karolina Kurkova.
Emil 182-183 cm said on 24/Aug/15
Toni is in similar height to Leo. Don't really know why she's listed taller.
Toni is in similar height to Leo. Don't really know why she's listed taller.
177-178 cm guy said on 19/Aug/15
177 cm is too low. He doesn't look anything under 5'11 next to Chris Tucker and Nolan.
177 cm is too low. He doesn't look anything under 5'11 next to Chris Tucker and Nolan.
Ali said on 16/Aug/15
177cm max. Gisele Bundchen is 177 cm tall and Di Caprio about the same height. Why 182cm rob? Real height + 2 inches hollywood height?
177cm max. Gisele Bundchen is 177 cm tall and Di Caprio about the same height. Why 182cm rob? Real height + 2 inches hollywood height?
man said on 14/Aug/15
Toni Garrn is listed 181cm so Leo is 176cm
Toni Garrn is listed 181cm so Leo is 176cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Aug/15
More than 50% of legit 5ft11 guys will claim 6ft.
It's purely an ego thing.
More than 50% of legit 5ft11 guys will claim 6ft.
It's purely an ego thing.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Aug/15
More than 50% of legit 5ft11 guys will claim 6ft.
It's an ego thing.
More than 50% of legit 5ft11 guys will claim 6ft.
It's an ego thing.
Gx79 said on 3/Aug/15
Rob would u say 5'11.5 is a good height for a man or short or what would u say the perfect height is fore
A male
Editor Rob
Rob would u say 5'11.5 is a good height for a man or short or what would u say the perfect height is fore
A male
Editor Rob gx, I think there are heights that are desired by men who are short or average. They would like to be 6ft, 6ft 1 or 2...some men who dream of basketball or nfl careers might have desired heights taller, like 6ft 3 or 6ft 7!
ova said on 30/Jul/15
need a downgrade. Leo is a legit 181cm. If he is 182 than Toni Garrn is 185cm. And Toni says she is 183cm
need a downgrade. Leo is a legit 181cm. If he is 182 than Toni Garrn is 185cm. And Toni says she is 183cm
cup1 said on 27/Jul/15
what do you think was high in titanic ?
what do you think was high in titanic ?
Gx79 said on 16/Jul/15
Rob it seem 5'11.5 guy can pull off 6'1 sometimes
Editor Rob
Rob it seem 5'11.5 guy can pull off 6'1 sometimes
Editor Rob anybody has the potential to look taller/shorter than their actual height. Photographs/positions/posture can sometimes account for 1-2 inches difference. I've seen it many times myself, someone looking shorter or taller in a photo than they really are up close.
177-178 cm guy said on 28/Jun/15
Good find Jakertini. Here another picture of him and Tarantino and Foxx. Both him an Jamie seem to be in similar sneakers.
Click Here
Take away the hat and that's at least two inches.
And here he is with Christopher Nolan who us listed at 5'11" everywhere and the both look the same height:
Click Here
Leo is 5'11" and nothing more.
Good find Jakertini. Here another picture of him and Tarantino and Foxx. Both him an Jamie seem to be in similar sneakers.
Click Here
Take away the hat and that's at least two inches.
And here he is with Christopher Nolan who us listed at 5'11" everywhere and the both look the same height:
Click Here
Leo is 5'11" and nothing more.
real height said on 22/Jun/15
Click Here
He's not 182 cm
Di caprio ---> 5ft11 (180cm)or somewhere between 5ft10/5ft11 (179)
Jean Dujardin --> 5ft11 (180cm) exactly
Click Here
He's not 182 cm
Di caprio ---> 5ft11 (180cm)or somewhere between 5ft10/5ft11 (179)
Jean Dujardin --> 5ft11 (180cm) exactly
youssef 5'8 said on 22/Jun/15
All the people i know thought he's short when i asked them most remember him for titanic and i thought he's short too max 5'9 and i don't think that a 5'11 guy would give that impression of a small guy i'm shocked to see this listing
All the people i know thought he's short when i asked them most remember him for titanic and i thought he's short too max 5'9 and i don't think that a 5'11 guy would give that impression of a small guy i'm shocked to see this listing
5'11Stud said on 19/Jun/15
Dicaprio's height definitely fluctuates between 5'11 -> 5'9.5.
Assuming Erin Heatherton is 5'9.5 (average between 5'9 and 5'10).
Pics with Erin Heatherton:
Pic on flat surface (Leo has shoe advantage ~1inch): Click Here
Pic on beach (Leo has sandal advantage ~.5inch): Click Here
My current theory is there is a smaller interval of height loss when his weight is low.
I've noticed that too with myself, where not only will I accumulate some height over the days
but also notice a smaller loss of height each day.
Me (low weight 8% BF): 5'11.5in -> 5' 11in
Me (heavy): 5'11in -> 5'10in
Seems there is compound gain/loss with each consecutive day from my observations.
Dicaprio's height definitely fluctuates between 5'11 -> 5'9.5.
Assuming Erin Heatherton is 5'9.5 (average between 5'9 and 5'10).
Pics with Erin Heatherton:
Pic on flat surface (Leo has shoe advantage ~1inch): Click Here
Pic on beach (Leo has sandal advantage ~.5inch): Click Here
My current theory is there is a smaller interval of height loss when his weight is low.
I've noticed that too with myself, where not only will I accumulate some height over the days
but also notice a smaller loss of height each day.
Me (low weight 8% BF): 5'11.5in -> 5' 11in
Me (heavy): 5'11in -> 5'10in
Seems there is compound gain/loss with each consecutive day from my observations.
rockitbaby said on 19/Jun/15
Rob, just put Leo as a 1,81 legit. It sounds fine by me. NO WAY he grewp after Titanic, at 23.
Rob, just put Leo as a 1,81 legit. It sounds fine by me. NO WAY he grewp after Titanic, at 23.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jun/15
181cm at the end of the day is possible.
181cm at the end of the day is possible.
Danimal said on 16/Jun/15
5'11" guy and 6'0" in shoes.
5'11" guy and 6'0" in shoes.
an anonymous peach said on 13/Jun/15
All evidence shows that Leo is a flat 5' 11" guy. He is clearly a solid inch shorter than Edward Norton who we know is a genuine 6 footer and Leo meaured 6 foot or possibly even a smidge less on a height chart with shoes on.
I think the absolute highest he can measure barefooted is 5' 11.25/181cm
All evidence shows that Leo is a flat 5' 11" guy. He is clearly a solid inch shorter than Edward Norton who we know is a genuine 6 footer and Leo meaured 6 foot or possibly even a smidge less on a height chart with shoes on.
I think the absolute highest he can measure barefooted is 5' 11.25/181cm
an anonymous peach said on 13/Jun/15
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM says on 10/Jun/15
His height at 18=5'7.5"
19-5'9"
20-5'9.5"
21-5'10.5"
22-23-5'11.25"
24+=5'11.75"
Do really think he grew after Titanic? I always thought he looked like a 5' 10" guy in that movie.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM says on 10/Jun/15
His height at 18=5'7.5"
19-5'9"
20-5'9.5"
21-5'10.5"
22-23-5'11.25"
24+=5'11.75"
Do really think he grew after Titanic? I always thought he looked like a 5' 10" guy in that movie.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 10/Jun/15
His height at 18=5'7.5"
19-5'9"
20-5'9.5"
21-5'10.5"
22-23-5'11.25"
24+=5'11.75"
His height at 18=5'7.5"
19-5'9"
20-5'9.5"
21-5'10.5"
22-23-5'11.25"
24+=5'11.75"
an anonymous peach said on 22/May/15
When do you reckon he stopped growing Rob? He seemed like a late bloomer to me.
Editor Rob
When do you reckon he stopped growing Rob? He seemed like a late bloomer to me.
Editor Rob 19-20 he could have got that other inch...
192 Scandinavian said on 21/May/15
Leonardo is between 5'11 and 6'. Heck NO under 180. He is 181.6, I bet!
My friend, who is 184cm, has interviewed him for a several times and says the first time he saw him walking to reporters, he looked taller than they've thinked he'd be. He's over 180 but little bit shorter than my friend. Once he had sneakers, he told. And still rather tallish. The pic with Norton, who is about 184, stands straighter and Leo leans forward.
Leonardo is between 5'11 and 6'. Heck NO under 180. He is 181.6, I bet!
My friend, who is 184cm, has interviewed him for a several times and says the first time he saw him walking to reporters, he looked taller than they've thinked he'd be. He's over 180 but little bit shorter than my friend. Once he had sneakers, he told. And still rather tallish. The pic with Norton, who is about 184, stands straighter and Leo leans forward.
JJF said on 20/May/15
Agreed. 180-181cm seems bang on.
Always looks 5'11" in pics where he is not dressed up for the occasion - ie. when he wears normal shoes and isn't 'prepared'...
Agreed. 180-181cm seems bang on.
Always looks 5'11" in pics where he is not dressed up for the occasion - ie. when he wears normal shoes and isn't 'prepared'...
177-178 cm guy said on 18/May/15
5'9" is waaay to low for Leo. That would make Billy Zane 5'10.5 and Tom Hanks 5'10". He is bang on 5'11". It's what he pretty much always looks.
5'9" is waaay to low for Leo. That would make Billy Zane 5'10.5 and Tom Hanks 5'10". He is bang on 5'11". It's what he pretty much always looks.
rockitbaby said on 14/May/15
Leo is shorter than Norton, who's 1,83m. And not just 1cm. He's the classic 5'11.
Leo is shorter than Norton, who's 1,83m. And not just 1cm. He's the classic 5'11.
fish said on 12/May/15
shib 175 ?? you must be out of your mind.
i think dicaprio is closer to 6 feet than 5'11"
he is indeed a tallish guy.
shib 175 ?? you must be out of your mind.
i think dicaprio is closer to 6 feet than 5'11"
he is indeed a tallish guy.
shib said on 8/May/15
175 to 178
175 to 178
perfect height man said on 5/May/15
I'm a tiny bit over 5"11.25' and I could clearly recognize he is the same exact height as me. I told someone that and they got mad at me saying Leo is 6'+.
Looking at some pictures here, he seems to have a lot better posture than me, I seem to slouch and yet most people say they'd believe it if I said I was 6 foot.
If you ask me, my height and his is perfect for a man, but he ain't 6 foot and nothing wrong with that.
I'm a tiny bit over 5"11.25' and I could clearly recognize he is the same exact height as me. I told someone that and they got mad at me saying Leo is 6'+.
Looking at some pictures here, he seems to have a lot better posture than me, I seem to slouch and yet most people say they'd believe it if I said I was 6 foot.
If you ask me, my height and his is perfect for a man, but he ain't 6 foot and nothing wrong with that.
b-mint1994 said on 30/Apr/15
Here are some good pics of Leo and Nolan. Both seem to be wearing similar shoes:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
If Nolan is indeed 5'11.25 then Leo is as well.
Here are some good pics of Leo and Nolan. Both seem to be wearing similar shoes:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
If Nolan is indeed 5'11.25 then Leo is as well.
177-178 cm guy said on 28/Apr/15
I find it funny that Gisele Bundchen was implying that Leo was shorter or the same height as her, when in most pictures Leo looks taller than her.
I find it funny that Gisele Bundchen was implying that Leo was shorter or the same height as her, when in most pictures Leo looks taller than her.
Marc said on 26/Apr/15
Rob do you think his height increased a little bit even after his 18. I've seen some pictures and at that age he looked like a 13-14 years old guy. I'm pretty sure he had late growth spurt. Before 18 and on his 18 birthday i think he could have been 5'10, after 18 he have reached the 5'11.5 level. Chris brown is a similar example. what do you think??
Editor Rob
Rob do you think his height increased a little bit even after his 18. I've seen some pictures and at that age he looked like a 13-14 years old guy. I'm pretty sure he had late growth spurt. Before 18 and on his 18 birthday i think he could have been 5'10, after 18 he have reached the 5'11.5 level. Chris brown is a similar example. what do you think??
Editor Rob yes around 18-19 he might have got another bit of growth.
Chron540 said on 21/Apr/15
Even though, He's pretty tall for a guy in his appearance.
Even though, He's pretty tall for a guy in his appearance.
Chron540 said on 20/Apr/15
Rob, you think 181 cm might've been possible. he might've looked close to that.
Rob, you think 181 cm might've been possible. he might've looked close to that.
177-178 cm guy said on 11/Apr/15
He pretty much looks just 5'11" in everything I've seen him in. This half-an-inch seems like too much. Quarter of an inch is possible though.
He pretty much looks just 5'11" in everything I've seen him in. This half-an-inch seems like too much. Quarter of an inch is possible though.
rockitbaby said on 6/Apr/15
Agree with Robbie. He's shorter than Garrn indeed and Levitt is 1,76m, Leo isn't that much taller than him.
And this is him next to Edward Norton, who's a legit 6'0. Shorter.
Click Here
Agree with Robbie. He's shorter than Garrn indeed and Levitt is 1,76m, Leo isn't that much taller than him.
And this is him next to Edward Norton, who's a legit 6'0. Shorter.
Click Here
Robbie said on 5/Apr/15
Leo looks a lot more 5'11 than 6'. But, occasionally he looks to be quite tall. But, I think he is actually around 180. Because if you look at pics of tobey maguire and Leo on the great gatsby set. You can see that the height difference definitely isnt as large as it seems on promotional events and premieres. So, I think this guy is 180.
Click Here
Click Here
These pics speak for themself. Albeit Tobey does have a slight footwear advantage. There is no way that Leo has more than 8cms taller.
Then, there is the case with his girlfriend Toni Garrn. No matter what, he looks to be at least 2-3 cmss shorter than her, and sometimes can look a bit more. Finally, with rockitbaby, he does reach 1.82-1.83, with shoes. What does that say for him being without shoes?
Click Here
This is inception and it does not look like the picture was altered. Leo looks around 3 cms taller than JGL and has all types of advantage on him.
Finally, with Jon Bernthal he looked to be exactly the same height in the wolf of wall street, maybe a cm on him, on a good day.
What are your thoughts on this Rob? Also, why can he sometimes look quite tall at premieres. Is he a lift wearer, or something.
Leo looks a lot more 5'11 than 6'. But, occasionally he looks to be quite tall. But, I think he is actually around 180. Because if you look at pics of tobey maguire and Leo on the great gatsby set. You can see that the height difference definitely isnt as large as it seems on promotional events and premieres. So, I think this guy is 180.
Click Here
Click Here
These pics speak for themself. Albeit Tobey does have a slight footwear advantage. There is no way that Leo has more than 8cms taller.
Then, there is the case with his girlfriend Toni Garrn. No matter what, he looks to be at least 2-3 cmss shorter than her, and sometimes can look a bit more. Finally, with rockitbaby, he does reach 1.82-1.83, with shoes. What does that say for him being without shoes?
Click Here
This is inception and it does not look like the picture was altered. Leo looks around 3 cms taller than JGL and has all types of advantage on him.
Finally, with Jon Bernthal he looked to be exactly the same height in the wolf of wall street, maybe a cm on him, on a good day.
What are your thoughts on this Rob? Also, why can he sometimes look quite tall at premieres. Is he a lift wearer, or something.
rockitbaby said on 1/Apr/15
Leo is barely 6' wearing shoes as we can see from that pic in Wolf Of Wall Street. He's 1,80 guys.
Leo is barely 6' wearing shoes as we can see from that pic in Wolf Of Wall Street. He's 1,80 guys.
dennis djjd said on 30/Mar/15
The problem with most listings is that celebs get height listed while wearing shoes, barefoot Leo is never 6 foot,same as the rock never is 6'3 without military boots.
The problem with most listings is that celebs get height listed while wearing shoes, barefoot Leo is never 6 foot,same as the rock never is 6'3 without military boots.
b-mint1994 said on 30/Mar/15
I wonder who would be taller if they stood next to each other today. Leo or Pitt? I think Leo would edge him out.
I wonder who would be taller if they stood next to each other today. Leo or Pitt? I think Leo would edge him out.
Chuckie Cheese 2 said on 28/Mar/15
All the listings I see in 1990's newspapers and magazines report him at 6 ft, and 140 lbs. If we subtract the standard inch, He's 5 ft 11 minimum, 6 ft tops. Yeah 5-11.5" is a good estimate.
All the listings I see in 1990's newspapers and magazines report him at 6 ft, and 140 lbs. If we subtract the standard inch, He's 5 ft 11 minimum, 6 ft tops. Yeah 5-11.5" is a good estimate.
Jake: 1.84 m- 1.85 m said on 24/Mar/15
5ft 11.5in seems a good listing.
5ft 11.5in seems a good listing.
Amaze said on 23/Mar/15
no less than 5'11.5. maybe 181cm at his extreme lowest but he imo is 184cm waking up and shrinks to 5'11.5. he's tallish nearing low tall
no less than 5'11.5. maybe 181cm at his extreme lowest but he imo is 184cm waking up and shrinks to 5'11.5. he's tallish nearing low tall
fuzzblaster77 said on 20/Mar/15
I don't believe he is more than 5'10.5
I don't believe he is more than 5'10.5
James B said on 19/Mar/15
Leo to me looks minimum 5'11 flat so a solid 5'11.25.
Leo to me looks minimum 5'11 flat so a solid 5'11.25.
184.3cm said on 14/Mar/15
Not under 6' in shoes, Cate is 5'11 with heels in that pic so Leo is minimum 5'11 flat. I think 5'11-5'11.25 is closer.
Not under 6' in shoes, Cate is 5'11 with heels in that pic so Leo is minimum 5'11 flat. I think 5'11-5'11.25 is closer.
b-mint1994 said on 12/Mar/15
5'11" or close to it seems about right based on the photo's I've seen. Great actor regardless of his height.
5'11" or close to it seems about right based on the photo's I've seen. Great actor regardless of his height.
James B said on 12/Mar/15
Rob do you think when Leo did Titanic he did not look over a flat 5'11? In my opinion he looked just 5'11 in that movie.
Maybe he did not do all his growing in 1997?
Rob do you think when Leo did Titanic he did not look over a flat 5'11? In my opinion he looked just 5'11 in that movie.
Maybe he did not do all his growing in 1997?
rockitbaby said on 2/Mar/15
Leo looks as height as Zane in this pic but there's his hair too LoL If Zane is 1,83m indeed, Leo is slightly shorter. I'd give him 1,80m/1,81m.
Leo looks as height as Zane in this pic but there's his hair too LoL If Zane is 1,83m indeed, Leo is slightly shorter. I'd give him 1,80m/1,81m.
CDS said on 27/Feb/15
Was wondering if anyone can answer this- and it's probably been brought up before. DiCaprio- when making "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" was about 18-?? He looked about the same, if not barely taller than 5'8.5" Johnny Depp, but now of course he's 6' (listed; in some places 6'1"). Did he have a major growth spurt after age 18?? This is not terribly uncommon, but look ahead to a picture taken in 1996 when he is like 22 (presumably done growing) next to Brad Pitt, who looks like a half head taller- WTf?? Also, see the movie "Celebrity", where a barefoot Leo looks about the same height as a 5'9" Kenneth Branagh (in shoes). I know Leo has admitted to wearing lifts. Now he himself has stated his own height barefoot at 5'11.25". I will give him that- out of bed height.
Was wondering if anyone can answer this- and it's probably been brought up before. DiCaprio- when making "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" was about 18-?? He looked about the same, if not barely taller than 5'8.5" Johnny Depp, but now of course he's 6' (listed; in some places 6'1"). Did he have a major growth spurt after age 18?? This is not terribly uncommon, but look ahead to a picture taken in 1996 when he is like 22 (presumably done growing) next to Brad Pitt, who looks like a half head taller- WTf?? Also, see the movie "Celebrity", where a barefoot Leo looks about the same height as a 5'9" Kenneth Branagh (in shoes). I know Leo has admitted to wearing lifts. Now he himself has stated his own height barefoot at 5'11.25". I will give him that- out of bed height.
Hypado said on 25/Feb/15
5ft 11.5in is the perfect listing for Leonardo DiCaprio. Agree.
A strong 181 cm and a weak 182.
5ft 11.5in is the perfect listing for Leonardo DiCaprio. Agree.
A strong 181 cm and a weak 182.
rockitbaby said on 19/Feb/15
This pic with Gisele is not very good but he wasn't very taller than her neither. I think Leo is 1,81 in the morning, 1,80m at night.
This pic with Gisele is not very good but he wasn't very taller than her neither. I think Leo is 1,81 in the morning, 1,80m at night.
Dwalin said on 19/Feb/15
looked about 5'9 on wolf of wall street
looked about 5'9 on wolf of wall street
Pierre said on 19/Feb/15
this picture on the beach is not good because it favor Leonardo :his feet are higher
this picture on the beach is not good because it favor Leonardo :his feet are higher
J.Lee said on 12/Feb/15
Rob, how tall is kate blanchett in those heels
Rob, how tall is kate blanchett in those heels
penguinboy25 said on 31/Jan/15
Splitting hairs here? In my mind if someone says they are 5'11 that can mean anywhere from 5'11 flat to 5'11 and change. Who really cares. 5'11 is 5'11.
Splitting hairs here? In my mind if someone says they are 5'11 that can mean anywhere from 5'11 flat to 5'11 and change. Who really cares. 5'11 is 5'11.
@rockitbaby said on 29/Jan/15
haahahha 6'1? Jeez Kate! hahaha
haahahha 6'1? Jeez Kate! hahaha
ARGH said on 29/Jan/15
Years ago Winslet said he was 6'1. Either she was lying or she wasn't sure. But yeah he's 5'11
Years ago Winslet said he was 6'1. Either she was lying or she wasn't sure. But yeah he's 5'11
@rockitbaby said on 28/Jan/15
This is Leo and Matthew at the Oscars in 2014. If Matthew is 1,80m, there's no way Leo is 1,82m.
Click Here
This is Leo and Matthew at the Oscars in 2014. If Matthew is 1,80m, there's no way Leo is 1,82m.
Click Here
@rockitbaby said on 25/Jan/15
Yeah, his shoes heels are higher but if they stand next to each other it seems they will be the same height. Next to Brad Pitt, who's around 1,82m, Jon looks slightly shorter, around 1,80m.
Click Here
Yeah, his shoes heels are higher but if they stand next to each other it seems they will be the same height. Next to Brad Pitt, who's around 1,82m, Jon looks slightly shorter, around 1,80m.
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Jan/15
205lbs on the bench....eh...wow
205lbs on the bench....eh...wow
The Exorcist said on 24/Jan/15
Photos with 5'11" Jon Bernthal from "The Wolf of Wall Street".
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Jon looks a little taller, but he has the bigger footwear advantage. Leo's shoes are hardly giving him anything at all.
Click Here
They'd probably be about the same height barefoot. Five-foot-eleven.
Photos with 5'11" Jon Bernthal from "The Wolf of Wall Street".
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Jon looks a little taller, but he has the bigger footwear advantage. Leo's shoes are hardly giving him anything at all.
Click Here
They'd probably be about the same height barefoot. Five-foot-eleven.
Jake: 1.84 m- 1.85 m said on 24/Jan/15
I think 5ft 11.5in is right!
I think 5ft 11.5in is right!
@rockitbaby said on 24/Jan/15
Just see him next to 6'0 people that you'll se he's 1,81 tops. Again, next to Jean Dujardin, who claims to be 1,81m, he's the exact same height.
Just see him next to 6'0 people that you'll se he's 1,81 tops. Again, next to Jean Dujardin, who claims to be 1,81m, he's the exact same height.
Tunman said on 23/Jan/15
Rob,you said he can look between 5'11 and 5'11.5,what are the chances that he cleans 182?very weak in my opinion so what about 5'11.25?He won't look over that with Honsou and even with Kate Winslet
Rob,you said he can look between 5'11 and 5'11.5,what are the chances that he cleans 182?very weak in my opinion so what about 5'11.25?He won't look over that with Honsou and even with Kate Winslet
Steve said on 22/Jan/15
He looks like he's barely 5'11".
He looks like he's barely 5'11".
Arthur said on 22/Jan/15
"At 5 ft. 11 in. and 175 lbs., he claims he can bench-press 205 lbs."
--Time - Feb 21, 2000.
What about this 5'11" claim Rob?
Editor Rob
"At 5 ft. 11 in. and 175 lbs., he claims he can bench-press 205 lbs."
--Time - Feb 21, 2000.
What about this 5'11" claim Rob?
Editor Rob I don't know if that was from him, the journalist could have got the bit about bench press and just added in a height/weight.
@rockitbaby said on 22/Jan/15
Leo is not 6'0, nothing takes this off my mind LoL he's 1,81m TOPS.
Leo is not 6'0, nothing takes this off my mind LoL he's 1,81m TOPS.
Johnny said on 22/Jan/15
Rob what do you think from my last comment?
Editor Rob
Rob what do you think from my last comment?
Editor Rob bernthal isn't 5ft 10, he's a 5ft 11 guy up close.
Johnny said on 22/Jan/15
I seriously doubt that Leo Dicaprio is 6ft tall. There was a scene in Wolf of Wall Street where he stood next to Jon Bernthal (from Walking Dead), who is listed at 5'10"; and they appeared to be the same height. Of course movies are tricky, as you need to take camera effects and lifts etc into account, but proved (at least from that angle) that Leo isn't 6ft.
I seriously doubt that Leo Dicaprio is 6ft tall. There was a scene in Wolf of Wall Street where he stood next to Jon Bernthal (from Walking Dead), who is listed at 5'10"; and they appeared to be the same height. Of course movies are tricky, as you need to take camera effects and lifts etc into account, but proved (at least from that angle) that Leo isn't 6ft.
david said on 19/Jan/15
180cm-181cm no more, no less.
180cm-181cm no more, no less.
as said on 19/Jan/15
Late bloomer looked tiny on growing pains at age 16, had a face of a 12 yr old. Must have had a good height shoot after that. I think he's in the 6ft out of bed 5ft11 in the evening range.
Late bloomer looked tiny on growing pains at age 16, had a face of a 12 yr old. Must have had a good height shoot after that. I think he's in the 6ft out of bed 5ft11 in the evening range.
Jeff said on 19/Jan/15
Rob, can a 181-182 guy look like a legit tall guy to people? I'm just wondering about the "Wow! You're a lot taller than I thought you'd be..." part in the description...
Editor Rob
Rob, can a 181-182 guy look like a legit tall guy to people? I'm just wondering about the "Wow! You're a lot taller than I thought you'd be..." part in the description...
Editor Rob maybe some people associate his youthful looks with a shorter appearance? Could be that his slimmer frame in the past and being somewhere in 181 range just surprised some of them.
cole said on 18/Jan/15
@jeremy: There are too many unknown variables surrounding that mugshot. The thing with photographing/filming a person up against a height chart is you'd have to get the angle for the camera near 100% right for it to be accurate, slightly too low and he'd appear taller, slightly too high and he'd appear shorter. He'd also have to be standing right up against the actual chart - which in the movie appears to be some distance further away from the camera than Leo (as seen when he does the side pose and walks away). We don't know if it's a chart that's done properly either, it could have been placed lower on the wall for all we know. On top of that he's more than likely wearing some kind of footwear.
@jeremy: There are too many unknown variables surrounding that mugshot. The thing with photographing/filming a person up against a height chart is you'd have to get the angle for the camera near 100% right for it to be accurate, slightly too low and he'd appear taller, slightly too high and he'd appear shorter. He'd also have to be standing right up against the actual chart - which in the movie appears to be some distance further away from the camera than Leo (as seen when he does the side pose and walks away). We don't know if it's a chart that's done properly either, it could have been placed lower on the wall for all we know. On top of that he's more than likely wearing some kind of footwear.
rockitbaby said on 18/Jan/15
Exactly, I totally forgot about that scene in Wolf. If he measures 6'0 (I don't even think he was in this mark) with shoes, he can't be 1,82 guys. He's 1,81 TOPS. For me, he's still the classic 1,80m guy.
Exactly, I totally forgot about that scene in Wolf. If he measures 6'0 (I don't even think he was in this mark) with shoes, he can't be 1,82 guys. He's 1,81 TOPS. For me, he's still the classic 1,80m guy.
KT said on 18/Jan/15
Jeremy, If he stands at exactly 6" with shoes on (as he does in "Wolf of Wall Street" when he gets arrested), then he's obviously not 6" barefoot. He's at least 1-inch under that, depending on the footwear.
Jeremy, If he stands at exactly 6" with shoes on (as he does in "Wolf of Wall Street" when he gets arrested), then he's obviously not 6" barefoot. He's at least 1-inch under that, depending on the footwear.
Bishop said on 18/Jan/15
@Jeremy
You have to take what shoes he's wearing into account, as they can add height :)
@Jeremy
You have to take what shoes he's wearing into account, as they can add height :)
jeremy said on 17/Jan/15
Jesus, there is no disputing he is 5'11 1/2 - 6' exactly just look at the scene in wolf of wall street when he gets arrested. He stands next to a measure that proves exactly this
Jesus, there is no disputing he is 5'11 1/2 - 6' exactly just look at the scene in wolf of wall street when he gets arrested. He stands next to a measure that proves exactly this
KT said on 17/Jan/15
In "Wolf of Wall Street," they show him standing in front of a height chart right after he gets arrested. He stood around the 6-foot mark; maybe slightly below if you took off the hair. He undoubtedly had his shoes on during this scene, so assuming regular footwear (1-inch), then he's around the 5'10-5'11 mark. At least we know he's not 6-feet barefoot. He's closer to 5'11 than 6'0, I think.
In "Wolf of Wall Street," they show him standing in front of a height chart right after he gets arrested. He stood around the 6-foot mark; maybe slightly below if you took off the hair. He undoubtedly had his shoes on during this scene, so assuming regular footwear (1-inch), then he's around the 5'10-5'11 mark. At least we know he's not 6-feet barefoot. He's closer to 5'11 than 6'0, I think.
Arthur said on 17/Jan/15
Rob, you have to consider these pics of Dicaprio and Garrn:
Click Here
Click Here
Their difference is too much noticeable to be just half an inch
Rob, you have to consider these pics of Dicaprio and Garrn:
Click Here
Click Here
Their difference is too much noticeable to be just half an inch
cole said on 14/Jan/15
@Dmeyer: I agree he's likely a bit shorter, but I've seen no picture good enough to specify just how much shorter.
@Dmeyer: I agree he's likely a bit shorter, but I've seen no picture good enough to specify just how much shorter.
rockitbaby said on 14/Jan/15
Btw, in these pics she seems slightly taller than Leo and both are with very similar shoes. If he's 1,82 she's probably over 1,84m or more.
Click Here
Btw, in these pics she seems slightly taller than Leo and both are with very similar shoes. If he's 1,82 she's probably over 1,84m or more.
Click Here
rockitbaby said on 14/Jan/15
Agree! In any picture we can see the exact difference but the thing is that she always looks taller than him, even barefoot. And it's not a 1cm difference only, is more. If Garrn is like 1,84, 1,85 then I believe Leo is 1,82m.
Agree! In any picture we can see the exact difference but the thing is that she always looks taller than him, even barefoot. And it's not a 1cm difference only, is more. If Garrn is like 1,84, 1,85 then I believe Leo is 1,82m.
Dmeyer said on 13/Jan/15
Cole the thing about Toni and Leo is that in every single pic he looks a consistent 2 to the cms shorter and even if they aren't that prefect some have to be somewhat accurate which means that Leo is 180 unless Toni is over 183
Cole the thing about Toni and Leo is that in every single pic he looks a consistent 2 to the cms shorter and even if they aren't that prefect some have to be somewhat accurate which means that Leo is 180 unless Toni is over 183
Johnny said on 12/Jan/15
Rob what is Toni gardens height you think look at pics of her with karlie Kross and then tell me what you think please. Is she talller than 184?
Editor Rob
Rob what is Toni gardens height you think look at pics of her with karlie Kross and then tell me what you think please. Is she talller than 184?
Editor Rob generally garn (I added her) looks in the 6ft range
cole said on 12/Jan/15
What have you guys seen to say Garrn's an exact amount of centimeters taller than him?
I haven't seen a single usable pic to debate Leo's height relative to Garrn. The ones where they are standing in the water or walking about on the beach are absolutely useless.
What have you guys seen to say Garrn's an exact amount of centimeters taller than him?
I haven't seen a single usable pic to debate Leo's height relative to Garrn. The ones where they are standing in the water or walking about on the beach are absolutely useless.
Judd said on 12/Jan/15
2 strong cms between Leo and Toni...if she's 6'0" the Leo can't be taller than 5'11.25", what he always looked...
2 strong cms between Leo and Toni...if she's 6'0" the Leo can't be taller than 5'11.25", what he always looked...
rockitbaby said on 11/Jan/15
If she's 1,83m Leo can be 1,81 tops. If she's 1,81m then Leo is 1,80m tops because there is a difference of more than 1cm between them.
If she's 1,83m Leo can be 1,81 tops. If she's 1,81m then Leo is 1,80m tops because there is a difference of more than 1cm between them.
Johnny said on 11/Jan/15
I do think that Leo is 5'11. But, the thing that I question is the fact that at time with Jean he appears to be a bit taller. Not only this, but he also appears to slouch in quite a few of the pics. So, I question whether he would really be shorter than him if he werent slouching at all. Rob, how tall is Toni Garrn? Because if she is around 6' then Leo is 179. But, if shes 185, then I think he could be 182. But, what do you think is her height?
I do think that Leo is 5'11. But, the thing that I question is the fact that at time with Jean he appears to be a bit taller. Not only this, but he also appears to slouch in quite a few of the pics. So, I question whether he would really be shorter than him if he werent slouching at all. Rob, how tall is Toni Garrn? Because if she is around 6' then Leo is 179. But, if shes 185, then I think he could be 182. But, what do you think is her height?
Andrea said on 11/Jan/15
Well, Dmeyer, she got listed at 6' by Rob... I've seen nothing of her except some photos with Leo but if she's "only" 6', i don't think Leo is much over 5'11! 5'11 flat really might be a better shout for Leo!!!
Well, Dmeyer, she got listed at 6' by Rob... I've seen nothing of her except some photos with Leo but if she's "only" 6', i don't think Leo is much over 5'11! 5'11 flat really might be a better shout for Leo!!!
Georgy said on 11/Jan/15
@rockitbaby Personal agent, periodicals, magazines etc. list her her as 181 cm. More importantlt, next to a true 6'1 Karlie Kloss ( Taylor Swift's bff ), she looks no more than 181 cm.
So yeah, it's been arguees for ages, us randoma and Leo's costars and ex model gfs - he is 180 cm. Nothing more than that.
@rockitbaby Personal agent, periodicals, magazines etc. list her her as 181 cm. More importantlt, next to a true 6'1 Karlie Kloss ( Taylor Swift's bff ), she looks no more than 181 cm.
So yeah, it's been arguees for ages, us randoma and Leo's costars and ex model gfs - he is 180 cm. Nothing more than that.
Dmeyer said on 11/Jan/15
If she is 181cm he is Max 179.5-180cm
If she is 181cm he is Max 179.5-180cm
Dmeyer said on 11/Jan/15
rockitbaby says on 3/Jan/15
I don't know...in this picture Jean looks taller than George.
Click Here
And in that Nespresso ad, the same thing:
Click Here
If Clooney is indeed 1,80 as he claims to be, then Jean is 1,81m, like he says himself. Leo is 1,80m, 1,81m tops.
Clooney is same height in that pic his head is just down a bit
rockitbaby says on 3/Jan/15
I don't know...in this picture Jean looks taller than George.
Click Here
And in that Nespresso ad, the same thing:
Click Here
If Clooney is indeed 1,80 as he claims to be, then Jean is 1,81m, like he says himself. Leo is 1,80m, 1,81m tops.
Clooney is same height in that pic his head is just down a bit
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 10/Jan/15
I don't know if this photo has already been linked, but he's clearly taller than a Cameron Diaz who has heels on (who is listed as 5'8", but appears more 5'8.25" to me):
Click Here
This photo proves that he's above 5'11".
I don't know if this photo has already been linked, but he's clearly taller than a Cameron Diaz who has heels on (who is listed as 5'8", but appears more 5'8.25" to me):
Click Here
This photo proves that he's above 5'11".
rockitbaby said on 10/Jan/15
@georgy I thought his ex-girlfriend was taller, like 1,84 or something. If she's 1,81 than NO WAY Leo is 1,82 LoL
@georgy I thought his ex-girlfriend was taller, like 1,84 or something. If she's 1,81 than NO WAY Leo is 1,82 LoL
Georgy said on 8/Jan/15
Next to his legit 181-cm-tall model gf. He ALWAYS looks shorter than her, especially when the're both barefoor. You don't need more evidende. Rob, he's been awaiting downgrading for ages now, deservedly so.
Click Here
Next to his legit 181-cm-tall model gf. He ALWAYS looks shorter than her, especially when the're both barefoor. You don't need more evidende. Rob, he's been awaiting downgrading for ages now, deservedly so.
Click Here
Georgy said on 8/Jan/15
It's been sorted out that Leo is not taller than 181 cm since he appears shorter than his present model girlfriend ( quoted as 181 cy model agencies and all thw websites ) when they're both barefeet. He is a classic 180 cm/5'11 guy.
182 cm is regarded as weak 6'0, since it translates to 182.8 cm. Leo is not that for sure. I'm slightly above 183 and my cousin is 182 cm and does happen to have a 181 cm tall girlfriend. Compring the two couples, Leo is definitelt below 181 cm.
It's been sorted out that Leo is not taller than 181 cm since he appears shorter than his present model girlfriend ( quoted as 181 cy model agencies and all thw websites ) when they're both barefeet. He is a classic 180 cm/5'11 guy.
182 cm is regarded as weak 6'0, since it translates to 182.8 cm. Leo is not that for sure. I'm slightly above 183 and my cousin is 182 cm and does happen to have a 181 cm tall girlfriend. Compring the two couples, Leo is definitelt below 181 cm.
rockitbaby said on 4/Jan/15
I really can't see Leo as a 1,82m guy. He just looks tall but seeing him next do Bradley Cooper he's way shorter. Unless Cooper is like 1,90m, which he's not.
I really can't see Leo as a 1,82m guy. He just looks tall but seeing him next do Bradley Cooper he's way shorter. Unless Cooper is like 1,90m, which he's not.
cole said on 4/Jan/15
@Clay: Yes you would, as Leo at best could be classified as a questionable 5'11.5. Off the top of my head Sharlto Copley, Matt Smith, Jay Baruchel, Tyler Hoechlin and Sean Pertwee are all more classic 5'11.5 than him.
@Clay: Yes you would, as Leo at best could be classified as a questionable 5'11.5. Off the top of my head Sharlto Copley, Matt Smith, Jay Baruchel, Tyler Hoechlin and Sean Pertwee are all more classic 5'11.5 than him.
Clay said on 3/Jan/15
You won't find a more classic 5'11.5 than Leo.
You won't find a more classic 5'11.5 than Leo.
rockitbaby said on 3/Jan/15
I don't know...in this picture Jean looks taller than George.
Click Here
And in that Nespresso ad, the same thing:
Click Here
If Clooney is indeed 1,80 as he claims to be, then Jean is 1,81m, like he says himself. Leo is 1,80m, 1,81m tops.
I don't know...in this picture Jean looks taller than George.
Click Here
And in that Nespresso ad, the same thing:
Click Here
If Clooney is indeed 1,80 as he claims to be, then Jean is 1,81m, like he says himself. Leo is 1,80m, 1,81m tops.
rockitbaby said on 29/Dec/14
Dujardin claims to be 1,81m so Leo must be something close this height too. Sometimes he looks a little bit shorter than Jean but others the same height so...
In this video from the Oscars, Leo seems to be the same height as McConaughey. How tall is he? Around 1,80m too?
Click Here
Dujardin claims to be 1,81m so Leo must be something close this height too. Sometimes he looks a little bit shorter than Jean but others the same height so...
In this video from the Oscars, Leo seems to be the same height as McConaughey. How tall is he? Around 1,80m too?
Click Here
Emil 183 cm said on 28/Dec/14
He looks identical in height with Dujardin judging from their pics, but its hard to tell really. Leo never looks shorter than 1.80 m imo and CAN look 6'0 at few occasions. I think 1.815 m is his exactly height though
He looks identical in height with Dujardin judging from their pics, but its hard to tell really. Leo never looks shorter than 1.80 m imo and CAN look 6'0 at few occasions. I think 1.815 m is his exactly height though
rockitbaby said on 26/Dec/14
For me 1,81m is fair too, at the moment he wakes up. But during the day he's 1,80m. These pics are hard to mesure because Leo might be in a better angle and Hill isn't in his perfect posture neither. But there's one pic of him in Wolf Of Wall Street in which he's mesured 6' wearing shoes. We can't see his shoes but I'd say they had around 2cm or 3cm.
For me 1,81m is fair too, at the moment he wakes up. But during the day he's 1,80m. These pics are hard to mesure because Leo might be in a better angle and Hill isn't in his perfect posture neither. But there's one pic of him in Wolf Of Wall Street in which he's mesured 6' wearing shoes. We can't see his shoes but I'd say they had around 2cm or 3cm.
johnny said on 26/Dec/14
Yeah maybe they are but there is no way leo is 182 I think he's a solid 180 but the only thing I question is the pic of him with bar on the beach where they are both in flip flops and he looks to be a good margin taller. Maybe the photo is taken at Leo's advantage but still makes me wonder maybe it's slanted and the fact that leo is in front gives him s a couple cms. Thoughts guys?
Yeah maybe they are but there is no way leo is 182 I think he's a solid 180 but the only thing I question is the pic of him with bar on the beach where they are both in flip flops and he looks to be a good margin taller. Maybe the photo is taken at Leo's advantage but still makes me wonder maybe it's slanted and the fact that leo is in front gives him s a couple cms. Thoughts guys?
182cm said on 26/Dec/14
181 cm is the most fair height. 182.5cm morning and 180.5 maybe 180 at night. I feel like most of the heights on this website are 1cm off
181 cm is the most fair height. 182.5cm morning and 180.5 maybe 180 at night. I feel like most of the heights on this website are 1cm off
rockitbaby said on 25/Dec/14
I don't know how tall is Timberlake but he looks at least 1,82m. Next to quite tall guys as Affleck and Hedlund, he's more than 5cm shorter. Leo just looks to be 6' but he's not. Maybe in a good day he's 1,81m.
I don't know how tall is Timberlake but he looks at least 1,82m. Next to quite tall guys as Affleck and Hedlund, he's more than 5cm shorter. Leo just looks to be 6' but he's not. Maybe in a good day he's 1,81m.
johnny said on 25/Dec/14
Yeah his claim is a lot more realistic but still he is not that height Justin just tried to overstate it leo on the other hand didn't overstate it by that much even if he is 179 which he is probably a bit over but Justin Timberlake s claim is way too much. Leo is definitely a solid 180 never dipping below that our above it
Yeah his claim is a lot more realistic but still he is not that height Justin just tried to overstate it leo on the other hand didn't overstate it by that much even if he is 179 which he is probably a bit over but Justin Timberlake s claim is way too much. Leo is definitely a solid 180 never dipping below that our above it
177cmGuy said on 25/Dec/14
179-181cm is the best estimate I can give for Leonardo with shoes he's easily 6'0. Merry Christmas to celebheights.
179-181cm is the best estimate I can give for Leonardo with shoes he's easily 6'0. Merry Christmas to celebheights.
KT said on 24/Dec/14
When I first came on this site many years ago, Leo was listed at 5'11.25. He went up 5'11.75 after a guy named Glen (whatever happened to him?) posted a picture where Leo looked around 6'1". A week later, Glen reported a second sighting of Leo where Leo looked 5'10-5'11. Glen asked him about that, and Leo said something about "period shoes" (probably lifts). That's when Leo went down to 5'11.5 on here, where he has stayed ever since. I think he should go back to the original 5'11.25 listing, even though that fraction of an inch seems like splitting hairs.
When I first came on this site many years ago, Leo was listed at 5'11.25. He went up 5'11.75 after a guy named Glen (whatever happened to him?) posted a picture where Leo looked around 6'1". A week later, Glen reported a second sighting of Leo where Leo looked 5'10-5'11. Glen asked him about that, and Leo said something about "period shoes" (probably lifts). That's when Leo went down to 5'11.5 on here, where he has stayed ever since. I think he should go back to the original 5'11.25 listing, even though that fraction of an inch seems like splitting hairs.
sixfooter said on 24/Dec/14
Leo's 6 ft claims seem more realistic than Justin Timberlake's 6'1 claims
Leo's 6 ft claims seem more realistic than Justin Timberlake's 6'1 claims
rockitbaby said on 24/Dec/14
@cole ok then. If Hill is 1,68m then Leo is around 1,80m. At the red carpet Leo looks way taller but when we see pics of them on their daily routine I can see a shorter difference. I think we all can say that Leo is a 1,80m guy. Pitt looks slightly taller though, like 1,82m or something.
@cole ok then. If Hill is 1,68m then Leo is around 1,80m. At the red carpet Leo looks way taller but when we see pics of them on their daily routine I can see a shorter difference. I think we all can say that Leo is a 1,80m guy. Pitt looks slightly taller though, like 1,82m or something.
Gx79 said on 23/Dec/14
Rob can he look 5'11 3/4,
Editor Rob
Rob can he look 5'11 3/4,
Editor Rob he can look anywhere from a 5ft 11 to a 6ft at times, but generally I wouldn't guess barefoot he was over 5ft 11.5, and there is as much chance he falls a bit shy of that mark too.
BOXOFFICEFLOP said on 23/Dec/14
Leo is 5'11 tops. It's very clear when he does films. He looks quite shorter than much taller actors who are like 6'2
Leo is 5'11 tops. It's very clear when he does films. He looks quite shorter than much taller actors who are like 6'2
Judd said on 23/Dec/14
Leonardo Dicaprio: 5'11.25"
Matt Damon: 5'9.5"
Brad Pitt: 5'10.5-11"
George Clooney: 5'10-10.25"
Samuel L Jackson: 6'1.25" (6'2" peak)
Leonardo Dicaprio: 5'11.25"
Matt Damon: 5'9.5"
Brad Pitt: 5'10.5-11"
George Clooney: 5'10-10.25"
Samuel L Jackson: 6'1.25" (6'2" peak)
cole said on 23/Dec/14
@rockitbaby: Jonah is listed at a solid 168 cm, and looks about that, could argue 169 though but wouldn't go as high as 170. I think for Leo to be near 182, Jonah would have to be pretty much 170 cm. Mr.R thought Leo looked 179 cm when he saw him and Jonah, and figured Jonah for a 167 cm guy, but both Leo and Jonah could well be people who virtually drops a cm or so with a more care free stance. 168 and 180 is I think a fair shout for their respective measured heights. It doesn't quite look like a 5 inch difference between them, so 5ft 6.25 and 5ft 11. A strong 183 cm guy like Channing Tatum looks noticably taller than Leo compared to Jonah, and other 180 cm guys - Seth Rogen and Brad Pitt for example, looks the same as Leo with Jonah.
@rockitbaby: Jonah is listed at a solid 168 cm, and looks about that, could argue 169 though but wouldn't go as high as 170. I think for Leo to be near 182, Jonah would have to be pretty much 170 cm. Mr.R thought Leo looked 179 cm when he saw him and Jonah, and figured Jonah for a 167 cm guy, but both Leo and Jonah could well be people who virtually drops a cm or so with a more care free stance. 168 and 180 is I think a fair shout for their respective measured heights. It doesn't quite look like a 5 inch difference between them, so 5ft 6.25 and 5ft 11. A strong 183 cm guy like Channing Tatum looks noticably taller than Leo compared to Jonah, and other 180 cm guys - Seth Rogen and Brad Pitt for example, looks the same as Leo with Jonah.
rockitbaby said on 22/Dec/14
Hill is what, 1,70m? He seems to be a little bit shrunken in these pics too. I found this one, in which you can see their shoes but they're not standing properly. Anyway, I'd give them a 10cm difference.
Click Here
Hill is what, 1,70m? He seems to be a little bit shrunken in these pics too. I found this one, in which you can see their shoes but they're not standing properly. Anyway, I'd give them a 10cm difference.
Click Here
rockitbaby said on 17/Dec/14
I agree with you all. These celebs sometimes look taller than they actually are when they're on premieres and other events but when you see them shooting or hanging out with friends they aren't that tall. The same with Leo. Seeing pics of him on the red carpet he really looks 1,83m to be honest but when you see him in other pics he's the classic 1,80m guy.
I agree with you all. These celebs sometimes look taller than they actually are when they're on premieres and other events but when you see them shooting or hanging out with friends they aren't that tall. The same with Leo. Seeing pics of him on the red carpet he really looks 1,83m to be honest but when you see him in other pics he's the classic 1,80m guy.
Peyman said on 16/Dec/14
I'd say
Leo : 180
matt damon : 176.5
brad pitt : 179
george clooney : 178
they could be 0.5cm shorter when going to sleep :)
I'd say
Leo : 180
matt damon : 176.5
brad pitt : 179
george clooney : 178
they could be 0.5cm shorter when going to sleep :)
Arch Stanton said on 16/Dec/14
He looks a weak 6 ft in Django next to Samuel L. Jackson, unless Samuel is sub 6'2 nowadays through age.
He looks a weak 6 ft in Django next to Samuel L. Jackson, unless Samuel is sub 6'2 nowadays through age.
Johnny said on 14/Dec/14
Yep also look at pics of when hes not in these public events. Moreover, when you see him out and about with any of his freidns hes always a bit shorter than on these premieres. Also, for anyone thinking he is above this mark, look at other pics of him with Cate Blanchett and Leo with Tobey Maguire. Check out pics where he is with Tobey on some premieres, and then when he was with him on the Great Gatsby set. There, one can see what his actual height is. But, his lifts arent massive which is why he can look believeable on the premieres.
Minimum for him is 5'10.75 but nothing under that for sure. If that even, Maximum though is 5'11.25 I can see him being a consistent 180cm throughout the day too. Very interesting and good actor too. With a great career, Look at some of the best movies of the last decade, and he has been in quite a few of them. Itz crazy for someone to have such a good track record. Finally, check him out with Toni Garrn. Who is certainly no shorter then 184, and no taller than 185. He looks 4-5 cms shorter than her. Sometimes, albeit rarely even more. Rob, look at pics of him off the red carpet and such, and then youll see he looks shorter than a true 182.
Yep also look at pics of when hes not in these public events. Moreover, when you see him out and about with any of his freidns hes always a bit shorter than on these premieres. Also, for anyone thinking he is above this mark, look at other pics of him with Cate Blanchett and Leo with Tobey Maguire. Check out pics where he is with Tobey on some premieres, and then when he was with him on the Great Gatsby set. There, one can see what his actual height is. But, his lifts arent massive which is why he can look believeable on the premieres.
Minimum for him is 5'10.75 but nothing under that for sure. If that even, Maximum though is 5'11.25 I can see him being a consistent 180cm throughout the day too. Very interesting and good actor too. With a great career, Look at some of the best movies of the last decade, and he has been in quite a few of them. Itz crazy for someone to have such a good track record. Finally, check him out with Toni Garrn. Who is certainly no shorter then 184, and no taller than 185. He looks 4-5 cms shorter than her. Sometimes, albeit rarely even more. Rob, look at pics of him off the red carpet and such, and then youll see he looks shorter than a true 182.
Dmeyer said on 14/Dec/14
When you see Someone quikly when can easily get fulled , for example i saw a Guy. I pegged him 183/4cm then he claimed 182cm we stood near each other we were equal , for some reason a Guy who saw us but not together pegged him as taller than me and at about 6'1-2in , he gave me a taller impression than leo , while leo had more shoes so 5'11 is very possible
When you see Someone quikly when can easily get fulled , for example i saw a Guy. I pegged him 183/4cm then he claimed 182cm we stood near each other we were equal , for some reason a Guy who saw us but not together pegged him as taller than me and at about 6'1-2in , he gave me a taller impression than leo , while leo had more shoes so 5'11 is very possible
rockitbaby said on 11/Dec/14
Yeah, Leo is 1,80 but he can be 1,81 with the perfect posture in the morning. But 1,82m? Never.
Yeah, Leo is 1,80 but he can be 1,81 with the perfect posture in the morning. But 1,82m? Never.
AG said on 10/Dec/14
Cate Blanchett called her height : about 5'8, which means 5'8 is her maximum height. On that picture i would give her heels about 3 inches, which makes her 5'11. Leo looks just 1 inch taller than her and as i see he has regular shoes which give him 1-1.25 inches. Leo is between 5'10.75 - 5'11.
Cate Blanchett called her height : about 5'8, which means 5'8 is her maximum height. On that picture i would give her heels about 3 inches, which makes her 5'11. Leo looks just 1 inch taller than her and as i see he has regular shoes which give him 1-1.25 inches. Leo is between 5'10.75 - 5'11.
Johnny said on 9/Dec/14
Yep he prolly never dips below that, and if he does he only does so up to prolly like 179.9 But, other than that, he goes up to 180,9 too. WOuld you agree Rob?
Look at the pics of him and Tobey Maguire on the great gatsby set too
Yep he prolly never dips below that, and if he does he only does so up to prolly like 179.9 But, other than that, he goes up to 180,9 too. WOuld you agree Rob?
Look at the pics of him and Tobey Maguire on the great gatsby set too
rockitbaby said on 8/Dec/14
Yeah, it's hard to say something because the angle changes from pic to pic. But I think it's fair to say he's a classic 1,80m guy.
Yeah, it's hard to say something because the angle changes from pic to pic. But I think it's fair to say he's a classic 1,80m guy.
johnny said on 8/Dec/14
Again though we are using the pic where the footwear is questionable look at other ones where leo looks the same if not slightly shorter
Again though we are using the pic where the footwear is questionable look at other ones where leo looks the same if not slightly shorter
rockitbaby said on 7/Dec/14
Thinking like that, she would then be 1,81m with her heels and Leo would be 1,82 or 1,83m. She's still slightly shorter than Leo then.
Thinking like that, she would then be 1,81m with her heels and Leo would be 1,82 or 1,83m. She's still slightly shorter than Leo then.
Dmeyer said on 7/Dec/14
Her shoes give in the 6.5-7cm no more in that shot and leo has 2cm
Her shoes give in the 6.5-7cm no more in that shot and leo has 2cm
rockitbaby said on 5/Dec/14
yeah, it depends on the angle and how they are posing. The same event, same shoes, one photo he looks taller and in the other one he looks shorter LoL but Blanchett is like 1,74, if she wears 10cm heels or higher she will be taller than him, unless his shoes are higher too.
yeah, it depends on the angle and how they are posing. The same event, same shoes, one photo he looks taller and in the other one he looks shorter LoL but Blanchett is like 1,74, if she wears 10cm heels or higher she will be taller than him, unless his shoes are higher too.
rockitbaby said on 3/Dec/14
This is him with that guy from The Beach. Leo is slightly taller (both are bending, I know but still).
Click Here
This is him with that guy from The Beach. Leo is slightly taller (both are bending, I know but still).
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Dec/14
@cole: in that picture he does look around 5ft11. But he's slouching while Blanchett is standing better.
Rob, is 5ft11 flat possible for Leo or do you still think he can clear can mark?
Editor Rob
@cole: in that picture he does look around 5ft11. But he's slouching while Blanchett is standing better.
Rob, is 5ft11 flat possible for Leo or do you still think he can clear can mark?
Editor Rob anywhere in 5ft 11-11.5 range is arguable, I've went with the top of that range as the guess.
rockitbaby said on 3/Dec/14
Leo is as tall or shorter than Jean Dujardin, who claims to be 1,81m. Leo is 1,80, 1,81m TOPS. Look at him in the beach, next to his French co-star. He's a little bit taller and the guy is 1,76m.
Leo is as tall or shorter than Jean Dujardin, who claims to be 1,81m. Leo is 1,80, 1,81m TOPS. Look at him in the beach, next to his French co-star. He's a little bit taller and the guy is 1,76m.
cole said on 2/Dec/14
@Dmeyer: Yeah it isn't always easy to tell from a meeting like that, if you had stood with him for a while on flat ground it would have been much better. That you even managed to see Leo in public is quite the accomplishment though, he usually does everything in his power to pass by unnoticed!
@Rampage: I think somehow Cate is at a disadvantage in the above photo, can't quite put my finger on what it is though. Here's another where Leo should be at an advantage because of the angle the photo is shot from, but he looks only an inch or so taller. Cate is wearing similar heels to the ones she's wearing in the above photo: Click Here
@Dmeyer: Yeah it isn't always easy to tell from a meeting like that, if you had stood with him for a while on flat ground it would have been much better. That you even managed to see Leo in public is quite the accomplishment though, he usually does everything in his power to pass by unnoticed!
@Rampage: I think somehow Cate is at a disadvantage in the above photo, can't quite put my finger on what it is though. Here's another where Leo should be at an advantage because of the angle the photo is shot from, but he looks only an inch or so taller. Cate is wearing similar heels to the ones she's wearing in the above photo: Click Here
Dmeyer said on 2/Dec/14
At Cole , i now think 5'11-11.25 is closer , i person he seemed 6'0.25 but had 0.5in more shoes and so 5'11.75 and had a baseball cap that could fulled me 0.5in so 5'11-11.5 is possible
At Cole , i now think 5'11-11.25 is closer , i person he seemed 6'0.25 but had 0.5in more shoes and so 5'11.75 and had a baseball cap that could fulled me 0.5in so 5'11-11.5 is possible
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Dec/14
He actually looks 6ft in the above picture. Blanchett is definitely hitting 5ft10+ territory in those heels and Dicaprio's shoes appear to be normally heeled.
I wouldn't go below 5ft11¼(181cm) for him and the current listing is probably closer.
He actually looks 6ft in the above picture. Blanchett is definitely hitting 5ft10+ territory in those heels and Dicaprio's shoes appear to be normally heeled.
I wouldn't go below 5ft11¼(181cm) for him and the current listing is probably closer.
Dmeyer said on 30/Nov/14
To me matt damon isnt under solid 177cm but leo can look 'anywere 180-181 with him
To me matt damon isnt under solid 177cm but leo can look 'anywere 180-181 with him
rockitbaby said on 29/Nov/14
Agree! 1,81m in the morning and 1,79m in the evening. With shoes he's 1,83m
Agree! 1,81m in the morning and 1,79m in the evening. With shoes he's 1,83m
cole 2 said on 28/Nov/14
Yeah sorry No I think you were first my bad
My name is cole though
But yeah by me Leo is like 180-179
How tall do you think his father is Rob? He looks to be quite a lot shorter. As does his mother thats why to me Leos huge growth is so odd and not only that but him being this height and not having lifts would be insane. Unless he got dem rlly good genes
Yeah sorry No I think you were first my bad
My name is cole though
But yeah by me Leo is like 180-179
How tall do you think his father is Rob? He looks to be quite a lot shorter. As does his mother thats why to me Leos huge growth is so odd and not only that but him being this height and not having lifts would be insane. Unless he got dem rlly good genes
Sponk said on 27/Nov/14
181 in the morning
180 during the day 100% KNOW THAT!
179,5 in the evening
181 in the morning
180 during the day 100% KNOW THAT!
179,5 in the evening
cole said on 27/Nov/14
@cole: Could you add something to that nickname, so people can tell us apart? Or were you the first cole? :O
@cole: Could you add something to that nickname, so people can tell us apart? Or were you the first cole? :O
rockitbaby said on 26/Nov/14
Oh I thought that you meant he was the same height as him or 1,83m. He's not much shorter, true. 3, 4cm is a little difference =)
Oh I thought that you meant he was the same height as him or 1,83m. He's not much shorter, true. 3, 4cm is a little difference =)
184.3cm said on 26/Nov/14
If he was measured 183cm in dress shoes then he is probably closer to 181cm if they were regular 2-2.5cm dress shoes and not extra thick ones. So i thought first a weak 5'11 (180cm flat) but now i think hes the full 5'11 as he looks very close to Nolan as well.
If he was measured 183cm in dress shoes then he is probably closer to 181cm if they were regular 2-2.5cm dress shoes and not extra thick ones. So i thought first a weak 5'11 (180cm flat) but now i think hes the full 5'11 as he looks very close to Nolan as well.
cole said on 26/Nov/14
@Dmeyer I think Leo is even a bit shorter though. Maybe 179. But, this is only true if people like matt damon are also like 175. Then he is most certainly 179. There is a lot of evidence suggesting matt damon is only 175 too. This guy is kind of hard to judge
@Dmeyer I think Leo is even a bit shorter though. Maybe 179. But, this is only true if people like matt damon are also like 175. Then he is most certainly 179. There is a lot of evidence suggesting matt damon is only 175 too. This guy is kind of hard to judge
Dmeyer said on 25/Nov/14
I meant zane is 184cm leo 181cm
I meant zane is 184cm leo 181cm
rockitbaby said on 25/Nov/14
@Marcus in that pic I think he wasn't even at the 6'0 mark, was he? Anyway, with heels he's close to 1,83 so he's around 1,80, 1,81m tops!
@Marcus in that pic I think he wasn't even at the 6'0 mark, was he? Anyway, with heels he's close to 1,83 so he's around 1,80, 1,81m tops!
marcus said on 24/Nov/14
in the wolf of wallstreet he was measured 183cm with dress shoes on(1 inch) so minus that he's 180cm he has bad posture too so he can look 5'10 most of the time
in the wolf of wallstreet he was measured 183cm with dress shoes on(1 inch) so minus that he's 180cm he has bad posture too so he can look 5'10 most of the time
rockitbaby said on 23/Nov/14
@Dmeyer If Leo is anything close to 1,84 then Bradley Cooper is like 1,90, Jean Dujardin (who claims to be 1,81) is actually 1,85 and Tobey Maguire is 1,78m. This picture is not good to see their heights at all. This is another picture, just like this last one you sent and Zane is quite taller than Leo.
Click Here
@Dmeyer If Leo is anything close to 1,84 then Bradley Cooper is like 1,90, Jean Dujardin (who claims to be 1,81) is actually 1,85 and Tobey Maguire is 1,78m. This picture is not good to see their heights at all. This is another picture, just like this last one you sent and Zane is quite taller than Leo.
Click Here
rockitbaby said on 21/Nov/14
Leo seems slightly shorter than Zane in Titanic and during promotion of the film. Zane is what, 1,83m?
Click Here
Click Here
Leo seems slightly shorter than Zane in Titanic and during promotion of the film. Zane is what, 1,83m?
Click Here
Click Here
Judd said on 21/Nov/14
Lebensdorf says on 20/Nov/14
I think 5'11. Really no more than that. Billy Zane seemed taller in Titanic. Did they have scenes together in that movie? It's possible that he wasn't done growing at that point. Next to Armie Hammer, he looks between 5'11 and 6 feet even.
I agree. I think diCaprio is 5'11.25", so precisely as tall as Christopher Nolan.
In titanic, there were more than 1" between diCaprio and Zane, and the last one showed to be a realist 6'0.5" next to tall guys like James Cameron (6'2" in 1997) and David Warner (6'1.75-2" in 1997).
Lebensdorf says on 20/Nov/14
I think 5'11. Really no more than that. Billy Zane seemed taller in Titanic. Did they have scenes together in that movie? It's possible that he wasn't done growing at that point. Next to Armie Hammer, he looks between 5'11 and 6 feet even.
I agree. I think diCaprio is 5'11.25", so precisely as tall as Christopher Nolan.
In titanic, there were more than 1" between diCaprio and Zane, and the last one showed to be a realist 6'0.5" next to tall guys like James Cameron (6'2" in 1997) and David Warner (6'1.75-2" in 1997).
rockitbaby said on 20/Nov/14
@Cole yeah, I agree with you. So Leo is like 1,80m, perhaps 1,81m when he wakes up? Rob should get him short here LoL He's not 1,82m.
@Cole yeah, I agree with you. So Leo is like 1,80m, perhaps 1,81m when he wakes up? Rob should get him short here LoL He's not 1,82m.
rmv said on 20/Nov/14
this is a generous listing. he is 179cm max. clearly shorter than nolan and next to tom hanks he's giving up at least 1.5 inches
this is a generous listing. he is 179cm max. clearly shorter than nolan and next to tom hanks he's giving up at least 1.5 inches
Lebensdorf said on 20/Nov/14
I think 5'11. Really no more than that. Billy Zane seemed taller in Titanic. Did they have scenes together in that movie? It's possible that he wasn't done growing at that point. Next to Armie Hammer, he looks between 5'11 and 6 feet even.
I think 5'11. Really no more than that. Billy Zane seemed taller in Titanic. Did they have scenes together in that movie? It's possible that he wasn't done growing at that point. Next to Armie Hammer, he looks between 5'11 and 6 feet even.
cole said on 19/Nov/14
@rockitbaby: Yeah he likely would measure between those two marks, but I highly doubt he would measure any taller than the latter. Hanks always had him beat by about 2-3 cm when he still was near to his peak height, today he's clearly dropped a cm or so, and Leo with a hint more footwear and better posture suddenly looks the same or a tad taller. Dujardin, who claims 181 cm, is listed on this site as 180 cm - which is what he mostly looks - Leo looks the same as him or maybe even a tad shorter in premiere pics, when both are wearing similar footwear. In the film though he looked taller than Dujardin, and close in height with 6'0.5 Jon Favreau. In premiere pics with Favreau though, he looks noticably shorter. He definitely had lifts in some of the scenes in 'The Wolf of Wall Street', like he had in 'The Aviator' and in 'The Departed'.
@rockitbaby: Yeah he likely would measure between those two marks, but I highly doubt he would measure any taller than the latter. Hanks always had him beat by about 2-3 cm when he still was near to his peak height, today he's clearly dropped a cm or so, and Leo with a hint more footwear and better posture suddenly looks the same or a tad taller. Dujardin, who claims 181 cm, is listed on this site as 180 cm - which is what he mostly looks - Leo looks the same as him or maybe even a tad shorter in premiere pics, when both are wearing similar footwear. In the film though he looked taller than Dujardin, and close in height with 6'0.5 Jon Favreau. In premiere pics with Favreau though, he looks noticably shorter. He definitely had lifts in some of the scenes in 'The Wolf of Wall Street', like he had in 'The Aviator' and in 'The Departed'.
rockitbaby said on 19/Nov/14
Leo is bending yeah but Benedict is also not in his right posture neither. He's taller than Leo. This is him next to Tom Hanks, who is listed as a 1,83m guy:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Now next to Jean Dujardin, who is 1,82m:
Click Here
Click Here
Leo is 1,80 or 1,81m.
Leo is bending yeah but Benedict is also not in his right posture neither. He's taller than Leo. This is him next to Tom Hanks, who is listed as a 1,83m guy:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Now next to Jean Dujardin, who is 1,82m:
Click Here
Click Here
Leo is 1,80 or 1,81m.
abit over 180 and iam taller then 90% guys i meet said on 17/Nov/14
He looked pretty tall when was young(thanks to slim build) In the times when i dont care about anybodys height i believed that he was 185.
But nowdays- no way he is anything about 182 cause it means that he reachs 183 in the morning. He is still young but i think he obviously lost about 0,5cm.
In Gilbert Grail with Johny depp he was around 20+ and ended up growing. As i remember he was about 5cm taller then Johny, 6-max what i can brought so:
180.5-182.5 when he was young(evening-morning)
180-182 today(he can easly lose 2cm durng day since he is a bit overweighted atm)
Last verdict: 181
He looked pretty tall when was young(thanks to slim build) In the times when i dont care about anybodys height i believed that he was 185.
But nowdays- no way he is anything about 182 cause it means that he reachs 183 in the morning. He is still young but i think he obviously lost about 0,5cm.
In Gilbert Grail with Johny depp he was around 20+ and ended up growing. As i remember he was about 5cm taller then Johny, 6-max what i can brought so:
180.5-182.5 when he was young(evening-morning)
180-182 today(he can easly lose 2cm durng day since he is a bit overweighted atm)
Last verdict: 181
Dmeyer said on 13/Nov/14
His leg is bended near cumcerbatch could easily look as tall
His leg is bended near cumcerbatch could easily look as tall
rockitbaby said on 7/Nov/14
@Joe I agree Joe. He's the kind of guy who looks tall but he's the classic 1,80m guy. He's not shorter than that but he's also not 6' at all. This is him next to CUmberbatch, who's 1,83m. Clearly shorter.
Click Here
@Joe I agree Joe. He's the kind of guy who looks tall but he's the classic 1,80m guy. He's not shorter than that but he's also not 6' at all. This is him next to CUmberbatch, who's 1,83m. Clearly shorter.
Click Here
Joe said on 6/Nov/14
Di Caprio is not a full 6 foot tall as some publicists claim. He stood next to legit 6 footer Tom Hanks his co-star in Catch me if you Can several times, he stood about an inch shorter than Hanks, maybe a bit more. A British tabloid described DiCaprio as 5-10 with a very slender frame. I believe his taller than 5-10. Probably between 5'10.5" to 5'11". Definitely not a full 6 feet tall man, his rather skinny build makes him appear to be taller than he really actually is, still a very talented actor and lives a very charmed life.
Di Caprio is not a full 6 foot tall as some publicists claim. He stood next to legit 6 footer Tom Hanks his co-star in Catch me if you Can several times, he stood about an inch shorter than Hanks, maybe a bit more. A British tabloid described DiCaprio as 5-10 with a very slender frame. I believe his taller than 5-10. Probably between 5'10.5" to 5'11". Definitely not a full 6 feet tall man, his rather skinny build makes him appear to be taller than he really actually is, still a very talented actor and lives a very charmed life.
guest said on 2/Nov/14
Jared, isn't the obviously taller guy in the middle listed at 6'1 and LD is wearing thick soled shoes
Jared, isn't the obviously taller guy in the middle listed at 6'1 and LD is wearing thick soled shoes
Dmeyer said on 30/Oct/14
This Guy can look 180 181 and 182
This Guy can look 180 181 and 182
rockitbaby said on 30/Oct/14
For me, Leo is 1,80m, 1,81m tops! Unless Jean Dujardin is like 1,83m and Bradley Cooper is 1,88m or something close to that.
For me, Leo is 1,80m, 1,81m tops! Unless Jean Dujardin is like 1,83m and Bradley Cooper is 1,88m or something close to that.
cole said on 29/Oct/14
@Jared: The ground is wonky and uneven to begin with and he's standing on a higher point than the others.
@Jared: The ground is wonky and uneven to begin with and he's standing on a higher point than the others.
Dmeyer said on 28/Oct/14
Jared in that pics he looks solid 184cm considering footwear
Jared in that pics he looks solid 184cm considering footwear
rockitbaby said on 28/Oct/14
@Jared I don't think so. Leo is never 1,85, at least in my view. Next to Jean Dujardin, who claims he's 1,81m, he's slightly shorter.
Click Here
Bradley Cooper is listed as 1,84m and Leo is quite shorter than him.
Click Here
And with his girlfriend, who's what? 1,81m? Or she's taller?
Click Here
@Jared I don't think so. Leo is never 1,85, at least in my view. Next to Jean Dujardin, who claims he's 1,81m, he's slightly shorter.
Click Here
Bradley Cooper is listed as 1,84m and Leo is quite shorter than him.
Click Here
And with his girlfriend, who's what? 1,81m? Or she's taller?
Click Here
Jared said on 27/Oct/14
What about this picture?Click Here
That's Christoph Waltz at the far right and he's 5'7 and Di Caprio looks a lot taller than him. I mean from 5'7 to 5'10 is just 3 inches and 3 inches doesn't look that big of a difference in real life. Now Jamie Foxx the black guy is 5'9 and still a lot shorter than 5'10-5'11 Di Caprio when in real life 1 inch is hardly noticeable. It looks like Di Caprio is 6'1 from this picture. What do you think?
What about this picture?Click Here
That's Christoph Waltz at the far right and he's 5'7 and Di Caprio looks a lot taller than him. I mean from 5'7 to 5'10 is just 3 inches and 3 inches doesn't look that big of a difference in real life. Now Jamie Foxx the black guy is 5'9 and still a lot shorter than 5'10-5'11 Di Caprio when in real life 1 inch is hardly noticeable. It looks like Di Caprio is 6'1 from this picture. What do you think?
rockitbaby said on 26/Oct/14
Leo is 1,80m. I'm convinced.
Leo is 1,80m. I'm convinced.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.