How tall is Stone Cold Steve Austin - Page 3

Add a Comment1626 comments

Average Guess (220 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.04in (185.5cm)
Current: 6ft 0.49in (184.1cm)
Alex 6'0 said on 27/Jul/14
Austin was a constant boot wearer so that would give a bit more height. He could pull off 6'1 legit but was he ever 6'1? I don't know. Probably not. He is turning 50 this year so at least a fraction he's lost. But in his wrestling career 6'0-6'0.5 looks right. Whatever he was Rock was 2 inches taller, HHH 1-1.5 inches taller during their days in WWF/WWE. 6'0 Austin puts Rock 6'2 range and HHH 6'1.5 range
Alex 6'0 said on 25/Jul/14
Peak maybe 6'0.5 today 6'0. At turning 50 this year a bit of height loss has happened
Alex 6'0 said on 14/Jul/14
I think at most he's 6'0.5 today.
willom said on 14/Jul/14
peak 6'1.75
today 6'0.75
SaveUsY2J said on 9/Jul/14
Alex, yeah I don't believe he's suffered any natural height loss yet but I believe he may have been 6'1.5 before Owen Hart's botched piledriver broke his neck at Summerslam '97. He still looks a good 6'1 nowadays, back in 2011 he made a guest appearance on an episode of Raw and was an inch taller than The Miz who's 6-foot even.
Alex 6'0 said on 4/Jun/14
Austin is going to be 50 end of the year so he's not old enough to lose much height. A fraction I can see but he's also had some surgeries so could have lost a bit more.
SaveUsY2J said on 30/May/14
Rob, maybe 6'1.5 peak? He did break his neck, that's got to have had some noticeable effect on his stature. He looked more than an inch taller than Bret Hart back in 1997 anyway....
Hell Yeah said on 22/May/14
If Hogan was around 6'3.5-6'4 max in boots at wrestlemania 30 that will put Austin with his nike airmax concidering his high shoes advantage at no more than
6'1, 6'1.5 at best, I think now austin is probably a legit 6'0 without shoes on.
Clay said on 4/May/14
Yeah, I would agree. Similar in weight probably as well, it's eery.
Alex 6'0 said on 3/May/14
Clay, Cena def didn't shrink at all. Austin is turning 50 later this year so a fraction lost is pretty possible. Cena I give 6'0.25-6'0.5 and Austin the same at his peak. Today Austin I give 6'0. Its very close
Clay said on 2/May/14
Alex who do you think was taller Cena or Austin, in their primes? I think they're really, really close.
Alex 6'0 said on 30/Apr/14
I don't buy him at 6'1. 6'0-6'0.5 range. He didn't look any taller than Cena who is listed 6'0.5 on here
Mario said on 22/Apr/14
He is no less than 185cm at night, closer to 186 would be fair. 187/188 morning.
BorkLaser said on 10/Apr/14
Looked 6'0.75" - 6'1" next to Hogan at WrestleMania
James B said on 9/Apr/14
6'05 maybe today?
rhaegar said on 7/Apr/14
Looked less than 6ft on Wrestlemania next to Hogan, like 4.5 inches shorter in maybe 0.5-1 inch less footwear so if Hogan is 6'3 then Austin is 5'11.5 max.
WHAT? said on 29/Jan/14
Who measures and tells people they're 6'7/8"? Are you kidding me?
James B said on 20/Jan/14
RVD for sure looks 5'11
Lorne said on 13/Jan/14
I'm aware Punk is listed 5ft11.75, but I think 5ft11.5 max(I'm splitting hairs, I know) yeah, 181cm is my "official" listing for RVD, but I wouldn't rule out flat 5'11(but not less). I was just saying that I think both listings are generous, if only a quarter or half inch. I think Austin is legit 6'1 though:) (and yeah, glad Goldberg was upgraded, that had bothered me for years!)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jan/14
Punk is actually listed 5ft11.75, Lorne. Austin could look about 2in taller. I wouldn't put RVD less
than a solid 5ft11 and a fraction over that is more likely. Goldberg edged out Lesnar so I agree with you there that he's 6ft2.5 minimum. Austin looked shorter during that match but was in sneakers.

Also, I just came across old an old 90s clip. Do any of you guys remember a wrestler by the name of Brian Pillman? He was billed 6ft by WWF but in football was listed 5ft10, which is probably closer. Austin always towered over him.
Lorne said on 9/Jan/14
Rampage: CM Punk is no more than 5ft11.5, look at him with Shawn Michaels, who certainly isn't over 5'11 today. And I think better chance 5ft11 for RVD than the 5ft11.5 listing, I give him 5ft11.25 at best. So 6'1 for Austin is fair, but I still can't see Goldberg less than 6ft2.5, he doesn't as well as Austin. For everyone else: How can you say Austin hasn't lost height at 49, but say for sure Rock has at 41? Just saying...
James said on 5/Jan/14
I always thought he looked more 6ft but if he's 6'1 the he is.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jan/14
He's actually talking about the first time he wrestled The Undertaker, Rob
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jan/14
He's 49. I'd be surprised if he lost anything yet.
Maybe 186-187cm?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Dec/13
Rob, what are you're thoughts on his claim?
[Editor Rob: is he talking about being a 'young 6ft 2' football type guy...maybe in shoes, but I can't see him as 6ft 2]
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Dec/13
Click Here

Rob, there's a 6ft2 and 250lbs claim from Austin at 3:57-3:58
[Editor Rob: worth adding up top yeah]
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Dec/13
Goldberg is taller than than Austin by at least 1in.
But I'm more in favour of Goldberg being nearer 6ft3
cobra said on 18/Dec/13
He and Goldberg look the same height in almost every picture so why is Goldberg listed 1.5 inches taller?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Dec/13
I'd be shocked if he was as high as 188cm barefoot. Although, next to Adam Sandler and Burt Reynolds in Longest Yard he looked it. Strong 6ft1 is fair
Slate said on 20/Nov/13
C'mon guys, no shorter than 6'1". I met the dude, I'm six 2 and we were looking eye to eye. He is tall and big.
Van said on 29/Oct/13
He is a legit 6'1, which will put the Miz at 6' and Angle at 5'10
Hell yeah said on 16/Oct/13
I'd give austin 6'to 6'1 in his prime seing him next to paul heyman back in those days. Nowadays not more than a 6'
Bakura said on 14/Oct/13
He's noticeably taller than weak 6ft Randy Couture in all of the Expendables premiere photos from 2010. He was 186cm in his WWE days and still is 185-186 nowadays.
CLEMENT said on 1/Oct/13
Stone Cold Steve Austin is 6'0"
Andy 185cm said on 9/Sep/13
Stone Cold is rly tall, Click Here 4:35

He edges out The Miz, and The Miz is taller than Cena.
Mathew said on 7/Sep/13
With Kurt Angle: Click Here
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 5/Sep/13
Austin like Cena is in that 183-184cm range
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Aug/13
Cenas wearing a hat as usual and is nearer the camera.

John Cena - 6ft0.5in/184cm
Steve Austin - 6ft1.25in/186cm
Andy 185cm said on 11/Aug/13
@Red183 Very good spot! I think i got fooled by his proportions!
Andy 185cm said on 7/Aug/13
@Red183 10:31
Andy 185cm said on 31/Jul/13
Looks shorter than billed height 6'2 Muhammed Hassan Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jul/13
Austin looks 6"1"-6"2" for definite if Punk's 5"11.75"(182cm) and RVD's 5"11.5"(182cm) are accurate. I think 186cm is strong possibility, possibly 187cm. He definitely held his own with Triple H and Brock Lesnar (both 6"2"-6"3") in the Attitude Era aswell as with The Rock (6"3"-6"4")
Ajax said on 5/Jul/13
You have to realize that most guys who claim their 6'1" are actually not that tall unlike Austin
who's actually that tall. My friend told me he was 6'1" and that I was 6'3". I measured him at just under 6' (5'11.75") and I'm 6'2". So in essence, most people don't realize that a true
6'1er is actually pretty ample in height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jul/13
Rob, what are the chances of Stone Cold being 5ft11?
[Editor Rob: as much chance of him winning an Oscar]
Patriot said on 1/Jul/13
I think he is just 5 foot 11 or 6 foot tall. WWE are renowned for exaggerating wrestlers heights. Billed on the World Wrestling Entertainment website as 6 foot 2 inches.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Feb/13
Maybe he's 186cm and just says 6ft1, Rob?
James said on 22/Feb/13
Yeah your right cause he looked around 6'1.5 next too CM Punk
James said on 21/Feb/13
Rob is there a chance stone cold was 6'1-6'2 range at one stage? He didn't look much smaller than the rock and looked 4cm taller than CM Punk in 2011.
[Editor Rob: I just reckon he is a real 6ft 1 guy, who can wear timberland style boots and at times look a little taller.]
Ali Baba said on 21/Feb/13
The measurement on the left is centimeters. Each line is 2 CMs.
Swanee123 said on 18/Feb/13
According to his celebrity mugshot, he is standing at the 92" mark, which would make him 7'8" instead of a puny 6'1". Unless the 92 is supposed to represent 192 cm, which would be odd for the USA to use metric.Click Here
Swanee123 said on 18/Feb/13
According to his celebrity mugshot, he is standing at the 92" mark, which would make him 7'8" instead of a puny 6'1". Unless the 92 is supposed to represent 192 cm, which would be odd for the USA to use metric.
Jamesy said on 21/Jan/13
Compared too cm punk appeared 186cm
Mathew said on 7/Jan/13
Maybe he's 6'0.5" today I don't know, but I always bought the 6'1" peak height, he always came across as that tall to me.
Chuckie said on 6/Dec/12
If he is 6'1 than how tall is goldberg who luks shorter than 6'2 hhh?
James said on 14/Nov/12
Looks 182cm next too tony atlas
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 14/Nov/12
6'0 1/2 peak and today 6'0 flat?
Vegas said on 14/Nov/12
austin didn't look 6'1 back in wcw
173 said on 13/Nov/12
I agree Alex, he's looked to have shrunk (maybe due to aging plus injuries and such), and looks closer to 6'0" flat today.
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 12/Nov/12
Could have been 6'1 peak and closer to 6'0 flat today
Clay said on 10/Nov/12
Brad says on 6/Nov/12
6 flat 2012. 6-1 peak.

6'0.5-6'1.
Brad said on 6/Nov/12
6 flat 2012. 6-1 peak.
big h said on 29/Oct/12
Austin was billed at 6'2. He is close to 50. He jas had neck surgery and broke 3 vertebre in his back. So he could have shrunk. Im only 30 and i shrunk from 6'1 to 5'11 3/4. Hulk hogan shrunk from 6'7 to 6'4. You have to look at their shoes and posture.
Mathew said on 26/Oct/12
I've never doubted his 6'1" is legit, at least back when he was at his most popular. I guess 6'0.5" could be possible as he's approaching 50. But he was a solid 6'1" in my eyes.
Frank said on 5/Oct/12
I personally think Vince wore lifts @ times
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 3/Oct/12
Danimal, so you think its possible Vince at his age now has went from 6'2 to 6'0 flat? he is over 60 so its def possible.
miko said on 30/Sep/12
Well he was the same height as McMahon, however tall he was in the 90's. We all know McMahon was never a 6'2 guy, but certainly around 6'1.
Clay said on 29/Sep/12
Does look just 6'0'' in those pics with the former NFLers.
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 29/Sep/12
Looks 6'0.5 with 6'4 3/4 Leavine but looks more like a 6'0 flat guy with 6'6 1/8 Godsey. We dont know for sure his exact height but its very safe to say hes a legit 183-184cm guy I would say
Vegas said on 29/Sep/12
andy leavine was measured 6'4 3/4 barefoot at the nfl combine Click Here

gary godsey was measured 6'6 1/8 barefoot at the combine Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Sep/12
Well anyway he doesn't look under a solid 6ft1. Could be up to 6ft1.5. Unlike most of the wrestlers he's not far off his billed height and would easily be at least 6ft2 in regular shoes.
Alex 6'0-6'0.75 said on 25/Sep/12
Rampage, your evening is the same as night I would say. Even midday/afternoon you're usually pretty close to your low anyway
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Sep/12
6ft1.75(187cm) out of bed
6ft1.5(187cm) morning
6ft1.5(187cm) lunch
6ft1.25(186cm) afternoon
6ft1.25(186cm) evening
6ft1(185cm) night
Frank said on 14/Sep/12
Ok Rob let me know Buddy !!! lol
Alex said on 12/Sep/12
Frank, would be great if Rob got to measure you. If he comes back to NY soon def should meet up
[Editor Rob: one day I should return]
Alex said on 12/Sep/12
Frank, I looked at our barefoot pic of us with Mamun and thats really no more than an inch and could be less. My posture is a bit better than yours there. Also you have a longer forehead which makes our eye level further apart which gives the impression I'm more taller than you than I really am. I remember this was taken around in the early-mid afternoon where we would have all been close to our low height for the day. You are over 5'11. 5'11.25-5'11.5 you def look
Frank said on 11/Sep/12
Alex my doctor measured me @ 6ft on those weight scales that have the height stick on the back!! I believe its off alittle i do believe im im over 5ft 11
Alex said on 11/Sep/12
Frank, yes I can appear an easy 6'1 but in reality my height is 6'0-6'0 1/4. Also in our pic the height difference looked slightly different in certain pics. Some pics can be decieving. A few pics I looked more like 1.5 inches taller then some I thought it looked closer to an inch difference. Have you recently measured yourself again on a stadiometer? I wouldn't say you were under 5'11 though
Mathew said on 10/Sep/12
I believe 6'1", he's looked it enough to me. And I'm generally a skeptic.
Frank said on 9/Sep/12
Alex your more closer to 6ft 1 than 6ft according to the pictures we took 2 years ago
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Sep/12
Stone Cold - 186cm, 250-255lbs
The Rock - 192cm, 265-270lbs
Alex said on 3/Sep/12
Austin I could see just over 6'0 like 6'0 1/4 to maybe 6'0 1/2
marc said on 27/Aug/12
maybe one day he was 6'1, but not anymore. Check the poster of the first "Expendables" movie. Austin and Bruce Willis are on the exteremes of the picture, aprox. same distance from the camera. Drawing a line from the top of one bald head to another, you'll see they're same height. Maybe in some places Willis is listed as 6'1, which we know he's not.
Cornbread said on 25/Aug/12
I would list Stone Cold Steve Austin's exact height at 6'0 and a little change. He's a little over 6 feet tall, slightly under 6'1
Alex said on 25/Aug/12
Austin was always in great shape in his WWF/WWE days. He was never shredded but he was cut enough and had pretty visible abs. Last I seen him he looked to have gotten bigger again
Shaun said on 24/Aug/12
I could actually buy anything up to 275 lb for his current size but I think he looks at least 18 stone which is 252 pounds and probably more 19 stone. And he looks more bad ass with the bald head!
Shaun said on 24/Aug/12
@Alex and Danimal. Yeah he's massive. In the latest xxx film he looks 250-260 lbs of solid muscle. Indeed back to his old wrestling size but less body fat, huge.
Alex said on 10/Aug/12
Danimal, there were a couple movies he looked maybe 220lbs tops but movies like Rundown and Walking tall he was closer to 250lbs but those movies were in 03-04 not long after he stopped wrestling fulltime in 2002. The movie the Game Plan he looked below 220lbs
Danimal said on 9/Aug/12
Rampage, the Rock dropped to below 230 pounds after retiring from movies. What was his lowest weight Alex? I'd say 210-220 pounds or there abouts..
Alex said on 9/Aug/12
Danimal, yea that makes sense. Rock was usually smaller in size in his movies other than the Scorpion King where he was 260. He looks to be back to his old wrestling size again but more cut though!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Aug/12
I think Goldberg's peak height was 280lbs and definitely
the most jacked up. I think The Rock was 5-10lbs lighter at
his heaviest (pre-WWF career), then after he retired from wrestling
withered down to 230lbs. But now is back up to 260lbs (give or take).

No offense to The Rattlesnake but a fair bit of his mass has turned into fat.
Not in great shape. But he was never a typically ripped guy. Just big, blocky
muscles. Upper end of 250lbs.
Danimal said on 7/Aug/12
Alex says on 7/Aug/12
Just saw the pic with Austin, Rock and Goldberg. Austin was always a big guy mainly in his WWF/WWE days but hes look even bigger in that pic. If you look at ROck now hes huge. he really bulked up for his latest movie role. Guy is more jacked at 40 than he was at 25-30 LOL

For real. The Rock, is big time jacked now (looks to be 260-265 pounds). Truthfully, so does Austin look to be that weight. I'm sure he's minimum 255 pounds today. Funny, Goldberg used to be by far the most built of all 3 (290 + pounds legit) and he's looking to be the smallest today (max 265-270 pounds imo).
Alex said on 7/Aug/12
Just saw the pic with Austin, Rock and Goldberg. Austin was always a big guy mainly in his WWF/WWE days but hes look even bigger in that pic. If you look at ROck now hes huge. he really bulked up for his latest movie role. Guy is more jacked at 40 than he was at 25-30 LOL
Danimal said on 7/Aug/12
Unagi says on 6/Jun/12
if he's 6'1, and Rock 6'3 then Goldberg 6'2.25... could you explain me that?:

Click Here

WOW, Stone Cold has beefed up BIG TIME. He's looking HUGE. He was never that built/large in his wrestling days. His chest and arms are really developed these days. Putting Goldberg and The Rock to shame in that pic.
Alex said on 6/Aug/12
I've done a few measurement in the past right out of bed and was in the 6'0.75-6'1 range but that height you lose right away anyway. I've never been taller than 6'0.25 in the afternoon/evening. 6'2 217lbs is a good weight. I weigh 187lbs currently but I've cut down from a solid 205. I was already in good shape, just wanted to cut up more. But I'll rebulk sometime next month back up to at least 205-210
Ajax said on 6/Aug/12
Have no idea. I'd guess probably 6'2.5-.75". I weigh 217lbs and have a size 14 USA which is a little large for my height IMO. I think depending on your foot wear and posture, you can fool someone into
thinking your maybe 1.5" taller than you are. I mean, the hair over 6'5" challenger fooled people into
thinking he was 6'6"-6'7"
Alex said on 5/Aug/12
Ajax, haha yea thats true. Though some 6'2 guys claim 6'4. I could claim 6'2 but some would and wouldn't question it. If I claimed 6'1 from now on 99% of people wouldn't question it. You're a legit 6'2 guy. What are you out of bed and midday?
Ajax said on 4/Aug/12
@Alex

I agree. Basically %99 of men add 1-2" of height. I'm 6'1 7/8" at my low and usually at 6'2" and people think I'm 6'3" and 6'4". But Alex, haven't you noticed most guys 6'2" and up usually don't exaggerate their height? We should claim 6'2" "the height exaggeration cut-off!" :)
Alex said on 2/Aug/12
Alot of guys who are 6'0 and even some 5'11 will claim 6'1 so it can make a legit 6'1 guy look 6'2-6'3. I am 6'0 at my low and 6'1 is the height I get guessed at most often
Ajax said on 30/Jul/12
He's one of the few 6'1" guys who actually is that tall. About 98% of the guys I met who claimed 6'1" were actually 6' and in many cases way less. Almost everyone exaggerates their height until they hit the 6'2" mark.
Witchdoctor said on 11/Jun/12
1.84m at peak and current.
Unagi said on 6/Jun/12
if he's 6'1, and Rock 6'3 then Goldberg 6'2.25... could you explain me that?:

Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Feb/12
He looks 186cm-187cm range in most
places. I definitely wouldn't peg him lower
than this height...
Rocky said on 10/Feb/12
Derek d:
He could be 6'2'' even though he said 6'1'' himself, because he's already fairly tall and muscular compared to the average man; he's not gonna care about half an inch or 5 pounds here and there. It's not like he's a 5'3'' Joe Pesci who might fudge things a bit.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jan/12
Doesn't look less than 6ft1...
185cm min and 187cm max
may even scrape 6ft2 out of bed
Johhny said on 13/Jan/12
i didn't know his exact height but those who are interested can have a look at his mugshot here is the pic Click Here for other celebrities mugshots link is here Click Here
Valdor said on 1/Jan/12
6'0" - 6'0"1/2" (184cm sounds fair)
Derek d said on 18/Dec/11
Why would the man be 6'2 if He said 6'1 himself? Lol.
Tman said on 3/Dec/11
1,84m 255 lbs(peak weight)
Tman said on 3/Dec/11
1,84m 255 (peak weight)
josh said on 18/Nov/11
6'2 ..same height as shane
Goldberg said on 15/Nov/11
Met Goldberg at a signing ar MCI Center in Washington, DC. I asked him to stand up to get a picture taken with me. I'm 6'1. He was SLIGHTLY taller than me. Definitely NOT 6'3 or 6'4.
Alex said on 14/Nov/11
He's max 184cm I think
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m said on 13/Nov/11
He's an honest 6ft 1in.
Mathew said on 13/Nov/11
Austin was/likely still is 6'1" legit. He's been billed at 6'2" and sometimes 6'3" but 6'1" is right.
logan noll 1996 said on 12/Nov/11
Stone cold is 6 foot. Almost everybody who is billed 6 foot 2 ends up being 6 foot in real life.
Parra said on 8/Nov/11
He is like 6'2
Alex said on 30/Oct/11
Henrik, claims like that make no sense LOL. There was no way 6 inches between them. More like 4 inches
Henrik said on 28/Oct/11
I have only seen Triple H talk about his height once (in USAToday), and he claimed 6'4". Ironically and contradicting, he did say that Shawn Michaels was 5'10". LOL.
Alex said on 27/Oct/11
Usually they will say the taller the wrestler the bigger the build but not always true. Kane billed at 7'0 but 6'8 max but Big Show billed at 7'0 and looks within an inch of that height. I do remember HHH was billed at 6'5 in WCW then 6'4 in WWF. I think he claimed 6'3 though?
Legend said on 27/Oct/11
He's about 6 ft flat today
Henrik said on 26/Oct/11
I think that wrestlers do on average get padded by two inches. An exception seems to be 6'1" types, who from my experience usually get billed as 6'2" ("only" one inch padded).

Then there are a few who get padded even more (Triple H original billing was 6'5") or have, at least close to, their actual heights billed.
Alex said on 20/Oct/11
He was always billed at 6'2. Seen a few 6'3 billings in magazines but he claimed 6'1 as his height
Danimal said on 18/Oct/11
TNTinCA says on 17/Oct/11
Sounds about right.
I think his 'billed height' in his wrestling days was 6'3".

Wrong. It was 6'2".
tell-em said on 18/Oct/11
cold stone is 6'1"
TNTinCA said on 17/Oct/11
Sounds about right.
I think his 'billed height' in his wrestling days was 6'3". Rule of thumb is that most wrestlers get about 2 inches of height added to them for billing purposes. The Rock was always billed as 6'5" while he is actually 6'3". Shawn Michaels was billed at 6 foot when he was around 5'10" or so.
Clay said on 15/Oct/11
Austin is 6'1'' at most, Goldberg I would say is 6'2.5''.
tell-em said on 14/Oct/11
goldberg is 6'2, screw 6'1".
Henrik said on 14/Oct/11
Bill Goldberg is listed 6'2.5" on this site (Viper argues that he's 6'1") and he is taller than Bosworth on the picture that Vegas provided. Bosworth being 6'2.5" would make Goldberg a weak or full 6'4" and Austin 6'2.5" as well.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Oct/11
Brian Bosworth looks 6"2-6"3 range
Alex said on 14/Oct/11
Austin has claimed 6'1 so at most that was his peak. He never looked more than 6'1 tops anyway back then excluding his footwear or those chunky boots he wore. Maybe 6'0 1/2 peak, and today 6'0. If he has lost height it was pretty minimal I would say
Legend said on 13/Oct/11
Austin isn't 6'1 anymore Rob. This is his peak height at most.
Vegas said on 13/Oct/11
goldberg did edge out bosworth in the movie viper Click Here

speaking of longest yard and bosworth, i was on a flight last year next to a chap who owns a bar in santa fe where longest yard was filmed, he said he was friends with bosworth since school and that he used to come over to his bar after filming most nights with some of the cast, he said he couldn't believe how much the likes of nash and khali dwarfed bosworth

ziggler was ~2 inches shorter than hugh jackman on raw 2 weeks ago
Viper said on 12/Oct/11
Goldberg taller than Bosworth? Impossible
Henrik said on 11/Oct/11
Appears to be about the same height as 6'2" billed Brian Bosworth, and taller than here listed strong 6' or 184cm William Fichtner (who is also closer to the camera) in the movie Longest Yard: Click Here

But I think Bosworth is more like 6'1.25" (186cm) or 6'1.5", as Bill Goldberg seemed to have some height advantage over him. He has no page here.
Legend said on 11/Oct/11
Ziggler is 5'10.25
SAM RICK said on 9/Oct/11
IN A VIDEOGAME CALLED RAW STONE COLD IS LISTED AS 6'2 AND 252LBS.A FEW MONTHS AGO JUST BEFORE CAPATIAL PUNISHMENT HE SEEMED TALLER THAN DOLPH ZIGGLER WHO IS LISTED AS 6;0.
ali said on 30/Sep/11
i think was powerful in wwe
Legend said on 27/Sep/11
I think he looks 5'11.5-6'0 with Angle. With UT the angle isn't fooling me. He still looks much shorter.
Alex said on 23/Sep/11
Austin looks slightly over 6'0 there with Angle.
With Undertaker he looks even taller LOL but backstage segments look different from in the ring though. I've UT have more inches on Austin in the ring than in that backstage interview
James said on 22/Sep/11
i have too disagree looking on youtube WWE in 1998 and 2000 was much more cooler than it is now.

the 1998-2000 RAW is War Arena was amazing as well.
Vegas said on 22/Sep/11
how tall does he look here legend Click Here

remember what i said about backstage stuff :D
Legend said on 21/Sep/11
Looks 6 feet here Click Here
Alex said on 21/Sep/11
Clay, yes very true. Within the last 3-4 years, mainly the last 2 years these young kids around 10-13 love this stuff.
Clay said on 20/Sep/11
Well James Im sure 12 year olds think this current brand is the greatest thing ever. Oh and John Cena is superman of course, lol.
James said on 19/Sep/11
Alex wat do you think the WWE will be like 7 years from now?
Alex said on 18/Sep/11
Clay, I was 23 in 2007 and thats the year where I personally lost interest. It was by start of 09 when I was really done with it LOL. Once in a while I'll check it out still
James said on 17/Sep/11
Alex says on 16/Sep/11
James, yea 98 was a new era in WWE. thats when Austin became WWF champion and was the face of the WWF. 05-06 was a new change and the attitude era was at its end. From 07-08 and on is a new era but not sure what to call it.

If you could take a wild guess what do you think the WWE will be like 7 years from now? Do you think it will be like the attitude era again in 7 years time?

i dislike this current WWE era :(
Clay said on 17/Sep/11
James and Alex:

It could be that it was cooler back then because we were just little kids, lol. I'm 23 now and it just seems goofy as hell.
Alex said on 16/Sep/11
James, yea 98 was a new era in WWE. thats when Austin became WWF champion and was the face of the WWF. 05-06 was a new change and the attitude era was at its end. From 07-08 and on is a new era but not sure what to call it.
Tman said on 15/Sep/11
the attitude era was not centrered around jumping off titantrons or 15 foot cages and Danimal you must be talking about Droz who had he's neck brocken after another perfomer(D lo) tried to do a running powerbomb on him and he could not get a good grip on Droz cos he was wearing a lose shirt and a fan had thrown a drink into the ring so D lo brown sliped and Droz landed awkwardly and became paraplegic(so how is that Att'de Era fault?) The Atti'de Era had the best perfomers,story lines came from all angles(not just around world H'vy weight chmpionship title and John cena) Divas were actually "wrestlers" the acting was convincing,the tag teams were legendary while at the same time WWF/E was "Kid friendly".
Legend said on 14/Sep/11
One of the best matches ever in my opinion is Stone Cold vs Bret Hart Wrestlemania 13.
James said on 14/Sep/11
Alex says on 14/Sep/11
James, the attitude era officially started in 98. 98 was a great year but I thought 99-00 was even better. 01-02 was pretty good too. 03-04 was good. 05-06 went down some but still was watchable. 07 on is when I really started to get out of it and by 08 that was it for me LOL. WM 17 in 2001 was my fave WM of all time

some say 2006 was the last year off the attitude era?

do you agree alex as well that there was a HUGE change in the WWE from 1997-1998? i saw a big change in the WWE as well from 2007-2008.

there will probably be anohter huge change in the theme in 2017-2018 LOL.
Alex said on 14/Sep/11
James, the attitude era officially started in 98. 98 was a great year but I thought 99-00 was even better. 01-02 was pretty good too. 03-04 was good. 05-06 went down some but still was watchable. 07 on is when I really started to get out of it and by 08 that was it for me LOL. WM 17 in 2001 was my fave WM of all time
James said on 13/Sep/11
Alex says on 13/Sep/11
James, I actually liked 01-03 range a lot. 04 was when it went down a bit but still enjoyable. I do agree 2000 was a great year. Maybe my favorite year. Those times I never missed a raw or smackdown show on TV lol

1999 was very good as well wasn't it?

What do you think off WWE in 1998 Alex? I think it was better than the 1999 season. I really like wrestelmania 1998 when mike tyson was in it although i did enjoy wrestlemania 1999 more.
Alex said on 13/Sep/11
James, I actually liked 01-03 range a lot. 04 was when it went down a bit but still enjoyable. I do agree 2000 was a great year. Maybe my favorite year. Those times I never missed a raw or smackdown show on TV lol
James said on 12/Sep/11
Alex says on 12/Sep/11
I started watching wrestling with WWF in 1991-1992 but got more into it by 93-94. I grew up with it in the late 90s-early 2000s when the attitude era was at its best. By 04-06 to me it wasn't quite as good but still enjoyable enough to way but by 07-08 I just got out of it. By that time I felt it was for a new generation of kids. By 07-08 I was 23-24 years old and a lot of it was meant for kids in their teens I felt. A lot of my fave guys were either gone or weren't doing much anymore

I think the WWE become kinda boring in 2001-2002 which is when i lost interest in it. The years 1997-2000 were the most enjoyable for me even though i was very young.

I remember just like it was yesterday 12 years ago that i would tune into too WWE smackdown every saturday morning on sky1. Also i would VERY much enjoy watching WCW every friday night on TNT. WCW Thunder was good as well.
Alex said on 12/Sep/11
Legend, yea Austin is known for his chunky boots that can give him a taller appearance but 5'11.5 for him I really doubt. I'd put him at 6'0.5 before 5'11.5 but barefoot I think hes 6'0-6'0.25 range
Alex said on 12/Sep/11
I started watching wrestling with WWF in 1991-1992 but got more into it by 93-94. I grew up with it in the late 90s-early 2000s when the attitude era was at its best. By 04-06 to me it wasn't quite as good but still enjoyable enough to way but by 07-08 I just got out of it. By that time I felt it was for a new generation of kids. By 07-08 I was 23-24 years old and a lot of it was meant for kids in their teens I felt. A lot of my fave guys were either gone or weren't doing much anymore
James said on 12/Sep/11
Danimal in 2011 Vince McMahon seems not so much off a tryant like he used too be in the attitude era. Would u not agree? The guys getting old now so its understandable.

Remember that infamous incident in 1998 when a fan threw a battery at shawn michaels and he walked off letting down loads of fans? In an interview Vince stated that he was less than impressed by shawns behaviour.
Legend said on 12/Sep/11
I knew I wasn't crazy to think he looked 5'11.5
Danimal said on 11/Sep/11
Vegas says on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good

for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40

What about that young wrestler who is now a paraplegic. I think he took over the role of one half of the Road Warriors? Then we have Mick Foley who has stated in several recent interviews that he has sustained so many concussions from chair shots to the head, that he has permanent brain damage and his whole think process is foggy (very scary stuff). Mick Foley was known for his intelligence. Now even that is gone due to the attitude era. Then we can look at Owen Hart who is DEAD. The list goes on and Vince McMahon takes no responsibility whatsoever for any of these tragedies.
James said on 11/Sep/11
Vegas says on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good

for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40

Does that mean edge is going too die?


I LOVED the attitude era it was great. also used too really enjoy WCW Nitro everyday friday night when i was 9 or 10 years old.

give it half a decade and we might see a new better era in the WWE. I wish they would change the design for the current WWE arenas :(
Legend said on 11/Sep/11
We were lucky to have witnessed the attitude era guys. JR announcing. All the hardcore matches. Stone cold, the Rock, Mankind, Masked Kane, Undertaker. Great times. It feels so empty now.
Alex said on 10/Sep/11
Vegas, you're right. Attitude era has been gone since the early 2000s. Most will say the attitude era was from 98-03
Alex said on 10/Sep/11
I'd put Austin at 6'0.5 before 5'11.5
Vegas said on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good

for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40
Danimal said on 9/Sep/11
Around 6'0" give or take .5".
James said on 9/Sep/11
Vegas so does that mean Edge is slowly losing height?

Last time Edge appeared on the WWE he still looked 6'3 i thought. Who knows Edge could have been taller than 6'3 ten years ago.
Vegas said on 8/Sep/11
edge did an interview the other day where he said he has spinal stenosis, its basically a shrinking of the spine, its the reason he retired and means he couldn't be passed to wrestle even if he wanted to, he said austin had the exact same thing among his many problems in 2002-03
Alex said on 8/Sep/11
Legend, think Austin maybe lost a slight bit of height since he had neck surgery and injuries. Could have been closer to 6'1 back in the 90s but today yea 6'0 to maybe 6'0 1/2 at most.
Legend said on 6/Sep/11
Okay, after watching him a lot the past few days I think he's barely over 6 feet. I'm not sold on a real 6'1.
Alex said on 5/Sep/11
All these wrestlers when you see them on TV are at their evening height I am pretty sure of
John said on 5/Sep/11
I've met Stone Cold Steve Austin at evening, and he was 6'0. I'm a strong 5'10.

But, remember. At NIGHT. Which means, he must be 6'1" at morning or 6'2".
James said on 4/Sep/11
He looked minimum 6'1 next too Dane Cook.
Legend said on 4/Sep/11
James says on 2/Sep/11
He can't be as low as 5'11.5 becuase he was taller than Dane Cook.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dane Cook is not that tall.
Alex said on 3/Sep/11
Austin could be 6'0.25 evening
James said on 2/Sep/11
He can't be as low as 5'11.5 becuase he was taller than Dane Cook.
Alex said on 2/Sep/11
I'd put Austin at 6'0.5 before 5'11.5 but yea he could maybe look that at times but usually not.
Legend said on 1/Sep/11
Sometimes Stone Cold looks 5'11.5 range. I'm not saying he is. But sometimes he does look it.
Legend said on 31/Aug/11
The Rock was never 6'3.
James said on 27/Aug/11
The Rock was at least 6'3
Terryman said on 26/Aug/11
James is Goldberg taller than Triple H in the Videos that were posted by Vegas?
Legend said on 26/Aug/11
The Rock is 6'2
James said on 25/Aug/11
Bill Goldberg 6'2.25 (189cm)
Rock Dwayne Johnson 6'3.5 (192cm) Peak.
Hansen said on 24/Aug/11
i think over mostly goldberg and the rock apear close in height 6ft2 both was listed 6ft4-6ft5 in WWE, SCSA always stand abit shorter than both. so 6ft1 is clear on the spot! ;)
James said on 23/Aug/11
goldberg is a strong 6'2 but his 6'4 listings were absolutely ridicolous.
Legend said on 22/Aug/11
It's still strange how he looked not much shorter than Kane. And does anyone know exactly why half his arm is extremely white in the picture?
Terryman said on 20/Aug/11
goldberg is in the 187-8cm Range not 188-9cm. Stone cold is dead on 1,84m
James said on 20/Aug/11
Goldberg is 188-189cm range not 189-190cm. Stone Cold does not look over 185cm at all in that pic with Goldberg.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Aug/11
Looks 186-187cm range here with 6"1(185cm) Vince McMahon. If you look closely you'll see Austin is jerking his head slightly away from the camera Click Here 6"1.75(187cm) with 189-190cm Bill Goldberg, but Goldberg is bending his head slightly Click Here
Legend said on 18/Aug/11
@Alex Sorry for thinking you weren't 6 feet lol and you're right about the angles they can use.
James said on 18/Aug/11
oh yeah just noticed that dane cook was downgraded too 182cm but still austin looks 186cm next too him
James said on 18/Aug/11
With 192cm Dolph Lundgren Austin looks 187cm or 188cm Click Here look 187cm or 185cm with 183cm listed Dane Cook and 175cm Jason Stathem. Could cook be 182cm though? Click Here 186cm near 188cm Donald Trump. Was trump still 6'2 in 2007? Click Here with 190cm dave batista he can look 184cm but maybe 185cm since batista has slight hair advantage. does not look at all over 185cm though and has low of looking 184cm. Click Here can look anywehre from 184cm too 187cm range compared too those guys but he does not look 188cm.
Alex said on 17/Aug/11
Legend, there were times where Austin and Kane didn't look too far apart then at times Kane just towered over him by at least 7 inches. Also in WWE camera angles can make a big difference. 2 guys 7-8 inches apart with angles can look more 4 inches apart at times lol
Alex said on 17/Aug/11
Rock- 6'2 1/2 Brock- 6'2 Austin 6'0 1/2
Legend said on 17/Aug/11
He was strangely close to Kane's height in a match they had once. What I mean by that is that Kane didn't tower him at all. I remember because it was very strange to see that. I guess legit 6 foot guys can hang in there with anyone.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Aug/11
6ft1.25(186cm) barefoot
6ft2.75(190cm) in wrestling boots

Pics to come soon!
James said on 15/Aug/11
6'1 barefoot and appearing 6'2 in wrestling boots.
Legend said on 15/Aug/11
He doesn't look more than 6 feet to me.
Hansen said on 15/Aug/11
SCSA bulky build give down illusion been 6ft. 6ft1 i truely believe it.
Danimal said on 15/Aug/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 12/Aug/11
185cm at least. He usually appeared 1.5-2in shorter than The Rock on WWF back in the day.
6ft1.25 or even 6ft1.5 are vague possibilities. The guy might even scrape 188cm first thing out of bed.

6'0" guy.
James said on 13/Aug/11
Clay says on 12/Aug/11
James - I thought the Rock was slightly taller than Lesnar, always have. Weak 6'3 for the Rock, or hell even solid 6'3 and strong 6'2 for Lesnar.

Alex says on 12/Aug/11
Rock was no more than an inch taller than Lesnar and at times it looked a bit less than an inch

Clay why do you think the rock might be a weak 6'3 when he can appear too have 1 inch on Lesner?
Desiboy said on 12/Aug/11
I think stone cold is like 5'11'' but 6' with shoes on
Clay said on 12/Aug/11
James - I thought the Rock was slightly taller than Lesnar, always have. Weak 6'3 for the Rock, or hell even solid 6'3 and strong 6'2 for Lesnar.
Alex said on 12/Aug/11
Rock was no more than an inch taller than Lesnar and at times it looked a bit less than an inch.
James said on 12/Aug/11
With Mike Tyson i don't think he looked over 185cm but i know sometimes he could pull of looking slightly taller than Vince McMahon who may not be over the 6'1 mark anyway. but i think he only looked taller than vince cause of his wrestling boots.

With Sid Eudy as well he did actually look 6'2 (188cm) but then again maybe Sid is more like 6'6.75?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Aug/11
185cm at least. He usually appeared 1.5-2in shorter than The Rock on WWF back in the day.
6ft1.25 or even 6ft1.5 are vague possibilities. The guy might even scrape 188cm first thing out of bed.
James said on 11/Aug/11
Clay says on 7/Aug/11
Nevermind the fact Lesnar has looked nothing but 6'2.25-6'2.5 barefoot in the UFC James, and on the NFL field in cleets as well.

As we know thats better evidence than what these wrestlers are standing at in their boots in the ring..

Fair enough i am just saying that at times there looked not much between Cena and Lesner. would you agree that the rock looked 6'3.5-6'4 next too Brock Lesner?
Clay said on 8/Aug/11
tell-em says on 8/Aug/11
whatchu talking about? i always had brock at a weak 6'2". he wakes and hits 6'2" and is about 6'1.5" during the day. lol. austin is 6'1". brock never looked a strong 6'2" in his life especially next to the rock or john cena or kurt angle.

Whatever. We're not far off anyways. At least we agree on Austin..
tell-em said on 8/Aug/11
whatchu talking about? i always had brock at a weak 6'2". he wakes and hits 6'2" and is about 6'1.5" during the day. lol. austin is 6'1". brock never looked a strong 6'2" in his life especially next to the rock or john cena or kurt angle.
Terryman said on 7/Aug/11
184,5cm during the day-1,83.5m at night he is definately not 185cm as he was about 0,5in taller than Miz and dolf zigler who are both about 1,82m
Clay said on 7/Aug/11
Nevermind the fact Lesnar has looked nothing but 6'2.25-6'2.5 barefoot in the UFC James, and on the NFL field in cleets as well.

As we know thats better evidence than what these wrestlers are standing at in their boots in the ring..
Clay said on 7/Aug/11
tell-em says on 5/Aug/11
2 inches between brock and austin doesn't make any sense. austin is 6'1" and brock is a weak 6'2". you have the rock at 6'2.75" when there is ATLEAST an inch between brock and roct. gosh you're stupid. you suck at math just like you suck at height gauging clay.

Changing your tune now eh? Now Brock is 6'2? lol. Austin a weak 6'1 at best, and Brock a strong 6'2'' is where it's at. Book it.
James said on 7/Aug/11
Alex maybe 6'4.75 (195cm) for test? LOL at 6'7.

I am kinda uncertain about Lesner being over 188cm?
Alex said on 6/Aug/11
James, also Test's height is uncertain too. Hes def not his 6'6 listing height. They even said he was 6'7 before too. I am not sure what he claims in height but I would guess he was 6'5 or at the lowest 6'4 1/2. He had over 2 inches on Brock.
Alex said on 6/Aug/11
Brock 6'2 and Austin about 6'0 1/2 could be very likely be dead on.
James said on 5/Aug/11
Sometimes Brock Lesner had a VERY hard time looking 6'2.5 next too John Cena but then again next too Test he could pull of looking 189cm.
tell-em said on 5/Aug/11
2 inches between brock and austin doesn't make any sense. austin is 6'1" and brock is a weak 6'2". you have the rock at 6'2.75" when there is ATLEAST an inch between brock and roct. gosh you're stupid. you suck at math just like you suck at height gauging clay.
tell-em said on 5/Aug/11
and yet you think brock is 6'2.5" thats freakin' hilarious.lol. thanks for proving my point.
Clay said on 4/Aug/11
tell-em says on 3/Aug/11
austin IS a hair shorter than brock. .5 inch or 1 inch is not a big gap. but you wouldn't understand that clay. rob should ban you for your awful height estimations. its embarrassing.

It's not a big gap, but I wreckon theres about 2 inches between them in the barefeet. You're the only sad-sack at the site who thinks there is only half an inch or so between them.
tell-em said on 3/Aug/11
austin IS a hair shorter than brock. .5 inch or 1 inch is not a big gap. but you wouldn't understand that clay. rob should ban you for your awful height estimations. its embarrassing.
Alex said on 3/Aug/11
Lesnar had about 2 inches on Austin I believe.
Clay said on 2/Aug/11
tell-em says on 29/Jul/11
james, rock hasn't lost anything. get outta here with your ridiculous commenting. you're as bad as clay.

Thanks bud. Go ahead and take shots at people who aren't even in the conversation now why dont you.

You wanna talk about ridiculous how about you thinking that Austin is only a hair shorter than Brock Lesnar, now thats funny.
Clay said on 2/Aug/11
Danimal says on 2/Aug/11
6'0"

I dont know how you can break people's balls about giving the lowest possible heights and then come up with estimates like this yourself...
James said on 2/Aug/11
6'1 and maybe would measure at 6'2 in big wrestling boots in the 90's.
tell-em said on 1/Aug/11
you're close vegas, but nah. austin has a big head. i'm still stickin w/ 6'1 or 185cm.
Mathew said on 1/Aug/11
6'1" is good enough for Stone Cold. I believe it.
Vegas said on 31/Jul/11
tell-em i am 5'11 and i think austin is about 184cm
Terryman said on 31/Jul/11
1,84m peak 1,83.5cm now?
tell-em said on 29/Jul/11
james, rock hasn't lost anything. get outta here with your ridiculous commenting. you're as bad as clay.
tell-em said on 29/Jul/11
vegas, how tall are you? and how tall do u think steve is?
James said on 28/Jul/11
the rock i think has not been so lucky cause he looks too have lost as a result of surgeries.... then again the rock is taller than stone cold steve austin so maybe that is why he is so prone too losing height?
Vegas said on 28/Jul/11
tell-em says on 27/Jul/11
the way you put it vegas, you make it seem as if he should have lost 2 inches.
________________

my point is if surgeries are really the main cause of so much shrinkage in wrestling (as a few on here claim) then why has austin not been affected, i don't think austins lost anything, if you look back at him early 1990s in wcw he looks right around 6ft or maybe a little taller and still looks that today

i have met steve a number of times since 2002 and he is taller than me
tell-em said on 27/Jul/11
well austin STILL looks 6'1". like i said, if he lost height, it had to be a few mm. the way you put it vegas, you make it seem as if he should have lost 2 inches.
hs2011 said on 23/Jul/11
Austin says that his neck is in better shape now than it has been in years, which is good to hear. He really was falling apart in 2003. He still looks ~6'1".
James said on 21/Jul/11
i don't get how he didn't lose hieght
Vegas said on 21/Jul/11
if anyone should have lost height it should have been austin, he has had both knees operated on a couple of times (he wore massive braces on both knees for the last 3 years of his run), had major back surgery and neck fusion surgery and of course was forced to retire at 39, the documentary mania of wrestlemania which was filmed in the days leading up to mania 19 really highlights how much his body was falling apart on him at that stage
tell-em said on 20/Jul/11
if he did lose height, it probably be 3 mm. a fraction is silly at 46. hes probly still 6'1". he looks it.
James said on 20/Jul/11
He did look 6'2 when he had a wrestling match against 6'7 Sid Eudy even though i don't think he was that tall.

maybe?
6ft.05 (184cm) today
6ft1 (185cm) peak
Alex said on 19/Jul/11
At 46 he could have def lost a fraction in height.
tell-em said on 19/Jul/11
he hasn't lost anything. and he isn't 50. hes 46. hes 6'1" then and now. the man has a huge crome dome. just look at it w/ mamun
Mathew said on 18/Jul/11
Alex says on 13/Jul/11
6'1 peak Austin I can agree with. Today he looks slightly shorter. 184cm I think he would be.

Yeah, he's a legit 6'1" back in his prime. I have no idea if he's lost a bit, he's gotta be pushing 50 now so it's possible he's down a fraction. He was usually billed as 6'2", occasionally even 6'3" I think although I'm not sure. Anyways, his 6'1" claim is pretty much bang on.
James said on 18/Jul/11
I don't think Austin is over 6'1
Legend said on 17/Jul/11
This guy has the perfect male height pretty much.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jul/11
Would 187cm out of bed be possible, Rob?
Terryman said on 14/Jul/11
austin barrely egded out 1,82m miz and dolf zigler,at best he was 0,5in taller but maybe their shoes were thicker than his running shoes!
Alex said on 13/Jul/11
6'1 peak Austin I can agree with. Today he looks slightly shorter. 184cm I think he would be.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jul/11
Rob, what are the chances of Austin being over 6ft1?
[Editor Rob: he only claims 6ft 1, which I think is perfectly reasonable for him.]
James said on 29/Jun/11
shocked to see DDP return.... but yeah that video proves that diamon dallas page is no less than 6'4
Vegas said on 29/Jun/11
yeah and next to kofi kingston he barely looked taller than i did

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.