How tall is Stone Cold Steve Austin - Page 4

Add a Comment1626 comments

Average Guess (224 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.04in (185.5cm)
Current: 6ft 0.49in (184.1cm)
Big Show said on 28/Jun/11
Speaking of Booker T, yesterday on RAW he looked easily 3 inches shorter than Diamond Dallas Page. Page might be in cowboy boots, but still.
Click Here
Sweep The Leg said on 26/Jun/11
he looks 6'1"... BUT I DONT KNOW WHY HE DOESNT LIE, OR HASNT BEEN UPGRADED ON HIS "BILLED HEIGHT" FOR WRESTLING 2 MORE INCHES LIKE THEY DO EVERYONE ELSE.
James said on 25/Jun/11
Yeah good chance JBL was 196cm peak
Terryman said on 23/Jun/11
Austin and JBl are solid proof that extensive neck and back surgery don't reduce that much in height! So:Austin 185cm peak 185cm today while JBL possibly 1,96m peak 1,94m today
James said on 22/Jun/11
Cena and Austin are around the same height
Mathew said on 21/Jun/11
Austin is a little taller than Cena, I believe, rather than the other way around.
Legend said on 20/Jun/11
He's 6 feet according to what I'm seeing in this picture.
Vegas said on 20/Jun/11
imdb is a user edited site, same site has giant haystacks at 6'11 and i think by now enough evidence should have been posted on andres page to show he was never taller than 6'7

every site has kevin federline at 6ft, imdb has him at that 6ft too, guess john cena is really 6'3-6'4 so 7min mark Click Here
Alex said on 19/Jun/11
Booker T at 6'3 is crazy. LOL

Clay, really Austin 6'0.5 at his lowest? I'm not arguing 6'0.5 but maybe its more his midday height and by night hes 6'0-6'0 1/4. Cena may be 6'0.5 evening.
James said on 19/Jun/11
6'3 for booker t? Now i have heard it all.
Mamun said on 19/Jun/11
Vegas , Booker is listed every where even on I M D B . COM at 6' 3" ! I am sure his Excellency King ROB wasn't touched by the Andre story and gave him the 6' 2" listing after some research .

Regards

SUPERMUN
Mathew said on 18/Jun/11
I always saw this guy as a legit 6'1". He is very close to Booker T in height.
Clay said on 18/Jun/11
Steve has on boots but he isn't standing as straight as Mamun either as he could care less about his height for the pic. I he did thats another CM gained at least.

Still I wouldn't go under a solid 6'0.5 evening for him.
Vegas said on 18/Jun/11
austin and booker were extremely close in height whenever the too were together on wwe tv back in the early 00s, not sure how mamun saw booker at 6'3, i think he probably gave him the extra 2 inches because he said nice things about andre :D
Big Show said on 18/Jun/11
Alex says on 17/Jun/11
Clay, thats true Austin looks very close in height to Booker T comparing the pics with Mamun but Mamun did say Austin had boots on in their pic.

Austin looked slightly taller than Booker T in a backstage segment on Smackdown back in 2011 Click Here
Although with those shoulder-mounted cameras you never know, but Austin was lookin' down at Booker T most of the segment and Booker T was lookin' up.
Alex said on 17/Jun/11
Clay, thats true Austin looks very close in height to Booker T comparing the pics with Mamun but Mamun did say Austin had boots on in their pic.
James said on 17/Jun/11
Vegas says on 16/Jun/11
James says on 15/Jun/11
Austin might have been 185cm in the 90's. He looks to have lost around 1 inch since then
________________

i don't think he has, he looks same height next to everyone recently, the rock at mania being the obvious one

wwe have now three nfl combine barefoot measured guys on their roster (at least that i know of and can find results), andy leavine was measured 6'4.75 barefoot at the combine Click Here andy with vince last week Click Here

Austins head looks higher than the NFL guys eye level so in comparison Austin looks 186cm or at worst 185cm........
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jun/11
Austin is just over 6ft1
Vegas said on 16/Jun/11
James says on 15/Jun/11
Austin might have been 185cm in the 90's. He looks to have lost around 1 inch since then
________________

i don't think he has, he looks same height next to everyone recently, the rock at mania being the obvious one

wwe have now three nfl combine barefoot measured guys on their roster (at least that i know of and can find results), andy leavine was measured 6'4.75 barefoot at the combine Click Here andy with vince last week Click Here
James said on 15/Jun/11
Austin might have been 185cm in the 90's. He looks to have lost around 1 inch since hten
Clay said on 14/Jun/11
Alex says on 8/Jun/11
I would say Austin is 6'0 and Cena is more like 6'0 1/2.

Austin is over 6'0 IMO. He's extremely close with Booker T next to amun at least.
James said on 13/Jun/11
looks 6'2 here compared to Pysco Sid. Big wrestling boots?
Click Here
James said on 10/Jun/11
Danimal says on 9/Jun/11
James says on 7/Jun/11
i think taker has not lost much height as hogan yet.

The only wrestler who has lost more height than Hogan is Piper (6'1.5" down to 5'9"). Billy Graham has as well. All due to multiple surgeries..

Yes but hogans height loss might be exzzagerated becuase he might have been more 6'5 than 6'6 at his peak.

Today Hogan does not look over 6'3. Even 6'3.5 is too much for him these days.

so maybe

6'5 (196cm) peak
6'2.75 (190cm) today
Danimal said on 9/Jun/11
James says on 7/Jun/11
i think taker has not lost much height as hogan yet.

The only wrestler who has lost more height than Hogan is Piper (6'1.5" down to 5'9"). Billy Graham has as well. All due to multiple surgeries..
James said on 8/Jun/11
i must say rob van damne looked not over 5'11 when he made an appearence at the 2009 Royal Rumble.
Alex said on 8/Jun/11
I would say Austin is 6'0 and Cena is more like 6'0 1/2.
Vegas said on 7/Jun/11
meant hogan and taker obviously, a list of wwe injuries between 2001 and 2010 Click Here no mention of neck surgery for taker there more detailed Click Here

prior to 2001 taker had surgery, september 1999 groin surgery, feb 2000, torn pectoral muscle, out of action till may 2000, october 2000 gallblader surgery october 2000 out till november 2000

neck surgery would have kept him out the best part of year anyway like austin, angle, rhyno, lita, benoit and he was never out that long
James said on 7/Jun/11
i think taker has not lost much height as hogan yet.
Vegas said on 7/Jun/11
austin and taker didn't have neck surgery, at least there is zero evidence online that they did
Danimal said on 6/Jun/11
Chief Wannadubie says on 31/May/11
Stone Cold was on the radio out here in the Bay Area back when he was promoting The Condemned. One of the interviewers commented on how massive he is, and guessed his height (he guessed high, but I don't recall what). He said that he used to be 6'1", but since his neck surgery he is 6 foot flat. His words.

Hogan AND Taker both lost height due to neck surgery as well.
Danimal said on 6/Jun/11
Alex says on 6/Jun/11
I just saw the clip of Austin and Cena on Tough Enough. Austin looks a bit taller when they shake hands due the angle I think. Both are probably the same in height.

Yeah, I think Austin is around 6'0". He probably came out taller than Cena because Austin tends to wear big army/construction boots almost all the time.
TELLEM said on 6/Jun/11
lol. due to the angle. i've said it time and time again. austin is a legit 6'1". hes always been taller than cena.
Legend said on 6/Jun/11
I like Steve Austin. I just wish he didn't drink as much. He seems like a really cool guy.
Alex said on 6/Jun/11
I just saw the clip of Austin and Cena on Tough Enough. Austin looks a bit taller when they shake hands due the angle I think. Both are probably the same in height.
Alex said on 6/Jun/11
Teddy, they are very close to the exact same height but Cena I thought was a smidge taller. I agree Austin was prob 6'1 at his peak but due to injuries more 6'0 or so now. Can you post the video with Cena and Austin.
James said on 6/Jun/11
i sometimes think cena can look 6ft max
Teddy said on 4/Jun/11
Alex, cena is shorter than austin just go watch the tough enough episode where austin and cena are close to each other. cena is 6'0 max and austin is 6'05 max. (after is injury that is, b4 I actually believe that 6'1 in 98 was accurate for austin)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Jun/11
187cm morning
186cm afternoon
185cm evening
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jun/11
There are three factors that need to be considered.
1. He's bald so when he's standing next to people of similiar stature full head of hair he can appear shorter.
2. He's always leaning to one side or bending his head forward when he's confronting someone.
3. The guy weighs about 250lbs and about as wide as a truck and so his massive frame can make him look shorter.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jun/11
This what I think

Barefoot 186cm
Normal shoes 188-189cm
Boots 190cm
Vegas said on 2/Jun/11
austins probably taller now than back in the mid 1990s (due to better posture), back then his neck was causing him great distress, when he had his neck fusion his doctor claimed his neck would be stronger than before his injury, 4th paragraph down Click Here

you rarely see austin holding his head to one side last few years
James said on 2/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 1/Jun/11
Sorry James but I disagree.

Might have been 188cm in boots back in 1998
Hugh 191cm said on 8/Jul/09
Austin 187-188cm, rock 191-192cm, Cena 184-185cm, triple h 189cm, mcmahon 187cm (188cm) peak. Shawn michaels 181-182cm. Bret hart 182-183cm, roddy piper 183cm (186cm peak)
TELLEM said on 2/Jul/09
Hugh 190cm says on 1/Jul/09
Clearly a solid 6ft1 if not closer to 6ft2. MAX 1.5 inches shorter than the Rock.

WHY DO YOU ALWAYS UPGRADE EVERYBODY??? he stated his height as 6'1. hes that or possibly lower. no more.
Hugh 190cm said on 1/Jul/09
Clearly a solid 6ft1 if not closer to 6ft2. MAX 1.5 inches shorter than the Rock.
Anonymous said on 1/Jul/09
Hes never seen 6-1 in his life. 6-0 max.
Daii said on 30/Jun/09
Austin looks 6'0 in this picture, but both arent standing level to each other. I can definitely see him as a full 6'1 guy from wrestling though
TELLEM said on 30/Jun/09
6'0.75 during the day. 6'1.25 when he wakes
Luis said on 30/Jun/09
I was thinking about 6'2 in this picture, but his cap is trickier...I give him around 184 cm.
Alex said on 27/Jun/09
6'0.75-6'1 out of bed probably and 6'0 by bed. Solid 6 footer overall.
Clay said on 25/Jun/09
6'0.75-6'1.
Hugh 190cm said on 22/Jun/09
Closer to 6ft2 in my Opinion.
Hugh 190cm said on 5/Jun/09
a very solid 6ft1 at the least and possibly a weak 6ft2.
Hugh 190cm said on 4/Jun/09
I buy 6ft1.5 to 6ft2 for this guy. I'm sorry if you think I'm constantly upgrading celebs but there are a fair few celebs I think are shorter than they're listed at.

Hugh 190cm.
Hugh 190cm said on 30/May/09
RVD might even be 5ft11.5.
Alex said on 29/May/09
Clay, I will agree that Austin can look as tall as 6'1 in the picture but barely. I dont see anything more than 2 inches there. May only be 1.5 inches. Its from a low camera angle so it may appear more do to that.
Clay said on 28/May/09
Thats easily 2 inches over RVD more like 2.5 IMO.
Alex said on 28/May/09
I've seen Austin and RVD look only an inch apart at times too.
TELLEM said on 28/May/09
i can't, because RVD doesn't have good posture aswell.
Hugh 190cm said on 28/May/09
If Austin stood with better posture I could possibly see him looking over 6ft1.
hs2009 said on 26/May/09
Thanks Tellem.

Austin has 2" on RVD in that pic, he's a legit 6'1" guy IMO because we know for sure that RVD is 5'11" given that we have a pic of him with a legit 5'11" guy on this site.
Alex said on 25/May/09
RVD at 5'11 puts Austin at 6'0 1/2 there which I can buy for him.
TELLEM said on 25/May/09
great pic hs, he does look 6'1
hs2009 said on 25/May/09
Look as this pic though, no way does Austin look only 6'0". He looks all of 6'1" IMO:
Click Here
Hugh 190cm said on 23/May/09
Looked barely shorter than Triple H at times. Both in Boots. 1 inch MAX. Aswell Triple H is probably over 6ft2 anyway.
Hugh 190cm said on 22/May/09
The Rock is more of a 6ft3-6ft4 type guy. Austin is Definately between 6ft1 and 6ft2. Rikishi could be 6ft1 but that's the max.
Hugh 190cm said on 21/May/09
The Rock 192cm
Steve Austin 187cm
Rikishi 184cm
Alex said on 21/May/09
Rikisi is 6'1. Austin I thought looked slightly shorter than him from what I remember. ANd Rock doens't look much taller than Rikishi there. Looks more 6'2-6'2.5 there but thats backstage and we cant really trust backstage. I've seen ROck look 2 inches taller than Rikishi in the ring.
James said on 19/May/09
Always looked a 6'0 guy.
Hugh 190cm said on 19/May/09
Austin always looked 1 inch taller than Rikishi who is listed as 185cm on this site. I'd say Austin is 6ft1.5-6ft2 and Rikishi is 6ft0.5-6ft1.
Hugh 190cm said on 19/May/09
Rikishi might be 6ft0.5.
calvinator said on 18/May/09
6 foot to 6'1 max.
Sheetz said on 18/May/09
Yeah, Austin looks around 6-0 and the Rock is around 6-2. I dont see the Rock being 6-3. Here the Rock barely looks taller than 6-1 Rikishi. Click Here
TELLEM said on 18/May/09
rock and austin face to face again: Click Here rock looks 2 inches taller than austin
Alex said on 18/May/09
Danimal, I saw Beyond the Mat but I dont really remember the height difference between Rock and Austin but usually in the ring it looks 2-2.5 inches. Most evidence points to Austin being 6'0 to 6'0 1/2.
Sam said on 18/May/09
Mam is a proven 5'8, so Austin is not shorter than 6'0, actually 6'1.5 looks about right.
Danimal said on 18/May/09
6'0" FLAT.
TELLEM said on 17/May/09
6'2 is bogus
TELLEM said on 17/May/09
Austin is 185cm
Anonymous said on 17/May/09
More like Austin is 184cm max and Rock is 189cm max.
Hugh 190cm said on 17/May/09
Austin is 187cm and The Rock is 192cm.
James said on 15/May/09
The Rock does see to have a good 2 inches on Stone Cold. But in the vid I did notice that Steve Austins legs were spread further apart than the rocks.
TELLEM said on 14/May/09
bret hart looks 6'0 next to 5'11 ric flair here: Click Here
TELLEM said on 14/May/09
thats a backstage vid anonymous, those are tricky.
Danimal said on 14/May/09
TELLEM says on 13/May/09
Hugh 190cm says on 13/May/09
In all those wrestling matches between the Rock and Austin there was only about 1.5 or at most 2 inches between them. Aswell the Rock could actually be 192cm. Which would result in a 187cm Steve Austin. I think Austin's height is between 186cm-188cm.

Austin had bret hart by 1 INCH. and bret hart is/was 6'0 peak. austin IS 6'1. and nothing more.

Bret Hart was 5'11" PEAK. that was what he was billed at in Stampede wrestling and he was in his 20's at that point (FULLY grown).
Anonymous said on 13/May/09
Hugh take a look at this, I always believed austin to be 6 feet or maybe half an inch taller than that in this video he is about 2 inches taller than 5'10 kurt angle, take a look. Click Here
TELLEM said on 13/May/09
Hugh 190cm says on 13/May/09
In all those wrestling matches between the Rock and Austin there was only about 1.5 or at most 2 inches between them. Aswell the Rock could actually be 192cm. Which would result in a 187cm Steve Austin. I think Austin's height is between 186cm-188cm.

Austin had bret hart by 1 INCH. and bret hart is/was 6'0 peak. austin IS 6'1. and nothing more.
TELLEM said on 13/May/09
but then again, when rock starts leaving i realized he had heels in his shoes. austin's boots are flat.
TELLEM said on 13/May/09
the rock and austin face to face starting @ 5:44: Click Here at them at 5:48. judge for yourself. the rock is leaning while austin is standing straighter than him.
Hugh 190cm said on 13/May/09
In all those wrestling matches between the Rock and Austin there was only about 1.5 or at most 2 inches between them. Aswell the Rock could actually be 192cm. Which would result in a 187cm Steve Austin. I think Austin's height is between 186cm-188cm.
TELLEM said on 12/May/09
Danimal says on 11/May/09
James says on 10/May/09
Hugh might have a point, there never looked a great deal between Austin and the Rock.

You've obviously never seen the movie Beyond the Mat where The Rock had 3" on Austin backstage.

He had 3 inches on Austin because The rock was RIGHT next to the camera and Austin was farther away.
Danimal said on 11/May/09
James says on 10/May/09
Hugh might have a point, there never looked a great deal between Austin and the Rock.

You've obviously never seen the movie Beyond the Mat where The Rock had 3" on Austin backstage.
James said on 10/May/09
Hugh might have a point, there never looked a great deal between Austin and the Rock.
Danimal said on 10/May/09
TELLEM says on 28/Apr/09
rvd with 5'10 burt reynolds Click Here

Burt is nothing over 5'9" imo.
Hugh 190cm said on 9/May/09
Austin is 185-187cm.
TELLEM said on 29/Apr/09
i agree with you hs2009.
hs2009 said on 29/Apr/09
Thanks for those pics Tellem!

RVD does indeed look much closer to 6'0" in those pics. Looking at him with SCSA, I do think Austin is deffo legit 6'1" & RVD is probably 5'11"-5'11.5".
TELLEM said on 28/Apr/09
rvd with 5'10 burt reynolds Click Here

rvd w/ 6'3.5-6'4 method man Click Here
TELLEM said on 28/Apr/09
look at RVD w/ 6'0 redman Click Here
TELLEM said on 28/Apr/09
5'10 for RVD is a joke. hes 5'11.5.
hs2009 said on 28/Apr/09
Ola says on 28/Apr/09
I believe RVD could be shorter than his listed 5'11, he was barely taller than 5'10 tops tatanka so rvd could be only 5'10 or so

I'm not sure about RVD, I thought he was 5'11" but Austin is leaning and has 2" on him. If he stood up straight, RVD would look 5'10". Hmmm...
hs2009 said on 27/Apr/09
Austin CLEARLY looks 6'1" there with RVD. No way is that only 1.5" between them, it looks 2" at least.

I'd also like to see a pic of Cena & Austin @ HOF last year :D
TELLEM said on 27/Apr/09
as far as i know, there are none. you have to watch in dvd because off youtube you can't tell very well. i always thought rvd was 5'11.5...he looks it on here in this page aswell.
Alex said on 24/Apr/09
Where is this picture of Austin 1/2 inch taller than Cena? I'd like to see.

With 5'11 RVD Austin looks 6'0 1/2.
TELLEM said on 23/Apr/09
which explains why he was 1/2 taller than john cena at the 2008 hall of fame.
TELLEM said on 23/Apr/09
now i'm beginning to think that austin really is a legit 6'1.
hs2009 said on 23/Apr/09
I think this is SCSA here with RVD, Sabu & Chris Masters. He looks a solid 6'1" here IMO:
Click Here
hs2009 said on 21/Apr/09
Thanks for those pics Vegas! Austin looks 6'1" there with Gary Godsey.
Alex said on 19/Apr/09
Ola, yea looked around 2.5 inches difference. 3 would be the most.
Clay said on 17/Apr/09
Rock could be 6'3.5. Steve could have the footwear advantage over Mamun but just look at the respective postures.
TELLEM said on 16/Apr/09
and you upgrade everybody hugh 190cm. whats your point? just look at 5'8 mamun next to austin, and according to mamun, austin was wearing the BIG FOOTWEAR.
Alex said on 16/Apr/09
In that mugshot he was at 192cm I believe which is 6'3 1/2. But with the low angle it made him appear that much. Could be as much as 2 inches less. Those mugshots can be off, cant judge by them.
Vegas said on 16/Apr/09
hs2009 says on 15/Apr/09
It's really good having the pic with Mamum, but it would nice to have one with someone 6'0"+.

will 6'7ish gary godsey do?? Click Here

vince and 6'2ish donald trump Click Here
Hugh 190cm said on 16/Apr/09
TELLEM you downgrade everybody. Sure you're nowhere near as bad as Viper but still. Austin always looked 1.5-2 inches MAX shorter than the Rock so 6ft1+ isn't laughable.
hs2009 said on 15/Apr/09
Alex says on 15/Apr/09
I'd love to meet Austin. One of my faves of all time. Also I'd be a great measuring stick for meeting him. I'd expect him to be roughly the same height as me.

Yeah Alex, you would be the perfect measuring stick on here. You'd be about the same height I would imagine, maybe 0.5" shorter.

It's really good having the pic with Mamum, but it would nice to have one with someone 6'0"+.
TELLEM said on 15/Apr/09
Hugh 190cm says on 14/Apr/09
The man measures at 6ft4 in boots. That definitely puts him close to the 6ft2 mark in barefeet.

please don't tell me your talking about his mugshot. rob demonstrated with a bad angle how u could get nearly 3 inches, which is what austin was aining due to the bad camera angle. 6'1 MAX.
Alex said on 15/Apr/09
I'd love to meet Austin. One of my faves of all time. Also I'd be a great measuring stick for meeting him. I'd expect him to be roughly the same height as me.
Hugh 190cm said on 14/Apr/09
The man measures at 6ft4 in boots. That definitely puts him close to the 6ft2 mark in barefeet.
Hugh 190cm said on 14/Apr/09
Easily 6ft1 and probably more of a 186cm guy if you ask me.
towel said on 14/Apr/09
Nope - doubt it...Watch that clip where hes in the ring with Mike Tyson...Theyre the same height..Tysons listed 5'11..Plus Stone Cold looks 2 inches shorter then 6'2 Triple H...
TELLEM said on 12/Apr/09
look at austin next to 5'9 brian pillman...6'0.5 for austin makes sense...hell look at him with the rock aswell.
Alex said on 10/Apr/09
Clay, I got to meet Rob, not Glenn because Glenn wasn't able to meet that weekend and I couldn't go there on the weekdays. It went well. Rob was the height I expected as a strong 5'8.25. He was a nice guy as well as his g/f Jenny who was nice too. Cool people they are. I was glad to meet them.

As far as Austin. I am a big Austin fan but I just dont think he's reaches 6'1 anymore, maybe out of bed at most. Not saying he's just 6'0 but something in between 6'0 and 6'1.
TELLEM said on 10/Apr/09
6'1 maximum
Hugh 190cm said on 9/Apr/09
6ft1 minimum.
TELLEM said on 9/Apr/09
austin at a weak 6'1 makes sense.
Clay said on 8/Apr/09
You've been lobbying to bring down Austin for a while now Alex. So you met Rob and Glenn, how did it go?
Clay said on 7/Apr/09
6'1 on the dot.
Alex said on 7/Apr/09
I was talking to Rob in person about some of the celebs on this site and Austin was one and I was suggesting to bring him down to 6'0.5.
Hugh 190cm said on 5/Apr/09
Sorry, but 6ft is ridiculous. There are just far too many pictures him on Raw and the condemned where he's consistently appearing at 6ft1-6ft2.
Alex said on 5/Apr/09
Austin was taller than Cena by an inch at the Hall of Fame Ceremony? Got a picture. I figured they were the same height or if anything Cena was slightly taller.
Hugh 190cm said on 31/Mar/09
The full 6ft2 is a bit to tall. But he does look near 6ft2. 186cm is a good estimate. Anything form 185cm to 187cm is right. He has clearly taller than John Cena (6ft0.5) at the Hall of Fame Ceremony by an inch.
Alex said on 30/Mar/09
Hugh, no disrespect but no way is Austin as tall as 6'2 or even in that range. The guy looks roughly in the 183-184cm range, 185cm would really be pushing it for him.

Goldberg is 6'2, same as Lesnar.
Hugh 190cm said on 27/Mar/09
Austin is unquestionably 185cm-188cm range.
TELLEM said on 24/Mar/09
actually austin edges out john cena by .5 inch...i was watching the wwe hall of fame 2008 and when the rock came out the camera from a far distance was panned to austin and cena who were both next to each other.
Anonymous said on 24/Mar/09
Yes I agree with Tellem I believe Austin is 6'0 feet he for all those who say john cena is shorter that a lie. Cena is just an inch shorter than triple h and on the Tonish show wiht jay leno tonight he was about 3 inches taller than 5'11 jay leno. So Leno is probably 5'10
Clay said on 23/Mar/09
Goldberg could be 6'3.
hs2009 said on 23/Mar/09
Austin says on 23/Mar/09
Steve and Vince have same height. Don't take it seriously, 'cause i just thought so.

Don't wanna steal one of Austin's old catchphrases here but, WHAT?
TELLEM said on 23/Mar/09
golberg had 2 inches over stone cold....and goldberg IS 6'2
Austin said on 23/Mar/09
Steve and Vince have same height. Don't take it seriously, 'cause i just thought so.
Anonymous said on 21/Mar/09
trump closer to camera and vince on his tip-toes in that video, both eliminated here, austin under 6ft ain't happening Click Here

does this look like a guy under 6ft Click Here
Danimal said on 21/Mar/09
For all those who think Steve is 6'1", THINK AGAIN. Here we have a RARE video of Stone Cold in 2007 coming in in SNEAKERS and facing off against Donald Trump and Vince McMahon. Stone Cold without his boots appears to be a FLAT 6'0", or just shy of that. It's at the 50 second mark and onwards and it's VERY obvious and remember, this is an AGED Donald Trump and Vince McMahon (both men in their 60's): Click Here
TELLEM said on 17/Mar/09
well most of the time vince is taller or the same height as austin,meanwhile austin isn't taller in any of those vids...austin IS shorter than vince.
Shock of Electric said on 16/Mar/09
This is no different from any other videos I've ever seen of Vince and Austin myself, their height advantage goes back and forth constantly depending on the camera angle, and most of the time Austin's head is level with Vince's hair anyway, on top of that, Austin is almost always leaning forward anytime he appears shorter.. They are virtually identical height.
Shock of Electric said on 15/Mar/09
Bret at 6'0.5" peak I believe, I believe did have a slight boot advantage over Austin, as just about everyone did. Austin's boots were definitely as small as .5", Hart's no more than 1", probably .75".
TELLEM said on 15/Mar/09
vince and austin again: Click Here

and again: Click Here

vince is taller than austin by half an inch, which would make austin 6'0.5 and reaches 6'1 out of bed. vince 6'1, 6'1.5 out of bed.
TELLEM said on 15/Mar/09
and neither did vince stand straight next to austin...actually its that way around, vince had worse posture than austin...look at :50 seconds and on here: Click Here
hs2009 said on 15/Mar/09
I totally agree SoE about Austin's boots. That's how Bret Hart looked so close in height with Austin. Bret was MAX 6'0" at his peak IMO, he wore boots with a thicker sole which made him look more 6'1".

I would be surprised if Austin's boots gave much more than 0.5"-0.75" boost.

He didn't really stand that straight with Vince all the time either, so he could have been the same height if he stood up straight IMO. Austin is certainly not under 6'0.75" IMO.
Shock of Electric said on 15/Mar/09
Sigh. I didn't say he was 6'2". I said it's not *ridiculous*. If someone thinks he's 6'2", I could understand why.

You can find pics where Austin is taller than Vince so you can't say "he was always shorter than Vince McMahon".

I've also seen people say Austin wore "large" footwear in the ring, now *that* is ridiculous as he had some of the thinnest boots at the time. In the ring he comes out in general, about .25"-.5" shorter on everyone than he actually was considering the average boot jump in the late 90s.
hs2009 said on 14/Mar/09
Only by about 0.5" though. Vince was about 6'1.25"-6'1.5" back then IMO, putting Austin in that weak 6'1" region again.
Vegas said on 13/Mar/09
pillman was listed at 5'10 in the nfl Click Here
Derek said on 13/Mar/09
Austin was always shorter than Vince McMahon.
TELLEM said on 13/Mar/09
6'2 is ridiculous...6'2 would mean brian pillman was 5'10.5, 6'2 would also mean that austin is a liar when claims hes 6'1, 6'2 would mean jason statham is 5'10.5, and 6'2 would aswell mean that the rock is 6'4.5-6'5.
Shock of Electric said on 13/Mar/09
6'2" for Austin is not at all "ridiculous." He's a cool 5" taller than Mamun in this pic and yet he's not even standing up straight while Mamun looks like he has a rake in his shirt. 6'1.5" is very possible and I'd even go as far to say 6'1.75" peak. A friend of mine is nearly 6'4" when he wakes up and 6'3 1/8" exactly before he goes to bed and still says he's 6'3". Some people don't care as much to inflate their height, and Austin obviously is one of those people. Austin probably should have been billed 6'3" but generally 6'2".
Clay said on 11/Mar/09
6'2 is really pushing it but 6'0.5-6'1 is where he nestles in.
TELLEM said on 9/Mar/09
6'2 for austin is ridiculous
Clay said on 9/Mar/09
He's taller next to Shaq than 6'1 Steve Nash Hugh.
_-_-_-Hugh-_-_-_/ said on 9/Mar/09
This guy to me is no less than his listed height here. I'm always seeing this guy at 6ft1/6ft2.
Alex said on 8/Mar/09
Think of all the faceoffs with Austin and HHH back then. Was HHH ever a full 2 inches taller than Austin. Sometimes barely looked 2 inches at most between the 2.
Vegas said on 8/Mar/09
Ola says on 6/Mar/09
6'0 1/2

i agree with that, thats what i saw in person about a year ago

Derek i don't believe he lost any height, in fact if anything the surgery meant he stands taller now, he ain't hanging his neck to one side now as he did for years Click Here Click Here
Derek said on 7/Mar/09
6'0.5" pre-neck injury, 6'0" today.
TELLEM said on 7/Mar/09
i agree, hes 6'0.5...and reaches 6'1 outta bed
hs2009 said on 7/Mar/09
Thanks Clay!

I really don't see how he can be under 185cm, it's blatant in every picture of him. He also had a solid 1", perhaps a smidge more, on a peak Shawn Michaels who was no way under 5'11.5" in 1997/1998.

I guess some people see something different :D
Clay said on 6/Mar/09
Agreed as always HS.
_-_-_-Hugh-_-_-_/ said on 6/Mar/09
John says on 5/Mar/09

6'1" 1/2

Couldn't agree with you more. Austin is a proper 187cm man with good posture. Barefoot aswell.
hs2009 said on 6/Mar/09
He has 4.5" on a 5'8.25" Mamum so is a weak 6'1" IMO.
hs2009 said on 3/Mar/09
TELLEM, Shane McMahon was in the audience chanting "You Sold Out!" at both men along with the MSG crowd! WWE can be pretty spiteful about people leaving the company the way those guys, especially Lesnar, did. He gave them SO little notice that he was leaving to play NFL, that storylines would've had to be hastily changed, it caused WWE a lot of inconvinience plus left a HUGE hole in their talent roster. It meant that career mid-carder Bradshaw had to become a main-eventer!

Why would you want to have a bad match leaving a company? It doesn't reflect bad on WWE because both guys are leaving. I think that match was WWE's parting gift to both men, Goldberg had a really mediocre run and made a lot of money doing it & Lesnar just upped & left with a weeks notice.
TELLEM said on 2/Mar/09
why would they want that hs2009? if anything i'm sure goldberg and lesnar planned the whole thing and wanted to stick it to WWE since it was their last night with that company, which they both loathed the company.
_-_-_-Hugh-_-_-_/ said on 27/Feb/09
Austin looked 2 inches taller than 6ft Dane Cook.
hs2009 said on 23/Feb/09
I think WWE deliberately wanted the Lesnar vs. Goldberg match to be boring, since both men were leaving the company afterwards. The only guy in that match that left looking good was Stone Cold as the referee.

It would be awesome to have Austin wrestle one more match at WM 25. I'd like to see him against Undertaker or John Cena, but I highly doubt that will ever happen :(
Alex said on 22/Feb/09
Back at WM 20 I was looking forward to Brock Lesnar vs Goldberg and I thought it was going to be a great match. 2 powerhouses facing off but Lesnar was the better wrestler of the 2. I watch the match and it ends up being under average. I wont say it sucked very bad because a few points in the match were good.
Alex said on 21/Feb/09
Vegas, yea back in 1998 Austin vs Goldberg would have been HUGE. Nobody would care much if that happened now though.
Yea if Austin or Hogan wrestle they may lose to someone like Cena. Orton is going for a main title so he wont be against either of them.
Vegas said on 20/Feb/09
hogan vs austin should have taken place in 2002 imo, it wouldn't draw near as much money now as people think, austin is finished, hogan can still go for sure but it would be up to him to dictate the entire course of the match, something which has never been his strong point; the match would probably end up looking horrible. hogan and cena imo would be fine match, hogan losing would signify passing the torch to the next generation of mega-star, if austin or hogan do wrestle they should put one of the current roster over big time, guys like cena, orton, edge are now ready to carry the torch.

regarding biggest match in history, imagine if they booked goldberg (before he lost) against austin in 1998, that would have broken all records
Alex said on 18/Feb/09
I heard Austin vs Hogan too. That would be cool to see though. I've heard UT vs HBK which would be great. I dont like the Jericho/Hogan idea really.
Vegas said on 18/Feb/09
Ola says on 17/Feb/09
Austin vs Hogan in WM25 false or true?

austin/hogan a match between two non-regular competitors will never happen at mania, current word is that it could be jericho/hogan or jericho/austin OR hogan/cena
Alex said on 14/Feb/09
Actually I think if anything Cena may edge out Austin by a hair.
Clay said on 13/Feb/09
Minimum 6'0.5.
\\\\\\\\-_-_-(Hugh)-_-_-/ said on 13/Feb/09
He's about an inch taller than Cena. Cena is 184cm and Austin is 187cm. End of discussion. He towered over everyone in The Condemned and Looked all of 4 inches taller than Adam Sandler whose a legit 5ft10.
Vegas said on 12/Feb/09
in your first photo TELLEM the guy in the middle is dane cook who is listed on this site at 6'0 Click Here

in your second photo the guy in the middle is ex soccer/football hardman vinnie jones who is listed on this site at 6'2 Click Here
TELLEM said on 10/Feb/09
steve austin w/ 5'9 jason statham and some other dude in the middle : Click Here Click Here
Alex said on 9/Feb/09
Mamun did say Austin looked to have a bit of footwear advantage too. If he was in boots and mamun was in sneakers then for sure Austin's gotta have 1/2 inch advantage.
chris said on 6/Feb/09
Stone Cold is 6 feet althought i thought hed be taller Click Here take a look at this its him and kurt angle swicth to 2:46 stone cold has 2 inches on kurt angle
Clay said on 5/Feb/09
Nope. Try again - draw a straight line from Austin's right eye it reaches near the top of Mamun's skull - 4'5-5 inches over 5'8ish Supermun'.
rob89 said on 3/Feb/09
He looks between 5'11 and 6' to me in Mamun's pic, but he's obviously not standing as straight as him. I still think he's closer to an even 6' though, than a legit 6'1. Stone Cold's posture really isn't THAT bad.
hs2009 said on 18/Jan/09
In Texas, the crowd would favour Austin HUGELY I would imagine.

I remember WM 17 in Houston, with Austin vs. The Rock. Even though Rocky was amazingly popular in his own right, the crowd was 100% pro-Austin.
Clay said on 17/Jan/09
Thats bizarre how much a mugshot enhances height like that Rob.
Hugh said on 10/Jan/09
He looks 6ft1-2.
Ian said on 3/Jan/09
How do you get 3 inches taller Rob in those trainers? Can you explain that?

[Editor Rob: they are converse, I was about 5ft 8.75 in them, that old shot was to show even being a few inches in front of somebody else and having a low camera angle and the camera being reasonably close can make you appear taller.

Imagine a 5ft 10 guy standing 4 inches behind me, we would look the same height.]
hs2008 said on 3/Jan/09
Hugh, I wouldn't quite go that high IMO but I wouldn't go under 185cm either. He has 4.5" on a 5'8.25" Mamum, so 6'0.75" or a weak 6'1" seems right for Austin.
Alex said on 2/Jan/09
Austin is 184cm.
Alex said on 1/Jan/09
Rob, so that picture of you is making you look 2 inches taller then. You are about up to the 5'11 mark there.
TELLEM said on 31/Dec/08
heres austin @ 2:38 seconds and on next to 6'0-6'1 peak arn anderson, 6'3-6'4 rick rude, 5'11 larry zbysko Click Here
Hugh said on 31/Dec/08
hs2008. I think Austin is around 187cm-188cm.
hs2008 said on 30/Dec/08
Austin has 3"+ on J.J. Dillon though, who's not under 5'10". J.J looks the same height as Ric Flair. I can't see Austin under 6'1".
TELLEM said on 28/Dec/08
thank you alex, now i believe hes under 6'1...i'm serious by the way
Alex said on 28/Dec/08
6'0 1/2 barefoot, plus big boots= 6'2-6'2 1/2 then plus the low angle shot which can make it appear 6'3.
TELLEM said on 27/Dec/08
once again, his mugshot has him at 6'3...please explain how a 6'0-6'0 1/2 wrestler goes up to 6'3?
Alex said on 27/Dec/08
I see 6'0 1/2 in the picture above.
Clay said on 26/Dec/08
Stone cold was a wrestler who was billed pretty accuratly, along with Cena, Orton and a few others. If they billed him 6'3'' 265 they could have gotten away with it. I just dont understand how people dont see 6'1'' in this pic next to Mamun. Keep in mind Mamun isnt 5'8, he's 5'8.25 - Austin is SLOUCHING and his right eye reaches the top of Mamun's skull. Use your noggen's people.
Alex said on 26/Dec/08
Ola, yea Austin is in that 6'0-6'0 1/2 range, no more no less. Thing is Cena is shorter on this site than Austin which I dont believe. If anything Cena may be a smidge taller than Austin.
Jason W. said on 25/Dec/08
pro wrestling generally bills there wrestlers at 2 inches taller and maybe 20 lbs heavier. stonecold to my knowledge has always been billed at 6'2, so chances are he is somewhere around the 6'0 range.
TELLEM said on 24/Dec/08
austin must have worn lifts thenin the mugshot
Da Man said on 23/Dec/08
Clay says on 18/Dec/08
"Actually next to Glenn he did look oddly 6'0ish but with Mamun here its easy 6'1''. Visualize his eyeline next to the top of Mamun's head, and look at the posture difference."

Eh, I only see 4"...*maybe* 4.5" difference between Austin and Mamun accounting for posture. I can't agree with an easy 6'1" there at all, more like 6'0.5" at the max and likely 6'0" based on the Mamun pic.
Hugh said on 22/Dec/08
If he's stacking up at above 6ft3 in the mugshot, he cannot be less than 6ft1. He's between 6ft1 and 6ft2.
Hugh said on 22/Dec/08
Guys, My cousin whose 5ft9-10 met Austin at a house event just a couple of weeks back and told me he was huge. She showed me a picture of him. He was in low cut sneakers and is towering over her.
Anonymous said on 22/Dec/08
i am not comparing mid 1990s this is 1987 and has been posted many times before, roddy is not taller than bret there, if he is its minimal Click Here

march 1992 again minimal or no height difference Click Here
Danimal said on 21/Dec/08
Anonymous says on 20/Dec/08
Danimal says on 18/Dec/08

Peak Hart was 5'11".

then peak roddy piper was 5'11 too

Roddy was most definitely taller than Bret Hart in the mid-late 80's. Do NOT compare a much shrunken Piper of WCW (mid-late 90's) with Bret Hart. Piper was a tall man in the 1980's. He lost height somewhere along the way (back surgery, hip replacement).
Anonymous said on 20/Dec/08
Danimal says on 18/Dec/08

Peak Hart was 5'11".

then peak roddy piper was 5'11 too
TELLEM said on 18/Dec/08
the thing that really gets me is austin's mugshot...therefore i cant buy him at 6'0-6'1/2...austin is 6'1
Clay said on 18/Dec/08
Actually next to Glenn he did look oddly 6'0ish but with Mamun here its easy 6'1''. Visualize his eyeline next to the top of Mamun's head, and look at the posture difference.
Danimal said on 18/Dec/08
Red says on 17/Dec/08
I think he
Alex said on 18/Dec/08
Next to Shaq I will say he did look as tall as 6'1 but with Glenn and Mamun he looked more 6'0-6'0 1/2.
Clay said on 17/Dec/08
Looked 6'1 next to:

Shaq
Glenn
Mamun
Vince
Red said on 17/Dec/08
I think he
Alex said on 15/Dec/08
Austin doesn't look more than 6'0 1/2 unless he's wearing big boots.
Hugh said on 23/Nov/08
Judging by that picture of him infront of the height chart he must be at least 6ft1. My guess though is 6ft1-2.
Jason W. said on 20/Nov/08
I saw the ole Texas Rattlesnake in Huntsville,Ala a few years back at a wrestling event. I was probably as close as 5 feet away and he looked a legit 6'0 maybe 6'1 to me.
Hugh said on 19/Nov/08
I'd say a definate 6ft1
Alex said on 19/Nov/08
Big T, my waist around my navel is 35 inches but my jean size is 33 to 34, depending on the make. Its pretty tough to put on pure muscle so you gotta expect a bit of weight at the least to go to your stomach area.
Big T said on 19/Nov/08
Interestingly Alex, my calves are 15" and thighs 25.5" at 185lbs, so I guess we are in proportion. Unfortunately I am rocking a 36" waist :(
Clay said on 18/Nov/08
I ignore my calves in the gym. Really, theres no need to be carrying huge calves around all the time as long as you're building your thighs and quads, you're laughin.
Alex said on 18/Nov/08
Morg, I guess I am pretending if 205lbs is small, haha.
M.o.r.g said on 18/Nov/08
Still pretending you're big alex? XD
Alex said on 18/Nov/08
Big T, I am the same. I carry weight in my lower body except my calves which are no more than average. My upper body is big too but my shoulders just aren't very wide. I gotta measure them to see though.

Derek, yea but he's 200lbs with a 30, you're 160lbs with a 30. Its crazy when you think of it like that too.
Derek said on 18/Nov/08
Alex- My waist is also a 30. I'm not sure if I have that V shape though. My shoulders are also 40", which is far bigger than my waist.
Big T said on 18/Nov/08
Clay, i actually have skinny calves, it's just that my legs are so close to the camera in that pic. Also, i did some sort of online test where i measured my wrist and apparently i am actually small-framed for my height (dunno how accurate that was) which makes me about 50 lbs overweight in that photo. I do however carry a lot of weight in my thighs and ass which people for some reason don't seem to notice in a guy.
Alex said on 17/Nov/08
Derek, yea. This trainer at my gym is 6'1 and 200lbs, about the same weight as me. My arms are bigger unflexed but his are bigger flexed though, lol. We are around thee same size but he can appear a bit bigger because he has more a V shape than I do. I lack the V shape kinda as I use to have a better one.
But he claims his jean size is a 30 which is pretty small for a 6'1 200lb guy. My jeans are 33-34. Personally I wouldnt' wanna go below a 32 jeans at my height, would be too lean even if I was very built.
Derek said on 17/Nov/08
Alex- Yeah, he's very bulky. He pretty much has muscles on top of muscles lol. I actually outweigh him, but I look far smaller because I'm not as bulky and I'm at least 5 inches taller.
Alex said on 17/Nov/08
My upper legs are big, 26 inches around but my calves are only 15.5 inches which throws it off.
Alex said on 17/Nov/08
Clay, I also believe when some gets undeestimated with their weight its because of their stomach/abdominal area If its on the lean side it may make you seem less.
Clay said on 17/Nov/08
Big T...your legs look huge a lot of your weight im sure came from there maybe thats how people underestimated you? lol.
Alex said on 16/Nov/08
Big T, though you're sitting its not the best angle but I'd say you look around 185lbs there. 160-170 is way too low, those who guessed that are bad at guessing weight.
Big T said on 16/Nov/08
I weigh 185 atm, but at max 3 years ago I was 200lbs, and even I was surprised at how heavy I had got without looking all that big (it wasn't muscle, I'm just a lazy fatty, lol). I asked 2 people what they thought I weighed and they both said 165lbs!

Click Here

Sorry to disappoint that I'm not actually "Big" T, my name has nothing to do with that. It's also not the best pic, but the only one I can find from the time

To me I look chunky there, but it's amazing how many people thought I was between 160-170 there at 5'10 1/2", when I was 200lbs
Alex said on 15/Nov/08
Derek, I have medium sized bones though I my friend told me I look to be big boned which I don't see. 5'9 155lbs but looked 200lbs? wow he must be bulked up and ripped at the same time to look that much heavier.
Clay said on 14/Nov/08
A small frame thats very muscular looks bigger than it is - see Carrot top. I've been told I look ''190, at least'' and that was when I was 170. Im 185 now.
Derek said on 14/Nov/08
I'm 6'2" 160 and I almost always get guessed at the minimum 170. When you're muscular and have small bones, you look bigger. I also know someone that is 5'9" at best and he claims he weighs 155, and he looks like he's almost 200 pounds because of a naturally small frame.
M.o.r.g said on 14/Nov/08
I think people bullsh*t a lot on this site about their size.
Alex said on 14/Nov/08
Danimal, that makes sense. But most people who have lower body fat will appear heavier than they are, but bone denisty/size, body frame, height, come into play too. The last picture I saw of you with the UFC guy you looked at least 200-205lbs I would have thought.
Danimal said on 13/Nov/08
Annoyed says on 13/Nov/08
right i have to say, about Alex, if you go over to the stallone page, and look at my article on heel height and elevator shows, you will see pics of myself, no I lift weights a little bit, I am 5'7.5" and I weigh 195 lbs. So if Alex is 6'0" he MUST be more than 200 lbs!!!! someone saying not even 170. that is truley ridiculous, i was 170 natural weight at 5'5.5" and i was slim! so Alex is easilly over 200 lbs in that pic.

Onto Austin, 6'1" NO MORE, NO LESS! His mugshot is taken right after his arrest so who knows what footwear he was wearing.

Not necessarily AT ALL. It's all about BONE DENSITY. My friend who is 5'10" and HUGE (muscle) is in his 160's. My brother in law is MAX 5'6" and weighs like 138 pounds. I on the other hand am close to 5'10" and weigh 215-220 pounds most people think I am at least 30 pounds less than that. You can not quality or quantify bodyweight with actual size. We are ALL made differently and most of us carry our bodyweight (muscle and fat) very different from one another.
Alex said on 13/Nov/08
Clay, a lot of the time I get guessed at 210-220lbs, sometimes even a bit more. One time I was guessed at 240 which is too much but was flattering, LOL.
Alex said on 13/Nov/08
The mugshot with Austin is still fishy.
Clay said on 13/Nov/08
White especially. Yeah, see from that head on view you definitely physically look 190-195 there.
Alex said on 13/Nov/08
Ok here is a picture from a front angle at the same time. Black can really make you look less. Colors like white, blue can make you look bigger I feel.

Click Here
Alex said on 13/Nov/08
I can give an impression of being less probably because I am at my side and wearing black can make you look less as well.

Clay, well only around 5lbs heavier but I am def a bit bigger. But since that picture in late 2006 I ended up cutting down to 189lbs in summer 2007 then bulked right back up to 200lbs now so I ended up losing fat and keeping most of my muscle and adding more muscle.
Annoyed said on 13/Nov/08
right i have to say, about Alex, if you go over to the stallone page, and look at my article on heel height and elevator shows, you will see pics of myself, no I lift weights a little bit, I am 5'7.5" and I weigh 195 lbs. So if Alex is 6'0" he MUST be more than 200 lbs!!!! someone saying not even 170. that is truley ridiculous, i was 170 natural weight at 5'5.5" and i was slim! so Alex is easilly over 200 lbs in that pic.

Onto Austin, 6'1" NO MORE, NO LESS! His mugshot is taken right after his arrest so who knows what footwear he was wearing.

6'1" comfortable.
Clay said on 12/Nov/08
I think you would look bigger if you were facing the camera directly. You must be pretty jacked now if you have packed on a few pounds since, good job dude.
Danimal said on 12/Nov/08
In all fairness, you give an impression of being in your 180's in that pic Alex. 170 pounds is just ridiculous.
Ivan 6'2.25 said on 12/Nov/08
I met him last year in late September in Saint-Martin. I'am 6'2.25 with 0.5 inch shoes at this time and he wear a flat 0.75 inch shoes.I had 1 inch over him compared to someone I know but when we pass nearby I though we had the same height.
Alex said on 12/Nov/08
Morg, you dont have to agree but I am around 14 stone in that picture. Maybe you were built different is why you may have felt beefier.
M.o.r.g said on 12/Nov/08
Uh yeah u didnt post my comment.I'll say it it again.I was 12 stone back in august and i was way beefier than that "alex" person.He's nowhere near 14 stone.

[Editor Rob: it's not the place to argue over who is beefier or whether someone weighs 14 stone...]
Joe said on 12/Nov/08
I'd say he was an easy 6'1 but thereare times when he looks taller or shorter than that. What is he like in person? has anyone met him?

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.