How tall is Tim Robbins - Page 3

Add a Comment1086 comments

Average Guess (90 Votes)
6ft 5.04in (195.7cm)
Danimal said on 26/Aug/11
Furthermore Rob, you gave Cusack 6'2.5" based on him commenting on his height as of recent, yet Tim Robbins has recently said he's 6'5". Why not take his word for it and list him at 6'5" (which is also WAY too low for him, but at least it's being consistent Rob).
Danimal said on 26/Aug/11
Rob, anything under a flat 6'5" is just not reasonable. How can you have John Cusack at 6'2.5" and Tim Robbins only 2 1/4" taller? Is that all you really see between them?
Shaun said on 26/Aug/11
Robbins looks about 6'6" in shoes, no more. 6'5" looks about right barefoot.
Shaun said on 26/Aug/11
Click Here

6'7" morning height? Hardly. Benicio del Toro is a legit 6'2"-6'2.5", same height as Robert Davi.
Vegas said on 26/Aug/11
danimal you really think robbins was 6'7 and tom noonan was only 6'4??

if you look at someone who is ~6'7 like stephen merchant on screen or in photos there is no way robbins looked that tall e.g. not even close to standing straight Click Here its interesting merchant has no problem saying he is 6'7 on every talk show he is on despite the fact he is trying to break into hollywood, robbins was well established by 1995 as a director and an actor winning numerous awards for both, he was well known worldwide by that time as a terrific actor who could play a variety of roles so whether he was 9ft or 4ft it wouldn't have made much difference,coming out and saying his real height was 6'7 at that time wouldn't have made any difference or reduce his chances of roles, its an awful pity i didn't get to meet him last year during the arthurs day guinness celebration as something else came up, looking at youtube he was taking photos after the show too :(

robbins these days is shorter than 70+ year old james cromwell and i have my doubts cromwell was ever a legit 6'7 man himself as he was noticeably shorter than richard moll back in the early 80s on nightcourt, the tallest i have ever seen cromwell look was on star trek
James said on 26/Aug/11
Danimal says on 25/Aug/11
Sorry, but I'm sticking with 6'7" morning height for Tim Robbins at his peak. Walked around at 6'6" and change during the day. Today is a strong 6'5"/weak 6'6". Just too much evidence to support this. 6'5" is him low balling not to appear as a freak (reduce his chances of getting roles).

Robbins has NEVER looked 6'7 that is beyond ridcolous . that is peter crouch tall range and robbins never looks that big. 6'4.75 is perfect. in the early morning would be 6'6 flat and quickly shrink down too 6'5 1/2 for most off the morning and would be 196cm by luncthime and 195cm in the afternoon.
Sam said on 26/Aug/11
He trully towered over Paul Newman in The Hudsucker Proxy. Next to Robbins is the shortest Newman looked, shorter than he looked next to George Kennedy in Cool Hand Luke, of course he could have lost a little height by then.
Hansen said on 26/Aug/11
what i knew john cusack was a weak 6ft2 by fact. tim robbins had near 4inch taller than cusack. maybe he is 6ft5 for awhile.. nowadays im not sure he is this mark. looking more like 194-195 range.
Danimal said on 25/Aug/11
Sorry, but I'm sticking with 6'7" morning height for Tim Robbins at his peak. Walked around at 6'6" and change during the day. Today is a strong 6'5"/weak 6'6". Just too much evidence to support this. 6'5" is him low balling not to appear as a freak (reduce his chances of getting roles).
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Aug/11
193cm is indeed a hard pill to swallow...
194cm is the very lowest the man could be. But I think the current 6"4.75(195cm) listing is spot on.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 25/Aug/11
Lol if he were 6'4, this site is a ****, with no offense, rob! But john cusack is solid 4 inches shorter than him and he's listed 189!
James said on 25/Aug/11
ANDREA[ITA] says on 25/Aug/11
in some photos he looks close to 2 metres! With Charlize Theron, that in heels is probably about 185, he looks at least 18 cms taller, so about 6ft8 in shoes! How's that possible, Rob? But that's not the only picture! With John Cusack, that you listed at 189, he looks at least 199! With Clive Owen, that you listed at 188, he looks at least 197! With Sean Penn he looks at least 197! In the Shawshank Redemption he looked 3.5 inches taller than Morgan Freeman, so 197 again! He looks about 15 cms taller than Edward Norton, so 198 according to the listings!

LOL
ANDREA[ITA] said on 25/Aug/11
in some photos he looks close to 2 metres! With Charlize Theron, that in heels is probably about 185, he looks at least 18 cms taller, so about 6ft8 in shoes! How's that possible, Rob? But that's not the only picture! With John Cusack, that you listed at 189, he looks at least 199! With Clive Owen, that you listed at 188, he looks at least 197! With Sean Penn he looks at least 197! In the Shawshank Redemption he looked 3.5 inches taller than Morgan Freeman, so 197 again! He looks about 15 cms taller than Edward Norton, so 198 according to the listings!
James said on 24/Aug/11
Rampage yeah with Morgan Freeman he looks 6'4 flat or even 192cm in the last 2 pics if Freeman is 188cm.

With James Cromwell looks more 6'4 than 6'5.......

rampage would you agree that if clive owen is 188cm the tim robbins did not look over 194cm in comparison? Some think that clive could be 187cm if thats the case then seriously tim looks 193-194cm in comparison.

if you look at robbins frame in photos he really does look more 6'5 than 6'4.

6'4 (193cm) is hard too belive. would u not agree rampage?
Larc 6 ft 1.75 in said on 21/Aug/11
He certainly did look a full 6'5 at his peak, huge guy.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Aug/11
I agree that if Fisbourne WAS 6ft, then Robbins for sure looks 6ft5-6ft6 in comparison. But James, most people on this site would agree that Fishbourne isn't quite 6ft.

Looks 6ft4 flat in these recent pics with 188cm Morgan Freeman
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Potentially 6ft5 with 197cm James Cromwell?
Click Here
Click Here
James said on 11/Aug/11
If Fishburne is 183cm and clint eastwood at time of the pic might have been 6'1.25 (186cm). Robbins does look 6'5.5 (197cm) next clint eastwood given that he is not exactley standing at his tallest either and i don't at the time clint eastwood any shorter than a very solid 6'1.

but hay it might be the camera angle and some say clint eastwood gains a lot height when he stands up properly.
Terryman said on 10/Aug/11
Click Here
James said on 10/Aug/11
Rob do you think 196cm would be impossible for Tim Robbins?
ANDREA[ITA] said on 9/Aug/11
I didnt notice you upgraded him! Good job rob! :)
ANDREA[ITA] said on 9/Aug/11
Come on! In the famous scene with cusack and tim robbins, cusack looks at least 10 cms shorter! You guys have different measure of height for everyone! Rampage for example first says tom welling is 188 and jared 194 when there's nothing more than 3 cms between them! The same guy says john cusack is 189 and tim robbins is 195! You must be joking... I agree with you that tim robbins is at least 195 but you cannot say john cusack is 189! He's clearly a lot shorter! Rob you too listed cusack at 188 and tim robbins at only 194? How cab you say he's only 6 cms shorter? I agree with you most of the time but dont tell me you reay think there's that difference! He doesnt even reach robbins' eyebrows! Search on youtube!
James said on 7/Aug/11
Today 6'4.5 (194cm)
Peak 6'4.75 (195cm)

Rampage Cusack is 6'1.75 (187cm) very close too 6'2.
Shaun said on 7/Aug/11
Does look about 6'6" in shoes so i think is is right.
Terryman said on 6/Aug/11
yeah 1,95meters Vince vaughn is this height too!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Aug/11
195cm is spot on, nice one, Rob. Has looked this next to Morgan Freeman and John Cusack who are both 189cm(6ft2.5)
Sam said on 5/Aug/11
I think splitting the difference of his quotes at 6'4.75" would be fair. What do you think, Rob?
[Editor Rob: that might be a possibility today]
Tea said on 2/Aug/11
this guy is at least 6'6" no shorter
Danimal said on 18/Jul/11
James says on 26/Jun/11
like i said though you could tell he was lying by his body language in the interview when he claimed 6ft5 recently.

Not over 6'4.5 today

Oh God....He's just being more honest these days. He's been under-billing his height kid since before you were born.
Alex V. said on 17/Jul/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 15/Jul/11
196cm morning
195cm afternoon
194cm evening


Same opinion...
James said on 17/Jul/11
this guy can really look 6'5. maybe today between 6'4-6'5 but you never know at some stage he might have been around the 6'5 mark.

might look taller than 6'4 these days because of his hair and proportions but he doesn't look over 6'4 1/2 when you see him in recent pics next to Cromwell.
James said on 17/Jul/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 15/Jul/11
196cm morning
195cm afternoon
194cm evening

Not sure if he's 194 or 195 in the afternoon?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jul/11
196cm morning
195cm afternoon
194cm evening
James said on 7/Jul/11
Robbins is 1 inch shorter than james cromwell
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jul/11
I think Clarkson has always been near 6ft5 but not quite. He's claimed 6ft4 which may indicate he doesn't like being tall.
jtm said on 6/Jul/11
he is still a legit 6'5 at 52.
James said on 5/Jul/11
Vince does not look too healthy though esspecially with his weight problems.
James said on 4/Jul/11
Shaun says on 4/Jul/11
Yeah but James if you measure 195cm evening height, the likelihood is you are probably 198 in the morning as guys that tall tend to lose more height during the day. A legit 6'6" barefoot really is borderline giant, as I say though I think a legit 6'8" and up is a true giant. Wlad Klitchko is frequently described as a "giant Ukrainian" and he's not even 2 metres. He's 198-199cm range although claims 6'5".

I think probably 6'7-6'8 is the start of when you will be considered a giant. would you agree shaun that 6'4 (193cm) is by no means giant sized at all?
Shaun said on 4/Jul/11
I think a legit 195cm and up is the point when people will really start to stare at you for your height. Its the point when you'll start to literally tower virtually eveybody in a crowd.
Shaun said on 4/Jul/11
Yeah but James if you measure 195cm evening height, the likelihood is you are probably 198 in the morning as guys that tall tend to lose more height during the day. A legit 6'6" barefoot really is borderline giant, as I say though I think a legit 6'8" and up is a true giant. Wlad Klitchko is frequently described as a "giant Ukrainian" and he's not even 2 metres. He's 198-199cm range although claims 6'5".
Terryman said on 2/Jul/11
1,95 meters peak 1,94.5 meters minimum today.(same as Vince vaughn!)
James said on 29/Jun/11
Shaun says on 28/Jun/11
James says on 26/Jun/11
like i said though you could tell he was lying by his body language in the interview when he claimed 6ft5 recently.

Not over 6'4.5 today

Doubt it, half an inch is hardly lying is it? Rather I think he is probably uncomfortable with discussing his height. His body language, hands through hair is usually a sign of exasperation, sort of a "so I'm 6'5" big deal, lets talk about something else". To measure a legit barefoot 195cm barefoot relaxed evening height though is borderline giant. IN the morning with shoes you probably look 6'6" to 6'7" if you measured that after a long day.

Shaun says on 28/Jun/11
I think 195cm is the cut off point for extremely tall range, 182-89cm range tall, 190-195 range very tall, 195cm -200cm extremely tall, 200cm + giant. Of course a true giant is probably over 6'8".

190-195cm and 195-199cm is all synonamous with the same label of 'very tall'. 200cm is the start of a giant. I woulden't say that 195cm barefoot relaxed evening height is 'borderline giant' its more at the mid range of very tall like 185cm is at the mid range of the tall range. i think 198cm barefoot relaxed in the evening is upper end of very tall/borderline giant. i'd describe 197cm-200cm to be more at the upper end of very tall since i don't think 'extremely tall' in a medical aspect really should be used.

Peter Crouch for example who stands at 6'7.5 (201cm) i would described as a giant. Tim Robbins I would described as solid/legit very tall not a giant though. Guys like Penn Jillete and James Cromwell were borderline giant men at there peaks.

Overall 6'3, 6'4, 6'5 and 6'6 are very tall heights but not giants.
Shaun said on 28/Jun/11
I think 195cm is the cut off point for extremely tall range, 182-89cm range tall, 190-195 range very tall, 195cm -200cm extremely tall, 200cm + giant. Of course a true giant is probably over 6'8".
Shaun said on 28/Jun/11
James says on 26/Jun/11
like i said though you could tell he was lying by his body language in the interview when he claimed 6ft5 recently.

Not over 6'4.5 today

Doubt it, half an inch is hardly lying is it? Rather I think he is probably uncomfortable with discussing his height. His body language, hands through hair is usually a sign of exasperation, sort of a "so I'm 6'5" big deal, lets talk about something else". To measure a legit barefoot 195cm barefoot relaxed evening height though is borderline giant. IN the morning with shoes you probably look 6'6" to 6'7" if you measured that after a long day.
lillo thomas said on 28/Jun/11
Tim Robbins could claim 6-5 when he is 6-4.5. In reality the difference between 6-4.5 and 6-5 can barely been seen . Most people can't tell difference of half an inch.
Mohammed said on 28/Jun/11
Does anyone know how tall his son Jack henry robbins is? He looks 1-2 inches shorter than his dad.
Boogee said on 27/Jun/11
Robbins is a legit 195cm most time during the day, converted 6'4 3/4", end of discussion!!!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Jun/11
Robbins 195cm
Vaughn 196cm
James said on 26/Jun/11
like i said though you could tell he was lying by his body language in the interview when he claimed 6ft5 recently.

Not over 6'4.5 today
Truthman said on 24/Jun/11
He is for sure was a legit 6'5 at peak, seems like a lot of people have no idea how tall 6'5 is. Now i think he lost a bit and 6'4.5 could be his current height (finally i'm around as tall as gigantic Tim!)

Click Here
TruebloodFan said on 23/Jun/11
this guy is huge. 6'5'' or a fraction under peak. today I'm not sure.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Jun/11
6ft4.75/195cm is bang on
James said on 22/Jun/11
197cm on the nose out of bed
ANDREA[ITA] said on 21/Jun/11
i think he never is under 194! out of bed he's probably still strong 196!
Boogee said on 21/Jun/11
Well, it gives the clearance that Robbins stands 195cm or 6'4 3/4" the most time of the day. On the one hand he is listed as 6'4 1/2" and on the other hand as 6'5". So the result can only be that he stands 195cm tall. Personally he often has a 6'6"-6'7" appearance when I saw a few films of him because he looks almost gigantic. Especially in Nothing to Lose he had a clear 6'7" appearance and in the Shawshand Redemption he looked 6'4" although he looked having almost 4 inches on 6'2" Morgan Freeman.
James said on 20/Jun/11
Robbins is no taller than 6'4 1/2 today
James said on 18/Jun/11
Danimal says on 16/Jun/11
James says on 16/Dec/10
Vegas not 1 inch but a good half an inch is possible. he's still massive but he was never 6'5.5 or 6'6 and LOL 6'7 that is insane.

NO it's not. Aren't you the same 20 year old kid who used to claim Clint Eastwood was only 6'2" at this peak? Who is insane now?

Okay i was wrong about Clint Eastwood. tell me danimal why do you think robbins is close to 6'7?
Vegas said on 17/Jun/11
james cromwell and robbins shot from earlier this year, cromwell is almost 20 years robbins senior too so i think we can pretty much rule out 6'7 or 6'6 for tim at this stage Click Here

cromwell was wearing sneakers not sure on tim footwear Click Here
Danimal said on 16/Jun/11
James says on 16/Dec/10
Vegas not 1 inch but a good half an inch is possible. he's still massive but he was never 6'5.5 or 6'6 and LOL 6'7 that is insane.

NO it's not. Aren't you the same 20 year old kid who used to claim Clint Eastwood was only 6'2" at this peak? Who is insane now?
Danimal said on 16/Jun/11
James says on 23/Apr/11
Peak 6ft4.5-6ft4.75 (194-195cm)
today 6ft4-6ft4.5 (193-194cm)

WAY TOO LOW kid...
Danimal said on 16/Jun/11
James says on 13/Jun/11
tim robbins is a classic example of what a lanky/legit 6'4.5 (194cm) guy should look.

Oh, he was WAY taller than 6'4.5" in his prime.. Had serious height on Conan Obrien. Had to lean in to appear Conan's height. Minimum 6'6" peak.
James said on 13/Jun/11
tim robbins is a classic example of what a lanky/legit 6'4.5 (194cm) guy should look.
adam 2 said on 13/Jun/11
6-5 prime. Why dont Rob put 6-5 as his height? Half an inch taller than guys like Eastwood and Sutherland? Come on.
Lenad said on 10/Jun/11
today a solid 194cm. Peak solid 195cm peak.
Mathew said on 10/Jun/11
Legiimate 6'4.5" guy, just like Vince Vaughn. It's good enough to claim 6'5".
James said on 6/Jun/11
clancy brown had to look up at tim in the shawshank redemption..... i have always wondered if 192cm was a bit inflated for clancys peak?
Mr. Kaplan said on 4/Jun/11
Robbins is most likely 6'4.5" in the afternoon. 6'5" out of bed. But Rob doesn't put out-of-bed heights on this site.

Keep the 6'4.5" listing.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jun/11
I'm thinking 6ft5...195cm at least
lordrandall91 said on 27/May/11
Yeah! Come on! He looks solid 10 cms taller than 188 john cusack!
James said on 26/May/11
I think Tim was lying becuase he was playing with his hair a bit when he claimed "6'5"

he could be 6'5 though
rafa said on 25/May/11
Hmmm I think he is close to 6'4.75"
jtm said on 25/May/11
rob maybe you could give him 6'5 now? there is no way he is under that.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 25/May/11
yeah he's gotta be 6''5'! he's too tall compared with 190 cms actors to be only 193-194! if he claimed to be 197-198 i would have trusted him ;)
Vegas said on 24/May/11
rob have you seen the late late show episode from september 2010 where robbins claimed to be 6'5, 4mins 25secs Click Here

[Editor Rob:
since he now says this, then I will add the quote aswell at the top.]
James said on 19/May/11
Rob do you think Tim might be 193cm in about 3 years time?

Sorry i know its a bit of tough question but i just want your opinion.

[Editor Rob: I'd say give it another 10 years to see if he loses any noticeable height.]
James said on 2/May/11
Probably will be 193cm in a few years down the line.
Lenad said on 1/May/11
I wouldnt argue under this listing
James said on 30/Apr/11
WHAT???????? Isn't Tyler Mane 6'8 (203cm)?

I don't think its impossible that robbins is 1cm shorter today than he was in his 20's and with James Cromwell he looks around 193cm if James has shrunked to 196cm today that is? If Cromwell is still 197cm then sure robbins looks 194cm in comparison.
Yeah Bon i have too agree with you in Bull Durham he did not look his tallest same in Shawshank Redemption. In Nothing to Lose he looked MASSIVE and made Martin Lawrence look like a small child. that is probably the tallest robbins has looked in that film..........
Bon_ said on 27/Apr/11
I thought he looked closer to 6'4 in Bull Durham. Peak nothing over 6'4.5 in my opinion.
Vegas said on 24/Apr/11
123, you really think robbins was taller than tyler mane, on manes page you claim he was 195.5cm and robbins 196cm
James said on 23/Apr/11
Peak 6ft4.5-6ft4.75 (194-195cm)
today 6ft4-6ft4.5 (193-194cm)
Alex says on 21/Apr/11 said on 21/Apr/11
Maybe

Peak 6ft5-6ft5.5 (196-197cm)
Today 6ft4.5-6ft4.75 (194-195cm)
James said on 20/Apr/11
he is 194cm solid
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Apr/11
He's 195-196cm...
Andrea [ITA] said on 19/Apr/11
I cant really see him under 196! How is it possible hes "only" 194, rob? I mean, he towers over freeman (he looks minimum 10 cms taller), he's much taller than charlize theron in heels (who is about 185, in heels)... He's just huge in movies
James said on 17/Apr/11
he looked skinny when younger but today he is broader and has filled out quite a bit.
Aaron said on 16/Apr/11
How much do you guys figure Robbins weighs? I agree on 6'4.5", although he'd clearly be over 6'5" in the morning (we lose half an inch within an hour of waking up). But as far as weight, I'm thinking he averages 210-220. He's very lanky.
James said on 15/Apr/11
if james cromwell IS still 197cm then robbins does look just about 194cm although personally judging by these pics tim could be heading towards 193cm today?
Click Here
Click Here

Maybe
today 6'4.25 (194cm)
Peak 6'4.5 (194cm)
DejaVu said on 9/Apr/11
I thought he looks 6'5.5 in Shawshank Redemption at first glance. He looks 3 inches taller than Morgan Freeman and at least 2 inches taller than Clancy Brown.
Mohammad said on 3/Apr/11
looked really tall in shawshank redemption, looked at least 2 inches taller than clancy brown
James said on 27/Mar/11
Tims nothing under 6'4.5.
ikbtops said on 26/Mar/11
If Woody Harrelson is 5'9.25" and Will Farrell is 6'2.75- no more than 6'4.25" for Tim.
Mr. Kaplan said on 27/Feb/11
Weak 6'5".
Alex V. said on 25/Feb/11
No problem Shadow2 :), 1m95 is my estimate, regards...
Shadow2 said on 24/Feb/11
Alex V., many thanks for your recent information on Tim and Vincent D'Onofrio in "The Player", it makes a great deal of sense. I'll now go with the 6'5" barefoot for Tim.
James said on 31/Jan/11
Oh yeah norton might be 5'9.

With Benecio Del Toro robbins did look slightly under 6'5.
Shaun said on 30/Jan/11
James says on 13/Jan/11
with 5'8 graham norton looks 6'4
Click Here

Graham Norton is more 5'9" than 5'8" so no he still looks 6'5".Norton has 1.5 inches on 5'7" Chris Moyles.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jan/11
195cm Rob?
Alex V. said on 23/Jan/11
Shadow2, I have "The Player" movie, Vincent D'Onofrio has cowboy boots making him about 6'5", Tim however, has flat shoes, in the line-up scene he appears to be between 6'5" and 6'6", regards...
James said on 20/Jan/11
i disagree because michaels head is slihglty over tims eye level.
Lenad said on 19/Jan/11
Yep 6'5-ish it is
Shadow2 said on 18/Jan/11
In "The Player", Tim is very close to the height of Vincent D'Onofrio (6'3.5") in their scenes together, but looks 6'6" (in shoes) with everybody else in the movie. Confusing!
James said on 15/Jan/11
he looks like a mamouth comapred to farrell.
Vegas said on 14/Jan/11
nowhere near standing straight in that photo with norton, reminds me of tom noonan and rob

this is just over 9 months ago, robbins sure looks every bit of 6'5 there if farrell is 5'10 Click Here
James said on 13/Jan/11
with 5'8 graham norton looks 6'4
Click Here

In the next few years might start shrinking?

Defenintly 20 years ago he was very close to 6'5.
mike saporta said on 13/Jan/11
in "Nothing to Lose" on WANTED-list he stated 6'5, i know they kinda meant McGinley, but he's 6'1 max, it's obvious.
Lenad said on 11/Jan/11
I'd say today he is at least 6'4
James said on 1/Jan/11
Anonymous is right many people that are 6'4 1/2 exzaggerate thier height and say 6'5 making it seem slightly shorter than it really is.
James said on 23/Dec/10
Anonymous says on 22/Dec/10
I personally think he was 6'4.5 peak max, and now is 6'3.75, He was only 3 inches taller tham ll cool j, but robbins was standing closer to the camera

No way at his peak he was a solid 194cm. today he is still a solid 6'4.
Klaus said on 22/Dec/10
Tim has always appeared to 6'6 in height, though he said he had 6'4 .5. So I think his height is now 1.96 m.
Anonymous said on 22/Dec/10
I personally think he was 6'4.5 peak max, and now is 6'3.75, He was only 3 inches taller tham ll cool j, but robbins was standing closer to the camera
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Dec/10
I think 6"4.75(195cm) or 6"5(196cm) is nearer...
James said on 21/Dec/10
Shaun okay fair enough but robbins did claim in the early 90's himself that he was "6'4 and a half."

I am just saying robbins is getting to the age now when 1cm height loss is possible.
Shaun said on 21/Dec/10
Yeah but James there is no evidence that Robbins is shrinking... Show me one recent pic of him looking flat 6'4".. The last pic I saw of him he was looking more a solid 6'5" than a solid 6'4". A genuine 6 ft 4 flat guy is David Hasselhoff. Robbins is obivously taller and still closer to 6'5" than 6'4" and obviously hits the 6'5" mark earlier in the day if not towards the end... Robbins is taller than 6'4" but you keep using that as a reason to downgrade everybody else to 6'3.5" or even 6'2.5" to say "they don't look 6'4" ". 6'4.5" is the very lowest Robbins could be.
Vegas said on 21/Dec/10
james forget about the photos, you can find photos of anyone looking any height
e.g how tall does ben affleck look here Click Here

how tall does david hasselhoff look here Click Here he looks sandlers height but wait Click Here

he isn't a flat 6'4, that i would be very sure on, as i mentioned he said 6'5 on irish tv in october and he looked as tall as a 6'6 listed rugby player had looked the week before next to the same host
James said on 20/Dec/10
You see Tim Robbins is a perfect expample of how tall a genuine strong 6'4 guy is and it is clear in pics how short he makes actors who 'claim' to be a certain height are. Tim Robbins is genuine about his height and Clint Eastwood in the early 200's tried to claim 6'4 which is absurd when you look at pics of him with robbins from 2005 becasuse tim is clearly 3.5 inches taller. Guys like Liam Neeson and Jeff Goldblum as well are honest 6'4ers but they do not look as tall as tim becasue of not great posture which is why they can look 6'3. Like I said Tim is one of those rare strong 6'4.5ers who maintains great posture which is why people on this site think he is much taller than 6'4 because really people have no clue about how big and impressive a strong 6'4 guy can look with the right body proportions and posture. Granted Neeson and Goldblum were slightly over 6'4 in thier primes there poor posture always made them look shorter.

Like Robbins as well Dolph Lundgren (who was very simialr in height to Robbins at his peak) just proves how big these heights are.
James said on 20/Dec/10
Shaun i am just saying i think there is chance robbins could be heading towards 6'4 flat today BUT certainy he is NOTHING under 6'4 not in a million years. Maybe in 10 years time he might be a hair under 6'4.

Actually i noticed that Harrleson has his head raised when looking up to robbins so yeah 6'4 1/2 is still possible today. mind you that pic was taken in 2008.......
James said on 20/Dec/10
Okay Shaun but I think today he could be 6'4.25 (194cm). Look at him with Woody Harrleson as well he does not look over 6'4. I still think 193cm solid is a possiblitly today. 194cm solid in the 90's.

By the way here is Del Toro with 5'11.75-6'0 Harrison Ford in 2002 looking no more than 6'1 1/2.
Click Here
Shaun said on 20/Dec/10
Just goes to show than anybody will downgrade anybody. LOL at the flat 6'4" for Robbins. Maybe standing at the toilet...
Shaun said on 20/Dec/10
Del Toro looked taller than Clive Owen in pics I saw. Owen is a weak 6'2", Toro is a strong 6'2". Toro is one of the few people who make Robbins look nothing more than 6'4.5".
James said on 19/Dec/10
Vegas there are pics of goldblum with will smith from the 90's where he looks easily 6'4 in comparison. even the editor agrees that goldblum at some stage could have been a little over 6'5 out of bed.

vegas look at dolph lundgren as well he is very tall but he used to stand at 194cm now at 53 he is 192cm. Also if you look at robbins in comparison to woody he does not look 6'5 but not really over 6'4.

when younger he was a solid 6'4.5 today he still stands very tall at a solid 6'4 barefoot.
Vegas said on 19/Dec/10
goldblum wasn't over 6'4, he even claimed that height in his 20s and was shorter than adam baldwin in 1995, i would be very surprised if robbins was 6'4 flat as of today, there is no proof taller people lose height faster (at least i haven't seen any) ask kareem and he is 12 years robbins senior and 9 inches taller Click Here ask bill russell 25 years robbins senior and 4 inches taller Click Here

robbins had 4-4.5 inches on craig ferguson last year, goldblum didn't have that amount, more like 3

those photos with Beneci Del Toro are from 7 years ago, are you saying robbins lost height by 44?? again it shows you cannot trust photos, robbins looks 2-3 inches taller next to clive owen than del toro despite aging nearly 2 years and you claim both owen and del toro are the same height, speaking of photos i have photos of jeff goldblum and a fan from about 8-10 years ago and the same fan with wrestler sid eudy, eudy looks 5 inches taller than goldblum in comparison to the fan but its only a photo
James said on 18/Dec/10
Well Vegas the jury is still out on if he is 6'4.5 or 6'5? If he was always 194cm and was 191cm at age 70 that is about average height loss. Also even though he is 51 very tall people like Tim Robbins tend to loose height faster at they age look at jeff goldblum he was 6'4.5 at his peak and is now heading towards 192cm.

Here with 177cm Woody Harrelson looks no bigger than 193cm given that his eye level is only 1.5 inches over the top of woodys head.

Click Here

With weak 6'2 Beneci Del Toro
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

With 6'1.75 Clive Owen
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

With 6'1ish Bob Geldof
Click Here
Click Here

With 6'2.75 Will Ferrell
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Again here looks 6'4 (193cm) with 5'8 Sean Penn (Tim has got slightly looser posture than Sean so might be loosing half an inch)
Click Here

With 6'1 (185cm) Clint Eastwood
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Close to 6'5 in the 80's and 90s but today is defenintly closer to 6'4. I still think 6'4 (193cm) is a possiblity today or 6'4.25 (194cm).
Vegas said on 17/Dec/10
nah he hasn't lost half an inch either imo, 51 year old males don't lose significant height and half an inch is significant at that age, he still looks the same height as always and he wouldn't claim 6'5 on a show just last month if he lost height

why would he lose 2 inches by 70?? thats double the average for that age and by that age the average man is suffering from health problems, if he stays in good shape and doesn't experience health related problems like many of that age he should lose minimal height, as i showed before bill russell is 76 years of age today and has lost nothing because he has kept himself in tip-top shape, he still looks every bit the 6'9 height the nba claim he grew to in his 20s, if jack palance can keep his full height in his mid 70s i think robbins can too
James said on 16/Dec/10
Vegas not 1 inch but a good half an inch is possible. he's still massive but he was never 6'5.5 or 6'6 and LOL 6'7 that is insane. About 194cm or 195cm at his peak and 193 or 194cm today.

Peak 6'4.5 (194cm)
Today 6'4 (193cm)

In 20 years will probably be 6'3.
Vegas said on 15/Dec/10
there is no way he has lost an inch james, he is only 51, in 20 years he might have lost an inch but not yet
James said on 14/Dec/10
With 1.90cm Will Ferrell
Click Here
James said on 14/Dec/10
Very close to 6'5 in his 20's. Solid 6'4 today.
James said on 13/Dec/10
Spence says on 10/Dec/10
Easily 6'5

No
Spence said on 10/Dec/10
Easily 6'5
Truthman said on 30/Nov/10
He is 6'5 just like Vince Vaughn.
Viper said on 30/Nov/10
Clive Owen just LOOKS like Bond.
James said on 29/Nov/10
Mr. Kaplan says on 29/Nov/10
Danimal, does that mean Morgan Freeman was 6'4.5"? Bull. Tim is a weak 6'5". When you've got guys like Lautner and Wahlberg claiming 5'10", 6'4.5" doesn't look especially tall, but it certainly is.

Exactly and look at Peter Crouch who is 6ft7 people would think he is 6ft9 or 6ft10 but it just shows you how big these heights are and 6ft4.5 or 6ft5 is rare like 6ft7 is.
Mr. Kaplan said on 29/Nov/10
Danimal, does that mean Morgan Freeman was 6'4.5"? Bull. Tim is a weak 6'5". When you've got guys like Lautner and Wahlberg claiming 5'10", 6'4.5" doesn't look especially tall, but it certainly is.
James said on 29/Nov/10
I think what you guys forget as well is how big 6ft4 really is. Many 6'4ers look 6'3 because of bad posture.

likewise i still think robbins is more than 193cm today. in his younger he could have actually been slightly taller than he is now in his 50's but he does not have looked to have lost any height at all though.
James said on 29/Nov/10
Well maybe no one would argue 6'3 for Robbins because unlike neeson and goldblum robbins always stands with great posture?

but yeah i agree though i think he could be more 6'5 than 6'4.

clive owen at 6'1.5 or 6'2 would be perfect to play bond. clive owen would tower over daniel craig who is not tall enough to play bond.
Shaun said on 27/Nov/10
6'4.5" measurement barefoot and relaxed posture later in the day maybe. Add shoes and posture and he passes for 6'6" in shoes which he probably is.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Nov/10
He's 6"5(196cm)
Danimal said on 27/Nov/10
James says on 17/Sep/10
Danimal am I veteran? I have been on this site since december 2006.

I got a full 2 years on you James, but that's decent time. Don't remember you posting in here since then though?
Danimal said on 27/Nov/10
This man once woke up at 6'7". No WAS was he every just 6'4.5". He's either downgrading his height, so not to sound like a freak in Hollywood (not wanting to stand out), or he just didn't measure himself accurately). Much taller than he states and taller than others think he is.
Viper said on 26/Nov/10
Ive been saying for the longest time that Clive Owen needs to play Bond
Bass Armstrong said on 25/Nov/10
Well, I think Robbins is nothing above and nothing below than a legit 195cm or almost 6'5" most time of the day. His varying height estimation between 6'4 1/2" and 6'5" give the clearance that he stands 6'4 3/4" in fact.
Shaun said on 25/Nov/10
Is there one person here who thinks Robbins only 6'3" or 6'4" flat? Nope. Even guys like Neeson and Goldblum some people claim are 6'3" ers but EVERYBODY here seems to agree that 6'4.5" is bare minimum for Robbins. In Nothing to Loose he looked 6'5.5" range for real.
Shaun said on 25/Nov/10
If Robbins truly is 6'4.5" then virtually everybody else needs a downgrade. He is certainly no shorter than Vince Vaughn and looks about the same height. He has to be 6'5" barefoot at some point in the day. If Rob did up to the full 6'5" then I think he's need a quote from him saying he's 6'5". I agree in the vast majority of photos he looks a solid 6'5" as in shoes he does look 6'6".
Shaun said on 25/Nov/10
James says on 9/Nov/10

3 inches on Clive Owen
Click Here

I agree, but hell how much does Clive Owen look a caricature of James Bond in that photo. Clive Owen must play Bond....
James said on 22/Nov/10
Moke he is still more than just 6'4 today.

With Constantine Maroulis looks every bit of 6'5.
Moke said on 21/Nov/10
6 ft 4.5 some years ago, nowadays maybe 6'4. Next to 6'1 Constantine Maroulis - Click Here
kevin said on 18/Nov/10
at least 195cm. could be even 196cm. maybe hes 194cm like he said after a long long day at his absolute lowest or not straightend out.
James said on 9/Nov/10
Easily 4 inches taller than Bill Murrey
Click Here

With Del Toro
Click Here

3 inches on Clive Owen
Click Here

Again look how he dwarfes Ed Norton
Click Here

Towers almost 6'1.5 LL Cool J and dwarfes Alice Cooper
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

With Will Ferrell
Click Here

Tims massive and actually looks very similar in comparison to Will Ferrell than Vince Vaughn does. Defenintly closer to 6'5 than 6'4.

I'd estimate Tim Robbins to be identical in height to Vince Vaughn.
James said on 9/Nov/10
I agree Vegas and robbins always looks taller than legit 6'4 guys like goldblum, seagal, and neeson etc...
Vegas said on 9/Nov/10
mr kaplan, he did claim 6'5 out of his mouth last month on irish tv though, the 6'4.5 thing might also have been last thing at night, we don't know
Mr. Kaplan said on 8/Nov/10
Upgrading him is just dumb. He has claimed 6'4.5" and that is most likely his afternoon/evening height. For once, a celebrity is honest about his height.
James said on 6/Nov/10
Sorry rob but are conisdering upgrading him to 195cm or 196cm in the next few days? I think when you look at him in comparison to Mcginley in Nothing to Loose he does look the full 6'5.

If you were to uprgrade him would u give him 195cm or 196cm?

[Editor Rob: I don't know yet]
James said on 6/Nov/10
rob do u think if vince vaughn and tim robbins stood next to each other it would be impossible to tell the difference in height?

I personally think Vince Vaughn is 194-195cm and Robbins could actually be 196cm.

[Editor Rob: that might be the case]
Legend said on 5/Nov/10
He is at the very least 6'5, people really can't judge height.
DejaVu said on 4/Nov/10
Rob, do you think that he is 6'5?

[Editor Rob: I think the guy got measured at 6ft 4.5, but maybe it's possible he didn't stand as tall and is 6ft 5. If he recently said 6ft 5 then maybe that is it]
DejaVu said on 31/Oct/10
Well he constantly looks like he has 3 inches on 6'2 guys like Cusack and Freeman.
Anonymous said on 27/Oct/10
he is defiantly 6ft 5in he is a very tall man but defiantly not a 7 footer.
James said on 26/Oct/10
who knows Mr.R also saw Flynn as being a weak 6'5 as well.
James said on 26/Oct/10
Well I think Tim is 195cm and Flynn 196cm tall.
Vegas said on 26/Oct/10
robbins and 6'5 listed neil flynn next to john mcginley, both look to have roughly the same height on mcginley Click Here Click Here
shane said on 8/Jul/09
tim is a gaint and a great actor he must be 6-5
Alex5 said on 3/Jul/09
Now, the thing you have to remember about movies is that when someone says "he looks like he has 4 inches over so and so here!!!" or whatever, is that it's a movie. The actor could well be wearing taller shoes or lifts to suit the scene. Personally though, I think Robbins is taller than 6'4.5". At least 6'5", if not 6'6" because 6'6" is pretty tall, but anyway Robbins is a big, big man. I would personally just say 6'5".
James said on 1/Jul/09
I would say at peak in the morning 197cm.
TELLEM said on 30/Jun/09
watched the player last night, and tim was standing in the police line up and 6'0 was right in his eye brows. he was in relaxed posture. was he shoes though? who knows? hes 6'5.
Hugh 190cm said on 30/Jun/09
195cm I can buy. 197cm isn't impossible either.
James said on 30/Jun/09
At some point in his life he probably was more than 194cm.
Doug said on 27/Jun/09
A legit 6'4.5"-6'5" (morning height is 6'5" verified by Robbins) then he will easily come across as a good 6'6" in shoes especially as he has unusually good posture for a man this height. And yes some people forget just how tall a solid 6'4.5" barefoot measurement is, it is the boundary for "super tall".
James said on 24/Jun/09
Anonymoous that depends if Morgan Freeman ever was a full 6'3?
Alex V. said on 24/Jun/09
As i said before, you people should try, like thekiddd, see "The Player" movie, it's all there in the line up scene.
Without a doubt, Tim is a big fellow and like someone said, a legit 6.4,5 - 6.5 is really very tall.

The movie also has 6.3,5 D'onofrio but he has has cowboy boots so he looks almost as tall as Robbins with flat shoes, maybe 6'5.
Anonymous says on 24/Jun/09 said on 24/Jun/09
If Tim Robbins was 3 inch (8cm)taller than 6.3 Morgan Freeman that would make ,if not a full 6.7 (201cm),a strong 6.6(198cm) or a weak 6.6,5(199cm)for Tim Robbins.But nowadays i think that he has lost some of height, so 6.5(196cm)or 6.4,75(195cm)could be pretty accurate for him.
James said on 24/Jun/09
Alex V well and if you look at 6'4 guys like Liam Neeson they can look 6'3 or even as low as 6'2 in pics because of bad posture. Mind you Dolph Lungren always stands with good posture but he only looks 6'2.5 in pics. Josh Duhamel is lanky as well and stands with good posture which is why he can look 6'5 in pics even though he isn't.
Alex V. said on 24/Jun/09
You're right James, Robbins has a good posture which makes him look taller than he really is. In the "IQ" movie with Robbins and Fry, Robbins seemed easy, taller than Fry because Fry has a bit "lazy" posture but after seeing carefully, i noticed that they were(are)the same height.

That's why "Anonymous says on 22/Jun/09", Robbins looks 6'7" in "Nothing to Lose".
Doug said on 23/Jun/09
Doesn't look more than 6'4.5" next to strong 6'2" Benicio del Toro.
James said on 22/Jun/09
Actually there was new pic where Tim Robbins looked what he was listed here next to glenn.

Tim Robbins is no way 6'3.5 barefoot or even 6'4. He's at least 194cm. When he was 20 I think he was 6'5.
Alex says on 22/Jun/09 said on 22/Jun/09
Is Tim Robbins 6,4.5 barefoot or with shoes on? Because in those pictures with Glenn he looks only 6,4 or 6,3.5.
Anonymous says on 22/Jun/09 said on 22/Jun/09
If Tim Robbins is only 6,4.5 why did he look a 6,7 guy in Nothing to Lose?
James said on 22/Jun/09
I think Tim Robbins is one of those rare 6'4-6'5 guys that actually stands with good posture, which is why he can look taller. Its like how 6ft guys can look 6'2 in pics sometimes.
Big King said on 22/Jun/09
thekiddd, thanks for that important information. So Robbin's height was a legit 195cm, you see? I sometimes wonder because some sources have Robbins at 6'5" and other sources at 6'4.5" so why can't we put his height at 6'4.75"? Although he claimed 6'4.5", I'm sure that his actual height is a legit 6'4.75", so he can only hit 6'5"-6'5.25" in the morning and 6'4.5" in the evening.
Alex V. said on 22/Jun/09
I'm with thekiddd and Big King in this. I saw "The Player" some time ago, and Robbins in the line up scene, was with flat shoes, between 6'5 and 6'6" so he CAN
Doug said on 22/Jun/09
OK so we have established that Robbins is 6'6" in shoes. I thought as much as I usually am an excellent judge of height. Must be around 195cm legit then barefeet.
thekiddd said on 21/Jun/09
Watched Player with him. He stood in the line up scene at 6'6". With his shoes off, 6'5 or 6'4 1/2" makes total sense. NOT 6'6"!
DejaVu said on 21/Jun/09
I think his peak height is close to 6'6 if not a legit one.
Big King said on 19/Jun/09
Robbins is a weak 6'5". So yes, a legit 195cm might be on the money for Robbins.
James said on 16/Jun/09
Robbins should at least be given 6'4.75.
Doug said on 15/Jun/09
There is a picture of Robbins standing a full head taller than the late Puerto Rican actor Jos
Doug said on 15/Jun/09
Judgin by how this man had two inches on even legit 6'4" Christopher Reeves he had to be 197cm peak. Now maybe 195.
Doug said on 15/Jun/09
3 inches taller than 6 ft 2.5 in Freeman yet this guy only claims 6'4.5"? Robbins I think looks 6'5.5". I think he is 197cm like Ralph Moeller. Both men often give a 6'7" illusion.
Doug said on 15/Jun/09
He is about 4 inches taller than Eastwood minimum. He was indeed about 3 inches taller than Morgan Freeman. Have to admit Robbins gives of a legit 6'5" impression.
Doug said on 15/Jun/09
3 inches? I saw 4-5 inches. Why the hell does Robbins look 6'6" in comparison to Eastwood and Forrest Whitaker? Is RObbins really "only" 6'4.5" or is he nearer 6'6" which he seems to often look? RObbins definately seems to reach 6'6" in shoes.
James said on 15/Jun/09
Big King go on the clint eastwood page and look at pic of him standing next to eastwood. That is a legit 6'5.
Big King said on 15/Jun/09
Robbins towered exactly 3 inches over Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption.
Anonymous said on 11/Jun/09
He is 3 inches taller than Clint Eastwood.
Big King said on 3/Jun/09
Yes, he looked 6'7" in Walking Tall.
James said on 1/Jun/09
Some think he looked a 6'7er in Nothing to Loose.
Big King said on 31/May/09
Robbins is a strong 6'5". End of discussion. In some scenes of his films he appears rather huge.
Mathew said on 31/May/09
He's a legitimate 194 cm, maybe even 195 - 196 cm in the mourning.
Anonymous says on 26/May/09 said on 26/May/09
There is a picture of Tim Robbins next to Clint Eastwood, Forest Whitaker and Sidney Potier and, obviously Tim is the tallest but he doesn,t look to be more than 6,4.5 - 6,4.75 or a weak 6,5 max.
James said on 25/May/09
6'7 is very extreme for Tim Robbins. He was probably close to 6'6 in his 20's.
Anonymous says on 25/May/09 said on 25/May/09
I think that if Tim Robbins looked to be 6,7 in Nothing to loose maybe it is because he is 6,5 or 6,5.5 barefoot and he can reach 4 or 5 cm more in shoes but i think that 6,7 barefoot is too high for him.
Gonzalo said on 25/May/09
In that pic next to Christopher Reeves he looks huge, clearly taller than Reeves. Maybe the angle favours him but he looks around 1`98
James said on 24/May/09
Maybe 197cm in shoes?
Anonymous says on 23/May/09 said on 23/May/09
Is Tim Robbins 196 - 197 cm barefoot or in shoes?
Hugh 190cm said on 20/May/09
197cm possibly in the morning.
Alex says on 18/May/09 said on 18/May/09
Tim Robbins is 6,5.5 to me.
James said on 13/May/09
That would make him 6'5 or 6'4.75 in the afternoon.
The Dutchguy said on 13/May/09
again, i think that he, just like my dad, grew a couple of inches since he was 18 or so, because he looks like a strong 6'5, or maybe even a weak 6'6 on the upper photo
Big King said on 12/May/09
Yes, 6'5.5" for Robbins out of bed might be on the money.
James said on 10/May/09
I don't think he ever reached 6'7. I could belvie 6'5.5.
Korben said on 6/May/09
wow new pic, looking closer to 6'6 there. and looking older. Poor tim lol. 6'5 min.
Big King said on 29/Apr/09
OK, although Robbins looked 6'7" in Nothing to Lose, this height estimate is a little bit too exaggerated for him. He isn't even a full 6'6" but a very strong 6'5" guy. So I think that it could be possible that Robbins is 6'5.5" as we all say.
Alex says on 28/Apr/09 said on 28/Apr/09
Maybe he was 6,7 in his younger days, in The Shawshank Redemption he looked pretty tall to me,nowadays i find him shorter (for instance in Mystic River),maybe a little weak 6,5 or 6ft4,75.Anyway,pretty tall guy.
Big King said on 27/Apr/09
I really have the feeling that Robbins could have exactly the same height as me.
yoyo said on 27/Apr/09
my estimate is Tim was (6ft5.5)197cm tall he 1st started his acting career at young, then till late 90s he drop a cm at 196cm a strong 6ft5. nowadays a little weak 6ft5 at 195cm(6ft4.75). Now a strong 195cm tall old guy only when a really bad day he were be like 6ft4.5 but not lower than that.
Jim said on 25/Apr/09
Just saw him at LAX a few weeks ago he is huge and scrufty looking. Looks like Orson Welles but he is around 6'5".He needs to drop some tonnage must be 275.
yoyo said on 24/Apr/09
he looks to have 25cm taller than glenn if he stand up straight on 1st pics. Glenn 5ft7 so Tim 6ft5..
Lenad said on 23/Apr/09
I assume Glenn sees him at 6'4
Big King said on 22/Apr/09
Robbins has 2 inches on 6'4" Christopher Reeve who is even a strong 6'4" guy.
glenn said on 22/Apr/09
thing is i never saw him look above 6-4.5.but he sure can look 6-5,6-6 in photos.
Big King said on 22/Apr/09
Yes, his 6'4.5" claiming is ridiculous. He's at least one inch above it.
yoyo said on 22/Apr/09
1st picture above if he would stand up straight he were be clearly near 6ft5 mark. Tim a strong 6ft4.5. on his good day i"ll say his 6ft5. 6ft5.5 in early 90s.
Daii said on 21/Apr/09
He must be close to 6'5 here
Thomas said on 20/Apr/09
This listing is spot on. Robbins is a nice man to meet but he is also a touch bit wacko.
Lenad said on 20/Apr/09
Anything under 6'4 1/2 is not likely. A full 6'6 is a bit much though!
RisingForce said on 20/Apr/09
Tim finally looks as tall as you'd expect him to look next to Glenn. 6'4.5" is too low, he looks taller.
DejaVu said on 17/Apr/09
Not the best picture but you can cleary see Tim Robbins is cleary taller than Christopher Reeves whos 6'4. I think a 6'5.5 peak is not impossible.
Click Here
Click Here
Big King said on 15/Apr/09
Haha, Robbins became an old man lol! Well, Robbins looks at least a foot taller than Glenn on the first new photo above. I think that Robbins was more 6'6" in his prime.
yoyo said on 3/Apr/09
i guess Tim was 6ft5 in morning and picture above taken at night he was 6ft4.75. No wrong i guess.
glenn said on 1/Apr/09
got him again last week.and almost again last night.see him all the time.
Doug said on 1/Apr/09
Big King I would say a legit 6'4"+ is a height that begins to stands out noticeably in the "west". A legit 6'4" barefoot is very rare and those guys loom above the vast majority of people. 6'4" is the maximum they cater for on public transport etc. Anything over 6 foot stands out in many developing world countries where the guys average out at 5'6", many shorter than this.
Doug said on 1/Apr/09
Yeah Glenn can often look surprisingly tall next to 6'4"+ guys like Robbins and Goldblum. From what I understand 5'7.5" is his day height too, 5'8" is a morning measurement? Those photos were taken at night too when you'd expect Glenn to be at his shortest.
Big King said on 29/Mar/09
If I watch this photo a longer time, I notice that Robbins looks in the 6'3"-6'4" range beside Glenn!

Glenn, are you really 5'8" in the morning???
Big King said on 27/Mar/09
Well, Freeman was clearly 3 inches shorter than Robbins. So he couldn't be 6'3". About Robbins' height, I guess he's 6'4.5" in the evening and slightly over 6'5" in the morning.
Anonymous said on 26/Mar/09
Yeah Big King at times in the Shawshank Redemption in some scenes he only looked 6'4. You never know Morgan Freeman might have been 6'3 when that film was made?
Big King said on 24/Mar/09
I also estimated him as 6'7" in Nothing to Loose because he was a clear giant in this film but in the Shawshank Redemption, he didn't look so tall.
RisingForce said on 10/Mar/09
He doesn't look as tall as I'd expect him to next to Glenn. I see a 7 inch in the top picture if they had equal posture. I see an 8 inch difference in the lower picture, although Glenn is a bit closer to the camera.

In most pictures and movies he looks atleast 6'5".
Lenad said on 7/Mar/09
Anything under this listing is BS
Anonymous said on 6/Mar/09
In the top photo he has 6.5 inches on glen (6ft 2.5in)and in the bottom photo he has 7.5 inches on glen (6ft 3.5in), but I would suggest if he stood straight,he would have 8.5 inches on glen making him 6ft 4.5in. And yes to the person who said people forget how tall that really is.
_-_-_-Hugh-_-_-_/ said on 5/Mar/09
I can picture Tim as being close to 6ft6 in his prime. and 6ft5 now.
Big King said on 27/Feb/09
ok, Robbins has no more than 8 inches on Glenn when I watch these photos but in the films Robbins appears to be huge. So his 6'4.5" claiming is ridiculous. Robbins is at least 6'5" because as mentioned he is huge and 6'5" is the height where a human starts to stand out.
T.J. said on 24/Feb/09
Ive heard he's 6'5"
Danimal said on 13/Feb/09
Has been described as having been as tall as 6'7" in his younger days. Definitely a strong 6'6" guy at least in his prime. Is still over 6'5" today imo.
Doug said on 9/Feb/09
Looking at photographs of him most of the time he is looking 6'5" to 6'6" clearly in shoes, he towers above everybody in the way a guy this tall would. Barefoot 6'4.5" **at least*** is very accurate I'm sure which would explain how he stands 6'5.5"-6'6" depending on the shoes/boots. Doesn't look as tall as usual here but in some pics he really looms above others in a way a 6'6" guy would. WOuld be interested too see a pic of him and Vince Vaughan. In my view Robbins looks a little taller.
Anonymous said on 8/Jan/09
Legit 6'4.5" and people forget how tall that really is.
george175cm said on 3/Jan/09
this needs to be changed. he is 6 foot 5 could of been over in his peak. i think it is stupid to have a man who is clearly 6'5 at 6.45 from two photos. time of day,posture how you feel etc. all contribute to how straight you stand i would love to see a pic with him stood straight but its unlikely i would see one thats good lol the evidence of him being taller is clear and loads of people agree just change it lol!!
Hugh said on 3/Jan/09
Bill Murray could've been 6ft2 years ago. Robbins looks like an overgrown version of Tom Hanks.
Mister Lennon said on 1/Jan/09
Robbins has to be at least a 6'5 guy, at least. He looks very, very big.
adam said on 1/Jan/09
He looks enormous in those pics Gonzalo posted. Robbins has to be 6-5! Once again: In Shawshank Redemption he towered over everyone, including Morgan Freeman who was probably around 6-3 at that time. Surprisingly there with Glenn he really doesn`t look that huge!
Anonymous said on 31/Dec/08
6ft4,1/2 is wrong!tim is at least an inch taller than steven fry in the film IQ
and fry is 6ft5
anonymous said on 27/Dec/08
6 foot 4-5.
Danimal said on 24/Dec/08
If Murray is now only 6'0" that means he has lost at least 2". That's scary for a man who is only around 60 years old. He seems to be in good health.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.