Add a Comment1311 comments
Average Guess (169 Votes)
6ft 5.06in (195.7cm)
6ft 5.06in (195.7cm)
Adam said on 10/Jun/17
Jesus Christ I didn't realise he was this big, must be why he doesn't get starring roles, apart from Shawshank
Jesus Christ I didn't realise he was this big, must be why he doesn't get starring roles, apart from Shawshank
jervis said on 5/Jun/17
He looked a foot taller than 5ft8 ish Paul Newman in the hudsucker proxy,an easy 6ft5.9 inch difference is clear or maybe a bit more.
He looked a foot taller than 5ft8 ish Paul Newman in the hudsucker proxy,an easy 6ft5.9 inch difference is clear or maybe a bit more.
Canson said on 3/Jun/17
His claim of 6'4 1/2 looks more accurate. People have no idea how tall that actually is in real life. Bobby3342 said it best 6'4.5 barefoot will get you guessed 6'6" all day. I know being that height barefoot
His claim of 6'4 1/2 looks more accurate. People have no idea how tall that actually is in real life. Bobby3342 said it best 6'4.5 barefoot will get you guessed 6'6" all day. I know being that height barefoot
BlueChord said on 28/May/17
I think he was solid 195cm in his prime and 193-194cm now :)
I think he was solid 195cm in his prime and 193-194cm now :)
jervis said on 28/May/17
In Bob Roberts he has 4 inches on Alan Rickman,who was 6ft1.
In Bob Roberts he has 4 inches on Alan Rickman,who was 6ft1.
jervis said on 27/May/17
He was a clear 3 inches taller than 6ft2 to 6ft2.5 Morgan Freeman, making him 6ft5 inches tall.
He was a clear 3 inches taller than 6ft2 to 6ft2.5 Morgan Freeman, making him 6ft5 inches tall.
MJKoP said on 22/May/17
LOL, Danimal thinks Robbins is 6'7", but Tom Cruise is under 5'7". Watch War of the Worlds...to think there is more than a full FOOT difference of height between them is insane. I'm sure if he replies to this he'll go with the generic lifts, boxes, camera angles, ditches, levitation, or whatever other tired excuse. ;D
LOL, Danimal thinks Robbins is 6'7", but Tom Cruise is under 5'7". Watch War of the Worlds...to think there is more than a full FOOT difference of height between them is insane. I'm sure if he replies to this he'll go with the generic lifts, boxes, camera angles, ditches, levitation, or whatever other tired excuse. ;D
dane said on 15/May/17
im not disputing his height, but he sure dont look 6'5, he didnt really tower over anyone in shawshank, and 6'5 is way above average height.
im not disputing his height, but he sure dont look 6'5, he didnt really tower over anyone in shawshank, and 6'5 is way above average height.
Sean95 said on 13/May/17
Thought he looked at least a solid 6'5 in The Shawshank Redemption, looked 3 inches taller than Morgan Freeman back then
Thought he looked at least a solid 6'5 in The Shawshank Redemption, looked 3 inches taller than Morgan Freeman back then
Canson said on 2/May/17
194/195 peak
194/195 peak
Richardspain said on 1/May/17
He is very tall. Around 195cm sure.
Peak 196cm
Now 194/195 cm
Barefoot of course
He is very tall. Around 195cm sure.
Peak 196cm
Now 194/195 cm
Barefoot of course
Canson said on 29/Mar/17
@Shiva: 6'5 st his lowest wouldn't make him 6'6" out of bed prob 6'5.75. But he's claimed 6'4.5 as well. Stern I believe prime was a hair over 6'5. So yes he was 6'6" out of bed I believe maybe 6'5.25 at his lowest maybe even 6'5 3/8 or 1/2
@Shiva: 6'5 st his lowest wouldn't make him 6'6" out of bed prob 6'5.75. But he's claimed 6'4.5 as well. Stern I believe prime was a hair over 6'5. So yes he was 6'6" out of bed I believe maybe 6'5.25 at his lowest maybe even 6'5 3/8 or 1/2
shiva 181 cms said on 29/Mar/17
@canson ,stern could have been 6'5.5 at his prime and Tim Robbins a flat 6'5, Robbins would have been easily 6'6 out of bed
@canson ,stern could have been 6'5.5 at his prime and Tim Robbins a flat 6'5, Robbins would have been easily 6'6 out of bed
jervis said on 17/Mar/17
The pic with Stern proves nothing, you can't see the ground level or footwear.Robbins was a clear 6ft5 in Shawshank way taller than the rest of the Cast.
The pic with Stern proves nothing, you can't see the ground level or footwear.Robbins was a clear 6ft5 in Shawshank way taller than the rest of the Cast.
jervis said on 15/Mar/17
He looks an easy 4 inches taller than Graig Ferguson, who was as tall, if not a little bit taller than Morgan Freeman.
He looks an easy 4 inches taller than Graig Ferguson, who was as tall, if not a little bit taller than Morgan Freeman.
Canson said on 9/Mar/17
@Arch: not sure about that. He said before he was 6'4.5. That'd make him 6'5.25 out of bed. He was never as tall as stern
@Arch: not sure about that. He said before he was 6'4.5. That'd make him 6'5.25 out of bed. He was never as tall as stern
Arch Stanton said on 7/Mar/17
6'5 out of bed?? Peak he'd have been very close to 6'6 out of bed.
6'5 out of bed?? Peak he'd have been very close to 6'6 out of bed.
Canson said on 5/Mar/17
@Guanzo: That's too low for him but he isn't 6'5. I think prime his 6'4.5 is legit and today maybe 6'4.25. He was always good for 6'5" out of bed
@Guanzo: That's too low for him but he isn't 6'5. I think prime his 6'4.5 is legit and today maybe 6'4.25. He was always good for 6'5" out of bed
Shredder said on 4/Feb/17
Rob , How tall does Martin Lawrence look next to him recently?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob , How tall does Martin Lawrence look next to him recently?
Click Here
Editor Rob it's trickier to say, I don't know if there are other photos from that event.
Canson said on 30/Jan/17
Rob has him close enough. He's 6'4.5 barefoot (6'5.25 out of bed). He's said himself before he's 6'4 1/2"
Rob has him close enough. He's 6'4.5 barefoot (6'5.25 out of bed). He's said himself before he's 6'4 1/2"
berta said on 27/Jan/17
when have he ever looked shorter than strong 195 guy?. dont get it. back when he did shawshank redemprion he llooked huge. i think he is the one who have 1/4 inch on vince vaughn back in the 90´s. today he may be 195. havent seen him in anything recently. but peak he made clancy brown look little over 6 foot 2
when have he ever looked shorter than strong 195 guy?. dont get it. back when he did shawshank redemprion he llooked huge. i think he is the one who have 1/4 inch on vince vaughn back in the 90´s. today he may be 195. havent seen him in anything recently. but peak he made clancy brown look little over 6 foot 2
Giorgi said on 21/Jan/17
Handsome man. Ironic, that the only thing missing isn't really missing, it's too much. I mean his excessive 2 inches ;))
Handsome man. Ironic, that the only thing missing isn't really missing, it's too much. I mean his excessive 2 inches ;))
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jan/17
Peak: 6ft4¾-6ft5
Today: 6ft4½-6ft4¾
Has done well so far for a guy pushing 60
Peak: 6ft4¾-6ft5
Today: 6ft4½-6ft4¾
Has done well so far for a guy pushing 60
berta said on 10/Jan/17
to me this guy never looks shorter than 195,5 and often 196. as an actor he claims less to be given moore jobs.he is the only guy that made peak morgan freeman look only 188. and made kevin costner look small. i think he should have full 6 foot 5 .
to me this guy never looks shorter than 195,5 and often 196. as an actor he claims less to be given moore jobs.he is the only guy that made peak morgan freeman look only 188. and made kevin costner look small. i think he should have full 6 foot 5 .
Jamie said on 4/Jan/17
I think he should have a peak height as 6ft5.25
I think he should have a peak height as 6ft5.25
movieguy said on 1/Jan/17
Looked a lot taller than Clancy Brown in Shawshank redemption. Brown is about 6'3'' I understand. Difficult one to call on Robbins. He might be more than 6'5'', looked shorter than Howard Stern but was this on an even surface. Same thing with shot with 6'7'' James Cromwell.
Looked a lot taller than Clancy Brown in Shawshank redemption. Brown is about 6'3'' I understand. Difficult one to call on Robbins. He might be more than 6'5'', looked shorter than Howard Stern but was this on an even surface. Same thing with shot with 6'7'' James Cromwell.
Canson said on 29/Dec/16
I don't see 3 inches between Robbins and Freeman. And if it really were who is to say that it's not Freeman as 6'1.75 or .5 and Robbins at 6'4.5? And no im not downgrading freeman because I know that's the next propaganda I'm gonna hear. Instead I'm asking why people always have to upgrade someone in order to make (for example) freeman a certain height just to make the math work? That to me is no different than someone downgrading another person. Either way you're undermining a claim whether it's up or down. Going off what Robbins claimed out of his own mouth when he said he's 6'4.5 and how he looks next to taller actors like Howard Stern (who by all reliable accounts) is a legit 6'5-6'5.25 no more (see Bobby3342's post as well as the poster who mentioned he met him at Dirty Beer). I think Robbins is a guy who would measure 6'5.25 out of bed (196.2cm) and 6'4.5 at his lowest prime (194.3). And wouldn't rule out based on his age, some shrinkage like 170cm fan mentioned below.
I don't see 3 inches between Robbins and Freeman. And if it really were who is to say that it's not Freeman as 6'1.75 or .5 and Robbins at 6'4.5? And no im not downgrading freeman because I know that's the next propaganda I'm gonna hear. Instead I'm asking why people always have to upgrade someone in order to make (for example) freeman a certain height just to make the math work? That to me is no different than someone downgrading another person. Either way you're undermining a claim whether it's up or down. Going off what Robbins claimed out of his own mouth when he said he's 6'4.5 and how he looks next to taller actors like Howard Stern (who by all reliable accounts) is a legit 6'5-6'5.25 no more (see Bobby3342's post as well as the poster who mentioned he met him at Dirty Beer). I think Robbins is a guy who would measure 6'5.25 out of bed (196.2cm) and 6'4.5 at his lowest prime (194.3). And wouldn't rule out based on his age, some shrinkage like 170cm fan mentioned below.
Canson said on 27/Dec/16
Yes Jervis unfortunately it's the revolving circle on this site. it's always so in so has to be (insert) because the other person has to be (insert). It's a bunch of comparing when each person can be claiming shoe heights. Usually the net result is we must make the other person taller to accommodate the first one. Robbins has claimed 6'4.5 before and likely is his lowest height and also 6'5". But yes He's a legit 196+ out of bed so rounded he'd be 6'5". Stern is taller than him even if ground isn't level. I'd believe rob's estimate for Stern and at most 195cm (Rob's estimate for Robbins). I bet if freeman claimed 6'3" Robbins by deduction would be 6'6" it's how it always works. By the way freeman is 6'1.75 listed here.
Yes Jervis unfortunately it's the revolving circle on this site. it's always so in so has to be (insert) because the other person has to be (insert). It's a bunch of comparing when each person can be claiming shoe heights. Usually the net result is we must make the other person taller to accommodate the first one. Robbins has claimed 6'4.5 before and likely is his lowest height and also 6'5". But yes He's a legit 196+ out of bed so rounded he'd be 6'5". Stern is taller than him even if ground isn't level. I'd believe rob's estimate for Stern and at most 195cm (Rob's estimate for Robbins). I bet if freeman claimed 6'3" Robbins by deduction would be 6'6" it's how it always works. By the way freeman is 6'1.75 listed here.
170cm fan of Andy Dufresene said on 26/Dec/16
Could he be heading towards 6'4 in a few years?
Could he be heading towards 6'4 in a few years?
jervis said on 25/Dec/16
what height do yot think Morgan Freeman was Canson?Robbins had an easy 3 on him, and Freeman was a strong 6ft2, I d'ont think anybody doubts that here,thats why I think he was 6ft5.
what height do yot think Morgan Freeman was Canson?Robbins had an easy 3 on him, and Freeman was a strong 6ft2, I d'ont think anybody doubts that here,thats why I think he was 6ft5.
Aza said on 23/Dec/16
He looked taller than Fry in The Player so yes this is a great listing.
He looked taller than Fry in The Player so yes this is a great listing.
tylort said on 23/Dec/16
The Howard Stern photo was obviously not on the same level of ground.
The Howard Stern photo was obviously not on the same level of ground.
Canson said on 21/Dec/16
Sorry but he isn't even a full 6'5. Still a good .5"- 2cm shorter than Howard stern. He's 6'4.5 at his lowest. All because these other celebs bill themselves a certain way do people inflate him to accommodate
Sorry but he isn't even a full 6'5. Still a good .5"- 2cm shorter than Howard stern. He's 6'4.5 at his lowest. All because these other celebs bill themselves a certain way do people inflate him to accommodate
Sandy Cowell said on 13/Dec/16
@ fterz and jervis: thanks, you two, for the vote of confidence! I think I might sleep better tonight!
@ fterz and jervis: thanks, you two, for the vote of confidence! I think I might sleep better tonight!
jervis said on 6/Dec/16
Had a clear 3inches on Morgan Freeman.If he was under 6ft5 at his peak, Freeman was not 6ft2.
Had a clear 3inches on Morgan Freeman.If he was under 6ft5 at his peak, Freeman was not 6ft2.
fterz said on 5/Dec/16
Tim in Shawshank doe look 6ft7 I mean he towers a tall cast.
Tim in Shawshank doe look 6ft7 I mean he towers a tall cast.
Sandy Cowell said on 4/Dec/16
@ Arch - Sometimes I think I AM my own 'Danimal Digest!'
@ Arch - Sometimes I think I AM my own 'Danimal Digest!'
Arch Stanton said on 2/Dec/16
Guessing she's been reading too much of the Danimal Digest, right Rob ;-)?
Editor Rob
Guessing she's been reading too much of the Danimal Digest, right Rob ;-)?
Editor Rob Arch, I can understand some estimations of 6ft 6 for Tim.
Sandy Cowell said on 1/Dec/16
I was told Tim was 6ft7, and, gullible that I am, I believed it!
At least I keep this sort of embarrassment to myself...
I was told Tim was 6ft7, and, gullible that I am, I believed it!
At least I keep this sort of embarrassment to myself...
Christian-196.2cm (6ft5.25) said on 30/Nov/16
"Tim Robbins' Peak Height was 6ft 4 7/8th in (195.3 cm)"
I doubt he was under 195cm in his prime, but I don't think he was as tall as a full 6ft5.
"Tim Robbins' Peak Height was 6ft 4 7/8th in (195.3 cm)"
I doubt he was under 195cm in his prime, but I don't think he was as tall as a full 6ft5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Nov/16
Cusack is definitely a tall guy. Never looks less than 6ft2 can pass for 6ft3. But Robbins would make just about everyone look noticeably shorter.
Cusack is definitely a tall guy. Never looks less than 6ft2 can pass for 6ft3. But Robbins would make just about everyone look noticeably shorter.
RainbowBlaster5 said on 25/Nov/16
Towered over Cusack in "High Fidelity" and Cusack is supposed to be really tall.
Towered over Cusack in "High Fidelity" and Cusack is supposed to be really tall.
jervis said on 16/Oct/16
Robbins looked 6ft5.25 next to 6ft2.25 Morgan Freeman in Shawshank,3 inches taller than Freeman in that movie.
Robbins looked 6ft5.25 next to 6ft2.25 Morgan Freeman in Shawshank,3 inches taller than Freeman in that movie.
170cm Air force one guy said on 5/Oct/16
Do you think Tim looks at least 6'4.5 or could he be a little less today cause he is pushing 58 now?
Editor Rob
Do you think Tim looks at least 6'4.5 or could he be a little less today cause he is pushing 58 now?
Editor Rob he might have lost a small fraction, although can still look nearly 6ft 5.
shiva 181 cms said on 23/Sep/16
He claimed 6'4.5 becoz he may have measured 6'4.75 and rounded down he looked 6'5 in his prime he could have got mistaken for 6'6+ guy granted his frame even in the above pic it looks like, now more 6'4.5
He claimed 6'4.5 becoz he may have measured 6'4.75 and rounded down he looked 6'5 in his prime he could have got mistaken for 6'6+ guy granted his frame even in the above pic it looks like, now more 6'4.5
Canson said on 5/Sep/16
He's not as tall as Howard Stern who's a legit 6'5 guy
He's not as tall as Howard Stern who's a legit 6'5 guy
Arch stanton said on 22/Aug/16
His hairstyle could influence his height I think. In Jacob's Ladder and Mystic River with a longer flatter style he looks shorter than he did in films where his hair was high like Bob Roberts and the Player.
His hairstyle could influence his height I think. In Jacob's Ladder and Mystic River with a longer flatter style he looks shorter than he did in films where his hair was high like Bob Roberts and the Player.
Canson said on 21/Aug/16
I'd go a 6'4.5 at his lowest in his peak. That's the height he claimed before. Maybe today he's 6'4.25 at his lowest.
I'd go a 6'4.5 at his lowest in his peak. That's the height he claimed before. Maybe today he's 6'4.25 at his lowest.
Mike said on 20/Aug/16
Tom Robbins peak: 6ft 5, today 6ft 4.5
Morgan Freeman peak: 6ft 2.5, today 6ft 1.5
Tom Robbins peak: 6ft 5, today 6ft 4.5
Morgan Freeman peak: 6ft 2.5, today 6ft 1.5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Aug/16
He could be more like 6ft4½ on the nose today. But 6ft5 peak is very possible
He could be more like 6ft4½ on the nose today. But 6ft5 peak is very possible
Canson said on 12/Aug/16
@The Man: wouldn't surprise me if both are really under 6'5. Both look like they could be somewhere between 194-195cm in their primes (I say prime for Robbins because he's older and may have lost a fraction).
@The Man: wouldn't surprise me if both are really under 6'5. Both look like they could be somewhere between 194-195cm in their primes (I say prime for Robbins because he's older and may have lost a fraction).
shiva 181 cms said on 9/Aug/16
Tim robbins is 6'4.75 in his peak at times he may look a solid 6'5 because of his frame posture and he doesn't bend over like for example liam neeson today he migjt be 6'4.5 like he claimed
Tim robbins height (6'4.75) peak ( 6'4.5) current
Tim robbins is 6'4.75 in his peak at times he may look a solid 6'5 because of his frame posture and he doesn't bend over like for example liam neeson today he migjt be 6'4.5 like he claimed
Tim robbins height (6'4.75) peak ( 6'4.5) current
The Man said on 7/Aug/16
Robbins gets listed as 195cm and Manganiello gets listed as 196cm, when it should be the opposite.
Robbins gets listed as 195cm and Manganiello gets listed as 196cm, when it should be the opposite.
Canson said on 20/Jul/16
@JamesB: if not hydrated and weightlifting it's possible def. I measure exactly 194-194.1 6'4.375-.4 at a normal low but I've also seen as Low as almost right at 6'4 once or twice with a combination lifting and being on my feet late at night for long periods and a normal low with just lifting with less hydration can be more around 6'4 1/4 or slightly over. Robins easily would dro too
@JamesB: if not hydrated and weightlifting it's possible def. I measure exactly 194-194.1 6'4.375-.4 at a normal low but I've also seen as Low as almost right at 6'4 once or twice with a combination lifting and being on my feet late at night for long periods and a normal low with just lifting with less hydration can be more around 6'4 1/4 or slightly over. Robins easily would dro too
James B said on 16/Jul/16
Rob would a 6'4.75 guy measure 6'4.5 very late at night like 2 in the morning?
Editor Rob
Rob would a 6'4.75 guy measure 6'4.5 very late at night like 2 in the morning?
Editor Rob anyone has potential to drop under their listing if they measure an absolute low or a very late at night or straight after a 2 hour session of sport.
Canson said on 9/Jul/16
@Bobby3342: the more I look at him the diff with Howard stern looks more like 2cm than 4 to me. I can see him as maybe a very strong 193 today (6'4.25) and Stern as 6'5 like you have him. Robbins may have been around 6'4 1/2 prime but def can't see 6'5 barefoot. Only in shoes and with those above he's prob 1.25 to put him near 197 in shoes
@Bobby3342: the more I look at him the diff with Howard stern looks more like 2cm than 4 to me. I can see him as maybe a very strong 193 today (6'4.25) and Stern as 6'5 like you have him. Robbins may have been around 6'4 1/2 prime but def can't see 6'5 barefoot. Only in shoes and with those above he's prob 1.25 to put him near 197 in shoes
Canson said on 8/Jul/16
Lillo Thomas said it perfectly below. The difference between 6'4.5 and 6'5 cannot be seen and unless u have two people equal who u are verifiably sure of then you can't tell. I can't always tell if someone is only 1/2" taller than me esp if footwear differs and I often get billed as 6'5". But I can definitely see a peak 196cm+ out of bed for Tim Robbins and what he initially claimed 6'4 1/2" as his aggregate. I think he just rounded up to 6'5 like most ppl. May have lost a small small fraction in his later years but still at least a solid 6'4" today
Lillo Thomas said it perfectly below. The difference between 6'4.5 and 6'5 cannot be seen and unless u have two people equal who u are verifiably sure of then you can't tell. I can't always tell if someone is only 1/2" taller than me esp if footwear differs and I often get billed as 6'5". But I can definitely see a peak 196cm+ out of bed for Tim Robbins and what he initially claimed 6'4 1/2" as his aggregate. I think he just rounded up to 6'5 like most ppl. May have lost a small small fraction in his later years but still at least a solid 6'4" today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jul/16
Stern looks to be edging Robbins. He's more a solid 6ft5 guy
Stern looks to be edging Robbins. He's more a solid 6ft5 guy
Scott said on 6/Jul/16
A solid 6' 5". 3 full inches taller than Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption
A solid 6' 5". 3 full inches taller than Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption
Canson said on 3/Jul/16
In the pictures with Howard Stern, Tim Robbins looks about an inch shorter. Possible Stern peak height was 6'5.25-.5 (today flat 6'5") which would make Robbins what he claimed (at least peak) 6'4 1/2. Maybe he's dropped a fraction now but prob still a legit 193 cm.
In the pictures with Howard Stern, Tim Robbins looks about an inch shorter. Possible Stern peak height was 6'5.25-.5 (today flat 6'5") which would make Robbins what he claimed (at least peak) 6'4 1/2. Maybe he's dropped a fraction now but prob still a legit 193 cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Jun/16
His 6ft4½ claim is probably the only thing keeping him from a 6ft5 listing here...because he looks every bit of it in pretty much all his movies! Makes it even more comical when you see the number of guys who are barely 6ft3 who claim to be that!
His 6ft4½ claim is probably the only thing keeping him from a 6ft5 listing here...because he looks every bit of it in pretty much all his movies! Makes it even more comical when you see the number of guys who are barely 6ft3 who claim to be that!
Canson said on 28/May/16
@Bobby: I guess I contradicted myself because Theler does lie up from 6'5 (he is very buff as well) but outside that I don't see much
@Bobby: I guess I contradicted myself because Theler does lie up from 6'5 (he is very buff as well) but outside that I don't see much
Canson said on 28/May/16
@Bobby: I agree about him being that height but I will say for guys like him or even Theler, I don't see them claiming 6'6 and 6'8. One thing I've noticed is that once someone is usually 6'5 or over (legitimately and solid enough) they usually don't lie up much outside of pro athletes. At least from what I've seen. A lot of the taller friends I have who are at their midpoint (I have a 6'5 1/2 friend who claims 6'5 as his height) they just round down. I'm actually similar I have in recent years begun to round down and just list myself as 6'4 on my docs even though I am a legit 6'4.5 in the afternoon but do drop to 1mm above 3/8. Of course always exceptions
@Bobby: I agree about him being that height but I will say for guys like him or even Theler, I don't see them claiming 6'6 and 6'8. One thing I've noticed is that once someone is usually 6'5 or over (legitimately and solid enough) they usually don't lie up much outside of pro athletes. At least from what I've seen. A lot of the taller friends I have who are at their midpoint (I have a 6'5 1/2 friend who claims 6'5 as his height) they just round down. I'm actually similar I have in recent years begun to round down and just list myself as 6'4 on my docs even though I am a legit 6'4.5 in the afternoon but do drop to 1mm above 3/8. Of course always exceptions
Canson said on 26/May/16
I think when we take Moe's advice (he goes off what someone else said they were at 6'5 and inflates the other person to accommodate) then Robbins is 6'6". In the real world however he was as stated a peak 6'4.5. May still be that height but doubt he's under 6'4 flat at his age. Howard Stern is clearly taller than him and Howard is a legit classic 6'5. He isn't any taller than that
I think when we take Moe's advice (he goes off what someone else said they were at 6'5 and inflates the other person to accommodate) then Robbins is 6'6". In the real world however he was as stated a peak 6'4.5. May still be that height but doubt he's under 6'4 flat at his age. Howard Stern is clearly taller than him and Howard is a legit classic 6'5. He isn't any taller than that
James B said on 25/May/16
I wonder how a peak Robbins would look next to challenger 16?
I wonder how a peak Robbins would look next to challenger 16?
Canson said on 25/May/16
@Berta; throw me in for peak 194.
@Berta; throw me in for peak 194.
berta said on 25/May/16
70% 196
20% 195
10% 194 ore 197
70% 196
20% 195
10% 194 ore 197
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/May/16
Yeah Arch he does look like an enormous 200cm+ guy in that picture! But again some people don't appreciate how big 6ft5 is.
Yeah Arch he does look like an enormous 200cm+ guy in that picture! But again some people don't appreciate how big 6ft5 is.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/May/16
Really Arch? I actually saw that as an instance where Costner could pull off 6ft2 if Robbins was 6ft5. I saw 3-4in between them.
Really Arch? I actually saw that as an instance where Costner could pull off 6ft2 if Robbins was 6ft5. I saw 3-4in between them.
Arch Stanton said on 17/May/16
Really looked at least 6'5.5 in Bull Durham, in fact he could look 6 ft 6 in that film with Costner. I don't think 6'5.5 peak is impossible. Doesn't look it today though I agree. At times though he can really look bigger than 195, see Click Here for instance! Looks like 6 ft 8 there and similar look to Greg Davies!
Really looked at least 6'5.5 in Bull Durham, in fact he could look 6 ft 6 in that film with Costner. I don't think 6'5.5 peak is impossible. Doesn't look it today though I agree. At times though he can really look bigger than 195, see Click Here for instance! Looks like 6 ft 8 there and similar look to Greg Davies!
Aza said on 7/May/16
Definitely thought he was taller than stephen fry in a film I can't remember many years ago. Actually agree with Arch. He needs a peak upgrade. Actually think he has lost a good inch so 195cm today is a good shout.
Definitely thought he was taller than stephen fry in a film I can't remember many years ago. Actually agree with Arch. He needs a peak upgrade. Actually think he has lost a good inch so 195cm today is a good shout.
James B said on 3/May/16
Arch seriously 6'5.5 peak? There was a photo of Robbins with James Cromwell not that long ago where he looked shorter for sure.
Arch seriously 6'5.5 peak? There was a photo of Robbins with James Cromwell not that long ago where he looked shorter for sure.
Arch Stanton said on 17/Apr/16
jtm said on 14/Apr/16
that's funny Arch Stanton. there is still a post from Oct 2013 and you admit that he was 3 inches taller than freeman. you have freeman 6'2.5-6'3 peak so he actually looked closer to 6'6 if that's true
Why's that funny? I have Freeman at 6'2.5. In Shawshank Robbins looked between 2 and 3 inches taller really. In films like Bob Roberts and The Player he could really look 6'5.5. I think 6'5.5 is possble peak. Morgan Freeman could give off a 6'3 impression, in fact in Last Vegas he could look that but more a strong 6'2.
jtm said on 14/Apr/16
that's funny Arch Stanton. there is still a post from Oct 2013 and you admit that he was 3 inches taller than freeman. you have freeman 6'2.5-6'3 peak so he actually looked closer to 6'6 if that's true
Why's that funny? I have Freeman at 6'2.5. In Shawshank Robbins looked between 2 and 3 inches taller really. In films like Bob Roberts and The Player he could really look 6'5.5. I think 6'5.5 is possble peak. Morgan Freeman could give off a 6'3 impression, in fact in Last Vegas he could look that but more a strong 6'2.
MrTBlack said on 16/Apr/16
He's over 6'5" if anything IMO but this listing works I guess.
He's over 6'5" if anything IMO but this listing works I guess.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Apr/16
@James: I do know how big it is (I'm that mark myself when I wake up). Robbins may very well be that today. But at peak he did look a legit 6ft5 guy
@James: I do know how big it is (I'm that mark myself when I wake up). Robbins may very well be that today. But at peak he did look a legit 6ft5 guy
jtm said on 14/Apr/16
that's funny Arch Stanton. there is still a post from Oct 2013 and you admit that he was 3 inches taller than freeman. you have freeman 6'2.5-6'3 peak so he actually looked closer to 6'6 if that's true.
that's funny Arch Stanton. there is still a post from Oct 2013 and you admit that he was 3 inches taller than freeman. you have freeman 6'2.5-6'3 peak so he actually looked closer to 6'6 if that's true.
Arch Stanton said on 12/Apr/16
Andrea said on 3/Apr/16
Rob, granted that i do think he generally looks (or at least looked) near 6'5, do you think he might have really been just 6'4.5??? After all, people who are truly 6'4.5 are obviously still very tall and can pull off looking near 6'5! See Ibra...
Editor Rob: the argument is whether he said 6ft 4.5 rather than 5 just to make it feel less.
He could have been a guy who at his low dipped a little under, but a large chunk of the day held 6ft 5.
In the early 90s he could really look like a legit 197 guy in some films like The Player and Bob Roberts. He didn't look over 6'5 with Freeman though in Shawshank.
Andrea said on 3/Apr/16
Rob, granted that i do think he generally looks (or at least looked) near 6'5, do you think he might have really been just 6'4.5??? After all, people who are truly 6'4.5 are obviously still very tall and can pull off looking near 6'5! See Ibra...
Editor Rob: the argument is whether he said 6ft 4.5 rather than 5 just to make it feel less.
He could have been a guy who at his low dipped a little under, but a large chunk of the day held 6ft 5.
In the early 90s he could really look like a legit 197 guy in some films like The Player and Bob Roberts. He didn't look over 6'5 with Freeman though in Shawshank.
James B said on 10/Apr/16
Rampage I don't think you realise how big 6'4.5 range is
Rampage I don't think you realise how big 6'4.5 range is
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Apr/16
196cm is arguable...
196cm is arguable...
Canson said on 7/Apr/16
@Berta: doubt he's as tall as you are or even I. I believe my height in his prime (6'4.5) maybe. But he's a clean 6'4 now. Hes a good inch shorter than Howard Stern. Stern's a legit 6'5.
@Berta: doubt he's as tall as you are or even I. I believe my height in his prime (6'4.5) maybe. But he's a clean 6'4 now. Hes a good inch shorter than Howard Stern. Stern's a legit 6'5.
moe said on 6/Apr/16
He is absolutely 6'5. If you want to spot him, you can go to the Actors Gang in Culver City. He runs the joint and is sometimes there. He's actually taller than 6'5. There was someone else there who was 6'5 when I went there, and Tim was taller.
He is absolutely 6'5. If you want to spot him, you can go to the Actors Gang in Culver City. He runs the joint and is sometimes there. He's actually taller than 6'5. There was someone else there who was 6'5 when I went there, and Tim was taller.
berta said on 6/Apr/16
this guy is ore have been when he was younger 196. He made morgan Freeman and clancy Brown look average. I Think his six foot 4 and a half claim was just to get more roles . Can never se him shorter than vince vaughn
this guy is ore have been when he was younger 196. He made morgan Freeman and clancy Brown look average. I Think his six foot 4 and a half claim was just to get more roles . Can never se him shorter than vince vaughn
Andrea said on 3/Apr/16
Rob, granted that i do think he generally looks (or at least looked) near 6'5, do you think he might have really been just 6'4.5??? After all, people who are truly 6'4.5 are obviously still very tall and can pull off looking near 6'5! See Ibra...
Editor Rob
Rob, granted that i do think he generally looks (or at least looked) near 6'5, do you think he might have really been just 6'4.5??? After all, people who are truly 6'4.5 are obviously still very tall and can pull off looking near 6'5! See Ibra...
Editor Rob the argument is whether he said 6ft 4.5 rather than 5 just to make it feel less.
He could have been a guy who at his low dipped a little under, but a large chunk of the day held 6ft 5.
He could have been a guy who at his low dipped a little under, but a large chunk of the day held 6ft 5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Apr/16
James, I'm sure Willis could have hit 6ft1 in certain types of shoes...
James, I'm sure Willis could have hit 6ft1 in certain types of shoes...
James B said on 30/Mar/16
Funny rob how Glenn saw Bruce Willis at 6'1 and even once as high as 6'2 yet he saw Robbins at 6'4.5.........,
Editor Rob
Funny rob how Glenn saw Bruce Willis at 6'1 and even once as high as 6'2 yet he saw Robbins at 6'4.5.........,
Editor Rob it is possible on a good day Willis in person could have looked tall from his perspective. Maybe robbins was walking smaller to avoid 'autograph fiends' and 'selfie hounds'
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Mar/16
Peak: 6ft5(196cm)
Today: 6ft4¾(195cm)
Could have lost no more than 1cm
Peak: 6ft5(196cm)
Today: 6ft4¾(195cm)
Could have lost no more than 1cm
berta said on 22/Mar/16
have Always thought that this guy is a proper 196. dont Think vince Vaughn is taller , probably 1 cm shorter.
have Always thought that this guy is a proper 196. dont Think vince Vaughn is taller , probably 1 cm shorter.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Mar/16
Robbins still looks in that 6ft4½-5 zone today. Maybe in a few years we'll see if he's dropped anything noticeable. But if he measured 6ft5, he'd either be honest or round down a full inch because he's uncomfortable with his height. He wouldn't round down just a fraction. His son looks like he might be a bit taller, like 6ft5½.
Robbins still looks in that 6ft4½-5 zone today. Maybe in a few years we'll see if he's dropped anything noticeable. But if he measured 6ft5, he'd either be honest or round down a full inch because he's uncomfortable with his height. He wouldn't round down just a fraction. His son looks like he might be a bit taller, like 6ft5½.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Mar/16
Or 6ft5 peak and 6ft4½ today.
Or 6ft5 peak and 6ft4½ today.
James B said on 22/Feb/16
Rob perhaps give him 6'4.5 current and 6'4.75 peak?
Editor Rob
Rob perhaps give him 6'4.5 current and 6'4.75 peak?
Editor Rob I think when someone looks to have lost half inch, that is the cutoff to maybe consider peak/current. A 1/4 inch I feel might be too small.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Feb/16
Arch, I think Hudson in his 20's-30's could look a strong 6ft5 at times but he lost a bit of height quite early. He definitely looked closer to 6ft4 flat at the end of his life. Robbins was just one of those rarities who had good posture and chose not to embellish his height when he easily could have gotten away with it. The other guys you mentioned I think could fall into that weak 6ft5(194-195cm) category because they can look 6ft4 range a lot. Other guys like Howard Stern, Ralf Moeller, Wladimir Klitschko or Nonso Anonzie who can look 6ft6...they're the strong 6ft5(196-197cm) guys
Arch, I think Hudson in his 20's-30's could look a strong 6ft5 at times but he lost a bit of height quite early. He definitely looked closer to 6ft4 flat at the end of his life. Robbins was just one of those rarities who had good posture and chose not to embellish his height when he easily could have gotten away with it. The other guys you mentioned I think could fall into that weak 6ft5(194-195cm) category because they can look 6ft4 range a lot. Other guys like Howard Stern, Ralf Moeller, Wladimir Klitschko or Nonso Anonzie who can look 6ft6...they're the strong 6ft5(196-197cm) guys
Arch Stanton said on 23/Jan/16
There's a few actors on here you could really argue this listing for, Joe Manganiello, Rock Hudson, Christopher Lee and Sterling Hayden to name a few. Unlike the others though, this guy could look a strong 6'5 in the early 90s.
There's a few actors on here you could really argue this listing for, Joe Manganiello, Rock Hudson, Christopher Lee and Sterling Hayden to name a few. Unlike the others though, this guy could look a strong 6'5 in the early 90s.
movieguy said on 23/Jan/16
Robbins did a film with 6'4'' Stephen Fry and I remember him being a bit taller than Fry. I'm not sure they were standing side to side though so maybe not easy to compare. The photos that throw me are the ones of Robbins dwarfing Clint Eastwood at time of Mystic River. Either Robbins was taller than 6'5'' or 6'4'' Clint had already been hit by severe height loss. I know some argue Clint wasn't a full 6'4'' but he looked close enough when young.
Robbins did a film with 6'4'' Stephen Fry and I remember him being a bit taller than Fry. I'm not sure they were standing side to side though so maybe not easy to compare. The photos that throw me are the ones of Robbins dwarfing Clint Eastwood at time of Mystic River. Either Robbins was taller than 6'5'' or 6'4'' Clint had already been hit by severe height loss. I know some argue Clint wasn't a full 6'4'' but he looked close enough when young.
Alex said on 18/Jan/16
I think barefoot is 192-193 and with shoes about 194-195, as in this photo.
I think barefoot is 192-193 and with shoes about 194-195, as in this photo.
John said on 16/Jan/16
6ft4.75 peak, 6ft4.5 today. Either height, he downright towers over people.
6ft4.75 peak, 6ft4.5 today. Either height, he downright towers over people.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jan/16
Rob, how likelt is it that he's down to 6ft4 flat today?
Editor Rob
Rob, how likelt is it that he's down to 6ft4 flat today?
Editor Rob I would still think he was above that mark.
bobby3342 said on 12/Jan/16
Ok how can he be a barefoot 6'5 when he's at least 1.5 shorter than howard stern? ( oh and I have seen stern more times than I care to mention he's .a .5 inch taller than me(if that) Howard stern is a legit b/f 6'5 tim robbins is not 64.75 b/f
Ok how can he be a barefoot 6'5 when he's at least 1.5 shorter than howard stern? ( oh and I have seen stern more times than I care to mention he's .a .5 inch taller than me(if that) Howard stern is a legit b/f 6'5 tim robbins is not 64.75 b/f
Canson said on 7/Jan/16
Lol someone actually compared him to Jalen Rose in height on this page!!! Jalen is 6'6" barefoot as measured and is even shorter than Scottie Pippen.
Lol someone actually compared him to Jalen Rose in height on this page!!! Jalen is 6'6" barefoot as measured and is even shorter than Scottie Pippen.
movieguy said on 7/Jan/16
Looked a lot taller than Clancy Brown in the Shawshank Redemption. Brown says he is 6'3'' and is probably not exaggerating. As other posters have said Robbins may be taller than the 6'5'' he usually gives. I suspect he was worried about not getting parts because of his height so knocked off an inch or two. I think the people that downgrade him to below 6'5'' are definitely wrong on this one.
Looked a lot taller than Clancy Brown in the Shawshank Redemption. Brown says he is 6'3'' and is probably not exaggerating. As other posters have said Robbins may be taller than the 6'5'' he usually gives. I suspect he was worried about not getting parts because of his height so knocked off an inch or two. I think the people that downgrade him to below 6'5'' are definitely wrong on this one.
Canson said on 26/Dec/15
Bobby: after looking at the footwear he may be. Def isn't much taller than those guys. He has thick soles in them shoes!!!
Bobby: after looking at the footwear he may be. Def isn't much taller than those guys. He has thick soles in them shoes!!!
Canson said on 25/Dec/15
So Goose based on your expertise I'll give Robbins 6'5 since you seem to be 2" off on all of your assessments.
@Bobby3342:actually may be just as tall as Barkley or MJ. He looks 6'6 in shoes.
So Goose based on your expertise I'll give Robbins 6'5 since you seem to be 2" off on all of your assessments.
@Bobby3342:actually may be just as tall as Barkley or MJ. He looks 6'6 in shoes.
bobby3342 said on 21/Dec/15
this guy is at least an inch shorter than MJ or barkley, I would bet my savings on it! needs a downgrade
this guy is at least an inch shorter than MJ or barkley, I would bet my savings on it! needs a downgrade
195.5cm said on 15/Nov/15
he's about 6'7 peak
proberly still on the upper end of 6'6 today. definetly wasn't 6.4.5 IMAO
he's about 6'7 peak
proberly still on the upper end of 6'6 today. definetly wasn't 6.4.5 IMAO
Goose said on 4/Nov/15
I posted this on this site before - dude is way way tall. He ain't no 6'5. Saw him sitting at the bar at a restaurant in Soho in about 1998'. Looked 6'7 to me and big boned. I've seen Conan too who I put at 6'5 (big guy as well) and there was a huge difference. BTW, extremely tall actors will downgrade their heights as 6'7 public ally would limit their roles/appeal.
I posted this on this site before - dude is way way tall. He ain't no 6'5. Saw him sitting at the bar at a restaurant in Soho in about 1998'. Looked 6'7 to me and big boned. I've seen Conan too who I put at 6'5 (big guy as well) and there was a huge difference. BTW, extremely tall actors will downgrade their heights as 6'7 public ally would limit their roles/appeal.
Darren510 said on 21/Oct/15
6'4.5 - 6'4.75 and 6'5 peak. Looked minimum 6'5 in Shawshank redemption next to Morgan Freeman
6'4.5 - 6'4.75 and 6'5 peak. Looked minimum 6'5 in Shawshank redemption next to Morgan Freeman
Gonzalo said on 21/Aug/15
To me they both look the same height. Robbins is mínimum 1`94.
To me they both look the same height. Robbins is mínimum 1`94.
Sam said on 20/Aug/15
I actually don't think that Robbins looks taller...but it doesn't surprise that Robbins and Schreiber would measure a very similar height.
I actually don't think that Robbins looks taller...but it doesn't surprise that Robbins and Schreiber would measure a very similar height.
Sam said on 17/Aug/15
Would be surprised if he was a couple inches taller than Conan but could buy him looking roughly an inch taller. At times he looks potential to be a bit shorter, height loss possible but a early, like with Stern and some other recent photos.
Would be surprised if he was a couple inches taller than Conan but could buy him looking roughly an inch taller. At times he looks potential to be a bit shorter, height loss possible but a early, like with Stern and some other recent photos.
jujwa said on 23/Jul/15
Wow i never noticed heights but i assumed he must be 5'6-5'7 because he has a slight baby fce imagine my surprise finding out he is nearky a foot taller lol
Wow i never noticed heights but i assumed he must be 5'6-5'7 because he has a slight baby fce imagine my surprise finding out he is nearky a foot taller lol
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jun/15
He really doesn't look like he's lost height
He really doesn't look like he's lost height
Ferrous said on 9/Jun/15
He looked surprisingly tall with Conan tonight - seemed to have as much as a couple of inches on the 6-3.5 Conan.
He looked surprisingly tall with Conan tonight - seemed to have as much as a couple of inches on the 6-3.5 Conan.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Jun/15
Danimal says on 9/May/15
Tim looking at least 6'6" if not 6'7" with Craig Ferguson in 2009 (at 20:52) and YES, Craig is around 6'2". To claim that Tim Robbins is only 6'4.75 is a tragedy, but its Rob's site: Click Here
That's got to be one of the dumbest comments I've ever read on this site
Danimal says on 9/May/15
Tim looking at least 6'6" if not 6'7" with Craig Ferguson in 2009 (at 20:52) and YES, Craig is around 6'2". To claim that Tim Robbins is only 6'4.75 is a tragedy, but its Rob's site: Click Here
That's got to be one of the dumbest comments I've ever read on this site
Sam said on 22/May/15
His performance in Mystic River really deserved the Oscar...really sold the haunted shell of a man, simultaneously hulking & scary as well as pathetic. Out of all things in the film his work there has aged the best so far.
His performance in Mystic River really deserved the Oscar...really sold the haunted shell of a man, simultaneously hulking & scary as well as pathetic. Out of all things in the film his work there has aged the best so far.
Sam said on 20/May/15
Rob, can you add to his credits?: Bull Durham, Jacob's Ladder, Bob Roberts, The Hudsucker Proxy, High Fidelity and War of the Worlds.
Rob, can you add to his credits?: Bull Durham, Jacob's Ladder, Bob Roberts, The Hudsucker Proxy, High Fidelity and War of the Worlds.
Sam said on 19/May/15
"6'4.5 is still very tall in Hollywood", very tall everywhere except perhaps in the NBA or Dinaric Alps.
"6'4.5 is still very tall in Hollywood", very tall everywhere except perhaps in the NBA or Dinaric Alps.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/15
Danimal says on 9/May/15
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 28/Nov/14
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4½ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need?
Proof??? MANY tall people low end their height in Hollywood to get more roles.
Umm...the quote above
Danimal says on 9/May/15
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 28/Nov/14
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4½ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need?
Proof??? MANY tall people low end their height in Hollywood to get more roles.
Umm...the quote above
Danimal said on 9/May/15
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 28/Nov/14
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4½ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need?
Proof??? MANY tall people low end their height in Hollywood to get more roles.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 28/Nov/14
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4½ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need?
Proof??? MANY tall people low end their height in Hollywood to get more roles.
Danimal said on 9/May/15
Dejavu says on 20/Feb/15
He had close to 3 inches on Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption.
Close to???? Try minimum 4" on him.
Dejavu says on 20/Feb/15
He had close to 3 inches on Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption.
Close to???? Try minimum 4" on him.
Danimal said on 9/May/15
Tim looking at least 6'6" if not 6'7" with Craig Ferguson in 2009 (at 20:52) and YES, Craig is around 6'2". To claim that Tim Robbins is only 6'4.75 is a tragedy, but its Rob's site: Click Here
Tim looking at least 6'6" if not 6'7" with Craig Ferguson in 2009 (at 20:52) and YES, Craig is around 6'2". To claim that Tim Robbins is only 6'4.75 is a tragedy, but its Rob's site: Click Here
Jeffery said on 26/Apr/15
Never 6'5" today. Out of bed maybe.
Never 6'5" today. Out of bed maybe.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Apr/15
@moe: and I think you're loser troll who wastes time and energy trying to denigrate other people's opinions.
@moe: and I think you're loser troll who wastes time and energy trying to denigrate other people's opinions.
moe said on 29/Mar/15
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover
I think you're speculating. And your speculation is wrong.
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover
I think you're speculating. And your speculation is wrong.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Mar/15
@Dejavu: I think they may have shot Shawshank a certain way to make him look more convincing as the self-confidant inmate who beat the system and serves as a hero to the other inmates. His towering presence naturally served the part.
Somewhat similar to what they did with Michael Clark Duncan in The Green Mile a few years later.
@Dejavu: I think they may have shot Shawshank a certain way to make him look more convincing as the self-confidant inmate who beat the system and serves as a hero to the other inmates. His towering presence naturally served the part.
Somewhat similar to what they did with Michael Clark Duncan in The Green Mile a few years later.
Dejavu said on 20/Feb/15
He had close to 3 inches on Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption.
He had close to 3 inches on Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption.
moe said on 7/Feb/15
What the guy below me said. Saying Tim Robbins is under 6'5 is absolute nonsense. I've seen him twice. Anyone who wants to catch a glimpse of him should go by the Actors Gang in Culver City. He's got to be 6'6.
What the guy below me said. Saying Tim Robbins is under 6'5 is absolute nonsense. I've seen him twice. Anyone who wants to catch a glimpse of him should go by the Actors Gang in Culver City. He's got to be 6'6.
jsmithe said on 15/Jan/15
Rob Tim is about 6ft6, this is wrong. Tim is taller than 6ft5 Vince Vaughn
Rob Tim is about 6ft6, this is wrong. Tim is taller than 6ft5 Vince Vaughn
Andrea said on 9/Jan/15
What if he really has never been over 6'4.5? After all, a big 6'4.5 is still very tall in Hollywood...
What if he really has never been over 6'4.5? After all, a big 6'4.5 is still very tall in Hollywood...
Judd said on 9/Jan/15
in my opinion he was 6'4.75-5" at his peak and today a strong 6'4.5"
in my opinion he was 6'4.75-5" at his peak and today a strong 6'4.5"
Andrea said on 7/Jan/15
Rob, what do you think about his 6'4.5 claim? You think that's possible? I mean, if Morgan freeman was really a bit over 6'2 at his peak, it's hard to believe Tim was under 6'5!
Editor Rob
Rob, what do you think about his 6'4.5 claim? You think that's possible? I mean, if Morgan freeman was really a bit over 6'2 at his peak, it's hard to believe Tim was under 6'5!
Editor Rob well he could genuinely have measured that, but maybe didn't stand quite at his tallest. Or he measured 6ft 5 and just dropped the half inch to be part of the 6ft 4 range crowd.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Dec/14
I don't think he's really lost anything to be perfectly honest...
I don't think he's really lost anything to be perfectly honest...
Bishop said on 4/Dec/14
I think he's at least this. He towers over Charlize Theron in heels: Click Here
I think he's at least this. He towers over Charlize Theron in heels: Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Nov/14
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4½ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need? He more than likely got measured at that mark (probably later in the day). Rob has him nailed. 6ft5 of course you could argue but 6ft6+ is just pure trolling. You clearly have no clue how big a legit 195cm man is in the flesh if that's the road you're gonna to take even in the face of evidence.
Click Here
Click Here
Ah...now this definitely helps Danimal's case,
Click Here
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4½ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need? He more than likely got measured at that mark (probably later in the day). Rob has him nailed. 6ft5 of course you could argue but 6ft6+ is just pure trolling. You clearly have no clue how big a legit 195cm man is in the flesh if that's the road you're gonna to take even in the face of evidence.
Click Here
Click Here
Ah...now this definitely helps Danimal's case,
Click Here
bob h said on 4/Sep/14
nobody saw bull durham? I guess? costners calls him a 6foot 3 stud
nobody saw bull durham? I guess? costners calls him a 6foot 3 stud
berta said on 2/Sep/14
i could not see him shorter than vince vaughn. He is probably 196 AND VINCE 195
i could not see him shorter than vince vaughn. He is probably 196 AND VINCE 195
Maximus said on 30/Aug/14
He is one of those actors that is obviously tall. I do believe that he states his height a little shorter to avoid being type cast. I believe he is at least 6'5" minimum without shoes.....he is obviously taller than Morgan Freeman in ShawShank and not many actors can to that to Freeman.
He is one of those actors that is obviously tall. I do believe that he states his height a little shorter to avoid being type cast. I believe he is at least 6'5" minimum without shoes.....he is obviously taller than Morgan Freeman in ShawShank and not many actors can to that to Freeman.
Danimal said on 14/Aug/14
Saw him on Conan about a decade ago. Had more than 2" on him. He was giving Conan presents for Christmas and they stood side by side. Conan was bare minimum 6'4" and has also claimed 6'4.5" for himself. Robbins had at least 2" on him. Robbins imo at his peak was 6'5" and change at night and a solid 6'6" (if not slightly over that) in the morning. 6'4.75" is just not true for his peak. He had several inches on Morgan Freeman, who was close to 6'3" 20 years ago.
Saw him on Conan about a decade ago. Had more than 2" on him. He was giving Conan presents for Christmas and they stood side by side. Conan was bare minimum 6'4" and has also claimed 6'4.5" for himself. Robbins had at least 2" on him. Robbins imo at his peak was 6'5" and change at night and a solid 6'6" (if not slightly over that) in the morning. 6'4.75" is just not true for his peak. He had several inches on Morgan Freeman, who was close to 6'3" 20 years ago.
Arch Stanton said on 13/Aug/14
Howard Stern can look taller than 6 ft 5 as he's rail thin.
Howard Stern can look taller than 6 ft 5 as he's rail thin.
Sam said on 13/Aug/14
Don't forget that Vaughn looked about the same as Michael Strahan, who admitted he wasn't the full 6'5"...Robbins has a slightly leaner build I think so at times he can seem taller, but I'd guess there's not a whole lot difference between Vaughn and Robbins with good posture. Stern definitely seems a little taller than that.
I get guessed at 6'7" or even 6'8" at times and I'm 6'5" tops (about 6'5.25" morning height).
Don't forget that Vaughn looked about the same as Michael Strahan, who admitted he wasn't the full 6'5"...Robbins has a slightly leaner build I think so at times he can seem taller, but I'd guess there's not a whole lot difference between Vaughn and Robbins with good posture. Stern definitely seems a little taller than that.
I get guessed at 6'7" or even 6'8" at times and I'm 6'5" tops (about 6'5.25" morning height).
Bishop said on 12/Aug/14
Rob, who do you think would be the tallest out of these three, Howard Stern, Vince Vaughn, or Tim Robbins?
Editor Rob
Rob, who do you think would be the tallest out of these three, Howard Stern, Vince Vaughn, or Tim Robbins?
Editor Rob Howard Stern never really looks a sub 6ft 5 and could be a guy who has rounded down from a fraction above it.
James B said on 11/Aug/14
Arch Stanton says on 9/Aug/14
Be honest though James, how many guys of that sort of impressive height do you see in public though who look good though? All I know if that if you really measure near 6 ft 5 barefoot after a long day with relaxed posture then first thing in the morning with good footwear you'll probably look 6 ft 7 to most people and stand out in public as a massive bloke. I think a lot of people underestimate how tall a proper guy this height really is as you often get guys who are more like 6'3" claiming 6'5".
I agree and even 6'3 guys claim 6'6
Arch Stanton says on 9/Aug/14
Be honest though James, how many guys of that sort of impressive height do you see in public though who look good though? All I know if that if you really measure near 6 ft 5 barefoot after a long day with relaxed posture then first thing in the morning with good footwear you'll probably look 6 ft 7 to most people and stand out in public as a massive bloke. I think a lot of people underestimate how tall a proper guy this height really is as you often get guys who are more like 6'3" claiming 6'5".
I agree and even 6'3 guys claim 6'6
Arch Stanton said on 9/Aug/14
Be honest though James, how many guys of that sort of impressive height do you see in public though who look good though? All I know if that if you really measure near 6 ft 5 barefoot after a long day with relaxed posture then first thing in the morning with good footwear you'll probably look 6 ft 7 to most people and stand out in public as a massive bloke. I think a lot of people underestimate how tall a proper guy this height really is as you often get guys who are more like 6'3" claiming 6'5".
Be honest though James, how many guys of that sort of impressive height do you see in public though who look good though? All I know if that if you really measure near 6 ft 5 barefoot after a long day with relaxed posture then first thing in the morning with good footwear you'll probably look 6 ft 7 to most people and stand out in public as a massive bloke. I think a lot of people underestimate how tall a proper guy this height really is as you often get guys who are more like 6'3" claiming 6'5".
James B said on 1/Aug/14
Arch Stanton says on 31/Jul/14
He must be pretty huge in person James as every show host says that same thing "very very big man" whenever he's on a show!! Just goes to show how tall a proper barefoot guy of this height actually is!
True. Someone like Ralf Möller who is a very strong 6'5 would look t VERY big in person even more so than robbins.
However there very impressive statures can't really compensate for there not so good 'looks' can it? That said you get huge guys like Dolph lundgren, steven seagal and darius Danish who have looks as well. I mean how smug and cocky can you be to be massive in height and good looking? They really did hit the genetic jackpot.
Arch Stanton says on 31/Jul/14
He must be pretty huge in person James as every show host says that same thing "very very big man" whenever he's on a show!! Just goes to show how tall a proper barefoot guy of this height actually is!
True. Someone like Ralf Möller who is a very strong 6'5 would look t VERY big in person even more so than robbins.
However there very impressive statures can't really compensate for there not so good 'looks' can it? That said you get huge guys like Dolph lundgren, steven seagal and darius Danish who have looks as well. I mean how smug and cocky can you be to be massive in height and good looking? They really did hit the genetic jackpot.
Sam said on 1/Aug/14
My brother in NYC, not the most reliable source given, said when he met Robbins he was big but not exceptional, would fit in with our family and about my size, but our family in made of ginormously tall people.
My brother in NYC, not the most reliable source given, said when he met Robbins he was big but not exceptional, would fit in with our family and about my size, but our family in made of ginormously tall people.
Arch Stanton said on 31/Jul/14
He must be pretty huge in person James as every show host says that same thing "very very big man" whenever he's on a show!! Just goes to show how tall a proper barefoot guy of this height actually is!
He must be pretty huge in person James as every show host says that same thing "very very big man" whenever he's on a show!! Just goes to show how tall a proper barefoot guy of this height actually is!
James B said on 22/Jul/14
Yeah I though in shawshank looked bang on this listing here or a weak 6'5.
Yeah I though in shawshank looked bang on this listing here or a weak 6'5.
Realist said on 10/Jul/14
Rob i think he wears absolutely flat shoes. 6'3 guys come very close to him. Sean Penn almost looks 5'9 with him (who definitely wears 2.75 inch lifts). For a 5'7 guy you should be a head shorter than a 6'3 guy or 6'4 guy. I just about touch the lip of a 192 cm guy.
Rob i think he wears absolutely flat shoes. 6'3 guys come very close to him. Sean Penn almost looks 5'9 with him (who definitely wears 2.75 inch lifts). For a 5'7 guy you should be a head shorter than a 6'3 guy or 6'4 guy. I just about touch the lip of a 192 cm guy.
177cmGuy said on 8/Jul/14
He looked a weak 6'5 in the Shawshank redemption. Not sure if he has actually lost any height today though.
He looked a weak 6'5 in the Shawshank redemption. Not sure if he has actually lost any height today though.
Alex V. said on 24/Jun/14
Robbins seems a bit taller than Vaughn...
Robbins Click Here
Vaughn Click Here
Robbins seems a bit taller than Vaughn...
Robbins Click Here
Vaughn Click Here
Dago Red said on 24/Jun/14
add shoes and hair to 6'4.75" and you get a 6'6" appearance.
add shoes and hair to 6'4.75" and you get a 6'6" appearance.
James B said on 23/Jun/14
196cm not out of the question rob?
Editor Rob
196cm not out of the question rob?
Editor Rob he might have been at his absolute low almost 6ft 5 but in Hollywood anybody who is a genuine 6ft 5 is going to really stand out.
James B said on 20/Jun/14
Arch Stanton says on 17/Jun/14
Looks 6 ft 6 in that clip James!
Rob could Jonathan Ross be a weak 6'1 judging by that clip? Like you did with Michael Jordan maybe upgrade Robbins to 196cm? He really does look over 195cm in that clip for sure.
Editor Rob
Arch Stanton says on 17/Jun/14
Looks 6 ft 6 in that clip James!
Rob could Jonathan Ross be a weak 6'1 judging by that clip? Like you did with Michael Jordan maybe upgrade Robbins to 196cm? He really does look over 195cm in that clip for sure.
Editor Rob he can look an honest 6ft 5 there
Alex 6'0 said on 19/Jun/14
6'4.5 Id say. If he claims 6'4.5 and 6'5 likely he measures 6'4.5 and sometimes rounds up as most would. Its like my tall friend I posted a pic with. He claims 6'5 but has said he's been measured 6'4.5-6'4.75 too
6'4.5 Id say. If he claims 6'4.5 and 6'5 likely he measures 6'4.5 and sometimes rounds up as most would. Its like my tall friend I posted a pic with. He claims 6'5 but has said he's been measured 6'4.5-6'4.75 too
Arch Stanton said on 17/Jun/14
Looks 6 ft 6 in that clip James!
Looks 6 ft 6 in that clip James!
James B said on 15/Jun/14
Rob with johnathan Ross here claims 6'5
Click Here
He really does tower over him
Rob with johnathan Ross here claims 6'5
Click Here
He really does tower over him
Sam said on 6/Jun/14
Ed, actually he has posed with James Cromwell. Here I think Robbins looks around 6'4.5" next to Cromwell.
Click Here
Ed, actually he has posed with James Cromwell. Here I think Robbins looks around 6'4.5" next to Cromwell.
Click Here
mike said on 3/Jun/14
Tim Robbins peak: 6ft 5 (196 cm) still around 194-195 today agree with Rampage. Morgan Freeman peak: 6ft 2 (188 cm) Tim had three inches on him in Shawshank.
Tim Robbins peak: 6ft 5 (196 cm) still around 194-195 today agree with Rampage. Morgan Freeman peak: 6ft 2 (188 cm) Tim had three inches on him in Shawshank.
moe said on 3/Jun/14
I've met him twice. He runs the Actor's Gang in Culver City, Ca. He's closer to 6'6 then 6ft5. Anyone who thinks he's as low as 6'4 hasn't met him. Don't take my word for it. Go check out the Actor's Gang yourself. I've also seen Jason Segel, Zachary Levi and Kevin Sorbo. They're all 6'3. Tim Robbins makes them all look like bitches.
I've met him twice. He runs the Actor's Gang in Culver City, Ca. He's closer to 6'6 then 6ft5. Anyone who thinks he's as low as 6'4 hasn't met him. Don't take my word for it. Go check out the Actor's Gang yourself. I've also seen Jason Segel, Zachary Levi and Kevin Sorbo. They're all 6'3. Tim Robbins makes them all look like bitches.
JayofNJ said on 9/May/14
Tim is easily six foot five inches. He is one of the tallest actors around. Probably almost as tall as Fred Gwynn.
Tim is easily six foot five inches. He is one of the tallest actors around. Probably almost as tall as Fred Gwynn.
Sam said on 17/Apr/14
Yes, pretty implausible with almost no struggle to be heard either...Robbins probably easily has 50 pounds and 9 inches on Cruise. When did Cruise's construction worker (haha) suddenly become a ninja? WOTW is not Spielberg's finest hour, maybe I'm biased since I'm not a fan of Cruise, outside of Tropic Thunder.
Yes, pretty implausible with almost no struggle to be heard either...Robbins probably easily has 50 pounds and 9 inches on Cruise. When did Cruise's construction worker (haha) suddenly become a ninja? WOTW is not Spielberg's finest hour, maybe I'm biased since I'm not a fan of Cruise, outside of Tropic Thunder.
Ted said on 24/Mar/14
Seems about right.
Btw, anyone else find that scene in War of the Worlds where 5'7" Tom Cruise 'takes out' 6'5" Tim Robbins in a closed door brawl pretty implausible?
Seems about right.
Btw, anyone else find that scene in War of the Worlds where 5'7" Tom Cruise 'takes out' 6'5" Tim Robbins in a closed door brawl pretty implausible?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jan/14
Around 194-195cm today. In his 20s and 30s he might've scraped 196cm. But, in Shawshank I think they just made him look even bigger. That cast had other legitimately tall actors (i.e. Morgan Freeman, Clancy Brown, Bob Gunton) who looked average at best next to Tim.
Around 194-195cm today. In his 20s and 30s he might've scraped 196cm. But, in Shawshank I think they just made him look even bigger. That cast had other legitimately tall actors (i.e. Morgan Freeman, Clancy Brown, Bob Gunton) who looked average at best next to Tim.
Goose said on 3/Jan/14
I sat next to him at the bar of a French Bistro in Union Square 15 years ago. I've got news for you guys - he's 6'7. Ignore the fact he lists his height lower, he'd get less acting jobs if he did because he'd be typecast which I'm sure his publicist told him years ago. JI'm 5'10 and have a couple of 6'5 buddies and he appeared to be 1.5 - 2 inches taller than them. Abnormally tall.
I sat next to him at the bar of a French Bistro in Union Square 15 years ago. I've got news for you guys - he's 6'7. Ignore the fact he lists his height lower, he'd get less acting jobs if he did because he'd be typecast which I'm sure his publicist told him years ago. JI'm 5'10 and have a couple of 6'5 buddies and he appeared to be 1.5 - 2 inches taller than them. Abnormally tall.
Lenad said on 8/Dec/13
194cm nowadays
194cm nowadays
Dejavu said on 27/Oct/13
This guy has to be 6'5. He looks 3 inches taller than legit 6'2 tall guys like John cusack and Morgan freeman
This guy has to be 6'5. He looks 3 inches taller than legit 6'2 tall guys like John cusack and Morgan freeman
Arch Stanton said on 9/Oct/13
He did look a proper 6'5" in the Shawshank Redemption (arguably the best film ever made) but looked really weedy/skinny of frame back in '94 and looked probably 170 pounds at that height. He had about 3 inches on Morgan Freeman anyway, that's true.
He did look a proper 6'5" in the Shawshank Redemption (arguably the best film ever made) but looked really weedy/skinny of frame back in '94 and looked probably 170 pounds at that height. He had about 3 inches on Morgan Freeman anyway, that's true.
Rusty said on 17/Sep/13
I bet 6'4.5" was a typical afternoon height but he likely scraped 6'5" in the morning and got his claim that way.
I bet 6'4.5" was a typical afternoon height but he likely scraped 6'5" in the morning and got his claim that way.
Dejavu said on 6/Sep/13
He was easily the tallest in Shawshank Redemption, looking 6'5 next to Morgan Freeman.
He was easily the tallest in Shawshank Redemption, looking 6'5 next to Morgan Freeman.
jtm said on 21/Aug/13
i'm not sure if mystic river is the right movie to judge his height from and he was 3 inches taller than freeman.
i'm not sure if mystic river is the right movie to judge his height from and he was 3 inches taller than freeman.
Blaze said on 11/Aug/13
195cm, same as me, but he's pretty old... and I'm 15
195cm, same as me, but he's pretty old... and I'm 15
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Jul/13
If he had just claimed 6ft4, I wouldn't doubt 6ft5 for a second. I think Vince Vaughn mightve done it aswell. But I reckon he got measured at 6ft4.5in/194cm at some point.
But could he have been 196cm?
If he had just claimed 6ft4, I wouldn't doubt 6ft5 for a second. I think Vince Vaughn mightve done it aswell. But I reckon he got measured at 6ft4.5in/194cm at some point.
But could he have been 196cm?
Arch Stanton said on 24/Jul/13
Didn't really look a full 6'5 or more in Mystic River. He looked 6'4" range I think..
Didn't really look a full 6'5 or more in Mystic River. He looked 6'4" range I think..
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jul/13
Yeah Lorne I agree.
Freeman was at least a strong 6"2" peak, probably 6"2.5"/189cm.
Still looks 6"2" on the dot now
Yeah Lorne I agree.
Freeman was at least a strong 6"2" peak, probably 6"2.5"/189cm.
Still looks 6"2" on the dot now
Lorne said on 20/Jul/13
If you upgraded him to 195cm, you should really upgrade Morgan Freeman. Say 6ft2.25in peak, 6ft1.75 now?
If you upgraded him to 195cm, you should really upgrade Morgan Freeman. Say 6ft2.25in peak, 6ft1.75 now?
Lenad said on 26/Apr/13
looks to be 2.5-3inches taller than morgan freeman.
looks to be 2.5-3inches taller than morgan freeman.
Mathew said on 24/Apr/13
Tim Robbins is 194 - 195 cm range, same as Vince Vaughn. Michael Jordan is probably the same height too tbh
Tim Robbins is 194 - 195 cm range, same as Vince Vaughn. Michael Jordan is probably the same height too tbh
Lenad said on 10/Apr/13
He might be closer to 6'4 now. But back when younger, to me he always looked 6'5ish
He might be closer to 6'4 now. But back when younger, to me he always looked 6'5ish
Two Jakes said on 9/Mar/13
Looked massive in The Shawshank Redemption. The height posted above is bare minimum. He's a legit 6'5!
Looked massive in The Shawshank Redemption. The height posted above is bare minimum. He's a legit 6'5!
James said on 27/Feb/13
In pics recently he's not looking 6'5
In pics recently he's not looking 6'5
BEASTMAN said on 23/Feb/13
If you look at the pictures too quickly, there's an illusion Tim's much taller, but he isn't if you add a straight line from the tip of Morgan's head to somewhere along the forehead of Tim's head. Don't get fooled by Tim's hair. There is no more than 7 cm difference in the 1st photo, where Tim's posture is slightly better than Morgan's. 2nd photo looks a 5cm difference and 3rd photo looks a 5-6cm difference. Therefore, I average it out at 6'4.25-6'4.5 with a possible 6'4.75 peak. By the way, here is the interview where Tim claims 6'5. He also says that Morgan is 6'3, admitting he was less than 3 inches taller than him. Since Morgan is 6'2 and not 6'3 though, Robbins can't be closer to 6'5 than 6'4.
Click Here (4:25-4:35)
If you look at the pictures too quickly, there's an illusion Tim's much taller, but he isn't if you add a straight line from the tip of Morgan's head to somewhere along the forehead of Tim's head. Don't get fooled by Tim's hair. There is no more than 7 cm difference in the 1st photo, where Tim's posture is slightly better than Morgan's. 2nd photo looks a 5cm difference and 3rd photo looks a 5-6cm difference. Therefore, I average it out at 6'4.25-6'4.5 with a possible 6'4.75 peak. By the way, here is the interview where Tim claims 6'5. He also says that Morgan is 6'3, admitting he was less than 3 inches taller than him. Since Morgan is 6'2 and not 6'3 though, Robbins can't be closer to 6'5 than 6'4.
Click Here (4:25-4:35)
James said on 21/Feb/13
Actually in the first pic Robbins looks 197cm IF freeman is still 6'2, 196cm in the second 194cm in the third photo.
If Robbins is still 195cm then there is a chance he could have been 196cm in his 20s.
Actually in the first pic Robbins looks 197cm IF freeman is still 6'2, 196cm in the second 194cm in the third photo.
If Robbins is still 195cm then there is a chance he could have been 196cm in his 20s.
BEASTMAN said on 30/Jan/13
Doesn't look quite 6'4.75 judging by these pics with Freeman (6'2). I reckon he's 6'4.25-6'4.5. I take back my previous comment, because I think it's possible he MAY have been 6'4.75 at his peak when younger. Doubt he was ever a complete 6'5 though.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Doesn't look quite 6'4.75 judging by these pics with Freeman (6'2). I reckon he's 6'4.25-6'4.5. I take back my previous comment, because I think it's possible he MAY have been 6'4.75 at his peak when younger. Doubt he was ever a complete 6'5 though.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 4/Nov/12
No way, he's still 195cm, he's only 54y and in very good shape.
No way, he's still 195cm, he's only 54y and in very good shape.
BEASTMAN said on 21/Oct/12
I absolutely doubt he's lost any height.
I absolutely doubt he's lost any height.
James said on 12/Oct/12
Could be 193-194cm range these days
Could be 193-194cm range these days
Ajax said on 14/Jan/12
Maybe if he was measured with a short pen or a rock he's 6'4.5", but that's not reliable. The only way you'll truly find out how tall you are is under the scale at the doctors office or a wall
mounted height stand. He's 6'5". I've seen guys who are that tall and they have to duck
Through doors and bend down most of the time. He shaved a 1/2" off probably and saying
hes 6'6" in shoes in nonsense.
Maybe if he was measured with a short pen or a rock he's 6'4.5", but that's not reliable. The only way you'll truly find out how tall you are is under the scale at the doctors office or a wall
mounted height stand. He's 6'5". I've seen guys who are that tall and they have to duck
Through doors and bend down most of the time. He shaved a 1/2" off probably and saying
hes 6'6" in shoes in nonsense.
Emil said on 10/Jan/12
6'4.5 at the very least! Could be 6'5.25 as well. Doesn't look over that though
6'4.5 at the very least! Could be 6'5.25 as well. Doesn't look over that though
Jack said on 4/Jan/12
not under 6'5"[196 cm] at his peak. Nowadays 194-195 cm range.
not under 6'5"[196 cm] at his peak. Nowadays 194-195 cm range.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 5/Dec/11
If i take other heights for granted, he looks at least 6'5/2! But hes probably just honest and other lie! For example, he looks much taller than john cusack, at least 3-4 inches taller!
If i take other heights for granted, he looks at least 6'5/2! But hes probably just honest and other lie! For example, he looks much taller than john cusack, at least 3-4 inches taller!
Shaun said on 26/Nov/11
Sure he could measure 6'4.5" barefoot if completely relaxed with posture and a tight marker to the skull afternoon/evening. A guy who measures that height will always look around 6'6" to most people, look at Kobe and Michael Jordan who I think are the same height as Robbins. I bet most people estimate Robbins at 6 ft 6.
Sure he could measure 6'4.5" barefoot if completely relaxed with posture and a tight marker to the skull afternoon/evening. A guy who measures that height will always look around 6'6" to most people, look at Kobe and Michael Jordan who I think are the same height as Robbins. I bet most people estimate Robbins at 6 ft 6.
Mathew said on 19/Nov/11
The New One says on 5/Nov/11
I have to agree with what Alex just said. I do think he was always 6-4.5, and he even admitted it in his earlier quote. I don't know why he makes other people look shorter than what they're listed at, maybe it's shoes, but he might have just said 6-5 recently to round up for once.
If you're a legit 6'4.5" who holds good posture and tend to wear shoes in the 1.25"+ range (large side of normal), you're going to look 6'6" sometimes, especially next to people who lie about their own height.
The New One says on 5/Nov/11
I have to agree with what Alex just said. I do think he was always 6-4.5, and he even admitted it in his earlier quote. I don't know why he makes other people look shorter than what they're listed at, maybe it's shoes, but he might have just said 6-5 recently to round up for once.
If you're a legit 6'4.5" who holds good posture and tend to wear shoes in the 1.25"+ range (large side of normal), you're going to look 6'6" sometimes, especially next to people who lie about their own height.
The New One said on 5/Nov/11
I have to agree with what Alex just said. I do think he was always 6-4.5, and he even admitted it in his earlier quote. I don't know why he makes other people look shorter than what they're listed at, maybe it's shoes, but he might have just said 6-5 recently to round up for once.
I have to agree with what Alex just said. I do think he was always 6-4.5, and he even admitted it in his earlier quote. I don't know why he makes other people look shorter than what they're listed at, maybe it's shoes, but he might have just said 6-5 recently to round up for once.
Alex says on 5/Nov/11 said on 5/Nov/11
Unsure about Robbins,s height. The truth is that i thought he looked closer to 6ft6 range in his prime, maybe 6ft5-6ft5.5 barefoot, but i dunno in some recent pics with Morgan Freeman, who is still a legit 6ft2 guy (in my opinion)he only looks about 2 inches taller which would put him in 6ft4 range! Hey, I,m not saying he is that height, but maybe the previous listing at 6ft4.5 is more accurate.
Unsure about Robbins,s height. The truth is that i thought he looked closer to 6ft6 range in his prime, maybe 6ft5-6ft5.5 barefoot, but i dunno in some recent pics with Morgan Freeman, who is still a legit 6ft2 guy (in my opinion)he only looks about 2 inches taller which would put him in 6ft4 range! Hey, I,m not saying he is that height, but maybe the previous listing at 6ft4.5 is more accurate.
Shaun said on 4/Nov/11
The 6'6"-6'7" claimers are forgetting how huge a legit 6'5" actually is. A legit 195cm barefoot guy will always look 6 ft 6 to most people like Robbins and Usain Bolt do.
The 6'6"-6'7" claimers are forgetting how huge a legit 6'5" actually is. A legit 195cm barefoot guy will always look 6 ft 6 to most people like Robbins and Usain Bolt do.
LAN Jiao said on 28/Oct/11
edward norton look 5'11 next to tim robbins. if robbins was min at 6'4.5 to say norton could be lower like 5'10.5 but not under.
edward norton look 5'11 next to tim robbins. if robbins was min at 6'4.5 to say norton could be lower like 5'10.5 but not under.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 26/Oct/11
6'4.5 at the end of the day makes him a legit 6'4.75! If he were 6'4.5 lots of celebs should be drastically downgraded! An example? Edward norton: he looks at least 15 cms shorter!
6'4.5 at the end of the day makes him a legit 6'4.75! If he were 6'4.5 lots of celebs should be drastically downgraded! An example? Edward norton: he looks at least 15 cms shorter!
LAN Jiao said on 26/Oct/11
robbins look 1.2" under 6'5.5 james cromwell. maybe 6'4.5 was closer in reality.
robbins look 1.2" under 6'5.5 james cromwell. maybe 6'4.5 was closer in reality.
Shaun said on 25/Oct/11
Nah talk of at least 198cm is bunk. The most he could possibly be is 6'5.5" barefoot. The tallest I've seen him look is between 6'6" and 6'7" range in footwear. To me he looks around 6 ft 6 in shoes. He's somewhere around the 6'5" mark. He could shrink to 6'4.5" as he once claimed at the end of the day..
Nah talk of at least 198cm is bunk. The most he could possibly be is 6'5.5" barefoot. The tallest I've seen him look is between 6'6" and 6'7" range in footwear. To me he looks around 6 ft 6 in shoes. He's somewhere around the 6'5" mark. He could shrink to 6'4.5" as he once claimed at the end of the day..
James said on 4/Oct/11
In the 90's a very solid 198cm out off bed. today 197-198cm outt off bed.
Probably was always a smidge under 196cm in the evening
In the 90's a very solid 198cm out off bed. today 197-198cm outt off bed.
Probably was always a smidge under 196cm in the evening
ANDREA[ITA] said on 4/Oct/11
If clive owen is 187-188, tim is a strong 6'5.5 man! Dont think so! 6'1 for clive sounds right, he got owned by an italian actor who claims to be 188-188! 185 is ok! He has no more than 2 inches on jude law who might be less than 5'11!
If clive owen is 187-188, tim is a strong 6'5.5 man! Dont think so! 6'1 for clive sounds right, he got owned by an italian actor who claims to be 188-188! 185 is ok! He has no more than 2 inches on jude law who might be less than 5'11!
Danimal said on 3/Oct/11
James says on 30/Sep/11
bang on 197cm in the morning
That's his evening height at his peak. At least 198cm as his morning height.
James says on 30/Sep/11
bang on 197cm in the morning
That's his evening height at his peak. At least 198cm as his morning height.
jtm said on 3/Oct/11
i agree that clive owen is 6'1 and not a hair over that.
i agree that clive owen is 6'1 and not a hair over that.
James said on 3/Oct/11
Clive Owen is 187-188cm
Clive Owen is 187-188cm
ANDREA[ITA] said on 3/Oct/11
I know! Thats why clive owen is max 185!
I know! Thats why clive owen is max 185!
James said on 30/Sep/11
bang on 197cm in the morning
bang on 197cm in the morning
Shaun said on 30/Sep/11
Clive Owen and Toro both looked 6'2" next to 6'1" Jonathan Ross, agreed with James. Robbins is one of those guys who measures 6'5" barefoot legit at some point in the day yet regularly gets estimated at 6'6"-6'7". This is how tall legit 195cm is!
Clive Owen and Toro both looked 6'2" next to 6'1" Jonathan Ross, agreed with James. Robbins is one of those guys who measures 6'5" barefoot legit at some point in the day yet regularly gets estimated at 6'6"-6'7". This is how tall legit 195cm is!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 29/Sep/11
Ok! Then tim robbins is bang on 197! :)
Ok! Then tim robbins is bang on 197! :)
James said on 28/Sep/11
Benecio Del Toro did look bang on 188cm next too Jonathan Ross.
Benecio Del Toro did look bang on 188cm next too Jonathan Ross.
James said on 28/Sep/11
Clive Owen did look 188cm with Jonathan Ross
Clive Owen did look 188cm with Jonathan Ross
ANDREA[ITA] said on 28/Sep/11
O yeah James, believe it! :)
Vince Vaughn is 194, Benicio del Toro is 187, Will Ferrell is 189-190, Kevin Costner is 185, but what it is important is that Tim Robbins is a legit 195 and with that you find all the liars and the fake height on this site! John Cusack is 185, Clive Owen 185, Morgan Freeman 187 today, Edward Norton looks 179 next to Tim Robbins, Charlize Theron looks 173 max 175, Sean Penn looks max 172!
O yeah James, believe it! :)
Vince Vaughn is 194, Benicio del Toro is 187, Will Ferrell is 189-190, Kevin Costner is 185, but what it is important is that Tim Robbins is a legit 195 and with that you find all the liars and the fake height on this site! John Cusack is 185, Clive Owen 185, Morgan Freeman 187 today, Edward Norton looks 179 next to Tim Robbins, Charlize Theron looks 173 max 175, Sean Penn looks max 172!
James said on 27/Sep/11
If he's 199cm then.....
Vince Vaughn 6'6.5 (199cm)
Benecio Del Toro 6'3.75 (192cm)
Will Ferrell 6'4.75 (195cm)
Kevin Costner 6'2.75 (190cm)
If he's 199cm then.....
Vince Vaughn 6'6.5 (199cm)
Benecio Del Toro 6'3.75 (192cm)
Will Ferrell 6'4.75 (195cm)
Kevin Costner 6'2.75 (190cm)
ANDREA[ITA] said on 27/Sep/11
He's gotta be about 2 metres, 199 if John Cusack is really 189! He has solid 4 inches on him!
He's gotta be about 2 metres, 199 if John Cusack is really 189! He has solid 4 inches on him!
jax nyc said on 22/Sep/11
Tim Robbins plays ice hockey at the same rink I do and he's 6ft, 5in without skates...in his skates he's 6 ft, 9in...either way, he's a big dude and he plays dirty.
Tim Robbins plays ice hockey at the same rink I do and he's 6ft, 5in without skates...in his skates he's 6 ft, 9in...either way, he's a big dude and he plays dirty.
James said on 21/Sep/11
Andrea vince vaughn does not stand as well as tim in photos and is overweight and out off shape.
Although 196cm is not impossible. maybe in his 20's but i don't know if he would measure that tall today? but the 6'7 estimates are absolutely ridicolous
Andrea vince vaughn does not stand as well as tim in photos and is overweight and out off shape.
Although 196cm is not impossible. maybe in his 20's but i don't know if he would measure that tall today? but the 6'7 estimates are absolutely ridicolous
ANDREA[ITA] said on 19/Sep/11
James if tim is 194 today, john cusack is no more than 184! Why do you upgrade the shorter and upgrade the real tall ones? He could be 196 because he looks that in most photos! Bince vaughn, that you claim at 195-196, im sure would be little shorter than tim!
James if tim is 194 today, john cusack is no more than 184! Why do you upgrade the shorter and upgrade the real tall ones? He could be 196 because he looks that in most photos! Bince vaughn, that you claim at 195-196, im sure would be little shorter than tim!
James said on 17/Sep/11
yeah nothing less than 195cm in his youth. not sure if robbins would be as low as 194cm these days?
yeah nothing less than 195cm in his youth. not sure if robbins would be as low as 194cm these days?
Lenad said on 14/Sep/11
now this is more accurate. I wouldnt argue over 6'5 though. solid 195cm looks accurate for Robbins
now this is more accurate. I wouldnt argue over 6'5 though. solid 195cm looks accurate for Robbins
James said on 7/Sep/11
Clive Owen only looked 2.5-3 inches shorter than tim robbins.
197cm is too high for robbins.
Clive Owen only looked 2.5-3 inches shorter than tim robbins.
197cm is too high for robbins.
lan jiao said on 7/Sep/11
cusack 186-187cm would put him accurate, clive owen claim himself he is 187cm(6ft1.75). both looks a big 3inch under tim robbin. sean penn im not sure he could have wore on heeled shoe next to tim and charlize theron is what she claim 5ft10,5ft8 sounds terribly impossible.
cusack 186-187cm would put him accurate, clive owen claim himself he is 187cm(6ft1.75). both looks a big 3inch under tim robbin. sean penn im not sure he could have wore on heeled shoe next to tim and charlize theron is what she claim 5ft10,5ft8 sounds terribly impossible.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 6/Sep/11
I dont think too, so change listings: for example, john cusack is at least 9 cms shorter so max 186, clive owen about 10 cms so 188, sean penn max 170, charlize theron max 173,...
I dont think too, so change listings: for example, john cusack is at least 9 cms shorter so max 186, clive owen about 10 cms so 188, sean penn max 170, charlize theron max 173,...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Sep/11
I don't see him as 6"5.5(197cm)
I don't see him as 6"5.5(197cm)
lan jiao said on 6/Sep/11
in tom noonan page someone say tim robbins was full inch shorter than noonan , sounds like the person mistaken noonan as james cromwell full inch taller than tim.lol.. noonan look kind of 6ft4.5-6ft4.75 range today(weak 6ft5) and tim robbins may not lost a cm today he is still 194-195cm tall. both tim , noonan would be same in real on many people bets on. 6ft5 morning for tim!
in tom noonan page someone say tim robbins was full inch shorter than noonan , sounds like the person mistaken noonan as james cromwell full inch taller than tim.lol.. noonan look kind of 6ft4.5-6ft4.75 range today(weak 6ft5) and tim robbins may not lost a cm today he is still 194-195cm tall. both tim , noonan would be same in real on many people bets on. 6ft5 morning for tim!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 4/Sep/11
He's gotta be at least 197 or you rob gotta change half the listings you did until now!
He's gotta be at least 197 or you rob gotta change half the listings you did until now!
James said on 30/Aug/11
Robbins and hertzberg are identical in height
Robbins and hertzberg are identical in height
Terryman said on 29/Aug/11
Vegas Goerge Hertzberg would be about 0,5 shorter than all the men that you just mentioned (although that might be the case with robins too) ;)
Vegas Goerge Hertzberg would be about 0,5 shorter than all the men that you just mentioned (although that might be the case with robins too) ;)
Vegas said on 29/Aug/11
i remember robbins looked about 3 inches taller than john cusack in tapeheads and that was mid 80s and robbins had a big afro in that movie, haven't seen High Fidelity so can't comment on that
with joan cusack whom rob has at ~5'8 not sure on footwear, thats a screenshot of final scene in arlington road Click Here
tims got a footwear advantage here and closer to the camera but he could stand a little straighter so probably evens out, about 9 inches taller in that shot Click Here i would say tim and this guy would be pretty much identical in height both 6'5 men, if we assume joan cusack is around rob and jennys height Click Here you can also throw john cleese at peak into the mix, if you posted a shot of all those 3 barefoot and shaven headed side by side in the early 80s (an early 90s george obviously) i bet nobody here would be able to tell much if any difference in those 3 guys heights, tom noonan would be pretty much around those 3 mens heights too
i remember robbins looked about 3 inches taller than john cusack in tapeheads and that was mid 80s and robbins had a big afro in that movie, haven't seen High Fidelity so can't comment on that
with joan cusack whom rob has at ~5'8 not sure on footwear, thats a screenshot of final scene in arlington road Click Here
tims got a footwear advantage here and closer to the camera but he could stand a little straighter so probably evens out, about 9 inches taller in that shot Click Here i would say tim and this guy would be pretty much identical in height both 6'5 men, if we assume joan cusack is around rob and jennys height Click Here you can also throw john cleese at peak into the mix, if you posted a shot of all those 3 barefoot and shaven headed side by side in the early 80s (an early 90s george obviously) i bet nobody here would be able to tell much if any difference in those 3 guys heights, tom noonan would be pretty much around those 3 mens heights too
James said on 28/Aug/11
Danimal says on 26/Aug/11
Furthermore Rob, you gave Cusack 6'2.5" based on him commenting on his height as of recent, yet Tim Robbins has recently said he's 6'5". Why not take his word for it and list him at 6'5" (which is also WAY too low for him, but at least it's being consistent Rob).
Cusack might have had footware disadvantage making the difference look more like 3-4 inches.
Danimal says on 26/Aug/11
Furthermore Rob, you gave Cusack 6'2.5" based on him commenting on his height as of recent, yet Tim Robbins has recently said he's 6'5". Why not take his word for it and list him at 6'5" (which is also WAY too low for him, but at least it's being consistent Rob).
Cusack might have had footware disadvantage making the difference look more like 3-4 inches.
Shaun said on 28/Aug/11
Certainly. If you compare him to the door frame (usually about 6'8") he's about 2 inches under them in shoes. I think he's 6'6" in normal shoes.
Certainly. If you compare him to the door frame (usually about 6'8") he's about 2 inches under them in shoes. I think he's 6'6" in normal shoes.
the shredder said on 28/Aug/11
I agree he can look 6'6 ... He was like foot taller then Martin Lawrence ... Do we really think Lawrence is 5'4.75 lol ?
I agree he can look 6'6 ... He was like foot taller then Martin Lawrence ... Do we really think Lawrence is 5'4.75 lol ?
James said on 27/Aug/11
shaun would u agree that robbins looked a legit 6'5 in nothing too lose?
shaun would u agree that robbins looked a legit 6'5 in nothing too lose?
Danimal said on 26/Aug/11
Furthermore Rob, you gave Cusack 6'2.5" based on him commenting on his height as of recent, yet Tim Robbins has recently said he's 6'5". Why not take his word for it and list him at 6'5" (which is also WAY too low for him, but at least it's being consistent Rob).
Furthermore Rob, you gave Cusack 6'2.5" based on him commenting on his height as of recent, yet Tim Robbins has recently said he's 6'5". Why not take his word for it and list him at 6'5" (which is also WAY too low for him, but at least it's being consistent Rob).
Danimal said on 26/Aug/11
Rob, anything under a flat 6'5" is just not reasonable. How can you have John Cusack at 6'2.5" and Tim Robbins only 2 1/4" taller? Is that all you really see between them?
Rob, anything under a flat 6'5" is just not reasonable. How can you have John Cusack at 6'2.5" and Tim Robbins only 2 1/4" taller? Is that all you really see between them?
Shaun said on 26/Aug/11
Robbins looks about 6'6" in shoes, no more. 6'5" looks about right barefoot.
Robbins looks about 6'6" in shoes, no more. 6'5" looks about right barefoot.
Shaun said on 26/Aug/11
Click Here
6'7" morning height? Hardly. Benicio del Toro is a legit 6'2"-6'2.5", same height as Robert Davi.
Click Here
6'7" morning height? Hardly. Benicio del Toro is a legit 6'2"-6'2.5", same height as Robert Davi.
Vegas said on 26/Aug/11
danimal you really think robbins was 6'7 and tom noonan was only 6'4??
if you look at someone who is ~6'7 like stephen merchant on screen or in photos there is no way robbins looked that tall e.g. not even close to standing straight Click Here its interesting merchant has no problem saying he is 6'7 on every talk show he is on despite the fact he is trying to break into hollywood, robbins was well established by 1995 as a director and an actor winning numerous awards for both, he was well known worldwide by that time as a terrific actor who could play a variety of roles so whether he was 9ft or 4ft it wouldn't have made much difference,coming out and saying his real height was 6'7 at that time wouldn't have made any difference or reduce his chances of roles, its an awful pity i didn't get to meet him last year during the arthurs day guinness celebration as something else came up, looking at youtube he was taking photos after the show too :(
robbins these days is shorter than 70+ year old james cromwell and i have my doubts cromwell was ever a legit 6'7 man himself as he was noticeably shorter than richard moll back in the early 80s on nightcourt, the tallest i have ever seen cromwell look was on star trek
danimal you really think robbins was 6'7 and tom noonan was only 6'4??
if you look at someone who is ~6'7 like stephen merchant on screen or in photos there is no way robbins looked that tall e.g. not even close to standing straight Click Here its interesting merchant has no problem saying he is 6'7 on every talk show he is on despite the fact he is trying to break into hollywood, robbins was well established by 1995 as a director and an actor winning numerous awards for both, he was well known worldwide by that time as a terrific actor who could play a variety of roles so whether he was 9ft or 4ft it wouldn't have made much difference,coming out and saying his real height was 6'7 at that time wouldn't have made any difference or reduce his chances of roles, its an awful pity i didn't get to meet him last year during the arthurs day guinness celebration as something else came up, looking at youtube he was taking photos after the show too :(
robbins these days is shorter than 70+ year old james cromwell and i have my doubts cromwell was ever a legit 6'7 man himself as he was noticeably shorter than richard moll back in the early 80s on nightcourt, the tallest i have ever seen cromwell look was on star trek
James said on 26/Aug/11
Danimal says on 25/Aug/11
Sorry, but I'm sticking with 6'7" morning height for Tim Robbins at his peak. Walked around at 6'6" and change during the day. Today is a strong 6'5"/weak 6'6". Just too much evidence to support this. 6'5" is him low balling not to appear as a freak (reduce his chances of getting roles).
Robbins has NEVER looked 6'7 that is beyond ridcolous . that is peter crouch tall range and robbins never looks that big. 6'4.75 is perfect. in the early morning would be 6'6 flat and quickly shrink down too 6'5 1/2 for most off the morning and would be 196cm by luncthime and 195cm in the afternoon.
Danimal says on 25/Aug/11
Sorry, but I'm sticking with 6'7" morning height for Tim Robbins at his peak. Walked around at 6'6" and change during the day. Today is a strong 6'5"/weak 6'6". Just too much evidence to support this. 6'5" is him low balling not to appear as a freak (reduce his chances of getting roles).
Robbins has NEVER looked 6'7 that is beyond ridcolous . that is peter crouch tall range and robbins never looks that big. 6'4.75 is perfect. in the early morning would be 6'6 flat and quickly shrink down too 6'5 1/2 for most off the morning and would be 196cm by luncthime and 195cm in the afternoon.
Sam said on 26/Aug/11
He trully towered over Paul Newman in The Hudsucker Proxy. Next to Robbins is the shortest Newman looked, shorter than he looked next to George Kennedy in Cool Hand Luke, of course he could have lost a little height by then.
He trully towered over Paul Newman in The Hudsucker Proxy. Next to Robbins is the shortest Newman looked, shorter than he looked next to George Kennedy in Cool Hand Luke, of course he could have lost a little height by then.
Hansen said on 26/Aug/11
what i knew john cusack was a weak 6ft2 by fact. tim robbins had near 4inch taller than cusack. maybe he is 6ft5 for awhile.. nowadays im not sure he is this mark. looking more like 194-195 range.
what i knew john cusack was a weak 6ft2 by fact. tim robbins had near 4inch taller than cusack. maybe he is 6ft5 for awhile.. nowadays im not sure he is this mark. looking more like 194-195 range.
Danimal said on 25/Aug/11
Sorry, but I'm sticking with 6'7" morning height for Tim Robbins at his peak. Walked around at 6'6" and change during the day. Today is a strong 6'5"/weak 6'6". Just too much evidence to support this. 6'5" is him low balling not to appear as a freak (reduce his chances of getting roles).
Sorry, but I'm sticking with 6'7" morning height for Tim Robbins at his peak. Walked around at 6'6" and change during the day. Today is a strong 6'5"/weak 6'6". Just too much evidence to support this. 6'5" is him low balling not to appear as a freak (reduce his chances of getting roles).
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Aug/11
193cm is indeed a hard pill to swallow...
194cm is the very lowest the man could be. But I think the current 6"4.75(195cm) listing is spot on.
193cm is indeed a hard pill to swallow...
194cm is the very lowest the man could be. But I think the current 6"4.75(195cm) listing is spot on.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 25/Aug/11
Lol if he were 6'4, this site is a ****, with no offense, rob! But john cusack is solid 4 inches shorter than him and he's listed 189!
Lol if he were 6'4, this site is a ****, with no offense, rob! But john cusack is solid 4 inches shorter than him and he's listed 189!
James said on 25/Aug/11
ANDREA[ITA] says on 25/Aug/11
in some photos he looks close to 2 metres! With Charlize Theron, that in heels is probably about 185, he looks at least 18 cms taller, so about 6ft8 in shoes! How's that possible, Rob? But that's not the only picture! With John Cusack, that you listed at 189, he looks at least 199! With Clive Owen, that you listed at 188, he looks at least 197! With Sean Penn he looks at least 197! In the Shawshank Redemption he looked 3.5 inches taller than Morgan Freeman, so 197 again! He looks about 15 cms taller than Edward Norton, so 198 according to the listings!
LOL
ANDREA[ITA] says on 25/Aug/11
in some photos he looks close to 2 metres! With Charlize Theron, that in heels is probably about 185, he looks at least 18 cms taller, so about 6ft8 in shoes! How's that possible, Rob? But that's not the only picture! With John Cusack, that you listed at 189, he looks at least 199! With Clive Owen, that you listed at 188, he looks at least 197! With Sean Penn he looks at least 197! In the Shawshank Redemption he looked 3.5 inches taller than Morgan Freeman, so 197 again! He looks about 15 cms taller than Edward Norton, so 198 according to the listings!
LOL
ANDREA[ITA] said on 25/Aug/11
in some photos he looks close to 2 metres! With Charlize Theron, that in heels is probably about 185, he looks at least 18 cms taller, so about 6ft8 in shoes! How's that possible, Rob? But that's not the only picture! With John Cusack, that you listed at 189, he looks at least 199! With Clive Owen, that you listed at 188, he looks at least 197! With Sean Penn he looks at least 197! In the Shawshank Redemption he looked 3.5 inches taller than Morgan Freeman, so 197 again! He looks about 15 cms taller than Edward Norton, so 198 according to the listings!
in some photos he looks close to 2 metres! With Charlize Theron, that in heels is probably about 185, he looks at least 18 cms taller, so about 6ft8 in shoes! How's that possible, Rob? But that's not the only picture! With John Cusack, that you listed at 189, he looks at least 199! With Clive Owen, that you listed at 188, he looks at least 197! With Sean Penn he looks at least 197! In the Shawshank Redemption he looked 3.5 inches taller than Morgan Freeman, so 197 again! He looks about 15 cms taller than Edward Norton, so 198 according to the listings!
James said on 24/Aug/11
Rampage yeah with Morgan Freeman he looks 6'4 flat or even 192cm in the last 2 pics if Freeman is 188cm.
With James Cromwell looks more 6'4 than 6'5.......
rampage would you agree that if clive owen is 188cm the tim robbins did not look over 194cm in comparison? Some think that clive could be 187cm if thats the case then seriously tim looks 193-194cm in comparison.
if you look at robbins frame in photos he really does look more 6'5 than 6'4.
6'4 (193cm) is hard too belive. would u not agree rampage?
Rampage yeah with Morgan Freeman he looks 6'4 flat or even 192cm in the last 2 pics if Freeman is 188cm.
With James Cromwell looks more 6'4 than 6'5.......
rampage would you agree that if clive owen is 188cm the tim robbins did not look over 194cm in comparison? Some think that clive could be 187cm if thats the case then seriously tim looks 193-194cm in comparison.
if you look at robbins frame in photos he really does look more 6'5 than 6'4.
6'4 (193cm) is hard too belive. would u not agree rampage?
Larc 6 ft 1.75 in said on 21/Aug/11
He certainly did look a full 6'5 at his peak, huge guy.
He certainly did look a full 6'5 at his peak, huge guy.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Aug/11
I agree that if Fisbourne WAS 6ft, then Robbins for sure looks 6ft5-6ft6 in comparison. But James, most people on this site would agree that Fishbourne isn't quite 6ft.
Looks 6ft4 flat in these recent pics with 188cm Morgan Freeman
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Potentially 6ft5 with 197cm James Cromwell?
Click Here
Click Here
I agree that if Fisbourne WAS 6ft, then Robbins for sure looks 6ft5-6ft6 in comparison. But James, most people on this site would agree that Fishbourne isn't quite 6ft.
Looks 6ft4 flat in these recent pics with 188cm Morgan Freeman
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Potentially 6ft5 with 197cm James Cromwell?
Click Here
Click Here
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.