How tall is Tim Robbins

Tim Robbins Height

6ft 4 ¾ (194.9 cm)

American actor best known for roles in films like The Shawshank Redemption, The Player, Mystic River, Bull Durham, Jacob's Ladder, Bob Roberts, The Hudsucker Proxy, High Fidelity and War of the Worlds. He has claimed to be both 6ft 4.5 and 5.

How tall is Tim Robbins
Photos by PR Photos
I'm six foot four and a half and I have a temper. - Playboy magazine, 1992
I did have one problem playing Einstein. Everyone was afraid I was too tall. I was going to walk along all stooped over. But then I met Tim Robbins, who's about 6 foot 5 and next to him I looked like a midget.
-- Walter Matthau in 1994

You May Be Interested

Height of Morgan Freeman
Morgan Freeman
6ft 1 ¾ (187 cm)
Height of Kevin Costner
Kevin Costner
6ft 1 (185 cm)
Height of Clint Eastwood
Clint Eastwood
6ft 0 (183 cm)
Height of David Morse
David Morse
6ft 3 ½ (192 cm)

Add a Comment951 comments

Average Guess (69 Votes)
6ft 4.86in (195.2cm)
Duffer 5ft 11 said on 19/Oct/19
What billionaireslayer said.
Every bit the 6'5" he's usually listed as.
Doubt he's lost nary a cm even today.
Way above average height.
Simply towers over everyone in every movie he's been in.
He gets the full 195cm from me.
Canson said on 17/Oct/19
@Junior: I would guess 194 is possible for him today
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 16/Oct/19
@Canson But i wouldn't argue anything under 6'4 1/2 for Tim. I doubt he lost anything yet.
Canson said on 9/Oct/19
@Junior: but a guy measuring 6’4.5 at a low will look closer to 6’5” being you guys who measure 6’4 maybe 2-3 hours out of bed and are 6’3.75 at a low. I hardly see him as 195 which would look 6’5” in reality. Kobe gives that impression but not him.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 8/Oct/19
@Canson Sometime a late morning measurement doesn't give off much different from evening/night. I can say is he could be 6'5 an early morning measurement and measure once in his low of the day 6'4 1/2 could also opposed to be 6'4 3/4 which he hardly look like a flat 6'4 1/2 guy. I admit sometimes he doesn't fit looking over 6'4 3/4 which i ever thought he look more closer to 6'5 that maybe on his good day he can even clock out 6'5 1/4. Normal day like 6'4 5/8 a low could be it. By the way Tim's son Jack Robbins look alot similar to Tim's height, they (father and son) could just be strong 6'4 1/2 guys not below it.
Canson said on 23/Aug/19
@Junior: he may very well have been 6’4.5 peak or rounded down from more like 6’4 5/8, and that may have been his low as opposed to a morning or late morning height. If I measured higher in the range say 6’4 5/8 or 6’4 2/3” I would likely round down and say that I’m 6’4 1/2”. Like in your case, if that were me I would claim 6’5 1/2 as opposed to 6’6” since you measure around 6’5.6 at a normal low. At those heights 6’4 5/8 or 2/3, I could still reach 6’4.5 if on my feet longer and 5/8 and under are the same in appearance as 1/2”. But At that stage he would probably look closer to 6’5” especially if others aren’t measuring the same way. He was at least 2cm shorter than Stern in his prime. A lot of people underestimate how a true 6’4.5 guy would actually look. I’ll give you an example in something Christian said before that he considers someone in the 1/4-5/8” to round up to half. So if we get a guy around my height they may claim half or have measured half. A 6’4 3/8-5/8” guy tho especially on the upper end of that would look more 6’5 or closer to 6’5 and they would’ve been 6’4.75 around lunchtime
Alex Vaz said on 20/Aug/19
Lola Kirke (5ft8in?!) and Jack Robbins

Click Here
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 6/Aug/19
6'5 could be Tim's peak and 6'4 1/2 claim was just a loose posture measurement. He still look 195cm now.
Alex Vaz said on 3/Aug/19
Robbins with flat shoes, is taller than D'Onofrio in cowboys boots by at least half an inch and the mugshot shows off 6ft5.5in for Tim.

My Guess:

Robbins 195.5cm
D'Onofrio 192cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Aug/19
Rob, how tall do you think his son Jack is?


He looks close enough to him recent photos and sometimes the same height! 6ft4 is my guess
Editor Rob
Yeah I doubt he's under 6ft 4 range, can seem close enough to his dad
Alex Vaz said on 27/Jul/19
Click Here
Canson said on 21/Jun/19
He’s always been what he claimed before 6’4.5. That’s probably a low for him though. Looks similar in size to Michael Jordan. Stern was likely on the stronger side of 6’5” in his prime like Rob lists him. There was prob 2cm difference between the two. Stern was Maybe a mm or two over 6’5.25. Today a solid 6’5 or a tiny hair over.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 7/May/19
@Dream I did believe Howard Stern was ever 6'6 or weak 6'6 and Tim maybe 6'5 peak and dip into 6'4.5" soon.
Shashank 6'4 1/8 said on 7/May/19
At his peak he might have been near weak 6'5 range. Now he might have lost a fraction. With freeman he only had 2 inches on him.I can see him no more than a strong 6'4 range(at worst solid 6'4). I can't go any lower than 6'4.
Canson said on 11/Apr/19
@Dream: he looked more like 6’4.5 with Stern like he claimed. Perhaps even 6’4.25 today. I think Stern is only 6’5 flat today
Dream said on 10/Apr/19
@Junior

He didn’t really look over 6’5” with Howard Stern.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 7/Apr/19
Strange that he ever claim 6'4 1/2. Honestly he look 6'5-6'5 1/4 peak and worst 6'4 3/4 now didn't see 194cm coming now.
James Brett 172cm said on 30/Mar/19
I bet a peak Jeff Goldblum and peak Tim robbins would look similar in height if stood next too each other.
Dream said on 27/Mar/19
Rob, who would you give the edge to? Bo Svenson or Tim Robbins?
Editor Rob
I'd say Bo could have been taller.
billionaireslayer said on 23/Mar/19
6'5 Peak, I think he would edge out 90's Vince Vaughn
Canson said on 22/Mar/19
@Dream: agreed and for a guy his size to claim 6’5 is normal. A lot of even the most “legit” 6’5 guys probably end up around 195cm or somewhere in that weak 6’5 range at a low like 6’4.5 like Robbins. 6’4.5 is rare but a flat 6’5” at a low is even more so
Dream said on 20/Mar/19
@Canson

Like you said before, 6’4.5” people are a lot more rarer than one would think. In the real world, people would say to them “I thought you were 6’6” ‘ when they are measured 6’4.5”.

Someone like Bo Burnham or Wladimir Klitscho could claim 6’7” and everyone would turn a blind eye, but Bo and Wlad claim 6’5”-6’6”, consistently.
Canson said on 19/Mar/19
6’5.25 out of bed 6’4.5 at a low peak. That’s why he claimed 6’4 1/2. His 6’5 is rounded up
billionaireslayer said on 19/Mar/19
6'4 n half maybe 6'5, Very tall guy has always come across tall in all his movies even next to other actors who are decent to tall height. I think he would edge out Vince Vaughn both in their primes next to one another.
SnerhagAip777 said on 26/Feb/19
Rob, if he stood next to Joe Manganiello, who would you bet on being the taller guy. Not taken possible height loss into accounts.

Also, any idea on Robbin's head size? It look as though his eye chin is as big as the eye head.
Editor Rob
Would be hard to tell them apart actually.
Andrea said on 15/Feb/19
That's my point, Tunman. I doubt Gunton has ever been as tall as he gets listed on here (6'1.5), and I struggle to even see the full 6'1 in that pic (unless he had already shrunk a bit by the time of the movie), especially if Tim wasn't even the full 6'5. But well, I should probably rewatch it, to have a better idea about the difference between them...
Same thing for Clancy Brown. Although I don't remember exactly how tall he looked, I certainly remember him looking noticeably shorter than Tim, and probably more than their listings suggest...
Tunman said on 8/Jan/19
In the cell scene I felt 3.5"was the max,but in your pic at least 4".Maybe Gunton was no more than 6'1?Anyways Clancy Brown was still way shorter than him.Ironically Brown was described as big by Freeman when he looked roughly the same.
Canson said on 6/Jan/19
@Andrea: he may have been a guy who measured like 6’4 5/8 or 2/3 at a low and rounded down. Half for someone like him though would be exactly like you said as the lowest he’d measure. Meaning likely along the lines of a weak 6’5” versus someone who’s strong 6’4 who is in the 1/4-1/2 saying half like I used to
Canson said on 6/Jan/19
@Andrea: he may have been a guy who measured like 6’4 5/8 or 2/3 at a low and rounded down. Half for someone like him though would be exactly like you said as the lowest he’d measure. Meaning likely along the lines of a weak 6’5” versus someone who is in the 1/4-1/2 saying half like I used to
Andrea said on 1/Jan/19
Tunman, are you sure he looked only 3-3.5 inches taller than Gunton in Shawshank? To be honest, I don't quite remember how tall he looked next to the rest of the cast as I saw that movie many years ago (when I probably didn't even have any interest or knowledge about height), but from this still, I would have said noticeably more than that: Click Here
Anyway, I agree with you. If he really got measured at 6'4.5 at one point (like his claim seems to suggest), that's certainly the absolute lowest he could have been at peak. Though overall I think that 6'4.75 is a decent shout as he generally looked very near 6'5. Maybe he measured somewhere between 6'4.5 and 6'5 and simply went with 6'4.5 once...
Canson said on 29/Dec/18
@Tunman: I think at his peak he was 6’4.5 afternoon height similar to Michael Jordan. Possible both were even inside .5-.6 but they appear more weak 6’5 guys as they may not be below the .5 mark st anytime unless an extreme low
berta said on 19/Dec/18
He looks mutch taller than morgan freeman in new photos together Click Here: Tim is standing with very loose posture and still looks in the 195 range of morgan freeman still is 187. I still argue peak of 6 foot 5 for tim andd maybe this height now. He never stands with good posture and still always looke in the 195 range.
Tunman said on 14/Dec/18
Certainly not under 6'4.5"anyways,he had somewhere between 3 and 3.5"on Bob Gunton in The Shawshank Redemption.Claiming 6'5 is also honest since he might lose near a full inch.
I wonder how on Mystic River he was chosen to play the role of a victim,actually double victim.To be fair,that film was great but it's not like a 5'8 like Penn could really dominate someone nearly 9"taller even psychologically.The scene with the Savage brothers taking him to the river was strange,they barely reached up to his shoulders.
Guru Guy said on 13/Dec/18
Hard to pinpoint his exact height, but he's over 6'0 sure! :P
Canson said on 12/Dec/18
I highly doubt he was a strong 6’5”. He claimed 6’4.5 and his 6’5 claim is a roundup. Stern doesn’t have that much on him honestly.

@Dream: yea I agree. He wasn’t much taller imho. I think you’re right it’s angled and maybe less than an inch difference
Canson said on 11/Dec/18
@Michael 5’10: only thing is him downgrading himself wouldn’t do any justice. Tom Selleck is the same. People thought he did too when he claimed 6’3.5. It’s likely that both guys measure that at a low and just decided to round up once they got their stardom. Not so much that they downgraded prior to it. A half inch is gonna get rounded up by most people anyway. So a 6’4.5 guy if he claims that will be told he’s 6’5 in Hollywood.
Canson said on 11/Dec/18
@Dream: I agree. Robbins claimed 6’4.5 previously. His 6’5” claim is likely just a roundup like most others do which is very reasonable. It’s more than likely that his claim was his low at his peak. That looks proper in pics as a guy who would measure 6’4.5 low would be 6’5+ out of bed. He’s got the long limbs of a guy who’s almost 6’5 like Michael jordan and Kobe. I have him exact with Jordan and Barkley and a little shorter than Kobe at his peak. Also same as Joe Mangianello. I believe his exact height to be around that with Stern and Martin Lawrence. As for Stern, He could just be one of those guys who gives off a taller impression than he is because he’s skinny and lanky. Maybe peak 6’5.25 but today I would believe closer to 6’5” like maybe 6’5 1/8 or 196cm flat perhaps or even just 6’5”. A lot of people aren’t aware of and can’t accept how tall that actually looks at a low or even if it’s just 1/8” or 1/6” over the mark. They assume a guy that size is 6’6-6’7” especially if proportionately built. The same way people would try to believe that a guy like Bo Burnham is 6’7” or Anyone else in that strong 6’5 range or weak 6’6” range here. Same with someone like Jordan or Kobe they assume 6’6”. The lying on behalf of others doesn’t help either. When someone my size says their real height it’s like “you’re only 6’4”? I would’ve thought 6’5 or 6’6 or they would’ve thought a full 6’6” when I measure Only a bit over 6’4”
Wadlow said on 11/Dec/18
Look guys the photo with stern is obviously not on even ground unless stern is like 6'9 and the woman 6'3. Prime Tim was a strong 6'5 guaranteed.
Dream(5'9.5") said on 8/Dec/18
@Canson

Maybe it’s angled, but I cannot see Tim Robbins close to 6’5”, let alone over 6’5”.
Canson said on 4/Dec/18
@Rob: in that link it’s def not 1.5. I would say the way it’s angled it looks more than it should and we can’t see footwear
Canson said on 4/Dec/18
@Junior: I accounted for Stern having Camera advantage. I don’t see 1.5” if that. It’s probably a bit less than 1”. So 2cm perhaps. I remember Bobby3342 also said 1.5” but it’s because of the angle. Bobby is one who has met Stern and said he’s 6’5 as he claims. Stern looked 6’5 range with Magic and a solid 6’5 with Ryan Anderson and Eric Gordon as well. Imho Stern is peak as he is listed here give or take 1/8”. Maybe today he’s a solid 196 guy. Tim Robbins admitted he was 6’4.5 before and his 6’5 claim is just a roundup from there. Robbins would likely only hit 6’4.5 at a low. Today he still looks near that but maybe 6’4 3/8. Have to remember if he is wearing some dress shoes he would be over 197cm if he’s 194 range without them.
Michael, 5'10" 178 cm said on 3/Dec/18
Tim was definitely 6’5” at peak afternoon height. He looked like 3 inches taller than 6’2 1/4” listed Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption and 2 inches taller than Clancy Brown. He towerered over almost everybody in that movie. I could already tell from watching the beginning of the film that he was very tall. He gave off a taller impression than someone like 6’5” Vince Vaughn or weak 6’5” Christopher Lee in films. Robbins probably downgraded his height so he could get more roles, he does have the record of being the tallest leading actor. Tim was 6’5” minimum!
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 3/Dec/18
@Canson If you are proving this picture then Howard Stern will be like 6'6 1/4 because he was standing behind Tim and in other way you believe Stern is only legit 6'5 then Tim would be more like 6'3 1/2 let alone 6'4 1/2. But it's just a picture we can't see the lower bottom.
Editor Rob
Unfortunately the url's didn't work, but I believe this Link will
Canson said on 29/Nov/18
About a 2cm, maybe half inch difference with camera with Robbins and Stern. I’m f we are going off personal encounters, Bobby3342 and NY Bruin both claimed to have met Stern (like the poster who claims he met Robbins before). They both say Stern is a legit 6’5 now a days. Robbins doesn’t look more than 6’4.5 with him

Click Here
Canson said on 28/Nov/18
@Dream: I would say guys like Klitschko, Stern, Svenson, Burnham, Tiny Lister (peak) Hogan (peak) Rory McCann and others would likely edge both Robbins and Joe out. They all seem legit to strong 6’5” guys.
Canson said on 28/Nov/18
@Dream: Robbins is the same as Joe Mangianello imho. At least peak. If he’s lost height probably not more than maybe 1/4”. I agree with Rob on Mangianello that he may look a weak 6’5 around lunch (5 hours out of bed) Rob said he was somewhere in the 6’4.5-6’5 range so 6’4.5 looks accurate for him at his low. Robbins measured the same 6’4.5 and claimed it then claimed 6’5 before as well. I could see both listings being late morning measurements and both coming out around 6’4.5 imho. I won’t speak for the other part about respecting the other poster as he doesn’t respect anyone (evidenced previously unless you agree with him).
Alex V. said on 26/Nov/18
Click Here
Dream(5'9.5 said on 25/Nov/18
Rob, how likely is 6'4.875" for Tim Robbins?

I respect moe, but I can't see Robbins over 6'5" after seeing pictures of Tim and Howard.

Click Here

Or maybe, I'm just lying straight through my teeth.
Editor Rob
I think maybe Robbins once got 6ft 4.5, but probably he looked near 6ft 5 so 6ft 4.75 to 5 might be his range.
Canson said on 24/Nov/18
@Joe: he looked 6’5-6’5.5 with Magic. But Magic was 6’7 not 6’7.5. I think today like Dream says Bo edges him. Bo could give a 6’5.5 impression to be honest (at times). Stern looks a classic 6’5 today maybe peak 6’5.25-.5
joe### said on 18/Nov/18
thisismoe!!!
Maybe you've seen him from far away
joe### said on 18/Nov/18
Canson
definitely stern look like a strong 6'5 with magic seemed between 6'5.25-6'5.5
Dream(5'9.5 said on 18/Nov/18
@Canson I actually think Bo would edge out Stern today. Stern didn't look any taller than Bo, if we're comparing them with Jimmy Kimmel.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stern leaning with Jimmy Kimmel → Click Here

Bo Burnham leaning with Jimmy Kimmel → Click Here

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Even those photos, let's also keep in mind that Kimmel (while he isn't the most reliable person) says Bo is 'literally a giant', in 4:19 seconds → Click Here

I don't think Kimmel ever described Howard Stern, Peyton Manning, or JJ Watt as such. (I'd have to look more if Kimmel described them as giants or very tall.)
Canson said on 15/Nov/18
@Joe: I think Bo Burnham May edge Stern today as well. I saw Burnham with Pete Holmes and he edged him even with less footwear. I could see Bo as a 6’5 and change guy today like he claims
joe### said on 12/Nov/18
thisismoe !!!
this seems impossible to me because howard stern look taller
Click Here
Click Here
Agent Orange said on 6/Nov/18
As mentioned on Stephen Fry's page Robbins edged him out in the 1994 film Pret-a-Porter. Peak 6'5. Today just under😎
thisismoe!!! said on 3/Nov/18
Saw him again last night at the Actor's Gang. They're having shows every Friday at 8 this month. Got to talk to him a bit. Still over 6'5
Canson said on 2/Nov/18
@Rob and James B: a guy that size could measure that in the morning even if they didn’t lose 3-4cm. If a guy is 6’5.5 out of bed and wakes up and throws even a pair of Jordan’s on he’s 200cm
Neelasish Sen Roy said on 30/Oct/18
He never looks solid 6'5". He looks same as Vince Vaughn who was not more than 6'4". He would be 6'4.5" at max not more than it. He would 6'4" or 6:4.5" at max Am I right,Rob?
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 14/Oct/18
It will be interesting to see Kobe Bryant standing next to Tim Robbins someday!
Canson said on 2/Oct/18
6’5” morning height 6’4.25 at a low today maybe 6’4.5 peak. Wears thick shoes like Stern does
Canson said on 2/Oct/18
6’5” morning height 6’4.25 at a low today maybe 6’4.5 peak
Jakob said on 23/Sep/18
Rob, how tall do you think his sob Jack is? He looks comfortably over 6ft but saw he was listed 194 and doubt that; he looks not as tall as his father.
Editor Rob
Yeah he might be that tall...certainly taller than brother Miles by a few inches.
Neelasish Sen Roy said on 31/Aug/18
Sir Christopher Lee and Tim Robbins have same height or both are shorter than 6'5" John Cleese,Rob?
Editor Rob
Both Cleese and Robbins have claimed the 6ft 4.5 mark...many would argue that they have rounded down.
Canson said on 10/Jul/18
Agree with poster below
Neelasish Sen Roy said on 15/Jun/18
In 1992 he said," I'm six foot four and a half and I have a temper." And in 2010 he said," I'm 6 foot 5" It that was a joke. I think his first words are true he is 6'4.5"
berta said on 15/Mar/18
i still think tim looked no shorter than vince vaughn when he was young. i believe tim was 6 foot 5 maybe still is i havent seen him in anything last 10 years. vince had a chanse of being fraction under 6 foot 5 i believe
James B 170.8cm said on 10/Mar/18
Rob this year might you give him a current and peak height?

6ft4.75 when he was younger and now aproaching 60 6'4.25-6'4.5.
Editor Rob
It's a sobering thought that many actors over next few years will end up with a peak and current...Tim I think has held onto his height fairly well, but it won't last forever.

The age of late 50's to 65 is when many men lose their first chunk of height. Some - like say Morgan Freeman - manage to make it to 65 without anything noticeable lost, but most will drop that first fraction.
Canson said on 13/Feb/18
@James B: I’d say morning 6’5”. Prob 6’5.25 maybe 6’5.25-.5 range or even .5 and loses an inch possibly but evening height can’t see a peak of above maybe 6’4.5 like he once claimed. Of course could be near 5/8 at that stage but 1/2” claim is fair for someone measuring 5/8 as well as it’d be closer to that than the full inch and still weak
James B 170.8cm said on 11/Feb/18
Wasnt that much taller than 6'3 clancy brown in shawshank
Canson said on 9/Feb/18
6’4.5 peak but that’s a low for him as well
Jtm said on 8/Feb/18
Then you could argue freeman was 6'1 if that was the case.
James B 170.8cm said on 7/Feb/18
Rob i think 6'4 range was defnintly arguable in the shawshank redemption.
Editor Rob
Upper 6ft 4 range I think looked believable. 6ft 4.5 was probably the lowest he ever measured.
Jtm said on 30/Jan/18
Matthau was about 6'2 peak and 6'0-6'1 in his 70s.
Quoter86 said on 27/Jan/18
How can Walter Matthau claim he's a midget next to Robbins when it's a 2.5" difference? Talk about looking insecure about your height from being so melodramatic.

Good listing and spot on.
Editor Rob
Some folk like to exaggerate things for dramatic effect.
Dylan said on 6/Jan/18
Rob, do you think being this tall in height can be a disadvantage for a actor?
Editor Rob: I've certainly read several occasions in which actors have commented about being 'too tall'.

Certain heights open up certain roles. Being tall can be a disadvantage, but also an advantage...you will win roles because of height, but you won't be considered for some roles you'd like because of height.

Nathan Wood said on 20/Dec/17
Hi from Australia,Rob, who do you think would be tallest at peak, out of, Vince Vaughn, Jeremy Clarkson, and, Tim Robbins?
Editor Rob: all could be argued to be 6ft 5 guys, I think I've seen about 3 different Vaughn movies in the last month. I think if you got all those guys at their peak, you'd be finding not that much between them.
Canson said on 10/Nov/17
6’5.25-.5 peak out of bed
6’4.5 up to .75 before

Today solid 194cm
Ricky said on 9/Nov/17
Peak height was 6'5" for sure.
Canson said on 8/Nov/17
If the man claimed 6’4.5 he likely measures that at some point in the day presumably at his low in his prime. It’s more than likely that it’s his low on the normal day and that he’s 6’5” plus out of bed. Face it a lot of guys here are overlisted and when a guy built like he is (a bit Big in the body too) is next to someone 3” shorter and is slightly favored he is going to look taller than that person.
Alex V. said on 1/Nov/17
With Kevin Nealon

Click Here
Canson said on 30/Oct/17
He never looked 6’6” in Nothing to Lose. I’d say next to Martin Lawrence the difference wasn’t that much different from Tommy Ford and Lawrence on his show. I believe 6’4.5 peak as an evening height meaning he could most likely be 6’5.25 out of bed
jack12 said on 30/Oct/17
Tim should be 6ft5 at least if not more, anything under just seems crazy.
Frty said on 29/Oct/17
Rob, do you think Tim could or underestimated his height like other tall actors? In films like nothing to lose and Shawshank (which was a very tall cast) he seems more 6'6. He looks much taller than other 6'5 actors.
Editor Rob: you could understand if he was 6ft 5 and said 6ft 4.5, but 6ft 6 I couldn't see for him.
Canson said on 18/Oct/17
@Junior: nothing significant but losing .1” isn’t hard to believe. I agree with you 6’4.5 at his lowest peak could be 6’4 3/8 today or 6’4.25 that’s not much loss
Junior said on 16/Oct/17
I don't see Tim losing height yet. He maybe 6'4.5" at lowest and still wakes up over 6'5, while standing next to 6'2 Benicio Del Toro look to clear 6'5 all the time, i wonder Benicio had already lost a cm maybe 187cm today.
Canson said on 18/Sep/17
Peak:

Out of bed 196-196.5
Before bed 194-194.5

Today:

193-194 at his lowest
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Sep/17
I think he's still a solid 6ft4½ today at worst. It really would be no harm giving him 6ft5 peak
James B said on 20/Aug/17
Do you think 3-4cm is a lot for a 6'4.75 man?
James B said on 16/Aug/17
Rob could a 6'4.75 guy measure 200m with shoes on in the morning?
Editor Rob: if they shrank 3-4cm, yes
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Aug/17
I wonder if he's really low-balled it in the past and claimed 6ft4. That would make proper buffoons out of the 6ft2 guys who claim it...
Junior said on 15/Aug/17
6'4.5 might be Tim's real height and 6'5 claim was a hollywood style which everyone claim a little higher.
James B said on 14/Aug/17
I used to have a friend who is 5ft6 and he claimed "5ft10". He's not exactley downplaying his height is he? LOL
Canson said on 12/Aug/17
@Rampage: I actually haven't seen too many Guys in person truly downplay their height. Maybe in my life enough to count only on one hand but that's people who actually say that they do as I've met two 6'6 guys at different times that claim 6'5". One of which claimed he's 6'5.5 and rounds down but I stood next to him in flats and he had on just Chuck Taylors and he still had me by about 2". He's a full 6'6 at worst. Then another guy who is a full 6'6" and admitted and looked it claimed 6'5" as he hated his height. But Your definition there is the correct one when someone claims a whole inch less or two inches less than what they actually are. I see others here use downplay to refer to someone who rounds down but I disagree with that as a 6'5.75 guy could claim 6'5 if he wanted to or a 6'5.5 guy could claim 6'5 if they wanted.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Aug/17
I doubt a 6ft6 guy would get away with downplaying his height by 2in...
Canson said on 28/Jul/17
@Bobby: my guess is 6-4.5 peak too. And 6'4 today is possible. I bet stern may have an inch tho after seeing pics not sure on 6'3.75 but maybe he's got poor posture with him
Agreco4l said on 27/Jul/17
Always looked really really tall, looks every bit of 6'5" to me.
bobbyh3342 said on 27/Jul/17
im sorry guys but your not even close with robbins, he is not the same size as MJ or Barkley or KOBE robbins is 6 3.75 straight 6'5 in shoes but not a barefoot 6'5. this guy claims 6 4.5 in his prime and then when hes an old man decides to claim 6'5.just look at his pics with howard stern
Canson said on 24/Jul/17
Out of bed 196-196.5 peak
Before bed 194-194.5 peak
Canson said on 24/Jul/17
@Berta: too close to call.
berta said on 23/Jul/17
to me this guy at peak looked taller than vince vaughn and joe manganiello
Canson said on 6/Jul/17
@SJH: I think peak Robbins could be 6'4,5.
S.J.H said on 5/Jul/17
6'4.5 maybe what he get measure at the doctor office for his medical. 6'4.25 lowest at night not a surprise just like joe manganiello
Alex V. said on 3/Jul/17
Tim and his 6'4,5"son, Jack.

Click Here
Canson said on 13/Jun/17
Dane said it well. He didn't tower in the movie and 6'5" towers almost anyone noticeably if it's a proper 6'5". Don't forget a 5'8 guy could be 5'7.75 or 5'7.5 even the former would make Tim Robbins appear 6'5 as that half inch could go in either persons favor. He also claimed 6'4.5 which is closer to the truth. He isn't as tall as Howard stern is and stern is maybe 6'5.25 peak 6'5 solid today
Adam said on 10/Jun/17
Jesus Christ I didn't realise he was this big, must be why he doesn't get starring roles, apart from Shawshank
jervis said on 5/Jun/17
He looked a foot taller than 5ft8 ish Paul Newman in the hudsucker proxy,an easy 6ft5.9 inch difference is clear or maybe a bit more.
Canson said on 3/Jun/17
His claim of 6'4 1/2 looks more accurate. People have no idea how tall that actually is in real life. Bobby3342 said it best 6'4.5 barefoot will get you guessed 6'6" all day. I know being that height barefoot
BlueChord said on 28/May/17
I think he was solid 195cm in his prime and 193-194cm now :)
jervis said on 28/May/17
In Bob Roberts he has 4 inches on Alan Rickman,who was 6ft1.
jervis said on 27/May/17
He was a clear 3 inches taller than 6ft2 to 6ft2.5 Morgan Freeman, making him 6ft5 inches tall.
MJKoP said on 22/May/17
LOL, Danimal thinks Robbins is 6'7", but Tom Cruise is under 5'7". Watch War of the Worlds...to think there is more than a full FOOT difference of height between them is insane. I'm sure if he replies to this he'll go with the generic lifts, boxes, camera angles, ditches, levitation, or whatever other tired excuse. ;D
dane said on 15/May/17
im not disputing his height, but he sure dont look 6'5, he didnt really tower over anyone in shawshank, and 6'5 is way above average height.
Sean95 said on 13/May/17
Thought he looked at least a solid 6'5 in The Shawshank Redemption, looked 3 inches taller than Morgan Freeman back then
Canson said on 2/May/17
194/195 peak
bobbyh3342 said on 2/May/17
not 6'5 let alone 6'6 just look at him in howard stern . He was giving his true height in a world full of liars. conan is 6 2.75bf that's why a 6 4.5 guy towers over him, lets face it guys most people that are 6 2.5 barefoot claim 6 '4 (mike phelps ben Affleck) when tim robbins said hes 6'4.5 hes not lying.
Richardspain said on 1/May/17
He is very tall. Around 195cm sure.

Peak 196cm

Now 194/195 cm

Barefoot of course
Canson said on 29/Mar/17
@Shiva: 6'5 st his lowest wouldn't make him 6'6" out of bed prob 6'5.75. But he's claimed 6'4.5 as well. Stern I believe prime was a hair over 6'5. So yes he was 6'6" out of bed I believe maybe 6'5.25 at his lowest maybe even 6'5 3/8 or 1/2
shiva 181 cms said on 29/Mar/17
@canson ,stern could have been 6'5.5 at his prime and Tim Robbins a flat 6'5, Robbins would have been easily 6'6 out of bed
Willes188 said on 27/Mar/17
Well.. he was clearly 1.5-2 inches taller than 6'3.25 (191.5cm) Clancy Brown in Shawshank
jervis said on 17/Mar/17
The pic with Stern proves nothing, you can't see the ground level or footwear.Robbins was a clear 6ft5 in Shawshank way taller than the rest of the Cast.
jervis said on 15/Mar/17
He looks an easy 4 inches taller than Graig Ferguson, who was as tall, if not a little bit taller than Morgan Freeman.
Canson said on 9/Mar/17
@Arch: not sure about that. He said before he was 6'4.5. That'd make him 6'5.25 out of bed. He was never as tall as stern
Arch Stanton said on 7/Mar/17
6'5 out of bed?? Peak he'd have been very close to 6'6 out of bed.
Canson said on 5/Mar/17
@Guanzo: That's too low for him but he isn't 6'5. I think prime his 6'4.5 is legit and today maybe 6'4.25. He was always good for 6'5" out of bed
Guanzo said on 2/Mar/17
6'3''
Shredder said on 4/Feb/17
Rob , How tall does Martin Lawrence look next to him recently?

Click Here
Editor Rob: it's trickier to say, I don't know if there are other photos from that event.
Canson said on 30/Jan/17
Rob has him close enough. He's 6'4.5 barefoot (6'5.25 out of bed). He's said himself before he's 6'4 1/2"
berta said on 27/Jan/17
when have he ever looked shorter than strong 195 guy?. dont get it. back when he did shawshank redemprion he llooked huge. i think he is the one who have 1/4 inch on vince vaughn back in the 90´s. today he may be 195. havent seen him in anything recently. but peak he made clancy brown look little over 6 foot 2
Giorgi said on 21/Jan/17
Handsome man. Ironic, that the only thing missing isn't really missing, it's too much. I mean his excessive 2 inches ;))
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jan/17
Peak: 6ft4¾-6ft5
Today: 6ft4½-6ft4¾



Has done well so far for a guy pushing 60
berta said on 10/Jan/17
to me this guy never looks shorter than 195,5 and often 196. as an actor he claims less to be given moore jobs.he is the only guy that made peak morgan freeman look only 188. and made kevin costner look small. i think he should have full 6 foot 5 .
Jamie said on 4/Jan/17
I think he should have a peak height as 6ft5.25
mister_lennon said on 2/Jan/17
195-196
movieguy said on 1/Jan/17
Looked a lot taller than Clancy Brown in Shawshank redemption. Brown is about 6'3'' I understand. Difficult one to call on Robbins. He might be more than 6'5'', looked shorter than Howard Stern but was this on an even surface. Same thing with shot with 6'7'' James Cromwell.
Canson said on 29/Dec/16
I don't see 3 inches between Robbins and Freeman. And if it really were who is to say that it's not Freeman as 6'1.75 or .5 and Robbins at 6'4.5? And no im not downgrading freeman because I know that's the next propaganda I'm gonna hear. Instead I'm asking why people always have to upgrade someone in order to make (for example) freeman a certain height just to make the math work? That to me is no different than someone downgrading another person. Either way you're undermining a claim whether it's up or down. Going off what Robbins claimed out of his own mouth when he said he's 6'4.5 and how he looks next to taller actors like Howard Stern (who by all reliable accounts) is a legit 6'5-6'5.25 no more (see Bobby3342's post as well as the poster who mentioned he met him at Dirty Beer). I think Robbins is a guy who would measure 6'5.25 out of bed (196.2cm) and 6'4.5 at his lowest prime (194.3). And wouldn't rule out based on his age, some shrinkage like 170cm fan mentioned below.
Canson said on 27/Dec/16
Yes Jervis unfortunately it's the revolving circle on this site. it's always so in so has to be (insert) because the other person has to be (insert). It's a bunch of comparing when each person can be claiming shoe heights. Usually the net result is we must make the other person taller to accommodate the first one. Robbins has claimed 6'4.5 before and likely is his lowest height and also 6'5". But yes He's a legit 196+ out of bed so rounded he'd be 6'5". Stern is taller than him even if ground isn't level. I'd believe rob's estimate for Stern and at most 195cm (Rob's estimate for Robbins). I bet if freeman claimed 6'3" Robbins by deduction would be 6'6" it's how it always works. By the way freeman is 6'1.75 listed here.
170cm fan of Andy Dufresene said on 26/Dec/16
Could he be heading towards 6'4 in a few years?
jervis said on 25/Dec/16
what height do yot think Morgan Freeman was Canson?Robbins had an easy 3 on him, and Freeman was a strong 6ft2, I d'ont think anybody doubts that here,thats why I think he was 6ft5.
Aza said on 23/Dec/16
He looked taller than Fry in The Player so yes this is a great listing.
tylort said on 23/Dec/16
The Howard Stern photo was obviously not on the same level of ground.
Canson said on 21/Dec/16
Sorry but he isn't even a full 6'5. Still a good .5"- 2cm shorter than Howard stern. He's 6'4.5 at his lowest. All because these other celebs bill themselves a certain way do people inflate him to accommodate
Sandy Cowell said on 13/Dec/16
@ fterz and jervis: thanks, you two, for the vote of confidence! I think I might sleep better tonight!
jervis said on 6/Dec/16
Had a clear 3inches on Morgan Freeman.If he was under 6ft5 at his peak, Freeman was not 6ft2.
fterz said on 5/Dec/16
Tim in Shawshank doe look 6ft7 I mean he towers a tall cast.
Sandy Cowell said on 4/Dec/16
@ Arch - Sometimes I think I AM my own 'Danimal Digest!'
Arch Stanton said on 2/Dec/16
Guessing she's been reading too much of the Danimal Digest, right Rob ;-)?
Editor Rob: Arch, I can understand some estimations of 6ft 6 for Tim.
Sandy Cowell said on 1/Dec/16
I was told Tim was 6ft7, and, gullible that I am, I believed it!
At least I keep this sort of embarrassment to myself...
Christian-196.2cm (6ft5.25) said on 30/Nov/16
"Tim Robbins' Peak Height was 6ft 4 7/8th in (195.3 cm)"

I doubt he was under 195cm in his prime, but I don't think he was as tall as a full 6ft5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Nov/16
Cusack is definitely a tall guy. Never looks less than 6ft2 can pass for 6ft3. But Robbins would make just about everyone look noticeably shorter.
RainbowBlaster5 said on 25/Nov/16
Towered over Cusack in "High Fidelity" and Cusack is supposed to be really tall.
jamw said on 23/Nov/16
Tim beside 6ft7 James Cromwell Click Here
BOBBYH3342 said on 4/Nov/16
6'5 in shoes 6'4 barefoot
jervis said on 16/Oct/16
Robbins looked 6ft5.25 next to 6ft2.25 Morgan Freeman in Shawshank,3 inches taller than Freeman in that movie.
170cm Air force one guy said on 5/Oct/16
Do you think Tim looks at least 6'4.5 or could he be a little less today cause he is pushing 58 now?
Editor Rob: he might have lost a small fraction, although can still look nearly 6ft 5.
Swish said on 1/Oct/16
hjh
shiva 181 cms said on 23/Sep/16
He claimed 6'4.5 becoz he may have measured 6'4.75 and rounded down he looked 6'5 in his prime he could have got mistaken for 6'6+ guy granted his frame even in the above pic it looks like, now more 6'4.5
Giorgi said on 12/Sep/16
Click Here
What do you think of this photo, Rob? They both seem pretty still and Robbins looks considerably shorter.
Editor Rob: unfortunately not sure on whether the ground is totally flat there, but Robbins did look at least an inch shorter.
Canson said on 5/Sep/16
He's not as tall as Howard Stern who's a legit 6'5 guy
Arch stanton said on 22/Aug/16
His hairstyle could influence his height I think. In Jacob's Ladder and Mystic River with a longer flatter style he looks shorter than he did in films where his hair was high like Bob Roberts and the Player.
Canson said on 21/Aug/16
I'd go a 6'4.5 at his lowest in his peak. That's the height he claimed before. Maybe today he's 6'4.25 at his lowest.
Mike said on 20/Aug/16
Tom Robbins peak: 6ft 5, today 6ft 4.5
Morgan Freeman peak: 6ft 2.5, today 6ft 1.5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Aug/16
He could be more like 6ft4½ on the nose today. But 6ft5 peak is very possible
Canson said on 12/Aug/16
@The Man: wouldn't surprise me if both are really under 6'5. Both look like they could be somewhere between 194-195cm in their primes (I say prime for Robbins because he's older and may have lost a fraction).
shiva 181 cms said on 9/Aug/16
Tim robbins is 6'4.75 in his peak at times he may look a solid 6'5 because of his frame posture and he doesn't bend over like for example liam neeson today he migjt be 6'4.5 like he claimed

Tim robbins height (6'4.75) peak ( 6'4.5) current
The Man said on 7/Aug/16
Robbins gets listed as 195cm and Manganiello gets listed as 196cm, when it should be the opposite.
Canson said on 20/Jul/16
@JamesB: if not hydrated and weightlifting it's possible def. I measure exactly 194-194.1 6'4.375-.4 at a normal low but I've also seen as Low as almost right at 6'4 once or twice with a combination lifting and being on my feet late at night for long periods and a normal low with just lifting with less hydration can be more around 6'4 1/4 or slightly over. Robins easily would dro too
James B said on 16/Jul/16
Rob would a 6'4.75 guy measure 6'4.5 very late at night like 2 in the morning?
Editor Rob: anyone has potential to drop under their listing if they measure an absolute low or a very late at night or straight after a 2 hour session of sport.
Canson said on 9/Jul/16
@Bobby3342: the more I look at him the diff with Howard stern looks more like 2cm than 4 to me. I can see him as maybe a very strong 193 today (6'4.25) and Stern as 6'5 like you have him. Robbins may have been around 6'4 1/2 prime but def can't see 6'5 barefoot. Only in shoes and with those above he's prob 1.25 to put him near 197 in shoes
Canson said on 8/Jul/16
Lillo Thomas said it perfectly below. The difference between 6'4.5 and 6'5 cannot be seen and unless u have two people equal who u are verifiably sure of then you can't tell. I can't always tell if someone is only 1/2" taller than me esp if footwear differs and I often get billed as 6'5". But I can definitely see a peak 196cm+ out of bed for Tim Robbins and what he initially claimed 6'4 1/2" as his aggregate. I think he just rounded up to 6'5 like most ppl. May have lost a small small fraction in his later years but still at least a solid 6'4" today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jul/16
Stern looks to be edging Robbins. He's more a solid 6ft5 guy
Scott said on 6/Jul/16
A solid 6' 5". 3 full inches taller than Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption
Canson said on 3/Jul/16
In the pictures with Howard Stern, Tim Robbins looks about an inch shorter. Possible Stern peak height was 6'5.25-.5 (today flat 6'5") which would make Robbins what he claimed (at least peak) 6'4 1/2. Maybe he's dropped a fraction now but prob still a legit 193 cm.
Canson said on 2/Jul/16
@Rampage: you speak the truth. It's funny how it became that way maybe in the last 10 years maybe outside of pro sports. And to me 6'3" is a damn good height. Not too tall but tall enough. Don't get why people if tall enough get greedy with it. But I've also seen a cutoff in life. I've noticed most legit 6'5" guys rarely lie up. Maybe outside maybe a college athlete or high school or maybe a former college athlete. And I think even 6'3 and 6'4 guys know it. They will push to lie and say they're 6'5. But never any higher
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Jun/16
His 6ft4½ claim is probably the only thing keeping him from a 6ft5 listing here...because he looks every bit of it in pretty much all his movies! Makes it even more comical when you see the number of guys who are barely 6ft3 who claim to be that!
Canson said on 28/May/16
@Bobby: I guess I contradicted myself because Theler does lie up from 6'5 (he is very buff as well) but outside that I don't see much
Canson said on 28/May/16
@Bobby: I agree about him being that height but I will say for guys like him or even Theler, I don't see them claiming 6'6 and 6'8. One thing I've noticed is that once someone is usually 6'5 or over (legitimately and solid enough) they usually don't lie up much outside of pro athletes. At least from what I've seen. A lot of the taller friends I have who are at their midpoint (I have a 6'5 1/2 friend who claims 6'5 as his height) they just round down. I'm actually similar I have in recent years begun to round down and just list myself as 6'4 on my docs even though I am a legit 6'4.5 in the afternoon but do drop to 1mm above 3/8. Of course always exceptions
Canson said on 26/May/16
I think when we take Moe's advice (he goes off what someone else said they were at 6'5 and inflates the other person to accommodate) then Robbins is 6'6". In the real world however he was as stated a peak 6'4.5. May still be that height but doubt he's under 6'4 flat at his age. Howard Stern is clearly taller than him and Howard is a legit classic 6'5. He isn't any taller than that
James B said on 25/May/16
I wonder how a peak Robbins would look next to challenger 16?
Canson said on 25/May/16
@Berta; throw me in for peak 194.
berta said on 25/May/16
70% 196
20% 195
10% 194 ore 197
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/May/16
Yeah Arch he does look like an enormous 200cm+ guy in that picture! But again some people don't appreciate how big 6ft5 is.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/May/16
Really Arch? I actually saw that as an instance where Costner could pull off 6ft2 if Robbins was 6ft5. I saw 3-4in between them.
Arch Stanton said on 17/May/16
Really looked at least 6'5.5 in Bull Durham, in fact he could look 6 ft 6 in that film with Costner. I don't think 6'5.5 peak is impossible. Doesn't look it today though I agree. At times though he can really look bigger than 195, see Click Here for instance! Looks like 6 ft 8 there and similar look to Greg Davies!
bobbyh3342 said on 11/May/16
nah he has got 6 5 all day in shoes but he iss not a bf 6.5 or he would claim 6'6 lol come on guys take a survey of people and ask them there heights how many go by b/f lol not many tim is 192 193 bf
Aza said on 7/May/16
Definitely thought he was taller than stephen fry in a film I can't remember many years ago. Actually agree with Arch. He needs a peak upgrade. Actually think he has lost a good inch so 195cm today is a good shout.
James B said on 3/May/16
Arch seriously 6'5.5 peak? There was a photo of Robbins with James Cromwell not that long ago where he looked shorter for sure.
Arch Stanton said on 17/Apr/16
jtm said on 14/Apr/16
that's funny Arch Stanton. there is still a post from Oct 2013 and you admit that he was 3 inches taller than freeman. you have freeman 6'2.5-6'3 peak so he actually looked closer to 6'6 if that's true

Why's that funny? I have Freeman at 6'2.5. In Shawshank Robbins looked between 2 and 3 inches taller really. In films like Bob Roberts and The Player he could really look 6'5.5. I think 6'5.5 is possble peak. Morgan Freeman could give off a 6'3 impression, in fact in Last Vegas he could look that but more a strong 6'2.
MrTBlack said on 16/Apr/16
He's over 6'5" if anything IMO but this listing works I guess.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Apr/16
@James: I do know how big it is (I'm that mark myself when I wake up). Robbins may very well be that today. But at peak he did look a legit 6ft5 guy
jtm said on 14/Apr/16
that's funny Arch Stanton. there is still a post from Oct 2013 and you admit that he was 3 inches taller than freeman. you have freeman 6'2.5-6'3 peak so he actually looked closer to 6'6 if that's true.
Arch Stanton said on 12/Apr/16
Andrea said on 3/Apr/16
Rob, granted that i do think he generally looks (or at least looked) near 6'5, do you think he might have really been just 6'4.5??? After all, people who are truly 6'4.5 are obviously still very tall and can pull off looking near 6'5! See Ibra...
Editor Rob: the argument is whether he said 6ft 4.5 rather than 5 just to make it feel less.

He could have been a guy who at his low dipped a little under, but a large chunk of the day held 6ft 5.

In the early 90s he could really look like a legit 197 guy in some films like The Player and Bob Roberts. He didn't look over 6'5 with Freeman though in Shawshank.
James B said on 10/Apr/16
Rampage I don't think you realise how big 6'4.5 range is
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Apr/16
196cm is arguable...
Canson said on 7/Apr/16
@Berta: doubt he's as tall as you are or even I. I believe my height in his prime (6'4.5) maybe. But he's a clean 6'4 now. Hes a good inch shorter than Howard Stern. Stern's a legit 6'5.
moe said on 6/Apr/16
He is absolutely 6'5. If you want to spot him, you can go to the Actors Gang in Culver City. He runs the joint and is sometimes there. He's actually taller than 6'5. There was someone else there who was 6'5 when I went there, and Tim was taller.
berta said on 6/Apr/16
this guy is ore have been when he was younger 196. He made morgan Freeman and clancy Brown look average. I Think his six foot 4 and a half claim was just to get more roles . Can never se him shorter than vince vaughn
Andrea said on 3/Apr/16
Rob, granted that i do think he generally looks (or at least looked) near 6'5, do you think he might have really been just 6'4.5??? After all, people who are truly 6'4.5 are obviously still very tall and can pull off looking near 6'5! See Ibra...
Editor Rob: the argument is whether he said 6ft 4.5 rather than 5 just to make it feel less.

He could have been a guy who at his low dipped a little under, but a large chunk of the day held 6ft 5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Apr/16
James, I'm sure Willis could have hit 6ft1 in certain types of shoes...
James B said on 30/Mar/16
Funny rob how Glenn saw Bruce Willis at 6'1 and even once as high as 6'2 yet he saw Robbins at 6'4.5.........,
Editor Rob: it is possible on a good day Willis in person could have looked tall from his perspective. Maybe robbins was walking smaller to avoid 'autograph fiends' and 'selfie hounds'
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Mar/16
Peak: 6ft5(196cm)
Today: 6ft4¾(195cm)

Could have lost no more than 1cm
berta said on 22/Mar/16
have Always thought that this guy is a proper 196. dont Think vince Vaughn is taller , probably 1 cm shorter.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Mar/16
Robbins still looks in that 6ft4½-5 zone today. Maybe in a few years we'll see if he's dropped anything noticeable. But if he measured 6ft5, he'd either be honest or round down a full inch because he's uncomfortable with his height. He wouldn't round down just a fraction. His son looks like he might be a bit taller, like 6ft5½.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Mar/16
Or 6ft5 peak and 6ft4½ today.
James B said on 22/Feb/16
Rob perhaps give him 6'4.5 current and 6'4.75 peak?
Editor Rob: I think when someone looks to have lost half inch, that is the cutoff to maybe consider peak/current. A 1/4 inch I feel might be too small.
moe said on 16/Feb/16
Tim Robbins son is 6'4 and a 1/2. Look here: Click Here And here: Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Feb/16
Arch, I think Hudson in his 20's-30's could look a strong 6ft5 at times but he lost a bit of height quite early. He definitely looked closer to 6ft4 flat at the end of his life. Robbins was just one of those rarities who had good posture and chose not to embellish his height when he easily could have gotten away with it. The other guys you mentioned I think could fall into that weak 6ft5(194-195cm) category because they can look 6ft4 range a lot. Other guys like Howard Stern, Ralf Moeller, Wladimir Klitschko or Nonso Anonzie who can look 6ft6...they're the strong 6ft5(196-197cm) guys
Arch Stanton said on 23/Jan/16
There's a few actors on here you could really argue this listing for, Joe Manganiello, Rock Hudson, Christopher Lee and Sterling Hayden to name a few. Unlike the others though, this guy could look a strong 6'5 in the early 90s.
movieguy said on 23/Jan/16
Robbins did a film with 6'4'' Stephen Fry and I remember him being a bit taller than Fry. I'm not sure they were standing side to side though so maybe not easy to compare. The photos that throw me are the ones of Robbins dwarfing Clint Eastwood at time of Mystic River. Either Robbins was taller than 6'5'' or 6'4'' Clint had already been hit by severe height loss. I know some argue Clint wasn't a full 6'4'' but he looked close enough when young.
Alex said on 18/Jan/16
I think barefoot is 192-193 and with shoes about 194-195, as in this photo.
John said on 16/Jan/16
6ft4.75 peak, 6ft4.5 today. Either height, he downright towers over people.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jan/16
Rob, how likelt is it that he's down to 6ft4 flat today?
Editor Rob: I would still think he was above that mark.
bobby3342 said on 12/Jan/16
Ok how can he be a barefoot 6'5 when he's at least 1.5 shorter than howard stern? ( oh and I have seen stern more times than I care to mention he's .a .5 inch taller than me(if that) Howard stern is a legit b/f 6'5 tim robbins is not 64.75 b/f
Canson said on 7/Jan/16
Lol someone actually compared him to Jalen Rose in height on this page!!! Jalen is 6'6" barefoot as measured and is even shorter than Scottie Pippen.
movieguy said on 7/Jan/16
Looked a lot taller than Clancy Brown in the Shawshank Redemption. Brown says he is 6'3'' and is probably not exaggerating. As other posters have said Robbins may be taller than the 6'5'' he usually gives. I suspect he was worried about not getting parts because of his height so knocked off an inch or two. I think the people that downgrade him to below 6'5'' are definitely wrong on this one.
Canson said on 26/Dec/15
Bobby: after looking at the footwear he may be. Def isn't much taller than those guys. He has thick soles in them shoes!!!
Canson said on 25/Dec/15
So Goose based on your expertise I'll give Robbins 6'5 since you seem to be 2" off on all of your assessments.

@Bobby3342:actually may be just as tall as Barkley or MJ. He looks 6'6 in shoes.
bobby3342 said on 21/Dec/15
this guy is at least an inch shorter than MJ or barkley, I would bet my savings on it! needs a downgrade
195.5cm said on 15/Nov/15
he's about 6'7 peak

proberly still on the upper end of 6'6 today. definetly wasn't 6.4.5 IMAO
Goose said on 4/Nov/15
I posted this on this site before - dude is way way tall. He ain't no 6'5. Saw him sitting at the bar at a restaurant in Soho in about 1998'. Looked 6'7 to me and big boned. I've seen Conan too who I put at 6'5 (big guy as well) and there was a huge difference. BTW, extremely tall actors will downgrade their heights as 6'7 public ally would limit their roles/appeal.
Darren510 said on 21/Oct/15
6'4.5 - 6'4.75 and 6'5 peak. Looked minimum 6'5 in Shawshank redemption next to Morgan Freeman
Ice said on 18/Oct/15
1.95 , the most alpha height for a guy , f**k 6'2 ..
Gonzalo said on 21/Aug/15
To me they both look the same height. Robbins is mínimum 1`94.
Sam said on 20/Aug/15
I actually don't think that Robbins looks taller...but it doesn't surprise that Robbins and Schreiber would measure a very similar height.
Alex V. said on 18/Aug/15
Robbins is taller...


Click Here
Alex V. said on 18/Aug/15
Tim Robbins... Pablo Schreiber.

Both 1m95.

Click Here
Sam said on 17/Aug/15
Would be surprised if he was a couple inches taller than Conan but could buy him looking roughly an inch taller. At times he looks potential to be a bit shorter, height loss possible but a early, like with Stern and some other recent photos.
jujwa said on 23/Jul/15
Wow i never noticed heights but i assumed he must be 5'6-5'7 because he has a slight baby fce imagine my surprise finding out he is nearky a foot taller lol
bobbyh said on 23/Jun/15
6 3.75 to flat 6 4bf in shoes mos def 6 .5 overlisted a tiny bit
Matthew said on 20/Jun/15
Bishop says on 5/Jun/14
@Ed Kline, I found a pic of him and 6'5" listed Howard Stern:

Click Here

---

Howard looks taller obviously.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jun/15
He really doesn't look like he's lost height
Ferrous said on 9/Jun/15
He looked surprisingly tall with Conan tonight - seemed to have as much as a couple of inches on the 6-3.5 Conan.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Jun/15
Danimal says on 9/May/15
Tim looking at least 6'6" if not 6'7" with Craig Ferguson in 2009 (at 20:52) and YES, Craig is around 6'2". To claim that Tim Robbins is only 6'4.75 is a tragedy, but its Rob's site: Click Here


That's got to be one of the dumbest comments I've ever read on this site
Sam said on 22/May/15
His performance in Mystic River really deserved the Oscar...really sold the haunted shell of a man, simultaneously hulking & scary as well as pathetic. Out of all things in the film his work there has aged the best so far.
Sam said on 20/May/15
Rob, can you add to his credits?: Bull Durham, Jacob's Ladder, Bob Roberts, The Hudsucker Proxy, High Fidelity and War of the Worlds.
Sam said on 19/May/15
"6'4.5 is still very tall in Hollywood", very tall everywhere except perhaps in the NBA or Dinaric Alps.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/15
Danimal says on 9/May/15
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 28/Nov/14
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4½ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need?

Proof??? MANY tall people low end their height in Hollywood to get more roles.

Umm...the quote above
Danimal said on 9/May/15
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 28/Nov/14
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4½ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need?

Proof??? MANY tall people low end their height in Hollywood to get more roles.
Danimal said on 9/May/15
Dejavu says on 20/Feb/15
He had close to 3 inches on Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption.

Close to???? Try minimum 4" on him.
Danimal said on 9/May/15
Tim looking at least 6'6" if not 6'7" with Craig Ferguson in 2009 (at 20:52) and YES, Craig is around 6'2". To claim that Tim Robbins is only 6'4.75 is a tragedy, but its Rob's site: Click Here
Jeffery said on 26/Apr/15
Never 6'5" today. Out of bed maybe.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Apr/15
@moe: and I think you're loser troll who wastes time and energy trying to denigrate other people's opinions.
moe said on 29/Mar/15
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover

I think you're speculating. And your speculation is wrong.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Mar/15
@Dejavu: I think they may have shot Shawshank a certain way to make him look more convincing as the self-confidant inmate who beat the system and serves as a hero to the other inmates. His towering presence naturally served the part.

Somewhat similar to what they did with Michael Clark Duncan in The Green Mile a few years later.
Dejavu said on 20/Feb/15
He had close to 3 inches on Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption.
moe said on 7/Feb/15
What the guy below me said. Saying Tim Robbins is under 6'5 is absolute nonsense. I've seen him twice. Anyone who wants to catch a glimpse of him should go by the Actors Gang in Culver City. He's got to be 6'6.
jsmithe said on 15/Jan/15
Rob Tim is about 6ft6, this is wrong. Tim is taller than 6ft5 Vince Vaughn
Andrea said on 9/Jan/15
What if he really has never been over 6'4.5? After all, a big 6'4.5 is still very tall in Hollywood...
Judd said on 9/Jan/15
in my opinion he was 6'4.75-5" at his peak and today a strong 6'4.5"
Andrea said on 7/Jan/15
Rob, what do you think about his 6'4.5 claim? You think that's possible? I mean, if Morgan freeman was really a bit over 6'2 at his peak, it's hard to believe Tim was under 6'5!
[Editor Rob: well he could genuinely have measured that, but maybe didn't stand quite at his tallest. Or he measured 6ft 5 and just dropped the half inch to be part of the 6ft 4 range crowd.]
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Dec/14
I don't think he's really lost anything to be perfectly honest...

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.