How tall is Tim Robbins

Tim Robbins Height

6ft 4 ¾ (194.9 cm)

American actor best known for roles in films like The Shawshank Redemption, The Player, Mystic River, Bull Durham, Jacob's Ladder, Bob Roberts, The Hudsucker Proxy, High Fidelity and War of the Worlds.

How tall is Tim Robbins
Photos by PR Photos
I'm six foot four and a half and I have a temper. - Playboy magazine, 1992
I did have one problem playing Einstein. Everyone was afraid I was too tall. I was going to walk along all stooped over. But then I met Tim Robbins, who's about 6 foot 5 and next to him I looked like a midget.
-- Walter Matthau in 1994

You May Be Interested

Height of Morgan Freeman
Morgan Freeman
6ft 1 ¾ (187 cm)
Height of Kevin Costner
Kevin Costner
6ft 1 (185 cm)
Height of Clint Eastwood
Clint Eastwood
6ft 0 (183 cm)
Height of David Morse
David Morse
6ft 3 ½ (192 cm)

Add a Comment1073 comments

Average Guess (85 Votes)
6ft 4.99in (195.6cm)
Canson said on 29/Jun/20
@Cmillz: I only could because he was shorter than Howard Stern
Tyler22 said on 29/Jun/20
Legit 6'5 guy.
cmillz said on 27/Jun/20
I doubt you’d see many people argue under 6’5 for him if he hadn’t claimed 6’4.5”.
cmillz said on 19/Jun/20
oh I agree that Peyton’s a legit 6’5. I just think Robbins was a legit 6’5 in the 80s/90s, too.
Canson said on 18/Jun/20
@Cmillz: maybe Kobe’s peak height. Manning was a legit 6’5 or a hair over peak
Hong said on 17/Jun/20
Rob how much taller is Robbins than Newman in the pic in your opinion?
Editor Rob
He can look near 9 inches taller than Paul.
cmillz said on 16/Jun/20
I ageee. I think in his prime, he’d prob be similar to Peyton Manning’s height.
cmillz said on 16/Jun/20
He would be the tallest looking 194cm guy in existence.
Tall Sam said on 15/Jun/20
I think the difference could be 9-10 inches between Robbins and Newman, in person (on stage) I thought Newman in old age still looked about 5'8". I think with Sidney Poitier when they were both young, Newman could look to be at most a weak 5'9".
Hong said on 15/Jun/20
@AlexV(5ft10) I think 6ft5 is reasonable for Tim's height,he always looked it too me.Rob why not just give him the extra bit and make it an even 6ft5?
Alex V. (5ft10) said on 14/Jun/20
One thing is for sure... Robbins is taller than D'Onofrio even with the cowboys boots... 197cm for Robbins, 194-195cm for D'Onofrio.

Plus, the mugshot scene, Tim is indeed the 6'5.5" in flat shoes...

Tim Robbins: 196cm morning, 195cm regular, 194cm afternoon;

D'Onofrio: 193cm morning, 192cm regular, 191cm afternoon.


Alex V. (5ft10) said on 14/Jun/20
Yup, Hong...

Saw 6'5.5" with flat shoes for Tim and 6'4.5"- 6'4.75" for Vincent with cowboy boots...

Hong said on 13/Jun/20
Click Here Robbins looking a foot taller than Newman.
Hong said on 12/Jun/20
Click Here Even if Newman was 5ft8 at that stage of life, Robbins looks like a giant next to him.
Hong said on 12/Jun/20
D'onofrio at 6ft3.5 + cowboy boots=around 6ft4.75 depending on how high the heel.If for argument sake D'onofrio was 6ft4.75 including the boots,that would mean that given Robbins is wearing a dress shoe of about an inch,and Robbins looks close to 2 inches taller,that would put Robbins at a bit over 6ft5 in comparison,if both guys were barefoot.I Know you can't see their footwear in the pic but if you see the movie you can.
Hong said on 11/Jun/20
Click Here Tim with 5ft9 paul Newman.
Hong said on 10/Jun/20
Click Here Tim with 6ft3.5 Christopher Reeves,it's not the best angle but Tim looks 6ft5.
cmillz said on 10/Jun/20
He looks near 6'6 there with Vincent
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 7/Jun/20
It might be because Robbins might've hung around shorter people, than Vaughn had. Either that, or Robbins has lankier proportions.
Hong said on 7/Jun/20
Click Here That's Vincent d'onofrio who is listed as 6ft3.5,also an important point is that d'onofrio is wearing cowboy boots and Robbins just normal dress shoe's.Robbins looks an easy 6ft5 in comparison to me.
Hong said on 7/Jun/20
Click Here @OriginalAnon I have to agree with you on the point of Robbins compared with Jeff Bridge.At the time of that movie Bridges was around 49 or 50 years old,Robbins 40-41 years old,I don't think Bridges would have shrank much if at all.Bridges at say 6ft1? would put Robbins in comparison a comfortable 6ft5,because to me Robbins looked 4inches taller in that movie,"without breaking a Sweat".It's 6ft5 peak Robbins for me, and maybe a bit of change too?
Jam Cherry said on 6/Jun/20
196 cm man little over 6’5” or maybe a perfect 6’5”
Canson said on 5/Jun/20
@Cmillz: that’s precisely where I have Robbins. Similar to Jordan
cmillz said on 4/Jun/20
Let me put it this way. IMO a peak Robbins gave off an even taller impression than Michael Jordan, who happens to be somewhere in the 6’4.5-6’4.75 range.
cmillz said on 4/Jun/20
Doesn’t it seem like Robbins would measure taller on a stadiometer? Even now, he seems to give off a more towering presence than Vaughn when standing around others, and he honestly just looks taller too. Robbins is a strange one for sure, it’s hard to see him at only 6’4.5” in the 90s.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 2/Jun/20
Me too. He never quite striked as a full 6'5" guy to me.
cmillz said on 1/Jun/20
That’s really the absolute highest I’d go for him. He was barely taller than Goldblum in the 90s tbh.
Jackzx said on 27/May/20

why not give Tim the full 6'5? Think he was at least that and the people have spoken.
Editor Rob
The majority of people have guessed 6ft 5 for Tim, a proportion 6ft 4.5 up to 5 and another proportion 6ft 5.25-5.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 24/May/20
Maybe 6'4.75" for Vaughn.
Canson said on 23/May/20
@Dguit and Cmillz: the highest I can buy for him assuming we are talking afternoon heights is what Rob lists him here. I doubt he’s as high as 6’5” flat at that stage. Now 6’5.5 out of bed is possible but my best guess is 6’5.25-.5 out of bed and 6’4.5-.75 range afternoon. Vaughn May be much of the same 195cm max in his prime not 6’5”. A real 6’5” prime was Peter Hermann, John Cleese, Tiny Lister, or Hulk Hogan who I thought may have even been a hair over but with Sid’s admission he was only 6’6” peak im hard pressed for over 6’5” for Hogan now.
OriginalAnon said on 23/May/20
I always thought that this guy was at least 6'5''.

Rob, you have Jeff Bridges listed at 184cm currently and almost 187cm peak. Have you seen Arlington Road? In that film Tim Robbins absolutely towered over Jeff Bridges. Although it is one of my favourite films, I can't remember if there were many instances where you could see the guys without angles playing their part. If a person did not have a clue about either height of each man, one could quite easily think that Jeff Bridges was a 5'11'' guy, or something, due to Robbins making him look so small. There can't have only been a 3 inch difference there.

If you have not seen the film, I'd highly recommend it.
Editor Rob
Yes I've seen and would recommend the film, it did look near 4 inches at times.
jack89 said on 23/May/20
Tall guy at least 6'5
cmillz said on 21/May/20
I doubt Vaughn was ever a legit 6’5.
Dguit said on 19/May/20
Definitely taller than other 6ft5 guys like Vince Vaughn. Just cause one interview he said 6ft4.5 does not mean that he was that low ever, and pics with him next to stern is not on even ground. James Cromwell and Tim had about height difference with Morgan Freeman.
Nik Ashton said on 13/May/20
@ Christian 6'5 3/8" - It depends how you see it, I merely meant that Tim didn’t look small in comparison to Walter.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 12/May/20
In the grand scheme of things, it might not seem a big difference, but on here, we rely on technicality. There are posters here who advocate for 1/8" downgrades or upgrades, lol.
190.5/189.5 said on 11/May/20
Hey Rob, can we change our username on here? I made mine on a whim and it's not actually correct, so it feels weird to use it. Thanks in advance
Editor Rob
Just clear any cookies from celebheights and refresh a page and use another name.
cmillz said on 10/May/20
If you stood peak Robbins with peak Matthau, the difference would look closer to 3” IMO. Now if you said Jeff Goldblum wasn’t much shorter than Robbins, I would agree with that.
Jtm said on 9/May/20
matthau wasn't ever over 6'2 imo and was maybe 6'1 in I.Q.
Nik said on 7/May/20
@ cmillz - A 2.25" difference is not a great one, he would hardly look short in comparison to him! Rob and I would look short if we were pictured with Tim Robbins and we are too ordinary dudes!
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 6/May/20
He was 6'2.5" max. He was at the very least 2" shorter than Robbins, so I'd have to disagree.
cmillz said on 6/May/20
What? He was significantly shorter than Robbins.
Nik said on 6/May/20
Walter Matthau wasn't that much shorter than Tim.
Canson said on 5/May/20
@Cmillz: he was probably over 6’5 flat in his prime. Very possible that Stern was 6’6 out of bed and 6’5.25 afternoon or even as high as 6’5 3/8 perhaps
Alex V. said on 5/May/20
Hi there,

Sometimes pictures can't help, maybe is something to do with angles, slouching, light and so on...

A friend of mine is like 2cm shorter than me, I am 5'10,5'', however we took a photo where the difference seems to be like 5cm which is not the truth.

Plus, another fellow that I know is always slouching and seems to be a 6'3'' guy but as soon as he brings his real height, 196cm; with footwear and measured by us, was 1cm less than the door frame here in Portugal, (they are more or less 200cm).

In my IMO the best option to know someone's height is through the height scale, or MAYBE seeing the person in "flesh".

Otherwise, just guesses.

Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 4/May/20
I'd have them around 1.5cm apart at their peaks, Stern at 196-197 and Robbins at 195.
cmillz said on 4/May/20
I can see it, but I think Stern was closer to 6’5.5” peak, rather than just a flat 6’5. Wish there were more photos of Robbins with Stern though, so we can get a better idea of what the true difference between them is.
cmillz said on 1/May/20
There was more than just 2.5 inches between Freeman and Robbins in Shawshank I thought.
Alex V. said on 30/Apr/20
Hey Canson...

Yup, nice guess, one or another...

Tim is tall but not as a guy like Noonan for example IMO.
Canson said on 27/Apr/20
@Alex V: peak out of bed I would say 196.5-197 range max. Before 195 max. Maybe even 196-196.5 and 194-194.5 afternoon
cmillz said on 22/Apr/20
He looked at least 6’5 in Nothing to Lose. I’m really trying hard to see him at 6’4.5” peak, but I just can’t.
viper said on 22/Apr/20
I'm surprised he would look noticably shorter than Stern
Alex V. said on 22/Apr/20
195 centimeters = 6.3976378 feet (6 feet 4_49⁄64 inches)
Source: Google

So, IMO...

Robbins' Height:

Morning: 197cm
During the day: 195cm
Night, absolute lowest: 194cm

Nik Ashton said on 20/Apr/20
It’s amazing that he claimed to be 6’4.5” considering the fact that Rob thinks he is 6’4.75” and the average guess is 6’4.97” (79 votes)! 😃👌
Alex V. said on 15/Apr/20
Hey cmillz...

Of course, I could be wrong, it's just my opinion... But like some other people said, there are people that can give a taller impression than others of the same size. When I saw the IQ movie for instance, Robbins appeared to be much taller than Fry however there is a scene where they look the same size but if I had to choose, Robbins would be the tallest...same goes for Vaughn, Neeson and Goldblum, for me they look the same height. Plus, in the Taken movie if you see close at the beginning when Neeson and Hertzberg are talking to each other, Liam leaning seemed to be as tall as George. I give my opinion after I look carefully but that doesn't mean that I'm right, just my opinion.

Cheers mate...
Tall Sam said on 14/Apr/20
I would say Robbins and Goldblum would stack up similarly and at the same height as Joe Manganiello and Alexander Skarsgard, about a half inch advantage for Robbins.
Canson said on 14/Apr/20
@Cmillz: maybe he rounded down from 6’4.75 but I saw him next to Stern and he looked Noticeably shorter. I could buy 6’5.25 and 6’4.5 or at their peaks maybe 6’4.5-.75 range for Robbins and stern 6’5.25-.5
cmillz said on 14/Apr/20
@Alex V
Not sure why you have peak Neeson and peak Vaughn both at 194cm. Even peak Vaughn and peak Goldblum being the same height is incorrect.
cmillz said on 14/Apr/20
@James B
You’d be surprised. Robbins has given off a near 6’6 impression at times seeing him next to others, although I can say the same about Goldblum giving a 6’5 impression at times. I don’t think he was quite as tall as Peak Howard Stern or Bo Burnham, but he had to be very close to 6’5 in his peak, especially after seeing how tall he looked in Jacob’s Ladder, Shawshank, Nothing to Lose, etc.
James B 172c, said on 12/Apr/20
Doubt there would be much between a peak goldblum and Tim robbins
cmillz said on 12/Apr/20
I wonder if he claimed 6’4.5” to get more roles in movies, since nobody would buy a 6’4 claim, maybe he claimed 6’4.5” to make it seem more believable.
cmillz said on 12/Apr/20
Robbins edges out Vaughn, but Howard Stern would edge out Robbins.
Alex V. said on 12/Apr/20

Try "The Player" movie, no more than 6'5,5"" with flat shoes for Tim, so he can't be more than six five without them, also he's taller than D'Onofrio with cowboy boots.

Peak heights

Robbins: 195
D'Onofrio: 192
Conan: 193,5
Kilborn: 193,5
Noonan: 197
Braun: 199
Neeson, Fry, Goldblum, Vaughn: 194
Cromwell: 198,5
Stiles: 198,5
Stern: 196
Burnham: 196
Cleese: 195

Canson said on 10/Apr/20
@Viper: footwear
cmillz said on 8/Apr/20
When has he ever given off a 6’7 impression though? Not sure what Danimal saw that made him think 6’7.
viper said on 8/Apr/20
Yep, I posted in 2008 how he gave off a really towering 6-6 impression
viper said on 8/Apr/20
I've been consistent

Really hard to imagine he's under 6-5
viper said on 8/Apr/20
Tim Robbins is definitely taller than Goldblum

If Robbins is only 6-4.5, he's a taller looking 6-4.5 than even Barkley.

Hard to see Robbins under 6-5
cmillz said on 7/Apr/20
Looking at old comments, it seems like a lot of people thought he was 6’6 back in the early days of this site.
Canson said on 7/Apr/20
@AlexV: I say

Robbins 6’4.5
Conan 6’3.5
cmillz said on 6/Apr/20
Peak Tim Robbins would have been noticeably taller than peak Jeff Goldblum. Not exactly sure by how much tho.
Dan Trojan said on 6/Apr/20
I'm not sure exactly how tall this guy is but he looks pretty tall in castle rock so i'm gonna say this is accurate
Alex V. said on 6/Apr/20
Hi ppl...

Conan has said that Robbins is taller and the last has answered, (I think), "Not with the hair", he's maybe one inch less than Tim.
IMO, Robbins is taller than Neeson, Goldblum, Fry, Vaughn, all in similar range and a little shorter than guys like Noonan, Stiles, Braun...

Canson said on 5/Apr/20
Robbins is not 6’6.5. He is probably a peak 194-195 range guy like he claimed before. Maybe 6’4 5/8 instead of 6’4.5 but 184guy is right he edges Conan
cmillz said on 5/Apr/20
I’d say nowadays he could be down to 6’4.5” though.
cmillz said on 5/Apr/20
He looks pretty damn tall in that video with Conan, but he does have some camera advantage of course. I’m of the belief that he probably was the full 6’5 in his younger days, but 6’6.5”? Come on...
184guy2 said on 4/Apr/20
He looks a lot taller than Conan , he had camera advantage all over tho ..
The listing is probably his minimum
Canson said on 3/Apr/20
@Cmillz: maybe with footwear that Stern wore like boots and Stern had wild hair
Soren said on 3/Apr/20
He's very tall; In his prime, I think he was 6'6.5, look here:
Click Here at 0:40 he towers over Conan
cmillz said on 2/Apr/20
A young Howard Stern looked a bit taller physically than Bo Burnham IMO.
Nik said on 28/Mar/20
The vast majority of people make him look very tall! He wouldn't lose his temper with Rob!
Canson said on 28/Mar/20
@Cmillz: I could but not by much. Howard has that thick hair
cmillz said on 28/Mar/20
I can’t see Bo Burnham being taller than a peak Howard Stern tbh.
185vietnamese said on 19/Mar/20
@Alex V
Tim and Howard are leaning. If Howard Stern stand a little taller, it should be like this.
Click Here
cmillz said on 16/Mar/20
I still think if peak Tim Robbins stood back to back with peak Vince Vaughn, Robbins would edge him out.
Jkiller said on 5/Mar/20
Very tall and lanky, I'd say he stands close to 6'5, just right under.
James B 172c, said on 21/Feb/20
Canson said on 20/Jan/20
His peak height was Around his claim of 6’4.5. I could buy 6’4 5/8 max. This listing is ok for lunchtime height. Maybe 1/8 less

Tim can look especially tall for a strong 6’4.5 guy since he has proportions.
Canson said on 20/Jan/20
His peak height was Around his claim of 6’4.5. I could buy 6’4 5/8 max. This listing is ok for lunchtime height. Maybe 1/8 less
Dream said on 20/Jan/20
@Alex V.

I also seem to recall, watching Bo enter the studio and the top of Jimmy’s head was barely reaching Bo’s chin too.

Also, Bo had adidas sneakers while Howard Stern is in boots.
Alex V. said on 18/Jan/20

Could be, Dream... but for me they seem to be, pretty much the same, 1 cm here, 1 cm there... Regards.

Dream said on 16/Jan/20
@Alex V.

Looking at them again, Bo looks the tallest, especially when he only had light sneakers on, that show.
cmillz said on 17/Jan/20
I just remember Tim Robbins looking significantly taller than Danny Aiello in Jacob’s Ladder, despite the fact that he was in his socks, while Aiello was wearing shoes, and thinking to myself that he had to be at least 6’5. Hard to imagine he was only 6’4.5” there, unless Aiello’s peak height is significantly overlisted (which is possible).
Dream said on 16/Jan/20
@Alex V.

Looking at them again, Bo looks the tallest, especially when he only had light sneakers on, that show.
Alex V. said on 12/Jan/20
Kimmel with...


Click Here


Click Here


Click Here


Click Here
Canson said on 10/Jan/20
@Cmillz: I’m thinking maybe 6’4 5/8 then 3/8 extreme low
cmillz said on 9/Jan/20
I’m leaning towards the 6’4.5” being an extreme low for him. He’s always seemed pretty close to 6’5 in his prime. Not sure what he is today tho.
Canson said on 6/Jan/20
@Dream and Cmillz: my guess is that Bo has at minimum 2cm on a peak Robbins. I agree more with Robbins’s 6’4.5 claim than the 6’5 claim. Bo is easily 6’5.25” minimum imho. Kobe 6’4.75 and MCW probably somewhere around my height. Best case maybe 6’4 3/8 worst maybe 6’4.25” being he got measured in the early morning like Dream said.
Dream said on 6/Jan/20
Can’t wait to hear moe say Tim Robbins is taller than Kobe. IMO!
Dream said on 4/Jan/20
Heck, 6'4.75" measured Kobe Bryant looks well taller than Tim Robbins, with Morgan Freeman.

Click Here
Click Here

Kobe has also downgraded himself to being 6'4.5" at times, without shoes. While i don't think he's that low, I doubt a 6'4.5" would look taller than a 6'5", evenly.
Dream said on 4/Jan/20

You'd be really surprised.

Bo, slouching, looks taller than Kobe Bryant, with Michael Carter Williams. MCW and Kobe Bryant are reportedly measured 6'4.75", without shoes. Yes, MCW was a combine measurement, but it's still a measurement regardless.

Click Here
Click Here

Bo didn't look much different from 6'8.5" Blake Griffin, with Pete Holmes.

Click Here
Click Here

Bo looks at least 6'5.5", if not close to 6'6", with Thomas F. Wilson. (Bare in mind, Rob has met Thomas F. Wilson, and confirmed, at least 6'2" range, in his late 50's.)

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Also, Top of their heads, Bo Burnham isn't much shorter than a young 6'8" Greg Davies, at around 1:14 seconds (mainly for clearer view). This is not considering that Greg has a bit more footwear than Bo, in this video. -- Click Here

For reference, by top of their heads, 6'5.75" Anthony Joshua, doesn't look taller, with a young Greg Davies, at 4:35 seconds, here. -- Click Here

Both, Anthony Joshua and Bo Burnham, are 'not' much shorter than 6'7.25" Richard Osman, with Greg Davies.

Click Here
Click Here

If anything, I'd argue Bo would have an inch on Tim Robbins. or 7/8ths of an inch, at least.
Dream said on 4/Jan/20

You'd be really surprised.

Bo, slouching, looks taller than Kobe Bryant, with Michael Carter Williams. MCW and Kobe Bryant are reportedly measured 6'4.75", without shoes. Yes, MCW was a combine measurement, but it's still a measurement regardless.

Click Here
Click Here

Bo didn't look much different from 6'8.5" Blake Griffin, with Pete Holmes.

Click Here
Click Here

Bo looks at least 6'5.5", if not close to 6'6", with Thomas F. Wilson. (Bare in mind, Rob has met Thomas F. Wilson, and confirmed, at least 6'2" range, in his late 50's.)

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Also, Top of their heads, Bo Burnham isn't much shorter than 6'8" Greg Davies, at around 1:14 seconds (mainly for clearer view). This is not considering that Greg has a bit more footwear than Bo, in this video. -- Click Here

For reference, by top of their heads, 6'5.75" Anthony Joshua, doesn't look taller, with Greg Davies, at 4:35 seconds, here. -- Click Here
cmillz said on 3/Jan/20
Peak Robbins wouldn’t look much shorter than Burnham imo. At most a half inch difference
Dream said on 1/Jan/20
With someone like Elsie Fisher, Tim Robbins looks well shorter than Bo Burnham, who's easily a strong 6'5".

Burnham is even slouching a lot, in many of the pictures, while Robbins is standing decent.
Dream said on 1/Jan/20
With Elsie Fisher, Tim Robbins looked shorter than Bo Burnham, who's easily a strong 6'5" guy.
Canson said on 31/Dec/19
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Dec/19
Danimal said on 17/Nov/19
Here he is recently with 6'1 3/4" Morgan Freeman: Click Here

Sorry, but that's more than 3". Tim was 6'7" in his prime and about 6'6" today

Bold statement

More like idiotic statement. One Rob won’t under list a guy 2-3” and 2 Tim claimed 6’4.5 and 6’5 in his prime and was shorter than Howard Stern. It’s funny how Danimal claims that you upgrade people when he’s doing just that here and with Charles Barkley who actually was measured
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Dec/19
Danimal said on 17/Nov/19
Here he is recently with 6'1 3/4" Morgan Freeman: Click Here

Sorry, but that's more than 3". Tim was 6'7" in his prime and about 6'6" today

Bold statement
Canson said on 30/Dec/19
viper said on 29/Dec/19
I just don't see much evidence for 6-7.

Even 6-6 is a stretch but he can give off a near impression of that a bit.

Danimal is usually fairly accurate.

I agree with some of Danimal’s estimates such as Michael Jordan, Rock and Will Smith but vehemently disagree with his estimates for Robbins Barkley and Conan. Robbins himself claimed 6’4.5. Maybe he was 6’4.75 but that’s still closer than him being 6’7 or 6’6. And with Conan since he “said he’s 6’4-6’4.5” which is unbelievable, he is accurate. Conan was never officially measured but Barkley was at 6’4 5/8 yet he is 6’5 1/2 according to him and downplays his height.
viper said on 29/Dec/19
I just don't see much evidence for 6-7.

Even 6-6 is a stretch but he can give off a near impression of that a bit.

Danimal is usually fairly accurate.
Canson said on 29/Dec/19
At best Stern strong 6’5 peak Robbins weak 6’5”

I’d say Robbins 194-195 and Stern 196-196.5 range
Alex V. said on 29/Dec/19
Hi, Tim has a larger head and Howard that immense hair, put them eye to eye and won't be any difference, IMO.

Regards, Happy New Year.
Canson said on 28/Dec/19
@Dream: Stern is def taller. At best Stern was maybe 6’5.25 or 3/8 peak height
Canson said on 28/Dec/19
@Dream: Rob’s listing isn’t bad for him. He’s likely 6’4.5 afternoon but I don’t rule out 6’4 5/8” so this could be his lunchtime or tea time listing if he falls just 1/8” more. Me personally, I think 6’5.25 to 3/8 out of bed 6’4.5 to 5/8” afternoon height and he looks to have shrunken today. His prime would be about the same as Michael Jordan’s
Dream said on 27/Dec/19
He looks shorter than Howard Stern.

Click Here

And people have said Howard Stern is a legit 6’5” guy, in person.
Jian Gedrick said on 3/Dec/19
Looks 6'5 next to Will Ferrell, Howard Stern, and James Cromwell
cmillz said on 30/Nov/19
I really do think he may have been the full 6’5 peak. 6’4.5 just seems too low, especially for a normal low. That would mean he’d be like 194cm flat an extreme low, which I honestly can’t see.
Canson said on 25/Nov/19
@Rob: he is disadvantaged but still clearly shorter than him. Robbins May really have been 6’4.5” peak but 6’4.5 for him is an afternoon height or something like 6’4 5/8 or 2/3” rounded down
cmillz said on 25/Nov/19
Lol, 6’7 is a joke. I can see how he may have given off a near 6’6 impression at times, but 6’7???

also, that’s not even a good picture for comparison. The most I can buy for him peak is 196cm
Canson said on 24/Nov/19
Here he is with an aged James Cromwell who Rob lists 6’5.5”. It’s possible Robbins has lose some height today but peak he could look 6’4.5 or up to 6’5 at times. Rob’s listing is decent maybe not a low

Click Here
Editor Rob
Robbins is at a little disadvantage there, I think Cromwell at times has looked anywhere in 6ft 5-6 range last few years, Robbins can still at times seem very near 6ft 5 with people, though I would expect he's also at an age that a fraction might be lost.
Canson said on 24/Nov/19
Danimal said on 17/Nov/19
Here he is recently with 6'1 3/4" Morgan Freeman: Click Here

Sorry, but that's more than 3". Tim was 6'7" in his prime and about 6'6" today.

Danimal, why would other actors say he’s 6’5? And why would he claim 6’4.5 and 6’5? Better question how is he shorter than a true 6’5 range guy like Howard Stern? Robbins is not as tall as a guy like Reid Carolin. More Joe Mangianello’s height
Canson said on 24/Nov/19
Danimal said on 17/Nov/19
Here he is recently with 6'1 3/4" Morgan Freeman: Click Here

Sorry, but that's more than 3". Tim was 6'7" in his prime and about 6'6" today.

Danimal, why would other actors say he’s 6’5? And why would he claim 6’4.5 and 6’5? Better question how is he shorter than a true 6’5 range guy like Howard Stern?
Danimal said on 17/Nov/19
Here he is recently with 6'1 3/4" Morgan Freeman: Click Here

Sorry, but that's more than 3". Tim was 6'7" in his prime and about 6'6" today.
Canson said on 17/Nov/19
@Cmillz: they’d be very close. Maybe identical at 6’4.5
Canson said on 17/Nov/19
@Cmillz: they’d be very close
cmillz said on 16/Nov/19
I think in his prime, he’d edge out Michael Jordan.
Canson said on 14/Nov/19
Judging by the pics of both guys they’re almost the same height.
Canson said on 14/Nov/19
viper said on 13/Nov/19
Viper652 said on 11/Oct/05
If anything, I figure Robbins truly is 6-5, and not 6-4.5. He looks it in pictures next to most people. I think he is taller then Vince Vaughn, who is more like 6-4 to 6-4.5 to me.

[Editor Rob: maybe he and hasselhoff got themselves measured with 'bad posture'...and so say 6ft 4]

You have to admit I've been consistent

Lol Viper you’re being a downgrader!!!!!

You guessed Robbins higher than I did actually. I have him 6’4.5 peak maybe 6’4 5/8”. Similar with Jordan. VV would prob be similar peak imho. Today VV May be my size 6’4.25
Canson said on 14/Nov/19
@Viper: he’s shorter than Howard Stern
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Nov/19
You were arguing 6ft5 for the Hoff in 2005?
Frank R said on 13/Nov/19
Tim Robbins was a solid 6'5" (peak). He's one of the numerous 'Top Gun' cast members who made Tom Cruise look tiny.
viper said on 13/Nov/19
Viper652 said on 11/Oct/05
If anything, I figure Robbins truly is 6-5, and not 6-4.5. He looks it in pictures next to most people. I think he is taller then Vince Vaughn, who is more like 6-4 to 6-4.5 to me.

[Editor Rob: maybe he and hasselhoff got themselves measured with 'bad posture'...and so say 6ft 4]

You have to admit I've been consistent
viper said on 13/Nov/19
Wow, I said this back in 2006

Viper652 said on 23/May/06
I would love to see Robbins and Vince Vaughn together in a picture. I bet Tim would be an inch taller.
viper said on 13/Nov/19
I don't know why Danimal ever thought he was 6-7.

6-6 I can see but not 6-7
Canson said on 12/Nov/19
@Viper: that could be his normal low. He looked close to an inch shorter than Stern.
viper said on 11/Nov/19
I think the 6-4.5 is an extreme low for him.
Yang (5 footer 8, 173) said on 7/Nov/19
His height is very similar to two twin actors from Property Brothers. Both are much taller than average men at least... doesnt seem like he has lost any heights from 2003 or so unlike many actors in his age.... He can even make Morgan Freeman look like waif when he stood next to him... 6ft 4 half and 6ft 4 3/4 range? Yes yes yes...
Alex V. said on 30/Oct/19
Hi everyone, can't see Tim shorter than Howard, same height for me... One picture doesn't mean accuracy.
Canson said on 27/Oct/19
@Cmillz: he can at times but he’s still shorter than Stern. I believe his 6’4.5 claim
cmillz said on 26/Oct/19
He looked a full 6’5 in Jacob’s Ladder IMO.
Canson said on 25/Oct/19
Weak 6’5”. Not as tall as Howard Stern
Importer said on 24/Oct/19
6’5” claim Click Here
Duffer 5ft 11 said on 19/Oct/19
What billionaireslayer said.
Every bit the 6'5" he's usually listed as.
Doubt he's lost nary a cm even today.
Way above average height.
Simply towers over everyone in every movie he's been in.
He gets the full 195cm from me.
Canson said on 17/Oct/19
@Junior: I would guess 194 is possible for him today
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 16/Oct/19
@Canson But i wouldn't argue anything under 6'4 1/2 for Tim. I doubt he lost anything yet.
Canson said on 9/Oct/19
@Junior: but a guy measuring 6’4.5 at a low will look closer to 6’5” being you guys who measure 6’4 maybe 2-3 hours out of bed and are 6’3.75 at a low. I hardly see him as 195 which would look 6’5” in reality. Kobe gives that impression but not him.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 8/Oct/19
@Canson Sometime a late morning measurement doesn't give off much different from evening/night. I can say is he could be 6'5 an early morning measurement and measure once in his low of the day 6'4 1/2 could also opposed to be 6'4 3/4 which he hardly look like a flat 6'4 1/2 guy. I admit sometimes he doesn't fit looking over 6'4 3/4 which i ever thought he look more closer to 6'5 that maybe on his good day he can even clock out 6'5 1/4. Normal day like 6'4 5/8 a low could be it. By the way Tim's son Jack Robbins look alot similar to Tim's height, they (father and son) could just be strong 6'4 1/2 guys not below it.
Canson said on 23/Aug/19
@Junior: he may very well have been 6’4.5 peak or rounded down from more like 6’4 5/8, and that may have been his low as opposed to a morning or late morning height. If I measured higher in the range say 6’4 5/8 or 6’4 2/3” I would likely round down and say that I’m 6’4 1/2”. Like in your case, if that were me I would claim 6’5 1/2 as opposed to 6’6” since you measure around 6’5.6 at a normal low. At those heights 6’4 5/8 or 2/3, I could still reach 6’4.5 if on my feet longer and 5/8 and under are the same in appearance as 1/2”. But At that stage he would probably look closer to 6’5” especially if others aren’t measuring the same way. He was at least 2cm shorter than Stern in his prime. A lot of people underestimate how a true 6’4.5 guy would actually look. I’ll give you an example in something Christian said before that he considers someone in the 1/4-5/8” to round up to half. So if we get a guy around my height they may claim half or have measured half. A 6’4 3/8-5/8” guy tho especially on the upper end of that would look more 6’5 or closer to 6’5 and they would’ve been 6’4.75 around lunchtime
Alex Vaz said on 20/Aug/19
Lola Kirke (5ft8in?!) and Jack Robbins

Click Here
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 6/Aug/19
6'5 could be Tim's peak and 6'4 1/2 claim was just a loose posture measurement. He still look 195cm now.
Alex Vaz said on 3/Aug/19
Robbins with flat shoes, is taller than D'Onofrio in cowboys boots by at least half an inch and the mugshot shows off 6ft5.5in for Tim.

My Guess:

Robbins 195.5cm
D'Onofrio 192cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Aug/19
Rob, how tall do you think his son Jack is?

He looks close enough to him recent photos and sometimes the same height! 6ft4 is my guess
Editor Rob
Yeah I doubt he's under 6ft 4 range, can seem close enough to his dad
Alex Vaz said on 27/Jul/19
Click Here
Canson said on 21/Jun/19
He’s always been what he claimed before 6’4.5. That’s probably a low for him though. Looks similar in size to Michael Jordan. Stern was likely on the stronger side of 6’5” in his prime like Rob lists him. There was prob 2cm difference between the two. Stern was Maybe a mm or two over 6’5.25. Today a solid 6’5 or a tiny hair over.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 7/May/19
@Dream I did believe Howard Stern was ever 6'6 or weak 6'6 and Tim maybe 6'5 peak and dip into 6'4.5" soon.
Shashank 6'4 1/8 said on 7/May/19
At his peak he might have been near weak 6'5 range. Now he might have lost a fraction. With freeman he only had 2 inches on him.I can see him no more than a strong 6'4 range(at worst solid 6'4). I can't go any lower than 6'4.
Canson said on 11/Apr/19
@Dream: he looked more like 6’4.5 with Stern like he claimed. Perhaps even 6’4.25 today. I think Stern is only 6’5 flat today
Dream said on 10/Apr/19

He didn’t really look over 6’5” with Howard Stern.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 7/Apr/19
Strange that he ever claim 6'4 1/2. Honestly he look 6'5-6'5 1/4 peak and worst 6'4 3/4 now didn't see 194cm coming now.
James Brett 172cm said on 30/Mar/19
I bet a peak Jeff Goldblum and peak Tim robbins would look similar in height if stood next too each other.
Dream said on 27/Mar/19
Rob, who would you give the edge to? Bo Svenson or Tim Robbins?
Editor Rob
I'd say Bo could have been taller.
billionaireslayer said on 23/Mar/19
6'5 Peak, I think he would edge out 90's Vince Vaughn
Canson said on 22/Mar/19
@Dream: agreed and for a guy his size to claim 6’5 is normal. A lot of even the most “legit” 6’5 guys probably end up around 195cm or somewhere in that weak 6’5 range at a low like 6’4.5 like Robbins. 6’4.5 is rare but a flat 6’5” at a low is even more so
Dream said on 20/Mar/19

Like you said before, 6’4.5” people are a lot more rarer than one would think. In the real world, people would say to them “I thought you were 6’6” ‘ when they are measured 6’4.5”.

Someone like Bo Burnham or Wladimir Klitscho could claim 6’7” and everyone would turn a blind eye, but Bo and Wlad claim 6’5”-6’6”, consistently.
Canson said on 19/Mar/19
6’5.25 out of bed 6’4.5 at a low peak. That’s why he claimed 6’4 1/2. His 6’5 is rounded up
billionaireslayer said on 19/Mar/19
6'4 n half maybe 6'5, Very tall guy has always come across tall in all his movies even next to other actors who are decent to tall height. I think he would edge out Vince Vaughn both in their primes next to one another.
SnerhagAip777 said on 26/Feb/19
Rob, if he stood next to Joe Manganiello, who would you bet on being the taller guy. Not taken possible height loss into accounts.

Also, any idea on Robbin's head size? It look as though his eye chin is as big as the eye head.
Editor Rob
Would be hard to tell them apart actually.
Andrea said on 15/Feb/19
That's my point, Tunman. I doubt Gunton has ever been as tall as he gets listed on here (6'1.5), and I struggle to even see the full 6'1 in that pic (unless he had already shrunk a bit by the time of the movie), especially if Tim wasn't even the full 6'5. But well, I should probably rewatch it, to have a better idea about the difference between them...
Same thing for Clancy Brown. Although I don't remember exactly how tall he looked, I certainly remember him looking noticeably shorter than Tim, and probably more than their listings suggest...
Tunman said on 8/Jan/19
In the cell scene I felt 3.5"was the max,but in your pic at least 4".Maybe Gunton was no more than 6'1?Anyways Clancy Brown was still way shorter than him.Ironically Brown was described as big by Freeman when he looked roughly the same.
Canson said on 6/Jan/19
@Andrea: he may have been a guy who measured like 6’4 5/8 or 2/3 at a low and rounded down. Half for someone like him though would be exactly like you said as the lowest he’d measure. Meaning likely along the lines of a weak 6’5” versus someone who’s strong 6’4 who is in the 1/4-1/2 saying half like I used to
Canson said on 6/Jan/19
@Andrea: he may have been a guy who measured like 6’4 5/8 or 2/3 at a low and rounded down. Half for someone like him though would be exactly like you said as the lowest he’d measure. Meaning likely along the lines of a weak 6’5” versus someone who is in the 1/4-1/2 saying half like I used to
Andrea said on 1/Jan/19
Tunman, are you sure he looked only 3-3.5 inches taller than Gunton in Shawshank? To be honest, I don't quite remember how tall he looked next to the rest of the cast as I saw that movie many years ago (when I probably didn't even have any interest or knowledge about height), but from this still, I would have said noticeably more than that: Click Here
Anyway, I agree with you. If he really got measured at 6'4.5 at one point (like his claim seems to suggest), that's certainly the absolute lowest he could have been at peak. Though overall I think that 6'4.75 is a decent shout as he generally looked very near 6'5. Maybe he measured somewhere between 6'4.5 and 6'5 and simply went with 6'4.5 once...
Canson said on 29/Dec/18
@Tunman: I think at his peak he was 6’4.5 afternoon height similar to Michael Jordan. Possible both were even inside .5-.6 but they appear more weak 6’5 guys as they may not be below the .5 mark st anytime unless an extreme low
berta said on 19/Dec/18
He looks mutch taller than morgan freeman in new photos together Click Here: Tim is standing with very loose posture and still looks in the 195 range of morgan freeman still is 187. I still argue peak of 6 foot 5 for tim andd maybe this height now. He never stands with good posture and still always looke in the 195 range.
Tunman said on 14/Dec/18
Certainly not under 6'4.5"anyways,he had somewhere between 3 and 3.5"on Bob Gunton in The Shawshank Redemption.Claiming 6'5 is also honest since he might lose near a full inch.
I wonder how on Mystic River he was chosen to play the role of a victim,actually double victim.To be fair,that film was great but it's not like a 5'8 like Penn could really dominate someone nearly 9"taller even psychologically.The scene with the Savage brothers taking him to the river was strange,they barely reached up to his shoulders.
Guru Guy said on 13/Dec/18
Hard to pinpoint his exact height, but he's over 6'0 sure! :P
Canson said on 12/Dec/18
I highly doubt he was a strong 6’5”. He claimed 6’4.5 and his 6’5 claim is a roundup. Stern doesn’t have that much on him honestly.

@Dream: yea I agree. He wasn’t much taller imho. I think you’re right it’s angled and maybe less than an inch difference
Canson said on 11/Dec/18
@Michael 5’10: only thing is him downgrading himself wouldn’t do any justice. Tom Selleck is the same. People thought he did too when he claimed 6’3.5. It’s likely that both guys measure that at a low and just decided to round up once they got their stardom. Not so much that they downgraded prior to it. A half inch is gonna get rounded up by most people anyway. So a 6’4.5 guy if he claims that will be told he’s 6’5 in Hollywood.
Canson said on 11/Dec/18
@Dream: I agree. Robbins claimed 6’4.5 previously. His 6’5” claim is likely just a roundup like most others do which is very reasonable. It’s more than likely that his claim was his low at his peak. That looks proper in pics as a guy who would measure 6’4.5 low would be 6’5+ out of bed. He’s got the long limbs of a guy who’s almost 6’5 like Michael jordan and Kobe. I have him exact with Jordan and Barkley and a little shorter than Kobe at his peak. Also same as Joe Mangianello. I believe his exact height to be around that with Stern and Martin Lawrence. As for Stern, He could just be one of those guys who gives off a taller impression than he is because he’s skinny and lanky. Maybe peak 6’5.25 but today I would believe closer to 6’5” like maybe 6’5 1/8 or 196cm flat perhaps or even just 6’5”. A lot of people aren’t aware of and can’t accept how tall that actually looks at a low or even if it’s just 1/8” or 1/6” over the mark. They assume a guy that size is 6’6-6’7” especially if proportionately built. The same way people would try to believe that a guy like Bo Burnham is 6’7” or Anyone else in that strong 6’5 range or weak 6’6” range here. Same with someone like Jordan or Kobe they assume 6’6”. The lying on behalf of others doesn’t help either. When someone my size says their real height it’s like “you’re only 6’4”? I would’ve thought 6’5 or 6’6 or they would’ve thought a full 6’6” when I measure Only a bit over 6’4”
Wadlow said on 11/Dec/18
Look guys the photo with stern is obviously not on even ground unless stern is like 6'9 and the woman 6'3. Prime Tim was a strong 6'5 guaranteed.
Dream(5'9.5") said on 8/Dec/18

Maybe it’s angled, but I cannot see Tim Robbins close to 6’5”, let alone over 6’5”.
Canson said on 4/Dec/18
@Rob: in that link it’s def not 1.5. I would say the way it’s angled it looks more than it should and we can’t see footwear
Canson said on 4/Dec/18
@Junior: I accounted for Stern having Camera advantage. I don’t see 1.5” if that. It’s probably a bit less than 1”. So 2cm perhaps. I remember Bobby3342 also said 1.5” but it’s because of the angle. Bobby is one who has met Stern and said he’s 6’5 as he claims. Stern looked 6’5 range with Magic and a solid 6’5 with Ryan Anderson and Eric Gordon as well. Imho Stern is peak as he is listed here give or take 1/8”. Maybe today he’s a solid 196 guy. Tim Robbins admitted he was 6’4.5 before and his 6’5 claim is just a roundup from there. Robbins would likely only hit 6’4.5 at a low. Today he still looks near that but maybe 6’4 3/8. Have to remember if he is wearing some dress shoes he would be over 197cm if he’s 194 range without them.
Michael, 5'10" 178 cm said on 3/Dec/18
Tim was definitely 6’5” at peak afternoon height. He looked like 3 inches taller than 6’2 1/4” listed Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption and 2 inches taller than Clancy Brown. He towerered over almost everybody in that movie. I could already tell from watching the beginning of the film that he was very tall. He gave off a taller impression than someone like 6’5” Vince Vaughn or weak 6’5” Christopher Lee in films. Robbins probably downgraded his height so he could get more roles, he does have the record of being the tallest leading actor. Tim was 6’5” minimum!
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 3/Dec/18
@Canson If you are proving this picture then Howard Stern will be like 6'6 1/4 because he was standing behind Tim and in other way you believe Stern is only legit 6'5 then Tim would be more like 6'3 1/2 let alone 6'4 1/2. But it's just a picture we can't see the lower bottom.
Editor Rob
Unfortunately the url's didn't work, but I believe this Link will
Canson said on 29/Nov/18
About a 2cm, maybe half inch difference with camera with Robbins and Stern. I’m f we are going off personal encounters, Bobby3342 and NY Bruin both claimed to have met Stern (like the poster who claims he met Robbins before). They both say Stern is a legit 6’5 now a days. Robbins doesn’t look more than 6’4.5 with him

Click Here
Canson said on 28/Nov/18
@Dream: I would say guys like Klitschko, Stern, Svenson, Burnham, Tiny Lister (peak) Hogan (peak) Rory McCann and others would likely edge both Robbins and Joe out. They all seem legit to strong 6’5” guys.
Canson said on 28/Nov/18
@Dream: Robbins is the same as Joe Mangianello imho. At least peak. If he’s lost height probably not more than maybe 1/4”. I agree with Rob on Mangianello that he may look a weak 6’5 around lunch (5 hours out of bed) Rob said he was somewhere in the 6’4.5-6’5 range so 6’4.5 looks accurate for him at his low. Robbins measured the same 6’4.5 and claimed it then claimed 6’5 before as well. I could see both listings being late morning measurements and both coming out around 6’4.5 imho. I won’t speak for the other part about respecting the other poster as he doesn’t respect anyone (evidenced previously unless you agree with him).
Alex V. said on 26/Nov/18
Click Here
Dream(5'9.5 said on 25/Nov/18
Rob, how likely is 6'4.875" for Tim Robbins?

I respect moe, but I can't see Robbins over 6'5" after seeing pictures of Tim and Howard.

Click Here

Or maybe, I'm just lying straight through my teeth.
Editor Rob
I think maybe Robbins once got 6ft 4.5, but probably he looked near 6ft 5 so 6ft 4.75 to 5 might be his range.
Canson said on 24/Nov/18
@Joe: he looked 6’5-6’5.5 with Magic. But Magic was 6’7 not 6’7.5. I think today like Dream says Bo edges him. Bo could give a 6’5.5 impression to be honest (at times). Stern looks a classic 6’5 today maybe peak 6’5.25-.5
joe### said on 18/Nov/18
Maybe you've seen him from far away
joe### said on 18/Nov/18
definitely stern look like a strong 6'5 with magic seemed between 6'5.25-6'5.5
Dream(5'9.5 said on 18/Nov/18
@Canson I actually think Bo would edge out Stern today. Stern didn't look any taller than Bo, if we're comparing them with Jimmy Kimmel.


Stern leaning with Jimmy Kimmel → Click Here

Bo Burnham leaning with Jimmy Kimmel → Click Here


Even those photos, let's also keep in mind that Kimmel (while he isn't the most reliable person) says Bo is 'literally a giant', in 4:19 seconds → Click Here

I don't think Kimmel ever described Howard Stern, Peyton Manning, or JJ Watt as such. (I'd have to look more if Kimmel described them as giants or very tall.)
Canson said on 15/Nov/18
@Joe: I think Bo Burnham May edge Stern today as well. I saw Burnham with Pete Holmes and he edged him even with less footwear. I could see Bo as a 6’5 and change guy today like he claims
joe### said on 12/Nov/18
thisismoe !!!
this seems impossible to me because howard stern look taller
Click Here
Click Here
Agent Orange said on 6/Nov/18
As mentioned on Stephen Fry's page Robbins edged him out in the 1994 film Pret-a-Porter. Peak 6'5. Today just under😎
thisismoe!!! said on 3/Nov/18
Saw him again last night at the Actor's Gang. They're having shows every Friday at 8 this month. Got to talk to him a bit. Still over 6'5
Canson said on 2/Nov/18
@Rob and James B: a guy that size could measure that in the morning even if they didn’t lose 3-4cm. If a guy is 6’5.5 out of bed and wakes up and throws even a pair of Jordan’s on he’s 200cm
Neelasish Sen Roy said on 30/Oct/18
He never looks solid 6'5". He looks same as Vince Vaughn who was not more than 6'4". He would be 6'4.5" at max not more than it. He would 6'4" or 6:4.5" at max Am I right,Rob?
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 14/Oct/18
It will be interesting to see Kobe Bryant standing next to Tim Robbins someday!
Canson said on 2/Oct/18
6’5” morning height 6’4.25 at a low today maybe 6’4.5 peak. Wears thick shoes like Stern does
Canson said on 2/Oct/18
6’5” morning height 6’4.25 at a low today maybe 6’4.5 peak
Jakob said on 23/Sep/18
Rob, how tall do you think his sob Jack is? He looks comfortably over 6ft but saw he was listed 194 and doubt that; he looks not as tall as his father.
Editor Rob
Yeah he might be that tall...certainly taller than brother Miles by a few inches.
Neelasish Sen Roy said on 31/Aug/18
Sir Christopher Lee and Tim Robbins have same height or both are shorter than 6'5" John Cleese,Rob?
Editor Rob
Both Cleese and Robbins have claimed the 6ft 4.5 mark...many would argue that they have rounded down.
Canson said on 10/Jul/18
Agree with poster below
Neelasish Sen Roy said on 15/Jun/18
In 1992 he said," I'm six foot four and a half and I have a temper." And in 2010 he said," I'm 6 foot 5" It that was a joke. I think his first words are true he is 6'4.5"
berta said on 15/Mar/18
i still think tim looked no shorter than vince vaughn when he was young. i believe tim was 6 foot 5 maybe still is i havent seen him in anything last 10 years. vince had a chanse of being fraction under 6 foot 5 i believe
James B 170.8cm said on 10/Mar/18
Rob this year might you give him a current and peak height?

6ft4.75 when he was younger and now aproaching 60 6'4.25-6'4.5.
Editor Rob
It's a sobering thought that many actors over next few years will end up with a peak and current...Tim I think has held onto his height fairly well, but it won't last forever.

The age of late 50's to 65 is when many men lose their first chunk of height. Some - like say Morgan Freeman - manage to make it to 65 without anything noticeable lost, but most will drop that first fraction.
Canson said on 13/Feb/18
@James B: I’d say morning 6’5”. Prob 6’5.25 maybe 6’5.25-.5 range or even .5 and loses an inch possibly but evening height can’t see a peak of above maybe 6’4.5 like he once claimed. Of course could be near 5/8 at that stage but 1/2” claim is fair for someone measuring 5/8 as well as it’d be closer to that than the full inch and still weak
James B 170.8cm said on 11/Feb/18
Wasnt that much taller than 6'3 clancy brown in shawshank
Canson said on 9/Feb/18
6’4.5 peak but that’s a low for him as well
Jtm said on 8/Feb/18
Then you could argue freeman was 6'1 if that was the case.
James B 170.8cm said on 7/Feb/18
Rob i think 6'4 range was defnintly arguable in the shawshank redemption.
Editor Rob
Upper 6ft 4 range I think looked believable. 6ft 4.5 was probably the lowest he ever measured.
Jtm said on 30/Jan/18
Matthau was about 6'2 peak and 6'0-6'1 in his 70s.
Dylan said on 6/Jan/18
Rob, do you think being this tall in height can be a disadvantage for a actor?
Editor Rob: I've certainly read several occasions in which actors have commented about being 'too tall'.

Certain heights open up certain roles. Being tall can be a disadvantage, but also an will win roles because of height, but you won't be considered for some roles you'd like because of height.

Nathan Wood said on 20/Dec/17
Hi from Australia,Rob, who do you think would be tallest at peak, out of, Vince Vaughn, Jeremy Clarkson, and, Tim Robbins?
Editor Rob: all could be argued to be 6ft 5 guys, I think I've seen about 3 different Vaughn movies in the last month. I think if you got all those guys at their peak, you'd be finding not that much between them.
Canson said on 10/Nov/17
6’5.25-.5 peak out of bed
6’4.5 up to .75 before

Today solid 194cm
Ricky said on 9/Nov/17
Peak height was 6'5" for sure.
Canson said on 8/Nov/17
If the man claimed 6’4.5 he likely measures that at some point in the day presumably at his low in his prime. It’s more than likely that it’s his low on the normal day and that he’s 6’5” plus out of bed. Face it a lot of guys here are overlisted and when a guy built like he is (a bit Big in the body too) is next to someone 3” shorter and is slightly favored he is going to look taller than that person.
Alex V. said on 1/Nov/17
With Kevin Nealon

Click Here
Canson said on 30/Oct/17
He never looked 6’6” in Nothing to Lose. I’d say next to Martin Lawrence the difference wasn’t that much different from Tommy Ford and Lawrence on his show. I believe 6’4.5 peak as an evening height meaning he could most likely be 6’5.25 out of bed
jack12 said on 30/Oct/17
Tim should be 6ft5 at least if not more, anything under just seems crazy.
Frty said on 29/Oct/17
Rob, do you think Tim could or underestimated his height like other tall actors? In films like nothing to lose and Shawshank (which was a very tall cast) he seems more 6'6. He looks much taller than other 6'5 actors.
Editor Rob: you could understand if he was 6ft 5 and said 6ft 4.5, but 6ft 6 I couldn't see for him.
Canson said on 18/Oct/17
@Junior: nothing significant but losing .1” isn’t hard to believe. I agree with you 6’4.5 at his lowest peak could be 6’4 3/8 today or 6’4.25 that’s not much loss
Junior said on 16/Oct/17
I don't see Tim losing height yet. He maybe 6'4.5" at lowest and still wakes up over 6'5, while standing next to 6'2 Benicio Del Toro look to clear 6'5 all the time, i wonder Benicio had already lost a cm maybe 187cm today.
Canson said on 18/Sep/17

Out of bed 196-196.5
Before bed 194-194.5


193-194 at his lowest
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Sep/17
I think he's still a solid 6ft4½ today at worst. It really would be no harm giving him 6ft5 peak
James B said on 20/Aug/17
Do you think 3-4cm is a lot for a 6'4.75 man?
James B said on 16/Aug/17
Rob could a 6'4.75 guy measure 200m with shoes on in the morning?
Editor Rob: if they shrank 3-4cm, yes
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Aug/17
I wonder if he's really low-balled it in the past and claimed 6ft4. That would make proper buffoons out of the 6ft2 guys who claim it...
Junior said on 15/Aug/17
6'4.5 might be Tim's real height and 6'5 claim was a hollywood style which everyone claim a little higher.
James B said on 14/Aug/17
I used to have a friend who is 5ft6 and he claimed "5ft10". He's not exactley downplaying his height is he? LOL
Canson said on 12/Aug/17
@Rampage: I actually haven't seen too many Guys in person truly downplay their height. Maybe in my life enough to count only on one hand but that's people who actually say that they do as I've met two 6'6 guys at different times that claim 6'5". One of which claimed he's 6'5.5 and rounds down but I stood next to him in flats and he had on just Chuck Taylors and he still had me by about 2". He's a full 6'6 at worst. Then another guy who is a full 6'6" and admitted and looked it claimed 6'5" as he hated his height. But Your definition there is the correct one when someone claims a whole inch less or two inches less than what they actually are. I see others here use downplay to refer to someone who rounds down but I disagree with that as a 6'5.75 guy could claim 6'5 if he wanted to or a 6'5.5 guy could claim 6'5 if they wanted.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Aug/17
I doubt a 6ft6 guy would get away with downplaying his height by 2in...
Canson said on 28/Jul/17
@Bobby: my guess is 6-4.5 peak too. And 6'4 today is possible. I bet stern may have an inch tho after seeing pics not sure on 6'3.75 but maybe he's got poor posture with him
Agreco4l said on 27/Jul/17
Always looked really really tall, looks every bit of 6'5" to me.
bobbyh3342 said on 27/Jul/17
im sorry guys but your not even close with robbins, he is not the same size as MJ or Barkley or KOBE robbins is 6 3.75 straight 6'5 in shoes but not a barefoot 6'5. this guy claims 6 4.5 in his prime and then when hes an old man decides to claim 6'5.just look at his pics with howard stern
Canson said on 24/Jul/17
Out of bed 196-196.5 peak
Before bed 194-194.5 peak
Canson said on 24/Jul/17
@Berta: too close to call.
berta said on 23/Jul/17
to me this guy at peak looked taller than vince vaughn and joe manganiello
Canson said on 6/Jul/17
@SJH: I think peak Robbins could be 6'4,5.
S.J.H said on 5/Jul/17
6'4.5 maybe what he get measure at the doctor office for his medical. 6'4.25 lowest at night not a surprise just like joe manganiello
Alex V. said on 3/Jul/17
Tim and his 6'4,5"son, Jack.

Click Here
Canson said on 13/Jun/17
Dane said it well. He didn't tower in the movie and 6'5" towers almost anyone noticeably if it's a proper 6'5". Don't forget a 5'8 guy could be 5'7.75 or 5'7.5 even the former would make Tim Robbins appear 6'5 as that half inch could go in either persons favor. He also claimed 6'4.5 which is closer to the truth. He isn't as tall as Howard stern is and stern is maybe 6'5.25 peak 6'5 solid today
Adam said on 10/Jun/17
Jesus Christ I didn't realise he was this big, must be why he doesn't get starring roles, apart from Shawshank
jervis said on 5/Jun/17
He looked a foot taller than 5ft8 ish Paul Newman in the hudsucker proxy,an easy 6ft5.9 inch difference is clear or maybe a bit more.
Canson said on 3/Jun/17
His claim of 6'4 1/2 looks more accurate. People have no idea how tall that actually is in real life. Bobby3342 said it best 6'4.5 barefoot will get you guessed 6'6" all day. I know being that height barefoot
BlueChord said on 28/May/17
I think he was solid 195cm in his prime and 193-194cm now :)
jervis said on 28/May/17
In Bob Roberts he has 4 inches on Alan Rickman,who was 6ft1.
jervis said on 27/May/17
He was a clear 3 inches taller than 6ft2 to 6ft2.5 Morgan Freeman, making him 6ft5 inches tall.
MJKoP said on 22/May/17
LOL, Danimal thinks Robbins is 6'7", but Tom Cruise is under 5'7". Watch War of the think there is more than a full FOOT difference of height between them is insane. I'm sure if he replies to this he'll go with the generic lifts, boxes, camera angles, ditches, levitation, or whatever other tired excuse. ;D
dane said on 15/May/17
im not disputing his height, but he sure dont look 6'5, he didnt really tower over anyone in shawshank, and 6'5 is way above average height.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.