How tall is Kevin Costner

Kevin Costner's Height

6ft 1 (185.4 cm)

American actor best known for starring in movies like The Untouchables, Dances with Wolves, Field of Dreams, The Bodyguard, No Way Out, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, Tin Cup, Mr. Brooks, Man of Steel and Waterworld. He has claimed to be 6ft 1 inches.

How tall is Kevin Costner
Photos by PR Photos
When I was in high school, I was 5-foot-4. My mother promised me I would grow. By the time I was in my second year at California State University in Fullerton, I was 6-foot-1.
- The Spectator, 2001
The fact that I was 5ft 2 as a sophomore didn't help. I'm 6ft 1 now but still relate to those feelings. I didn't date in high school and didn't get my growth until college. I never got over being short.

You May Be Interested

Height of Harrison Ford
Harrison Ford
5ft 11 (180 cm)
Height of Mel Gibson
Mel Gibson
5ft 9 (175 cm)
Height of Sean Connery
Sean Connery
6ft 2 (188 cm)
Height of Dennis Quaid
Dennis Quaid
5ft 11 ¼ (181 cm)

Add a Comment949 comments

Average Guess (91 Votes)
6ft 0.77in (184.8cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Aug/19
CDS: Jones claimed 6ft2 aswell. Costner next to Liotta looked bare minimum 6ft1. This is how I see both of them at their peaks

Costner - 6ft1⅛(185.7cm)

James Earl Jones - 6ft1⅝(187cm)


I asked Rob about Jones’s peak and he thinks is the lowest he could’ve been 6ft1½ and quite possibly 6ft1¾. The full 6ft2 is probably pushing it though
CDS said on 9/Aug/19
@rampage: 6'1.75" for Jones peak? Even if he was that height, yes, by "field of dreams", from his age and weight he was no more than 6'1". And this site has him at a peak of 6'1.5" which I think is generous considering he himself claimed only 6'1". That's why I tend to think he was 6'1" barefoot, 6'2", in shoes, end of day height. And Kevin just a tad under that, but like I said, ever so barely...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Aug/19
@CDS: I think JEJ was arguably 6ft1¾ peak but could he have lost a little by Field of Dreams? He was almost 60 and quite heavy


I think Costner prime was a solid to strong 6ft1 (187.5-188cm out of bed, 185.5-186cm before bed)
CDS said on 5/Aug/19
@Rampage: Also in "Field of dreams", I thought 6'1" James earl Jones had the slight edge over Kevin? Barely anything, like no more than a half inch at best.
CDS said on 5/Aug/19
@Rampage: Did Kevin edge out Cole Houser on tv's "Yellowstone"? I thought they looked about dead even, with some shots even of Houser edging him out??
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Aug/19
Looked 6ft1½ in Field of Dreams and Bull Durham. I’m settling on 185.5-186cm peak. If you watch Yellowstone you’ll see that he’s easily taller than Gil Birmingham (5ft11½ guy that claims 6ft2), edges out Cole Hauser (6ft0½) and only a little shorter than Dan Huston (6ft1½-2). If anything he may still about 6ft1...not much under anyway
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 1/Aug/19
5'11-6'0.25 is ridiculous. He is 185cm peak and 184cm now at worst.
berta said on 23/Jul/19
he was never under 6 foot 1. he mde 182 cm ray liotta seem alot shorter than him. could look like a 186-87 guy beside 182 guy. in his young days he always looked 186 to me. but lets say 185-86. today i think he have lost a little. maybe just posture but he only look 185 today.
CDS said on 11/Jul/19
I would not go as low as 5'11.5" now, but its not impossible. I would actually say, peak 6'0.25" to 6'0.75", and now from 6'0" to 6'0.5".
RP said on 28/Jun/19
Peak: 6’0.75”
Current: 5’11.5”
On his new television series Yellowstone... it’s noticeably obvious that now in his mid-60s his body has settled and compressed some .
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/19
I can’t see a young Costner measuring under 6ft1
CDS said on 19/Jun/19
I thought I'd point out, in a recent interview, Costner said, "I'm a six foot white guy".
Shane minton said on 17/Jun/19
Exact same height as Chris pine in jack ryan
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 12/Jun/19
Click Here This picture look 3cm shorter than Ashton Kucther.
179cm guy said on 30/May/19
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover I think that those pictures of Murray and Costner are more indicative of Costner being a fraction under 6'1 than being Murray being a fraction over it. 6'0.75 and 6'1 are what I'd personally give Costner and Murray respectively.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/May/19
Berta, or Costner 186cm and Murray 186.5cm
berta said on 20/May/19
Yeah Murray was probably the taller one. Costner 185,5 ish guy and Murray legit 186
RichardSpain said on 3/May/19
A strong 183cm nowadays
And 185 cm young

This guy was the classic 185 cm barefoot
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Apr/19
I’d give Murray the edge over Costner peak. But then could he actually have been 6ft1½? A lot ot strong evidence to support that still
Mister lennon said on 25/Apr/19
Both bill and kevin were solid 6'1 peak. Now, i would say that murray could be closer to 185 than kevin. And bill is 5 years older.
CDS said on 23/Apr/19
@anonymous: was recently watching the Netflix film, the highwaymen, and comparing the difference between Kevin and woody harrelson in that film, vs the difference between bill Murray and woody in the film, kingpin, there was no comparison. While Kevin had only a modest edge over woody (2-2.5 inches?), in "kingpin", Bill completely dwarfed him (3.5-4"). Now the question is, has Kevin lost any height since his peak? I didn't think so before, but now really starting to think its possible, although I'd say no more than a 0.25" or so.
viper said on 22/Apr/19
Bill Murray easily 6-1.

Costner is 6-0
'Annonymous' said on 22/Apr/19
Rob, who in your opinion would be able to measure taller, Costner or Bill Murray in their prime? And which of them you think could be taller today?
Editor Rob
I feel Murray has the greater chance of peak being 186 than Costner.
CDS said on 30/Mar/19
Watching the Netflix original, the highwaymen, with Kevin and 5'9.5" woody harrelson. For what its worth, if I had no idea how tall Kevin was, I would say next to woody, consistently throughout this film, he appears to be about 6' even, no more, no less. Both have similar footwear, and posture throughout the film. Good movie btw...
berta said on 23/Mar/19
a think you are very close, rampage with that estimate. he is still a fraction taller than a guy like chris pine.( atleast couple years ago) Not a legit 186 guy peak but taller than 185 flat guys. Dis will sound ridiculous but i think on average if he was measured a couple times 4 in the afternoon at peak, then he would be about 185,6. And 186 just before lunch
Dhouser said on 13/Jan/19
Still a pretty tall guy.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jan/19
Peak: 185.9cm (187.8cm out of bed)
Today: 184.7cm (186.6cm out of bed)
GRIT said on 5/Jan/19
Legit 6'1" peak
Love bananas said on 26/Dec/18
185
Love bananas said on 26/Dec/18
185 no questions
viper said on 20/Dec/18
I agree 6-0 max
Bradley said on 19/Dec/18
6-1 is incorrect. Never over 6 foot..weak at that.
Mister lennon said on 18/Dec/18
Well. 185 peak its possible too for costner
Mister lennon said on 16/Dec/18
I think 186 peak and 184 today.
berta said on 14/Dec/18
i have always though kostner was about 186 at peak but it seems like poeple think he was barely 185 peak.Maybe thats right. But i just cant imagine him being same height as harrison ford. I truly beieve him to be 2 cm taller than ford in the 70s-80s
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Dec/18
Dream, I think that mark could be spot on if not the full 186cm.. I respectfully do not fully agree with Rob’s assessment (not disagree).

This listing is perfect for his peak. But from what I’ve seen of Costner, 6ft1 and change looks more arguable than a little under but nowadays I do think he’s a little under this mark
CDS said on 11/Dec/18
The first image of Kevin and woody harrelson was just posted from the upcoming film, the highwaymen. I think its more relevant on Kevin's page than woody s since woody s 5'9.5" listing seems to be less debatable. It looks to me to be no more than from 2 to 2.5 inches difference, less than to be expected.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 25/Oct/18
Peak 6'1. 12 years back 6'0.75" and now 6'0.5" nothing more.
CDS said on 23/Oct/18
And I'd like to ask jack me off (ah I see the name now?). What kind of posture he typically has, and at the gala, did Kevin have his usual slouchy posture?
Dream(5'9.5 said on 22/Oct/18
Rob, how likely is 6'1 1/8ths" at times?
Editor Rob
Earlier in the day I'm sure he could have hit that, but I don't think from everything I've seen over the years that Costner would be 6ft 1 and change range.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 21/Oct/18
He can't have lost a full inch yet. Jack Meoff might have advantage ground on Costner on the Gala. 5'11 now is insane. Near 6'1 peak is believable and 6'0.5" now.
Mister lennon said on 20/Oct/18
Less than 6'1 at peak is highly unlikely.
Agent Orange said on 20/Oct/18
Held up well against a peak Morgan Freeman in Robin Hood Prince of Thieves. Peak 186 cm. Today still 185 cm.
CDS said on 19/Oct/18
@rampage,, I thought Chris pine actually edged Kevin out by a tad, in the film, "jack Ryan: shadow recruit", as well as 6'1" Dennis Leary, in the film, "draft day", released the same year. I'd say both men edged him out, not by a full inch, but maybe a quarter to half inch,, Leary more so. And in "night shift", you could argue he had more 3.5 inches on Keaton, once Keaton stands up to full posture. I went back and watched that movie again recently, and Keaton has no more than 2-3 inches over 5'6" Henry Winkler, so I'd say he's somewhere between 5'8" and 5'9". So that actually goes right along with the poster below s comments. Again, to clarify, I don't see Kevin that low, just bad posture. Not a full barefoot, end of day 6'1" like bill Murray or Daniel day-Lewis though.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Oct/18
During that brief appearance he makes in Night Shift he tops Michael Keaton by a good 4in at least. Could pass for a 6ft2 guy.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Oct/18
5ft11 is a joke. Edged out both Henry Cavill and Chris Pine just a few a years ago
viper said on 6/Oct/18
Agree with Jack. 6-0 max peak
CDS said on 5/Oct/18
@jack meoff,,, wow, is that right? That goes against about every comment on here!?? I thought about my observances in my comments below about tv's "Yellowstone", and if Luke grimes is 5'11" in shoes, and Wes Bentley did have on flats vs Kevin's cowboy boots, that would actually match up pretty close?? I'm still not convinced he's that low. Did he have his usual really bad posture?? I honestly think that's how a lot of 5'10" and 5'11" guys often end up looking pretty close to him in the movies...
Jack Meoff said on 1/Oct/18
Peak 6’0”. Now he’s 5’11”. Stood next to him at a gala event. I’m 5’10”, and he was about an inch taller than me.
MAD SAM said on 10/Aug/18
Easy peak height of over 6’1” at 186 cm, still pulls off 6’1” at 184.5-185 cm
CDS said on 3/Aug/18
Been watching the new paramount tv series, Yellowstone, good show btw, a kinda modern day "Dallas"!?? 😂 but on that show Kevin appears about a good inch taller than his 5'11" costar, Luke grimes, who may have better posture. And Kevin looks about 2-2.5 inches taller than 5'10" Wes Bentley, who is wearing flats.Kevin and Luke both have cowboy boots on most if the time. I didn't think so before, but now really am wondering, with Kevin being in his 60s now, if he's lost a little height? Certainly nothing like Harrison Ford or Clint Eastwood. Maybe about a quarter to half inch?
Gracian said on 1/Aug/18
Rob, I think a peak height of 186 cm can really be argued for him. Here are some examples:
Next to Liam Neeson in 2005: Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
In "Bull Durham" Costner did not look like nearly four inches shorter than Tim Robbins: Click Here
Click Here
In "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves" he did not look much shorter than Morgan Freeman: Click Here
He looked taller than Harrison Ford: Click Here
In this photo session, Costner looks taller than Gene Hackman: Click Here
Click Here
Many people in the comments agree that 186 looks fine for him when he was younger and today he could lose half an inch. Rob, can you see peak height 6'1.25" as possible for Kevin?
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 2/Jul/18
Click Here Sample frame of my legit 185cm friend who measure it at night and some people thought he was 6'2. I think he look abit taller frame than a current Costner look.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jun/18
Nowadays I reckon he’s 6ft0½-6ft0⅝
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 28/Jun/18
Kutcher maybe 6'2 1/4 and Costner 6'0 3/4 from a decades ago.
RP said on 24/Jun/18
Peak 6’1” & current 6’0” to 6’0.25” IMO
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/May/18
Kutcher is comfortably over 6ft2.
Canson said on 9/May/18
@psychedelic: it can begin in at 30 but usually mid 30s and only at a rate of about .1 every decade
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 8/May/18
Costner height have been over estimated for many years. At most a peak 6'1 and that wasn't last long that i have see him look 1.5" shorter than Ashton Kutcher who can never be over 6'2 standing next to 6'6-6'6.25" Carmelo Anthony who have a 1/3 less footwear. I believe Costner have already lost height in his 50s was about 6'0.5" now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/18
The scenes with Liotta in Field of Dreams do back 186cm range for Costner though
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/18
I think 6ft1⅛ could be spot on for his peak and nowadays 6ft0⅝ at worst.
berta said on 26/Apr/18
most guys here seems to think just under 185 peak .hmmm i can never believe anything under 185-185,5. i still go with barely 186 peak. i mean 184,5 chris pine was fraction shorter than kevin couple years ago. with perfect posture and kevin with his bad posture as usuall.
Scoobydoo said on 23/Apr/18
well in my opinion Kevin never was taller than 185/ 186 cm in peak, and nowadays he seems 6 foot not more.
Sandy Cowell said on 19/Apr/18
Six feet and an inch tall is somewhat hard to swallow in the film I'm chewing over whether to see out! Kevin was just walking rather like Hannibal Lector just now, but then I noticed that, being a severely disturbed prisoner, his feet are chained, so making him appear much, much shorter! Now who feels like a silly girl? Moi!

The film is called, quite simply, 'Criminal' and it boasts a pretty steller cast, including Gary Oldman! For that reason alone, I am going to stick with it! I might buy it if I think it's good enough!
They are doing something along the lines of brain switching, hardly a subject that's new to the silver screen though, is it?

Oh, dear! Kevin is showing his prowess now, beating a fairly large specimen of manhood to a pulp! What a nasty piece of work, but it shows that he's OUT of those chains, fully mobile and fighting fit!

I was going to opt for just over 6ft, but he looks as fit and well now that the film is fully underway as he did in his 'Dances With Wolves' days.... only he's not as nice!

Kev can have 6ft0.75!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Apr/18
Pulled off 6ft2 in Bull Durham if Robbins was 6ft5
176cm guy said on 26/Mar/18
Damn, if i have the same growth spurt as him in my sophomore year. I would be about 6'8" by now, or 6'9" to be more technical with proportions. Too bad, i only grew about half an inch compared to now. I don't mind being average, but i kind of want to be more in the 5'10" area. Oh well, i'm close enough anyways.
CDS said on 19/Mar/18
Per the snow white comment...Kevin and his future wife (his first one) actually played Prince charming and snow white in a Disneyland parade float...
Editor Rob said on 12/Mar/18
One of his frat brothers mentioned "[Kevin] was a skinny little runt, just over Six Feet and weighed about 150 pounds....he was crazy about 'Snow White'"
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Feb/18
Looked 186-187cm zone w/h Liotta.

Not under 6ft1 peak. I like berta's estimates
Dmeyer said on 13/Feb/18
Lets not forget 6'1 is 185,4cm si its easy to apear 186cm AT that height , but he is one of those guys who is 185,4cm AT night
berta said on 12/Feb/18
peak 6 foot 1 1/8- 1/4. could look steong 186 range sometimes but to be safe a frqction over 6 foot 1. today 6 foot 3/4 - 7/8
Carlos172 said on 9/Feb/18
I'd always thought he looked taller than 6'-1", when he was younger, closer to 6'-2"! Now, maybe closer to 6'-1", but not below.
CDS said on 7/Feb/18
I wasn't quite sure which thread to post in. This is a great pic of several 90's stars taken at the 1994 "Showest" convention. It's a great matchup of the biggest stars of the time height-wise, and as you can see with Kevin, he looks a tad shorter than 6'1" Warren Beatty, and barely taller than 5'9" Mel Gibson and 5'8" Tom Cruise. Maybe just a tad taller than 5'11.5" Dennis Quaid. Now if this doesn't prove the dude is not a solid 6'1" barefoot..?? Going along with what I claimed earlier -- more in the 6'0.25"-6'0.5" range...

Click Here
Junior Hernandez said on 2/Feb/18
I don't think Costner were ever over 185cm and probably 6'0.5" current status.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jan/18
Rob, how about this for a 63rd birthday present?



"Kevin Costner's height: 6ft 0⅝in (184.5cm)"
"Peak height was 6ft 1⅛in (185.7cm)"


I think he'd appreciate it
Mark said on 12/Jan/18
Costner is 6'0.5".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jan/18
Costner was still looking this mark just a few years ago so I think if he's lost anything it can't be more than a fraction.

That's why I think he went fro a strong 6ft1 to a weak 6ft1
Paul NS (6ft0.5) said on 8/Jan/18
I'm sorry if my comment seemed overly harsh. But to me Costner genuinely did look a fraction above 6ft1 at his peak. Nothing to suggest that he was a fraction over 6ft1 in his 20s and then lost it.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 7/Jan/18
That’s okay 👌🏻 I am very out of it. I’ve suffered anxiety/depression for years and don’t remember what it’s like to be normal. Now let’s bring the topic back to height.
Paul NS (6ft0.5) said on 6/Jan/18
Don't take my comment to mean I don't think Costner has shrunk though, he's definitely a bit shy of 6ft 1 today. It's just not plausible he notably varied in height from his 20s to 30s
Paul NS (6ft0.5) said on 6/Jan/18
Height loss may begin at 30, but you almost certainly wouldn't lose anything noticeable. If you think people are naturally losing over 1/4 at 30 you're out of it.
Editor Rob: for a man like Kevin, I would say he made it to his 50's without any noticeable loss.
It's when you get into late 50's, early 60's, that first fraction might be lost for many men.

It's certainly rare for a man in his 30's to lose height. It can happen, though nearly always because of injuries to discs, bad accidents or medical conditions.
No.One said on 5/Jan/18
Rob has he dropped some height? He is pretty old now
Editor Rob: 1/4 inch is likely, though I like to think giving peak/current when 1/2 or 3/4 is lost
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 28/Dec/17
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Dec/17
Psychedelic height loss does NOT start at 30
*********^^
🍀, sorry man, ask @sumdude and @canson.
Gracjan said on 25/Dec/17
Full agreement to give Kevin a peak height of 6'1.25" and the current height of 6'0.75"! I will present some good arguments to the fact that 186 cm will probably be the best peak height for Kevin:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Costner really looks only a little shorter than Morgan Freeman and Sean Connery! Besides, in one photo with Harrison Ford it looks much higher, despite the fact that Ford has thicker hair! Kevin with Liam Neeson also see more than a flat 6'1"!
Gracjan said on 25/Dec/17
Full agreement to give Kevin a peak height of 6'1.25" and the current height of 6'0.75"! I will present some good arguments to the fact that 186 cm will probably be the best peak height for Kevin:
Click Here=_
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Costner really looks only a little shorter than Morgan Freeman and Sean Connery! Besides, in one photo with Harrison Ford it looks much higher, despite the fact that Ford has thicker hair! Kevin with Liam Neeson also see more than a flat 6'1"!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Dec/17
Psychedelic height loss does NOT start at 30
Jann said on 22/Dec/17
6'3" 2" taller then obama
Richard said on 21/Dec/17
He never looked 6'2". 6'1" at most.

He did make one film when he was about 24.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 19/Dec/17
dont forget, height loss starts at 30(read the article on here: Click Here )
kevin never made a film in his 20's, so 186.0 (6'1.25") is likely.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 17/Dec/17
he also edged ray liotta by 4-5 cm in that 1989 movie.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 17/Dec/17
edged scott glenn(stick from daredevil) by 4-5 cm: Click Here
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 17/Dec/17
pulled off 186 here: Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Dec/17
6ft2 first thing is believable for a 30 year old Costner and 6ft1 at his absolute low...same range as Gatiss or Luke Mitchell
Slim 186 said on 12/Dec/17
Rob, what could physical prime kevin costner clear first thing in the morning?

for me hes 188 mornings to 186 evenings.
Editor Rob: I couldn't see him that tall in the 80's, but still, shrinking a full inch is very possible so he might have brushed near 6ft 2 on a good day.

Dreampuffe(5'9.5") said on 11/Dec/17
Now this ‘Kevin’ (Kevin Costner) is much more cooler than f#@!ing Spacey

Costner: 186 cm at peak. He may have rubbish posture, but he often looked 186 cm. He doesn’t need to standing on his tip toes to be tall.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Dec/17
Exactly, Slim and Connery was probably still 6ft2 in the late 80's
Slim 186 said on 5/Dec/17
Not that much shorter than Connery.
James said on 28/Nov/17
Rickman was made to look shorter in "Robin Hood".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Nov/17
We need to remember, this guys posture has always been rubbish so yeah he might look more 6ft but on the rare occasions that he has stood to his full height he's looked this bare minimum. An 80's Costner would be similar someone like Gerard Butler (also a desperate slouch…
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Nov/17
He edged out Alan Rickman in Robin Hood
berta said on 23/Nov/17
THE AVERAGE GUESS IS EVIDENCE TGHAT MOST PEOPLE THINK HE NEEDS A PEAK HEIHGT. 186 peak and 184,8 now. he was barely shorter than morrgan Freeman in robin hood
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Nov/17
Mister Lennon, agreed. He looks on the weaker side of 6ft1 now...
Anonymous said on 18/Nov/17
If he was 186cm in his prime then 188cm out of bed is very likely...
Mister lennon said on 15/Nov/17
Today, i think that costner is in the 184-185 range and ford in the 179-180 range.
Slim 185 said on 14/Nov/17
I’d 186 him tbh

He’d easily clear 188 CM range in the mornings during glory days.

Imho, tall doesn’t start at 5’11” or 6’, it’s starts at 6’1”.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Nov/17
183cm today is too low for Costner, probably still close to 6ft1 like 184/185cm. Ford looks 5ft11 tops now and sometimes less
Richardspain said on 10/Nov/17
Kevin Costner was a bit taller than harrison ford. Only a bit taller.

Harrison Ford 184 cm in peak,barefoot
Kevin between 185-186cm in his peak and barefoot too.

Anyway i see still a strong 183cm to kevin costner and a full 180cm /181 cm to Harrison Ford nowadays.
James said on 10/Nov/17
Costner looked exactly six foot when he was a star 25 years ago. He's about 5'11.5" today.
berta said on 6/Nov/17
peak 6´1.25 today 6,75
Adijos said on 5/Nov/17
Thank you Rob for your advice, I really liked you because you're okay 😃. As for Kevin Costner, I think his peak height is 6'1.25" (186 cm) and his current height is 6'0.5" (184 cm).
Editor Rob: Costner is beginning to look a bit under 6ft 1, I am not sure he has lost almost an inch, possibly 1/4 to 1/2 inch.
Slim 184 said on 5/Nov/17
186 range upgrade necessary.
Adijos said on 3/Nov/17
Rob please help me! What should I do to make it as big as possible? What should I eat, what not to eat? What do not you do and how many hours to sleep and at what times? I'm 17 now, although in half a year already 18! This morning I have 5'11.25" and at night 5'10.5" and I would like to grow up! Apparently a man can grow up to 21 years old, so I was about 3 and a half years old. Kevin Costner is a good example to me that the rapid growth of such a late age is not impossible! My mother in her youth was 5'5.75" and my father was 6'0.5" in his youth at the moment they could lose a bit because they are over 50 years old. I still have a lot of acne, which seems to mean that I have not stopped growing or growing.I've heard that the right amount of sleep at my age is 8 or 9 hours and that between the hours of 21.00 and 00.00 the most is growing but I do not know if it's true, maybe you know Rob? I never smoked cigarettes, did not drink alcohol or took drugs ...What should I do Rob according to you? What I exercises do you do? What to eat and what foods to avoid? How much time to sleep at night and at what times? What kind of sport do I practice? Please Rob, please advise me and help me.
Editor Rob: genetics plays the biggest role, but if I was going back to my youth and wanted to maximize any growth potential, I'd definitely take advice about improving diet with more variety and keep up exercise and stop playing computer games till midnight 👍

Costner just had late genetic spurt, look at a guy like Will Poulter, from 16-20 he gained a fair whack of height.

Rupert Everett claimed he was 5ft 1 at 16 and ended up 6ft 4 or near it...unbelievable amount of growth, but that's quite rare of course to gain that much.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Nov/17
...and 185.8cm sounds pretty trendy aswell as a peak evening height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Oct/17
berta, I think he's still a high 184cm guy today if measured (i.e. 184.7cm).
berta said on 31/Oct/17
the average guess seems very low. i think its because there is no peak and current so many give him 184 cm. i really think 186 is what he looked peak. lets say 185,8. He is taller than cavil today that could be close to 185. And there is a big chanse he have lost 0,5 cm by now
Slim 6' said on 29/Oct/17
Also, I’d kindly request a peak and current height.
Young:186 CM.
Today: 184 CM
Slim 6' said on 29/Oct/17
Even by looking at his proportions you can tell he is a big 6’1”er, 186.5 CM at youth is really possible.
Slim 6' said on 24/Oct/17
186 CM wouldent surprise me at prime. There's nothing 6'0" about him like Tenant and Amell.
Dreampuffe(5'9.5 said on 12/Oct/17
186 cm would really suit Costner.
Mister lennon said on 8/Oct/17
He was clearly a solid 6'1 peak. Evem could look 6"2 sometimes.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Oct/17
I'm sorry but 6ft is just not on the menu even today nevermind 30 years ago. 6ft1¼ is very plausible peak. An easy 2in on Ray Liotta (minimum 5ft11½, if not 6ft). Pulled off 6ft2 w/h Tim Robbins (a probable 6ft5). Varied next to Connery (still most likely 6ft2). Sometimes looked 1in shorter, other times the same.

Out of bed: 6ft1⅞(187.6cm)
Before bed: 6ft1⅛(185.7cm)

Very desirable height range especially if you insist on claiming 6ft2. No one would bat an eyelid...and it wouldn't necessarily be a total lie.
Mister lennon said on 7/Oct/17
Solid 6'1 peak.
Slim 6' said on 6/Oct/17
The flat 6' is injustice, the guy was clearly 185- 186

Hey may have been a 6'1.25" at best like rampageclover said.
James said on 6/Oct/17
Costner was 6'0" at his peak. He's 5'11.5" now.
Rory said on 2/Oct/17
He's at least 1.5 inches taller than Bill Paxton. 6ft1 peak and 6ft0.5-0.75 today I'd say. He's held his height pretty well.
Jtm said on 28/Sep/17
He looks shorter than culp in that picture. Are you telling us costner is really 5'9? Lol
CDS said on 26/Sep/17
@Rampage Clover -- again with your over-estimates. LOL Take a look here, both 5'10.5" Culp and Costner standing side by side.

Click Here
CDS said on 26/Sep/17
@ Rampage Clover: Barely farther back than Culp. And BTW, Culp is playing Bobby Kennedy in this film, so there is no reason whatsoever to make himself look taller since I would guestimate the late RFK at no more than 5'7" (Culp is 5'10.5")
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Sep/17
@CDS: He's standing a bit further back there...
CDS said on 18/Sep/17
I posted this in the Bruce Greenwood thread, but perhaps it's just as relevant in this one. A pic from the 2000 film, "Thirteen Days", with Costner on the left, 5'11.5" (listed) Bruce Greenwood in the center, and the actor to the right (Steven Culp) is listed as 5'10.5":

Click Here
Slim said on 16/Sep/17
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Sep/17
Slim, I suggest you watch Field of Dreams and Bull Durham
*******
Thanks.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Sep/17
Slim, I suggest you watch Field of Dreams and Bull Durham
Slim said on 11/Sep/17
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Sep/17
I think he had a slightly better chance of measuring a fraction over 6ft1 in his prime than just about scraping it.

Peak: 185.8cm
Today: 184.6cm
********
Not using eighth intervals buddy, and 186 is just too much tbh.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Sep/17
I think he had a slightly better chance of measuring a fraction over 6ft1 in his prime than just about scraping it.

Peak: 185.8cm
Today: 184.6cm
Jtm said on 2/Sep/17
If he truly was under 6'1 even in his younger days then that's bad news for a lot of posters that believe ray liotta is 6'0 and also supports the 5'8 for Michael Keaton.
Slim said on 1/Sep/17
rob, Costners listing is great and doesn't need a downgrade, I'm sure Kevin's lost half an inch at 60 years old but in the 70's and 80's the guy would've had no problem scraping 6'1" on a stadiometre.
James said on 28/Aug/17
Costner was 6'0.5" as a young man but closer to six feet even in later years. He was already in early middle age during his brief superstardom.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Aug/17
Rob, nowadays he's around that mark for sure but peak I think he was one of the more genuine 6ft1 guys
Editor Rob said on 15/Aug/17
There was a book from 1991 which mentioned "he was of small to average height during school; by the time he left Fullerton University he was almost 6 feet 1 inch".
Maybe the 6ft 0.75 is right...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Aug/17
He wasn't any less than 6ft1 peak. Look at him in Night Shift. He's in it for literally a few seconds but he clearly towers over Michael Keaton (then a strong 5ft9). Then Field of Dreams and Bull Durham. A solid 2in on Ray Liotta and barely 3in below Tim Robbins. He was barely shorter than Connery in The Untouchables sometimes maybe 1in under but it's more than likely Sean was still 6ft2.


186cm is definitely a better shout for his prime than 184cm (more arguable these days though)
Duffer 5ft 11 said on 5/Aug/17
Hes a tough one to pin down. In Hidden Figures, some scenes show him a little shorter than Sheldon, in others he looks a bit taller. I'd say a tad over 6' peak, probably dips a bit under the magic 6' these days.
RichardSpain said on 2/Aug/17
Click Here

A bit taller than Harrison Ford.

Kevin Costner 185cm in peak
Harrison 184 cm in peak

Nowadays is other history. nobody know really how tall are they.
Ali said on 31/Jul/17
An inch shorter than Sean Connery and 2 inches shorter than Kutscher. My guess 5'11.5 peak which is about
6'1 hollywood height. I also think he wears lifts.
RichardSpain said on 28/Jul/17
berta said on 23/Jul/17
i think richardsapin is spot on.
Kostner 186 connery 188,5
Ford 183,7

Yes Berta
your guess is very reasonable too.

I Conclude:

Connery always moved between 187-189 cm Max
Costner between 185-186cm Max
Ford between 183-184 cm Max

I would play all my money that this is true ha haha it's a joke..
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
187.8cm out of bed
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Jul/17
Connery: 188.6cm
Costner: 185.9cm
Ford: 184.6cm



I think Harrison pre-Indiana Jones days was genuinely near 6ft1.
berta said on 23/Jul/17
i think richardsapin is spot on.
Kostner 186 connery 188,5
Ford 183,7
S.J.H said on 5/Jul/17
Maybe before Costner turn 50 he was always 6'1 and somewhere in his late 40 to 50 he had already loss 0.5" at 6'0.5 and still holding it now
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jul/17
I'd put a young Ford in the 184-185cm zone. Star Wars and earlier. He easily cleared 6ft in his prime. In the 90's he looked more 6ft flat
Richardspain said on 29/Jun/17
He was a very strong 185cm (6'1)
He is taller than Harrison Ford too and almost same height than Sean Connery in untouchables.
No
Costner between 185/186cm,in peak
Connery between 188/189cm in peak
Ford between 183cm/184cm in peak

Not more not less
S.J.H said on 13/Jun/17
I think costner might be always 6'0.5 and ashton kutcher 6'2 when i check out how 6'6.25 carmelo anthony edge out kutcher by more than 4'
James said on 11/Jun/17
Costner never looked any taller than six foot, even when he was a major star 25 years ago.
Mark(5'9.25") said on 7/Jun/17
I would settle the case for 6'1.25"
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/May/17
He could pull off 186/187cm at times and on a couple of occasions even 188cm (like in Bull Durham or Field of Dreams). I'm almost certain he's stated 6ft2 as his height in addition to the usual 6ft1
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/May/17
I wouldn't call him thin. That's more John Waters or Raymond Massey. Costner's lean but quite athletic looking in build. Broad shouldered...
James said on 7/May/17
He was always very thin.
Dr JJ said on 6/May/17
I always had him around 5' 10" because of his proportions. He must be a very very solidly built bloke. Don't mess build.
berta said on 4/May/17
rampage i think you can be very rght with that listing BUT he was 1 cm taller than cavill who i sstrong 184 guy. my guess is 186 peak as you say but still little taller than 185 rather than just under
Mark(5'9.25 said on 30/Apr/17
@Leo2001 Costner is taller than Cavill in most pictures.

However, the picture you sent is Costner having Cowboy boots on while Cavill had regular dress shoes. Also, he looks the same as 6'3.5" Michael Shannon. I'm ruling out that picture because Cavill is not only leaning, but he had 0.5 inch less footwear.
Davey said on 29/Apr/17
186/187 in his prime.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Apr/17
Easily 187-188cm out of bed
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/17
Peak: 6ft1¼(186cm)
Today: 6ft0¾(185cm)


Rob, how feasible would that be?
Richardspain said on 27/Apr/17
I agree with this website this man is a perfect 185cm no less. With his footwear could be 187 cm. A bit taller than Harrison Ford was.
James said on 24/Apr/17
Costner used to be six foot when he was a major star 30 years ago, but he's 5'11" today.
Leo2001 said on 22/Apr/17
Kevin cleary taller than Cavill
Click Here

Legit 6ft1
berta said on 19/Apr/17
brett favre looked only 4 cm shorter than vince vaughn. something of with him being 188. i think both him and ryan reynold could be legit 189 guy and kostner 186 guy peak an maybe 185 today. dont really know if he lost any height could still be legit 6 foot 1
Johnny said on 19/Apr/17
You cannot say definitely that a person is over a particular mark. Nothing is certain and everything is a guess. A particular person may look taller on screen but if you measure the guy he can turn out to be shorter.
Johnny said on 19/Apr/17
@Mark(5'9.25") Ryan Reynolds is a tad shorter than Brett Favre who was measured 6ft 2 and 1/8ths. Reynolds is 6ft 2 max. Click Here Click Here
Mark(5'9.25") said on 19/Apr/17
@Johnny Check Ryan Reynolds. He claims 6'1"-6'2", but Reynolds is above 6'2".

186 cm for Costner.
Mark(5'9.25") said on 19/Apr/17
@Johnny Check Ryan Reynolds. He claims 6'1"=6'2", but Reynolds is above 6'2".

186 cm for Costner.
Johnny said on 17/Apr/17
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Apr/17
186cm in the 80's-90's is definitely worth arguing. Watch him in The Untouchables...looks like strikingly tall man walking through the Chicago streets and in Bull Durham I thought he looked nearer 6ft2 w/h Tim Robbins
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________I have never seen a 6ft 2 man who claims 6ft 1.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Apr/17
186cm in the 80's-90's is definitely worth arguing. Watch him in The Untouchables...looks like strikingly tall man walking through the Chicago streets and in Bull Durham I thought he looked nearer 6ft2 w/h Tim Robbins
Mark(5'9.25 said on 15/Apr/17
I would argue 186 cm peak for Costner.


@James

Costner has always looked a bit taller than 6'1" flat at peak.
James said on 13/Apr/17
Costner did not look any taller than six foot in any of his films. I've no idea why his career imploded 25 years ago.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Apr/17
Go away James
Borats Chicken said on 4/Apr/17
Rob, how tall his father William Costner you reckon is?
James said on 3/Apr/17
Costner was 6'0.5" at his peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Mar/17
Rob, what do you mean by that when you say your estimation went up?
Editor Rob: for calling out the guy tip-toeing!
Editor Rob said on 29/Mar/17
Was reading an article the other day and an actor Dan Gordon mentioned something: "So, Marie was on one side of Kevin Costner, who is about 6ft 2in - and I was on the other side - I’m only 5ft 10, so I kinda lifted myself up a wee bit in the picture and Kevin went (he adopts a drawly American accent) ‘Get off your toes Dan’"

My estimation of Costner just went up a bit...
berta said on 17/Mar/17
i think cosnter was a guy that was (maybe still is i dont know) 187.0 when he woke up and by the evening he was 185,9. 1/4 over this listing but never really cared about claiming it
mister_lennon said on 17/Mar/17
Yeah. a strong 187 out of bed and 186 the rest of the day.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Mar/17
Probably was a high 187cm out of bed in his prime (like 187.8cm or something).
Joseph said on 12/Mar/17
I was just like him in high school I was five foot six at 16 I'm still growing already at 21 I'm already six foot one I'm glad I'm growing I never got over being short also because what girl would date a short guy
James said on 4/Mar/17
He was six foot at his peak.
Guanzo said on 2/Mar/17
6'0''
the Slav said on 25/Feb/17
@imsomniak

Costner was 5'2 at 17... Dont quite think he was very developed
insomniak said on 14/Feb/17
I'm still growing I've grown about 2 inches since turning 18 no I don't look 12 either I guess taller people tend to grow for longer periods of time hence why their taller in the first place.
the Slav said on 13/Feb/17
6 foot 17 yrs still growing

Costner was a super late bloomer. biologically he was probably more like a 12-year old at 17
Johan said on 13/Feb/17
Text book example of 185 cm guy, he never wore lifts lol...in several films he is even barefoot ie..Waterworld.
6 foot 17 yrs still growing said on 11/Feb/17
Is growing that much at that age possible ? I can understand 5 ft 11 to 6 ft 1 at that age but 5 ft 2 to 6 ft 1 ..no..and a 6 ft 1 guy at 20 i doubt he was considered short from 13/14 and up .. if not since he was born .. I'm 6 feet and I was considered very tall since 4 or 5 as people compared me with children of my age at that time .."average for a guy in my country is 5 ft 7"
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Feb/17
Nearly 6ft2 out of bed and 6ft1 flat in the evening at peak or 6ft1-6ft1¾
berta said on 10/Feb/17
yeah i think i have to agree with rampage to. there is maybe 1 or 2 times in his whole carrier he have looked shorter than 6 foot 1. and most of the timme a littel over. i think bill murray would have about 0,5 cm on kevin. this is to guys that always looked a littel taler than their listing. murray 186,5 ore lets just say 186 and kevin 186 and with skinny frame he could sometimes gives almost 187 impression but he wasnt that tall. i think costner is ore was maybe a guy that would be in the 185,8 range in the evening and 187,2 in morning.In the afternon he was probably 186,1. and by now he is 185,3 in the afternon.
mister_lennon said on 7/Feb/17
Agree with rampage.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Feb/17
Editor Rob: watch No Way Out, you can see him in scenes with Will Patton and he can look closer to 6ft than 6ft 1.


He wasn't standing at his tallest. He could look near Hackman's height or at most 1in shorter. He looked that way with Connery aswell in The Untouchables. Both of those guys were still 6ft2. Nothing under 6ft1 peak and just over it is highly possible. Always looked in the tall range.
mister_lennon said on 5/Feb/17
Costner was 6'1 peak and he looked it in almost every movie.
the lifts thing is only a weak guess from you.there Isnt a proof of it. For you, every people in hollywood wear lifts.that is absurd.
James said on 4/Feb/17
Costner was six foot but always wore lifts in films.
mister_lennon said on 30/Jan/17
he also had an inch on solid 6 tommy lee jones in jfk. he looked 6'1 in almost all his movies.
Sandy Cowell said on 30/Jan/17
Poor guy to still feel affected by being small throughout his growing up years. I have just read on Sean Connery's page that Kevin is a lift wearer and then again on his own page. Our formative years have a lot to answer for!
I saw 'Dances With Wolves' over Christmas and I thought Kevin was about 6ft, which is fine; I didn't for a moment think he was less or in need of lifts! Now I see here that he is 6ft plus, though my boyfriend reckoned he was less!
I shall put Kevin at his full 6ft1, even though he might have shrunk by now. There is no 'peak height' box so I'll give him his full and optimal height!
🐃🐂🐂🐃 WOLF:🐺 (not fox, and the other animals are buffalo!)
berta said on 29/Jan/17
cliams under 6 foot 1 is bad estimates. he looks it even today most of the time. peak he could have been 186
Editor Rob: watch No Way Out, you can see him in scenes with Will Patton and he can look closer to 6ft than 6ft 1.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Jan/17
He could easily have fallen into the strong 6ft1 range 2
30 years ago. Looked 2in taller than Ray Liotta (who some still say was 6ft). Even just a few years ago appeared near 2in taller on Bill Paxton (5ft11½) in Hatfield & McCoys. Also edged out Henry Cavill and Chris Pine (both minimum 6ft0½).

He might actually still be 6ft1 when measured. There are times now when he can appear closer to 6ft though
mister_lennon said on 27/Jan/17
Maybe ray lliotta was a solid 5'11 guy at peak, but costner looked about 6'1 near to him.
mister_lennon said on 27/Jan/17
He was a weak 6' 1 peak. Same tall than 6'1-6'2 kevin kline in silverado. Taller than 6 ray lliotta in field of dreams. And now he looks the same than strong 6 henry cavill.
6'1 peak.
S.J.H said on 25/Jan/17
@Hijopotamus @james

I once thought he was between 180-182cm but more look at costner he is sure a real 6 footer like he have claim it before. So 6'1 could be peak or at least with sneakers he is 6'1
James said on 25/Jan/17
He was well known for wearing lifts. He wore lifts in "Wyatt Earp" to look in line with Michael Madsen.

Costner had a hair transplant so why would he not increase his height?
Hijopotamus said on 23/Jan/17
James, why are you so sure? Have you met him?
I always thought Kevin was 5'11" and small frame but I saw him once and he was a big dude and tallerof what I always thought. Normally it's the opposite.
James said on 21/Jan/17
Nope. He was six foot. He wore built up shoes in films.
mister_lennon said on 20/Jan/17
He was 6'1. Looked every bit of it. Taller than many 6 guys and almost as tall than many 6'2 guys. A legit 6'1 guy.
James said on 18/Jan/17
No he wasn't. He was exactly six foot.
mister_lennon said on 16/Jan/17
He was 6'1 peak. 185-186
James said on 15/Jan/17
Costner was never any more than six foot. I never understood why he was popular for a few years and then disappeared.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jan/17
6ft0½-6ft0¾ if measured today
Johno said on 14/Jan/17
Still over 6'0.
S.J.H said on 11/Jan/17
Costner needs a downgrade. 6'0.75 now and 6'1 peak
James said on 29/Dec/16
Costner was six foot and Quaid was 5'11".
James B said on 21/Dec/16
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Dec/16
Lol James


Why lol?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Dec/16
Lol James
James B said on 19/Dec/16
Rampage- Costner looks a lot like David Beckham facially doesn't he? Similar colouring too.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Dec/16
Rob, at 14:43, Costner describes himself and Dennis Quaid as being "about 6 feet"

Click Here
Editor Rob: yes Rampage, he has mentioned it before, though I think he's clearly taller than Quaid.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Dec/16
You don't know when to quit James
James said on 13/Dec/16
He probably had help to look more in line with Hackman.
Johno said on 24/Nov/16
I reckon he could of measured 6'1; nowadays, somewhere over 6'0.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Nov/16
I thought No Way Out was another instance where he could look pull off 186-187cm zone. Could look marginally shorter than Hackman or the same height.
That and Field Of Dreams. 186cm peak is definitely arguable
Mark said on 4/Nov/16
Rob, is it possible to put a peak for Costner? I would say 6'1.25" peak for him and 6'0.75" today. He sometimes looks shorter than Cavill and Pine due to bad posture.
Editor Rob: I'm not so sure, I think peak 6ft 1 is ok, last time I watched No Way Out, looking at him with Hackman and Will Patton, I just couldn't see him over it.

Today you could argue 184-5 zone, maybe if he starts to look 6ft 0.5 most of the time I will change it.
James said on 30/Oct/16
Costner was six foot.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Oct/16
185.5-186cm evening peak.
184-184.5cm evening today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Sep/16
Federer could look that mark with Nadal at times.
Mark said on 27/Sep/16
@Rampage Agreed. Actually, I looked again and Costner would have had the chance of 186/188 cm in his young days. I'm not sure if Federer can pull it off.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Sep/16
@Mark: Costner is 61, Federer is 35 so you can't really compare them today. But Costner in his 30's like Federer wouldn't have dropped under 6ft1.
Mark said on 22/Sep/16
@Rory Federer is holding his own with 7'5"-7'6" Yao Ming here. Federer and Yao Ming are only wearing standard footwear.

Click Here
Mark said on 12/Sep/16
@Rory Federer stood well with Michael Jordan, was noticablily taller than Bradley Cooper and Rafael Nadal, and in some pictures, he looked the same or edged out Maria Sharapova.

Click Here
Click Here
Rory said on 11/Sep/16
I don't know why people always assume federer is a solid 6'1 or more guy, when he looks a clear inch shorter than Djokovic whose a weak 6'2.
Mark said on 8/Sep/16
I'll admit, Costner is a good 6'1", but Federer usually pulls of 6'1.25" more often than Costner did. Now Costner is at least about 6'1" or a strong 6'1".

Currently, Costner would be 6'1"-6'.075" while Federer is 6'1"-6'1.25". I would still give the edge to Federer, but Costner would have looked similar to Federer in his peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Sep/16
Federer can look 186cm at times. Costner could pull that off aswell in the 80's-90's. Probably were both level in their prime
Mark said on 1/Sep/16
He was a full 6'1". However, Roger Federer strikes me as being taller than Costner even in peak.
Brandon said on 15/Aug/16
6'1" peak
6'0.25-6'0.5" today
James said on 12/Aug/16
He always wore lifts in films.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Aug/16
...also in The Bodyguard, No Way Out, Silverado, Bull Durham, JFK and The Guardian
berta said on 8/Aug/16
to my he was 186 peak in alla his old Movies he looked minimum 185 and osmetimes 187. Now he looks frail and could be weak 185. peak very strong 185 weak 186 and now weak 185
James said on 6/Aug/16
Costner never looked any taller than six foot, except with lifts.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/16
It's not really, James. A solid 6ft1 guy can easily be guessed at 6ft2 and sometimes even 6ft3
James david elliot said on 22/Jul/16
I graduated 8th grade at 5'3" . I remember because we had to measure for our cap and gown. Got some pics with my mom who us 5'5" and I'm significantly shorter. By the time I was a senior I was close to my full height which is right at 6'1". So for me the story sounds very plausible
James said on 17/Jul/16
Lol, Costner was never 6'2". That is a joke.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jul/16
Peak

Out of bed: 6ft1⅞-6ft2
Before bed: 6ft1-6ft1⅛

Today

Out of bed: 6ft1⅜-6ft1½
Before bed: 6ft0⅝-6ft0¾
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jul/16
His story does give hope…
Johnny said on 7/Jul/16
Costner may have been lying about his drastic height growth.... he was about average height in his high school baseball team. I think he was 5'10" during his high school graduation. Click Here
James said on 7/Jul/16
Costner is six foot.
Ice said on 29/Jun/16
Costner had one of the most dramatic growth spurts in celebratie history .
Mat said on 21/Jun/16
From 163 to 185 cm ? That's 22 cm, it's a hell of a lot to gain. I guess he might have been 163 range in his early years of high school, and towards the later he might have been average. And then grew more
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jun/16
Might still stretch up to about 6ft1 if measured. Some guys surprise with a bit of hidden heighr. Easily held that mark before bed, 20-30 years ago.
Elly m said on 5/Jun/16
The thing with Costner is he has terrible posture it's especially bad in The Bodyguard, i think that's why in some scenes he looks taller than his co-star and in other's looks shorter. If he stood up straight he'd look 2 in taller.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.