How tall is Sean Connery

Sean Connery's Height

6ft 2 (188 cm)

Scottish actor best known for playing James Bond in films like Goldfinger and Thunderball. He also had a host of memorable roles in movies like Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade, The Rock, The Untouchables, Marnie, The Offence, The Man Who Would be King, Highlander, The Hunt for Red October and Entrapment. The 007 actor was described as standing Six Feet Two Inches tall in the early 1960's by his agency.

How tall is 007 Sean Connery
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of Roger Moore
Roger Moore
6ft 1 ¼ (186 cm)
Height of Harrison Ford
Harrison Ford
5ft 11 (180 cm)
Height of Pierce Brosnan
Pierce Brosnan
6ft ¾ in (185 cm)
Height of Gene Hackman
Gene Hackman
6ft 2 (188 cm)

Add a Comment2002 comments

Average Guess (146 Votes)
6ft 2.03in (188cm)
Canson said on 9/Jan/19
I agree with Rampage that he was at his peak a decent maybe a good 6’3” in shoes. More I see of him he was probably a solid 6’2 peak
Canson said on 3/Jan/19
@Michael 5’10: he’s got competition though If they decide to go with Idris Elba although I don’t think it’s much difference between them. Connery I believe is 6’2” but Idris is probably within about a CM of him. I also heard somewhere that they had considered Seal!!!!
Michael 5'10", 178 cm said on 31/Dec/18
Sean always looked like the tallest Bond in the movies, I thought he could've been 6'3", but this is a good listing. He was no shorter than 188cm at his peak. Definitely a 6'2" guy in his youth and looked it more than the other Bonds who were more like 6'1". He was quite a bit taller than Richard Gere. I also remember him being taller than Harrison Ford in the Last Crusade. He was also noticeably taller than Nicholas Cage in the Rock. He was 6'2" when he was younger, more like 6'0" nowadays. He's in his 80's, he lost at least 2 inches in height.
Canson said on 30/Dec/18
@Richard Spain: maybe even 190-191 in shoes if he really was the full 6’2”
RichardSpain said on 29/Dec/18
188 cm barefoot when he was young
183/184cm barefoot nowadays older

With shoes very close 190 cm in prime younger

Great actor Mr Connery
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Dec/18
A decent 6ft3 in shoes of not 6ft3½
Mateusz said on 9/Dec/18
Connery always looked the tallest bond . My height is 6 ft 3 with shoes and connery looks about my height so my guess is that he was 6 ft 3 in shoes when he was James Bond .
Tall In The Saddle said on 26/Nov/18
I have not seen any reasonable photo showing Connery to be taller than Caine - at best for Connery I see them as equal while all other times I see Caine having a slight edge. I don't see Caine as any taller than 6'2" peak - so I can only see Connery 6'2" at best but probably more likely around the 6'1.5" to 6'1.75" mark. I will add that Caine appeared to stand with better posture more often than Connery did.
Greg99 said on 17/Nov/18
The odd thing is that pics of Ian Fleming with Sean Connery (Fleming was occasionally onset for the first three bond movies) Fleming looks maybe an inch at most shorter than Connery yet Fleming is listed at 6' even
Dream(5'9.5") said on 5/Nov/18
I grew up with this James Bond, but Roger Moore, along with Pierce Brosnan, are other Bonds (no pun intended) are also other bonds I've watched.
Rising - 174 cm said on 31/Oct/18
I agree Carrey is at least 6'1", but it's difficult to tell if he's shorter than Connery in that pic. His eye level is lower, but the top of their heads are too close to call and there looks to be a tilt in Connery's favor, though Carrey's posture is probably better. I don't know if Connery was the full 6'2" or only 6'1.5" peak, but he was definitely 6'1.5" max by the late 80's since 6'1.5" listed Kevin Kline was taller on video.
Z1854 said on 29/Oct/18
Carrey can’t be used as a benchmark.. he’s an inch shorter than jack Whitehall (see jacks instagram)
Mister lennon said on 27/Sep/18
Carrey a solid 6'1 minimum.
Connery a solid 6'2 peak.
viper said on 25/Sep/18
Carrey is 6-1 minimum. Still have Connery at 6-1.5 peak
Mister lennon said on 23/Sep/18
Carrey was and is a strong 6'1 guy.
Jtm said on 22/Sep/18
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 24/Aug/18
Click Here Incredible at 78 he still edge out Jimy Carrey by 1/2.

that's because carrey is closer to 6'0 than 6'2.
Mister lennon said on 19/Sep/18
A strong 6'1 for caine and a solid 6'2 for connery is very close to the truth.
Hackman looks a solid 6'2 sometimes and a strong 6'1 sometimes. Tricky heigth.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Sep/18
Rory 2cm is not noticeable. Besides they’re just rough estimates.
187-188cm for Caine and 188-189cm for Connery sound spot on. Hackman I keep at 188cm on the nose
Rory said on 15/Sep/18
No chance Connery was 2cm taller than Caine. 2cm is a noticeable difference when Connery only marginally edged him if at all. Wouldn't go under 187.5 for Caine and 188.5 tops for Connery.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Sep/18
Keep in mind both Connery and Hackman in their late 50’s were taller than a prime Kevin Costner
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Sep/18
Gracian the 6ft2 mark is reasonable for all three of them. However if I think one could argue Caine stood slightly shy of it and Connery slightly exceeded it while Hackman I’d put in the middle because he could look both a bit under and a bit over 6ft2 at times.

Caine: 187cm
Hackman: 188cm
Connery: 189cm

Just my opinion
viper said on 12/Sep/18
Never taller than 6-1.5
Gracian said on 10/Sep/18
For some time I've been interested in who could be the highest, Gene Hackman, Sean Connery or Michael Caine. Many people estimate Hackman and Caine as 6'1.75" and Connery as 6'2.25". IMDb lists each of them as 6'2" but google says 188 cm for Hackman and Caine and 189 cm for Connery. Rob, all three in the past were described as 6'2" but I remember when you said that you once saw a source describing 6'3" as Connery which unfortunately you can not find so far... Here are some shots from 1977 from the movie "A Bridge Too Far" where we can see Connery and Hackman side by side:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
In the first picture, Hackman looks taller than Connery, but he has a camera advantage. In the second picture, Connery looks taller than Hackman and on the third one again Hackman looks taller than Connery. After all, Hackman had an advantage of hair over Connery and if I had to guess, I would bet that Connery could be a little taller than Hackman.
I also found some comparisons between Caine and Connery. In the film "Man Who Would Be King" in 1975, Connery looked taller than Caine:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
However, in one program in 1975, where Connery and Caine made a guest appearance, they looked like similar height, but Caine had an advantage of hair over Connery:
Click Here
Here's a photo of Caine, Connery and Sidney Poitier from 1991:
Click Here
In this photo Caine looks like a tallest and Poitier looks like a shortest. However, Caine had an advantage of hair and a camera advantage over them, and Caine is three years younger than Connery and six years younger than Poitier, I think Poitier and Connery could lose a fraction faster than Caine.
Here are the photos of Caine, Connery and Roger Moore next to each other in 2003:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Moore looked at the shortest, while Connery and Caine looked like a similar height, but Caine also had an advantage over Connery this time. I can accept 6'2" for Caine and Hackman, but I think Connery has a decent chance at 6'2.25". Rob, your thoughts about Caine, Connery and Hackman?
Editor Rob
I don't think any of them ever looked tall enough to give them 6ft 2.25, but they all seemed taller than 6ft 1 and near enough 6ft 2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Sep/18
Out of bed: 190.2cm
Before bed: 188.3cm
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 3/Sep/18
That "6'1 1/2 without shoes" might've been with bad posture, evening measurement, or just internet yapping. Personally, I can buy 189cm for a young sean connery, but no more than that.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 24/Aug/18
Click Here Incredible at 78 he still edge out Jimy Carrey by 1/2.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 23/Aug/18
I think most likely he was 6'2 on the dot when young. Not sure if weak 188cm or solid, but I would give him 187cm at the very least. It has been claimed on the internet that he was given 6'1 1/2 without shoes by Bond tailors, maybe that was an evening measurement? Maybe it was just internet crap talk? Frank 2 met him in 1999 and said he was around 6 feet, but that was probably bad posture.
Mark Harrison said on 22/Aug/18
Charles Gray was 6'1".
Mister lennon said on 15/Aug/18
And both connery peak and reynolds are solid 6'2 guys.
Mister lennon said on 13/Aug/18
Desagree here. Im with rampage. The most of the times, connery looked taller than caine the most of times. And im not a fanboy of connery or caine. I like them as great actors, nothing more. Im only guessing their heigths.
Maybe caine has looked taller sometimes, but sean looked the tallest one the most of the times.
Connery looked the same or mayne a little bit shorter than desmond. And in both you only live twice and diamonds are forever, gray looked taller sometimes and connery taller sometimes. It depends of the posture, camera angles, etc.
Sean was a true 6'2 guy. 188-189. Probably 190 out of bed or a strong 189.
And far from being a fanboy or something.
viper said on 13/Aug/18
6-1.5 peak, same as Ryan Reynolds
MAD SAM said on 13/Aug/18
If anyone says he’s under 6’2” he would be a fool, he’s easily 188 cm guy
Z185 said on 10/Aug/18
I think that Connery was actually edged by Charles Gray in YOLT, but can’t be too sure. He always looked shorter than Desmond (Q) though who was probably a legit 1,88m.
Z185 said on 10/Aug/18
@newman ... I agree, it does seem that some people have a super soft spot for Connery... which is fair enough as he’s a cinematic legend, a great bloke and actor. However he doesn’t need to be 190cm to still be great. Compared to others in his range like Caine he never looks 6-3, and definitely not with female cast members in some of the early bonds. He was probably a well built 187cm if we are being honest. Even his stunt double Bob Simmons said Connery was 6’1 ... it’s fine to compare Sean to tables and other people in films but I think this guy would know better than most.
Newman said on 6/Aug/18
Rampage do you run the Sean Connery club or something?

You must have mentioned at least 3 times below that "Connery always looked an inch taller than Caine." When?....When? If anything, Caine looks half an inch taller. There must be 100 pictures on Google of them standing together.

As for your reference below to Connery looking taller than Charles Gray, show me some evidence. They looked dead level in both Bond films especially YOLT where they will have been peak height. In fact, having watched that garbage film Meteor yesterday I would say Connery was only 6ft 1 and some change.

Lots of people on here suggested Connery had a peak height of nearly 6ft 3 without providing any evidence. Could well have been under 6ft 2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Aug/18
Berta, by then he may have been a weaker 6ft2 than the decade or so before. But 189cm does look arguable when you see him w/h Caine in the 70’s. Looked taller than guys like Jack Lord, Gert Frobe (184-185cm) and Charles Gray (maybe 186cm).

IMO, a prime Connery woke up at 6ft3 on the nose and closed the day at a little over 6ft2. He got measured 6ft2⅜ for the Mr. Universe and there’s no reason to believe that would be in shoes. Most likely a mid-morning measurement. So an eighth more to this listing is fair.
ND89 said on 30/Jul/18
Sutherland towered him easily by 2-2.5 inches taller than Connery
berta said on 28/Jul/18
connery is a hard one. he could have been 189 but with guys like christpher lambert- the guy from highlander. He could look in the 187 range. i think 6 fot 2 flat is pretty safe listing. maybe 1/8 over but probably not more. HE was/ is very well built, i guess that can made him appear bigger than he was sometimes
Thomas Feusi said on 25/Jul/18
Saw From Russia with Love yesterday evening.
Found this photo Sean with Daniela Bianchi from Russia with Love - Click Here.
Daniela Bianchi is 5ft7in(170cm) and Sean is not barefoot here but Daniela is.
My wife is 5ft 7in also like Daniela and i am 6ft 1.5i at morning 11am. We stand like them and it was very similar like the picture. So Sean was surely 6ft 1.5 in his youth but not more like Frank2 said it in the past.I think nowdays Sean is around 183-184cm.Only after a long sleep maybe i or him were 6ft2in.So 6ft2in is maybe a bit to high for Sean. Funny is that i did not loose height and i`am 47.
Jtm said on 24/Jul/18
apparently he claimed 6'1.5 when he was on jay leno in 1996 but i watched the interview on youtube and he never talked about his height.
Editor Rob
Which is why we shouldn't always put trust in a recollection of a quote.
Benny said on 21/Jul/18
Connery was 6’2” in his prime (1960-1990). Currently probably 6’0-6’.5”
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jul/18
I think Connery was a guy who could have woken up at 6ft3
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jun/18
Connery: 188.3cm
Caine: 187.6cm
James B 171.5cm said on 21/Jun/18
Michael Caine was 6ft1.5 i think.

Could seem taller in Alfie because he was really skinny in those days.
Mister lennon said on 16/Jun/18
Yes. Usually, connery was half an inch or maybe an inch taller than caine.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jun/18
Generally Connery looked a tiny bit taller than Caine
marcus said on 15/Jun/18
Just saw a clip of Connery and Michael Caine on Carson. Connery looked a small fraction shorter than Caine, but Caine was the same height as Ed McMahon, listed here at 6'3"
Leno179 said on 12/Jun/18
Solid 6'2, a rare case of a old man but very active, good posture and shape, probably has lost very little in stature(if he did lose anything)
James B 171.5cm said on 11/Jun/18
Anyone seen Russia with Love? He looked 6ft1 range in that film.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jun/18
Gracian I think all of those are arguable I made up a list like that and all those guys were there
ImTall(6'6) said on 2/Jun/18
Definitely 6'2 maybe 6'2.5"
Gracian said on 16/May/18
Rob, can I argue about a quarter inch in many auctions? Here are my own assumptions:
Club 6'2.25": Sean Connery, Benicio Del Toro, John Cusack, Donald Trump, Hugh Jackman, Samuel L. Jackson, Ryan Reynolds, Gottfried John, David Warner, Graham McTavish, John Newman, M. C. Gainey, Will Poulter, George H. W. Bush and Joe Don Baker
Club 6'1.75": Michael Caine, Paul Walker, Bill Clinton, Sean Kingston, Flo Rida, Hugo Weaving Kevin Kline, Jim Carrey, Matthew Fox, James Earl Jones, Robin Thicke and D'Lo Brown
Rob, do you think that some of these auctions are possible?
Editor Rob
I would say some of the 6ft 1.75 guys are very possible...Some of the 2.25 estimates are also possible.
mjadasd said on 15/May/18
just look at this. Click Here: sean looks 6ft no more with 6ft 1 michael jonson. sean was 6ft 1 in his youth and shrinked only inch when he got old
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/May/18
Fox could have been 186cm but I tag Caine as 187-188cm and Connery 188-189cm
Jordan87 said on 9/May/18
Danield,

How do you know Connery wore lifts? What's wrong with you?
danield said on 14/Apr/18
sean was about 6ft 1 in his youth, he never was 6ft 2 without lifts. I'm from georgia and here we have great actor named Tengiz Archvadze who was very good friend of sean connery. This actor tells very often that they( he and sean) were same wight, same height and had very similar voice. This actor was 6ft1(184) and about 90kg. so i guess sean was 6ft 1 too.
Mister lennon said on 14/Apr/18
In the most of pictures and videos, sean looke an inch taller than michael, or almost. Between half an inch and one inch. Sometimes, caine could look the same or taller than connery, but its because several factors: posture, camera point of view, etc.
Is the same thing with james fox. Connery is taller in the most of the time, but fox could look the same or taller sometimes.

Connery a solid 6'2 guy and caine and fox about strong 6'1 guys.
kevin5762 said on 13/Apr/18
Click Here just look.. how can you say that connery was taller than michael caine? they have same suit and shoes and their age is also almost same and michael caine looks about inch taller than sean. sean has more athletic build so its hard to see the difference but if you look closely michael is clearly taller. connery was about 6ft1 in his prime
Mister lennon said on 11/Apr/18
I think that peak fox could be a strong 6'1 or weak 6'2 all the way. Between 186-188, i think.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/18
I can see Fox at 186cm but near 6ft2? Not as sure on that one.
Mister lennon said on 8/Apr/18
Yes, rampage. In the russia house, sometimes fox looked the same or even a little bit taller than connery in some scenes. But sean looked taller the most of the time.

Solid 6'2 for connery and strong 6'1 or weak 6'2 for fox.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Apr/18
Hackman really is a tricky one. Generally could go from looking just under to just over 6ft2. That's why I think he should be left alone.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Apr/18
Connery was taller than James Fox
Mister lennon said on 2/Apr/18
Connery was true and solid 6'2. And looked a little bit taller than hackman and the same heigth of desmond lewweyl.
Fox was also 6' 2 and connery looked the same.
joemanila said on 1/Apr/18
sean was tall man, but he never was near 6ft 2. look him with Q(DESMOND) who was listed as 6ft 2 connery was about inch smaller, look at him with gene hackman same situation here, look at him with james fox who was 6ft 1 (the russia house) and james was slightly taller than sean but at that time sean was 60 years old and probably lost some height. I think sean was between 6ft, 6ft 1 in his prime. anyway he was tall man with athletic build long legs big shoulders so he always seemed even taller than he realy was
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Mar/18
He was still looking 6ft1½ range only 10-12 years ago and a decent 6ft2 in the 90's....I'm not convinced he was less than this peak
The Tall Guy said on 22/Mar/18
If you watch Thunderball, Connery walks in barefoot from the beach to the pool alongside his costar Claudine Auger,who appeared identical in height. Auger was a professional model - a tall woman listed as 5'10". She appeared to be wearing two inch heels so those plus her height of 5'10" would make her 6'0" in heels and Connery 6'0" too. He's no more than that, I'm sure.
Tall Sam said on 2/Mar/18
In The Great Train Robbery 6'2" was the most that you could argue for Connery with Donald Sutherland, who looked a good 1.5 inches taller.
Newman said on 1/Mar/18
That film the "Man Who Would be King" has been mentioned on this thread already to compare the heights of both Connery and Michael Caine. These fella's are the SAME height. The were in the film and they were at the Oscars in 1989 or whenever it was.

I don't think Connery was anywhere near 6-3 as some people suggest. I would say 6-2 maximum but probably more 6-1.5 or 0.75inch from the 1970s onwards. He is however the same height as Gene Hackman too [Bridge too Far].

There is some information on Timothy Dalton's IMBD page stating he was the tallest Bond according to the James Bond tailors, standing at 6-2 barefoot. Apparently Connery and Lazenby were 6ft 1.5 and Moore and Brosnan 6-1. If this is true, it settles it. However, I can't find this source of information anywhere else though, so have to question its validity. Would they really use the same tailor in 1995 that they did in 1962?
Jordan87 said on 26/Feb/18
I'd say Connery and Hackman are certainly in the same ballpark.

AS Far as Hackman goes, in French Connection, as well as the sequel he gave me a 6'3 Impression. Obviously he not 6'3 but he was in fact taller than every single person he shared a scene with in both those films I am pretty sure.

( For the Record Hackman's performance in French Connection 2 when he was getting off the Heroine was amazing, guy is not appreciated enough he is one of the greats).

Far as Connery goes, I do not believe he is over 6'2, but pretty much right there as a Solid 6'2 guy in his day. Constantly looked a bit taller than Caine and Was even taller than Jim Carrey when he was an old man, in his 70's I believe.
Smiles03 said on 11/Feb/18
He's 6'2 and 6'3 when he had hair
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Jan/18
📈: 188.9cm
📉: 184.5cm
Mark said on 16/Jan/18
Caine was 6'1". He was clearly shorter than Connery when they made a film together in 1974.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jan/18
I think Caine was a weak 6ft2
mister_lennon said on 2/Jan/18
my guesses:

peak beatty: strong 6'1
peak hackman: weak 6'2
peak connery:solid 6'2
peak caine:strong 6'1
and yes, hackman edged out beatty in Bonnie and clyde
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jan/18
Hackman edged out Warren Beatty by 2cm in Bonnie &Clyde
berta said on 29/Dec/17
saw the 3rd indiana jones movie today agian. i saw 3,5 cm beetween him and weak 184 ford. i guess conerry was maybe 187,5 range by that time. he is a well built man i dont think he had lost more than 0,5 by that time. maybe 188 flat is the best peak listing. 189 is to mutch for him.gene hackman was probably 187,6 peak and caine 187,2
Bruno said on 26/Dec/17
Appeared slightly shorter than Tony Perkins in 74 Murder on the orient express.
Mister lennon said on 20/Dec/17
Caine was a strong 6'1. Probably a weak 6'2 out of bed.
James said on 19/Dec/17
Caine was 6'1". He was shorter than Connery and Hackman.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Dec/17
Yes I do Canson.

I think Caine was a weak 6ft2, Hackman a flat 6ft2 and Connery a strong 6ft2
Mister lennon said on 17/Dec/17
Lord was shorter than hackman. Connery was a hair taller than hackman.
I think:
Lord: weak 6'1
Connery: solid 6'2
Hackman: weak 6'2
Canson said on 16/Dec/17
@Rampage: do you think he would edge Hackman out?
James said on 14/Dec/17
Lord was exactly six foot. With his special shoes he could look 6'1" on that TV series.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Dec/17
Lord might've been 184-185cm at worst but 6ft1 is still reasonable. Probably wore bigger shoes to look 6ft2 range
James said on 26/Nov/17
Jack Lord was six foot.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Nov/17
Rob, he would have been 78 there and he still looked 6ft1 range. I have no doubt he was big 6ft2er in his hey day if not 189cm. Look at him with 6ft1 guys like Jack Lord or Gert Frobe

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Nov/17
Rob, I actually think Connery edges out Carrey in that photo
Editor Rob: I'm accounting for the camera being more on Sean's side, I'd have said he gained some height in the photo.
Mister lennon said on 5/Nov/17
Sorry, rob, but in that picture , connery is taller than carrey.
Scoobydoo said on 4/Nov/17
Connery never was 190 cm barefoot he was a genuine 188 cm in peak , maybe 189 cm in the morning.
Nowadays ... well he is old, who knows?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Nov/17
Rob, have you looked at grizz's photo?
Editor Rob: yes, Carrey is barely any taller really, you could make a case for Carrey as a 186cm guy and Connery still seeming near 185 there.
grizz said on 22/Oct/17
Click Here Next to Jim Carrey (roughly 10 years ago) he still looked taller!
matt hill said on 13/Oct/17
Every inch of 6ft2 in his prime probably around 6ft now at 87 years old and probably the best bond of all time the second best been daniel craig
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Oct/17
Out of bed: 6ft2⅞(190.1cm)
Before bed: 6ft2⅛(188.2cm)



😎
Rory said on 2/Oct/17
How can you tell he is 5ft11 with his carers unless you are or know his carers height ? I doubt he's under 6ft today.
James said on 2/Oct/17
Nope, he is clearly 5'11" in the recent pictures with his carers.
mister_lennon said on 1/Oct/17
he is 6 now
James said on 26/Sep/17
Connery is 5'11" in the latest pictures with his carer.
Cameron said on 20/Sep/17
Why no peak height option? considering he was 6'2" at his peak and is 90 years old, I think it's a given he's lost some height.
Editor Rob: he's been retired for a while and mainly out of the limelight, so was left at his peak. I'd say he is probably 6ft now.
Rory said on 19/Sep/17
A classic 6ft2 guy peak and 6ft0.25 today. 1.75 inch loss isn't bad at all for 87. I felt he looked 6'0.5-0.75 with Murray in 2012 but has probably lost another fraction since then.
Willes188 said on 14/Sep/17
Yea 189 is punching it even if it would be cool, 188-188.5 is ok
James said on 8/Sep/17
Caine is exactly six foot now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Sep/17
Agreed. Caine does look to have lost a bit more. He'd still clear 6ft though
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Sep/17
Caine just got given 184cm. I reckon it's safe to assume that Connery is also around that today but there's not really any point in giving him a current height. He's been absent from the limelight for many years now.
Editor Rob: Caine is still active, but I think in last 5 years went from still looking near 6ft 1 to maybe 184ish
berta said on 31/Aug/17
as most guys here seems to think i agree on 188-188,5 peak. a full 189 seems a little to mutch and even today he still looks 185 cm range maybe 184,5. he have lost barely 4 cm and is almost 90 years old.
James said on 26/Aug/17
Connery was 187 at his peak.
Richardspain said on 25/Aug/17
Between 184-185cm nowadays.

Between 188-189cm young.

He has the same height than Clint Eastwood's height nowadays only difference is Clint Eastwood was 1 cm taller than Sean in peak .
Willes188 said on 24/Aug/17
188-188.5cm peak or between 6'2 and 6'2.25, still close to 6ft 1 today 6'0.5 maybe
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Aug/17
I believe that measurement from the 1950 Mr. Universe. He's the tallest guy in that photo...
James said on 14/Aug/17
@James I disagree with you. He is around 1.84 today.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/17
184cm zone today
Mister lennon said on 2/Aug/17
He's clearly still 6.
James said on 1/Aug/17
He's clearly below six foot now.
Mister lennon said on 1/Aug/17
He is 6 now.
James said on 31/Jul/17
Connery is 5'11.5" now.
Mister lennon said on 28/Jul/17
Strong 188 at youth. Today about 184-185.
Aza said on 28/Jul/17
Believe he was a solid 6'2 peak.
RichardSpain said on 27/Jul/17
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
190.4cm out of bed


what??? ha ha ha
James said on 27/Jul/17
Connery may have been 187 cm in his youth. He's less than 183 today.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
190.4cm out of bed
Mister lennon said on 25/Jul/17
Connery was always 6'2 at his peak.
James said on 25/Jul/17
Connery was 6'1.5" in "Dr No", and six foot by his last film in 2002.
Mark(5'9.5 said on 24/Jul/17
More like 6'2.25" on the dot.
The Master said on 24/Jul/17
Shorter than Hackman, by a good inch.
RichardSpain said on 24/Jul/17
Connery was a strong 188 cm ( 6'2 feet)

Costner was a strong 185cm ( 6'1 feet)

Harrison between 183-184cm ( strong 6 feet nearly 6'1 feet)
Canson said on 24/Jul/17
I'd say he's close to Hackman at his peak maybe fraction lower. 6'1.75 and 6'2 for Hackman
James B said on 23/Jul/17
Costner was 6'1 legit
James said on 23/Jul/17
Costner wasn't 6'1". Connery was clearly shorter than Nicol Williamson.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 23/Jul/17
187-188 peak
Mister lennon said on 22/Jul/17
Costner was a solid 6'1 guy.
The lifts things is becoming so annoying . Is just trolling.
James B said on 22/Jul/17
Rory said on 21/Jul/17
I've no idea how someone could watch from Russia with love and then come to the conclusion he was below 6ft2. Watching Connery walk through the corridors/airport etc in that film he's basically always the tallest man in the scene. The idea he wore lifts is for the birds too...in many a bond film he was walking on the beach or in his hotel room or swimming visibly barefoot and his profile still looks the same size as when fully dressed in shoes. Just accept the fact he was a solid 6ft 2.


Russia with love is only one film and I just thought he could look in the 6'1.5 range in that movie. Connery looked a legit 6'2 in Dr No though because he was very slim in that film.
James said on 22/Jul/17
He was 6'1.5" at his peak.
Rory said on 21/Jul/17
I've no idea how someone could watch from Russia with love and then come to the conclusion he was below 6ft2. Watching Connery walk through the corridors/airport etc in that film he's basically always the tallest man in the scene. The idea he wore lifts is for the birds too...in many a bond film he was walking on the beach or in his hotel room or swimming visibly barefoot and his profile still looks the same size as when fully dressed in shoes. Just accept the fact he was a solid 6ft 2.
James said on 21/Jul/17
Costner was exactly six feet tall at his peak. Connery probably wore lifts in "The Untouchables" to look slightly taller.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jul/17
Connery and Hackman in their late 50's were both taller than a 32-year old Kevin Costner who was a yardstick 6ft1.


Some of these comments defy logic...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jul/17
6ft peak is a joke.
James said on 21/Jul/17
Fleming was only 5'11" in 1964.
Mister lennon said on 21/Jul/17
That is bull****h. He was a clear 6'2 guy. Taller than many 6'1 guys like kevin costner or michael caine or roger moore. 2 inches taller than a 6 harrison ford, and he was almost 60 when he did indiana jones.
The lifts thing and the small sets is just stupid and nonsense. Lets guess than connery was just 6'1 peak(what he wasnt. He was 6'2.) So, he wears lifts and shooted in small sets only to look 6'2. A tall 6'1 guy with lifts and small sets? I can understand it with dustkn hoffman. But with a 6'1 guy???and Whats the matter if bond was 6'1 or 6'2??? That is just absurd.and later, bond has been played by 6'1 roger moore, 6"1 pierce brosnan and 5'10 daniel craig.
All this issue is pretty ridiculous
.
James said on 21/Jul/17
He was made to look taller in the early Bond films with lifts, camera angles, small furniture and small sets.
Dan said on 20/Jul/17
James...you may be right.

Mister lennon...based on what? 6'2" for Connery is a joke to me. Look at the pictures of him standing with the 6'0" Bond creator Ian Fleming. Connery consistently looks not even an inch over him...doesn't even look a half-inch over.
James B said on 20/Jul/17
Saw Russia with love tonight and thought he looked more 6'1.5 in that film.
Rory said on 20/Jul/17
No he had to be a legit 6ft2 peak..watching from Russia with Love he looks a genuinely big man.
James said on 20/Jul/17
Connery was only 6'2" with lifts.
Mister lennon said on 20/Jul/17
6 is a joke for connery.
Nothing less than a solid 6'2 at peak.
Jug said on 19/Jul/17
I don't know if this is accurate but I've heard that the EON tailors measured him at 6'1.5. He was a bit more than two inches shorter than Sutherland in The Great Train Robbery and sometimes Martin Landau and Karl Malden looked taller than him in a film called Meteor. Peter Boyle looked a little taller in Outland. James Fox looked taller in The Russia House. He was noticeably taller than Harrison Ford in Indiana Jones and about the same height as Kevin Costner in The Untouchables. I think he was slightly under 6'2 at peak. He also never had great posture.
Mark(5'9.5") said on 19/Jul/17
Over 188 cm is better.
James said on 18/Jul/17
Sutherland was 6'3" so Connery was six foot in that awful film.
Dan said on 18/Jul/17
even...based on what?? 6'1" is the highest I'd go for Connery...again, easily 3" shorter than the 6'4" Sutherland in "The Great Train Robbery."
even said on 17/Jul/17
six foot two is correct
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jul/17
185cm peak is definitely too low
Dan said on 14/Jul/17
Spencer...not even close. Connery is a good three inches shorter than the 6'4" Donald Sutherland in "The Great Train Robbery." 6'1" was his peak.
James said on 13/Jul/17
He was 187 at his peak. Camera angles and smaller sets and furniture were used to make him look taller as Bond.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jul/17
He did look more 187cm in Never Say Never Again but like you said he was 52. I still stand by 189cm peak
RichardSpain said on 11/Jul/17
Guys ,

Between 188 -189 cm was Connery in peak. I think he was a solid 189 maybe in the morning out of the bed. But 188 cm in the afternon.

Here next to Rowan Atkison (181-182 cm) in the movie "never say never again"

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

As you can see, Connery doesn't look 189cm next to Rowan but 187 / 188 cm is more credible.

In this movie Connery was 52 years old
Spencer said on 9/Jul/17
189 peak 6'2.5
James B said on 5/Jul/17
Watching Dr no right now. Just looking at him in the film Iam thinking he would have been a great choice to play Bruce Wayne. Does anyone else agree?
James B said on 5/Jul/17
lol even to me 6'2 is not freakishly tall.

6'5 is what I'd call freakishly tall
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Jul/17
Brosnan would edge out Costner and possibly Moore
James said on 4/Jul/17
Brosnan was clearly taller than Moore, and Hackman was taller than Caine.
Richardspain said on 3/Jul/17
Peaks of ours" stars"

Sean Connery: (188.5cm)
Gene Hackman: (187.5cm)
Michael Caine: (188cm)
Roger Moore: (186cm)
Pierce Brosnan: (186cm)
Kevin Costner: (186cm)
Harrison Ford: (184cm)
Christopher Walken: (183.5cm)
Alec Baldwin (181.5cm)


Connery was taller than our friends

Alec was shorter than besides

Moore,Brosnan and Costner same height.

Gene Hackman a bit shorter than Michael Caine.

I think I am sure.
Arch Stanton said on 1/Jul/17
I can see 6'2.5 in the corridor scenes in Goldfinger and Thunderball but never thought he looked a big 6'3.
Richard said on 30/Jun/17
Connery was 6'1.5" but now he's below six foot. Costner was six foot at his peak.
Johan said on 30/Jun/17
5'9"-5'10" for Connery lmao. That makes Christopher Lambert 5'7" tops and Nic Cage 5'8" Max.
Mister_lennon said on 30/Jun/17
5'9 for connery is just trolling.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jun/17
6ft2 is not freakishly tall mate
S.J.H said on 29/Jun/17
He could be 6'1 now but few years back he look around 6'1.5
Charlie said on 29/Jun/17
I am a huge James Bond fan and in many of Sean's Bond Films the Female is 2 to 3 inches shorter than him while in heels.I personally have never met a female in my entire life that was over 5'10 in heels. But according to the 6'2 listing here the females in the earlier Bond movies would have to be 5'10 to 5'11 while in heels. We can easily rule out any females reaching 5'10 in heels. 5'6 in heels yes that's believable. This would make Sean Connery 5'9 to 5'10 when he played Bond. I don;t think truly understand exactly how tall 6'2 is. It's freakishly tall.I am 5'10. I am male. In the afternoon i am 5'9 1/4 but when i go outside people are amazed by how tall i am. I saw a guy who was in deed taller than myself. Going by the re-flexion from the window he looked to be 3 inches taller than me. 6'1 is how he appeared. From a distance he stood out like a sore thumb and looked freakishly tall compared to the other males. Sean Connery blended in quite well with his other male co stars. No way was he ever 6'2. Absolutely not. He looked like a 5'9 man when he did James Bond. Today i would say he is 5'7 maybe 5'8.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Jun/17
Sean Connery: 6ft2¼(188.6cm)
Gene Hackman: 6ft2(188.0cm)
Michael Caine: 6ft1¾(187.3cm)
Roger Moore: 6ft1½(186.7cm)
Pierce Brosnan: 6ft1½(186.7cm)
Kevin Costner: 6ft1¼(186.1cm)
Harrison Ford: 6ft0¾(184.8cm)
Christopher Walker: 6ft0½(184.2cm)
Alec Baldwin 5ft11¾(182.3cm)
James said on 23/Jun/17
Costner was 6'0.5" and Connery was 6'1.5" at their peaks.
RichardSpain said on 23/Jun/17
Costner : 185 cm .
Connery: 189cm younger in peak 187cm/188cm in "untouchables"
Harrison: 183cm/184cm in peak
Mimi said on 22/Jun/17
Is he still holding on to this height at age 86? I'm expecting at least an inch of loss.
Editor Rob: since he's been retired, he's kept a peak height, but today I believe he may well be closer to 6ft flat.
Ted said on 16/Jun/17
Slightly over 6' 2'' in his 30s.
berta said on 15/Jun/17
at 56 he probably had lost max 0,5 cm because he was same height as carey even 10 yhears back. Withcosnter he looked max 2 m taller. Costner is one of the evidence that he might have been 188 flat and not taller at peak.well either that ore just over it
James said on 2/Jun/17
Connery was 6'1.5" in 1953 and six foot by 2000.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jun/17
Still looked 187-188cm zone in the 90's-00's and 186cm about 9 years ago (w/h Jim Carey at an AFI event)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/May/17
If Costner was 185/186cm, Connery looked 188/189cm
Leo2001 said on 29/May/17
Legit 6ft2
Taller than 6ft1 Kevin Costner at 56 years old.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
TheoJ said on 29/May/17
Worked with him on Entrapment in 1998 when he was 68, and he was much bigger and taller than I expected. I was around 185cm and he seemed a little taller, around 186cm. So 188cm peak is right.
movieguy said on 27/May/17
Great photo posted of Landau and Connery. Can't see any height difference though. Both were probably about 6'2''.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/May/17
188/189cm is more plausible than 187/188cm
James said on 24/May/17
Martin Landau was 6'2" at his peak.
Willes188 said on 24/May/17
I do think that 6'2.5 is a little too high for him, but he generally looked anywhere between 6'1.75-6'2.25 in his prime.
AlexMahone said on 20/May/17
In the 1979 movie Meteor, Connery and Martin Landau in some scenes stand face to face. I always thought that Landau was in prime a legit 6'2.5" guy. Landau in the movie is slightly taller than Connery.

Click Here

Landau's posture is always terrible but here stands in great military posture. What do you think Rob?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/17
In Never Say Never Again he did look a little shorter than before. He was heavier though
James B said on 17/May/17
Rampage- I saw Dr No a little over 1 year ago on TV and I didn't think he really looked over 6ft2 in that film.

Might have to see it again to refresh my memory but I will say though that I thought he could look 6'1.5 in never say never again
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/May/17
I think he could be 184/185cm zone today if measured. Can look like a 6ft guy when walking
msn187 said on 14/May/17
He hansn't at least lost a cm or two in height at his age? That's rather impressive.
Editor Rob: he has lost height, but because he is basically retired, he kept his peak height. Today he might be 6ft flat.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/May/17
Goldfinger, Dr. No and You Only Live Twice were times where he could pass for 6ft3. If he was a strong 6ft2 then he could have been 6ft3 out of bed.
James B said on 10/May/17
You could make a case for him looking 6ft3 in Goldfinger. Not saying he was that tall though.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/May/17
James is just a troll....


Look 6ft2 flat is fine for Connery aswell but nothing less. I just think it's more likely he measured a bit over it rather than under...just like Caine is also entitled to a 6ft2 listing but he may have been a little shy of it
mister_lennon said on 4/May/17
The lifts thing is just crap, as always.
connery was a true and strong 6'2.
AlexMahone said on 4/May/17
James wants again his 5 minutes fame...

The lift wearer talk is insane...
Editor Rob: James comments have slowed down a bit
Rory said on 3/May/17
Why would a 6ft 2 guy or even accepting for a minute you're right and that he was 6ft 1.5...why would a 6ft 1.5 guy(about the equivalent of 6ft 3.25 today compared to then) need to wear lifts or indeed need the furniture shrinked down ? Very odd.
James said on 3/May/17
Connery was wearing lifts in "Dr No", and the furniture and sets were smaller than they would be in reality. Connery's peak height was 6'1.5".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/May/17
He looked abut 6ft3 w/h Jack Lord. Absolute nothing below 188-188.5cm at night in 1962
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Apr/17
Maybe at a push he could be near 185cm today.
Richardspain said on 28/Apr/17
He is tall. I think he is a strong 185cm no less, with footwear about 187cm.

Similar Roger Moore's height but a bit shorter than Connery.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/17
Peak: 6ft2¼(188.6cm)
Today: 6ft0½(184.2cm)
James said on 27/Apr/17
He was 71 or 72 when his last film "The League of Gentlemen" was filmed in 2002.
RichardSpain said on 25/Apr/17
My resume;

Connery was 189cm in peak to his fifty years old.

From the age of fifty years old to ...maybe ¿¿¿sixty-five ??? years old his height was 188cm not less.

Since his 65 years old, he lost a bit of height.

The problem he retired of the cinema when he was around seventy years old , and we couldn't control his height. But in my opinion today 184 cm to Connery is ok.Not more.
Johan said on 22/Apr/17
Back in 2012 he already looked 6'0.5" next to 6'2" Andy Murray ( measured). So I agree with James for once, now 5 years later and at 87 years old its pretty certain that he is 6' or maybe even less because of poor posture.

He is retired so no real point giving a current height.
Willes188 said on 20/Apr/17
He looked 6ft 1.5-6ft 2 in 1989 next to Harrison Ford. In his younger days he looked a solid 6ft 2


6'2.25 is still up for debate in his prime
Thomas Veil said on 20/Apr/17
6'2 easy for 007
berta said on 19/Apr/17
i personally think that this average guess listings is not 100 procent what people believe. Its many guys on this site that always write stuff like" he had 4 inches lifts on" and vote a guy like connery at 6 foot.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 19/Apr/17
6'2" without shoes. Actually, 6'2.25" without shoes is also arguable. That's me just saying it neutral.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 19/Apr/17
6'2" without shoes.
mister_lennon said on 17/Apr/17
6'2 without shoes.
James said on 16/Apr/17
He was 6'2" with shoes.
mister_lennon said on 15/Apr/17
188-189 peak. Not less.
James said on 13/Apr/17
Connery was 187 cm at his peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Apr/17
Still looked 188cm in the 80's-90's.
berta said on 12/Apr/17
rob in all honeslty of you had listing like 6 foot 2 and 1/5 on this site then i think connery would have been listed that. may have been to short for 1/4 LISTING but i still think he was not 188,0 tall in the afternoon but more 188,4 rangea strong 188 guy. people on the site seems to think he was barely 188. to name a few movie where he could look shorter is indiana jones. he mad ford look almost 185 aorund 184,5 maybe. and highlander he didnt rally look almost 10 cm taller than the main guy. and in that cosnter movie he looked half inch taller. other than that he looked really tall. hm also with nicolas cage it looked like he was barely 188 and cage maybe 184. hm its a lot of movies he actually did look at best 188 but the question is when did he start to loose height . he is well built and have big bones just look at his hands so i think he didnt loose more than 1-3 mm until he was around 60-64 years old.
190 cm said on 10/Apr/17
Maximum of 185 cm for him when he was young.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/17
Could look a 6ft3 guy in Dr. No
Richard said on 5/Apr/17
Remember the sets in "Dr No" were smaller than they would be in real life so Connery would look taller.
Editor Rob: sometimes that is true...I also am getting my house remodelled, with smaller doorways and lower ceilings so in future videos I look Big Rob²
Headlights said on 4/Apr/17
Having just watched his early Bond movies I'd have to go with a peak/young height of 6' 1.5" or 6' 2".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Apr/17
He could've been 187-188cm in the 90's
DirectorKrennic said on 4/Apr/17
Time for Peak 188 cm and current 184 cm.
RichardSpain said on 3/Apr/17
I think Sean never was 190 cm, in my opinion 188 cm or 189cm in peak is possible. When he was Dr Henry Jones in Indiana Jones and the last crusade, maybe his height was 187cm and Harrison 183cm. Today Connery 184 cm is posible, he is 86 years old.
James said on 3/Apr/17
Connery is actually six foot now.
mister_lennon said on 3/Apr/17
Yes. Thath is what i said. 4 or 5 years ago, he looked the same or a little bit taller than jim carrey.
S.J.H said on 1/Apr/17
4 years ago he look at least same height as jim carrey. Now is a myth if he have lost more height or not.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Mar/17
He can look barely 6ft today when walking around or standing loosely but I'm convinced he'd still clear that mark if measured. Possibly a just under 6ft1 though. He's lost roughly 1½in from his peak.


I think he woke up at 6ft3 and dropped to 6ft2-2¼ at his low
Sam said on 20/Mar/17
Hmm, I think seeing him with 6'6" Alan Napier in Marnie, I wouldn't try to argue anything over 189 cm at his full peak, Napier looks pretty much a strong 4 inches taller. Other evidence that the listing is correct, was that Connery clearly edged by nearly a couple inches by 6'3.5" Donald Sutherland in The Great Train Robbery and no taller than the even 6'2" Michael Caine in The Man Who Would Be King.
Adijos said on 19/Mar/17
Peak - 6'2.75"
Now - 6'1.5"
James said on 19/Mar/17
He was 6'1.5" as a young man.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Mar/17
I think in his prime he easily hit a solid 190cm out of bed (maybe even 190.5cm which is actually 6ft3 on the nose).
Willes188 said on 18/Mar/17
190cm is not hard to believe at all, he probably measured it in the morning (prime)
berta said on 17/Mar/17
i think connery can look 184 range today but who knows if he is 185 when he stands tall. under 6 foot 2 is hard to believe at peak. and anything over 189 is also to mutch
James said on 15/Mar/17
Connery is six foot now.
mister_lennon said on 15/Mar/17
He hasnt lost so much heigth . He owned jim carrey some years ago.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Mar/17
Still looking 6ft2 in these

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob: that's a few years ago I'd say now.
Shredder said on 9/Mar/17
I've been watching old films with him , He really did look 6'2 at the lowest. I believe the over 6'2 measurement.
mister_lennon said on 7/Mar/17
Hackman was 6'2. Connery was a strong 6'2.
Arch Stanton said on 6/Mar/17
Wow, a very strong resemblance to his mother. Click Here She looks so masculine it's tough to see her as female there. Connery said she was "hard as nails", he obviously takes after her!
James said on 6/Mar/17
Hackman was 6'1". Connery was 6'1.5".
Canson said on 5/Mar/17
@Rampage: definitely thanks as well! Agreed too! Hackman to me still looks every bit of 6'2 in Heist and even in enemy of the state when he is standing straight looks as tall as Smith or taller. In Heist he looked almost even with the way has Delroy Lindo. Possible both have lost height today but lindo looked a 192-193 guy prime imho maybe even your height a full 6'4.
mister_lennon said on 5/Mar/17
Hackman was 6'2. As connery.
James said on 4/Mar/17
Hackman was 6'1".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Mar/17
@Canson: I appreciate that thanks and likewise, you clearly have sharp eye for this. There are far too many trolls on here who just refuse to let up.

I think Hackman is a hard guy to pin down. He has looked both a weak and strong 6ft2 on different occasions. I think 6ft2 flat is fine for him overall though. Right between Caine and Connery
Canson said on 4/Mar/17
@Rampage: I'll admit it's possible I agree. I value your opinion a lot more than Willes and I always have liked and respected you as a poster as you present your points logically and respectfully! Plus you are around that height of 6'4" so much easier to tell that type of height. I do certainly agree on Hackman. He was a legit 6'2" prime and looks it in Heist still with Delroy lindo. At worst maybe he dipped to weak 6'2 but that's a big if
Guanzo said on 2/Mar/17
6'1'' no more
mister_lennon said on 22/Feb/17
Thanks, berta.
berta said on 21/Feb/17
mister_lennon i would say excactly the same on all them. the one who can be hard is dwayne johnson in your first post you thought 191-192 and now 190-191 and i am with you on that sometimes i bevlie he wwas just 6 foot 3 at peak but other times it looked like he could have been a littel over maybe not 6 foot 3 and a half but 1/4. And as you say ford and travolta was very close at their peaks. But ford was probably something like6 fot and 3/8 while travolta was 6 foot 1/4 with a chanse of being 6 foot flat on bad days. Thums up for your guesses!!!
Mark(5'9.25 said on 14/Feb/17
I would go by the strong 6'2" for Connery.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Feb/17
Dolph Lundgren: 6ft4½(194.3cm) peak; 6ft3(190.5cm) today
Dwayne Johnson: 6ft3½(191.8cm) peak; 6ft2¾(189.9cm) today
Harrison Ford: 6ft0¾(184.8cm) peak; 5ft11(180.3cm) today
John Travolta: 6ft0½(184.2cm) peak; 5ft11¾(182.2cm) today
Willes189 said on 13/Feb/17
I think that Connery deserves a place on the "Classic Hollywood Actors" page
mister_lennon said on 12/Feb/17
Berta , i think it:
Harrison ford: 183-184 peak and 178-179 now.
dolph lundgren:192-193 peak and 189-190 now.
the rock: 190-191 peak and 188-189 now.
john travolta: 183-184 peak and 182-183 now. Maybe 181.
peak ford and peak travolta were very similar. Both solid 6 guys.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Feb/17
Berta, I think Ford was near 6ft1 up until the mid-80's. Minimum 6ft0¾ anyway. Looked 6ft1 in Star Wars and The Conversation. Obviously he began to lose height quite early. Dolph had to be at least 6ft4 in the 80's and I don't doubt the listed 6ft4¼. He was a monster of a guy and had inches over other tall guys. But like Ford, he's fallen victim to injuries and lost a fair bit. The Rock was possibly a bit over 6ft3 when he entered WWE. I can see an argument for 6ft3½ and in wrestling boots was his claimed 6ft5. Travolta was a bit over 6ft, possibly 6ft0½. In Fever he was no less than 6ft2 in those big dancing shoes and likely nearer 6ft3. Similar in Grease. He was super skinny, had the Elvis hairdo and just looked much taller than he probably was. In the 90's when he made his comeback, he was heavier but probably still about same height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Feb/17
Connery still looked every inch of 6ft2 w/h Costner, Ford and Cage. May have dropped a centimetre by then and was 188cm in the 80's-90's. By early 2000's he was starting to look 187cm. As of recently maybe 184-185cm range. I think he can still clear 6ft today when measured.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.