Roger Moore's Height
6ft 1 ¼ (186.1 cm)
English actor, best remembered for playing James Bond and for films such as The Wild Geese, The Cannonball Run, Escape to Athena, The Last Time I Saw Paris, The Man Who Haunted Himself and The Sea Wolves. On TV he made a name for himself playing Simon Templar in TV series The Saint. His CV lists him as standing 6ft 2 inches tall.
Six Foot Two...in the morning.
- Indiana Evening Gazette, 1967
I always played heroes because I'm six-foot-one-and-a-half, but I never really believed I was a hero, so I always played things tongue in cheek.
Roger & Linda Gray
Photo © ImageCollect.com / AcePixs
Sir Roger told me that when he first went to acting school he had a teacher who asked him, "How tall are you?".
"Six foot one," he replied.
"So now stand as though you are 6ft 1in," the teacher said.
Roger did - and from that day started getting more work.
- Paul McKenna
You May Be Interested
Add a Comment1098 comments
Average Guess (140 Votes)
6ft 1.14in (185.8cm)
Enrique Jorge said on 22/Oct/21
For those of us who grew up in the 70s, he was our James Bond. He played the role with a good natured humility. He was an all around decent guy. The world could use more Roger Moores who do not take themselves so seriously that they must always put down others to make themselves feel relevant. For me, he will always be 7 feet tall.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Oct/21
I think Remington Brosnan would possibly edge Saint Moore
recapa said on 3/Oct/21
185.5-186 peak ,he was probably edged by peak brosnan.
said on 24/Sep/21
As listed with Lee Click Here
Rory said on 20/Sep/21
Of course many people wear lifts, but the vast majority dont which is why id always assume first that a person/actor doesn't wear lifts because statistically speaking its unlikely they will.
6ft1 1/8th in 1960s,6ft0.75 in 80s,6ft0. 5 in 90s.
avi said on 16/Sep/21
@Rory said on 15/Sep/21
This is an untrue statement and conjecture as well.
Many actors wear lifts
Many people are conscientious of height
Moore looked taller in the Saint in the 1960s I've seen almost every episode and every Bond plus other films he was in
I doubt he lost height from 1965 to 1975
With the lifts piece aside,the 6'1 height is fine
By the 80s he seemed to be sub 6'1
Rory said on 15/Sep/21
Its pointless suggesting he might have worn lifts, there's no evidence at all to point to that and he never wore suspicious looking footwear. The vast majority of people dont wear lifts. Rogers height didnt fluctuate either, to me he nearly always looked in that solid to strong 6ft1 zone in his prime. Its people like Richard Harris where the lifts question becomes more relevant, where in one film he looks 6ft0.5 and then in the next film 6ft2 and then 6ft1 etc etc.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Sep/21
6ft1 flat or possibly a nibble under by A View To A Kill
avi said on 8/Sep/21
@Rory said on 5/Sep/21
Yh with O'Toole id have Peter at 6ft2 and Roger at 6ft0.75 based on that picture, looks a 1.5 inch difference at most to me.
Yes that pic he is maybe 1.3 inches shorter looks close to 1.5
And yeah in the Saint he looks 6'1.5 even 6'2 at times (maybe the hair ?)
I think he was 6'1 and change then by mid 50s he was barely 6'1
I don't think he would have worn lifts in the Saint and Persuaders but never know...
Rory said on 5/Sep/21
Yh with O'Toole id have Peter at 6ft2 and Roger at 6ft0.75 based on that picture, looks a 1.5 inch difference at most to me. That was 1982 though, Roger was about 55 there and I always had a feeling Roger looked a fraction shorter by the 80s than he had done in the 60s. Never looked anything less than 6ft1 in The Saint, but could sometimes appear shy of it in the 80s and even late 70s. I think 185.5/186 in The Saint/Persuaders and 185 flat by View to a Kill. I think in more recent times I remember seeing him with Robbie Williams and he still looked 5ft11+ 10 yrs back.
avi said on 4/Sep/21
Think he was a strong 6'1
Then 6'0.75 at most by the last Bond film a view to a kill
Eventually he was barely 6'0 before his death
And most will lose 1 inch to 1.5 by late 80s
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Sep/21
O’Toole honestly looks like a 6ft3 guy if Moore’s height is correct.
In reality the difference between them probably wasn’t that much but I can see a case for Peter being a more solid 6ft2 (like 188-188.5cm) than a weak one with Roger at 186cm
said on 2/Sep/21
Looks 184 next to Peter O'Toole
O'Toole still looking a big 6ft 2 guy there with Moore
Rory said on 18/Aug/21
I dont see young Roger being as tall as 6ft1.5, as ive said before, a suave good postured actor like Moore if he really was 6ft1.5 would have pulled off a 6ft2 look with ease. He never really did. At times he could look 6ft1.5 for sure, but then several times he could look 6ft1 max too so.. I think probably 6ft1 flat is the lowest you could argue and in my personal opinion 6ft1 3/8ths is the most you could argue. Very likely he fell somewhere within that range.
talker said on 16/Aug/21
Moore in the early sixties when he played The Saint was 1.87m which is about 6'1.5".He would round up sometimes and say 6'2".Then he may have lost 1cm in later years in his late fifties or so.He looked about that height all through the Saint next to many actors ,many of them listed at 6'2" looked about the same height with Moore,actor Anthony Dawson one of them.
Rory said on 31/Jul/21
Of course he could lose an inch, he could even lose more, or perhaps less.. There's no cast iron rule. Id agree with what Rampage said though, 6ft2 straight out of bed and then 6ft1-1.25 at night in the 60s/early 70s.
I suspect, though cant be sure, when posters on this site say theyve lost half inch say from morning to night theyve not really measured their low. Wake up at 7am say and measure yourself,then do a physically intensive job on your feet for 10 hrs straight and then see if youve only dropped half an inch. I suspect for many it will be 0.75-1 inch range.
Canson said on 31/Jul/21
@Rob: that’s what I was alluding to. I see anywhere from 6’1-6’1.5 afternoon height and 6’1.75-6’2.25 out of bed (3/4” loss from morning to evening). But he isn’t at that size where you lose the inch
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jul/21
6ft2 first thing, 6ft1-1¼ at his low
Rory said on 30/Jul/21
Yh 6ft2 out of bed is probable for a young Roger. Doubtful hed measure it an hr out of bed though because that would make him a decent 6ft1.5 guy which i always felt was just a tad too much. More a solid/strong 6ft1 than a guy edging towards 6ft2.
Solid 6ft2 actor Nicholas Smith had Moore by an inch in The Saint.
said on 30/Jul/21
Was he the full 6’2 out of bed? Or was it after an hour? Depends on the pic you see where he can look anything 6’1 to 6’1.5
I'd say he had a good chance in his youth of reaching 6ft 2 out of bed
David Tang said on 23/Jul/21
Rory said on 19/Jul/21
I think 186 is the best fit for Roger, he was always easily taller than six foot range men in the 60s and 70s. I wouldn't say it was impossible he was just a good postured flat 6ft1, but I think 6ft1.25 is still reasonable. Roger measuring around his claim of 6ft1.5 at say 11am is very believable.
Dr Decker said on 18/Jul/21
6-1 peak. Never really looked over that imo.
David Tang said on 3/Jul/21
tall guy. i think the 6'1.75 was a morning height out of bed. rob why don't you count that. he isn't lying when he says his height is 6'1.75 if he reaches it out of bed.
MaskDeMasque said on 25/May/21
I think he's the best bond too. Love the inuendos and comic cheesiness of his films. I think Daniel is good but too serious, prefer old style bond.
said on 17/May/21
Rob, would you agree that Ted Wass was 6’0.25” at peak?
In Curse of The Pink Panther, I make Moore approximately an inch taller than Wass.
I doubt he was less than 6ft range
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/May/21
Harris was likely a bit over 6ft....was never convinced that Rob downgrading him to 6ft flat was the right move
said on 19/Apr/21Click Here
Here's Roger looking similar height to 6ft listed Richard Harris.
MaskDeMasque said on 17/Apr/21
Watched the man with the golden gun last night. Roger looks a solid 6'1. 6'1.25.
Rory said on 6/Apr/21
Wasnt really any clear cut opportunities to compare Moore and Walken in View to a Kill, although you could tell they looked fairly close. By then id say Moore 185cm(185.5/186cm peak)Walken 183.5cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Mar/21
Haven't seen A View To A Kill in years...trying to remember how much was between Roger and Chris Walken. More a flat 6ft1 by then perhaps. Live and Let Die/Man with the Golden Gun days could hold his own next to the really big guys like Christopher Lee and Yaphett Kotto (who we just lost RIP), even pass for 6ft2
Hong said on 16/Mar/21
He looked like a solid 6ft1 guy in his youth,a bit shorter than Connery and Caine,who both looked like solid 6ft2 guys.
Rory said on 15/Mar/21
In that episode of The Saint I think Sutherland had somewhere in 2-2.5 inches on Moore so 6ft1.25 and 6ft3.5 looked correct.
said on 14/Mar/21Click Here
Here's Roger with 6ft3.5 Donald Sutherland,it's not a great pic for height comparison,but Sutherland is leaning and looks comfortably taller.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Mar/21
Moore - 186.4cm
Brosnan - 186.7cm
Caine - 187.6cm
Connery - 188.3cm
Moore - 186.1cm
Brosnan - 186.4cm
Caine - 187.3cm
Connery - 188cm
Rory said on 9/Feb/21
I think the average guess here of 185.8 is perfect for Roger. Its the sort of height id fully expect him to measure in the 1960s at about 3pm.
Slim 6'1" said on 7/Feb/21
The5'11Dude said on 30/Jan/21
Definitely looked 6'1-6'1.25 in the 007 films, sometimes a little under or over the mark.
slim 6'1 said on 21/Jan/21
slim 6'1 said on 20/Jan/21
I reckon even just the flat 5’9”
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 2/Dec/20
He definitley didn't look 6'2, let alone 6'1 1/2 next to christopher lee in the man with the golden gun. More like a weak 6'1, but maybe the ground was uneven??
jon mortimer said on 17/Nov/20
He was exactly what he said at his peak - 6'ft 2 out of bed and 6ft 1 & 1/2 after lunch. I mean that's it - really. I saw him up very close on his way to signing his autobiography after one of his 'Evening With...' when he was already in his early - mid 80's and the guy was still a good 6ft in normal shoes. If you see him in that terrible film Bullseye with Michael Caine who claims and again definately was if not bang on 6' 2" very very close to it where they stand back to back for the cover & are right next to one another in many scenes they are pretty much the same height - maybe Caine has a fraction of an inch. Its interesting seeing so many people second guessing - its a real obsession. He was what he said. I think as a general rule men 6ft or over simply don't exaggerate their height as much as shorter men and I think in that generation they hardly did at all.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 14/Oct/20
Roger Moore was born 93 years ago today. He took over from my favourite Bond, Sean Connery.
Roger lived to 89.
RIP Roger Moore 🕯️
14/10/1927 - 23/5/2017
said on 12/Oct/20Click Here
Here's Roger with 6ft3.5 listed Curt Jurgens.Jurgens is 12 years older and may have lost a bit of height,would have been in his early 60s at the time.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Oct/20
I’m still not sure about Arnold. He could look 6ft1 and other times pull off 6ft2. Him, Moore and Brosnan might’ve been close peak
Arch Stanton said on 28/Sep/20
Same height as Arnie peak IMO.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Sep/20
Roger manages to pull off 6ft2 with Clint
said on 24/Sep/20Click Here
Here's a nice pick of Roger.
Rory said on 21/Sep/20
Lol well Roger looks 6ft3 there with Walker which he obviously wasn't anywhere near so somethings amiss.
said on 17/Sep/20Click Here
Here's Roger with Clint Walker.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Aug/20
186-187cm fits both I think
Rory said on 11/Aug/20
Too difficult to say who would have been taller out of peak Brosnan and peak Moore. Brosnan obviously edged out a 1990s Roger in his late sixties, but to separate Saint era Roger and Remington Steele era Brosnan you would have needed to measure them. I'm sure they'd appear extremely close in person.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Aug/20
Sinclair, I think Pierce might have had the edge
Sinclair said on 8/Aug/20
I’d give Roger more than just a flat 6’1” at peak, the 6’1.25” listing seems perfect to me. He did look very tall during the run of The Saint and The Persuaders!. He looked about the same height as Michael Lonsdale in Moonraker and was probably a flat 6’1” or even less by the time of A View to a Kill. Rob, who do you think was taller at peak, Roger Moore or Pierce Brosnan? I would say Roger Moore was a hair taller than Brosnan when comparing their peak heights, but Brosnan eventually became the taller man, perhaps around the late 1970s or early 1980s.
QM6'1QM said on 13/Jul/20
Rory said on 8/Jul/20
Absolutely "good looking comment" bro 100%!
Rory said on 8/Jul/20
There were occasions though where he did look no more than 6ft1. I'm thinking with guys like Steven Berkoff,James Cosmo and Joss Ackland. Did look more 185 than 186 or 187 with those guys and that was during his peak years. Admittedly though there are several incidents of him looking a good 186 too. I think 6ft1.25 is perfect for Moore but if I had to say what was more likely 6ft1 or 6ft1.5 for him I'd opt for 6ft1 flat, he was too often comfortably edged out by genuine 6ft2ers to have been 6ft1.5 Imo. The 6ft2 out of bed and 6ft1 at night e,g strong 6ft1 has always sounded right for him.
I could see him measuring 6ft1.5 at say 10am and then rounding to 6ft2 quite often.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Jul/20
Yeah I think a 6ft1 flat is a disservice for Moore and Brosnan peak. Anywhere 186-187cm range in the Saint/Persuader/early Bond years is possible. An easy round up to 6ft2 from there
said on 26/Jun/20
Rob, is 6ft1½ still a possibility?
That was always the most I'd give him, I'm not sure I would go with a flat 6ft 1 for him in his 20's and 30's, hence between 6ft 1 and 1.5 was a figure to settle on.
Jam Cherry said on 18/Jun/20
Roger Moore was 186 cm atleast he was little over 6’1”
said on 15/May/20
Rory, I agree that most people aren't as Obsessed With Height
as regular visitors to this site. Although at the end of the day I consider this site to be harmless fun no more, no less.
However I do think that in films or TV shows the image of the leading man is protected. They don't use actors in supporting parts who are better looking than the star or make the leading man look like a midget. The same way a band or their manager doesn't choose a support act that are better than they are.
said on 11/May/20
I'd say Sutherland looked 2.5 inches taller than him at most in that episode, I feel the difference between Mike Tyson and Rob is similar to how Sutherland looked with Moore, I think 2.25 range. So 6ft3.5 and 6ft1.25 looks very close. I just don't buy arguments about people especially casting actors because of their height with them needing to be shorter or w,e. Most people aren't Obsessed With Height
and it doesn't enter their head as much as it would a visitor to this site. Plus as I say a 186cm guy in the 1960s would look tall regardless.
movieguy12 said on 11/May/20
To add to my earlier comments about Roger Moore in the Saint. I've just watched the episode Escape Route in which Donald Sutherland appears. Sutherland is about 2 or 3 inches taller I'd say which would put Moore between 6'1'' and 6'2'' if Sutherland is 6'4'' or thereabouts. My guess is that Moore was at the lower end of this range roughly in line with the official celebheights estimate. I think that given that Moore was the leading man they did perhaps avoid casting him alongside tall actors on too many occasions. The episode with Sutherland was the exception I guess there was one other actor also taller than Moore in this show.
Rory said on 10/May/20
I disagree with that, there were actually quite a lot of actors over six foot in The Saint. A solid/strong 6ft1 man in the 1960s would be the equivalent of like a 6ft3 guy today too so he would look pretty tall on and off screen.
movieguy12 said on 8/May/20
Watching the colour episodes of the Saint at the moment. Roger Moore is closing in on 40 at this point but looks surprisingly youthful. He also looks a genuinely big man but given that he was the star of the show maybe they avoided casting him alongside too many tall actors.
QM6'1QM said on 8/Apr/20
TheoJ said on 5/Apr/20
I think he looks easily 5cms taller than Moore, i mean take a look on their shoulders or size difference of heads. Generally Moore did his posture better on this photo.
But yeah i don't see 6-7 cm if 007 Bond still be solid 186 cm there.
So 191 cm is a high possible for Christopher.
movieguy12 said on 4/Apr/20
In the last of his published books Moore mentions finding the metric system confusing in some respects having grown up with imperial measures. He mentions when people ask him his height he says he thinks he is 1.83 m and gives his weight as 12.5 stone. I'm not sure how accurate these figures are. 1.83 m equates to 6ft I think this may be accurate for an older Roger Moore he was probably taller in his youth.
movieyguy12 said on 29/Mar/20
I don't think Roger wore lifts as he was a tall guy anyway. At least 6ft probably a bit more if you forgive the pun. Roger does mention on the DVD commentary of the Wild Geese of how Richard Harris appeared on set one day taller than he was having previously appeared shorter. He quickly worked out that Harris was wearing boots with lifts. So yeah it does happen.
I watched Live and Let Die yesterday for the first time in a while and was surprised how youthful Moore looked. I know there are some who say that Roger at 46 yrs of age was too old to be cast as Bond but in the early films at least he did still look young enough for the role of the superspy. The later films although entertaining probably in these Moore did look a little past it for part.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Feb/20
Moore - strong 186cm
Brosnan - weak 187cm
Dalton - weak 188cm
Connery - strong 188cm
Rory said on 17/Dec/19
Certainly not under 6ft1 in the 1960s. Looked what I'd call a solid 6ft1 guy back then. Never looked under it and could often seem a fraction taller, occasionally pulling off 6ft1.5. Generally though roughly 6ft1.25 seems bang on really, I'd struggle to see him under 6ft1 but also struggle to envisage him being a legit 6ft1.5 so somewhere in between looks nailed on.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Nov/19
Not under 6ft1
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Oct/19
I think he said 6ft2 a couple of other times when asked
Importer said on 22/Sep/19
Brosnan gave me taller impression than Moore.
Importer said on 22/Sep/19
@Rory “innocent until proven guilty policy”. The only word I agree on in that sentence is “policy”.
Importer said on 26/Jul/19
HAHAHAHA I like that story told by Paul McKenna. Roger Moore simply improved his posture and got the credibility he deserved! rather inspirational if you ask me.
said on 17/Jul/19
I think when it comes to lifts and anything really you have to have an innocent until proven guilty policy and I've never seen a shred of evidence to say he was a lift wearer as his height always looked consistent to me. It's not like in one episode he looked 6ft2 and in the next 6ft flat which would arouse suspicions, no he always looked 6ft0.75 lowest up to 6ft1.5 maximum when stood impeccably. Somewhere Inbetween that range the truth lies I think. My guess is Roger woke up out of bed at 6ft2 and maybe shrunk an inch to 6ft1 flat after a long day on set. I think Connery would have had close to but no more than an inch on Moore.
It would seem unlikely a man like Roger would wear them.
Importer said on 16/Jul/19
@avi I disagree, Connery was a solid 6'2
avi said on 12/Jul/19
@Rory said on 15/Jun/19
Yes I always thought he looked a good 6'1.
I also noticed he looked taller in the Saint.
His hair is different (it's pushed back ) and his posture is very solid. Plus cameras can easily make 5'10 actors look 6'0 if done right.
Looking next to a 6'4 -6'4.5 guy like Christopher Lee he looked 3-3.5 inches shorter.
I guess my thought was he may have worn a small lift. Not saying he did but you never you know. In his memoir he mentioned he was told to "walk like he's 6'1 not 5'10" in his early acting days maybe this made him more cognizant of his height.
I'm perfectly fine with 6'1 though. Over that like 6'1.5 is pushing it.
Next to Connery later on he looked closer to 6'0 flat considering Connery was never a solid 6'2.
Rory said on 15/Jun/19
I couldn't really agree he looked 6ft0.5, for example in the last saint episodes I watched he looked not much more than 2 inches shorter than Donald Sutherland (6ft3.5) and in another one looked a good 2 inches taller than Oliver Reed (5ft11). As I say he was a guy who when compared to everyone always looked in the sturdy 6ft1 zone in the 60s and 70s so for me a little over 6ft1 is more likely than say 6ft0.5. But generally 6ft1 or 1.25 he had to have been there or there abouts.
avi said on 12/Jun/19
@Rory said on 11/Jun/19
Yes he appeared 6'1 throughout most of his career.
In the Saint he can look over it.
I think it's possible Moore was 6'0.5 because with his slim , proportioned body he can be one of those who can look an inch taller on screen.
But 6'1 is a fair listing.
Rory said on 11/Jun/19
I've watched most of Moores stuff from the 60s and 70s and he always looked a good 6ft1. 6ft1 flat would be the least I'd argue and 6ft1.5 would be the most I'd argue. I think personally he was either 6ft1 1/8th or the current 6ft1.25 but he wasn't under 6ft1 that's for sure I think the average guess here of 185.8 is probably very close for an evening measurement for Roger he was always clearly taller than 6fters and when standing with good posture could look not far off 6ft2 guys. I actually think he would have measured 6ft2 out of bed.
Visitor said on 2/Jun/19
@avi Yes, "looked on screen". Was not necessarily in reality. 6'0.75 wouldn't be absurd, but neither would 6'0". What the "looks 6 ft on screen" basically means "is actually 5'10" ". Across the board, on this site absolutely everyone who is in a picture with Rob turns out to be way shorter than people tend to think.
I don't really like arguing about this as I really like Moore as Bond, he just simply was not as tall as someone else. He was nowhere near 6 ft 2 except maybe in shoes.
avi said on 20/May/19
I think next to Lee Moore looked around 3 to 3.5 inches shorter.
Lee wasn't 6'5 but was a strong 6'4. This would make Roger Moore 6'1. I'm not against 6'0.5 to 6'0.75 but these 6'0 flat calls are a bit absurd.
Timothy Dalton did look a good inch taller. To me Moore looked 6'1 almost all the time on screen. Did he wear lifts? I don't think so but you never know!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Apr/19
Moore still looked around 6ft1 in A View To A Kill if Walken was a fraction over 6ft. In Live And Let Die/Man With The Golden Gun could look 6ft1½ to 6ft2.
Rory said on 16/Mar/19
Walken wasn't in Live and let die but in View to a kill I'd say Moore had half inch on Walken who I think was a 6ft0 1/8th guy. So you're looking at a 57 year old Moore at around 6ft0.75 imo, about 1cm down from his peak which I believe was 6ft1.25.
62B said on 7/Mar/19
I was watching Live and Let Die last night. To me he looked about the same height as Christopher Walken.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Feb/19
Canson said on 9/Jan/19
Definitely not as tall as Connery
Michael 5'10", 178 cm said on 31/Dec/18
He was 6'1", looked it in The Spy who Loved Me and Moonraker. He was roughly a foot shorter than Richard Kiel who made him look short. Gave a similar impression in height to Brosnan. Roger was 6'1" at his peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Dec/18
6ft2 straight out of bed
movieguy12 said on 20/Nov/18
Looked at Sherlock Holmes in New York last night. An entertaining romp. Moore was a pretty big guy. He's taller than co-star Patrick Macnee by a couple of inches and Mcnee was close to 6ft I understand. Maybe he wasn't a full 6'2'' which he sometimes claimed but was probably about 6'1'' or so.
Polar Bear said on 21/Oct/18
There are pictures of Roger Moore and Arnold Schwarzenegger at a party in 1988 (frailes Club Stag Asado). In each picture Arnold’s shoulders and waistline are approx. the same level as Roger Moore’s, however he has a solid height advantage and Roger Moore is looking up at him. Does this mean that Roger was only 5ft 10? Or was Arnold 6ft 2 and has since shrunk in later life?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Sep/18
I agree Rory. Anything under 6ft1 is a joke
Rory said on 11/Sep/18
Moore in The saint and Persuaders always had a good inch or so on 6 foot actors (Terrence Alexander,Terry Thomas,Donald Pickering,Garfield Morgan). In that era he always looked 6ft1-1.5. 188 out of bed, 185.5-186 lowest. He probably did measure 6ft1.5 at around 11am. He clearly wasn't 4.5 inches shorter than Lee, it looked 3-3.5 inches which makes perfect sense with 194 and 186 listings.
There's an actor in Diamonds are forever called Joe Robinson who looked identical in height to Connery in their scene in the elevator, that actor in The Saint looked 2cm taller than Moore. Connery was a decent 6ft2 and Moore a strong 6ft1 imo.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Sep/18
Out of bed: 188.3cm
Before bed: 186.4cm
diavolo said on 9/Sep/18
In a 1985 interview for Good Morning America, Moore described himself as 6'2".
Neelasish Sen Roy
said on 5/Sep/18
Rob, Roger Moore was 3.5 inches or 4.5 inches shorter than Sir Christopher Lee?
I wouldn't say 4.5, but arguably 3.5 range.
bugsy185 said on 28/May/18
If you guys have all the while been talking about a early/mid day height and/or height in shoes, then 186.0 cm for Roger Moore in the 70's makes sense.
I have always estimated celebs at their VERY LOWEST and no shoes height. My bad, I guess. This also explains many others on this site.
After a long day, I myself am 183+ even in just converse sneakers and 185+ in regular dress shoes. I'm not especially thin either, pretty normal but I look tall in photos.
186 cm is a good guess for low fat, in shape Roger Moore in 70's style 3+ cm heel dress shoes or cowboy boots, I agree
Jordan87 said on 9/May/18
Connery was a little more than an Inch on Roger Moore.
Jordan87 said on 4/Apr/18
Agreed On Moore being taller than 6 foot. I still do not see how Mr. Eastwood is as high as you guess but I will admit Sir Roger was right around the 6'1 mark ( When he did Bond).
Rory said on 4/Apr/18
Anyone who says he was 6ft peak clearly hasn't ever watched an episode of The Saint or The Persuaders where he consistently looked a solid 6ft1 guy next to anyone he shared the screen with. From Donald Sutherland,to James Cosmo or Oliver Reed or Ed Bishop, you name it. Always minimum 6ft1. The lowest you could argue is 185cm the most being 187cm, anything above or below those parameters is garbage.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Apr/18
Berta, I think anywhere from 6ft1-1½ is arguable for Moore and he did claim that and also 6ft2 as a morning height. Costner could look that as well but has always stuck to 6ft1.
Personally I'd leave Roger at this and possibly maybe give Costner 6ft1⅛ peak. Probably were very close in height.
joeblowXXIV said on 24/Mar/18
I'll bet he may have been a solid six foot, but probably not more.
Rory said on 24/Mar/18
@The tall guy, just a word of advice, don't ever start up a rival celebheight site as you are abysmally bad at guessing the height of pretty much everyone.
Berta said on 2/Mar/18
I think 187,5 out of bed and before bed 185,8 maybe. A very strong 6 foot 1 guy that was barely 186. Like peak costner
Ian C. said on 5/Feb/18
Moore said, "I always played heroes because I am six foot one and a half?" Well no, Roger. You always played heroes because you had a beautiful, masculine face. Lee Marvin was the same height as you, and he often played heavies. Tony Curtis was a lot shorter than you, and he mostly played heroes.
What is it with this ridiculous taboo that handsome men can't just admit it? The story Moore tells is, when he was inducted into the British Army he was immediately assigned to Officers Candidate school because he "looked the part." And how did you look the part, Rog? Did you have an enormous nose, like the Duke of Wellington? Well, no. It was something else.
An ideal Simon Templar but a lousy James Bond.
said on 6/Jan/18
Lee WAS a LOT taller than Moore, indeed you could say "towering". They stood back to back in the movie, and there was definitely a 4" difference. Also he was definitely not TALLER than Michael Lonsdale, who is still listed at 6'1 flat. Possibly the same height.
Simply by looking at pictures, films, it simply makes zero sense to list Moore as being only a quarter inch shorter than Timothy Dalton, and half an inch taller than Pierce Brosnan. Dalton was a LOT taller than either of them. If you have to INSIST that Moore was 6'1"+ , then Dalton MUST have been more than 6'2". I find it much more believable that Moore was perhaps Brosnan's height. Somewhere between 6' and 6'1".
Here: Click Here
. Note: Dalton as well was already over 50 years old at the time of that picture. You can find more pics from the same event(s) using Google image search or whatever you prefer.
somerandomguy said on 2/Jan/18
Probably 185 cm. when younger.
Mister lennon said on 2/Jan/18
Christopher lee could be a weak 6'5 peak. He looked it many times.
6'1 for peak moore.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jan/18
185cm by his last Bond outing but looked 186-187cm in Live And Let Die. Didn't get dwarfed by Yaphett Kotto or Geoffrey Holder...
This height is fine for him and you could still argue 6ft1½. His 6ft2 in the morning claim seems too precise. He was obviously aware of the body shrinking during the day
Rory said on 31/Dec/17
6 foot is a puzzling guess. I've watched many old episodes of The Saint and The Persuaders and with literally every known actor who appeared in those series he looked 6ft1 minimum. I even have scrutinised his footwear because I know James will throw "he wore lifts" back at me and no never once did i see him wearing any footwear which looked remotely suspicious. 6ft1.25 is absolutely perfect for Moore back then.
Richard said on 30/Dec/17
Moore was six foot at his peak, and 5'10" in old age.
avi said on 30/Dec/17
James B states that Lee was a lot taller than Moore. But what is a lot? Like towering? Because then he says there is 3.5 inches between them. Which is a solid difference but it's not a huge amount. Not like Moore was 6'0 and Lee was 6'5.
I think Moore at 6'1 and Lee at 6'4 to 6'4.5ish is fair.
Lee was never a full 6'5.
I do think Moore could look a touch under 6'1 at times though. However strangely in the saint he can look 6'2.
Rory said on 20/Dec/17
He would have been 186cm in Live and let die and 185cm by View to a Kill.
fisherman said on 17/Dec/17
Mister lennon: could be possible, since he never was over 6'1 he could have been at least close to that in 74. He wasn't even 50 at that point so he wouldn't have had lost any height
James B said on 17/Dec/17
Lee defnintly was a lot taller than Moore.
Mister lennon said on 17/Dec/17
Lee was a strong 6'4-weak 6'5 guy. Moore was still 6'1 when he made the man with the golden gun with lee.
Rory said on 15/Dec/17
Not really I thought Moore aesthetically looked great as Bond up until Moonraker which should have been his last Bond outing. He certainly looked the part in live and let die. 6ft1.25 is perfect for Moore it explains all three of his claims, 6ft2 in the morning which he would be at strong 6'1 range..6ft1 a slight round down and 6ft1.5 a tiny round up from 6ft1.25. It also happens to be the kind of range be always looked so I think Roger Moore at 186 is one of the Most reliable listings. I found though often he was acting with other taller actors so the perception was he wasn't that tall when actually a 186 guy in other films with a different cast etc could have been made to look solid tall range especially in the 60s and 70s.
James said on 14/Dec/17
Christopher Lee was 6'4" in 1974 so Moore wasn't even 6'1". It's a real mystery why they cast someone that old as James Bond.
said on 13/Dec/17
Rob do you think he could have been just 6'1 flat peak?
There wasn't any less than 3.5 between him and Christopher Lee
I think the chance of shrinking a full inch at his height is very possible, I wouldn't say Moore was lying about being near 6ft 2 first thing in the morning...maybe he did shrink to a flat 6ft 1.
said on 13/Dec/17
Rob, who do you think would have measured taller peak Roger Moore or Kevin Costner?
at the moment I still give an edge to Moore, though it may well be the case both are within a tiny fraction of each other if you measured them at age 25.
James said on 19/Nov/17
He was 182 at his peak. Like Craig he wore lifts as Bond.
Anonymous said on 15/Nov/17
said on 12/Nov/17
Scoobydoo: yeah, 185 cm when he was young is reasonable. That's a refreshing comment on this page. A SANE assessment :)
I believe some commenters are taking things the wrong way. Not even that troll
here has said Moore was SHORT, he said he was shortER than the other Bond's. Also some seem to forget. We're talking barefoot, afternoon heights here. What someone "could look" on an old TV show wearing cowboy boots is not a good reference point. It actually seems like many people give the elsewhere typical "with shoes" estimate, in which case the listings make better sense.
Scoobydoo said on 4/Nov/17
Genuine 185 cm in peak, barefoot. 186 cm in the morning.
183 cm when he was old in his sixty /seventy years old
James said on 26/Oct/17
Moore was the shortest Bond, clearly below Brosnan and Dalton.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Oct/17
6ft1½ is arguable for him I think. Looked 6ft2ish on The Saint and The Persuaders.
said on 19/Oct/17
@rob Do you have picture of Moore's spotlight like you do for Brosnan & Dalton ?
I don't, but I have seen it in a mid 1960's edition, he removed it after that.
Mister lennon said on 15/Oct/17
He looked 6'2 at times in the saint. Not less than a strong 6"1 at that time.
James said on 14/Oct/17
He looked six foot in "The Saint".
Mister lennon said on 13/Oct/17
Lifts here, lifts there, over and over again. So boring.
Moore was 6'1 at his peak. In his younger days could look 6'2 at times. In the saint, for example.
James said on 12/Oct/17
Moore was six foots without lifts.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Oct/17
I've seen a lot of 6ft2 reports for Moore and Brosnan, just as many as there are 6ft1. Really anywhere between those two marks is arguable if you go back an look at their bodies of work. An 80's Remington Steele Brosnan and a 60's Saint Moore I thought looked closer to 6ft2...
Ben said on 11/Oct/17
Arch, my father died the exact same morning. September 11 2017 at 1:00 am. I performed cpr on him. Sadly it was too late. He wasn't my biological dad, but for me he was my real father and he have been taking care of me since I was not even 2 years old (I'm now 17). I don't have any contact with my biological dad, I only know he's 52 years old and he's 6'0".
He died at 65 years old and he was 6'2.5".
said on 11/Oct/17
Rob, what do you think of Roger Moore's satetment that James Bond can never be feminine, gay or a female? Personally I agree because it's a part of the character so be a very masculine handsome man who drinks his dry martini's shaken and fakes laugh when someone hits him in the nuts. But I do believe he can be black but I would want someone like Idris Elba to play him in that case.
I honestly haven't given it much thought, but I appreciate it's an interesting debate for many!
I like the idea of James McAvoy
as Bond, an even shorter spy!
James said on 10/Oct/17
Moore was the shortest bond until Craig.
said on 3/Oct/17
I don't give a crap about anyone's hairpiece or being "too old" (and I personally would prefer to NOT see that stupid troll
ing here). Moore was my favorite Bond, it is just crystal clear that he WAS shorter than the other (60's-80's) actors.
I suggested this already (well, hinted at it): do a Google image search for "dalton brosnan moore". Dalton is supposed to be 6'1.5 or 6'2" (and taller than Connery, as Dalton is said to have been the tallest actor to play Bond). Look at those pictures and be serious. Which one do you think is ACTUALLY 6'2"? It is reasonable to think Moore could have been close to 6ft1 when he was younger, but not more than that.
X185 said on 1/Oct/17
Like that Rory
said on 1/Oct/17
Richard/James comes on here and only ever says so and so wore lifts/ hairpiece was too old etc. Such and such a film was awful. Why bother? Guess I'm feeding the troll
s by posting this though.
Rory said on 27/Sep/17
Richard wore lifts when he posted that comment.
Richard said on 26/Sep/17
He wore lifts in "The Persuaders".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Sep/17
He does look near 6ft2 in The Persuaders...
Rory said on 24/Sep/17
The lowest you could argue for Moore is 6ft1, the most you could argue is 6ft1.5. That's why 6ft1.25 is a great fit. Talk of him being 6ft flat and wearing lifts is just an out and out lie.
James said on 23/Sep/17
No he wasn't. Moore always wore LIFTS in films and on TV. He was the shortest Bond until Craig, and far too old to play a secret agent.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Sep/17
Moore was taller than 6ft guys
said on 11/Sep/17
My aunt died this morning, my dad's eldest sister. She was a similar age to Roger Moore, 90. This really isn't a good year is it!
sorry to hear.
Bugsy said on 8/Sep/17
Arch Stanton: I was mainly comparing Dalton and Moore (hence the "kind of"). All around a bigger and 'bulkier' guy for the lack of a better word. It is much more notable in The Living Daylights, he seemed to have lost some weight for Licence To Kill.
On the subject of height, you can find many pictures of Dalton, Moore and Brosnan together (probably in 95). Dalton is consistently and very clearly taller than the other two in every single photo. If the estimates are based on Dalton having been 187-188 cm, that places both Brosnan and Moore somewhere in the 180-184 range. We know Moore was the oldest of them and probably had lost height, but if you want to go there, don't forget Dalton is also notably older than Brosnan and was still 5 cm taller than him.
There is no way Moore or Brosnan were EVER near Dalton's height, at any age, peak height or not. I still say my initial guess of 6'0.25" for Moore (as a young man) stands its ground.
James said on 5/Sep/17
Connery was 52 in "Never Say Never Again" and had put on quite a bit of weight since the 1960s.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Sep/17
Connery struggled with 6ft2 next to Pat Roach
James B said on 30/Aug/17
Pat Roach made Connery look small
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Aug/17
Connery was the burliest of the Bonds especially in Diamonds Are Forever...
Arch Stanton said on 24/Aug/17
Dalton big?? Don't agree, he was always slender build. Connery was more muscular and bigger of frame but still relatively slender in the 60s.
Bugsy said on 23/Aug/17
One more odd thing is that BOTH Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan looked clearly (meaning more than an inch) taller than Desmond Llewellyn, but Moore looked to be around the same height or just barely taller. The significance of this is that Dalton is supposed to have been close or equal to 6'2" and Brosnan some measure shorter than Dalton. The comparison with Dalton being slightly more relevant I suppose, since not that much time had passed between his and Moore's Bonds.
Also compare the build of Dalton vs. Moore. Dalton looked like a BIG guy, not just a tall guy. Kind of like Connery. That is actually what I meant earlier when I referred to Moore as being 'slim' or 'slender'. I did NOT mean he looked starved or underweight. I'll also repeat that being slim is very 'ordinary'. If your natural build is slim, there's no way out of it except to build a LOT of muscle (which Moore did not have) or appear to be overweight (which Moore did not do). I think the producers requirement for him to lose weight for Live and let die was precisely designed so that he would appear tall, not stubby, on screen. They succeeded.
James said on 19/Aug/17
Moore was six foot without the lifts he wore on TV and in films. He was the shortest Bond until Craig.
Rising - 174 cm said on 16/Aug/17
This is probably most likely and explains why Burt Reynolds(obviously in elevator boots) looked a bit taller than Roger at the end of Cannonball Run. Roger must have not lost much height by his late 60s, though, because he still looked almost as tall as Pierce Brosnan and was still looking like a tall guy near 6'1" next to Jean-Claude Van Damme and James Remar in The Quest.
Arch Stanton said on 15/Aug/17
Finally, spot on now I think.
movieguy said on 14/Aug/17
The 6'1.5'' quote is made when he stands next to Michael Parkinson who is given as 5'10'' on this site. The funny thing is if you take a look at it they look more or less the same height. Pierce Brosnan looks clearly taller than Parkinson at the same event. To contradict this there is the clip where Moore presents at the Oscars with 6'2'' Michael Caine and 6'2'' Sean Connery. Moore is perhaps slightly shorter but only just, does look 6'1'' in this clip. Maybe Moore had lost height by the time of the later clip. I do think Moore was a genuine 6ft plus in his prime but did lose an inch or two with age.
said on 13/Aug/17
Rob, what do you think is the best option for Roger Moore at his peak?
A) 185.5-187.5 cm
B) 186-188 cm
C) 186.5-188.5 cm
I think he was quite honest in saying first thing in the morning he was near 6ft 2...it's just, maybe he shrank to 6ft 1 flat evening range.
berta said on 12/Aug/17
good update this may well have been closer to his real height probably was somewhere in the 186 range
movieguy said on 11/Aug/17
Gyles Brandreth who knew him well describes Moore as 6'1'' in an obituary column in the Telegraph.
Bugsy said on 9/Aug/17
Rory: I did not concede anything, since I did not at any point claim anything like that. A direct quote from my earlier comment is "perhaps an inch, maybe a little less". Please learn some reading comprehension.
By your logic, the footwear and camera angles could just as well have been favoring Moore, not Lonsdale. And then there's the question of Lonsdale's height, him being 6'1" is in itself only an assumption here. Anyway, I guess I'm going to leave this pointless discussion here, because you seem to have some sort of fixation with Moore being a certain height and you're not even open to looking at it objectively.
Prayer said on 9/Aug/17
Actually Moore could have been "only" 5'11 or 180 cm. Look at him with Geoffrey Keen who was listed as 5'5 or 165 cm. Moore looks barely 6 inches taller than Keen and Keen was a old man by that far. 6'1 and 6'2 is ridiculous.
Jug said on 8/Aug/17
Moore was 6'1 at peak. A guy who is 6'1 will say that he is 6'2. He was 4 inches shorter than Christopher Lee in The Man With the Golden Gun. He had broad shoulders and a big chest and sometimes looked quite big. Note that he and Connery look the same amount taller than Lois Maxwell. Also compare with Bernard Lee and Desmond Llewelyn. At 58 he was still taller than Christopher Walken.
Rory said on 7/Aug/17
@Bugsy : Well that's funny because you've gone from saying he was an inch shorter than Lonsdale to now conceding they were practically the same and also retracting that he was "slender" to now saying he was ordinary. There was no visible difference between them, but it's silly to say he looked 6ft1 there and not 6ft1.25 because a quarter inch can be accounted for by anything from a difference in footwear,camera angle etc even an inch difference could be distorted by such variables. Age too, Moore was 51 during filming, Lonsdale was 47 during filming..Rob has said men on average lose their first mm at age 47-48 so it's possible in the film Lonsdale had lost nothing and Moore had been losing a tiny bit for the last 4 years. I still think Moores build made him look shorter than he was, quite short legs and a long torso.
Bugsy said on 6/Aug/17
Indeed, an ORDINARY build. Not a big guy, nor especially thin. Not especially tall either.
Rory, even after I clarified it you seemed to miss one point I was making. EVEN IF he was the same height as Lonsdale, that would only have made him 6'1" (Lonsdale's listing), not 6'1.25" as he's currently listed.
I don't know how recently you saw Moonraker but I saw it less than a week ago. They were indeed "eye to eye" (standing face to face close to each other), and Moore was the shorter one out of the two. Not by much, but Moore having been taller is out of the question.
Rory said on 5/Aug/17
@Bugsy : Having narrow shoulders though is nothing to do with muscle, its to do with the width of your shoulders which is made from bone. I repeat, he wasn't narrow shouldered. Someone like Damian Lewis I'd say was narrow shouldered, not Roger Moore. I wouldn't even say he was particularly thin really, I'd say he had quite an ordinary build. No but the point is he wasn't shorter than Lonsdale at all ! I watched Moonraker recently and thought both men were eye to eye, not once did I detect Lonsdale was taller, I've no idea how you you concluded that he was..in every scene they were in together they were inseparable in height. Big heeled shoes for men were all the rage in the 1970s, a good chunk of men would have been wearing them.
Bugsy said on 5/Aug/17
Rory: I said "comparatively" narrow shoulders. He did not have a broad chest, he was not very muscular in general (not a bodybuilder). Even that b&w photo above on this site shows that. Does that look like a big, bulky guy to you? He just simply had a smaller (thinner) frame. That's what some people have. I know a guy who is 2 inches taller than me but weighs 40 lbs less. I also know a guy who is exactly my height and weighs 65 lbs less. People are built different.
Maybe he wasn't exactly "an inch" shorter than Michael Lonsdale, who cares. What I said was that Moore was VISIBLY shorter, definitely not the taller one out of the two. Lonsdale btw is listed as 6'1.0".
One more thing I noticed the other day was that (again, in the 70's Bonds) Moore's dress shoes tended to have quite a large looking heel. Large enough for me to clearly notice it and think "hmm, those shoes look bigger than regular". Maybe it was to make sure he would look tall next to the leading women in heels.
Richard said on 3/Aug/17
Moore was far too old to play Bond. He never even looked six foot, let alone 6'1".
Rory said on 2/Aug/17
@Bugsy In my view you're wrong on all accounts. He wasn't narrow shouldered,he didn't have long legs,he wasn't an inch shorter than Lonsdale they were about the same and he wasn't as low as 6'0.25.
Ali said on 1/Aug/17
Rob, Roger Moore was clearly shorter than Connery and Lazenby by about 2 inches or so. Roger Moore
is overall a smaller guy compared to Connery and Lazenby.
Bugsy said on 1/Aug/17
Just to be clear about this on my part: I don't have any kind of an agenda against Moore. In fact, he was always my favorite Bond actor regardless of his age or whatever.
About his build, I read the Bond producers told him to lose weight (presumably in the early 70's). He was definitely not a BIG guy, he just wasn't. He was slender with comparatively narrow shoulders (and long legs). So again, the perfect example of someone who appears on screen to be taller than in reality.
I just saw Moonraker, Moore was visibly shorter than Michael Lonsdale by perhaps an inch, maybe a little less.
I can definitely believe Moore WAS genuinely (didn't drop under the mark even after a full day on his feet) 6 ft and again, a genuinely 6 ft guy is TALL so I don't even see a problem here. The heights listed here are low/afternoon heights so my guess is still at 6'0.25".
Mister lennon said on 1/Aug/17
He was 6'1 when he played bond in the 70s.
Prayer said on 31/Jul/17
6'2 is ridiculous. He wasn't no more than 6 ft when played Bond. Yes he was very slim and looked taller than he was.
James said on 31/Jul/17
Moore never even looked 6'1", let alone 6'2".
They would never cast an old man as Bond today.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jul/17
In The Saint could pass for 6ft2
Rory said on 29/Jul/17
The thing is 6ft 2 in the morning can be quite an ambiguous claim. It could mean he meant 6ft 2 straight out of bed meaning he'd be a 6ft1.25 guy, or it could mean he measured 6ft2 in the morning 3 hrs out of bed meaning he'd be a 6ft1.75 guy, it could mean he measured around 6ft2(like 6'1.75 or 6'2.25) at some point in the morning. It's very unclear.
Mister lennon said on 28/Jul/17
Moore always looked 6'1 exept in his 60s, when he looked a strong 6.
Mario said on 28/Jul/17
If Roger Moore says he's 6 ft 2 in the morning or 6 ft 1.5, I believe he's. I mean, he seemed like an humble guy, he even did make fun of his acting. It doesn't make sense to me why he would add an extra 0.25 inch to him.
James said on 27/Jul/17
Moore only weighed 160 lbs so he was quite thin.
Rory said on 27/Jul/17
I actually think his build made him look shorter than he was. He had a big,long torso and quite short skinny legs. Quite unusual actually. At times because of his build I thought he could seem much shorter than 186cm but then when stood next to others you'd see he clearly was that range.
James said on 27/Jul/17
Moore never looked 6'1" in anything. His thin build made him appear taller. Since he wore a hairpiece in "The Saint" and as Bond he probably wore lifts as well.
My grandfather once met Moore and Dorothy Squires at a racetrack and he said Moore was no taller than six foot.
Bugsy said on 26/Jul/17
Moore had the build that made him appear taller on screen. He was quite slim. I don't think he was over 6'1". Never looked THAT tall.
If you're genuinely 6 ft, you are TALL. Doubly so in the old days because the average height was lower.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
188.4cm out of bed
Mister lennon said on 26/Jul/17
He was 6'1 peak. He always looked it.
He was only 6 in his late 50s and 60s.
James said on 25/Jul/17
Moore never looked any taller than six foot. I don't know why they cast a 50-year-old as Bond.
Mark(5'9.5") said on 24/Jul/17
Okay, I think the downgrade to 6'1" is extreme.
This listing is fine, but I would have kept the original listing.
even said on 24/Jul/17
a strong legitimate 6 foot 1 .
James said on 20/Jul/17
He should be downgraded to 6'1". Moore was the shortest Bond until Craig.
Mark(5'9.5 said on 19/Jul/17
Still shock of the downgrade.
Richard said on 15/Jul/17
Moore never looked his stated height. I'm surprised they cast him as Bond when he was already well into middle age.
James said on 12/Jul/17
Actually there were many women who did not find Moore attractive. Don't forget he was a very heavy cigarette smoker until he was 45, and overused the sun which led to his long battle with skin cancer.
MJKoP said on 11/Jul/17
James said on 3/Jul/17
He famously wore lifts and a hairpiece as James Bond.
So did Connery...and Brosnan(at least in his last two Bond films, as he himself admitted). Not sure about Lazenby or Dalton.
Mark(5'9.5") said on 11/Jul/17
Interesting, i still wouldn't go lower than 186 cm.
Rob, if Roger Moore is downgraded to 6'1.25", where would that leave a Peak Christopher Lee?
James said on 3/Jul/17
He famously wore lifts and a hairpiece as James Bond.
Rory said on 3/Jul/17
Yh I think a strong 6ft 1 in his Saint days looks very fair. A weak 6ft 1 by his last Bond outing.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jul/17
Interesting one Rob. At his low maybe
Richard said on 30/Jun/17
At six foot Moore was the shortest Bond until Craig. He was also far too old to play 007.
RichardSpain said on 27/Jun/17
Moore was a perfect 185cm in peak, barefoot.
Moore 185cm peak
Brosnan 186cm in peak
Connery 188/189cm in peak.
Craig 178 cm
James said on 7/Jun/17
Roger Waters was 6'1" at his peak so he was an inch taller than Moore.
lak said on 7/Jun/17
@MJKoP i know that , but some guys here say arnold was just 183 or less
Arch Stanton said on 7/Jun/17
It's hard to see Moore as the same height as Roger Waters and James Garner...
James said on 6/Jun/17
Moore might have been 6'1" when he was 20, but as James Bond he never looked any more than six foot.
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 4/Jun/17
James said on 1/Jun/17
Schwarzenegger is 5'11".
I agree, 5'11" nowadays.
Canson said on 3/Jun/17
6'1.5 looks good.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jun/17
Moore might've lost a fraction by then...but peak they may have been similar.
Both could look from 6ft1 up to 6ft2
James said on 1/Jun/17
Schwarzenegger is 5'11".
MJKoP said on 30/May/17
Houss said on 24/May/17
He was shorter than Arnold swharzenegger
Because Arnie was taller than 6'1.5"
Mark(5'9.25") said on 30/May/17
Rest In Peace, Sir Moore.
Also, 6'1.5" in his glory days.
RichardSpain said on 29/May/17
Rest in peace Mr Moore! and thanks for your movies. Everybody all countries love you.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/May/17
Nah Brosnan's meant to be a gent aswell. Connery and Lazenby have reputations for being bullies though
said on 26/May/17
How did he die Rob? i only heard aboutin his death a few days ago, was it old age or cancer or something? i cant believe it thats so sad and devastating to hear, he was a great person, kind, funny and full of charisma and one of the best bonds
R.I.P Sir Roger Moore
he did battle cancer in last few months, late 80's is a long life, he entertained a lot of people and also with humanitarian work, contributed a lot.
Houss said on 24/May/17
He was shorter than Arnold swharzenegger
Sandy Cowell said on 24/May/17
Another of our golden greats gone, but never to be forgotten. He was a true English gent and a credit to the acting industry. Can't believe it... 😭
RIP Roger xxx
Johnny said on 24/May/17
Rest in peace Sir Roger. One of the best actors of all time.
Bazza said on 24/May/17
Best Bond for me, and the one i enjoyed watching growing up.amazing to think he was already 45 when he took on the role and 58 by the time of his last Bond film!
Phantasm Tall Man said on 24/May/17
Rest in peace, always the coolest bond!
shiva 181 cms said on 23/May/17
I just commented yesterday about sir Roger's height
came to know he passed away at 89, one of the best James bond ever , also a good person
Glad he made it to 89. Rip sir Roger Moore
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/May/17
I do think that Moore was taller than most people give him credit for and I'm not saying that because he's now passed (still hasn't sunk in with me yet). He shared the screen with some big men like Yaphett Kotto, Christopher Lee, Curt Jurgens and Jeffrey Holder. Richard Kiel wasn't a great person to compare height against because he'd make anyone look average or short. But when you see him next to guys a bit closer to his range like Julian Glover (6ft2), Michael Lonsdale (6ft1) or Christopher Walken (6ft0½) the listed height isn't unreasonable.
Nik said on 23/May/17
@ Arch Stanton
I agree with everything you said, R.I.P Sir Roger Moore.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/May/17
Another giant of cinema gone...
Scarlett Rose said on 23/May/17
Currently watching reruns of "The Persuaders!" on True Entertainment at 9.00pm. The brilliant theme tune is by the equally brilliant John Barry. RIP Sir Roger Moore. 😞
Mario said on 23/May/17
Rip, 6 ft 1.5.
James B said on 23/May/17
Will never see an actor quite like you ever again
MJKoP said on 23/May/17
Back to 6'1.5". RIP
Arch Stanton said on 23/May/17
If you see him with Prince Phillip who was nearer 6 ft prime Roger was MUCH taller, didn't look under 6 ft with him even in his last years.
said on 23/May/17
Best remembered.... Rob. Another great one passes away, he had a good innings at 89 though. RIP Sir Roger. Your light hearted appariach to acting and suave demeanor will always be remembered, a true gentleman.
89 is a very good age, may he rest in peace...
HeightMan said on 15/May/17
I think Roger Moore was taller than most people think. He's probably the most unpopular Bond so people underestimate them. Popularity always makes people taller; e.g. the Rock is loved but it is hard to argue the dude was ever over 1.88. Connery wasn't over 1.88 either. Craig is lower than 1.78. Moore faced tall opponents in his movies. The bad guys in "live and let die" were over 6'3''(!), Richard Kiel is self-explanatory, Drax in Moonraker was also 6'1''...
1.87 for Moore, most of the day!
Arch Stanton said on 14/May/17
In Gold (1974) Roger Moore had about 1.5 inches on Milland who was 186 peak but had lost height. I do think Moore looked a legit 187 in that film.
said on 7/May/17
Compare for yourself, here is an old-ish Roger Moore (1996) with Harald Schmidt who is a solid 194cm guy...
berta said on 5/May/17
6foot 1 or 186 at peak either of them would be good listings and today i dont think for a second he oculd still be 6 feet. 180is probably his current height
James said on 5/May/17
He's 5'10" now.
Rory said on 3/May/17
I dont think he ever really looked 6ft 2 even in the Saint days. He certainly didn't give as tall an impression on screen as someone like Connery. I reckon peak he fell to 186cm at night. No idea what he'd be today but I'd guess 5'11 range.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Apr/17
187cm peak is believable. Go back to before Bond. Could look 6ft2 at times
berta said on 12/Apr/17
there is a few guys on this site that say everyone is 4 cm shorter than their listing and always say " he is wearing lifts" this is very bad backtalking. If you dont know personally that a guy wears lifts dont say it . tell rumours is a bad thing. this guy is clear as day he didnt wear lifts and he was atleast 6 foot 1. not shorter could have been taller but if he was i dont think he was over 186. cant see this guy taller than costner.
James said on 3/Apr/17
"The Man Who Haunted Himself" had the usual hilarious Hollywood view of London.
Sandy Cowell said on 2/Apr/17
I'm currently watching an enormously entertaining little film called, 'The Man Who Haunted Himself'! If I'd known just how entertaining it would be, I wouldn't have gone downstairs for an extended tea break, thus missing a large chunk of it!
It was made in 1970, when the naughtiest word used in film was 'bloody', (and there's a lot of that!), and an insult is being called an 'old croc, ha ha yah' and if someone's cross, it's like, 'what the Devil do you think you're doing?'
I've been laughing my butt off!
Roger is getting in all sorts of trouble with his wife, his pretty girlfriend who he barely knows and being shown the way to the psychiatrist's waiting room! That's because there are two of him!
He died on an operating table and that resulted in the creation of another one, exactly the same - how very scientific!!!
I was expecting Roger to be tall and he is! 6ft1-2 was my estimate, and he is bang in the middle at 6ft1.5! I am pleased with that!
I also find myself liking him beyond all expectations, as I am NOT a Bond fan! He is quite a gent in this yarn instead of the conceited, self-serving Bond! Of course, with the year being 1970, Roger is at his peak height.
said on 31/Mar/17
He's no shorter than Michael Caine, maybe a tad taller if anything... Click Here
mister_lennon said on 31/Mar/17
He was 6'1.
James said on 30/Mar/17
He's 5'10" today, so he was clearly never 6'2".
Mark(5'9.25") said on 29/Mar/17
Big six one peak. 187 cm is right.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Mar/17
I think both Brosnan and Moore were 187cm peak
Adijos said on 19/Mar/17
Stalin said on 16/Mar/17
Rob, Farell is least 272 at his heaviest
Stalin said on 14/Mar/17
Rob, is Farrell 272 One now
Johnny said on 11/Mar/17
@Rob do you think Sir Roger could have edged out Cary Grant?
said on 11/Mar/17
I posted this photo earlier but I post now again.
We don't know, how many height lost Patrick Duffy now but I don't think that so many because he was way taller than 6'0" Brenda Strong and Strong wore high heels in the 2012 Dallas series promo photos. So what do you think Rob about this photo?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Mar/17
He's probably lost 2in by now
AlexMahone said on 10/Mar/17
Uhhhh....Rob....the James guy again! Well, Arch has right. You gave him a warning, I hope this is a FINAL warning before the ban, and seemed to me that his tone was a little bit more endurable but now....this. He tell us the same old crap again and again and again. Moore wore wig, Moore wore lifts and all the tall man in this board are lift wearers according to James.
This is really ridiculous now.
And mister-lennon has right as well. The lift thing is just crap.
mister_lennon said on 8/Mar/17
He was 6'1 peak. 6 is too low for him.
and proof that he said that lifts him???
this lifts things is getting so old an annoying.
said on 7/Mar/17
Rob, why is James still permitted to post on celebheights? Every comment he makes just looks like troll
ing. He knows that people will react to his claims about lifts.
he's been given a warning to tone it down a bit...