How tall is Morgan Freeman

Morgan Freeman's Height

6ft 1 ½ (186.7 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 2 ¼ (188.6 cm)
American actor best known roles in films such as Se7en, The Shawshank Redemption, Driving Miss Daisy, Unforgiven, The Dark Knight Trilogy, Million Dollar Baby, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves and Deep Impact. In a 2008 CanMag interview he mentioned his stature, saying "So aside from being six foot two and black."

How tall is Morgan Freeman
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of Samuel L Jackson
Samuel L Jackson
6ft 1 (185 cm)
Height of Denzel Washington
Denzel Washington
5ft 11 ¾ (182 cm)
Height of Clint Eastwood
Clint Eastwood
6ft 0 (183 cm)
Height of Michael Caine
Michael Caine
6ft ½ in (184 cm)

Add a Comment548 comments

Average Guess (132 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 2.4in (189cm)
Current: 6ft 1.59in (186.9cm)
James B 171.5 said on 27/Feb/21
Rob do you think In maybe a years time he will be a flat 6’1?
Editor Rob
Look at him in 2019 with Depp and Big Joe click here...maybe in 2021 he could be around 6ft 1 flat.
Vincent Caleb said on 19/Feb/21
Good update for current. It is still the most I would give him though as he has looked a bit shorter recently.
BT said on 12/Feb/21
Surely he's lost the full inch by now, Rob? If he in fact has only lost 0.5in at 83 years of age he's a medical marvel!
Editor Rob
looking at 2018-19 I think 6ft 1-1.5 is a range he can start to look.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jan/21
186-187cm now maybe. I'm confident he'd still clear 6ft1
slim 6'1 said on 17/Jan/21
Probably dipped to 186 today
Vincent Caleb said on 9/Jan/21
Possibly dipping to just 6’1” and change today. Peak looks good.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 4/Jan/21
I love Morgan's voice and so does my boyfriend! 😍

Peak height - 6ft2.5
Today - 6ft1.75
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Dec/20
Looks a bit under 6ft2 but not sure he’s down to 6ft1
houss said on 8/Dec/20
From where comes the 187cm listing!! He looks taller than all the 6'2 claimers
Editor Rob
he is shrinking
berta said on 20/Nov/20
rob i think the best listing could be the full 189 peak and not over 6´1 1/2 today. lost about 2,5 cm. done very well
Black Noir said on 7/Nov/20
He’s a tall man, and he’s one of the greatest actors to ever live and breathe!!!
Vincent Caleb said on 24/Oct/20
Peak was 6’2.25”, today an inch less. One of my favorite actors. Shawshank Redemption is probably my favorite movie ever.
Pedriscovery said on 23/Oct/20
Click Here
TheBat said on 25/Sep/20
I agree with both his peak and current listing.
Bora said on 18/Sep/20
I don't know why he doesn't seem as tall as he is to me, maybe just because of hid bad posture he looks like 6'1 ½
cmillz said on 11/Sep/20
Actually, I think he could be down to a flat 6’1 now looking at him recently, but hard to see him being under 6’2 in his prime.
Carlos Santana said on 2/Sep/20
6'2.25 peak
6'1.5 today
Slim 6'1" said on 7/Aug/20
needs current downgrade to 185cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Jul/20
I doubt Morgan is as low as 6ft1 now nevermind peak.

But maybe 6ft1½ currently Rob?
Willes190 said on 11/Jul/20
Is he really this tall today? No doubt 6ft2 peak however.
cmillz said on 9/Jul/20
6’1 is too low for his peak height. He’s still at least 6’1 today, and maybe even 6’1.5” still.
Editor Rob
I would be surprised if there are many folk who'd estimate Freeman as short as 6ft 1 peak. One of the most believable 6ft 2 guys out there.
Davidjr said on 5/Jul/20
It's to tall to be true I give him 6 foot 1 inch in peak Height and 6 foot at most or 5 foot 11.75 inches at his actually height
Canson said on 30/Jun/20
6’1.5 max today. 6’2 peak
cmillz said on 28/Jun/20
He didn’t look 6’2.5 next to 6’5 Tim Robbins in Shawshank
James roy said on 20/Jun/20
6 foot 1 flat now and peak height strong 6 foot 2
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 2/Jun/20
...with a beautiful speaking voice! 🎶
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 2/Jun/20
🎉🎁🎂 Happy Birthday Morgan! 🎂🎁🎉

A Very Happy Birthday to Morgan Freeman, who celebrated his 8️⃣3️⃣rd Birthday yesterday. One exceptional actor! 👌

6ft2.5 peak; 6ft1.75 today.
Nearly 180cm guy said on 1/Jun/20
Morgan is celebrating his 83rd birthday today and I don't believe he lost only 1/2 inch. In 2005, Morgan met Jet Li, RZA and Bob Hoskins, he looked like giant next to Jet and Bob but RZA stood a little closer to the camera than Morgan: Click Here Click Here
But in other photos, when Morgan and RZA are standing at a similar distance from the camera, Morgan looked much taller than RZA: Click Here Click Here
Rob, please look again at his photos from 1995 next to Michael Jackson: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
And his photos next to Joan Collins and Tom Skerritt from 1990: Click Here Click Here
In 2000, Morgan met Frances Fisher: Click Here Click Here Click Here
He was wearing normal shoes and she was most likely wearing heels: Click Here Click Here
In 2000, Morgan looked taller than Clint Eastwood: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
It looks like Clint even had slightly thicker shoes than Morgan then! If Clint really had around 6ft 2 at that time, Morgan must have had 6ft 2.5. Rob, after all I've seen, I think Morgan really deserves a upgrade to 6ft 2.5.
FredBatmanTV said on 20/May/20
Rob Morgan Freeman in his Peak was 6ft 2 188cm i say now a days hes the same height of Michael Cane wich he was 6ft 2 as well and now hes 184.2 cm 6ft ½ i watched Going in style yesterday no way in hell is he 6ft 1 ¾ hes 6ft ½ now a days
Hong said on 18/May/20
189cm peak slightly shorter than 191cm Eastwood and 191Christopher Reeves.
berta said on 9/May/20
this guy never looked under 189 cm peak. he still looks weak 187 otday
VitoCheng said on 24/Apr/20
Jtm said on 16/Apr/20
or some are listed too high especially pitt.
Nearly 180cm guy said on 15/Apr/20
@cmillz: You can say that in the case of some photos but definitely not at all of them. For example, in his first two photos next to James Woods, Woods is closer to the camera and only on the third they are at a similar distance. And in the picture with Jerry Lewis, here not Morgan but Lewis stands a little closer to the camera. Also in his photos next to Brad Pitt, Elisabeth Shue and Robin Wright they are also located at a similar distance from the camera. However, when it comes to his photos with Ashley Judd, I was mistaken when writing about their footwear in my last comment, because it wasn't about their footwear, but only about Ashley heels. Looking at photos, videos and movies of Morgan from the 80's, 90's and the beginning of the 21st century I would still say that Morgan was one of the more legit 189 cm guys and that is why I hope that Rob will someday give Morgan 6ft 2.5 as his peak height.
cmillz said on 14/Apr/20
Morgan has camera advantage in a lot of those pics.
Nearly 180cm guy said on 12/Apr/20
Well, Morgan was one of the more solid 189 cm tall guys. Here is a picture of him next to Tim Robbins from 1994 from the Shawshank movie set: Click Here
And here is his picture next to Brad Pitt from 1995 from the Se7en movie set: Click Here
Another photo of Morgan next to Elisabeth Shue from 2001: Click Here
And here is a photo of Morgan next to Pitt from 1995 from the premiere: Click Here
Pitt had thicker shoes than Morgan: Click Here Click Here
In 1990, Morgan looked well over 3 inches taller than James Woods: Click Here Click Here Click Here
Their footwear: Click Here Click Here
In 1996, Morgan met Robin Wright: Click Here Click Here Click Here
His shoes and her heels: Click Here Click Here
Here are other photos of Morgan next to Ashley Judd from 1997: Click Here Click Here
Their footwear: Click Here Click Here
In 1991, Morgan looked at least four inches taller than Jerry Lewis: Click Here
Here you can see Jerry's footwear: Click Here Click Here
Back in 2003, Morgan looked over 4 inches taller than Tom Sizemore: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Their footwear was similar: Click Here Click Here
Morgan really needs to upgrade his peak height to 6ft 2.5. Rob, I think you should give it to him.
OriginalAnon said on 10/Apr/20
6'2'' prime absolute max.
Ashton Clayton said on 17/Mar/20
He bareley looked 3 inches taller than dustin Hoffman on outbreak
cmillz said on 4/Mar/20
He was a legit 6’2 peak, not much shorter now.
Jkiller said on 29/Feb/20
Peak was definitely 190cm, nowadays 187cm seems legit
Peter175 said on 22/Jan/20
He towers brad pitt it looks a minimum of 3.5 inches in Se7en. Sometimes 4 inches
berta said on 12/Jan/20
both him and Lance henrik was probably 6´2 1/2 peak. but if i would bet on one being taller than the other then i would guess morgan Freeman. morgan may have measured something like 189,3 and Lance 188,9. basically the same height but morgan would edge him i Think. today i Believe morgan is no taller than 187 at best and could be 186,5. he and gerard butler is pretty mutch the same height.
Nearly 180cm guy said on 27/Dec/19
Rob, I think 6'2.5" can still be argued for Morgan. You can look at him next to Conan O'Brien again when they met in 1993 (video number 4 and see from 28:07): Click Here
I also found his two pictures next to CCH Pounder (which you met in person) from 1986 from the movie set Resting Place: Click Here Click Here
I remember that when recording this scene, Pounder wore heels and Morgan had normal shoes, so I believe that Morgan was at least 8 inches taller than she was. Now look at his photos with Elisabeth Shue from 2001 and pay attention to her heels: Click Here Click Here
Morgan might have looked full foot taller than she. Here is another photo of Morgan next to Forest Whitaker from 2007: Click Here
Here is a photo of Morgan next to Ashley Judd from 1997: Click Here
In 1996, Morgan met Laurence Fishburne and he looked at least two and a half inches taller than him: Click Here
Their footwear: Click Here Click Here
Here is a photo of Morgan next to Tim Robbins from 1995: Click Here
Robbins is closer to the camera than Morgan, and it is quite possible that Robbins had slightly thicker shoes: Click Here Click Here
Here are two more photos of Morgan next to Michael Jackson from 1995: Click Here Click Here
Also look at his photos next to Christian Slater, Minnie Driver and Randy Quaid from 1998: Click Here Click Here
Their footwear: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
And now look at his photos next to Stephen Dorff from 1992: Click Here Click Here Click Here
Their footwear: Click Here Click Here
Stephen was 19 years old so he probably reached his full height by then and Morgan looked over 7 inches taller than him. Morgan met Blair Underwood in 1998: Click Here
Their footwear: Click Here Click Here
Morgan looked a good 4 and a half inches taller than him. It's true that he maintained his height very well and still looks over 6'1", the evidence for this is that when he recently met Joe Manganiello he looked only 3 inches shortet than him and also looked at least an inch taller than Chris Tucker when he also recently met him: Click Here Click Here Though in the 80s and 90s he looked like a good 189 cm guy. Rob, can you now give him an upgrade of his peak height to 6'2.5"?
Editor Rob
2.25 or 2.5, either figure can be argued.

Maybe like Lance Reddick, both guys claim 6ft 2, but can look near 6ft 2.5 at times...
DeoDexter said on 7/Nov/19
What is this magic? Such small height loss.
Arthur! said on 4/Oct/19
Rob, he is best known for being God, you should add that in the description!
Wrestling Fan said on 4/Sep/19
Your estimates may be right upto some extent as both were strong 6'2" in their prime.
But Freeman being 6'2.5" is something I may not fully agree on.
Can you show me some comparisons to justify your estimates?
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 16/Aug/19
@Canson and cmillzz
Right. If he was 6'3", he would've claimed it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Aug/19
I think today Morgan can still clear 6ft1 safely and would still edge out Sam Jackson
Canson said on 13/Aug/19
Freeman has never been 6’3 barefoot. Max 6’2
cmillzz said on 13/Aug/19
Lol, he’s never been 6’3. 6’2 in his prime, no taller.
Mama said on 13/Aug/19
Rob this guy was 6'3" in his peak he was close to height as Chris Reeve who is 6'4". Now he’s prob just 6'1.5-6'2
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Aug/19
Peak Jackson - 188.6cm
Peak Freeman - 189.2cm
179cm guy said on 6/Aug/19
For his peak height, I would rule out a flat 6'2 or the full 6'3 for him and say that anywhere between 6'2.25 and 6'2.75 could be argued for him which is why 6'2.5 would be the ideal listing. It seems unlikely that he's only lost a half-inch by now, 2cm seems far more likely.
tkazi04 said on 3/Aug/19
@179cm guy. Exactly rob why don’t you just give Freeman the 6'2.5" listing even the average guess for his height is over 6-2.5
179cm guy said on 23/Jul/19
Rob, why not give Freeman the 6'2.5 listing for his peak height? At eighty-two I think that two full centimeters of loss are likely.
K.A 188 said on 18/Jul/19
Solid 6ft2 peak
Solid 6ft1 now
179cm guy said on 2/Jul/19
On second thought:
Peak: 6'2.5-2.75 (189-190cm)
Current: 6'1.75-2 (187-188cm)
I actually think that Freeman would have edged out guys like Ben Affleck, Lance Reddick, Adam Driver, Terry Crews and Ross Butler at his peak. At eighty-two I think that he's lost only two centimeters.
Hong said on 20/Jun/19
I'd go with the average guess here as his peak.
Hong said on 16/Jun/19
He looked the same height as Clint Eastwood in the 90s, Eastwood was a fraction off peak at that time and stood about 6ft2.5,so 6ft2.5 sound's like a realistic height for Freeman at that time. Also in the clip with Michael Jackson, Jackson is wearing very high heels, and if he was 5ft9 barefoot then he was 5ft11.5 in those heels, and Freeman looked 6ft4 in comparison, if you take his heel into account. He also held his own with Conan who IMO was a solid 6ft4 guy, so 6ft2.5 very believable as Freeman's height.
179cm guy said on 27/May/19
Peak: 6'2.25-2.5
Current: 6'1.5-1.75
Dmeyer said on 12/May/19
Rob , looking at him with Neeson its hard to see Neeson more than 2cm taller even considering haïr footwear posture , Neeson Can realy look 6'2,5 with Bad posture
Editor Rob
Neeson isn't anywhere as bad as paul bettany posture-wise, but sometimes can look 6ft 2.5-3 in photos.
'Annonymous' said on 5/May/19
Rob, I think you should not hesitate to give Morgan an upgrade of at least 6'2.5". In 1989 in movie "Driving Miss Daisy", Morgan looked from 1.5 to even two inches taller than Dan Aykroyd: Click Here Click Here
Now look at the photos on which Morgan and Dan are standing side by side: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Look at these pictures of Morgan next to Robert Duvall in 1999: Click Here Click Here
Morgan clearly bends to Robert, with a slightly better posture he could look easily five inches taller than Duvall. In this photo from 1997, Morgan looks easily four inch taller than George Clooney: Click Here
Now, two people you met in person, look at this photo of Morgan alongside Tom Skerritt and Joan Collins from 1990: Click Here
Morgan in 1993 met Conan O'Brien, look at this video from 0:26: Click Here
Morgan looked just one inch shorter than Conan. Morgan in 1995 met Michael Jackson, look at this video from 4:18: Click Here
Now look at their photos together and pay attention to their footwear, Michael had much thicker shoes than Morgan: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
In the case of Michael, I don't rule out 5'9.25" but he really made Morgan look comfortable over 6'2". In addition, even in 2007 Morgan, despite the fact that he was 70 years old, still looked taller than Forest Whitaker: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I'm not sure the full 6'3" but sometimes even 6'2.75" looked like a arguable character for him and I just can't see Morgan shortet than 6'2.5". Rob, can you give Morgan the upgrade of his peak height by at least 1/4 inch?
Editor Rob
6ft 2.25 or 2.5 I feel is quite arguable for his peak, but I'm not sure about 2.75, I wouldn't go that high.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Apr/19
Peak: 6ft2½
Today: 6ft1½
Shashank 192.4 said on 27/Apr/19
In shawshank redemption he looked very close to clansy brown.Tim robbins who was a weak 6'5 had only 2 inches on him.
Peak height-6'2.5-6'2.75
Current height-6'1.5-6'1.75
billionaireslayer said on 19/Mar/19
6'2 peak is believable.
Redwing said on 1/Jan/19
Hey rob, how did he lose 2 cm but by now? Is it the same for Craig t Nelson?
Editor Rob
Maybe genetics and held good posture through his 60's and 70's.

Some men can make it to age 70 with 1/4 inch loss, whilst others lose significant (1.5-2 inches)...injuries, genetics, lifestyle play roles in how much we lose.

I don't think my lifestyle of working at a computer helps my own back! I need to watch my back as I get older too...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Dec/18
Still easily 6ft1½ today. Over 1in taller than Michael Caine (heading toward 6ft but not under)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Dec/18
The full 6ft2½ peak. Generally looked like a guy right between 6ft2-3.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 16/Sep/18
Dipping to look 6'1 with Kobe Bryant.
Arch Stanton said on 7/Sep/18
Matt6'5 said on 19/Jun/18
Editor Rob, which celebrity do you feel has held their height (suffered the least loss) with age. My money is on Mr.Freeman here!
Editor Rob
Yes, he held onto height quite well.

Yes, Sidney Poitier as well still standing tall with Obama in his 80s. Not many men around 80 who could stand close to 6'2.
Tod Charming said on 30/Aug/18
Strong 6'2 at his youth. Strong 6'1 at his grave.
188cm KNight said on 1/Jul/18
@Matt6'5 I feel that a good diet and a good amount of stretching is a great way to mitigate any lossage of height. Age can take a good hold on you so it is good to start as young as possible.
Matt6'5 said on 19/Jun/18
Editor Rob, which celebrity do you feel has held their height (suffered the least loss) with age. My money is on Mr.Freeman here!
Editor Rob
Yes, he held onto height quite well.
berta said on 17/Jun/18
189 peak and 186,5 today
viper said on 7/Apr/18
I think people overrate height shrinkage here. My soon to be 80 year old Uncle has always been a solid 5-8
Gracian said on 29/Mar/18
Freeman from Monica Bellucci and Gene Hackman: Click Here
Freeman generally always looked much taller than Hackman. Rob, he's ending 81 this year, just a half-inch loss of his age looks a bit unreal... Please, Rob, give him at least a peak height of 6'2.5".
Tall Sam said on 2/Mar/18
I'd have no trouble seeing Freeman as edging someone like Samuel L. Jackson by a cm or even more, who really doesn't convince as being an more than a flat 6'2" standing his best at his peak, probably never being more than 6'1.5" by early evening. I've posted in the past, I saw Morgan in person many years ago and he would've been tall enough to convince people he was 6'3" range, with great posture, even though he was more of a strong 6'2".
Ken said on 11/Feb/18
Charlie get it this website you just made the dumbest statement I have ever read Morgan at 5’10 hahaha he’s 6’1.75
Charlie Evans said on 16/Jan/18
Morgan is shorter than Kevin Kline by an inch. Kevin from old aged would of shrunk to 5'11 at most.I have Morgan Freeman pegged at 5'10 which is not strange for a man his age.I am a 5'10 man myself and i tower over most middle aged men and i'm 50. Men my age or Morgans age in Canada would be about 4 inches shorter than myself around 5'6 in height.Morgan is 5'10 today.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jan/18
Peak: 189.2cm
Today: 186.7cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Dec/17
6ft3 is pushing it although at times he could pull that off...
Dmeyer said on 3/Dec/17
Peak 6 FT 2,25 now 6'1,5
Slim 185 said on 12/Nov/17
Bodybuy said on 11/Nov/17
@Slim Maybe because according to numerous pieces of research, people in Western societies don’t shrink anything over 2-3 cm over the course of life, unless their work was heavily physical.
Bodybuy said on 11/Nov/17
@Slim Maybe because according to numerous pieces of research, people in Western societies don’t shrink anything over 2-3 cm over the course of life, unless their work was heavily physical.
Anonymous said on 8/Nov/17
very little lost height. this is a man who takes care of his spine!
Slim 6' said on 14/Oct/17
Berta and mark are correct.
Slim 6' said on 11/Oct/17
189 would be a better listing for peak, he was much taller than brad pitt in "seven" and held his own against the giant Tim Robbins in "shawshank redemption".
Mark(5'9.5 said on 27/Sep/17
More like a good 6'2.5" peak for Freeman.
Mark(5'9.5 said on 26/Sep/17
187 cm peak? In your dreams. :P
berta said on 26/Sep/17
looking at pictures from this year he seems to shrink more now at this age. i think he is max this height now.peak 189 and today about 186,5- 187
Slim said on 22/Sep/17
Rob, how do you think freeman has only lost 1-2cms at 80 years of age?
Ali said on 27/Aug/17
Tall guy. Has maintained height very well. Christopher Reeve looks to be about 2 inches taller. 187cm peak and 185max today.
yansti said on 20/Jul/17
I am 37 and went to the wax museum in london, I was the exact same height as morga freeman altough I am only 72,88 inches flatn and the issue was this one, he surely must have shrunk with age, from my 6 inches flat to Mr Freeman 6,2 or over is impossible. I believe he was tallaer when younger... by the way I am a very amateur bodybuilder, I started working out because I was bullied at school and i am now 6 flat and weigh in at 222 pounds, not very lean cause I always kept my unhealthy diet and never took any kind of supplements, I benchpress 265 pounds 12 times and 330 6 times, don't know what theu didi at Madameme Toussout wax mueum.... I am surely vey shorther in real life.
RisingForce said on 11/Jul/17
Actually, Freeman could have been just a flat 6'2" considering there's a decent chance Christopher Reeve was a flat 6'3".

Richard, height loss can vary greatly from person to person. Freeman seems to have done unusually well not losing much at all, but Clint is the other extreme as he lost more than most.
Matt6'5 said on 9/Jul/17
He's held his height well for an older man. You just don't see very many 6ft+ men in their 80's. Rob, is it possible he was closer to 6'3 in his youth?
Editor Rob: I don't think 6ft 3, though 6ft 2.5 argument is still believable.
even said on 8/Jul/17
6 foot 2 peak
6 foot 1.5 now
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jul/17
Rob, is it possible he had already lost a bit by Shawshank?

He looked a strong 6ft2 w/h Robbins so I'm wondering if he was maybe taller than that in his 20's-30's
Editor Rob: Freeman I think made it to his 50's without anything lost, or anything noticeable.
RichardSpain said on 30/Jun/17
Guys ! it is curious!

Today Freeman is taller than Eastwood. Clint is only 7 years older than Freeman.

Click Here
Click Here


Have you got any explication about it? remember Eastwood was listed in 192 cm and Freeman 189 cm in their younger days. But nowadays Freeman is taller than him with almost similar age. Do you understand this?
6'1.5 said on 27/Jun/17
Watch the first 20 minutes of london has fallen and you'll see that 6'1.25" gerard butler looks like a giant next to freeman. He probably had lifts on though
RichardSpain said on 26/Jun/17
Eastwood wasn't 192cm ! it's a joke! marketing! Eastwood was 192 cm with his boots. I think Eastwood was a solid 189cm max 190 cm younger. In this way we can understand why Eastwood is around 183cm nowadays crearly because he lost only 6 or 7 cm of his pic that's credible.

Morgan had similar height than Clint Eastwood. 189 /190cm in peak.

Morgan has good genetics. Nowadays still has good height and he is an old man.

Eastwood, Freeman and Affleck have very similar heights in his peaks. range 189/190cm
Amy said on 19/Jun/17
Rob who would you say is taller Morgan Freeman or Ben Affleck?
James B said on 12/Jun/17
He didn't look 6'2.25 with 6'2.5-6'2.75 clint Eastwood in Unforgiven
S.J.H said on 8/Jun/17
I check out those close up shots of morgan freeman with 6'4.75 kobe bryant at first i thought was 4' but theres a loop of angle and it's a solid 9cm between them. Freeman is 186cm not 6'1.75 i wouldn't go 6'1 that low now. I strongly see it he is 6'1.25 at least clear 6'1.5 in the morning.
RisingForce said on 7/Jun/17
I have to disagree, Shredder. I rewatched it again and Reeve seems noticeably taller to me, particularly when they've almost got to their table. But when I have time I'll watch the whole film. From what I remember, it was a good movie anyway.
jervis said on 2/Jun/17
At 2.01mins if you pause it you can see a clear 1 inch plus advantage for Reeves.
Shredder said on 31/May/17
I don't see much of a difference between them RisingForce , less than an inch.
RisingForce said on 19/May/17
Here he is with 6'3.5" Christopher Reeve: Click Here They appear together around 1:40 in a scene indoors and you can see as they walk around 1:56 that Reeve is clearly at least an inch taller. Strong 6'2" seems right just as he said. Problem is when an older actor claims a height, you're never sure if they're claiming a peak or current height(e.g., Ernest Borgnine). Wouldn't be surprised if he'd have claimed 6'3", would have been a lot more reasonable than Samuel L. Jackson claiming it.
RisingForce said on 10/May/17
The fact that Clint Eastwood was 6'3" flat at the time of The Unforgiven confirms Freeman at about 6'2" peak and 6'4.5"-6'5" Tim Robbins was definitely a few inches taller. I'm gonna have to check how Freeman measured up to Christopher Reeve in Street Smart.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Apr/17
Peak: 6ft2½-6ft2¾
Today: 6ft1½-6ft1¾
Sandy Cowell said on 29/Apr/17
Morgan's a brilliant actor with a great voice that's a joy to listen to! I loved it when he was fooling around at the dinner table with Gwyneth Paltrow and Brad Pitt in 'Seven' and they were giggling - so funny! And who can forget his narration and his role in 'the Shawshank Redemption'?
So the man has only lost half an inch over the years, which is exceptionally good! That's quite an achievement, and good to hear that it's possible and not an inevitability that we're all destined to shrink! I like that! It should prove encouraging to the young people who come here looking for help and advice for reaching and maintaining as good a height as possible! 🍻
My guesses are: 6ft 1.75 now and 6ft2.25 for his peak.
Richardspain said on 28/Apr/17
I think he is a solid 187cm today.Good genetics.

190cm when he was young. This man is tall.
shiva 181 cms said on 21/Apr/17
Rob is 6'2.5 peak and 6'1.5 today possible ,hard to believe he lost just 0.5" at 80 ,while Eastwood lost 4" at 87
Editor Rob: yeah you could definitely argue those figures.
mister_lennon said on 30/Mar/17
189-190 peak
187-188 now
berta said on 29/Mar/17
i think 0,25 inches on peak would be better and today the listing is fine. could sometimes even now look 188
Willes188 said on 28/Mar/17
Solid 189cm in his prime, 6'2.25-6'2.5, nowadays just under 188cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Mar/17
I think 6ft2½ peak is more than fair. Still looked that 15 years ago. Looks at least 6ft1½ today
Adijos said on 21/Mar/17
Peak: 6'2.75" (190 cm)
Today 6'1.75" (187 cm)
Mark(5'9.25") said on 14/Mar/17
Freeman was a solid 1.5 inch taller than Jim Carrey. 6'2.5" is closer for peak.
Gwynbleidd said on 9/Mar/17
Morgan imo has to be a strong 6' 2.5" peak, and a 6' 1.5" current. Seen him in many movies where he was peak, including the legendary Shawshank Redemption alongside a very solid 6' 5" Tim Robbins. Definitely 6' 2.5" peak.
RisingForce said on 2/Mar/17
Danimal, if you have men who lose significantly more than average like Clint, Arnold, Hogan and Dolph, then you also must have men, who lose significantly less than average. Morgan Freeman just happens to be one of them, although I do think he could look as tall a 6'2.5" or even 6'3" at times in the early 90s. Also, that survey only included 2,084 people. A decent sample to extrapolate from, but far from enough to be conclusive with 320 million people in the US alone.
grizz said on 29/Jan/17
@Donald Trump, why nobody is taller than you, Mr. President!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Jan/17
Kutcher looks 189cm minimum and sometimes 190cm. Freeman at his peak I can picture being close to Ashton...
S.J.H said on 18/Jan/17
Lol. Mr President is here. A young freeman might be the taller than those 6'2-6'2.25 guys lsited here
Donald Trump said on 16/Jan/17
Who is taller. Freeman, Justin Hartley, Alan Ritchson, or Ashton Kutcher
Editor Rob: shouldn't you be busy preparing for inauguration, rather than posting on celebheights!

I think Kutcher has a chance of being more 189 than say Hartley, but Freeman at his peak may well look 6ft 2.5 at times too.
berta said on 10/Jan/17
by looking at that photo with santaro he looks the exact same height and he have poorer poster than santaro who stands really well i n that i really think he still i s188 and at peak was no less than 189 ore a littel over that. i mean with 192-193 christopher reves there was maybe 3 cm max difference not more
Mark said on 8/Jan/17
A tall guy, for sure. Until seventy years old he was a solid 6ft2.5.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 6/Jan/17
By 187 CM Rodrigo Santoro:

Click Here
HonestSlovene said on 1/Jan/17
Jim Carrey is no more than 6'1, maybe 6'1.25" peak.
HonestSlovene said on 1/Jan/17
6'2" solid peak and closer to 6'1" now. Anything more than 6'2.5" peak is a joke Danimal, a legitimate 6'2" tall guy is already quite tall in the west.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Dec/16
I've said it before and I'll say it can easily put a 30-year old Jackman in that 'strong' 6ft2 category.
Ren said on 17/Dec/16
Rob, Who gives a more taller impression?
Freeman, Affleck, Reddick, Bana, Jackman, or Roman Reigns
Editor Rob: Freeman today can still look not far off 6ft 2, the last thing I remember seeing him in was that Last Vegas, and was taller than Kline for sure.

I think all of those guys (except Jackman) could (peak) be argued a fraction over 6ft 2, maybe only Reddick/Freeman more chance of hitting nearer 6ft 2.5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Dec/16
So Danimal you therefore think he was 6ft4?
Danimal said on 28/Nov/16
He's 6'2" today and almost 80 years old. Most men will have lost 2" by his age. Not joking.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 25/Nov/16
He looks to be the same height as Gerard Butler:

Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Nov/16
Not sure if he'd only be 6ft1 flat. 186-187cm today at worst, 189-190cm at peak
Candyman said on 16/Nov/16
Slightly taller than RGIII recently so still at least 6'2" if not more with good posture.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Oct/16
Amazing that Clint peak would have had near 2in on Freeman and today it's the opposite!
Mark said on 26/Sep/16
He had an edge on Jim Carrey, so 6'2" is still fine currently.

6'2.5" is very likely.
6ftJoe said on 5/Sep/16
watching TDKR Bale cant be 511 atmost
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Sep/16
Looking at recent photos he can still look near 6ft2
jervis said on 28/Aug/16
There are no good shots of him and Clint together in unforgiven,but there are a few pics of them from that time and Clint has the edge on Morgan. Clint was about 6ft3 then.Now Morgan is taller. In last vagas he looked still a strong 6ft2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Aug/16
Rob, how likely would 6ft1 flat be today?
Editor Rob: he may be around that today.
Mike said on 29/Jul/16
6ft 2.5 peak, no less.
Brandon said on 15/Jul/16
Peak:: 6'2.5"
Dmeyer said on 15/Jul/16
5-10 years back was only 188cm while hé looks barely smaller than 6 ft 3,5-4in 5-10 years ago Liam neeson
Dmeyer said on 6/Jul/16
in the last movie he looked a bit smaller than butler so max 6 ft 0.5 in while he looked 3in taller than 6 ft bale 7-8 years back , he probably started to lose decent amount of height
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jun/16
I thought he could pass for a 6ft3 guy when he was younger.
5'6.5 Indiana jones guy said on 28/Jun/16
I think his peak height was 190 cm and nowadays 187 cm.
Also, I see him at 188 cm max he could even be close to 192-193 cm at peak which is **** but to make it safe, I'm guessing 190 cm at peak.
berta said on 25/May/16
100 % 189 peak. 190 is to tall and 188 to short. But i Think he was closer to 190 than 188 peak. Can still look 188
Hypado said on 18/Apr/16
Morgan Freeman height is 6ft 2in (188 cm)

A Legit 188 guy in the movie Street Smart.
Donnie said on 14/Apr/16
Freeman is clearly shorter than Gerard Butler in London has fallen, yet Butler is listed as 186?
Matt said on 4/Apr/16
187 cm for God.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Mar/16
Robbins may very well have been a full 6ft5 in his 20's-30's and woken up at 6ft6. But really a barefoot 198cm guy in the evening peak? I don't know about one. That would bring Freeman up to almost 6ft4 which he never looked. Freeman could have been a solid 189cm guy though.
Maximus said on 28/Feb/16
Freeman usually always comes across as tall on film. He was obviously shorter than Tim Robbins in Shawshank but then again I believe Tim is around 6'5" to 6'6" tall.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jan/16
He still looked 189cm 10 years ago.

Question is could he have been 6ft3 at some point? said on 21/Oct/15
if you look the final scene with donald sutherland face to face,donald is cleary two inches or more tall than freeman its very clear.SO FREEMAN IS NOT 6,2 OR SUTHERLAND WAS IN THIS TIME MORE THAN 6,4 THIS MOVIE IS "OUTBREAK"
Sam said on 16/Oct/15
Not worth enduring Ted 2 to see if there's really an obvious lift shot IMO, LOL. I've seen Freeman when he was probably still full height and he stood out as tall, would be surprised...
dmeyer said on 12/Oct/15
Exept with robbins he defenetly look 6'2-2.5 up to 5-10 yrs back
MrTBlack said on 1/Oct/15

Then he'd 6'1.5" today.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 25/Sep/15
6'2 1/4" for his peak height, and 187 CM today.
Arch Stanton said on 24/Sep/15
Peak 6'2.5 in my opinion, but I'm glad Rob has tweaked to 189 peak now at
least and a current one, which looks more accurate.
Armandy 6'1.5 said on 1/Sep/15
Peak 188 and half or 6'2.25
Rey said on 20/Aug/15
Christopher Reeve had an inch or so over him in "Street Smart."
Ron said on 15/Jul/15
I could be wrong on this, but I just saw "Ted 2" and at the end he appeared to be wearing some HUGE badly disguised lifts. Check out his shoes in the court-house, the mid-section appears to be nearly vertical and the light reflects it, his trousers do nothing to disguise it as they hang about 3 inches above his foot as if he's taller than the trousers expected and he even walks a little bit as if he's got some big uncomfortable lifts in.
Possibly the worst example if lift wearing I've ever seen.
frank said on 11/Jul/15
rob, morgan probably didn't lost anything, not even 1 cm before 70s, don't you agree? in the last few years seems that he lost 1-2 cm.
[Editor Rob: he seemed to retain a 6ft 2 up to near 70 yes. Genetics and diet maybe meant his bone density was still very good.
Sam said on 6/Jul/15
Yep, a very tall guy, I met and talked to him in the late 90s. Freeman look 6'2.25"-6'2.75" at that time, commanding presence and voice in person even though I'm a solid 2 inches taller (don't recall but I believe I was fully grown by that point).
gaga said on 2/Jul/15
Rob, when did you list his peak height? Last time I checked he only had his current height listed here.
[Editor Rob: a few months back]
Dejavu said on 22/Jun/15
He was the same height as ben affleck in sums of all fear. Both a bit over 6'2
jade said on 5/Jun/15
I love Morgan Freeman. I now know what the expression"tall drink of water"means.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/May/15
The way I see it

Batman Begins: 189cm
Dark Knight: 188cm
Dark Knight Rises: 187cm
Dmeyer said on 13/May/15
Tanks Rob this Guy realy looked 189 up to not too long ago
Rey said on 26/Apr/15
In the past has appeared taller than "6'2"" Craig Ferguson, Ben Affleck and Jim Carrey. Interesting....
German Beryozkin said on 19/Apr/15
Click Here
look at this with Ben Affleck
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Mar/15
6ft3 out of bed peak...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Mar/15
I think at peak he'd have been similar to Idris Elba.
Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2" said on 26/Feb/15
I know that this will seem like a foolish question, but how was he only a few inches taller than Steve Carrell in Evan Almighty?
Lorne said on 25/Feb/15
Finally! This is perfect, a fraction over 6ft2 peak, a fraction under today.

I must say, however, you took so long doing it he may be 6ft1.5 by now! ;)

Seriously, though, thanks, you continue improving and expanding the site, although this one was a bit overdue.
Judd said on 13/Jan/15
For sure 6'1.75" for him today is the best guess!
Not sure about his peak height...he may have been 6'2.5"...
cole said on 13/Jan/15
@Editor Rob: Is there any reason why his picture shows up in the tumbnail but not on the actual page? It's the same with Bryan Cranston and a few others. A good current and peak height listing this.
[Editor Rob: I did add a photo for him just now, some I'd done the thumb but forgot the main picture to upload.]
trav said on 10/Jan/15
Damn he lost nearly like a half an inch
Sam said on 9/Jan/15
Yeah, I met the man in the 1990s and he looked in the 6'2"-6'3" zone, had excellent posture.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jan/15
The full 6ft2½ is a better fit. I won't argue with his current height. He does look that
Njp said on 6/Jan/15
Looks about 2.5 to 3 inches taller than Christian Bale
Mike said on 30/Dec/14
No less than this, and probably more likely to be a full 6ft 2.5.
6ft 2.25-2.5in 189 peak
6ft 1.5-1.75in 187 today
Mike said on 16/Dec/14
If he's not 6ft 2 today, he's pretty close to it. 6ft 1.5-1.75in today and 6ft 2.5in peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Dec/14
Comparisons w/h Connery are illogical because A) they're aren't photos of the two veteran actors together and B) Freeman is a good 7 years younger than Connery.

Rob, could Freeman be rounding down?
[Editor Rob: he might have been a little over 6ft 2, I know at times he can pass for a 189 in the 80's and 90's]
Mike said on 9/Dec/14
No photo for him Rob?
[Editor Rob: I will later this month]
pedriscovery said on 8/Dec/14
If you looks the film outbreak,have a scene with donald sutherland face to face,and sutherland hace almost two inches on freeman look this movie the diference of heigth is notable
Mike said on 6/Dec/14
In fact he actually gives a taller impression than 6ft 2 Sean Connery! He really needs an upgrade to a full 6ft 2.5 thats what he generally looked. He can even give 6ft 3 impressions. He looked the same height as 6ft 2.5 Affleck also.
cole said on 23/Nov/14
He should have a 6'2.25 or 6'2.5 peak height, he still looks 6'2 or at worst 6'1.75 today.
Arch Stanton said on 9/Nov/14
Rob can you add a photo and The Dark Knight Trilogy, Million Dollar Baby, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, Bruce Almighty, and Deep Impact?
Arch Stanton said on 9/Nov/14
Greg (6'1'') says on 13/Oct/14
Struggles with 6 foot next to Kobe:

Click Here

6 ft? Looks pretty near 6'2" in comparison still.
mike said on 6/Nov/14
Yeah Rob can you add a photo, add The Dark Knight trilogy and upgrade him to 6ft 2.5 peak?
Arch Stanton said on 2/Nov/14
Rob can you add a photo?

Watch The Dark Night Rises people. He looked 6'3" next to Bale, about an inch shorter than how Neeson looks in Begins and clearly taller than Michael Caine in comparison. Honestly I generally get a weak 6'3 impression of him in his films. But I don't think he looked it next to Tim Robbins who had him by about 3 inches.
Greg (6'1'') said on 13/Oct/14
Struggles with 6 foot next to Kobe:

Click Here
Judd said on 13/Oct/14
Yeah, I watched a couple of his movies, recently and then I admitt he was taller than a flat 6'2" one.
Maybe he brushed 6'2.5" when he was young and today I wouldn't put him below 6'1.75"...
Although he got older he didn't lose a big amount...he's still a tall guy and great actor, too.
Vegas said on 2/Oct/14
Danimal says on 1/Oct/14
At almost 80 years old, he's still taller than 6'2" (yes, he's 6'2") Craig Ferguson.

ferguson was 2 inches shorter than the rock a couple of years ago..
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Oct/14
He did look around 6ft3 in Se7en and Shawshank Redemption.

"Peak height was 6ft 2.5in (189cm)"

In his 20s-30s possibly 190cm even. Remember he was late to the party in terms of success
mike said on 1/Oct/14
Rob, when will you give Morgan 189 peak?
Danimal said on 1/Oct/14
At almost 80 years old, he's still taller than 6'2" (yes, he's 6'2") Craig Ferguson.
Danimal said on 1/Oct/14
There should really be a before and after height listing for Morgan. He's almost 80 years old (most men will have lost 2" by then) and he still looks like a strong 6'2" + guy (taller than Ben Affleck). In his younger days, was easily over 6'3". I used to read 6'3.5" and 6'4" for him when he was young. Legit tall man who has aged very well, but has lost height nonetheless.
mike said on 25/Sep/14
There's actually a chance he could've dipped to a flat 6ft 2 at night he could look sometimes a full 3 inches shorter than legit 6ft 5 actors, like Tim Robbins other times he could look 6ft 3 (or really close to it). so this listening is pretty accurate maybe a slight upgrade to 189 he's similar to Sean Connery both 6ft 2-2.5 peak.
judd said on 13/Sep/14
i read an article which said he was 6'2 and he always looked a full 6'2ish...
Dejavu said on 20/Aug/14
Looks the same height as 6'2.5 Ben Affleck in Sums of All Fears. 189cm peak is a possibility.
mike said on 19/Aug/14
Morgan Freeman's height 6ft 1.5in (187 cm)
Peak height was 6ft 2.25in (189 cm)

nothing under 188 in his prime.
James B said on 16/Aug/14
Taller than Clancy brown
Miiiiiiighty_- said on 17/Jul/14
I'd say he is 6'2 nowadays ( 188 cm ), maybe still 189 if he postures up.
Probably a strong 189 and maybe even 190cm in his prime.
He still looks considerably taller than Bale in the Batman series, and slightly taller than Michael Caine.
berta said on 15/Jul/14
i cant se morgan freeman be just 3 cm taller than a guy like harrison ford 30 years ago more lika 5 cm difference
Arch Stanton said on 13/Jul/14
Honestly, even now he still gives a 6 ft 3 impression in films. I find it hard to believe he was low as 6 ft 2 pealk. He doesn't look much shorter than Paul Bettany in Transcendence.
177cmGuy said on 9/Jul/14
Morgan Freeman was probably a strong 6'2 (189cm) at his peak today he is likeley a weak 6'2 (187cm).
cole said on 18/Jun/14
He's held up pretty well. About 6'1.75 today, can still look 6'2 at times, and 6'2.25 in his prime I'd say.
Dmeyer said on 3/Jun/14
Rob to me he looked taller than Affleck and near 4in on pitt nothing under 6'2.25-2.5 peak
mike said on 2/Jun/14
6ft 1.25 today
6ft 2 flat peak
d said on 30/Apr/14
rob do you think morgan hasn't lost any height at all?
[Editor Rob: I think a fraction is quite probable, he could have passed for 189 20-25 years ago.]
Banshee said on 3/Apr/14
People who think that all men shrink around 1 inch or more during the course of their life needs some biology classes.
Btw, Nikolaj Coster Waldau ( Jaime Lannister from Game of Thrones ), also listed here at 6'1.5'', is undoubtedly towered by Freeman in all possible pictures by at least 5 cm.
Something is wrong here or Freeman is above 192 cm tall.
James B said on 20/Mar/14
6'2.5 peak
6'1.5 today
Hypado said on 15/Mar/14
188 looks right
James B said on 15/Mar/14
If bale is 6ft then I think in batman begins he looked 6'2-6'3 but then his hairstyle is very thick
pedriscovery said on 22/Jan/14
berta said on 17/Jan/14
there is no way he was just 188 at peak even now in last vegas he looks 188-189. And peak was probably weak 190 ore stron 189. The dude looks 189 most of the time even now if he would stand well. If he was 188 at peak he was a very strong one and have grew to 188,6 at the age of 76 :P hahaa
Arch Stanton said on 2/Jan/14
Robbins did look about 3 inches taller in Shawshank though and if you also consider his 6'4.5" claim... Poitier was a leggy dude with a smallish torso in his prime, he had the legs of a 6'4"-6'5" guy I think but I'm not sure he looked taller than Freeman.
Arch Stanton said on 2/Jan/14
Rob the thing is I find it hard to believe he'd have been shorter at peak than Sidney Poitier. I've seen about five of Poitier's 60s films and honestly I don't think he'd have been taller than Freeman. Freeman to me looked more likely to be over the 6'2" mark than Poitier.
Arch Stanton said on 1/Jan/14
With 189cm Sidney Poitier: Click Here
Arch Stanton said on 1/Jan/14
Here's a front shot Click Here That's not even close to 3 inches surely?
[Editor Rob: he's managed to maintain height well...maybe Robbins is approaching an age were his posture isn't as good as it used to be.

This is Morgan with a guy who is supposed to have had an early (i.e. not long after waking) measurement of 6ft 2 3/8ths.]
Arch Stanton said on 1/Jan/14
Rob do you think he looks a bit taller than this here Click Here ?
Arch Stanton said on 1/Jan/14
If you consider that guys like Ryan Reynolds have the same height listing on here I think you're undercutting his peak height slightly Rob. I think at peak he'd never had dropped under this mark and I think 6'2.5" would be a fair listing.. I don't think he's lost much at all today even at 76, he honestly looked near 6'3" next to Kline in Last Vegas.
Lenad said on 1/Jan/14
188cm min peak
Arch Stanton said on 31/Dec/13
Actually looks 6 ft 3 in Last Vegas. Has easily 2 inches on Kevin Kline.
avi said on 30/Dec/13
Yeah 6'2.25 peak and 6'2 now he barely lost anything.
Lenad said on 15/Dec/13
187cm now 189cm peak. Or maybe 190cm peak and 188cm now.
dmeyer said on 12/Dec/13
Rob He was defenetly over 6'2 peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Dec/13
"Peak height was 6ft 2.5in (189cm)"

188cm peak seems a little low. In Street Smarts (his best performance, IMO) he looked only 1in under Steve Reeves. He was 51 at that point. Could he have been 6ft3?
pedriscovery said on 17/Nov/13
in "disclosure"he have a scene face to face with donald sutherland an looks cleary shorter than donald two inches.
jtm said on 5/Nov/13
he definitely looked more than 2 inches shorter than robbins to me.
Sam said on 4/Nov/13
Almost 15 years ago, that's the impression Freeman gave me in person as well, very strong 6'2", near 6'3".
brotha said on 2/Nov/13
I saw morgan about six years ago at a hotel I worked in. I'm 5'11.5" and I promis was 6'2.5" minimum. He was wearing freaking loafers too. Probably 6'3" peak at least.
Lenad said on 19/Oct/13
I don't think hes over 6'2 now. I doubt under it when younger though. He was still a good inch taller than Jim Carrey back in 2003
Emil said on 3/Oct/13
Nah, Freeman didn't look more than 2 inches shorter than Robbins to me
jtm said on 1/Oct/13
3 inches shorter than tim robbins in the shawshank redemption. a lot of people on robbins page are now claiming he is 6'4-6'4.5. that would mean freeman was 6'1 range at his prime but i think robbins is 6'5 and freeman's peak height was 6'2 flat.
Nenninn said on 25/Sep/13
agree with Lorne
Lorne said on 22/Sep/13
Morgan Freemans height is 6ft1.75/187cm. Peak height was 6ft2.25in/189cm
Rusty said on 5/Sep/13
I think a legit 6'2.5" is good for his peak but he is looking more a weak 6'2" these days.
Anon said on 30/Aug/13
6'2 seems right.
Lo sgozzatore said on 27/Aug/13
So you agree that Morgan is not looking over 184-185 in this pic (not saying he really is this low)?
[Editor Rob: Morgan at times can look anywhere in 6ft 1-2 range last few years]
Lo sgozzatore said on 26/Aug/13
Rob, what about this pic? Click Here
Freeman barely reaches Kobe's eyelevel. Once again Kobe looks taller than his 6'4.75 measurement, but then again he doesnt look taller than Michael Jordan, who could be slightly shorter than 6'5...
[Editor Rob: he can appear taller in a lot of photos, 6ft 5.5 is what he can pull off looking at times. It helps that he doesn't have a low eyelevel and if he raises it slightly his eyelevel would be no more than 4 inches.]
pedriscovery said on 23/Aug/13
in a movie "estallido" wiht donald shuterland an dustin hoffman morgan is 2" more short than donald sutherland if sutherland is 6"4 morgan is 6"2
cole said on 22/Aug/13
Maybe a current height vs peak height is in order for Mr. Freeman these days, Rob? He is 76 after all! Personally I'd say 6'2.25 (189 cm) peak, and 6'1.75 (187 cm) today.
DaveC said on 14/Aug/13
Always looked about 6'3" or 6'4" to me. Taller than Clint in both films
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jul/13
No way did this guy have 3in on Dan Aykroyd. 1-1.5in maybe.

I think 6"2" on the dot now. Has more height over Christian Bale than Michael Caine. 6"1.75"/187cm at worst today.

189cm peak for definite. Looked 6"3" in Seven with Brad Pitt
Larc 74in said on 8/Jul/13
He's lucky, he lost barely nothing at 76y.
He still looks about 6'2 today, although a weak 6'2, at peak he was for sure a strong one.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.