|
Kirk says on 19/Nov/09
Well, heightcritique, it's not the fact you think I'm disagreeing with but the fact You take it seriously and respond very defensive (and you call me emotional?). Hey I'm not the one screaming for attention on a height forum and deniely say you're not messed up but the other person is. But if being positively right keeps you conciously, good for you. If I may ask what is the motive for your attention reasoning on the Charlie Sheen height site? This is judging from ALL your comments posted below. Is there something personal you have with this guy? If you don't mind me asking.
ME says on 19/Nov/09
always looks pretty high to me.
it's a tricky one, because he looks 5'10 next to cryer, but 5'10 jenna elfman made him look tiny (she wore hills, but steel) Heightcritique says on 19/Nov/09
Kirk: briefly, objective arguments are supported by evidence, and subjective arguments based on personal motives (in your case full of dire stubborness to talk about feelings, to be right, and to incite an emotional reaction from me).
If you want to discuss height objectively, why don't you start by gauging Sheen's height by either commenting on any evidence posted, or post any new evidence. Your English is good enough. Good for you? Kirk says on 18/Nov/09
Oh you correct, if I wanted to talk about feelings I certaintly would use words like "patronizing" and "condescending" as means of expressing my self on a height website. For the minor mistakes of typos, I sure wish my English was better. I guess addressing somebody to seek better time than direly arguing one's feelings about how right they wish to be on a height site. I sure brought a bad arguement, right "heightcritique"? Good for you. Heightcritique says on 17/Nov/09
Kirk: the only feeling I have right now is sorriness for your poor English and poor argument. This is a height forum to discuss height so are you in the right place? If you want to discuss feelings this is not the most appropriate forum. Kirk says on 16/Nov/09
Hey heightcritque, it's nice that you want people to know about your feelings, specially the fact this is something deep to you (Charlie Sheen height). Also the fact you assmptions of the josh guy then get mad because he insulted you. Boy height are serious for you, eh? Not really good for you. Heightcritique says on 16/Nov/09
Sheen despite being farthest from the camera looks the same height next to 5'10" Lucy Lawless: Click Here The surface and footwear is discerned in the photo so it is reliable, thus Sheen clearly stands 5'10" tall. Heightcritique says on 15/Nov/09
Josh: your comment was immature and insulting. You did not post any evidence just a comment to downgrade and mock my objective argument. I enjoy to have civilized dialogue with mutual respect but I will defend myself if someone want to step on my toes and deliberately insult me. If you post evidence to counter my opinion I will be glad to disscuss it and compare it with other evidence. Thank you for apologizing; apology accepted. Please accept my sincere invitation to disscuss Sheen's height objectively if you want to continue discussing it. If so, my first point is that Sheen (barefoot)is taller than his co-star 5'9" Cryer, and in shoes is over an inch taller, so thus Sheen cannot be 5'9" and closer to 5'10":
Sheen barefoot next to 5'9" Cryer: Click Here
Sheen in shoes next to 5'9 Cryer: Click Here
One more thing: let's lose the "good for you" comment please; it's condescending and patronizing. How can Sheen height be good for me? josh says on 15/Nov/09
ok heightcritique i am sorry about that that was very immature of me for someone that is 29 like me but if you think he is 5'10 good for you but everytime somebody disagrees, you become so defensive about it so can you stop this already nobody comes to this page that often anyways. so again im sorry for the insult but can you please let it go now because not everyone is gonna agree with you and yes i don't really like charlie sheen that much but i am a fan of martin sheen and emilo's work. Heightcritique says on 14/Nov/09
Josh: why don't you and your boyfriend Tom hold hands and go bowling since you have so much in common. I think Sheen is a talented actor, and by comparing him next to other actors it's evident that he is not a short guy, and closer to 5'10" than 5'9", period.
So what you are doing under this thread if you do not esteem Sheen's acumen as an actor? If you are here just to contradict and seek attention than take up a hubby or suck your thumb...there is a moron like you in every thread that cannot differentiate an objective comment based on evidence compared to a subjective comment motivated by bias sensitivity. Your comment is obviously based on feelings so everybody here knows who is the tutti fruti?
josh says on 12/Nov/09
"...is obsessed with charlie sheen. ...just loves the guy so much..." Heightcritique says on 13/Nov/09
Tom: I proved that you are laughable in character and in word...where is the proof of your claim?... josh says on 12/Nov/09
tom, heighcritique is obsessed with charlie sheen. he has seen every movie and show he was in.he just loves the guy so much. good for you heighcritique! Tom says on 12/Nov/09
Ok so what have YOU proofed - your pictures are nothing than funny......... Heightcritique says on 5/Nov/09
Tom: "I saw him", "I met im" amount to squat when you have no tangible proof. There is one of you in every thread in this website paying lip service to the docile, dumb, and unintelligent. Grow up and post some evidence and stop insulting the intelligence of everyone here. Tom says on 4/Nov/09
Heightcritique you are a fool... Sheen is MAX 5´9 - i have seen him in person and i am 5´9 he actually looks like 5´8.5
to each his own i think...... Heightcritique says on 3/Nov/09
gcm: In this neutral and level photo, if you draw an imaginary line on top of Sheen and drag it across it will land at the level of 6'6" Syles nose, which from there to Style top of the head is about 7"-8" inches. Thus 6'6" minus 8" equals 5'10", Sheen's actual height.
In regards to your comment of Sheen wearing lifts on socks? where?
Click Here Click Here
What is a sock lift? Are you an expert on the subject? Enlighten me? gcm says on 2/Nov/09
I don't think there's anything between Cryer and Sheen and Sheen has at least an inch over Cryer in his hair. When Cryer has more hair it is neck and neck. Cryer looks taller Sheen sometimes. The killer here is that Ryan Styles has at least 9 inches on them when they all stand up straight. Whe Martin Sheen was on the show Charlie had barely one inch on him. There is no way Sheen is 5'10" I would put a fair sized bet on that he is not 5'9" either. Otherwise Styles is about 6'7" - 6"8" ( check it - Styles tends to slump a bit in most scenes but when they all get up to go somewhere you see at least 8 or 9 inches difference. If an adjustent is due I think it is downward. Also some actors have lifts even when they appear in socks. Jason W says on 1/Nov/09
i would buy Charlie Sheen's height at 5'10, although im not so sure that his co-star John Cryfuss is 5'9, probably closer to 5'8. openeyes says on 1/Nov/09
5'10 ? don't be ridiculous... he barely looks 5'9 but i'll give him that... Heightcritique says on 30/Oct/09
One clear example of Sheen's actual and present height is when he stands next to 5'9" John Cryfuss in 'Two and a Half Men'. He is always taller in socks next to 5'9" Cryfuss in shoes, so he can't be 5'9". And when Sheen is in shoes, he is taller than Cryfuss by over an inch and a half: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Editor Rob: my question to you is how can Sheen be 5'9" if he is taller (in socks and in shoes) than 5'9" Dryfuss? In the Enquirer Sheen says he is 5'10" and he does look it. In the major and respectable websites he is listed at 5'10": Click Here Don't you agree a correction on his listed height is in order? Alex2401 says on 28/Oct/09
Sheen is closer to 174cm than to 177cm. miser says on 11/Oct/09
sheen is closer to 5'10 than to 5'9 Heightcritique says on 2/Oct/09
Your comment in the Johnson thread per verbatim:
RisingForce says on 21/Sep/09
"You've also said Stallone is around 5'9", 5'9.5" based on how tall he looked to you on the golf course, iirc. So based on what you've seen at the golf course, Garcia, Stallone and Johnson are all around 5-9ish? I can buy that, JT."
Your own words claim that Don is 5'9"ish so you debunk your own Costner picture and argument. A 5'9" man does not look 1 1/2" inches shorter than a 6'1" man. Otherwise your statement is indireclty claiming that Costner height is 5'11"ish.
Besides, Don Johnson is 5'8" not 5'9" or do you need subtitles for the photos posted on his thread. These are pictures of a 5'8" next to a 6'1" (with advantage to Don by standing in front of the camera) Click Here and Click Here
In addition, 5'9" Garcia and 5'9" Sly are taller than Don: Click Here Click Here
Lastly, Kevin Costner's height is 6'1" not 5'10".
On a side note: it is obvious you know nothing about camera angles if you are affirming a "good angle" on the picture you posted. If you know anything about perspective you will know that the camera angle is in favor of Don adding .5" to 1" to his "illusional" height but I am not going to educate you on this since I was assuming you actually knew this when you started discussing camera angles.
Overall, your comment lacks deductive insight and is full of conflicting rationality; it debunks your photo at various levels. RisingForce says on 1/Oct/09
No, the rational explanation is that this is the only good angle picture of the 3 and it shows Don at his actual height of 5'9"-5'10". Click Here Heightcritique says on 1/Oct/09
Risingforce: Have you bothered to look at the photos under Don's thread? Don is 5'8" and Costner is 6'1" as the first picture indicate, and a bad angle is not going to make Don 3" taller or be half way at Costner forehead. And on the second picture, discussing footwear for 6'1" Costner and for 5'8" Don (which you conveniently did not mentioned) is simply silly, even if you still believe he is 5'9".
There are only two rational possibilities: (1) the third photo is photoshopped or (2) Don is wearing massive lifts. Heightcritique says on 30/Sep/09
5'10" Sheen next to 5'9" Ron Silver (1.5" difference): Click Here RisingForce says on 29/Sep/09
No, Heightcritique neither picture is photoshopped. The reality is that Costner was favored less in the 3rd picture hence the difference being a lot smaller.
As far as the second picture, well the difference looks like it could be 4" plus we can't see Costner's footwear. He could be wearing cowboy boots. Heightcritique says on 28/Sep/09
RisingForce: Your unwarranted comment makes me laugh. In both pictures Johnson has the camera advantage; the ceiling beam behind them in the two pictures indicate that the camera angle is at the same angle and tilted in favor of Johnson. I considered my former comment on two possibilities: if the two pictures were taken the same day, the one where Johnson is taller is photoshoped, and if not the two pictures were taken on different days (one shows Don with lifts and the other without lifts) and it is a coincidence that they are wearing the same clothes. So are you blind or just retarded? they are standing next to each other in both pictures, and in one picture Johsnon's head top is at the bottom of Costner's nose, and in the other Johnson's head top is halfway Costner's forehead. Do you need subtitles? Well, obviously you do: Johnson is 3" taller in one picture and 3" shorter on the other.
Also, if you are going to argue the comparison of Don with or without lifts, then explain the second picture where Don is a lot shorter than Costner. You can't because he is wearing lifts which is the reason you conveniently did not comment on that picture.
And if you still insist that Johnson is 5'9", look at the picture I posted of him with 5'4.5" Barbara Streisand in heels which shows a marginal height difference between the two.
In any case, you're comment shows that you're not only ignorant but also pretentious, and you know nothing about camera angles. I am probably also wasting my time trying to educate your arrogance. RisingForce says on 28/Sep/09
Are you retarded Heightcritique? The last picture you posted with Don Johnson was from the same day as the first picture you posted! Except Costner doesn't have the same camera advantage as the first picture so the difference isn't as big. Look at how they're dressed for gods sake. That proves you know nothing about camera angles. Heightcritique says on 28/Sep/09
Risinforce: let's hypothericaly entertain your statement:
"...Sheen wouldn't straight out to more than Johnson's height".
Okay, now compare the pictures of Johnson next to 6'1" Costner with and without lifts:
without lifts 5'8" Johnson: Click Here Click Here
with lifts 5'8" Johnson: Click Here should give you an idea of Sheen's height as compared to a 6'1" man.
The picture of Johnson with lifts next to 6'1" Costner should give an idea of how tall Sheen is.
If you still insist Johnson is 5'9" look at the picture I posted of him next to Barbara Streisand and my former posts of him next to his -5'8" wife when she wears sandals and in heels. Heightcritique says on 27/Sep/09
From the caption cited here Sheen said in the Enquirer "I'm 5' 10" and 155 pounds"
He is probably one of the few stars in Hollywood that doesn't care about his height or try to hide it. Why would he be walking in his socks around other stars in 'Two and Half Man' then and appear as a 5'10" next to them and next to his co-star in shoes who is 5'9"?
Next to Hatcher and McCarthy (pictures I posted in my 26/Sep/09 post) he is clearly 5'10" as well as all other clips and pictures I posted herein. RisingForce says on 27/Sep/09
Don Johnson isn't standing at his straightest either. It's obvious that Johnson is taller in that photo, Sheen isn't hunched that much. He wouldn't straight out to more than Johnson's height. MHouillon says on 27/Sep/09
A clear 5'9.
5'10 is too much.
Saw Good advice yesterday. He wore lifts to appear taller.. Heightcritique says on 26/Sep/09
Risinforce: You admit that Sheen is slouching, so that in itself ruins your argument. If Sheen was standing up straight we will be looking at a difference picture.
In regards to Johnson, you saw the pictures of Don next to Costner with and without lifts, and a picture of his footwear and yet that is not enough to convince you. You are entitled to your own opinion and I hope you can show your point of view with proof then.
In regards to Al Pacino, the editor of this website has the following caption under his thread:
"US Actor from like The Godfather at his peak maybe stood just under 5ft 7, but definitely around 5ft 6 in his 60's. Certainly, in the book Godfather Legacy, Harlan Lebo writes, "He wore lifts in other scenes" (beside taller co-stars)."
Credibility or not I think the editor made a good reference to this and thus we see the prevalent 5'7" height assigned to Pacino in most websites and cast descriptions: Click Here
FYI: when 'Scarface' came out in 1983, Pacino was 43 years old. RisingForce says on 26/Sep/09
I don't care if Sheen is slouching, he's clearly shorter than Johnson there. And Don is not 5'8" either, you haven't shown particularly good evidence of him wearing lifts.
You lost all credibility on the Steven Bauer page when you said that Al Pacino is 5'7". Heightcritique says on 26/Sep/09
RisingForce: Your picture makes sense because first of all, Charlie is as usual standing with poor posture (i.e. tilting his head to the front and down and and probably slouching his back too). If you want to debate that tell me where is his neck? Obviously he is not standing straight. Besides that variable:
know what is 5'8" Don's usual enhanced footwear:
Click Here Click Here
I think there is enough evidence to show Don's with lifts and without lifts under his thread (i.e. see photos with Costner and Cheech Marin)
and,
know 5'9.5" Alice Cooper's usual footwear (high heel cowboy boots):
Click Here Click Here
Otherwise this photos are impossible:
Click Here Click Here
Brooke Shields is 5'11" not 5'9"
Click Here
Van Halen is 5'8" not 5'6"
And the last clips I posted: Kimmel is 6'1" not 5'11", and Kudrow is 5'8" not 5'6"...and so on with all the examples I posted here thus far. You get the picture...
Also, Charlie Sheen looks consistently 5'10" in "Two and Half Man" next his 5'9" co-star, and next to all guest co-stars.
Click Here
Sheen next to 5'6" Teri Hatcher: Click Here Click Here
For scale, Hatcher next to 6'1" Pierce Brosnan: Click Here
Sheen next to 5'7" Jenny McCarthy: Click Here
for scale McCarthy next to 5'9" Hugh Hefner: Click Here
Charlie Sheen is 5'10".
next to TELLEM says on 25/Sep/09
great picture rising.
more proof that charlie sheen is a 5'9 man. 5'10 is an abortion. RisingForce says on 25/Sep/09
Yeah, Sheen is 5'9".
Heightcritique insists that Don Johnson is 5'8" max yet Charlie Sheen is 5'10" minimum? Click Here Yeah, that sure makes sense.... TELLEM says on 24/Sep/09
i posted pics of sheen in full body shots next to his short brother and short father. hes 5'9 tops. Even rob and 99% on this forum agree that sheen is 5'9. TELLEM says on 24/Sep/09
Heightcritique says on 23/Sep/09
TELLEM: once again, Cage and Sheen: Click Here
Sheen is 5'10".
Tell me, how does this pic prove sheen is 5'10? just how? The fact that you post a pic like this and say sheen is 5'10 backs up what i've been saying all along about you, and proves that sheen isn't 5'10. Thanks for helping me back my statement up heightcritique. Your desperation to get your bogus 5'10 estimate across shows it, and its pathetic. you lose. sheen is 5'9. have fun you desperate goof. end of. Bouncer says on 24/Sep/09
Heightcritique says on 23/Sep/09
But if you want to take the position that because you said you saw Sheen and want me to believe it as undisputable proof and evidence without showing any photo or tangible evidence to back it up, than you are probably better off having a dialogue with someone docile, dumb, and unintelligent.
Although i don't believe Sheen is a full 5'10 (more like 5'9 - 5'9.5) i have to agree on that. Heightcritique says on 23/Sep/09
Frank2: If you show civility and respect in discussing evidence on height, I am glad to discuss it with reason and with other evidence to counter. But if you want to take the position that because you said you saw Sheen and want me to believe it as undisputable proof and evidence without showing any photo or tangible evidence to back it up, than you are probably better off having a dialogue with someone docile, dumb, and unintelligent.
Your comment that you are leaving because of "too many people like Heighcritique" is an excuse to mask your bogus argument that you have meet Sheen which does not have any effect or credibility here anymore. From reading all you posts in this site I see that you repeat this same claim in various threads without showing a photo or any tangible evidence to support it.
I see why you and TELLEM get along, and I will leave it at that. Heightcritique says on 23/Sep/09
Moondoggy: I agree in the photo with 5'8" Van Halen, Sheen appears 2" to 3" inches taller. Notice also that this time his posture is better than many of the other photos. When Sheen when stands up straight he looks his height.
Care to comment on TELLEM bipolar delusions? His disorder makes him think that anybody who disagrees with him is the same person. Also, I think he wants to talk about height now that his insults prove inefective against reason and tangible proof.
FYI: if you post anything to refute his stubborn 5'9" claim despite all the evidence posted, expect for him to call it garbage and an insult, and if you agree with him, he will invite you to go bowling with him. TELLEM says on 23/Sep/09
more pics of charlie sheen and emilio estevez. full body shot Click Here
sheen is in cowboy boots and so is estevez: Click Here
if estevez is 5'4, then sheen is 5'9 MAX and NO MORE. TELLEM says on 23/Sep/09
charlie sheen and his 5'4 bro emilio estevez: Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
after these pics, i'm more convinced that hes 5'9 MAX and less is possible. Heightcritique says on 23/Sep/09
TELLEM: once again, Cage and Sheen: Click Here
Sheen is 5'10". Frank2 says on 23/Sep/09
I've decided to leave and this time for good. Too may people like Heighcritique. Makes me long for Glenn! TELLEM says on 23/Sep/09
rob, ban heightcritique, and his other username moondoggy. Too much lame insults and ridiculous posts, not enough talk about height. TELLEM says on 23/Sep/09
another nicolas cage and charlie sheen pic: Click Here
once again, sheen is 5'9. Frank2 says on 23/Sep/09
Heighcritique, I know what I know and I'm sick and tired of arguing with you and others who've never met these people as I have, never even seen them in the flesh. I've posted tons of photos to prove Sheen is not 5'10". Anyone with eyes can see he's shorter than Michael Douglas and Daryl Hannah in WALL STREET. So you believe whatever you want. I'm out of here. I'm beginning to vacate many of these threads simply because I'm tired of arguing. Heighcritique says on 22/Sep/09
Self-explanatory:
Heightcritique says on 20/Sep/09
TELLEM: Thank you for invalidating and refuting all the evidence you posted thus far with your own statement:
TELLEM says on 18/Sep/09
"sorry heightcritique but your wrong as usual. Notice that at 4:05-4:06 chris tucker has his head down which clearly shows him losing height and notice after that its no longer a two inch difference, but a 3 because tucker no longer has his head down and sheen is closer to the camera. you only see what you want to see don't you? LOL this just keeps getting more and more hilarious by the minute. proving you wrong is a riot!..."
We already agree that Tucker is 6'1", so if you claim there in a 3" difference between Sheen and him, what is the result of the subtraction genious: 5'10".
Evidently, in addition of not knowing what a contradiction is you also don't know how to subtract. And you know what is hillarious and a riot? A moron arguing against his own self and making a fool out of himself in front of hundreds of people.
TELLEM's reply:
and thank you for proving my point of what a GIANT idiot you are heightcritique. When you come back to realization and understand that charlie sheen is 5'9, then i'll take your posts serious, until then, you can keep replying to me all you want, but all you'll be doing is talking to yourself. have fun.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Idiot, definition: n.
1.A foolish or stupid person.
2.A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against common dangers. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive.
Synonyms: TELLEM. Heighcritique says on 22/Sep/09
Frank2, if you want me to comment on your question, then comment of the clips (i.e. Kimmel, Kudrow) and photos I posted here, including the 'Wall Street' photos where Sheen is taller than Douglas, and appears as a 5'10" next to other actors.
If you really met him, then I hope you can upload a picture of him with you. I also know a girl, a professional model, who dated him and she is 5'9", and she said Sheen was taller than her. But, as you probably know, all this "I saw him" and "I met him" means squat without tangible proof. The pictures and clips posted here do not lie. In the clips I posted last Sheen is 5'10" and you cannot photoshop those so they are realiable evidence. TELLEM says on 21/Sep/09
Moondoggy says on 20/Sep/09
Heightcritique, I met Van Halen and he is 5'8" dude so Charlie has to be at least 5'10" - 5'11" in the photo you posted. You are right about ignoring the TELLEM moron. He doesn't comment and ignores your pictures and clips, but expects you to comment on his. I agree that Charlie looks 5'10" next to Kimmel, Kudrow and Tucker. And by the way, don't bother responding to Moron because Sutherland is 5'9" and Stone is 6'1" (google for Stone's photos next to 50 cent and Rourke where he is 3" and 2" taller than them).
TELLEM, in response to your insult, go get a new pair of eyeballs and theraphy for you self-importance complex.
You think oliver stone is 6'1. can your posts get any more stupider? mickey rourke is 5'10 these days you neanderthal: w/ 5'10 ric flair Click Here same height. so there goes your moronic 6'1 claim.
5'8 kiefer w/ 5'9 woody: Click Here Click Here
there goes your silly 5'9 kiefer estimate.
NOW. unless you provide evidence of those abortions you call height estimates, then your done. Til then, heres some advice for you, leave this site to us height experts. your height inflations are borderline retarded, just like your lessor half, heightcritique. TELLEM says on 21/Sep/09
and thank you for proving my point of what a GIANT idiot you are heightcritique. When you come back to realization and understand that charlie sheen is 5'9, then i'll take your posts serious, until then, you can keep replying to me all you want, but all you'll be doing is talking to yourself. have fun. Frank2 says on 21/Sep/09
Then if he's 5'9.5", why on earth was he at minimum two inches shorter than me? I mean for that matter he could have even been three inches shorter. All the Sheens are short, especially Emilio Estévez who's probably less than 5'4", so it wasn't a surprise to see Charlie not being on the tall side.
What does it take? The guy is not 5'10". Guaranteed. TELLEM says on 21/Sep/09
they can't explain it, frank2, because their charlie sheen fanboys, who have 5'10 charlie sheen permanently tattoed on their forehead. TELLEM says on 21/Sep/09
heightcritique and moondoggy are the same people. Bouncer says on 21/Sep/09
He can look slightly taller than his 5'9 co-star in two and a half men while wearing flat shoes, so i'd say 5'9.5 is not impossible for Sheen. Frank2 says on 21/Sep/09
Please explain why Sheen looks shorter than Michael Douglas and Daryl Hannah in WALL STREET. Explain why I was at least two inches taller than him when I stood right next to him. He's no more than 5'9". I'd bet money on it. Moondoggy says on 20/Sep/09
Heightcritique, I met Van Halen and he is 5'8" dude so Charlie has to be at least 5'10" - 5'11" in the photo you posted. You are right about ignoring the TELLEM moron. He doesn't comment and ignores your pictures and clips, but expects you to comment on his. I agree that Charlie looks 5'10" next to Kimmel, Kudrow and Tucker. And by the way, don't bother responding to Moron because Sutherland is 5'9" and Stone is 6'1" (google for Stone's photos next to 50 cent and Rourke where he is 3" and 2" taller than them).
TELLEM, in response to your insult, go get a new pair of eyeballs and theraphy for you self-importance complex. Heightcritique says on 20/Sep/09
TELLEM: Thank you for invalidating and refuting all the evidence you posted thus far with your own statement:
TELLEM says on 18/Sep/09
"sorry heightcritique but your wrong as usual. Notice that at 4:05-4:06 chris tucker has his head down which clearly shows him losing height and notice after that its no longer a two inch difference, but a 3 because tucker no longer has his head down and sheen is closer to the camera. you only see what you want to see don't you? LOL this just keeps getting more and more hilarious by the minute. proving you wrong is a riot!..."
We already agree that Tucker is 6'1", so if you claim there in a 3" difference between Sheen and him, what is the result of the subtraction genious: 5'10".
Evidently, in addition of not knowing what a contradiction is you also don't know how to subtract. And you know what is hillarious and a riot? A moron arguing against his own self and making a fool out of himself in front of hundreds of people. Heightcritique says on 18/Sep/09
TELLEM: thank you for acknowledging that there were 2" difference on that scene. Let's contemplate for argument sake that as you pointed out there were 3" difference thereafter, and we already agreed that Tucker is 6'1", so how tall does this height difference make Sheen. Yes, from your own assessment the answer is 5'10."
What is trully hillarious and a riot is you supporting and proving my argument as true and refuting your own argument and all the evidence you posted. LOL...What is wrong with you, don't you know how to count? Subtract 3" to 6'1" what do you get?
From hereonout, if you acknowledge your fair assessment, I would think you are an honorable man who has cojones to admit an error. If you don't, I would think you are a stubborn, arrogant, and irrational egotistical moron who has no honor to admit a legitimate mistake, and I would not take your posting here and other parts of this website seriously.
And please don't insult my intelligence and make a fool out of yourself claiming that you have stood or met Sheen because that is not only a desperate argument but also a pathetic attempt employed by a coward who fears engaging in fair debate.
By the way, I know someone who met Sheen in person and claims that he was 5'11" but I take this second hand testimony with a grain of salt, as any prudent and objective person. Frank2 says on 18/Sep/09
And guess what? I've met Stone and he wasn't much taller than me. Maybe an inch, but I got the feeling he was more like 5'11.5". Dreadful hair transplant. One of the worst I've ever seen. Looks like a cheap hairbrush. TELLEM says on 18/Sep/09
sorry heightcritique but your wrong as usual. Notice that at 4:05-4:06 chris tucker has his head down which clearly shows him losing height and notice after that its no longer a two inch difference, but a 3 because tucker no longer has his head down and sheen is closer to the camera. you only see what you want to see don't you? LOL this just keeps getting more and more hilarious by the minute. proving you wrong is a riot! oh and by the way, i like how you ignore them pics i posted of sheen looking no more than 5'9 next to oliver and kiefer. Heightcritique says on 17/Sep/09
TELLEM: good clip where it shows clearly at 4:05 and 4:06 when Sheen and Tucker are next to each other, and at the same distance from the camera, that there is only 2" difference in height. Thanks for indirectly claiming that Sheen is 5'11", but I disagree. He is 5'10" as the other evidence indicates.
One particularity about Sheen is that he has a tendency to slouch a lot and to have a extremely relaxed posture in general. In addition, his low and broad slanted shoulders make him appear not as tall. When he stands up straight he looks his real height which is the case at 4:05-06 in the clip. TELLEM says on 17/Sep/09
charlie sheen w/ 5'8 kiefer sutherland: Click Here
charlie sheen w/ 6'0 oliver stone: Click Here TELLEM says on 17/Sep/09
i guess in order to have it your way, you have to ignore and dismiss all facts of charlie sheen looking 5'9 next to several actors to say hes 5'10 and use terrible evidence of him looking 5'10 to say hes 5'10.
but in the end the truth will STILL prevail, and the truth is, whether you like it or not, charlie sheen is 5'9.
o and heres a clip of 5'9 charlie sheen w/ 6'0.5-6'1 max chris tucker starting @ 3:30. sheen is 4 inches shorter. Click Here Heightcritique says on 17/Sep/09
Moondoggy: Thanks for your correct assessment. In addition, look at the pictures of Sheen next to 5'11" Brooke Shields and the screenshots I posted from the movie 'Wall Street' and the clips with Kimmel and Kudrow which clearly show a 5'10" Sheen.
It doesn't take a genious to deduct from these pictures that Sheen is 5'10" so don't waste your time reading the desperate and poor attempts to counter from the as you put it "morons" posting here. TELLEM says on 17/Sep/09
sheen is 5'9 heightcritique. deal with it. TELLEM says on 17/Sep/09
Moondoggy says on 17/Sep/09
I agree. Charlie looks 5'10" in 'Two and Half Man.' In the pictures Heightcritique posted he looks that height too. 5'9" is short and Sheen is a little above average. Who is this dude Tellem? Dude don't you know Nielsen is 6' and Stallone uses huge lifts. Also, Hannah was on heels on that scene, and Sheen is not standing straight and leaning and slouching. look at the pictures Heighcritique posted. LOL...Tucker is in his tip toes next to Willis on the photo you posted (look at his feet moron).
Cage also looks about an inch taller than Sheen in the photo Heighcritique posted and they are next to each other. LOL...face the facts dude, you are under delirium.
i don't know whats funnier, you making a completely laughable and useless post, or you saying cage is only 1 inch taller than sheen. LOL @ nicolas cage being only 1 inch taller than charlie sheen and ignoring the other sheen-cage pics i posted. Go buy yourself a pair of bifocals the size of coke bottles and come back here making a useful post, not this garbage. Heightcritique says on 17/Sep/09
5'10" Sheen next to 6'1" Jimmy Kimmel (2" difference; stop at :43): Click Here
For scale: Jimmy Kimmel next to 6'1" Ben Affleck: Click Here
5'10" Sheen next to 5'8" Lisa Kudrow (2" difference): Click Here
BTW: the claim in a former post ("this guy is just about the same height at Sheen") is bogus, poor, and a desperate attempt to counter. Sheen is slouching and his head is tilted down and his shoulder is higher. With a straight head Sheen is undoubtely 1" taller. So if Sheen was next to Nielsen (in small heels she is 6'1") there will be a 2" to 3" difference. FYI: Everybody in Hollywood knows Stallone is 6' ish in custom made shoes.
Also, Tucker has high shoulders which makes him look taller than he really is, and Sheen has low and broad shoulders which makes him smaller than he really is. If one inch is subtracted by Tucker's posture, Sheen is still 5'10", otherwise he is 5'11". Moondoggy says on 17/Sep/09
I agree. Charlie looks 5'10" in 'Two and Half Man.' In the pictures Heightcritique posted he looks that height too. 5'9" is short and Sheen is a little above average. Who is this dude Tellem? Dude don't you know Nielsen is 6' and Stallone uses huge lifts. Also, Hannah was on heels on that scene, and Sheen is not standing straight and leaning and slouching. look at the pictures Heighcritique posted. LOL...Tucker is in his tip toes next to Willis on the photo you posted (look at his feet moron).
Cage also looks about an inch taller than Sheen in the photo Heighcritique posted and they are next to each other. LOL...face the facts dude, you are under delirium. Frank2 says on 16/Sep/09
Charlie with his dad:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Martin Sheen is about 5'6". Charlie is no more than three inches taller. That makes him 5'9".
Martin Sheen with 5'8" Don Cheadle:
Click Here
And with 6'1" Keith Carradine:
Click Here
Charlie Sheen with 5'11" Corbin Bernsen:
Click Here
And another shot from MAJOR LEAGUE:
Click Here
And please don't say Bernsen is over 6". I worked on LA LAW. I saw him on the Fox lot quite frequently as well as at wrap parties. He and I are the exact, same height. Frank2 says on 16/Sep/09
Willis looks about the same height in the photo. You need glasses.
I've met Sorvino. I stand 5'11" (6" in shoes). Sorvino was three inches taller than me. I've also seen Charlie in the flesh. He's no more 5'10" than I'm 6'. He's 5'9" max. Watch WALL STREET. He's visibly shorter than Michael Douglas throughout the entire film. I've seen Douglas in person. Back when I saw him which was when he was working on SHINING THROUGH he appeared to be 5'10". Today he looks to have lost an inch.
Heightcritique, all I'm doing is reporting facts as well as others. If anything, you're the one with the obsession.
Psychosis? Know the meaning of the word? It's a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality. TELLEM says on 15/Sep/09
heightcritique: you just keep making a bigger FOOL out of yourself the more you keep posting. That charlie sheen and chris tucker pic you posted doesn't prove shen is 5'10, all it proves is that tucker has to slouch terrbily. My god, compare tucker's shoulders to sheens, BIG DIFFERENCE.
Now, how do you know paul sorvino was still 6'2.5? especially during 'money talks" (1997)? sorvino was 57 at that time, so its a posibility that he was no longer in the 6'2 range.
you last sentence is funny heightcritique. i've showed GREAT proof of charlie sheen looking 5'9, and we have a witness who's actually met charlie at 5'9, so evidently, he isn't 5'10 and it isn't downsizing or a psychosis like you say, its facts, something people like yourself just keep running from it. Heightcritique says on 14/Sep/09
5'10" next to 6'1" Chris Tucker (2" difference): Click Here
In the fifth Element Willis wears combat boots with high heel because the director wanted Willis, the hero and protagonist, to be taller than the supporting cast.
Tucker is actually about an inch+ taller than Willis (look at the last picture of the series): Click Here
Paul Sorvino is 6'2.5" (1.89 cm) which is 4'.5" difference with a 5'10" which is incidentally what the picture shows.
Evidently, Charlie Sheen is 5'10" as the various pictures posted formerly indicate. The obsession of the critics to downsizing is not evidence, but a psychosis. Frank2 says on 14/Sep/09
Charlie Sheen 5'10"?
Hardly:
Click Here
Notice this guy is just about the same height at Sheen:
Click Here
Now check out the same guy with Bridget Neilsen!:
Click Here
Even Stallone managed to look taller and I've seen him without the benefit of lifts. When he was just in socks I towered over him. Stallone is no more than 5'8" barefoot.
Sly and Neilsen:
Click Here
Sheen and Hannah:
Click Here
From what I see watching WALL STREET, Hannah wore ballet flats throughout the entire film. You can clearly see them, especially during the scene where Gekko meets with the Blue Star Airline employees in Sheen's townhouse.
Heightcritique, if you keep up the silly argument that Sheen is 5'10", I'll go out on a limb and say I now think he's more like 5'8". TELLEM says on 14/Sep/09
chris tucker and bruce willis, full body shot: Click Here TELLEM says on 14/Sep/09
hey height critique: look how short sheen looks next to paul sorvino, who's 6'2: Click Here
maybe sorvino is also in cowboy boots? don't think so. TELLEM says on 14/Sep/09
hey height critique: look how short sheen looks next to paul sorvino, who's 6'2: Click Here Frank2 says on 14/Sep/09
That publicity photo you keep using over and over means nothing. Watch the damned movie! Sheen is shorter than Douglas and in every scene!
For that photo, I can post several showing Sheen being obviously shorter like this one which is a frame from the film:
Click Here
That's the difference. You see it throughout. If you can't, you're blinding yourself to the truth.
TELLEM, some people refuse to accept anything that destroys the image they've built up of their idols. I'm facing folks who cannot accept the fact that Tom Cruise is no taller than 5'7" or Michael Jackson was no way close to being 5'11". It's like banging ones head against a brick wall.
Here's Chris Tucker, Paul Sorvino and Sheen:
Click Here
Sheen is at least five inches shorter than Sorvino who's around 6'2".
By the way, Chris Tucker is listed being 6'1". I seriously doubt it. He was visibly shorter than 5'11" Bruce Willis in THE FIFTH ELEMENT:
Click Here Heightcritique says on 13/Sep/09
Let's try this again, from the movie 'Wall Street':
Charlie Sheen and Michael Douglas next to each other at exactly the same height (5'10") and at level camera angle (see visual clue rail behind them):
Click Here TELLEM says on 13/Sep/09
if sheen is 5'9, why is he 3 nches shorter than 6'0 MAX nicolas cage? i think heightcritique is a charlie sheen fanby, that, or his agent. Heightcrititque says on 12/Sep/09
From the movie 'Wall Street':
Charlie Sheen and Michael Douglas next to each other at exactly the same height (5'10") and at level camera angle (see visual clue rail behind them): Click Here
Here, Sheen looks slighly taller than Douglas but the camera angle is in his favor slighly: Click Here
FYI: Camera angles are utilize by directors to reach a desired effect. For examples, the first act of the movie, the director may want Douglas to appear taller thus giving him a subtle appearance that is more powerful and savy than Sheen; in the middle of the movie he may fluctuate the height between the two (Douglas and Sheen) to subtly indicate that Sheen is becoming as powerful as Douglas, and maybe in the last act of the movie he may either want Sheen to appear at the same height or taller...It's creativity 101 by using the tools of the trade (i.e. camera angles) to create an artistic effect which the untrained eye does not detect, but the subtleties are detected at the subconcious level which creates the mystic affect we all feel at the movies.
Sheen is 5'10" not 5'9". For further reference, look at the other pictures I posted herein. Frank2 says on 12/Sep/09
Oh, I forgot to mention that in WALL STREET, Sheen and James Spader are the same height. Spader is 5'9". I know. I've seen him in person. Frank2 says on 11/Sep/09
In the film WALL STREET, when Sheen shows up at Gekko's beach home, in every single angle, Michael Douglas is taller by at least an inch, sometimes by two inches. We never see a full shot of Daryl Hannah. She appears taller than Sheen by as much as two inches. I'm sure she wore flat shoes. When 6' Terrence Stamp shows up, he's two inches taller than Douglas and at least three inches taller than Sheen. Watch the film and tell me I'm wrong. That goes for everyone. Frank2 says on 11/Sep/09
When Sheen stands up straight he's about three inches shorter than 6' Cage:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Explain this one:
Click Here
Sheen appears shorter than 5'8" Don Johnson and 5'9.5" Alice Cooper.
Finally, one more time with this revealing photo:
Click Here
Now tell me, you really believe Sheen looks like a man who'd be 5'11" in regular shoes?
Give me a frigging break!
I keep reading nonsense on this forum. There are a couple of dumb clucks who keep insisting John Wayne was not 6'4", but was no more than 6'2" and wore four-inch lifts. A couple of clueless clowns still believe Michael Jackson was 5'11". Then there are people who cannot accept the fact that Tom Cruise is no more than 5'7". Not to mention a handful who keep insisting Stallone is at least 5'10". Makes me wish Glenn was back. TELLEM says on 11/Sep/09
Heightcritique says on 11/Sep/09
In the picture posted with Cage, Sheen is slounching, benting his knees, and with his face tilted forward and down losing aproximately 2.5" to 3". Sheen with a straight back, head, and legs is 1" shorter than Cage:
these 2 pics here were taken the same night the full body shot pic i posted was taken: Click Here Click Here
its clear that in these pics sheen isn't bending his knees, because if he was, then his head would be under cage's eyebrows, like the full body shot pic.So, once again, sheen is 5'9. TELLEM says on 11/Sep/09
sheen is 5'9.
end of. Frank2 says on 11/Sep/09
Give it up. I've seen him in person. No way is he 5'10". That would mean I'm six feet and I'm not. Heightcritique says on 11/Sep/09
In the picture posted with Cage, Sheen is slounching, benting his knees, and with his face tilted forward and down losing aproximately 2.5" to 3". Sheen with a straight back, head, and legs is 1" shorter than Cage:
Click Here
Simple analysis and assessment for the trained eye. Conversely in all fairness, Sheen is in front of the camera and Cage is in the foreground and tilting his head down and thus they look aproximately the same height, but I see an inch at least in favor of Cage due to said factors. Thus, Sheen is at least 5'10" or close to 5'11' if Cage is really 6'00".
Simple process. Anonymous says on 9/Sep/09
For what it's worth, a friend of mine in the biz who's worked with Sheen tells me he's roughly 5'8" and wears lifts in his movies. But the same fellow believes Tom Cruise is 5'6" so take what he says with a grain of salt. Cruise is more like 5'7". Sheen is no more than 5'9". That shot of him with Cage should end the argument once and for all. Cage is a solid six footer. Heightcritique says on 9/Sep/09
5'10" Sheen next to 6'00 Nicolas Cage (1" difference): Click Here Heightcritique says on 9/Sep/09
It is not a simple process to train your eye to see subtleties. Sheen has his knees bent loosing at least 1 inch, tilting his head forward and down losing another inch. The actual difference is 2" between the two man. Sheen at 5'10" and Cage at 6". Too complicated? TELLEM says on 8/Sep/09
heightcritique: its a very simple process. All you do, is look down at this pic Click Here and you'll see both men are wearing similar footwear. Heightcritique says on 4/Sep/09
6'2" Simon Rex next to 5'10" Sheen: Click Here
5'10" Luke Perry next to 5'10" Sheen: Click Here Frank2 says on 4/Sep/09
You should have seen me next to Sheen. I'm sure you'd have said I look 6'. But guess what? I'm not. Heightcritique says on 4/Sep/09
5'6" Denise Richard looks tiny next to 5'10" Sheen: Click Here
5'11" Brooke Shields next to 5'10' Sheen: Click Here Frank2 says on 3/Sep/09
All photos that don't support your belief that sheen is 5'10" will be deemed a poor and unreliable example.
I've seen the man standing right in front of me and he's no more 5'10" than I'm 6'. Heightcritique says on 2/Sep/09
Sheen does not wear cowboy boots but Nicolas Cage does and in the photo you posted we cannot see their footwear. Poor and unreliable example unless you can post a photograph with Cage and Sheen visible footwear. Below find some examples of Sheen's usual footwear:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here derek d says on 2/Sep/09
Heightcritique says on 31/Aug/09
Screenshots from 'Wall Street':
5'10" Sheen and 6'1" Hal Holbrook (2" difference): Click Here
Wouldn't that make a 5'11" Sheen? And I see a 3 inch difference anyway, also not to mention Hal's much looser posture. leonari says on 2/Sep/09
sheen is 5'9" . Never taller. Long limbs and rather thin guy. Frank2 says on 2/Sep/09
Sheen isn't 5'10" Not the Charlie Sheen I've seen. Heightcritique says on 1/Sep/09
5'10" Sheen with 5'8" Eddie Van Halen (2"+ taller): Click Here
5'10" Sheen with 5'7" Jennifer Taylor (3"+ taller): Click Here
5'10" Sheen with 6'5" Michael Duncan (5" difference wearing no heal shoes and Duncan wearing heeled sneakers: Click Here TELLEM says on 1/Sep/09
none of those pics you guys posted are good enough proof, the camera angles COMPLETELY distort height evidence. Now, heres nicolas cage and charlie sheen: Click Here both are in cowboy boots, and sheen doesn't look 2 inches shorter than nic.
Click Here another photo where sheen doesn't look 5'10. Frank2 says on 1/Sep/09
Hal Holbrook is not 6'1". Not at least the Holbrook I met. More like six feet even. He wasn't that much taller than me.
Sheen is no more 5'10" than I'm six feet. He's 5'9". Heightcritique says on 31/Aug/09
Screenshots from 'Wall Street':
5'10" Sheen and 5'10" Douglas (Sheen taller): Click Here
5'10" Sheen and 6'1" Hal Holbrook (2" difference): Click Here
5'10" Sheen and 5'8" Andrea Thompson (Sheen 2"+ taller): Click Here
5'10" Sheen and 5'10" Hannah (Sheen taller): Click Here Heightcritique says on 31/Aug/09
In the picture with Rush Limbaugh and Sheen pay attention to the rail above their heads as a marker for height and tell me who is taller (you don't know much about camera angles and illusional perspective do you?). In the picture of Sheen and Perry, they are the same height (look at the shourders level, and Sheen leaning forward, and Perry standing straight). And the last picture, the babe is tall and probably wearing high heels but generally this is a poor example to reference height because we do not know see her foot wear, or who she is or at least I do not recognize her. Look at the picture of Brooke Shields 5'11" below standing to a barefoot Sheen. You do not need a physicist degree to deduct his height: Charlie Sheen is a 5'10" man. Frank2 says on 31/Aug/09
Sheen isn't 5'10". Nonsense! Plus you must be watching an entirely different version of WALL STREET than I have. There are hardly any full shots in the entire film showing people standing together and when there is one such as when Sheen is seen with Douglas, Sheen is clearly shorter by an inch. Tell me where in the entire movie do we see Sheen and Hannah in a wide shot where Sheen is clearly taller? It doesn't exist.
Here's Sheen with 5'11" Rush Limbaugh:
Click Here
Sheen with 5'10" Luke Perry and 5'8" Jason Priestley:
Click Here
Charlie certainly doesn't appear to be a 5'10" guy in this shot:
Click Here Heightcritique says on 30/Aug/09
In various scenes of 'Wall Street'Sheen taller is taller than Douglas and Hannah, watch the movie again and pay attention when Sheen stands next to Hannah in whole body shots. The pictured posted below are a few scenes where Hannah appear taller. Pay attention to whole body shots not head or half body shots. If you want a reference with certitude about Sheen's height google/search for photos of Brooke Shields and Sheen next to each other. To help you out: Click Here
Sheen is clearly a little smaller than Brooke standing barefoot next to her. Charlie Sheen is at least 5'10" or the camera used for 'Two and a Half Man' is uniquelly magical. Frank2 says on 29/Aug/09
Sheen is no more 5'10" than Michael Jackson was 5'10". This is pretty silly.
Throughout WALL STREET, Sheen appears to be an inch shorter than Douglas:
Click Here
And when Sheen arrives at Douglas's home, we don't see Hannah's feet. At least I don't. I do see her easily looking taller than Sheen:
Click Here
Click Here
Sometimes she an inch taller, but in other angles she looks two inches taller.
When 5'10" Hannah wears high heels, she's damn near as tall as Sean Connery and towers over many men:
Click Here Heightcritique says on 28/Aug/09
I saw 'Wall Street' last night, and in many scenes Douglas and Sheen are the same height and in some Sheen is taller so the camera angles in this movie distort height appearances and is not easy to tell who is taller. As far as Hannah and Sheen standing next to each other in whole body shots (see scene when Martin Sheen arrives to meet with Douglas and Hannah stands next to Charlie), Sheen is taller, but Hanna was wearing low heel shoes so in my deduction, if Hannah is 5'10" barefoot and sheen is taller by an inch than he has to be 5'10". That is a fact unless Hannah is 5'9" barefoot than Charlie's height listed here is accurate but clearly that is not the case. Hannah is tall woman standing 5'10". Webmaster, watch the scene and verify. I know you will agree with me. A height correction is in order. Frank2 says on 28/Aug/09
Douglas didn't wear lifts. He was on the Fox lot when some of the soundstage work for WALL STREET was being filmed and I saw him several times. He wore regular shoes with one inch heels.
How do you know Hannah wore heels, They photographed them from the waist up plus Hannah goes barefoot when shooting. I've seen it. TELLEM says on 28/Aug/09
5'10 for brooke shields isn't IMpossible. Heightcritique says on 28/Aug/09
Frank2: two things, (1) Michael Douglas wears lifts, and two Daryl Hannah is wearing heels in that scene, and (2) Sheen is leaning against the wall and he is not standing straight. To me the best example of his height IS when he stands barefoot next to Brooke Shield in 'Two and a Half Man' and he is almost the same height. He is 5'10" unless Brooke Shield is 5'10" which clearly is not the case. Frank2 says on 27/Aug/09
Charlie is no more than 5'9". He was at least an inch shorter than 5'10" Michael Douglas in WALL STREET and minimum three inches shorter than 6' Terrence Stamp. Sheen was obviously shorter than 5'10" Daryl Hannah. Sometimes he appeared to be two inches shorter and Daryl was in flat shoes. I just watched the film again.
Click Here
Click Here Heighcritique says on 26/Aug/09
Tellem: good examples except the one about Nicolas Cage; he wears boots a lot and Sheen usually wears low heeled surfer preppy shoes. Also, if you google for pictures of Sheen and Brooke Shields you will find them to be the same height more or less, and it does not take a physicist to figure out what this signifies: a man standing 5'10" at least. TELLEM says on 25/Aug/09
sheen did look taller than 5'9 wesley snipes in "major league" and an inch shorter than 5'11 tom berenger, but then again he looks more than two inches shorter than 6'0 max nicolas cage bella says on 24/Aug/09
I was just watching a Two and a Half Men episode with Brooke Sheilds who's 5'11. Charlie looks slightly under 5'10 compared with her, I'd give him a 5'9.5 Heightcritique says on 24/Aug/09
You cannot compare Michael Douglas to Sheen in height. A renown elevator shoemaker in Hollywood, the self-styled "shoemaker to the stars Pasquale di Fabrizio, named Douglas as one of his clients. In contrast and clearly, whole body shots show that Sheen does not wear height-enhanced shoes. Sheen next to Douglas barefoot will be at least the same height if not taller than Douglas since elevator shoes usually give a man at least a 2.5" of height boost. You do the math: Sheen is at least 5'10" barefoot. Heightcritique says on 24/Aug/09
I agree with the many comments here about Sheen's height being higher than 5'9". He is barefoot in many scenes and holds his height well with other actors. One whole body scene in particular with 5'11" Brooke Shield shows a Sheen seen her at eye level thus Sheen cannot be less than 5'10" barefoot. In the show 'Two and a Half Man' his footwear consists of surfer preppy shoes with maybe half an inch sole and in public appearances he wears normal shoes with an average .5" sole so obviously this guys is not an elevator shoe man. Unless there is a camera that can make a man taller standing next to other actors, Sheen is 5'10" and his height needs to be corrected. A 5'9" guy will look shorter barefoot standing to other actors and will look short next to a 5'11" Brooke Shields and besides the average actor or actress. Judging from the wide variety of stars who visit 'Two and a Half Man", casting is not a problem since his main star is taller than average and this means a 5'10"+ man. Karl Karlsen says on 18/Aug/09
He looks kind of small in two and a half men compared to some women which tower Charlie sometimes. I would say 5'7-5'8. Not more!
But he's a legend ;D Eddie Denis says on 11/Aug/09
Charlie Sheen is definitely 5'8". mcfan says on 5/Aug/09
One thing I notice is a difference in his posture vs. years ago. He was always slumped over back then and now frequently stands completely straight on "Two & a Half Men." Yes, I agree Douglas was taller than Sheen in "Wall Street" by about an inch. Tough dude to pin down. TELLEM says on 31/Jul/09
then that would mean that michael douglas was 5'10 in the 80s and sheen is no more than 5'9. but today douglas is strugling with 5'8. Frank2 says on 30/Jul/09
For what it's worth, Sheen was about an inch shorter than Michael Douglas in WALL STREET. And Darryl Hannah was taller than Sheen by at least an inch. And she was barefoot during her scenes with him. I know since I saw a couple of production stills taken on the set. mcfan says on 29/Jul/09
Sheen is definitely 5'9.5+. RisingForce says on 29/Jul/09
I agree that Charlie isn't less than a solid 5'9". If he looks shorter it's because of his posture which is usually poor. Anonymous says on 22/Jul/09
Charlie is taller than Alan in two man and a half he look's 5'9-5'9.5 than 5'8-5'8.5 you can see it clearly gui says on 20/Jul/09
Alan is taller than charlie Anonymous says on 14/Jul/09
I don't think that he's fudging his height. He is often barefoot on two and a half men, and when he is, he looks practically the same height as jon cryer who is listed just short of 5'9 here. Sheen is probably 5'9.5 or 5'9.75. Parker says on 20/May/09
5'9 spot on. Maybe even a tad taller. Clay says on 20/May/09
Not a chance he's 5'7 he pulls off looking average barefoot on his show all the time. Luna says on 20/May/09
Charlie is supposedly 5'7 in real life Anonymous says on 9/May/09
Charlie Sheen 5'9.5" 177 cm (Charlie)
Jon Cryer----5'9" 175cm (Alan) LG69 says on 2/May/09
I've read numerous times in other articles that Charlie is 5'9". He's not short; he's average. Midget says on 27/Apr/09
In your pics Tellem, Charlie looks to have approx 2" on 5'7" listed Willem Dafoe so I think Rob has Charlie pegged correctly.Good pics btw. TELLEM says on 17/Apr/09
sheen looking 5'9 next to 6'0 oliver stone (who has admitted to being that height): Click Here Click Here TELLEM says on 16/Apr/09
but charlie was 2 inches shorter than 5'11 tom berenger. Clay says on 14/Apr/09
Charlie was standing taller than Jon Cryer on the show barefoot, while Cryer was in shoes. He might be 5'10. miser says on 30/Mar/09
Some people just stick to their irrational, pre-conceived notions, even when they are contradicted by good evidence. Too many years of hearing "everybody knows that Brooke Shields is six feet tall" leads to this situation. RisingForce hasn't provided any decent reason as to why Sheen looks slightly taller here...
Click Here
Click Here
... other than lame excuses (Sheen has footwear advantage in one picture, ground advantage in another, blablablah). I'm still waiting for him/her to post a better picture or at least the source of his conviction that Shields is "at least 5-10". Ola of course is exaggerating, she ain't as low as 5-7 but he is right in saying that she looked only slightly taller than Sheen in heels in two and a half man. To lay bare the truth to you folks: both Sheen and Shields are about 5-9.7, or 5-10, Sheen is perhaps just slightly taller than her. leonari says on 30/Mar/09
Ola: you are a joke or as blind as Stevie Wonder. One or the other. Brooke Shields is a tall women. Even in her 80ies she will be over average for a chick short stack says on 29/Mar/09
He's 5'9", 5'10" with shoes. Its impossible to tell the difference between 5'9 and 5'10 for some reason. RisingForce says on 29/Mar/09
Some people come up with the craziest estimates. Shields is about 5'11" and Sheen is in the 5'9"-5'10" range. Not over or under. TELLEM says on 29/Mar/09
u can't see their feet in that picture...someone post the episode and if they both show them BAREFOOT FULL BODY SHOT, then i'll believe sheen is 5'10. til then, i'm sticking with 5'9. leonari says on 28/Mar/09
ola: Brooke shields 5'7"??? hahahahaha.Ridiculous miser says on 26/Mar/09
Brad, I didn't say Shields was 5-9, but 5-9ish, in the same way that Sheen is 5-9ish. Reading comprehension needs to be bettered in this thread, as well as spelling. Big T says on 25/Mar/09
Brooke Shields is also shorter than Andre Agassi in most pics even when she has more footwear Big T says on 25/Mar/09
If Ryan Stiles is 6'6" than Sheen has to be taller than 5'9" Brad says on 25/Mar/09
Porpoisedly. Like a dolphin. 5' 9" for Brooke Shields is the most ridiculous estimate. miser says on 25/Mar/09
purposedly =) miser says on 25/Mar/09
Yeah RisingForce, it's totally ridiculous to say that Brooke Shields is 5-9ish... total nonsense... but you said yourself that Sheen is 5-9ish, right? Sheen can be 5-9ish, Shields can't. And yet:
Click Here
Click Here
Reality sometimes interfers...People can say and create whatever myths they want, but pictures don't lie... at least not puporsedly. RisingForce says on 24/Mar/09
Brooke Shields at 5-9ish is really one of the more ridiculous things that I've heard on this site. miser says on 24/Mar/09
"The fact that Sheen is in front of the camera and we can't see their footwear proves that those pictures mean nothing."
Pffft! hahaha, ;-D good lord I expected more from you!
"Shields isn't under 5'10" and she's likely more like 5'11", get over it."
It's you who are dismissing a picture because it contradicts your bias. You have to say exactly what is wrong with the picture and present a better one, or get over it yourself and stop making excuses. RisingForce says on 24/Mar/09
The fact that Sheen is in front of the camera and we can't see their footwear proves that those pictures mean nothing.
Shields isn't under 5'10" and she's likely more like 5'11", get over it. glenn says on 23/Mar/09
cage isnt 6ft flat.he is a hair over.5-10 for sheen is very possible.so is 5-9. miser says on 23/Mar/09
TELLEM so you think Shields is 5-9 too? These new versions of those pictures are not that "terrible", maybe they are worthy of your judgement now, hahaha ;-D
Well RisingForce, what is the "big advantage"? RisingForce says on 23/Mar/09
I'm not going to argue over Sheen's height Tellem because I don't really disagree with you here. I think 5'9" is very likely, all I'm saying is that I think 5'10" is possible as well. As far as Cage, well he's confusing. I use to think he was 5-11ish because of posture, but he could be 6'0" or 6'1" stretched out in my opinion. TELLEM says on 23/Mar/09
so how tall is tom berenger then? 6'0? the guy is 5'11...heres sheen with 5'11 berenger and 5'7 willem dafoe...sheen looks 5'9: Click Here
if sheen is 5'10, why is there so much gap between him and 6'0 nic cage? Click Here
sheen is 5'9 TELLEM says on 23/Mar/09
so how tall is tom berenger then? 6'0? the guy is 5'11...heres sheen with 5'11 berenger and 5'7 willem dafoe...sheen looks 5'9: Click Here miser says on 23/Mar/09
why are you sure she is at least 5'10"? what "big advantage" are you talking about? the first and the last aren't good for comparison of course, but the second does give you a pretty good idea, even though sheen's head is a bit closer. honestly i can't really see how shields could be 5-10 and sheen 5-9.
"I've never been accused of downgrading male actors before."
yeah probably because pretty much everyone else here also downgrades them. RisingForce says on 22/Mar/09
Sheen I'm unsure of. He could be 5'9" or 5'10", Shields I'm sure is atleast 5'10" but probably a bit taller. Sheen has a big camera advantage in those first 2 pictures.
Thanks for the compliments, but I've never been accused of downgrading male actors before. miser says on 21/Mar/09
"What do you mean some honesty for a change?"
I was having a fight with my wife earlier and that line worked... against me. So I picked it up I think. Don't take this seriously, it isn't. I have read your other posts, they quite are quite good and reasonable, with good pictures... even if you too have a tendency to downgrade all male actors and give tallish women too much credit. But that's the trend here you know.
"Maybe Sheen is 5'10" and his bad posture makes him look shorter."
LOL what a sudden change of mind eh? :-D What's Tellem gonna think about this?
"But regardless Shields is 5'11" NOT 5-9ish."
She ain't 5-11... and yes looking more like 5-9ish. Both her and Sheen are probably about 5-9.5, 5-9.7
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here RisingForce says on 21/Mar/09
What do you mean some honesty for a change? That is no more than a 1.5" difference MAX. And how do you know that she isn't in flats while Billy Cyrus is in boots. There is no way Shields is only 5'9".
By the way here's a picture where Sheen looks tall. It was posted on the Stallone page at first.
Click Here
Compare Sheen to Luke Perry who is listed at 5'9.5" here and was measured in socks at about "about 5-10" on the Howard Stern show. Despite the slight tilt favoring Sheen over Perry, Sheen does seem taller.
Maybe Sheen is 5'10" and his bad posture makes him look shorter. But regardless Shields is 5'11" NOT 5-9ish. 5-9ish for Shields is a joke. miser says on 21/Mar/09
What the heck happened with my response to RisingForce, why was it deleted, too inconvenient? There ain't any "goal" in any of my postings, I simply aim at the truth, wherever the pics take me... that's the only pic of her standing next to someone I could google. I have seen others of her standing next to Andre Agassi, and she looked shorter in most. Also next to Jenna Elfman. That's not a 1 inch difference RisingForce, how about some honesty for a change? And we can't see what shoes she's wearing. Brooke Shields is 5-9sh, in the same way that Charlie Sheen is 5-9sh... or more 5-9sh than Sheen. RisingForce says on 20/Mar/09
What's your point? She looks an inch, maybe an inch and a half max shorter than a 6'0" man. That puts her 5'10.5", 5'11". miser says on 18/Mar/09
"RisingForce says on 18/Mar/09
miser, all Glenn said was that 5'10" was possible but that 5'9" was more accurate. There's no way Shields is 5'10" flat or under though. Sheen is at best a weak 5'10", but more like 5'9". This is a ridiculous argument."
Really... I presented two pictures to back up the claim that Sheen is taller than Shields(not great pictures, but they do give some indication), you have presented zero so far. Give us any evidence that "there's no way Shields is 5'10" flat or under". Honestly, your side of the argument is looking a lot more ridiculous than mine. TELLEM says on 18/Mar/09
judging several pics of sheen and 5'10 guys, or 6'0ers hes more 5'9 than anything. if anyone was a weak 5'10 once upon a time, it was michael douglas, and he was taller than charlie sheen in "wallstreet" RisingForce says on 18/Mar/09
miser, all Glenn said was that 5'10" was possible but that 5'9" was more accurate. There's no way Shields is 5'10" flat or under though. Sheen is at best a weak 5'10", but more like 5'9". This is a ridiculous argument. miser says on 12/Mar/09
"Shields is 5'11" and Sheen most likely had a footwear advantage in the second picture and likely a ground advantage or footwear advantage in the first."
Pffft... footwear advantage in the first one, ground in the second... excuses, excuses... Sheen may have had footwear advantage in the second picture, they were in some sort of beach party and Brooke may have been in flip flops. Now, I wouldn't be surprised if you claimed he was at a beach party in "lifts", lol... his advantage may have been 1 inch tops. Yet he looks 1 inch taller than her. She is at the very best same height as he as Tellem cleverly put it. ;D In case you disagree please present a better picture RisingForce.
"You notice that both Glenn and Frank2 have met Charlie in person and estimate him at 5'9"? Almost every regular poster here estimates him at that and Rob lists him at 5'9". He's looked shorter than numerous 5'9.5"-5'10" men. What does all of that tell you?"
What I am really disputing here is this ridiculous claim that Brooke Shields is 5-11. Sheen really is 5-9ish. Probably 5-9.5. 5-10 tops. Here's what glenn said:
"glenn says on 2/Jun/08
he isnt 5-7.5 either.5-10 is possible cause he is leaning in.5-9 is more like it." RisingForce says on 9/Mar/09
Shields is 5'11" and Sheen most likely had a footwear advantage in the second picture and likely a ground advantage or footwear advantage in the first.
You notice that both Glenn and Frank2 have met Charlie in person and estimate him at 5'9"? Almost every regular poster here estimates him at that and Rob lists him at 5'9". He's looked shorter than numerous 5'9.5"-5'10" men. What does all of that tell you? miser says on 7/Mar/09
Lol, I think they meant that he writes down his height as 5-10 anonymous, even if he isn't exactly 5-10. Anonymous says on 7/Mar/09
Paper is completely flat, so it seems most likely that he's trying to say 5'10" is his exact height. Unless he's standing on a stack of paper.
I watch the show regularly, and Sheen does look 5'9" to me. I'm convinced that he's taller than Jon Cryer; in fact there are many scenes where you can tell. The difference is less than an inch though, because when Cryer wears sneakers with a 0.75inch sole he looks Sheen's height or taller. I think 5'9 is perfect for Charlie. miser says on 6/Mar/09
It could also mean that he's slightly over 5-10, so 5-10 "on paper". Not everybody is trying to boost their heights in the real world, some just don't care... but no, probably not the case here. RisingForce why don't you answer my question about Brooke Shields? Are you beginning to change your mind, lol? anonymous says on 6/Mar/09
5 foot 9 and funny. Doesn't look like a 5 foot 10 actor. RisingForce says on 5/Mar/09
miser what do you think that "5-10 standing on paper" means? It means he needs a little boost to get there. TELLEM says on 3/Mar/09
if sheen was 5'10, then he wouldn't look so obvious short next to 6'0 nicolas cage here: Click Here Click Here 2 inches between the 2? no. miser says on 3/Mar/09
No he did not really "admit" to being a weak 5-10 that's only your interpretation.
But he may probably be really a weak 5-10. That picture with Don Johnson and Alice Cooper is no better than the pics with Brooke. Why do you think Brooke looks shorter or at best same height as Sheen? RisingForce says on 2/Mar/09
No miser, you're wrong. Sheen admitted to being a weak 5'10" meaning he's probably 5'9" as he usually looks that height. Look at Tellem's picture with 5-10ish Don Johnson and 5-9.5, 5-10 Alice Cooper. It's no coincidence that Sheen looks shorter. miser says on 28/Feb/09
Yes those pics of him and shields are terrible tellem. Your picture of alice cooper and don johnson is marvelous... as I said, whatever may throw you off the scent...
Brooke Shields is 5-11... in heels. Pretty much all women are listed at their heel-height in this website. She is clearly shorter than Sheen without her heels. And I never said sheen was 5-11, it was tellem who said that because he needed to get his mind around the fact that sheen looked taller shields who is said to be 5-11. Sheen is about 5-10, and Shields about 5-9, 5-9.5 at the most.
Notice that EVEN TELLEM admitted that Sheen and Shields may be the same height... evidence enough that he is taller, lol. ;-)
Click Here
Click Here TELLEM says on 24/Feb/09
i agree risingforce, 5'9 seems more accurate. those pics of him and shields are terrible miser says on 23/Feb/09
lol, no sh*t... ;-) Do you even have any reason to offer as to why she looks shorter than Sheen in the last 3 pictures I posted here? RisingForce says on 23/Feb/09
Shields is about 5'11". miser says on 20/Feb/09
How tall do you think Brooke Shields is, RisingForce? RisingForce says on 20/Feb/09
Did someone seriously suggest that Sheen could be 5'11"? Not only did he claim 5'10" in the Enquirer like Rob mentioned, but also in the NY Times in 1987.
Defining himself as ''5-foot-10-inches tall on paper'' and ''155 pounds soaking wet with a pocketful of change,'' Charlie Sheen has a hulking presence and watchful eyes.
Click Here
So I think we can rule out 5'11" since he never really looks it and he's claimed 5'10" atleast twice. In fact "5-10 on paper" seems like he's implying that he's a weak 5'10".
I agree with 5'9". He could be 5'10", but 5-9ish makes more sense to me. TELLEM says on 18/Feb/09
this guy says "blahblahblah" in the beg. of his sentence and says i should be psychologically evaluated? wow, i lose credibility just talking to him. its like talking to a brick wall. anyway...charlie sheen is more 5'9 than 5'10. next to nicolas cage he looks about 5'9 and has his dad my a couple inches. miser says on 18/Feb/09
>how old are you? 12? you don't know how to judge height well do you?
eeh, don't get me started... honestly I don't even know why I bothered answering anything to you. If you are over 10 you should be psychologically evaluated TELLEM.
here let me >show you a pic of charlie sheen looking no more than 5'9. w/ 5'9 alice cooper >and 5'9.5-5'10 don johnson: Click Here
Yeah if you don't like a picture just ignore it and take another. Whatever does it to you TELLEM. TELLEM says on 17/Feb/09
miser says on 16/Feb/09
>sheen is closer to the camera on both of them. so no, that doesn't prove sheen >is taller, unless you count his pompous hair. it proves either she's taller or >their the same height.
Blablablah... in the second picture Sheen is closer but in the first they are touching heads and sheen is taller. He at the very least as tall as her. Or more likely, taller. And he is listed at 5-9. She is listed at 5-11. Lol.
how old are you? 12? you don't know how to judge height well do you? here let me show you a pic of charlie sheen looking no more than 5'9. w/ 5'9 alice cooper and 5'9.5-5'10 don johnson: Click Here miser says on 16/Feb/09
>sheen is closer to the camera on both of them. so no, that doesn't prove sheen >is taller, unless you count his pompous hair. it proves either she's taller or >their the same height.
Blablablah... in the second picture Sheen is closer but in the first they are touching heads and sheen is taller. He at the very least as tall as her. Or more likely, taller. And he is listed at 5-9. She is listed at 5-11. Lol. TELLEM says on 12/Feb/09
o and all those pics you can't see neither of their feet so i doubt sheen is 5'11 or 5'10. TELLEM says on 12/Feb/09
miser says on 12/Feb/09
Take a look at the two upper right pictures:
Click Here
sheen is closer to the camera on both of them. so no, that doesn't prove sheen is taller, unless you count his pompous hair. it proves either she's taller or their the same height. miser says on 12/Feb/09
Take a look at the two upper right pictures:
Click Here miser says on 12/Feb/09
I post that picture for the simple fact that it is the only one I could find. Where the heck have I said it "proofs" anything? It is only an indication, certainly not "useless". How about you post a picture yourself? TELLEM says on 11/Feb/09
miser, it seems like you continiously post that mid-strided pic which you can't even see their feet to show proof that hes taller. look at the background, its mid stride which gives sheen some height advantage. unless theres a vid out there of this episode that pic is useless.
o and she still looks taller than him. look at their shoulders, eyes, and sheen's hair doesn't count. miser says on 11/Feb/09
lol, she's clearly not 5-11.5 in sneakers. maybe not even in heels. here sheen is actually taller than brooks:
Click Here mcfan says on 10/Feb/09
I read comments below that Brooke Shields dwarfed Sheen and Cryer on Two & a Half Men. Now, with her slight heels, she did look 2 inches taller than Sheen. However, in her regular shoes I only saw a difference of about an inch or a hair more. If Charlie is 5'10 in sneakers then Brooke must be 5'11.5 in sneakers. Clay says on 8/Feb/09
Under average would be shortish now wouldn't it. Anonymous says on 5/Feb/09
Richard even a strong 5'9/5'10 isn't tall, besides I wasn't implying that 5'8.75 was short, thats my height and I am am what I figure to be just below average. |