|
lisa says on 18/Jan/12
you can't see what shoes they're wearing in that picture doesn't look like "glaring evidence."
Amateur says on 16/Jan/12
Okay, 5'0"~5'0.5" tops for Christina, period.
Glaring evidence: Click Here lisa says on 25/Oct/11
Christina is no 5'. I have seen her looking taller than other people in other pictures; also, pictures could not depict height accurately. it may seem obvious but the only research that can be accurate is to measure people truth says on 20/Oct/11
Christina Aguilera is 5'0 research it and see comparisons next to most stars she stands with sometimes with heels and no heels she is still shorter than she says.Christina has taken pictures with Kim Kardashian at the pool with no shoes on and Kim says she is 5'3 but it's not possible for christina to be 5'2 if Kim towers over her by 3 or 4 inches at the pool regardless of the angles of the camera.There are many celebs she has taken pictures with in flats or heels and she is always the smallest for example Nicole Ritchie she says she is taller than her friend but her friend is taller than her in almost every picture.Really who cares about her height the thing is why do celebs lie about simple things? suni says on 9/Sep/11
I always use to think she was between 5ft3 to 5ft4. toma says on 18/Aug/11
if it is true won't u like her any more????.she has perfect voise,,,,,,,and i think that is everything forthe popular singer,,,,,,she is known all over the world not for her growth but for the nice woise she has..actually i do not care how tall she is ...love her songs and woice.. Bailey goodnight says on 14/Aug/11
i want to start to say you are a amazing singer you are my hero and i wish i was you sister that would be great and i would like you to us my name bailey in one of your songsits ok if you dont i am just playing with you and i heard you are 5ft2 something like that i am 4ft10 so i am sort and i one more thang to say you are beautiful. you are beautiful in every kind of way bye sorry to bother you bye bye bye bye!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:):):):):):):):):):):):) Epic!Wicked! says on 12/Aug/11
Oi button, just in case you knew I just read your post and you don't have to be such a control freak with Micheal. :3 josh says on 10/Aug/11
I thought she was bout 4ft12 case she wears really tall high heels . Button 156cm says on 5/Aug/11
Michael, there's no need to sound so horrible about it. Gosh. Also, in case you failed to notice, my previous post on this page is nearly 2 months old. I'm not "incredibly infatuated" with Christina's height lately, am I? My posts are much shorter than they used to be (but this one will probably turn out long again as I feel I have to explain some stuff). And I'm not a "dude", and judging by your post I don't believe I'm your "buddy" either. More like, you think I'm annoying and boring and obsessive, right? Not that I'm trying to put words in your mouth or anything, but I bet your perception of me is something along those lines. Do you know what? I truly loathe those mammoth older posts I did, because I know I sounded like a total freak. Actually I would like it if they were erased, but I don't think that's going to happen. I really despise them, and I don't know why I ever posted them. But because of them, I just think now if most people see my name on a post, they're like "Oh, it's Button, the one who did all the stupidly long and tedious posts, I'm not going to even read anything else she says", and so they skip right over my posts. So, I agree with you that there's no need for me to be long winded. I know that, and I wish I knew that right from the outset. Anyway, I doubt you'll even read this post, because you probably think it's too long in itself, so I'll get lost now. Michael says on 4/Aug/11
For Christs sake Button. Height is just a number. There isn't any need to be long-winded with your post there buddy. You seem to be incredibly infatuate with it dude. Fiya Love says on 9/Jul/11
Even with heels most times she still looks short like when she was in the middle of all those other women for the 2011 Grammys or when she is standing in the middle of the other 'The Voice' coaches and look at her compared to Heidi Klum...HOWEVER NONE OF THAT MATTERS she is still the best singer/preformer/actress of all time so who cares of she 5ft. or 500ft.
I LOVE YOU X-TINA
-Fiya Love- yoneda says on 27/Jun/11
i can only be sure that her bone structure is really really tiny! no matter how tall she is, her proportion looks good when she is slim. Button says on 7/Jun/11
Rian, fair enough. Easy mistake to make, as both 157cm and 5'7" have the 5 and 7 in them. Christina could hit close to 5'7" in a pair of killer heels. But, as we know, they would have to me some seriously gigantic monster heels. Still, that's a way she can see 5'7". Anyway yeah, I completely agree with you that she always look very small in terms of height and bone structure. She most certainly has a small frame. I also agree with you that she tends to look really small when near other people. For example, she is around 3 inches shorter than Britney. But it's not just that she lack 3 inches height compared to Britney. You can tell it just by looking at her, that she has also has a smaller bone structure and frame size than Britney. Britney has a medium frame and bone structure I would say. Even though Britney has gained a noticeable amount of weight over the years, I reckon she can pull it off and she definitely doesn't look bad to me. Still looks great to me in fact. I mean, she looks nowhere close to overweight. She looked in very good and healthy shape last time I saw her. It is so nice that she seems to have pulled herself back from her darkest times back in 2007 or whenever it was.
I notice that Christina has also gained a lot of weight, but with her, it's been over a much shorter time length than Britney. I'm quite concerned that Christina might be going through a rough patch at the moment. With her last album flopping (which she totally didn't deserve because her album was and still is so amazing) and also her divorce, it's no wonder she may be finding things hard. Main reason I wonder, is just the sheer amount of weight she has gained, over literally 2 or 3 months. I'm not trying to be mean at all, I adore Christina, and I have been a fan of hers for many years now (I absolutely agree with you that it's quite surprising how someone so small can have her powerhouse voice, she truly has something so special and technically she's one of the most perfect singers I have ever heard) but I just don't understand how this much weight gain over such a short time is normal. It does not suggest happiness or health to me. It mostly suggests to me that she may have some deep rooted emotional issues going on. And going back to her short height and small bone structure and frame size, it makes the extra weight on her look all the more awkward. I really think she appears to be carrying too much weight on her frame now. I just hope she's OK and she's not struggling as much as I feel she may be.
As you say Rian, she might have been 100lb back in her Genie In A Bottle days. I think perhaps even less in fact, I mean I once read she weighed 85lb back in her heyday. I am 5'1.5" and around that weight, and I think I look a similar size to how she looked back then. As the next few years passed though then she looked to be more around 100lb or even a bit over. During her Back To Basics era, my guess would be probably around 105 to 110lb, and she also seemed about the same during the release of her previous album Bionic. I think 115lb at the most but I really couldn't see any higher than that. Now it is very different. Saw some new images of her literally a few days ago, and I couldn't believe how much heavier she was looking. No less than 130lb in my opinion, and might possibly even be 140lb. For her height and frame size, she doesn't look to be a desirable weight. She's such a beautiful woman and I do hope she's all right. I hope she is not going through any emotional eating or anything like that. It makes me sad as I wonder what has happened to her. If she is happy then I suppose that's the main thing. Hopefully she is. Jupitar says on 29/May/11
I would have thought she was around 5'3". Whatever, she seems to have long legs for her height. Rian says on 28/May/11
Yes, that was a typing mistake, haha. In my country we always use cms to talk about heith, so that's why i was wrong.
I've been following Christina for many years, and she has always seemed very tiny for me. But not even height, i mean bone structure. She looks very tiny near other people, and it's always hard to belive how can someone that small have such a black powerful voice! (sorry for my bad english) Button says on 25/May/11
Rian, that's OK, there's no need to be sorry. I did wonder if you may have made a typing mistake, because 5'7" just sounded very wrong and I found it difficult to believe there was ever a 5'7" listing for Christina anywhere, and how anyone would have believed it even if there was. But I'm really sorry if I seemed rude towards you. I didn't mean you were the ridiculous one, not at all, I meant the 5'7" listing for her would have been ridiculous. Seeing as you just made typing error though, and you are saying the listing you saw for Christina was actually 5'2", then that is certainly not ridiculous. That sounds like a good listing to me, and she could well be that height. I still reckon 5'1.5" (156cm) is correct for her, but hey, that's my opinion and it's only 0.5 inches less than what you said. Christina can still be the height you say though, absolutely, I would not rule that out. Rian says on 24/May/11
oh my go, sorry, i wanted to say 5'2(1,57)!
hey, don't be rude. That's a mistake leonari says on 15/Apr/11
5'7"? Rian you jokster. Ridiculous. Button says on 14/Apr/11
Rian, there's no way Christina is anywhere near 5'7". She certainly doesn't look 5'7", and I have to say, I've never ever seen her listed at that height. I've no idea where you saw that listing, but I can assure you that it is way off. A 5'7" listing for her is so ridiculous. This 5'1.5" listing Rob has given her is heaps more accurate. I can promise you that. Rian says on 8/Apr/11
she was listed as 5'7 many years ago, and the 100 pounds were from her gennie in a bottle days, so she was listed at this height and weight many years ago and that is what they put at the booking report. She's 5'7. Button says on 5/Apr/11
Andrea, I agree. There is absolutely no way Christina weighs 100lb today. Not a chance. She has gained a significant amount of weight these past few months. So I think nowadays she can't be anything under 120lb as you said. She is far from fat but she certainly looks quite a lot bigger than she used to before. I read somewhere that she weighed 85lb when she first came onto the music scene. I can buy that. I am 5'1.5" and weigh 88lb and I look quite similar to how she used to look in her Dirrty days. I was up to 99lb at one time but even then I am sure I was a fair bit thinner than she is now. She cannot be 100lb. Ooooops, sorry for going off topic a bit. Back to height I still think she is in the 5'1" range. If she was in the 5'2" range then Nicole Richie would have to be in the 5'3" range. Which I think sounds a little too high. I think Nicole is either 5'2.25" (158cm) or 5'2.5" (159cm), but not quite a full 5'3". I definitely think the 5'1.5" here for Christina is a decent estimate. Exact same height as me. andrea says on 3/Apr/11
Christina has put on weight these past 6-7 years, but not height.
The girl is short...5f2 tops. Maybe shorter.
Her weight may have been 100lbs 10 years ago, but she is not 100lbs today. My daughter is thin and is 5f2 and 107 lbs.
No offense, but Christina is a little too heavy for her frame (IMHO)and must weigh at least 120lbs. Remember,s he has very small bones....she's not just short, she's small framed. Button says on 1/Apr/11
Well I think we can all agree Christina Aguilera is below average female height. I am also quite confident that she is shorter than 5'3". But I can't get my head around the pictures of her with Nicole Richie. Nicole is given 5'1" on this site and Christina 5'1.5", but Nicole looks undeniably taller than Christina in every picture at every angle. I cannot for the life of me understand why Christina has a taller listing than Nicole. But, I actually think it is Nicole's listing which is off, not Christina's. If Christina is 5'0" like a lot of people here seem to say, then Britney Spears is in the 5'2" to 5'3" range. Look at pictures of them together and there really is not a great deal of height difference between them. Britney does not appear that short to me, therefore I don't think Christina is 5'0". I think the 5'1" range is a fair estimate for Christina. 5'1.5" sounds OK to me. Nicole on the other hand, I don't think she is 5'1". I think she looks at least 5'2" and possibly even 5'2.5". But not 5'1". This is Christina's page here though so back to her, I think 5'1.5" sounds about right. SAL says on 30/Mar/11
She looks liek 5'2 Click Here a tad taller than Kylie Brookelin says on 2/Mar/11
Actually, while 128 is a heavy estimate for her, she could be as much as 122lbs. I'm about her same size (I met her at a concert a few years back. She's just under 5'2". Sadly, I haven't grown since then lol) and I'm a gymnast and dancer and 122 is the heaviest I've ever been. Currently I'm about 117lbs and for anyone who gets as much excessive as Christina does (she dances a lot) and is her same size, 110 is really too low of a weight. Muscle weighs more than fat. I'd say that the 100lb listing is either a bad estimate by someone who doesn't guess well, or a lie to save face. Simona Sanchez says on 1/Mar/11
We can see her real height stated here: "Aguilera was arrested at 2:45 AM and booked at the West Hollywood Sheriff's substation on a misdemeanor charge.
On the booking report, Aguilera was listed at 5'2" and 100 pounds."
Click Here mememme says on 24/Feb/11
i dont know what to say about this but next to her mom she looks like a giant, but may be its becuase her mom is like only 4'5. but you got to admit she is pretty tall for having a dwarf for a mom. Brad says on 18/Feb/11
5 feet 1. Hates her short height. lisa says on 16/Feb/11
pictures may "not lie" but they are not as accurate for height comparison as you may think depending on the angle and perspective of each shot. I have seen the same group of photos of people and in some pictures they look different compared to each other in height then others from the same group of photos facts says on 16/Feb/11
She says that she is 5'2 but she's not, if Kim Kardashian says she is 5'2 then that can't be .Christina has been photographed with Kim at the pool with no shoes on and she is way shorter I say she is 5'0.Christina was also recently photgraphed next to Martina Mcbride for the grammys and Martina is 5'2 and Christina is about 2 inches shorter so she can't be 5'2 she is 5'0.Pictures don't lie. facts says on 16/Feb/11
Sorry Christina Snookielera is 5'0 at the grammys 2011 Martina mcbride and Christina took a picture standing next to each other Martina is 5'2 and was 2 or 3 inches taller than Christina and they were both wearing heels so Christina is only 5'0 I don't know why she lies about her height because nicole Ritchie and Kim K are also taller than her.Christina says she's 5'2 but that's not possible pictures don't lie. Deedee says on 7/Feb/11
Jenna Devan who herself in about 5 2 and listed mostly as 5 3,said in an interview that christina is the tiniest person she has ever known. She meant that everything about her was sort of tiney. Which probably means she is about 5.0. Plus her body structure and frame definitely show about a 5 foot height Soraya Fuentes says on 5/Feb/11
Here Click Here we can see Xtina wearing high heels while 5.8' Cher is wearing a sort of sneakers, and the difference is still remarkable. Scott says on 30/Jan/11
She was 128 lbs while 8 months pregnant with Max, idiots! she's naturally no more than 110...although, after filming Burlesque, it seems she shot way up to 140 :( Anonymous says on 4/Jan/11
I sat next to her waxwork at Madame Tussauds and she was very short. 5'1" 1/2 sounds right. JoJester says on 31/Dec/10
I recently purchased one of Christina Aguilera's dresses from the wardrobe of Burlesque... She's 5'2" and was a size 2 while filming. =o) Khal-Ken says on 29/Dec/10
I think that she is 5ft 2in. Ryan says on 23/Dec/10
I would say 5'0.5" She even has the littlest hands and feet. She wears a size 5 shoe, and I noticed recently how tiny her hands were |
