|
Ras says on 22/Jan/12
Going by the second pic I'f say she's shorter than you Rob, it looks fishy. I'd still give her 174cm/5'8.5".
ad says on 29/Dec/11
She is tall and beautiful the shredder says on 14/Dec/11
I dated a girl that looked just like her ! ANDREA[ITA] says on 10/Dec/11
not over 5'8! Physics Enemy says on 22/Nov/11
ChiasmataX - I think I made a mistake. She's 5' 9.5" in footwear according to Matt's pic. Her footwear is 2.75", giving 5' 6.75". Add 1" for lean and that's 5' 7.75". So yes, she's under 5' 8". Physics Enemy says on 22/Nov/11
You can shave, dye your hair and get a cool haircut. What's the problem Shaun? ChiasmataX says on 22/Nov/11
@Physic Enemy no man you can't add height of people in shoes like that. Normal shoes don't add much height like they are advertised (normal shoes usually add 1-1.5cm at most, if you want to add 2cm you need lifts or elevator shoes or nike air max.) Just wear your own shoes and measure yourself and you will see. With a 0.75 inch shoes here Rob is still about 174-174.5cm at most (not 175cm), which means with the 2 inch shoes advantage Jodi is about 171-172cm bare-feet at most not 175cm. Her big frame fool people into thinking she's 175cm. Not many women goes beyond 173cm BARE-FEET in height. Shaun says on 18/Nov/11
Physics Enemy says on 7/Nov/11
Shaun - You're tall, blonde, blue eyed and white? You have it made.
Yep, with a surfer goatee and hair like Gordon Ramsay/James Cracknell. I know, that's what everybody says when I say I wish I had dark hair and coloring. Physics Enemy says on 9/Nov/11
Matt, stop trying to fool people with those line drawings using a 5' 8" Rob. He's 5' 8.25" on the stadiometer barefoot AND you keep forgetting Rob is a solid 5' 9" in FOOTWEAR, so your charts are always off by an inch.
By your chart + 1 inch, Jodi looks 5' 10.5". But she's clearly leaning. Add an inch for that and you get 5' 11.5". She's got 2.75" footwear according to Rob. So that makes her 5' 8.75". Close enough to her claim for us to trust 5' 9". Physics Enemy says on 7/Nov/11
Shaun - You're tall, blonde, blue eyed and white? You have it made. lorne says on 10/Oct/11
... Damn she is sexy. She certainly does have the proportions of a legit 5ft9 woman, but if she had close to a 2 inch footwear advantage, then she doesn't look much taller than you. I mean even if she straightened up, I don't see more than 2 inches... maybe 174cm is fairer??? Shaun says on 26/Sep/11
I have sky blue eyes Legend, I'll swap my Gordon Ramsay hair with your dark hair please!! PB_fan says on 23/Aug/11
She looked way smaller than 185 Linc Burrows, 10 cm at least. so 175 cm fair enough Legend says on 13/Aug/11
@shredder
No. Why can't a guy care how he looks? LOL Tex says on 8/Aug/11
If she was standing straight--she would be over 5'10".in this photo ..5'9" has got to go/// I think Rob may be losing his touch.....jk 5\'8.56784 says on 26/Jul/11
Rob, do you think she could be a bit over 5'9, she definitely has the proportions of a big girl
[Editor Rob: I don't believe so.] the shredder says on 23/Jul/11
Legend ... Your a female ? Legend says on 22/Jul/11
She's 5'8.5 and I wish I had blue eyes with my dark hair. My eyes are hazel though. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 30/Apr/11
175cm(5"8.75) I think Observant says on 10/Apr/11
Lets be generous and give her 5'10 based on the height chart, thats still only 5'8 flat barefoot nothing more. Legend says on 9/Jan/11
I will be honest, she's beautiful, and she's not over 5'8.5 barefoot. somebody new says on 9/Jan/11
if she looks taller in this photo she's not 5'9. Maybe 5'8,5 at most. I always wondered why would a tall girl lie... to make herself even taller, lol Matt says on 7/Dec/10
Rob, you do realise that by saying shes 5ft 9 that she 'appears' 5ft 11 in this photo (+2in footware) and its obvious she 'appears' no more than 5ft 9.5
Click Here
i dont think she is anything over 5ft 8
i dont know maybe she was crouching severely here? doesnt seem like it
[Editor Rob: she said she was 5ft 10, she should have looked near 6 foot if she was] |
