CelebHeights.com Home :: Contact Rob :: Bookmark :: Faq
Mick Jagger Height
Mick Jagger height: 5 ft 10 in (178 cm)

Rolling Stones lead singer and occasional actor from such classics as FreeJack. In the past, a bit like Rod Stewart the UK tabloids would put down Mick and call him a shrimp, regularly listing him as being 5ft 8. To me, he doesn't look this, more like 5ft 10. Of course, he was (still is?) dating a pretty large lady, L’Wren Scott at around 6ft 3.

Met this celebrity? Add a comment below. Got a photo with Mick Jagger? Please Editor Rob.

Add a comment about their height

Your Comment:
mcfan says on 4/Sep/08
He looks taller than Bowie by a half-inch. Bowie was 5'9.5. Jagger looks like he's shrunk over the years, but then he'll wear large shoes and look tall.
D says on 3/Sep/08
He looks about as tall as David Bowie. Click Here
MickJagFan says on 27/Jul/08
He wears big elevated shoes. He always stretches his legs. He is no more than 5'9in 176cm Click Here
Daniel says on 9/Jul/08
If Jagger was less than 1.80m in the 60s, then average height for English males at the time should have been 1.70 tops, for he looked rather tall most of the time. And I mean in normal shoes.
Lmeister says on 3/Jul/08
Come on, Mick doesn't have the best posture and I do think that Janice Dickinson wears rather high heels all the time. Mick might be 1/2 inches shorter than her, but definitely not 5ft8. At least wasn't in his youth. Nowadays maybe around 5ft8.5.
Anonymous says on 2/Jul/08
I am really doubting this 5'10" listing... Jane Dickinson (5'10") has said, "...he only came up to my shoulders if we were standing."
soup says on 1/Jul/08
He is 5'10'' in the morning and 5'9'' at night.

Why my posts sometimes aren't saved? I posted only once yesterday right here.

:(
Soup says on 30/Jun/08
Mick in not taller than 5'10'', maybe less. He looks short sometimes and the same height as David Bowie.
miles smiles says on 28/Jun/08
Glenn, have you peeped his sneakers in Shine A Light? Strange, hi-tech looking things, with a definite boost. As I've stated before, Jagger's up there with DMX as a true height Zelig. What do you think?
JonDoe says on 26/Jun/08
so why the **** did Janice Dickinson call him a midget?This is what i read on the internet she said "he only came up to my tits". These statements make no sense to me.
zapspace says on 11/Jun/08
Mick's always been height sensitive ... Wouldn't be surprised if he often wore special shoes.
glenn says on 5/Jun/08
how does he wear enormous lifts in low cut,flat sneakers?only latel ive noticed him wearing thick sneakers.he is 5-10.
Daniel says on 4/Jun/08
I don't know about his height at present times, but what I'm almost sure is that if Jagger wasn't at least 5'11'' in the 60's, then most of the other rock musicians from his era, including his bandmates of course, were a bunch of short dudes, because he was clearly at least 2 inches taller than the average.
Anonymous says on 30/May/08
I don't know about Mick. It's so hard to tell because he's clearly careful about his height. My dad saw the Stones live in the seventies and said that they were all a bunch of shrimps. But then my dad is obsessive about height so you can't really trust what he says. In the Shine a Light movie Mick does a duet with Christina Aguilera who is only about 5-1 or 5-2. She is wearing four inch heels in the clip, and Mick is just a few inches taller than her. Which would put him in at 5-9 or so. However, that's only if he's not wearing lifts in his shoes.

Another testimony to his height comes from a girl I work with. She ran into him at a resort about ten years ago and she said he was very small. She's about 5-4 herself and said he was just a few inches taller than her.

I'd say Mick is probably about 5-7.
John says on 25/May/08
he wears enormous lifts, maybe 2 inches and 1/2 on some concerts. Looks like he is 5-9 and tops 6-0 on his lifts.
JanisJoplin says on 19/May/08
Well he certainly is a tall man no matter if he is between 5'9-5'11. I think that shorter skinnier guys like Mick and Prince like to date taller women for some weird reason...I mean most of the women that Mick has dated have been taller then he is...if indeed he is 5'9 or shorter...
glenn says on 16/May/08
that makes total sense actually guk.the man can look tall or short.
GUK says on 16/May/08
Jagger can look a strong 5ft 11 then barely 5ft 9. I think this is down to how skinny he is, 28 inch waiste is tiny. My estimate is 5ft 9.5 barefoot, up to nearly 6ft in dodgy shoes
stones fan says on 26/Apr/08
a friend was in a nyc bar one night back in the 70's and ran smack in to keith and saw mick and bianca going out a door and he was in her estimation 5 ft 8.
milies smiles says on 23/Apr/08
Yes, that pic is truly baffling. He's towering over Dicaprio! I just saw Shine A Light, and he looks like a lean and stretched-out 5-10 throughout, especially next to Bill Clinton. However, he's wearing these funny springy and generously-heeled designer running shoes throughout the show. A real hard dude to pinpoint, as we all know.
Curious says on 16/Apr/08
I'm reading Mick Jaggar Unauthorized, and the author said Mick's 5'9" and barely 130 pounds.
glenn says on 15/Apr/08
thats an amazing pic.but i think leo is leaning in.ron wood is another chameleon.i laughed when i read in a tour book he was 5-10.5.but he is! saw him 2 weeks look that in converse and look barely 5-9 the next day same footwear.crazy posture fluctuations mick and ron have.charlie always looks 5-8.keith shrunk from 5-9 to 5-8ish.sometimes looking 5-10 in the 90s.actually alot of times.
glenn says on 15/Apr/08
you forgot to mention rob,they said he was 4 inches shorter than his 6-2 girlfriend.thats accurate.unless of course you read a different article.
Tom says on 14/Apr/08
Click Here Look here mick is taller than dicaprio

[Editor Rob: in the paper the other week they had a little digg of sorts about Jagger's footwear. He Nike's that were elevated with extra height...see them on getty]
glenn says on 27/Mar/08
jagger is 5-10.looking 5-8 with bad posture and 6ft with great posture.an enigma.
Maxi says on 26/Mar/08
lol! Jagger got to be kidding to date a 6'4" girl who is almost a foot (-4 inches) taller than him.
Anshelm says on 15/Mar/08
I'm guessing the angle is on Scott's favor Click Here
Anonymous says on 29/Jan/08
Paul McCartney&Mick Jagger came to the meeting place of Reunion Live of Led Zeppelin of December for admiration.
McCartney was about 1 inch taller than Jagger at time when two people lined up.
The height of McCartney becomes 5 feet 11 inches if the height of ,Jagger is 5 feet 10 inches.
On the contrary, the height of ,Jagger becomes 5 feet 9 inches if the height of ,McCartney is 5 feet 10 inches.
McCartney wore flat shoes.
Jagger has many rumors related to shoes, but I do not understand it.
glenn says on 19/Jan/08
20 years is what i meant.
glenn says on 18/Jan/08
like you said.unreliable.multiple encounters for 20 has him at 5-10 for.cause he could look 5-11,6ft.and 5-9.depending on posture and footwear.
thom says on 17/Jan/08
...maybe witnesses ARE always unreliable -- I stood behind Mick as he did a sound check at a 1972 Seattle concert and he was like a jockey, stunningly small. His head was a little above my shoulders and I'm 5'10". Maybe he was in a hole or a lower stair, but it's surprising to hear people credit him with anything above 5'6"...

My hunch is that he's about the same size as Dylan but remember, as Maria sang, "It ain't the meat but the motion."
Roger Field says on 2/Jan/08
I met Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones in Munich in 1976 and showed Mick and the others the prototype of my Foldaxe folding electric guitar invention which I designed for Chet Atkins (in Chet's book "Me and My Guitars" on the internet). Mick played it a bit, bent it over his knee and said "Good night!" (as an exclamation). I have photos of him with it. They were all very nice. Mick is the same height as me, about 5'9," or a tiny bit taller. Roger Field
glenn says on 30/Dec/07
great work on the shoes.the black ones look close to what he wears.but he also looks tall in black adidas too.
Phibes says on 29/Dec/07
It's not so much about the photos for me as they seldom show the full body (head to toe) of a person, the type of footwear, surface etc ,..but more about the countless videos, movies, documentaries of the Stones from the 60s, 70s, ..I've seen over the years show clearly that Jagger in flat shoes has always looked an inch taller than Richards (officially 5'9")- if not wearing his cowboy boots, or Wood - who's always appeared about the same height as Richards (from 70s till now) so I doubt Wood was ever 5'10.5... Watch She's So Cold or Shattered from the 70s when they were still young or countless other Stones viedos on youtube.

As for Jagger's retractable spine:), I don't think he has any, you can buy shoes that look low cut and will give you 2.5 - 3 inches, check this out:

Click Here
Click Here

I hope this helps solve the mystery about Jagger's 6ft in low cut shoes and his everchanging height esp. in recent years.
He indeed could have lost around 2 inches since the 80s, after all he'll be 65 next year. If you watch the beginning of the Stones Rio concert in 2006 (Biggest Bang DVD)just before the start of the show, when the Stones walk across the bridge from their hotel to the stage on the beach, Jagger (who's wearing his thick concert trainers) and Watts are walking next to each other and appear almost the same height, Jagger being only very slightly taller than Watts who was 5'8" when he was young. Jagger still looks a tad taller than Richards&Wood but they both also must have shrunk at least 2in in the last 20years.

So all in all, it is possible that Jagger - withouth any tricks, is indeed around 5'8" nowadays. And with the 'proper' footwear he can easily appear 5'11"-6ft max.
Anonymous says on 15/Dec/07
Jagger was at least 5'10", maybe even 5'10.5" in his prime. Nowadays, he's probably closer to 5'9". In the '70s he could have appeared much taller because he wore humungous heels onstage.
glenn says on 22/Nov/07
he can in photos.and in my friends pics with him.i saw a pic that a women journalist had with him and she towered him.and i saw photogs getting the whole stones in a photo with them and their knees were bent(the photogs knees) and they made fun of their heights afterwards.they or he can look short.
Viper says on 22/Nov/07
I find it crazy that Jagger can look as short as 5-8.
glenn says on 22/Nov/07
who is this fool tel? ron wood is 5-10.5 in his prime,5-9 now with bad posture.jagger can look 5-8 to 6ft,no doubt.he is 5-10 in reality.ive been meeting the stones for 20 years now and see mick 3,4 times a year.im the authority on the stones.
Anonymous says on 21/Nov/07
There is a pic on google image search of Wood and Jagger with Di Caprio, although Di Caprio hasn't got the greatest posture in the pic, Jagger looks the same height, maybe taller.
tel says on 29/Oct/07
Phibes says it's impossible that Mick Jagger is 5'8" or 5'9". Er, Elle saw him face to face over the course of a whole evening so I think she should know! Official biographies (and official photographs) always exaggerate the height of the celebrity in question, and it wouldn't surprise me if Jagger wore lifts in his footwear now and again, particularly when his girlfriend is 6'4" and towers over him even in flat shoes.

As maryport said, Jagger is lean to almost an extreme degree, and this together with his good posture (and perhaps shoe lifts) makes him look taller. Ronnie Wood is much closer to the heights of The Small Faces than he is to someone of 5'10" or 5'11". Wood has had a near-emaciated look for all of his adult life, and being so skinny always makes someone look taller.

All of the Rolling Stones are small in height and all have skinny legs, so they tend to look tallish in pictures or on stage. To draw a comparison, Roger Daltrey (5'6") has always been slim and would have looked around the 5'8"/5'9" mark on stage and in pics if Pete Townshend and John Entwistle had been of a similar height, rather than 6 foot. The folks to believe about Jagger's height are the ones who've seen him face to face, and the consensus seems to be around 5'8". Beware of misleading publicity pics!
Anthony says on 14/Oct/07
I really do think Mick has a retractable spine. I've seen Mick and the boys in concert twice and have one of them on tape, Mick looks he could be anywhere from 5'10 to 6'. 5'7-5'8 could be with astoudingly bad posture. Remember this guy beat out DiCaprio and was a head taller than Marty Scorsese at the premiere of "The Departed" a year ago.
miles smiles says on 9/Oct/07
Glenn, the Jagger mystery continues. An ex-girlfriend of mine used to be dragged to Stones concerts by her obsessed dad, and she got backstage a few times. She's 5-7. We're still in touch, and the other day I asked her how tall Jagger was, and she says she was exactly the same height as him (and she never wears heels. I also just came across a blog where several people quote sightings of 5-5(!) and 5-7 for Jagger. Obviously 5-5 is way off, but it does make me question his official height. Remember he only weighs a buck forty by his own admisssion, which is so skinny it gives the appearance of being lanky and lean.
Anthony says on 3/Oct/07
Plant was at least 6'1 when he was younger. Elvis was 6', and Mick Fleetwood was 6'7 in his youth. Only ones I can think of right now. Yeah, they're mostly in that range.
glenn says on 23/Sep/07
i noticed what you are saying too miles.long ago.some of my childhood heroes were my height too.edward van halen,steve harris.
miles smiles says on 23/Sep/07
He most definitely has a retractable spine...or else he knows some freaky height-enhancing voodoo (from his Voodoo Louge..heh heh.) Hey glenn, isn't it kinda weird that so many old skool rock stars are in the 5-9 to 5-11 range? From Jagger to Richards to Lennon to McCartney to Hendrix to Clapton to Bowie to Page to Arthur Lee...the list continues. I know it's about the average height range, but they rarely stray much outside that range. I suppose the Small Faces and Prince are on the extreme short end, but you rarely see a major rock star over 6-1 or so. Can't think of any at the moment.
glenn says on 18/Sep/07
mick has a retractable spine.
Viper says on 17/Sep/07
He must laugh at Sly's munsters.
glenn says on 17/Sep/07
of course he would wear lifts.thats not the mystery.its that i examine his black low cut sneakers all the time.how the hell does he go from 5-9 to 6ft in that kind of footwear? i see what your friend sees all the time.its astonishing.
miles smiles says on 17/Sep/07
So glenn, my record exec friend from l.a. has seen Jagger twice in the last couple of years (Mick's been seeing this Amazon hottie from the area), and he says once he appeared 5-9ish, and the other time 6 feet. Do you think Sir Mick would even bother wearing lifts? I mean, I know huge egos never really die, but would the guy who co-wrote Beggars Banquet, Sticky Fingers, and Exile On Main Street and shagged every hottie on the planet even care about a few extra inches?
glenn says on 25/Aug/07
they are fascinating.i wish i could morph in height like that.
miles smiles says on 25/Aug/07
I was going by this website's official listing for Kravitz. But yeah, Glenn, the two times I've seen Kravitz he did appear at least 5-9 (taking into account footwear.) There's a Jagger documentary from a few yaers back where he and Kravitz look about the same height. Jagger's an enimgma....up there almost with Depp and DMX.
glenn says on 25/Aug/07
lenny kravitz is a minimum of 5-9.and in public usually looks 5-10,5-11.
miles smiles says on 24/Aug/07
I'm glad you guys agree about Jagger the vertical Zelig. It's gotta be that weird spine-stretching voodoo thing that DMX does too. I've seen a photo of Mick towering over 5-8 lenny Kravitz....and other times he looks about 5-8.
glenn says on 24/Aug/07
geez.serious anthony? he looked 5-8 next to my 6-1.5 friend.i always look at his shoes.usually black low cut sneakers.
Anthony says on 24/Aug/07
There's shots of Mick looking 6'1-6'2 with DiCaprio.
glenn says on 24/Aug/07
correct miles.the guy might be the king of heights cause ive seen him look from 5-8 to 6ft,except that he wears low cut normal shoes unlike the stallones,pitts and depps of the world.which makes him more of an enigma!
miles smiles says on 23/Aug/07
Jagger is almost like the DMX of the classic rock world. There are pictures where he looks 6-0 standing next to other celebs, and sometimes he appears 5-9, as Glenn points out. Obviously he's quite the peacock, so lifts seem a definite possibility. But would he even bother? I mean, he's friggin' Mick Jagger...and he's 64.
glenn says on 11/Aug/07
jagger looks taller over the years.i always thought he was 5-8 due to his posture.a girl once told me she read 5-9.5 for jagger.a 1994 tour book has him at 5-10.and ronnie at 5-10.5.and mick can look taller than wood.hence the 6ft illusion.but wood can look 5-9 as well.
CarbonM5 says on 10/Aug/07
We have worked for Mick Jagger in the past. He looked 5-11 close-up.
glenn says on 9/Aug/07
he does look 6ft on stage in black skippies or sneakers.no room for too much lifts.he can look 5-11 in street.usually 5-9.5 to 5-10 appearence.very tricky guy to figure out.looked 5-8 next to my 6-1.5 friend in a photo,1994.
tubbs says on 9/Aug/07
Saw Mick leaving his hotel in Helsinki last week, looked about 5'11...honestly, also saw Charlie at the same time, he looked around 5'8". What really surprised me was that Mick looked 6' during the concert later that evening. Have you ever seen Jagger at 6' Glenn?
glenn says on 8/Aug/07
she is 6-3 or 6-4.
jacky says on 7/Aug/07
how tall l'wren scott. she obviously towers over him by miles.
maryport says on 28/Jun/07
My husband and I came almost side by side with Mick Jagger at an Oporto museum in August 2006 and I can garantee that he is a little shorter than my husband that is 1 m 75 cm tall. He is extraordinary skinny, only bones, muscles and skin! This year, at Lisbon concert, I used with magnifiyng lenses and I am sure he used special shoes on stage. It looked like he had springs under his feet and they look to have an extra height not only high heels. I would like to have a pair like that for my fitness sessions. And one more thing all my aquagym teachers are rather short, but when I look up from the pool down, they look rather tall, is the same with musicians on stage
Reminidi says on 26/Jun/07
Jagger has been whereing very ugly ortho looking workout shoes for many years now - who only knows what is inside (don't think I'd want to take a close look either, lol) Looked 5-9ish and frail when I saw him up close 10 yers ago. Can look a bunch taller though, must be his skinny arese frame...lol
A. Rodney Rodriguez says on 14/May/07
looks in that pic like Mick is closest to the camera (see hows his hand looks outsized), my hump is that his height is exaggarated by an inch or so maybe. saw him up pretty close once and he looked about 5-9 to maybe barely 5-10 but very thin which exaggarates his heighth somewhat me thinks. back to your regular programeing. he once stated he is only 125 pounds P.S. Mick wears really ugly orthopedic looking shoes onstage for the past 10+ years, check em out, they seem to have thick heels.
venice beach says on 12/Apr/07
it's possible that leo wears heels
glenn says on 6/Apr/07
and the last time i saw leo he was 6-1!!!
glenn says on 6/Apr/07
now you see what i mean about jude law brad? how can jude be 5-9,5-10 when he was 2 or 3 inches taller than mick? what happened was probably this-mick was 5-9 that night,which ive seen,and jude was 5-11 with better posture too.
Brad says on 6/Apr/07
Mick is 5' 10". Jagger destroying Dicaprio's height is amazing. Mick must be in cowboy boots, he looks well over 6'.
glenn says on 30/Mar/07
it is crazy cause i saw dicaprio at 6-1, 4 months ago.wood was 510.5 in youth.he is 5-9.5 now.jagger looks 5-9.5 to 5-11.5 whenever i see him.
Pik says on 29/Mar/07
I've posted this picture before, but somehow it was deleted. How can Wood and Damon both be 5'10 ? Look at this picture !
Click Here
JMG says on 20/Mar/07
very odd picture here of Jagger...

Click Here

Mick Jagger(5'10"), Dicaprio (5'11"ish),and Ron Wood(5'9")
Dicaprio seems his normal height here but Jagger...wow! he must be wearing unbelievable lifts in this photo to appear 6'1" to 6'2"
mcfan says on 16/Feb/07
I agree with Phibes about Jagger being taller than Lennon by a slight margin. He was also very slightly taller than McCartney. I have a vivid memory of this. I would think he was 5'10.5 when he was young...maybe close to 5'10 now.
Phibes says on 11/Feb/07
No way Jagger's height is 5'8-5'9, that's impossible. He never used to wear high-heeled boots (not even in the 60s), check him out in any of the concerts (e.g. on YouTube) - Hyde park 69, Rock'n'Roll Circus 68 or 81 tour (Let's Spend the Night Together film), Bridges of Babylon, Voodoo Lounge Tour.. always flat shoes/trainers - and he always looked taller than say Richards, Ron Wood (5'9). Watch him standing next to Lennon (5'11) in Rock'nRoll Circus both wore flat shoes and Jagger looked a bit taller. Or check him out wearing white trainers and yellow suit and standing next to Vaclav Havel (5'7) in Prague in 1990. Or next to Freddie Mercury (5'9-5'9 1/2) backstage during Live Aid (both wearing trainers) Jagger looks way taller than both of them. Or performing Miss You with Timberlake who's supposed to be around 6'. People who say he's cca 5'8 probably never saw Jagger. There's no way he's shorter than 5'10-5'11.
Viper says on 17/Jan/07
Mick has always looked around 5-10 to me.
Glenn says on 17/Jan/07
It is interesting.I thought Jagger was 5-8ish too,until years gone by,I noticed he had a slouch.in the street he normally looks 5-9.5,5-10.rare occasion,mostly on stage,he can look 5-11.he towers the whole band.tour book has him at 5-10.Keith at 5-9,Charlie at 5-8,Woody at 5-10.5.Woody can give a 5-9 impression from a slouch.but is indeed around 5-10.
Elle says on 9/Dec/06
I spent an entire evening in the mid-eighties at a dinner party at Jagger's townhouse in the West Eighties (NYC). He talked to and flirted with me enough to absolutely gauge him at 5'8.5", he was wearing totally flat Capezio jazz shoes (and Nicholson was there and he was a bit taller at 5'9", and I'm 5'11"). Also Jerry Hall was creeping about in her bare feet and she was just an inch shorter than I, making her 5'10". I was there for over six hours so I had plenty of time to compare, and, of course, party!
Glenn says on 20/Oct/06
In a 90s tour book it had Woody at 5-10.5 and Mick at 5-10.I always thought Woody was 5-8,but after studying him closely,I realised he had a slouch.
Glenn says on 14/Oct/06
No,no.Jones was the shortest.5-5 or 5-6.study those old pics.he wore the biggest heels and still was shortest.
Anthony says on 13/Oct/06
Thanks for the info, Glenn. How tall would you say Jones was. I'd estimate about 5'7-ish.
Glenn says on 12/Oct/06
Charlie Boy is 5-8.Wyman is 5-6.Taylor is 5-11,6ft.Woody is 5-10.Mick appeared 5-11 on stage.and usually does.in the street,he can look 5-9 to 5-11 in low cut shoes.
Anonymous says on 11/Oct/06
biography on mick jagger states his height at 5ft9
Anthony says on 27/Sep/06
Mick's leaning forward, and he's not afraid to wear height enhancing shoes.
Viper652 says on 27/Sep/06
Mick is looking taller than Dicaprio here too. Click Here
Matt says on 27/Sep/06
The footwear and ground level in this picture is suspect but it appears that Jagger is taller than 5'10'', especially if DiCaprio is 5'11'':
Click Here
Anthony says on 26/Sep/06
Glenn, do you know the heights of the other Rolling Stones? By my own estimates, I'd say Charlie was maybe 5'7 (or 5'8 at his peak), Bill 5'8-5'9, Woody about 5'9-5'10, and Mick Taylor about 5'10-5'11.
Tom T. says on 26/Sep/06
Yep, EJ definitely 5'6"
Glenn says on 23/Sep/06
No Paul.sorry.
Paul says on 22/Sep/06
Does anyone know how tall Mick's son James is? I'm just interested.
Glenn says on 10/Sep/06
I was wrong.he is 5-6.not 5-7,5-8 that I thought.and certainly not the 5-9,5-10 he can look at times.in the top 10 or 20 hardest photos with to get.16 years of asking.in NYC he poses maybe once a year,if that.luckily the photo came out fine.
Anthony says on 9/Sep/06
That's grea, Glenn. I always assumed Elton was no more than 5'7.
Glenn says on 9/Sep/06
ELTON JOHN MY MAN! FINALLY POSED WITH ME!
Glenn says on 8/Sep/06
I believed the Jagger 5-8 myth for awhile.mainly cause he looked that in my friends photos.
Anthony says on 8/Sep/06
"I met jagger and he was no more than 5'9", he isnt a tall guy."

Not a tall guy, but not as small as many people have made him out to be. 5'9-5'10.

And I'm in interested in finding out who this shapeshifter is.
Glenn says on 8/Sep/06
Right Anthony.JUST last night I caught a shapeshifter Ive been chasing 16 years.by surprise, and I think he forgot to where his lifts! its not hard to figure out who and if it isnt up by tommorow,Ill reveal who.one of the hardest to get ever.
ralph says on 8/Sep/06
I met jagger and he was no more than 5'9", he isnt a tall guy.
Glenn says on 25/Aug/06
Again.Jagger is 5-10.Richards is 5-9.Bowie was or is slightly under 5-10.more 5-9 if you ask me.
mcfan says on 24/Aug/06
This guy was definitely 5'10.5 if Bowie was 5'10. In "Dancing In The Streets" he was a half-inch taller than Bowie.
Daniel says on 24/Aug/06
Well, in the picture recently posted by Anthony we see that Jagger is a bit taller than Ronnie Wood, who, in turn, is not any shorter than Rod Stewart, who is at least 5'10.5''
Daniel says on 23/Aug/06
Yes, if you look at the photograph posted by Anthony you'll notice a difference of 5-6 inches in favor of the girl. But she must have been wearing high heels too, that probabbly added 2-3 inches to the difference. So, the real difference between both of them should be 3-4 inches, that is, Mick Jagger –in his middle 60s- is not shorter than 5-11, unless he's wearing high heels too.


Raz + Mary says on 17/Aug/06
So Eoin, are you just estimating these guys heights or do you actually know. Cos I know for a fact Mick Jagger is not 5"10.
Daniel says on 9/Aug/06
Besides, if you look at the picture posted by mcfan on 24/Apr/06 you'll see that Jagger is at least 3 inches taller than Springsteen, who is 5-10. So, I don't understand how everybody seems to have fun puttin' down Mick's height. Of course nowadays Jagger has shrunk a little, maybe even 2 inches, but in his early youth he must have been at least 6ft tall.
Daniel says on 8/Aug/06
Well, I have a book about the Stones, with a lot of fotographs of all the members of the band, and in all of them Jagger seems to be at least 6ft tall. There's even a picture of him walking hand in hand with former wife Jerry Hall (who is no less than 5-11) and is clear that he is taller than her (2 or 3 inches), since they both are barefoot and walking relaxed, neither straightin' up nor slouching.
Viper652 says on 3/Aug/06
Yeah, hes no shorter than 5-9,.
Glenn says on 3/Aug/06
Looks 5-10 when I see him,but I believe 5-9.
Brad says on 2/Aug/06
Met him at a gas station in Greenwich Ct. in '78, he's 5'9" in sneakers.
MHouillon says on 14/Jun/06
Mick Jagger is 177cm
Orlando says on 26/May/06
I guess he's a 5' 9" at the most. Haven't you noticed he always wears elevated shoes/sneakers? He seems small framed but with his good posture and mercurial leaness he looks taller than he really is. Besides, the man is always jumping and romping, no way of having a good estimate about his actual height...
mcfan says on 5/May/06
If McCartney is 5'11 in his prime then I guess Jagger should be put up to 5'11.25. Jagger, Tom Jones, and Eric Clapton were marginally taller than McCartney so something is wrong with Jagger's height at 5'10....or McCartney should be downgraded to 5'10 in his prime and 5'9.5 now.
Glenn says on 25/Apr/06
jagger still is 5-10.bowie shrunk to 5-9.
mcfan says on 15/Jan/06
I would place Jagger at 5'10.5 at his peek. He's probably 5'10 at the most now, but he was just a little more than 5'10. Slightly taller than Lennon, McCartney, and Richards.
cendrin rovini says on 30/Nov/05
Saw Jagger walking next to Bowie and he was smaller. An interviewer wrote in a book that he was smaller than expected, 170cm. I have no idea, was always looking more like 178cm to me..
mcfan says on 21/Aug/05
Mick Jagger is no way 5'6 or 5'7. He's a half-inch taller than David Bowie and was roughly the same height as Lennon and McCartney. He was 5'10 but I'm sure like all men 62 years old he could have shrunk an inch.
CelebHeights Editor says on 21/Aug/05
Some comments from a gossip newsgroup thread on Mick's height:

"I have seen him in person and he is a shrimp. Maybe 5'6 or 5'7 at most, and that is being charitable. He is very short. I'm 5'5 and he wasn't much taller."

"Julianna Margulies rcently stated that she was shocked how tiny he was after working with him on a film. She was somewhat patronizing about it"

"I'm 5'9" and when I *brushed shoulders* (errr.... walked by him at a large party) with him he seemed a good head shorter than I was, though the 5'5 - 5'6" estimate seems on target"

"I'm six feet even, I don't remember Mick's footwear but I was wearing Chuck Taylors which don't add any height. I don't remember Mick being really short but I did look down on him a little heightwise. I'd guess him to be maybe 5'9."
Eggplant says on 9/Jul/05
Saw him at Madame Tussaud's, too. Very slightly shorter than me at 5'10. Maybe 5'9-5'9 1/2.
Star Heights A-Z
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R
S T U V W X Y Z
Latest Star Heights
Latest 50 Heights
Latest Comments
John McCain
Ryan McPartlin
Karen Shenaz David
Samantha Ferris
Owain Yeoman
Katy Hill
Rey Mysterio
Kathryn Erbe
Sandy Allen
Randy Couture
Popular Articles
Tom Cruise
Leonardo DiCaprio
Mel Gibson
General Height
Rob Paul
Brad Pitt
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Sneakers
Sylvester Stallone
Photos and Perspective
How to Measure a Celebrities Height
Hollywood Shoe Lifts
Heel Height Truth
Elevator Shoes
Celebs my Height
Search CelebHeights
 
CelebHeights.com © Rob Paul, 2004-2007
Using this site you are agreeing to its Terms

All heights are barefeet Estimates and are derived from actual quotations by celebrities, official website, agency resumes, studying pictures, films and importantly actual fan encounter estimates.

Photos of 'Fans with Celebrities' on this site are © to their respective owners and should not be used or linked to without permission.
This site is 100% Scottish.