Mike Tyson's Height
5ft 10 (177.8 cm)
American former World Heavyweight Boxing Champion. In 2005 he said "I measured myself as 5ft 10in....I'm a f****** dwarf!" and again in 2013, "I'm only a small guy, I'm five foot ten" and has also claimed "I was 5'10 1/2".
5ft 8 Rob and Mike @ London Film Con
[Height Comparison Video]
[Height Comparison Video]
He was coming there to intimidate me but I was like, 'You're 5ft 5in and I'm 6ft 5in — this is ridiculous.
-- Lennox Lewis on Tyson
You May Be Interested
Evander Holyfield
6ft 1 ¼ (186 cm)
6ft 1 ¼ (186 cm)
Larry Holmes
6ft 3 (191 cm)
6ft 3 (191 cm)
Carl Froch
6ft 0 (183 cm)
6ft 0 (183 cm)
Barry McGuigan
5ft 5 ½ (166 cm)
5ft 5 ½ (166 cm)
Add a Comment2034 comments
Average Guess (425 Votes)
5ft 10.08in (178cm)
5ft 10.08in (178cm)
Abdul-5'10 said on 28/Nov/23
177-179
177-179
Abdul 5'10 said on 16/Sep/23
5’10.25 / 5’10 3/8.
In the past he could look 5’11 ish in the ring.
5’10.25 / 5’10 3/8.
In the past he could look 5’11 ish in the ring.
Canson said on 13/Sep/23
@Darksol and Guy from Poland: he was a solid enough 5’10” in the late 2000s or early 2010s but if you see him with Roy Jones there’s a slight difference so I’m not so sure he’s 5’10 1/2” when Jones is only about that height. Jones was listed 5’10.5”. So I think this listing is fair. Maybe today he’s losing height but close enough. I’ve seen other pics Rob has where a celeb looks shorter than they ordinarily would
@Darksol and Guy from Poland: he was a solid enough 5’10” in the late 2000s or early 2010s but if you see him with Roy Jones there’s a slight difference so I’m not so sure he’s 5’10 1/2” when Jones is only about that height. Jones was listed 5’10.5”. So I think this listing is fair. Maybe today he’s losing height but close enough. I’ve seen other pics Rob has where a celeb looks shorter than they ordinarily would
Andrea said on 12/Sep/23
Rob has already said many times that the picture does favor Tyson, so yeah, he certainly looks over 5'10 here, but I doubt he really was (outside of morning time). If we're talking about a low mark or so, I can buy 5'9.75-5'10, but no more.
Rob has already said many times that the picture does favor Tyson, so yeah, he certainly looks over 5'10 here, but I doubt he really was (outside of morning time). If we're talking about a low mark or so, I can buy 5'9.75-5'10, but no more.
Darksol64 said on 11/Sep/23
@Guy from Poland:
Fully agree. Even in the pic with Rob, you can easily see that his head is more than 2 inches above Rob's and he had likely lost at least 1/4 inch from peak height there. Honestly he looks like he would be 5'11 in the pic if he straightened his head, maybe Rob was losing posture?
Got to be the strongest 5'10 listing on the site regardless.
He's obviously not insecure about height at all, as he has no problem calling himself a "dwarf" when in reality he's got an inch over the average guy. Probably saying he's a dwarf compared to the 6'5 guys he had boxed in his day.
I think the full 5'10 1/2 he claimed is quite possible and Rob should consider a 1/4 upgrade if not the full 1/2.
@Guy from Poland:
Fully agree. Even in the pic with Rob, you can easily see that his head is more than 2 inches above Rob's and he had likely lost at least 1/4 inch from peak height there. Honestly he looks like he would be 5'11 in the pic if he straightened his head, maybe Rob was losing posture?
Got to be the strongest 5'10 listing on the site regardless.
He's obviously not insecure about height at all, as he has no problem calling himself a "dwarf" when in reality he's got an inch over the average guy. Probably saying he's a dwarf compared to the 6'5 guys he had boxed in his day.
I think the full 5'10 1/2 he claimed is quite possible and Rob should consider a 1/4 upgrade if not the full 1/2.
Abdul 5'10 said on 11/Sep/23
Mike looks a good 2 inches taller than 5’8.25 Rob.
Mike looks 178.5 cm in the picture. I guess his peak height was 5’10.5 or 5’10 3/8, and nowadays 178 cm flat.
Mike looks a good 2 inches taller than 5’8.25 Rob.
Mike looks 178.5 cm in the picture. I guess his peak height was 5’10.5 or 5’10 3/8, and nowadays 178 cm flat.
Guy from Poland said on 9/Sep/23
Photos of Mike Tyson next to Sugar Ray Leonard from 2012 really show that Mike was over 5ft 10. Here is another photo: Click Here
I can accept 5ft 10.25 for Mike as his peak height, although I also see a chance for 5ft 10.5 but I think 1/4 inch over 5ft 10 suits both Mike and King Charles. However, I wonder about the height of the leader of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, he is listed on the Internet as 5ft 9. Here is a photo of him with Mike from 2005: Click Here
Rob, if we assume Mike was 5ft 10.25, did Kadyrov look like a real 5ft 9 with him?
Photos of Mike Tyson next to Sugar Ray Leonard from 2012 really show that Mike was over 5ft 10. Here is another photo: Click Here
I can accept 5ft 10.25 for Mike as his peak height, although I also see a chance for 5ft 10.5 but I think 1/4 inch over 5ft 10 suits both Mike and King Charles. However, I wonder about the height of the leader of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, he is listed on the Internet as 5ft 9. Here is a photo of him with Mike from 2005: Click Here
Rob, if we assume Mike was 5ft 10.25, did Kadyrov look like a real 5ft 9 with him?
5'11james said on 2/Sep/23
I think Tyson needs a Peak and Current listing.
Peak: 5'10 1/4
Now: 5'9 3/4 or 5'9 7/8
I think Tyson needs a Peak and Current listing.
Peak: 5'10 1/4
Now: 5'9 3/4 or 5'9 7/8
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 11/Jun/23
6ft8 undertaker makes 5ft10 mike Tyson look small back in 2012
6ft8 undertaker makes 5ft10 mike Tyson look small back in 2012
Shane Gray said on 10/Jun/23
He was listed for a lot of fights at 5'11 1/2". Probably measured in shoes.
He was listed for a lot of fights at 5'11 1/2". Probably measured in shoes.
Henners said on 6/Jun/23
Mike Tyson has never came off 5"10 and this photo is a good example of him looking possibly 5"11 barefoot
Mike Tyson has never came off 5"10 and this photo is a good example of him looking possibly 5"11 barefoot
Glacierr said on 31/May/23
Hello Rob, Do you believe that Mike Tyson lost some height?
Editor Rob
Hello Rob, Do you believe that Mike Tyson lost some height?
Editor Rob1/4 to 1/3rd maybe
7272 said on 11/May/23
5'10.25 peak nowadays 5'9.75
5'10.25 peak nowadays 5'9.75
paleotheman said on 6/May/23
5'10 and 1/4
5'10 and 1/4
QM6'1.75"QM said on 28/Apr/23
Incredible photo, Rob.
5'10" man!!!
Incredible photo, Rob.
5'10" man!!!
Discord said on 22/Apr/23
Click Here=
How tall is Ryan Garcia, Rob?
Editor Rob
Click Here=
How tall is Ryan Garcia, Rob?
Editor RobTyson I do think might have shrunk a 1/4 inch or so, but last time I thought Ryan could be at least 174cm.
6'0.5king said on 8/Apr/23
One of the most legit 5’10s I’ve seen he’s also looking a big over the mark with rob
One of the most legit 5’10s I’ve seen he’s also looking a big over the mark with rob
houss said on 8/Apr/23
He looks the full 5'11 with you @rob
He looks the full 5'11 with you @rob
Jawilder said on 7/Apr/23
@Rob any chance for a 1/4 upgrade? He looks a solid two inches taller than you in the picture.
@Rob any chance for a 1/4 upgrade? He looks a solid two inches taller than you in the picture.
Powerhouse said on 7/Apr/23
5’10 flat for Mike seems about correct, Rob who do you think would have measured taller between Rocky Marciano and Mike Tyson? I’ve seen listings for both of them at 5’10, 5’10.5 and 5’11. But I’ve also heard claims that Marciano was a 5’9 range guy who liked to add an inch or two to his claim. Marciano never looked over 5’10 to me.
5’10 flat for Mike seems about correct, Rob who do you think would have measured taller between Rocky Marciano and Mike Tyson? I’ve seen listings for both of them at 5’10, 5’10.5 and 5’11. But I’ve also heard claims that Marciano was a 5’9 range guy who liked to add an inch or two to his claim. Marciano never looked over 5’10 to me.
JavedAK said on 5/Apr/23
Mike has shrunk now
shorturl.at/kpO48
Khabib is 5'9 and he is slightly taller than inch but the difference cannot be more than 0.5 inch. Mike currently is 5'9.5(max)
Mike has shrunk now
shorturl.at/kpO48
Khabib is 5'9 and he is slightly taller than inch but the difference cannot be more than 0.5 inch. Mike currently is 5'9.5(max)
RoyzDaBoi said on 1/Apr/23
He walked by me fairly close with a couple of security guys at a boxing show back in 2006, he glanced at me as he walked by and was eye to eye level with me in regular black dress shoes, which is what I was wearing also. I'm a hair over 5'10,he was my height from what I saw. Broad shouldered with pretty good posture (at the time) so he can appear taller. Can appear 5'11+ but don't think he is quite that tall. Probably about 177cms nowadays with age.
He walked by me fairly close with a couple of security guys at a boxing show back in 2006, he glanced at me as he walked by and was eye to eye level with me in regular black dress shoes, which is what I was wearing also. I'm a hair over 5'10,he was my height from what I saw. Broad shouldered with pretty good posture (at the time) so he can appear taller. Can appear 5'11+ but don't think he is quite that tall. Probably about 177cms nowadays with age.
Discord said on 22/Mar/23
@5'10-Abdul.
5'10 is best height for light to middleweight, most of fighters are at that range as well. For heavyweight I'd say 6'2+ is good. To carry all that mass.
@5'10-Abdul.
5'10 is best height for light to middleweight, most of fighters are at that range as well. For heavyweight I'd say 6'2+ is good. To carry all that mass.
5'10-Abdul. said on 20/Mar/23
5’10 might be small for a heavyweight, but for other weight classes it’s a normal height.
5’10 might be small for a heavyweight, but for other weight classes it’s a normal height.
Discord said on 15/Mar/23
@Oho
5'10 is rather really small for heavyweight.
@Oho
5'10 is rather really small for heavyweight.
Discord said on 14/Mar/23
Click Here
Interesting one, Mike claims he have shrunk on 46:40. I think it's time for current and peak height, Rob.
Editor Rob
Click Here
Interesting one, Mike claims he have shrunk on 46:40. I think it's time for current and peak height, Rob.
Editor RobCould he be 5ft 9.5 today?
Oho said on 12/Mar/23
How the 5,10 is small guy!! I mean I am 5'5.5 I am insect then
How the 5,10 is small guy!! I mean I am 5'5.5 I am insect then
handsomebuckaroobradyjr said on 11/Mar/23
I think Tyson's about five-nine,as I was once was before age-caused shrinkage dropped me to five-eight-and-one-quarter . (I'll be 70 July 6.)
I think Tyson's about five-nine,as I was once was before age-caused shrinkage dropped me to five-eight-and-one-quarter . (I'll be 70 July 6.)
Discord said on 8/Mar/23
Looked short next to Ronaldo. Maybe 177 cm now?
Looked short next to Ronaldo. Maybe 177 cm now?
Tiron said on 7/Mar/23
How tall would you say this Brazilian kickboxing Alex Perreira looks besides Mike Tyson? He claims 194 cm and in the pic Mike has sneakers on and he's barefoot
Click Here=
Editor Rob
How tall would you say this Brazilian kickboxing Alex Perreira looks besides Mike Tyson? He claims 194 cm and in the pic Mike has sneakers on and he's barefoot
Click Here=
Editor RobLooks a solid 5 inches taller there...plus maybe near 3cm for Tyson's footwear.
Although lately I've been thinking Tyson has sometimes looked sub 5ft 10...whether he really has lost height by mid 50's?
Although lately I've been thinking Tyson has sometimes looked sub 5ft 10...whether he really has lost height by mid 50's?
Yves said on 1/Mar/23
Looked like a 5 ft 9 next to Cristiano Ronaldo last week at Tommy Fury vs Jake Paul fight
Unless CR7 is 6’2 and 6’3 in shoes then Mike can be 5’10, otherwise if CR7 is 6’1 no way Mike is 5’10
Looked like a 5 ft 9 next to Cristiano Ronaldo last week at Tommy Fury vs Jake Paul fight
Unless CR7 is 6’2 and 6’3 in shoes then Mike can be 5’10, otherwise if CR7 is 6’1 no way Mike is 5’10
Ben - 186cm said on 1/Mar/23
No way is Tyson 5’10 anymore. Look at him with Ronaldo Click Here=
That’s over 4 inches. Dude looks 5’9 range at best if Ronaldo is only a flat 6’1.
No way is Tyson 5’10 anymore. Look at him with Ronaldo Click Here=
That’s over 4 inches. Dude looks 5’9 range at best if Ronaldo is only a flat 6’1.
5'7 and a fraction said on 25/Feb/23
Looks about right.
Looks about right.
Jordan87 said on 24/Feb/23
At times he is now hunching drastically due to his back problems but up Straight if he is actually under 5'10, I don't think its by much.
At times he is now hunching drastically due to his back problems but up Straight if he is actually under 5'10, I don't think its by much.
James (178.3cm) Jones said on 1/Feb/23
5'10.25 - 5'10.5 in his prime
5'9 3/4 now
5'10.25 - 5'10.5 in his prime
5'9 3/4 now
Felipe Graciano said on 30/Dec/22
Mike tyson’s height is the one who intrigues me the most, in some videos you measured 174 , in this photo he doesn’t look under 178, i think in his prime he could pull off 179, and today just 5’10 flat
Mike tyson’s height is the one who intrigues me the most, in some videos you measured 174 , in this photo he doesn’t look under 178, i think in his prime he could pull off 179, and today just 5’10 flat
Canson said on 29/Dec/22
@Berta: not sure if he’s lost height from his prime but if he did, I don’t rule that out completely or even a hair over. He surely looked 5’10 when I met him in the late 2000s. He easily looks over it with Rob but that happens sometimes
@Berta: not sure if he’s lost height from his prime but if he did, I don’t rule that out completely or even a hair over. He surely looked 5’10 when I met him in the late 2000s. He easily looks over it with Rob but that happens sometimes
berta said on 28/Dec/22
always looked a legit 5´10. I think he can look 179 to alot of people in person and if he claimed 5´11 most people would believe it ( except from all us guys from celebheight ). I think he measured 5´10 1/8 to be exact.
always looked a legit 5´10. I think he can look 179 to alot of people in person and if he claimed 5´11 most people would believe it ( except from all us guys from celebheight ). I think he measured 5´10 1/8 to be exact.
Felipe Graciano said on 25/Dec/22
how do you think he holds up with this 6’1 boxer?
Click Here=
Editor Rob
how do you think he holds up with this 6’1 boxer?
Click Here=
Editor RobStill seems near 5ft 10, although maybe a little better footwear/posture than taller guy.
Sonny Black said on 20/Dec/22
5’10 - 5’10.5 in his prime (In some of his earlier pro bouts he’s listed at his real height of 5’10). I believe he’s shrunk to 5’9.5 now.
5’10 - 5’10.5 in his prime (In some of his earlier pro bouts he’s listed at his real height of 5’10). I believe he’s shrunk to 5’9.5 now.
c-mo 176cm said on 28/Nov/22
@Rob
prime / peak mike tysons extreme low ? what would be your guess ?
lets say being on his feet for 15 hours + heavy training that day etc
Editor Rob
@Rob
prime / peak mike tysons extreme low ? what would be your guess ?
lets say being on his feet for 15 hours + heavy training that day etc
Editor RobHe might not have measured under 5ft 10 and could have got a little over it.
Abdul-DK said on 25/Nov/22
178.4 cm.
178.4 cm.
(Billythetreesurgeon) said on 21/Nov/22
5.10.5 fair
5.10.5 fair
Vick said on 8/Oct/22
The most Mike could be is 5’9 7/8 but he is going through a health crisis right now because of his back.
The most Mike could be is 5’9 7/8 but he is going through a health crisis right now because of his back.
Glacierr said on 3/Oct/22
Hi Rob, do you think that Mike Tyson has lost a little bit of height recently?
Editor Rob
Hi Rob, do you think that Mike Tyson has lost a little bit of height recently?
Editor RobA small fraction could be argued, but I don't think we're talking half inch or that amount.
viper said on 30/Sep/22
5-10.5 too much
Maybe 5-10-5-10.25
5-10.5 too much
Maybe 5-10-5-10.25
Darksol64 said on 28/Sep/22
Looks like he could be a little over 5'10 with Rob straightened up.
I absolutely believe his claim that he "was" 5'10.5. No doubt about that.
I like his playful attitude calling himself a dwarf. Even though 5'10 is a touch above average, his standards are so high from fighting hard to become a world champion 5'10 is nothing, from his POV. It also shows his self confidence, not exaggerating his height whatsoever. Downplaying it if anything.
Going to give 5'10.25 to Mike.
Looks like he could be a little over 5'10 with Rob straightened up.
I absolutely believe his claim that he "was" 5'10.5. No doubt about that.
I like his playful attitude calling himself a dwarf. Even though 5'10 is a touch above average, his standards are so high from fighting hard to become a world champion 5'10 is nothing, from his POV. It also shows his self confidence, not exaggerating his height whatsoever. Downplaying it if anything.
Going to give 5'10.25 to Mike.
Abdul-177DK said on 26/Sep/22
177 cm
177 cm
Almost 180cm guy said on 16/Sep/22
Turns out Mike met the President of Turkey (Recep Tayyip Erdogan) in 2005. Here are their joint photos: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I have a question, Rob - if we assume Mike was 5ft 10.25 (I believe that he was that mark), how would you rate Erdogan's height in these shots? He looks about 2.5 inches taller than Mike to me.
Turns out Mike met the President of Turkey (Recep Tayyip Erdogan) in 2005. Here are their joint photos: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I have a question, Rob - if we assume Mike was 5ft 10.25 (I believe that he was that mark), how would you rate Erdogan's height in these shots? He looks about 2.5 inches taller than Mike to me.
viper said on 8/Sep/22
Don't think he's lost anything
Don't think he's lost anything
toddd0461 said on 4/Sep/22
Rob, is it possible that Mike Tyson could be under 5'10" now, because there are times where I feel like he might be 5'9.75"
Editor Rob
Rob, is it possible that Mike Tyson could be under 5'10" now, because there are times where I feel like he might be 5'9.75"
Editor RobBeen over a decade now since I seen him and maybe today he has lost a small fraction, but a solid 1/4 to 1/3rd inch?
Alex 6'0 said on 4/Sep/22
5'10.25 with Rob
5'10.25 with Rob
Blaine said on 2/Sep/22
Why does Joe rogan with mike look taller than you here rob? Possibly footwear? Click Here
Editor Rob
Why does Joe rogan with mike look taller than you here rob? Possibly footwear? Click Here
Editor RobMaybe a little posture difference?
Linke said on 27/Aug/22
Rob, if Tyson is 5'10. How tall do you reckon Vijay Deverekonda is? Certainly not 6 feet that he claims.
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, if Tyson is 5'10. How tall do you reckon Vijay Deverekonda is? Certainly not 6 feet that he claims.
Click Here
Editor RobI think he could be taller than Tyson, more 5ft 11 than 6ft...albeit, the ground isn't exactly perfectly flat.
Malcolm Oliver said on 19/Aug/22
@RP
5’10.5 is the highest I can see for him. Usually looks 5’10 though.
Under 5’10 nowadays.
@RP
5’10.5 is the highest I can see for him. Usually looks 5’10 though.
Under 5’10 nowadays.
RP said on 14/Aug/22
Needs a peak & current, Rob.
Peak: 5’10.5”
Current: 5’10”
Needs a peak & current, Rob.
Peak: 5’10.5”
Current: 5’10”
Canson said on 10/Aug/22
He didn’t appear to be wearing heels when I met him and he looked 5’10”. And He looked 5’10 with 6’1” Evander Holyfield
He didn’t appear to be wearing heels when I met him and he looked 5’10”. And He looked 5’10 with 6’1” Evander Holyfield
DefyYourLogic said on 9/Aug/22
I could see 5’10.25 in his prime. Likely 5’9.75 today.
I could see 5’10.25 in his prime. Likely 5’9.75 today.
Jaymes said on 8/Aug/22
Are you sure he's not wearing heels or something? Some guys who met him say he's like 5-8 or 9.
Are you sure he's not wearing heels or something? Some guys who met him say he's like 5-8 or 9.
JeffBuckley said on 5/Aug/22
This is the only time I've seen you looking a bit fearful in picture haha. Was he an intimidating guy? Intimidatingly nice I can imagine.
This is the only time I've seen you looking a bit fearful in picture haha. Was he an intimidating guy? Intimidatingly nice I can imagine.
miko said on 15/Jul/22
5'10.25/5'10.5 peak isn't impossible.
He was certainly what you'd call a very solid 5'10 so likely was a touch over it, given he still looks 5'10 today at 56 when he's likely lost a small fraction would likely add to that theory.
5'10.25/5'10.5 peak isn't impossible.
He was certainly what you'd call a very solid 5'10 so likely was a touch over it, given he still looks 5'10 today at 56 when he's likely lost a small fraction would likely add to that theory.
Vick said on 15/Jul/22
Hey Rob,
I know this is annoying and forgive me but with you being roughly a fraction over 5’8 by lunch, similar footwear, camera maybe little closer but Tyson still pulls off 5’10.5 and he was only in his mid 40s when you guys met, Malcolm (?) the cameraman is 5’11.5 I remember you saying that did they look at least an inch apart?
Editor Rob
Hey Rob,
I know this is annoying and forgive me but with you being roughly a fraction over 5’8 by lunch, similar footwear, camera maybe little closer but Tyson still pulls off 5’10.5 and he was only in his mid 40s when you guys met, Malcolm (?) the cameraman is 5’11.5 I remember you saying that did they look at least an inch apart?
Editor RobHe pulled off looking taller in a few photos that day, more than I would have guessed from seeing him up close and with other people around.
Iron said on 14/Jul/22
He never wake up more then 178
End of the day 175.5-176
He never wake up more then 178
End of the day 175.5-176
Abdul-DK said on 12/Jul/22
@ c-mo 5'9.25 said on 14/May/22
@Canson
but he broke his back . i bet he lost 1-2cm to be honest . he also seemed to look a little taller in his peak compared to now
i really do think mike was 179cm at his low when he was young . + shoes = his billed 5'11.5 in fights
-
I’d say he might be 177 today
@ c-mo 5'9.25 said on 14/May/22
@Canson
but he broke his back . i bet he lost 1-2cm to be honest . he also seemed to look a little taller in his peak compared to now
i really do think mike was 179cm at his low when he was young . + shoes = his billed 5'11.5 in fights
-
I’d say he might be 177 today
Abdul-DK said on 12/Jul/22
178.5 cm is a possibility for him..
178.5 cm is a possibility for him..
Jordan87 said on 13/Jun/22
@ Slim 6'0.25
5'10, or slightly under it ( Tyson is nowadays) doesn't come off as tall when you have Mike's stocky proportions.
Also A legit 5'10" is not tall nowadays for most white and black males my age, no way actually.
7/10 of my Friends are over 5'10, Some of which are even Hispanic and are factually over 5'10.
@ Slim 6'0.25
5'10, or slightly under it ( Tyson is nowadays) doesn't come off as tall when you have Mike's stocky proportions.
Also A legit 5'10" is not tall nowadays for most white and black males my age, no way actually.
7/10 of my Friends are over 5'10, Some of which are even Hispanic and are factually over 5'10.
c-mo 5'9.25 said on 9/Jun/22
@Slim 6'0.25
he doesnt look tallish though . especially not nowdays
@Slim 6'0.25
he doesnt look tallish though . especially not nowdays
Slim 6'0.25 said on 9/Jun/22
Proof that 5’10 is tallish and a great height!
I wouldn’t dare make fun of his lisp to his face, he is crazy!
Proof that 5’10 is tallish and a great height!
I wouldn’t dare make fun of his lisp to his face, he is crazy!
Slim 6'0.25 said on 9/Jun/22
He could be 5’10 and some change
180.5cm out of bed not impossible
👍🏻
He could be 5’10 and some change
180.5cm out of bed not impossible
👍🏻
Duhon said on 7/Jun/22
@Joe Ponce yes, before prison he was listed at 5'11.5" and 5'11" but he's been pretty open that he's just 5'10' or so.
@Joe Ponce yes, before prison he was listed at 5'11.5" and 5'11" but he's been pretty open that he's just 5'10' or so.
Joe Ponce said on 6/Jun/22
If I'm not mistaken, I saw somewhere he was once billed at 5'11½", and I also heard he has a 5'11" reach. Do you think he could be taller, Rob?
Editor Rob
If I'm not mistaken, I saw somewhere he was once billed at 5'11½", and I also heard he has a 5'11" reach. Do you think he could be taller, Rob?
Editor RobI cannot see how he was 5ft 11.5.
Canson said on 24/May/22
@Jawilder: I can too on occasion. He may have easily been that at lunch and 5’10 1/8 at a low
@Jawilder: I can too on occasion. He may have easily been that at lunch and 5’10 1/8 at a low
Jawilder said on 21/May/22
I could see 5’10.25 easily
I could see 5’10.25 easily
c-mo 5'9.25 said on 18/May/22
Canson . how can he exeggerate having broken his back lol
Canson . how can he exeggerate having broken his back lol
Canson said on 15/May/22
@C-Mo: he may have been exaggerating. I don’t think he looks much different. In his prime, Roy Jones Jr was half inch taller and he was 5’10.5”. Maybe it was more centimeter than half inch but Tyson looked 5’10 in person when I met him. He was listed 5’10 most of the time in his prime as well
@C-Mo: he may have been exaggerating. I don’t think he looks much different. In his prime, Roy Jones Jr was half inch taller and he was 5’10.5”. Maybe it was more centimeter than half inch but Tyson looked 5’10 in person when I met him. He was listed 5’10 most of the time in his prime as well
c-mo 5'9.25 said on 14/May/22
@Canson
but he broke his back . i bet he lost 1-2cm to be honest . he also seemed to look a little taller in his peak compared to now
i really do think mike was 179cm at his low when he was young . + shoes = his billed 5'11.5 in fights
@Canson
but he broke his back . i bet he lost 1-2cm to be honest . he also seemed to look a little taller in his peak compared to now
i really do think mike was 179cm at his low when he was young . + shoes = his billed 5'11.5 in fights
Canson said on 14/May/22
@C-Mo: midday peak May have been something like 5’10 1/4. I also met him after 2005 but I’m not so sure he really has lost all that much height if any. He looked 5’10 in person about 12-13 years back. He looked 5’10 next to 6’5 Darryl Strawberry and some of the boxers such as Roy Jones Jr who was half inch taller
@C-Mo: midday peak May have been something like 5’10 1/4. I also met him after 2005 but I’m not so sure he really has lost all that much height if any. He looked 5’10 in person about 12-13 years back. He looked 5’10 next to 6’5 Darryl Strawberry and some of the boxers such as Roy Jones Jr who was half inch taller
c-mo 5'9.25 said on 13/May/22
guys there is something that got on my mind . mike broke his back before . i think it was before he measured himself in 2005 . and before rob met him
he said after a fight to the reporter " i broke my back " , "spinal" . it is a famous funny outtake
i think mike was 179cm midday when he was younger . maybe even 180cm .
guys there is something that got on my mind . mike broke his back before . i think it was before he measured himself in 2005 . and before rob met him
he said after a fight to the reporter " i broke my back " , "spinal" . it is a famous funny outtake
i think mike was 179cm midday when he was younger . maybe even 180cm .
viper said on 9/May/22
He's still 5-10
He's still 5-10
Okidoki said on 9/May/22
@Canson In the picture with Rob, he looks right around 5'10, the lowest he could ever be is 5'9 7/8, but i feel that's probably a bit too low. I guess the footwear here were about the same between them. I think when you met him, he was at age when he hasn't lost anything yet. Tyson is quite fit and a genetic anomaly, he is a beast so i doubt really he had lost anything when you met him, as i guess you met him before Rob.
There is a good chance of a solid 178 cm for him.
@Canson In the picture with Rob, he looks right around 5'10, the lowest he could ever be is 5'9 7/8, but i feel that's probably a bit too low. I guess the footwear here were about the same between them. I think when you met him, he was at age when he hasn't lost anything yet. Tyson is quite fit and a genetic anomaly, he is a beast so i doubt really he had lost anything when you met him, as i guess you met him before Rob.
There is a good chance of a solid 178 cm for him.
Sonny Black said on 9/May/22
I’m starting to think Tyson’s probably shrunk a bit. He looks 5’9 range now where as he was probably a tall 5’10 in his prime. Maybe a prime and today option on him Rob.
I’m starting to think Tyson’s probably shrunk a bit. He looks 5’9 range now where as he was probably a tall 5’10 in his prime. Maybe a prime and today option on him Rob.
Canson said on 29/Apr/22
@Okidoki: he may have been a guy in his prime that didn’t go under 5’10 flat. Perhaps Rob was at his normal low of 5’10 1/8” and Tyson was 5’10 1/8 or maybe he had dipped a bit under 5’10 to 5’9 7/8” which is prob a worst case but he really did look 5’10 in person when I met him too
@Okidoki: he may have been a guy in his prime that didn’t go under 5’10 flat. Perhaps Rob was at his normal low of 5’10 1/8” and Tyson was 5’10 1/8 or maybe he had dipped a bit under 5’10 to 5’9 7/8” which is prob a worst case but he really did look 5’10 in person when I met him too
Okidoki said on 23/Apr/22
@Rob When you met Mike do you think at most he could have been a couple of mm shorter than peak and i assume around 5'10.25 range is the most he could have been at peak you would say? Do you see a chance of him and Frazier being the same height? I do agree that Frazier seemed slightly taller generally.
Editor Rob
@Rob When you met Mike do you think at most he could have been a couple of mm shorter than peak and i assume around 5'10.25 range is the most he could have been at peak you would say? Do you see a chance of him and Frazier being the same height? I do agree that Frazier seemed slightly taller generally.
Editor RobWhat was he, just turned 44 so maybe hadn't quite lost anything.
MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 8/Apr/22
Legit 5'10. Mike is good proof you don't need to be 6 foot plus to be a contender.
Legit 5'10. Mike is good proof you don't need to be 6 foot plus to be a contender.
Lysander said on 18/Mar/22
It’s kind of hard to tell with Mike, from what I’ve seen he might be 5’9 and a half or so, he probably looks a lot bigger just because… well…he’s a big dude, I mean Tysons neck is 20’ in circumference alone, and his hands are the size of a male toddlers skull, most people who are 5’9 don’t have As large proportions in retrospect,so it’s hard to pin point, does it really matter though?
5’8 or 5’11 doesn’t matter the guy is an absolute unit either way haha
It’s kind of hard to tell with Mike, from what I’ve seen he might be 5’9 and a half or so, he probably looks a lot bigger just because… well…he’s a big dude, I mean Tysons neck is 20’ in circumference alone, and his hands are the size of a male toddlers skull, most people who are 5’9 don’t have As large proportions in retrospect,so it’s hard to pin point, does it really matter though?
5’8 or 5’11 doesn’t matter the guy is an absolute unit either way haha
MaximusPrime04 said on 10/Mar/22
5’10 1/4th then shorter now
5’10 1/4th then shorter now
Slim 6'0.25 said on 7/Mar/22
He does measure 179 earlier in the day but I do agree better to just claim solid 5’10
Should I take Hgh and become a giant?
He does measure 179 earlier in the day but I do agree better to just claim solid 5’10
Should I take Hgh and become a giant?
Slim 6'0.25 said on 7/Mar/22
He would knock me out even if I was in rage mode on steroids…
180-180.5 mornings
178 afternoon
✅
He would knock me out even if I was in rage mode on steroids…
180-180.5 mornings
178 afternoon
✅
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 3/Mar/22
He probably measures up at 5’10 1/2” out of bed, or maybe a fraction above it. It was unnecessary for him to claim the 1/2” inch, even if it’s technically not dishonest
He probably measures up at 5’10 1/2” out of bed, or maybe a fraction above it. It was unnecessary for him to claim the 1/2” inch, even if it’s technically not dishonest
Slim 6'0.25 said on 27/Feb/22
Add rocky marciano
Tyson has a chance to be an eighth over 5’10
Add rocky marciano
Tyson has a chance to be an eighth over 5’10
Jordan87 said on 15/Feb/22
@ Robby Harris,
When Al Sharpton stands on his Wallet he is 6'7-3/4".
@ Robby Harris,
When Al Sharpton stands on his Wallet he is 6'7-3/4".
Robby Harris said on 13/Feb/22
What's your estimation of Al Sharpton's height, Rob?
Editor Rob
What's your estimation of Al Sharpton's height, Rob?
Editor RobHe could sometimes look within 5ft 8-9 zone
viper said on 9/Feb/22
Watched the Tyson-Ruddock fights back to back.
Tyson just couldn't land those punches on Holyfield
Watched the Tyson-Ruddock fights back to back.
Tyson just couldn't land those punches on Holyfield
Canson said on 7/Feb/22
@Luke: when I met him around 12-13 years ago he looked every bit of 5’10” next to my wife who is a weak 5’8”. I asked my wife about it recently and she also said he was every bit of the full 5’10” standing next to her. He actually looks taller than that next to Rob but maybe it’s the angle as Rob suggests he’s 5’10 flat
@Luke: when I met him around 12-13 years ago he looked every bit of 5’10” next to my wife who is a weak 5’8”. I asked my wife about it recently and she also said he was every bit of the full 5’10” standing next to her. He actually looks taller than that next to Rob but maybe it’s the angle as Rob suggests he’s 5’10 flat
Canson said on 7/Feb/22
@Robbe: agreed. I wonder if Sharpton may have been 5’9 in his younger days though. He’s a lot older than Tyson and would’ve been at an age where height loss becomes more prevalent
@Robbe: agreed. I wonder if Sharpton may have been 5’9 in his younger days though. He’s a lot older than Tyson and would’ve been at an age where height loss becomes more prevalent
Robby Harris said on 7/Feb/22
Reverend Al Sharpton gets a lot of 5'10" listings and has been described as that by People.com in a 2020 article regarding his weight loss, but has always appeared to be in the 5'8" range. Tyson looked a solid 5'10" with him.
Al Sharpton with 5'10" Mike Tyson in 2013:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Here's Sharpton with other celebs for reference. He could actually look a little taller than 5'8" at times, but was certainly no less than 5'8" peak.
Al Sharpton with 5'9" Michael Jackson in 1984:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Al Sharpton with 5'10" Chris Rock in 2009:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Al Sharpton with 5'10" Chris Rock in 2011:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Al Sharpton with 5'8" Kanye West in 2004:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Al Sharpton with 5'9.25" Eddie Murphy in 2012:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Al Sharpton with 5'8" Usher in 2016:
Click Here
Reverend Al Sharpton gets a lot of 5'10" listings and has been described as that by People.com in a 2020 article regarding his weight loss, but has always appeared to be in the 5'8" range. Tyson looked a solid 5'10" with him.
Al Sharpton with 5'10" Mike Tyson in 2013:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Here's Sharpton with other celebs for reference. He could actually look a little taller than 5'8" at times, but was certainly no less than 5'8" peak.
Al Sharpton with 5'9" Michael Jackson in 1984:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Al Sharpton with 5'10" Chris Rock in 2009:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Al Sharpton with 5'10" Chris Rock in 2011:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Al Sharpton with 5'8" Kanye West in 2004:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Al Sharpton with 5'9.25" Eddie Murphy in 2012:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Al Sharpton with 5'8" Usher in 2016:
Click Here
Robby Harris said on 5/Feb/22
Do you think the 5'10.5" was an earlier measurement or is it possible he actually lost height by then, Rob?
Editor Rob
Do you think the 5'10.5" was an earlier measurement or is it possible he actually lost height by then, Rob?
Editor RobMaybe 9-10am he wasn't far off it
Andrea said on 23/Jan/22
Who would you give the edge to, Rob, Mike or your father?
I know you said you measured him at pretty much 5'10, but you also said he claimed 5'9.75... Mike I'd be surprised if he was even a mm taller than him!
Editor Rob
Who would you give the edge to, Rob, Mike or your father?
I know you said you measured him at pretty much 5'10, but you also said he claimed 5'9.75... Mike I'd be surprised if he was even a mm taller than him!
Editor RobVery close in person. I do expect Mike measured 5ft 10.
Duhon said on 21/Jan/22
@Luke look at the photo below I posted below of Tyson with minimum 5'9" Khabib Nurmagomedov from the last couple years. He's still well above a flat 5'9" and could still pass as 5'10".
@Luke look at the photo below I posted below of Tyson with minimum 5'9" Khabib Nurmagomedov from the last couple years. He's still well above a flat 5'9" and could still pass as 5'10".
Luke Warwick said on 18/Jan/22
I think in his prime years he was between 5'10 & 5'10 & 1/2, he often looked 5'11 + in shoes. I think he looks an inch shorter now that he's pushing 60 and battered his body over the years, so 5'9 - 5'9 & 1/2 range
I think in his prime years he was between 5'10 & 5'10 & 1/2, he often looked 5'11 + in shoes. I think he looks an inch shorter now that he's pushing 60 and battered his body over the years, so 5'9 - 5'9 & 1/2 range
kevinself said on 15/Jan/22
He even can be a weak 5'11
He even can be a weak 5'11
J.Blaze said on 10/Jan/22
Looks 5'10.5 in the photo with you.
Looks 5'10.5 in the photo with you.
Vick said on 9/Jan/22
@Rob,
179 cm at 9 am seem reasonable then, I'll give the champ 5’10 for now
@Rob,
179 cm at 9 am seem reasonable then, I'll give the champ 5’10 for now
Canson said on 31/Dec/21
@Jawilder: I actually don’t rule it out at his peak
@Jawilder: I actually don’t rule it out at his peak
Jawilder said on 31/Dec/21
5’10.25”
5’10.25”
Duhon said on 22/Dec/21
Still looks around 5'10" next 5'9" (5'10" UFC listed) Khabib Nurgamedov Click Here
Still looks around 5'10" next 5'9" (5'10" UFC listed) Khabib Nurgamedov Click Here
Wehrmacht180 said on 21/Dec/21
175 cm
175 cm
Vick said on 16/Dec/21
Hey Rob,
A person’s physique and build can deceive height appearance for the untrained eye but don’t think it’s possible he could still be 5’10.5 by afternoon and shrinks to 1/4?
Editor Rob
Hey Rob,
A person’s physique and build can deceive height appearance for the untrained eye but don’t think it’s possible he could still be 5’10.5 by afternoon and shrinks to 1/4?
Editor RobIf he measured 179cm I would have thought it was earlier like 9am
Alahu said on 2/Dec/21
I have a question Rob, do you take in account morning height or evening height when you measure people in your page? And what do you think is the correct height to give when you're asked how tall you are? I measure myself frequently, both in the morning, in the afternoon and midnight. I'm 6'2 1/2 (1,89) when I get up from bed and 6'1 1/4 (1,86) when I go back to bed. Every time people ask me about my height I say I'm 6'2 1/2 barefoot, mostly because I think that's the real height, which shrinks with gravity along the day, and because it's the practical height. Also, that's because more or less, the height you lose because of gravity is gained with shoes latter (I'm 6'3 aprox with shoes).
Editor Rob
I have a question Rob, do you take in account morning height or evening height when you measure people in your page? And what do you think is the correct height to give when you're asked how tall you are? I measure myself frequently, both in the morning, in the afternoon and midnight. I'm 6'2 1/2 (1,89) when I get up from bed and 6'1 1/4 (1,86) when I go back to bed. Every time people ask me about my height I say I'm 6'2 1/2 barefoot, mostly because I think that's the real height, which shrinks with gravity along the day, and because it's the practical height. Also, that's because more or less, the height you lose because of gravity is gained with shoes latter (I'm 6'3 aprox with shoes).
Editor RobI go with height at least a few hours from rising.
frank burjan said on 24/Nov/21
He might have been 5'10 max when he was 20. He only looks 5'9 now. Maybe you need a downgrade too.
He might have been 5'10 max when he was 20. He only looks 5'9 now. Maybe you need a downgrade too.
Canson said on 24/Nov/21
@Johno: He doesn’t appear to have lost much height if any
@Johno: He doesn’t appear to have lost much height if any
Mickie said on 2/Nov/21
I think he's a solid 5'10" in the evening. If you measures him earlier in the day he could get 5'10.5" - 5'10.75" depending how early. I'm talking about his prime but if he's lost height since then I doubt it's anything significant.
I think he's a solid 5'10" in the evening. If you measures him earlier in the day he could get 5'10.5" - 5'10.75" depending how early. I'm talking about his prime but if he's lost height since then I doubt it's anything significant.
Zero said on 31/Oct/21
5’10 for sure.
Hey Rob do you think 5’10 guys look a lot more taller than 5’9 guys is because their shoulder width changes from 17 inches to 18 between that inch making their frame look taller?
Editor Rob
5’10 for sure.
Hey Rob do you think 5’10 guys look a lot more taller than 5’9 guys is because their shoulder width changes from 17 inches to 18 between that inch making their frame look taller?
Editor RobShoulders vary amongst people of the same height and even just the way you are turned towards a camera can make shoulders look bigger or smaller than the people you stand with.
Vick said on 28/Oct/21
Hey Rob,
Know any 6’0 men next to Mike?
Editor Rob
Hey Rob,
Know any 6’0 men next to Mike?
Editor Robwould need to have a good look through photos to find it.
Ejel Khan said on 27/Oct/21
I met him (Tyson). He’s defo 5’10”.
I met him (Tyson). He’s defo 5’10”.
Crixus said on 21/Oct/21
He's still atleast 5'10. Peak a quarter inch or so over that.
He's still atleast 5'10. Peak a quarter inch or so over that.
Lokas said on 16/Oct/21
I say he is 5’9.5 out of bed
Shrink 5’8 3/4
What you think rob
I say he is 5’9.5 out of bed
Shrink 5’8 3/4
What you think rob
ChaosControl 189.3cm said on 2/Oct/21
Cjcjcj said on 1/Oct/21
"I'm a small guy" I hope that he is ironic
For a heavyweight boxer 5’10 is small though
Cjcjcj said on 1/Oct/21
"I'm a small guy" I hope that he is ironic
For a heavyweight boxer 5’10 is small though
Cjcjcj said on 1/Oct/21
"I'm a small guy" I hope that he is ironic
"I'm a small guy" I hope that he is ironic
Johno said on 28/Sep/21
I think he can still in his 50s stand tall and measure 5'10.
I think he can still in his 50s stand tall and measure 5'10.
Canson said on 2/Sep/21
He looks over 5’10 with Rob but not 5’11”. But then other guys look shorter next to him than they are.
He looks over 5’10 with Rob but not 5’11”. But then other guys look shorter next to him than they are.
Benjamin's Jam said on 2/Sep/21
I don't think he's under 5'10 he looks 5'11 range
I don't think he's under 5'10 he looks 5'11 range
Jordan87 said on 31/Aug/21
@ Viper,
Those Combine measurements and NFL Measurements are morning measurements. Arguing 3/8" makes no sense, my overall point was Suge doesn't look 6'2 or 6'2 and " 3/8" With Mr. Tyson. He looks shorter.
@ Viper,
Those Combine measurements and NFL Measurements are morning measurements. Arguing 3/8" makes no sense, my overall point was Suge doesn't look 6'2 or 6'2 and " 3/8" With Mr. Tyson. He looks shorter.
ChaosControl said on 21/Aug/21
Ian C. said on 19/Aug/21
I've got to give you kudos, Rob, for getting that close to young Mr. Tyson. One of the strongest humans on Earth, violent by profession, trained to injure people, an ex-con and a sufferer from manic depression. I'm not going anywhere near a man like that. I'd be worried about losing an ear.
Five foot ten is not a dwarf, even metaphorically. I'm not scared of dwarfs, provided they don't have firearms or the protection of large friends.
You’re 6’4 right? What’s “large” to you?
Ian C. said on 19/Aug/21
I've got to give you kudos, Rob, for getting that close to young Mr. Tyson. One of the strongest humans on Earth, violent by profession, trained to injure people, an ex-con and a sufferer from manic depression. I'm not going anywhere near a man like that. I'd be worried about losing an ear.
Five foot ten is not a dwarf, even metaphorically. I'm not scared of dwarfs, provided they don't have firearms or the protection of large friends.
You’re 6’4 right? What’s “large” to you?
Jordan87 said on 19/Aug/21
@ VIPER,
I saw that Picture as well, if Tyson is 5'10",Suge is only 6'1ish which would be a shock.
Suge was listed in the NFl at 6'2", so Honestly I would not think he would be taller than that but I would not have guessed as low as 6'1", But Tyson makes him look that.
Click Here
@ VIPER,
I saw that Picture as well, if Tyson is 5'10",Suge is only 6'1ish which would be a shock.
Suge was listed in the NFl at 6'2", so Honestly I would not think he would be taller than that but I would not have guessed as low as 6'1", But Tyson makes him look that.
Click Here
Ian C. said on 19/Aug/21
I've got to give you kudos, Rob, for getting that close to young Mr. Tyson. One of the strongest humans on Earth, violent by profession, trained to injure people, an ex-con and a sufferer from manic depression. I'm not going anywhere near a man like that. I'd be worried about losing an ear.
Five foot ten is not a dwarf, even metaphorically. I'm not scared of dwarfs, provided they don't have firearms or the protection of large friends.
I've got to give you kudos, Rob, for getting that close to young Mr. Tyson. One of the strongest humans on Earth, violent by profession, trained to injure people, an ex-con and a sufferer from manic depression. I'm not going anywhere near a man like that. I'd be worried about losing an ear.
Five foot ten is not a dwarf, even metaphorically. I'm not scared of dwarfs, provided they don't have firearms or the protection of large friends.
viper said on 18/Aug/21
He actually looks a good 5-11 with 6-2 Suge Knight
He actually looks a good 5-11 with 6-2 Suge Knight
toddd0461 said on 15/Aug/21
Mike Tyson really looks like a 5'10. I'm kind of a 5'10 guy, 5'9 3/4 to be exact, but I appreciate that he's at least honest with his height.
Mike Tyson really looks like a 5'10. I'm kind of a 5'10 guy, 5'9 3/4 to be exact, but I appreciate that he's at least honest with his height.
Benjamin's Jam said on 15/Aug/21
179-180cm
179-180cm
Ali Noufal said on 28/Jun/21
One of the realest looking 5ft 10 guys. He actually looks a bit more than 5ft 10 here like 5ft 10.25.
One of the realest looking 5ft 10 guys. He actually looks a bit more than 5ft 10 here like 5ft 10.25.
James B 171.5cm said on 26/Jun/21
Remarkable isn’t rob how a 5ft10 guy who does not do steroids or much weightlifting can naturally weigh 220 pounds.....
Editor Rob
Remarkable isn’t rob how a 5ft10 guy who does not do steroids or much weightlifting can naturally weigh 220 pounds.....
Editor Robgenetics can throw up a fair bit of variation within humans, both in terms of natural height, but also weight.
Vick said on 11/Jun/21
@Canson- I’m busting your chops mate. So long!
@Canson- I’m busting your chops mate. So long!
Canson said on 7/Jun/21
@Vick: what beef? And you’re talking about sarcasm and can’t even detect mine. Well not really. 5’9.75 is more likely than 6’0” for real
@Vick: what beef? And you’re talking about sarcasm and can’t even detect mine. Well not really. 5’9.75 is more likely than 6’0” for real
Vick said on 6/Jun/21
Canson- Sarcasm can certainly be confusing. You still mad about that beef a few years back? Jesus
Canson- Sarcasm can certainly be confusing. You still mad about that beef a few years back? Jesus
Sjane6 said on 2/Jun/21
Surprised Tyson looks to have roughly 3 inches on Rob in photo. Footwear advantage, I'm guessing?
Editor Rob
Surprised Tyson looks to have roughly 3 inches on Rob in photo. Footwear advantage, I'm guessing?
Editor RobAbout same thickness of footwear.
Sjane6 said on 2/Jun/21
I remember when they used to announce him at 5'11 1/2" for his fights, clearly using an early morning shoe height. The half inch thing is tricky as it makes u think of barefoot heights. They did the same with Holyfield etc.
I remember when they used to announce him at 5'11 1/2" for his fights, clearly using an early morning shoe height. The half inch thing is tricky as it makes u think of barefoot heights. They did the same with Holyfield etc.
Fougas said on 30/May/21
How tall do you reckon he’d wake up? Think he was 5’10” peak now probably around 177.
Editor Rob
How tall do you reckon he’d wake up? Think he was 5’10” peak now probably around 177.
Editor RobI would have thought he had a chance of 5ft 10.75 at least out of bed
Canson said on 29/May/21
@Vick: I’m confused. You suggested he could be 5’9.75 a couple years back. That’s more believable than 6’0” lol
@Vick: I’m confused. You suggested he could be 5’9.75 a couple years back. That’s more believable than 6’0” lol
Canson said on 29/May/21
@Chaos Control: lol couldn’t have said it any better. Usually the other way around 5’9 guys padding 3” and claiming 6’0”
@Chaos Control: lol couldn’t have said it any better. Usually the other way around 5’9 guys padding 3” and claiming 6’0”
Vick said on 27/May/21
Hi Rob, what about 6’1 then? The guy can pull it off I think 😁
Editor Rob
Hi Rob, what about 6’1 then? The guy can pull it off I think 😁
Editor RobOn tip toes for sure.
ChaosControl 6'2.5/189.2cm said on 20/May/21
Vick said on 16/May/21
Mike Tyson is 6’0, end of the story. Rob, don't you agree?
Editor Rob
that would be a surprise!
No 6’0 man claims 5’10
Vick said on 16/May/21
Mike Tyson is 6’0, end of the story. Rob, don't you agree?
Editor Rob
that would be a surprise!
No 6’0 man claims 5’10
Slim 6'1.5 said on 19/May/21
@Viper, true but he’s still just not young anymore
@Viper, true but he’s still just not young anymore
Vick said on 16/May/21
Mike Tyson is 6’0, end of the story. Rob, don't you agree?
Editor Rob
Mike Tyson is 6’0, end of the story. Rob, don't you agree?
Editor Robthat would be a surprise!
viper said on 16/May/21
Slim 6'1.5 said on 12/May/21
Doing well for his age 👏
Lol he's only 54, not 74
Slim 6'1.5 said on 12/May/21
Doing well for his age 👏
Lol he's only 54, not 74
Canson said on 15/May/21
Thepredaror said on 14/May/21
NOW I SEE MIKE TYSON I CAN SWEAR! HE IS 5’9 MAXIMUM NO MORE 5’10 or 5’11 is a total bul !! (MAYBE 5’8 and half with no shoes) but he s head is very huge and his hands
The picture with Rob alone suggests he’s at least 5’10”
Thepredaror said on 14/May/21
NOW I SEE MIKE TYSON I CAN SWEAR! HE IS 5’9 MAXIMUM NO MORE 5’10 or 5’11 is a total bul !! (MAYBE 5’8 and half with no shoes) but he s head is very huge and his hands
The picture with Rob alone suggests he’s at least 5’10”
Thepredaror said on 14/May/21
NOW I SEE MIKE TYSON I CAN SWEAR! HE IS 5’9 MAXIMUM NO MORE 5’10 or 5’11 is a total bul !! (MAYBE 5’8 and half with no shoes) but he s head is very huge and his hands
NOW I SEE MIKE TYSON I CAN SWEAR! HE IS 5’9 MAXIMUM NO MORE 5’10 or 5’11 is a total bul !! (MAYBE 5’8 and half with no shoes) but he s head is very huge and his hands
Philip550 said on 13/May/21
He looked 5'9.75 with Jake Paul. Unless Jake had a footwear advantage.
He looked 5'9.75 with Jake Paul. Unless Jake had a footwear advantage.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 12/May/21
Doing well for his age 👏
Doing well for his age 👏
Slim 6'1.5 said on 8/May/21
If he lost anything we’re talking a few mms
If he lost anything we’re talking a few mms
Philip550 said on 6/May/21
I think he lost a fraction. He's about 5'9 ¾ now, or 177 cm.
I think he lost a fraction. He's about 5'9 ¾ now, or 177 cm.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 6/May/21
What goes up must also come down, at the end of his boxing career Tyson was losing aswell not just winning… especially by younger less experienced men 😎
What goes up must also come down, at the end of his boxing career Tyson was losing aswell not just winning… especially by younger less experienced men 😎
Slim 6'1.5 said on 6/May/21
@Rampage clover, I’m the original slim btw. I left celebheights in 2018 and came back mid last year 👍
@Rampage clover, I’m the original slim btw. I left celebheights in 2018 and came back mid last year 👍
Slim 6'1.5 said on 6/May/21
I’m not overly tall at 6’1 and some change but I do shrink the full inch throughout the day, it takes about 8-9 hours sleep to reach extreme morning height 🤙
I’m not overly tall at 6’1 and some change but I do shrink the full inch throughout the day, it takes about 8-9 hours sleep to reach extreme morning height 🤙
Slim 6'1.5 said on 6/May/21
@Canson, good point
I would say the flat 5’10 is likelier than 5’10.25
@Canson, good point
I would say the flat 5’10 is likelier than 5’10.25
Canson said on 3/May/21
@Slim: he didn’t lose an inch. Guys that size don’t lose that much. I don’t rule out 5’11 out of bed and 5’10.25 peak afternoon height or 5’10.75 out of bed and 5’10 flat peak afternoon or right in between the two. It’s funny that he can appear over 5’10” in his pic with Rob yet he’s still listed 5’10” while some other celebs can appear shorter than their listing, some even blatantly shorter, and Rob may list them taller (with little evidence in the pics) but that just shows the disparities
@Slim: he didn’t lose an inch. Guys that size don’t lose that much. I don’t rule out 5’11 out of bed and 5’10.25 peak afternoon height or 5’10.75 out of bed and 5’10 flat peak afternoon or right in between the two. It’s funny that he can appear over 5’10” in his pic with Rob yet he’s still listed 5’10” while some other celebs can appear shorter than their listing, some even blatantly shorter, and Rob may list them taller (with little evidence in the pics) but that just shows the disparities
Tall In The Saddle said on 2/May/21
Mike's apparently going to box Lennox Lewis later in the year. Is Mike going to keep fighting until he no longer has teeth to bite anyone, even if he wants to? Logan Paul is set to face Floyd Mayweather Jr. in June. Strange times. Boxing's "New Normal". Foreman vs Holmes, anyone? Legends from the 70s who are now actually in their 70s. Some nice prospective work on the horizon for the sprightly Michael Buffer. He might've forgotten a lot of things over his many years but he really only has to remember his iconic 5 word phrase, "Let's get ready...." He built the brand and now it's easy money.
Mike's apparently going to box Lennox Lewis later in the year. Is Mike going to keep fighting until he no longer has teeth to bite anyone, even if he wants to? Logan Paul is set to face Floyd Mayweather Jr. in June. Strange times. Boxing's "New Normal". Foreman vs Holmes, anyone? Legends from the 70s who are now actually in their 70s. Some nice prospective work on the horizon for the sprightly Michael Buffer. He might've forgotten a lot of things over his many years but he really only has to remember his iconic 5 word phrase, "Let's get ready...." He built the brand and now it's easy money.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 29/Apr/21
Peak was flat 5’11 out of bed with flat 5’10 before bed 👌
Peak was flat 5’11 out of bed with flat 5’10 before bed 👌
Alexy1 said on 12/Apr/21
He's 5.10 to 5.11ft
He's 5.10 to 5.11ft
Canson said on 31/Mar/21
@Ben 6’0”: in person about 12 years ago, he looked 5’10” and next to Rob he looks at least 5’10”. Of course with Rob, celebs can look taller or shorter depending on the pic
@Ben 6’0”: in person about 12 years ago, he looked 5’10” and next to Rob he looks at least 5’10”. Of course with Rob, celebs can look taller or shorter depending on the pic
heyyyyyyyy said on 29/Mar/21
i see 5'10" here maybe in his prime he could've been 5'10.5"
i see 5'10" here maybe in his prime he could've been 5'10.5"
Ben - 6'0 said on 15/Mar/21
@viper: If he’s the full 5’10 how do you explain him looking over an inch shorter than Jake Paul who you say is “Max 5’10”?
@viper: If he’s the full 5’10 how do you explain him looking over an inch shorter than Jake Paul who you say is “Max 5’10”?
Jade Aimers said on 9/Mar/21
5 feet 10 inches
5 feet 10 inches
viper said on 23/Feb/21
I really doubt Tyson has lost any height.
He looked the full 5-10 with 5-10.5 Roy Jones
I really doubt Tyson has lost any height.
He looked the full 5-10 with 5-10.5 Roy Jones
Need Answers said on 20/Feb/21
The last time Mike probably measured 5’10” was 10 years ago
I think he’s 5’9” 1/2 maybe 3/4 today
The last time Mike probably measured 5’10” was 10 years ago
I think he’s 5’9” 1/2 maybe 3/4 today
mande2013 said on 19/Feb/21
Rob, how tall do you think the guy on the left is: Click Here
That's Major League Baseball player Pete Alonso by the way.
Editor Rob
Rob, how tall do you think the guy on the left is: Click Here
That's Major League Baseball player Pete Alonso by the way.
Editor Robat that moment I could see him 6ft 2-2.5, if he has lost say 1cm more in posture than Mike.
Rohon Ray said on 1/Feb/21
When was that pic taken?
Editor Rob
When was that pic taken?
Editor Roba decade ago
Canson said on 16/Jan/21
@Slim: maybe 179.5-180 today. 5’10.75 and 5’10 afternoon
@Slim: maybe 179.5-180 today. 5’10.75 and 5’10 afternoon
Almost 180cm guy said on 16/Jan/21
Today Mike may be no more than 5ft 10 but in his prime he could look even like 5ft 10.5 sometimes. Here is a photo of Mike with Evander Holyfield from 1986: Click Here
Mike with Suge Kinght in 1990: Click Here
Mike alongside Sugar Ray Leonard and Nelson Mandela in a 1990 photo: Click Here
Finally, a few more pictures of Mike next to Sugar Ray Leonard from 2012: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I can't see Mike below 5ft 10.25 and even 5ft 10.5 could be argued. Rob, how about that?
Today Mike may be no more than 5ft 10 but in his prime he could look even like 5ft 10.5 sometimes. Here is a photo of Mike with Evander Holyfield from 1986: Click Here
Mike with Suge Kinght in 1990: Click Here
Mike alongside Sugar Ray Leonard and Nelson Mandela in a 1990 photo: Click Here
Finally, a few more pictures of Mike next to Sugar Ray Leonard from 2012: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I can't see Mike below 5ft 10.25 and even 5ft 10.5 could be argued. Rob, how about that?
Saif said on 14/Jan/21
I m 5'10 barefoot 1 inch shoes + hair i look like 5'11 and half
I m 5'10 barefoot 1 inch shoes + hair i look like 5'11 and half
slim 6'1 said on 13/Jan/21
180 first thing straight out of bed
180 first thing straight out of bed
slim 6'1 said on 9/Jan/21
5’10 and one eighth 178cm
5’10 and one eighth 178cm
Nodin said on 8/Jan/21
I refuse to believe he said that . Anyway hes 5'10 on the dot definitely
I refuse to believe he said that . Anyway hes 5'10 on the dot definitely
Mikester said on 8/Jan/21
interesting. the top of his head seem considerably over 5ft10 to me in the photo.
interesting. the top of his head seem considerably over 5ft10 to me in the photo.
Callum Barker said on 7/Jan/21
5’10 ish
5’10 ish
Canson said on 1/Jan/21
@Editor Rob: yes I can see something like 5’10 3/8” early morning (1-2 hours after waking
@Editor Rob: yes I can see something like 5’10 3/8” early morning (1-2 hours after waking
Antoine said on 31/Dec/20
Tyson looks the same height as Cyril Hanouna but Hanouna once said that he measured 177 cm. Click Here
Hanouna with Justin Bieber : Click Here
Hanouna with 183 cm Camille Combal : Click Here
Hanouna with Tyson : Click Here
On Google, Hanouna is listed at 175 cm.
Rob, I would be very interested in your opinion.
Thanks.
Editor Rob
Tyson looks the same height as Cyril Hanouna but Hanouna once said that he measured 177 cm. Click Here
Hanouna with Justin Bieber : Click Here
Hanouna with 183 cm Camille Combal : Click Here
Hanouna with Tyson : Click Here
On Google, Hanouna is listed at 175 cm.
Rob, I would be very interested in your opinion.
Thanks.
Editor RobTyson doesn't seem much bigger, though the clip is geo-restricted.
Thefrench said on 28/Dec/20
Hello everyone I'm French and Mike Tyson is going on a show known in France alongside "Cyril hanouna" that measures 170cm and Mike Tyson is exactly the same size how do you explain this rob?
Hello everyone I'm French and Mike Tyson is going on a show known in France alongside "Cyril hanouna" that measures 170cm and Mike Tyson is exactly the same size how do you explain this rob?
c-mo176.2cm said on 28/Dec/20
"editor rob: I could see him getting comfortably over 5ft 10 flat for 9-10am doctor measurement quite easily"
@rob can you go more into detail regarding this post of yours ? what do you think a prime mike tyson would measure in centimeters at 9-10am doctor measurement ?
Editor Rob
"editor rob: I could see him getting comfortably over 5ft 10 flat for 9-10am doctor measurement quite easily"
@rob can you go more into detail regarding this post of yours ? what do you think a prime mike tyson would measure in centimeters at 9-10am doctor measurement ?
Editor Robyou can't rule out the chance he might have got closer to 5ft 10.5 at a medical like 9.30am.
tony t. said on 25/Dec/20
Mike Tyson is living proof that if you judge a person by their height alone you'd be sorely mistaken. Him and Conor. And Floyd too.
Mike Tyson is living proof that if you judge a person by their height alone you'd be sorely mistaken. Him and Conor. And Floyd too.
viper said on 21/Dec/20
He looked 5-10 with 5-10.5 Roy Jones in their staredown.
Not sure where people are seeing under 5-10.
He looked 5-10 fighting Jones at night
He looked 5-10 with 5-10.5 Roy Jones in their staredown.
Not sure where people are seeing under 5-10.
He looked 5-10 fighting Jones at night
Tall In The Saddle said on 18/Dec/20
You can never be sure but I think there's a fair measure of visual evidence to argue for no more than 5'10" flat for Mike's prime and perhaps even a touch less. As Tyson stands now it might be supposed that Mike has lost some height but it's possible that he has lost very little if at all.
You can never be sure but I think there's a fair measure of visual evidence to argue for no more than 5'10" flat for Mike's prime and perhaps even a touch less. As Tyson stands now it might be supposed that Mike has lost some height but it's possible that he has lost very little if at all.
Canson said on 17/Dec/20
@Editor Rob/ do you think he’s shrunken? From his prime?
Editor Rob
@Editor Rob/ do you think he’s shrunken? From his prime?
Editor Robif
he has lost something we are talking a few mm's, nothing like half inch or anything.
he has lost something we are talking a few mm's, nothing like half inch or anything.
Christopher Chammas said on 16/Dec/20
Whats the highest you’d go on Mike Tyson’s Prime height?
Editor Rob
Whats the highest you’d go on Mike Tyson’s Prime height?
Editor RobI could see him getting comfortably over 5ft 10 flat for 9-10am doctor measurement quite easily.
Slim 6'1" said on 16/Dec/20
He could’ve been 5’10 & 1 eighth
He could’ve been 5’10 & 1 eighth
Johnny 181-182 cm said on 10/Dec/20
@Rob what are your top 10 celebrity photos? Mike Tyson is certainly in that list right?
Editor Rob
@Rob what are your top 10 celebrity photos? Mike Tyson is certainly in that list right?
Editor Robit is hard to say offhand, but for sure Tyson is up there.
Slim 6'1" said on 9/Dec/20
178cm is the spot on listing
178cm is the spot on listing
FriedChicken said on 8/Dec/20
He might be weaker 5'10" now in my opinion at least he doesn't seem like a big 5'10 guy compared to his prime.
He might be weaker 5'10" now in my opinion at least he doesn't seem like a big 5'10 guy compared to his prime.
Gman41 said on 4/Dec/20
I think there was less than an inch between them, but like other folks here I would give Roy the edge, I think .5 to .75 inches. I have met Roy in person (great guy by btw) and I thought he looked 5'10.5, this was about 5 years ago.
I think there was less than an inch between them, but like other folks here I would give Roy the edge, I think .5 to .75 inches. I have met Roy in person (great guy by btw) and I thought he looked 5'10.5, this was about 5 years ago.
Guest66 said on 2/Dec/20
I think he looked nearly an inch shorter than Roy as well, Mike might be not 5’10” anymore these days.
I think he looked nearly an inch shorter than Roy as well, Mike might be not 5’10” anymore these days.
Tall In The Saddle said on 2/Dec/20
Watching the exhibition I got the feeling that Mike had to reign himself in lest he accidentally KO Roy.
Rather than pull his each and every punch (difficult for Tyson, LOL), I think Mike sometimes simply didn't punch to avoid an accidental single shot or two KO. To that end, he put in some considerate work to Roy's body but he might've accidentally broke Roy in half anyway. Those body shots were audibly hard and the resulting discomfort on Roy's face said it all. Mike easily "won" the fight but a "draw" was fine in the spirit of the exhibition.
Relatively speaking, a nice, controlled display by Tyson but put in proper perspective, it was against an older, well worn version of a naturally smaller Roy Jones.
Watching the exhibition I got the feeling that Mike had to reign himself in lest he accidentally KO Roy.
Rather than pull his each and every punch (difficult for Tyson, LOL), I think Mike sometimes simply didn't punch to avoid an accidental single shot or two KO. To that end, he put in some considerate work to Roy's body but he might've accidentally broke Roy in half anyway. Those body shots were audibly hard and the resulting discomfort on Roy's face said it all. Mike easily "won" the fight but a "draw" was fine in the spirit of the exhibition.
Relatively speaking, a nice, controlled display by Tyson but put in proper perspective, it was against an older, well worn version of a naturally smaller Roy Jones.
dicky curtis said on 28/Nov/20
Tyson looked 1 inch shorter than roy jones
Tyson looked 1 inch shorter than roy jones
Christopher Chammas said on 28/Nov/20
@Rob, have you watched Tyson facing off Roy Jones Jr?
What’s the difference in height between them two? And has anyone of them lost height? If so, what is the “current” and “peak” height of each boxer?
Editor Rob
@Rob, have you watched Tyson facing off Roy Jones Jr?
What’s the difference in height between them two? And has anyone of them lost height? If so, what is the “current” and “peak” height of each boxer?
Editor RobI don't know if either has lost anything like 1/4 to 1/2 inch...a few mms? Maybe.
I'd give Jones an edge, but at times could look pretty close.
I'd give Jones an edge, but at times could look pretty close.
Tall In The Saddle said on 27/Nov/20
Finally they face off. Mike 220 lbs. Roy 210 lb. Both in socks standing straight enough. Perfect.
Click Here
For mine, Roy taller by a few cigarette papers. Otherwise, very close to even. Interesting when guys like Roy, who once carried a high end physique, go somewhat to pot as they age, even more than the average bear. Of course the consequences of steroid usage can also be a factor.
I know with some sports people, the intensity of their time training as a professional actually works as aversion therapy in late life. Training of any form is the last thing they want to do after they've retired or have become semi active in their chosen sport. IMO, as far training goes, it seems middle of the road steadily maintained is best for the long haul of your whole life.
Finally they face off. Mike 220 lbs. Roy 210 lb. Both in socks standing straight enough. Perfect.
Click Here
For mine, Roy taller by a few cigarette papers. Otherwise, very close to even. Interesting when guys like Roy, who once carried a high end physique, go somewhat to pot as they age, even more than the average bear. Of course the consequences of steroid usage can also be a factor.
I know with some sports people, the intensity of their time training as a professional actually works as aversion therapy in late life. Training of any form is the last thing they want to do after they've retired or have become semi active in their chosen sport. IMO, as far training goes, it seems middle of the road steadily maintained is best for the long haul of your whole life.
Matt(182cm) said on 27/Nov/20
I grabbed a screenshot of Tyson facing off with Jones Jr. No shoes, face to face, full body side shot. Basically as close to perfect as you can get
Click Here
I grabbed a screenshot of Tyson facing off with Jones Jr. No shoes, face to face, full body side shot. Basically as close to perfect as you can get
Click Here
sheldon shortt said on 23/Nov/20
mike recently took a photo with jake paul who on here is listed as 5’10” 1/2” tyson looks 5’9” at most with him
mike recently took a photo with jake paul who on here is listed as 5’10” 1/2” tyson looks 5’9” at most with him
Slim 6'1@ said on 22/Nov/20
Solid 178cm
Solid 178cm
slatestudbrady67 said on 18/Nov/20
Seems about right to me.I'm five-nine (or at least was until some age related shrinkage-I'm 67 )- and Tyson looked about an inch taller than I at my tallest.
Seems about right to me.I'm five-nine (or at least was until some age related shrinkage-I'm 67 )- and Tyson looked about an inch taller than I at my tallest.
Roots4828 said on 12/Nov/20
@Animus, that’s your opinion. But it’s a fact that Tyson was below average in terms of height and mass for a heavyweight and probably even more so for a heavyweight champion. We’re splitting hairs over what is considered “below average” and what is considered “small” or “tiny”.
@Animus, that’s your opinion. But it’s a fact that Tyson was below average in terms of height and mass for a heavyweight and probably even more so for a heavyweight champion. We’re splitting hairs over what is considered “below average” and what is considered “small” or “tiny”.
Slim 6'1" said on 11/Nov/20
180cm out of bed. 178cm before bed 5'10 and 1 eighth
180cm out of bed. 178cm before bed 5'10 and 1 eighth
J2Frenzy said on 11/Nov/20
@Animus whether someone is big or small varies based on height and weight. A guy like Tyson, who’s 220-230 at only 5’10 is a big guy. A guy like who’s 6’2-3 but only about 170 would be considered a big guy
@Animus whether someone is big or small varies based on height and weight. A guy like Tyson, who’s 220-230 at only 5’10 is a big guy. A guy like who’s 6’2-3 but only about 170 would be considered a big guy
Animus said on 11/Nov/20
@Roots4828
Nah, it's just factually incorrect to describe Tyson as 'tiny' even for a heavyweight. Size is more closely linked to weight/lean body mass than height. A 5'8 guy who is in shape and weighs around 200lbs is bigger than a 6'0 guy who weighs, say, 155lbs. Height is obviously not irrelevant to size, it's a component of size, but lean body mass is a more important metric of size, in my opinion. We do have a bit of a verticality bias, I suppose, but if you look at it geometrically, out of three dimensions, two of them are more closely linked to mass and one equals the person's height. Increasing one of those two dimensions will result in a larger volume than increasing the height dimension by the same amount.
Fair enough that you didn't intend anything offensive, but in common parlance it's universally quite offensive when used to refer to people.
You're reaching badly with that comparison. While all things 'giant' are 'massive', not all things 'massive' are 'giant'. So you're argument is fallacious.
@Roots4828
Nah, it's just factually incorrect to describe Tyson as 'tiny' even for a heavyweight. Size is more closely linked to weight/lean body mass than height. A 5'8 guy who is in shape and weighs around 200lbs is bigger than a 6'0 guy who weighs, say, 155lbs. Height is obviously not irrelevant to size, it's a component of size, but lean body mass is a more important metric of size, in my opinion. We do have a bit of a verticality bias, I suppose, but if you look at it geometrically, out of three dimensions, two of them are more closely linked to mass and one equals the person's height. Increasing one of those two dimensions will result in a larger volume than increasing the height dimension by the same amount.
Fair enough that you didn't intend anything offensive, but in common parlance it's universally quite offensive when used to refer to people.
You're reaching badly with that comparison. While all things 'giant' are 'massive', not all things 'massive' are 'giant'. So you're argument is fallacious.
Lebron small said on 8/Nov/20
5"10 correctly
5"10 correctly
Canson said on 7/Nov/20
@Roots428: considering a heavy weight he was undersized. But 5’10” isn’t tiny and I’m 6’4 and change saying that
@Roots428: considering a heavy weight he was undersized. But 5’10” isn’t tiny and I’m 6’4 and change saying that
Roots4828 said on 6/Nov/20
@Animus, “tiny” is a relative term. While somebody may be larger than average it is irrelevant outside of group being referenced. You seem to be projecting your own insecurities onto the word. While I agree that “tiny” can be used in a offensive manner it was not my intention to be derogatory.
On the contrary, “giant” and other adjectives the can be offensive too. Should I accuse you of being disrespectful since you called Tyson’s neck “massive”?
Tyson referred to himself as a “dwarf” because he knew he was small for a man in his sport.
@Animus, “tiny” is a relative term. While somebody may be larger than average it is irrelevant outside of group being referenced. You seem to be projecting your own insecurities onto the word. While I agree that “tiny” can be used in a offensive manner it was not my intention to be derogatory.
On the contrary, “giant” and other adjectives the can be offensive too. Should I accuse you of being disrespectful since you called Tyson’s neck “massive”?
Tyson referred to himself as a “dwarf” because he knew he was small for a man in his sport.
Animus said on 5/Nov/20
@Roots4828
He was not "tiny" by any stretch of the imagination. That's a joke; you must, quite frankly, know next to nothing about the sport of boxing. In his prime Tyson carried 215-220lbs in an athletic frame (meaning with little body fat and well-proportioned; unlike many bodybuilders who have outsized arms or other features incommensurate with their overall frame). In what universe is that "tiny"? For a heavyweight back then that was a very respectable weight. Tyson was considerably shorter than the average heavyweight (I'd say the average was 6'2 or so; most heavyweights back then fell into the 6'1-6'3 range), that is true, but in terms of girth and skeletal structure he was absolutely a legitimate heavyweight. Tyson has a big head with a pronounced brow ridge and strong facial bone structure, he had a massive neck helpful for absorbing blows with minimal damage, a compact, muscular frame, big legs suitable for generating power and stability, and he even had big feet (again indicative of a large frame). While it's true height plays a factor in determining weight class placement, lean body mass is arguably a more important metric to consider and Tyson certainly qualified as a heavyweight on that count.
Furthermore, one should never call another person "tiny". It's disrespectful and frankly a rather inane comment to make about another human being. And... could you pick a worse person to call 'tiny'?
@Realist
Tyson has said that he's ~230lbs these days. Roy Jones Jr said on Joe Rogan's podcast that he weighs 210lbs. Keep in mind, though, that Tyson is not only heavier but also leaner than Jones Jr.
@Roots4828
He was not "tiny" by any stretch of the imagination. That's a joke; you must, quite frankly, know next to nothing about the sport of boxing. In his prime Tyson carried 215-220lbs in an athletic frame (meaning with little body fat and well-proportioned; unlike many bodybuilders who have outsized arms or other features incommensurate with their overall frame). In what universe is that "tiny"? For a heavyweight back then that was a very respectable weight. Tyson was considerably shorter than the average heavyweight (I'd say the average was 6'2 or so; most heavyweights back then fell into the 6'1-6'3 range), that is true, but in terms of girth and skeletal structure he was absolutely a legitimate heavyweight. Tyson has a big head with a pronounced brow ridge and strong facial bone structure, he had a massive neck helpful for absorbing blows with minimal damage, a compact, muscular frame, big legs suitable for generating power and stability, and he even had big feet (again indicative of a large frame). While it's true height plays a factor in determining weight class placement, lean body mass is arguably a more important metric to consider and Tyson certainly qualified as a heavyweight on that count.
Furthermore, one should never call another person "tiny". It's disrespectful and frankly a rather inane comment to make about another human being. And... could you pick a worse person to call 'tiny'?
@Realist
Tyson has said that he's ~230lbs these days. Roy Jones Jr said on Joe Rogan's podcast that he weighs 210lbs. Keep in mind, though, that Tyson is not only heavier but also leaner than Jones Jr.
Robin Wolf said on 3/Nov/20
You tryna tell me that you’re 173cm and he’s 178cm? This is never just 5 centimeters you probably faking your own height then...
Editor Rob
Remember people can gain advantage in photos, one person slouches, another could rise up on toes, or is closer to camera etc.
In person Tyson looks 5ft 10.
You tryna tell me that you’re 173cm and he’s 178cm? This is never just 5 centimeters you probably faking your own height then...
Editor RobRemember people can gain advantage in photos, one person slouches, another could rise up on toes, or is closer to camera etc.
In person Tyson looks 5ft 10.
Realist said on 2/Nov/20
Tyson is 5'10 and 220 pounds I think and Roy Jones is like 5'11 and 205 their fight will be entertaining for sure.
Tyson is 5'10 and 220 pounds I think and Roy Jones is like 5'11 and 205 their fight will be entertaining for sure.
J2Frenzy said on 31/Oct/20
Yeah 200lbs is a lot to carry around if you’re under 6 foot
Yeah 200lbs is a lot to carry around if you’re under 6 foot
Roots4828 said on 29/Oct/20
Tyson was a tiny man for a heavyweight boxer though. 6ft barely gets you going in the heavyweight division.
Tyson was a tiny man for a heavyweight boxer though. 6ft barely gets you going in the heavyweight division.
Vincent Caleb said on 24/Oct/20
As listed.
As listed.
Canson said on 10/Oct/20
@Tall in the Saddle: yea Will does look taller in that one. At the end of the scene it looks less but I wonder if it was footwear. Will looks taller than listed there I’ll admit
@Tall in the Saddle: yea Will does look taller in that one. At the end of the scene it looks less but I wonder if it was footwear. Will looks taller than listed there I’ll admit
Tall In The Saddle said on 10/Oct/20
@Canson
Just based on the vision below, it seems to me Smith appears clearly taller, certainly more than the 1/4" diff. suggested by this site's separate listings. At about the 41 sec mark Will is leaning forward, neck bowed a bit and still looking taller. Smith wore an array of Nike shoes throughout the series, these would've given Will some added advantage over those in average heel. Unfortunately I couldn't find anything else to compare Will and Evander head to head.
Click Here
@Canson
Just based on the vision below, it seems to me Smith appears clearly taller, certainly more than the 1/4" diff. suggested by this site's separate listings. At about the 41 sec mark Will is leaning forward, neck bowed a bit and still looking taller. Smith wore an array of Nike shoes throughout the series, these would've given Will some added advantage over those in average heel. Unfortunately I couldn't find anything else to compare Will and Evander head to head.
Click Here
Canson said on 8/Oct/20
@Tall in the Saddle: who would you say is taller between Holyfield and Will Smith? They look almost identical in the one shot when he was on FPOBA
@Tall in the Saddle: who would you say is taller between Holyfield and Will Smith? They look almost identical in the one shot when he was on FPOBA
Tall In The Saddle said on 30/Sep/20
Interesting that Evander H. appears more than just 3 and a bit inches taller than Mike in a lot of photos. I think Rob highlighted this before. Even with angles etc. in play, an apparent 3+" is curiously consistent. Posture wise I would give Evander the edge on Mike. Maybe in civilian gear Holyfield wears a bit more heel than Mike. Not sure. I've never really seen Mike wear anything beyond a modest heel.
Interesting that Evander H. appears more than just 3 and a bit inches taller than Mike in a lot of photos. I think Rob highlighted this before. Even with angles etc. in play, an apparent 3+" is curiously consistent. Posture wise I would give Evander the edge on Mike. Maybe in civilian gear Holyfield wears a bit more heel than Mike. Not sure. I've never really seen Mike wear anything beyond a modest heel.
FriedChicken said on 29/Sep/20
Legit 5 ft 10 in guy. At least in his prime. The guy's 54 years old now.
Legit 5 ft 10 in guy. At least in his prime. The guy's 54 years old now.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 29/Sep/20
@Eric
Maybe he was talking within the world of heavyweight boxing. 5'10" was on the shorter side for a HW boxer, even during Mike's generation.
@Eric
Maybe he was talking within the world of heavyweight boxing. 5'10" was on the shorter side for a HW boxer, even during Mike's generation.
slim 6'1 said on 26/Sep/20
@canson, good point there 178cm flat is probable and very possible
@canson, good point there 178cm flat is probable and very possible
Canson said on 24/Sep/20
@Slim: no telling for his peak height. Maybe he was 5’10 1/8 at his best
@Slim: no telling for his peak height. Maybe he was 5’10 1/8 at his best
Slim 6'1" said on 12/Sep/20
178 area spot on or 5’10,25 upgrade
178 area spot on or 5’10,25 upgrade
Eric W. Tam said on 8/Sep/20
Lol at "I'm a dwarf." Clown. YOu're average in most of Western Europe/US, you are under in Nordic countries/The Netherlands, and you are absolute CHad material in SOuth America and East Asia. I feel 6'3 in NY China town and I'm not even quite this dude's height without footwear.
Lol at "I'm a dwarf." Clown. YOu're average in most of Western Europe/US, you are under in Nordic countries/The Netherlands, and you are absolute CHad material in SOuth America and East Asia. I feel 6'3 in NY China town and I'm not even quite this dude's height without footwear.
Hoss said on 28/Aug/20
Lava said on 4/Aug/20
Morning: 180 cm
Night: 178.1 cm
Why do you put the 0.1mm on his night height? it makes zero difference
Lava said on 4/Aug/20
Morning: 180 cm
Night: 178.1 cm
Why do you put the 0.1mm on his night height? it makes zero difference
Andrea said on 18/Aug/20
Nothing over 5'10, and it wouldn't surprise me if he's always been a fraction shy of it (and maybe near that 5'10.5 claim in a pair of boxing shoes).
Nothing over 5'10, and it wouldn't surprise me if he's always been a fraction shy of it (and maybe near that 5'10.5 claim in a pair of boxing shoes).
Canson said on 17/Aug/20
@Christian: agreed
@Christian: agreed
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 14/Aug/20
@Canson
Most athletes Tyson's age have already lost more height than him (if Tyson even lost any). I'd say that his height has held up pretty well. He doesn't really need both a peak and a current listing anytime soon.
@Canson
Most athletes Tyson's age have already lost more height than him (if Tyson even lost any). I'd say that his height has held up pretty well. He doesn't really need both a peak and a current listing anytime soon.
Canson said on 11/Aug/20
@Slim: maybe in his prime. Today I think he is solid. Meaning maybe
5’11/5’10.25 peak or 5’10 7/8-5’10 1/8
5’10.75/5’10 flat today
@Slim: maybe in his prime. Today I think he is solid. Meaning maybe
5’11/5’10.25 peak or 5’10 7/8-5’10 1/8
5’10.75/5’10 flat today
Animus said on 10/Aug/20
I don't think he'd measure above 5'10 these days; occasionally, he appears more like a 177cm guy now at 54 y/o. In his prime I think 5'10¼ is quite plausible, probably at least 5'10⅛; meaning he didn't fall below 178cm at night.
I don't think he'd measure above 5'10 these days; occasionally, he appears more like a 177cm guy now at 54 y/o. In his prime I think 5'10¼ is quite plausible, probably at least 5'10⅛; meaning he didn't fall below 178cm at night.
Slim 6'1" said on 7/Aug/20
canson, good to see u back mate, ur 100% safe on here we'll talk to u any second.
as for tyson 178cm area 5'10 with a chance of 5'10.25"
canson, good to see u back mate, ur 100% safe on here we'll talk to u any second.
as for tyson 178cm area 5'10 with a chance of 5'10.25"
Alir?za said on 5/Aug/20
Canson said on 3/Aug/20
That is interesting. He is very heavy and low body fat for 5'10. 230 lbs and probably %15 body fat. He is heavy as Wilder that he is 6'6.5 inches. And not to much smaller than anthony joshua that his weight is 240 lbs. He has too much muscle and bones like his 20's but I don't know his cardiovascular capacity
Canson said on 3/Aug/20
That is interesting. He is very heavy and low body fat for 5'10. 230 lbs and probably %15 body fat. He is heavy as Wilder that he is 6'6.5 inches. And not to much smaller than anthony joshua that his weight is 240 lbs. He has too much muscle and bones like his 20's but I don't know his cardiovascular capacity
Canson said on 5/Aug/20
@Slim: I think it is just this particular picture with Rob that makes him look taller than he really is. Roy Jones called him 5’10 and said that he’s only 1/2” taller himself and Tyson in person didn’t look over 5’10”. Now the question is what was he in his prime? He may have been a hair over 5’10” then. He claimed 5’10.5 before but was that a morning height? Possibly or possibly he was a strong 5’10” who woke up to 5’11” and dipped to 5’10.25” in his prime. He looked 3” shorter than Holyfield more often than not
@Slim: I think it is just this particular picture with Rob that makes him look taller than he really is. Roy Jones called him 5’10 and said that he’s only 1/2” taller himself and Tyson in person didn’t look over 5’10”. Now the question is what was he in his prime? He may have been a hair over 5’10” then. He claimed 5’10.5 before but was that a morning height? Possibly or possibly he was a strong 5’10” who woke up to 5’11” and dipped to 5’10.25” in his prime. He looked 3” shorter than Holyfield more often than not
Lava said on 4/Aug/20
Morning: 180 cm
Night: 178.1 cm
Morning: 180 cm
Night: 178.1 cm
Slim 6'1" said on 3/Aug/20
178.5cm upgrade would be great
178.5cm upgrade would be great
Canson said on 3/Aug/20
@Tall in the Saddle: it’s ironic. Now I see him fawning over Tyson lol. He says he will rule. I’ll tell you what. Iron Mike at 54 is in better shape than some athletes in their 30s lol
@Tall in the Saddle: it’s ironic. Now I see him fawning over Tyson lol. He says he will rule. I’ll tell you what. Iron Mike at 54 is in better shape than some athletes in their 30s lol
Tall In The Saddle said on 3/Aug/20
@Canson
Agree. As far as we can judge, they may well just appear basically even in height. So Joshua is calling Mike out also? Funny. Mike back in full focus and demand and I bet he's loving it. LOL.
@Canson
Agree. As far as we can judge, they may well just appear basically even in height. So Joshua is calling Mike out also? Funny. Mike back in full focus and demand and I bet he's loving it. LOL.
JustJohnny said on 2/Aug/20
I think he was probably 5’ 10 1/2” peak.
I think he was probably 5’ 10 1/2” peak.
Canson said on 1/Aug/20
@Tall in the Saddle: I’m pumped! And the beers are a given for me lol. I have Iron Mike. I saw Him in action on TV and he still is in remarkable shape. At 54 years old, that’s amazing. Those two will be close in height but I want to see if Jones really edges him in the ring as Rob has them. It wouldn’t surprise me if those two are the same. with someone like Joshua and Klitschko we saw a difference but that Was hard at times. And now Joshua has issued warning shots to iron Mike lol. But I really wanted to see Iron Mike fight Fury. Fury would have the height and reach but Iron Mike is still the man!
@Tall in the Saddle: I’m pumped! And the beers are a given for me lol. I have Iron Mike. I saw Him in action on TV and he still is in remarkable shape. At 54 years old, that’s amazing. Those two will be close in height but I want to see if Jones really edges him in the ring as Rob has them. It wouldn’t surprise me if those two are the same. with someone like Joshua and Klitschko we saw a difference but that Was hard at times. And now Joshua has issued warning shots to iron Mike lol. But I really wanted to see Iron Mike fight Fury. Fury would have the height and reach but Iron Mike is still the man!
Tall In The Saddle said on 30/Jul/20
@Canson
Yeah, I remember you were pumped for a Fury v Tyson match. Just the "face off" in the ring would've been a sight to behold in itself given the size diff.
Should be more or less eye to eye with Roy. Depending on how it goes, a Fury match might still manifest.
Certainly still worth a watch and a good excuse for me to get out for just a "few quiet" beers with some mates. LOL.
Supposedly just an exhibition but IF they get serious and bang on for real, who have you got?
@Canson
Yeah, I remember you were pumped for a Fury v Tyson match. Just the "face off" in the ring would've been a sight to behold in itself given the size diff.
Should be more or less eye to eye with Roy. Depending on how it goes, a Fury match might still manifest.
Certainly still worth a watch and a good excuse for me to get out for just a "few quiet" beers with some mates. LOL.
Supposedly just an exhibition but IF they get serious and bang on for real, who have you got?
Tall In The Saddle said on 29/Jul/20
@Rob
Sweet. I didn't know Roy claimed 5'10.5". Sounds about right from what I've seen. A new page for yet another famous boxer is a good thing.:)
Editor Rob
@Rob
Sweet. I didn't know Roy claimed 5'10.5". Sounds about right from what I've seen. A new page for yet another famous boxer is a good thing.:)
Editor RobA pretty recent claim.
Canson said on 29/Jul/20
@Tall in the Saddle: yea I heard RJ was fighting him and got excited. Too bad not Tyson Fury lol
@Tall in the Saddle: yea I heard RJ was fighting him and got excited. Too bad not Tyson Fury lol
BavarianPatriot757 said on 27/Jul/20
I think 5'10.5 seems accurate Rob
I think 5'10.5 seems accurate Rob
Sole11 said on 23/Jul/20
You sure he isn’t 5'10 1/2 ?
I don't think he would lie about it
Editor Rob
You sure he isn’t 5'10 1/2 ?
I don't think he would lie about it
Editor Robmaybe he got near it earlier in the day like 9.30am
Alir?za said on 18/Jul/20
This guy is real Rocky balboa.. He beat a lot of 6'5-6-7 guys
This guy is real Rocky balboa.. He beat a lot of 6'5-6-7 guys
Danimal 176.7cm said on 16/Jul/20
Mike JUST claimed to be 5'10.5" on his newest podcast with William Shatner. Btw, Shatner is turning 90 years old in a few months: Click Here
Mike JUST claimed to be 5'10.5" on his newest podcast with William Shatner. Btw, Shatner is turning 90 years old in a few months: Click Here
Alir?za said on 16/Jul/20
He always seems 5'10 5'11 to me. 5'9 or 5'8 are short for him because in a lot of match he didn't look too short next to 6'3 guys.
He always seems 5'10 5'11 to me. 5'9 or 5'8 are short for him because in a lot of match he didn't look too short next to 6'3 guys.
Canson said on 12/Jul/20
@Editor Rob: did Mangianello look definitively taller than McPartlin in person? I’d have a hard time telling 1/4” difference between two people let alone if I don’t see them together. I know you said Mangianello looked 6’4.5/6’5 range so is McPartlin more 6’4/6’4.5 range?
Editor Rob
@Editor Rob: did Mangianello look definitively taller than McPartlin in person? I’d have a hard time telling 1/4” difference between two people let alone if I don’t see them together. I know you said Mangianello looked 6’4.5/6’5 range so is McPartlin more 6’4/6’4.5 range?
Editor RobNot when he was standing about talking to people...but when he stood at his tallest I think he has a good chance of measuring a bit taller. But it could be quite close in reality, Mcpartlin is very tall, even Jenny commented on that fact when we were queuing up.
184guy2 said on 4/Jul/20
@Rob
Did timelord looked taller than Mangelio ?
Editor Rob
@Rob
Did timelord looked taller than Mangelio ?
Editor RobLast I seen Timelord was at a star trek convention, he still looked Ryan McPartlin territory I thought.
Jeffrey Pedal? said on 29/Jun/20
Hi Rob, it may be that today he is near the 230 pounds?
Editor Rob
Hi Rob, it may be that today he is near the 230 pounds?
Editor RobHe could be cutting his weight down a bit these days, being back in gym getting fitter again and losing weight, I'm not sure exactly what he's down to.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.