Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Jan/12
Doesn't look less than 6ft1...
185cm min and 187cm max
may even scrape 6ft2 out of bed

clint says on 19/Jan/12
He may make 6'2". I love how all these morons think they know what someone's max height is! There are very few true experts!

Johhny says on 13/Jan/12
i didn't know his exact height but those who are interested can have a look at his mugshot here is the pic Click Here for other celebrities mugshots link is here Click Here

Spencer says on 11/Jan/12
weak 6'1

Valdor says on 1/Jan/12
6'0" - 6'0"1/2" (184cm sounds fair)

Derek d says on 18/Dec/11
Why would the man be 6'2 if He said 6'1 himself? Lol.

Tman says on 3/Dec/11
1,84m 255 lbs(peak weight)

Tman says on 3/Dec/11
1,84m 255 (peak weight)

josh says on 18/Nov/11
6'2 ..same height as shane

Goldberg says on 15/Nov/11
Met Goldberg at a signing ar MCI Center in Washington, DC. I asked him to stand up to get a picture taken with me. I'm 6'1. He was SLIGHTLY taller than me. Definitely NOT 6'3 or 6'4.

Alex says on 14/Nov/11
He's max 184cm I think

jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m says on 13/Nov/11
He's an honest 6ft 1in.

Mathew says on 13/Nov/11
Austin was/likely still is 6'1" legit. He's been billed at 6'2" and sometimes 6'3" but 6'1" is right.

logan noll 1996 says on 12/Nov/11
Stone cold is 6 foot. Almost everybody who is billed 6 foot 2 ends up being 6 foot in real life.

Parra says on 8/Nov/11
He is like 6'2

Alex says on 30/Oct/11
Henrik, claims like that make no sense LOL. There was no way 6 inches between them. More like 4 inches

Henrik says on 28/Oct/11
I have only seen Triple H talk about his height once (in USAToday), and he claimed 6'4". Ironically and contradicting, he did say that Shawn Michaels was 5'10". LOL.

Alex says on 27/Oct/11
Usually they will say the taller the wrestler the bigger the build but not always true. Kane billed at 7'0 but 6'8 max but Big Show billed at 7'0 and looks within an inch of that height. I do remember HHH was billed at 6'5 in WCW then 6'4 in WWF. I think he claimed 6'3 though?

Legend says on 27/Oct/11
He's about 6 ft flat today

Henrik says on 26/Oct/11
I think that wrestlers do on average get padded by two inches. An exception seems to be 6'1" types, who from my experience usually get billed as 6'2" ("only" one inch padded).

Then there are a few who get padded even more (Triple H original billing was 6'5") or have, at least close to, their actual heights billed.

Alex says on 20/Oct/11
He was always billed at 6'2. Seen a few 6'3 billings in magazines but he claimed 6'1 as his height

Danimal says on 18/Oct/11
TNTinCA says on 17/Oct/11
Sounds about right.
I think his 'billed height' in his wrestling days was 6'3".

Wrong. It was 6'2".

tell-em says on 18/Oct/11
cold stone is 6'1"

TNTinCA says on 17/Oct/11
Sounds about right.
I think his 'billed height' in his wrestling days was 6'3". Rule of thumb is that most wrestlers get about 2 inches of height added to them for billing purposes. The Rock was always billed as 6'5" while he is actually 6'3". Shawn Michaels was billed at 6 foot when he was around 5'10" or so.

Clay says on 15/Oct/11
Austin is 6'1'' at most, Goldberg I would say is 6'2.5''.

tell-em says on 14/Oct/11
goldberg is 6'2, screw 6'1".

Henrik says on 14/Oct/11
Bill Goldberg is listed 6'2.5" on this site (Viper argues that he's 6'1") and he is taller than Bosworth on the picture that Vegas provided. Bosworth being 6'2.5" would make Goldberg a weak or full 6'4" and Austin 6'2.5" as well.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 14/Oct/11
Brian Bosworth looks 6"2-6"3 range

Alex says on 14/Oct/11
Austin has claimed 6'1 so at most that was his peak. He never looked more than 6'1 tops anyway back then excluding his footwear or those chunky boots he wore. Maybe 6'0 1/2 peak, and today 6'0. If he has lost height it was pretty minimal I would say

Legend says on 13/Oct/11
Austin isn't 6'1 anymore Rob. This is his peak height at most.

Vegas says on 13/Oct/11
goldberg did edge out bosworth in the movie viper Click Here

speaking of longest yard and bosworth, i was on a flight last year next to a chap who owns a bar in santa fe where longest yard was filmed, he said he was friends with bosworth since school and that he used to come over to his bar after filming most nights with some of the cast, he said he couldn't believe how much the likes of nash and khali dwarfed bosworth

ziggler was ~2 inches shorter than hugh jackman on raw 2 weeks ago

Viper says on 12/Oct/11
Goldberg taller than Bosworth? Impossible

Henrik says on 11/Oct/11
Appears to be about the same height as 6'2" billed Brian Bosworth, and taller than here listed strong 6' or 184cm William Fichtner (who is also closer to the camera) in the movie Longest Yard: Click Here

But I think Bosworth is more like 6'1.25" (186cm) or 6'1.5", as Bill Goldberg seemed to have some height advantage over him. He has no page here.

Legend says on 11/Oct/11
Ziggler is 5'10.25

SAM RICK says on 9/Oct/11
IN A VIDEOGAME CALLED RAW STONE COLD IS LISTED AS 6'2 AND 252LBS.A FEW MONTHS AGO JUST BEFORE CAPATIAL PUNISHMENT HE SEEMED TALLER THAN DOLPH ZIGGLER WHO IS LISTED AS 6;0.

ali says on 30/Sep/11
i think was powerful in wwe

Legend says on 27/Sep/11
I think he looks 5'11.5-6'0 with Angle. With UT the angle isn't fooling me. He still looks much shorter.

Alex says on 23/Sep/11
Austin looks slightly over 6'0 there with Angle.
With Undertaker he looks even taller LOL but backstage segments look different from in the ring though. I've UT have more inches on Austin in the ring than in that backstage interview

James says on 22/Sep/11
i have too disagree looking on youtube WWE in 1998 and 2000 was much more cooler than it is now.

the 1998-2000 RAW is War Arena was amazing as well.

Vegas says on 22/Sep/11
how tall does he look here legend Click Here

remember what i said about backstage stuff :D

Legend says on 21/Sep/11
Looks 6 feet here Click Here

Alex says on 21/Sep/11
Clay, yes very true. Within the last 3-4 years, mainly the last 2 years these young kids around 10-13 love this stuff.

Clay says on 20/Sep/11
Well James Im sure 12 year olds think this current brand is the greatest thing ever. Oh and John Cena is superman of course, lol.

James says on 19/Sep/11
Alex wat do you think the WWE will be like 7 years from now?

Alex says on 18/Sep/11
Clay, I was 23 in 2007 and thats the year where I personally lost interest. It was by start of 09 when I was really done with it LOL. Once in a while I'll check it out still

James says on 17/Sep/11
Alex says on 16/Sep/11
James, yea 98 was a new era in WWE. thats when Austin became WWF champion and was the face of the WWF. 05-06 was a new change and the attitude era was at its end. From 07-08 and on is a new era but not sure what to call it.

If you could take a wild guess what do you think the WWE will be like 7 years from now? Do you think it will be like the attitude era again in 7 years time?

i dislike this current WWE era :(

Clay says on 17/Sep/11
James and Alex:

It could be that it was cooler back then because we were just little kids, lol. I'm 23 now and it just seems goofy as hell.

Alex says on 16/Sep/11
James, yea 98 was a new era in WWE. thats when Austin became WWF champion and was the face of the WWF. 05-06 was a new change and the attitude era was at its end. From 07-08 and on is a new era but not sure what to call it.

Tman says on 15/Sep/11
the attitude era was not centrered around jumping off titantrons or 15 foot cages and Danimal you must be talking about Droz who had he's neck brocken after another perfomer(D lo) tried to do a running powerbomb on him and he could not get a good grip on Droz cos he was wearing a lose shirt and a fan had thrown a drink into the ring so D lo brown sliped and Droz landed awkwardly and became paraplegic(so how is that Att'de Era fault?) The Atti'de Era had the best perfomers,story lines came from all angles(not just around world H'vy weight chmpionship title and John cena) Divas were actually "wrestlers" the acting was convincing,the tag teams were legendary while at the same time WWF/E was "Kid friendly".

Legend says on 14/Sep/11
One of the best matches ever in my opinion is Stone Cold vs Bret Hart Wrestlemania 13.

James says on 14/Sep/11
Alex says on 14/Sep/11
James, the attitude era officially started in 98. 98 was a great year but I thought 99-00 was even better. 01-02 was pretty good too. 03-04 was good. 05-06 went down some but still was watchable. 07 on is when I really started to get out of it and by 08 that was it for me LOL. WM 17 in 2001 was my fave WM of all time

some say 2006 was the last year off the attitude era?

do you agree alex as well that there was a HUGE change in the WWE from 1997-1998? i saw a big change in the WWE as well from 2007-2008.

there will probably be anohter huge change in the theme in 2017-2018 LOL.

Alex says on 14/Sep/11
James, the attitude era officially started in 98. 98 was a great year but I thought 99-00 was even better. 01-02 was pretty good too. 03-04 was good. 05-06 went down some but still was watchable. 07 on is when I really started to get out of it and by 08 that was it for me LOL. WM 17 in 2001 was my fave WM of all time

Alex says on 14/Sep/11
James, the attitude era officially started in 98. 98 was a great year but I thought 99-00 was even better. 01-02 was pretty good too. 03-04 was good. 05-06 went down some but still was watchable. 07 on is when I really started to get out of it and by 08 that was it for me LOL. WM 17 in 2001 was my fave WM of all time

James says on 13/Sep/11
Alex says on 13/Sep/11
James, I actually liked 01-03 range a lot. 04 was when it went down a bit but still enjoyable. I do agree 2000 was a great year. Maybe my favorite year. Those times I never missed a raw or smackdown show on TV lol

1999 was very good as well wasn't it?

What do you think off WWE in 1998 Alex? I think it was better than the 1999 season. I really like wrestelmania 1998 when mike tyson was in it although i did enjoy wrestlemania 1999 more.

Alex says on 13/Sep/11
James, I actually liked 01-03 range a lot. 04 was when it went down a bit but still enjoyable. I do agree 2000 was a great year. Maybe my favorite year. Those times I never missed a raw or smackdown show on TV lol

James says on 12/Sep/11
Alex says on 12/Sep/11
I started watching wrestling with WWF in 1991-1992 but got more into it by 93-94. I grew up with it in the late 90s-early 2000s when the attitude era was at its best. By 04-06 to me it wasn't quite as good but still enjoyable enough to way but by 07-08 I just got out of it. By that time I felt it was for a new generation of kids. By 07-08 I was 23-24 years old and a lot of it was meant for kids in their teens I felt. A lot of my fave guys were either gone or weren't doing much anymore

I think the WWE become kinda boring in 2001-2002 which is when i lost interest in it. The years 1997-2000 were the most enjoyable for me even though i was very young.

I remember just like it was yesterday 12 years ago that i would tune into too WWE smackdown every saturday morning on sky1. Also i would VERY much enjoy watching WCW every friday night on TNT. WCW Thunder was good as well.

Alex says on 12/Sep/11
Legend, yea Austin is known for his chunky boots that can give him a taller appearance but 5'11.5 for him I really doubt. I'd put him at 6'0.5 before 5'11.5 but barefoot I think hes 6'0-6'0.25 range

Alex says on 12/Sep/11
I started watching wrestling with WWF in 1991-1992 but got more into it by 93-94. I grew up with it in the late 90s-early 2000s when the attitude era was at its best. By 04-06 to me it wasn't quite as good but still enjoyable enough to way but by 07-08 I just got out of it. By that time I felt it was for a new generation of kids. By 07-08 I was 23-24 years old and a lot of it was meant for kids in their teens I felt. A lot of my fave guys were either gone or weren't doing much anymore

James says on 12/Sep/11
Danimal in 2011 Vince McMahon seems not so much off a tryant like he used too be in the attitude era. Would u not agree? The guys getting old now so its understandable.

Remember that infamous incident in 1998 when a fan threw a battery at shawn michaels and he walked off letting down loads of fans? In an interview Vince stated that he was less than impressed by shawns behaviour.

Legend says on 12/Sep/11
I knew I wasn't crazy to think he looked 5'11.5

Danimal says on 11/Sep/11
Vegas says on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good

for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40

What about that young wrestler who is now a paraplegic. I think he took over the role of one half of the Road Warriors? Then we have Mick Foley who has stated in several recent interviews that he has sustained so many concussions from chair shots to the head, that he has permanent brain damage and his whole think process is foggy (very scary stuff). Mick Foley was known for his intelligence. Now even that is gone due to the attitude era. Then we can look at Owen Hart who is DEAD. The list goes on and Vince McMahon takes no responsibility whatsoever for any of these tragedies.

James says on 11/Sep/11
Vegas says on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good

for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40

Does that mean edge is going too die?


I LOVED the attitude era it was great. also used too really enjoy WCW Nitro everyday friday night when i was 9 or 10 years old.

give it half a decade and we might see a new better era in the WWE. I wish they would change the design for the current WWE arenas :(

Legend says on 11/Sep/11
We were lucky to have witnessed the attitude era guys. JR announcing. All the hardcore matches. Stone cold, the Rock, Mankind, Masked Kane, Undertaker. Great times. It feels so empty now.

Alex says on 10/Sep/11
Vegas, you're right. Attitude era has been gone since the early 2000s. Most will say the attitude era was from 98-03

Alex says on 10/Sep/11
I'd put Austin at 6'0.5 before 5'11.5

Vegas says on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good

for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40

Danimal says on 9/Sep/11
Around 6'0" give or take .5".

James says on 9/Sep/11
Vegas so does that mean Edge is slowly losing height?

Last time Edge appeared on the WWE he still looked 6'3 i thought. Who knows Edge could have been taller than 6'3 ten years ago.

Vegas says on 8/Sep/11
edge did an interview the other day where he said he has spinal stenosis, its basically a shrinking of the spine, its the reason he retired and means he couldn't be passed to wrestle even if he wanted to, he said austin had the exact same thing among his many problems in 2002-03

Alex says on 8/Sep/11
Legend, think Austin maybe lost a slight bit of height since he had neck surgery and injuries. Could have been closer to 6'1 back in the 90s but today yea 6'0 to maybe 6'0 1/2 at most.

Legend says on 6/Sep/11
Okay, after watching him a lot the past few days I think he's barely over 6 feet. I'm not sold on a real 6'1.

Alex says on 5/Sep/11
All these wrestlers when you see them on TV are at their evening height I am pretty sure of

John says on 5/Sep/11
I've met Stone Cold Steve Austin at evening, and he was 6'0. I'm a strong 5'10.

But, remember. At NIGHT. Which means, he must be 6'1" at morning or 6'2".

James says on 4/Sep/11
He looked minimum 6'1 next too Dane Cook.

Legend says on 4/Sep/11
James says on 2/Sep/11
He can't be as low as 5'11.5 becuase he was taller than Dane Cook.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dane Cook is not that tall.

Alex says on 3/Sep/11
Austin could be 6'0.25 evening

James says on 2/Sep/11
He can't be as low as 5'11.5 becuase he was taller than Dane Cook.

Alex says on 2/Sep/11
I'd put Austin at 6'0.5 before 5'11.5 but yea he could maybe look that at times but usually not.

Legend says on 1/Sep/11
Sometimes Stone Cold looks 5'11.5 range. I'm not saying he is. But sometimes he does look it.

Legend says on 31/Aug/11
The Rock was never 6'3.

James says on 27/Aug/11
The Rock was at least 6'3

Terryman says on 26/Aug/11
James is Goldberg taller than Triple H in the Videos that were posted by Vegas?

Legend says on 26/Aug/11
The Rock is 6'2

James says on 25/Aug/11
Bill Goldberg 6'2.25 (189cm)
Rock Dwayne Johnson 6'3.5 (192cm) Peak.

Hansen says on 24/Aug/11
i think over mostly goldberg and the rock apear close in height 6ft2 both was listed 6ft4-6ft5 in WWE, SCSA always stand abit shorter than both. so 6ft1 is clear on the spot! ;)

James says on 23/Aug/11
goldberg is a strong 6'2 but his 6'4 listings were absolutely ridicolous.

Legend says on 22/Aug/11
It's still strange how he looked not much shorter than Kane. And does anyone know exactly why half his arm is extremely white in the picture?

Terryman says on 20/Aug/11
goldberg is in the 187-8cm Range not 188-9cm. Stone cold is dead on 1,84m

James says on 20/Aug/11
Goldberg is 188-189cm range not 189-190cm. Stone Cold does not look over 185cm at all in that pic with Goldberg.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 19/Aug/11
Looks 186-187cm range here with 6"1(185cm) Vince McMahon. If you look closely you'll see Austin is jerking his head slightly away from the camera Click Here 6"1.75(187cm) with 189-190cm Bill Goldberg, but Goldberg is bending his head slightly Click Here

Legend says on 18/Aug/11
@Alex Sorry for thinking you weren't 6 feet lol and you're right about the angles they can use.

James says on 18/Aug/11
oh yeah just noticed that dane cook was downgraded too 182cm but still austin looks 186cm next too him

James says on 18/Aug/11
With 192cm Dolph Lundgren Austin looks 187cm or 188cm Click Here look 187cm or 185cm with 183cm listed Dane Cook and 175cm Jason Stathem. Could cook be 182cm though? Click Here 186cm near 188cm Donald Trump. Was trump still 6'2 in 2007? Click Here with 190cm dave batista he can look 184cm but maybe 185cm since batista has slight hair advantage. does not look at all over 185cm though and has low of looking 184cm. Click Here can look anywehre from 184cm too 187cm range compared too those guys but he does not look 188cm.

Alex says on 17/Aug/11
Legend, there were times where Austin and Kane didn't look too far apart then at times Kane just towered over him by at least 7 inches. Also in WWE camera angles can make a big difference. 2 guys 7-8 inches apart with angles can look more 4 inches apart at times lol

Alex says on 17/Aug/11
Rock- 6'2 1/2 Brock- 6'2 Austin 6'0 1/2

Legend says on 17/Aug/11
He was strangely close to Kane's height in a match they had once. What I mean by that is that Kane didn't tower him at all. I remember because it was very strange to see that. I guess legit 6 foot guys can hang in there with anyone.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 16/Aug/11
6ft1.25(186cm) barefoot
6ft2.75(190cm) in wrestling boots

Pics to come soon!

James says on 15/Aug/11
6'1 barefoot and appearing 6'2 in wrestling boots.

Legend says on 15/Aug/11
He doesn't look more than 6 feet to me.

Hansen says on 15/Aug/11
SCSA bulky build give down illusion been 6ft. 6ft1 i truely believe it.

Danimal says on 15/Aug/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 12/Aug/11
185cm at least. He usually appeared 1.5-2in shorter than The Rock on WWF back in the day.
6ft1.25 or even 6ft1.5 are vague possibilities. The guy might even scrape 188cm first thing out of bed.

6'0" guy.

James says on 13/Aug/11
Clay says on 12/Aug/11
James - I thought the Rock was slightly taller than Lesnar, always have. Weak 6'3 for the Rock, or hell even solid 6'3 and strong 6'2 for Lesnar.

Alex says on 12/Aug/11
Rock was no more than an inch taller than Lesnar and at times it looked a bit less than an inch

Clay why do you think the rock might be a weak 6'3 when he can appear too have 1 inch on Lesner?

Desiboy says on 12/Aug/11
I think stone cold is like 5'11'' but 6' with shoes on

Clay says on 12/Aug/11
James - I thought the Rock was slightly taller than Lesnar, always have. Weak 6'3 for the Rock, or hell even solid 6'3 and strong 6'2 for Lesnar.

Alex says on 12/Aug/11
Rock was no more than an inch taller than Lesnar and at times it looked a bit less than an inch.

James says on 12/Aug/11
With Mike Tyson i don't think he looked over 185cm but i know sometimes he could pull of looking slightly taller than Vince McMahon who may not be over the 6'1 mark anyway. but i think he only looked taller than vince cause of his wrestling boots.

With Sid Eudy as well he did actually look 6'2 (188cm) but then again maybe Sid is more like 6'6.75?

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 12/Aug/11
185cm at least. He usually appeared 1.5-2in shorter than The Rock on WWF back in the day.
6ft1.25 or even 6ft1.5 are vague possibilities. The guy might even scrape 188cm first thing out of bed.

James says on 11/Aug/11
Clay says on 7/Aug/11
Nevermind the fact Lesnar has looked nothing but 6'2.25-6'2.5 barefoot in the UFC James, and on the NFL field in cleets as well.

As we know thats better evidence than what these wrestlers are standing at in their boots in the ring..

Fair enough i am just saying that at times there looked not much between Cena and Lesner. would you agree that the rock looked 6'3.5-6'4 next too Brock Lesner?

Clay says on 8/Aug/11
tell-em says on 8/Aug/11
whatchu talking about? i always had brock at a weak 6'2". he wakes and hits 6'2" and is about 6'1.5" during the day. lol. austin is 6'1". brock never looked a strong 6'2" in his life especially next to the rock or john cena or kurt angle.

Whatever. We're not far off anyways. At least we agree on Austin..

tell-em says on 8/Aug/11
whatchu talking about? i always had brock at a weak 6'2". he wakes and hits 6'2" and is about 6'1.5" during the day. lol. austin is 6'1". brock never looked a strong 6'2" in his life especially next to the rock or john cena or kurt angle.

Terryman says on 7/Aug/11
184,5cm during the day-1,83.5m at night he is definately not 185cm as he was about 0,5in taller than Miz and dolf zigler who are both about 1,82m

Clay says on 7/Aug/11
Nevermind the fact Lesnar has looked nothing but 6'2.25-6'2.5 barefoot in the UFC James, and on the NFL field in cleets as well.

As we know thats better evidence than what these wrestlers are standing at in their boots in the ring..

Clay says on 7/Aug/11
tell-em says on 5/Aug/11
2 inches between brock and austin doesn't make any sense. austin is 6'1" and brock is a weak 6'2". you have the rock at 6'2.75" when there is ATLEAST an inch between brock and roct. gosh you're stupid. you suck at math just like you suck at height gauging clay.

Changing your tune now eh? Now Brock is 6'2? lol. Austin a weak 6'1 at best, and Brock a strong 6'2'' is where it's at. Book it.

James says on 7/Aug/11
Alex maybe 6'4.75 (195cm) for test? LOL at 6'7.

I am kinda uncertain about Lesner being over 188cm?

Alex says on 6/Aug/11
James, also Test's height is uncertain too. Hes def not his 6'6 listing height. They even said he was 6'7 before too. I am not sure what he claims in height but I would guess he was 6'5 or at the lowest 6'4 1/2. He had over 2 inches on Brock.

Alex says on 6/Aug/11
Brock 6'2 and Austin about 6'0 1/2 could be very likely be dead on.

James says on 5/Aug/11
Sometimes Brock Lesner had a VERY hard time looking 6'2.5 next too John Cena but then again next too Test he could pull of looking 189cm.

tell-em says on 5/Aug/11
2 inches between brock and austin doesn't make any sense. austin is 6'1" and brock is a weak 6'2". you have the rock at 6'2.75" when there is ATLEAST an inch between brock and roct. gosh you're stupid. you suck at math just like you suck at height gauging clay.

tell-em says on 5/Aug/11
and yet you think brock is 6'2.5" thats freakin' hilarious.lol. thanks for proving my point.

Clay says on 4/Aug/11
tell-em says on 3/Aug/11
austin IS a hair shorter than brock. .5 inch or 1 inch is not a big gap. but you wouldn't understand that clay. rob should ban you for your awful height estimations. its embarrassing.

It's not a big gap, but I wreckon theres about 2 inches between them in the barefeet. You're the only sad-sack at the site who thinks there is only half an inch or so between them.

tell-em says on 3/Aug/11
austin IS a hair shorter than brock. .5 inch or 1 inch is not a big gap. but you wouldn't understand that clay. rob should ban you for your awful height estimations. its embarrassing.

Alex says on 3/Aug/11
Lesnar had about 2 inches on Austin I believe.

Clay says on 2/Aug/11
tell-em says on 29/Jul/11
james, rock hasn't lost anything. get outta here with your ridiculous commenting. you're as bad as clay.

Thanks bud. Go ahead and take shots at people who aren't even in the conversation now why dont you.

You wanna talk about ridiculous how about you thinking that Austin is only a hair shorter than Brock Lesnar, now thats funny.

Clay says on 2/Aug/11
Danimal says on 2/Aug/11
6'0"

I dont know how you can break people's balls about giving the lowest possible heights and then come up with estimates like this yourself...

James says on 2/Aug/11
6'1 and maybe would measure at 6'2 in big wrestling boots in the 90's.

Danimal says on 2/Aug/11
6'0"

tell-em says on 1/Aug/11
you're close vegas, but nah. austin has a big head. i'm still stickin w/ 6'1 or 185cm.

Mathew says on 1/Aug/11
6'1" is good enough for Stone Cold. I believe it.

Vegas says on 31/Jul/11
tell-em i am 5'11 and i think austin is about 184cm

Terryman says on 31/Jul/11
1,84m peak 1,83.5cm now?

tell-em says on 29/Jul/11
james, rock hasn't lost anything. get outta here with your ridiculous commenting. you're as bad as clay.

tell-em says on 29/Jul/11
vegas, how tall are you? and how tall do u think steve is?

James says on 28/Jul/11
the rock i think has not been so lucky cause he looks too have lost as a result of surgeries.... then again the rock is taller than stone cold steve austin so maybe that is why he is so prone too losing height?

Vegas says on 28/Jul/11
tell-em says on 27/Jul/11
the way you put it vegas, you make it seem as if he should have lost 2 inches.
________________

my point is if surgeries are really the main cause of so much shrinkage in wrestling (as a few on here claim) then why has austin not been affected, i don't think austins lost anything, if you look back at him early 1990s in wcw he looks right around 6ft or maybe a little taller and still looks that today

i have met steve a number of times since 2002 and he is taller than me

tell-em says on 27/Jul/11
well austin STILL looks 6'1". like i said, if he lost height, it had to be a few mm. the way you put it vegas, you make it seem as if he should have lost 2 inches.

hs2011 says on 23/Jul/11
Austin says that his neck is in better shape now than it has been in years, which is good to hear. He really was falling apart in 2003. He still looks ~6'1".

James says on 21/Jul/11
i don't get how he didn't lose hieght

Vegas says on 21/Jul/11
if anyone should have lost height it should have been austin, he has had both knees operated on a couple of times (he wore massive braces on both knees for the last 3 years of his run), had major back surgery and neck fusion surgery and of course was forced to retire at 39, the documentary mania of wrestlemania which was filmed in the days leading up to mania 19 really highlights how much his body was falling apart on him at that stage

tell-em says on 20/Jul/11
if he did lose height, it probably be 3 mm. a fraction is silly at 46. hes probly still 6'1". he looks it.

James says on 20/Jul/11
He did look 6'2 when he had a wrestling match against 6'7 Sid Eudy even though i don't think he was that tall.

maybe?
6ft.05 (184cm) today
6ft1 (185cm) peak

Alex says on 19/Jul/11
At 46 he could have def lost a fraction in height.

tell-em says on 19/Jul/11
he hasn't lost anything. and he isn't 50. hes 46. hes 6'1" then and now. the man has a huge crome dome. just look at it w/ mamun

tell-em says on 19/Jul/11
he hasn't lost anything. and he isn't 50. hes 46. hes 6'1" then and now. the man has a huge crome dome. just look at it w/ mamun

Mathew says on 18/Jul/11
Alex says on 13/Jul/11
6'1 peak Austin I can agree with. Today he looks slightly shorter. 184cm I think he would be.

Yeah, he's a legit 6'1" back in his prime. I have no idea if he's lost a bit, he's gotta be pushing 50 now so it's possible he's down a fraction. He was usually billed as 6'2", occasionally even 6'3" I think although I'm not sure. Anyways, his 6'1" claim is pretty much bang on.

James says on 18/Jul/11
I don't think Austin is over 6'1

Legend says on 17/Jul/11
This guy has the perfect male height pretty much.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 15/Jul/11
Would 187cm out of bed be possible, Rob?

Terryman says on 14/Jul/11
austin barrely egded out 1,82m miz and dolf zigler,at best he was 0,5in taller but maybe their shoes were thicker than his running shoes!

Alex says on 13/Jul/11
6'1 peak Austin I can agree with. Today he looks slightly shorter. 184cm I think he would be.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 12/Jul/11
Rob, what are the chances of Austin being over 6ft1?

James says on 29/Jun/11
shocked to see DDP return.... but yeah that video proves that diamon dallas page is no less than 6'4

Vegas says on 29/Jun/11
yeah and next to kofi kingston he barely looked taller than i did

Big Show says on 28/Jun/11
Speaking of Booker T, yesterday on RAW he looked easily 3 inches shorter than Diamond Dallas Page. Page might be in cowboy boots, but still.
Click Here

Sweep The Leg says on 26/Jun/11
he looks 6'1"... BUT I DONT KNOW WHY HE DOESNT LIE, OR HASNT BEEN UPGRADED ON HIS "BILLED HEIGHT" FOR WRESTLING 2 MORE INCHES LIKE THEY DO EVERYONE ELSE.

James says on 25/Jun/11
Yeah good chance JBL was 196cm peak

Terryman says on 23/Jun/11
Austin and JBl are solid proof that extensive neck and back surgery don't reduce that much in height! So:Austin 185cm peak 185cm today while JBL possibly 1,96m peak 1,94m today

Terryman says on 23/Jun/11
Austin and JBl are solid proof that extensive neck and back surgery don't reduce that much in height! So:Austin 185cm peak 185cm today while JBL possibly 1,96m peak 1,94m today

James says on 22/Jun/11
Cena and Austin are around the same height

Mathew says on 21/Jun/11
Austin is a little taller than Cena, I believe, rather than the other way around.

Legend says on 20/Jun/11
He's 6 feet according to what I'm seeing in this picture.

Vegas says on 20/Jun/11
imdb is a user edited site, same site has giant haystacks at 6'11 and i think by now enough evidence should have been posted on andres page to show he was never taller than 6'7

every site has kevin federline at 6ft, imdb has him at that 6ft too, guess john cena is really 6'3-6'4 so 7min mark Click Here

Alex says on 19/Jun/11
Booker T at 6'3 is crazy. LOL

Clay, really Austin 6'0.5 at his lowest? I'm not arguing 6'0.5 but maybe its more his midday height and by night hes 6'0-6'0 1/4. Cena may be 6'0.5 evening.

James says on 19/Jun/11
6'3 for booker t? Now i have heard it all.

Mamun says on 19/Jun/11
Vegas , Booker is listed every where even on I M D B . COM at 6' 3" ! I am sure his Excellency King ROB wasn't touched by the Andre story and gave him the 6' 2" listing after some research .

Regards

SUPERMUN

Mathew says on 18/Jun/11
I always saw this guy as a legit 6'1". He is very close to Booker T in height.

Clay says on 18/Jun/11
Steve has on boots but he isn't standing as straight as Mamun either as he could care less about his height for the pic. I he did thats another CM gained at least.

Still I wouldn't go under a solid 6'0.5 evening for him.

Vegas says on 18/Jun/11
austin and booker were extremely close in height whenever the too were together on wwe tv back in the early 00s, not sure how mamun saw booker at 6'3, i think he probably gave him the extra 2 inches because he said nice things about andre :D

Big Show says on 18/Jun/11
Alex says on 17/Jun/11
Clay, thats true Austin looks very close in height to Booker T comparing the pics with Mamun but Mamun did say Austin had boots on in their pic.

Austin looked slightly taller than Booker T in a backstage segment on Smackdown back in 2011 Click Here
Although with those shoulder-mounted cameras you never know, but Austin was lookin' down at Booker T most of the segment and Booker T was lookin' up.

Alex says on 17/Jun/11
Clay, thats true Austin looks very close in height to Booker T comparing the pics with Mamun but Mamun did say Austin had boots on in their pic.

James says on 17/Jun/11
Vegas says on 16/Jun/11
James says on 15/Jun/11
Austin might have been 185cm in the 90's. He looks to have lost around 1 inch since then
________________

i don't think he has, he looks same height next to everyone recently, the rock at mania being the obvious one

wwe have now three nfl combine barefoot measured guys on their roster (at least that i know of and can find results), andy leavine was measured 6'4.75 barefoot at the combine Click Here andy with vince last week Click Here

Austins head looks higher than the NFL guys eye level so in comparison Austin looks 186cm or at worst 185cm........

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 16/Jun/11
Austin is just over 6ft1

Vegas says on 16/Jun/11
James says on 15/Jun/11
Austin might have been 185cm in the 90's. He looks to have lost around 1 inch since then
________________

i don't think he has, he looks same height next to everyone recently, the rock at mania being the obvious one

wwe have now three nfl combine barefoot measured guys on their roster (at least that i know of and can find results), andy leavine was measured 6'4.75 barefoot at the combine Click Here andy with vince last week Click Here

James says on 15/Jun/11
Austin might have been 185cm in the 90's. He looks to have lost around 1 inch since hten

Clay says on 14/Jun/11
Alex says on 8/Jun/11
I would say Austin is 6'0 and Cena is more like 6'0 1/2.

Austin is over 6'0 IMO. He's extremely close with Booker T next to amun at least.

James says on 13/Jun/11
looks 6'2 here compared to Pysco Sid. Big wrestling boots?
Click Here

James says on 10/Jun/11
Danimal says on 9/Jun/11
James says on 7/Jun/11
i think taker has not lost much height as hogan yet.

The only wrestler who has lost more height than Hogan is Piper (6'1.5" down to 5'9"). Billy Graham has as well. All due to multiple surgeries..

Yes but hogans height loss might be exzzagerated becuase he might have been more 6'5 than 6'6 at his peak.

Today Hogan does not look over 6'3. Even 6'3.5 is too much for him these days.

so maybe

6'5 (196cm) peak
6'2.75 (190cm) today

Danimal says on 9/Jun/11
James says on 7/Jun/11
i think taker has not lost much height as hogan yet.

The only wrestler who has lost more height than Hogan is Piper (6'1.5" down to 5'9"). Billy Graham has as well. All due to multiple surgeries..

James says on 8/Jun/11
i must say rob van damne looked not over 5'11 when he made an appearence at the 2009 Royal Rumble.

Alex says on 8/Jun/11
I would say Austin is 6'0 and Cena is more like 6'0 1/2.

Alex says on 8/Jun/11
I would say Austin is 6'0 and Cena is more like 6'0 1/2.

Vegas says on 7/Jun/11
meant hogan and taker obviously, a list of wwe injuries between 2001 and 2010 Click Here no mention of neck surgery for taker there more detailed Click Here

prior to 2001 taker had surgery, september 1999 groin surgery, feb 2000, torn pectoral muscle, out of action till may 2000, october 2000 gallblader surgery october 2000 out till november 2000

neck surgery would have kept him out the best part of year anyway like austin, angle, rhyno, lita, benoit and he was never out that long

James says on 7/Jun/11
i think taker has not lost much height as hogan yet.

Vegas says on 7/Jun/11
austin and taker didn't have neck surgery, at least there is zero evidence online that they did

Danimal says on 6/Jun/11
Chief Wannadubie says on 31/May/11
Stone Cold was on the radio out here in the Bay Area back when he was promoting The Condemned. One of the interviewers commented on how massive he is, and guessed his height (he guessed high, but I don't recall what). He said that he used to be 6'1", but since his neck surgery he is 6 foot flat. His words.

Hogan AND Taker both lost height due to neck surgery as well.

Danimal says on 6/Jun/11
Alex says on 6/Jun/11
I just saw the clip of Austin and Cena on Tough Enough. Austin looks a bit taller when they shake hands due the angle I think. Both are probably the same in height.

Yeah, I think Austin is around 6'0". He probably came out taller than Cena because Austin tends to wear big army/construction boots almost all the time.

TELLEM says on 6/Jun/11
lol. due to the angle. i've said it time and time again. austin is a legit 6'1". hes always been taller than cena.

Legend says on 6/Jun/11
I like Steve Austin. I just wish he didn't drink as much. He seems like a really cool guy.

Alex says on 6/Jun/11
I just saw the clip of Austin and Cena on Tough Enough. Austin looks a bit taller when they shake hands due the angle I think. Both are probably the same in height.

Alex says on 6/Jun/11
Teddy, they are very close to the exact same height but Cena I thought was a smidge taller. I agree Austin was prob 6'1 at his peak but due to injuries more 6'0 or so now. Can you post the video with Cena and Austin.

James says on 6/Jun/11
i sometimes think cena can look 6ft max

Teddy says on 4/Jun/11
Alex, cena is shorter than austin just go watch the tough enough episode where austin and cena are close to each other. cena is 6'0 max and austin is 6'05 max. (after is injury that is, b4 I actually believe that 6'1 in 98 was accurate for austin)

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 4/Jun/11
187cm morning
186cm afternoon
185cm evening

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 4/Jun/11
187cm morning
186cm afternoon
185cm evening

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 3/Jun/11
There are three factors that need to be considered.
1. He's bald so when he's standing next to people of similiar stature full head of hair he can appear shorter.
2. He's always leaning to one side or bending his head forward when he's confronting someone.
3. The guy weighs about 250lbs and about as wide as a truck and so his massive frame can make him look shorter.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 2/Jun/11
This what I think

Barefoot 186cm
Normal shoes 188-189cm
Boots 190cm

Vegas says on 2/Jun/11
austins probably taller now than back in the mid 1990s (due to better posture), back then his neck was causing him great distress, when he had his neck fusion his doctor claimed his neck would be stronger than before his injury, 4th paragraph down Click Here

you rarely see austin holding his head to one side last few years

James says on 2/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 1/Jun/11
Sorry James but I disagree.

Might have been 188cm in boots back in 1998