said on 23/Nov/23
Rob, we back in business?
Yes, apologies for not being able to do comments again.
said on 23/Nov/23
Next to 6ft 4.5 listed Armie Hammer and 5ft 11.5 listed Justin Timberlake: Click Here
Easy six inches between Hammer and Garfield, and at least an inch between Timberlake and Garfield. Bit more than three inches between Eisenberg and Garfield.
Again with Hammer: Click Here
Since Hammer might as well be a bit below 6ft 4.5, Garfield at 5ft 10.5 really is the highest I'd go. Don't think he'd ever drop below 5ft 10 though, even at an absolute low.
Abdu-5'10" said on 27/Sep/23
Andrew deserves a 5’10 5/8 listing or a 5’10 3/4 listing. Have you considered to give him a slight upgrade for his height?
Abdul 5'10 said on 16/Sep/23
185.4cm Elais said on 10/Sep/23
Honestly, these comments about "insane proportions" that makes Garfield look over 6 foot is nonsense and sounds ridiculous. Looks like any other slim or skinny guy with a fine or good posture like whats so different about him, Garfield doesnt even have a small head that would make him look taller but vise versa lol, his thick hair makes his head looks relatively big for his proportions. I get it, fine proportions yes. But "insane proportions that make him look over 6'0" is just absolutely ridiculous sugercoating.
said on 8/Sep/23
What’s his eye level height? Around 5’5 1/2?
Somewhere around there.
said on 14/May/23
Rob, how tall he looks with Benedict Cumberbatch and Jon Bernthal ?
Could be almost 5ft 11
James (179cm) Jones said on 6/May/23
5'10.5 for bedtime height. I don't think he dips below that for bed...
James (179cm) Jones said on 6/May/23
I think he's 5'10.75, and 5'10.5 at a low.
Verisimilitude Trumps Precaution said on 1/May/23
Definitely looks like a 179.5 guy & has all the proportions of 6’er, but falls just a bit short thanks to his torso. I wouldn’t be surprised if him and Jake Paul were height twins barefoot
James G. said on 24/Apr/23
GERAD HOKJH said on 13/Apr/23
His proportions look like a guy 6ft+ guy. He’s barely above the average Hollywood male actor height.
said on 20/Mar/23
Rob, how tall does Andrew look next to Chris, taking into account that Andrew is slouching a bit and that both of them have similar footwear?
5'10-Abdul. said on 6/Mar/23
I would be of a very similar height to Andrew .
udo said on 3/Mar/23
This is ridiculous, his proportions are insane. I'm 179 myself and even though I have a very similar build to Garfield, I never look as tall as he does.
It makes me consider if Andrew really is a flat 5'11.
5'7 and a fraction
said on 25/Feb/23
He can sometimes look the same height as 5'11 1/2 Justin Timberlake for some reason.
Not saying he is that tall though. Rob's listing is pretty solid.
James Matthews said on 24/Feb/23
said on 4/Feb/23
Rob, how tall he looks with Wyatt russell?
Could pass for 5ft 11 with him.
Abdulrahman said on 31/Jan/23
berta said on 7/Jan/23
179 or 180
Jolapizza 6'0 5/8 said on 16/Oct/22
His slim frame gives him a tall illusion. Before, I tought he was like 6 feet in the movies. But 5'10 1/2 is a good listing. He was around 3 inches taller than Tobey Maguire in no way Home.
5'7 and a fraction said on 1/Oct/22
The listed height here is fine. Wouldn't have said any taller.
Malcolm Oliver said on 24/Aug/22
When you’re this height with good proportions, you can fool a lot of people. He can look a good inch or two above what he actually is.
This listing is alright, but wouldn’t argue against a quarter inch (maybe even a half inch) upgrade either.
hurricanebrat said on 23/Aug/22
He said 'about 6 feet' on the Wtf with Marc Maron podcast recently
Psuedo said on 15/Aug/22
Deserves upgrade to even 5’10 5/8 or 5’10 3/4, as I doubt he ever drops below 179 at night.
Most Legit 6'3 said on 12/Aug/22
Like me, he is quite lanky and it makes him look over 6’. So like how I get guessed at 6’5-6 despite being 6’3, he’ll be guessed at 6’-6’1 despite being a weak 5’11.
5'11Kid said on 12/Aug/22
This dude has really good proportions. I would actually think he’s around 6’0” if I saw him and didn’t know who he was.
said on 11/Jul/22Click Here
There is no way he looks 5’10.5 here…
Matt99 said on 6/Jul/22
5’10.75 seems possible, 5’10.5 is the absolute least he’d be.
said on 2/Jul/22
Rob, what abt 5"10¾ ? He certainly does look that most of the times.
Well, it's an option...
Enthusiasmpro said on 18/May/22
5’10 ½” seems about right. He’s almost 5’11” but very weak.
Josh Jeffords said on 13/May/22
Impossible he is under 510plus listing.
Funny ten days older than me and an la born brit?
Heightist9999 said on 16/Apr/22
You wouldn't be surprised if he measured 5ft 11 flat.
mnecro said on 6/Apr/22
Looks sub 5'10" with Jesse Eisenberg. There's no way he has 6cm on rob, more like 4.
Crazy that people here want him to be upgraded to 5'11".
TJE said on 5/Apr/22
Great find. Proves Andrew's no taller than this listing. Jamie's swaggering and slouching pretty hard and Andrew can barely measure up. It's funny cuz everyone wants Jamie to be 5'9 and Andrew to be 5'11+.
Happily5.7 said on 1/Apr/22
What about 5"10¾ , rob he does appear 5"11 ish and even with Jamie dornan he does seem to slightly be taller and if I had to bet on who might edge the other, I would bet on Andrew cause he does seem to edge him by a ¼ of an inch.
Jake Aughey said on 1/Apr/22
Looked a solid 3-5 cm smaller than zendaya at the Oscar’s, although she’s in heels.
said on 28/Mar/22
Garfield and Dornan are pretty much neck and neck in height: Click Here
They are definitely reaching 6’ territory with the footwear, if not at it already.
said on 26/Mar/22
He doesn’t appear shorter than Eddie Rednayne, who is 5’11ish”:
With Bradley Cooper:
With Adam Driver and Liam Neeson:
172 said on 25/Mar/22
Nah andrew's actually 175cm. 5ft 9 gives a really tall impression.
Getlikes666 said on 23/Mar/22
Andrew has to be the tallest 5’10 person I’ve ever seen. His long neck and slender body frame makes him look 6 ft.
said on 22/Mar/22
Here are other pictures since the last link is broken:
(go to 2nd slide for comparison w/ 5’11 actor)
The more I look at it, he does look this listing next to Lee Jung-jae, but can look at most 5’11. That’s the highest I’d guess him at.
said on 21/Mar/22
Garfield is the epitome of polarizing when it comes to short vs. tall. You have 179 celebrities who don't "look" tall and the measurement itself is
somewhat average-above average (depending on your definition). But not
“tall tall” or “towering tall.” Andrew has that look where he looks it by himself, but when you see him next to others, his 5'10.5 listing starts to
Though a recent pic in question makes me wonder if 5’10.75 or 5’11 would be better fit: Click Here
(next to 5’11 Lee Jung-jae)
said on 18/Mar/22
With Armie Hammer:
How tall does he appear?
I'd give another half inch to him there as I think the pose is slightly worse...still I think 179 is the lowest I would go.
said on 14/Mar/22
Interesting to see him by Benedict Cumberbatch, his fellow slender Brit and lanky looking guy without being especially tall. You could say Cumberbatch pulls off a weak inch higher but hard for the bigger head of Cumberbatch to overcome Garfield neck length. Click Here
CodyChris said on 12/Mar/22
no way he is under 180CM .... he always looked like a super tall guy to me, he has a 6' face and long legs !!!
CodyChris said on 12/Mar/22
no way he is under 180CM .... he always looked like a tall guy to me
Blair (177) said on 9/Mar/22
I’d give him 5’10.75”. He can pull of looking 5’11” a lot of the time
Darthvader said on 5/Mar/22
Wow, he must be one of the tallest looking sub 6’ guys. I know he’s in the 5’10-511” range but standing alone his proportions make him look like he is 6’1”-6’2”. But I’m think he’s like 5’10.75”.
Tormod Brandal said on 1/Mar/22
The pictures from the No way home filming makes me reconsider both Andrew and Tobey's heights. If Tom really is 5'6.5, tobey has shrunk atleast 1/4 inch. Andrew also looks about 5 inches taller than Tom without even standing straight. Needs a small upgrade.
TJE said on 28/Feb/22
5'10.5 is fine. He can look 5'11 with Mel Gibson, but barely clears 5'10 with Jesse Eisenberg, who's no taller than his listing on here and stands pretty loosely to boot.
Decently Big said on 28/Feb/22
He needs an upgrade. Look at the BTS footage between him, Tom and Tobey. He towers above them so easily, almost looking like a 6 ft guy barefoot. 5’11 is spot on. Let him have it, Rob.
Slim 6'0.25 said on 27/Feb/22
Slim 6'0.25 said on 27/Feb/22
Tall Sam said on 24/Feb/22
Could be deserving of a 5’10.75” listing, he did just edged out a smidge by Justin Timberlake.
said on 24/Feb/22
Definitely 5’11. Standing next to Jake Gyllenhall he looks the same height, if not taller. Click Here
said on 15/Feb/22
With Garrett Hedlund, who is a weak 6’2”:
Andrew Garfield could be 5’10 3/4”.
Respectfully Tall said on 6/Feb/22
Give him the 5 ft 11, Rob. He deserves it.
2CVO said on 29/Jan/22
Tall Sam- For tick tick boom I think he’s supposed to look taller than he is. Jonathan Larson was pretty tall - I’m not sure how tall but I heard an interview where his sister described him as a tall guy. (And his death was from an aortic dissection, rumored to be complications of undiagnosed Marfan syndrome - a characteristic of which is taller height). I assume some of the casting deliberately added to that effect. Robin De Jesus is clearly a short man, etc.
And, like you say, Tobey Maguire, Tom Holland, and Jacob Batalon are all shorter than average, and Zendaya exaggerates her height. All combines to make Andrew appear really tall.
But in the case of TTB at least, I think it was intentional.
Rob, can we get a listing for Robin De Jesus by any chance? Googling has gotten results between 5’6” and 5’10” (lol!). I think he’s about 5’4” but was curious.
Matt99 said on 17/Jan/22
I believe this is his lowest height, he can certainly pull off 5’11.
Eusebiu - 6'1" (185 cm) said on 17/Jan/22
In all of his movies, he gives the impression of a tall guy, especially when compared to his Spider-Man co-stars who measure in the average height range.
Justin Timberlake (listed 182 cm) is slightly taller than Andrew, there is max. 2 cm between them - and sometimes Andrew looks the same height as Justin, just check the photos of them together.
Also, Andrew gives a taller impression then most 179 cm listed guys.
From my point of view, I think it is safe to say that he can get away with an upgrade to 180 cm.
said on 15/Jan/22
Rob,How tall Andrew looks with Jamie Foxx ?
Anywhere from 1 to 2 inches range.
said on 11/Jan/22
Rob,Who would you give the edge between Andrew Garfield and Michael B Jordan ?
There might be a greater chance of Garfield having the edge when it came to measuring under the stadiometer.
Tall Sam said on 6/Jan/22
Recently watched No Way Hone and tick tick BOOM and he’s definitely one of the tallest looking actors at his only slightly over average heights. A lot has to do with his long slender neck and his co-stars in both are generally rather short but I could see how somebody could be fooled into thinking him a six footer or something. In the later film, Garfield looked rather tall even in a random crowd in a subway scene.
Jake Aughey said on 2/Jan/22
He looks so talk standing on his own then looks bang average beside people, so confusing
Ian Momo 'Questionable 5'10' said on 1/Jan/22
he often pull 5'11 looks oftenly, tho if google listed him as 179 cm, and looks like it, then there's no doubt about it, although i think he could be measured as 179,5-180 cm on a good day.
Big Nick said on 26/Dec/21
He's a 5'11" guy, there's no doubt about it. He has the exact proportions most guys I've seen at that height do and he towers above his 5'6" and 5'7" "dimensional counterparts" in that one new movie he's in. I think Rob should consider giving him an upgrade. He's an easy 5'11" and most 5'10" don't pass as tall as he does.
2CVO said on 26/Dec/21
Andrew really drives home how short most leading men are because he looks so, so tall. And yet he’s not.
Balrog said on 25/Dec/21
Closer to 5'11" than 5'10". He was eye to eye with Timberlake in the Social Network. No way there is an inch between them.
Evan Soloway said on 19/Dec/21
looks 5'11 with 'cough cough cough cough' that 5'6 1/2 guy who he is *maybe* in a movie with.. ;)
said on 18/Dec/21
Rob, why is he listed at 179cm on the web if it's his very lowest. I think most of the day he is about 180, am I wrong?
Yeah he might be 5ft 10.75
5 ft 9 dude said on 16/Dec/21
5'10 Dude said on 30/Nov/21
He's no less than 5'10½. Possibly a tiny bit over it I'd say. Did he claim 6'1 though? If so that's a straight up lie. His proportions and hair however do make him look quite tall.
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 30/Nov/21
He looks 5’11” by Vince Vaughn. I would have expected him to look smaller by him if he was 5’10”.
said on 28/Nov/21
@berta: Rob did say the boots Mel was wearing look like they could be small elevator boots: Click Here Click Here
As he said, it's tough to tell with a Chelsea style, but there's definitely a good footwear advantage between them either way since Garfield's sneakers are flat. Mel's boots aren't as thick as the cowboy boots he usually wore until 2015, but they still have a nice heel on them. The height difference at that event could vary as well and can look like as much as 1.5" or sometimes closer to 3 cm. Part of that is probably because Mel tends to stand straight while Garfield's posture can be loose.
I don't know if Mel had lost a small fraction by 2016, but he can look as low as 174 and as high as 175 cm with Garfield considering footwear. Peak, I'm pretty sure Mel was about 5'9" flat or 175 to 175.5 cm. By 2016, it's possible he had shrunk a small amount and was 5'8.75" barefoot.
said on 25/Nov/21
Rob,have you seen pics of him and Jamie dornan ?
Yeah,they are pretty close
berta said on 18/Nov/21
2,5-3 taller than gibson and gibson have 1,5 cm more shoe. My guess is that there is 4 cm beetween them at the time. garfield 179,5 and gibson 175,5 or 176 is probably what they would measure.
ppc said on 14/Nov/21
Just say you're 5'11, who cares about rounding half an inch. I rarely hear anyone ever claim half an inch in their height.. unless you are talking about discussions on here
said on 13/Nov/21
With Vince Vaughn:
said on 4/Oct/21
Looks pretty tall but his frame does help. I have a very similar frame to him and am around 5’10.5 but most people guess me at 6 ft.
Rob, if I’m 5’10.75 an hour after I wake, 5’10.5 around 12.30 pm and never drop below 5’10.25 in the eve then what height can I claim?
Started to say I’m 5’10.5 or sometimes 5’10.75 but rarely have claimed 5’11.
Going with 179cm or 5ft 10.5 seems perfectly fine.
ViperPilot said on 6/Sep/21
More like 5’ 9 1/2”. The poofed-up hair is deceptive.
Slim 6'1.5" said on 24/Aug/21
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 24/Aug/21
Andrew looked every bit of Rob's listed 5ft10.5 in the Red Riding Trilogy, a strong one at that. He's only 38, so no way could he have suffered any height loss.
In fact, I'm going to give him 5ft10.75, knowing full well that his lean physique makes him look taller, but I did originally gauge him as a 5ft11-er when I first saw him act. 🎭
said on 23/Aug/21
@Rob, Is 178cm possible for Andrew Garfield ?
Don't think I would guess him that short.
IJWKDKDK123 said on 30/Jul/21
How much do you reckon he weighs in the Spider-Man movies Rob? Under 150?
said on 4/Apr/21
Rob would you say Garfield is a guy who wears lifts? It wouldn’t make much sense if he does since 5’ 10 1/2” is not short at all, in fact I remember when I was that height and I felt like I was taller than most people.
doesn't seem the kind of guy to wear lifts.
Pianotruffles said on 24/Mar/21
How does he look so tall?
Dom5'11.5 said on 24/Feb/21
Nice slim proportions makes him look tall when he is alone but when he stands with others such as emma stone he doesn't look that tall, he is obviously average height
Genau 5ft9 7/8
said on 11/Feb/21
Rob could he have measured 6ft1 accounting for his hair
Shoes an d hair yeah
johnnysidgursson said on 28/Jan/21
Seems taller at the first impression, His long neck and good posture make it look like 6-6'1
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 11/Jan/21
Did he seriously claim 6’1? Nearly as bad as Jake Paul! If 5’10.5 guys claim 6’2 I’m gonna have to start telling people I’m 6’5
bird in box said on 10/Jan/21
179cm guy with the look of a 6 feet guy.
Hyper said on 7/Dec/20
Like someone said, Spider Man is listed 5’10”. Andrew Garfield being at least 5’10.5” is perfectly fine. It’s different from Tyler, who’s listed 5’11.75”, plays Superman on a tv show (Superman is listed 6’3”).
Hyper said on 7/Dec/20
Truthfully, he gives a taller impression than someone like Jake Paul.
His lankiness and proportions made me thought he was 5’11”.
He never looks short, even when he is shorter than many 6’0”ers.
Cooler said on 1/Dec/20
He has always given me 6’ vibes. Interesting to see him at 5’10 but I believe it.
said on 3/Nov/20
Rob, maybe 5'10 5/8", if you weren't limiting the 1/8ths measurements?
5ft 10.5-10.75, it may well turn out a range Garfield could measure
said on 18/Oct/20
What are the chances he's closer to 5'11 than 510.5. He gives a taller impression.
5ft 10.5 would be lowest I'd guess, but I can see almost 5ft 11 at times for him.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 20/Aug/20
🎂🎁🎊🎈 Happy Birthday Andrew 🎈🎊🎁🎂
Wishing Andrew Garfield a Very Happy 37th Birthday today!
Ha ha! I remembered his height from when I last wrote on his page! 🤓😇
Peter175 said on 14/Aug/20
maybe 5'11 at a push not 6ft at all let alone 6'1"
Endrit Bajrami said on 10/Aug/20
I never met him personally or seen him , but I am slightly obsessed with his height specifically , I strongly came to conclusion that he is 5’11” 180cm
BT said on 9/Aug/20
Agree with the average guess. 5'10 5/8 would be a good listing for Andrew.
6footTom said on 23/Jul/20
We don't know if he actuaally claimed that mark. Even then, it's not really THAT ridiculous. I remember when I was still a bit over 5'11" in high school and people constantly guessed me at 6'1"-6'2". I've also met a few people who claimed to be 6'1" but were only around Garfield's height. My guess is maybe some people guessed him at 6'1" due to his proportions and he just sort of went along with it since or he measured himself in shoes and added in his thick hair which would make him close to 6'1".
6footTom said on 20/Jul/20
Not at all. Spider-Man is actually listed at 5'10" in the Marvel comics database, which would make Garfield the closest Spider-Man actor to match the character's height.
Cathy Wu said on 16/Jun/20
Rob, would you say his morning height is 180.5cm given that we shrink on average 1.5-1.6cm throughout the day?
Ronaldo 185.5cm said on 11/Jun/20
@Vexacus yeah but its ridiculous that he CLAIMED that, he is way off
FMExTREME said on 8/Jun/20
In the film 'The Social Network' he came across as a strong 6 footer and and looked taller than Justin Timberlake who is listed taller on this site, in the Spiderman films he looked close to if not 6ft so it was a surprise coming here to see him in the 5'10 range, he does have a proportion and shape of someone that's minimum 6 ft so it can be an illusion but I'll give him 5'11 minimum just by going on how he compares to other actors.
Vexacus said on 22/Apr/20
6'1 is not that ridiculous . Garfield's body proportions and weight could trick you if he's standing alone like in the picture above. I think he's about 5'11.
said on 4/Apr/20
Can’t believe he claimed 6’1. Rob, what the most ridiculous claimed height vs real height you’ve seen a celeb claim?
I still think [6-foot-1] has been inserted into the quote by the journalist writing the article.
I don't know if he claimed the mark.
Nik said on 20/Feb/20
He probably thinks I'm around his real height!
5ft 11 7/8 in said on 14/Feb/20
He is the tallest Spider-Man, like spider-man's character on PS4 who is 5ft 10in too
Jkiller said on 8/Feb/20
Seems a perfect 179cm.
ASG said on 22/Nov/19
He’s got the legs of a 6’0-6’1 guy, but the torso of a 5’8 guy. Which why he evens out at 5’10.5. But if you include footwear and hair, he’s easily 6’0
Nik Ashton said on 1/Nov/19
I have seen him listed as 6’0” on an online site!
Jordan87 said on 29/Oct/19
LOL @ 6'1" Claim. Christ lol
TheBat said on 9/Oct/19
That's a pipe dream if Andrew claimed 6'1". Definitely a strong 5'10".
Henri_Plonk said on 20/Sep/19
Rob, could you add the British actor Tom Sturridge please? I believe he is friends with folk like Garfield, Redmayne, Pattinson ect and was in movies like on the read and the boat that rocked. Thanks!
said on 29/Aug/19
Rob, so if a person can lose a full inch through the day, what part of that inch would you say they could fairly claim as their height? Or would you say none at all and go with the lowest measurement? Thanks
It varies between people, there are some who like claiming morning, others go with whatever figure they get measured at, others who might know they shrink an inch go with the value in the middle...others the lowest maybe they don't like claiming a height to which they fall under.
Personally I think if you go with a height you measure after 4-6 hours of being awak, that's reasonable.
said on 21/Aug/19
Rob, how tall do you think this bloke wakes up? 5'11.5 or 5'11.25?
anywhere admist that range could be possible.
Kimblemur said on 6/Aug/19
6’1 claim is ludicrous, 5’10 1/2
mini golf kid said on 24/Jul/19
5 foot 10.5 is already tall and he is really lanky, giving that 6 foot 'look'. Why the hell does he need to inflate his height to 6 foot 1. God.
said on 17/Jul/19
Rob, now that I measured 178.7cm after roughly 7 pretty active hours out of bed under a stadiometer by a doctor would you say Andrew and I might be the exact same height. I measured 179.9 (they said 180 but I took a quick look it looked maybe 179.9 but I'm not sure it might've been flat 180) under a stadiometer after only 2 hours out of bed.
In photos, you both have similar hair so it would be hard to tell any difference really. I can see why andrew gets estimated at 5ft 11, because sometimes he has looked it.
andrew jones said on 8/Jul/19
Must be pretty insecure to be claiming 2.5 inches taller
said on 5/Jul/19
Is his eye-level below 170cm?
Well below that!
Jammes said on 28/Jun/19
Do people read comics? Peter Parker is usually 5'10 and has usually been drawn good looking even the 90s cartoon hes good looking. Like others say Wolverine is the short underdog so casting somebody a foot taller kinda kills his character
179cm guy said on 28/Jun/19
Rob, when you say that Andrew's eye-chin is smaller than average, does that mean that he has a slightly bigger eye-top of head versus eye-chin? So if his head isn't over nine inches does that mean that his eye-top of head is 4.75 inches long and his eye-chin is 4.25 inches long? Or is it the other way around?
said on 13/Jun/19
Rob, he is standing barefoot next to a barefoot Corden here at 2:43 Click Here
What do you think? Is that a 3 inch difference?
Could be around 2.5 inches, wouldn't have thought a full 3 though.
Jesse5ft11 said on 12/Jun/19
6footTom spider-man shall not be small in stature in order to be an relatable uderdog, he always should be above average height, if people want a small underdog superhero then there is Wolverine, if Spider-Man is 5’10 then he is indeed 5’10, has always been and always will be in that height range.
said on 1/Jun/19
Rob, do you think he has a longer than average neck? I think he gets that 0.5 inch just from his neck...
Yes I'd say a bit longer than average, with smaller head size too.
6footTom said on 1/Jun/19
I think that impression comes from the idea of Spider-Man's image as the relatable underdog in pop culture. Being smaller in stature would fit that image fairly well.
179 said on 11/May/19
Tbh he looks like someone 6’1” but if he’s 179 and claims 6’1” then that’s stupid
DJ5ft9 said on 6/Apr/19
@Klapperschlangensindgeil21 Why does height matter? That didn’t stop hugh jackman making a fantastic wolverine, and last time i checked wolverine is supposed to be 5’3 while hugh jackman is only 6’3,
Kaine193cm said on 28/Mar/19
@Bobby 178cm its just mostly ignorant people on online who only know’s Spider-Man from the movie’s, act like they know the source material’s. Heck they even complained that Andrew Garfield was too skinny to play Spider-Man. If that doesn’t scream ignorant i don’t know what it is.
Bobby 178cm said on 20/Mar/19
If you knew about the source material, you would know that traditional Adult Spider-Man, who Andrew Garfield portrayed, has been 5'10 since 1962. Garfield was well within that range to portray Spider-Man. I don't know where this idea of a small Spider-Man came from, but he's anything but that.
JD 5'9" said on 18/Jan/19
Just a lanky 5'10" guy. Looks tallish standing on his own, but when standing with other people or in a crowd. He looks extremely average.
6feet heller said on 5/Jan/19
Andrew looks 6 feet mainly beacuse of how lean and skinny he looks.
I feel kinda bad for andrew was fired playing as spider-man he had alot of potential if he had better screen writers and an director, lots of people hated him as spider-man beacuse apperently he was too good looking and not nerdy enough, too cool to play spider-man and im like omg who honestly care’s, no one complained that Hugh Jackman was too tall, handsome, too much of a pretty boy to play wolverine who is supposed to be short, ugly, stocky, and (most of all) ridiculously hairy superhero.
But yet people say he is the perfect guy to play wolverine, ignoring the fact that he is too tall and too attractive to play wolverine, but no one care’s, yet people make’s a big deal of andrew being too pretty to play spider-man/peter parker, goes to show how biased people were to andrew beacuse he wasn’t the one people grew up with in the ealy 2000s, its perfectly clear that andrew garfield would be much more loved as spider-man if he was casted before tobey maguire, thats a fact, imagine how many people would dislike hugh jackman to play as wolverine if he wasn’t the first actor to play wolverine,
if the they got an actor who played wolverine before hugh who was actually short ugly and stocky, the way the character is supposed to be? i guarantee It that people would complain and dislike hugh jackman as wolverine beacuse he isn’t like the character he is supposed to be?
Clover said on 13/Dec/18
Just saw "Under the Sliver Lake". There is a scene Andrew Garfield is walking with Grace Van Patten. If she is 5'7", then he cannot be 5'10.5".
said on 10/Dec/18
What would you say his inseam is Rob?
Might be 31.5 inch
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 26/Nov/18
Out of bed: 181.5 CM tall
Before bed: 179.3-4 CM tall
He never appears to be shorter than this by other celebrities, with him frequently appearing to be 180-181 CM tall by them. He easily appears to be 6’2”-6’3” in stand-alone shots as well due to his lean-muscular build, an inch and a half of hair, short face and long(ish) legs. He could even be 5’10 3/4”-7/8”.
Junior Hernandez 1990
said on 19/Oct/18
Rob, do you think Andrew Garfield could be 180cm?
I think at times he has looked that tall, but for the moment I feel between 5ft 10 and 11 is likely.
James B 172cm said on 15/Oct/18
6ft1? HA HA HA HA
Benn said on 11/Oct/18
Tbh he can look quite tall because he's slender and has good proportions.
said on 3/Oct/18
Rob, he seems to have a tiny head. Is bis head size below 9 inches?
Yeah I wouldn't have thought over 9 inches mainly because eye-chin is smaller than average for Andrew.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 7/Sep/18
I atually start seeing Andrew at 5'11 but i think 5'10 3/4 would be higher chances. Jamie Fox is probably not under 5'9 1/2 and Emma Stone is about 5'5 3/4. Btw Jesse Eisenberg listed height was clearly a joke next to Rob, Jess look 5'6 3/4 at most and look it next to Andrew.
said on 1/Sep/18
Rob, is there any chance you could meet him in any event?
I would say there is a smaller chance of that happening.
Jake is 5'9" said on 31/Aug/18
He got downgraded to 5'10" flat on Google.
Tod Charming said on 30/Aug/18
Legit 5'11. Even taller with his hair!
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 17/Aug/18
Atually he can look 180ish. Not sure if he could measure it. Hoping Rob met him upon comic-con somedays..
Warren said on 14/Aug/18
Rising - 174 cm
said on 1/Aug/18
@MAD SAM: If that's the difference then it means Mel has a big footwear advantage or he's going on his toes/standing straighter. You can see at the Hacksaw Ridge photocall in Venice that Garfield in 0.7" type sneakers is still clearly taller than Mel in 1.5" cowboy-type boots: Click Here
If you click the image, you can zoom in and really see footwear. Mel wore elevators to the red carpet premiere at that same festival. If Mel is still close to 5'9" then Garfield can't really be shorter than listed.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 16/Jul/18
5'10 5/8 (179.4) a little chance.
HonestSlovene said on 8/Jul/18
6'1", just lol, he's a decent 5'10".
said on 22/Jun/18
He’s slightly (0.5-1cm) taller to Mel Gibson
, he awkwardly looks tall cause he’s really skinny, 179 cm seems right
Andrea said on 15/May/18
I'm not sure he's really claiming to be 6'1 in that interview, though, Tunman. I mean, never say never with these celebrities, but I think that that 6'1 figure simply comes from the interviewer...
Edimar184 said on 14/May/18
Tunman said on 13/May/18
lol at 6'1.if anything he looks 1" taller than Keira Knightley in her heels,in fact he looks similar to her in many pics though they must be deceiving.5'10.5"is the max and wouldn't rule out something closer to 5'10.
He's certainly in the top 10 most wanted by the height police.He will hardly escape even if he finds a trick with his hairstyle or posture.
Obviously there is always a chance to bribe some officers like Bieber (who was listed 5'9)
said on 7/May/18
Rob, who would you give a better chance for almost 5'11" (5'10.75") Andrew Garfield or Michael B Jordan?
Maybe Michael has a greater chance of being closer to 5ft 11 than Andrew.
Matt99 said on 4/May/18
His proportions make him look shorter, I was watching the amazing Spider-Man and when he was wearing casual clothes he looked 5’9-10 range max! Sometimes I think the 5’10/5’10.25 listing wouldn’t be unreasonable.
Smiles03 said on 1/May/18
Guest66 said on 30/Apr/18
@Lawrence, he looks almost 6’1 to you relatively to who or what ? How you can tell how tall he is from a stand alone photo ? It doesn’t tell you much about his size apart from him being skinny, just put someone who is legitimately 6’1 next to him and see how he looks.
Leno said on 28/Apr/18
He is very slim, has a lot of hair and a good/great posture, Wich makes him look taller than he is, but he is a solidv179 cm guy.
Yht said on 26/Apr/18
Lawrence said on 25/Apr/18
Idk know about this listing Rob, he does look almost 6'1 in this photo. And in the movie 99 Homes he looked only 3" shorter than 6'3.5" -6'4" michael shannon (who is listed here on CelebHeights at almost 6'4"
berta said on 29/Mar/18
i wonder if he really claimed 6 foot 1 thats just insane.
Nik said on 26/Mar/18
I dunno, maybe 5'10.75"!
Peter175 said on 26/Mar/18
He really claims 6'1?? He's not a notch above 5'10 imo (albiet a strong one)
even said on 14/Mar/18
5'10.5" , 150 to 160 pounds
said on 6/Feb/18
Rob, would you like to measure Andrew? He sometimes looks 5'10 flat, other times 5'11 flat. He is tricky.
If you had to give a probablity only between 5'10 1/4 and 5'10 3/4 at night for him, what would you bet, if we completely discount 5'10.5 as an option.
I think it would be a toss up, 5ft 10.25 to 10.75 is probably the range that is most arguable for him...I'd tend to say there might be more chance of 10.5-10.75 than 10.25 for him.
said on 27/Jan/18
What is your extreme low height rob ?
I've yet to get an extreme low, I have tested after a day of work and still got a couple of mm over 5ft 8, but I think it would fall to 5ft 8 at most under extreme conditions, maybe even slightly under if you are talking becoming dehydrated...I don't plan on becoming badly dehydrated any time soon!
said on 27/Jan/18
Rob how can I discover my extreme low
Say you are an actor like Andrew. If you were filming Hacksaw Ridge and doing action scenes and carrying/pulling bodies, by 8pm your body will be well and truly done in and you would be at an extreme low.
If you are active during the day and then play a sport for 1-2 hours and measure straight after, you might be at extreme low. Similarly after a weight-lifting session, you might even hit an absolute extreme low.
said on 24/Jan/18
With 5'9.75" Russell Tovey. Neither is standing straight, but something for reference.
Personally, I think he's closer to a flat 5'10".
:) said on 10/Jan/18
Lets rule out the 6'1 LOL
Leno said on 6/Jan/18
Probably 5'11 out of bed and 5'10.5 the rest of the day
said on 4/Jan/18
Rob, do you think he's 5'11" out of bed?
possibly a fraction over that mark first thing in the morning.
Ally183 said on 30/Dec/17
Sometimes he looks 177-178, other times looks at least 180, i think 179 is perfect for him
Krauser said on 29/Dec/17
5'11 is better to him
Ajay said on 28/Dec/17
Yes, he would definitely edge you. Here's Rob's response to a guy who is your height:
MM said on 2/Sep/17
Rob, if I am a flat 178 cm at my extreme low, how much would Andrew edge me if we measured? 1 full cm?
Editor Rob: he has a chance of being 1cm taller, I think 178 might just be too low for him...heck, sometimes he looks almost 5ft 11 with some other actors.
said on 27/Dec/17
Rob, would he edge me out? By how much?
he would look similar to you...similar frame, hair.
Ben said on 27/Dec/17
Adult Peter Parker has been 5'10" since August 10th 1962. 15 year old Peter Parker has been listed as 5'5" since 2000.
Klapperschlangensindgeil21 said on 24/Dec/17
I do believe Andre Garfield was a little too tall to portray Spider-Man. I always pictured Spider-Man as being a little below average, like 5 ft. 7”-5 ft. 8.” I think Toby Maguire was perfect heightwise and he was also nerdy enough to pull it off. Toby Maguire will always be the real Spider-Man.
james said on 22/Dec/17
for whatever reason, he always looked taller to me when in his spider man role, would believe his 6-1 claim, but yeah in other movies, it becomes clear he's in the 5'10-11 range
Anonymous said on 6/Dec/17
I was thought he was 5'10 or '11 perfect height wise for Peter Parker.
In Spider-Man hes got some height on Martin Sheen(whos about 5'6) and Rhys Ifans and Denis Leary are taller than him(listed as 6'2)
said on 30/Nov/17
Rob, he appears to have claimed 6 foot 1 in this interview Click Here
I was expecting him to be honest with his height claim since he is listed everywhere in the web as 5'10, I thought he might be claiming that figure, but looks like he is another BSer after all (and the worst kind, over 2 inches fraud)
not sure about that, looks like the interviewer inserted the 6ft 1 into the quote.
Mistakes also occur and journalists sometimes put a figure into a quote that the actor never said, for instance the Daily mail had a recent quote from Paul McGann "I'm 5ft 7in. When people meet me, they say: “I thought you were taller.” People think I'm 6ft 5in!"
It's nonsense, McGann in person is over 5ft 8.
Peter Parker said on 23/Nov/17
i never understood why people were complaining andrew was too tall to play spider-man, even thought spider-man in the comic books was indeed 5'10 not 5'7, spider-man is not a short guy,
said on 14/Nov/17
Rob, how much is that difference without considering footwear, 3 cm? Click Here Click Here
yes a good 3cm, you can make a case at times for Garfield being 5ft 10.75, but overall I still put him 179 range.
said on 11/Nov/17
Rob, he looks 5'10 here though, right?
sometimes he might look only 5ft 10, other times can seem nearer 5ft 11!
Bwk said on 10/Nov/17
This guy is the most lanky 5'10" I have ever seen. If he claimed 5'11"-5'11.5" I'd totally believe him.
Henry said on 8/Nov/17
Dream height , I'm gonna try to grow taller 17 and 5'6.
meson777 said on 24/Oct/17
5ft 10.5-75 in
Dreampuffe(5'9.5") said on 22/Oct/17
I wouldn’t argue anything below this listing. He fooled me into thinking he was taller than he looked.
Itsspider said on 4/Oct/17
Looks tall to me Andrew 5ft 10.75in imo
said on 22/Sep/17
Rob what would his height be before bed just curious because I wake up at like 179.4 and drop to like 177.5 at night also can I claim 5'10 or 5'10.5 thanks
I think Garfield can still hold near 5ft 10.5, maybe even during some of the day he will pass for almost 5ft 11 to people...so he might look 2cm taller than yourself.
said on 16/Sep/17
With Joshua Jackson 6ft1in(185.4cm)
With Eddie Redmayne 5ft11.25in(181cm)
With Jimmy Fallon
With Justin Timberlake
Andrew is wearing New Balance
sneakers while standing properly. Justin Timberlake is wearing boots and leaning to the left, putting his weight on his longer left leg, feet closer together.
I don't know what height Andrew is, but he looks the same height as Justin Timberlake when Justin isn't standing closer to the camera, isn't stretching his neck like a giraffe and is not wearing thicker soled shoes/boots/sneakers.
I would guess Garfield at 5ft10.75in-5ft11in. Long neck and not enough muscle mass up top. Could appear way bigger if he wanted to.
Please, do post pictures of Andrew wearing lifts/elevators as i haven't found any. As far as I know, he wears thin soled shoes and sneakers.
Kat said on 16/Sep/17
Saw him at TIFF recently and he has the appearance of someone over 6 feet in person. Surprised to see him well below 6.
MD said on 13/Sep/17
Hey, it was made a big deal of a few months ago that Garfield had lost 40lbs for his role in Silence. Was it ever revealed what he got down to? It's just hard for me to imagine where he had 40lbs to lose.
said on 5/Sep/17
Rob, how tall do you think he looks with Kimmel? 2 cm smaller or less? Click Here
said on 2/Sep/17
Rob, if I am a flat 178 cm at my extreme low, how much would Andrew edge me if we measured? 1 full cm?
he has a chance of being 1cm taller, I think 178 might just be too low for him...heck, sometimes he looks almost 5ft 11 with some other actors.
Joshua said on 2/Sep/17
He looks pretty tall though
Slim183 said on 26/Aug/17
He's like the opposite to brad pitt,
Andrews got a great build that makes him look taller and if his waist was equal to his leg length, he'd be 6'.
Spot on listing.
Rising - 174 cm
said on 21/Aug/17
He does give a taller impression standing by himself and I do think looked around 5'11" in some scenes in Hacksaw Ridge(great movie and outstanding performance, btw) but Jamie Foxx often only looked about 3 cm shorter than Andrew at events. I think this is the best event to compare Andrew to Mel Gibson
because we can see a clear footwear difference making lifts unlikely due to how they looked together other times when footwear was less clear.
Viewing the series, I'd guess Andrew stood about 1.5" taller than Mel that day. Even viewing another pic like this where the camera probably favors Mel and Mel has better posture, Andrew still looks about 3 cm taller to me: Click Here
In another fairly neutral pic like this, I see a 1.5" difference again: Click Here
But Andrew looks to only have 0.7" type sneakers and Mel looks to have a cowboy type boots so they may add around 1.5". Andrew could easily be 2" taller barefoot these days. Now I'm thinking Mel may have scraped 5'9" in his prime, but I'd have to guess no more than 5'8.75" the last few years considering footwear. But Mel can't be under 174 cm either so Garfield would have to be at least close to 179 meaning Jamie Foxx typically pulled off 176 with Andrew. Actually, unless Jamie wears lifts, I'd guess him taller than Mel, at least these days.
Dan said on 18/Jul/17
I thought he was 6 foot
Animus said on 17/Jul/17
He looks weirdly tall in the above photo given he is actually 5'10½". I just browsed through some photos on Google Images and he genuinely gives an impression of being tall. He is exceptionally well-proportioned.
John said on 7/Jul/17
179 is very fair
Jon bernthal fan said on 2/Jul/17
Hi rob I just turned sixteen and I'm 6ft tall (184cm), my dad's peak height was 6'1 (185cm) but he's 181 now. And my mom was always and still is 5'4(164cm). Do you think I'll make it to about 187cm? By the time I'm 19? I alwayd wanted to be Hugh jackmans height
Rob is Awesome
said on 30/Jun/17
Hi Rob I have question which I'm really concerned about my height ? I really idolize Spiderman and Andrew Garfield , my height is around 5'5 or 5'6 and I just turn 17, just crossing fingers here, Do you think I can reach at least 5'10 before I stop growing, by eating healthy and excerising and have good amounts of sleep ? Thank you tell me whats your opinion on this.
I'd say if you reached 5ft 9 to be very happy, because at 17 the average growth isn't much more than around an inch.
Though, you could end up in the minority, those who gain several inches after 17.
Arch Stanton said on 21/Jun/17
He has a very similar look and demeanour to Anthony Perkins in the 50s and 60s.
Brendan 179cm said on 20/Jun/17
Andrew has the same build I have
He's skinny which gives the Illusion of being taller
He's definitely 178.5 -179.5 cm tall
Doesn't look tall enough to be 180 to too tall to be 5,10
said on 10/Jun/17
3 inches between him and 6'1.5 Chris Martin - Click Here
jyr said on 10/Jun/17
lol i thought he was like 6 foot or more. wow. I guess being skinny and his head shape makes him have that tall vibe
RisingForce said on 2/Jun/17
Oddly, he can look shorter than this at events for Lions for Lambs. As for Gibson, there's quite a few comparisons that suggest he was never taller than 5'9" without his cowboy boots so it's very possible he could have dropped a bit below it the past couple years and be at say, 5'8.75" today. As for Garfield, I have to look at him more, but my initial impression is no more than this listing.
Chris said on 14/May/17
Next to 5'9.75" (177cm) Russel Tovey, Andrew looks not much more than a solid 5'10" goo.gl/9CnwsG
a knaw knee moose said on 11/May/17
he looks awful tall because he's skinny but 5'10.5 seems right
Chris said on 10/May/17
My stepbrother and stepfather are exactly his height. It's still in the average range, but on the taller side. A very decent height to be.
sina jamyari said on 6/May/17
Hi . I cant believe this but I got self confidence when I saw this because I m think about my self that im short . Im 175 and 18 years old . So may i will be next andro garfild from Iran. :) ;)
Sandy Cowell said on 2/May/17
I have just watched Andrew in a very violent feature-length episode of what is called 'The Red Riding Trilogy'. Although I recognize his face, I have never seen him acting in something of which he is the main character. I bought the trilogy because I liked the cast! Now I have discovered a new actor to like!
Without going into detail of what is an extremely shocking plot, I had a chance to see that Andrew was around the height of Sean Bean, and a fair chunk taller than Eddie Marsen and Peter Mullan. I put Andrew's height at around the 5ft11 mark, but I did ask myself if being rather on the lean side could make him appear a little taller; in fact, in my intro to this actor, I would have said that yes, the guy is tall! At 5ft10.5, he is above average and certainly scrapes through the 'nearly tall' or 'fairly tall' bracket.
I will go for 5ft10.75 and I must add that I haven't read any of his comments yet, so this is purely what I thought from his performance in the play I saw tonight, which hails from 2009!
Mona said on 2/May/17
I legit thought he was about 6'1 before I clicked on this. He has lanky proportions.
Arch Stanton said on 17/Apr/17
Agreed Smoshian, he has the look of a very tall guy! In the above photo there's plenty of legit 6 ft 3-5 guys who look similar in photographs.
Smoshian said on 17/Apr/17
Thanks to his proportions he could claim 6'3" and people would believe it
Arthur said on 16/Apr/17
Rob, I guess you think Andrew edges me, so that's why you didn't answer? :p It's ok if he does, I don't mind xD
Arthur said on 15/Apr/17
Rob, I wake up at 180.4-5 cm usually, and go to bed around 178.2-3 cm. Yesterday I tested my really extreme low, and it was 178.0 cm. Do you think Garfield would edge me, and if so how much?
Ben said on 14/Apr/17
Peter Parker/Spider-Man is listed as 5'10" in the comics and so far Andrew has been the closest one. Shame the script for his Spider-Man wasn't :P
Spider-Man (2002) and Spider-Man 2 (2004) are still considered to be one of the best movies of all time! :)
Stalin said on 18/Mar/17
Andrew Garfield look slim in silence movie. How much he weighs. 160-165
S.J.H said on 8/Mar/17
Andrew is only 5'10 in person not taller. His tall hair fool people alot
Mark(5'9.25") said on 28/Feb/17
If his torso was proportioned to his legs, he would have been an easy 6 footer.
Chris said on 26/Feb/17
Rob, with Dev Pate 6'1.75 - Andrew looks minimum 5'11 or even taller. Either Dev needs a downgrade, or Andrew needs a lift up.
YUH said on 26/Feb/17
Arthur you got roasted LMAO
Balrog said on 3/Feb/17
"My estimate is closer to the site's, so there is a bigger probability that I am correct, and you are wrong" So, you're using the typical "appeal to probability" argument which is a logical fallacy. I was trying to show you how ridiculous your argument was. Anyway, I can't imagine how sad must be your life to consider yourself smarter than someone you don't know. And all because of a simple discussion about someone's height. I hope I have boosted your ego enough, great thinking man. Have a nice life.
Arthur said on 3/Feb/17
Balrog. Do you even know what objectively means?
In any case you said that there's a 0.5 inch difference at most, so with your stupid logic, you are wrong too.
Average Guess is the subjective guess of every individual. It's not objective. The sample of votes is under 100 too, which is very small. Still, the Editor's subjective estimates are featured on the top of the page, not the average guess. Just accept the fact that outsmarted you, it wasn't of course really difficult since you are not smart. Now go and have some english lessons
Balrog said on 2/Feb/17
Well, Garfield's listing has changed through years, but you should check Timberlake's page and see if most people agree with you. The average guess is at 5'11.25'', so I gotta say, objectively, you're wrong.
Arthur said on 2/Feb/17
Well Balrog, there are objective and subjective facts. The objective fact is that your english isn't good, which you aknowledged yourself, and that's good for you. The subjective fact is how much taller Timberlake looks over Garfield. If we don't measure them both, it's a subjective estimate. Now, my estimate of 1-1.25 inches difference, is shared with the editor of celebheights, who pegs the difference at 1 inch. I say it's 1 or 1.25, you say it's 0.5 inch. My estimate is closer to the site's, so there is a bigger probability that I am correct, and you are wrong.
Balrog said on 1/Feb/17
@Arthur you're right, my english is not good. I'm working on it. You should work on recognizing that you are wrong instead of correcting someone's grammar. Have a great day.
said on 31/Jan/17
Rob, would you say that his appearance appears taller due to his longer legs and slender stature. I mean -- his legs look that of a 6ft+ male, but his torso is clearly short enough to make him 5'10.5
Chris, his dimensions and slim frame have certainly helped...
Arthur said on 31/Jan/17
Balrog, maybe you should learn some proper english next time you want to debate with someone.
Elias said on 31/Jan/17
@Arthur, in your two first pics, Justin Timberlake is in thick boots whereas Andrew Garfield is in very thin shoes.
Balrog said on 30/Jan/17
Well, commentors can see your pics or mine and decide which one are better. Your pics are pretty useless, but hey go ahead and I think Timberlake is almost 6 foot if that make you happy.
Either way, I think Garfield's listing is spot on.
said on 29/Jan/17
You just deliberately picked the only photos that show them about the same. The angles are screwed up mind you. I can do that too to support my opinion you know, so there you go.
With these photos, I can even argue 6'0 flat for Timberlake, but I won't do it, because I do take angles and posture into consideration, unlike you. The least Timberalke can be is 181 cm (and that's only if Andrew drops to 178 cm at night), he is problably more 182 cm though. There is no way in hell Timberlake is only 0.5 in taller than Garfield as you've suggested.
said on 28/Jan/17
Really, really doubt it. Timberlake deserves a slight downgrade.
Arthur said on 25/Jan/17
Editor Rob: yeah, I couldn't see just 5ft 10 flat
Do you think he maybe could be his old 5'10.75 listing at his low?
Oh, balrog, Timberlake isn't under 5'11.5, he may in fact be 5'11.75
said on 23/Jan/17
Rob, I think you got Garfield's height perfect. I've seen enough of him and he's over 5'10'' for sure but not quite 5'11''. But how come you still have Timberlake at 5'11.5''? There are plenty pics of both together and there is no way Timberlake is an inch taller than him, there are quite close in height, at most the difference is .5
yeah, I couldn't see just 5ft 10 flat
Arch Stanton said on 13/Dec/16
It's odd really, as he really had the look of a 6'3-6'5 type guy yet isn't tall.
said on 26/Nov/16
Eisenberg is no more than a weak 5'7 and most likely is a flat 5'6.5 guy (similar to Big G)as shown next to Rob,you could even argue 168 range as a low-guess and Garfield looks a good 8-9cm taller than him.Therefore,Garfield is a strong 178cm guy.He's most likely 5'10-5'10 1/4 at night,similar to user Josh.
believe me, Eisenberg is 100% taller than a barefoot G.
Gaza2121 said on 17/Nov/16
Don't let his slender build fool you. 178 cm is possible for him.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 12/Nov/16
Andrew Garfield has his head tilted down in that shot.
said on 12/Nov/16
Yeah he's at least 5'10; I'm just saying 10.25 is likelier than 10.75, given what he looks like most of the time. He does look a solid 179 with Mel Gibson
, though he's likely Busting a Gut
miko said on 12/Nov/16
Who knows, maybe these days Big G is slipping a cheeky lift in the porties ;)
said on 11/Nov/16
Exactly. Timberlake is 1.5 inches taller than Garfield. If Garfield is no less than listed then Timberlake is no less than 6'0.
TJE, hold the front page, one of Glenn's friends just forwarded me his photo...Click Here
so I guess the 'clowns' aren't too far off the truth.
Dingus said on 11/Nov/16
His neck seems a bit longer than average. Perhaps that's what gives him the extra .5 inches.
said on 31/Oct/16
would andrews night height be 5,10.25 rob ? :)
I'm thinking he might not really drop much under 179 now...
said on 29/Oct/16
Editor Rob: remember the odds of Mel heading towards 175 is increasing greatly, so Garfield pulls off looking at least 179 with him, I wouldn't argue any less...I think with Jesse Eisenberg I wouldn't go sub 179cm either.
Didn't you say that 178 cm was quite possible after meeting Eisenberg though? You have said they typically look 3 inches apart, and Eisenberg ain't 5'7.5.
Timberlake isn't 2 inches taller than Garfield. To me he always looked at least an inch more, sometimes near 1.5 but not over that. I think their difference is somewhere in the 1-1.5 inch range. So 1.25 in or 3 cm is a good shout, Timberlake is probably 5'11.75.
I think when standing tall he could be a solid 3 inches over Jesse, but I wouldn't put him at 5ft 11, as I said it is more likely Mel is shrinking a little - I would have guessed him as roughly 5ft 9 with Danny Trejo in Machete Kills.
TJE said on 28/Oct/16
Then I guess Justin Timberlake clears 6'0 if that's the case.
Teddy said on 15/Oct/16
He's pretty much 5'11" (180.34 cm) exactly.
His appearance on Jimmy Fallon proves it.