How tall is Andrew Garfield

Andrew Garfield's Height

5ft 10.5in (179.1 cm)

British Actor best known for appearing in films such as The Amazing Spider-man, Hacksaw Ridge, Lions for Lambs and The Social Network.

How tall is Andrew Garfield
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of Emma Stone
Emma Stone
5ft 6in (168 cm)
Height of Jesse Eisenberg
Jesse Eisenberg
5ft 7.25in (171 cm)
Height of Tobey Maguire
Tobey Maguire
5ft 7.75in (172 cm)
Height of Tom Holland
Tom Holland
5ft 7in (170 cm)

Add a Comment 250 comments

Average Guess (75 Votes)
5ft 10.54in (179.2cm)
Grit said on 23/Oct/17
Dreampuffe(5'9.5") said on 22/Oct/17
I wouldn’t argue anything below this listing. He fooled me into thinking he was taller than he looked.
Itsspider said on 4/Oct/17
Looks tall to me Andrew 5ft 10.75in imo
Logan Johnson said on 22/Sep/17
Rob what would his height be before bed just curious because I wake up at like 179.4 and drop to like 177.5 at night also can I claim 5'10 or 5'10.5 thanks
Editor Rob: I think Garfield can still hold near 5ft 10.5, maybe even during some of the day he will pass for almost 5ft 11 to he might look 2cm taller than yourself.
Tonyx said on 16/Sep/17
With Joshua Jackson 6ft1in(185.4cm)
Click Here
With Eddie Redmayne 5ft11.25in(181cm)
Click Here
With Jimmy Fallon
Click Here
Click Here
With Justin Timberlake
Click Here
Andrew is wearing New Balance sneakers while standing properly. Justin Timberlake is wearing boots and leaning to the left, putting his weight on his longer left leg, feet closer together.

I don't know what height Andrew is, but he looks the same height as Justin Timberlake when Justin isn't standing closer to the camera, isn't stretching his neck like a giraffe and is not wearing thicker soled shoes/boots/sneakers.
I would guess Garfield at 5ft10.75in-5ft11in. Long neck and not enough muscle mass up top. Could appear way bigger if he wanted to.
Please, do post pictures of Andrew wearing lifts/elevators as i haven't found any. As far as I know, he wears thin soled shoes and sneakers.
Kat said on 16/Sep/17
Saw him at TIFF recently and he has the appearance of someone over 6 feet in person. Surprised to see him well below 6.
MD said on 13/Sep/17
Hey, it was made a big deal of a few months ago that Garfield had lost 40lbs for his role in Silence. Was it ever revealed what he got down to? It's just hard for me to imagine where he had 40lbs to lose.
MM said on 5/Sep/17
Rob, how tall do you think he looks with Kimmel? 2 cm smaller or less? Click Here
MM said on 2/Sep/17
Rob, if I am a flat 178 cm at my extreme low, how much would Andrew edge me if we measured? 1 full cm?
Editor Rob: he has a chance of being 1cm taller, I think 178 might just be too low for him...heck, sometimes he looks almost 5ft 11 with some other actors.
Joshua said on 2/Sep/17
He looks pretty tall though
Slim183 said on 26/Aug/17
He's like the opposite to brad pitt,

Andrews got a great build that makes him look taller and if his waist was equal to his leg length, he'd be 6'.

Spot on listing.
Rising - 174 cm said on 21/Aug/17
He does give a taller impression standing by himself and I do think looked around 5'11" in some scenes in Hacksaw Ridge(great movie and outstanding performance, btw) but Jamie Foxx often only looked about 3 cm shorter than Andrew at events. I think this is the best event to compare Andrew to Mel Gibson because we can see a clear footwear difference making lifts unlikely due to how they looked together other times when footwear was less clear.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Viewing the series, I'd guess Andrew stood about 1.5" taller than Mel that day. Even viewing another pic like this where the camera probably favors Mel and Mel has better posture, Andrew still looks about 3 cm taller to me: Click Here In another fairly neutral pic like this, I see a 1.5" difference again: Click Here

But Andrew looks to only have 0.7" type sneakers and Mel looks to have a cowboy type boots so they may add around 1.5". Andrew could easily be 2" taller barefoot these days. Now I'm thinking Mel may have scraped 5'9" in his prime, but I'd have to guess no more than 5'8.75" the last few years considering footwear. But Mel can't be under 174 cm either so Garfield would have to be at least close to 179 meaning Jamie Foxx typically pulled off 176 with Andrew. Actually, unless Jamie wears lifts, I'd guess him taller than Mel, at least these days.
Dan said on 18/Jul/17
I thought he was 6 foot
Animus said on 17/Jul/17
He looks weirdly tall in the above photo given he is actually 5'10½". I just browsed through some photos on Google Images and he genuinely gives an impression of being tall. He is exceptionally well-proportioned.
John said on 7/Jul/17
179 is very fair
Jon bernthal fan said on 2/Jul/17
Hi rob I just turned sixteen and I'm 6ft tall (184cm), my dad's peak height was 6'1 (185cm) but he's 181 now. And my mom was always and still is 5'4(164cm). Do you think I'll make it to about 187cm? By the time I'm 19? I alwayd wanted to be Hugh jackmans height
Rob is Awesome said on 30/Jun/17
Hi Rob I have question which I'm really concerned about my height ? I really idolize Spiderman and Andrew Garfield , my height is around 5'5 or 5'6 and I just turn 17, just crossing fingers here, Do you think I can reach at least 5'10 before I stop growing, by eating healthy and excerising and have good amounts of sleep ? Thank you tell me whats your opinion on this.
Editor Rob: I'd say if you reached 5ft 9 to be very happy, because at 17 the average growth isn't much more than around an inch.

Though, you could end up in the minority, those who gain several inches after 17.
Arch Stanton said on 21/Jun/17
He has a very similar look and demeanour to Anthony Perkins in the 50s and 60s.
Brendan 179cm said on 20/Jun/17
Andrew has the same build I have
He's skinny which gives the Illusion of being taller
He's definitely 178.5 -179.5 cm tall
Doesn't look tall enough to be 180 to too tall to be 5,10
Chris said on 10/Jun/17
3 inches between him and 6'1.5 Chris Martin - Click Here
jyr said on 10/Jun/17
lol i thought he was like 6 foot or more. wow. I guess being skinny and his head shape makes him have that tall vibe
RisingForce said on 2/Jun/17
Oddly, he can look shorter than this at events for Lions for Lambs. As for Gibson, there's quite a few comparisons that suggest he was never taller than 5'9" without his cowboy boots so it's very possible he could have dropped a bit below it the past couple years and be at say, 5'8.75" today. As for Garfield, I have to look at him more, but my initial impression is no more than this listing.
Chris said on 14/May/17
Next to 5'9.75" (177cm) Russel Tovey, Andrew looks not much more than a solid 5'10"
a knaw knee moose said on 11/May/17
he looks awful tall because he's skinny but 5'10.5 seems right
Chris said on 10/May/17
My stepbrother and stepfather are exactly his height. It's still in the average range, but on the taller side. A very decent height to be.
sina jamyari said on 6/May/17
Hi . I cant believe this but I got self confidence when I saw this because I m think about my self that im short . Im 175 and 18 years old . So may i will be next andro garfild from Iran. :) ;)
Sandy Cowell said on 2/May/17
I have just watched Andrew in a very violent feature-length episode of what is called 'The Red Riding Trilogy'. Although I recognize his face, I have never seen him acting in something of which he is the main character. I bought the trilogy because I liked the cast! Now I have discovered a new actor to like!
Without going into detail of what is an extremely shocking plot, I had a chance to see that Andrew was around the height of Sean Bean, and a fair chunk taller than Eddie Marsen and Peter Mullan. I put Andrew's height at around the 5ft11 mark, but I did ask myself if being rather on the lean side could make him appear a little taller; in fact, in my intro to this actor, I would have said that yes, the guy is tall! At 5ft10.5, he is above average and certainly scrapes through the 'nearly tall' or 'fairly tall' bracket.
I will go for 5ft10.75 and I must add that I haven't read any of his comments yet, so this is purely what I thought from his performance in the play I saw tonight, which hails from 2009!
Mona said on 2/May/17
I legit thought he was about 6'1 before I clicked on this. He has lanky proportions.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 2/May/17
Damn. Rob, I have to admit it! I almost got fooled that he was a 6 footer until I searched him up!
Arch Stanton said on 17/Apr/17
Agreed Smoshian, he has the look of a very tall guy! In the above photo there's plenty of legit 6 ft 3-5 guys who look similar in photographs.
Smoshian said on 17/Apr/17
Thanks to his proportions he could claim 6'3" and people would believe it
Arthur said on 16/Apr/17
Rob, I guess you think Andrew edges me, so that's why you didn't answer? :p It's ok if he does, I don't mind xD
Arthur said on 15/Apr/17
Rob, I wake up at 180.4-5 cm usually, and go to bed around 178.2-3 cm. Yesterday I tested my really extreme low, and it was 178.0 cm. Do you think Garfield would edge me, and if so how much?
Ben said on 14/Apr/17
Peter Parker/Spider-Man is listed as 5'10" in the comics and so far Andrew has been the closest one. Shame the script for his Spider-Man wasn't :P

Spider-Man (2002) and Spider-Man 2 (2004) are still considered to be one of the best movies of all time! :)
Stalin said on 18/Mar/17
Andrew Garfield look slim in silence movie. How much he weighs. 160-165
S.J.H said on 8/Mar/17
Andrew is only 5'10 in person not taller. His tall hair fool people alot
Mark(5'9.25") said on 28/Feb/17
If his torso was proportioned to his legs, he would have been an easy 6 footer.
Chris said on 26/Feb/17
Rob, with Dev Pate 6'1.75 - Andrew looks minimum 5'11 or even taller. Either Dev needs a downgrade, or Andrew needs a lift up.
YUH said on 26/Feb/17
Arthur you got roasted LMAO
Arthur said on 4/Feb/17
I don't need to know you to conclude that I am smarter than you. What you are saying is reflecting your intelligence, and the results ain't good for you. You just said that probability isn't logical. Only a moron would say that. I am laughing at you. The only reason I am sad right now is for wasting my time trying to argue with a guy who can't speak english, doesn't understand what a probability is, doesn't know what logic is and has no idea about height as a topic. Hope you have a nice life too
Balrog said on 3/Feb/17
"My estimate is closer to the site's, so there is a bigger probability that I am correct, and you are wrong" So, you're using the typical "appeal to probability" argument which is a logical fallacy. I was trying to show you how ridiculous your argument was. Anyway, I can't imagine how sad must be your life to consider yourself smarter than someone you don't know. And all because of a simple discussion about someone's height. I hope I have boosted your ego enough, great thinking man. Have a nice life.
Arthur said on 3/Feb/17
Balrog. Do you even know what objectively means?

In any case you said that there's a 0.5 inch difference at most, so with your stupid logic, you are wrong too.

Average Guess is the subjective guess of every individual. It's not objective. The sample of votes is under 100 too, which is very small. Still, the Editor's subjective estimates are featured on the top of the page, not the average guess. Just accept the fact that outsmarted you, it wasn't of course really difficult since you are not smart. Now go and have some english lessons
Balrog said on 2/Feb/17
Well, Garfield's listing has changed through years, but you should check Timberlake's page and see if most people agree with you. The average guess is at 5'11.25'', so I gotta say, objectively, you're wrong.
Arthur said on 2/Feb/17
Well Balrog, there are objective and subjective facts. The objective fact is that your english isn't good, which you aknowledged yourself, and that's good for you. The subjective fact is how much taller Timberlake looks over Garfield. If we don't measure them both, it's a subjective estimate. Now, my estimate of 1-1.25 inches difference, is shared with the editor of celebheights, who pegs the difference at 1 inch. I say it's 1 or 1.25, you say it's 0.5 inch. My estimate is closer to the site's, so there is a bigger probability that I am correct, and you are wrong.
Balrog said on 1/Feb/17
@Arthur you're right, my english is not good. I'm working on it. You should work on recognizing that you are wrong instead of correcting someone's grammar. Have a great day.
Chris said on 31/Jan/17
Rob, would you say that his appearance appears taller due to his longer legs and slender stature. I mean -- his legs look that of a 6ft+ male, but his torso is clearly short enough to make him 5'10.5
Editor Rob: Chris, his dimensions and slim frame have certainly helped...
Arthur said on 31/Jan/17
Balrog, maybe you should learn some proper english next time you want to debate with someone.
Elias said on 31/Jan/17
@Arthur, in your two first pics, Justin Timberlake is in thick boots whereas Andrew Garfield is in very thin shoes.
Balrog said on 30/Jan/17
Well, commentors can see your pics or mine and decide which one are better. Your pics are pretty useless, but hey go ahead and I think Timberlake is almost 6 foot if that make you happy.

Either way, I think Garfield's listing is spot on.
Arthur said on 29/Jan/17

You just deliberately picked the only photos that show them about the same. The angles are screwed up mind you. I can do that too to support my opinion you know, so there you go.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

With these photos, I can even argue 6'0 flat for Timberlake, but I won't do it, because I do take angles and posture into consideration, unlike you. The least Timberalke can be is 181 cm (and that's only if Andrew drops to 178 cm at night), he is problably more 182 cm though. There is no way in hell Timberlake is only 0.5 in taller than Garfield as you've suggested.
Balrog said on 28/Jan/17

Really, really doubt it. Timberlake deserves a slight downgrade.

Click Here
Click Here
Arthur said on 25/Jan/17
Editor Rob: yeah, I couldn't see just 5ft 10 flat

Do you think he maybe could be his old 5'10.75 listing at his low?

Oh, balrog, Timberlake isn't under 5'11.5, he may in fact be 5'11.75
Balrog said on 23/Jan/17
Rob, I think you got Garfield's height perfect. I've seen enough of him and he's over 5'10'' for sure but not quite 5'11''. But how come you still have Timberlake at 5'11.5''? There are plenty pics of both together and there is no way Timberlake is an inch taller than him, there are quite close in height, at most the difference is .5
Editor Rob: yeah, I couldn't see just 5ft 10 flat
Arch Stanton said on 13/Dec/16
It's odd really, as he really had the look of a 6'3-6'5 type guy yet isn't tall.
Peter 179cm said on 26/Nov/16
Eisenberg is no more than a weak 5'7 and most likely is a flat 5'6.5 guy (similar to Big G)as shown next to Rob,you could even argue 168 range as a low-guess and Garfield looks a good 8-9cm taller than him.Therefore,Garfield is a strong 178cm guy.He's most likely 5'10-5'10 1/4 at night,similar to user Josh.
Editor Rob: believe me, Eisenberg is 100% taller than a barefoot G.
Gaza2121 said on 17/Nov/16
Don't let his slender build fool you. 178 cm is possible for him.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 12/Nov/16
Andrew Garfield has his head tilted down in that shot.
TJE said on 12/Nov/16
Yeah he's at least 5'10; I'm just saying 10.25 is likelier than 10.75, given what he looks like most of the time. He does look a solid 179 with Mel Gibson, though he's likely busting a gut there.
miko said on 12/Nov/16
Who knows, maybe these days Big G is slipping a cheeky lift in the porties ;)
Arthur said on 12/Nov/16
Editor Rob: TJE, hold the front page, one of Glenn's friends just forwarded me his photo...Click Here

so I guess the 'clowns' aren't too far off the truth.

Wow... he looks 5'9 in the photo with Glenn... does that mean he could be 5 Foot 10 flat?
Editor Rob: Arthur, I don't think he really is under 5ft 10, I would be surprised if there wasn't 1-1.5 inches lost through footwear or tip toe technique.
TJE said on 11/Nov/16
Exactly. Timberlake is 1.5 inches taller than Garfield. If Garfield is no less than listed then Timberlake is no less than 6'0.
Editor Rob: TJE, hold the front page, one of Glenn's friends just forwarded me his photo...Click Here

so I guess the 'clowns' aren't too far off the truth.
Dingus said on 11/Nov/16
His neck seems a bit longer than average. Perhaps that's what gives him the extra .5 inches.
declan said on 31/Oct/16
would andrews night height be 5,10.25 rob ? :)
Editor Rob: I'm thinking he might not really drop much under 179 now...
Arthur said on 29/Oct/16
Editor Rob: remember the odds of Mel heading towards 175 is increasing greatly, so Garfield pulls off looking at least 179 with him, I wouldn't argue any less...I think with Jesse Eisenberg I wouldn't go sub 179cm either.

Didn't you say that 178 cm was quite possible after meeting Eisenberg though? You have said they typically look 3 inches apart, and Eisenberg ain't 5'7.5.

Timberlake isn't 2 inches taller than Garfield. To me he always looked at least an inch more, sometimes near 1.5 but not over that. I think their difference is somewhere in the 1-1.5 inch range. So 1.25 in or 3 cm is a good shout, Timberlake is probably 5'11.75.
Editor Rob: I think when standing tall he could be a solid 3 inches over Jesse, but I wouldn't put him at 5ft 11, as I said it is more likely Mel is shrinking a little - I would have guessed him as roughly 5ft 9 with Danny Trejo in Machete Kills.
TJE said on 28/Oct/16
Then I guess Justin Timberlake clears 6'0 if that's the case.
Arthur said on 28/Oct/16
Rob, what's the difference between Andrew and Mel in this one? Click Here Looks like 3 or 4 cm, though Mel has definitely more shoe... Click Here

Damn, this puts Garfield to at least 179 cm
Editor Rob: remember the odds of Mel heading towards 175 is increasing greatly, so Garfield pulls off looking at least 179 with him, I wouldn't argue any less...I think with Jesse Eisenberg I wouldn't go sub 179cm either.
Teddy said on 15/Oct/16
He's pretty much 5'11" (180.34 cm) exactly.

His appearance on Jimmy Fallon proves it.
Civman said on 6/Oct/16
It's really hard to think that a guy shorter than 179 could give the tall impression he usually does. But considering he looks about 3 inches taller than Jesse Eisenberg who is around 5'7, the 178 mark is equally possible, but nothing under that. He is either 178 or 179 really, so a 5'10.25 is a decent guess I believe. Maybe we underestimate how tall a solid 178 guy can look, with the great proporations he has though...
TJE said on 5/Oct/16
Not sure how the average guess is heading towards 5'10.75 when he's 1.5 inches shorter than Justin Timberlake and 3 inches taller tops than Jesse Eisenberg, but I trust over time the gauge will change.
Bobby said on 3/Oct/16
He's 6'0, and my reason why is due to an observation I made while he was in a scene with Irrfan Khan, I looked up the latter'a height, and guess what? He's 6ft! When Andrew was walking backwards and he bumped into Irrfan's character, there shoulders and head were level with one another. Explain that. Either Irrfan isn't really 6ft or Andrew isn't really 5'10.
S.J.H said on 26/Sep/16
He was 2cm off the 5'11 listing in person. Solid 5'10 , legit 178ish
Kei said on 12/Sep/16
All I'm saying is he wears custom made heels.....

Click Here
Editor Rob: that is just a feeder blog trying to get clicks through to their elevator shoe page. Many of the elevator shoes out there are modelled off existing sneakers or shoe styles, so you could literally pick any actor and find some elevator shoes that look similar to the shoes they are wearing.
Chris said on 11/Sep/16
My stepdad/stepbrother are exactly 179 also. They have a more athletic frame, but I can perfectly understand Garfield being their height. It's the taller side of average and to anyone under 5'7" it can definitely appear as "tall" - it's taller than over 70% of males and with a lanky frame like Garfield's it's unsurprising he looks taller, I'm sure the majority of people in his height range often claim 6ft and never think twice about it.
George 173 cm said on 31/Aug/16
I think he can be from 178 to 180 cm
T said on 18/Aug/16
Proably wake up at 1.79m and goes to bed at 1.78 m
If I buy 4 inches said on 14/Aug/16
He can be anywhere from 5'9 to 6'0, he has the build and he just needs the shoes
Johno said on 1/Aug/16
And Timberlake looks more than an inch taller.
Johno said on 1/Aug/16
With Eisenberg, i Can't see more then 3-inches between them and Eisenberg looks around 5'6.75 at his average with Rob. You can givw credit to users here who see Garfield going sub-5'10. 5'9.75 looks about right to me.
Brandon said on 17/Jul/16
He is too tall to be 5'10" flat and not tall enough to be 5'11". 5'10.5" is a solid listing. On his own he can look like a 5'11"-6'0" guy but compared to genuine 6'0" guys it's obvious he is not as tall. 5'10.5" is perfect.
TJE said on 2/Jul/16
the Slav said on 30/Jun/16
Lol, this guy is nowhere near 182-183 cm as some of you guys think. He's not a mm over 179 cm and could be 178 cm in fact

Especially since Jesse Eisenberg runs a good chance at being a flat 170.
the Slav said on 30/Jun/16
Lol, this guy is nowhere near 182-183 cm as some of you guys think. He's not a mm over 179 cm and could be 178 cm in fact
truth said on 27/Jun/16
@Elias Where are those pictures though?

Click Here

In most pictures he looks to be 1-1.5 inches shorter and Timberlake is 181 cm maximum (shoulder level is lower, has lower eyelevel etc.). He looks 177-179cm range, but is most likely 178 cm, even Rob admits him dipping under 5'10.5 a bit.
TJE said on 27/Jun/16

I have never seen Garfield edge out Timberlake. In fact, he always looks 1.5 inches shorter than Timberlake.
Elias said on 26/Jun/16
@truth, I'm not a troll, See pictures of Andrew Garfield next to Justin Timberlake, Andrew looks the same height or even a bit taller than him, it's the same case with Jimmy Fallon. How a 178 cm flat guy can appear that tall ?? It's for these reasons that I think that Andrew can be in the 181 cm - 182 cm range. 179 cm can be possible though but 178 cm is too low for him, that's sure.
Mat said on 25/Jun/16
Rob, now that you've met Jesse Eisenberg, and you thought he was 5'7-5'7.25 range, does that mean that Andrew could be in the 5'10-5'10.25 range? Click Here
Editor Rob: it means 5ft 10.25 is quite possible
truth said on 25/Jun/16
@Elias Trolls already out this soon? He looks 178-179cm maximum range to me. Classic example of a 5'10 guy that looks taller due to ectomorph build. 178 cm flat is most likely his height.
Elias said on 12/Jun/16
Andrew really looks way taller than what he is listed, I really think he could be in the 182 cm - 183 cm range, and when you look at him standing alone he looks 6ft 1+ range
Chris said on 31/May/16
No question the guy is over 5'10". Wouldn't be surprised if he was 5'11" but the reality may very well be in between.
Mark said on 12/May/16
Anything under 5'10" would be ridiculous. He clears that range with 6'3.5" Michael Sannon and 6'0.25".

He's really lanky.
Mat said on 28/Apr/16
Rob, if you only had to chose between 178 cm or 180 cm what would you give him as an afternoon measurement
Editor Rob: at night I'd say 178 was likelier than 180, but I think afternoon he really could be right between the 2 marks.
paulkersey32 said on 19/Apr/16
anyone who says hes 175 lbs knows jack about physical appearance relative to weight. He is skinny, low muscle, more a runners body. Be real. Maybe 150.
he is taller than a 5 9 Jamie Foxx.
Its clear that even Foxx with thicker shoes still is shorter.
cox said on 12/Apr/16
Some people are just gifted and lucky to have a build that makes them look taller than they really are. Damnit!
Sam said on 25/Mar/16
Example of a guy who can suggest tallness that he doesn't have with slim build, long neck and good posture
Mat said on 23/Mar/16
@Chris, he has never seen 6 foot in his life, a 5'11 guy is the most he can look, and 5'10 the least.
chris said on 21/Mar/16
Andrew's height man, wow, this guy can look anywhere from 178-183cm, on Ellen he looked a solid 183cm, in the Social Network he looked 182cm, and TASM he looked 180cm, but anywhere outside, he looks 179cm. 179-180cm is still my guess.
TJE said on 5/Feb/16

Similar shoes and Garfield has camera advantage. Also Timberlake isn't even the full 182. 178 range for Garfield is very plausible.
Jedi Master 5' 11 said on 2/Feb/16
He has to be at least 5'9.5" I can't see 5'11" at all but I can see him wearing something to give him a boost. After seeing him in the social network movie I thought he was much taller, but when next to Jesse Eisenberg, I'd say he's not that much taller
Chris said on 21/Jan/16
EVERYONE check this out! apparantly he wears elevator shoes! is this legit?? If so this could be the reason why he looks 6-6'1 sometimes(in the social network is he looks really taller, taller than usual) What do you think Rob??
Editor Rob: I won't give a link to that because it's a promotional bait article to get you to visit the elevator shoe site ;)
Chris said on 21/Jan/16
@plus that's around 4 inches, and it does seem that Garfield has the footwear advantage, but your also ignoring that 182cm Justin Timberlake is a clear 3cm taller than Garfield, if anything that picture, is Eisenberg shorter than 171cm(169-170cm is more likely)
plus said on 11/Jan/16
with Eisenberg (171 cm), he towers him

Click Here
TJE said on 23/Nov/15
179 is the most he can be, really.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 18/Oct/15
By Robert Pattinson:

Click Here

He appears to be exactly as listed by him. Not more, not less.
Mat 5'10.25 said on 18/Oct/15
Rob, do you think he dips to a flat 178 at night?
[Editor Rob: at times I think that does look possible, but I think the 179 is best fit for him]
Billy said on 26/Sep/15
A very weak 5'11
Billy said on 26/Sep/15
A very weak 5'11
TJE said on 19/Sep/15
The photo was shot from a high angle, giving the advantage to the person standing further away. You can see in my pic how Garfield's feet are positioned higher than Timberlake's.
Elias said on 16/Sep/15
@TJE, in your pic , Justin Timberlake is raising his head and he has more shoes, better posture and he is closer to the camera than Andrew Garfield .If they would have the same shoes and same posture, they would appear about the same height.For me Andrew Garfield is closer to 5'11 than 5'10. He looks 5'11-6'0 so often for being only a 5'10 flat guy.
TJE said on 11/Sep/15
IMO Garfield's closer to 5'10 than 5'11.

Click Here
Stuboy82 said on 23/Aug/15
From the pic posted by rockitbaby garfield is 1inch shorter than timberlake and timberlake comes exactly upto armie hammers eyeline.. rob cant you tell their exact heights with ur method? Pressuming u have a good guess in armie that is
binu said on 16/Aug/15
drew is about 5'11
mees said on 1/Aug/15
I thought he would be 6'1 at least after seeing the amazing spiderman, but this listing seems accurate
an anonymous peach said on 10/Jun/15
He looks like a someone who was shrunken down from 6' 3"
anonymous peach said on 21/May/15
@Elias, you'd be surpirsed. I know someone who's 170cm but looks really tall because of his slim build, long legs and small torso. If you were to look at him in standalone shots, you'd assume he was 183cm!
b-mint1994 said on 13/Apr/15
He's one of the lankest looking 5'10" guys I've seen. You'd guess he's 6'1" just looking at him in stand alone shots.
pablo77bar said on 11/Apr/15
Justin Timberlake isn't that tall
He is a true Lift user
Lorne said on 8/Apr/15
I personally wouldn't at all be suprised if he measured 180 in the afternoon...

Wonder what he claims?
Elias said on 6/Apr/15
There is much more chance that Andrew is 6ft rather than 5ft 9 because he is almost the same height as 182 cm guys like Justin Timberlake and Matt Smith. Also he gives a tall lanky impression (a 5ft 9 guy can't appear like that).Andrew is definitely a 179cm-181cm guy.
pablo77bar said on 5/Apr/15
I can't see this guy as almost a 180
He is much smaller than 194 Armie Hammer
For me this guy is 175 ( 5ft 9)
S.J.H said on 1/Feb/15
5'10.25 on the money. I had met Andrew he was a very sociable person and did tell me he was a little over 5'11 in sneakers and so it sound to be a weak 179cm barefeet
max said on 5/Nov/14
i think he's 180cm, he's a normal 5'11 guy
spider said on 7/Sep/14
Then again - Shannon does have poor posture in that photo George
Sam said on 2/Sep/14
Yeah, I think he can look pretty close to 5'11" next to Shannon, not towered by him.
George said on 31/Aug/14
Andrew looks about 4.5-5 inches shorter than Michael Shannon (6'3.5).
Click Here
TJE said on 29/Aug/14
He's built similarly to Topher Grace, he can look 179-180, but consistently looks about 3.5-4 cm shorter than someone like Justin Timberlake. I'd say he's a weak 179, in other words 178.5.
bodwaya said on 12/Aug/14
rob phillip is 5 foot 9 and in this PIC he towers him by 2 inches i thnink andrew needs a 1 inch upgrade
cole said on 6/Aug/14
@Editor Rob: Garfield and Timberlake looked pretty close in the movie, and in the few full body shots from various events, they also look about the same. I'd be very surprised if Timberlake was 1 inch taller than Andrew - maybe there is 0.5in between them, but I wouldn't say much more than that. The 5'10.5 listing is bang on for Garfield imo - it's Timberlake that should be taken down a fraction or two.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Dejavu said on 1/Aug/14
He looks 5'11 next to Justin Timberlake.
rockitbaby said on 31/Jul/14
Assuming that Justin Timberlake is around 1,83m, Andrew is 1,79m.

Click Here
RoDawg said on 19/Jul/14
I'm 5'11 and I've always looked at him and thought we'd be the same height. He seemed not too much shorter than 6'1 Heath Ledger in Imaginarium.
RoDawg said on 19/Jul/14
I'm 5'11 and I've always looked at him and thought we'd be the same height. He seemed not too much shorter than 6'1 Heath Ledger in Imaginarium.
trav said on 19/Jun/14
I am 5'10 he about 5'10.5 to 5'11
Dejavu said on 10/May/14
I think he is a weak 5'11 at worst. He gives an impression of being taller than 5'10.
Winston said on 5/May/14
Click Here
Arch Stanton said on 5/May/14
Didn't you see The Social Network dude? He looked a similar height to Timberlake and was could look 4 inches taller than Eisenberg,
Realist said on 5/May/14
@George woah. Guy Bearman looks 5'7 in that video. But he states 5'9. As for Andrew i think 176-177 seems fair.
dude said on 5/May/14
Rob, would you rule out 5 ft 10 for Andrew?
[Editor Rob: it might be arguable, but you could probably say anywhere from 5ft 10 to 11 was possible.]
xrz said on 5/May/14
what the? I thought he was 6 ft tall. Especially standing next to a weak 6ft Fallon.
Marcus Hickman said on 4/May/14
i'm also 5' 10 1/2", but a bulky 208 lbs.
George said on 3/May/14
6ft 1.25 Chris Martin is noticeably taller than Andrew, so the listing seems correct to me.
Click Here
Damon said on 3/May/14
Check out this video towards the end, he and Fallon are right next to each other. i wouldn't guess more than a half an inch to maybe an inch between them. I think he's no shorter than the listing. Maybe even 5'11

Click Here
Emmett said on 2/May/14
"I will give him 5'11 and a ripped 175 pounds."

175 is pretty big for 5'11, especially with a slim build and low body fat like him. I think he looks 160 lbs max, maybe less. Since he became famous, people have commented on how much I look like him; the hair and everything. Funny that we're pretty close in height too.
tristen said on 29/Apr/14
The listing is spot on to me 179cm no shorter no taller. He looks that height and his slim frame makes him look 6ish. Maybe 179.3cm?(5'10.5)
spider said on 25/Apr/14
If he were 6ft or even 6ft1 Emma stone wouldn't be looking onto his face at all, more like his chest. So he for sure isn't over 5'11 and certainly not under 5'10 - listing is fair in this case I think.
Damon said on 24/Apr/14
Click Here He looks a solid 5'10 here. He looks a good 3 inches taller than Pena, about 2 inches taller than Cruise and about the same height as Redford (who seemed to have lost a wee bit of height at that point)
Say_what said on 17/Apr/14
I can't believe you guys! Just came back from watching the movie and the guy is clearly 6 foot 1!
Dejavu said on 15/Apr/14
I think he is 5'10.75 or a weak 5'11
spider said on 12/Apr/14
I saw him at the Spiderman 2 premiere and he doesn't look ad big in public as in photos but he is definitely not under 178. Having said that he was wearing about 4-5cm dress shoes on the red carpet and still didn't look over 5'11 so my personal feeling is that the listing is correct, judging from the mixed images of him looking both taller and shorter than the 179-180 mark.
dejavu said on 12/Apr/14
I think he is closer to 5'11 than 5'10. He often wears converse to events. He measures well next to Justin Timberlake.
MD said on 7/Apr/14
Yeah, there is not a 2" difference between him and Jaime.
Dejavu said on 6/Apr/14
Rob, don't you think Garfield, with less footwear, looks 2 inches taller than Jamie Foxx.
[Editor Rob: I think 179 is still a good shout for him. ]
Ally said on 6/Apr/14
This guy is weird, sometimes he look 5'11, other times 5'9-5'10

@dejavu if Fox is 5'9, Garfield is 5'10. There is only 1 inch difference between them in these pictures. His hair makes him look taller
dejavu said on 6/Apr/14
Click Here
Click Here
I see a 5'11 guy here.
dejavu said on 6/Apr/14
He looks 2 inches taller than Jamie Foxx consistently when the ground is flat. Plus he usually wears converse. He is 5'10.75 at least or a legit 5'11. He looked similar to Justin Timberlake, who is arguably 5'11.5 max. I see a 5'11 guy.
spider said on 4/Apr/14
He looks consistently tall in public - if you were to round up id say he looks 180 but there is evidence to show 178-179
MD said on 1/Apr/14
With 5'9" Jamie Foxx (and however tall Emma is in whatever heels she's wearing) at a recent press event:

Click Here
Dejavu said on 31/Mar/14
He always look 180cm to me
freddy said on 28/Mar/14
he's 5'10 without shoes on
Arch Stanton said on 21/Mar/14
Click Here

LOL the resemblance with Kelly Jones is uncanny..
Arch Stanton said on 21/Mar/14
Mmm, he looks minimum 4 inches taller than Eisenberg in The Social Network.
sss said on 11/Mar/14
Timberlake is 179-180. Same height with Beckham, maybe a fraction under.
sss said on 13/Feb/14
178 imo
chrisssss said on 7/Feb/14
Does he wear lifts? Cuz sometimes he can look 11feet tall 0.0
lelman said on 2/Jan/14
@Seahawks, he doesn't look quite 4 inches taller than her, more 3, and they're both slouching a bit.

I wouldn't give him any more than 179cm.
cole said on 2/Jan/14
@MD: They are on grass though, that has a huge impact. I remember when I played football a few years ago, and we took team-pictures on the field after the games - I was about 5'10 flat at the time and appeared the same height as the 6 ft range guys on the team. I think 5'10.5 mostly seems fair for Garfield.
Balrog said on 24/Dec/13
He is in the strong average area, and alone he can pull off 6'0" because of slim build and hairstyle.
tony said on 22/Dec/13
Wow, I thought he is for about 184 or smth pretty close to that height. Just because of his slim build one might think he is over average.
Dejavu said on 10/Dec/13
He can look 5'11
Realist said on 7/Dec/13
5'9.5 or 177 cm is good.
George said on 1/Dec/13
Andrew looks really tall in Red Riding: 1974 (he was even few inches taller than 5'10 Rebecca Hall), but he's probably wearing some kind of lift shoes in that one. In other movies he looks average. I think the listing is correct, though I wouldn't be surprised if he turned out to be a bit taller or shorter than that, the guy's really thin and lanky, so it's hard to tell how tall he is exactly.
Ally said on 21/Nov/13
@crumble is you okay dude? Why are replying to yourself :D
Anyways yeah Andrew is between 177-179cm
MD said on 18/Nov/13
Crazy shot. Here he is with 5'9" Jamie Foxx, who appears to even have a footwear disadvantage:

Click Here

Click Here
Ally said on 14/Nov/13
Rob, how did you get this? Why 179 cm? Why not 178 or 180 cm?
Iceman said on 30/Oct/13
Garfield is not 5'11" and is for sure shorter then Timberlake. He's 5'10"-5'10.5".
Dejavu said on 23/Oct/13
Looks 5'11
chris said on 14/Oct/13
Rob, if you get a chance to have a picture with Andrew, please do so because a lot of pictures- height wise are very misleading.
MD said on 11/Oct/13
Where'd all my posts go?
Bakura said on 5/Oct/13
@MD- I can't see how you can think Matt is 5'10.5 in light of Rob and Jenny's photos with them. Taking into account he's tilting his head considerably, he easily looks a strong 5'11" in both photos.

Maybe 6ft is a stretch, but on the grounds of that photo I could buy 5'11" for Garfield. As Rob has said, Matt can be deceptive with height.
crumble said on 26/Sep/13
agreed crumble looks 179
crumble said on 23/Sep/13
looked 179 in amazing spiderman.
cole said on 12/Sep/13
@chris: I'd just say it's because of perspective distortion. In that shot Redmayne is much closer to the camera, and that's why you can't use it to argue their heights. I also highly doubt that Garfield has had any height-surgery, there is no need to de that at 179-180, in fact, there is no need for anyone to do it.
chris said on 10/Sep/13
@cole, fair point but yet we still aren't 100% about footwear.. take a look at my post with Andrew Garfield and Eddie Redmayne -- of course the photos aren't ideal, but in two different photos Andrew looks around 3 inches shorter than Redmayne, similar height to the other unknown man next to him. I've heard that Andrew is quite self aware, is it possible that he could wear lifts or even perhaps have gone to the extent of surgery to become a few inches taller? In the second photo he looks about the same height as 5'11" redmayne, what are your thoughts on this?
Chameleon said on 10/Sep/13
@Seahawksfan he looks 5'10 max in that pic he even has footwear adventage..
cole said on 8/Sep/13
@chris: You are obviously free to think so. But when you (in the pic you call evidence): 1. Can't see their feet, 2. Garfield is clearly dropping posture, and 3. Timberlake stands tall (including several other crucial factors you simply cannot gauge from a shot like that), it's just not usable as clear evidence (not that there is a whole lot of those out ther that is).

A word of advice: Read the articles that Rob has posted about: 'photos and perspective' and 'how to measure a celebrities height'.

And also, take a look at this, and tell me if you can see as much of a difference as you seem to think there is between them: Click Here

It's not 100% ideal either, I know, but I'm yet to find one of JT and Garfield that actually is.
chris said on 6/Sep/13
@cole that's a perfectly reasonable picture, and there are plenty other to prove..
cole said on 5/Sep/13
@Chris: You should find an even slightly usable picture before making a statement like that. From what I have seen, in good shots, the ones I have posted further down the comment-section, they look more or less the same height. But to me, Andrew can give the taller impression.
Balrog said on 31/Aug/13
What a terrible pic, chris.
chris said on 30/Aug/13
yeah cole don't think he's taller than timberlake... Click Here
chris said on 30/Aug/13
yeah cole don't think he's taller than timberlake... Click Here
cole said on 29/Aug/13
Mostly actually see him as a 180 cm guy, same height as, if not taller than Timberlake.
chris said on 24/Aug/13
Hey Rob, this interests me.. Here with 5ft 11 Eddie Redmayne Andrew looks about 5ft9 or even less... and this photo was taken a few years back... Click Here a more modern photo of the two he looks about the same height and his hair even adds extra height... Click Here seeing as he is now 30 he must have been around his mid 20s when the first photo was taken and his growth slowing/stopped. Is it possible he had a last minute growth spurt and grew 2 or so inches or could he be a lift wearer...
Dejavu said on 23/Aug/13
Rob, is 5'11 a possibility? He looks 5'11 next to Jamie Foxx and the same height as Justin Timberlake.
[Editor Rob: he can look anywhere from a 5ft 10 to 11 guy]
chris said on 20/Aug/13
Here he is with 5ft7 Keira Knightley. She's wearing about 3 inch heels making her about 5ft10 or just under--- Click Here . Looks as though Garfield has about 1cm of height on her, 2cm MAX. So i'd say 5ft10-5ft10.5 sounds right.
Dejavu said on 19/Aug/13
This guy can look a strong 5'11 and he wears thin soled shoes
Bakura said on 17/Aug/13
Click Here

This is just plain weird. I believed prior to seeing this photo that Garfield was no more than a strong 5'10" but standing here with Matt Smith, who Rob has met and pegged at 5'11.5" he doesn't look any shorter, in fact a fraction taller. We can see their feet, too, and he clearly isn't wearing lifts. Is the terrain/camera angles throwing me off guard here or could Garfield be taller than this listing?
Tempest said on 11/Aug/13
Rob is too deep in his height contracts to change certain heights. We all know Timberlake isn't 5'11.5".
chris said on 10/Aug/13
his slim build makes him look like a 6ft, 6ft1 guy. Only next to people you can kind of tell he is a bit shorter. I'd say the listing is correct.
cole said on 8/Aug/13
Click Here

Again he looks the same height as Timberlake, whom, again, is not a 5'11.5 guy. My bet is both Timberlake and Garfield are guys who will measure in the upper 5'10 range (5'10.5-9), reaching around 5'11 early in the day.

My bet is Garfield is actually the taller one. Timberlake having 1 inch on him I can never see, unless JT has a serious footwear advantage: Click Here

Even when Timberlake is in boots and Garfield is in converse, they look similar in height: Click Here

Rob do you agree that there is not 1 inch between them, at least not in favour of Timberlake?
Jeremy said on 7/Aug/13
1,75 cm... maybe 1,77
Elias said on 6/Aug/13
@lisa, yes i agree with you that garfield can look 183 cm alone because his slim body and his long neck make him taller than he rally is but when you see him next to other people like jamie fox, justin timberlake, roberd redford, tom cruise and garett hedlund you conclude that andrew is 180 cm max.
lisa said on 5/Aug/13
andrew height is almost 183 cm
cole said on 2/Aug/13
He can look 5'11 range with Jamie Foxx, and I doubt he's wearing lifts.

Click Here
SAK said on 30/Jul/13
Looking at the great pic Yaspaa posted, Garfield is no shorter than 5f10. 5f10.5 fits him perfectly.
chris said on 28/Jul/13
Cruisindude said on 27/Jul/13
Btw, I looked him up next to "Gemma stone" which really is Emma stone, and he looked really tall next to the person you said I should go look at. Emma might look almost tall as him because she wears high heels and Andrew wears those shoes that have a little sole in them.
Cruisindude said on 27/Jul/13
Okay @FA, Andrew Garfield isn't a "solid 6 foot" then. The reason I said that was because he's lanky and that seemed to have a good amount of height to him. But if your gonna say he's a "weak 5,10" or "doesn't deserve that title", then so be it.
Yaspaa said on 27/Jul/13
Wrong! looks comfortably taller than Knightley in heels in a nice straight shot. Listing is fair.
Click Here
Cruisindude said on 22/Jul/13
He looks like a solid 6 foot.
Balrog said on 19/Jul/13
Not under 5'10''. He actually had more than 3in on Jesse Eisenberg in the Social Network. I think he's closer to 5'10'' but 179 cm is possible.
thomas85 said on 4/Jul/13
Come on... Andrew is between 1,75 or maybe 1,76, look at him beside Emma Stone
chrissss said on 3/Jul/13
Id say he's a legit a 180cm, nuthin less nuthin above, he is quite lean and can look taller but is shorter than justin timberlake who is(182cm)
Bakura said on 1/Jul/13
@Jake: No way, he's at least 178, more likely 179.
chris said on 22/Jun/13
I'd say he's 5'10' 178/179... here with 5'7' Keira Knitley they are basically the same height and she is wearing 3inch heels or so. A lot of websites list him as 6ft but I don't think so...
harry said on 21/Jun/13
5´10´´ 1,78
Dane said on 21/Jun/13
I think Andrew´s height is 1,76. He is not tall
Jax said on 1/Jun/13
Id say between 176cm and 177cm...179cm only in shoes and good posture
Balrog said on 6/Apr/13
Arch Stanton. Garfield is clearly slouching in your pic. This guy constantly looks same height that Timberlake. He's 5'10'' range just like him.
Willy said on 2/Apr/13
After being listed as 6' on Rob's favorite site for years, Garfield is now listed over there as 5'10''. Don't know why they changed it though. Maybe they've read my comments here and are more willing to go with what seems most natural than Rob is. But they might change it back just as well.
kevin said on 9/Mar/13
im not sure on this guy sometims looks close to 180cm and other times 175cm.
bodwaya said on 7/Feb/13
spectator is right I.m.d.b does that lot they label david hyde pierce 5 foot 11 but he is 5 foot 9 billy bob is listed as 6 foot is 5 foot 10. richard gere is listed 5 foot 11 there only 5 foot 9
Maximus meridius said on 4/Jan/13
@conti Emma Watason 5ft 7in in her boots not being funny that's a joke she doesn't reach 5ft 7in in boots.
Spectator said on 31/Dec/12
I have noticed that the website I.M.D.B. adds almost 2 inches to most actors.
This looks more fair.
SAK said on 30/Dec/12
179 is fair.
Trey said on 10/Dec/12
Looked closer to 5'9 with Garrett Hedlund.
MaskDeMasque said on 9/Dec/12
Just watched Never Let me Go, thought he looked 5'10.
Willy said on 2/Dec/12
Come on, Rob, bring him down to 178 cm (5'10.25'' or 5'10'' flat). You know you want to.
Willy said on 28/Nov/12
The photo with Lily Cole and Terry Gilliam is a good find, cause it shows that Garfield doesn't go over 178 cm even when he's pulling out his giraffe's neck. In fact, on this picture, he looks as if he's struggling to hit 177 cm. Maybe that's his evening low. Nevertheless, I'm willing to believe that Andrew is 179 cm when waking up and then 178 cm for most of the day.
Elias said on 25/Nov/12
look at that Click Here
Conti said on 22/Nov/12
He was standing front of Emma Stone who is 5'7 in her boots at high school in The Amazing Spiderman.I would say he's 5'10 in his shoes and 5'9 barefoot when he was in his room looking at himself from the mirror in The Amazing Spiderman.
Chiara said on 20/Nov/12
I saw him on Ellen and he looked huge there, like 6´2 or something.
Arch Stanton said on 9/Nov/12
He reminds me of my geeky cousin. He's such a geek LOL. But seems like a really nice guy.
Arch Stanton said on 9/Nov/12
Click Here

You sure about this Rob, he doesn't look it here next to Justin Timberlake who is 6' tops. His hair is huge, looks like a cross between Andy Murray and Kelly Jones.
jed said on 2/Nov/12
I met him while working as a movie extra, I'm 5'10.5, and I thought he was just a little bit shorter than myself. I'd say 5'9, perhaps even 5'8.5 or something., but he's slender. Very very nice gentleman and very sincere.
zero said on 11/Sep/12
Same height as Justin Timberlake and he's listed an inch shorter than him.
Willy said on 7/Sep/12
Emma Stone does not have the body of a 5'6'' woman, and even 5'5'' seems unlikely to me. 5'4.5'' tops.
johnnyfive said on 6/Sep/12
I dunno. That beach pic from Bran is probably a good example that Garfield could just be 5'10 flat like you originally had him and now I see you upgraded him by .5 inches. However, he does seem 5'11 on most pictures with 5'6 listed Emma Stone, like this one.

Click Here

Stone has crazy big heels and he has sneakers, and Garfield also looks 5'11 minimum on this one, where they are both rocking similar footwear.

Click Here

I hear Stone might be 5'5 and not 5'6, therefore, Garfield is 5'10, so in that case, that is not good news at all for Ben Stiller who looked like a midget next to Stone at the Oscars.
Willy said on 28/Aug/12
There are more than three inches between Andrew and Emma, but Stone is not 5'6'', more like 5'4''. For Garfield I'd say
Out of bed: 5'10.5'' (179 cm)
Morning: 5'10.25'' (178 cm)
Afternoon: 5'10'' (178 cm)
Evening: 5'9.75'' (177 cm)
Give him 178 and you have him.
bran said on 22/Aug/12
Looks 5'9" with 5'6" Emma stone Click Here
Z- Man said on 14/Aug/12
5 ft 10.5 inches seems legit!!!
BigT said on 29/Jul/12
Morrell says on 7/Jun/12
Rob, please check out the new clip from The Amazing Spider-Man, Andrew Garfield and Denis Leary are walking beside each other. Now if you say Leary is in the 6'2" range then Andrew must be 5'9.5" max. Hes only until Leary's eye brows. Now either Leary is taller than 6'2" or Andrew is smaller than 5'10.5"

If leary is 188 cm and Andrew reached his eyebrows, that would make Andrew 177-179 cm, depending on Leary´s facial structure, and of course: footwear, camera-angles, and the fact that they were walking...
Comicbookmaster17 said on 25/Jul/12
@MaskDeMasque, In the comic books he was 5'10'.
BigT said on 25/Jul/12
A bit shorter than this, like 176-177 cm.
josh b said on 24/Jul/12
You sure Rob? Looks taller than this compared to Rhys Ivans in pictures.
[Editor Rob: I think his hair adds a bit to height. ]
Berial said on 23/Jul/12
His slim figure often makes him look taller, that and his ridiculous hair, but I think 1,78 to 1,80 is about right to him.
Morrell said on 7/Jun/12
Rob, please check out the new clip from The Amazing Spider-Man, Andrew Garfield and Denis Leary are walking beside each other. Now if you say Leary is in the 6'2" range then Andrew must be 5'9.5" max. Hes only until Leary's eye brows. Now either Leary is taller than 6'2" or Andrew is smaller than 5'10.5"
ANDREA[ITA] said on 6/Jun/12
Rob, why did you downgrade him? He's noticeably taller than Jesse Eisenberg, listed at 171... He's no less than 8-9 cms taller! He's also very close to Justin Timberlake's height... If jesse is really 171 and justin 182 the 5'10.75 is closer to the truth...
[Editor Rob: 179cm on the nose might be nearer to the mark than 180cm, I'm not sure he looked a 3 inch bigger than someone like cruise.

then again, cruise can look 5ft 8-8.5 range!]
MaskDeMasque said on 11/Feb/12

actually, spiderman was 5'9 according to the comics.

but yeh he looks like a strong 5'10- .5 or maybe .75
Silent d said on 27/Jan/12
I thought he was 6 foot but i guess 180cm is closer to the truth. He sometimes looks taller than justin timberlake.
Godred said on 22/Jan/12
5`10 - just like spiderman.
Jack said on 20/Jan/12
He can look 182 cm.
Voiceless Dental Fricative said on 12/Jan/12
I think he could be a strong 5'11

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.