Add a Comment2460 comments
Average Guess (658 Votes)
6ft 2.25in (188.6cm)
6ft 2.25in (188.6cm)
viper said on 16/Nov/19
Reynolds looks shorter than 6-2 Rock and I remember a video on TMZ some years ago where Reynolds looked shorter than Rock.
Reynolds must have been wearing some big time footwear to look that tall
Reynolds looks shorter than 6-2 Rock and I remember a video on TMZ some years ago where Reynolds looked shorter than Rock.
Reynolds must have been wearing some big time footwear to look that tall
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 15/Nov/19
viper, Reynolds is way taller than you think or read it in person when standing straight up. In person he look between 6'2-6'3 so more towards 6'2 1/2. Although i'm not able to walk close to him by surrounded by his huge fans and few security guard blocking the way i can tell he is easily over 6'2. I have a 6'2 3/4 brother and i know how that range people looks. 6'1.25-6'1.5" is way nasty underestimated, you could have mislead by his poor posture sometimes maybe look 6'1 1/2 a slouch. There is 2" between Samuel Jackson and Reynolds with no lies.
viper, Reynolds is way taller than you think or read it in person when standing straight up. In person he look between 6'2-6'3 so more towards 6'2 1/2. Although i'm not able to walk close to him by surrounded by his huge fans and few security guard blocking the way i can tell he is easily over 6'2. I have a 6'2 3/4 brother and i know how that range people looks. 6'1.25-6'1.5" is way nasty underestimated, you could have mislead by his poor posture sometimes maybe look 6'1 1/2 a slouch. There is 2" between Samuel Jackson and Reynolds with no lies.
viper said on 11/Nov/19
IMO, better chance he's 6-2 than Ryan Reynolds, absolutely.
I think Reynolds is 6-1.25-6-1.5
He admits it and was listed 6-1 everywhere before he got super fanous
IMO, better chance he's 6-2 than Ryan Reynolds, absolutely.
I think Reynolds is 6-1.25-6-1.5
He admits it and was listed 6-1 everywhere before he got super fanous
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 11/Nov/19
Here’s Matt Damon standing with Ben Affleck in one photo, and the with Chris Hemsworth in another:
Click Here
Here’s Matt Damon standing with Ben Affleck in one photo, and the with Chris Hemsworth in another:
Click Here
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 11/Nov/19
Ben Affleck looks to be shorter by the Hemsworth brothers in those photos, but it’s really impossible to tell since the ground is invisible; the angle is very disoriented in those photos, too.
Ben Affleck looks to be shorter by the Hemsworth brothers in those photos, but it’s really impossible to tell since the ground is invisible; the angle is very disoriented in those photos, too.
Importer said on 6/Nov/19
@TheyTookMySon2
This is a better one. Similar posture and I wouldn’t of thought he’s below 6’2” despite the big camera disadvantage.
Click Here
@TheyTookMySon2
This is a better one. Similar posture and I wouldn’t of thought he’s below 6’2” despite the big camera disadvantage.
Click Here
Pierre said on 4/Nov/19
Comparisons Ben Affleck /other celebrities
Benedict Cumberbatch and James Corden = Click Here
Samuel Anderson 5"10.25' = Click Here next to James Corden = Click Here . By this comparisons Benedict to me looks again under 5"11',he does not look really taller than Samuel Anderson here
Comparisons Ben Affleck /other celebrities
Benedict Cumberbatch and James Corden = Click Here
Samuel Anderson 5"10.25' = Click Here next to James Corden = Click Here . By this comparisons Benedict to me looks again under 5"11',he does not look really taller than Samuel Anderson here
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 3/Nov/19
@viper Honestly sometimes i feel Ben is only 6'1 3/4 a low not more. But he also could be 6'2 a low. Matthew Fox can pull off 6'2 but i have a feeling he was a guy could be rule out as 187.5cm a low. Fox is either 1/8 taller than Ben or in opposite way.
@viper Honestly sometimes i feel Ben is only 6'1 3/4 a low not more. But he also could be 6'2 a low. Matthew Fox can pull off 6'2 but i have a feeling he was a guy could be rule out as 187.5cm a low. Fox is either 1/8 taller than Ben or in opposite way.
Pierre said on 1/Nov/19
@Jackson =
Matt Damon 5"9.75'?! And James Corden ? 5"9.25'/5"9.5'? = Click Here Mickael
Douglas? around 5"11' ?! Woaw!I don't see him as tall....
@Jackson =
Matt Damon 5"9.75'?! And James Corden ? 5"9.25'/5"9.5'? = Click Here Mickael
Douglas? around 5"11' ?! Woaw!I don't see him as tall....
viper said on 1/Nov/19
Don't know If I'd upgrade Fox.
I think Fox and Ben are probably the exact same height.
Don't know If I'd upgrade Fox.
I think Fox and Ben are probably the exact same height.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 31/Oct/19
@viper said on 30/Oct/19
I would have to agree with you Fox is more close to 6'2 and always look solid 187cm and i bet Rob would upgrade him if met him and took a photo the amount of upgrade from 6'1 1/2 would be 1/4 to 1/2 inch.
@viper said on 30/Oct/19
I would have to agree with you Fox is more close to 6'2 and always look solid 187cm and i bet Rob would upgrade him if met him and took a photo the amount of upgrade from 6'1 1/2 would be 1/4 to 1/2 inch.
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 31/Oct/19
And if people want to argue that his eye level isn’t low, I’ve seen people make random jokes about his forehead length off of this website out of the blue, lol. His is evidently very low.
And if people want to argue that his eye level isn’t low, I’ve seen people make random jokes about his forehead length off of this website out of the blue, lol. His is evidently very low.
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 31/Oct/19
@Jackson,
I agree with that, and if I recall correctly, Rob did mention that one of the photos that he took with Benedict Cumberbatch was taken after the latter had a rough night of sleep, or at a time where Rob wasn’t at his normal low; I forget which one it was, however. The top of Rob’s head comes up to approximately 1.5” inches above Benedict’s eye level, and Benedict’s eye level has to be AT LEAST five inches beneath the top of his head.
That puts Benedict at roughly 5’11 5/8”; factor in the 1/3” of an inch footwear advantage, and he’d measure down to around 5’11 1/4”. He could be 5’11 1/2” as well, though I wouldn’t rub much emphasis on that photo alone in terms or breaking it down to the nearly 1/8”-1/4” of an inch. One could nitpick and say that he looks 5’11” or 6’0” depending on the photo, considering how the height that he appears seems to fluctuate by the picture.
@Jackson,
I agree with that, and if I recall correctly, Rob did mention that one of the photos that he took with Benedict Cumberbatch was taken after the latter had a rough night of sleep, or at a time where Rob wasn’t at his normal low; I forget which one it was, however. The top of Rob’s head comes up to approximately 1.5” inches above Benedict’s eye level, and Benedict’s eye level has to be AT LEAST five inches beneath the top of his head.
That puts Benedict at roughly 5’11 5/8”; factor in the 1/3” of an inch footwear advantage, and he’d measure down to around 5’11 1/4”. He could be 5’11 1/2” as well, though I wouldn’t rub much emphasis on that photo alone in terms or breaking it down to the nearly 1/8”-1/4” of an inch. One could nitpick and say that he looks 5’11” or 6’0” depending on the photo, considering how the height that he appears seems to fluctuate by the picture.
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 31/Oct/19
Benedict might look 5’10 1/4” if you go by the eyes levels alone in the side-by-side photo that he has with Rob, but Benedict’s eye level is significantly lower than it would be for your average man who exceeds 5’11” due to his abnormally long facial structure. I don’t think that 5’11” to even 5’11 1/2” is preposterous for him.
Benedict might look 5’10 1/4” if you go by the eyes levels alone in the side-by-side photo that he has with Rob, but Benedict’s eye level is significantly lower than it would be for your average man who exceeds 5’11” due to his abnormally long facial structure. I don’t think that 5’11” to even 5’11 1/2” is preposterous for him.
Jackson said on 30/Oct/19
@Viper
6’1.5” is waaaay more reasonable of a guess then @Pierre guessing 6’0.5”
@Viper I hope you’d agree the 6’0.5” guess is silly...
I have Damon at what Rob lists him at. He holds up well with Christian Bale
Click Here
Lowest I see Ben is 6’1.75” highest 6’2.5”
What I truly think is 6’2.25” early day closer to 6’2” near end of day
I see Ben having 5 inches on Damon at when they both wear equal dress shoes.
Ben can look less than 5 inches taller range then Damon when I see Damon in boots. It can be hard to tell.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
@Viper
6’1.5” is waaaay more reasonable of a guess then @Pierre guessing 6’0.5”
@Viper I hope you’d agree the 6’0.5” guess is silly...
I have Damon at what Rob lists him at. He holds up well with Christian Bale
Click Here
Lowest I see Ben is 6’1.75” highest 6’2.5”
What I truly think is 6’2.25” early day closer to 6’2” near end of day
I see Ben having 5 inches on Damon at when they both wear equal dress shoes.
Ben can look less than 5 inches taller range then Damon when I see Damon in boots. It can be hard to tell.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Pierre said on 30/Oct/19
viper said on 29/Oct/19
Hartnett is 6-2 at most
Yeah Viper i agree with you i think Adam Godley is probably a bit over his 6"1' list and Josh Hartnett does not look even one hair over him,i think it's even the contrary.
viper said on 29/Oct/19
Hartnett is 6-2 at most
Yeah Viper i agree with you i think Adam Godley is probably a bit over his 6"1' list and Josh Hartnett does not look even one hair over him,i think it's even the contrary.
Jackson said on 30/Oct/19
@Celebheights 6’1.5
Exactly. Common sense. Cumberbatch is at least 5’11” and Rob just confirmed it.
@Celebheights 6’1.5
Exactly. Common sense. Cumberbatch is at least 5’11” and Rob just confirmed it.
Jackson said on 30/Oct/19
@grizz
Unfortunately alcohol addiction can be a extremely hard thing to fight. He had been sober for about a year but slipped up it seems. He is only human and I hope he can bounce back. He was a cool Batman to me but just the writing wasn’t all that great.
@grizz
Unfortunately alcohol addiction can be a extremely hard thing to fight. He had been sober for about a year but slipped up it seems. He is only human and I hope he can bounce back. He was a cool Batman to me but just the writing wasn’t all that great.
Pierre said on 30/Oct/19
@Celebheights 6"1.5' @ Rob =
Next to Josh Benedict seems to me under a full 5"11',he had probably a fraction more shoes ,his hairs are looking higher than Josh's hairs,he's standing a little bit closer to the camera too with the camera very close to them that give him an advantage imo.Their postures are looking very similar.
@Celebheights 6"1.5' @ Rob =
Next to Josh Benedict seems to me under a full 5"11',he had probably a fraction more shoes ,his hairs are looking higher than Josh's hairs,he's standing a little bit closer to the camera too with the camera very close to them that give him an advantage imo.Their postures are looking very similar.
viper said on 30/Oct/19
On the flip side, I would have bet a good amount of money Matthew Fox was a straight up 6-2 guy.
On the flip side, I would have bet a good amount of money Matthew Fox was a straight up 6-2 guy.
viper said on 30/Oct/19
IMO, Matt Damon is no taller than 5-9.
I see consistently anywhere between 4 and 5 inches with Ben.
He could be bang on 6-1.5
IMO, Matt Damon is no taller than 5-9.
I see consistently anywhere between 4 and 5 inches with Ben.
He could be bang on 6-1.5
viper said on 30/Oct/19
Jackson, IMO Reece is 5-11.5 and Hartnett is 6-2.
Don't see quite 4 inches with Rob, and Josh has what looks to be 2.5 inches on Reece.
Adds up to me.
Jackson, IMO Reece is 5-11.5 and Hartnett is 6-2.
Don't see quite 4 inches with Rob, and Josh has what looks to be 2.5 inches on Reece.
Adds up to me.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 29/Oct/19
There’s a photo of Benedict Cumberbatch standing by Rob, who is confirmed to be 5’8 1/8”, and he looks to be AT LEAST 5’11” by him, even if you consider the fact that he has a slight footwear advantage. I’m sorry, but he isn’t as short as 5’10 1/4”.
Editor Rob
There’s a photo of Benedict Cumberbatch standing by Rob, who is confirmed to be 5’8 1/8”, and he looks to be AT LEAST 5’11” by him, even if you consider the fact that he has a slight footwear advantage. I’m sorry, but he isn’t as short as 5’10 1/4”.
Editor RobBenedict isn't under 5ft 11 in person...
Pierre said on 29/Oct/19
Jackson said on 29/Oct/19
@Pierre
OH MY GOODNESS.... you downgrade everyone. Every single person. This site literally has lower heights then you’ll find people being listed at on google but it isn’t enough for you. Someone actually looks there height and you just downgrade. You search for one picture anywhere possibly posted and boom
That is it for you. You automatically downgrade them. It is so embarrassing. You have shown that you simply are on this site to downgrade. No Mather who it is you downgrade them to help your arguments. So so lame.
@Jackson = I have guess Adam Godley taller than his list here by around an inch if you re-read my comments.....Based on the average guesses i don't really downgrade this guys....But the problem for you is that finally Ben is never the height you claim for him....
Jackson said on 29/Oct/19
@Pierre
OH MY GOODNESS.... you downgrade everyone. Every single person. This site literally has lower heights then you’ll find people being listed at on google but it isn’t enough for you. Someone actually looks there height and you just downgrade. You search for one picture anywhere possibly posted and boom
That is it for you. You automatically downgrade them. It is so embarrassing. You have shown that you simply are on this site to downgrade. No Mather who it is you downgrade them to help your arguments. So so lame.
@Jackson = I have guess Adam Godley taller than his list here by around an inch if you re-read my comments.....Based on the average guesses i don't really downgrade this guys....But the problem for you is that finally Ben is never the height you claim for him....
Jackson said on 29/Oct/19
@Pierre
OH MY GOODNESS.... you downgrade everyone. Every single person. This site literally has lower heights then you’ll find people being listed at on google but it isn’t enough for you. Someone actually looks there height and you just downgrade. You search for one picture anywhere possibly posted and boom
That is it for you. You automatically downgrade them. It is so embarrassing. You have shown that you simply are on this site to downgrade. No Mather who it is you downgrade them to help your arguments. So so lame.
@Pierre
OH MY GOODNESS.... you downgrade everyone. Every single person. This site literally has lower heights then you’ll find people being listed at on google but it isn’t enough for you. Someone actually looks there height and you just downgrade. You search for one picture anywhere possibly posted and boom
That is it for you. You automatically downgrade them. It is so embarrassing. You have shown that you simply are on this site to downgrade. No Mather who it is you downgrade them to help your arguments. So so lame.
Pierre said on 29/Oct/19
Dejavu said on 29/Oct/19
Josh Hartnett is not under 6’2. He looks right between 6’2-6’3 next to Benedict Cumberbatch.
To me Benedict Cumberbatch does not look really 5"11' i remember a pic Benedict next to Josh a 5"10.25' guy who posted some pics here he was looking only one hair over him,you can show this pic in Benedict's page in Josh's comment on 03/August 17,Josh said in a more recent comment in the same page(on 28/dec/2018) Benedict had probably a fraction more heels than him in the pic...
Dejavu said on 29/Oct/19
Josh Hartnett is not under 6’2. He looks right between 6’2-6’3 next to Benedict Cumberbatch.
To me Benedict Cumberbatch does not look really 5"11' i remember a pic Benedict next to Josh a 5"10.25' guy who posted some pics here he was looking only one hair over him,you can show this pic in Benedict's page in Josh's comment on 03/August 17,Josh said in a more recent comment in the same page(on 28/dec/2018) Benedict had probably a fraction more heels than him in the pic...
Jackson said on 29/Oct/19
@Dejavu
Thank you. Finally some common sense. @Pierre just downgrades the living heck out of everyone on this site waaaaay to much. Like seriously you can’t think Affleck is 6’0.5” unless you have some kind of agenda. I guess it’s time for Jon Krasinski to be downgraded to 5’11 and Henry Cavill must be 5’10.
If you want to argue 6’1.75” to 6’2.2” range that’s much more realistic. I think Ben is a 6’2” guy but the saying he is 6’0.5” is just absurd. @Pierre also claims Jon Cena is 5’11” flat lol. He just goes nuts on these downgrades. Lol
@Dejavu
Thank you. Finally some common sense. @Pierre just downgrades the living heck out of everyone on this site waaaaay to much. Like seriously you can’t think Affleck is 6’0.5” unless you have some kind of agenda. I guess it’s time for Jon Krasinski to be downgraded to 5’11 and Henry Cavill must be 5’10.
If you want to argue 6’1.75” to 6’2.2” range that’s much more realistic. I think Ben is a 6’2” guy but the saying he is 6’0.5” is just absurd. @Pierre also claims Jon Cena is 5’11” flat lol. He just goes nuts on these downgrades. Lol
TheyTookMySon2 said on 29/Oct/19
@Dejavu It's no surprise Hartnett looks 6'3" next to faux 6-footers like Cumberbatch and Carney.
Click Here Cumberbatch with 183cm Google-listed Reggie Watts and 177cm Styles. Looks 180cm max.
@Dejavu It's no surprise Hartnett looks 6'3" next to faux 6-footers like Cumberbatch and Carney.
Click Here Cumberbatch with 183cm Google-listed Reggie Watts and 177cm Styles. Looks 180cm max.
viper said on 29/Oct/19
Hartnett is 6-2 at most
Hartnett is 6-2 at most
Dejavu said on 29/Oct/19
Josh Hartnett is not under 6’2. He looks right between 6’2-6’3 next to Benedict Cumberbatch.
Josh Hartnett is not under 6’2. He looks right between 6’2-6’3 next to Benedict Cumberbatch.
TheyTookMySon2 said on 28/Oct/19
@Jackson In the second pic you posted, yes, Hartnett has about 3" on Carney; though, how Carney is listed at 6', is not at all justified. Firstly, you can see that Carney has only an inch over 5'9.75' Treadaway on the left, and also his waist is directly in line with Hartnett's, which shows he must be wearing lifts (as he always does).
Hartnett 187.5-188cm
Affleck 186.5-187cm
Carney 180-180.5cm
@Jackson In the second pic you posted, yes, Hartnett has about 3" on Carney; though, how Carney is listed at 6', is not at all justified. Firstly, you can see that Carney has only an inch over 5'9.75' Treadaway on the left, and also his waist is directly in line with Hartnett's, which shows he must be wearing lifts (as he always does).
Hartnett 187.5-188cm
Affleck 186.5-187cm
Carney 180-180.5cm
Pierre said on 28/Oct/19
@Jackson =Haha! good selection have you some other "qualitative pics" with special 30 degree angle or guy in military posture ?! Very funny , i look forward your next neutral pics lol.
The fact is= by all this pics in web Adam Godley/Josh Gartnett if Adam is 6"1' Josh Hartnett is very close to his height!Not even sure he's as tall as Adam !
The pic Reeve next to Rob =if Reeve had some little helps in his shoes then in reality he's more 5"11' than 6"0',he had a better posture than Rob in the pic,Rob slouch a bit while Reeve looks upward .33 votes guess him finally a weak 6"0' not a real 6"0'(5"11.88').I talk about shoes =here is Reeve in cow boy boots next to John Cho listed 5"10'(24 votes are giving him 5"9.44')= Click Here =by this comparison Reeve is closer to 5"11' than 6"0' .
This pic is the best to me = Click Here about same postures just Josh stands a bit closer to the camera.
Adam Godley between 6"1.75'/6"2' Josh Hartnett between 6"1.75'/6"2' Reeve Carney between 5"11.25'/5"11.5' John Cho between 5"9.5'/5"9.75' Ben Affleck between 6"0.5 / 6"0.75'
@Jackson =Haha! good selection have you some other "qualitative pics" with special 30 degree angle or guy in military posture ?! Very funny , i look forward your next neutral pics lol.
The fact is= by all this pics in web Adam Godley/Josh Gartnett if Adam is 6"1' Josh Hartnett is very close to his height!Not even sure he's as tall as Adam !
The pic Reeve next to Rob =if Reeve had some little helps in his shoes then in reality he's more 5"11' than 6"0',he had a better posture than Rob in the pic,Rob slouch a bit while Reeve looks upward .33 votes guess him finally a weak 6"0' not a real 6"0'(5"11.88').I talk about shoes =here is Reeve in cow boy boots next to John Cho listed 5"10'(24 votes are giving him 5"9.44')= Click Here =by this comparison Reeve is closer to 5"11' than 6"0' .
This pic is the best to me = Click Here about same postures just Josh stands a bit closer to the camera.
Adam Godley between 6"1.75'/6"2' Josh Hartnett between 6"1.75'/6"2' Reeve Carney between 5"11.25'/5"11.5' John Cho between 5"9.5'/5"9.75' Ben Affleck between 6"0.5 / 6"0.75'
Marvin said on 28/Oct/19
Ben Henry and Gal Gadot all were pretty tall in person. Gal had on big heels and she is 5'9.5" and the guys still were taller. Ben was the biggest guy on stage. and ZackSnyder and Jesse Eisenberg were the smallest on stage. Ben looked at least 6'2" in person. I thought 6'3" but that was in shoes. I guess none of these guys are ever going to get measured barefoot except Jake Gyllenhaal did!so anything is possible :) I noticed Ben has a large head too that gives him some of his height for sure! wide shoulders and Cavill had smaller body proportions but was still a tall guy. I wonder how big Robert will get to play batman? needs to pack on some weight undoubtably! He will do good I think! :)
Ben Henry and Gal Gadot all were pretty tall in person. Gal had on big heels and she is 5'9.5" and the guys still were taller. Ben was the biggest guy on stage. and ZackSnyder and Jesse Eisenberg were the smallest on stage. Ben looked at least 6'2" in person. I thought 6'3" but that was in shoes. I guess none of these guys are ever going to get measured barefoot except Jake Gyllenhaal did!so anything is possible :) I noticed Ben has a large head too that gives him some of his height for sure! wide shoulders and Cavill had smaller body proportions but was still a tall guy. I wonder how big Robert will get to play batman? needs to pack on some weight undoubtably! He will do good I think! :)
Jackson said on 28/Oct/19
Ahhh here we have the beet proof humanly possible...
Josh Hartnett with Reece Carney who Rob has met and has a picture with on this site listed at 6’0” and looks every bit of it.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Now Reece with Rob...
Click Here
You can keep trying to find angles that favor your narrative but I just gave the best proof possible. Rob has met and has a picture with this guy and listed him at 6’0” and please have a look at him and Hartnett........
Ahhh here we have the beet proof humanly possible...
Josh Hartnett with Reece Carney who Rob has met and has a picture with on this site listed at 6’0” and looks every bit of it.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Now Reece with Rob...
Click Here
You can keep trying to find angles that favor your narrative but I just gave the best proof possible. Rob has met and has a picture with this guy and listed him at 6’0” and please have a look at him and Hartnett........
Jackson said on 28/Oct/19
@Pierre
You just did the exact same size thing Again.... you are taking photos I posted and finding angles that favor your argument. Proving my point lol.
@Pierre
You just did the exact same size thing Again.... you are taking photos I posted and finding angles that favor your argument. Proving my point lol.
Pierre said on 27/Oct/19
@ Jackson =
-In the first pic you posted by the white vertical lines of the wall behind them = you can see the pic is a lot inclined in favor to Josh Hartnett and he's standing closer to the camera lol
-In the second pic you posted Josh is standing in a perfect military posture while Adam Godley is standing in a classic posture lol
In the pic number 3 you posted Josh always stands straight while Adam Godley slouch
You say in the pic i posted Josh bent his knees?! Lol,his legs are looking straight here his posture does not look more broken than Adam it's even the contrary!(shoulders global posture...)
Click Here = Is it a very straight 6"2.75' guy next to a 6"1' guy in here ?! Ahahah!!
Same event as your pic number 3 Josh a bit closer to the camera = Click Here ....
@ Jackson =
-In the first pic you posted by the white vertical lines of the wall behind them = you can see the pic is a lot inclined in favor to Josh Hartnett and he's standing closer to the camera lol
-In the second pic you posted Josh is standing in a perfect military posture while Adam Godley is standing in a classic posture lol
In the pic number 3 you posted Josh always stands straight while Adam Godley slouch
You say in the pic i posted Josh bent his knees?! Lol,his legs are looking straight here his posture does not look more broken than Adam it's even the contrary!(shoulders global posture...)
Click Here = Is it a very straight 6"2.75' guy next to a 6"1' guy in here ?! Ahahah!!
Same event as your pic number 3 Josh a bit closer to the camera = Click Here ....
Jackson said on 27/Oct/19
@Pierre
Ohhhhhh so every single cast member wore lifts huh? They ALL wore lifts? Hahahaha...
And wow you really search until you find weird pics. Hartnett not only bends his knees but has flat shoes compared to Godley large dress shoes. There is something off about that pic. And I’m not just saying that to say it. I will provide tons of regular pics to prove it. Hatnett is obviously taller. Not even a debate.
THIS IS WHERE YOU GET EXPOSED... are you ready? Are you ready to see what camera angles can do? here is the EXACT SAME PIC.
Click Here
Wow! It’s almost like angles are a thing...
Click Here
Click Here
@Pierre
Ohhhhhh so every single cast member wore lifts huh? They ALL wore lifts? Hahahaha...
And wow you really search until you find weird pics. Hartnett not only bends his knees but has flat shoes compared to Godley large dress shoes. There is something off about that pic. And I’m not just saying that to say it. I will provide tons of regular pics to prove it. Hatnett is obviously taller. Not even a debate.
THIS IS WHERE YOU GET EXPOSED... are you ready? Are you ready to see what camera angles can do? here is the EXACT SAME PIC.
Click Here
Wow! It’s almost like angles are a thing...
Click Here
Click Here
Pierre said on 27/Oct/19
@Jackson ,as you like the pics with the whole bodies ,here is Josh Hartnett next to Adam Godley listed 6"1' here = Click Here
Josh Hartnett and Ben Affleck both not walking this time Josh slouching more than Ben= Click Here other= Click Here
@Jackson ,as you like the pics with the whole bodies ,here is Josh Hartnett next to Adam Godley listed 6"1' here = Click Here
Josh Hartnett and Ben Affleck both not walking this time Josh slouching more than Ben= Click Here other= Click Here
Jackson said on 27/Oct/19
@Viper
Can we at least agree on one thing? Ben at 6’1.75” -6’2.25” is much more of a realistic range for Ben than 6’1” flat??
@Pierre seems to think Ben is only 6’1” flat and Momoa is 6’3”
@Viper
if I think Ben is weak 6’2” and you think he is 6’1.75” range that’s very close. But the whole Ben is only 6’1” flat argument is absolutely absurd to me.
@Viper
Can we at least agree on one thing? Ben at 6’1.75” -6’2.25” is much more of a realistic range for Ben than 6’1” flat??
@Pierre seems to think Ben is only 6’1” flat and Momoa is 6’3”
@Viper
if I think Ben is weak 6’2” and you think he is 6’1.75” range that’s very close. But the whole Ben is only 6’1” flat argument is absolutely absurd to me.
Jackson said on 27/Oct/19
I’m sorry but there is absolutely zero chance Momoa is shorter than 6’3.75” to me. I give him a full 6’4” look at him with 6’2.5” listed Will Arnett!
Click Here
They both seem to have relaxed posture. Can’t see lower body and I acknowledge that.
And I don’t want to hear Arnett is smaller than 6’2.5” here he is with 5’10 3/4” listed Jason Bateman.
Click Here
Momoa Is huge. And i think his posture is relaxed with pics with Rob.
I’m sorry but there is absolutely zero chance Momoa is shorter than 6’3.75” to me. I give him a full 6’4” look at him with 6’2.5” listed Will Arnett!
Click Here
They both seem to have relaxed posture. Can’t see lower body and I acknowledge that.
And I don’t want to hear Arnett is smaller than 6’2.5” here he is with 5’10 3/4” listed Jason Bateman.
Click Here
Momoa Is huge. And i think his posture is relaxed with pics with Rob.
Pierre said on 27/Oct/19
Jackson said on 25/Oct/19
@Pierre
Oh so now Charlie is 5’11” huh? Okay lol. And more lifts too! Haha.
LOOK at Garret Hedlunds shoes!! Then look at Pedro Pascals shoes!! They all are the same. Your argument is getting old with the “laces” they are all exactly the same. Lots of men’s dress shoes have a natural curve up kinda look on the laces....
Click Here
No Jackson ,Charlie looks 6"1' in fact next to David Beckham lol.
I never said Ben in this pic was the only one to wear lifts....
Jackson said on 25/Oct/19
@Pierre
Oh so now Charlie is 5’11” huh? Okay lol. And more lifts too! Haha.
LOOK at Garret Hedlunds shoes!! Then look at Pedro Pascals shoes!! They all are the same. Your argument is getting old with the “laces” they are all exactly the same. Lots of men’s dress shoes have a natural curve up kinda look on the laces....
Click Here
No Jackson ,Charlie looks 6"1' in fact next to David Beckham lol.
I never said Ben in this pic was the only one to wear lifts....
viper said on 27/Oct/19
I'll say this.
If I was a betting man I'd bet he was a full 6-2 before somebody like Brian Austin Green was a full 5-11, and that's with Rob having a pic with him.
I'll say this.
If I was a betting man I'd bet he was a full 6-2 before somebody like Brian Austin Green was a full 5-11, and that's with Rob having a pic with him.
Marvin said on 27/Oct/19
Saw Ben at 2015 Comic Con. Guy is large. Wide shoulders and this guy made Cavill look small. He looked 6'3" up close but I could believe 6'2" maybe.
Saw Ben at 2015 Comic Con. Guy is large. Wide shoulders and this guy made Cavill look small. He looked 6'3" up close but I could believe 6'2" maybe.
Pierre said on 27/Oct/19
Sorry i have forgotten the link 🙂 .So=
@John 46 = Jason Momoa next to Jenny does not look 6"4' to me ,a lot closer to 6"3' than to 6"4' (at around 1:45) = Click Here
Sorry i have forgotten the link 🙂 .So=
@John 46 = Jason Momoa next to Jenny does not look 6"4' to me ,a lot closer to 6"3' than to 6"4' (at around 1:45) = Click Here
Jackson said on 27/Oct/19
@pierre
Easily shorter by at least 2 inches huh? Nice awful photos with only their upper body. Time to show you he had to have been standing on a lower platform. Or the angle is absolutely awful.
Here we have Hartnett next to his girlfriend. He is significantly taller!
Click Here
NOW he is magically the same height or even SHORTER in the picture you provided. Horrible angle or he is not standing level. Give me a break.
Click Here
What you just tried to pull off is proof anyone can find a bad angled or weird shot with no lower body to try and prove points. Well clearly there’s something off in those pics. He has like 4+ inches on his girlfriend and boom in your pic she is taller??? Nah..
@pierre
Easily shorter by at least 2 inches huh? Nice awful photos with only their upper body. Time to show you he had to have been standing on a lower platform. Or the angle is absolutely awful.
Here we have Hartnett next to his girlfriend. He is significantly taller!
Click Here
NOW he is magically the same height or even SHORTER in the picture you provided. Horrible angle or he is not standing level. Give me a break.
Click Here
What you just tried to pull off is proof anyone can find a bad angled or weird shot with no lower body to try and prove points. Well clearly there’s something off in those pics. He has like 4+ inches on his girlfriend and boom in your pic she is taller??? Nah..
viper said on 27/Oct/19
I think he's 6-1.5 at best. No taller than a guy like Matthew Fox.
6-1.5 Matthew Fox looks 6-3-6-3.5 with 6-4 Tyler Perry.
I think he's 6-1.5 at best. No taller than a guy like Matthew Fox.
6-1.5 Matthew Fox looks 6-3-6-3.5 with 6-4 Tyler Perry.
viper said on 26/Oct/19
Lol Will Smith isn't 6-1.5
He's lucky If he's a full 6-1
Lol Will Smith isn't 6-1.5
He's lucky If he's a full 6-1
Canson said on 26/Oct/19
Momoa is more 6’3.75 in terms of how he looks. Affleck is around 187 cm next to him
Momoa is more 6’3.75 in terms of how he looks. Affleck is around 187 cm next to him
Canson said on 26/Oct/19
@Viper: strong 6’1” looks low but maybe weak 6’2”. Absolute best he is is 6’2 flat
@Viper: strong 6’1” looks low but maybe weak 6’2”. Absolute best he is is 6’2 flat
Canson said on 26/Oct/19
@Viper: strong 6’1” looks low but maybe weak 6’2”
@Viper: strong 6’1” looks low but maybe weak 6’2”
Pierre said on 25/Oct/19
Jackson's comparisons Ben /Josh Hatnett supposed 6"2.75'.
Now Josh Hartnett/Prince William listed himself 6"2.75' = Click Here
Click Here ...Hum he looks easily shorter here by at least two inches
Jackson's comparisons Ben /Josh Hatnett supposed 6"2.75'.
Now Josh Hartnett/Prince William listed himself 6"2.75' = Click Here
Click Here ...Hum he looks easily shorter here by at least two inches
Pierre said on 25/Oct/19
@John 46 = Jason Momoa next to Jenny does not look 6"4' to me ,a lot closer to 6"3' than to 6"4' (at around 1:45)
@John 46 = Jason Momoa next to Jenny does not look 6"4' to me ,a lot closer to 6"3' than to 6"4' (at around 1:45)
Jackson said on 25/Oct/19
@Pierre
Oh so now Charlie is 5’11” huh? Okay lol. And more lifts too! Haha.
LOOK at Garret Hedlunds shoes!! Then look at Pedro Pascals shoes!! They all are the same. Your argument is getting old with the “laces” they are all exactly the same. Lots of men’s dress shoes have a natural curve up kinda look on the laces....
Click Here
@Pierre
Oh so now Charlie is 5’11” huh? Okay lol. And more lifts too! Haha.
LOOK at Garret Hedlunds shoes!! Then look at Pedro Pascals shoes!! They all are the same. Your argument is getting old with the “laces” they are all exactly the same. Lots of men’s dress shoes have a natural curve up kinda look on the laces....
Click Here
Jackson said on 25/Oct/19
@john46
He is really not that much shorter than Momoa... lots and lots of pics to prove that.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Just looks like a classic 6’2” range guy to me next to 6’4” Momoa
@john46
He is really not that much shorter than Momoa... lots and lots of pics to prove that.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Just looks like a classic 6’2” range guy to me next to 6’4” Momoa
Jackson said on 24/Oct/19
@houss
... idk what your trying to prove with that as Ben looks 6’3” in pics with Momoa in that video and “don’t be fooled by pics like this” haha what?? You do realize it’s very obvious even if 6’1.5” will smith did stand as tall as possible he’d still be shorter than Ben.
Click Here
Honestly if Will would stand straight he is obviously still gona be shorter than Ben...
@houss
... idk what your trying to prove with that as Ben looks 6’3” in pics with Momoa in that video and “don’t be fooled by pics like this” haha what?? You do realize it’s very obvious even if 6’1.5” will smith did stand as tall as possible he’d still be shorter than Ben.
Click Here
Honestly if Will would stand straight he is obviously still gona be shorter than Ben...
john46 said on 24/Oct/19
Have you seen him next to jason momoa??
If momoa is 193 cm there is no way that affleck is 188.6. Also look athim next to 189 liev schreiber, who is at least 3-4 cm taller than him.
Have you seen him next to jason momoa??
If momoa is 193 cm there is no way that affleck is 188.6. Also look athim next to 189 liev schreiber, who is at least 3-4 cm taller than him.
Jackson said on 24/Oct/19
Josh Hartnett is listed at 6’2 3/4”
Micheal Bay is listed at 6’1”
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Clearly Ben is 6’2” range. my goodness Michael bay is a classic 6’1” example and Ben is CLEARLY taller. Ben has bad posture theses days at times but come on now. The list of downgrades that would have to happen if Ben was under 6’2” is crazy
Josh Hartnett is listed at 6’2 3/4”
Micheal Bay is listed at 6’1”
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Clearly Ben is 6’2” range. my goodness Michael bay is a classic 6’1” example and Ben is CLEARLY taller. Ben has bad posture theses days at times but come on now. The list of downgrades that would have to happen if Ben was under 6’2” is crazy
Pierre said on 24/Oct/19
Charlie Hunnam and David Beckham very weak 5"11' = Charlie Hunnam Generally standing in straighter posture than David =Charlie Hunnam is a real 5"11' in the best case to me not 6"0' = Click Here Click Here
Ben and Charlie =watch the difference of laces angle between Charlie's shoes and Ben 's shoes = Click Here Click Here =To me ,if one of this two guys wear elevator shoes this is not Charlie ....
Charlie Hunnam and David Beckham very weak 5"11' = Charlie Hunnam Generally standing in straighter posture than David =Charlie Hunnam is a real 5"11' in the best case to me not 6"0' = Click Here Click Here
Ben and Charlie =watch the difference of laces angle between Charlie's shoes and Ben 's shoes = Click Here Click Here =To me ,if one of this two guys wear elevator shoes this is not Charlie ....
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Oct/19
6ft1 range is garbage
6ft1 range is garbage
Jackson said on 24/Oct/19
Charlie Hunnam is listed at 6’0” on this site and has looked 6’0” in everything I’ve watched him In. Sons of anarchy and King Arthur. And Ben is Easily at least 2 inches taller........
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Charlie Hunnam is listed at 6’0” on this site and has looked 6’0” in everything I’ve watched him In. Sons of anarchy and King Arthur. And Ben is Easily at least 2 inches taller........
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
viper said on 22/Oct/19
Disagree Johan.
Nothing more than a strong 6-1
Disagree Johan.
Nothing more than a strong 6-1
Jackson said on 22/Oct/19
@Dejavu
Exactly.. If you scroll down a bit you’ll see I posted a ton of photos where Ben had 2 inches on Cavill and was taller than Garret. Not to mention significantly taller than Charlie Hunnam who rob lists at 6’0”
@Dejavu
Exactly.. If you scroll down a bit you’ll see I posted a ton of photos where Ben had 2 inches on Cavill and was taller than Garret. Not to mention significantly taller than Charlie Hunnam who rob lists at 6’0”
Dejavu said on 22/Oct/19
He cannot only be 6’1. If he is 6’1, Garret Hedlund should be downgraded to 6’0 range and Hugh Jackman too. Cavill who can appear close to 2 inches shorter will be 5’11 range.
He cannot only be 6’1. If he is 6’1, Garret Hedlund should be downgraded to 6’0 range and Hugh Jackman too. Cavill who can appear close to 2 inches shorter will be 5’11 range.
Johan 185 cm said on 21/Oct/19
Read an article today about tall actors in Hollywood. They still list Ben as 6'4" and Dwayne Johnson at 6'5". Funnily enough they had the HOFF at 6'4" and Vince Vaughn at 6'5".
Nothing more than a strong 6'2".
Read an article today about tall actors in Hollywood. They still list Ben as 6'4" and Dwayne Johnson at 6'5". Funnily enough they had the HOFF at 6'4" and Vince Vaughn at 6'5".
Nothing more than a strong 6'2".
Ian555 said on 20/Oct/19
Rob do you have the link of the Intelligencer article where Affleck claims 6' 3"?
Editor Rob
Rob do you have the link of the Intelligencer article where Affleck claims 6' 3"?
Editor Robit's a syndicated article I believe (so appeared in a few places), but behind a paywall like newspapers.com.
Pierre said on 20/Oct/19
@Jackson =Jackson, if you read or reread my old comments you will see when i guess suspicious shoes i give arguments ,i generally never claim a guy wear lifts without post pics and arguments =and this is the case for Ben's shoes too= read or reread eventually old comments i posted here = example = comments on 14/feb/2019 or 10/April/2019 on Ben's shoes.
@Jackson =Jackson, if you read or reread my old comments you will see when i guess suspicious shoes i give arguments ,i generally never claim a guy wear lifts without post pics and arguments =and this is the case for Ben's shoes too= read or reread eventually old comments i posted here = example = comments on 14/feb/2019 or 10/April/2019 on Ben's shoes.
Jackson said on 20/Oct/19
@pierre
Look... a little bit back anytime I would provide a picture of Ben looking 6’2” + you would simply say He was in lifts and quite frankly I did find that argument a bit ridiculous. He seems a bit too tall to be feeling like he needs to wear lifts.. so I am just pointing out to you that I can say other people wear lifts too for my own sake. It isn’t hard. Also brad Pitts lift wearing is OBVIOUS. like you can clearly see it in some pics. Not the case with Ben at all.
At the end of the day I think he is a certain height and so do you. We are never gona change each other’s mind. I will admit sometimes I get annoyed on this site when i see someone saying something I think is wrong. So I apologize for ever getting frustrated.
@pierre
Look... a little bit back anytime I would provide a picture of Ben looking 6’2” + you would simply say He was in lifts and quite frankly I did find that argument a bit ridiculous. He seems a bit too tall to be feeling like he needs to wear lifts.. so I am just pointing out to you that I can say other people wear lifts too for my own sake. It isn’t hard. Also brad Pitts lift wearing is OBVIOUS. like you can clearly see it in some pics. Not the case with Ben at all.
At the end of the day I think he is a certain height and so do you. We are never gona change each other’s mind. I will admit sometimes I get annoyed on this site when i see someone saying something I think is wrong. So I apologize for ever getting frustrated.
Pierre said on 19/Oct/19
Jackson said on 18/Oct/19
@pierre
You have some “famous pics” too hahaha. You reference James Corden in like 99% or your arguments. I have watched Ben throughout his career and he has most of the time looked 6’2” range. Period. You trying to find a few pics won’t change that. Your arguments before have been so ridiculous about lifts and stuff that I am just going to use the same argument against you. Not hard to do lol.
Ahahah .....You talk as you live in his shoes....Very funny...Brad Pitt also never wear lifts you know....I have understand your arguments since a long time = all the arguments/pics/comparisons that prove Ben is only 6"1' are ridiculous arguments....Then finally it's not my arguments that are "ridiculous"....
Jackson said on 18/Oct/19
@pierre
You have some “famous pics” too hahaha. You reference James Corden in like 99% or your arguments. I have watched Ben throughout his career and he has most of the time looked 6’2” range. Period. You trying to find a few pics won’t change that. Your arguments before have been so ridiculous about lifts and stuff that I am just going to use the same argument against you. Not hard to do lol.
Ahahah .....You talk as you live in his shoes....Very funny...Brad Pitt also never wear lifts you know....I have understand your arguments since a long time = all the arguments/pics/comparisons that prove Ben is only 6"1' are ridiculous arguments....Then finally it's not my arguments that are "ridiculous"....
Jackson said on 18/Oct/19
@pierre
You have some “famous pics” too hahaha. You reference James Corden in like 99% or your arguments. I have watched Ben throughout his career and he has most of the time looked 6’2” range. Period. You trying to find a few pics won’t change that. Your arguments before have been so ridiculous about lifts and stuff that I am just going to use the same argument against you. Not hard to do lol.
@pierre
You have some “famous pics” too hahaha. You reference James Corden in like 99% or your arguments. I have watched Ben throughout his career and he has most of the time looked 6’2” range. Period. You trying to find a few pics won’t change that. Your arguments before have been so ridiculous about lifts and stuff that I am just going to use the same argument against you. Not hard to do lol.
Pierre said on 17/Oct/19
Jackson said on 16/Oct/19
@pierre
You literally can’t even see knees or legs in 90% of photos you provide... no way of telling who is slouching or standing tall.
@Jackson =lol then some of your pics are not showing the whole bodies too and i have post some pics in the past and even recently with the whole bodies....inwhich we can even see the shoes and the floor.....In your famous pic inwhich we can see the"whole bodies" John Krasinski slouch a lot and looks something like 5"11' next to a Matt Damon slouching himself and who is clearly around the same height as James Corden , you continue to take this famous pic like a good example to claim Ben is 6"2' range.As i said in my recent comment you can even claim 6"3' for Ben with this type of pics ....
Jackson said on 16/Oct/19
@pierre
You literally can’t even see knees or legs in 90% of photos you provide... no way of telling who is slouching or standing tall.
@Jackson =lol then some of your pics are not showing the whole bodies too and i have post some pics in the past and even recently with the whole bodies....inwhich we can even see the shoes and the floor.....In your famous pic inwhich we can see the"whole bodies" John Krasinski slouch a lot and looks something like 5"11' next to a Matt Damon slouching himself and who is clearly around the same height as James Corden , you continue to take this famous pic like a good example to claim Ben is 6"2' range.As i said in my recent comment you can even claim 6"3' for Ben with this type of pics ....
Jackson said on 17/Oct/19
Feel free to zoom into Ben and Justin’s footwear and you’ll see that the bottom of Justin’s foot literally sits like 2 inches away from the sole... so you always try to claim when Ben is taller than you want he wears lifts. I can do the same thing...
Click Here
I watched their film together and he had 3 inches on Timberlake in shots with equal footwear. You can find awful shots of them walking up a slanted ramp.... or you can find shots that favor Ben. It just doesn’t prove anything to me. Justin claims to be 6’1” but rob has him at 5’11.5”
Horrible angled shot
Click Here
Another bad angle.
Click Here
Feel free to zoom into Ben and Justin’s footwear and you’ll see that the bottom of Justin’s foot literally sits like 2 inches away from the sole... so you always try to claim when Ben is taller than you want he wears lifts. I can do the same thing...
Click Here
I watched their film together and he had 3 inches on Timberlake in shots with equal footwear. You can find awful shots of them walking up a slanted ramp.... or you can find shots that favor Ben. It just doesn’t prove anything to me. Justin claims to be 6’1” but rob has him at 5’11.5”
Horrible angled shot
Click Here
Another bad angle.
Click Here
viper said on 17/Oct/19
I thought for sure Matthew Fox was a solid 6-2. Turns out hes not.
And he physically looks a bit taller to me than Affleck.
I thought for sure Matthew Fox was a solid 6-2. Turns out hes not.
And he physically looks a bit taller to me than Affleck.
viper said on 17/Oct/19
Affleck was only 2 inches taller than Timberlake through the whole movie
Affleck was only 2 inches taller than Timberlake through the whole movie
Nik said on 16/Oct/19
The average guess justifies the listing!
The average guess justifies the listing!
Jackson said on 16/Oct/19
@pierre
You literally can’t even see knees or legs in 90% of photos you provide... no way of telling who is slouching or standing tall.
@pierre
You literally can’t even see knees or legs in 90% of photos you provide... no way of telling who is slouching or standing tall.
viper said on 16/Oct/19
Affleck looked no taller than 6-1 with Timberlake in the entire movie get did together
Affleck looked no taller than 6-1 with Timberlake in the entire movie get did together
Pierre said on 15/Oct/19
John Krasinski in fact seems to me lose ehight in lots of picture ,like here = Click Here he looks only an inch taller than Matt Damon here!
John Krasinski in fact seems to me lose ehight in lots of picture ,like here = Click Here he looks only an inch taller than Matt Damon here!
Pierre said on 15/Oct/19
John Krasinski in better posture than in the pic next to Matt Damon, Ben Affleck a bit closer to the camera = Click Here
John Krasinski in better posture than in the pic next to Matt Damon, Ben Affleck a bit closer to the camera = Click Here
Pierre said on 15/Oct/19
Click Here Click Here = John Krasinski in the famous pics slouch a lot and looks here only around 4 inches taller than Matt Damon not even perfectly straight himself here(legs...)....Matt Damon himself looks around the same height as James Corden....(here next to Michael Douglas in poor posture.... Click Here ) Click Here .... Then of course without considering John Krasinski lose a good quantity of height here we can claim Ben in his military posture is even 6"3'....that is clearly not the case...
Click Here Click Here = John Krasinski in the famous pics slouch a lot and looks here only around 4 inches taller than Matt Damon not even perfectly straight himself here(legs...)....Matt Damon himself looks around the same height as James Corden....(here next to Michael Douglas in poor posture.... Click Here ) Click Here .... Then of course without considering John Krasinski lose a good quantity of height here we can claim Ben in his military posture is even 6"3'....that is clearly not the case...
Jackson said on 14/Oct/19
yet we just ignore him taller than 6’2.5” Jon Krasinski with less footwear.. or how much he towers over 6’0” Charlie Hunnam. Like look there’s times he looks easily 6’2”+ and just because you find a couple pics of Justin Timberlake and him doesn’t mean it 100% makes him under 6’2” ... a few bad angled shots of them on a boat together? And I will use your argument against you since you claim lifts when Ben looks taller then you want.. what if..... what if..... Justin Timberlake knows Ben is a tall guy and maybe Justin decided he didn’t want Ben to tower him in photos so maybe Justin worse some lifts at the red carpet. You never know?? Lol
Seriously Charlie Hunnam and many more I’ve posted before would definitely need some big downgrades if Ben was downgraded...
Click Here
yet we just ignore him taller than 6’2.5” Jon Krasinski with less footwear.. or how much he towers over 6’0” Charlie Hunnam. Like look there’s times he looks easily 6’2”+ and just because you find a couple pics of Justin Timberlake and him doesn’t mean it 100% makes him under 6’2” ... a few bad angled shots of them on a boat together? And I will use your argument against you since you claim lifts when Ben looks taller then you want.. what if..... what if..... Justin Timberlake knows Ben is a tall guy and maybe Justin decided he didn’t want Ben to tower him in photos so maybe Justin worse some lifts at the red carpet. You never know?? Lol
Seriously Charlie Hunnam and many more I’ve posted before would definitely need some big downgrades if Ben was downgraded...
Click Here
Pierre said on 13/Oct/19
I personnally don't search to downgrade Ben's height i just give my opinion and try to find good proofs on his real height.This is not very important for me if Ben is listed 6"2',i just discuss about this .If Rob think his list is good this is not a sufficient reason for me to have a bad sleep the night lol
(Always a weak 6"1'for me)
Editor Rob
I personnally don't search to downgrade Ben's height i just give my opinion and try to find good proofs on his real height.This is not very important for me if Ben is listed 6"2',i just discuss about this .If Rob think his list is good this is not a sufficient reason for me to have a bad sleep the night lol
(Always a weak 6"1'for me)
Editor RobNobody should lose any sleep over an estimate of Ben or anybody's height 👍
viper said on 13/Oct/19
Some people need to be upgraded If Affleck is really 6-2, like Justin Timberlake
Some people need to be upgraded If Affleck is really 6-2, like Justin Timberlake
viper said on 13/Oct/19
I would be really surprised If Affleck looked the same height as 6-2 Rock
I would be really surprised If Affleck looked the same height as 6-2 Rock
Jackson said on 11/Oct/19
I think Ben is perfectly listed and has for the most part looked 6’2” range the majority of the time. His posture does suck sometimes. He claimed 6’3” which is a very believable height in shoes. I don’t see why so many people are hung up on trying to get him downgraded when Rob already stated the lowest he’s guess Ben at is 6’2” flat and highest 6’2.5” to put it mildly if Affleck ever got downgraded it would mean a HUGE amount of other guys would need downgraded as well. He’s not going to get downgraded. Why not worry about dudes like the rock who constantly claim on Instagram to be 6’5” like obviously that is absurd. It’s not like Ben marches around claiming to be some huge guy.
I think Ben is perfectly listed and has for the most part looked 6’2” range the majority of the time. His posture does suck sometimes. He claimed 6’3” which is a very believable height in shoes. I don’t see why so many people are hung up on trying to get him downgraded when Rob already stated the lowest he’s guess Ben at is 6’2” flat and highest 6’2.5” to put it mildly if Affleck ever got downgraded it would mean a HUGE amount of other guys would need downgraded as well. He’s not going to get downgraded. Why not worry about dudes like the rock who constantly claim on Instagram to be 6’5” like obviously that is absurd. It’s not like Ben marches around claiming to be some huge guy.
Pierre said on 11/Oct/19
@TheyTookMySon2 = Click Here = Here is Taran Killam next to Donald Trump = Click Here Click Here = their heights are looking very similar,Taram never look taller than Donald,only Taran's big wig of course sometimes but their eyes are the same height imo and Taran has not a longer head/forehead than Donald imo.Now Donald and Barack 6"0.75' from around 0:16 to 0:29 = Click Here = Donald looks always around an inch shorter than Barack (6"0.75') imo so logically Taran Killam too
@TheyTookMySon2 = Click Here = Here is Taran Killam next to Donald Trump = Click Here Click Here = their heights are looking very similar,Taram never look taller than Donald,only Taran's big wig of course sometimes but their eyes are the same height imo and Taran has not a longer head/forehead than Donald imo.Now Donald and Barack 6"0.75' from around 0:16 to 0:29 = Click Here = Donald looks always around an inch shorter than Barack (6"0.75') imo so logically Taran Killam too
TheyTookMySon2 said on 11/Oct/19
From the SNL files:
Click Here
From 2:35 Affleck is 2cm taller than 184cm-listed Taran Killam.
Click Here
From 0:55 Affleck has only 1cm on 185cm-listed Bill Hader, and again 2cm on 184cm guys Killam and Sudeikis.
186.5cm for Ben.
From the SNL files:
Click Here
From 2:35 Affleck is 2cm taller than 184cm-listed Taran Killam.
Click Here
From 0:55 Affleck has only 1cm on 185cm-listed Bill Hader, and again 2cm on 184cm guys Killam and Sudeikis.
186.5cm for Ben.
viper said on 9/Oct/19
Derrick Rose just measured 6-1.
His average guess is 6-2.
If you were to guess Shannon Sharpe at 6-1 you were labeled crazy.
He turned out to be a measured 6-1.
Affleck is the same. A 6-1-6-1.5 guy where so many think he's 6-2 minimum
Derrick Rose just measured 6-1.
His average guess is 6-2.
If you were to guess Shannon Sharpe at 6-1 you were labeled crazy.
He turned out to be a measured 6-1.
Affleck is the same. A 6-1-6-1.5 guy where so many think he's 6-2 minimum
viper said on 8/Oct/19
Ben is a 186-187cm guy
Ben is a 186-187cm guy
Pierre said on 8/Oct/19
I have the sensation some guys here go to moan between them each time a guy guess Ben Affleck around 6"1' range...if a guy come here and guess Ben 6"3' he will be welcome here 100% sure 🙂
I have the sensation some guys here go to moan between them each time a guy guess Ben Affleck around 6"1' range...if a guy come here and guess Ben 6"3' he will be welcome here 100% sure 🙂
K.A 188 ! said on 8/Oct/19
@WRESTLING FAN & @JACKSON
I agree,I used to be one of those in here confronting posters who cherry peak pictures just to prove that Affleck is 6ft1 ,when in reality he always looked 6ft2. So I just got fed up... The arguments became ridiculous.
@WRESTLING FAN & @JACKSON
I agree,I used to be one of those in here confronting posters who cherry peak pictures just to prove that Affleck is 6ft1 ,when in reality he always looked 6ft2. So I just got fed up... The arguments became ridiculous.
K.A 188 ! said on 8/Oct/19
@WRESTLING FAN & @JACKSON
I agree,I used to be one of those in here confronting posters who cherry peak pictures just to prove than Affleck is 6ft1 ,when in reality he always looked 6ft2. So I just got fed up... The arguments became ridiculous.
@WRESTLING FAN & @JACKSON
I agree,I used to be one of those in here confronting posters who cherry peak pictures just to prove than Affleck is 6ft1 ,when in reality he always looked 6ft2. So I just got fed up... The arguments became ridiculous.
Pierre said on 8/Oct/19
@Wrestling Fan= well i don't understand what is your problem, i talk about what i see and apparently you
have not arguments in your comments to counter my arguments lol.
Ben Affleck always weak 6"1' to me
@Wrestling Fan= well i don't understand what is your problem, i talk about what i see and apparently you
have not arguments in your comments to counter my arguments lol.
Ben Affleck always weak 6"1' to me
Jackson said on 7/Oct/19
@wrestling fan
Exactly. It’s why I stopped with him. His arguments got too ridiculous.
@wrestling fan
Exactly. It’s why I stopped with him. His arguments got too ridiculous.
TheBat said on 7/Oct/19
@Pierre
If you think Ben's a weak 6'2" or weak 6'1", you need to go see an eye doctor ASAP. Ben's a legit 6'2.5" and Rob's 6'2.25 listing is totally fine. Deal with it like what @Wrestling Fan told you.
@Pierre
If you think Ben's a weak 6'2" or weak 6'1", you need to go see an eye doctor ASAP. Ben's a legit 6'2.5" and Rob's 6'2.25 listing is totally fine. Deal with it like what @Wrestling Fan told you.
Wrestling Fan said on 7/Oct/19
@Pierre
No matter what you say,at the end of the day Rob has listen Ben at 6'2¼" which is not not gonna change.
Yeah you heard it right
"It's not gonna change"
And also no matter what you say,at the end of the day fallacious things are never counted.
These are facts!
So either you deal with it or keep convincing yourself in your fantasy that Ben is a weak 6'2" or weak 6'1"
I know you're here with the attitude of "Let's piss people off and see what happens"
But it's gonna work out.
@Pierre
No matter what you say,at the end of the day Rob has listen Ben at 6'2¼" which is not not gonna change.
Yeah you heard it right
"It's not gonna change"
And also no matter what you say,at the end of the day fallacious things are never counted.
These are facts!
So either you deal with it or keep convincing yourself in your fantasy that Ben is a weak 6'2" or weak 6'1"
I know you're here with the attitude of "Let's piss people off and see what happens"
But it's gonna work out.
Pierre said on 5/Oct/19
....And both in classic shoes on the yacht Ben looks around 2 inches taller than weak 5"11' Justin Timberlake ....= Ben = weak 6"1'
....And both in classic shoes on the yacht Ben looks around 2 inches taller than weak 5"11' Justin Timberlake ....= Ben = weak 6"1'
TheBat said on 4/Oct/19
6'2.25" is the lowest I see Ben as, I'm totally fine with Rob's listing. Ben often looks 6'2.5" on average, his 6'3" claim is definitely his height in shoes. He's definitely not 6'4" like Google lists him as.
6'2.25" is the lowest I see Ben as, I'm totally fine with Rob's listing. Ben often looks 6'2.5" on average, his 6'3" claim is definitely his height in shoes. He's definitely not 6'4" like Google lists him as.
Importer said on 2/Oct/19
@Pierre Physically he looks similar to Liev Schreiber both around 189cm
@Pierre Physically he looks similar to Liev Schreiber both around 189cm
Pierre said on 2/Oct/19
Nik Ashton said on 30/Sep/19
The average guess justifies the listing!
Imo this is average guess without considering sometimes his advantageous shoes
Nik Ashton said on 30/Sep/19
The average guess justifies the listing!
Imo this is average guess without considering sometimes his advantageous shoes
Nik Ashton said on 30/Sep/19
The average guess justifies the listing!
The average guess justifies the listing!
griana arande said on 29/Sep/19
how about his head size? 26cm?
how about his head size? 26cm?
Pierre said on 24/Sep/19
@Wrestling Fan 22/Sep/2019
Lol i personnaly took the time to post lot's of comments with pics to explain my point of vue here.....
You have to read or re-read some old comments here imo....
@Wrestling Fan 22/Sep/2019
Lol i personnaly took the time to post lot's of comments with pics to explain my point of vue here.....
You have to read or re-read some old comments here imo....
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 24/Sep/19
@Wrestling Fan I did met Hasselhoff in person from a carnival event several years back he was standing on a stage but the crowd restrict me to walk close to the Hoff, up on the stage from distance away he look between 6'4-6'5 with illusion of his hair or long inseam. But i've seeing him walk down the stage next to a 6'5 1/2 security which he look about 1.5" lower, the security was about my size (6'5 5/8) someone my wife knew and we had a chat a little while before the crowd and Hoff. If in future somebody say met Hoff and he is 6'3 it could only mean the person see a shrunk Hoff or the person did a troll.
@Wrestling Fan I did met Hasselhoff in person from a carnival event several years back he was standing on a stage but the crowd restrict me to walk close to the Hoff, up on the stage from distance away he look between 6'4-6'5 with illusion of his hair or long inseam. But i've seeing him walk down the stage next to a 6'5 1/2 security which he look about 1.5" lower, the security was about my size (6'5 5/8) someone my wife knew and we had a chat a little while before the crowd and Hoff. If in future somebody say met Hoff and he is 6'3 it could only mean the person see a shrunk Hoff or the person did a troll.
Wrestling Fan said on 22/Sep/19
@Jackson
Don't waste your energy on people you can't convince with truth
Let them live in fantasy
Whoever that poster guy was who met Ben
That guy never showed up here with some evidence or anything,all he did was said and people believed him.
I'm still ready to believe that guy but guess what?
He didn't bother to show up here to discuss something about Ben's height.
So I can't just trust "Talk and Run" thing.
Other than that,I already said that Ben is already tall enough for his profession so wearing lifts is an outlandish claim.
I know one day some people here will say that David Hasselhoff is only 6'3" and he wears elevator shoes to look 6'4" because to tell you the truth,some people comment here just for fun and don't take things seriously
@Jackson
Don't waste your energy on people you can't convince with truth
Let them live in fantasy
Whoever that poster guy was who met Ben
That guy never showed up here with some evidence or anything,all he did was said and people believed him.
I'm still ready to believe that guy but guess what?
He didn't bother to show up here to discuss something about Ben's height.
So I can't just trust "Talk and Run" thing.
Other than that,I already said that Ben is already tall enough for his profession so wearing lifts is an outlandish claim.
I know one day some people here will say that David Hasselhoff is only 6'3" and he wears elevator shoes to look 6'4" because to tell you the truth,some people comment here just for fun and don't take things seriously
Pierre said on 17/Sep/19
Yes i know @Jackson ,elevator shoes don't really exist ,celebrities never wear elevator shoes and
particularly never in events....Only in my dreams ...lol
Yes i know @Jackson ,elevator shoes don't really exist ,celebrities never wear elevator shoes and
particularly never in events....Only in my dreams ...lol
Jackson said on 16/Sep/19
@Pierre
There’s no point in me going back and fourth with you if your just going to say “lifts!” Anytime someone doesn’t fit your narrative for how tall they are. Ben has looked to be a 6’2” range guy to me all his career. His 6’3” claim is a shoe claim and it’s not unusual at all for celebs to claim height in shoes. The lifts argument is getting really silly. There’s no proof of that. Ive seen you ridiculously downgrading lots of people too far on this site like recently you said John Cena is 5’11” haha like c’mon.....I’m not some fanboy who thinks Ben is 6’4” but truly what I’ve seen for the most part points to a 6’2.25” listing which I think Rob has him at perfectly.
@Pierre
There’s no point in me going back and fourth with you if your just going to say “lifts!” Anytime someone doesn’t fit your narrative for how tall they are. Ben has looked to be a 6’2” range guy to me all his career. His 6’3” claim is a shoe claim and it’s not unusual at all for celebs to claim height in shoes. The lifts argument is getting really silly. There’s no proof of that. Ive seen you ridiculously downgrading lots of people too far on this site like recently you said John Cena is 5’11” haha like c’mon.....I’m not some fanboy who thinks Ben is 6’4” but truly what I’ve seen for the most part points to a 6’2.25” listing which I think Rob has him at perfectly.
Pierre said on 16/Sep/19
In my memory Jeremy Renner was wearing very big shoes in the pic next to Rob with very probably some internal helps = shoes a little bit like this = Click Here Click Here
Click Here
In my memory Jeremy Renner was wearing very big shoes in the pic next to Rob with very probably some internal helps = shoes a little bit like this = Click Here Click Here
Click Here
Canson said on 15/Sep/19
@Jackson and Viper: actually one poster S.J.H said he looked 186-187. That’s closer to 6’2 but is a weak 6’2
@Jackson and Viper: actually one poster S.J.H said he looked 186-187. That’s closer to 6’2 but is a weak 6’2
Pierre said on 15/Sep/19
6"3' guess ? then he was wearing lifts like i said....
6"3' guess ? then he was wearing lifts like i said....
Jackson said on 14/Sep/19
Rob you met Jeremy Renner and list him at 5’8 1/4” and you two look extremely similar in height almost identical. This is what Ben looks like next to him. So this is essentially what Ben would look like next to you.
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob you met Jeremy Renner and list him at 5’8 1/4” and you two look extremely similar in height almost identical. This is what Ben looks like next to him. So this is essentially what Ben would look like next to you.
Click Here
Editor RobAnother possible photo of how he might look.
Jackson said on 14/Sep/19
@viper
Guess what? I can say same thing. Nobody can explain why a poster on here said he met Ben at comic con and said he looked 6’3” lots of he said she said. Doesn’t mean it’s 100% true.
@viper
Guess what? I can say same thing. Nobody can explain why a poster on here said he met Ben at comic con and said he looked 6’3” lots of he said she said. Doesn’t mean it’s 100% true.
viper said on 14/Sep/19
None of you guys can explain why he looks 6-1 with Timberlake consistently.
The one poster who met him said he looked 6-1.
None of you guys can explain why he looks 6-1 with Timberlake consistently.
The one poster who met him said he looked 6-1.
Pierre said on 13/Sep/19
@Jackson =To speak with your compliments, i think your arguments are more "silly" and "stupid" than mine
in fact....because first = these are not real arguments in fact....
Ben Affleck always max 6"1' to me
@Jackson =To speak with your compliments, i think your arguments are more "silly" and "stupid" than mine
in fact....because first = these are not real arguments in fact....
Ben Affleck always max 6"1' to me
Jackson said on 12/Sep/19
@Pierre I remember you said something ridiculous like bens laces looked higher than normal. Nonsense look at all the dress shoes of all the guys in pics I posted with Hunnam and Hedlund. All the same. All laces same height. Your argument is absolutely silly about Ben wearing lifts
@Pierre I remember you said something ridiculous like bens laces looked higher than normal. Nonsense look at all the dress shoes of all the guys in pics I posted with Hunnam and Hedlund. All the same. All laces same height. Your argument is absolutely silly about Ben wearing lifts
Jackson said on 12/Sep/19
Hahaha anytime @Pierre sees Ben looking taller than he’d like he just says “yeah that’s because he wears lifts” come up with something better... literally 0 proof of lifts except your silly explanations.
Hahaha anytime @Pierre sees Ben looking taller than he’d like he just says “yeah that’s because he wears lifts” come up with something better... literally 0 proof of lifts except your silly explanations.
Jackson said on 12/Sep/19
Ben and Henry Cavill
Click Here
Click Here
Ben and Will Smith
Click Here
Ben and Matt Damon
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Ben and John Krasinski
Click Here
Ben and Charlie Hunnam and Garret Hedlund
Click Here
Click Here
Ben and Jason Momoa
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Ben and Jennifer Garner
Click Here
Click Here
Ben doesn’t always stand straight. His posture is really loose sometimes but when he stands straight he doesn’t look anything under 6’2.25”
Ben and Henry Cavill
Click Here
Click Here
Ben and Will Smith
Click Here
Ben and Matt Damon
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Ben and John Krasinski
Click Here
Ben and Charlie Hunnam and Garret Hedlund
Click Here
Click Here
Ben and Jason Momoa
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Ben and Jennifer Garner
Click Here
Click Here
Ben doesn’t always stand straight. His posture is really loose sometimes but when he stands straight he doesn’t look anything under 6’2.25”
Pierre said on 11/Sep/19
Of course he wear sometimes lifts in events (i have demonstrate this in comments this year here ),he's 6"1' max on the yacht next to Justin Timberlake (weak 5"11')both wearing about the same heels.
Of course he wear sometimes lifts in events (i have demonstrate this in comments this year here ),he's 6"1' max on the yacht next to Justin Timberlake (weak 5"11')both wearing about the same heels.
Canson said on 10/Sep/19
@Wrestling Fan: lol it’s pretty easy to copy and paste. No energy
@Wrestling Fan: lol it’s pretty easy to copy and paste. No energy
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 10/Sep/19
@Wrestling Fan,
A lot of people who use the imperial system generally don’t understand the metric system, partially due to how much of a foreign concept it is in some people’s eyes. I agree with a lot of what you said, but I’m not under the impression that it’s solely weak math skills that cause for someone to give someone misleading information about their own height. A lot of people often overestimate how much they’ve grown after hitting a growth spurt, or they try to use other people’s claims as measuring sticks; when you have people who are 5’9” claiming to be 6’0” though (lmfao), you can only imagine how precise the numbers will be.
@Wrestling Fan,
A lot of people who use the imperial system generally don’t understand the metric system, partially due to how much of a foreign concept it is in some people’s eyes. I agree with a lot of what you said, but I’m not under the impression that it’s solely weak math skills that cause for someone to give someone misleading information about their own height. A lot of people often overestimate how much they’ve grown after hitting a growth spurt, or they try to use other people’s claims as measuring sticks; when you have people who are 5’9” claiming to be 6’0” though (lmfao), you can only imagine how precise the numbers will be.
Wrestling Fan said on 7/Sep/19
@Canson
People standing at 6'2" claiming 6'3" doesn't necessarily have to be lie.
It happens around 70% of times because of their weak math.
Yes Sir!
Because of weak math.
I can bet my money that most of the celebs think that 6ft means 180cm because 1ft is equal to 30cm(as they saw it on the geometry scale that they used during their school days)
But most of the people don't know that 1ft has more than 30cms.
That's why 6'2" guy claims 6'3".
Ben might be thinking that he's around 189cm so he said he's 6'3½" when in reality its 6'2½".
Other than than that the people who come in the remaining 30% are the ones who always believe in exaggerating an inch and the guys like me and you and other honest geeks who claim their precise real height.
I hope you would have had observed this around yourself.
The picture I shared said pretty much clear that Ben and Ray are around the same height.
The camera angle is straight,you can their shoes,you can see their posture.
But still I am convinced by you that their maybe a chance that Ben is under 6'2" mark.
Where can I find the pictures if that poster guy meeting Ben?
Did he post here or do I have to search it somewhere else?
Pal,save your energy lol!
You would have had simply replied to me just by referencing my name instead of putting down my whole comment and then replying to me.
Lmao!
@Canson
People standing at 6'2" claiming 6'3" doesn't necessarily have to be lie.
It happens around 70% of times because of their weak math.
Yes Sir!
Because of weak math.
I can bet my money that most of the celebs think that 6ft means 180cm because 1ft is equal to 30cm(as they saw it on the geometry scale that they used during their school days)
But most of the people don't know that 1ft has more than 30cms.
That's why 6'2" guy claims 6'3".
Ben might be thinking that he's around 189cm so he said he's 6'3½" when in reality its 6'2½".
Other than than that the people who come in the remaining 30% are the ones who always believe in exaggerating an inch and the guys like me and you and other honest geeks who claim their precise real height.
I hope you would have had observed this around yourself.
The picture I shared said pretty much clear that Ben and Ray are around the same height.
The camera angle is straight,you can their shoes,you can see their posture.
But still I am convinced by you that their maybe a chance that Ben is under 6'2" mark.
Where can I find the pictures if that poster guy meeting Ben?
Did he post here or do I have to search it somewhere else?
Pal,save your energy lol!
You would have had simply replied to me just by referencing my name instead of putting down my whole comment and then replying to me.
Lmao!
Canson said on 7/Sep/19
Wrestling Fan said on 6/Sep/19
@Jackson
That's how a mess occurs when you guess someone's height just by looking at the photos instead of meeting them in person or seeing them from close.
Ben is being said here to be under 6'2" because in one picture he looked shorter than Ray Fisher
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
In the above pictures Ben is in loafers and Fisher is wearing the shoes I guess which are thicker at the bottom than Ben's loafers.
But here they are at the same height. Here both are wearing loafers.
Click Here
Click Here
That's why I never trust the photos until I see the straight camera angle with full body including shoes.
I have also seen people here accusing Ben for wearing lifts to look taller.I saw that and I wondered that why a guy who's an actor/director and is already over 6'1"(already tall enough for his profession) would wear lifts to look taller than others?
If you ask my personal opinion I'll say that Ben is nowhere under 6'2".
There actually was a poster who met Ben. His name is S.J.H. He said that Ben didn’t look more than 186-187 in person. Not saying he can’t be 6’2” but a claim of 6’3” in shoes is not far fetched for a weak 6’2” guy. It’s commonplace for a guy who claims that. Even a 6’3.5” claim isn’t since so many people add 2” to their heights. It’s also possible he only measured 6’3” in shoes in the morning. Meaning 6’1.75 is not out of the question. As far as what Jackson said, I agree with parts of it but nothing is ever said to the people who inflate other celebs just to make a certain celeb a certain height. Example Charles Barkley
Wrestling Fan said on 6/Sep/19
@Jackson
That's how a mess occurs when you guess someone's height just by looking at the photos instead of meeting them in person or seeing them from close.
Ben is being said here to be under 6'2" because in one picture he looked shorter than Ray Fisher
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
In the above pictures Ben is in loafers and Fisher is wearing the shoes I guess which are thicker at the bottom than Ben's loafers.
But here they are at the same height. Here both are wearing loafers.
Click Here
Click Here
That's why I never trust the photos until I see the straight camera angle with full body including shoes.
I have also seen people here accusing Ben for wearing lifts to look taller.I saw that and I wondered that why a guy who's an actor/director and is already over 6'1"(already tall enough for his profession) would wear lifts to look taller than others?
If you ask my personal opinion I'll say that Ben is nowhere under 6'2".
There actually was a poster who met Ben. His name is S.J.H. He said that Ben didn’t look more than 186-187 in person. Not saying he can’t be 6’2” but a claim of 6’3” in shoes is not far fetched for a weak 6’2” guy. It’s commonplace for a guy who claims that. Even a 6’3.5” claim isn’t since so many people add 2” to their heights. It’s also possible he only measured 6’3” in shoes in the morning. Meaning 6’1.75 is not out of the question. As far as what Jackson said, I agree with parts of it but nothing is ever said to the people who inflate other celebs just to make a certain celeb a certain height. Example Charles Barkley
Jackson said on 6/Sep/19
@Wrestlting Fan
Exactly. Totally agree.
@Wrestlting Fan
Exactly. Totally agree.
Wrestling Fan said on 6/Sep/19
@Jackson
That's how a mess occurs when you guess someone's height just by looking at the photos instead of meeting them in person or seeing them from close.
Ben is being said here to be under 6'2" because in one picture he looked shorter than Ray Fisher
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
In the above pictures Ben is in loafers and Fisher is wearing the shoes I guess which are thicker at the bottom than Ben's loafers.
But here they are at the same height. Here both are wearing loafers.
Click Here
Click Here
That's why I never trust the photos until I see the straight camera angle with full body including shoes.
I have also seen people here accusing Ben for wearing lifts to look taller.I saw that and I wondered that why a guy who's an actor/director and is already over 6'1"(already tall enough for his profession) would wear lifts to look taller than others?
If you ask my personal opinion I'll say that Ben is nowhere under 6'2".
@Jackson
That's how a mess occurs when you guess someone's height just by looking at the photos instead of meeting them in person or seeing them from close.
Ben is being said here to be under 6'2" because in one picture he looked shorter than Ray Fisher
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
In the above pictures Ben is in loafers and Fisher is wearing the shoes I guess which are thicker at the bottom than Ben's loafers.
But here they are at the same height. Here both are wearing loafers.
Click Here
Click Here
That's why I never trust the photos until I see the straight camera angle with full body including shoes.
I have also seen people here accusing Ben for wearing lifts to look taller.I saw that and I wondered that why a guy who's an actor/director and is already over 6'1"(already tall enough for his profession) would wear lifts to look taller than others?
If you ask my personal opinion I'll say that Ben is nowhere under 6'2".
Dejavu said on 5/Sep/19
He is not less than 6’2. He looks taller than Garrett Hedlund who is estimated to be taller than what he is listed.
He is not less than 6’2. He looks taller than Garrett Hedlund who is estimated to be taller than what he is listed.
Jackson said on 5/Sep/19
Oh my goodness stop the nonsense. You guys are just downgrading other guys to justify downgrading Ben. Lol. Just ridiculous. He’s not getting downgraded he’s looked 6’2” + 90% of his career to me. Doesn’t even have great posture because he’s usually the biggest guy on screen until lately where he’s been around guys like Jason momoa. Hugh Jackman clearly has been 6’1.5” - 6’2” range all his career. Downgrading Ben means downgrading tons and tons of other celebs. Not gona happen.
Oh my goodness stop the nonsense. You guys are just downgrading other guys to justify downgrading Ben. Lol. Just ridiculous. He’s not getting downgraded he’s looked 6’2” + 90% of his career to me. Doesn’t even have great posture because he’s usually the biggest guy on screen until lately where he’s been around guys like Jason momoa. Hugh Jackman clearly has been 6’1.5” - 6’2” range all his career. Downgrading Ben means downgrading tons and tons of other celebs. Not gona happen.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 5/Sep/19
@Junior
It varies from person to person though. Some lose more quickly than others.
@Junior
It varies from person to person though. Some lose more quickly than others.
Canson said on 5/Sep/19
Wrestling Fan said on 4/Sep/19
@Canson
But how will you justify him being 1/2 inches taller than Hugh Jackman?
That means you think that Hugh Jackman is only 6'1" at present right?
That doesn't seems to be true from any angle.
I'm not accusing for anything,don't take it as a disrespect
None taken. And I respect your opinion too! I agree with Viper. Max 186 for Hugh. Ben imho is around 186-187. Maybe top of that range is possible
Wrestling Fan said on 4/Sep/19
@Canson
But how will you justify him being 1/2 inches taller than Hugh Jackman?
That means you think that Hugh Jackman is only 6'1" at present right?
That doesn't seems to be true from any angle.
I'm not accusing for anything,don't take it as a disrespect
None taken. And I respect your opinion too! I agree with Viper. Max 186 for Hugh. Ben imho is around 186-187. Maybe top of that range is possible
Pierre said on 5/Sep/19
Watch again my recent comparisons here Hugh Jackman looks in the best case the same heigth as 6"0.75' Barack
Watch again my recent comparisons here Hugh Jackman looks in the best case the same heigth as 6"0.75' Barack
viper said on 4/Sep/19
I think Jackman is 186cm
I think Jackman is 186cm
Wrestling Fan said on 4/Sep/19
@Canson
But how will you justify him being 1/2 inches taller than Hugh Jackman?
That means you think that Hugh Jackman is only 6'1" at present right?
That doesn't seems to be true from any angle.
I'm not accusing for anything,don't take it as a disrespect
@Canson
But how will you justify him being 1/2 inches taller than Hugh Jackman?
That means you think that Hugh Jackman is only 6'1" at present right?
That doesn't seems to be true from any angle.
I'm not accusing for anything,don't take it as a disrespect
Pierre said on 2/Sep/19
Ben Affleck 188 means Justin Timberlake about 6"0' and Justin is probably more a weak 5"11' than a full 5"11'....
Ben Affleck 188 means Justin Timberlake about 6"0' and Justin is probably more a weak 5"11' than a full 5"11'....
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 31/Aug/19
People don't keep losing height in a day. Majority is 2cm lost and 2.5cm for those 7 footer out of bed. If Rob comfirm Ray Fisher to be 6'2.25" when see him in the late morning it isn't much different from a afternoon/evening/night height. Between afternoon, evening and night height most people only lost to the max 1/8 inch some hold only 1 mm lost. I do believe Fisher is like a 188.5cm guy and Affleck 188cm on the nose but probably could hold 6'2.25" awhile before 10-11am.
People don't keep losing height in a day. Majority is 2cm lost and 2.5cm for those 7 footer out of bed. If Rob comfirm Ray Fisher to be 6'2.25" when see him in the late morning it isn't much different from a afternoon/evening/night height. Between afternoon, evening and night height most people only lost to the max 1/8 inch some hold only 1 mm lost. I do believe Fisher is like a 188.5cm guy and Affleck 188cm on the nose but probably could hold 6'2.25" awhile before 10-11am.
Pierre said on 26/Aug/19
@Canson = Ray Fisher is probably a little bit under 6"2' he does not look really 6"2' next to Rob and i think Rob lose a little bit height in the pic.Generally when the celebrities are in pics next to Josh i guess them shorter than when they are in pics with Rob.
@Canson = Ray Fisher is probably a little bit under 6"2' he does not look really 6"2' next to Rob and i think Rob lose a little bit height in the pic.Generally when the celebrities are in pics next to Josh i guess them shorter than when they are in pics with Rob.
Jordan87 said on 26/Aug/19
@ Canson, A Weak 6'2" Fits Ben IMO. I bet by around 6:00pm He is something like 6'1.5"-6'1.75".
@ Canson, A Weak 6'2" Fits Ben IMO. I bet by around 6:00pm He is something like 6'1.5"-6'1.75".
Canson said on 25/Aug/19
Affleck looks slightly shorter than Ray Fisher who is listed 6’2.25 and may just be a flat 6’2 with Rob. Affleck May be only a weak 6’2”
Affleck looks slightly shorter than Ray Fisher who is listed 6’2.25 and may just be a flat 6’2 with Rob. Affleck May be only a weak 6’2”
Pierre said on 23/Aug/19
Comparisons Ben /Matt = Click Here =James Corden and 5"8' Michael Douglas James Corden and Matt Click Here
Comparisons Ben /Matt = Click Here =James Corden and 5"8' Michael Douglas James Corden and Matt Click Here
Mister lennon said on 23/Aug/19
Aflleck has always looked 6'2 and IS 6'2.
Aflleck has always looked 6'2 and IS 6'2.
Canson said on 22/Aug/19
@Viper: probably 6’1.5 at worst or 6’1.75
@Viper: probably 6’1.5 at worst or 6’1.75
Pierre said on 22/Aug/19
Importer said on 21/Aug/19
@viper Click Here Affleck is taller than peak 6’2” Jackman by a bit. Both are most likely wearing same footwear here. On side note, I’d have thought they are brothers lmao
Ben wear very probably sometimes lifts in event like i have demonstrate in a recent comment this year.now comparisons Hugh Jackman/Stephen Colbert/6"0.75' Barack = Click Here Click Here = at around 0:32 = Hugh Jackman for me is never 6"2' range
Importer said on 21/Aug/19
@viper Click Here Affleck is taller than peak 6’2” Jackman by a bit. Both are most likely wearing same footwear here. On side note, I’d have thought they are brothers lmao
Ben wear very probably sometimes lifts in event like i have demonstrate in a recent comment this year.now comparisons Hugh Jackman/Stephen Colbert/6"0.75' Barack = Click Here Click Here = at around 0:32 = Hugh Jackman for me is never 6"2' range
K.A 188 ! said on 22/Aug/19
@PIERRE
You did not notice that both were slouching in all the picture you guys posted no decent picture of both of them standing close face to face or side by side ,common... . Stop cherry picking.
@PIERRE
You did not notice that both were slouching in all the picture you guys posted no decent picture of both of them standing close face to face or side by side ,common... . Stop cherry picking.
viper said on 22/Aug/19
His height varies more than usual.
It's not out of the question he gets a little lift. People on Dwayne Johnson's page have thought that about him.
His height varies more than usual.
It's not out of the question he gets a little lift. People on Dwayne Johnson's page have thought that about him.
viper said on 22/Aug/19
Affleck looks 6-1 range at best with
6-3.5 max Snoop Dogg in multiple pics.
Why does Affleck look consistently 6-1 with 5-9 max Matt Damon. Explain that.
Affleck looks 6-1 range at best with
6-3.5 max Snoop Dogg in multiple pics.
Why does Affleck look consistently 6-1 with 5-9 max Matt Damon. Explain that.
Jackson said on 21/Aug/19
@K.A 188!
Don’t even bother. @viper will just find the pictures that favors his claims. And anytime Ben looks 6’2” + which is 90% of the time he just claims Ben wears lifts. Which is so ridiculous. Lol. Ben is 6’2 minimum.
@K.A 188!
Don’t even bother. @viper will just find the pictures that favors his claims. And anytime Ben looks 6’2” + which is 90% of the time he just claims Ben wears lifts. Which is so ridiculous. Lol. Ben is 6’2 minimum.
Pierre said on 21/Aug/19
K.A 188 ! said on 20/Aug/19
@VIPER dude Affleck is NOT 6ft1.
He is 6ft2 google out is pictures with Henry Cavill and also with Will Smith, then come back and tell me what makes you think he is 6ft1??!.
Stop relying on a picture in which you can not see footwear .
Click Here = here you can see footwears and you can see both have around the same heel...that give = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here = difference around two inches never three
K.A 188 ! said on 20/Aug/19
@VIPER dude Affleck is NOT 6ft1.
He is 6ft2 google out is pictures with Henry Cavill and also with Will Smith, then come back and tell me what makes you think he is 6ft1??!.
Stop relying on a picture in which you can not see footwear .
Click Here = here you can see footwears and you can see both have around the same heel...that give = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here = difference around two inches never three
Importer said on 21/Aug/19
@viper Click Here Affleck is taller than peak 6’2” Jackman by a bit. Both are most likely wearing same footwear here. On side note, I’d have thought they are brothers lmao
@viper Click Here Affleck is taller than peak 6’2” Jackman by a bit. Both are most likely wearing same footwear here. On side note, I’d have thought they are brothers lmao
K.A 188 ! said on 20/Aug/19
@VIPER dude Affleck is NOT 6ft1.
He is 6ft2 google out is pictures with Henry Cavill and also with Will Smith, then come back and tell me what makes you think he is 6ft1??!.
Stop relying on a picture in which you can not see footwear .
@VIPER dude Affleck is NOT 6ft1.
He is 6ft2 google out is pictures with Henry Cavill and also with Will Smith, then come back and tell me what makes you think he is 6ft1??!.
Stop relying on a picture in which you can not see footwear .
viper said on 17/Aug/19
Ben does not look any taller than 6-1 with 5-11 Timberlake and 5-9 Max Matt Damon
Ben does not look any taller than 6-1 with 5-11 Timberlake and 5-9 Max Matt Damon
Importer said on 16/Aug/19
@Pierre I swear there was a clip somewhere online from his movie Argo. He alongside his crew were walking in the crowd and he pretty much stood out due to his height. Point is that he’s got to be closer to 190cm than 185cm.
@Pierre I swear there was a clip somewhere online from his movie Argo. He alongside his crew were walking in the crowd and he pretty much stood out due to his height. Point is that he’s got to be closer to 190cm than 185cm.
6footTom said on 16/Aug/19
Probably 6'2" flat at the lowest, I doubt he'd go under it.
Probably 6'2" flat at the lowest, I doubt he'd go under it.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 15/Aug/19
The Affleck brothers have almost exactly the same Birthday! Today Ben celebrates turning 47 and just two days ago, his younger brother was 44. But that's where the similarities end, for they are like chalk and cheese in the height department!
🎈🎁🕯️🎂 Happy Birthday Ben! 🎂🕯️🎁🎈
His Birthday guess from me is 6ft2.25.
🎈🎁🕯️🎂🎈🎁🕯️🎂🎈🎁🕯️🎂🎈🎁🕯️🎂
The Affleck brothers have almost exactly the same Birthday! Today Ben celebrates turning 47 and just two days ago, his younger brother was 44. But that's where the similarities end, for they are like chalk and cheese in the height department!
🎈🎁🕯️🎂 Happy Birthday Ben! 🎂🕯️🎁🎈
His Birthday guess from me is 6ft2.25.
🎈🎁🕯️🎂🎈🎁🕯️🎂🎈🎁🕯️🎂🎈🎁🕯️🎂
Pierre said on 12/Aug/19
@Jackson=Sorry but you will not convince me with your answers = first = i choose moments in the videos inwhich they are standing in around the same posture and so we can compare them .Second = in the pics Ben and Justin on the yacht we can see their shoes.Always argue celebrities never wear elevator shoes is false.i've already demonstrated in comments Ben was probably wearing lifts sometimes.
Where is the nonsense?Hugh Jackman is listed 6"1.5' and?What were their shoes?Is Hugh really 6"1.5'?And Garret?Ben is standing as straight as a I in your pic with Garret, and both are very distant one to the other this is not the best pic to compare them.And the pics with Matt Damon?Matt damon is around the same heigh as James Corden = Click Here Click Here Click Here and James Corden tiptoeing next to Samuel Anderson slouching looks max the same height as 5"8' Rob next to Samuel straight ...Click Here Click Here
....Click Here Click Here Even if Matt"s soles are a little bit more advantageous this never means Ben is 6"2' here....6"1' max
@Jackson=Sorry but you will not convince me with your answers = first = i choose moments in the videos inwhich they are standing in around the same posture and so we can compare them .Second = in the pics Ben and Justin on the yacht we can see their shoes.Always argue celebrities never wear elevator shoes is false.i've already demonstrated in comments Ben was probably wearing lifts sometimes.
Where is the nonsense?Hugh Jackman is listed 6"1.5' and?What were their shoes?Is Hugh really 6"1.5'?And Garret?Ben is standing as straight as a I in your pic with Garret, and both are very distant one to the other this is not the best pic to compare them.And the pics with Matt Damon?Matt damon is around the same heigh as James Corden = Click Here Click Here Click Here and James Corden tiptoeing next to Samuel Anderson slouching looks max the same height as 5"8' Rob next to Samuel straight ...Click Here Click Here
....Click Here Click Here Even if Matt"s soles are a little bit more advantageous this never means Ben is 6"2' here....6"1' max
Jackson said on 11/Aug/19
@Pierre
I guess I’ll use your logic. Anytime Ben looks taller than you like you just randomly claim he wears lifts. It’s ridiculous. Let’s talk about how Ben wears slippers in the film with Justin. Or how about this I’ll just do what you do. Justin Timberlake has way more evidence of lift wearing then Affleck ever had.
You also just want people to pause a video at an Exact moment that Ben could possibly not look as tall as you want. If anything seeing Ben come and great Stephen Colbert made me more sure he’s 6’2” + and then The very first thing Stephen mentions is how tall he is.
@Pierre
I guess I’ll use your logic. Anytime Ben looks taller than you like you just randomly claim he wears lifts. It’s ridiculous. Let’s talk about how Ben wears slippers in the film with Justin. Or how about this I’ll just do what you do. Justin Timberlake has way more evidence of lift wearing then Affleck ever had.
You also just want people to pause a video at an Exact moment that Ben could possibly not look as tall as you want. If anything seeing Ben come and great Stephen Colbert made me more sure he’s 6’2” + and then The very first thing Stephen mentions is how tall he is.
Jackson said on 11/Aug/19
Enough with the nonsense. Hugh Jackman is listed on here at 6’1.5” and here is Garret Hedlund looking taller than Hugh.
Click Here
Now......... Ben is taller than Garret. And after watching Garret and Ben in their recent movie together I see Ben is taller. Ben doesn’t always have great posture. But a downgrade is silly.
Click Here
Also.... Charlie Hunnam is listed on here at 6’0” by Rob. And yet Ben is easily... and I mean EASILY taller by more than an inch... so that 6’1” argument is silly.
Click Here
Enough with the nonsense. Hugh Jackman is listed on here at 6’1.5” and here is Garret Hedlund looking taller than Hugh.
Click Here
Now......... Ben is taller than Garret. And after watching Garret and Ben in their recent movie together I see Ben is taller. Ben doesn’t always have great posture. But a downgrade is silly.
Click Here
Also.... Charlie Hunnam is listed on here at 6’0” by Rob. And yet Ben is easily... and I mean EASILY taller by more than an inch... so that 6’1” argument is silly.
Click Here
Pierre said on 8/Aug/19
Click Here = Stephen Colbert and Ben Aflleck = make a pause/low speed at around 1:30 when they hug each other and when they're standing very close to each other and both around the same distance to the camera(Ben stands always a little bit closer) .Now Stephen Colbert and 6"0.75' Barack = Click Here =make a pause /speed low at around 0:32 ........Ben is not taller than Barack here
Click Here = Stephen Colbert and Ben Aflleck = make a pause/low speed at around 1:30 when they hug each other and when they're standing very close to each other and both around the same distance to the camera(Ben stands always a little bit closer) .Now Stephen Colbert and 6"0.75' Barack = Click Here =make a pause /speed low at around 0:32 ........Ben is not taller than Barack here
Matthew 6'0.3 15.3 yrs said on 5/Aug/19
Google says 6'4, im going with 6'2 1/2
Google says 6'4, im going with 6'2 1/2
K.A 188 ! said on 5/Aug/19
@Viper
stop being ridiculous just look at the pictures of Affleck with Cavill and and also Will Smith and Affleck .
He is 6ft2! And no less he had cavil by 4 cm just google out their picture and stop with your ridiculous 6ft1 claims.
@Viper
stop being ridiculous just look at the pictures of Affleck with Cavill and and also Will Smith and Affleck .
He is 6ft2! And no less he had cavil by 4 cm just google out their picture and stop with your ridiculous 6ft1 claims.
Pierre said on 2/Aug/19
With 5"11' Justin Timberlake when around the same heels = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
With 5"11' Justin Timberlake when around the same heels = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
viper said on 2/Aug/19
If 6-1 is a joke why does he always look 6-1 with 5-11 Justin Timberlake and 5-8.5-5-9 Matt Damon
If 6-1 is a joke why does he always look 6-1 with 5-11 Justin Timberlake and 5-8.5-5-9 Matt Damon
Importer said on 2/Aug/19
@Pierre Affleck had 3inch on Uma Thurman on paycheck. Below 6'2" is impossible.
@Pierre Affleck had 3inch on Uma Thurman on paycheck. Below 6'2" is impossible.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 1/Aug/19
6'2.5" is indeed a joke. Ben is decent 6'2.
6'2.5" is indeed a joke. Ben is decent 6'2.
Pierre said on 30/Jul/19
Because people don't understand he wear sometimes advantageous shoes.Next to Justin Timberlake (pics yacht etc )he wear classic shoes Justin too he's never over 6"1'
Because people don't understand he wear sometimes advantageous shoes.Next to Justin Timberlake (pics yacht etc )he wear classic shoes Justin too he's never over 6"1'
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jul/19
6ft1 is a big joke...
6ft1 is a big joke...
Canson said on 24/Jul/19
6’2.5 is too much for him. He’s likely tops 6’2” flat and 6’1.5-6’2 is not impossible for him.
6’2.5 is too much for him. He’s likely tops 6’2” flat and 6’1.5-6’2 is not impossible for him.
Jackson said on 24/Jul/19
@TheBat
Totally agree! Definitely not a 6’1” guy. 6’2.5” seems perfect for Ben.
@TheBat
Totally agree! Definitely not a 6’1” guy. 6’2.5” seems perfect for Ben.
K.A 188 said on 23/Jul/19
@Importer maybe
@Importer maybe
TheBat said on 22/Jul/19
@K.A 188
I agree. Ben's not in the 6'1" range. Looks an inch taller than 6'1.5" Will Smith. I personally put Ben at 6'2.5".
@K.A 188
I agree. Ben's not in the 6'1" range. Looks an inch taller than 6'1.5" Will Smith. I personally put Ben at 6'2.5".
Importer said on 20/Jul/19
6'3" 1/2 in shoes?
6'3" 1/2 in shoes?
K.A 188 said on 18/Jul/19
He is 6ft2 and a change!what is it with everyone on this site is so desperate to downgrade?
He lookes constantly 4 cm taller than 184 Henry cavill who always stands at his tallest.Really don't understand all this 6ft1 comments.. When he easily edged strong 6ft1 186.7lWill smith by 2-3 cm. Folks should look at pictures before writing first thing that comes into their minds.
He is 6ft2 and a change!what is it with everyone on this site is so desperate to downgrade?
He lookes constantly 4 cm taller than 184 Henry cavill who always stands at his tallest.Really don't understand all this 6ft1 comments.. When he easily edged strong 6ft1 186.7lWill smith by 2-3 cm. Folks should look at pictures before writing first thing that comes into their minds.
David_6000 said on 13/Jul/19
I saw him in line at a store in his hometown a few years ago. I'm 6'.5" barefoot and he was considerably taller. 6'2 at the very least but I'd go with 6'3.
I saw him in line at a store in his hometown a few years ago. I'm 6'.5" barefoot and he was considerably taller. 6'2 at the very least but I'd go with 6'3.
Dejavu said on 13/Jul/19
If he is 6’1, Garret Hedlund and Hugh Jackman should be downgrades to 6’0 range.
If he is 6’1, Garret Hedlund and Hugh Jackman should be downgrades to 6’0 range.
Pierre said on 12/Jul/19
Watch another time the pics Ben /Justin Timberlake /Jesse Eisenberg in both posts on 3/April/2019,he's maybe 6"1' not 6"2'
Watch another time the pics Ben /Justin Timberlake /Jesse Eisenberg in both posts on 3/April/2019,he's maybe 6"1' not 6"2'
Importer said on 7/Jul/19
188.5cm minimum.
188.5cm minimum.
Hijoputamus said on 7/Jul/19
6ft1 barefoot and without the wig
6ft1 barefoot and without the wig
viper said on 4/Jul/19
He consistently looks 6-1 with
5-8.5-5-9 Damon
He consistently looks 6-1 with
5-8.5-5-9 Damon
Dejavu said on 30/Jun/19
A bit above 6’2 is what he always look with good posture. He looked more than an inch taller than 6’1 Bill Hader in the snl sketch.
A bit above 6’2 is what he always look with good posture. He looked more than an inch taller than 6’1 Bill Hader in the snl sketch.
viper said on 27/Jun/19
Matt Damon is maybe, maybe a full 5-9. But probably more 5-8.5 seeing him with 6-4 measured Tom Brady on video.
Affleck looks 6-1 with Damon consistently
Matt Damon is maybe, maybe a full 5-9. But probably more 5-8.5 seeing him with 6-4 measured Tom Brady on video.
Affleck looks 6-1 with Damon consistently
viper said on 27/Jun/19
Affleck barely looks taller than Houser all through the movie.
Affleck had no more than 2 inches on
5-11 max Justin Timberlake in the movie they did.
Absolute, absolute most I could give Affleck is 6-1.5. I doubt even that.
He doesn't even physically look as tall as a 6-1.5 guy like Matthew Fox.
6-1ish Ryan Reynolds also seems to give a taller look
Affleck barely looks taller than Houser all through the movie.
Affleck had no more than 2 inches on
5-11 max Justin Timberlake in the movie they did.
Absolute, absolute most I could give Affleck is 6-1.5. I doubt even that.
He doesn't even physically look as tall as a 6-1.5 guy like Matthew Fox.
6-1ish Ryan Reynolds also seems to give a taller look
Jackson said on 26/Jun/19
@Viper
Not true at all. Affleck normally looks to have 2 inches on Cole Hauser who Rob has at 6’0.5”
Click Here
@Viper
Not true at all. Affleck normally looks to have 2 inches on Cole Hauser who Rob has at 6’0.5”
Click Here
viper said on 25/Jun/19
Affleck looks 6-1 with Cole Houser in Dazed and Confused
Affleck looks 6-1 with Cole Houser in Dazed and Confused
Callum Parry said on 23/Jun/19
If you took him and Krasinski and stood them back to back with equal footwear I think John would edge him out. Ben is 6ft2.25 and I think John is more in the region of 6ft2.5-.75. I think Rob has got their listings pretty spot on.
If you took him and Krasinski and stood them back to back with equal footwear I think John would edge him out. Ben is 6ft2.25 and I think John is more in the region of 6ft2.5-.75. I think Rob has got their listings pretty spot on.
Pierre said on 22/Jun/19
In all this pics Ben Affleck is standing very straight like in a military posture and probably wear lifts next to Jason Momoa .Jon Krasinski make the split here one foot behind the other foot and her front knee bented,the proof he lost lots of height is = he looks only 3.5 inches taller than Matt Damon in this pic(Matt Damon/James Corden = Click Here ).And Matt is not even standing straight here !he's in the same posture or even in a poorer posture than Jon ....
In all this pics Ben Affleck is standing very straight like in a military posture and probably wear lifts next to Jason Momoa .Jon Krasinski make the split here one foot behind the other foot and her front knee bented,the proof he lost lots of height is = he looks only 3.5 inches taller than Matt Damon in this pic(Matt Damon/James Corden = Click Here ).And Matt is not even standing straight here !he's in the same posture or even in a poorer posture than Jon ....
cmillzz said on 21/Jun/19
weak 6’2
weak 6’2
Jackson said on 21/Jun/19
@viper
So I that makes Jon Krasinski 6’0” then?
Click Here
And how about Jason Momoa? What’s he 6’2”?
Click Here
Ben is obviously not a 6’1” guy. He’s 6’2” range easy.
@viper
So I that makes Jon Krasinski 6’0” then?
Click Here
And how about Jason Momoa? What’s he 6’2”?
Click Here
Ben is obviously not a 6’1” guy. He’s 6’2” range easy.
TheBat said on 20/Jun/19
No way I can see Ben Affleck below 6’2.25” at all. He’s definitely 6’2.5” currently and probably 6’2 7/8” at peak.
No way I can see Ben Affleck below 6’2.25” at all. He’s definitely 6’2.5” currently and probably 6’2 7/8” at peak.
Michael Christman said on 17/Jun/19
And Google lists him as 6’4” lol when he is nowhere close.
And Google lists him as 6’4” lol when he is nowhere close.
Pierre said on 2/Jun/19
If you take in consideration Justin Timberlake is maybe more a weak 5"11' than a full 5"11' then Ben Affleck weak 6"1' is very possible.Sophisticated shoes in events make the rest.
If you take in consideration Justin Timberlake is maybe more a weak 5"11' than a full 5"11' then Ben Affleck weak 6"1' is very possible.Sophisticated shoes in events make the rest.
Canson said on 13/May/19
@Viper: I think he could be the full 6’6 out of bed and come down to 6’5.25 or 5 or 6’5.75 and 6’5 at a low. The more I saw of him on the court with Kawhi and others the more evident it is he’s around 6’5 not almost 6’6”. He doesn’t look as tall as Tobias Harris either who is 6’6” at a low
@Viper: I think he could be the full 6’6 out of bed and come down to 6’5.25 or 5 or 6’5.75 and 6’5 at a low. The more I saw of him on the court with Kawhi and others the more evident it is he’s around 6’5 not almost 6’6”. He doesn’t look as tall as Tobias Harris either who is 6’6” at a low
Canson said on 13/May/19
@Rob: I agree with Viper about perhaps under 6’2” as he looked it with other actors and athletes. But I don’t think he is only 6’1” flat. Weak 6’2” is worst case. He’s not as tall as Michael Phelps
@Rob: I agree with Viper about perhaps under 6’2” as he looked it with other actors and athletes. But I don’t think he is only 6’1” flat. Weak 6’2” is worst case. He’s not as tall as Michael Phelps
viper said on 12/May/19
Jimmy Butler almost straight out of bed hits 6-6, but in reality he's nowhere close to it.
Jimmy Butler almost straight out of bed hits 6-6, but in reality he's nowhere close to it.
viper said on 12/May/19
Damon is most definitely 5-8.5.
Look at him with 6-4 measured Tom Brady on the Jimmy Kimmel show
Damon is most definitely 5-8.5.
Look at him with 6-4 measured Tom Brady on the Jimmy Kimmel show
Canson said on 11/May/19
@Viper: 6’1.5 maybe but not 6’1 flat. I think a weak 6’2 is really what he would be 6’1.5-.75
Editor Rob
@Viper: 6’1.5 maybe but not 6’1 flat. I think a weak 6’2 is really what he would be 6’1.5-.75
Editor RobWith great posture for the life of me I couldn't see ben under 6ft 2...I still feel 6ft 2 and change is what he would measure.
Jackson said on 10/May/19
Damon is not 5’8.5” rob has him at 5’9 3/4” which is far more accurate.
Damon is not 5’8.5” rob has him at 5’9 3/4” which is far more accurate.
viper said on 9/May/19
Affleck is just a 6-1 guy, and it shows with 5-8.5 Damon.
He looked 6-1 throughout the whole movie he did with 5-11 Justin Timberlake
Affleck is just a 6-1 guy, and it shows with 5-8.5 Damon.
He looked 6-1 throughout the whole movie he did with 5-11 Justin Timberlake
Pierre said on 7/May/19
here on the same step the difference is smaller between Jennifer and Ben = Click Here Click Here Click Here = here with a little bit more heels (around 1.25/1.5 inches more imo) . Click Here = here the ground seems to be a little bit more advantageous for him and maybe his shoes a little bit more advantageous too
here on the same step the difference is smaller between Jennifer and Ben = Click Here Click Here Click Here = here with a little bit more heels (around 1.25/1.5 inches more imo) . Click Here = here the ground seems to be a little bit more advantageous for him and maybe his shoes a little bit more advantageous too
Aus said on 5/May/19
He is listed as 6'4" on Google, in my opinión there is cero chance he is over 6'3"
He is listed as 6'4" on Google, in my opinión there is cero chance he is over 6'3"
Pierre said on 5/May/19
he wears lifts in the pics next to Ray Fisher,his shoes are looking clearly bigger than Ray's shoes,with vertical angle of the laces etc
he wears lifts in the pics next to Ray Fisher,his shoes are looking clearly bigger than Ray's shoes,with vertical angle of the laces etc
TheBat said on 2/May/19
@'Annonymous'
Great pics! I agree that Ben's 6'2.5" on average, 6'2 3/8" to 6'2.25" are the lowest I can see him being. And it's funny how much he towers over Jeremy Renner (not how a 5'10" guy should look as he claims).
@'Annonymous'
Great pics! I agree that Ben's 6'2.5" on average, 6'2 3/8" to 6'2.25" are the lowest I can see him being. And it's funny how much he towers over Jeremy Renner (not how a 5'10" guy should look as he claims).
'Annonymous' said on 30/Apr/19
Rob, I still think that Ben needs a 1/4 or at least 1/8 inch upgrade. A few photos of Ben next to Fisher which I sent recently may have been blurred so I send them again:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Please note that when Fisher has a lot of thicker shoes than Ben, they may look like a similar height, but when Fisher only has a little thicker shoes than Ben, then Affleck looks much taller than Fisher. You can see Ben next to someone like Jeremy Renner:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I noticed that his posture was very often up and down like in the case of Will Smith... But in moments when his posture was not so bad, Ben really looked taller than Ray Fisher and could look over six inches taller than Jeremy Renner. Rob, from everything I've seen, I think the list of 6'2.5" or at least 6'2" and 3/8 inch would be more precise for Ben.
Rob, I still think that Ben needs a 1/4 or at least 1/8 inch upgrade. A few photos of Ben next to Fisher which I sent recently may have been blurred so I send them again:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Please note that when Fisher has a lot of thicker shoes than Ben, they may look like a similar height, but when Fisher only has a little thicker shoes than Ben, then Affleck looks much taller than Fisher. You can see Ben next to someone like Jeremy Renner:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
I noticed that his posture was very often up and down like in the case of Will Smith... But in moments when his posture was not so bad, Ben really looked taller than Ray Fisher and could look over six inches taller than Jeremy Renner. Rob, from everything I've seen, I think the list of 6'2.5" or at least 6'2" and 3/8 inch would be more precise for Ben.
Pierre said on 19/Apr/19
But ben looks taller than John Krasinsky when John Krasinsky looks under one forehead higher next to Matt Damon who brake his posture....When you compare Ben and Matt in this famous pic, Ben is standing in a perfect posture and Matt bent his knees ,and break his right shoulder,but in these conditions Ben looks only one forehead taller than Matt here .Matt Damon /James Corden=make a pause at 0:18 they are standing in about the same posture = Click Here .James Corden and Matthew Horne listed 5"6' = Click Here (James in sneakers type Nike air max then both with around the same heels imo) Click Here Click Here
But ben looks taller than John Krasinsky when John Krasinsky looks under one forehead higher next to Matt Damon who brake his posture....When you compare Ben and Matt in this famous pic, Ben is standing in a perfect posture and Matt bent his knees ,and break his right shoulder,but in these conditions Ben looks only one forehead taller than Matt here .Matt Damon /James Corden=make a pause at 0:18 they are standing in about the same posture = Click Here .James Corden and Matthew Horne listed 5"6' = Click Here (James in sneakers type Nike air max then both with around the same heels imo) Click Here Click Here
Pierre said on 18/Apr/19
@Jackson(14/April/19)= Yeah :)
@Jackson(14/April/19)= Yeah :)
TheBat said on 18/Apr/19
@Junior Hernandez 1990
You may think that Ben isn't in the 6'2" range, but he truly is. In BvS he was taller than Jeremy Irons who's 6'1" at best now, in Pearl Harbor he was very similar in height to 6'2.75" Josh Hartnett, and edged out 6'1.5" Garrett Hedlund by an inch in Triple Frontier. In real life he edged out 6'2" flat John Krasinski, was similar to 6'2.5" Ray Fisher, and was noticeably a little over three inches taller next to 5'11" Ezra Miller.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
@Junior Hernandez 1990
You may think that Ben isn't in the 6'2" range, but he truly is. In BvS he was taller than Jeremy Irons who's 6'1" at best now, in Pearl Harbor he was very similar in height to 6'2.75" Josh Hartnett, and edged out 6'1.5" Garrett Hedlund by an inch in Triple Frontier. In real life he edged out 6'2" flat John Krasinski, was similar to 6'2.5" Ray Fisher, and was noticeably a little over three inches taller next to 5'11" Ezra Miller.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 17/Apr/19
Ben don't look 6'2 when watching him on screen. His physical now look like a 6'0 guy maybe also due to his long head like a person with smaller and shorter head will look lanky than him.
Ben don't look 6'2 when watching him on screen. His physical now look like a 6'0 guy maybe also due to his long head like a person with smaller and shorter head will look lanky than him.
Dejavu said on 15/Apr/19
I don’t see any evidence that he is wearing lifts.
I don’t see any evidence that he is wearing lifts.
TheBat said on 15/Apr/19
@Jackson
I can see both you and Pierre's opinions. But I agree Ben's like 6'2.5" currently, 6'2.25" at the very low. He definitely edges out 6'2" John Krasinski.
As for Henry, I'll now say he's on average 6'0.5" or 6'0.75" but can look 6'1" in other times.
@Jackson
I can see both you and Pierre's opinions. But I agree Ben's like 6'2.5" currently, 6'2.25" at the very low. He definitely edges out 6'2" John Krasinski.
As for Henry, I'll now say he's on average 6'0.5" or 6'0.75" but can look 6'1" in other times.
thi said on 15/Apr/19
Rob its true that 6'1 guys start to have the "lanky look" that 6' guys doesnt had?
Editor Rob
Rob its true that 6'1 guys start to have the "lanky look" that 6' guys doesnt had?
Editor RobEvery inch above 5ft 9 will increase chances of looking lanky, but leg length, weight and head size all play a role too.
Jackson said on 14/Apr/19
@Pierre
Fair enough. We’re all entitled to our opinions. :)
@Pierre
Fair enough. We’re all entitled to our opinions. :)
Pierre said on 13/Apr/19
@Jackson=Rob's estimation is just an estimation,i don't talk about the height chart i talk about what i see in the pic Rob/Ray Fisher.6"2.25'/6"1.75'...Who's know,we talk just about 1/2 inch here....You think Ben has no advantageous shoes,i think he wear these and i argue my guess
@Jackson=Rob's estimation is just an estimation,i don't talk about the height chart i talk about what i see in the pic Rob/Ray Fisher.6"2.25'/6"1.75'...Who's know,we talk just about 1/2 inch here....You think Ben has no advantageous shoes,i think he wear these and i argue my guess
Jackson said on 11/Apr/19
@Pierre
You seem to think the height chart determines people’s height. It does not! There’s people on this site listed at 6’2.5” that don’t even hit 6’2” on the height chart created on this site. And Rob said Fisher was 6’2.5” to 6’2.25” in person. And no it doesn’t look like he’s wearing lifts at all...
@Pierre
You seem to think the height chart determines people’s height. It does not! There’s people on this site listed at 6’2.5” that don’t even hit 6’2” on the height chart created on this site. And Rob said Fisher was 6’2.5” to 6’2.25” in person. And no it doesn’t look like he’s wearing lifts at all...
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 11/Apr/19
When you're 6'0 claiming 6'3-6'4 for hollywood style. Or you can be 6'2 claiming at 16 being 5'4 growing a foot taller.
When you're 6'0 claiming 6'3-6'4 for hollywood style. Or you can be 6'2 claiming at 16 being 5'4 growing a foot taller.
Pierre said on 10/Apr/19
Dejavu= Rob listed Ray Fisher 6"2.25',i see him a little bit shorter in the pic more like 6"1.75'. Ben Affleck can look sometimes taller than him but in this pics i think Ben's shoes are elevator shoes like here(same event) = Click Here .His shoes= Click Here =Logically if his shoes were classic horizontal shoes(i want to say without internal heel) with this pronounced angle of ankle (the right ankle) his right heel should be higher than the floor imo .When you walk with classic shoes the heel of your rear leg is higher than the ground with this pronounced angle of ankle imo like here = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Dejavu= Rob listed Ray Fisher 6"2.25',i see him a little bit shorter in the pic more like 6"1.75'. Ben Affleck can look sometimes taller than him but in this pics i think Ben's shoes are elevator shoes like here(same event) = Click Here .His shoes= Click Here =Logically if his shoes were classic horizontal shoes(i want to say without internal heel) with this pronounced angle of ankle (the right ankle) his right heel should be higher than the floor imo .When you walk with classic shoes the heel of your rear leg is higher than the ground with this pronounced angle of ankle imo like here = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Dejavu said on 9/Apr/19
He is at least 6’2. He looks similar height to Ray Fisher and could look taller with good posture. He looked similar height to Morgan Freeman who is a bit above 6’2 in sums of all fear which was over 10 years ago. With bad posture, he can look sub 6’2 though.
He is at least 6’2. He looks similar height to Ray Fisher and could look taller with good posture. He looked similar height to Morgan Freeman who is a bit above 6’2 in sums of all fear which was over 10 years ago. With bad posture, he can look sub 6’2 though.
Pierre said on 9/Apr/19
I don't know if John Krasinski is really 6"2.5' but lot's of time he looks under this height in pics = next to Wendell Pierce listed 5"8' he looks 6"1' = Click Here .Here he looks shorter than Rainn Wilson listed 6"1.5'peak = Click Here Click Here here next to Matt Damon who is max 5"9' imo = Click Here (Matt and James Corden = Click Here James in poor posture = Click Here ) .
I don't know if John Krasinski is really 6"2.5' but lot's of time he looks under this height in pics = next to Wendell Pierce listed 5"8' he looks 6"1' = Click Here .Here he looks shorter than Rainn Wilson listed 6"1.5'peak = Click Here Click Here here next to Matt Damon who is max 5"9' imo = Click Here (Matt and James Corden = Click Here James in poor posture = Click Here ) .
Jackson said on 9/Apr/19
Lol seriously? Lifts? He's usually the guy wearing flat shoes and has Cast mates around him in boots and dress shoes. Also often leans down and has bad posture. There’s not even a slight bit of evidence that he wears lifts... and why would he? He’s already a tall dude. I’ve never once seen a photo of him with suspicious looking footwear.
Lol seriously? Lifts? He's usually the guy wearing flat shoes and has Cast mates around him in boots and dress shoes. Also often leans down and has bad posture. There’s not even a slight bit of evidence that he wears lifts... and why would he? He’s already a tall dude. I’ve never once seen a photo of him with suspicious looking footwear.
German Beryozkin said on 8/Apr/19
Actually I think he wear lifts for some reason ...
Actually I think he wear lifts for some reason ...
Jackson said on 8/Apr/19
@Annonymous
Ben is very clearly taller than Krasinski even with footwear disadvantage. So that puts to rest any downgrades for Ben. Especially since Krasinski is listed at 6’2.5”
@Annonymous
Ben is very clearly taller than Krasinski even with footwear disadvantage. So that puts to rest any downgrades for Ben. Especially since Krasinski is listed at 6’2.5”
Pierre said on 7/Apr/19
@Annonymous = then watch the angle of the laces of Ben's shoes = very vertical.
@Annonymous = then watch the angle of the laces of Ben's shoes = very vertical.
'Annonymous' said on 5/Apr/19
Hi Rob! I still think Affleck needs an upgrade. I found even more photos on which Affleck looks taller than Ray Fisher (even considering his hair):
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
If you pay attention to their footwear, you can see that Fisher even had some thicker shoes than Affleck. I also found photos from another event on which Fisher has much thicker shoes than Affleck and even then they look like a similar height:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
In those pictures, Ben didn't have bent legs, considering their footwear, Ben just looked taller than Ray Fisher. Besides, look at him here alongside Matt Damon and John Krasinski (in these pictures Krasinski and Damon have thicker shoes than Ben):
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
It's weird that Ben looks taller than Krasinski, but I'm sure Ben really needs an upgrade. Rob, you said Affleck is probably measuring somewhere in the zone from 6'2.25" to 6'2.5" however in my opinion 6'2.25" looks a little too low for him... Rob, could you give Ben an upgrade to 6'2.5" or at least 6'2" and 3/8 inch now?
Hi Rob! I still think Affleck needs an upgrade. I found even more photos on which Affleck looks taller than Ray Fisher (even considering his hair):
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
If you pay attention to their footwear, you can see that Fisher even had some thicker shoes than Affleck. I also found photos from another event on which Fisher has much thicker shoes than Affleck and even then they look like a similar height:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
In those pictures, Ben didn't have bent legs, considering their footwear, Ben just looked taller than Ray Fisher. Besides, look at him here alongside Matt Damon and John Krasinski (in these pictures Krasinski and Damon have thicker shoes than Ben):
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
It's weird that Ben looks taller than Krasinski, but I'm sure Ben really needs an upgrade. Rob, you said Affleck is probably measuring somewhere in the zone from 6'2.25" to 6'2.5" however in my opinion 6'2.25" looks a little too low for him... Rob, could you give Ben an upgrade to 6'2.5" or at least 6'2" and 3/8 inch now?
Pierre said on 5/Apr/19
in add to my comment on 03/April/19 = Ben and Justin shoes = Click Here very similar heels here imo
in add to my comment on 03/April/19 = Ben and Justin shoes = Click Here very similar heels here imo
German Beryozkin said on 4/Apr/19
Agree with Pierrre. 6’1 Max for Affleck
Agree with Pierrre. 6’1 Max for Affleck
Pierre said on 3/Apr/19
In addition to my comment=Rob and Jesse Eisenberg = Click Here .Now Justin Timberlake and Jesse Eisenberg when i think they have around the same shoes = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
In addition to my comment=Rob and Jesse Eisenberg = Click Here .Now Justin Timberlake and Jesse Eisenberg when i think they have around the same shoes = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Pierre said on 3/Apr/19
Justin Timberlake and Ben Affleck when probably around the same shoes = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Now Justin Timberlake and Stephen Colbert(Stephen Colbert and 6"0.75' Barack = Click Here Click Here ) = so = Click Here Click Here = make a pause at 0:28 .Justin Timberlake and Barack = Click Here (i ask me for the heels) Justin Timberlake and Jimmy Fallon = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Now Jimmy Fallon and Stephen Colbert in around same shoes imo = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here =My guess = Justin Timberlake max 5"11' Ben Affleck max 6"1'
Justin Timberlake and Ben Affleck when probably around the same shoes = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Now Justin Timberlake and Stephen Colbert(Stephen Colbert and 6"0.75' Barack = Click Here Click Here ) = so = Click Here Click Here = make a pause at 0:28 .Justin Timberlake and Barack = Click Here (i ask me for the heels) Justin Timberlake and Jimmy Fallon = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Now Jimmy Fallon and Stephen Colbert in around same shoes imo = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here =My guess = Justin Timberlake max 5"11' Ben Affleck max 6"1'
HENDOOOOO said on 3/Apr/19
G day Rob mate, Do you think a 6 ft 2.5 measurement would be possible?. And are what time of day would celebs measure the height you pin them at? Becuase some are more active than others so their height will fluctuate during the day.
Editor Rob
G day Rob mate, Do you think a 6 ft 2.5 measurement would be possible?. And are what time of day would celebs measure the height you pin them at? Becuase some are more active than others so their height will fluctuate during the day.
Editor RobIn the afternoon I still would say he's a strong 6ft 2 range, 6ft 2.25 or 2.5 I feel are probably more believable than 6ft 3 or flat 6ft 2.
Pierre said on 25/Mar/19
@Jackson=i don't know how really tall is Steven Spielberg, by this mugshot,in 1993 Harrison is about 72 inches(so 6"0') and wear very probably shoes....
@Jackson=i don't know how really tall is Steven Spielberg, by this mugshot,in 1993 Harrison is about 72 inches(so 6"0') and wear very probably shoes....
Pierre said on 25/Mar/19
@Jackson =.... but your pic was made in 2008 and maybe Steven lost height?And He wear converses here and seems to me not very straight here....
@Jackson =.... but your pic was made in 2008 and maybe Steven lost height?And He wear converses here and seems to me not very straight here....
Dejavu said on 24/Mar/19
He edged on Garrett Hedlund who many argues to be around 6,1.5. Ben is not under 6’2.
He edged on Garrett Hedlund who many argues to be around 6,1.5. Ben is not under 6’2.
Jackson said on 22/Mar/19
@Pierre
Yeah ok. Pretty easy to find pictures of Harrison towering over Steven Spielberg. Not the ones you found not showing their full bodies.
Click Here
@Pierre
Yeah ok. Pretty easy to find pictures of Harrison towering over Steven Spielberg. Not the ones you found not showing their full bodies.
Click Here
Pierre said on 22/Mar/19
Comparisons Ben Affleck /Hugh Jackman = now Hugh Jackman and imo max 6"0.75' Barack (with very short hairs)= Click Here .Barack/Hugh/Stephen Colbert = Click Here (this one for amusement= Click Here ) Click Here
Comparisons Ben Affleck /Hugh Jackman = now Hugh Jackman and imo max 6"0.75' Barack (with very short hairs)= Click Here .Barack/Hugh/Stephen Colbert = Click Here (this one for amusement= Click Here ) Click Here
Pierre said on 22/Mar/19
Comparisons Ben Affleck/Harrison Ford in 2002 = Click Here Click Here = here in 2002 too next to Steven Spielberg(5"7.5' prime here) Harrison clearly does not look 6"0'
Comparisons Ben Affleck/Harrison Ford in 2002 = Click Here Click Here = here in 2002 too next to Steven Spielberg(5"7.5' prime here) Harrison clearly does not look 6"0'
Jackson said on 20/Mar/19
@Annonymous
Great photos. Thanks for sharing. Totally agree with you and Rob that the lowest Ben could be is 6’2.25”
@Annonymous
Great photos. Thanks for sharing. Totally agree with you and Rob that the lowest Ben could be is 6’2.25”
billionaireslayer said on 20/Mar/19
Very Weak 6'2 or strong 6'1, would edge out Sam Jackson or John Cusack, but I think Freeman would edge him out prime.
Very Weak 6'2 or strong 6'1, would edge out Sam Jackson or John Cusack, but I think Freeman would edge him out prime.
'Annonymous' said on 19/Mar/19
Hi Rob! In my opinion, a 6'2.5" would be a better list for Affleck, here are 3 of his other photos alongside Hugh Jackman from 2013:
Click Here Click Here Click Here
Although it is true that in 2002, 6 feet was believeble for Harrison Ford, here are another 2 photos of Ben and Ford:
Click Here Click Here
However, there are quite a few photos on which Affleck looked taller than Ray Fisher (even considering that Ben had more hair than Fisher) and their footwear was similar on one of these events, please take a look:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Ben, most of the time, can look like a decent guy of 189 cm. Rob, I think it's time to upgrade.
Editor Rob
Hi Rob! In my opinion, a 6'2.5" would be a better list for Affleck, here are 3 of his other photos alongside Hugh Jackman from 2013:
Click Here Click Here Click Here
Although it is true that in 2002, 6 feet was believeble for Harrison Ford, here are another 2 photos of Ben and Ford:
Click Here Click Here
However, there are quite a few photos on which Affleck looked taller than Ray Fisher (even considering that Ben had more hair than Fisher) and their footwear was similar on one of these events, please take a look:
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Ben, most of the time, can look like a decent guy of 189 cm. Rob, I think it's time to upgrade.
Editor RobFor a long time 6ft 2.5 seemed the best figure, 6ft 2.25 probably is the lowest I'd argue and it may turn out 6ft 2.25 - 2.5 is the range he measures.
TheBat said on 10/Mar/19
I'd say now, Ben's a strong 6'2.5".
I'd say now, Ben's a strong 6'2.5".
Pierre said on 8/Mar/19
Comparisons Charlie Hunnam /Ben Affleck .now Charlie Hunnam with David Beckham who is imo a weak 5"11' = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here = by considering Charlie is always standing very straight he's about the same height as David imo .
Comparisons Charlie Hunnam /Ben Affleck .now Charlie Hunnam with David Beckham who is imo a weak 5"11' = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here = by considering Charlie is always standing very straight he's about the same height as David imo .
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 8/Mar/19
6'2 1/8 candidate for Ben. Lol.
6'2 1/8 candidate for Ben. Lol.
Jackson said on 7/Mar/19
@GRIT
Interesting. Thanks for letting me know. And yeah I totally agree Bens a solid 6’2.5”
@GRIT
Interesting. Thanks for letting me know. And yeah I totally agree Bens a solid 6’2.5”
GRIT said on 6/Mar/19
Jackson, keep in mind that Rob has kinda underlisted Garret Hedlund, he is most likely in the 187-188 range so probably like 6'1.75" ish, maybe 6'1.5" at the worst. Ben gets a legit 6'2.5" from me.
Jackson, keep in mind that Rob has kinda underlisted Garret Hedlund, he is most likely in the 187-188 range so probably like 6'1.75" ish, maybe 6'1.5" at the worst. Ben gets a legit 6'2.5" from me.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.