How tall is Brock Lesnar

Brock Lesnar's Height

6ft 2 (188 cm)

American Professional Wrestler and MMA Fighter. Brock himself stated his height in a 2008 NY Times article as "I'm 6-3 and 277 pounds" but when (briefly) at Minnesota Vikings Football team he was given a 6ft 2 listing.

Brock Lesnar in March 2015

You May Be Interested

Height of The Undertaker
The Undertaker
6ft 6 ¼ (199 cm)
Height of John Cena
John Cena
6ft ½ in (184 cm)
Height of Randy Orton
Randy Orton
6ft 4 (193 cm)
Height of  CM Punk
CM Punk
5ft 11 ½ (182 cm)

Add a Comment3748 comments

Average Guess (499 Votes)
6ft 2.22in (188.5cm)
viper said on 23/Jan/20
I agree with 6-1

He looked it with 6-2 Rock and people who meet him
viper said on 23/Jan/20
No way that's 5 inches.

4 at most

At first glance I thought maybe just 3.5
Christian 6'5 3/8 said on 23/Jan/20
@Juggernaut
Here are his 6'5" claims: Click Here
Click Here

@Rob
I didn't see anything wrong with the archive though.
Editor Rob
Those links above worked, the previous ones referenced your desktop like file://users/christian/etc rather than https://url.com
Canson said on 23/Jan/20
@Christian: I don’t see a lot of 6’5” guys add much height to themselves. Very few actually. But some I’m sure do. A celebrity maybe or an athlete
Christian 6'5 said on 22/Jan/20
@Juggernaut
BTW, that maxpavlak98 guy claimed 6'5" on two separate occasions, so it's pretty much confirmed that's he's not over that.
Editor Rob
Those were file://desktop links you tried to include.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 22/Jan/20
@Juggernaut
That guy doesn't even quite look a solid 5" taller than Cena. He could be around 6'5" max. A lot of 6'5" guys add an inch or so to their height.
toots said on 21/Jan/20
6'1 - every height in the WWE or UFC is wrong or manipulated freely
edwards said on 21/Jan/20
@ christian

agreed
Roderick said on 20/Jan/20
@juggernaut I don't think Kane ever used steroids. My opinion. It's not impossible.
juggernaut said on 20/Jan/20
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 19/Jan/20
@juggernaut
Where's the proof that he's 6'6" though? You can't automatically decide that's he's 6'6", just because he claimed it.
I saw his pic with Cena, looked a solid 5 inches taller than him.. The guy can't be less than 6'5' 3/8 imo..
Canson said on 20/Jan/20
@Christian: ive noticed When someone claims or is listed a certain height they must be it but then when someone actually is and claims it such as Charles Barkley they’re taller than they claim? I saw recently on one page a poster said that so in so is listed 6’5 and uses that as proof that another celeb is this height or that height. That “6’5” guy measured sub 6’4” at the NFL combine by the way
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 19/Jan/20
@juggernaut
Where's the proof that he's 6'6" though? You can't automatically decide that's he's 6'6", just because he claimed it.
viper said on 18/Jan/20
He looks 6-1 range, so I doubt he ever measured 6-2
juggernaut said on 18/Jan/20
Here is Brock with a 6'6' dude.. Lesnar looks a strong 6'2' if I am not wrong.. It seems the pic is 6 days old, got it from twitter..the guy in the pic claimed to be 6'6' he had a pic with Cena and he was towering over Cena..

Click Here
randomdude30 said on 18/Jan/20
@Murtuza

he would not have measured over 6'3 let alone 6'3 in his prime as he was measured at 27 years old( in his prime) at 6'2 1/4, and that was an early measurement so by evening he would be 6'2 flat.

currently he is about 6'2 still, and no it was not a rumour he was measured at 6'2 it was a fact,he was measured at the combine for his try out for the vikings, as a huge Lesnar fan since 2003 I remember this just like Roman Reigns was too at his combine,you can find some of the stats online at 6'2, the NFL game for example goes by the measurements from the combine and they have him listed at 6'2, also he was measured by K1 (who are generally spot on with their heights) at 6'2.

he was also taller than 185-186 measured Min Soo kim by 2 cm , hence making him 188 cm or 6'2
juggernaut said on 17/Jan/20
Mikey97 said on 10/Jan/20
@juggernaut I don't believe Kane ever took roids. He was a naturally wide, thick guy who just worked out a lot. Lesnar has used steroids but I can have access to all the steroids in the world and I won't be able to get anywhere near that dudes strength.

IMO Kane had more raw strength, but Lesnar was more athletic and was more technical.
I will be really shocked if Kane could pass a USADA test, it is not possible that he never took roids. Even the same was not told about Lesnar until he failed drug test of USADA, Lesnar and kane were super strong guys..but I still believe Lesnar would edge kane out in pure brute strength, the guy was a farmer in his youth days and a damn amateur wrestler since a kid.. I feel Kane was stronger before 2002, he lost some strength after that..
Murtuza said on 14/Jan/20
@randomdude30 no it is not confirmed he’s measured that’s just rumours and anybody who’s says he’s under 6’2” needs to get checked. Currently I’m sure he’s 6’2.25”-6’2.5” in his prime he was over 6’3” no doubt
Roderick said on 13/Jan/20
Here is a quote from Brock Lesnar saying Kane was stronger than him.

--------------

Kurt and I competed against each other at EVERYTHING. We hated losing to each other, but it was all in good fun. We even wrestled in the back - he was a little weasel. That was our things, and it went on for a very long time. Even today, there is no way I will let Kurt beat me at something.

At one of the events, the guys in the back were all testing their strength through arm-wrestling and 'mercy'. Most of them were there to 'impress the divas'. I remember running through all of them, even Paul [Big Show], who had bananas for fingers. The only guy I remember being stronger than me and it pissed me off because I hated not being first, was Kane. No one in the WWE was as strong as that guy. Trying to slam his arm down was like trying to push over a tree with one arm.

The life style was too much for me. Right now, I am doing what I love to do - sleep, train, fight and spend time with my family. That is all that matters to me.
viper said on 12/Jan/20
I'll pay money to anyone who can show he measured 6-2
randomdude30 said on 11/Jan/20
@Ashish

he was measured at 6'2 1/4 by the NFL in the morning

so he is 100% not over 6'3
Mikey97 said on 10/Jan/20
@juggernaut I don't believe Kane ever took roids. He was a naturally wide, thick guy who just worked out a lot. Lesnar has used steroids but I can have access to all the steroids in the world and I won't be able to get anywhere near that dudes strength.

IMO Kane had more raw strength, but Lesnar was more athletic and was more technical.
Roderick said on 10/Jan/20
@James It really isn't. Some pro arm wrestlers can beat bodybuilders/strongmen simply because they have better technique/better strategy.
Ashish yadav said on 10/Jan/20
He is a bit more than 6' 3".
juggernaut said on 9/Jan/20
I've watched pro-wrestling since the year 2000, I've followed Kane's career since then and he is one of the strongest man ever, he used to frequently bodyslam the Bigshow in the early 2000s.. and used to press people up all the time, Kane's strength was like that of a bigger Goldberg.. I would say kane was stronger then Goldberg as well but Lesnar is/was on a different power level.. the man effortlessly delivered belly to belly suplexes on a 500 lbs Show back in his early days, he suplexes Henry and rikishi like they weighed 130lbs.. nobody had tossed Show around the ring like a ragdoll more than Lesnar, Lesnar body slammed, powerbombed and suplexed Lesnar numerous times..his strength is not one dimensional like Goldberg or Cena, this guy is truly a superhuman and everyone in WWE had taken roids even if in a little amount, Lesnar is a genetic freak and apart from Mark Henry and Bigshow I don't see anyone being stronger then Lesnar.. Lesnar's feat of strength is superior to Kane's..
James B 172cm said on 7/Jan/20
arm wrestling isnt the best measure of strength is it?
Mikey97 said on 6/Jan/20
Kane is a powerful man. He was going to play in the NFL before he blew his knee out. Luckily he went to WWF and ended up having more success than he would have if he ended up playing in the NFL. NFL teams were looking at Kane before the season even started. That's how good he was.

Lesnar is more aggressive I'd say. Although he's not natural and juices, he still has a very impressive physique and I hope he holds onto it approaching his mid 40s.

It would be disrespectful in my opinion to try to discuss who is stronger because I feel like they both have their strengths and weaknesses.
Roderick said on 2/Jan/20
@juggernaut Yeah, I know the interview you're talking about. I do believe they were pretty evenly matched in strength but remember Kane must have been training with Lesnar in 2002-2003 when he has already lost a good amount of size. Kane was waaay bigger in 2000-early 2002 and Lesnar came in after WM 18 when Kane was taking a break. So I think if a weakened, smaller Kane can match a prime Lesnar, then a prime Kane was stronger than Lesnar for sure.
juggernaut said on 31/Dec/19
Kane said to Jim Ross in an interview that the stories of him defeating Brock in arm-wrestling is exaggerated, He and Brock just used to match each other well in the gym..nothing more
Roderick said on 29/Dec/19
@viper They were probably evenly matched, but Lesnar was probably more athletic.
viper said on 29/Dec/19
Kane being stronger is a bit hard to believe
Roderick said on 26/Dec/19
Supposedly Lesnar said that Kane was stronger than him. Not sure if that holds true or not. If it is then Kane must have been a freaking mammoth of a man to outclass Lesnar.

They were workout buddies though, I know that
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 24/Dec/19
@Edwards
He's also one of the strongest. Probably the second strongest member of the WWE active roster right now, after Strowman.
Roderick said on 23/Dec/19
@Canson Haha all good, I like to joke around sometimes :)
edwards said on 23/Dec/19
he is truly one of the biggest 6'1.75/6'2 athlete out there.looks much bigger than 6'5.75/6'6 guys like taker or corbin.

@ canson

agreed dude,i personally feel weak 6'2 for lesnar
Canson said on 23/Dec/19
@Roderick: lol my bad
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 23/Dec/19
@Roderick
It's more probable that Lesnar would beat a prime Tyson in a street fight though, just based on the size difference and Lesnar's MMA and wrestling skills.
Roderick said on 22/Dec/19
@Canson What about a month 6'2"?
Canson said on 22/Dec/19
@Edwards: I have him as a week 6’2” as well
Roderick said on 21/Dec/19
@tony In a street fight, it could go either way. For the sake of simplicity, let's say they are both in their primes. Tyson could just quickly knock him out if Lesnar moves slow enough, but if Lesnar gets inside and takes him down, Tyson is done.

So to me, it could go either way.
edwards said on 21/Dec/19
@ christian

my bad.i meant to say lesnar at 2015 did looked 6'2 with undertaker.dude,i was saying 6'1.75 for lesnar today but back in 2015 ,he did looked flat 6'2.ofcourse i could be wrong.undertaker in 2015 did looked tad over 6'6.i would like to add that 2015 was last time undertaker looked over 6'6,from 2016 and onwards it looked like taker already dipped undertaker 6'6 or he was max 6'6.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 21/Dec/19
@tony t
It depends on the type of fight. In a unsanctioned street fight or a MMA fight, Lesnar would more than likely win. Tyson at his prime could come close though. But if it's a boxing match, prime or current, Tyson would destroy him.

@Edwards
If Taker was 6'6.25"-6'6.5", then that would put Lesnar at 6'2.25"-6'2.5", since he looked 4" shorter, not 6'1.5"-6'1.75"
edwards said on 20/Dec/19
back in 2015 @wwe hell in a cell,he looked four inches shorter than the undertaker.taker at 2015 did looked over 6'6 and was likely 6'6.25/6'6.5
lesnar today is likely 6'1.5/6'1.75
tony t. said on 19/Dec/19
Kind of off topic but who would win a fight between him and Mike Tyson?
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 17/Dec/19
@miko
He looks max 3.5" taller than Angle here, after accounting for posture. If you just go by the top of their heads, it's only a 3" difference. Click Here
miko said on 17/Dec/19
When Brock stood at his tallest he had a full 4 inches on Angle. Angle was nothing under 5'10 peak.

Brock rarely stands that great with smaller guys though so the difference with Angle mostly looked 3/3.5 inches.
juggernaut said on 16/Dec/19
I don't see Lesnar shorter than 6'2', just no way..instead I would say he is a hair taller than that
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 16/Dec/19
@Xpac99
He doesn't look more than 3.5" taller in the second pic. Hard to tell the difference in the third pic because of the angle and Brock's head being partially cut off in the pic, but the first pic favors Brock too much because of the tilt. He honestly looks around 6'4" there. Click Here
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 14/Dec/19
@Canson
So do I, but if I had to guess to a tee, it'd be 6'1.75"
Xpac99 said on 13/Dec/19
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
He was clearly over 4 inches taller than 5ft10 kurt angle. The top of angle head is below brock eyelevel. He was taller than 6ft2 flat
Canson said on 12/Dec/19
@Christian: I see anywhere 6’1.5-6’2”
randomdude30 said on 11/Dec/19
@Murtuza

obviously you've come late to the party, Lesnar was never 6'4 or even 6'3 prime( out of the question ) , he was measured at 6'2 1/4 in his prime at 28 and that was an early afternoon height.
Murtuza said on 9/Dec/19
I think Lesnar is a solid 6’2.5” at his prime he was 6’3”-6’4”
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 7/Dec/19
@viper
I don't see him any shorter than 6'1.5" though. That's my absolute minimum for him.
randomdude30 said on 7/Dec/19
Rob how many inches do you think is between JBL and Brock in this picture? - Click Here

JBL is in around 6'5, looks about 3 or 4 to me note we don't know what footwear both men are wearing and Brock's posture isn't as upright as Bradshaws.
Editor Rob
It's tricky photo because they are being quite intimate and not standing well there.
viper said on 3/Dec/19
That's just his listing, not a measurement.

Don't see him any taller than 6-1.5
Roderick said on 2/Dec/19
285lb of pure muscle, what a damn beast
randomdude30 said on 2/Dec/19
well you're correct he measured at slightly over 6'2 1/4 , but you have to take into account the time of the measurement, combine measurements are taken in the morning to early afternoon, so he probably would lose at least another 1/4 inch ( which I'm sure Rob will agree ) by late evening. so if we are going by evening height he is in and around 6'2 if we are going my mid day height yes he is over 6'2.
Xpac99 said on 2/Dec/19
@randomdude
If he was listed 6ft2, does not mean that he is 6ft2 flat.
This is in goldberg’s page description
• in the NFL expansion draft he was listed 6ft 2 and 266lbs•
But he was listed 6ft2 1/2
randomdude30 said on 1/Dec/19
@viper I've found some evidence that alludes to Lesnar being measured at 6'2 again it was a morning measurement so who knows his exact evening height but

- Click Here @ 1:48 of the video it has his stats listed which were probably taking directly from the NFL combine.
Editor Rob

The video game would take stats from what the NFL had stored him as...as many know, they did indeed have him at 6ft 2 and 285 pounds, here is an image of one of the old Brock Cards: 6ft 2 285 lbs.
TheBat said on 30/Nov/19
6'2" flat. Can't really see him over that.
randomdude30 said on 30/Nov/19
@juggernuat

clearly Lesnar is closer to the camera, his shoulder is much closer hence he is closer.
Xpac99 said on 30/Nov/19
@randomdude30
It is the same segment where lesnar looks 2 inches taller than cena.
Click Here
juggernaut said on 29/Nov/19
randomdude30 said on 28/Nov/19
@Xpac97

Lesnar is clearly the one who is closer to the camera in that pic.
No, Cena is closer..look carefully
Xpac99 said on 29/Nov/19
You said matt hardy is in 6ft range in john cena’s page
Editor Rob
Somewhere in 6ft range.
Click Here
After watch this 6ft2 flat is for aure too low
randomdude30 said on 28/Nov/19
@Xpac97

Lesnar is clearly the one who is closer to the camera in that pic.
Xpac99 said on 27/Nov/19
The camera is in favor to cena but considering cena a strong 6ft 1/2 range, lesnar looks over 6ft2 again
Click Here
Roderick said on 25/Nov/19
Brock Lesnar clearly isn't over 6'2". Look at all his barefoot UFC staredowns and show me when he looked over 6'2". He typically looked a weak 6'2" (6'1.5"-6'1.75") which seems right to me.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Nov/19
A bit over this is possible for him
juggernaut said on 24/Nov/19
Roderick said on 22/Nov/19
@Demon87 Lesnar has never looked over 6'2", that's why lol
Lesnar looked over 6'2' with Hogan and Rock..
Demon87 said on 23/Nov/19
@roderick
Rob paul said
Editor rob:
for me I could argue 6ft 2 or 2.25, I think both figures could be given to him, at the moment he's on 6ft 2 flat, but you never know!

Not me! But i think 6ft2.25 is fair as peak height espacially if Roman reigns has been listed at 6ft2.25.
Rob upgrade?
Roderick said on 22/Nov/19
@Demon87 Lesnar has never looked over 6'2", that's why lol
Demon87 said on 21/Nov/19
You said this:
Editor rob:
(Brock lesnar)
for me I could argue 6ft 2 or 2.25, I think both figures could be given to him, at the moment he's on 6ft 2 flat, but you never know!

I don’t understand Why do you go with the lowest claim if we tolk about peak height. you put every wrestler at the maximum height arguable. Undertaker,kane,nathan jones, Kevin nash, goldberg...
If for you 6ft2.25 is fair you put lesnar in that range, otherwise not talk more than peak height i think
Mikey97 said on 20/Nov/19
Id say max 6'1" or 186cm exactly.

No way over that
viper said on 20/Nov/19
Lesnar is maybe 6-1.5 with 6-2 Rock
Canson said on 20/Nov/19
@Viper: I’m pretty sure I’ve seen it before. I just saw one place 6’2 188cm but that’s far from official. Either way I’d be far more inclined to believe he’s that over 6’3”. And 6’2 flat morning height means something like 6’1 5/8 or .5 if he really is that low. I think he’s taller than 6’1 though
Roderick said on 19/Nov/19
If Lesnar measured 6'2.25" then he's probably 6'1.75".

But where is the evidence he measured 6'2.25"?
James B 172cm said on 19/Nov/19
the rock looks 6'3 tops next too lesnar
viper said on 19/Nov/19
Canson there's no evidence he measured 6-2
Canson said on 19/Nov/19
Lesnar measured 6’2.25 at the combine so he wasn’t 6’3.5 at any point in his life. If anyThing it would surprise me if he was really a legit 6’2 since the measurement was in the AM and we don’t know it was accurate but In the other direction: they wouldn’t lie down they’d lie up
Xpac99 said on 16/Nov/19
Click Here
In the same position of the rock he didn’t looks an inch shorter. The rock was taller becuase he have a big forehead, but brock lesnar hair were taller than Rock. I doubt brock’s hair was more than an inch, this is certainly not the difference between 6ft2 and 6ft3 guys. Maybe between 6ft2 1/4 - 1/2 and 6ft3 guys
Murtuza said on 15/Nov/19
I think Lesnar in his Prime was a legit 6’3.5” but now prob 6’2.75”
Demon87 said on 15/Nov/19
Click Here
Joe wwe the difference next to goldberg at wrestlemania 20? He looked about the same height
Xpac99 said on 15/Nov/19
Click Here
Brock lesnar looks an inch taller than stone cold.. 6ft2 1/4 seems more accurate
Xpac99 said on 14/Nov/19
Click Here
Next to Batista (2001) he looks very similar in height
viper said on 11/Nov/19
I'll say this.

Better chance he scrapes 6-2 than Ryan Reynolds or Ben Affleck
Xpac99 said on 8/Nov/19
How tall do you think he looks in this segment with randy orton?
Click Here
Editor Rob
There might be a slight advantage to Orton there (little tilt), generally I'd have said 2 inches
Demon87 said on 4/Nov/19
Click Here

This is an interisting pic. 6ft5 test is near 3 inches taller than brock, but is not a full 3 inches. I think you can agree with me that it is 2 1/2 inches up to 2 3/4, but not over 6-7cm
Roderick said on 2/Nov/19
Lmao let's talk about that "weigh-in" Brock and Cain had where Brock was fully dressed and holding his belt LMAO.

I think Brock weighs 265 max currently, if he was really 280 range there would be no need to fake a weigh-in. But that weigh-in was so hilariously fake it made me laugh. Right on everybody's billed weight!

Seriously I thought WWE would think more on that one....
Mikey97 said on 2/Nov/19
@Rob I met Mark too and have posted pics here. I thought he looked just 6'1" while I was in the ring with him but yeah I thought to myself maybe if he presses for a measurement he might just be 6'1.5".
Johan 185 cm said on 30/Oct/19
Maybe a possibility of 6'1.75" at his normal low. He does look similar to 6'2"Reigns but sometimes a fraction shorter. He also went up on one foot with a 6'3" max Hogan and still looked shorter.
Demon87 said on 29/Oct/19
Triple h-hogan 2002
Lesnar-hogan 2002
Click Here
viper said on 28/Oct/19
The countless posts of Lesnar measuring 6-2 1/4 or 6-2 3/8 without one shred of evidence.
There was apparently Lesnar's height listed in the NFL draft probably in their website which was removed.. ppl are not blindly saying Lesnar measured 6'2'25


Apparently and probably.

Dude, there has been no evidence shown LMAO
viper said on 28/Oct/19
Xpac, we all laugh at you. Apologies for being blind.

What Rob says is not the end all be all. Other posters who have met Henry say he doesn't look more than 6-1.

People who think Brock is 6-2 plus is trolling If we go that route. He looks shorter than 6-2 Rock in their face offs. He doesn't look more than 6-1 with 6-0 Cena.

...
Editor Rob

Height estimation throws up all sorts of wild estimates. Like anybody, I'm just offering my own estimates.

I can see how people might go with a 6ft 1 estimate for Mark...however, I've seen him stand at his tallest on occasions and feel 6ft 1 is too low for my estimate.

Check Henry facing up to someone like Swagger. He holds up pretty well there.
Demon87 said on 28/Oct/19
Are you sure he was half of an inch shorter than bill goldberg?
Xpac99 said on 28/Oct/19
@roderick
@viper
You downgrade every one. Even big rob said that lesnar over 6ft2 is a possibility and henry under 187 cm today is a big surprise. you are not objective, and the thing that makes us laugh is that you also believe in what you say
juggernaut said on 28/Oct/19
Roderick said on 27/Oct/19
He's not trolling. You guys don't know what trolling is, at all.

Lesnar has looked 6'1" range before but I wouldn't say 6'1" flat, though he has looked 6'1.25"-6'1.5" with Cena, that I can agree on.

Saying Brock is over 6'2" is more ridiculous than saying he's 6'1" flat.
To be honest, Brock looking 6'1' with Cena at times could be due to his posture..But Lesnar has looked 2 inches taller than Cena as well, Saying Brock is over 6'2' is NOT more ridiculous than saying Brock is a flat 6'1' cos Lesnar looked over 6'2' with Triple H, Mark Henry and even Reigns in one of their faceoffs.. even if he is not trolling, the way straight out says Lesnar is 6'1' is nothing short of trolling..
Roderick said on 27/Oct/19
He's not trolling. You guys don't know what trolling is, at all.

Lesnar has looked 6'1" range before but I wouldn't say 6'1" flat, though he has looked 6'1.25"-6'1.5" with Cena, that I can agree on.

Saying Brock is over 6'2" is more ridiculous than saying he's 6'1" flat.
viper said on 27/Oct/19
Your reading comprehension sucks.

I didn't say he looked 6-0 with Rob
juggernaut said on 27/Oct/19
viper said on 27/Oct/19
You want to talk about trolling....

The countless posts of Lesnar measuring 6-2 1/4 or 6-2 3/8 without one shred of evidence.
There was apparently Lesnar's height listed in the NFL draft probably in their website which was removed.. ppl are not blindly saying Lesnar measured 6'2'25
Xpac99 said on 27/Oct/19
Reigns is at least 6ft2 not 6ft1. I’m honest. Mark Henry doesn’t look 6ft, at worste he looks 6ft1 - 1,5 range. Lesnar is a 188 - 189 cm guy. If you see the pic with rob and henry and you said that henry looked 6ft you are kidding us
viper said on 27/Oct/19
You want to talk about trolling....

The countless posts of Lesnar measuring 6-2 1/4 or 6-2 3/8 without one shred of evidence.
viper said on 27/Oct/19
I didn't say Henry was 6-0. I said he can look it. He's 6-1.

Lesnar is a 186-187cm guy.

There are mismeasurements in the NFL and Reigns sure as hell looks 6-1 a lot for a guy who supposedly measured as high as 6-2 5/8.

I'm sorry you are an upgrader. My sympathies
Xpac99 said on 26/Oct/19
@roderick
brock lesnar at 6ft 1 is a troll estimate. @viper estimate every wwe man 1 or 2 inches short. in mark henry's page he said that henry is 6feet (183 cm) if henry is 6feet or lesnar is 6ft1 flat i'm santa claus. lesnar at 6ft2 - 6ft2 1/2 range is fair, anywhere in that range. i don't know why rob don't upgrade him, because he clearly looks the same range of roman reigns.
@rob
there's a chance you upgrade him at 6ft2 1/4 ?
juggernaut said on 26/Oct/19
Roderick said on 23/Oct/19
@juggernaut Viper isn't trolling. I get the feeling you don't know what "trolling" means. Trolling would be like stating a height that is obviously incorrect or impossible while knowing it is while still insisting that's how tall a person is.

Brock at 6'1" isn't a troll estimate. It's reasonable. I don't think Lesnar is as low as 6'1" flat though, I still think maybe if he busts his gut for a measurement he can hit 6'2", or 6'1.75".
Well, I wouldn't call out someone if I didn't know the meaning of trolling, He lists every wrestler an inch less than their supposed actual height, Lesnar being 6'1' or Reigns being 6'1' are nothing more than jokes when both were measured above 6'2' in NFL draft.. Lesnar being 6'1'75 would be his absolute lowest, he is 42 and there is not a chance he has lost a complete inch from his youth, listing him as 6'1' is nothing more than trolling..
Roderick said on 23/Oct/19
@juggernaut Viper isn't trolling. I get the feeling you don't know what "trolling" means. Trolling would be like stating a height that is obviously incorrect or impossible while knowing it is while still insisting that's how tall a person is.

Brock at 6'1" isn't a troll estimate. It's reasonable. I don't think Lesnar is as low as 6'1" flat though, I still think maybe if he busts his gut for a measurement he can hit 6'2", or 6'1.75".
juggernaut said on 21/Oct/19
viper said on 19/Oct/19
They are honest 6-1 guys
Please stop trolling
Demon87 said on 21/Oct/19
Do you think lesnar is more solid 6ft2 than other 6ft2 wwe guy. For sure he looks taller than mark henry,triple h and Alberto del rio.. solid 6ft2 range?
viper said on 19/Oct/19
They are honest 6-1 guys
juggernaut said on 19/Oct/19
Xpac99 said on 17/Oct/19
@randomdude20020
Triple h was short in this staredown. In the first pic triple h looks clearly short as in the second pic
Click Here
Click Here
Both were in peak height.
If triple h was 6ft2 lesnar was at least 6ft2 1/4
@rob
What do you think
Lesnar was slightly taller than Hunter by atleast half an inch in their prime, Lesnar could be 6'2'1/2 in his prime..
juggernaut said on 19/Oct/19
Randomdude202000 said on 17/Oct/19
@Xpac99

Reigns clearly looks taller in all of those images you posted, not by much but still it's pretty clear, anybody else agree? Rob what you think?

Click Here
Click Here
I see both of them as equal in height, I regard both men to be legit 6'2' 1/4 inch give or take
James B said on 19/Oct/19
Rob how many inches does there look between test and Brock Lesner here?
Click Here
Editor Rob
At least a couple of inches, maybe near 3 but not 4
miko said on 18/Oct/19
As far as prime heights go, I think HHH and Lesnar were both honest 6'2 guys.

Today HHH has lost a bit but still looks close to 6'2 when he actually stands straight. People on here just have no clue when it comes to posture.
Randomdude202000 said on 17/Oct/19
@Xpac99

Reigns clearly looks taller in all of those images you posted, not by much but still it's pretty clear, anybody else agree? Rob what you think?

Click Here
Click Here
Xpac99 said on 17/Oct/19
@randomdude20020
Triple h was short in this staredown. In the first pic triple h looks clearly short as in the second pic
Click Here
Click Here
Both were in peak height.
If triple h was 6ft2 lesnar was at least 6ft2 1/4
@rob
What do you think
Randomdude202000 said on 16/Oct/19
@Xpac99

Triple H and Lesnar look very similar in height on that picture - Click Here

in the first Triple H actually looks marginally taller, in the second Lesnar looks taller but very marginally also.
Randomdude202000 said on 16/Oct/19
@Xpac99

Lesnar is standing on one foot in that picture with Bubba Dudley probably giving him an extra 1/2 inch to an inch - Click Here

Lesnar does this a lot when sizing up to opponents to try make himself taller.
Xpac99 said on 16/Oct/19
With 6ft1 seth rollins
Brock is in shoes, rollins in wrestling boots
Click Here
Xpac99 said on 16/Oct/19
@rob
Click Here
Roman reigns is listed 6ft2 1/4
Brock lesnar peak height was 6ft2??
Xpac99 said on 15/Oct/19
@rob
honestly speaking lesnar as tall as reigns today and in some shots looks taller
Click Here
Click Here
You are listed reigns 6ft2 1/4 and you think he is in that range.
how do you think that as a peak height, when he was young, lesnar was only 6ft2 if even today in military position for both, he looks the same height of 6ft2 1/4 roman reigns if not taller?
Xpac99 said on 15/Oct/19
Click Here
Click Here
Triple h was short than lesnar. In every staredown among them and with others
Click Here
@rob
I can't believe that if you see these pictures you can think they were the same height
Xpac99 said on 15/Oct/19
@randomdude20020
As Rob said
[Editor Rob]
I've always said there was a chance he could measure over 6ft 2. It's never been dismissed.

You don't understand that a measurement means nothing. Brock lesnar was always taller than 6ft2 guy and I brought every proof (pic, videos, ecc) you insist without proof on a measurement that even at the time the link was not sent and no one knows exactly. I repeat you again again again, Rob don’t list people based on a measurament. Nathan jones ex wwe wrestler billed by k1 6ft9 is listed by rob 6ft10. Tyson fury billed 6ft7 is listed by rob 6ft7 1/2. and there are another 1000 example on this site. If even Rob paul said this
[Editor Rob]
I've always said there was a chance he could measure over 6ft 2. It's never been dismissed.
I don't think he says it at random, he knows better than you how to calculate height ;)
viper said on 14/Oct/19
Rock was never 6-3, lol
Randomdude202000 said on 14/Oct/19
@Xpac99

why are you so adamant on peer pressuring Rob to change Lesnar's height when you haven't really provided any evidence that points that way?

again if you understand basic physics and human biology you would know humans are taller in the morning/early afternoon than they are at night. Brock measured at 6'2 3/8ths in the late morning/ early afternoon therefore by the evening he was more than likely down to 6'2 flat. There really is no arguing with a measurement. ( and this was peak Lesnar at 27 years old )
Xpac99 said on 14/Oct/19
With 6ft3 the rock
Click Here
Xpac99 said on 14/Oct/19
@randomdude20020
Click Here
You see 1 inch??? 😂 You need to go to bed
For randomdude this is over 1 inch
Click Here
And in the pic with hardcore holly, lesnar is taller by only an inch.😂
go play chess ;)
viper said on 14/Oct/19
Henry - 186cm
Triple H - 186cn
Lesnar Maybe 187cm, maybe
viper said on 14/Oct/19
Mark Henry and Triple H were never 6-2.


Always 6-1
Xpac99 said on 13/Oct/19
Editor Rob
[I've always said there was a chance he could measure over 6ft 2. It's never been dismissed.]
@rob
instead it seems to me almost yes... you look every pic posted in this page. lesnar edge out mark Henry and triple h, both listed 6ft2 when he was young. I posted any proof where lesnar is taller than other guy listed 6ft2 flat. If you really think he could measure over 6ft2 you have all the evidence to put lesnar over 6ft2
Randomdude202000 said on 13/Oct/19
@childishname

Click Here - that's 2 inches???? you need to go back to school that's at most 1 inch
DemolisherofRandom said on 13/Oct/19
@Randomdude202000
Well, since you seem so concerned about the manners of this "sophisticated" forum, your behavior surprises me, instead of refuting my statements with keen intellect and well-founded facts you detain yourself in trivialities like my orthography and puerile disparagements.
I do not want to go to an adversarial discourse level with no thematic reference, in which insults serve as a substitute for argumentation.I will, as a consequence,ignore any of your affronts and will remain with my statement as long as not the contrary has been proven.


I like to repeat my declaration again that even someone special like you should be able to understand it:
"Mark Henry wore big boots and he was shorter than Brock Lesnar, clearly John Cena and Brock Lesnar wear the same type of boots. Brock Lesnar was at least 2 inches taller than Hardcore Holly.
Xpac99 said on 13/Oct/19
@randomdude
This is a civil forum but personally i don’t like people who talk random. If i clearly show you the boots and you look at the pic and deny the evidence you are stupid. the only thing you say is that I am yuri99, i’m Demon, i’m heightpic, demon is heightpic ecc ecc. you don't bring proof, you don’t speak about height. And i repeat you, i don’t speak english very well as my friend, but this does not mean that I do 10 mails to write with 10 different profiles. concentrate on calculating the height and not on how I write, which for now you have only random reasoned ;)
Xpac99 said on 12/Oct/19
@rob
you said this years ago:
[Editor Rob: he's always been a guy who can look from 6ft 2 up to 3...in that photo maybe the angle might give him more than brock, but certainly he could be very similar if measured, 189 range.]

[Editor Rob: I looked more videos and accounts and thought there's a chance 189 is nearer the mark]
Why you change your mind in only 6ft2 flat for peak lesnar when between lesnar and goldberg weren’t 1/2 of an inch difference? They were very close
Editor Rob
I've always said there was a chance he could measure over 6ft 2. It's never been dismissed.
Xpac99 said on 12/Oct/19
@miko
Click Here
You see an inch? Really?
Click Here
If this is an inch, seth rollins is 190 cm 😂😂
Randomdude202000 said on 12/Oct/19
@Xpax99

well you both have extremely poor English and grammar and you both can't string a coherent sentence together, you also seem to comment directly after one another and not only that but use the same image sites so all the evidence is pointing that way, you probably use multiple accounts to try and get an unfair advantage across( two on one )

again this is a civil forum which we discuss heights in an adult way, seems like you are finding it hard to act like an adult. P your insults are weak. You should learn English properly first so we can understand you a bit better, just a friendly tip :)
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 11/Oct/19
Mark Henry was likely never 6'2". Even at his peak, I've always thought he seemed under it like 6'1.5"
miko said on 11/Oct/19
Lesnar an inch taller than Velasquez at the WWE press conference, like he was a few years back.
Xpac99 said on 11/Oct/19
@randomdude20020
I’m italian and demon is italian. If you see various page we didn't always have the same ideas. For you yuri99 are me, demon are me, heightpic are demon. make peace with yourself.
I think there are no other words to say, mark henry was in big boots and he was shorter than lesnar, clearly cena and lesnar wear the same type of boots and brock was 2 inches or more taller than hardcore holly in the pic. I don't know if you are blind or if you do the fake blind, but with the photos now loaded everyone will understand how much you speak random ;)

P.s the pic with khalifa first of all we don’t see the footwear and second lesnar isn’t young and today i repeat 1000 times, 6ft2 is fair.

I demolished you again. random is the right term for you @randomdude20020 😂
Bye ;)
viper said on 11/Oct/19
Lesnar is a 186-187cm guy
randomdude200200 said on 11/Oct/19
@demon87 the footwear clearly looks the same, by the way it's quite obvious you are the same person as Xpac99, your spelling is the same, you like to insult people when you can't argue, your grammar and broken English is also identical.
randomdude200200 said on 11/Oct/19
point number 1.
Judging from this picture which you provided - Click Here . It looks like Lesnar clearly has the footwear advantage, you have to be blind to think otherwise from that photo.

point number 2.

Holly who is 6'1 (max) looks at most an inch shorter than Brock maybe less in the picture you provided, seems like you are the one who is making excuses ( Brock is not standing straight lol he clearly is ) - Click Here


point number 4.
Mark Henry's and Lesnar's in ring boots look similar to me.

no evidence you have provided proves to me that Brock is over 6'2 in the evening

also why is Brock a full inch shorter than 6'3 Wiz Khalifa? ( what excuse will you come up with this time ) facts.

just because you fail to convince me Brock is anything more than 6'2 at night doesn't mean you have to revert to insults. As mentioned Brock was measured at 6'2 3/8ths late morning height so by the end of the day he was probably down to 6'2. It's highly unlikely he didn't lose at least another 1/4 to 1/2 inch by the evening , use common sense.
Demon87 said on 11/Oct/19
@randomdude20020
Click Here
Lesnar Was taller.
This was the boots
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
The footwear look almost identical for you? You are crazy 😂😂
Xpac99 said on 11/Oct/19
@randomdude20020
1•
Is the same type of boots that cena and brock lesnar wore in the staredown. The same. even the design of the boots Is the same. The boot sole is the same.
Click Here
Click Here
even a child could see it
Lesnar Was near 2 inches taller.
2•
When brock face off Hardcore holly not standing straight in that moment and you took that picture to cheat.
Click Here
Lesnar was taller than 6ft2 again
3•
I repeat you goldberg is listed 6ft2 by nfl and rob listed him 6ft2 1/2.
Nathan jones is listed in pride 6ft9 and rob listed him 6ft10.
Tyson fury was billed 6ft7 and rob give him a 6ft7 1/2 list
and you keep talking about Lesnar that even in his time the link wasn't sent about the misuration .
4•
Mark Henry always wore big boots. In the pic i posted you can see clearly, but if you are not convinced look at other matches of that period. You are the only

start saying sane things and stop making excuses ;)
Thanks
randomdude200200 said on 10/Oct/19
@xpac97

you like to mention footwear advantages a lot so I decided to take that into account so I could be as fair as possible,

The picture you posted below is nonsense , they are not the same wrestling low top sneakers Cena is wearing in the picture where I said Lesnar had the footwear advantage - Click Here - just look at the heels it's pretty obvious. so taking into account footwear Lesnar looks 1.25 - 1.5 inches taller than Cena

also the picture you posted with Vince looks about 1.5 inches in the difference but let's not forget that is not peak Vince, Vince probably had lost about an inch back then as he was pushing 60 years old. peak Vince would be in his 20's,30's and maybe 40's.

@demon87 the problem with the second picture which you posted is that Lesnar is slightly standing on one foot which will add a little bit of height, also the footwear looks almost identical to me, I would like to call on any other users on here to tell me their opinion on the apparent footwear advantage Henry has - Click Here. Many people who have met Mark Henry also argue he is under 6'2.

also yes Lesnar is 6'2.25 - he was measured at 6'2 3/8ths by the NFL combine, if we are going to go by late morning/early afternoon height he is indeed 6'2.25 . now if we are to go by evening height it is not physically possible Lesnar is 6'2.25 as he will lose some of that height throughout the day, so his night height is in and around the 6'2 mark in my opinion.

here is some counter proof to show you Lesnar is 6'2 but unlikely above it

here is Lesnar in 2003 with 6'0 - 6'1 (absolute max ) Hardcore Holly - Click Here
here is Lesnar with 5'11 - 6'0(max) Piers Morgan - Click Here - note Lesnar isn't standing fully straight here but neither is Piers
here is Lesnar with 6'3 Wiz Khalifa - Click Here

sorry but I can't see Lesnar being anything over 6'2 max at night.
juggernaut said on 10/Oct/19
viper said on 8/Oct/19
Lesnar probably measured 6-1 3/8
Lesnar being measured at this height is impossible, He cant be lower than a flat 6'2' at worst
Xpac99 said on 10/Oct/19
@juggernaut
Yes lesnar was about 2 inches taller than cena in the same footwear. In another staredown i posted lesnar looks only 1,5 inch difference because he was in shoes, but in the same type of boots lesnar was about 2 inches taller or near that.
Rob an upgrade is necessary, today 188 cm is fair but not when he was young. He was taller than mark henry and he was 2 inches or near that taller than cena. He was even taller than triple h. you should have seen enough for an upgrade
Xpac99 said on 10/Oct/19
@randomdude
Ok...
Click Here
Lesnar was in footwear advantage.. yes, but only for you 😂😂
Lesnar was 6ft2 1/4 and cena 6ft 1/2. and I can bring you any proof unlike you that say random things
Demon87 said on 10/Oct/19
@ramdomdude20020
I repeat you mark henry was in clearly footwear advantage and he was short than lesnar
Click Here
Click Here
Lesnar was taller than 6ft2 listed henry.
juggernaut said on 10/Oct/19
Brock Lesnar is 6'2'25 he was never shorter than Dwayne Johnson than half an inch.. Same with Hogan at most Hogan would be 0.75 taller than Lesnar.. Lesnar is taller than Cena, Rollins, Triple H.. taller than Goldberg, mark Henry today..similar to Batista and Reigns
juggernaut said on 10/Oct/19
Xpac99 said on 9/Oct/19
Click Here
In my opinion lesnar was near 2 inches taller than cena
Yes, Lesnar looks 2 inches taller than Cena.. but I don't think there's much of a footwear advantage..
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 10/Oct/19
@Matthew
Actually, standing only on one foot makes you a bit taller. Try measuring your height with both feet on the floor and then with one foot, and see the difference.
Xpac99 said on 9/Oct/19
Rob you said that hogan was an inch taller than brock back 2003, but i’m wrong hogan was taller than 6ft3 in 2003.
Click Here
With 6ft3 the rock he was taller.
Click Here
6ft3 peak height The rock he wasn’t 1 inch taller than lesnar. Do you agree?
Matthew86 said on 9/Oct/19
In this video with the 6’4 Randy Orton, for me there are 2” of difference between them
Click Here
Matthew86 said on 9/Oct/19
I think 188 cm is correct , if you take a look at the picture below, I think their height is very similar. Brock’s right foot doesn’t touch the ground. He stands on one feet. So he doesn’t have an advantage.
Click Here
Xpac99 said on 9/Oct/19
Click Here
And again it is hard to believe that lesnar was only 6ft2 if vince mccmahon peak height was 6ft1 1/2
Wrestling Fan said on 9/Oct/19
@Sotiris
Can't see the footwear advantage in any of the pics.
Rob will never list a 6'4½" guy at 6'6".
The least I can argue for Gene is 6'5½" but no less than that.

Here's him with 6'3" Batista who's having footwear advantage
Scroll to 3:11 or 3:12
Click Here
Other than that here's him with Heidenreich who's exactly the same as Gene in height
Click Here
Or you can see this picture but Heidenreich is slouching a little bit here
Click Here
Now to see how tall is Heidenreich see this video
Here's him with the The Undertaker
Scroll to 3:48
Click Here

Here's Gene with 6'4" Goldust
Click Here
If they both stand straight Gene will be taller upto 2 inches

Gene claimed himself as 6'7" which is neither his billed height in any of the wrestling promotions he ever wrestled in nor it is an overexaggeration because no 6'4½" guy will ever ever claim himself to be 6'7" especially when its not his listed height.
randomdude200200 said on 9/Oct/19
@Randomdude

Henry "clearly" did not have the footwear advantage in that video,both are wearing equally padded wrestling boots ( watch again )

@Xpac Lesnar has the footwear advantage no doubt in that picture but does look about 2 inches.
Xpac99 said on 9/Oct/19
Click Here
In my opinion lesnar was near 2 inches taller than cena
Demon87 said on 9/Oct/19
@randomdude20020
Mark henry was in clearly footwear advantage. Brock lesnar was taller, yes not by much but he was taller and Rob said in mark henry’s page that would be a surprise if he was only 187 cm.
the only surprise is lesnar 6ft2 if henry is 6ft2.
it does not make any sense
viper said on 8/Oct/19
Lesnar probably measured 6-1 3/8
viper said on 8/Oct/19
Also Reigns did measure at 6'2 5/8ths and Lesnar at 6'2 3/8ths,

Lol Lesnar did not measure that
viper said on 8/Oct/19
Max Starks is 6-7
randomdude200200 said on 8/Oct/19
@Demon87

but re watching the video, they look very similar in height. Lesnar may be a hair taller but barely.
randomdude200200 said on 8/Oct/19
@Demon87

yes slightly, I don't think Henry is a full 6'2 though to be honest.
Demon87 said on 8/Oct/19
I only have a question. In the pic i posted when lesnar confronts mark henry in 2002, lesnar was clearly taller.
Click Here
This is the video
•Why are both listed 6ft2???????????????
Xpac99 said on 8/Oct/19
@randomdude20020
If roman reigns is listed 6ft2 1/4 and the difference is about 1/8 of an inch, lesnar today in your opinion is 6ft2 1/8 following to the list made by Rob. If today they are very close, for sure back 2002,2003,2004 lesnar wasn’t short than today. He doesn’t drop much height, but a few mm at least. Do you agree with me if roman is listed 6ft2 1/4, lesnar could be considered 6ft2 1/4 back then
Sotiris Gravas said on 8/Oct/19
Gene Snitsky w/ maybe 6'4.5" (listed 6'5") Ben Roesthlisberger and listed 6'8" Max Starks:
Click Here

W/ listed 6'8" Dennis Kelly... Click Here

W/ listed 6'8" Jordan Mailata... Click Here


Snitsky (billed 6'8") was never 6'6".


Snitsky w/ Mick Foley (2016)... Click Here
6'5" Howard Stern w/ Foley... (2017) Click Here , (1999) Click Here
Foley/Regal (1993)... Click Here
Stern w/ 6'2" Eric Gordan and maybe 6'8" Ryan Anderson (2013)... Click Here
randomdude200200 said on 7/Oct/19
@Xpac99

well then a lot of people must be gods lol.

None of those injuries you mentioned should prevent someone from standing up straight,and if so please explain the science of it to me , the only injury you mentioned that would have a small affect was the bruised pelvis but his combine measurement was 3-4 weeks (as far as I know ) before the accident and a bruise even a severe one would be healed by then. Again he was medically cleared by the NFL vikings doctors.

also if Lesnar could run a 40-yard dash in 4.7 seconds and couldn't even stand up straight that would be unbelievable hence I doubt it affected his measurement.

Also Reigns did measure at 6'2 5/8ths and Lesnar at 6'2 3/8ths, that is only 1/4 of an inch difference, a lot of factors affect this. Reigns could have possibly measured in at an earlier time than Lesnar or was out of bed less time than Brock giving a higher measure, 2/8ths of an inch is too insignificant to make a proper judgement on, many variables could be at play.

Lesnar and Reigns are very close in height, it's hard to say who is taller if I was to take a shot in the dark I would say Reigns is a fraction taller but a mere 1/8th of an inch at most.
Demon87 said on 7/Oct/19
@space
Click Here
It’s hard to see orton 2 inches taller than the rock. 1 inch is fair
Xpac99 said on 7/Oct/19
@randomdude
Lesnar as tall as reigns or near that today. If reigns measured at nfl combine 6ft2 5/8 how do you think it was measured 6ft2 1/4 when he was young? Lesnar was measured after motorcycle crash. In the accident lesnar has reported: broken jaw, a broken left hand, a bruised pelvis and a severely pulled groin. If you meausure the same height after this, you are a god
Space said on 7/Oct/19
@ demen87

If rock was 6’3” for a low then Orton was like 6’5” in their stare down in 2004. Orton was never over 6’4” or even a complete 6’4”.. how could the Rock be 6’3”? lol
Wrestling Fan said on 7/Oct/19
@Xpac99
There are some unlucky cases everywhere.
Even in NBA Durrant is given only 6'9" when in reality he must be given atleast 6'10"
Bob Sapp is pretty much over 6'4" but he was given 6'4" listing in nfl

Now let's talk the same in pro wrestling:-
1)Gene Snitsky who's around 6'6" was once given 6'4" billing in WWE.
Funny right?
Thank god he went to indies and got billed at 6'8"
2)Hardcore Holly who's pretty much 6'1" is given 6'0" billing in WWE.
3)Billy Gunn is about 6'4" got billed from 6'3" to only 6'4".
4)William Regal is 6'2" and got billed at only 6'2"
5)6'2" Mark Henry was for a while billed at only 6'1" by WWE
6)6'3" Mick Foley was billed at only 6'2" for his whole career

Roman is not at all taller than Lesnar and whoever says otherwise is wrong.
And guess what?
You'll never know it either!
Because you'll never see Reigns in Running Shoes inside the ring.Or you'll never see Lesnar wearing combat boots in the ring

Lesnar's boots:-
Click Here

Reigns's boots:-
Click Here
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 6/Oct/19
@Xpac
That's obviously not a 2" difference between Lesnar and Cena. Accounting for footwear, it's 1.5" max.
randomdude200200 said on 6/Oct/19
@Xpac99 you agree with him because it's you haha, it's quite obvious :)

anyway Lesnar measured at 6'2 1/4 ( slightly over it) at his peak height at 27 years old, do you think you don't lose any height from the morning to the evening? doesn't seem impossible to me or science.

let's say Lesnar's measurement was a late morning height ( which the NFL combines measurements are ) he would have been measured at 11:00 am - 12:00 pm . so if we are going by evening height he would have lost at least another 1/4 inch by the evening, so lets say 8pm he would probably be down to around 6'2, as most people go by evening height that would make him 6'2.

If you are going to go by his late morning height/ early afternoon yes then he is 6'2 1/4 but Brock like every other human on the planet is susceptible to gravity.

Yes Lesnar was measured after a motorcycle crash but he was healed enough to do an NFL training camp so yes he was medically cleared, this does not take anything from his height, unless he had major spinal damage which he did not, it was more so a concussion. Again If he could get cleared medically to do training for an NFL combine he could stand up straight so that doesn't come into the equation in my opinion.
Xpac99 said on 6/Oct/19
@randomdude20020
By the way i repeat you i’m agree with demon. Goldberg was measured by nfl 6ft2 and listed by rob 6ft2 1/2, nathan jones was meausered in pride 6ft9 and listed by rob 6ft10. If the meausarament from nfl and K1 don’t lie, you should turn down Goldberg and do not talk about lesnar. If goldberg was meausered 6ft2 and listed 6ft2 1/2 I don't see the problem of putting lesnar 6ft2 1/4. Remember lesnar was measured after the motorcycle crash. Today as tall as roman reigns (nfl measurament: 6ft2 5/8) i doubt he was under 6ft2 1/4 in peak, indeed it seems impossible
Xpac99 said on 6/Oct/19
@randomdude
I don’t say that the difference between cena and lesnar was over 2 inches. I said was near 2 inches, maybe 1,75 inches. Remeber the sneakers give 2-3 cm, but the wrestling boots always give more. The distance between the eyes and the nose is about 5cm and lesnar and cena’s forehead is pretty much the same. Brock looked near 6ft2 1/2 but 6ft2 1/4 seems fair. it is impossible that if you ask rob he will only see 4 cm or even 3 cm. Rob don’t change the list because today 6ft2 is fair, but he knows that as a peak height he could list lesnar 6ft2 1/4 without problems
randomdude200200 said on 5/Oct/19
@Xpac99 No, Cena also seems to be wearing pretty flat wrestling boots much like the ones Lesnar wears today, he may have a slight footwear advantage yes but only slight maybe 1/8th - 1/4 of an inch, but I'm sorry that is no where near 2 inches in the difference, anyone with good common sense will tell you there is about 1.25 - 1.5 inches in the difference max

if it was over 2 inches it would be more significant than that. Also Lesnar looked at least an inch shorter than 6'3 Wiz Khalifa - Click Here

Also only looked 2cm max taller than 186cm Min Soo Kim - Click Here starting at 2:25

Lesnar is 6'2 I do believe that but he is 6'2 max evening height. Also the measurements from K1 and NFL don't lie
Roderick said on 5/Oct/19
He's starting to look 6'1" range a lot
Xpac99 said on 5/Oct/19
By the way cena didn’t look an inch short than lesnar. Cena with wrestling boots looked near 2 inches short and lesnar was in sneakers.
Click Here
Lesnar sometimes looks near 6ft2 1/2, but i definitly think 6ft2 1/4 was fair
Demon87 said on 5/Oct/19
@rob
Goldberg is one wrestler with permanently hunched posture. I can see why many folk have him at just over six two peak because most of the time he didn’t look near a full six three

Yes Rob i agree, but however looks taller than guy like triple h listed by you 6ft2.
Click Here
Lesnar always give a taller impression if you see the statedowns with goldberg. In every pic poster in this page lesnar edge out every superstar listed 6ft2, mark henry and triple h. it seems impossible with all the photos and videos sent that you have not put lesnar a touch over 6ft2. I can't find a superstar listed by you 6ft2 as tall as brock lesnar. I don't think it's a case
Demon87 said on 5/Oct/19
Sorry but i don’t know who is fred.. maybe this guy agrees with me.
@space
If rock was 6ft2 1/2, lesnar was 6ft2... but the rock was 6ft3 in my opinion and rob listed him 6ft3, for this lesnar wasn’t a full inch shorter than rock. Max 2 cm. Lesnar peak height 6ft2 1/4 or 3/8.
randomdude20020 said on 4/Oct/19
@demon87 and @fred please choose one name and stick to it, it's kind of hard to reply to you under two different handles ( just a friendly tip ) using different names to post different pieces of evidence is pretty much similar to spamming, I'm sure Rob will agree.

thanks :)
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 4/Oct/19
@randomdude
Lifts are seemingly only worn by very tall wrestlers, such as Kane, Undertaker, Big Show, and other guys that height. Sheamus may be the only exception. I can't see Lesnar, Goldberg or Bautista ever wearing lifts though.
Yuri99 said on 4/Oct/19
Click Here
Click Here
The same footwear.. if lesnar stood straight, i didn’t see only 4 inches on kurt angle (5ft 10 peak height)
Space said on 4/Oct/19
Lesnar was shorter than 6’2.5” Rock in the early 2000s. 6’2” at the most for Lesnar is accurate.

Lesnar HHH Goldberg were 6’2” range at the most in the early 2000s. Rock was 6’2.5”. Orton was 6’3.75”.
Canson said on 4/Oct/19
@Christian: only thing is Reigns has thick hair which may have given him some boost. At times they can appear the same or maybe up to 1cm. My guess would be both would be 187cm range at lows and Rock 188. Rock and Reigns look the same at times
viper said on 3/Oct/19
Peak Rock looked shorter than 6-2.5 Eddie George.

Only in his wildest dreams was he ever 6-3 or even a crazier 6-3.5
viper said on 3/Oct/19
Everyone thought Shannon Sharpe was 6-2.

Until it was revealed he measured 6-1.
randomdude20020 said on 3/Oct/19
prime Brock was in and around 6'2 yes shade over it or shade under, but Brock still is close to his peak height imo,

also yes Christian that is right, legit 186cm Min Soo Kim he looked about 1 - 2cm taller.

it's hard to argue with a measurement and even though some don't believe it took place, it did ( it sucks that it's almost impossible to get a hold of ) Lesnar measured at 6'2 3/8ths at the combine and and probably lost another 1/4 to 1/2(most) inch going into the evening putting him around the 6'2 mark.

the pictures in the WWE are not great to go by,as Brock was billed as a monstrous heel and "the next big thing" at the time so I wouldn't be surprised if he was wearing huge lifts in his wrestling boots ( which many of the big stars do ) to maximise the portrayal of an unstoppable monster. Goldberg probably also got the same treatment and other stars like Kane,The Undertaker,Batista and Sheamus ( Sheamus and Kane are 100% confirmed )

of course these days I don't think Brock wears much lifts in his wrestling sneakers just by looking at them.

I remember in 2003 Lensar and Cena were both wearing pretty flat sneakers in one segment and Lesnar looked 1.5 inches at the absolute max over 6'0 1/2 John Cena.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 3/Oct/19
@Canson
I'll say that the 6'2 3/8" lines up closer to Reigns' 6'2 5/8", since they're no more than 1/4" apart, and at times can they look the exact same.
fred rosser said on 3/Oct/19
Click Here

HHH then was 6'1.5. or probably 6'1.75. Brock here looks huge (massive long arms, big chest and big head). But here he looks taller than HHH. O don't know how tall Brock here is but he doesn't look less than 6'2 here.

I think this segment is from 2015 raw , I could be wrong.
Demon87 said on 3/Oct/19
Click Here
Click Here
Vince macmahon peak height was 6ft1 1/2.. lesnar 6ft2 flat again is complitly ridicolous
fred rosser said on 3/Oct/19
My bro has measured many people, he's the best at measuring at height. Many people are shocked after he measures them. Some are shocked that their much shorter than what they thought they were. Some were shocked that they were taller than what they thought or even what we thought. Some people just look short but when they stand properly fully attached out and have perfect posture come out as taller than expected.

Yes. I remember, when in 2002 king of the ring - Brock stood face to face in front of Andrew Martin (aka Test) and both were around same age (Test is only two years older), test was 27 and Brock was 25 then. Test is a big dude a 6'5. Brock looked shorter but no less than 3 inches. That makes Brock at least 6'2 flat. He may have been anywhere from 6'2-6'2.5 (6'2 lowest figure, and 6'2 highest possible figure.). And wresting matches happen when during night.

And RVD is legit 5'11 , Rob (owner of this site ) had confirmed this. Preak rvd may have been 1/2 taller or even more. And I remember seeing Brock wrestling rvd in 2002 , he Def did not look 6'1, he looked 6'2 flat or taller (but not less than 6'2).


And that picture with the rock ws from 2002. I remember when rock and hh fueded with Rock, saw a couple of clips of him with rock in the ring in matches and segments he didn't look less than 6'2.
That picture below which Somone posted I saw that smackdown. The Rock was tilting his head up and even lifted his shoes on his tiptoe with one leg slightly ahead of the other leg. So the height difference looks even greater.

And dlo brown was 6'2 (in his prime at least if not now). Rob has met and dlo and put him at 6'2 (he has a big head). But back in mid to late 90's D'Lo brown next to the rock looked shorter. I don't how much shorter but no less than 1 inch , looked 1.5 inches taller than D'Lo. That puts prime young Rock at no less than 6'3 flat, so between 6'3 and 6'3.5 , but not under 6'3 flat.

Reigns was 6'2 5/8th in NFL I think. Brock didn't look shorter than Roman from wwe 2012 to now .

Brock lifted weights and trained like an animal since he was a kid, that probably combined with him doing pro wrestling (from 2000-2004) getting thrown around, slammed, doing shooting Star presses, having many injuries (broken ribs, blew his knee etc. In pro wrestling), terrible injury accident right before his NFL combine) and his old age knocked some height off him.

I don't know how tall Brock is now. But prime young Lesnar was no less 6'2 flat. Anything from 6'2 flat to 6'2.5 is my guess.

Here's Brock talk about pro wrestling :

Click Here
Demon87 said on 3/Oct/19
Ok Rob mark Henry is listed 6ft2.
Click Here
With hhh both 6ft2 range, but this is with lesnar
Click Here
Click Here
And henry was in big boots.
Click Here
If you see this and don’t put lesnar over 6ft2, i don’t say anything, because it would be ridiculous to bring other evidence
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 2/Oct/19
@randomdude
I remember seeing a clip where Lesnar looked no taller than his 186cm listed Korean opponent on K1 though. Best case Lesnar may have been 1cm taller, but the difference was very minimal.
Canson said on 2/Oct/19
@Christian: so we’re back to square 1 probably. Even after all of that there is still no proof that he measured 6’2 3/8”. I saw 6’2.25 once too
Canson said on 2/Oct/19
randomdude20020 said on 1/Oct/19
@Christian

the measurement was taken and the full details of his combine including all his measurement and numbers were posted on pro wrestling insider( which the page has been taken down ) by Dave Meltzer, who is one of the leading journalists not just in pro wrestling but in all of combat sports, Brock was measured at 6'2 3/8ths , he was also listed as 6'2 by K1 in his MMA debut, K1 generally are more accurate and don't fudge or inflate their fighters stats as much as the UFC is known to do. so he was probably measured at 6'2 by the K1 or slightly above it and was rounded down to 6'2. Brock in my opinion is 6'2 in the evening or maybe 6'1.75 at his lowest.
Editor Rob

On June 10th he did a Tryout/Workout for the Vikings.

He ran 4.75 second 40 yard dash. I haven't yet seen any specific mention of a measurement, but the fact the Vikings put him at 6ft 2 rather than 6ft 3 does lend some credence to the idea he was measured, but it would have been under 6ft 2.5.

If he got 6ft 2.5 or over he'd have been down as 6ft 3...


@Rob: that’s true for most but not all. Some players do get rounded down. An example is Matt Schaub. 6’5 5/8 is his supposed measurement and he’s listed 6’5”. Then you have Mike Glennon 6’7 1/8 is his supposed and he’s listed 6’6”. He’s probably more 6’6.5 range tho at a low which is why he did that. But then you get players who measure 6’2.25 and get 6’3” listings
Editor Rob
In Brock's case, given he has claimed 6ft 3 I'm sure he'd have insisted...I also saw some articles describing him as a 'shade over' 6ft 3...I've no idea how that originated, maybe the journalist was given it, but it surely wasn't a measurement.
Xpac99 said on 2/Oct/19
@rob
with all due respect, if you see an inch between hogan and lesnar is the smallest 1 inch i ever seen
Click Here
randomdude20020 said on 2/Oct/19
xpac99 and heightpic, clearly the same guy judging by your typing and spelling and grammar, so please pick one name and stick with it.
randomdude20020 said on 2/Oct/19
@xpac99

to the contrary actually, I'm advocating that Brock is quite a strong 6'2 and possibly holds 6'2 by the evening, some people on here are estimating him at 6'1 which I don't agree with. I'm just working with the facts and evidence I'm giving, if anything it seems like you are over estimating his height with the evidence pointing in my favour.

If you would have read carefully. I did say that the picture is a bad picture because Hogan is closer to the camera hence giving Hogan the advantage but to say Lesnar looks identical in height to Hogan in that picture is outright ludicrous, Hogan was clearly an inch taller( again not a great picture to go by ) plus Hogan was not in a good posture. Also the picture you showed with peak HHH and peak Lesnar, HHH looks slightly taller in that picture also.

If you know anything about height, you should know you are about 2-3 cm taller in the morning than you are in the evening, the NFL combine measures their athletes in the late morning meaning Brock did measure at 6'2 3/8ths. After a couple of hours out, by the evening time he would have probably( approx 95% chance ) lost any where from another 1/2 to possibly more, putting him at 6'2 evening height ( I'm not ruling out 6'1.75 on a very bad day, at an absolute low)

all the proof is not pointing toward Lesnar being over 6'2 evening height just by his measurement it proves he is likely 6'2 at night.

note* Lesnar is still at his peak height in my opinion, possibly could have lost a couple of mm but he seems to still be a solid 6'2 today, while other guys who are older such as Goldberg Triple H and Batista have certainly lost some height, Lesnar today is taller than HHH and Goldberg.

Reigns is also in the 6'2 range, probably a couple mm taller than Brock but there is very little in it, I would put Reigns at a fraction over 6'2 night height and I mean a fraction maybe 1/8th.
Xpac99 said on 2/Oct/19
Click Here
Click Here
Demon87 said on 2/Oct/19
Nathan jones was listes 6ft9 by k1 but Rob listed him 6ft10. Even goldberg was listed 6ft2 by the nfl expansion but rob listed him 6ft2 1/2. it depends on what he did during the day, from what he rested and other 1000 consideration. it does not mean anything.
Rob i have a question. where did you see goldberg taller than lesnar by 1/2 an inch?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob

Goldberg is one wrestler with permanently hunched posture. I can see why many folk have him at just over six two peak because most of the time he didn’t look near a full six three
Heightpic said on 2/Oct/19
Another proof is when he had a staredown vs wrester test. Test was a legit 6ft5, taller than randy orton and the same height of jbl..
Click Here
Brock lesnar looks over 2 inches shorter, but not a full 3 inches shorter. Maybe 2 1/2 inches or 3/4 max. Lesnar even in my opinion 6ft2 flat was too short at peak.. Rob upgrade lesnar peak height
Xpac99 said on 2/Oct/19
Click Here
This is the position when lesnar face off hogan in 2002. Hogan in this position is 6ft3 the same as the rock, not complitly straight but hogan in 2000’s always had this posture, otherwise he was taller than 6ft3. Rob you have all the proofs that lesnar was more than 6ft2 peak height. Could you put a peak height? Today looks as tall as roman reigns (6ft2 5/8 measurament) listed 6ft2 1/4 and lesnar over 10 years of fighting, inevitably lost a fraction
randomdude20020 said on 1/Oct/19
@Christian

the measurement was taken and the full details of his combine including all his measurement and numbers were posted on pro wrestling insider( which the page has been taken down ) by Dave Meltzer, who is one of the leading journalists not just in pro wrestling but in all of combat sports, Brock was measured at 6'2 3/8ths , he was also listed as 6'2 by K1 in his MMA debut, K1 generally are more accurate and don't fudge or inflate their fighters stats as much as the UFC is known to do. so he was probably measured at 6'2 by the K1 or slightly above it and was rounded down to 6'2. Brock in my opinion is 6'2 in the evening or maybe 6'1.75 at his lowest.
Editor Rob

On June 10th he did a Tryout/Workout for the Vikings.

He ran 4.75 second 40 yard dash. I haven't yet seen any specific mention of a measurement, but the fact the Vikings put him at 6ft 2 rather than 6ft 3 does lend some credence to the idea he was measured, but it would have been under 6ft 2.5.

If he got 6ft 2.5 or over he'd have been down as 6ft 3...
Xpac99 said on 1/Oct/19
@randomdude2020
You constantly downgrade lesnar without reasons and proof. Lesnar was over 6ft2 in prime. Legit 6ft2 like triple h, mark henry looked shorter than lesnar. With 6ft3 guy doesn’t look an inch shorter. you don't know how to judge heights, even rob paul said lesnar and hogan was close in height in the pic and you is the only one who sees more than an inch. Every pic has a problem for you. Lesnar was over 6ft2 peak height like it or not. bring evidence that he is 6ft2 flat or shut up,thanks.
fred rosser said on 1/Oct/19
@Xpac1999. That picture with Lesnar in front of hogan is NOT from 2003, that picture is from 2002 smackdown.

So Lesnar is standing in front of a 2002 hulk Hogan.
Demon87 said on 1/Oct/19
I strongly believe he was taller than a legit 6ft2 guy like triple h. 6ft2 is correct today, but peak height is too low
Click Here
fred rosser said on 1/Oct/19
@Xpac1999. That picture with Lesnar in front of hogan is NOT from 2003, that picture is from 2002 smackdown.

So Lesnar is standing in front of a 2002 hulk Hogan.
randomdude20020 said on 1/Oct/19
@xpac99 again not a great image to go by as Hogan looks slightly closer to the camera , as I said hard to judge by the angles but Hogan looks over an inch taller( where the top of the heads meet ), Lesnar eyes and shoulders are above Hogans eyes and shoulders making him look similar in height, but Hogans forehead is much longer than Brocks, also Hogan doesn't appear to be standing with great posture.
Xpac99 said on 1/Oct/19
Click Here
Click Here
Even with rock and edge (both 6ft3) he doesn’t looks an inch short guy... maybe 2 cm shorter but not much in my opinion.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 1/Oct/19
@fred
Where's the proof that he measured 6'2 3/8"?
Xpac99 said on 1/Oct/19
@rob
Click Here
This is right before the staredown i posted. Yes both was in identical posture. Hogan in this position as tall as the rock (6ft 3). Ok he doesn’t was in straight legs but in 2000’s hogan was 6ft 3 in this position, otherwise he would have been taller. Even lesnar wasn’t in perfect straight legs. I think 1 inch is too much.. Rob what do you think
Editor Rob
I can't see Hogan any less than an inch taller
Canson said on 30/Sep/19
No one knows the measurement is valid but he was only listed at 6’2” in the NFL so he’s not taller than that. If anything he’s less
Canson said on 30/Sep/19
@Randomdude20020: that’s about how I am. Lose half inch in 2 hours and 3/4” to 2cm in a full day for my normal low and on a rare occasion extreme low is 1” below
viper said on 30/Sep/19
Lesnar measured 6-1.

I have just as much proof as the people who say he measured 6-2
randomdude20020 said on 30/Sep/19
@Fred

that is correct Lesnar was involved in a motorcycle crash ( Harley I think ) the month before he was due for the combine, he did have multiple injuries including fractures but this wouldn't have affected his height, although not 100%,he was still healed enough and given medical clearance by the doctors so he probably wasn't back to his full strength but wouldn't really have made him lose any height.

and that is also correct he measured just over 6'2 1/4 or 6'2 and 3/8ths by the combine but at the end of the day he probably would have dropped to 6'2 or just slightly below 6'2

Brock probably wakes up in the 6'2 1/2 - 3/4s range but by night he probably drops to 6'1.75 - 6'2
Xpac99 said on 30/Sep/19
Click Here
Rob nothing to say when lesnar confronts hogan back 2003? Hogan (6ft 3)standing straight and lesnar doesn’t look much shorter
Editor Rob
They don't look far apart that moment, whether both are identical posture is unknown.
randomdude20020 said on 30/Sep/19
@fred

prime Lesnar measured at 6'2 1/4 late morning so, no prime Lesnar was never 6'2 1/2

prime Lesnar was 6'2 and in my opinion is still 6'2, I personally don't think he has lost any height, he looks just as tall today as he did 10+ years ago.

@Canson

for me I wake up at about 6'1, 2 hours out of bed I lose almost half an inch down to 6'0 1/2, and by night I'm 6'0 to 6'0 1/4 - depending on how much activity I do throughout the day ( how much stress I've put on my spine ) but I lose around or very close to a full inch on a busy day ( I have a very long torso though which is why I may lose more than the average person :/ )
Demon87 said on 30/Sep/19
@randomdude20020
Triple h looked shorter than lesnar in the pic, even when both face off the rock. Lesnar was close to goldberg than other 6ft2 guy did. Today 6ft2 is ok, he isn’t taller than that and he isn’t shorter than that.. today he is very close to roman (6ft2 5/8 at nfl combine) listed 6ft2 1/4. sometimes looks exactly the same height.
Click Here
from this you understand that lesnar could not be measured 6ft2 1/4 by the nfl when he was young and second back 2000’s lesnar at 6ft2 1/4 or over that was very possible range. I think is arguable for young lesnar I'd like to know rob what he thinks
viper said on 30/Sep/19
I'm willing to pay money to anyone who can show he got measured at 6-2 at this point
fred rosser said on 29/Sep/19
@ ROB. PLEASE add Nate Diaz to your website. He deserves it. ufc say he's 6ft. absolute certain he's no less than 6ft. he can look 6'1. he might be one of those few examples where he's downgraded.
fred rosser said on 29/Sep/19
young prime Brock, low - 188.5-189cm
now - 188
Brock was 6'2 3/8 in nfl. he also had a terrible accident injury right before his combine.
sometimes a person can look short (there are many different factors), but once measures he can come out taller than expected.

The Man is strong af, has massive hands, long arms (81 inch wingspan). had he started mma since he was a kid or teenager or even right after college, didn't have terrible stomach disease that nearly killed him (he had three surgeries while in ufc), had world class trainers - he would have been much better.

he could do shooting star presses when he was young and he was 300 lbs! He's also very fast for his size. My Favorite fighter is Nate Diaz. Nate is underrated. He is real
fred rosser said on 29/Sep/19
young prime Brock - 6'2 1/4-1/2 at low fully stretched out.
now - 6'2
fred rosser said on 29/Sep/19
6'2 now
prime young lesnar at low - 6'2 1/4-1/2 fully stretched out
Canson said on 29/Sep/19
@Randomdude2020: people don’t lose 1/2” from late morning to early afternoon. Maybe 1/8” or max 1/4” but Lesnar measures that at the combine it’s likely about an hour after waking meaning 6’1 3/4” would be afternoon and lunchtime 6’1 7/8 or 6’2 tops. Usually it’s the heavier or more active guys who lose more after they have been awake 5 hours (assuming normal activity for those first 5 hours and not less than normal). If less than normal that may be a precursor for losing more after lunch. I know in my case if I measure after 5 hours I tend to lose 2-3 mm more for the day or if I hit the gym or am on my feet maybe another 1-2mm. I’m not on my feet the entire day but for good parts I am as I walk some in my profession being a Facilities and Ground Director
Yuri99 said on 29/Sep/19
@randomdude20020
We don’t know the nfl measurament. No one reports it. even big rob said that he hasn’t seen any newspaper mention of it. in the past a guy said this news but anybody seen this article. So you keep making mistakes, this thing is wrong
randomdude20020 said on 29/Sep/19
@Demon87

but peak Triple H actually looks taller in that picture? so if Triple H is 6'2 peak how would Lesnar be over 6'2 peak?

also with the picture of Rock and Brock 6'2 1/2 - 6'3 peak Rock visibly looks an inch or very close to it taller than Brock.
randomdude20020 said on 29/Sep/19
@yuri99 I agree he is 6'2 1/4 late morning/early afternoon height, but if we are going by evening height ( which most people consider your true height) he is not 6'2 1/4, he is in the 6'1.75 - 6'2 range , if he is 6'2 1/4 late morning it's extremely unlikely that he is 6'2 1/4 in the evening.
Heightpic said on 29/Sep/19
Today he looks 6ft2 but is very close to 6ft2 1/4 roman. Still looks a legit 6ft2. I have a question that nobody asked you.. back 2002/2003 when he was young in your opinion it was arguable 6ft2 1/4 or even 6ft2 1/2 (6ft2 - 6ft2 1/2 range) or this guy never looks over 6ft2 ?
I think it's an interesting question, I hope you can answer me
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 28/Sep/19
I don't get why some people are trying to diminish the difference in that pic between Lesnar and Gunn. Worst case it looks 2.5" visually.
Yuri99 said on 28/Sep/19
@radomdude2020
I don’t say that lesnar is taller than goldberg, i said lesnar was 6ft2 1/4 in my opinion and goldberg 6ft 2 1/2. Lesnar was close to goldberg than others legit 6ft2 did (ex. Triple h)
Click Here
6ft2 1/4 isn’t a bad listing for sure
Demon87 said on 28/Sep/19
Click Here
Click Here
With 6ft2 peak triple h... i think he looks slighty taller than 6ft2 in prime
Randomdude2020 said on 27/Sep/19
@Yuri99 also that is a horrible image to go by, Lesnar is again closer to the camera

here is a better angle when both mean are same distance from the camera and nose to nose - Click Here -starting from 7:32

Goldberg was clearly the taller of the two back then.
Randomdude2020 said on 27/Sep/19
@Yuri99 who I also think is xpac99

if you look at the wrestlemania 20 staredown between Brock and Goldberg, Goldberg was about a 1/2 inch taller, the latest staredown Lesnar looked a hair taller.

Lesnar was at his peak height when he was measured by the NFL, he was only 27. and if he was 6'2 1/4 in the morning it's extremely unlikely he was that at night so no I don't think 6'2 1/4 at night is possible for him in his peak. but if you go by morning to early afternoon height yes 6'2 1/4 is very possible and likely as reflected by his measurement.
Yuri99 said on 27/Sep/19
@rob
Brock lesnar can looks 6ft2 1/4. Triple h in prime was a legit 6ft2 but i think if lesnar and triple h were face to face, lesnar was taller..
Click Here
Click Here
You said in the past that lesnar and goldberg were about the same height like 189 cm. Goldberg at 6ft2 1/2 is ok, but don’t you think that lesnar was 6ft2 1/4? An upgrade is possible or 188 is ok in your opinion?
Xpac99 said on 26/Sep/19
Click Here
How is the difference in this staredown?
Demon87 said on 25/Sep/19
In my personal opinion he was 6ft2 1/4 in peak height. Today looks about the same height of roman, and when he was young looks about 2 cm on vince (6ft1 1/2 peak height)
Click Here
Can you see lesnar at 6ft2 1/4?
Space said on 24/Sep/19
Peak height for Lesnar could have been 6’2.25”-6’1.5” range is what the nfl was saying back then. However I think he was 6’1.75”-6’1.25” back then. And more 6’1.5”-6’1” today.
Demon87 said on 24/Sep/19
Rob he really measured 6ft2 1/4 by the nfl combine? Because everyone said that, but You don’t mention... in my opinion he looks 6ft2 1/4 in prime
Editor Rob
I haven't seen any newspaper mention of it yet.
Xpac99 said on 24/Sep/19
Sorry but the guy with rob have 3 inches on him.. why did you see 3 inches on lesnar by gunn?
Click Here
Xpac99 said on 24/Sep/19
Click Here
How tall is lesnar next to cena
Roderick said on 23/Sep/19
It is SAID (Said means that that's what people say, not from me, take notes specific posters...) that Lesnar measured 6'2.25" in the NFL. So if that was in the morning, wouldn't that mean Lesnar is max 6'1.75"?
Space said on 23/Sep/19
I think the picture with 6’3.5” Bill Gunn just adds to the point that Lesnar Reigns Rock Batista are all somewhere in the 6’1.75”-6’0.75” range for a low.
Randomdude2020 said on 23/Sep/19
@Xpac99

clearly looks like 3 inches to me, but not a great picture to go by as both men are not side by side and Lesnar is not standing straight, also we can't tell what footwear they have on,

but it clearly looks like 3 inches
viper said on 22/Sep/19
Lesnar was never measured.

Nobody can show any proof.

Most fakest of fake news
Xpac99 said on 22/Sep/19
@christian
Why did you see 3 inches on lesnar by gunn? I see 2 inches not much, maybe even less in the pic. 3 inches is complitly ridiculos based on the pic
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 21/Sep/19
@Randomdude
True
Canson said on 21/Sep/19
@Creeper: Christian didn’t say that. He said that he “looks 6’1” if Gunn is really 6’4” and that’s based off that picture he’s referring to. As for Lesnar, I do agree under 6’1” is crazy but anything over 6’2” also is. Some guys that have met him in person here on this site have said he looked 6’1” range in person
Randomdude2020 said on 21/Sep/19
@Johan also that picture with Lesnar and Overeem is not a good basis to go by, Lesnar is much closer to the camera than Overeem which will give a taller illusion, the weigh ins had a better one, Overeem was standing flat footed and Lesnar was posting on one foot ( which gives about 1/2 inch) and Overeem still edged him. Cain and Brock seem to be about the same distance to the camera so that is probably a better one to go by( but still not great as one could still closer )
Randomdude2020 said on 21/Sep/19
@creeper Lesnar was measured at 6'2 1/4 by the NFL and is probably 6'1.75 (lowest ) - 6'2 at night

facts

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.