How tall is Conan O'Brien - Page 3

Add a Comment1940 comments

Average Guess (197 Votes)
6ft 3.86in (192.7cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Sep/18
Anywhere between 6ft3½-4
Andrea said on 11/Sep/18
Considering that the camera is clearly on Liam's side, that's a pretty bad clip to draw any conclusion from, Christian, but if anything, I would say that Conan doesn't look much different than him when Liam isn't raising his eyelevel, DESPITE the camera disadvantage: Click Here
Andrea said on 11/Sep/18
Not only they wind up looking very close, Rising, but Conan can even pull off looking a bit taller than Jared there, so even if Conan has say 0.5 inches more footwear than Jared (the most he probably has), they must be quite close barefoot. If Conan really is 191, Jared can't be much more than that either, which I highly doubt.
As for Neeson, "Conan's reaction and guessing Liam 6'5"" doesn't necessarily prove that Liam is (or was) easily taller than him because it totally depends on Conan's perception of height and height differences. I remember Michael Strahan claimed to feel short next to Alexander Skarsgard, and he even joked that he had to go on his toes when the latter went to his show (which certainly suggests that he genuinely thought that Alexander was comfortably taller than him), yet they're supposed to be around the same height and they actually didn't look much different when they stood next to each other to see who was the taller one. All of this (that's just one example, but I could give many) to say that you can't always go with other people's estimates/reactions when it comes to height because most of the time they prove nothing.
Canson said on 11/Sep/18
@Christian: yea Conan is about 191 if Liam is 193. Liam may be a wee bit over earlier in the day but a solid 6’4 at a low. Best case 6’3.5 peak for Conan 6’4.25 for Liam but Conan never looks that tall when he’s next to Barkley or Kobe. Kobe could look 2” taller to be honest
184guy2 said on 10/Sep/18
Let's be honest
Conan was in a 2inch elevator shoes ( inside lifts because outside was a normal heel) and Jared in a 0.2in thin sneaker
The truth is that Conan is 6'2.25
Right folks ?
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 9/Sep/18

They're about 2cm apart in this clip. Click Here
Canson said on 9/Sep/18
I think he is 2cm shorter than Neeson as well. 6’4 for Liam and 6’3.25 for Conan
Rising - 174 cm said on 8/Sep/18
Some dress shoes at the large end are indeed 1.2", though I don't think Conan's heels look as big as that as far as I can tell. I thought most Converse add around 0.6", but I can't remember if they're less when worn. I also thought I remembered Rob saying some Vans won't add much more than half an inch. There are quite a few popular sneakers around 0.7" nowadays. Regardless of the brand Jared has, I wouldn't guess them much or any more than that. In any case, Jared and Conan wind up looking very close, but posture isn't perfect. I can't tell the exact difference with Neeson, but Conan's reaction and guessing Liam 6'5" made it obvious he's taller.
Canson said on 7/Sep/18
@Christian: maybe at his peak 192 but I still say 191 range and today he’s surely not over 6’3.25. He never looks much over 6’3” when he’s next to a legit 6’4”. Also have to remember how thick his hair is. Lol he inflates half the people on his show to make himself taller. In the clip I posted with Magic Johnson he’s nowhere near 6’4”
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 7/Sep/18
Meanwhile i wouldn't go under 192cm for Conan but Jared Padalecki probably not a full 193cm low guy like many think. Rob claim that Jim Parrack is same height as Jared Padalecki and he look between 6'3-6'3 1/2 with Rob and having more footwear than Rob. That i can believe Jim at most 192cm in person barefoot and Jared will only be fraction over him and Conan also i"ll throw Jason Momoa in the 192cm Club. Many estimate Jensen Ackles to be 5'11 1/2-5'11 3/4 not 6'0 but Rob met him (Jensen in thick boots) and still listed him 6'0 and i agree more looking it i"ll go with a strong 5'11 1/2 for Jensen maybe just 182cm. I now think Rob may not estimate perfectly for all celebrities height even standing close to them there will be a variation of a 1cm over estimate than saying underestimate 1cm just like most people. Jared Padalecki 6'4 1/8 guesses from many people could came out to be measurement at the doctor office in the morning and the strong 6'4 low will be someone like a peak Hoff and Goldblum both many thought they look 6'5 peak and 6'4 1/2 low that is just 1cm or a 1/2 inch over estimate. Conan can look 6'3 sometimes when he had a hunch posture shaking hand with guests on his show but with Jared it proves him easily over 6'3.
Andrea said on 6/Sep/18
Based on what do you basically say that he is (or was) 2 cms shorter than Neeson, Christian?
Canson said on 6/Sep/18
@Rising: yea I think 6’4-6’4.5 like he said in that video with shoes. I think he’d be 191cm flat (6’3.25)
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 6/Sep/18
I have him at 191 range, but to be fair, 192 is also possible for him. But I still would go for that than 193, which is a bit too high IMO. A 193 Conan would put guys like Liam Neeson at 195.
184guy2 said on 5/Sep/18
Vans give more like 0.8in than 0.5in so we can say that conan had at max 0.3 in more than Jared
Rising - 174 cm said on 4/Sep/18
@Andrea: I'm not sure whether they're Vans, Converse or something else, but they seem somewhere in that 0.5"-0.7" range. As for Conan, 191 is the absolute lowest I'd go. My guess would be more like 6'3.5" since I believe his 6'4.5" claim probably came from a shoe measurement. About 1" would be pretty typical for a dress shoe and quite a few sneakers, though many can give a bit less and some a bit more.
Visitor said on 4/Sep/18
@Canson many mid-size or even compact cars are basically the same for the driver, I've noticed larger cars mostly tend to have more leg room for the rear passengers. I don't think I've ever driven a car that was "too small".

I compared Converses and dress shoes recently... and did it again now. Converses give you 7 millimetres (0.28"), the dress shoes I have (1.0" heel) give 3.1 centimetres (1.22"). NO INSOLE. Converses are of course normally worn without insoles (it's "built-in") whereas dress shoes are worn with insoles, and they can easily have a bigger heel than 1.0".

Just your regular run of the mill dress shoes are definitely MUCH more than a half inch advantage against Chucks or other sneaker style shoes.
Andrea said on 3/Sep/18
I'm not sure they are Vans, Rising, but I doubt there would be much more than a 0.5 inches footwear difference between them. Taking that (and the fact that Conan manages to look a bit taller than Jared there) into account, it's hard to believe he would be much under 6'4. I mean, 192 I guess is still quite possible, but I have a hard time seeing him as low as 191, after seeing him with Jared (and Zach).
Andrea said on 2/Sep/18
Junior, converse shoes add about 0.6 inches, so if Conan's shoes add 1.1-1.2 inches like you say, there's no more than 0.6 inches footwear between them. And if Zach really is a little bit over 6'3 (which maybe isn't impossible, but I certainly wouldn't bet on), it makes it even harder to believe that Conan is much shorter than 6'4...
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 1/Sep/18

Most cars are alright, but planes are a nightmare if sitting in economy seats. This is why I fly business class whenever possible. It's bit more expensive, but fortunately I don't fly as often as the average person does.
Rising - 174 cm said on 31/Aug/18
@Visitor: Your friend sounds like a taller version of me in that regard. I wear 28/30, but I need a belt since they don't seem to make any smaller and even those are difficult to find.

@Andrea: That did surprise me since I agree Jared seems an honest 6'4". What is he wearing, Vans? I know those don't add much more than half an inch while dress shoes can vary from only around 0.8" up to 1"-1.1", even 1.2" range. I'd think about an inch for Conan's there, but I'm not sure. That's another talk show where Jensen looks shorter than I'd expect without his logger boots. Personally, the absolute most I could see Conan measuring would be in the 192 range while the lowest would be around 191, but he was taller than Billy Campbell, iirc.
viper said on 31/Aug/18
The other day a guy thought I had lost weight with my shirt tucked in some.

He thought I had a 30 inch waist when it's 33
viper said on 31/Aug/18
At 6-0 I could tolerate a window seat. But at 6-3 forget about it
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 31/Aug/18
@Andrea Zachary levi had a 1/2 inch converse chucks compare to Conan footwear solid 1.1-1.2" style. He is more like a little bit over 6'3 then a little under.
Canson said on 31/Aug/18
@Visitor: I have rented vehicles when I’ve gone out of town such as a Chevy Cruze etc and fit fine. Some of the medium size cars like the Camry Accord Altima Fusion seem to have as much or more room than my 5 Series does. My wife’s Murano when she had it was even roomier and comfortable. My 6’6” friend drives an Expedition and my 6’7” friend a Ford F-150 while my 6’5” friend drives an Altima (along with his F250 that he uses for work) which is quite roomy for him
Mickie said on 30/Aug/18
Planes are one of the only scenarios where I ever feel "too tall" at 6'3" and some change. Conan is 6'3" and change too. And while I wouldn't be shocked if he slipped a quarter inch or so, I really don't think he's shrunk by any particularly discernible chunk. So my guess today is 6' 3 3/8" and peak 6' 3 5/8".
Myself said on 29/Aug/18
How did you measure your inseam? Did you measure only from hip bone (without taking it into account) to the bottom of one leg or to the floor right below it? I used the latter method.
Canson said on 29/Aug/18
@Viper and Visitor: yep and that’s the reason why I particularly claim my actual height as opposed to an inflated height. What benefit would there be at 6’5 or 6’6 that 6’4” doesn’t already give me today? It’s funny because I’ve met 6’3” guys who look foolish claiming 6’5” (insecurity or ego) and then expect a guy Christian’s size to claim 6’7” when in reality they know as well that 6’7” is too tall. The cutoff now a days is 6’5” whereas back in the day 6’5” was too tall
Andrea said on 29/Aug/18
Although I haven't seen that much of him, he never quite struck me as be as being a big 6'4 guy, but he surprisingly (at least to me) looks a bit taller than Jared when he greets him here: Click Here I know he is in bigger footwear (how much I'm not sure, but I highly doubt it's anything more than 0.5 inches), but if Jared is 6'4 (which I firmly believe he is), Conan can't possibly be much less than 6'4 either, all things considered.
Even next to Zach (who although I personally believe may well be a bit under 6'3, I certainly doubt he's much less than that) Click Here , he does look near enough the 6'4 mark, considering that he easily looks 1.5 inches taller than him, albeit in maybe 0.5 inches more footwear, which still makes him at least one inch taller, after taking it into account.
Visitor said on 29/Aug/18
@viper I know a guy who's round about my height (182 cm) but weighs less than 140 lbs... not really that tall but ridiculously lean. Probably close to zero body fat. He has the kind of build that makes him look much taller than he is (I mean for example in pictures and/or generally where there's no clear reference point. Like an illusion.) I think he said he wears something like 28/32 but even the 28 is too big at the WAIST and he has serious trouble finding pants that fit.

Writing it down it's kind of "shocking" that I weigh over 50 lbs more than him... and I'm not "fat" either, I'm the tiniest bit "overweight", the type where you don't really notice it if I'm in regular clothes. I wouldn't even want to go below 175 lbs, I'd lose every bit of muscle along with the fat... and I don't think I could anymore if I wanted to (I've once in my adult life weighed 160 lbs and that was mega thin).
viper said on 28/Aug/18
Canson my dad drives a BMW 650i and the backseat room is enough for around town.
My head almost touches the ceiling.

Granted the front passenger seat needs to be up almost all the way
Visitor said on 28/Aug/18
@Canson In general cars have more than enough space, there's the odd one here and there. Like the one where if I'd lift my leg straight up it would hit the ignition key spot on and crack it in half. I tried searching the web for what my roughly one meter (39.37") legs (hip to floor, not inseam) actually mean but the little I found actually suggested my legs are slightly on the shorter side of average. Your thighbone is supposedly supposed to be 26.74% of your height but for me it's more like 26.0-26.3.

I don't fly or use buses that much, they're I guess adequate for me but you can definitely tell they weren't designed for comfort for anyone much over 5'11". At that height, the leg room is exactly what it sounds like, you can squeeze your legs in there but that's it. MUCH more of a problem on planes I have to say though (unless you frequently fly trips that only last 30 mins or something!)
viper said on 26/Aug/18
Being 6-3 really sucks on planes.

I have to get an aisle seat and stretch my legs out. Can't imagine being taller than myself on a plane
viper said on 26/Aug/18
32x34 pants are impossible to find. Is nobody tall and lean anymore
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 24/Aug/18
I wear a 34-35" inseam and my atual inseam measurement was 36.5" and my cousin was 1.5" shorter than i wear the same inseam as me. I guess people measure their inseam much likely in different ways somehow.
Myself said on 23/Aug/18
What about planes and buses? If i fit in bus seats it's usually by angling my legs and still most of the time my knees push hard against the seat in front...If i had a little larger inseam i wouldn't fit at all...well that's pretty much the feeling i have in planes...i hate them so much, expecially when the...(no insults on this site right?...) front of me decides that he isn't confortable enough and angles his seat!

About pants sizes...i don't know exacly...i usually just buy the largest available and they fit both in length and width (i have a large hip bone). The jeans i usually wear are size 38"/34" and i haven't applied any changes/modifications to them.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 23/Aug/18
One thing. Conan atual inseam is not 36 that long. Probably measure 36 inch when he fits in an inch footwear.
Canson said on 22/Aug/18
@Visitor: I own a BMW 535I X drive at 6’4.25” and have enough room. And We just bought my wife a Highlander. Even when she had a Murano it was more than enough room (even roomier than my BMW on the inside) for me
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 22/Aug/18

I'm the opposite of you. I prefer to wear pants above the waist, because I don't like sagging. That's one of the reasons why I stopped wearing 36's, along with my ankles showing. I prefer my ankles not being shown when I wear pants.
Visitor said on 21/Aug/18
@Myself could be simply that at our heights, the relative difference (should be about 5% or something) just isn't big enough to make slightly different proportions that noticeable. And you might have a bigger head also, not just the torso. Shoe sizes (actual shoes) are even more all over the place than pants, sometimes even a 42 EU can fit if it's wide enough, sometimes even a 44 is too SHORT.

Leg space is sometimes a problem even for me, mostly though only in small cars where someone tall is sitting in front of me. Although worse than any actual space is that in some cars, no matter how I try to adjust the drivers seat, I have to bend my leg awkwardly unless I want to crack the ignition key in half with my knee. Those times I think "seriously, whose idea was it to install the lock that low AND at that angle?"
Myself said on 20/Aug/18
I don't think i measured wrong because i measured it multiple times and even on a site called "bodyvisualizer" (.com), when i put 191 or 193 cm, the predicted insteam is 87 and 89 cm respectively...
It is true that i have a pretty large torso (and weigh 240 pounds now, being overweight but not obese...i actually feel good, i would only want to lose maximum 5-6 kg of fat and keep building muscle) but i wouldn't say that i have short legs either, because anywhere i go, leg space is always a problem.

My shoe size should be 47.5 EU i think (13/13.5 US?), but the last time i tried shoes that size i couldn't fit my foot inside, so i decided to try something like 48/48.5 but i couldn't find the end i had to buy 49 and 1/3 (49.33, 14 US it says) with a thicker insole to fit better, and i feel comfortable.
viper said on 20/Aug/18
I can wear 32 inseam because I like it more sitting below my waist
Visitor said on 19/Aug/18
I just measured a pair of 36W/34L trousers I have that fit just right (without cuffing). The actual inseam (inside seam) is 30.3". The total length is almost 41" so I really don't know where they got the 34" from. I think they're French or something ( ;) ) as they are a bit small for their marked size. If it's jeans, it's usually 34L and I just cuff them.
My actual waist measurement (or hip, where most pants actually sit) isn't even close to what the labels say either. I don't think I have many pants the same labeled size, it's all this "vanity sizing" (and ill-fitting clothes) or whatever it is these days. It used to be that if I just grabbed a pair of 34/34's, 90% of the time they'd fit.

A bonus "supposed long legs" peculiarity... my little brother is 5'10", possibly 178 cm and wears the same size. He isn't oddly proportioned either in any way. In fact, for a long time I've wondered if I have SHORT legs for my height (182 cm afternoon) in part because of that.
Editor Rob
You will definitely find some label mistakes or those workers who didn't measure exact.
Canson said on 19/Aug/18
@Christian: I wear my pants out easily by having them too long. I have to get them tailored even at 36.
Visitor said on 17/Aug/18
@Canson @Christian : Alright, well that makes a whole lot of sense to me. The pants that you typically buy are 2"-4" longer than mine, just as I'd have expected for someone that much taller. I guess only 'Myself' remains a mystery now. 10+ cm taller and only in the torso... I'd still tend to think we measured the inseam differently in some way.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 15/Aug/18

Same here, I buy 34"/38" in pants but the inseam has to get tailored to 37". There are a few 34"/37" pants but are rare. But my waist is no less than 34" and sometimes even goes up to nearly 35".
Canson said on 13/Aug/18
@Rising: yea that wasn’t intended for you. There is another poster who always uses the excuse that the measurement didn’t occur and throws that out when comparing Barkley to others and subsequently upgrades half the celebs he comments on. I don’t think you do that at all. Your estimates for the most are very good estimates even if we can disagree on the basketball players some
Canson said on 13/Aug/18
@Visitor: I’m 36 years old and have been roughly the same size since about 16. Maybe 1/4” or a centimeter gain but that’s all. I typically buy 36/36 and have to get them tailored both waist and Inseam. When measured I’m around 35 waste and inseam about 35/36 but closer to 35 in reality. I myself am 6’4.25” barefoot (193.7cm at my normal low in the afternoon)
Visitor said on 11/Aug/18
@Myself @Canson : About the inseam(s)... and stuff. Are we absolutely sure we're measuring it the same way? I find it REALLY hard to believe someone 10, 15 cm taller than me would have legs the same length as me. I have several friends 190+ cm, all of them have their hip level WAY higher than me. Do you guys then feel that you have short legs? I really don't look like I have long legs, at all.

On occasion I have dropped down to even 180 cm flat if I've been on my feet REALLY long (24+ hours) and carrying heavy stuff on my back, but normally I still clear 181 cm late in the evening. Pubic bone to floor is 87-88 cm (34.25"+), barefoot, as best as I can measure it. Curiously, the pants I have on now are marked 35"/30"... those always seem to be all over the place though, ones that fit are most usually 32"-34" length (I do fold the hem).

As another reference, I wear a size 10 (US) shoe, VERY wide. Just trying to make some sense of these confusing metrics. Which one is the real freak? :)
Rising - 174 cm said on 10/Aug/18
@Canson: My bad, I didn't know who else was Barkley lately, though I didn't think you'd call me an idiot so I suppose I just meant to clarify my position. I'd agree that if there were a measurement, Barkley wouldn't care enough to fake it. I agree on Lithgow being a legit 6'4" until his mid 60's and he was 59 when Conan compared height with him. I don't know of the difference with Neeson, but the fact Conan sees himself as 6'4"-6'4.5" and Neeson as 6'5" suggests Conan saw Neeson anywhere from a half inch to an inch taller than himself. I don't really suspect the Conan video was staged, but I do think it's important to note that we have no way of knowing the other guy's height so the video is only significant for showing what Conan claims, but it certainly doesn't prove he's that height barefoot. I'd go slightly higher than you on Conan barefoot since I could see him measuring 6'4.5" in 1" shoes, but I could easily be a fraction off in either direction.
Canson said on 6/Aug/18
@Rising: I wasn’t so much referring to you. I don’t recall you saying it was made up as much. It was a couple other posters here who I’ve called out already but not you and I assure you that
Canson said on 5/Aug/18
@Rising: my thoughts exactly. I think Selleck May have been telling the truth that he’s 6’3.5 at his low or could be 6’3.5-.75. While Conan could be 6’3.25 barefoot and 6’4.5 in dress shoes. Now for Neeson there’s a chance that he was 6’4 1/8 peak imho as he did appear to have closer to 1” on Conan. I wouldn’t go below 6’4 flat for him though. He’s one of the more legit 6’4”s here on this site. This is along with Goldblum and I honestly see Lithgow as possibly being that. If anything maybe Lithgow was 6’3.75 too but he looked taller than Conan. Howard Stern appeared 2” Taller as did Klitschko when they stood with Conan. Stern probably was a 6’5.25 (6’6 out of bed) peak and 6’5” today still while Wlad is probably a strong 6’5” guy like Rob lists him
Tall In The Saddle said on 5/Aug/18
@Canson - yeah, exactly my point, staged/scripted. Notice when the guy first asks "how tall are you?" Conan replies "what's that?" and after the guy repeats the question Conan acts nonchalant as if it's something he doesn't really think about too much and replies "About 6'4" 6'4.5" something like that". Like Conan isn't fixated on height and the preservation of his own claims - lol.
Rising - 174 cm said on 5/Aug/18
@Canson: My position on Barkley never had anything to do with Conan, which is why I had no problem saying Conan was below 6'4" when I looked into it despite being initially skeptical. But we don't know at all that Barkley was measured at the '92 Olympics. All it says in one article is it was "learned" he was "more like 6-4 5/8". If you want to believe that comes from a measurement, that's a reasonable assumption, but it's simply an assumption so it's simply false to state it as a verified fact that Barkley was measured at the Olympics when that's not even what the writer claimed. The writer was ambiguous and didn't even say Barkley was exactly 6'4 5/8", but "more like", which could mean 6'4" and any fraction. Falsified would only seemingly apply to a measurement we witness, otherwise if it was an inaccurate, it'd be more plausible to say it's misreported. And we both know measurements can be misreported from the varying figures for Shawne Merriman. But Conan looks comfortably shorter than both Barkley and Kobe in any case.
Canson said on 4/Aug/18
@Tall in the Saddle: we also don’t know if Conan’s video was staged. He’s always making a reference to “how tall he is”. But he clearly isn’t 6’4” but 6’3”ish next to Kobe and Charles Barkley and the others. But people here want him to be 6’4” so they accuse 6’4 1/2 guys like Barkley of downplaying their height even when he has an accurate measurement from the olympics. However that is “falsified”. You have a bunch of idiots here who say that
Rising - 174 cm said on 3/Aug/18
@viper: If you're 6'3" then 3/4" is the most I'd expect Conan's advantage to be and 1/4" the least. As for Selleck, I actually first suspected he was shorter after seeing a bunch of 1990 photos with 5'10" Patrick Swayze. Even with Selleck's slouch, I was very surprised he didn't tower Swayze. I still wouldn't go under Selleck's 6'3.5" claim, but I take his word for it and assume he's honest. He did like wearing some pretty thick boots on some talk show appearances in the 90's so that would be enough for him to hit 6'5" in footwear. Actually, he had boots when he appeared on Chevy Chase's talk show in 1993 and though you can only compare them very briefly, they look virtually identical during the greeting.
Tall In The Saddle said on 3/Aug/18
@Canson - at least that's 4 of us that have Conan at about 6'3.25". If he includes his shoes it's a deliberate fudge - especially since the line up of guests who are taller and who Conan acknowledges to be taller state their height to be exactly what O'Brien claims for himself - they're height obviously being bare feet exactly as Conan should give his.
I appreciate Danimals clip and if the other guy was in fact 6'4" bare feet then O'Brien could be reasonably guessed to be up to 6'4.5" but I don't know the other guy from a bar of soap and cannot compare him to anyone. Also was it just me or did the dialogue re height in the clip seem awfully convenient to raise the question of and confirm O'Brien's prev. claimed height at 6'4"-6'4.5" - scripted perhaps or am I being too cynical?
viper said on 2/Aug/18
Gun to my head lowest I'd ever go for Selleck would be 6-3.75, so the 6-3.5 is a surprise.

Thought he would be exactly the same height as Liam Neeskn
Dmeyer said on 2/Aug/18
If you look well at the 2004 vidéo and you consider the angle that favors Liam they are both 6'4 equal height
Canson said on 1/Aug/18
@Viper: night and afternoon shouldn’t vary much. I measure 6’4.299 at the doctor after 8+ hours awake this week and this was at 1pm and woke up just before 5am. When I measured that night without going to the Gym I was still that amount but because I didn’t do anything out of ordinary.

As for Conan, 3/4” seems high. He’s shorter than Goldblum, Neeson who is 6’4 Hasselhoff who is 6’4” and the list goes on. Conan looks more like 6’3.25 max with Kobe Bryant or Barkley. He may edge you by half inch if you drop to 6’2.75. Conan says 6’4:6’4.5 which is his shoe height
Rising - 174 cm said on 1/Aug/18
@viper: It's probably closer to Selleck's low than anything else. He claimed it at least twice in the 80's, though so I assume he measured it, but did say "about" in one of those claims so I'd leave open the possibility of something like 6'3 5/8" or even 6'3 3/4". Rob lists Craig T. Nelson at 6'3.25" now though so Selleck was taller regardless.
Canson said on 31/Jul/18
@Rising: Agreed! Maybe he was 6’4.5 in dress shoes and 6’3.25 barefoot today
viper said on 31/Jul/18
I think Conan would have three quarters of an inch on me imo
viper said on 31/Jul/18
Is the Selleck 6-3.5 claim his height at night.

Selleck has always looked taller to me than somebody like 6-3.5 Craig T Nelson.
Agent Orange said on 31/Jul/18
How large do you think his head looks?
Editor Rob
At times 10.5 inches, but I think his hairstyle adds a bit to overall length. Still a bit over 10 inches might not be improbable.
Rising - 174 cm said on 30/Jul/18
@Canson: You may remember I was initially skeptical about Conan being under 6'4" barefoot, but I've now come to agree. I think he's 6'4.5" in shoes and while the angle on his show can make him look shorter or taller, Conan's own words suggest he thinks of height being in shoes. As you know, Tom Selleck claimed 6'3.5" more than once back in the 80's and has never claimed more than 6'4" yet Conan thought he was 6'4"-6'5" and this makes sense since Selleck would be about 6'5" in the boots he wore that night and 6'4.5" in most other shoes. Similarly, most would agree Liam Neeson was about 6'4" yet Conan thought he was 6'5", which would again be a shoe height.
Canson said on 30/Jul/18
@Dream: I think that’s too high for Conan but I wouldn’t be surprised if he edges Boris. By a hair.
Dream(5'9.5") said on 28/Jul/18
6'3.75" or 6'3.875" seems more reasonable, but I wouldn't go lower. I think he'll edge out someone like Boris Kodjoe.
Canson said on 19/Jul/18
@Danimal: so why is that you believe that Conan is claiming a barefoot height just because he “says that he is” but don’t believe Charles Barkley is claiming one? That’s called being inconsistent and biased
Danimal 5'9 3/4" said on 18/Jul/18
At 2:29 the guy asks Conan how tall he is and Conan answers 6'4"-6'4.5". Conan was 46 years old when this was filmed, so I have NO doubt that 15 years earlier he was easily that height. The other guy claims he's 6'4" and Conan is taller than him (and YES, the guy can be seen wearing running shoes): Click Here
Canson said on 18/Jul/18
@Mickie: i didn’t think he was much different from you as it is. I would peg Conan around the same probably from the looks about 191cm maybe 6’3 1/8 (today) or 6’3.25 but he never looks more than that imho
Mickie said on 18/Jul/18
@Canson it could, but I felt like he was very similar to my height which is 6' 3 3/8". If he's above or below that, I'd be amazed if it was by more than a half inch and I believe the difference is more likely to be within a quarter of an inch.
Canson said on 15/Jul/18
@Mickie: his hair looks like it adds to the perception of his height
Myself said on 13/Jul/18
34 inches is definitely long for your height, even Canson has a 35ish inseam and is half an inch taller than me.
Mickie said on 11/Jul/18
I don't know if he's lost height (I doubt it's more than just a fraction at most) but he didn't look a solid 6-4 to me in person. I'd say he was over 6-3 though.
Canson said on 11/Jul/18
Sorry Myself. Meant to tag Visitor. My bad!
Visitor said on 11/Jul/18
Canson: The "only 6'3" thing was a response to Junior Hernandez... I mean, I think it would be difficult to tell a 1% difference, as an inch is relatively less the taller you are. More so if it was someone who just told you they were 6'3" (don't know if the uncle he mentioned was measured at that). In Conan's case, I've just seen him on TV with a bunch of people known to be 5'10"-6'0 and he doesn't look 11 cm taller than any of them.

The 6'3 guy I know is actually 191 cm and like I said he is massive, in a photo together his eyes are completely above my head even though I'm closer to the camera and the angle is favoring me.

@"Myself": the inseam thing is tricky since there seem to be conflicting ideas on how it should actually be measured. As far as I know it should be floor to pubic bone, and for me that is 88 cm. Hip bone to floor is 100 cm and according to the charts I've seen that should be totally average for my height (181.5 cm).
Myself said on 9/Jul/18
I think you tagged the wrong user
Canson said on 8/Jul/18
Click Here

He doesn’t look more than 6’3” with Magic. And I’d have a hard time believing Magic is 6’7.5 prob 6’7” flat, today at least.
Canson said on 8/Jul/18
@Myself: only 6’3” would simply imply he’s not 6’4” Or 6’4.5 like he claims. But I concur with your estimate 6’3-6’3.5 191cm
Myself said on 7/Jul/18
Yeah i was referring to floor insteam too...mine is 88 cm, if i measured right.

It's impossible that your legs aren't long for your height, since i'm 6'3.60/70 and my floor inseam is 34.6" from what it looks like...
Visitor said on 6/Jul/18
I don't understand why you would refer to someone as "only 6'3"... I know a guy who's been measured 6'3", he's HUGE. I would have no problem believing Conan at 6'3" - 6'3.5".

I have a floor inseam of 34.25", I don't have long legs and I'm 5'11" - 6' range. Seems consistent to me as Conan himself has brought up his "long goofy legs" many times on his show, and it does look like he has very long legs.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 2/Jul/18

My pants inseam's 37 but floor inseam's 39. I don't wear 39 in pants, that would be too long.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 2/Jul/18
I had a 6'3 uncle on my mom's side. I hardly see Conan only his height. Conan look 6'4 with Chris Hemsworth. We can argue Chris is 190cm but Conan is not under 192.5cm.

Click Here Chris look quite a legit 6'3 we can tell it with those ladies.

Click Here This is one of the best comparison to see Conan's height. I wouldn't go under 6'3 7/8 in this picture.
Nils2 said on 1/Jul/18
I would almost dare say no chance under 6'3.5 for this guy. I think the closest guess would be 6'3.75.
It would be very unlucky for the rock if Conan measured 6'3.25..
Myself said on 30/Jun/18
You have a 39 inch(99 cm) inseam?! What the...?! Mine is about 88 cm, 34.6', 10 cm smaller than yours, but i'm 4 cm shorter! This means that i have a 7 cm longer torso!
Maybe that is the reason why i naturally weigh a good amount, even without exercising and not being too fat.
Dam, i wish i had a little longer legs, so i would have been a legit 6'4 at least!
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 27/Jun/18
@MAD SAM Because Liam Hemsworth could be 6'3 1/2. Hoping Rob will meet him one day and took a picture.
MAD SAM said on 23/Jun/18
Conan isn’t much taller to 191 cm Liam, maybe 0.5-1 cm so that brings Conan’s height in 191.5-192 cm range
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 21/Jun/18
Click Here start at 0:38 onward we could tell Howard Stern look an easy 2" taller than Conan and this video was 12 years back still in their legit peak height but not sure if Stern had more footwear. Stern is 63 now might have losing 1/4. Point was Stern could be 6'5 1/2 peak but ignore the 1/2 claim and Conan really could be 6'3 1/2 and wee bit.

Howard Stern 197cm peak, 196.3cm now.
Conan 192cm, maybe start to lose a fraction now.
Canson said on 10/Jun/18
@Tall in the Saddle: I think it could be that Conan measured in the earlier morning and that he has long hair. Other scenario is that he measures in shoes as he claims 6’4/6’4 1/2. I have a friend with thick tall hair that used to claim 6’4”. I stood next to him and I’m close to 2” taller and now he says he’s 6’3”. I honestly think his 6’4 was in shoes and that nobody called him on that until he saw a real 6’4 guy like myself (in actually 6’4 and change) do it. He looks a strong 6’2” and has almost since I’ve known him. I have a solid 6’3” friend (190.4cm at a low) who is taller than he is noticeably
Canson said on 10/Jun/18
In their peaks, Neeson needs an upgrade or Conan needs a downgrade. I’d say both do. a touch for the former and a bit more for the latter
Canson said on 10/Jun/18
I do agree that 6’3.75 may be a good start although I still think he’s less than that
Canson said on 6/Jun/18
@micky and Tall in the Saddle: I think Conan would be closer in height with Micky. Likely 6’3.25ish. He has very long hair and when he was next to neeson that was a noticeable difference. That wasn’t just 1/2” between them and Neeson is listed 6’4 here. Maybe he really was over by 1/4” but that still would make Conan max 6’3.25 or .5
Tall In The Saddle said on 4/Jun/18
184guy - agree that when guests approach from left to right of screen (placing them closest to an already lowered camera angle) it does put Conan at an illusory disadvantage. Much less often guests have approached from right to left (eg. Anthony Joshua) and Conan appears a bit better off.
Of course we try to "allow" for the distorted angle but no question it is less than ideal.
Micky - excellent clip provided. Agree Snoop looks a shade shorter. Personally I can't judge the footwear but if Conan does have a good .5" advantage in that dept. then it would flip to Snoop having the slight advantage imo but certainly not the advantage that appears in the prev. clip I linked in which Snoop is closest to camera.

Canson raises an important point re several other guests - notwithstanding what we all think we see, Conan himself has afforded various height advantage to those guests - I see a good number of people seem to want to reject Conan's own perceptions also - which in all possibility isn't failsafe but he is after all standing right next to them in the flesh without the distortions we have to factor in.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 2/Jun/18
@Editor Rob
I agree he may fully lost 1/4 and the worst i still see him at least a legit 192cm now and with 1/2 inch more footwear look fractionally taller than Jared Padalecki. I can't understand people bringing him down as low as low 6'2 3/4.

Quite true Conan have alot of disadvantage camera angle moment. Just some highlights i guess Hoff is simply strong 6'4 1/4 peak like Jeff Goldblum, peak Liam Neeson closer to 6'4 1/4 and Tom Selleck flat 6'4. Conan maybe close to 6'4 peak like 6'3 7/8 (192.6) and could be 6'3 5/8 (192) now not less.
Micky said on 2/Jun/18
Snoop Dogg actually looked a shade shorter than Conan (they stand near each other a lot in this clip) here: Click Here

However, Conan looks to have a good half inch of footwear advantage. I think both men are between 6'3" and 6'4" barefoot.
Canson said on 1/Jun/18
@184guy: that could be possible. The only thing is that with both Selleck and Neeson, Conan added on to both 6’4/6’5 and 6’5” when he guessed their heights. Same with Klitscko. Neeson at least he acknowledged was taller than him. Now the other possibility for them is maybe there was some sort of footwear advantage we didn’t see. Or Neeson May have been closer to 6’5 possibly when he mentioned the “wee bit” or maybe 6’4.5. I’ve always felt Conan when he said “I’m 6’4 but I’m not” could be close to accurate as he may be a guy who measured 6’3.5-75 in the morning and went with it. Meaning he could be a bit less in the afternoon and just always been a morning height
Tall In The Saddle said on 1/Jun/18
@Junior H - you orig. agreed that Conan self describes at 6'4" but suggested he was being polite affording Neeson 1" advantage at 6'5". You then suggested that Conan perhaps sees himself as 6'4.5" in a subsequent post to suggest Conan was only allowing for a literal .5" advantage.. All due respect but it appears that multiple valid reference points are being rejected and goal posts constantly moved in Conan's favour.
The man himself says he's 6'4", he then gives Neeson 6'5" so he's giving Neeson 1" advantage over himself and I think the 1" advantage is plain to see. Neeson then rejects Conan's "inflation" as several other legit 6'4" guests have done but gives Conan a legit "wee bit" more than 6'4' - about an extra 1/4 inch imo that Neeson generally dispenses with otherwise.
I see about 1" diff. between Liam H and Chris H. In about every shot Chris is standing as tall as possible while Liam slouches in.
@Judy - you took a snap shot of the most favourable instance in time for Conan relative to Neeson - and Neeson is still clearly taller imo. Any other point in the video Neeson is that much taller again. Freeze the clip just 2 secs prior at .36 sec and you'll see Neeson looking a bit taller than Magnum does relative to Conan.
@Canson - unfortunately I'm not up with Magic's current height - but if you say 6'7" I'll take that as a highly reputable estimate and as such Conan does appear in the lower range of 6'3" imo.

Any opinions on Snoop Dogg relative to Conan? Imo, another legit 6'4" guy (along with Lithgow, Selleck, Goldblum, Hasselhoff) who proves that Conan is somewhat below 6'4".
Canson said on 31/May/18
@Tall in the Saddle: agree with everything you said except Snoop. He’s at least an inch shorter than Kobe. But he’s still likely taller than Conan. If anything he is more of a legit 6’4 although he’s a weak 6’4”.
184guy2 said on 31/May/18
@Canson @Tall In the Saddle @Junio Hernandez 1990
The problem with Conan is that he ALWAYS have a camera disadvantage . A few years ago ,2004-2006 The Rock went to Conan and we know that he Rock wasn't over 6'3 and he looked taller than Conan because Conan was further away from the Camera. I believe Hasslehoff was obviously taller than Conan in 1995 but in the video below with Neeson I don't think so . Maybe 1 cm between than but not over.
Judy said on 30/May/18
Magnum appears taller than neeson next to conan
Click Here
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 30/May/18
@Editor Rob

Do you think Conan have atually lost height or he was never 6'4 could be at worst really 6'3.25"?
Editor Rob
1/4 inch maybe...but I can't see him only 6ft 3.25
Micky said on 30/May/18
With Magic the difference looks about 3.5" imo. But I believe Magic today isn't over 6'7" (peak 6'7.25" or 6'7.5" I can believe is possible, but I don't think anymore).
Judy said on 30/May/18
Click Here

Really nothing to choose between them.
Tall In The Saddle said on 30/May/18
@Judy - at 38 sec Conan appears closest to a relaxed Neeson's height than at any other point in the clip. However, Neeson still looks clearly taller in that moment and taller again at every other point in the clip. Let's not forget Conan himself afforded Neeson 1 inch advantage. Re-watching I also noticed Neeson mouth words to the effect of "I'm taller or I'm bigger" or something like that - Conan talks up his height but then always appears nonplussed when he pulls up short next to a pop. reported 6'4" guest who Conan then tries to inflate - as Canson has clearly illustrated many times.
Now Snoop Dogg is imo another legit 6'4" guy. This site has him 6'3.75". Snoop like Neeson is clearly taller than Conan when they greet - though Snoops footwear is a question mark.
Link - Click Here
I've also watched several clips of Conan with reg. guest Will Ferrell. I give Will 6'3" tops perhaps a touch less. Conan is taller but there is not a lot to choose between them so I'm still comfortable pegging O'Brien at 6'3.25"
Canson said on 29/May/18
@Tall in the Saddle: Conan also looks 6’3” maybe 191cm with Magic Johnson. There are, at times, 4” between them in their video. And Conan claimed 6’4” after asking Magic how tall he was. Magic claimed 6’9” of course, his listed height
Canson said on 29/May/18
Neeson is taller than Conan. Conan acknowledged that himself
Jtm said on 29/May/18
he doesn't look over 6'3 with magic johnson.
Canson said on 28/May/18
I think AJ claimed his shoes there. He looks “a touch under” 6’6 in reality. 197.5ish
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 28/May/18
@Tall In The Saddle If Conan is only 6'3 1/4 that would leave Chris Hemsworth at 6'2.5" and there is only 1/2 between Liam and Chris not 1". The height compare with Neeson suck a bit that Neeson get the camera advantage close to the camera. However Neeson is at least a 1/2 taller than Conan at peak. Conan think he is 6'5 maybe because he think himself as 6'4.5". In their recent comparison few years ago Neeson look to be 1/2 and more shorter than Conan. I wouldn't put Neeson under 6'3 1/8 now if there's a chance Neeson could be 6'4 1/8 peak. So Conan had more chance to be a 192cm guy than just 191cm.

Click Here:
Judy said on 28/May/18
At 38 seconds into the clip, Conan and Neeson are exactly the same height.
184guy2 said on 27/May/18
Conan and Anthony Joshua
Click Here
Editor Rob
He pushed it there...6ft 6 6ft 7...
Tall In The Saddle said on 27/May/18
@Junior - Simple cross referencing does it for me.
I have Neeson at 6'4.25". You have him at 6'4.18". Near enough to say we agree on Neeson's height and in accord with Neeson's self described 6'4" and wee bit.
I have Conan at 6'3.25" and you have him at 6'3.6". Not quite the same but we both can still agree that Conan's self described 6'4" is an inflated height.
I see at least 1" diff. between Conan and Neeson. You imply you only see .6" diff. However, Conan sees same 1" diff. that I see and he also knows his audience sees same diff. SO to preserve his 6'4" claim Conan suggests Neeson to be 6'5". It's that simple.
Polite had nothing to do with it. Conan waxes on about height a lot and even comments on about other celeb guests being a lot smaller than people realise - to the point of ridicule. If anyone was polite it was Neeson who usually only claimed 6'4". After showing a good 1" advantage and after Conan's own attempt to inflate Neeson's height to 6'5", Neeson threw Conan a bone by giving him the extra "wee bit" to dilute the obvious difference between them and take some of the edge off Conan's obviously false claim of 6'4".
As to Hemsworth - he is not 6'3". Is there more than just the one pic to compare him against Conan? There are several pics which appear to show his brother Liam (IMO 6'3.5") having up to 1" advantage on him. There are also several other pics which appear to show Liam having an edge over Conan also.
Alex 6'3.25 said on 27/May/18
Conan 191 cm I think. He never was 193 cm IMHO.
Canson said on 26/May/18
@Junior: that looks like an inch between Conan and Neeson in the video he posted. A peak height maybe 6’3.5 at a low but keep in mind how long Conan’s hair is. Also with Magic Johnson, Conan looked lower 6’3” range
Canson said on 26/May/18
@Junior: that looks like an inch between Conan and Neeson in the video he posted. A peak height maybe 6’3.5 at a low but keep in mind how long Conan’s hair is
Canson said on 25/May/18
@Junior: my guess for Rock is a solid 6’2”. I can see Conan 6’3.25. He gives a taller impression due to his limbs and his thick hair. I agree on Jared. Probably 6’4 flat maybe Neeson was 6’4.25 but that’s max imho. He’s surely not less than Rob lists him and I could argue a touch more. He may be similar to Goldblum who I believe is about my height at 6’4.25
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 25/May/18
@Tall In The Saddle
6'3 Chris Hemsworth listed 190cm by his australia agency and is min 0.75" shorter than Conan. 6'3 5/8 (192cm) is absolute lowest. Conan may have just try to be polite and round up Neeson by an inch over his own 6'4 claimed. I believe Neeson peak was likely to be 193.5cm max.
Canson said on 24/May/18
We all know Magic is only 6’7” and he claims 6’9. Conan doesn’t look over 6’3” next to him

Click Here
Canson said on 24/May/18
@Tall in the Saddle: you said that about as well as anyone has! Go to :45 seconds in and it’s at least an inch. But of course you’ll see people say it’s half inch and make Neeson 6’4.25 just to make Conan 6’3.75 which is close to 6’4”. Conan has never been that tall. Now Neeson I could see at maybe 6’4.25 peak (which is pushing it a bit but not out of the realm of possibility). Yet he’s clearly an inch taller than Conan. I’ll leave it around an inch or at a full inch only because the camera may favor him a tad because with the angle it looks more than 1 solid inch. Conan is 6’3.25 however. He joked about his hair but he is 100% right because that’s why he looks taller than he does. His hair
Tall In The Saddle said on 23/May/18
Neeson on Conan '04.

Link - Click Here

Personally I see a bit more than an inch advantage to Liam. Anyway, if Conan sees himself as 6'4" he's giving Liam an inch advantage guessing Liam to be 6'5". Without equivocation, Liam states himself to be 6'4" and a "wee" bit. Therefore, at best, that makes Conan 6'3" and a "wee" bit - exactly as I have previously estimated at about 6'3.25".
Note how quickly Conan recedes from the unfavourable height check - just as he did when he and the Hoff went back to back.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 17/May/18
@Christian-6'5 3/8 @Canson Chris Hemsworth is min 6'2.75" and we could see 184guy2 post that Conan look min 3/4 taller than Chris also look like pushing an inch. 6'3 3/4 is really possible. Jared at most max 6'4 1/8. Tom Selleck at peak only claim once at 6'3.5" and other time was always claim 6'4 possible was 192.5cm barefoot and Neeson was probably 6'4-6'4 1/8 peak not more. Conan could be always 6'3 5/8 or 6' 3 3/4 and round up 6'4. I found out the recently clip that Rock with Conan there was 1.75" max but it looks like Conan had a thick footwear look 3/8 over Rock. Rock is more like 6'2 1/4 not more so Conan could be a flat 192cm guy.
184guy2 said on 14/May/18
Let's say Chris Hemsworth is 6'2.75 rather than 6'3 ...
Click Here
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 12/May/18

But Conan had a 1/2" shoe advantage over Jared, you acknowledged it too.
Canson said on 12/May/18
@Junior: I have to disagree. I saw Jared as taller at one stage even with a footwear disadvantage. That angle wasn’t the best however. I would really need to see a better pic but Jared looks a legit 6’4. I can easily see Conan as only 191 especially next to 195cm Kobe Bryant. The key with Conan is that he inflated Neeson to 6’5, Selleck to 6’4/6’5 when he may even have been slightly less than 6’4. Selleck once claimed 6’3.5. Conan was also shorter than Hasselhoff and lithgow both
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 11/May/18
@Canson But if you put Conan at 6'3.25" therefore Jared Padalecki really couldn't be over 6'3.5". There isn't much between them even i hardly gauge out seeing 1cm.
Micky said on 9/May/18
When I saw Conan in person, I didn't think he was too different than myself. I'm 6' 3 3/8" - I really thought Conan was at most only fractionally taller than my height. Perhaps like a quarter inch taller yes, but not as much as a full inch taller like some on here seem to think he would be.
Canson said on 9/May/18
@Junior: Selleck claimed 6’3.5 before and 6’4 another. The thing with Conan or Selleck or anyone else for that matter, them claiming a height doesn’t mean it’s thejr low. Conan never looks just 1” shorter than Kobe Bryant. And I agree he looks 1/2”, maybe, shorter than Selleck, I would put Selleck a hair under 6’4 peak 6’3.75 probably and Conan 6’3.25 peak. Conan also was shorter than Hasselhoff, Lithgow, Neeson, Goldblum at their peaks. Also have to look at how Conan has tried to inflate others. He told Neeson he was 6’5 that Selleck was 6’4/6’5 that Wlad Klitschko was 6’6/6’7. Conan also claimed 6’4/6’4.5. That’s correct but doubt it’s out of bed. That’s a shoe height for him which could lead to 6’3.25ish. To be fair, he could be 6’4” out of bed tho
Sonnecker said on 8/May/18
I'd quote him at 6'4" and a quarter, he looks taller because he's skinny, 193 cm at his lowest.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 8/May/18
@Canson Atually a peak Tom Selleck only look a fraction taller than Conan. Selleck had also claim that he was a wee bit over 6'4 and i doubt he is is just decent 6'4 at his low not over it. Someone like Hasselhoff is more like a 6'4 1/4 peak while i remember Hoff look at least 1cm taller than Conan on his show. Conan can't be as low as 6'3, maybe his 6'4.5" later claim was a out of bed height and always standing at 6'3 3/4 tall.
canisvy said on 6/May/18
He is at the same height as armie hammer.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 3/May/18
@Canson 0:23 onward Jared was closer to camera angle and tilt up his head. Conan is really not under 6'3 3/4 i believe just 1/4 under this listing. In the clip when they shook hand its obvious Conan a bit taller by a 1/2 shoe advantage.
Canson said on 25/Apr/18
So Willes189, I’ve provided enough evidence that he is under 6’4. The pics with Selleck (who claimed 6’3.5 before) as well as Neeson with him who Conan acknowledged was taller, and Lithgow. All are taller than Conan as is Padecki who is a legit 6’4”. In addition, Hasselhoff is taller than Conan. There’s no way that a 6’4.75 Kobe Bryant and 6’4 5/8 Charles Barkley are at least 1.5” taller than Conan if he is really a legit 6’4”. Yet you claim he’s 6’4 and change at his peak which is the biggest joke I’ve seen. And before you start with your constant upgrading which you are famous for, kobe’s Wife measured him at that height and barkley was measured at the Olympics. The only way you arrive at Conan being a solid 6’4” is by upgrading others.

As for running in the corner, that’s what you are doing and you are a hypocrite. Everyone knows that about you. It’s no secret. Everyone knows you upgrade everyone as well even telling Rob that you are sure and that you know more than he does. Yet You have the nerve to say someone is insulting someone else? Lol do you really want to go there with me or are you that senile and delusional? You clearly said below that people who think he’s under 6’4 are this or that. Fact is you never met Conan and the average guess obviously reflects he’s under 6’4”. It’s quite funny how you called out Psychedlic Earth about his comments to you yet you have started arguments with me and James both and likely wit Him as well and have insulted many others here calling them trolls or insulting their intelligence while you preach about your “so called college institution”. I think anyone who has to brag about their intelligence or institution that they “supposedly attend” is insecure with himself and is looking for some sort of self validation or for others here to believe your estimates just because you “claim” to attend this prestigious institution. Don’t forget that you are also the same person who claims that his “father” posted under his username several times and has openly admitted to posting under the influence while insulting others at the same time and that says all guys 6’4” or over downplay their height. So you don’t have and will never have any credibility here. And how is what Psychedlic is doing to you any worse than what you have done over the years? It’s peanuts if you ask me.
Canson said on 25/Apr/18
So Willes189, I’ve provided enough evidence that he is under 6’4. The pics with Selleck (who claimed 6’3.5 before) as well as Neeson with him who Conan acknowledged was taller, and Lithgow. All are taller than Conan as is Padecki who is a legit 6’4”. In addition, Hasselhoff is taller than Conan. There’s no way that a 6’4.75 Kobe Bryant and 6’4 5/8 Charles Barkley are at least 1.5” taller than Conan if he is really a legit 6’4”. Yet you claim he’s 6’4 and change at his peak which is the biggest joke I’ve seen. And before you start with your constant upgrading which you are famous for, kobe’s Wife measured him at that height and barkley was measured at the Olympics. The only way you arrive at Conan being a solid 6’4” is by upgrading others.

As for running in the corner, that’s what you are doing and you are a hypocrite. Everyone knows that about you. It’s no secret. Everyone knows you upgrade everyone as well even telling Rob that you are sure and that you know more than he does. Yet You have the nerve to say someone is insulting someone else? Lol do you really want to go there with me or are you that senile and delusional? You clearly said below that people who think he’s under 6’4 are this or that. Fact is you never met Conan and the average guess obviously reflects he’s under 6’4”. It’s quite funny how you called out Psychedlic Earth about his comments to you yet you have started arguments with me and James both and likely wit Him as well and have insulted many others here calling them trolls or insulting their intelligence while you preach about your “so called college institution”. I think anyone who has to brag about their intelligence or institution that they “supposedly attend” is insecure with himself and is looking for some sort of self validation or for others here to believe your estimates just because you “claim” to attend this prestigious institution. Don’t forget that you are also the same person who claims that his “father” posted under his username several times and has openly admitted to posting under the influence while insulting others at the same time and that says all guys 6’4” or over downplay their height. So you have and will never have any credibility here. And how is what Psychedlic is doing to you any worse than what you have done over the years? It’s peanuts if you ask me.
Willes189 said on 24/Apr/18

By the way what? You didn't even question my statement nor did you denounce my evidence that Conan is in fact 6'4. You can't just ruthlessly harass and attack people if you're are going to hide in a corner afterwards. Your little brain should just accept the overwhelming evidence that Conan is in fact a rock solid 6'4
Nils2 said on 22/Apr/18
This guy has to be near 6'4
Canson said on 21/Apr/18
@Junior: I don’t know. Jared looks taller at 0:23.
Canson said on 21/Apr/18
@Willes189: by the way, my retaliation back to you was you making the statement you did about anything people guessing Conan anything under 6’4. And yet you are saying that I ridicule people who disagree with me when you are doing that to me and to James and Christian in the past. Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black if you ask me
Canson said on 21/Apr/18
@Junior: I think his hair gives that impression but I can agree he’s probably not a solid 6’3”. Maybe 6’3.25 as he’s a good 1.5” shorter than Kobe
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 21/Apr/18
If not in a fussy way of estimated correctly compare to certain actors height i did just give Conan 6'4 peak at least and 6'3 3/4 now when i see him face to face with legit 6'4 Jared Padalecki in less sneakers look to be a bit taller than Jared.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 20/Apr/18
6'3 too low i agree with Rampage. At first i thought of 6'3 1/4 but he look taller than solid 6'3 1/4 guy like Liam Hemsworth. More i look at Conan i think at worse 6'3 5/8 (192cm) than just 6'3.5 (191.77cm) while look at him looking solid 1.5" taller than The Rock who is more like a decent 6'2 than 6'2.5" and i found a clip Conan edge 6'4 Jared Padalecki by a fraction. Jared had a sneakers look about 2cm and Conan had a solid looking 3cm footwear on his feet. I can even buy 6'3 3/4 for Conan but seriously not 6'4.

Click Here Heres the clip Conan with 6'4 Jared face to face at 0:17
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Apr/18
Agreed but I wouldn't rate him as a solid 6ft4 like Neeson or Goldblum
Canson said on 19/Apr/18
Agree with Christian. 191 today and that’s a best case which is why he claims 6’4/6’4.5 as that is a shoe height
Canson said on 19/Apr/18
@Rob: you may want to see him next to Barkley or Kobe and take a hard look. Kobe may be the full 195cm at a low but doubt Barkley measures that at a low. People who meet Barkley guess him as 6’4” more often than not so it’s likely he’s more 6’4.5 at a low. In addition, you have Neeson listed 6’4” flat and he’s clearly taller than Conan as Conan acknowledged when he told Neeson he was 6’5” before. Conan also called Selleck 6’4/6’5 and Wlad Klitschko 6’6/6’7. Something has to be said when the guy inflated all of these celebs by an inch or more and also claimed a height of 6’4/6’4.5 himself when he’s not even as tall as a guy who claimed 6’3.5 (Selleck) or a guy who claimed 6’4 and a wee bit (Neeson). He’s also not as tall as Hasselhoff or Haysbert who are both 6’4”. That almost points to his claim being a shoe height. Wlad would be 6’6/6’7 in some shoes even at a low, especially if he’s a strong 6’5”. I honestly feel a good 6’4 is reasonable out of bed but he would dip to 6’3.25 maybe at very best 6’3.5 at a low and the latter would be at his peak. Take into account how long his hair is, as well. That makes him look taller than he really is.
Willes189 said on 19/Apr/18

First of all I'm a student at Umeå University the third biggest in Sweden, 2nd my IQ is well above yours, I've done 3 IQ test all of them resulted in 125-135 range. You are what we call a pseudo intellectual, you always think you are correct and anyone who doesn't agree with your twisted logic and self reflected agenda is apparently not as "smart" as you...

How do you explain these pictures, it couldn't be that the rock is shorter that 6'2.5 could it? Oh wait he is, you are so predictable it's laughable.

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Keep in mind that Conan is 55 yo, he most likely has lost a fraction of height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Apr/18
Rob, what are the chances of 6ft3½?
Editor Rob
I can't see it...he's got to still measure very close to 6ft 4, at worst a little under it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Apr/18
6ft3 is too low
Nik said on 18/Apr/18
6'3" - 6'4"!
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 18/Apr/18
Closer to 6'3" than he is to 6'4"
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Apr/18
Out of bed: 194-195cm
Before bed: 192-193cm

Not a solid 6ft4 but close enough…
Canson said on 13/Apr/18
@Viper: I can agree with Micky below but my guess is 191cm more so than 192. Maybe at his peak he was that but can’t see it today. Maybe he wakes up to 6’4 but he isn’t that at a normal lowZ He is always shorter than the Kobe Bryants Charles Barkleys David Hasselhoffs Liam Neesons John Lithgows etc. Him claiming 6’4/6’4.5 is his shoes height as there is no way he is physically that tall or ever was. That would make him close in height with Michael Jordan or Charles Barkley and he is not as tall as those guys and never was. And Conan didn’t lose any significant height as his posture is still great even at his age. Maybe 1/4” or 1/8”, but no way he’s lost an inch yet. Kobe Bryant at 195 cm is at least 1.5” taller than him.
Micky said on 7/Apr/18
I have seen him in person before. I think he's between 6'3" and 6'4".
Colin Dowson said on 5/Apr/18
Conan stood next to the legit 6ft 4 Jeff Goldblum and appeared shorter.. probably 6ft 3.5
viper said on 30/Mar/18
I think his height is a bit strange. He can look 6-4 plus while also just look 6-3. I think he's 6-3.5
CDS said on 27/Mar/18
A solid 6'4" barefoot, maybe even 6'4.5", always the tallest guy in the room...
Yas said on 24/Mar/18
Conan has got to be 6'4, he can't be under unless he wears lifts.
Tall In The Saddle said on 21/Mar/18
Dwayne Johnson's listing of 6'5" is a legacy of his wrestling days I'm guessing. I'd cut some slack for that personally and at least he didn't try to suggest that Conan must be in the 6'6"+ range to perpetuate his own 6'5" myth. He stood right with him and knows the audience has eyes. IMO, Dwayne is about 6'2"-6'2.5" but IF The Rock is in fact 6'3" then I would say O'Brien is reasonably over 6'3" and pushing close to 6'4".
berta said on 21/Mar/18
yeah canson its possible.
Dream(5'9.5 said on 20/Mar/18
While I don't buy 'Six Four and a half' for Conan, he is well over 6'3".

He did expose Dwayne Johnson's 6'5" claim.
Canson said on 17/Mar/18
@Berta: imho Hoff was a legit 6’4” and so was Liam Neeson. One thing people don’t realize here is that Conan gives it away that he lies about his height. Maybe lie is a harsh word but he claims his shoes. Conan has gone on record to call Neeson 6’5 (he’s likely just a strong 6’4 at best), Selleck he called 6’4/6’5 when Selleck has said before he’s 6’3.5. Maybe 6’3.75 is possible but he’s taller than conan and Conan acknowledged that he was. Then with wladimir klitschko he called him 6’6/6’7”. With all of that it shows that Conan claims his shoes esp when he called himself 6’4-6’4.5. Conan has always likely been a strong 6’3” guy barefoot and at best maybe he was 6’4 out of bed. Maybe a touch over peak but 6’3-6’3.5 is what he commonly looks (at most) with Kobe or Barkley or the other guys mentioned
berta said on 16/Mar/18
i think conan is ore atleat was a legit 193 guy.guys like hasselhoff looked taller because he was probably littel ovetr 6 foot 4
Tall In The Saddle said on 15/Mar/18
Hilarious skit - almost forgot to focus on height comparison. I looked at eye level. Also, given Conan's high hair line, it was easy to imagine him sans hair ala The Rock.

With all that, I see only 1" tops in favour of Conan. On the other hand, I see a near 2" advantage for Hoff over the Rock and that reconciles to the near 1" advantage I see Hoff holding over O'Brien.

This site lists The Rock at 6'2.5" which I think is max. for Dwayne who is possibly only really 6'2". As such I'm still only calculating O'Brien to be between 6'3" and 6'3.5".
Canson said on 15/Mar/18
Conan is not 2” taller than the Rock they’re eye level at several points during the video. Conan would be taller than him but that’s not hard especially being Rock is 6’2” and Conan 6’3” range

@Tall in the Saddle: amen! Says a lot when your usual people here go to great lengths to inflate guys like Charles Barkley to 6’5.5 or 6’6” just to make Conan 6’4. Conan peak was probably 6’3.25 at best. 6’4+ with shoes on which is what celebs do in Hollywood (except Howard Stern or Tim Robbins).
6'3 said on 14/Mar/18
Solid 2 inches taller than Dwayne Johnson here. Conan's standing slightly further away and he's still nearly 2 inches taller.

Click Here
Canson said on 10/Mar/18
@Berta: you’re roughly 2.5-3cm taller than me at a low and your inseam is ridiculous lol. Mine is 35-36. Usually a 36 if untailored and in a loafer or other casual shoe they can be too long. And I’m 193.7-.8 at my lowest
berta said on 9/Mar/18
he could have 38 inseam. at a strong 6 foot 5 i have 38 and consider my legs pretty long. but his are diffenetly longer for his height
Tall In The Saddle said on 9/Mar/18
From a Lilliputian's point of view, Conan could perhaps look to be 100 feet tall. In the real world however, Conan looks to be about 6'3.25". Now I am not trying to tell anyone how to crack their eggs and certainly not looking to start a war over a trivial inch or so in height.
I'll just say, in my many travels, no one has ever called me Gullible. Get it?
Mike O said on 7/Mar/18
He's massively tall. A legitimate and strong 6'4", probably close to 6'5" (over 6'5" with the hair).
Canson said on 4/Mar/18
A 5’9 range Wendy Williams with 5” heels would make her about 6’2.5 in them meaning Conan would be taller as he’d be 6’4 range in shoes (6’3-6’3.25 barefoot)
Canson said on 4/Mar/18
Wendy Williams is not 5’11 barefoot
saltyfish said on 4/Mar/18
looks every bit 6'4. dwarves everyone else who claims that height such as the rock
Boob said on 3/Mar/18
Click Here
Wendy williams is 5'11 and wearing 6 inch heels in this vdieo so she's 6'5". They stood next to each other and he's significantly still taller than her. So Conan is 6'7" or 6'8". My guess is 6'8".
Canson said on 27/Feb/18
@Willes189: yes instead you say “oh he’s downplaying it” for any celeb over 6’2” which represents 95% of the celebs you comment on here. You said Neeson Barkley Howard Stern and Kobe even Conan downplays their heights. How stupid is that? Yes this coming from someone who has to try to brag about an IQ that he probably doesn’t have who also upgrades every person he comments on, and delves Into topics such as politics and posts here under the influence and claims “my dad posted that not me or I wasn’t sober”. You’re a joke and the insecure one since you have to broadcast that you have such a high IQ. But it doesn’t manifest itself here because you don’t post or sound intelligent at all. You just sound like a little **** who hasn’t reached his full potential or puberty and is mad at the word. Oh and someone who is in therapy right now. Seriously Willes spare yourself the embarrassment. I really wonder why you still post here because nobody takes anything you say seriously or respects you as a poster with your garbage that comes out. The only proper move here was when Rob banned you for claiming your father posted which you have done several times. The mistake was letting you back on here.

And you are one to talk? You really just said Rob has been on the job since 2004. Yet you’re telling Rob that he has several people under-listed like Howard Stern and Kobe and barkley? So much for trusting Rob because obviously you don’t? It just doesn’t apply to you for some reason or to anyone who upgrades people like you do

@Rob: pardon my response back to Willes but what can I say? It’s Willes
Monkey knees said on 25/Feb/18
Recent pics show a clear almost 2 inch height advantage over Dwayne Johnson (who people always over estimate, at a smidgen over 6"2).
Willes189 said on 23/Feb/18
At least I'm not the on downgrading 95% of Rob's estimates on this site... And the last time I checked Rob is more reliable than you because of this being his job for which he's been doing with great record since 2004.

I think there's something below the surface in your case, you seem to have a thing for commenting (and downgrading) male celebs around your own height range just to feed your ego or prove something. At least 80% of your posts are on celebrity's 6'3 and higher ( you especially have a thing for the ones who are 6'4) You don't have the same downgrading agenda when it comes to guys under 6'2, probably because you're comfortable taller then them.
Editor Rob
People can estimate as they like, but don't lose sleep over anyboydy's guesses!

Unless it's 5ft 6 for me, then all bets are off 😂
Willes189 said on 20/Feb/18
190cm is still tall range, 191cm is the start of very tall, this has been agreed on by all of the most reliable visitors on this site. The guys you mentioned are notorious downgraders, i didn't look at your links but it was probably something irrelevant and generally bad for judging heights.

Anything under 193cm is a joke for Conan, he is in the very tall range. I'm 189cm and i can tell that Conan is at least 3-4cm taller.
Canson said on 19/Feb/18
The “about” 6’4/6’4.5 is in shoes
Canson said on 18/Feb/18
@Willes189: 6’3” is very tall. And it’s “common knowledge” in show business that entertainers claim their shoes which is why Conan guessed a guy (Tom Selleck) at 6’4/6’5 when Selleck likely fell under 6’4” at his prime as he admitted he was 6’3.5 once. Sorry but that’s not embarrassing to think that just because it isn’t in agreement with you. But what is embarrassing is saying that everyone else “downplays” their height just to make some of these guys what they claim. That’s actually beyond ridiculous
Canson said on 18/Feb/18
Not seeing how he’s 6’4 with John Lithgow or Tom Selleck. Lithgow is clearly taller than he is. He even acknowledged to Selleck that he’s “almost as tall as he is”. He’s 6’4 but he’s not.

Click Here
Willes189 said on 18/Feb/18
He is/was 193-194cm as he claims. It's common knowledge in America show business that Conan is very tall, 6'3 is just embarrassing to suggest...
Canson said on 17/Feb/18
@Junior: i can see him at 6’3” today. His hair is thicker and longer than Barkley’s as well. Barkley could’ve been 6’4.5 at a low. I’m not sure exactly what time the show was taped but I could see the max for Conan in his prime 6’3.25. He looked shorter than lithgow every time he was on his show and Selleck and Hasselhoff.
Danimal said on 15/Feb/18
6'7" Manny Yarbrough who is barefoot stands toe to toe with 41 year old Conan Obrien (in 2004) who may be in dress shoes. Conan is taller than Manny here. He was EASILY 6'4" if not 6'4.5" barefoot in his prime (he's in his mid 50's now). Forward the video to 4:20 and onwards:
Click Here
Junior Hernandez said on 6/Feb/18

I haven't seem much that Conan look under 6'3 1/4 at worst. But thinking back how Conan look about 1.5" shorter than 194.6cm Charles Barkley surprsie me. Lithgow listed at 6'3 1/4 now that would make a safe bet they're both equally same height now.
Canson said on 4/Feb/18
@Junior: I think Lithgow still edges Conan. At least the last video he still did. I can’t see Conan above 6’3” flat today but Lithgow I buy a full 6’4 peak or worst case 6’3.75
Junior Hernandez said on 4/Feb/18
@bugs Conan could be a tap bit taller than a current 6'3.25" John Lithgow. I wouldn't go over 6'3.5" for Conan but Lithgow peak is truely 6'4.
Canson said on 21/Jan/18
@Dillon: and Draymond is closer to 6’5 than 6’6. Steve Kerr Alvin Gentry and even Carmelo Anthony have all said he’s 6’5 not to mention the Warriors previous GM said in a podcast that I posted before that he was the third shortest player on that team last year behind Curry and Clark. I can see him maybe as a 6’5.25 guy at his lowest if he’s not a bit less 6’5.75 could be a morning height as could 6’5 5/8 rounded up since the NBA doesn’t do 1/8”. Draymond is only about a cm or half inch taller than 6’4.75 Kobe was at absolute best
Canson said on 21/Jan/18
@Bugs: Conan has long hair and long proportions. He’s likely at his peak a 191cm guy at best maybe just 6’3” flat. I don’t think he’s lost much if any height. He never measured up to Selleck or Lithgow and there’s debate as to whether either is a legit 6’4. Hoff and Neeson were tho and both clearly had an inch on him at worst 2cm. Goldblum is taller than all of them imho and possibly Haysbert at his peak. But I’d say both were likely 6’4.25 max Haysbert could’ve even been same as the other guys or 193.5 max. Conan next to Charles Barkley or Kobe Bryant never looked above a flat 6’3 taking into account hair. Kobe could look close to 2” taller and Barkley around 1.5”. But people here will desperately upgrade Barkley when he measured 6’4 5/8 at the Olympics and not to mention one of my best friends is 6’3 on the nose (only dips 1-2mm below at night in his late 50s) and said Barkley was about an inch and a half taller than him at most and that he’s around my height more or less. Not to mention Barkley today has had hip replacement done so may just be my height 6’4.25 at a low possibly esp being as obese as he is and the injuries he’s had during his career. That’s actually good if he’s still that all things considered because he doesn’t look good when he walks at least he didn’t for a while
Dillon said on 16/Jan/18
Conan and Draymond:
Click Here
bugs said on 13/Jan/18
It's been discussed so much here that it's clear John Lithgow is TALLER than Conan.

On Will Ferrell's page here, people are estimating Ferrell to be only a half an inch shorter than Lithgow.

I have also seen Ferrell with Conan and there's nothing there. There's no significant height difference, Ferrell and Conan are likely close to the same height, and absolutely neither of them is 6'4". Compare this to the case between Conan and Norm MacDonald I presented earlier. Norm is supposed to be 6 foot ONE pt 5 and is HUGELY shorter than Bob Saget. On the other hand Norm (in thinner shoes) appears MAX 1.5" shorter than Conan and Bob Saget is claimed to be shorter than Conan. Doesn't make any sense.

Look at the famous clip with Jake Gyllenhaal (about 5'11", right?). Even with Gyllenhaal in SOCKS, there's not a large enough difference to make Conan 6'4". A LOT of other contradictory estimates and listings would also be easily solved, if it could be honestly accepted that Conan is not fixed at 6'4" and is likely shorter. Lots of evidence of that has been provided. It simply seems (for whatever unknown reason) that Conan being less than the claimed 6'4" is not and is not going to be SERIOUSLY considered.
SMcM said on 10/Jan/18
Compare Conan to Will Ferrell (listed here as peak 6'3), I'd say he consistently looked significantly taller. I'd say 6'4 peak, 6'3.5 current.
bugs said on 8/Jan/18
Editor Rob: Here's a couple, for example the one starting at about 12.50 min Click Here Again, I'm putting stress on the shoes, Conan is in dress shoes (actually in ones that appear to have lifts in them, believe it or not), MacDonald in running trainers. At about 12.55 min, Norm's knee is still bent and he's already eye to eye with Conan while they're shaking hands. ALSO...

What about that Saget/Norm picture? The pic is tilted but even if you straighten it out you can see that Saget is MASSIVELY hunching down to talk to Norm and they're still not eye to eye. That has got to be a 4" difference, and in essence what I'm saying is that Conan doesn't look anywhere near that much taller than Norm. Add to that... Saget is listed as SHORTER than Conan.

Everything is reinforcing my estimate that Conan is actually about 6'3" flat maybe.
Editor Rob: I did watch a clip of Conan, Norm and Gordon Ramsay...I think he wasn't much taller than Gordon.
Junior said on 7/Jan/18

People could lie of height,weight,inseam everywhere it is common nowadays but a point is that older athlete Kevin Young weigh heavier unlike Conan had skinny legs for a bigger upper body proportion that could help to look having longer legs. I would say Conan inseam was almost 37" only when he fit with shoes on measured.
ALEXANDRE ALVES BR said on 29/Dec/17
Click Here Well look at these photos ... this is kevin young an old american athlete he is 6'4 with an inseam of 37 his legs seem shorter than those of conan ...
Canson said on 29/Dec/17
@Junior: his hair is what throws off pics. IMHO he was never higher than 191 but could appear 192-193 with his thick hair. He’s good good posture too. Like with Liam Neeson, he was a good 6’4 peak but can look shorter than Conan today because of his poor posture whereas Conan still looks 6’3” range imho. Maybe he’s still around 191 or worst 190.5
Junior said on 25/Dec/17

True he could be 6'3.5" peak and 6'4.5" with shoes and just go with both claim but now at 54 he could have loss 1/4 dig into in 6'3.25" with Scottie Pippen few years back he look max 8cm shorter than Scottie who was more like Lebron height 6'6.75" not higher.
Canson said on 22/Dec/17
@Adam: I can agree on that especially since lithgow with Conan was when lithgow was a bit older so may have lost a fraction. But yea we both agree Conan is
Adam said on 22/Dec/17
Canson, we agree on that - Lithgow is taller than Conan. What I’m saying is that Lithgow’s pose with Conan doesn’t prove Lithgow taller than Selleck (as you would claim) because Selleck’s edge over Conan seems to be even clearer. But again, neither does that prove that Selleck is taller than Lithgow.
Canson said on 21/Dec/17
@Adam: I’ve seen enough proof to know he’s taller than Conan is. It’s clear as day Lithgow edges him
Canson said on 21/Dec/17
@Rob: have to disagree here. he’s not even as tall as Lithgow or Selleck or Hasselhoff. When he’s thinking Selleck is 6’4/6’5 and Selleck has said 6’3.5 before that proves it’s his shoes he’s claiming. Conan seems to inflate everyone to make himself 6’4
EM said on 20/Dec/17
6-3.75 Rob? He did say "I'm about Six-Four...but I'm not"
Editor Rob: yes he said that and then backed it up by claiming to be 6ft 4 and a that's what he meant - he thinks he's 6ft 4.5
Adam said on 19/Dec/17
Canson, there’s no way you could guess Lithgow taller than Selleck in the Conan pics. If I had to guess, on the pics, Selleck gets the nod every time. But that’s my point, the pictures won’t ever prove half inch differences if you use a third party (Conan) as yardstick. Its too imprecise, impossible in fact. Again, I don’t conclude Selleck is taller than Lithgow just because the former looks taller with Conan. But neither does Lithgow’s pose with Conan prove him taller than Selleck. No way.
Canson said on 19/Dec/17
@Adam: it’s hard to tell with that pic looking at how Lithgow’s neck is there. But could be a 2cm difference or half inch just like with Selleck was like half inch taller than Conan and admitted he was 6’3.5 once and said 6’4” before too. I think Selleck was more like 6’3.75 Conan 6’3.25
Adam said on 17/Dec/17
Canson, Conan also guessed Selleck an inch taller.
Adam said on 15/Dec/17
Canson, to expand on my point below - Conan here with Lithgow :
Click Here

And with Selleck :
Click Here

I’m not saying Selleck is taller than Lithgow but if you want to use Conan as a yardstick for the former two, no way you can conclude Lithgow appears taller with Conan than Selleck does. Quite the contrary.
Canson said on 15/Dec/17
@Adam: lithgow looked to edge him by more than Selleck and he guessed Liam an inch taller and told him he was 6’5. My guess Conan is peak 6’3.25 esp when Selleck claimed 6’3.5 at one point maybe really 6’3.75 tho
Adam said on 14/Dec/17
Canson, of those four you mentioned all were indeed taller. But to put an exact figure on the difference is stretching it. Lithgow doesn’t seem to edge conan by a greater margin than Selleck. The latter went right up in his face and looked down to Conan. No similar approach by Lithgow. No apparent evidence Lithgow’s edge is greater, or for that matter Neeson or Hoff. If anything, much more difficult to assess their edge over Conan than with Selleck.
Jason said on 14/Dec/17
@Alexandre I have a 36-36.5 inseam and Conan's legs look a similar length to mine. 35 is too low for him, but 37 is too high.
Canson said on 14/Dec/17
@Kevin: he would be lucky at peak to be above 6’3.25 at a normal days low. He’s half inch less than Selleck and a full inch almost below Lithgow Neeson Hoff. People make those guys taller or diminish the difference between them just to make Conan 6’4 or when he’s clearly not it’s always that he’s 6’3.75 and only half inch shorter or 1/4” when we know damn well we can’t see a 1/4” that easily unless back to back or side by side in a good view where we see the top of their heads very clearly
ALEXANDRE ALVES BR said on 12/Dec/17
I think he has an insult of 37 or 36.5 ... 35 is not so long for 6'4 ... there are freaks out there anyway.
Kevin said on 12/Dec/17
Conan does need a downgrade. 6'3.75 would be a good start.

let's be honest there's no way this guy would actually measure 6'4 on the stadiometer. if you bet money on that u will lose for sure.
Junior said on 8/Dec/17
No way Conan had a 36-38 inseam. At most 35 and with shoes on he get a 36" measured.
ALEXANDRE ALVES BR said on 5/Dec/17
I saw on the internet ... the name of the guy is jeremy medley him an 6'4 with 38 inseam
James B said on 4/Dec/17
Rob 6'3.75?
Jason said on 3/Dec/17
@Alexandre 38 inseam at 6'4? That's insane. I'm a 36 inseam at 6'4 and I thought I was relatively long legged.
Canson said on 30/Nov/17
@Frost: i doubt Amare is that low. If anything he’s 6’8.5 maybe at a low or can actually look 6’8.75 as well like his pre draft has him. He can look around 204/205 most of the time
ALEXANDRE ALVES BR said on 30/Nov/17
Searching the internet I found a model whose name will not reveal that it is 6'4 with 38 of inseam ...
ALEXANDRE ALVES BR said on 30/Nov/17
The question is not the number of the inseam but its index (%) in relation to the total height Conan does not seem to have a ratio of 47% that is normal not too long
Frost said on 30/Nov/17
Iirc Amare Stoudemire (former NBA player) had a 38" inseam at his listed height of 6'10 (obviously shorter than this by at least 2 inches)

It's an incredibly large inseam for a 6'4 man. Likewise a 30 inch inseam is almost absurdly short for a guy like Micheal Phelps.
Canson said on 29/Nov/17
@Insomniak and Christian: yea the more i look at him 36 would be more appropriate than 38. I myself am 35ish where i usually have to get a 36 and tailor it a a bit
ALEXANDRE ALVES BR said on 27/Nov/17
8 inches is more than you imagine.
EM said on 26/Nov/17
Michael Phelps says he wears a 30 inseam. He's short legged for his height, and Conan long legged for his, but could the difference in their leg length really be 8"? I don't think so.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 26/Nov/17
Maybe Conan was talking about his floor inseam when he said 38". Maybe his pants inseam's 36". That makes sense because I wear 37" in pants, but my floor inseam's 39"
insomniak said on 26/Nov/17
Conans legs really aren't that long to be 38. That 7 foot vlogger has a 38 inseam. My guess he has a 36 inseam and is perpetuated by how skinny his legs are. I have a 36.5-37 inseam and I seldom see anyone with longer legs than me.
Canson said on 25/Nov/17
He does have a long inseam which explains why he looks taller than he is. To go along with long hair. Conan peak was never above 191cm. He’s nothing more than a strong 6’3” maybe even flat 6’3” today. He’s always nearly an inch shorter than Hoff Lithgow Neeson and half inch to 2cm below Selleck who claimed 6’3 1/2 before
ALEXANDRE ALVES BR said on 24/Nov/17
36 would not be so long ... not to the point of drawing attention as it does with Conan ... I've seen models that are 6'4 with 36 inseam and they look normal ... only long legs
EM said on 24/Nov/17
38 seems a little too long to believe, if we're going by pants inseam. 36 is already a very long inseam.
ALEXANDRE ALVES BR said on 23/Nov/17
I found this segment on the internet ... if it had an inseam of 38 it would have a ratio of 49.7% there are many people with this ratio ... I researched about an olimpic medalist named Edwin Moses who was 6'1.5 (187 cms ) and had a inseam of 37 ... Rob should have a look at it
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 22/Nov/17
@Editor Rob

Didn't Conan once say he has a 38" inseam? That's very long for a 6'3"-6'4" range guy.
Editor Rob: 38 isn't impossible, he did joke about it in the segment with Josh Brolin.
ALEXANDRE ALVES BR said on 22/Nov/17
I dont know i think he have 37 of inseam
ALEXANDRE ALVES BR said on 20/Nov/17
What will your inseam Rob ????
Editor Rob: exactly 30.5 inch, nearly 6 inches shorter than Conan's
Canson said on 18/Nov/17
@Drew: i don’t notice a lean in the video where he says I’m 6’4 but I’m not. However looking at Conan with John Lithgow he’s also shorter than him and Rob has Lithgow even lower today but likely because he’s older than Conan. My guess would actually be that Lithgow is still a hair taller and that if 6’3.25 for him it’s 6’3 for Conan or somewhere in between 6’3-3.25. Conan has never stacked up properly against 6’4 and 6’5 guys he’s always looked max a 191cm guy only can look taller to people because of his posture and his long hair along with long limbs
fisherman said on 18/Nov/17
6'3 flat, always has been. Maybe 191 cm and a hair in the morning.
Drew Jackson said on 14/Nov/17
In the Tom Selleck picture Conan is leaning in, so it seems pretty biased to me. Seems about a little under 6’4
Drew Jackson said on 14/Nov/17
In the Tom Selleck picture Conan is leaning in, so it seems pretty biased to me
Canson said on 14/Nov/17
@Kevin: as do pics with Hasselhoff and lithgow both edged him out. Peak 6’3.25 max today prob still around or near 191
Kevin said on 14/Nov/17
that Tom Selleck pic seals his fate imo
EM said on 13/Nov/17
192 cm. I'm surprised even after his admission to being not quite 6'4", he's still listed at the full 193.
RobJay said on 13/Nov/17
Still holds strong to his claimed 6'4.
James B said on 9/Nov/17
Looks 6"3 1/2
Canson said on 5/Nov/17
@adam: yep and it’s the same with lithgow edging Conan. Fair to say Conan was at best Morning 6’4 out of bed and likely was measured an hour or two out and rounded up all along. Never looked above 191 peak imho and maybe 190.5 today
Adam said on 4/Nov/17
This is when Tom Selleck meets Conan on stage in 2004. Again looking down to Conan. Click Here
Canson said on 31/Oct/17
Based on how he inflated people in the past I’d say Conan is 6’3-6’3.5 peak maybe 191 and 6’3 today. He said that selleck was 6’4/6’5. If his peak was 6’3.5 or 6’3.75 his shoe height would make him 6’4.5-6’5 in shoes. That would make Neeson 6’5” in shoes as well as wlad klitschko 6’6/6’7 (6’6-6’6.5) in shoes possibly if he’s strong 6’5. He really gives it away that he claims his shoes. Not many celebs actually claim their barefoot heights other than Liam Neeson Selleck (maybe a roundup) and Stern. Tim Robbins also a roundup from 6’4.5
Canson said on 29/Oct/17
Agree with Bennett
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 28/Oct/17

I agree 100%
Bennett said on 28/Oct/17
That Six four and a half was literally a joke. He can only look that with his black leather shoes on. Bare footed 191cm
Junior said on 27/Oct/17
Now what Canson say is true that a 6'4 peak Tom Selleck is taller than Conan and Conan pegged Selleck to be over 6'4 but his not. I guess Conan is a strong 6'3.5 maybe closer to 6'3.75" peak and just 6'3.5" now always look 3" taller than Andy Ritcher who get listed 6'1 peak and 6'0.5" now but maybe Richter is more like 6'0.75" at his peak.
Canson said on 20/Oct/17
@Sonny Black: I have to agree with you. He’s always been at best a strong 6’3” guy. Maybe 6’3.25 peak. His hair makes him appear taller along with his ungodly long limbs.
Junior said on 20/Oct/17
More like 193cm prime and 192.5cm today. There is really not more than 8cm between Andy Richter and Conan, although rob standby 6'0.5" and 6'1 peak for Richter but obviously Richter is 3 years younger than Conan and i look through them many times 8cm is the max between this two best friend and both had lost small fraction since they're over 50 now.

Conan O'brien 192.5cm
Andy Richter 184.5cm
Sonnyblack said on 20/Oct/17
Judging by a picture my 6’1 buddy took with him I’d say he’s about 6’3 - 6’3.5.
Checkmate said on 16/Oct/17
Solid 193cm even now in his late 50s, prime 193.5 or almost 194cm is reasoneble
Tall In The Saddle said on 15/Oct/17
If you can understand how the angle was skewed in O'Brien's favour you should also be able to make the necessary "adjustments" and see Hoff as taller. All due respect but the lines you drew weren't parallel with the background features of the set which would otherwise appear perfectly horizontal in a square frame. Your lines are actually parallel to and in support of the skewed frame - angling down and away from the understood horizontal - in favour of Conan. I think the shoulder height is a perfectly reasonable ref. point for the reasons I outlined previously - there's a big difference there and while I can't see a longer neck on Conan anyway it would have to be an extraordinarily long neck to pull up the slack. Even in the skewed frame the top of Hoff's ear is a touch higher - draw the lines appropriately parallel to the understood horizontal and the top of Hoff's ear is that much higher again. Another way of looking at it as I said before - you could leave your lines exactly where they are and simply rotate the shot clockwise until the understood background horizontal features actually become horizontal in the frame - that obv. means Hoff will move up and Conan will move down and the height diff. will be more readily apparent.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.