Megan Fox's Height
5ft 4 (162.6 cm)
American Actress best known for roles in Transformers, Jennifer's Body, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and Hope and Faith. She once remarked that she had a "clinical fear of small people"
and on Entertainment Weekly's website commented on a common misconception about her height, saying "I'm way shorter than people think I am. Everybody thinks I'm like 5-10 and I'm only 5-4"
Photo by s_bukley/BigStock.com
You May Be Interested
Add a Comment417 comments
Average Guess (94 Votes)
5ft 3.56in (161.4cm)
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 19/Feb/21
Why’s her average guess so low?
ALEXIZ/180cm said on 7/Jan/21
160 cm max
said on 10/Oct/20
Looks over a foot shorter than mgk here Click Here
Alanna said on 11/Aug/20
I think she’s between 5’3”-5’4”
The French Dude said on 6/Aug/20
I through she was atleast 5'7!, well her face is so pretty so her height doesn't really matter in this case, she have nice proportions.
ChristianS said on 30/Jul/20
"If Machine gun Kelly is 6’4” there is no way that Megan Fox is 5’4”. She is 5’2” or shorter"
Using my pixel math, using the picture you provided, Assuming he has a small head for his height at average (based off of visuals), and knowing what 3 inches of someone's head looks like, we can figure out that he is nearly 12.25 inches taller than her, without knowing her footwear his footwear, and differences in posture. If she is indeed 5'3.5" or around that range, then that makes sense, but definitely not a 14 inch difference between them! I say she's 5'3.75" and probably around 5'4.25" just out of bed.
said on 29/Jul/20
If Machine gun Kelly is 6’4” there is no way that Megan Fox is 5’4”. She is 5’2” or shorter
moonlight22224 said on 11/Jun/20
@latinmix 5'4" is a beautiful height for a woman and you should shut the hell up, your toxicity is showing
Jam Cherry said on 10/Jun/20
No more than 161 cm
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 16/May/20
@ LatinMix - There's no such thing a 'a bad height'. Height doesn't make a person any better or worse.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 16/May/20
It's Birthday Time for Megan again, and this year she turns 34 years old.
💝🎂💐🎉 Happy Birthday Megan! 🎉💐🎂💝
Have a great time, Megan!
Silverleaf said on 13/Apr/20
Latinmix, if you’re so bothered by somebody’s height you have issues.
LatinMix said on 2/Oct/19
162 cm for she i think
Beautiful face and bad height :/
cmillzz said on 10/Jul/19
Lol, I too thought she was much taller for some reason before knowing her real height.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 16/May/19
💝🎂🎁 Happy Birthday Megan! 🎁🎂💝
Here's wishing one of the most bewitchingly beautiful brunettes in the World a very happy 33rd Birthday!
Megan looked a couple of inches taller than Amanda Seyfried, 5ft2 I think, in 'Jennifer's Body', so I will go with 5ft4.
Jammes said on 6/Apr/19
She was even shorter than Noel Fisher at the TMNT Premiere she wore heels and hes a strong 5'6 or weak 5'7
Kelly Germany said on 23/Feb/19
Her claiming like 5ft 6 is hilarious. She is around 5ft 3.5.
Jancys said on 22/Feb/19
She did claim like 5ft 6. Obviously, she is no taller than 160cm.
Lwra said on 20/Feb/19
Have you seen the picture of megan fox and tyra banks where tyra makes megan look so short near her. I think the megan's height is 5'3
Nik said on 7/Jan/19
It's interesting what she said about everyone thinking that she's "like 5-10"!
Sandy Cowell said on 5/Jan/19
I really do see quite a difference between Megan and Amanda Seyfried in 'Jennifer's Body'.
I can't see Megan below 5ft4. I used to think she was 5ft5, having read it in a magazine - and I didn't doubt it either. Mind you, she's as slim as a whippet and about as striking a woman as I have ever seen!
Mister lennon said on 4/Jan/19
Dont see a full inch between megan and amanda. Maybe half an inch.
They are very close in height.
said on 31/Dec/18
Amanda Seyfried and Megan Fox seem to be wearing similar heel heights at this event: Click Here
. Amanda is 5’3”, maybe a little shorter, and Megan is definitely at least 1” taller than her. Same event: Click Here
; Click Here
. Even when Megan is further away from the camera, she’s still a tiny bit taller.
5'3 said on 10/Jun/18
(my english is bad .. sorry)
Why are y'all trying to prove that people shorter than they are? Like omg, why y'all can not just admit fact that 99% celebs not a 5-feet-shrimps? She is 5'4, but almost everyone is trying to prove that she is dwarf, and it's applies to all celebs. But nobody thinks that many celebs may be taller than they say?
MOHAMMAD / 6'1.5
said on 8/Jun/18
Oh Rob... you don't know how i feel. I love this girl. I fell in love with her when i saw her at jennifer's body movie. She is perfectly beautiful. I don't know if there is a chance that one day i could see her face to face.
Well she is down for attending conventions, so that may be possible for you to look into!
hokk said on 12/Apr/18
anyone can u suggest a picutre of megan fox with taller woman than her
Bobby said on 1/Mar/18
Had no idea she was this small, she's got a gorgeous body. Petite women for some reason tend to have very curvy bodies, I don't know why.
MAD SAM said on 16/Dec/17
Being bluntly honest here she can’t be more than 158 cm
Nik said on 19/Nov/17
Sub 5'4"! Pretty lady!
Tessa said on 16/Nov/17
People like Julianne Hough and Scarlett Johansson will edge her out.
Tallish89 said on 11/Oct/17
Would still go with a weak 5'4 for her, to me she just does not drop so low
said on 17/Aug/17
She is not really taller than Amy Adams, who i think is closer to 5ft 3.25, almost same height both
Conclusion, strong solid 5ft 3 for Megan, period
even said on 5/Jul/17
the most likely number is 162 cm
Kelly said on 19/Jun/17
I can't tell probably 5'4
Mark said on 28/May/17
there's picture of her with a tall female reporter in sydney grill team television station like that can u tell me the source of it
GM said on 17/Apr/17
How tall is she in those heels in the picture? Around 5'7 probably?
Megrace said on 14/Apr/17
Omg she is leaning on the side I can't tell!
Sandy Cowell said on 10/Apr/17
@ Anonymousmom - So you saw Megan Fox when you were out and about! How exciting!
Anonymousmom said on 8/Apr/17
I saw her today and she is tiny. I'm 5'3 and she's about the same height and she had an extra inch in and a half with the type of shoes she was wearing
said on 5/Apr/17
How tall would she be in heels?
Editor Rob: in some of the heels she wears, surely near 5ft 8
alfred said on 23/Mar/17
i couldnt find any on wire image can u suggest me a tall woman with megan fox
said on 16/Mar/17
@rob or anyone of you can you suggest me how i can search photos of megan with taller woman or girls models or celebreties female in which she looked short
Editor Rob: you could try to use wireimage.com and just scroll through - after typing megan fox - to see potential people she has been photographed near.
Marquis said on 11/Feb/17
Looks about 5' 3.5" to me in most everything she's done.
Never thought she was tall, though she almost looked it in Jennifer's Body by virtue of playing opposite tiny Amanda Seyfried.
Chris Park said on 1/Feb/17
I saw her in person with my mother when she was promoting Transformers in Korea. She was exercising in the hotel gym where I am a member at. Her proportions look amazing, but she was shorter than my 5'4 mother.
Sandy Cowell said on 27/Oct/16
A clinical fear of small people, she claims! Very funny, especially as she's a Mum now!
Megan the Mum, does it apply to your own?
Sammy Derrick said on 8/Sep/16
In the movie Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles:Out Of The Shadows,her character's ID is listed as
SEX:F HEIGHT:5'04 EYES:GRN
I was shocked!!!I've always thought she was like 5'7 mostly due to the fact that she has the stereotypical hot girl body...long legs and a short torso.
She's now the perfect woman!!!
Naughty said on 3/Jul/16
I don't know why I used to think she was at least 5'7', but looking at pictures now she looks 5'3" to me.
6'1 Joe said on 25/Aug/15
Visually, she looks like 5'9" supermodel.
Tom said on 26/Jul/15
She said herself in an interview that people dont notice her at events because shes only 5'3. I will try and find the interview and link it.
M said on 27/May/15
She is the one of very few female celebs who is really honest about her height (and Niki Reed also).
said on 11/May/15
A solid 5'4 seems right. In this photo with Jessica Alba, who is between 5'6 and 5'7... Megan, who has a platform, looks even height with Jessica who has no platform. plus Jessica is bending her knee more. I think 5'4 is fair.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 8/Apr/15
Kellan Lutz is nine full inches taller than her, so 5'3.25".
Ally said on 22/Mar/15
She looks a little shorter here, more like 5'2- 5'3
Clara said on 17/Mar/15
I think megan fox is 5'2.she looks shorter than 5'4
redyeu12 said on 24/Feb/15
she has such a good body that it can fool you, she could look tall or petite. 5'4
antropolog said on 19/Feb/15
She is definitely not taller tan 160cm. I assume that she's 157cm tall. But anyway not taller than 160cm, that's just ridiculous!
Judd said on 21/Jan/15
5'2.5" in my opinion...I remember she looked something like that next to Michael Bay (6
lee said on 18/Jan/15
in confessions of a drama queen saw looked same height as lindsay lohan when both in flats
Hypado said on 1/Dec/14
163cm is the right for Megan Fox.
Awesome possum said on 13/Aug/14
She's about 5'3" 1/2
said on 26/Jul/14
She's no more than 5'3".
First look here: Click Here
Or here: Click Here
She wears at last 10 cm heels.
Now look here: Click Here
Then here: Click Here
Here: Click Here
And finally here: Click Here
Arnett is 189 cm and wears classic men shoes: 3 cm.
If Megan is 163 cm, adding her heels and considering Arnett height, the difference between her and him reported in the photos is just 19 cm? Seriously?
Alex 6'0 said on 14/Jun/14
Not everyone inflates their height. Megan does look her 5'4 claim. Also 5'3-5'5 range is one of those ranges that can be harder to tell I feel.
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 25/Dec/13
She looks about the average height for a female in the US. Actually her legs seem a bit longish at times so I wouldn't say she has short legs. At worst she would maybe 5'3 1/2 but 5'4 seems accurate but she can sometimes come across a bit taller
someone said on 1/Nov/13
she has short legs i thought she was 5'2 max.
lol93 said on 13/Sep/13
Sammy I would not want my son to be 6'2 because I think that't too much at least in the European country I live in.Now if you would say 5'11 or 5'8 then I would choose 5'11 but not taller than that.Megan is very beautiful at 5'4 there is no reason for her to be taller also don't think that men like tall girls they prefer smaller girls in general
Sammy said on 29/Jul/13
Some do, yes. But most prefer tall. At least in the countries I've lived in that I mentioned... including the USA.
scotty said on 18/Jul/13
Sorry sammy but don't agree with you there this idea of taller people more desirable tends to be cultural some cross cultural studies show a preference for smaller males and females.
Sammy said on 26/Jun/13
It is a known fact that most people find taller more desirable. Just because you can't change your height and you must conform to what you are, doesn't make it not so. I'm not talking extreme height either, Just taller than average.
I'm not saying ALL people feel this way, but more do than not. If you have a son and you could chose from 2 heights: 6f2 or 5f8. A daughter 5f6 or 5f2. Most people would chose the taller height. Please don't say it's not true.
At least in the world I live in. People are ALWAYS bragging about how tall their kids are or pointing out "He/She is getting so tall". This makes children, teens, and adults BEAM with pride. Parents with tall children brag about their childrens' height all the time.
I'm just stating the reality I see and hear around me. I have lived in California, Florida, and Colorado, Paris, and briefly in Santiago, Chile and it has been the same everywhere.
Personally, I don't care. I'm 5f4 and have never cared much either way. I'm just voicing what I have seen and heard around me. I'm one of the few people who I known who genuinely don't care.
Anyways, Megan is probably 5f3-5f4. She is beautiful as is, I agree.
Me said on 1/May/13
Why are here so many women that have complexes about being small as if its something shameful. Since when is being tall equating being attractive. Its your subjective opinion dont state it as a fact.
The Neighbor said on 20/Apr/13
Trust me, Megan is about 5'2 1/2
Stephanie said on 20/Feb/13
Before I read her quote on this page, I always assumed she was 5' 6" because she looked about an inch taller than Lindsay Lohan in "Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen." But 5' 4" isn't surprising, that's only 2" difference from what I expected.
K said on 16/Feb/13
I read an article an online magazines website stating she's only 5'2"! Insane! She's not that short! I made a comment about it as did several other people saying there is no way she's that short. They replied that they are in the industry and know because they have inside sources and talent information. I'm confused. No way is she 5'2". I'm actually surprised she's 5'4". Thought she was taller.
Im awesome said on 3/Feb/13
Megan Fox is 5'3 1/2". I've met her. And I'm 5'6
Brandy said on 19/Dec/12
That picture with Jessica looks like Jessica has on shorter heels, and looser posture.
Lo sgozzatore said on 16/Dec/12
Jessica Alba in heels was completely dwarfed by Tom Welling, like 20 cms... If Welling is 180, hes 192-193 in shoes and she's 5'8 in heels which means she's max 5'5! And that makes sense if u see her with Megan
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 15/Dec/12
Yea they look right about the same height in that pic but its not easy to say since the way they're both standing. Alba is no more than 5'6 and some would argue that shes closer to 5'5. Looks like Fox is standing slightly more straight though.
said on 13/Dec/12
Weird, her and Jessica Alba look the same height in this pic.
said on 2/Dec/12
Rob is it possible, that she is 5'3 ?
I mean she just looks about 2cm shorter than 5'2 Seyfried-
[Editor Rob: generally i think she looks more 4cm taller than seyfried than smaller]
said on 1/Dec/12
Rob is it possible, that she is 5'3 ?
I mean she just looks about 2cm shorter than 5'2 Seyfried-
[Editor Rob: not sure she looks just a 5ft 3 girl]
said on 20/Oct/12
She is NEVER 5'4, she looks shorter.
I think Megan is 5'3 next to 5'2 Amanda Seyfried. :)
said on 2/Sep/12
Rob, is there any chance she's 5'5"?
It's very tricky because she can look 5'7" sometimes.
[Editor Rob: I think her 5ft 4 claim is about as honest you'll get]
ana said on 3/Aug/12
she looks much much taller than that. but if she says so, then thank you, 164 end of discussion!
Chameleon said on 3/Aug/12
I think she is 160cm.
Alex said on 2/Aug/12
Nice pic of her here! Pics like this are hard to tell how tall someone looks but she does look on the short side here
Aya said on 28/Jan/12
megan fox is 99 pounds only!! i thought it was impossible because i thought she was tall, but then i read that she is 5'4 .. I FELT RELIEVED
said on 21/Jan/12
i think she looks really small compared to BAG because shes always walking behind him, not side by side. Someone that is in front of someone will gain even more height compared to the person behind due to perseption of the camera. In this pic, shes not THAT small compared to him and shes wearing flip flops. Hes wearing boots that give him more than an inch. I still say 5'4 for her.Click Here
Andrea said on 10/Jan/12
I was shocked to see that she's only 5'4! I always thought she was 5'8+ I'm only 5'3 so that makes me feel good!!
nick said on 8/Jan/12
She seems more like a 5'6" to me. She doesn't look short, damn she looks tall!
Silent d said on 20/Dec/11
5 foot 4 but i'm not to sure about shia being 5 foot 9.
Andrea said on 17/Dec/11
So admitting she's 5f4 is a huge thing? 5f4 is not short and shameful. But yes, most people like to say they are taller because for the most part taller is more desireable. She looks 5f4 or 5f3. I don't like when people lie about something that is too obvious. Like Jennifer lopez saying she is 5f6. It's almost emabarrassing to see that.
Alex said on 29/Nov/11
Brian Austin Green is more like 5'10.5 than 5'11 if you look at the pic Rob took with him. hes not a full 5'11 so with that Megan is 5'4 max
heather said on 26/Nov/11
an extra inch on a high heel does not make an extra inch of height. Read Rob's heel height truth article. Theres no way Megan and Amanda are the same height when shes that much taller (and still slouching i might add) with just an extra inch of heel height. This would give her about a half inch extra height at best but it looks like they have about a 2 inch difference. They are not the same height.
mister_Lennon said on 21/Nov/11
Megan and Amanda are about the same height. Only check them in equal shoes. In that picture, Megan has higher shoes than Amanda.
orly said on 20/Nov/11
heather - if you look at Megan's shoes, they have about an inch platform so they are higher than Amanda's. Just an observation.
said on 16/Nov/11Click Here
Pic of megan and amanda side by side. A lot of people on here arent using full length photos. This is proof that megan is at least 5'3.5 mostly 5'4. She has about 2 inches on amanda and she isnt even standing up completely straight next to amanda. Click Here
with her husband BAG. As you said satchy, BAG is 5'11 and the top of her head reaches the bottom of his chin. This would give about a 7 inch difference which makes complete sense. You want to argue half an inch with me? fine....but i can just keep giving more and more proof that this is her appropriate listed height..these heights of 5'3 and less are rediculous
heather said on 31/Oct/11
everyone is arguing about her height when she said shes 5'4 herself in plenty of interviews...not 5'3...5'4. If she wanted to lie, she would simply state that shes 5'6 like ALL the websites say. Therefore, shes telling the truth about her height. Also, she makes herself out to be so short so if she was shorter than 5'4, she would have said so..get it? She's stated her height more than once in interviews, go read them. Brian Austin Green is 6'0..and shes short compared to him but not tiny. The top of her head is around his shoulders which makes sense.
Silent d said on 23/Oct/11
In transformers next to 5 foot 9 shia. I can live with 5 foot 4. Who cares about her surgery. She has dodgy ink though. Why would she want to ruin what some people would consider perfection. I guess everyone is imperfect. No one is perfect. I still think she looks hot but i wouldn't say she is the sexiest in the world. I read about her weird phobias where she doesn't like eating at restaurants because the cutlery has germs. I think she is a germaphobe. She doesn't want to put her mouth where everyone has already put their mouth. Weird!
John said on 21/Oct/11
how can anyone say she looks like 5-10 when shes 5-4? its a huge difference.
Alex said on 4/Oct/11
Legend, yea shes had some work done. Implants, nose job, lip injections. I think shes smokin though but if you look back to a few years ago or even before then you can clearly tell her face was different.
Legend said on 4/Oct/11
I had no idea so many people thought she could be under 5'4. 5'4 is good enough for me. I really wish she stayed natural though.
Alex said on 30/Sep/11
Saying everyone thinks shes 5'10 must be a joke. No way in the 5'3-5'4 range would you get guessed at 5'10 LOL
Carol said on 29/Sep/11
Yeah in the movie, "Jennifer's Body", she looks about half an inch taller than 5'2'' Amanda, possibly up to one inch taller. It's hilarious how she said, "People think I'm like 5'10'' - she looks about 5'5''/5'6'' at the most, and that's cause she has very good proportions. I'd def say Megan is 5'3'' max, but I wouldn't say she's "short" either (I'm only 5'1.5'' myself).
Alex said on 23/Sep/11
Shes 5'3 and beautiful :)
Chameleon said on 16/Sep/11
Legend once again I agree with you buddy.................
kara said on 13/Sep/11
Alex, thats not true, there are alot of people who don t have any ;)
Alex said on 13/Sep/11
Almost everyone in hollywood got a bit of plastic surgery done LOL. She may have some plastic surgery done but shes still fine :)
Legend said on 12/Sep/11
She's 5'4 max. She's plastic and a little robotic in her personality. I think she has major issues. Would I marry her? No, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't...lol
lemon said on 27/Aug/11
she seems SOLID 5-3.5 to be more precise
Alex said on 27/Aug/11
Yea 161cm may be right on for her which is about 5'3 1/2. I'd still love to take her away from Brian Austin Green and marry her lol
Chameleon said on 26/Aug/11
Megan isnt more than 161cm, possibly 160 flat.
Jesus Smith said on 24/Aug/11
Look at her in that episode of SNL she hosted. There's a skit where she's a stewardess with Kristen Wiig. She looks MUCH shorter than Kristen, so either Kristen needs an upgrade from 5'5" or Megan needs a downgrade...
Alex said on 14/Aug/11
Yea she looks 160-161cm next to 179-180cm BAG.
Chameleon said on 14/Aug/11
Alex she looks to short next to BAG and Shia to be anything over 160cm.
Alex said on 11/Aug/11
I am the same height I was when I graduated high school at 18. A few mm taller probably but thats it.
Alex said on 11/Aug/11
Brian Austin Green isn't 6'0 like that site had him at next to Megan. Hes maybe 5'11 barely lol.
Chameleon, tough to tell since its only an inch we're talking about but I'll go with 5'3 1/2 and shes just rounding up to 5'4.
verastegui said on 9/Aug/11
Did you always taller than Alex or grew it in high school? If so, did you start to grow when in high school?
Chameleon said on 7/Aug/11
Alex I know but she aint no 5'4. You know it, and I know it :p
Alex said on 7/Aug/11
Green is 5'10.5 to maybe 5'11.
franlin said on 7/Aug/11
maybe Brian Austin Green 5'10.25..megan 161.5
ali said on 6/Aug/11
Ä± things her husband 5'11.25..megan is 5'4.25
ayÅŸe said on 6/Aug/11
if Brian Austin Green is 5'10.25 megan is 5'2.25
tolga said on 6/Aug/11
Ä± think she's 158.5
Alex said on 6/Aug/11
Chameleon, for Rob to lower her height 3/4-1 inch on here he'd need A LOT of evidence in pics. He may knock off 1/4 inch but I doubt more than that right now. Not saying I disagree with you. She could be as low as 5'3-5'3 1/2.
Chameleon said on 4/Aug/11
She's 160/161cm. Needs downgrade
Alex said on 4/Aug/11
Brian Austin Green is 5'10 1/2. She isn't as much as 8 inches shorter than him. More like 7ish
Isabelle said on 2/Aug/11
I see Megan Fox as having a long torso, long arms, and shorter to meduim legs. Quite the opposite. Her legs look long when she is wearing heels. She looks longer because she is narrow and thin. Great bone structure and no strange body deformities (though I suspect her thighs are her problem area if she gained weight).
Anyways, 5f4 sounds perfect. 108 lbs sounds right. She's beautiful.
Alex said on 1/Aug/11
Rick, I think her legs give her a taller impression sometimes but if you look at her in general she no more than 5'4 max.
Rick Springfield said on 31/Jul/11
I always thought she was 5-7 or 5-8 she looks taller then 5-4 in Jennifer's Body. But I know you guys are pretty good at the height estimate but I would bump her up to say 5-5 which is my opinion. and yes she is very very hott.
Alex said on 31/Jul/11
Chameleon, I am 94-95kg range. I feel like I am a pretty big guy. Not huge but big. When you look at yourself in the mirror everday usually you dont see yourself that big but friends and people tell me I am pretty big. Far as my height 183-184cm I dont feel is that tall. Its on the tall side but nothing too much. Depends where I go. Sometimes I'll be one of the tallest or tallest in an area but in crowded areas I'll only feel above average. I think at 188cm is where you look tall anywhere you go.
Chameleon said on 30/Jul/11
Alex yea, but whats 210 lbs in KG? And so you do feel tall&big actully, as I recall u once said u dont feel so tall in places(@ general height page), but u actully do feel tall & big?
Alex said on 30/Jul/11
Chameleon, I wasn't sure haha. Yea I know she had a few surgeries done to her. I think she looked better before the face surgery but still looks great I think. Yea I feel big at 6'0 210lbs. I have posted pics on here before in the past but they're gone now.
Chameleon said on 29/Jul/11
Alex: Im male bro!, anyway u do realize Fox has had surgery and stuff? But ok, I wonder, you are a muscular 6'0, do you feel tall/big at 184cm with ur big build? Im curious how it is from your perspective having the height&build you have.
Alex said on 28/Jul/11
Chameleon, each to their own but Fox is in my top 5. Just curious are you a guy or girl?
anon said on 27/Jul/11
@matt yes too short for you as you are 6ft5 Matt, not too short generally for the average male , who prefers the shorter woman!
Chameleon said on 23/Jul/11
Alex she doesnt come close to the likes of Odette Yustman and Charlize Theron (the list goes on)
Matt said on 20/Jul/11
@eddie, that's too large of a height range to call it all "perfect." I'd say perfect height range is 5'6.5"-5'10" Either way 5'0 is definitely too short
Alex said on 20/Jul/11
All I know is Megan Fox is SMOKIN HOT whatever height she is LOL
Chameleon said on 19/Jul/11
Lol yeah 160cm is closer than the listing
bernard said on 19/Jul/11
yeah right at 163 cm
MAXIMUM 5-3 aka 160 cm
Alex said on 18/Jul/11
Funny how she quotes "everybody things I'm 5'10 and I'm only 5'4" LOL
She can pull off looking like 5'6 with heels and her legs but really shes 5'4 tops. My guess is 5'3 1/2.
Alex said on 14/Jul/11
55kg for her when she wasn't as thin is too much I think. More like 51-52kg which is about 115lbs. Now she looks more 45-47kg which is 100-105lbs.
Chameleon said on 13/Jul/11
Alex, 55 or below.... shes small and thin. Im better with height estimates, but this is what I think, wouldnt be suprised if she was like 51 range. What do you think?
Alex said on 13/Jul/11
Only OK looking? Each to their own but I'd say shes very hot. Yea I seen her thumb before too. Not sure whats up with that.
Chameleon, what do you think her weight is now in KG then?
Chameleon said on 12/Jul/11
Alex, I dont know weight in lbs sorry :p only kg. and I dont think shes over 160/161cm either.
Legend: Yeah she has had surgery aswell, I never understood the hype about her.Her thumb is creepy too :p
Kelly said on 10/Jul/11
@Button - sorry but by underweighted are considered all females with BMI lower than 19 not 17! Her body frame is identical to those of Scarlet Johanson, Natalie Portman and so on, and as it seem smaller than any other 5'4 celebs I conclude she s 5'3 tops
TruebloodFan said on 10/Jul/11
the only bad thing about TF3 is that there's no Megan Fox. the new chick is hot(if we count out the strange mouth), but not as hot or cool as Fox.
Alex said on 9/Jul/11
Chameleon, what do you think she weighs though? Do you think she was really just 99lbs for Jennifers Body? I think she was down to around 100 for that movie and today looks around 100lbs too. Looked to be 110 to 115lbs in Tranformer movies though.
Legend said on 9/Jul/11
She's ok looking. She has quite a few blemishes and a couple of deep looking scars on her face in some pics. Anyway, she's about 161.5 cm.
llmn said on 8/Jul/11
she is SOLID 5-3
Alex said on 8/Jul/11
Chameleon, she could be like 161-162. Tough to tell a CM difference haha. Still shy of 5'4 though. In heels her legs can give her a taller impression I think which is why some people think can could pass for 5'5-5'6.
Button said on 5/Jul/11
Kelly, you can't really assume someone is anorexic based on their BMI. Obviously we don't know Megan's weight so therefore we don't know her BMI, but even if she happened to be 5'4" and 100lb at one point, it doesn't necessarily mean that she was anorexic. And you said 5'4" and 100lb would be a BMI of less than 17, but it would actually be just over 17. However, that's not the point. The point is that you can't automatically tell if someone is anorexic based on their BMI. No doubt most people on here think I sound anorexic based on mine, but I'm not and nor do I look it. I'm 5'1.5" and 86lb (156cm and 39kg), giving me a BMI of 16.1. I'm 21 years old. As I said though, I really don't look even remotely anorexic. It is possible for a person of 5'4" and 100lb to be healthy, course it is. 100lb could be too light for some 5'4" people, but for others, I'm sure it would be nice and ideal. I think it depends on factors like bone structure and frame size and body composition. Megan may well have been 100lb at some point in the past months. We can't know for sure, but even if she did weigh 100lb it doesn't have to mean she was anorexic.
Chameleon said on 5/Jul/11
Alex she isnt under 160cm I know, but shes not over either.
Alex said on 4/Jul/11
I am not picky with girl's heights as long as they arent taller than me barefoot. I am 6'0 so 5'11 or 6'0 is my limit. Also those heights are rare to see girls barefoot anyway and rare I see girls over 6'0 who are attractive.
Alex said on 4/Jul/11
Chameleon, 5'3 is possible but I wouldn't go less. Those 5'1-5'2 estimates for her are BS. Shes average height or a bit less. Shes smokin hot, thats all I know for sure :) Shes my celeb crush
@ Just me said on 2/Jul/11
Just me said on 30/Jun/11
I would assume most people commenting are short. Taller is better.
Chameleon said on 30/Jun/11
Alex I think shes 160cm.
Alex said on 29/Jun/11
I could see her as low as 5'3 1/2. 5'3 maybe? but below that I dont see at all.
Chameleon said on 26/Jun/11
redux: I never said u have to date a girl taller than u bro.
susan said on 20/Jun/11
I doubt she s 5'4 for several reasons:
1. even being so skinny her legs and arms look shorter than those of other 5'4 stars (check the list of this site and see for yourself)
2. on photos with Amanda S, Fergie, Elsa P. (all 5'2) she would top them over if she was 5'4, however there is barely and inch difference between them (same footwear)
3. With platforms she s wearing a 5'4 person would NEVER look short, yet Megan doesn t strike as a tall person even with huge lifts
4. Wearing flip flops next to her hubby makes him look as a gian even though he is only 5'10-11
5. People and especially celebrities inflate their height for at least an inch
...all in all Megan deserves a downgrade to 5'3!
dana said on 15/Jun/11
average height for a man is 5`9...average height for a woman is 5`3,5`5... you`re called tall if you are 5`7,as a woman...
5`9 is just too much . women wear high heels and stuff...it looks bad being 5`9 and having high heels on,being taller than anyone in the room...
being 5`5 is the best,i think. being 5`3 is not bad either... the only thing that matters is how well proportioned you are. take amanda seyfried and fergie... same height,actually fergie is 2 cm taller, and she actually looks shorter than seyfried... seyfried is very well proportioned... kourtney kardashian also is very short but she looks average height,coz she is well proportioned.. the long neck saves the day. like in megan fox`s case.
redux said on 14/Jun/11
Chameleon -- let me tell you, I am a guy who is 5'11", I LIKE girls who are smaller than me. Girls who are taller than me make ME feel short...lol....it's true. Also, it's weird seeing a girl with a guy who is shorter than she is....I don't care if the guy is 5'6" and the girl is 5'8" or if the guy is 6'3" and the girl is 6'7", it is just WEIRD. lol.
Chameleon said on 13/Jun/11
Eddie thats BULL.
and Shaun I'd take a 5'9 girl over 5'4 any day
and my estimate for Fox is 160cm
Shaun said on 11/Jun/11
Nah I think Megan Fox is hotter being 5'4" than she would be at 5'9". I know I said I think chicks under 5'2" are too short and 5'5"-5'8" is ideal height for a woman but there are tons of sexy girls who are 5'4". But under 5'2" in my view is too short.
Chameleon said on 9/Jun/11
160cm is my estimate.
Quinn said on 5/Jun/11
I'm not sure what meeting Angelina Jolie has to do with figuring out Megan Fox's height, but on that note, I met Angelina Jolie as well and she was far from beautiful. She had nice hair, but she looked like E.T. That was the only thing I could think -- the hunch, the body shape, the huge eyes and gaunt features. She actually looks exactly like her brother, but knows how to pose in pictures. As for Megan Fox, she does look a little thin, but not unhealthily so.
hola said on 1/Jun/11
im happy that she isn't tall, i think she looks fine being 5'4, not being tall isn't ugly.
not sure about the whole 'she looks 5'10 thing' though
Julia said on 29/May/11
i wish she was tall... tall people look so graceful.. it would just add to her gorgeousness. but she looks tall so it works.. and whenever she is around someone they look really tall bc she looks liek 5 10
Button said on 27/May/11
Megan Fox is beautiful. And yes, I would also say 5'4" seems about right for her too. She did always used to get listed at 5'6", and I have to say, I believed it for a while, back when I wasn't so focused and interested in height. But, I have now looked into it some more, and I seriously cannot see 5'6" for her. Even 5'5" still seems a little too high in my opinion. She definitely appears more in 5'4" range than 5'5" to me, based on pictures of other celebrities I've seen her with anyway, so I think this is a very good listing right here. Of course, there will always be a chance she is a bit over or under 5'4", but it's extremely difficult to tell a tiny difference like that. I think 5'4.5" (164cm) is a possibility but no more than that. On the other hand I can also see 5'3.5" (161cm) as a possible height for her but no less than that. I'm pretty sure she falls somewhere inside this range. 5'3" and under is not correct in my eyes. How do some people on here only see that height for her? Well, a full 5'3", I can just about understand why some people see this as her height as she can at times look that range, but less than 5'3"? That is not right. Look at her proportions and then compare to a true 5'2" range woman like Christina Aguilera or Dannii Minogue. Megan really appears significantly longer than them. I am 0.5 inches shorter than 5'2", and visibly I know I don't look anywhere near as long as Megan. She isn't shorter than 5'3", I feel really sure about it. 5'4" is about right for her.
NN said on 25/May/11
''clinical fear of small people''???!!! DUH! She s lucky if she reaches 5'4 IN SHOES!
Chameleon said on 23/May/11
5'4 in shoes, sure.
said on 18/May/11Click Here
look at this video 4:29
she says shes 5'4
Im kinda glad shes not tall cause shes like one of the most beautiful woman in earth! And doesn't need to be tall to be gorgeous!
Alex said on 11/May/11
She could still be 100lbs at 5'4 which is skinny.
Osmel said on 4/May/11
BeautifulHi megan my name is osmel I want to metyou am 22years old am5.3 am singer and iam a nice guy I know how to fight but my dad dosent let me fight I do weights with my sister husband you are
Aly said on 1/May/11
My mum and I met her - mum is 5'3 and I'm 5'5. Megan was wearing thongs and was a bit taller than my mum but shorter than me - so this seems accurate! BTW she didn't actually talk to us, she sort of just kept walking.
Chameleon said on 30/Apr/11
Yeah I think she's 1.60.
@ Lilly said on 30/Apr/11
better check the recent pics...as for height absolutely less than 5.4, watch the Confessions of the Drama Queen with Lindsay (5.4) - Megan is at least an inch or inch and a half shorter in every single scene (both wearing same footwear). If that doesn t do it, then check Hope and Faith catwalk scene with Kelly Ripa (5.2) where Megan seems not more than an inch taller (again same footwear). My conclusion definetely 5.3
Lilly said on 29/Apr/11
@ Megy- She does not look anorexic nor does she look 99 lbs to me. She's skinny, but she looks healthy and tone. You could tell by her arms and her abdominal region that she works out and watches what she eats, because she is not skinny fat. 5'4 and no less than 105 lbs and no more than 118 lbs for Megan.
Camille said on 29/Apr/11
5f4 at 115 lbs is not skinny. I am 5f4 @ 113 lbs and I am thin/average. Ive weight 105...that was skinny. 5 pounds can make a difference in my height.
Megan Foix is thin and I do not believe her to weigh more than 110 lbs. I'd say 107 lbs. As far as her height, 5f3 1/2.
She does not look too skinny IMO, but she's def on the thinner side. I prefer on the thinner side, but she can't loose any weight. She's borderline. Loosing 5 pounds would make a negative difference.
Megy said on 28/Apr/11
@ Kelly - her weight is 99lbs and lately she does look close to anorexic. Anyway 99 lbs on 5'2 person is VERY skinny so there is only one reasonable explanation - she is shorter than 5'4
lemon said on 28/Apr/11
she seems WAY too small to be 5-4
5-3 imo b/c 5-4 women are not THAT short like her
Kelly said on 27/Apr/11
She's a good average height at 5'4", but if she weighed or weighs 100lbs, then she'd be anorexic, with a BMI of less than 17! She looks pretty healthy to me, so I'd say she's at least 115lbs, which is still pretty skinny.
hola said on 24/Apr/11
5'4 is def right
Alex said on 22/Apr/11
I think her legs can give her a taller impression especially in heels. She is still listed at 5'6 sometimes but if she claims 5'4 you can bet thats the most she is. She could be like 5'3 1/2 but I dont buy these 5'2-5'3 estimates. She isn't that short lol
Sara said on 22/Apr/11
I myself am a bit over 5.2 and to me Megan def looks more than 5.2. However I don t buy the 5.4. She looks shorter than Lindsay L, Britney and other 5.4s. At the same time she s a smudge taller than 5.2 Fergie, Kelly Ripa and Amanda S. Finally at the Golden globe pics with 5.1-5 Vanessa Hudgens her height doesn t rocket over. So to conclude 5.3 is right.
Ana said on 19/Apr/11
Angie :O Famous people want to appear taller not smaller!
Viper said on 19/Apr/11
Angie you cant tell height for crap.
Jess said on 19/Apr/11
Why are you guys arguing? She already said that she is 5'4", and that seems about right. For some reason, all celebs are being put as taller than they really are. 5'4" is the exact average height- it's not short at all. Short is like less than 5'2".
Angie said on 18/Apr/11
I don't believe she's that short, especially not 5'3. I think actresses actually downgrade their height to appear smaller for some reason. She looks 5'5 or 5'6.
Sarahlicious said on 18/Apr/11
Didn't any of you watch her on Conan. She said that she's only 5'4 ft.
megan said on 16/Apr/11
5'3" 110bs & naturally beautiful
jess said on 14/Apr/11
One inch can make a difference but not that much. confusing height for 1 inch is easy, that is why celebrities lie. Whatever a celebrity says, bank on subtracting a solid inch...at least. that is usually the standard lie. Some go for 2 inches.
Anyways, Megan at 5f4 sounds right.
Alex said on 14/Apr/11
2 inches difference isn't a good deal but its def noticeable. When you start getting 4 inches or more difference it becomes large.
Karina said on 10/Apr/11
For short people yeah, one inch is very important and u can see the diference ;)
Sindy said on 8/Apr/11
Are people really going to notice an inch difference 2.5cm!!!? especially if us girls always wear heels.
She's got a good height.
andrea said on 4/Apr/11
2 inches isn't "way" shorter if you're standing next to somebody. My daughter is 2 1/2 inches shorter than me and it feels like she's shorter, but not that much.
Megan Fox is possibly 5f4. I believe that.
Anna said on 27/Mar/11
Hey, i saw her 2 weeks ago or something, she is 5.3 for sure, i m 5.5 and she was way shorter then me ;) Anyway she is hot :D
celebcomment said on 27/Mar/11
Rachael Taylor is 5'8, Megan can't be 5'4 because they have much than 10sm diffrents in height
Why Rob said on 7/Mar/11
5 ft 4 inch Good Height for Women
Alex said on 5/Mar/11
Some are acting as 5'3 and 5'4 is a big difference. We're arguing over an inch here. Megan I dont see coming off as a short girl.Shes a skinny girl but not really short.
fresher than fresh said on 3/Mar/11
her body doesnt look 5"4 anyway its nice
Rated R said on 28/Feb/11
She is 5'3 1/2 i repeat.
Kara said on 28/Feb/11
Def. Looks a solid 5 4". She looks average height to me. Could be 5 3.5" but def not under that. Pretty girl.
Alex said on 27/Feb/11
She had did Jennifers Body where was down to 100lbs before she did Transformers 2 so Bay had her gain the weight back for that film. I think shes still hot but yea in Transformers was her best look.
kookierx said on 27/Feb/11
5-4 is ok and all but ...
she (barefoot) could also be 5-3" or 5-3.5" also ???
seems like it b/c at times she seems TOO tiny to be 5-4 ?
Rox said on 26/Feb/11
She's more like 5'2'' I'm 5'3'' I've met her on a couple of occassions and she was slightly shorter. She's also very very skinny, and not nearly as beautiful as the image used to market her. Met Angelina as well, there is no comparison Angelina is naturally gorgeous, very slender as well however; but stunning to look at.
gregarious ginger said on 21/Feb/11
She's pretty thin and has always been on the small side.To Alex: she said Michael Bay made her gain weight for the second Transformers,and in the past birth control made her gain ten pounds when she was younger. So,she's probably 100 pounds.As someone with "meat on my bones",people shouldn't be criticized just for being skinny.
Alex said on 21/Feb/11
Shes never come across as 5'6 but I doubt shes under 5'4 either.
RICHARD said on 20/Feb/11
hola said on 20/Feb/11
she is 5'4
Alex said on 20/Feb/11
What do you think she weighs then? I dont see how 115lbs for Transformer movies is not possible. 5'4 115lbs is thin. She said she got down to 99lbs for Jennifers Body, could have been that or slightly more. I would say shes about 100lbs now or slightly under.
Anonymous said on 20/Feb/11
She looks small in many pictures, 5'2-5'3 at most for her.
Anonymous said on 16/Feb/11
P.S.: I think she gets listed in the 110-114lbs range because of they want to pretend anorexia doesn't exists in show business and that hollywood actress don't perpetuate an unreal dangerous model of beuaty for women. It's a kind of politically correct lie...
Anonymous said on 16/Feb/11
I think she was under 110lbs even in transformers movies...
Now maybe she looks good ( and think thant in pictures she seems fatter ) because she's a beautiful girl and has good proportions but she's really too skinny... and it's also a bad and dangerous ideal of feminine beauty, that's my opinion...
Anonymous said on 16/Feb/11
I really don't think she ever weighted 115lbs!
You don't realize how thin she is!
Alex said on 16/Feb/11
Shes not 110lbs now. She gets listed at 114lbs and looked to be right around that mark in the Tranformers movies. She said somewhere that the most she ever weighed was 118lbs anyway. Looking at those pics below someone posted of her I'd say she looks in the 95-100lb range. Megan was always thin but now shes more skinny. I think she looks good still but better with a little more weight on her.
Alex said on 15/Feb/11
Megan has a small frame and bone structure but even at her height and frame she can only get so light without looking too skinny. In Jennifer's Body was was down to 100lbs various sites had said but she looked great I thought except for being a bit on the pale side. In Tranformers she was def around that 115lb mark. But at 5'4 with a small frame you shouldn't weigh under 100-102lbs though.
Anonymous said on 15/Feb/11
She's not 110 lbs. She says that, but she's NOT. She just pretends not to be anorexic. It's clear she's really starving and not "naturally a small girl".
Anyway she seems to be around 5'3''.
little sue said on 14/Feb/11
Depends on bone structure, I'm 4ft 11 and if I weighed as low as 114lbs I look awful. It might not be anorexic for her but its a very low body weight for her height,
Alex said on 13/Feb/11
She gets listed at 114lbs and shes admitted to being just 5'4. She in Transformers was def in the 115lb range but now she looks more like 100lbs. she still looks good though but thats my opinion. Shes not anorexic. Just naturally a small girl. At 5'4 110lbs is like an ideal weight.
said on 13/Feb/11
I think after this pic you'll see that she ISN'T 5,4 , she's 5,3 but she's anorexic that's why she seem to be 5,4 !
said on 12/Feb/11
she's 5'4" she said it herself here
Brad said on 3/Feb/11
It is PROFOUNDLY irritating to see people and even the stars themselves say they're "SO SHORT! Only 5'4!"
News flash: that's average height for a North American female. If you are average height, you are, by definition, not short; you are AVERAGE. Stop denigrating everyone else who is NORMAL height as SHORT.
Anonymous said on 28/Jan/11
5'4'' is a little too much. I think she's 5'3'' max.
User account 7-16 said on 26/Jan/11
5"4 exactly i seen her im 5"4,and we were the same height both wearing flip flops,thanks good bye..
dana said on 26/Jan/11
she could be 5.4 the same way as she could be 5.3, that long neck of hers confuses me.
you cant tell only from the pictures, you have too actually see her in person, so if someone met her, tell us
lara said on 25/Jan/11
she is about 5.3 - 5.4, maximum 5.5, but not more!
Anonymous said on 25/Jan/11
She's a weak 5'3''!
dana said on 16/Jan/11
in which show?
Anonymous said on 15/Jan/11
She 5 ft 3. She admitted in a show.
Anonymous said on 13/Jan/11
Arm lenght is always a good indicator, for 5.4 arms should simply look longer than hers...She seems to be a bit taller than 5.2 but surely shorter than 5.4, so 5.3 is my guess too
kelly said on 11/Jan/11
haha...funny how she says ppl always think she's 5'10, thats just silly...i always thought she looked 5'3...5'4 is the absolute max, but most probably 5'3-5'3.5...she looks really petite, especially since she got even thinner.
Anonymous said on 10/Jan/11
I thonk she's not taller than 5'3.5"
Master Of Rolls said on 1/Jan/11
a solid 5'4 i'd say
felecity u.j said on 31/Dec/10
i think she's 5'4... its her body type which makes her appear taller... i'm 5'5 and people thought i am 5'10 or something... just because what you wear makes you look taller...
lola said on 28/Dec/10
I think she is 5f3 cause she's the same height as fergie ; both are knowing to wear huge heels
amy l. said on 19/Dec/10
i buy the "5-4"
but if you compare her proportions to another 5-4 celeb like britney spears
megan's arms upper body are very tiny compared to any other 5-4 female forget celeb
so i give her a SOLID 5-3 or even 5-3.5
b/c not all 5-4 woman appear THAT small like her
except other 5-2 or 5-3 women like kim k. or mila kunis ??
MasterMind said on 10/Dec/10
I havent seened her myself but I do however think that she is between 1.60-1.62m,
1.63 is inaccurate in my eyes, 5'3 sounds about right.
Chameleon said on 10/Dec/10
she looks 160 max next to Shia lol..
dana said on 7/Dec/10
nah, she always says she is 5`4 but i dunno
Ben said on 6/Dec/10
While on the Tonight Show she stated that she was 5'3
Anonymous said on 29/Nov/10
well, i`m 1,60 and we have the same proportions , i mean she doesnt seem to have longer legs,arms,torso etc.. she looks 1,60 to me but she could be 1,63 too because she has a very long neck. my neck is shorter than hers at 1,60. her neck is too long even for 1,63, so i dont know. she could be 1,60 the same way as she could be 1,63. her neck is definately giving her extra height
what do you think?
hola said on 27/Nov/10
dana how tall do you think she is?
said on 25/Nov/10Click Here
if he`s 1,75 and she, supposedly is, 1.63, then why is there such difference between them? she`s wearing high heels, and even so, there are still 5 cm difference between the 2 of them.
another one. still shorter.
and even if she is actually 1.63, those 3 cm go only to her neck
Anonymous said on 25/Nov/10
i'm a paparazzo, she is 5.3
hola said on 25/Nov/10
I think she's 5'4 solid
dana said on 25/Nov/10
is she 5-3 or 5-4 ? someone who actually met her,please tell us