Natalie Portman's Height
5ft 2 ½ (158.8 cm)
American Actress best known for roles in films like Star Wars Phantom Menace, Leon, Black Swan and Thor has claimed to stand tall at "five foot three"
Keira Knightly said in a 2004 edition of The Sunday Mirror that after meeting Natalie "There is a huge height difference. I'm 5ft 7 and she's 5ft 3"
The first thing people always say to me is, 'You're so much shorter in person.' I'm like, 'That's really nice and friendly!'
Photos by PR Photos
You May Be Interested
Add a Comment420 comments
Average Guess (75 Votes)
5ft 2.22in (158cm)
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 9/Jun/19
💐🎂🎁 Happy Birthday Natalie! 🎁🎂💐
Wishing Natalie a terrific Birthday with her family and friends.
My all time favourite of hers? 'Black Swan' - of course! She is unbelievable in it, as is Mila Kunis.
My Birthday guess for Natalie is 5ft2.5.
said on 22/Apr/19
Rob, I think we can settle with Natalie in a position between 5'2" and 5'3". The full 5'3" could look a little too high, but I'm not sure if she really only has 5'2". It seems to me that 5'2.5" is height that she generally looked next to Eric Bana, Liam Neeson, Hayden Christensen, Samuel L. Jackson and Ian McDiarmid. Good job Rob, I agree with your list👍!
She has looked as short as 5ft 2, but sometimes 5ft 3, somewhere in between I feel she has a chance of measuring.
denisse said on 12/Oct/18
She’s 157 cm
lollipop95 said on 24/Sep/18
She looks a tiny bit taller than 5'2.5 Winona Ryder in pictures
MAD SAM said on 22/Jun/18
She ain’t 160 cm, more like 155 cm equal/shorter to Kat Dennings
said on 27/Apr/18
This is one of my favorite actresses. How tall do you think she is barefoot at night Rob?
She might drop another little fraction lower towards 5ft 2
Sandy Cowell said on 10/Mar/18
Well and truly a 'downgrade' that was justified, Rob! Bravo! Excellent! Fantastic!
Now, as it's voting-time for me again with Natalie, I have decided on 5ft2.25!
Frederik said on 6/Mar/18
i really think natalie needs an upgrade. she doesn't seem quite this short!
Hector Rivera said on 5/Feb/18
She is no taller then 5' or 5'1 I met her in 2008 and stood right by her side she was wearing flat shoes
Tall Sam said on 5/Feb/18
Next to any tall co-stars (male or female), Natalie can pretty much look closer to a flat 5'2" than 5'2.5".
Jee said on 3/Nov/17
Always thought she's a solid 5'3 but when I saw her pictures with Mila Kunis i'd say there's more between them than 1 inch...
Lean said on 11/Oct/17
Natalie is 5'3
Subzero said on 10/Oct/17
5'2 on the dot. Short lady.
elena said on 24/Aug/17
she's 159 cm.slightly less than 5'3 johansson
Tom said on 7/Aug/17
Meh said on 18/Jul/17
Looks very short in Thor. Can't be more than 155 cm
Slim 181 cm said on 10/Jul/17
Legit 5'3. 5'3.25 maximum.
XXX said on 16/Jun/17
I agree with heightist about the being 5'3 part. She really does look much shorter, but I would put her at 5'2, since it's probably and illusion because of her really small frame.
Arch Stanton said on 18/Apr/17
@Heightist, if you take the time to look there's 2 inches allowed either way from the list for each celeb. Not a chance of her being 5 ft 1 let alone under it. That's silly, but 5 ft 2 range is certainly arguable.
Heightist said on 17/Apr/17
I'm 5'3" with a small build, and I can tell she's definitely shorter than me. She has the build of a 5'0"-5'1" person. She doesn't seem short from her well-balanced classically beautiful face. But she is!
The pull-down menu doesn't have anything under 5'1", so I'm forced to select 5'1". But if it had shorter heights, I'd select 5ft 0.75in. Rob, or whoever runs this site - please add heights less than 5'1" in the dropdown menu. There are plenty of female celebrities who are shorter than 5'1".
Kenny D said on 19/Mar/17
Natalie Portman as Padme Amidala in the pre-Darth Vader Star Wars looks anywhere from 3 to 5 inches shorter than 6'0" Anakin Skywalker in her high heel type shoes or boots.
So I think Natalie Portman is most likely five-foot-five ish or five-foot-six.
Sandy Cowell said on 27/Jan/17
@ 6'7" - Very well then! Apology accepted from Sandy, also known as 6'8"!
6'7'' said on 27/Jan/17
All right guys.Sorry for the showoff@Nik,Sandy cowell
Nik said on 25/Jan/17
She's the same height as my niece.
Nik said on 25/Jan/17
May be you are exceptionally tall! There was a boss where I used to work who was about 6'7" and I was about an inch or 2 underneath his shoulders, It felt strange seeing someone so tall compared to me and everybody else.
Sandy Cowell said on 24/Jan/17
@ 6'7" - Hi! I think most people would look tiny in comparison to you, especially women! I had a hairdresser who was 6ft7 and I had neck strain speaking to him!
I saw 'Black Swan' again the other day, and I did notice that during the erotic scene between Natalie and 5ft4 Mila Kunis, there could possibly have been fewer than 2 inches when they were standing up, though there did look to be 2 inches when they got into the taxi.
I still have difficulty believing that Natalie is 5ft3, so I will stick with my original estimate of 5ft2, though she could be a fraction more.
6'7'' said on 22/Jan/17
She is like 6 inches below my shoulder level.Very tiny
LM10-196 cm(6'5'') said on 16/Jan/17
Well she's 5'1'' or even shorter.Looked so short in thor2
Sandy Cowell said on 1/Nov/16
I have never read that Natalie Portman is 5ft3, only 5ft2 or less! In 'Black Swan' she looks at least 2 inches shorter than 5ft4 Mila Kunis.
172.4cm guy said on 19/Oct/16
I remember that she often had to stand on a ramp or box when filming her scenes with Chris Hemsworth in the Thor movies. It seems that they had more than one foot of difference between them, so 5'1" to 5'2" seems more realistic.
Holly said on 11/Aug/16
I doubt she is any taller than 5'1". In the photos that Marla Singer posted in 2013, she is standing next to Scarlett Johansson. Scarlett is wearing flats and Natalie is wearing approx 2" heels, but they are still the same height. She may even be a bit less than 5'1".
jtm said on 9/May/16
she's actually shorter than johansson.
Spiderman~ said on 8/May/16
5'1, 5'2" the most, she is about the same height as Scarlett Johansson
Biswajit Debnath said on 13/Apr/16
my hight 5.3" I need growth my hight
Dan said on 4/Feb/16
I think she is 5' 2". She looks tiny next to her 5' 10" boyfriend, even in high heels!
Anya said on 21/Dec/15
I ran into her(literally)in Harvard Square when she was attending school there. We were going opposite ways down an aisle in a store and ended up basically face to face. She is Tiny! Im 5'1 and can say with confidence that she is AT MOST a bit under 5'2. She actually seemed shorter then me at the time but she was slouching a bit, Either way, she is an extraordinarily beautiful petite woman!
lollipop1995 said on 9/Mar/15
@Alien They're the same height :) Scarlett is 5'3 too
Alien said on 18/Feb/15
She is a little bit taller than Scarlett Johansson, I say 5'2" to 5'3"
lollipop1995 said on 31/Jan/15
I'm 5'3 and in flats, Natalie looks to be the same height as me
Linda said on 15/Dec/14
She's probably only 5'1. She can't be more than 5'2 at most. She looks really small. Other actresses who are actually 5'3/5'4 don't look as small as she does. Going by the two-inch rule (most people are listed as two inches taller than they really are), then she'd be 5'1.
Sam said on 15/Dec/14
I'm guessing due to her appearance in Jake's photo, she is wearing larger heels than the other ladies, she'd probably appear more petite in flats or barefoot compared to them.
Sam said on 31/Jul/14
She has one of the most gorgeous faces in movies today, although I thought her look was too thin in Black Swan. Usually don't go in for girls this petite, but her beauty is hard to ignore. Something about her makes me think she'd be...uh, difficult in person.
Arch Stanton said on 4/Jun/14
BTW Rob you made a good call downgrading Winona as Portman is a bit taller. I think she is close to 5 ft 3 even if she can seem smaller but Winona is definitely shorter!
Arch Stanton said on 4/Jun/14
She's without a doubt one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen.
Arch Stanton said on 4/Jun/14
Looks 5'2 in Black Swan. @Mid 190s Seriously you think it really matters how tall she is and it makes her less attractive because she's not 5 ft 11? Weird. IMO that she's petite it makes her more vulnerable and gorgeous looking.
leonari said on 4/May/14
Below 160. Very sure about that.
Brad said on 3/Apr/14
5-2. Spears had her easy by a duece.
joy said on 19/Jan/14
See her with Reese Withepsson. Same height
hello said on 4/Jan/14
Olivia thirlby is 5ft3 and natalie is like an inch shorter so 5ft2
klk said on 27/Nov/13
scarlett is obviously taller and I highly doubt she would say she is shorter than she really is. natalie needs a downgrade
Arch Stanton said on 1/Nov/13
More 5 ft 2 range, She makes Chris Hemsworth look 6'4"-6'5" in Thor. Most beautiful Hollywood actress though IMO.
Silent d said on 21/Oct/13
Saw her on graham norton show and she was tiny. She said she had to stand on a ramp next to chris hemsworth and she said she makes anyone look tall. She was 25cm shorter than chris in 5 inch heels. 5 foot 2. Petite but pretty.
omar13 inches said on 21/Oct/13
I think 5 ft 3 seems too high after seeing the hoe on the Graham Norton Show?
K said on 21/Oct/13
I think this list may be accurate.
Britney Spears (5'4)
Scarlett Johansson (5'3)
Natalie Portman (5'2)
Reese Witherspoon (5'1)
Christina Ricci (5'0)
Eva Longoria (4'11)
Brad said on 21/Oct/13
5 feet 2, the Spears photo is not a 5' 3" person by Britney.
Get Shorty said on 19/Oct/13
Natalie was on the Graham Norton Show last night. She referred to her height in saying that she makes anyone look tall...
said on 4/Sep/13
I think Natalie is no more than 5f2 imo. Britney Spears is 5f4 and looked more than 2 inches taller than her in this pic: Click Here
bob said on 11/Aug/13
I stood by her in 2004 at the Melrose Trading Post, in Hollywood.
She is the same height as my daughter, 5 foot. Maybe, 5'1" max. She was dressed casual, I think sandals, if I recall. She is tiny! And, I'm only 5'7", if that.
truth179cm said on 14/Jul/13
Knightley is overstating a bit. It is a big height difference, no doubt, but hardly huge, I mean she is not 5ft9-10 or something.
Vivi said on 3/Jul/13
I think Marla singers right, I think she's closer to 5'2.5".
said on 2/Jul/13
Natalie is 5 ft 2.25 in, because she looks def shorter than Scarlett who is 5 ft 3. 1 Click Here
2 Click Here
3 Click Here
said on 21/Jun/13
I highly doubt she's any less than 5'2.5" considering she's taller than 5'1.5" Reese Witherspoon and Reese's Witherspoon shoes have a platform while Natalie's doesn't and Natalie is still a tad taller
Jessica said on 21/Jun/13
She's taller than Reese Witherspoon...
MikeyD said on 17/Jun/13
She looks short alongside Dustin Hoffman. She's definitely shorter than 5'3 then maybe 5'2 just to be generous.
Wendy said on 1/Jun/13
She is 5'3. She has a skinny frame. And June is right, it's ridiculous that she's short. When I watching Chicago, i always thought she was short cause she was super thin to play Roxie and I thought she was wearing work boots to make her two inches taller but when I watch bridget jones diary, she's looks average height and kinda of chunky since she gained 25 pounds for the role so if Natalie was a size 14 like bridget jones, she'll prove to you all she's 5'3.
Tim said on 31/May/13
She's around 5'2-5'3. And Renee zellweger is definitely 5'4 or taller. I've seen them together around wearing scandals in Los Angeles. But from the look of it, Renee has a good two inches taller than her so Renee needs an upgrade.
said on 5/May/13Click Here
i was bored so i compared her height to her car. she has a mercedes e350 sedan, and according their website, is 57.1 inches tall. the sandals give her absolutely no extra lift and she still looks about 6 inches taller than the car so i'd say 5'3" is pretty accurate. i think it's because she's really skinny.. so it makes her look even smaller. gorgeous woman :)
June said on 3/May/13
If she's 5'1 then Renee is probably 5'1 too. I doubt she's that short.
Chezza said on 1/May/13
She is 158cm, she looks smaller, but she is 158cm.
Arch Stanton said on 21/Mar/13
Most gorgeous woman in Hollywood in my opinion, love her. I thought she was about 5'4" but in thinking about does seem a bit smaller.
Violet said on 20/Feb/13
Natalie is gorgeous! It doesn't matter how tall she is. I don't feel so bad now that I know she is the same height as me. I've been guessed at 5 feet once. Most of the time people guess I'm 5'4". I'm petite like natalie, 104lbs and small boned. So the below comments, I understand why people would guess 5 feet or even 5'4".
R jha said on 18/Feb/13
Height ain't got to do with acting.
jenna said on 25/Jan/13
I met her at Thor premier and she's very short. I'm 5'4 and she was my height in 2-3 inch heels! She's 5'1-2 for sure.
ali said on 20/Jan/13
these heights of 5' are ridiculous. look at pictures of her and mila kunis. they are almost the same height! like how is she really short? 5'4 is average people!
Jack said on 10/Jan/13
Hmm... I had to wait in line behind her at Heathrow in 2007 when I was 15 and 5'9.5", wearing converse shoes as I did all the time back then. We were standing there for about ten to fifteen minutes and she never appeared to be anything more than 5'1" at best. I really can't see how she'd make 5'3" except in heels.
K said on 30/Nov/12
She doesn't look 5'3" to me at all! Maybe she is. She looks more 5'2" or even 5'1".
Trey said on 25/Nov/12
I don't see more than 5'1 - 5'2.
Silent d said on 21/Oct/12
I heard she was really short but i never thought 5 foot. I always thought at least 5 foot 2. How does kiera knightley know she is 5 foot 3? Did they stand side by side to measure or did kiera just agree with natalie? 5 foot 2.
5'4" said on 12/Oct/12
I saw her in Harvard Square and that girl is tiny! Tiny, petite, waif. She was 5 feet, tops. 5'1" close to but no taller. I was quite surprised at her slight frame. She must have been 5'3" in heels, which would technically make me a staturesque 5'7"! If I kept the same poundage and stretched 3" that would make me willowy too! Sweet! ; )
poco loco said on 5/Oct/12
Kiera Knightly says in the Sunday Mirror magazine in July 2004 after meeting her co-star from Episode 1, that regarding Natalie Portman: "There is a huge height difference. I'm 5ft 7 and she's 5ft 3"
how is this height difference HUGE???isnt it only 10cm??my gfriend is 5'10'' and her best friend is 5'2''
in that way of thinking i (being 6'3'')have a huge height difference with the entire wordl.
Maiasatara said on 26/Jul/12
Met her while at Harvard. I'm telling you, she's right around 5'0". That's IT. I AM 5'6.5" and had to bend my head down to look at her. On the most generous of days I might be persuaded to go as high as 5'1" but NO TALLER. Bottom line: what does it matter to anyone? I'm only annoyed that so many people here seem insistent and invested in the height of a person they neither know nor have met, and are basing wild assumptions on photographs with other people they don't know, who's heights can't be confirmed either!!! I came to the site to compare my height with a few people for fun and was shocked to find people arguing about the relative heights of STRANGERS. This page needs to come with a disclaimer, like psychic or horoscope sites, that it's for entertainment purposes only. Why not invest this much energy scrutinizing the candidates in the next political election in your area.
Silent d said on 5/Feb/12
160cm. She is slightly shorter than mila kunis. Really attractive.
said on 30/Jan/12
i looked at tb's link and then watched where she was actually on ellen's show.
at 0:17 in this video clip Click Here
they stood right next to each other and ellen looks like she's about 3 inches taller.
natalie's shoes didn't give her much height, but ellen's had about an inch on hers.
either ellen shrunk a lot or natalie is a bit taller than what you guys think.
5'3" for sure. 5'3.5" works too. maybe even 5'4"
it doesn't really matter all that much.
nada said on 29/Jan/12
Natalie and friends claim 5'3" -5'4"
Non-Hollywood people who have met her in person report 5ft to 5'2" (including folks in that height range).
I'm going to going with an in-person estimate average of 5'1"
said on 27/Jan/12Click Here
natalie looks like she's wearing flats. ellen degeneres is about 5-7? she has shoes on in this video, but then again she is standing a little bit farther from the camera.. and has a slightly worse posture.. but that shouldn't cause too much of a height difference.
i'd say 5-3 works
said on 26/Jan/12Click Here
She and 5'3 Renee Zellweger are about the same height.
Amiwhat-uh said on 26/Jan/12
Say what you will, Natalie is 5'3, and this is a very accurate height for her. My God, have any of you met someone of this height? Stand next to a Redwood tree if you're feeling so tall. I dare you.
jtm said on 25/Jan/12
jeong and kaling both have terrible posture and they are still at least inch taller than portman.portman was also shorter than 5'3 renee zellweger.
NP is 5'3
said on 24/Jan/12
NP may have a small bone structure, but she is very much 5'3, evidenced by a recent reading of The Apartment. Afterwards, she posed with the rest of the actors who had participated, two of which are 5'3"/5'3.5" Mindy Kaling and 5'3.5"/5'4" actor Ken Jeong. She appears to be wearing flats, Mindy, tennis shoes, and Ken is wearing tennis shoes:
Sam said on 13/Jan/12
I think 5'3" is accurate for her
Moke said on 12/Jan/12
Maybe a cm or two shorter than that?
Silent D said on 25/Oct/11
She is 158cm. I saw garden state and six foot jd from scrubs was towering her. She was a little taller than his shoulder. In all her movies she looks short. On letterman, absolutely looked tiny. Very attractive though!
Ginny R. said on 19/Oct/11
5´3 max? That´s why Hayden Christensen got the role in Star Wars instead of Jared Padelecki??
Mr. Tempus said on 16/Oct/11
She is 5'2 at much
said on 11/Oct/11
Natalie cannot be more than 5ft1 or –GENEROUSLY"” 5ft2, if we compare her to her "Black Swan" co-star Mila Kunis, who is around 5ft3– 5ft3.5. Check out this image from "Black Swan": Click Here
This picture is good because you can see both of their feet at the same time, both are standing up pretty straight and they're both wearing flat-heeled shoes-- no boxes to stand on, no heels, no camera tricks. Mila definitely has inches on Natalie"”perhaps around 2 to 3 inches.
If Mila is in the 5ft3.5- 5ft4 range, no way can Natalie cannot be more than 5ft1-5ft2 at the MOST. NO WAY is Natalie 5ft3 or over.
Sean73 said on 9/Oct/11
I just saw black swan and looked the same with 5-3 mila kunis.
klem said on 30/Sep/11
gabriel says on 23/Sep/11
perfect height for me im 5"6 a guy should be 3 -4 inches taller
when more than that i think it looks stupid
Perfect is 5-6 inches. So women can have 3 inch heel advantage and you still be 3 taller.
On the subject, I think she looks 160 cm, just a bit under average she looks in movies.
AJ said on 26/Sep/11
That sems about right. She's an inch shorter than average, although if you were to make an average range, then it'd be 5'3-5'5, so it's a pretty good height.
MsKitty said on 25/Sep/11
I think this is accurate for her....just watched V for Vendetta again and next to 5'10.5 Stephen Rea and 6'2 Hugo Weaving she appears to be about 5'3. There are several shots of Portman standing next to both actors and she is always wearing flats. She is very petite but not as short as some folks seem to think...
gabriel said on 23/Sep/11
perfect height for me im 5"6 a guy should be 3 -4 inches taller
when more than that i think it looks stupid
Phil said on 21/Sep/11
She is not that short. I think she is 159 cm - 161 cm.
I guess 5 foot 3 is accurate.
Mione said on 14/Sep/11
I always thought she looked taller - she has longer legs and a shorter torso, I think. I'm 5'3" and I look WAY shorter (probably because I have shorter legs and a longer torso).
Her height suits her beautifully, though.
bence said on 14/Sep/11
ı think 155-158
whooodini said on 19/Jul/11
looks 5-1 mostly to me
rach123 said on 17/Jul/11
i think she looks taller than 5'3
Sarah said on 15/Jul/11
I'd say either 5"3 or 5"3.25 No higher or lower
Aly said on 8/Jul/11
She's about 5'2 or 5'2.5 because next to a 5'3 Mila Kunis (she's stated this herself, I don't think she would go lower) she's always been a tiny bit shorter. People think she's tinier than that because she's got a very big head - often it's bigger than even people taller than her!!!
Button said on 2/Jul/11
What's with all the massive downgrades on this page? I cannot believe how many people think Natalie Portman is 5'0". Seriously, I don't think she can be that short. If anyone can show me a picture of her looking 5'0" I would like to see it. You know, just a picture of her with someone else whose height we're quite sure of, and where we can see the heel heights as well. For her to be 5'0" she would have to be at least 3.5 inches shorter than the 5'3.5" listed Mila Kunis. There's never a 3.5 inch difference between them, more like 1 inch, so Natalie seems 5'2.5" at the lowest. And I wouldn't even try telling me Mila is 5'1" or something crazy like that, because that is just plain insane. Mila is not that short. If you Google images of her with 5'5" listed Ginnifer Goodwin, they are near the same height, and their heel sizes are similar. 5'4" range for Mila is believable. I can just about see why some people may say 5'2" for Natalie, she does look that on occasions, so fair enough. 5'0" though? That seems so absurd. I hope people aren't downgrading so much for the sake of it. I find it hard to believe all the people who say 5'0" actually think that. Why do so many people on here downgrade so much? How does she look 5'0"? Show me a picture where she looks 5'0" then please. I don't think you will be able to. I don't reckon very many people fully realise what 5'0" looks like. My opinion is Natalie is 5'2.5" (159cm) or 5'3" (160cm), but more likely the latter.
Gareth said on 28/Jun/11
5' or 5'1"
Ariana said on 28/Jun/11
Big downgrade on this one.
burby said on 27/Jun/11
5'1.5" would be my guess.
yoneda said on 27/Jun/11
She really has a very big head compared to her bone structure, maybe just becos she is smart, and a big head makes she look shorter than she really is. i guess she is around 5'3".
Tere said on 22/Jun/11
yes.... she's DEFINATLY shorter than 5'3, if she was that height i don't think people would call her short, tiny like all the time! i think she is like 5'1 or maybe 5'2...
Cindy said on 2/Jun/11
She is not around 5'2! I am 5'2 and I saw her live, she was shorter than me! She's 5', but very well proportioned, that's why she can pass as 5'3...
Mark said on 30/May/11
My guess is around 5'2, maybe a little above. She's shortish, but really not that short. The reason a lot of people think Portman's super tiny is because she's otherwise just very petite- small frame, fine facial features, she's just very delicate-looking. If I just looked at her with no reference point I would think 5'0 or even below. But in reality she's more the short side of average.
Cindy said on 30/May/11
@ 5'8.18758596 LOL what do you mean ''that's more Whiterspoon or Longoria territory''?? Longoria is 5', just like Natalie, and Reese is 5'2, actually taller than Natalie...
Shannon Gray said on 28/May/11
I think she's 5'3, you're right. But that would mean she's my height, and I'm 13 years old.
Kiffy said on 27/May/11
She is not 5'3.
She is clearly much below since she is towered by mila kunis in black swan so she needs to be downgraded.
Lizzy Reed said on 26/May/11
jtm, maybe 5'4/5'5 is average height for females of this generation, which would make Nat slightly under the average height, not dwarf by any means, maybe short compared with the whole 90's generation of tall Hollywood girls, still not THAT small
jtm said on 24/May/11
she calls herself a very short lady. 5'3 is average height for a female.
5'8.18758596 said on 23/May/11
She's small alright, but not "dwarf", that's more Whiterspoon or Longoria territory, plus Natalie is incredibly gorgeous, the thing is that she's usually cast alongside tall men, so she looks consistently short, when she isn't "that" short, since 5'5 is average height for women, how do you expect her to appear "average" next to the mostly tall cast of Thor?? She's below average, maybe kinda petite, but she has the looks to kill anyways. Rob, your thoughts on this?
#% said on 22/May/11
many girls in asia / southern asia are around 5' and they look gorgeous. what is up with those people saying that she has the body of a 10 year old? i think she looks beautiful and def looks like a mature woman.
tall girl said on 18/May/11
sorry people that was wrong i wanted to copy paste that comment in mandy's moore height discussion not here
here people are mean with small girls
tall girl said on 17/May/11
i am also 5 10 and it is so funny reading comments on this side and realizing how racist and insecure a person can be.it is so difficult for some people to accept the diffetent.mandy moore is smoking hot but because she is tall the comments are like-beast,giant,unbelievable,shoking etc.If she was 5 2 the comments would be like how pretty she is and how great are shorties.of course shorties are great but tall girls are fine aslo.i am 1.78 and i am with a 1.90 guy(i had never problem at dating)and my best friend is 1.57(5 2)and we have no problem with that.and i hang around with people at any height,but i would never want to meet persons like @anonymous @M.P. @ dan because they seriously need a psychologist,they are kind of funny.Joker (RIP heath)was right at The Dark Knight--people are mean,veeeery mean.if the comments are from americans,then i guess that the american girls are an average 4 11(i dont say that this is bad)if you think that 5 11 for a girl is THAAAAAT strange,not even in greece,where girls are around 5 feet i havent met so much racism
greek guy said on 17/May/11
dear @ouch you are so funny.''Some of you are so cruel-most tall women can look like trannys''
Stephanie said on 10/May/11
I think she's about 5' or 5'1" - I'm 24 and only 4'9. Many people think I'm anywhere from 12 to 16 years old and I have to sit on cushions to drive, but I'm completely in proportion and not a dwarf at all. There's nothing wrong with being small or petite. Many Asians are smaller as well and no one seems to think anything's wrong with that - so why is it so bad to be short if you're Caucasian?
Cindy said on 1/May/11
I'm 5'2 and saw her at a New York airport 2 years ago and she was in flats, I was in Converse, she was def 5'. I am too offended like ouch, kate and mikey because midgets are under 4'5. It's ridiculous to call her that, she's just short, period.
LA said on 16/Apr/11
Fed - I lied about my height on my driver's license. Nobody checks. I said I'm 5'6", but I'm really 5'5." So I wouldn't put too much weight on a self-reported ID.
LA said on 14/Apr/11
saw her in LA, she's 5'0, pretty, pity she's a midget
said on 14/Apr/11
Her driver's license photo (1999, age 18)
Chameleon said on 13/Apr/11
No she has the body of a child but the face of a model.
At most shes 160cm
ouch said on 9/Apr/11
Some of you are so cruel, shes tiny and in proportion, she looks like a little angel, nothing wrong with being petite if you ask me most tall women can look like trannys.
jasperrrrr said on 4/Apr/11
seems about a foot shorter than ashton kutcher whos 6'2.5 so 5'3 seems perfect
Kate said on 1/Apr/11
there's nothing wrong with her height. most women are near that 5'4 and under mark. she's not a dwarf either. if she lives in LA, then 5'3 would make her pretty normal. many other celebrities aren't very tall either, some just count their height when they're wearing stilettos.
Mikey said on 29/Mar/11
Can I just say I'm offended by everyone calling the 5-foot mark "almost dwarf" territory. That is incredibly offensive and mean-spirited. I know a lot of women around that height and am one myself and I'm tired of people talking about it like it's a disability. And also, what's wrong with being a dwarf?
said on 23/Mar/11
She seems closer to 5f1.5 or 5f2 because she looks the same height as Rosie Perez who claims to only be 5f1.5 Click Here Click Here
Chameleon said on 18/Mar/11
She looks very tiny and scrawney indeed..
Bob said on 8/Mar/11
Whether she is 5' or 5 4" it doesn't change the fact that she normally has the body of a 10 year old boy. Her face is her strength and she was much prettier when she was younger. Maybe motherhood will change that??
Sarah said on 8/Mar/11
Brent, Just of curiosity how tall are you? My husband sucks at estimating height, especially when someone is a lot shorter than him. He's is always off by a few inches. I find it easier to estimate height when it's closer to mine. But everyone is different.
Most people who have met her still estimate her height to be 5' 0" - 5" 2. There will always be some outlier that finds her taller. I'm going with the average.
And seriously what is up with her tiny hands??? In some pictures they look really odd.
Sarah said on 8/Mar/11
Brent, Just of curiosity how tall are you?
And seriously what is up with her tiny hands??? In some pictures they look really creepy!!
Shan said on 6/Mar/11
I would never have guessed she was that small
Brent said on 5/Mar/11
Met her in LAX once. She's around 5'3 or 5'4.
Lindsay said on 2/Mar/11
Everyone who has actually met her in person and has posted on this blog or elsewhere claims she is 5'0"-5'1". I'd trust them over those guestimating via photos. The weirdest thing to me is how tiny her hands look; I recently saw her giving an interview and they looked like the hands of a small child. Creepy.
lisa said on 28/Feb/11
Kara: I know when pictures aren't accurate I do know they also can give a
lisa said on 28/Feb/11
Karen: I know when pictures aren't accurate I do know they also can give a
said on 28/Feb/11
Ok, so pictures aren't that accurate... But this one shows how tiny she is in general. Of course don't use it for it's exactness, but she really looks the size of a child. They are all in flats -- Ashton supposedly 6 1" and ben Larson is about 6 2". Who knows how tall she is, but she looks the height of a child.
lisa said on 20/Feb/11
yes pictures cannot prove heights no matter what it depends on the whether it's the angle, perspective and lighting; all can be inaccurate. people who don't see it though are not "in denial" or "blind." this probably goes for basically all pictures
lisa said on 19/Feb/11
I don't think you are "in denial" or "blind" when looking at pictures differently after all we can't use photos as accurate evidence just like we say
Pear said on 18/Feb/11
Even if she's tiny, she still makes good couple with Ashton Kutcher in "No Strings Attached". =) Kutcher is very tall though.
said on 18/Feb/11
To anonymous: She always has amazing posture so that's no argument...that coupled with her very skinny build is what's making people think she's taller than she is. And I agree with Emma, it is entirely appropriate to judge height on pictures. Here is one of her with ScarJo. ScarJo is supposedly 5'3" and is not wearing heels, while Natalie is and she only looks half an inch taller. At the very least she should be downgraded .5" and if you don't see that, then I'm sorry but you're clearly in denial or blind. Some of yall act like it's this impossible, negative thing that she's tiny, but it's not a bad thing at all. It's just the truth.
Jonathan said on 17/Feb/11
She has the most gorgeous deep brown eyes. I don't care if she is 4 foot. She'd mesmorise me at any height ;-)I'm 6'2" and love short girls.
Emma said on 16/Feb/11
@anonymous: If you can't judge height based on photos, at live award events, or in movies the movies, then all that is left is judging height in person. Most in person meetings describe her as under 5' 3". While some doctor might have told her she is 5'3" at some point, she clearly seems shorter in person-- barely 5' 2". That is saying something!
Anonymous said on 15/Feb/11
Guys stop downgrading her. you cannot be sure he's 5'1' unless you see a photo of her straight posture... I agree with ruth its ridiculous that you guys are using photos as evidence of her height. many times we can look shorter depending on our posture on photos... i dont doubt she is under than 5'3 she doenst look that shorter than mila kunis.
Sarah said on 9/Feb/11
If she looks a foot shorter than Ashton, then either he should be upgraded or she should be downgraded to at least 5' 2.5". Ashton is tall, but you can tell there is at least a foot difference between them.
Sarah said on 9/Feb/11
There is no way she is 5 3". At award shows she is always the shortest one (even in tall shoes). She really should be downgraded. They don't even measure you at the DMV, how in the world could that be considered accurate? Kiera was estimating in her comment, I don't even think kiera is a full 5 7", more likely just shy of it.
Sam said on 7/Feb/11
She does appear to be a solid foot shorter than Ashton Kutcher recently
Jackie said on 26/Jan/11
I'm 5'1 and I'd say Natalie is the same height as me, maybe an inch more at most.
Brad said on 25/Jan/11
100% box work with Ashton in the publicity stills. She's coming in at 5' 9" easy.
anonymous said on 20/Jan/11
She has about the same body type as me, petite, semi-muscular calves, about the same length in limbs when i've seen pictures....she has to be under 5'3... I would say 5'1" or 5'0
Brad said on 18/Jan/11
I'm looking at stills from Ashton & Natalie in her new one...Ivan Reitman (a really funny guy, I met him in '86 at Universal) must have really done some outstanding box work and massive heels with Nat'. I'd love to see his eyes answering how he got that duo in each shot.
Biff Tannen said on 17/Jan/11
She is closer to five feet flat than 5'3". She is almost a midget.
Anonymous said on 16/Jan/11
Natalie claims she's 5'4". I don't think so Natalie.
Anonymous said on 15/Jan/11
I don't understand how she has not been downgraded yet?? She is indisputably shorter than 5'3" Mila Kunis and ScarJo. Seriously downgrade her already.
June said on 11/Jan/11
Met her at Harvard. She is 5'0" or 5'1" tops. Might even be shorter than 5'0". Really, really small and really, really skinny.
Brad said on 11/Jan/11
Friend of mine just met her a few days ago in Palm Springs, she's 5' 1" tops, really small. They really must use boxes with male leads, 5' 1" is so short.
leonari said on 7/Jan/11
5'3" is short enough. She is not tiny tiny.
lisa said on 26/Dec/10
I think when you see someone in person you also have to take account that you may not both be standing completely upright and see what shoes you are wearing. I have good posture and that fools some people who don't
Mila said on 23/Dec/10
I met Natalie in the village one day when I was out getting a tattoo. I went up to her and started choppin it up with her. She was very nice. I am 5'2.5 and she was just a tiny bit below my eye level. So I know for a fact that she isn't 5'3 (my most educated guess would be 5'1.5 - 5'2 at the most. And as for the License thing, that doesn't mean much because I put that I was 5'5 on my license/i.d card. Lol The dmv doesn't check your height.
Cliff said on 18/Dec/10
Natlie is shorter than Scarlett Johansson AND Mila Kunis. How can she possibly be 5ft3? I doubt she's taller than 5ft1.
said on 17/Dec/10Click Here
Shorter at least 2 inches than Mila Kunis who claims to be 5'4.
Bon said on 7/Dec/10
5'1 or little over that
kay said on 28/Nov/10
lisa said on 22/Nov/10
Ruth: you are absolutely right and I totally agree-you can't use pictures for comparison or evidence of height. so many celebs on this site are said to be certain heights just because of pictures in comments but a lot of people don't know these facts. I am glad you explained it like you did and brought it out in the open.
said on 22/Nov/10
Obviously photos cannot be used as absolute evidence, but they're great if you'd like a little perspective.
Case in point:
with Ashton, Click Here
with tall friend, Click Here
While no definitive height can be determined based on these photos, I can plainly see that she is rather short.
ruth said on 1/Nov/10
In a general sense from seeing her in videos, movies, etc., she appears extremely short... and I think shorter than 5'3". However, on another note, it's ridiculous that people use photos as evidence of height. Firstly, photos do not record accurate height comparison consistently, as you cannot see accuracy with the perspective and angle in most shots. Example, I found photos of her and Bernal when they were dating. Some photos make it appear that they are the same height and others show that he is quite a few inches taller, even from the same group of photos. Also, you are assuming the published heights of others in the photos are accurate. Most celebrities and models have inflated height stats because it's needed to appear more attractive in the industry. Most ppl in the industry are actually significantly shorter than what the general public believes. Bottom line: stop using photos as evidence. It just doesn't work.
Nat said on 25/Jun/09
Generaly, girls between 5'1 and 5'2 say they're 5'3... I'm around 5'1 1/2 but can get away with 5'3 because I'm not overly small-boned.
Francophile said on 5/Jun/09
I used to be a buyer for Barneys New York, and Natalie Portman is incredibly beautiful but TINY! I do NOT think she is taller than 5'1, and I still believe she could be 5'0. She is stunning in beauty, in her thinness and her very small stature.
teddy89 said on 17/May/09
in closer there's a moment when she's barefoot and close to judd law (5-9). Judd came from outside so he wears shoes and when they talk i think there's a difference of 8 inches more or less. If we consider judd law shoes (probably 1 inch) i think she could be 5'1''. No way 5'3''!! if she was 5'3'' then judd law was surely 6'1 or even 6'2! (impossible)
FiveOne said on 11/May/09
I still agree with my original posting. Natalie is 5'2".
To beverage bird: Have you heard of the Shroud of Turin? It's the buriel cloth of Jesus. When scientists examined the image on it (of Jesus), the figure was roughly 6 feet in height. Remember, Jesus was a carpenter before he began preaching. Back then, you had to be a pretty big guy and strongly built to have worked in that profession.
Shorty said on 8/May/09
Hmm... I just saw the pictures of Natalie Portman giving Bjork a prize (award?) and they look the same height to me. I think Natalie is around 5'4" or 5'3". She has a small frame and she can look quite petite, but by no means is she really short. People with small frames tend to look slight. For example, although many people think she was "small", Audrey Hepburn was roughly 5'7".
I'm short, sadly, I would have loved to be taller (or as pretty as Natalie). I'm 5'0... or maybe I'm really 4'11". Fortunately, Joan of Arc was 4'11" so at least there are other people my height.
anon said on 30/Apr/09
She could have grown by then. Some girls, if they're late bloomers, can grow past 21 OR 22 (if they're lucky). That happened to me, and now I'm about 5' 5" (Just like Natalie, I was around 5' 3
Anonymous said on 26/Apr/09
She is at least 5 inches shorter than Ewan McGregor (reference-Mtv movie awards), and she is really puny in real life. 5ft 1" seems about right.
PS: Sorry - I have a great pic with her and Ewan, but I do not know how to link:(
internet gypsy said on 26/Apr/09
You people can not contemplate one actress' height in comparison to others alongside her on screen. When she's conveying a character, she has to assume all features of that character (including height), which production crews skew by camera angles, shoes, and pedestals even.
natalie said on 20/Apr/09
i think she is shorter than 5ft3. i saw v for vendetta and she was so tiny next to hugo weaving.
Anonymous said on 17/Apr/09
I saw her face to face in Harvard Square about 7 years ago. I was 6'2 at the time and she was at least a full foot shorter than me. She didn't look any taller than 5'1 in regular shoes. This was in the late afternoon so I will assume she shrunk an inch. I think in platforms she is probably 5'3 but no way is she 5'3 barefoot, even in the morning.
Stephanie said on 16/Apr/09
Wow. I must say I am surprised at these comments attacking people for discussing height. This website is called celebHEIGHTs.com. If you don't want to talk about height or discuss height with people, why are you here?
BOT- I think Natalie is 5' 3", maybe a little shorter. ;)
Alexis said on 5/Apr/09
I've always thought she was 5'1''-5'2'' TOPS. Whenever I've read an interview of her, the reporter always comments on how small she is. I don't think they would be saying that if she measured only one inch below average height. And anyway, look at her in garden state. zach braff, who is listed here at 6'0'' looks at least 10 inches taller than her, if not more. She is really teeny. Just goes to show good things come in small packages!
Bambi said on 26/Mar/09
Why are all these actresses so small?! Can't they get bigger men? It is known that the average height of an actor is 5"8. Whoa - thats short because I'm 6'2 and I'm a girl (well, 19) and its so hard to find tall men! They always go for short women!
shahid said on 9/Mar/09
lol i put 6'4 on my liscence when i'm really 6'2, portman looks only 5'1 most of the time, she's very small looking
mark said on 10/Feb/09
That is exactly what we are doing here, debating the lies the media throws (and celebs) at us.
You say we are trying to say being tall is the most beautiful?? Please. Obviously you didn't read much, and you must be short, bitter, and very insecure to jump into such a conclusion. That is really too bad.
runt said on 14/Jan/09
kitten says on 7/Jan/09
"i just came across this site and all i can say is: you are all brainwashed losers! who cares about how tall someone is?? you all act like being tall makes someone beautiful. woman come in all shapes and sizes."
Obviously you've just run accross this site. If you think that people on this site think that tall=beautiful then obviously you haven't read much on this site.
beverage bird said on 12/Jan/09
Jesus could not have been much more than about 5'1" to 5'4". The average height man back then in Israel was 5'1", and that one time when the Romans were looking for him but he hid by blending into the crowd at a bazaar proves he couldn't be that much taller than average.
Bunny said on 10/Jan/09
All the people who say that being interested on peoples height, especially celebrities, is stupid and ridiculous, I'd just like to say that that is unfair And untrue. We see celebrities all the time on tv and In the media, but we rarely get to meet them so it's interesting to know how they would compare to ourselves in stature, we often build these people up in our minds till they seem unreal but if you meet them in person you realize they're just normal
People...frankly I'd like to know how tall
kitten said on 7/Jan/09
i just came across this site and all i can say is: you are all brainwashed losers! who cares about how tall someone is?? you all act like being tall makes someone beautiful. woman come in all shapes and sizes. there isn't one height or body shape (curvy to thin) that makes someone perfect. if you want to believe that models are ideal than you are limiting yourself. if everyone was tall and thin, there would be no variety in the world. soon people like you would be talking about how big their feet are or finding other stupid things (that aren't important) to judge them by. it's hard enough for woman to feel attractive without people analyzing their height too!! get over it!! btw natalie portman is gorgeous!! her height is prfect for her. it's part of who she is. as if any of you wouldn't want to look like her or date her!!
Anonymous21 said on 2/Jan/09
i thought she was 5ft 6!! She is taller than Scarlett Johansson, in the movie it looks like she is taller by 2 to 2.5 inches.
Anonymous said on 2/Jan/09
shes never 5 ft 3! a lot of stars who are about the 5 ft3 range seems to look taller than natalie do. so i guess 5 ft 1 is right
anonymous said on 1/Jan/09
I made up my mind villie, she's a short looking 5 foot 2.
alex said on 30/Dec/08
in star wars she does look kind of tiny together with hayden christensen who is 6.1 feet tall (185cm)
Ville said on 11/Dec/08
"She is tiny. I would say she's five foot max. Maybe she grew since than. How old is she anyway? Maybe she grew since than. I would say five foot 2 seems reasonable."
L0L. Make up your mind.
anonymous said on 8/Nov/08
I just watched garden state a few days ago and she was up to zach braff's shoulder. She is tiny. I would say she's five foot max. Maybe she grew since than. How old is she anyway? Maybe she grew since than. I would say five foot 2 seems reasonable.
FiveOne said on 27/Sep/08
5'2". And I doubt that was the actual Natalie Portman. Isn't it amusing how most celebs lie about their height? Hollywood brainwashes them.
MIA said on 20/Sep/08
Yup, driver licenses are not good references. Mine says I am 5'6" when I am actually 5'4" lol
I bet Nathalie Portman is only 5'1", 5'2" tops.
d said on 17/Sep/08
who cares what it says on her drivers license? you can write whatever you want on there. no one measures you at the dmv. my mom has a friend who is no taller than 5'1 but she wrote down that she's 5'4 on her drivers license. haha
so yeah, doesn't mean anything.
i'm guessing she's 5 ft - 5'1 based on how small she still looks in heels. 5'2 is still really small so that's the tallest she could be, but even at 5'2, with 3 - 4 inch heels you can be 5'5 - 5'6 which is almost on the tall side for a girl and she never looks tall next to other people in photos
Jaime said on 16/Sep/08
Lol, this is the internet. You are all idiots if you think that is seriously Natalie Portman. No celebrity would use their real name on any site, since nobody would believe them. Christ.
Anyways, I was watching Project Runway and she was on the last episode (september 8th). I am POSITIVE she has to be at the most 5'2", because I am 5'2" and she looks even smaller than myself.
Brad said on 27/Aug/08
That's kinda true, she would know how to use grammar. Mark Hamill isn't 5' 9". I wonder if she knows about the Portman boots?
G-MANN said on 26/Aug/08
I think I'm too cynical to believe that really was Natalie Portman, but if that it actually is her, how mean spirited!
runt said on 22/Aug/08
Must be a Star Wars thing. I remember Mark Hamill once chimed in on the Mark Hamill page claiming 5-9 and said you can measure him if you want. Mark wrote his name properly though.
BD said on 22/Aug/08
Yeah, that's so not Natalie Portman. NP: (1) probably would have typed her name properly (i.e. "Natalie Portman" and not "natalieportman"), (2) arguably capitalized the "G" in "Googled," and (3) definitely avoided that last comma splice.
Brad said on 15/Aug/08
Remember Nat, he's Supermamun in disguise.
Mamun said on 14/Aug/08
Natalie if this is really you then I would love to offer my sincere friendship
to you ! You can see my pictures in many places in this site ! I do pray you
will kindly accept ?
Brad said on 14/Aug/08
She's a midgit. She signs autographs for eBay dealers thinking they are fans. 87% of her autographs sold on the market are fakes as well. She can't get an A role with a 5' 10"+ actor unless they put her on a box like they did with Madonna at Warner Bros. on a closed set with Warren Beatty. Beatty had 10" on her. Even Dustin Hoffman made Port look small and I was taller than him at age 13 meeting him.
miko said on 14/Aug/08
Portman is yet another actor who thinks that they are something special, call someone a pathetic individual in the street Natalie and you'd be flat on your back. If you were an A class actor I'd have more respect for you, but your just a D Class has been midget.
Brad said on 13/Aug/08
Hey Nat, I'm a sad pathetic individual but I'm not as sad and pathetic as people making "living" standing in front of hotels waiting for you to sign stuff to sell on eBay cause they have little education to do anything else in their sad lives. You are 5' 2" and a cool doo.
natalieportman said on 12/Aug/08
I was googling myself and am very surprised to find this message board filled with sad, pathetic individuals spending their petty little lives discussing my height. I won't reveal my real height here because it would only vindicate the disgusting conversation that is taking place. I just want to say please stop wasting your time discussing my height, it really doesn't matter.
Anonymous said on 9/Aug/08
i forgot to mention that she is very pretty & looks the same in person as on the movie screen, but just small.
Anonymous said on 9/Aug/08
i saw natalie at ralphs near l.a., she's very small. i'm 5'10 and have a daughter 5'2 & she seems to be about that height or shorter. i'd guess she's
runt said on 24/Jul/08
jln747 says on 3/Jul/08
"i always thought she was 5'8'' because she's so skinny and pretty. learning that she's my height and looks so beautiful is a great thing for me. i hate being short."
Let me guess...your not a Star Wars fan. Because if you were, with your 5-8 estimate, Hayden Christiansen would be 6-6, Sam Jackson and Jimmy Smitz would be 6-8 or 6-9. Why are they acting when the NBA could use all three of them? =)
jln747 said on 3/Jul/08
i always thought she was 5'8'' because she's so skinny and pretty. learning that she's my height and looks so beautiful is a great thing for me. i hate being short.
Mattiew_- said on 18/May/08
She seems shorter than 5'3 to me ...
If she says 5'3 then she must be around 5'2 for sure ...
Amanda said on 17/May/08
Oh, please, I really believe she might be just 5'-5'1. 5'3 would be average (think on Julianne Moore) and she's described (by others and by herself) as short.
hamawyn said on 8/May/08
i think she looks hot and being a petite makes her cute too. she must be around 160cm.
Amanda said on 7/Apr/08
Natalie's height = 5'1 - 5'1.5. I went to school with her a few years ago at Harvard. We were in the same psych class. i'm 5'3 and she was significantly shorter. everyone always commented on how small she was - but i dont think it bothered her a bit. she's very slim too. sweet girl.
said on 13/Mar/08
she was about a 1/2 inch taller than Jason Schwartzman (who is 5'5) in Hotel Chevalier...but she was wearing huge heels - 4 + inches. I'd say her listing here is not far off - but maybe she's more like 5'2-5'2.5.
here she is with Schwartzman at a premiere. she's wearing 3.5-4 inch heels and he is in runners. he's definitley at least an inch or 2 taller...Click HereClick Here
I also think the pictures with 5'4 Scarlett Johansson prove that Natalie is more than an inch shorter, most likely 2 or more inches shorter.
Have you thought about down grading her a little bit Editor Rob?
anon said on 8/Mar/08
Natalie is 5'0" to 5'1". She's very very very small in real life. Saw her at Columbia university a few years back when she gave the speech on campus.
Scott said on 6/Mar/08
Glen are you 5"3 yourself? Why do look as short as her in this pic?
Lucia said on 3/Mar/08
i agree with you - i think Portman is probably 5'1.5
said on 1/Mar/08
in the Berlin Film Festival, they were pretty much wearing similar heels, i doubt Scarlet is 5'4...shes prolly 5'2-5'3 and portman looks about 1" to 2" shoter...so i wud say natalie is prolly 5'1 and scarlet 5'3Click Here
Magda said on 25/Feb/08
anne boylen is supposed to be taller than mary, so they probably made it look that way in the movie...but the evidence on this page (expecially where Scarlett is in flats and Nat in heels and Scar is only about an inch shorter) all points to Natalie being shorter. She must be 5'2 to Scarlett's 5'4.
sandy said on 24/Feb/08
she's not taller than scarlett. she's probably 5'1-5'2...it's called "movie magic" they can make anyone look taller!
A said on 18/Feb/08
She's 5'1"/5'0". Scarlett is 5'4" and looks 3 inches taller than Natalie in those pics, looking like they are wearing similar heels.
Lyndsay said on 16/Feb/08
judging by the evidence with Scarlett Johansson - I'd say Portman is 5'2!
said on 16/Feb/08
Looking a good deal shorter than Scarlett Johansson Click Here
MissK said on 15/Feb/08
I just checked the photos again, and Scarlett was wearing flats.. I'm sorry I didn't noticed earlier..
So that would mean they are about equally tall.. maybe scarlett is half an inch taller...
I think you got it pretty correctly :)
said on 15/Feb/08
There's a picture of her and Scarlett Johanson on Click Here
(front page on 15th, something about their upcoming(?) movie, and Natalie is clearly taller than 5ft3.75 Scarlett. Either, she has bigger heels (which I doubt) or Scarlett is shorter, say 5ft2.5, or Natalie is taller, but I clearly doubt it.
By the way, that picture is so great. Natalie is adorable, and Glenn, you look real good aswell (fun, but good :) )
Anita said on 15/Feb/08
new pictures just surfaced of her with Scarlett Johansson at one of their Boylen Girls movie premires. Scarlett is in flat shoes and Natalie is in 3 inch heels. Natalie is 1 inch taller than Scarlett. So if Scarlett is 5'4, and Natalie is 5'5 and i inch taller in her in her 3 inch heels, she must be 5'2 without them! Case Solved! I'll try to find pics!
yawn said on 10/Feb/08
She's 5'0"/5'1"...saw her in real life
Jane doe said on 22/Jan/08
I didn't think she was 5'3" because she always looked an awfull lot shorter then her ex Gael Garcia Bernal but standing next to 5'8" Glen she doesn't look to short. Also Glen shouldn't lean so much so we can get a better idea of how tall she is.
Anonymous said on 10/Jan/08
lol 5'5 is average height for a girl
just so everyone gets a clue
5'3 isn't that much closer to average height than 5'2
Anonymous said on 6/Dec/07
"Thats a load of crap. Idiot. I saw her recently, and just because she's quite thin it doesn't make her anorexic."
Well considering I said she LOOKS anorexic, and I never said she is anorexic....get a clue and learn how to read.
And yes, she is anorexic looking in real life. I doubt you saw her. She came to UC Berkeley...where did you supposedly see her anyway,you liar.
laina said on 3/Dec/07
i'm 5'2 and when i went to get my drivers license, they put me down as 16cms or 5'3. it's because i was wearing thicker sneakers and they rounded up. i suspect the saem happened with portman - she's so petite, 5'2 MAX
Anonymous said on 23/Nov/07
"She looks anorexic in real life"
Thats a load of crap. Idiot. I saw her recently, and just because she's quite thin it doesn't make her anorexic.
And she is about 5", 5'1"
Anonymous said on 12/Nov/07
Ditto, I go to UC Berkeley as well...Natalie is short and very, very thin in real life. It's amazing how the camera really does add 10 pounds. She looks anorexic in real life, and she's probably 5'1" or so.
T said on 27/Oct/07
I saw her at my university, UC BERKELEY about a month ago when she went to our campus. She's EXTREMELY thin and very short in real life. I'd say she's 5'2" WITH heels, so maybe 5' and less than 100 pounds. She's very, very skinny in real life.
said on 26/Oct/07
The person referenced to in this article (Click Here
) described her as:
"Beautiful and TINY: at around 5 feet and 100 lbs, The Franimal astutely observed the petite starlet was so slight, she looked as if she belonged inside of a jewelry box."
Tess said on 20/Oct/07
she wasnt 16 or 17 in that picture...she was like 23/24/25
HAAA said on 4/Oct/07
anonymos thts not necessarily true . i'm tall and i'm graceful. but ya i am clumsy :P lol. but thts cuz when u have long limbs u knock everything over. especailly legs. :S i trip over my legs quit a bit lol.
glenn said on 28/Sep/07
i was walking by madison square garden and i bumped into her.about a year and a half ago.