How tall is Nathan Jones

Nathan Jones Height

6ft 10 (208.3 cm)

Australian actor and wrestler known for appearing in Mad Max: Fury Road. In a WWE interview referred to himself "Here's a 6-foot-10 guy running through 2,000 people" and on his facebook mentioned his weight, saying "I'm 6 foot 10" and 350 pounds"

How tall is Nathan Jones
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of Kevin Nash
Kevin Nash
6ft 9 (206 cm)
Height of Tyler Mane
Tyler Mane
6ft 7 (201 cm)
Height of Tom Hardy
Tom Hardy
5ft 9 (175 cm)
Height of Hafthor Julius Bjornsson
Hafthor Julius Bjornsson
6ft 7 ¾ (203 cm)

Add a Comment566 comments

Average Guess (79 Votes)
6ft 9.52in (207.1cm)
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 3/Nov/18
At worst 6'8 1/4 with 6'0 1/2 Michael Jai White. Thought 6'9 at first but took more look 6'8 1/2 would be max.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 20/Oct/18
Undertaker today is 6ft6 1/2 nathan was 2.5inches taller 6ft8 1/2 barefoot.
FMExTREME said on 10/Oct/18
Jones doesn't look 6'10 at all at any time, a peak Nash was around 6'10 and you can just tell he rwally is a giant, Jones doesn't give that impression, I'd say even today Nash would Jones, 6'8 max.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 6/Sep/18
If Nathan Jones is only 6'7 then Conan Stevens would be 6'7 3/4. Actors like Stephen Merchant will be 6'5 flat.
Xpac99 said on 29/Aug/18
I think Rob that 6ft 10 for jones is too much... ok is taller than Morgan 1 inch or more but the first mistake in my opinion is that Morgan is rank taller than he is . Morgan looks very tall but when came face to face with a Train i didn’t see much different...
Click Here
While for nathan wasn’t taller in my opinion than Nash and i show you this two videos
Click Here
Click Here
What do you think ?
I think your guess of height for Morgan and nathan is too much because you didn’t compared them with others but only looking them in the ring... but of course i can be wrong
Sotiris Gravas said on 24/Aug/18
The dude is around 6'7".

Here he is w/ Arnie... Click Here

Here w/ Luke Gallows... Click Here


@Xpac99 Great pic.

@Rob Based on Xpac99's pic alone, why is Jones still at a crazy listing like 6'10"...? The word laughable comes to mind. Look at the match between him and Kurt Angle. Angle looked like a giant.

P.S. If Jones is 6'7", Matt Morgan is 100% 6'6". In a word: downgrade.
Xpac99 said on 17/Aug/18
Click Here
With 6ft 6 heideraich you still think that nathan jones was 6 ft 10 ?
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 27/Jun/18
Consider a long head and face features than Michael Jai White i did give 6'9 don't think he look over it. 6'9.5" measure in the morning and 6'10 out of bed.
YL07 said on 27/May/18
Hey Rob. I honestly think Nathan Jones could be closer to 6'9" than his 6'10" claim. In his MMA career, he was listed at 6'9" Click Here. Seeing with all the segments when he was working for the WWE w/ The Undertaker, A-Train (who I feel looks to be around 6'7"), Big Show, Matt Morgan etc. He definitely looks he has almost a 2" advantage over The Undertaker here Click Here, and also looks Nathan Jones might have a slight edge over Matt Morgan (either 0.5 - 1 in advantage over Matt Morgan) Click Here. I definitely think he could be closer to 6'9" than 6'10". Do you agree Rob?
Editor Rob
6ft 9.5 is possible
tree said on 11/May/18
But Nathan is looking down,if he would look straight ahead he would be 6ft9,i can buy that for him,but 6ft10 looks too much.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 6/May/18
I found out Nathan Jones atually claim his wrestling billed height at both 6'10-6'11. More i at look Jones i figure he look just fine at 6'8.5" nothing over it next to 6'0.5" Michael Jai White which some people even guessing lower between 6'0-6'0.25" range. At some point i can see a flat 204cm for Jones maybe not less.

Click Here: This is how they look in difference at most 8". 204cm vs 184cm.
Slim said on 15/Apr/18
Looks an inch taller than taker maybe. Click Here
5'12 said on 12/Feb/18
@raju
Kurt Angle said that Benoit was 5’8”.
Paddy said on 8/Feb/18
I think this guy is 6'8" tops. He didn't look that much taller than Koji Kitao who is around 6'6".
Yas said on 4/Feb/18
Heights given in fights are regularly wrong.
Logan said on 2/Feb/18
About 6'9" little taller than Morgan who is about 6'8" at the least
niceguy82 said on 22/Jan/18
Click Here Here barefoot match. Stats say 6'9 and nowhere near 6'11 that's for sure.
raju said on 20/Jan/18
How tall is chris benoit?Click Here
Cameron said on 17/Nov/17
Been watching him a bit lately and I think he is or was 6'9 maybe 6'8 1/2 barefoot certainly no less than that he has long legs and average torso.
Edimar1.84 said on 2/Nov/17
6ft9, needs a downgrade.
Anonymous said on 31/Oct/17
He does not loook 6ft10 Click Here
Canson said on 29/Oct/17
@Junior: I thought 6’9.5 at first but maybe that is more of what he really is today 6’8.5-6’9 Chris Webber height
JJAK said on 28/Oct/17
Can we get a peak height I believe he has lost an inch from early 90s.
He looked less huge in mad max maybe 6 9 or 8 even.
Peak should be this 6 10 fing huge dude and funny should do comedy :#.
Supermanfan380 said on 17/Oct/17
This one has always been hard to pin down. Part of the issue as with all wrestling is camera distance in the ring as well as footwear can vary by a whole 2". Nathan is certainly one of the tallest non-acromegalic giants the WWE has had in the last 40 years.
Junior said on 14/Oct/17
@mrtguy said on 3/Aug/17
Rob, 6'9'' seems more realistic than 6'10'', Big Show had over 2 inches

Totally agree. He did look about 2" shorter than a peak Big Show and comparing a peak Big Show next to 7'0 Shaquille O'neal i did say Big Show at most 6'11 peak and Nathan Jones maybe 6'9 or worst 6'8.75".
mrtguy said on 3/Aug/17
Rob, 6'9'' seems more realistic than 6'10'', Big Show had over 2 inches
even said on 27/Jul/17
both his claims about his height and his weight are legit
chris said on 25/Jul/17
Next to Big Show he looked 6'9 at most. He also seems to be an inch taller than Undertaker, who was 6'8 at the time.
even said on 7/Jul/17
morning = 6'10"
night = 6'9.5"
S.J.H said on 6/Jun/17
Not over one foot taller than 5'9 tom hardy
Bard said on 2/Jun/17
He's around Durant's height. Durant can give a taller impression because of his obviously thinner build.
Logan said on 29/May/17
He is 6,9.5-6,10
mrtguy said on 23/May/17
Rob, you really think there's a 0.5 half inch between him and Big Show seems likely more face to face, tall to tall in person??
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/May/17
Hard to say really they could have been closer than we think
James B said on 24/Apr/17
Rob if this guy edged out a peak Nash would that rule out a peak of 6'10 for Kevin?
Bwin said on 22/Apr/17
This needs to be downgraded to 6'9.
miko said on 19/Apr/17
He never looked close to 6'10 with Big Show.
Supermanfan380 said on 19/Apr/17
And sure enough... right when I think I have evidence that there wasn't much difference with Jones and Magnus, then I find this video where Magnus claims that Jones was about 10cm taller than himself, and that is about 4" inches. It's the second video on this site: Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Apr/17
Rob, do you think this guy would edge out a young Nash?
Editor Rob: it's arguable, sometimes he can give off a bigger impression than Nash did, but you never know - they might have measured within half inch
Supermanfan380 said on 18/Apr/17
I wouldn't be shocked one bit if the 6'10" for Nathan is actually his morning height. On reviewing the Magnus vs. Nathan Jones arm wrestling match it's important to see what they look like, at the top of their heads, when both are standing upright. There actually is not a big difference there. Looks like roughly 1" to 2" between them.

Part of why Nathan looks profoundly bigger in overall size is because he had far more muscle on his frame at that time. Nathan was 340 while Magnus only weighed about 275 back then.

Then add to that how Magnus technique involved dropping himself lower than the table. He is literally trying to get his center of gravity as low as possible.

The second part of the vid, right before the arm break, Magnus is low and leaned away from the camera. Nathan is leaning a lot further toward the camera.

So we get an illusion of Nathan being like half a foot taller, but just is not the case. Sure Nathan is taller, but we are talking only a couple inches.

It would have been interesting to see the two compared once Magnu himself was up around 350 pounds.
Chris said on 5/Mar/17
Nathan Jones is at least 1.5 inches taller than the Undertaker. There is a noticeable difference.

And remember, Nathan is completely bald. Hair adds at least 0.5 inches to your height.

If you shaved Matt Morgan's head, he'd look smaller. I promise you. You're giving Matt Morgan an inch in height that is just his hair!

That's a real important point. Remember guys like Nathan Jones, The Rock and Hulk Hogan are bald. And you're comparing them, often, to guys with big heads of hair.

Believe me, if you shave your head you'd lose at least 0.5 inches in height
Yas said on 4/Mar/17
MMA listing are always accurate lol.
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 25/Feb/17
Nobody said on 3/May/16
Here he is competing in his first and only MMA fight at the first Pride event, he is barefoot as was listed at 6'9 Click Here

************************************************************************************************



Exactly, 6ft9" barefoot, no taller than that next to Taker, Big Show and Matt Morgan for sure.

6ft10in in footwear only
Sean said on 21/Feb/17
Not sold that Nathan is 6'10". Only 1/2 inch taller than 6'8.5" Matt Morgan. Looked 1 1/2 inches taller than Undertaker (6'7.5")in 2003. Also there are pics with NFL turned wrestler Jon Heidenreich out there with Nathan, and Jon is listed at 6'5" by the NFL. 6'9" fits at this point.
Yas said on 24/Jan/17
I've only seen two pics from that movie and Nathan looks noticeable taller in one of them.
S.J.H said on 21/Jan/17
Nope. He is at most 6'9 and check him out with tom hardy and a thai movie he starred. 205-206cm not over
josh jeffords said on 1/Nov/16
Gigantic guy has been billed everywhere from 6 8 to over 7.
To be honest anything over 6 8 is freaking huge also dude carries ton of muscle on him.
He likely is shrinking and those weights are not helping.
He looked 7 ft in first strike but Jackie Chans height was inflated take him down to 5 8 and Nate is 6 10 prime.
Actually he looked even bigger against Jet li but his is likely under 5 8..
Must be fun finding clothes and shoes or a car to fit in..
S.J.H said on 18/Oct/16
Absolute highest 6'9.25 generous, his big frame doesn't seem to help him look 6'10
miko said on 14/Oct/16
Big Show had too much height on this guy for him to be a flat 6'10.

6'9/6'9.25 range IMO, barely taller than 6'8.5 Matt Morgan.
joe### said on 1/Oct/16
kevin nash peak in my opinion was higher than Nathan Jones
S.J.H said on 27/Sep/16
No way nathan is 4 inches taller than 6'6 bruce spence. Look every bit of 6'9 next to tom hardy
Fern194cm-192cm said on 2/Sep/16
I do believe that 6,9.5 is right on the money for jones in mid day. What do you think Rob?
Sean said on 25/Aug/16
Rob, do you think a downgrade is possible for Nathan? Maybe 6'9"-6'9.25"? In 2003 only looked 1-2 inches taller than Underaker who was probably peak 6'7.5" at the time. In addition I only felt he was 1/2 inch taller than Matt Morgan also. Unless Matt Morgan is taller than 6'8.5"?
Canson said on 17/Aug/16
@heightchecker34: well said that 6'10 is a lot but 6'7 honestly is pushing it IRL. No benefit to being that tall and not being a pro athlete. ive noticed even legit 196 and 197 guys while the latter may round to 6'6 never say 6'7 unless they were former athletes themselves.
heightchecker34 said on 8/Aug/16
I'll give Nathan Jones the 6'10 listing... with that height and physique, that's just freaky strong. I selfishly would love to be in that body, imagine what you could do. I doubt anyone picks on him, he has an intimidating presence, not to mention he has already been in prison so he knows how to take care of himself. I think a lot of women would be still be attracted to a guy like that, he is strong, brawny, essentially a man's man. My perfect height is 6'7, so its still in the extremely tall range, 6'10 is admittedly pushing it. Too bad his run in WWE didn't really pan out, its a shame would could have been.
Canson said on 3/Aug/16
Rampage's estimate is legit. He does look like he could overtake Nash these days. I can see him as maybe 210 out of bed 207 at his lowest and NAsh 208 205 at his lowest
James B said on 23/Jul/16
I think his 6ft10 claim is probably in shoes
Alex said on 9/Jul/16
Rob, Google listed him as 213 cm, like Shaquille O'Neal. Another generous listing of Google?
Editor Rob: he only claims 6ft 10, so anything more is a bit like a wrestling listing.

It's like listing alberto del rio 196cm and Colin Salmon 193cm.

There's about 2-2.5 inches between those guys in person, in Colin's favour of course.
James B said on 22/Jun/16
Actually rampage I'd say Jones and Nash would measure very close today.

Nathan himself could be 6'8.5 now aged 45 and 6'8.75 12 years ago.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Jun/16
I believe he'd measure taller than Nash today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jun/16
"Nathan Jones's Height is 6ft 9½in (207.01cm)"


Alternatively 6ft9¼ or 6ft9¾ are also feasible. Maybe not a full 6ft10 but not 6ft9 flat either. He looks noticeably taller than 6ft7-8 range guys.
Sam said on 27/May/16
Yeah, I think he looks more 6'9" range than 6'10" such as in Fury Road.
Slim said on 22/May/16
Canson said it best
Nobody said on 3/May/16
Here he is competing in his first and only MMA fight at the first Pride event, he is barefoot as was listed at 6'9 Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Apr/16
I can believe somewhere between 6ft9-10 for Jones (similar range to a peak Kevin Nash I'd imagine). Not under 6ft9 though.
James B said on 25/Apr/16
Jones looked taller than undertaker in there segements (taker might have not been over 6'7 at that point)

My opinions on team lesnars heights

Nathan Jones 6'8.75
Matt Morgan 6'8.5
Big Show 6'11.75 (peak 7'0)
Brock Lesnar 6'2.25
A-Train 6'5 (not far of 6'8 in thick wrestling boots)
Sean said on 22/Apr/16
2003 Team Lesnar (WWE), barefoot heights:
Nathan Jones 6'9"
Matt Morgan 6'8.5"
Big Show 6'11.75" (Peak 7'0.5")
Brock Lesnar 6'2"
A-Train 6'6"
joe### said on 16/Apr/16
6'8.75 seemed to look it in Pride
Johno said on 15/Apr/16
I don't remember him being taller than Taker.
mrtguy said on 14/Apr/16
Nathan Jones is 6'9'' IMO, but can get a taller impression because of his build
S.J.H said on 8/Apr/16
Tom hardy make nathan jones look like a decent weak 6'9 - 6'8.75
Canson said on 5/Apr/16
I have to agree with MD and 184.3cm. I wouldn't want to be 6'10 nor do I "care" about towering over others. 6'10 has to be an awful quality of life. No normal I modded vehicle fits someone that tall "comfortably" you just get by in SUVs from what I've seen. Not practical. Lol have to disagree with you Rampage. You're a very very good height as is compared to Jones and still edge most. 6'4 flat (while clothes shopping may be a bit more challenge for u than a 6' or 6'1 guy, is still manageable). I'm only about 1/2" or so taller than you at 6'4.5 my normal afternoon low if no gym, compression.

Ice: TBH you speak complete utter nonsense. And Thomas and MD is right, you are coming across as insecure. What do you mean 6'1 is average? It's tall and is practical tall. It looks average because so many 5'11 guys claim it when they aren't. That is the real issue here. Too many people claim shoes, lie, etc. 6'1 also looks abnormal when a guy who measures 6' for most of the day claims an "out of bed 6'1". even a proper 5'11 is relatively tall and is a great height. A legit 5'11 guy in good footwear can pull off a weak 6' almost with ease. Don't see why people don't just claim what they are rather than lying. 6'-6'1 are comfortable tall.
Canson said on 5/Apr/16
I have to agree with MD and 184.3cm. I wouldn't want to be 6'10 nor do I "care" about towering over others. 6'10 has to be an awful quality of life. No normal I modded vehicle fits someone that tall "comfortably" you just get by in SUVs from what I've seen. Not practical. Lol have to disagree with you Rampage. You're a very very good height as is compared to Jones and still edge most. 6'4 flat (while clothes shopping may be a bit more challenge for u than a 6' or 6'1 guy, is still manageable). I'm only about 1/2" or so taller than you at 6'4.5 my normal afternoon low if no gym, compression.

Ice: TBH you speak complete utter nonsense. And MD is right, you are coming across as insecure about your height. What do you mean 6'1 is average? It's tall and is practical tall. It looks average because so many 5'11 guys claim it when they aren't. That is the real issue here. Too many people claim shoes, lie, etc. 6'1 also looks abnormal when a guy who measures 6' for most of the day claims an "out of bed 6'1". even a proper 5'11 is relatively tall and is a great height. A legit 5'11 guy in good footwear can pull off a weak 6' almost with ease. Don't see why people don't just claim what they are rather than lying. 6'-6'1 are comfortable tall.
184.3cm (Night) said on 2/Apr/16
Its more a matter of opinion. I can tell you one thing i would never want to be a solid 6'10". My co-worker is pushing 6'11" and even doing the most rundimentary things is a struggle for him. They had to special order his clothes and shoes as well and give him his own modified car. So he has leg room...two other guys in the office use the car as well.

I get it some people want to be really tall but its too much in everyday life.

To me 6'6"-6'7" is the end of comfort with around 6'4" being the perfect height if you want to call it that. 6'3" being also good.
Thomas6ft1 said on 1/Apr/16
@Ice
You sound psychotic and top of that you have insecurity issues and inferiority complex.
MD said on 1/Apr/16
No, I'm one of those people (and there are many of us) tired of your tired antics on this website, Ice.
Ice said on 31/Mar/16
Extremeley many very tall men who havent crossed the border of having that impressive imposing , near freak height claim 6'10 , when they are actually in the 6'7-6'8 range .
Ice said on 31/Mar/16
@ MD Im not trolling ? Have you ever thought about that some guys would like to tower over others ? Or are you stuck in your "beeing average / slightly over average" is absolute best and everyone shouldnt dare to think something else ? Are you one of those "5'11-6'1 is absolute god status" guys , who are just fooling themselves ?
Rory said on 29/Mar/16
Wouldn't want to be 6ft10 myself but each to their own.
MD said on 28/Mar/16
@Ice, you really need to stop trolling.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Mar/16
An enviable height...
Ice said on 24/Mar/16
Perfect height for a guy
Gary said on 13/Mar/16
I think undertaker and Kane are tAller than 6ft7 range if jones if 6ft10, which I can find believe able.
mrtguy said on 28/Feb/16
Nathan Jones is 6'9'' he can pass as being taller.
Musclehed320 said on 17/Feb/16
Its difficult getting a height on Nathan from his WWE days, camera distances in certain videos with wide lenses and the distorting of some being closer to the camera than others makes it hard.

In the video where BigShow appeared a lot taller, as Rob noted, it’s difficult to tell, and those angles may have been used to sell BigSHow and Albert as “overwhelming odds”.

In some videos Nathan Towers over the Undertaker. Undertaker actually looks up at Nathan, with Nathan looking down. Yet in others they both look close in height. Very Similar to how Kevin Nash and Undertaker sometimes looks very close in height, and other times Nash looked clearly 2-3” taller.

Anyhow, at the time TROY was filmed Nathan had one of the best super tall physiques on film, regardless of his exact stature. Very few men of his stature have ever been built like that. Find me 5 men of his height and build, there likely are a few, but they are very rare.

Likely not many men of that height care to develop their bodies to that point. I’ve seen quite a few impressive specimens, who were quite tall, thick sturdy bone structures, but who never really got into weights, and tended to go for what came easy to them, such as Basketball. Take 7’2” Chris Christofferson for example. Looks like you could build a ton of strength and muscle on such a frame, but instead he plays Basketball. Sure he lifts, but its only a secondary hobby, which he can only do in moderation, as he has to stay relatively light for BBall.

Nathan on the other hand only had the weights as is option in Prison. In general taller guys start out at a deficit in static strength, yet Nathan defied that, building his strength to profound levels. He excelled in the Bench Press and Deadlift, and had to have had decent Squat as well to become a powerlifting champion, before moving on to strongman.

So, however tall he was exactly, try to find 5 men around his height or taller with a more impressive build.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Feb/16
I have to say that he had a very underrated physique in Troy...definitely silenced the naysayers who think that the tall man has no place in bodybuilding and powerlifting. He was jacked. Not sure if it was natural though
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 10/Jan/16
In 2003 I would say

Big Show 6´11.5"
Nathan Jones 6´9"
Matt Morgan 6´8"
Undertaker 6´7"
Kane 6´7.25"
mrtguy said on 3/Jan/16
Rob , Isn't this a solid 3 inch height difference? Click Here
Editor Rob: being that close with wide angle can be hard to tell the actual difference.
AussieMike said on 15/Jul/15
As a big dude myself (6'8" 265, I've noticed that while an average person's height can vary by an inch day/night, the variance gets wider the bigger you are. A fair amount of my height comes from my torso, so spinal disc compression and poor posture (tired) can drop my height up to 2.5" over a long day, but my armspan stays at 205cm. (Ordinary shoes add at least another inch, so exact numbers are never going to happen).

You can also lose apparent height in a photo because you have to tilt your head down to look at the camera/talk to someone shorter than you, if you stand up straight you'd have to look down your nose at people. Not exactly friendly!

Just felt like sharing,

(Nathan's fight with Tony Jaa in 'The Protector' was epic, he just yells and breaks stuff!)
Jake T. said on 28/Jun/15
I think Nathan would be the same height as Nash at 6'9. He looks a foot taller than Tom Hardy.
Fern194cm-192cm said on 31/May/15
Honestly, Nathan Jones sometimes looks 6,8ish and sometimes looks legit 7,0. I think anywhere between 6,9.5 and 6,10.5 is realistic. He is absolutely enormous no matter what. Also, he is incredibly strong. Heck, its kind of weird. Some of the big strong guys on this site (Nash, Mane, Thor, Jones) are actually fairly handsome guys
:D said on 23/May/15
Click Here
hal said on 23/May/15
Saw Mad Max: Fury Road yesterday and dang, this guy's a beast. I could tell he was really tall but I wasn't expecting him to be almost 7 feet. I would've guessed 6'7" or 6'8". Must be his mesomorphic build that makes him seem slightly shorter. So jealous of guys like Nathan. He would've been a good Mountain on Game of Thrones.
six nine said on 30/Apr/15
I am 6'9" 400# and met Nathan Jones in the LAX airport...he was an 1" taller.I was bigger body wise. He is a nice guy and asked me if I ever thought of pro wrestling or strongman. I said no I was into personal protection i.e bodyguard. I told him there were two fellow bigger than myself, that work for me.
Stronggamedude13 said on 29/Apr/15
He is 7'0
James B said on 1/Apr/15
6'10? I would have thought 6'8 range i mean can you honestly say this guy would have edged out a 1994 kevin nash?

Rob is 6'9.5 possible?
6'1 dan said on 25/Mar/15
how can you downgrade this monster like that? he was 6foot 10 in 2003 and had 2 inches on taker.that's the only truth
The Tall Kid said on 22/Mar/15
Out of curiosity guys, how tall would you say Conan Stevens is?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 17/Feb/15
Njp says on 17/Oct/14
6'9" flat.

Right, was listed 6´9" as a barefoot fighter, vid was posted here again and again...
Didn´t look more than 2.5-3 inches taller than Sid Eudy after legbreak and about 1.5"-2" taller than Taker, but Taker had clear footwear advantage.
Icehole73 said on 14/Nov/14
I agree that he had two inches on Taker and was about 2.5" shorter than Big Show. So that puts them at 7', 6'9.5" and 6'7.5" respectively. But thats me. Happy to help!
Paul said on 10/Nov/14
6'10 probably but really around 3 inches on Undertaker?
This linked relates to around 2003 when UT was already past peak height.
Clearly one estimate on this site must be wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBPsWarWRb4
Njp said on 17/Oct/14
6'9" flat.
njp said on 28/Aug/14
looking back at the Undertaker (6ft 7 max.) collaboration he looks marginally taller than taker. Probably 6'9" peak in the morning
lion said on 27/Aug/14
He was 6'10 + at his peak. Looked like a giant freak in his strongmen days
Halb said on 10/Jun/14
I think the new mountain is the best. Has the mass.
Sam said on 28/May/14
Stevens was the best of the three Mountains on GOT, the new one looking like a baby-faced college linebacker in the midst of a temper tantrum.
Yaspaa said on 26/May/14
I think it's time to get Conan Stevens on the site, he's about the same height as Jones, bills himself as 7'0 though.
Vince said on 24/May/14
Matt Morgan 6'9''
Nathan Jones 6'10''
cdk82 said on 13/Apr/14
BAREFOOT 6'9"
IN BOOTS 6'10.5"
Yaspaa said on 5/Jan/14
Clement, what are you talking about? How on earth do you extrapolate that answer from what I wrote. I say 6'9, you think I say 6'5-6'6... honestly...
Yahright said on 1/Nov/13
I truly believe he is at least 6'9 barefoot. 203,4 cm? No way.... he DID comfortably tower over Magnus. The commentator even said on the video he made Magnus look like a little school kid haha, Does anyone have any info on what his doing nowadays?
berta said on 19/Oct/13
he didnt look that mutch taler than samuelsson in the video where samuelsson brake his arm maybe 7 cm. i met samuelsson today im about 196,5 evening and we were about the same height. I think nathan jones are about 203-204 cm
clement said on 11/Oct/13
I guess Yaspaa has got it Nathan Jones is in 6'5" to 6'6" RANGE ....taht's it.
Yaspaa said on 29/Aug/13
Samuelsson isn't a 'legit' 2m, his height was given anywhere from 6'5-6'7 in the Strongman events. Torfi Olafsson competed with Samuelsson and was billed as 2m and he always slightly edged out Samuellson, leading me to believe him to be a flat 6'6. Jones did make him look significantly smaller though, and Jones was billed at 6'9 in PRIDE Fighting. No less than 6'9 and no more than 6'10.
Icehole73 said on 8/Jul/13
I think next to Taker he looks maybe 6'9". Still huge but not 6'10" because he is too short next to Big show, I agree.
187 said on 8/May/13
@Dicksock

Yes I understand that, but I dont feel that is the case with Nathan Jones. Just take a look at him in his strongman days, he would tower over all the other competetiors. If you've ever seen the size of these strongmen- you would know that is not an easy feat lol. Jones looked huge opposite Magnus Samuelsson back in the 1995 arm wrestle match up, and Samuelsson is a legit 6'6.75.
187 said on 6/May/13
@Dicksock

Nice name Lol, take a look at him in his strongman days firstly and tell me his not 6'10.. his even huge opposite Magnus Samuelsson, who is a legit 6'6.75.
dicksock said on 30/Apr/13
187 says on 5/Apr/13
6'8? Is this a running joke on this site to downgrade people all the time?

Why would someone that tall lie about there height? It makes no sense, WWE even tried to bill him as 7 foot, but he kept saying he was 6'10.

________

People lie about their height all the time. I'm 5'10" and I have met numerous people that told me that they are 5'10" as they were looking up at me. Beyond that, I have met dozens of people that have exaggerated their heights. Magic Johnson was listed at 6'8" or 6'9" in the NBA and always claimed 6'9" for himself. However, he was listed at 6'7" in the 1992 Olympics.
Josey Wales said on 22/Apr/13
Is anybody here familiar with former Dutch strongman Ted Van Der Parre? He won WSM in 1992. He was always announced as beieng 7 foot. Wouldve liked to see him and Nathan Jones togehther for comparrisson. I always thought he (Van Der Parre) was of much same proportions to Kevin Nash.
187 said on 5/Apr/13
6'8? Is this a running joke on this site to downgrade people all the time?

Why would someone that tall lie about there height? It makes no sense, WWE even tried to bill him as 7 foot, but he kept saying he was 6'10.
Drummer777 said on 3/Apr/13
matt morgan more like 6'6 to 6'7
jimmy said on 29/Mar/13
I would say that 6'8" is more possible
187 said on 22/Mar/13
Click Here
Phoney said on 16/Mar/13
@red183 his at least 6'9
Clay said on 10/Mar/13
He looked barely taller than Matt morgan because Morgan's 6'8.5-6'9ish.
The Ben said on 20/Feb/13
6'10 peak for Jones.
Haven't seen him in years, he did an interesting interview about coming off steroids a while ago.
BB89 said on 20/Feb/13
How come mostly everyone on this site give people their minumum height? Just because most of you are insecure doesnt mean you have to downgrade peoples height! Click Here He is announced as 6'10 here, as someone has already said! Look at him opposite Magnus for goodness sake!! :0
The Ben said on 18/Feb/13
really not sure about steiners height 5'10-5'11 max
Vegas said on 18/Feb/13
187 says on 17/Feb/13
Still reckon Jones is 6'10 though.
___________

there has already been a video posted of jones listed 6'9 in mma Click Here
187 said on 17/Feb/13
@ Ali Baba- He is leaning in that picture, but i agree he is't the full 5'11. I Still reckon Jones is 6'10 though.
miko said on 16/Feb/13
Scott Steiner is between 5'11 and 6'0.
187 said on 15/Feb/13
Is'nt Scott Steiner listed as 6'1?
Ali Baba said on 14/Feb/13
Rioo says on 22/Jan/13
Why do you say that? If you click on the website the picture is from you will see that he is of similar height of all the other wrestlers he is pictured with. Click Here
-------------------------------------
He's shorter than Scott Stiener by about two inches.
Rioo said on 22/Jan/13
Why do you say that? If you click on the website the picture is from you will see that he is of similar height of all the other wrestlers he is pictured with. Click Here
Bard said on 18/Jan/13
He looks at least 6'10 in the pic below. 6'11 isn't out of the question, but maybe he has a footwear advantage.
Rioo said on 14/Jan/13
Click Here The gentleman with Nathan is 5'11 (180 cm) who is a WWE journalist. How many inches difference is that?
Aola said on 8/Jan/13
@Duhon: I have no idea about foot sizes, but while Nathan is said to be 208cm on one site and 211cm on another, Conan is described equally everywhere as 214cm. Depending on which of Nathan's heights you pick, that makes Conan 3-6cm taller. (2.5cm is an inch, roughly.) Hope that helps you?
ted said on 21/Dec/12
Yes but magnus beat Jones when he broke his arm in arm wrestling
I suppose he didn't realise the pressure when magnus had his arm almost down
Otherwise jones might have won words strongest man
Vegas said on 20/Dec/12
undertaker in 2003 measured up better next to jones than magnus did and matt morgan was basically same height as jones and ali claims morgan is max 6'6 so where does that really leave magnus and conan stevens if ali is correct
Clay said on 18/Dec/12
Magnus still beat Nathan Jones in arm wrestling easily even when he was lighter. Incredible strongman.
Corey Saint said on 16/Dec/12
@ Danimal
I saw Magnus in Atlanta in 2001 and managed to speak to him. I was in awe over how big his shoulders, upper back, and arms were. Not only was the guy thick, but very tall too. I'm a hair over 6'4" and I had to look up to talk to him. One word: Impressive. Magnus is a very nice guy who is strong but doesn't come across as too good to talk to you. As a result of that encounter, i'll say Jones is the full 6'10, after all the height difference with Magnus when they stood opposite was a substantial amount.
bigfern192-194cm said on 15/Dec/12
@ Danimal
Magnus is not 6,6. He is every bit a strong 6,7. He is massive and yes, he did fill out a ton. He is probably a lot bigger than Nathan is now in terms of muscle mass.
Duhon said on 11/Dec/12
Hey, i posted this a little while ago and didn't get a response. But how tall does conan stevens look next to nathan over here? He was an actor on the first season of game of thrones and claims to be 7'.
Click Here
[Editor Rob: I don't think conan looks much taller, he may be slightly nearer...]
Clay said on 10/Dec/12
Mr Marko says on 28/Nov/12
I also saw the video of Jones arm wrestling Magnus and Jones just dwarfed him in every way. Nathan’s height and size is truly one in a million.

One in about 200 million is more like it.
Mr Marko said on 28/Nov/12
I also saw the video of Jones arm wrestling Magnus and Jones just dwarfed him in every way. Nathan’s height and size is truly one in a million.
Arch Stanton said on 25/Nov/12
Well, he made Magnus Samuelsson look quite skinny, but Samuelsson back in the 90s was much lighter than today, he's near 340 pounds now I think or at least was in his last competition. He looked 3-4 inches taller than 200cm Samuelsson so yeah, 6 ft 10 looks about right.
Ravin said on 24/Oct/12
@Mr Marko... At the start of that video where they are lined up, Jones is standing next to Joe Onasai (to Jones left). Onasai was listed as 6 ft 4 by the Dallas Cowboys and in his strongman days and Jones is clearly a head taller than him. I would say in shoes he was def hitting 7 ft. I watched the whole video and when he got close to the camera it just showed how big he really was . A true Megaman!
Mr Marko said on 13/Oct/12
Click Here The speaker announces him as 6 foot 10 in height.
Beefus said on 11/Oct/12
Jones easily towered over other strongmen when he was competing.

He was often called 7ft tall, and its been mentioned on this page already, but he was measured at 6'10.5" back in the mid 1990's.

6'10" easily.

Keep in mind those videos with matt morgan. The soles of Matt's boot looked thicker, Morgan had a full head of hair too. Jones was bald.

Those little things can easily hide up to an inch of height, so Jones may have been a full inch taller than Morgan.

Only way to know 100% sure is to put them back to back barefoot and measure.

If you cannot do that, then well, simply put you gotta take their word for it.

I see nothing proving Jones to be a liar when he called himself "6-10", and he may not have thought it important to mention the extra half inch.

If a guy is only 5'3.5" he will never forget that extra half inch. Guys over 6ft almost never mention it.
Kunoiti said on 9/Sep/12
1997.10.11 japan Click Here
Nathan Jones was billed 6'9.
Duhon said on 17/Jun/12
How tall would you wager conan stevens is? He played the mountain on game of thrones. Here he is with nathan according to himself he is 7 feet tall.

Click Here
Ali Baba said on 14/Jun/12
Went to the TNA show tonight and stood at the entrance where the wrestlers enter the arena. Matt Morgan 6'9"? LOLOLOLOL
Not Rocket Science said on 18/Jan/12
Official - Morgan 6'9, Jones 6'10 and Big Show 6'11.5, Nash 6'10
These are real heights....
Rikashiku said on 24/Sep/11
Sorry, I meant the part where Brock confronts Hayman with the debuting Morgan and returning Jones. Bigshow is a meter away from Jones but you can see that Jones is taller than Morgan and Show has what looks like 3-4 inches on Morgan.
Vegas said on 20/Sep/11
formation of team lesnar big show wasn't next to jones, show was next to morgan and looked about 2-2.5 inches taller than morgan, also morgan was same height as nash, that screenshot of jones and morgan is taken from a match jones had with angle both are exactly same distance from camera on level ground, i would bet the house that if you stood morgan and jones together barefoot there would be no more than half an inch in it Click Here

michael kingma seemed slightly taller in person than matt morgan, would like to see him next to jones and nash

btw cole would describe jones as almost 7ft tall, if i could get archive.org to work properly you would see jones was listed 6'10 on wwe.com in 2003
Rikashiku said on 20/Sep/11
Really? Because I also remember JR and Cole giving him the 7'0" treatment, even going for 6'11" a few times.

No a very good pic there Vegas. Look at the formation of team Lesnar and you can see Jones is closer in height than Morgan is next to Bigshow.
Vegas said on 19/Sep/11
wwe listed jones at 6'10 for sure i remember that listing vividly on wwe.com and in wwe magazines at the time, surprised me because i had seen jones wrestle couple years earlier in person for another fed who listed him 7'1 and i knew he has been listed 6'10 in strongman so i expected wwe to bump that up couple of inches especially as they had taker at 6'10.5 and kane listed 7ft, they would describe jones as 6'10 back in 2002-03 on tv at least in his first run eg 55 seconds Click Here

jones and morgan were extremely close in height, probably no more than half an inch in it, if that Click Here
Rikashiku said on 15/Sep/11
WWE had Jones at 7'0". It was Nathan who was saying the whole time that he was 6'10". He looked around an inch taller than Morgan so he could have been 6'9.5". I can't find the MMA listing him at 6'9" but apparantly its PRIDE and thats about as credible as UFC.

Click Here
A part of a news paper stating him as 208cm(6'10") and 150kg(I think thats about 330lbs. Wow I just guess that and google says its right)

He could have shrunken in height over the years. He is coming up to 41 now and my Papa told me that men who are really tall and heavy will struggle to stay tall for very long because their being brought down by the weight. Sore knees and bent backs.
miko said on 11/Sep/11
It's a shame he and Big Show never had a proper staredown, whenever he and Show got close Show was clearly quite a few inches taller, would have been cool to see them face to face.
Vegas said on 11/Sep/11
Rikashiku says on 10/Sep/11
Jones is a legit 6'10", he was measured in Prison at 208cm
________________

i remember when jason posted here he also said jones was measured in prison but his figure was lower than 208cm, he also said jones was listed 6'9 in his one and only mma match, wwe did bill him 6'10 in 2003 as well just as they did matt morgan
Rikashiku said on 10/Sep/11
Jones is a legit 6'10", he was measured in Prison at 208cm. He was billed at 7'0" by WWE while Bigshow was billed at 7'2", but Jones kept saying that he was 6'10" so that ruined what WWE was billing him at.
Hansen said on 26/Aug/11
is wwe given him 7ft ? he only look weak 6ft9 in Muay Thai Giant a minute over barefoot scene. guess 205cm might have been his real bare height.
Kian said on 17/Aug/11
He's 6'11 on wik***** it says height 6'11 weight 350lbs billed height 7'1 billed weight 370lbs hes 6'11 and 350lbs.
stevep said on 31/Jul/11
Saw Nathan a few times years ago, he used to bounce at my local in shorncliffe. Saw him at the shop once too. Definite six ten. He's a monster. Biggest bloke I've ever stood next to. Gives off a real strong don't **** with me aura too. Scary guy.
PatB said on 3/Jul/11
I first saw him on World's Strongest Man. He was said to be 6'10" at that time. He had to leave the competition when the eventual winner Manus Samuelson broke his arm in the arm wrestling contest. Samuelson is no midget (about 6'6" or 6'7") but he was noticably smaller than Jones. He was billed as MegaMan.

Next I saw him in a Jackie Chan movie. He was indeed taller than Chan.

His best role however was in Troy as Boagrius.
ThaMessenger said on 29/Jun/11
If he is 6'10 then Big Show needs to be 6'11/7'0. He clearly holds an inch or 2 on him and Matt.
Clay said on 21/Jun/11
big mike says on 20/Jun/11
theres a youtube clip of nathan jones vs kurt angle and when i saw matt morgan and nathan jones walking down to the ring, nathan only looked an inch taller than matt morgan who i estimate at 6ft 7.

You're the absolute worst estimator on this site if you're being serious.
Vegas said on 21/Jun/11
big mike says on 20/Jun/11
nathan only looked an inch taller than matt morgan who i estimate at 6ft 7.

_______________

thats not surprising as you downgrade pretty much everyone, 6'2 jack swagger, 6'8 paul wight, morgan played ncaa division 1 basketball at center and was listed 6'10 Click Here i have met morgan in person a number of times, he is a good 6'8.5, morgan and jones were very close in height back in 2002, ~6'2 brock lesnar (lesnar was clearly taller barefoot than a 6'1 3/8 nfl combine measured shane carwin) looks like a midget in this clip Click Here
big mike said on 20/Jun/11
theres a youtube clip of nathan jones vs kurt angle and when i saw matt morgan and nathan jones walking down to the ring, nathan only looked an inch taller than matt morgan who i estimate at 6ft 7.
NorthRose said on 2/Jun/11
hyruler, I agree he is an "overqualified giant", I met him once and he said "six ten and a half". He has no reason to exaggerate. I've noticed taller men are much more honest with me about height than the average. Short ones are the most likely to exaggerate. Strongman is a real sport and when I looked him up on youtube they announce him at 6'10": Click Here
hyruler said on 27/May/11
this guy is as tall as they come, 6'9" 320lbs, an overqualified giant... anyone taller then this guy deserves a lot of love, because that would suck.
NeNa said on 11/May/11
Vegas says on 9/May/11
nathan and heidenreich Click Here

Interesting pic, but it's hard to draw any conclusions from it, because Heidenreich is looking up a bit while Jones is lowering his chin. Thanks for posting, though!
Supermanfan380 said on 11/May/11
You can get a copy of a VHS, if you still have the ancient player here: Click Here Someone had videos of it up on a download site I got back in the day, in #8 you can clearly so a great difference in height with Jones and Heidenreich. Wish there was a video of it on youtube, if anyone cares to order the video, convert it and host it.
Supermanfan380 said on 11/May/11
Don't know about that picture Vegas, they look close in height there, but it's not a good picture to judge height from. I've seen videos of matches with both Jones and Heidenreich performing in Japan, and Jones looked a easily 4" taller than Heidenriech. The picture you posted looks like a promo shot and he may be leaning closer to the camera to be level with his tag team partner. Whatever the case in the videos of matches they had together Jones towered over heidenreich.
Vegas said on 9/May/11
nathan and heidenreich Click Here
Cranberries said on 7/May/11
If I saw this guy in public, I'd think the same thing they said about him in Troy: "He's the biggest man I've ever seen."

Huge, huge, huge man. 6'10"+. Really sad what happened to him arm-wrestling Magnus Samuelsson; he's one of the strongest men ever, that's for sure.
Tom Martin said on 6/May/11
Met him once a while ago back when he was in the WWE. He is one of the tallest people I've ever met. I wanted to know how tall he was and he said "almost seven feet". Jones arms were bigger around than my head and his legs looked bigger around than my waist.
Harrys Savva said on 27/Apr/11
6 ft 11
Will said on 16/Apr/11
Nathan Jones is 6'10 1/2". This man is a huge giant. BTW he's 6'11" with shoes.
michiele said on 21/Feb/11
I have met Nathan Jones and he is so tall. I am only 5'3 and I cane up to his waist. I also have a picture of him holding me like a baby. I am a huge fan of Nathan Jones and met him on several occasions when he was in OVW. Does anyone know what he is up to now?
Jake T. said on 19/Feb/11
On WSM Magnus Samuelsson did look 3 inches shorter than Jones, Nathan is huge alright but 6'9 could be right for him.
Icehole73 said on 4/Jan/11
6'9" next to Taker and Show. He doesn't look at tall as Nash did next to Taker or Show. In Troy obviously they were making him look much taller with the camera angle and looked almost 7, I agree. Still a big man by any means and wished to see him and Morgan back in the day wrestle Kane but that would have messed up his near 7' listing with his big boots. Kane was shorter than Kurgan in Battle Royals but only by a hair. Taker, Kane, Nash, Morgan, Jones and Mane could all pass between 6'8" to 6'10" with the right boots.
NorthRose said on 7/Dec/10
I met Jones back in 2003 when he was still doing the Lesnar team thing. I asked him how tall he was and he said "about six ten and a half" and when I aksed him how heavy he was he said "around three fifty". He looked every bit of it.
Predator X said on 5/Jul/09
Supermanfan is right about it all. Anyone knows when he will debut in TNA?
Austrian said on 4/Jul/09
lol hes a beast he looks 3 meters tall
supermanfan380 said on 3/Jul/09
He was in Prison in the early 1990's, at that time Growth Hormone use was very rare, as it had to come from cadavers, and was even dangerous as it could carry diseases. When I say expensive and rare, I mean to the point that its rarity and cost would have made it impossibly prohibitive to the means of someone like him in Prison.

He may have been using regular run of the mill Anabolic Androgenic Steroids, but this likely would have not increased his height. He may have been lucky and just kept on growing. It has not been proven, due to ethics in studies, as no scientist is going to get a grant to administer large doses of AAS to teenagers. There is a theory none the less, that AAS could in some cases shut off or slow vertical growth in height, and would at the best not increase vertical height.

Jones has admitted to being a steroid user as a teen, and even tried to use it as the cause of his bad behavior during his trail.

Many years later, as an Adult, Nathan has changed his story to saying that he made it up in a bid for a more lenient sentence. He said, because steroids were in the news so much at the time in the early 1990
Yaspaa said on 22/Jun/09
Nathan Jones did not reach 6'10 by taking growth hormone,he would have used that for his strength training.
Henri said on 21/Jun/09
Nathan Jones is 6ft 10" and he got that way from taking growth hormones whilst in jail for armed robbery in Brisbane Australia. This is on his own admission before a Senate committee investigating drugs in jails.
supermanfan380 said on 15/Jun/09
Electric Shock,

the pic you got of Nathan and UT makes UT's head look far bigger than Nathan's, to the point of being evidence that UT was closer to the camera. Nathan's arm is extended more and the rope is in UT's arm pit. The videa that was taken from uses very odd angles, where telling the height difference of either is very hard, as anything closer to the camera angle looks far bigger.

Many of the WWE vids use odd angles. Often when the camera is to a wrestlers back, they seem to tower over the person they are near, but if you try to use same plane scaling, you would be wrong, as they are not in the same plane. If that were the case, then one guy has a head 3" taller than the other, and unless we are talking about Andre, that just is not the case.

Click Here pause on second 32 of this clip, right as the screen fades out. There Nathan looks several inches taller than UT. In the angles before hand, Nathan's head is so far away from UT's it looks like his head is half the size of UT's, and you will notice that NAthan is looking DOWN at the Undertaker.
Yaspaa said on 5/Jun/09
Anyway,what the hell has Sylvia got to do with shootfighting.
Yaspaa said on 5/Jun/09
Sylvia isn't 2" shorter
Electric Shock said on 5/Jun/09
Also, shoot fighting isn't any more reliable than Pro Wrestling for heights. They say Tim Sylvia's 6'8", and he's two inches shorter than Undertaker. Giant Silva has been billed 7'6.5" in a shoot match and he's about 7' even.
Electric Shock said on 4/Jun/09
Ben, the answer is in the half inches. I get Nash 2.5" taller than Sid.

Yaspaa, you've yet to show any evidence of Taker and Nathan Jones which shows Nathan Jones anymore than an inch taller than Taker. There is also no significant proof that Nathan Jones is anything over 6'9".
The Ben said on 4/Jun/09
Hmmm then seeing sid and nash together there is no 3 inch height difference... Its all to confusing!..
The Ben said on 4/Jun/09
Jones is one person who has consistently been billed at 6'10... From worlds strongest man (anyone know how accurate their billings are) to hollywood and WWE....
I am inclined to think that jones is 6'10... He looks as tall as nash to me, he always looks taller then taker and kane.
He was taller then matt morgan...
Jones 6'10
nash 6'10
taker 6'8
kane 6'8
sid 6'7
Yaspaa said on 4/Jun/09
That pic from the Jones training shows Taker in the best light,height wise.
Electric Shock said on 3/Jun/09
Show me one piece of footage or video that suggests Nathan Jones is more than an Inch taller than The Undertaker.
Yaspaa said on 3/Jun/09
In or around the ring proof... is no proof at all but to tag along,what about the A-train/Taker faceoff? I was disagreeing with your opinion on their height difference,6'9 to bed.
You have big hearts in the eyes Undertaker love which is obscuring your cognitive functions into believing that the difference between Taker and Jones is only an inch......Undertaker...I...wuv you.
Electric Shock said on 3/Jun/09
I never said under 6'9"!

I said Nathan Jones is 6'9.25". That'd be over 6'9". I said under 6'10". Unlike you I don't believe Undertaker is 6'7.5", and I've proven repeatedly that he's over 6'8". Jones is 1 inch taller than Taker which makes him 6'9"-6'9.5".
Yaspaa said on 2/Jun/09
How do you explain the Conan Stevens pics?,give me some proof of Taker not in a ring setting there is nothing real about those events so why use them for evidence and you cant say 'even boots' because you dont know. All I know is he looks close to 6'10,his limbs look really long and he was easily taller than Samuelsson and there was no ring attire there. He was given a 6'9 at Pride FC and I'm going with that being his minimum.
The Ben said on 1/Jun/09
Jones always looked 6'10 to me. He looked to have 2 inches on the dead man...
I'd love to see jones stood with nash... I believe they would be eye to eye.
Electric Shock said on 31/May/09
Yaspaa, Nathan Jones eyes are only an inch and a half max over Taker's. Taker has a substantial forehead. As for footwear, they were both wearing even boots.

Nathan Jones is NOT 6'10". He's barely hanging onto 6'9". Undertaker is 6'8.25", given that he's a half an inch taller than Kane.
Yaspaa said on 29/May/09
You cant see the top of Taker's head properly in that shot,Nathan's shoulders,neck and eyes are closer to 2" above Taker's and whats the footwear like? he was listed at 6'9 on Pride FC.
Electric Shock said on 21/May/09
Click Here

Nathan Jones is no more than an inch taller than The Undertaker.

I'm currently seeing:
Kevin Nash: 6'9.75"
Nathan Jones: 6'9.25"
Matt Morgan: 6'8.75"
Undertaker: 6'8.25"
Kane: 6'7.75"
Sid: 6'7"
Big Daddy V: 6'6.75"
supermanfan380 said on 21/Apr/09
there was an old scan of a newspaper article posted on a bodybuilding website, that said "prison record lists him as 209cm 150kg inmate", sorry I don't have a link, hence why I asked it as a question, note the "?" on my post.
Predator said on 5/Apr/09
where did you find his prison record, supermanfan?
nuggy said on 15/Mar/09
im 6'6 met nathan jones before wrestlemania 19 he was a deffo 6ft 10 if not more felt small beside him
supermanfan380 said on 15/Mar/09
Didn't his prison records list him as a 209cm inmate? That is 6'10".
Predator said on 15/Feb/09
@Lebowski, so you think everyone is wrong with 6'9" as minimum? The whole world is wrong exept you:p. Jones stated himself to be 6'10". In various strongman competitions he is bill 6'10.
Yaspaa said on 14/Feb/09
4 inches shorter? 6'7-6'8 is what is way off the mark,it's actually silly. 7ish inches taller than arnie whilst having the most relaxed posture ever. 6'9.5 is the starting bid for this guy.
Lebowski said on 13/Feb/09
There is no way Nathan Jones is 6'10 if you take a look at this video, where he attacks the big show (6'11).
If you stop the video at 0:37 you clearly see he is a good 4 inches shorter than the Big Show. If you stop it at 0:59, he appears to be 7 inches taller than Arnold Schwarzenegger. Both ways...he appears to be no taller than 6'7 to 6'8. 6'10 is really way off the mark.

Click Here
Predator said on 10/Feb/09
Khali is 214 cm in real life. Imo, taker is around 6'8" in real life. Jones is a bit taller, around 6'10". Jones is always billed 6'10" everywhere, so I rather believe that.
rian mcqueen said on 6/Feb/09
i believe you are wrong anthony undertaker is abotu 5ft 10.5 and he s bgger than nathan jones soz m8 but you clearly don't know anything about taker cuz seen him n aberdeen and he is much more than 67 to 6ft 8.5 dude he is only like 4 inches shorter than khali!!!!
Yaspaa said on 3/Feb/09
The guy in the middle of that shot says he is 5'10.
AK said on 14/Dec/08
IMO Jones is 6'11'' Look at this pic of him and fellow countryman giant Conan Stevens who is listed at 7' 3/4''.
Click Here
Anthony said on 25/Nov/08
I believe nathan jones is 6'10. Which IMO puts taker at around 6'9 in ring gear ( 6'7.5 - 6'8 ) barefoot. It seems alot of people on here downgrade wrestlers heights but over exaggerate actors heights?!?

Either way theyre both massive guys
supermanfan380 said on 3/Nov/08
gazz the height of both guys varies a LOT in that video. It was filmed with very distorted angles, and depending on what guy is closer to the camera at any frame they go back and forth so much it is hard to tell anything from it.
Predator said on 1/Nov/08
You make some valid points about his height, supermanfan280. He probably doesn't realy care. But anyway, he's HUGE.

And I don't know if the 320 kg dl was his PL record or in stronman 1996. I think it might be in 1996, because is was listed in a strongman book. Sons of Samson vol.2
So yeah, maybe his PL deadlift was realy near 900 lbs.
gazz said on 1/Nov/08
has nathan even got 1.5 on taker, that training video they look pretty identical in height, takers head is so long but his eye level is lower.
supermanfan380 said on 31/Oct/08
I forgot to mention a couple things in the last post. Jones has said himself
supermanfan380 said on 31/Oct/08
Predator, do you know if that DL was in 1996? If it was from the heat that he came in 3rd, that was the year right after his arm break. He had less than 6 months to train leading up to that contest.

His arm had to be fully healed before he could train it again. For example: in that heat his SQ was 285 kg, o 627 pounds. This was a way past parallel squat, deep squat. He failed at 310 kg, or 682 pounds. Numbers like those are NOT what got him to being the Australian Powerlifting Champion. Keep in mind however, that was only 6 months of training after letting his arm heal. Before his injury He was likely putting up over 100 more pounds on every lift.

Even if that was before his arm break, you have to consider that he is extremely tall. 711 DL is very very good for any one over 6'6", and we know that regardless of exactly how tall he is, 6'6" is still short next to him.

As far as him saying 6
Anonymous said on 30/Oct/08
It's not weird when you consider that Khali is usually mentioned "over 7 feet tall" when they could be precise on at least some 3 extra inches. Why are they rounding it below?Well, They are not always trying to impress you, you know!?
Anyway, back on the Nathan-Sid comparisson. Is there any recent pic of both men standing straight, no walking cane, no street shoes... next to each other? I don't think nathan has as much advantage as the video makes believe.
Predator said on 29/Oct/08
Well, I dunno either is it's realy RLC posting here. But I doubt it cause here they say he's 6'11, ,while he is always billed as 6'10. Thats a bit weird I think. And I found that his max DL was 320 kg. Thats 711 lbs. His SQ and BP can be right, because he was a good powerlifter. So his SQ and BP had to be high to compensate his DL. 320 kg still is a lot, but I dunno if it's enough to become a powerlifting champ. I don't now if that is true either, but I do know that his strenght was mostly in his upper body. Chest and arms.
supermanfan380 said on 28/Oct/08
Predator, RLC Motion Pictures really is Nathan's management company. I don't know if it is really RLC posting here. Even if they are legit, they may not know what Nathan's old powerlifting records from 1995 are. Honestly, with the low level of popularity that sports like that have. I think there is an old score card sitting in the rusting file cabinet of an old grungy gym. That was also Nathan in his late 20s. These days he is close to 40, and so those feats are not his current lifts anyway. This is not official, I cannot prove it, but on several powerlifting boards, a few years ago, Nathan's lifts were supposedly around 700 BP, 800 SQ, and 900 DL. Only one rep each, and with equipment like a squat/deadlift suit, and a bench shirt for the bench. None of those were world records, even in 1995, but the combined total of 2400 or so was what made Nathan the Australian National Powerlifting Champion.

Like I said, I could not find proof of those numbers either. Take them with a grain of salt. Likely RLC does not have access to the forgotten rusting old gym cabinet either (if anyone knows where it is). The only thing RLC could do is ask Nathan if those numbers I posted are correct, and take his word for it if he says
supermanfan380 said on 24/Oct/08
RLC, how is Nathan's left arm doing after the cement truck hit him? Is it permanently damaged, or does hejust have to give it a few months to heal and then hit the gym to rebuild it?
Predator said on 17/Oct/08
Well then, if you are his management compagny, why is he always billed 6'10? It's a bit stupid to bill him shorter as he is. So....I don't realy believe you actually. (if you realy are his management compagy, what's his DL, BP and SQ then? Don't exargerate them)
He's 6'9 or 6'10.
RLC Motion Pictures said on 15/Oct/08
We are Nathan's management company and can assure everyone that Nathan stands barefoot at 6 feet 11 inches or 211 centimeters.
Red said on 10/Oct/08
I
Anonymous said on 1/Oct/08
Taker is 6'8", and there only seemed to be an inch or maybe an inch and a half between jones and taker in 2003. So nathan jones is either 6'9" or 6'9.5", or maybe taker is adding an inch to his height with some huge boots or something which is possible since taker probably didnt want to look "short" next to nathan.
M.o.r.g said on 30/Sep/08
U make it sound like nathan jones has shrunk.
Steve said on 25/Sep/08
Well M.o.r.g he is in his prime now.
M.o.r.g said on 24/Sep/08
wtf re u talking about nathan "in his prime" he's 6'10 now.
Steve said on 23/Sep/08
Nathan was definetely 6ft 10in in his prime although Kevin Nash was 6ft 9.5in or also 6ft 10in in his prime.
Red said on 20/Sep/08
I think Nathan and Nash would be the same peak height. Nathan slouches often even with big people like Undertaker he doesn
Steve said on 19/Sep/08
Is he taller than Kevin Nash?I would say he is but i am not sure.
M.o.r.g said on 18/Sep/08
yeah only u think that jimmy.
Jimmy said on 17/Sep/08
Red, that video plays a little trick on you there. Nathan is still taller than Sid, but the video makes it look more significant than it really is. First of all, the angle favours Nathan through most of the vid. Second, if you search for another video that shows the arrival of Sid at the event, you'll notice that Sid wears thin street shows (while Nathan wears regular wrestling boots wich are higher). Nathan has maybe 1.5 inches on Sid, the video makes it look like 2.5 inches or so.
Norton K said on 11/Sep/08
redator says on 16/Aug/08
He realy is 6 10. Even in strongman he was billed like that. But has anyone has more news on his possible return to the WWE?

no man he's signed a contract with tna
Red said on 11/Sep/08
Click Here Nathan towers Sid Vicious in this vid, I say 6
Predator said on 16/Aug/08
He realy is 6 10. Even in strongman he was billed like that. But has anyone has more news on his possible return to the WWE?
Supermanfan380 said on 30/Jul/08
NathanW,

That video is about the worst possible to discern the height of either of them, compared to each other or anything else for that matter. The camera is at an angle pointing downward, Not nearly level, and odd camera seems to make anything even slightly closer to itself appear gigantic, while anything in the background looks tiny.

Notice how if either of them are even just slightly closer to the camera than the other, they appear to TOWER over the other, and then in the next instant be DWARFED by them.

The angles in that particular video are significantly worse than most wrestling videos, and a lot of them have bad angles to begin with.

As I said before, you would need to show me a level picture, head to toe, barefoot next to another very tall person of a known height to convince me otherwise. Too much evidence puts him at 6
NathanW said on 26/Jul/08
Click Here
Jones has bout an inch or so on taker, id give him 6 8 - 6 8.5
Supermanfan380 said on 16/Jul/08
In person Magnus is a monster 6'6.5" easily. In the videos with Nathan and UT, Nathan did look taller, and the angles were really weird a lot too. Later as part of team Lesnar, he only looked about 2" shorter than the BigShow in the ring at the beginning of the match, and Jone
Drexyl said on 14/Jul/08
There's a good video somewhere of Jones arm wrestling a legit 6,6.5" Magnus Samuelsson. Judging by that I'd say 6,10" was spot on.
agshedhdhhfd said on 18/Jun/08
nate is 6'10 350 lbs
Supermanfan380 said on 12/May/08
Mattiew,

That is a tough call, being that no picture of the two togetehr, barefoot for that matter, at a level angle, and equal distance from the camera, really cannot say for certain that Nash is taller than Jones.

Wearing flats, clearly evident, when UT had cowboy type boots on, Jones still looked a little taller than UT, but if you consider the different footwear.

When Nash was paired with UT at Wrestlemania, Nash was the one wearing the thicker footwear, and at the time, UT was not wearing the biker/cowboy boots that he later was wearing durring the Jones angle, 8 years later.
Both of those references, are totally scewed, as boot thickness, bad angles can severly scew the way wrestlers look in height. There are pictures with Jones looking within 2" of the Bigshow, and some where he looks 5" shorter, with angles clearly giving the advantage to show. The same has been seen with Nash and BigShow (Giant) in WCW. I remember there being times the two looks only 2" appart, and other a half foot.

Personally I think Jones is a solid 6'10", and that Nash used to be a solid 6'10", and is now with all his injuries closer to 6'9". Nash is a lot older than Jones, but I think the peak for Nash was spot on the same as Jone's current.
Mattiew_- said on 6/May/08
I find it odd that this site Nathan Jones at a 6'10 height , while it has Kevin Nash at 6'9 ...

Kevin is obviously as tall if not taller than Nathan Jones ...
Predator said on 5/May/08
Who would win in a real fight? Nathan jones vs Big Daddy V or Khali? And does anyone knows ho much he can deadlift bench and squat? And does anyone thinks he is stronger than Mark Henry or Khali? I think he is stronger than both.
Yaspaa said on 21/Apr/08
Nathan is too heavy for the UFC anyway
Supermanfan380 said on 20/Apr/08
Nathan is NOT a UFC fighter. Strength is only 1 aspect of the game. I give credit due on his height as a strong 6'10, his extreemely impressive build he had especially circa 2003-2004, his powerlifting feats etc...

However, his size alone would slow him down for a KO with the worlds best and much faster opponents. He likely does not fear any of this however, as UFC fighters do not go around picking fights in public, and anyone else is not going to pick a fight with Nathan. 99.9% of the huma population Jones could beat into hamburger. Besides UFC has a weight limit of 265, and Nathan is out of that by anywhere from 60-85 pounds, depending on how much he has been hitting the weights recently.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.