How tall is Ryan Gosling - Page 3

Add a Comment864 comments

Average Guess (286 Votes)
6ft 0.1in (183.1cm)
cole said on 11/Jul/13
Click Here
Click Here

Rob, haven't you met Zachary Levi? And thought he looked a good 191 cm? I know these pics are not that good, with Zachary closer to the camera and all, but I thought Ryan looked a bit more than 7 cm shorter than Zachary.
[Editor Rob: he can look around 6ft, he is a little further in that first shot though]
cole said on 30/Jun/13
Click Here

It didn't look like Steve Carell fell off a box or anything when Ryan pushed him, so I'm assuming that they are standing on level ground. If Carell is 5'9, I don't think Gosling looks more than 5'11.5. Carell even looks shorter than 5'9 at times, especially next to Ed Helms and Timothy Olyphant on The Office. Ryan can't be 6'0.5.
cole said on 27/Jun/13
@Sam: I feel the same. 182-183 cm is fine for Gosling, and he doesn't quite look like a 180 cm flat. I just think 184 is overdoing it, as he is a fraction shorter than Cooper, whom I doubt is 184 himself. The fact that he also looks within 4-5 cm of 5'10 guys, sometimes even less than that, tell's me that he is not as close to 6'1 as suggested. Around 182 cm is what I think he would measure mid-day, but he'd probably measure 183 cm at some point anyway, so that's a more fair listing (6ft) than 6'0.5.
Chameleon said on 27/Jun/13
Exactly bulgvar, he is 180cm.
Sam said on 26/Jun/13
I feel that Gosling's righat around 183 cm after all the pictures and seeing him next to Steve Carell, Bryan Cranston, Jimmy Kimmel, etc. To me 185 cm is too much but 180 cm is cutting a low.
bulgvar said on 24/Jun/13
This guy is nothing more than 180, maybe 181. Look him up in "Crazy, Stupid, Love". There's a scene where him and barefeet Steve Carell stand together. Not to mention Ryan's shoes, which give him a lot of advantage. There's no more than 5 cm between them.
Anthony said on 24/Jun/13
At this point, considering all our doubts, we have to rely on Rob cin one of his photos, can unravel the mystery. Rob, lovely pics for a photo with Ryan
cole said on 22/Jun/13
Rob, I know you are not thinking about downgrading him to 182 cm, as you seem to think he is 183-184 cm, and I am fine with that, as I agree he can look a strong 183 cm at times. But you have also said it before, that you think he can look just 183 cm at times. Personally I am dead set on 182 cm for Gosling, as that is what I think he looks most of the time, at least not taller than 183 cm. You can see it clearly next to confirmed 5'10-11 guys like Fassbender and Clooney for example, that he really isn't that much taller than them. I think it would be more fair, and more accurate if he were to be dongraded to 6ft flat, or at least take away .25" and call it 6ft 0.25in (183 cm). Optimally I would have listed him 5'11.5 or 5'11.75, although I don't think you see him at that height.
Silent d said on 22/Jun/13
I can't see him taller than 182cm. Maybe shorter. I am not convinced next to 175cm steve carrel.
jtm said on 21/Jun/13
still think he is closer to 5'11.
Cole said on 19/Jun/13
Hmm.. Ryan doesn't really look much more than 5'11 here, with 5'5.5 listed Dustin Hoffman, who might actually be shorter than that:
Click Here
Click Here

Also he looks about 5, not 7 cm, taller than 177ish Max Minghella: Click Here

182 cm is perfect for Gosling, 183 cm at most,

Click Here
cole said on 19/Jun/13
@Guiseppe: Those pics look quite deceiving, yeah. In reality I think they are pretty close in height, but neither is a genuine 6'0.5 imo. Generally I think Bradley might look marginally taller.. 182,5~183 cm, and 181,5~182 cm for Gosling.

Seeing Gosling with 180 cm tops Fassbender, backstage, with bigger footwear, and still only looking 1-2 cm taller at most just totally excludes this 184 cm listing for me, not believable. Rob, surely you must considerate a slight downgrade? Recent evidence shows he really doesn't look the full 6'0.5.
Arch Stanton said on 19/Jun/13
LOL did you hear about the guy who had $10,000 surgery to look like Gosling? Crazy. Like Robert Pattinson and Channing Tatum, I really don't get what women (and guys) see in him. He's pretty skinny, with a face which reminds me of McCauley Culkin and Nicholas Lindhurst.I guess he looks pretty good overall and has a cool style and air about him, but it amazes me that women would even consider those guys in the same looks league as some of the other guys in Hollywood like Manganiello, Hemsworth brothers etc. The cosmetic surgeon said about "Hollywood facial perfection" being guys like Gisling and Rob Lowe, I can see what he means with Rob Lowe, but Gosling has rather a long nose and eyes too close together, but each unto his own..
Mr. R said on 19/Jun/13
I actually saw the movie Brad and Ryan did tonight called "The Place Beyond the Pines". Sadly, they only have one scene together, but they never stand next to each other.
Giuseppe said on 19/Jun/13
Hello Cole.Sono agree with you on the fact that the angle of the pictures can be deceiving, though I wish you gave a look at these pictures:
Click Here

Click Here

I await your judgment. thanks
cole said on 18/Jun/13
Tempest says on 11/Apr/13
I think it's crazy how some of you really believe that he's 6' or more.

Ryan Gosling and Bradley Cooper: Click Here

He's 5'10" range. Look how diminutive his body looks next to 6' Cooper. Look at the big heels. Cooper 5'11.5" - 6'. Gosling 5'10" - 5'10.5".

I've seen that one before, and I don't think it's at a good enough angle to claim anything spot on. I for example, had a picture with my 5'11.5 cousin, from a similar angle to that one, I am 5'11 and I looked 2 cm taller than him. A photo from a bad angle can disturb the reality by 4 cm or more at times, it really doens't take much more than a slight change of angle to make someone shorter appear taller than someone who is actually a good bit taller.

And even from that same set of pictures you can find examples where Gosling actually looks taller than Cooper, but I don't think that's the case, they look very close in height as Rob also seem to think. But what I cannot really believe is that they are both close to 184-185 cm, they both look shorter than that too often imo, next to for example 6'2 Dax Shepard and 6'2 Will Ferrell. I'd imagine Bradley would measure about 182,5 cm at some point of the day, and Gosling possibly 181,5 or close to 182 cm flat.

Check my latest post with behind the scenes photos of Gosling and Fassbender, and see that there's clearly not 4 cm between the two, if anything they could look the same height when Gosling as slightly bigger footwear.

Here's a couple of pics that show them closer in height, but of course you can't be entirely sure of footwear-advantages etc.:
Click Here
Click Here
Footwear: Click Here and Click Here
They are both wearing some kind of boots it seems, Gosling's has a more suspicious look though.
Giuseppe said on 18/Jun/13
Hello Cole. Thank you for publishing photos. Obviously I agree with you. Fassbender and 'top 180 and in photographs wearing flat shoes.
In fact, without taking into account the heels of Gosling, the difference can not be 4 cm. Also, if Ryan really was 184 cm, it would explain the difference there is with Bradley Cooper (185). Check if you want and let me know.
cole said on 14/Jun/13
Fassbender (listed 180 cm) and Gosling (listed 184 cm):

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Can't quite see the 4 cm difference in these photos...
Fassbender is no taller than 180 cm. Gosling might be dropping a bit of posture in some of these photos, dropping down to Fassbender's level. But Fassbender also has a footwear-disadvantage in some of them, so it's kind of hard to tell. Gosling could maybe be 2 cm taller from what I see, definitely not 4.
Giuseppe said on 14/Jun/13
Apart from the photo with Steve Carrel. I do not understand why no one takes into consideration the photos that show Ryan Gosling and Bradley Cooper (185cm). You notice so clear in fact that between Bradley (185cm) and Ryan (184cm??) The difference is not 1cm but much more. Also check yourself and let me know.
Giuseppe said on 14/Jun/13
You're right Chrissss the photos that show Ryan with Steve Carrel (175cm), show that there is no difference between the two 9cm.
cole said on 9/Jun/13
Seen a few sites giving 182,88 cm as well, I think he would measure around that mark early in the day.
Frank said on 8/Jun/13
Looking several pics and with my experience i would tell that Gosling probably is 182-183 cms
chrissss said on 8/Jun/13
Ryan gosling is not 6'1, u can tell, steve carrel is almost his height and he never appears that tall ,id say he's 5'11(180-181) maximum just 6ft(182) but id say he's 181cm for sure
cole said on 6/Jun/13
In gangster squad he looks reasonably close to Robert Patrick, 2 maybe 3 cm taller at most. Patrick I'd peg at 179 cm, so 181-182 for Gosling.
Jax said on 26/May/13
at first I thought he was a legit 6feet flat man, but in crazy stupid love there was a scene where he stood next to weak 5'6 emma stone (she was in barefeet) and he didnt look 6ft at all....Id say 181-182cm is spot on,... about the same height as bradley cooper
Balrog said on 18/May/13
Dude's 6 feet tall or close to it. Not buying under 182 for him.
gsbr said on 14/May/13
If someone could provide actual evidence of him tiptoeing, I'd love to see it.

In the meantime, he's still taller than the 182 cm David Strathairn.

Click Here
Alex said on 14/May/13
Look at this photo Click Here if Nerf 6"2 then Ryan should be exactly 6"0 no less.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 13/May/13
Some people on here estimate him at 5'10" flat but I think that might be pushing it a bit. I'd guess him between 5'10.5" (179cm) and 5'11.5" (182cm). But he does tiptoe a lot.
Chameleon said on 13/May/13
He's 180cm
gsbr said on 13/May/13
Nobody here is claiming he's 6'1" or 6'2". This listing is actually lower than his "official" height of 6'1" and people still argue it's too high.

I couldn't find any good images of Gosling and Carell together, though I did find one where Gosling is leaning into Carell and he's still clearly taller.

Click Here

And maybe the angle isn't the best, but he sure looks taller than Christian Bale here.

Click Here
Luther6ft said on 13/May/13
He often looks about 184-185 cm I'll give him that, but he's not that tall barefoot. Gosling was shorter than 184 cm Kellan Lutz, he looked at most 182-183 cm with 188 cm Dax Sheppard, and he's taller than Gosling. 180-182 cm range for Gosling, he looks it with 187-188 cm Ryan Ryenolds and Will Ferrell as well. But of corse it would mean downgrading a host of other actors as well, and obviously that's not going to happen.
John said on 12/May/13
Gosling often looks taller due to his slim build and long limbs, but the truth is he's about 5'11. Which isn't short anyway - that's still slightly above average and nothing to be ashamed of - but there's no way in hell he's the 6'1 or 6'2 some people here are claiming. Look at him in Place Beyond the Pines on his motorbike (easier to see the overall dimensions there), or look at him compared to Steve Carell in Crazy Stupid Love: even with lifts, 5'8 Carell should appear a few inches shorter than Gosling if he's really over six feet tall, but they're barely two inches apart. I would say 5 '11 to 6' flat is a good guesstimate - same for Cooper.
penguinboy25 said on 12/May/13
I agree with many of the listings on this site but this isn't one of them. I don't even think Cooper is 184. In my opinion Gosling is on the low side of 5'11. I think Cooper is about 6'0 flat.
gsbr said on 9/May/13
Gosling's feet are on the ground. The "tiptoeing" argument people keep using is ridiculous. And anyways, if he was trying to get an edge on the other actors, he wouldn't be leaning forward. That'll cost you an inch.
John said on 7/May/13
Cooper and Gosling are the same height, both around 6 feet. Cooper might seem taller sometimes because of his bodybuilt; though both of them seem to be in a really good shape, Gosling is way thinner than Cooper. That's why Cooper looks taller sometimes. But both of them are basically the same height.
A Jeffrey said on 7/May/13
You're right Tempest, I was more indicating that Perlman, alongside 5'10 Brooks and Cranston (highly probable 5'9), is wrongly listed at 6'0 and that he's more 5'11. Gosling is a 5'10 guy in my eyes, he's tiptoeing for that extra inch.
tmx said on 7/May/13
Conclusive photo in my opinion. Cranston and Brooks are definitely around 5'10 or below, no more. And Perlman around 5'11, no less. Gosling within the 5'10-5'10.5 range, as seen below tiptoeing to get the edge on 5'10 guys. Standing on his own he can look 5'11/6' because of his features, but full-length body photos with other celebs expose him very often
gsbr said on 7/May/13
I love everyone says Gosling is tiptoeing (which I sure don't see in that photo) while nobody mentions Brooks is straining his posture.

Besides, that photo is at an angle. Here's Gosling and Perlman both looking straight at the camera and Gosling is taller.

Click Here
Giuseppe said on 6/May/13
I agree with Jeffrey and I wonder why no one realizes this. Ryan looks 5.11
Tempest said on 30/Apr/13
And in all honesty Ron Perlman doesn't look 6'. He looks closer to 5'11", but that's just me. It might just be his big head.
A Jeffrey said on 28/Apr/13
5'10 Cranston, 5'10 Brooks an look within half an inch 6'0 Perlman. Gosling tiptoeing here to try and get the edge on them.
Click Here
joey said on 27/Apr/13
you've got ron perlman at 6'0. i think ryan is the same height.
gsbr said on 18/Apr/13
Click Here

Gosling is taller than Kimmel and they have the same footwear on.

If anything, Gosling has the proportions of someone over six feet. He possesses a long, tall (as some would call it) face you'd expect an imposing figure to have.
Chameleon said on 18/Apr/13
Jimmy Kimmel is 180 max and so is Ryan..
gsbr said on 17/Apr/13
Gosling will never be downgraded because he is 184 cm. In the photo with Cooper, he's slouching and leaning to his left. Here's another full body shot of Gosling and Cooper- they're practically the same height:

Click Here
Guy said on 16/Apr/13
This guy is one fascinating height specimen. In every photo he seems to look a slightly different height. He doesn't have the proportions of someone 6' or above and in the photos where he looks that tall his proportions are off I.e. his shins look weirdly long.

I would bet my bottom $10 that he's a frequent lift wearer and we just haven't caught it yet. He really looks 5'11 to me and with lifts makes him hover close to 6'1, just like Brad Pitt.
Robert said on 15/Apr/13
Thanks for posting the photo that shows next to Ryan Bradley. I agree with Tempest, Ryan can not be 185cm
John said on 13/Apr/13
Rob, who do you think is taller: Ryan Gosling or Bradley Cooper??
[Editor Rob: cooper can give the taller impression at times, but I think they are very close.]
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 13/Apr/13
Tempest is right, I wouldn't rule out 5'10" range for Gosling. The pictures where Gosling is the same height as Cooper don't show their full body, so Gosling might be tiptoeing like he often does. In the full body shots he is clearly shorter than Cooper.

In addition he looked only a fraction taller than 5'10" guys Bryan Cranston and Albert Brooks. The evidence is clear, downgrade is needed.

182cm MAX, probably 180cm flat, maybe even 179cm.
Double E said on 11/Apr/13
Tempest - Yes you are right in that pic he does look shorter ... but there are other pictures from that same night like that :
Click Here

Click Here

In these pics you can clearly see that gosling is at the same height as 6'1 Bradley ... maybe even a little taller
Tempest said on 11/Apr/13
I think it's crazy how some of you really believe that he's 6' or more.

Ryan Gosling and Bradley Cooper: Click Here

He's 5'10" range. Look how diminutive his body looks next to 6' Cooper. Look at the big heels. Cooper 5'11.5" - 6'. Gosling 5'10" - 5'10.5".
Robert said on 10/Apr/13
In the picture I was talking about Bradley Cooper does not have the stivali.Se someone can insert you'll notice the difference with Ryan
Double E said on 10/Apr/13
The pictures with Bradley Cooper ... I dont know it seems like in one picture he is 6'1 with Bradley maybe even a little taller and another picture he looks like he is alot shorter ... like 5'10 .
But if I had to guess I would give 6'1 for this guy . I just got a feeling that he is tall
Balrog said on 10/Apr/13
Both Cooper and Gosling are around 6'0''
MarcusTheSwede said on 9/Apr/13
Listen to HEW.
Look at the picture HEW listed with 5 feet ten guys. There is no way Gosling is 183cm much smaller.Look at picture Hew listed with the guys besides him. Evidence shows he is not taller then five ten. Look at pictures there are no height diffrence similiar footwear and same postures all of them. Evidence blows all youre speculations out of the way. Time for a downgrade.
Robert said on 8/Apr/13
After the recent film, I saw some pictures of Ryan Gosling alongside Bradley Cooper (1.85) and I think that Ryan is much lower. Someone could post some pictures that portrays them together? thanks
Nate said on 5/Apr/13
Gosling is a tall man. Met the guy just 1 month ago at Miami International Airport and had the same judgement that many people do on this page. I believed he was no taller than 6'. I thought I was 5'11.5-.75 and man he had like 1.5 inch on me at least. My immediate thought was that he was 6'1 but then i got measured on a stadiometer and I ended up 5'11.25...My input? the guy is no less than 6'05.
Anonym said on 3/Apr/13
It seems like most of people here have height complex themselves telling that actors are so much smaller than they really are...Gosling is definitely 184-185cm
penguinboy25 said on 30/Mar/13
I don't know. 184 is pushing it. Does this guy ever walk or do anything without wearing boots?
Anonymous said on 23/Mar/13
he's 6'1''. just out of emerson, worked on drive (will be honest... i was a glorified bitch, getting even the camera men water, or whatever they requested. i was the bitch on set).

honest, i'm 188 cm barefoot. know i was wearing my converse all stars then (i went through a decade long phase wearing them...) and i did get to speak to R. Gosling a couple times ("can i get you something?" the answer was always "no, i'm good"... nice guy). anyway, he was wearing very low sole boot type shoes for the movie, these weird white boots, but they did not have soles. and he is very close to my height. i think you probably have the height correct on this site, but he may be 6'1''.. he's definitely nowhere under 6 foot and half an inch. trust me--big guy. also, a lot bigger muscle wise than you would think. he's not a little man. probably a solid 190 lb.
Tempest said on 20/Mar/13
Yeah, looks 5'10.5" with Will Ferrell. Rob's either not changing some of these heights to spite the more observant height guessers, or he's getting paid to make actors "taller". Just my opinion - take it or leave it.
gsbr said on 19/Mar/13
The amount of downgrading this guy gets is ridiculous. He's taller than Ron Perlman, who's listed as 6' here. He's taller than the 5'11.5" David Strathairn and the 6' Cliff Curtis in Fracture. Will Ferrel is closer to 6'3" than 6'2". This listing is spot on.
Miiiiiiighty_l- said on 19/Mar/13
Always looked the exact same kind of bodytype that Edward Norton to me, I'd say Gosling is a flat barefeet 182-183 cm, nothing more nothing less
Chameleon said on 21/Feb/13
Jake whats suspect is u overlooking evidence, but u are entitled to ur opinion go ahead and believe he's a solid 6' lol. Im sticking to my 180cm estimate :) A real 6' is Duchovny.
Jones said on 20/Feb/13
I think he is a solid 6 foot, looked a good three inches taller than Phillip Seymour Hoffman
Balrog said on 16/Feb/13
Ferrell is 6'2'' flat? Don't think so. 3in over Gosling? Don't see it. Still 182-184 range for Gosling.
Sam said on 15/Feb/13
Actually I think Gosling pulls off a solid six foot look next to Ferrell.
Chameleon said on 15/Feb/13
There u have it, Gosling is 180cm like me and some others been saying for ages now.
Josh said on 14/Feb/13
a bit shy of 6'0 181cm-182cm no more
Short dude said on 14/Feb/13
Looks a lot shorter than 6'2" will ferrell in this video:

Click Here

I'm thinkin' 5'11"
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 10/Feb/13
He is clearly below 183, the question is by how much.
Hew said on 9/Feb/13
Also, seeing him in the movie Fracture with 6ft (183 cm) Cliff Curtis he shorter. And with 5'11.5 (182 cm) listed Paul Schneider in the movie Lars And The Real Girl, he looked the same height or slightly shorter.

With Schneider:
Click Here
Click Here
Hew said on 9/Feb/13
Click Here

Seriously, this should be enough to seal his fate as "not-a-6'0.5-guy".

In what universe is there a 6 cm difference between him and the 5'10-guys surrounding him?
Hew said on 8/Feb/13
I agree he can look 6ft at times. But with guys like Anthony Mackie, George Clooney, Steve Carell and Bryan Cranston, even you who redicule a 5'11ish listing have to agree; he doesn't look 6'0.5 with those guys. He's 5'11 at least and 6ft at most, either way, 6'0.5 is just too much.
Balrog said on 7/Feb/13
Gosling 179 cm? Funny.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 5/Feb/13
180cm most likely, 182cm at the absolute MAX.
tim said on 30/Jan/13
182-184 cm is his range.
Nenninn said on 27/Jan/13
183.5-184.5 def.
Silent d said on 22/Jan/13
182cm is solid.
jd 99 said on 22/Jan/13
I think just shy of 6ft more 11.75 looks this alot
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 21/Jan/13
I agree with Hew, 182cm at the absolute MAX for Gosling. 179-182cm is his range.
Hew said on 21/Jan/13
Ok Balrog. I'm thinking 180-182 but fair enough.
Balrog said on 21/Jan/13
Hew I was refering to Scotty pic not yours. Still think Gosling is 182-183.
Mike 181 said on 20/Jan/13
After watching gangster squad im convinced 184 is right for gossling
thinker said on 19/Jan/13
182 cm imo
Hew said on 19/Jan/13
Balrog: I know it's not ideal, but it's as good as any of the pics being used to argue this inflated listing. The pics with Cranston are good, and with other 5'10ish people proving he's no more than 2-3 cm taller than most of them. 182 cm is the most I could see Gosling at. And Silent d: Brolin is absolutely 100% not 178 cm, more like 175.
Silent d said on 18/Jan/13
182cm. A little taller than 178cm josh brolin. He doesn't look like a guy shorter than 182cm.
Balrog said on 18/Jan/13
That's not a good pic to compare height.
Hew said on 17/Jan/13
Also with Justin Timberlake.
Click Here
Hew said on 17/Jan/13
After seeing Ferrell with Federer, Craig Robinson, John C. Reilly and others he strikes me as a 6'1.5/75-guy at most. He certainly wasn't 6 cm taller than Federer, more like 2 cm max. Ryan looks 5'11-range if 6'1.5/75 is correct for Will. But if Will really is 6'3 (hihgly doubtful imo), Ryan is around 6'0.5 as listed.

Click Here
Chameleon said on 16/Jan/13
Ferell aint even 190cm.....Gosling once again looks 180cm.
Brad said on 15/Jan/13
Doesn't add up. 5-11ish
Trey said on 13/Jan/13
Ferrell's not quite 6'3, at least he doesn't look it with Federer.
Scotty said on 12/Jan/13
6-3 Ferrell and Gosling
Click Here
Hew said on 11/Jan/13
Balrog: I think I saw a different picture with Felton/Franco, rushed to conclusion, my bad. You can't see their feet in any of the pics, but Gosling looks 6ft in that ONE pic with Felton. I agree he looks 183-184 cm range at times, still I think 180-182 cm range is closer to the reality. But we will never know for sure will we...
Stephen said on 11/Jan/13
183.5 Gosling 184.5 Cooper
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 11/Jan/13
I agree a downgrade to 182cm for Gosling would be fair. I still think 180 flat is the most likely height for him, but I wouldn't argue if he were to be downgraded to 182. In my opinion the 179-182cm range covers this guy, he's somewhere in that range.
Balrog said on 10/Jan/13
Franco and Felton:

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Felton and Gosling:

Click Here

Gosling looks clearly taller than Franco next to Felton.

Btw, Felton seems Gosling's younger brother.
Hew said on 10/Jan/13
Gosling looks with Felton, more or less like James Franco looks with Felton. Again I can't see him at 184 cm, 182 cm is not impossible. At least he should be downgraded to 5'11.75.
Emily said on 10/Jan/13
He was on Kimmel and looked the same height as him. Kimmel´s listed at 182 cm here.
Anon said on 9/Jan/13
Doesn't look any taller than 6ft 0.5in, imo.

Click Here
mike 181cm said on 8/Jan/13
I've seen him edge out 180 guys but not by an inch. Maybe 182-183 at most in my opinion. Idk
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 8/Jan/13
Chameleon is right, Gosling looks 180cm flat next to Carell, Cranston, Brooks, Reynolds etc. I could live with a 182cm listing for him, weak 6', but anything over that is pure upgrading.
Trey said on 8/Jan/13
There's an early picture where he look even, give or take 1 cm, in height with Billy Zane. Can't see their footwear though. Maybe he's 182-183 cm after all. At least 184 cm I can't see.
Trey said on 7/Jan/13
I agree with Chameleon. Looks 180 cm a lot. Can argue from 180-183 cm. 184 is too high anyways imo.
Lo sgozzatore said on 7/Jan/13
This time i gotta agree with Rob, i saw some photos and he look 6' range a lot. Maybe 6'0.5 is a bit too much, but he generally doesnt look under 6'.
Balrog said on 7/Jan/13
I agree with editor Rob.
Chameleon said on 7/Jan/13
but Rob we cant see the floor/footwear. In that pic he does look 6' range.. but in all the other shots posted even the full body ones he appears like a legit 180 guy all the time, as he does in every scene in the movie crazy stupid love which exposes him even more. Nor did he look 6' with Reynolds.
Chameleon said on 7/Jan/13
Sorry Balrog, but he has 2 inches at best on Carell. And it has nothing to do with confusing angles in their shots together.
[Editor Rob: remember there was a shot were he was with tom felton. You can certainly argue he doesn't appear over 6 foot, but as low as a 5ft 11 guy i'm not convinced of.]
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 6/Jan/13
180cm on the dot.
Balrog said on 6/Jan/13
Sorry Chameleon, Gosling has 3in over Carell, camera angles can confuse at times. Still think he's 182-183.
Chameleon said on 5/Jan/13
Gosling had no more than 2'on Carell without his dress shoes.. He is 5'11
Balrog said on 4/Jan/13
Gosling had 3in over Carrell, I can't see Ryan under 5'11.5''
(S)ain't said on 3/Jan/13
He is likely a bit over 6'0". He IS tall and had inches on Albert Brooks in Drive. Albert Brooks, although appearing to have a short build, is average height.
Sam said on 31/Dec/12
Rob is correct. Gosling and Bradley Cooper appear to be around the same height:
Click Here
Hew said on 28/Dec/12
Balrog says on 28/Dec/12
Not buying 5'11'' flat for him, looks taller than this in pics, around 6'0'' like Bradley Cooper and I'll bet Ryan is a smidge taller than him because Cooper most of the time is holding good posture.

Think what you want, but roughly 5'11 fits for both of them when you look at the evidence. In my mind Ed Helms is pretty pinned down at 5'11.25 (might be 5'11.5 with his best posture), looked it with Kurtwood, Riley and others, Cooper was the same height or shorter when barefoot. He also looks no taller than 6ft with Kellan Lutz, and shorter than 6ft with Dax Shepard.

Gosling with Steve Carell, George Clooney, Bryan Cranston and Evan Rachel Wood proves 6'0.5 is very, very generous, unless (and this is so unlikely I have no idea why I'm even mentioning it) everyone around him is wearing lifts... 5'11
Balrog said on 28/Dec/12
Not buying 5'11'' flat for him, looks taller than this in pics, around 6'0'' like Bradley Cooper and I'll bet Ryan is a smidge taller than him because Cooper most of the time is holding good posture.
Trey said on 28/Dec/12
Both Ryan Gosling and Bradley Cooper seems to be very keen on appearing taller than they really are by every means necessary, making it almost impossible to pin down an accurate height for either one.

But for now I am going with 180 cm for Ryan Gosling, because he looks it with 5'8/9-guys like Carell and 5'10-guys like Bryan Cranston and George Clooney. I'm tempted to go for 180 cm for Cooper to as he actually looked shorter than Ed Helms at one point in Hangover 2(see the scene from when they are barefoot in the monastery. 181 cm for Helms - looks it with every co-star in Cedar Rapids and The Office). The only time Cooper edges Helms is when Helms walks around in flat shoes like vans, and Cooper has on a pair of boots or other types of heeled shoes. Other than that they look dead on even, if not Helms looking the marginally taller guy. It's just something to be on the lookout for when watching Hangover 2: Cooper in boots, Helms in vans and the barefoot scenes.
Height specialist said on 27/Dec/12
I agree Trey a solid 5'11" no more
Trey said on 27/Dec/12
There's SO many horrible pics out there of Gosling, being used to argue his real height. The tiptoeing and boots suggest he has a bit of a height complex, for some reason. He's probably 5'11, but with his lean frame, and with the right footwear, he pulls off 6'0.5. I don't trust any listing until I see JUST ONE solid pic of him, as a whole, looking around 6'1. As for now, the only pics of that nature are the ones making him look around 5'11, which in return is what I'm currently estimating him at.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 26/Dec/12
Rob, after seeing those pictures of Ryan Gosling and Bradley Cooper next to each other, surely you have to admit their listings don't make sense anymore? This site lists both Gosling and Cooper at 184, yet Gosling was shorter than Cooper. At least one of these two listings is wrong. Personally I think both listings are wrong, they're both shorter than 184cm. I could buy Gosling at 180cm and Cooper at 182cm.
[Editor Rob: you can find a taller one...

the ones with cooper taller than gosling have camera distortion aswell.]
Trey said on 26/Dec/12
Rob I more or less always agree with your listings, but this one you've got wrong. I just don't know what has gotten you to belive he's this close to 6'1. With Carell, with Cranston, with Cooper, with Clooney and with Gyllenhaal he looks nothing over 180-181 cm.
Chameleon said on 20/Dec/12
No way hes over 180cm!!
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 19/Dec/12
From what I've seen of him, he is 180cm at best.
klem said on 17/Dec/12
It's really hard to tell with 5-11 to 6-1 guys. I was recently taken a few picture at high-school anniversary. On a few pictures I look almost 2 inches taller than my friend who is very close to my height , I can't really tell if he is 1 cm shorter or we are the same. I also look as tall as my 6-1 friend, whom I personally measured at 6-1 in the afternoon.
Than on another picture first friend (who is probably same height as me or shorter) looks 0.5 inch taller as I am bit hunched forward, but not that significantly. So it is really hard to tell.
I am also wearing pretty solid 1 inch shoes while friends could only be wearing 0.75 inch.
What I am saying is you can't really judge height by pictures, a little looser posture can make you look as much 2 inches shorter and it is not even that obvious.
MaskDeMasque said on 16/Dec/12

5'11 guys can easily look 6' in films though with all the fancy angles. Look at pics with Ryan next to Steve Carrel, there is no more than a 2 inch difference and Carrel is def not taller than 5'9.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 9/Dec/12
If Ryan Gosling saw Jake's " 6' flat at worst " comments I'm sure the 180cm at best actor would chortle.
MaskDeMasque said on 8/Dec/12

Why are you so convinced that Ryan is 6'?
balrog said on 3/Dec/12
Between 5'11'' and 6'0''.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 2/Dec/12
LOL @ Jake, 6' flat at worst? That makes Steve Carell 5'10" at worst and Bradley Cooper 6'1.5" at worst. Yeah right.
Chameleon said on 2/Dec/12
Nonsens, he is 180cm at best.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 25/Nov/12
This guy is 180cm at best.
Chameleon said on 20/Nov/12
Good lord, he is 180cm thats IT now enough of this 6+ garbage
Dmeyer said on 19/Nov/12
Hé is nothing under 6'0.25 after 6 weeks without sleep and a broken vertebra hé might not be 6'1 but 6'0.5 yes 6'0.25-6'0.75 zone
MaskDeMasque said on 18/Nov/12

Just look at any photo of him, he is clearly not 6 foot.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 18/Nov/12
Jake: 182.9 cm -- 183.5 cm says on 8/Nov/12
Under 6ft is fallacious for Gosling. He'd be minimum 1.83 m.

Jake you're delusional. Look at viapto's picture, Gosling is definitely below 6'. Gosling at 6' would imply Bradley Cooper at 6'1.5"+ which is insane.

I'm even starting to doubt 5'11"/180cm for Gosling. He can't be over 180 even by a hair.
richkid123 said on 17/Nov/12
5'11" for Gosling is kinda ridiculous. solid six footer
MaskDeMasque said on 17/Nov/12

he looks 2 inches smaller than 184cm listed cooper there. that would make him a strong 5'10. weird, i always thought gosling looked a strong 5'11.
WalkingTall 6ft 3.25in said on 17/Nov/12
No way he is 184cm,he's more like a strong 5'11''.His body frame tells a lot because it corresponds to an average tall person.I'm surprised that Rob thinks he's actually 6'0.5''.
viapto said on 17/Nov/12
see the photo.

Click Here
viapto said on 17/Nov/12
smoller than bradley cooper 1.84 m
Chameleon said on 10/Nov/12
He's 180cm
jtm said on 9/Nov/12
still think he is 5'11.
Chiara said on 7/Nov/12
No way he´s 5´11 or under 6´. You guys are delusional. He definetely looks at least 6 foot, if not a bit taller.
kevin said on 6/Nov/12
i say he could be 6ft on the dot
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 3/Nov/12
Excellent pictures Trey, Gosling is a textbook example of a 180cm guy. Bradley Cooper is 182cm.
Trey said on 3/Nov/12
His barefoot height is 1.80m at best. I am 100% convinced.

There is no more than 1-2 cm difference between him and Bryan Cranston, who is 1.78m at best these days.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Jimm said on 31/Oct/12
A good picture of Ryan hugging Bradley Cooper. He looks at least 1 inch shorter than Bradley.

Click Here
Dik said on 30/Oct/12
So what is the purpose of all these downgrades? I can only see the usefulness if 6 ft 0.5 in (184 cm) will be changed, so why is there still incorrect information?
[Editor Rob:
the only person who can truly say 'that is incorrect' is the person who measures an actor. Everybody is just offering their own estimations on celebs.]
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 27/Oct/12
Gosling's height has to be in the 179-182cm range. Most likely 180-181cm, a flat 5'11".
Hew said on 26/Oct/12
Click Here

This is one of the few pictures from this set where you see their feet, they are equally close to the camera - no one has the advantage, they also seem to have equal footwear, maybe Cooper has a bigger heel. Proves that Gosing tiptoes at times, and that Cooper is a bit taller.

Gosling looks 5´10 - Cooper looks 6´0.
[Editor Rob: I think there is a bit of perspective distortion in a shot like that]
Silent D said on 25/Oct/12
Everyone should calm down. 182cm.
Hew said on 25/Oct/12
Take a look at this: Click Here

Looks like they´re both standing on firm ground? What´s your take on this Rob?
My opinion is that, if Steve is really 5´9, which I doubt, Ryan Can´t be 6´0.5. Personally, I think Steve is closer to 5´8.

There is also this: Click Here
And this: Click Here

Steve with 5´7.5-5´8" Paul Rudd: Click Here
Steve with 6´1.5" Will Ferrell: Click Here

In my opinion Ryan Gosling is no taller than 181 cm.
Chameleon said on 24/Oct/12
Ryan Gosling is not any taller than a legit 180cm.
Hew said on 23/Oct/12
Dick says on 22/Oct/12
I believe he is at least 6 feet. Look to this picture: Click Here

Emma Stone is 168 cm. She wears at least 10 cm/ 4 inches heels. That would me make her 178 cm. If Ryan Gosling is in the 5'10" - 5'11" range, he would be close to Emma, though he is obvious taller. Of course he wears shoes with a heel too, but they don't seem shoes that will make him transform from 179 cm to 184 cm.

Logically, you are right on the money with your statement, but Emma Stone is 165 cm (5´5), so she´s close to 175 cm (5´9) with the heels. Ryan looks to have a 1.25" (3 cm) heel, so if he was really 184 cm tall, he would be around 187 cm with the shoes, and Emma should still have been underneath his eyelevel. She´s at the middle of his forehead, so 184 cm barefoot for Gosling is out of the question imo. 179,5-180,5 cm (5´10.75/5´11) looks the most likely at this point for Ryan Gosling, in my opinion. Should Emma Stone prove to be a solid 5´6, Ryan Would be closer to/over 6ft.
Dick said on 22/Oct/12
I believe he is at least 6 feet. Look to this picture: Click Here

Emma Stone is 168 cm. She wears at least 10 cm/ 4 inches heels. That would me make her 178 cm. If Ryan Gosling is in the 5'10" - 5'11" range, he would be close to Emma, though he is obvious taller. Of course he wears shoes with a heel too, but they don't seem shoes that will make him transform from 179 cm to 184 cm.
Jack said on 18/Oct/12
What about this picture? How tall is Bryan Cranston? Hmmm

Click Here
balrog said on 12/Oct/12
Shorter than Bradley Cooper. Shave the .5
Silent d said on 5/Oct/12
I have read the comments. I am not a troll. That is hurtful! 6 foot.
Dmeyer said on 4/Oct/12
184cm at lowest
Chameleon said on 3/Oct/12
lol @ silend d, nobody believes Gosling is 180? clearly u havent read much comments then. Troll.
Silent d said on 3/Oct/12
Big T are you a fan of chameleon or something? You make me laugh. Mark wahlberg at 169cm? 173cm at least. All your other estimates are way off. You and chameleon should get together and discuss because no one here believes ryan is 180cm. 6 foot.
Chameleon said on 29/Sep/12
He actually really is 180 flat.
Shaun said on 27/Sep/12
I did think he was 5'11" ish but the fact he is roughly two inches taller than Clooney I doubt he under six.
Shaun said on 27/Sep/12
He has two inches on Clooney, I'd guess 6'-6'0.5"
zero said on 10/Sep/12
5'11.5'' - 6'0'' range. 182-183 cms, my guess.
jtm said on 9/Sep/12
there is actually a full body picture where he is clearly shorter than cooper and many don't agree that cooper is 6'1.
Chameleon said on 9/Sep/12
Cooper is a 5'11 guy go to his page. Gosling is a legit 180cm any taller would also require Steve Carell to have an upgrade to 179cm which aint the case.
Darius said on 8/Sep/12
Click Here

They're both around 6'1.
Darius said on 8/Sep/12
Click Here

He looks taller than 6'1 Cooper.
jtm said on 7/Sep/12
mendes is not 5'5.
Shaun said on 7/Sep/12
But then again if Mendez is 5'5" in those huge wedges he does look about this..
Shaun said on 7/Sep/12
Click Here

His proportions looks strong 5'11" to me.
Shaun said on 7/Sep/12
Mmm, I'd have guessed 5'11"-6'. Over 6' I think is a little bit of stretch.
Klem said on 7/Sep/12
Eva Mendes is around 5-5, her sandals on the pic are platform, notice how they are also thick at front, so they could really be around 4 inches. That makes her 5-9 in shoes.She reaches to to around his eye-level. He is than around 5-9 + 4.5 = 6-1.5 in shoes. Shoes looks to give solid inch so that would make him around 6-0.25 barefoot. Also the pavement looks uneven in Mendes favor. He really looks as listed on that picture.
zero said on 1/Sep/12
Mmmm he struggles to look 6 foot. Hard to pin down this guy, i'm going with a weak 6 foot or 5 11-75
Johnnyfive said on 1/Sep/12
Yup, based on the Mendez pic, Gosling is 179 or 180 max! Ive seen Eva in 2004 in NYC while she and Will Smith were filming Hitch and she did indeed look close to 5'5 from 10 feet away. Therefore, Gosling can't be more than 5'11 flat
joe joe said on 30/Aug/12
Looking at the picture with eva mendez there is no way this guy is 184. eva mendez is tiny and a 184 guy would tower her.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 9/Aug/12
Rob is there any chance you will at least downgrade this guy to 182? Looking at him next to Carell, Cranston, Brooks, Reynolds etc, I think it is clear as day that he is below 6', and many posters on this page agree with me on this.
[Editor Rob: I can't see him being under 6 foot, I'm sure on occasions he might look it, but you can say this with most people - at times they will look shorter ]
Chameleon said on 5/Aug/12
Click Here with eva mendez. 180cm max his shoes aint flat either look at all the evidence posted over time, there is no way hes over 180cm how much more u need he is a clear cut 180cm max guy, immediate downgrade.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 4/Aug/12
Jtm, one thing ive learnt is that you cant judge someone's height from movies! Anyway, i saw some pics of him and, comparing him to other celebs listed here, he really doesnt look under 6', unless he wears lifts. But what would be the point?
jtm said on 4/Aug/12
ANDREA[ITA] says on 2/Aug/12
I dont think he's under 6'! Why everybody is trying to get him down? He looks in the 6'-6'0.5 range!

i am not trying to downgrade him. he just never looks 6'0 to me. i have seen almost all his movies except for united states of leland and never thought he looked 6'0 or taller.
BigT said on 3/Aug/12
@Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP: Thanks man! There are probably going to be a bunch of angry fans calling us "downgraders", but I would like to make one thing very clear. I would like nothing more if Gosling was really this listed height. I wouldn't give a flying f*** if he was really 6'1, heck I'd be happy for him. The problem is though, I just don't SEE it. I call them as I see them, I don't downgrade celebs for the sake of downgrading, or to troll. Some people are just delusional and terrible at judging heights. Some people need to learn that the majority of celebs, and people in general for that matter, lie about and manipluate their height.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 3/Aug/12
There is loads of evidence that proves this guy is 180-181, maybe 182cm at the absolute MAX. Same height as Robert Pattinson, who is overlisted at 184cm as well.

@BigT: I think those are some excellent estimates man.
Chameleon said on 3/Aug/12
@BigT: I pretty much agree with all your listings! except that I would put Damon a cm lower at 174cm, and Leo might be the full 5'10.

@Cranberries: Indeed, Gosling is a 180 guy.
Cranberries said on 3/Aug/12
I think there is a severe lack of evidence that Gosling is anything over 6 feet.
He's not much taller than Steve Carell and can't be more than an inch taller than George Clooney or Bryan Cranston.

Click Here
Click Here
BigT said on 2/Aug/12
I would really like to meet him in person. I have many legit 6ft friends so I know exactly how that looks next to a 5'11"ish guy like myself. If I ever see a legit 6ft+ for Gosling I would be very, very surprised, he doesn't look it at all.

@Chameleon: What's your take on Justin Timberlake, Jake Gyllenhaal, Leonardo Dicaprio, Matt Damon, Channing Tatum, George Clooney, Mark Wahlberg, Christian Bale and Brad Pitt?

Here's mine:
Justin Timberlake: 178 cm
Matt Damon: 175 cm
Jake Gyllenhaal: 178 cm
George Clooney: 176 cm
Brad Pitt: 176 cm
Channing Tatum: 180 cm
Leonardo DiCaprio: 177 cm
Mark Wahlberg: 169 cm
Christian Bale: 179 cm
ANDREA[ITA] said on 2/Aug/12
I dont think he's under 6'! Why everybody is trying to get him down? He looks in the 6'-6'0.5 range!
Chameleon said on 2/Aug/12
Ah allright I misunderstood, and good that u also see his true heigh, 180cm.
BigT said on 1/Aug/12
Chameleon, I completely agree with you, Gosling ain't over 180 cm. What I'm saying is that he can look around 183-185 cm, but only when those factors are in the picture, and perhaps even tiptoeing.
Chameleon said on 1/Aug/12
Even in dress shoes here and still the usual 2 inches on Carell he never looked more then 2 inches over Carell, watch Crazy Stupid Love and check his height, u can also google their pics together because off set he also always looks 180cm.

Click Here
Chameleon said on 1/Aug/12
No there have been a lot of pics without all those 'factors' where he keeps coming out 180cm, even in the movie Crazy Stupid Love you can tell around Steve Carell in scenes without any tricks that he is 180cm. Carell especially exposed Gosling's real height. With Cranston and brooks, 180cm, with Reynolds, 180cm. Clooney, 180cm.
Click Here
he even tries to tiptoe here, this guy isnt more then 180cm.
BigT said on 1/Aug/12
My parents got married today and the priest was 6'1", in the pictures I looked as tall as him eventhough I'm only shy of 5'11. There are a lot of factors, uneven surfaces, camera-angles, footwear etc.
Chameleon said on 1/Aug/12
Just because he appeared to you 6ft1 doesnt mean he is, CLEARLY he is not a cm over a 180cm.
Tmann said on 1/Aug/12
Not sure I can explain his height in all the pics posted. Being that he looks shorter than than his listed height. But again, I've been within feet of him (a few years ago). He looked 6 ft 1. I have no reason to embellish my height at 6 ft 2. And I am not shorter than that. As this website has made me realize how crazy people are about it. So I measure myself barefoot quite often to make sure
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 31/Jul/12
@Chiara and Jake
No he is 182cm at the absolute MAX as he was only a fraction taller than Bryan Cranston and Albert Brooks, and he was only 5-6cm taller than Steve Carell. He was also a lot shorter than Reynolds.
In my opinion a flat 180cm is the most likely height for Gosling, this listing is way off.
Chameleon said on 31/Jul/12
@Chiara no Reynolds is not 6'2, he was listed 6'1 before he made it big. Even if he is 6'2 is then Gosling is still 5'11 tops as u can see, so what makes u think u think this listing is accurate lol? If Gosling is the listed height, then Steve Carell should be upgraded to 179cm which he is not now, Gosling is 5'11 max get over it.
Chiara said on 31/Jul/12
@Chameleon Reynolds is 6´2. This listing is definetely accurate, if not even half an inch too low.
BigT said on 30/Jul/12
I see many people refering to the pictures of Gosling and Gyllenhaal to 'prove' that Gosling is 185 cm, but those pictures are all tricky camera angles and tiptoeing from Mr. Gosling, which often tends to do. The ONE picture from that seance that could be used to draw any type of comparison between the two is this one: Click Here Gyllenhaal is (imo) 178 cm, as he looks it with Sarsgaard, Hathaway and Jamie Foxx. There's basically no difference between Gosling and Gyllenhaal here.

Gosling: 180 cm (MAX!! And even that might be generous)
Gyllenhaal: 178 cm
Jake: 1.82 m-- 1.83 m-- 1.84 m said on 30/Jul/12
He's 6ft0.25in (184 cm) minimum. In Fracture, he was definitely taller than 5ft 11.5in David Strathairn.
BigT said on 30/Jul/12
Can´t wait to see him in Gangster Squad and compare him to Brolin, Ribisi, Penn, Mackie, Peña, Nolte and the others. I know movies isn´t the best way to judge height, with the lifts, camera-angles and other factors, but it gives you an idea.
Chameleon said on 30/Jul/12
Click Here

as posted before he even gets destroyed by legit 6'1 Reynolds.
BigT said on 29/Jul/12
@Chameleon and Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP: Strongly agree with you guys regarding Gosling´s height, this listing is very generous. He might be this height in a fine set of built-up dress shoes, but not barefoot. 180 cm MAX, looks it with Carell, Clooney and others. Downgrade-time.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 29/Jul/12
Gosling: 182cm MAX, probably 180cm flat.
Gyllenhaal: 178cm MAX, probably 176-177cm.
Chameleon said on 28/Jul/12
No he isnt more then a 180cm
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 28/Jul/12
I could live with a 182cm listing for this guy, but not a millimeter more than that.
jtm said on 28/Jul/12
still don't think he is a 6 footer. go watch lars and the real girl or half nelson for example.
MaskDeMasque said on 26/Jul/12
i think he's a strong 5'11 after watching movies with him in.
Chameleon said on 26/Jul/12
Think all you want, he isnt more than a legit 180cm.
Jay said on 25/Jul/12
i think 6 ft 0.5 is correct. I think the rest of you are pegging celebrities to make yourself bigger.
BigT said on 23/Jul/12
Click Here
In my opinion, Clooney is 176-177 cm MAX. Judging from this picture, Gosling looks 179-180 cm. I´ve seen some pictures of Gosling tiptoeing with other celebs, he also seems to wear lifts in convencions, award-shows and premieres. Clooney also wears lifts, and you can´t see their feet in this picture, but I am sure that Gosling can´t be more than 180-182 cm, and Clooney can´t be more than 176-178 cm.
Berial said on 23/Jul/12
His slim figure,very well proportioned body and well fitting clothes make him look much taller than he actually is, but when you see him by other actors side you realize he is only a little bit over 1,80. He is 6 foot tops, and does not seem to every wear lifts.
Chameleon said on 12/Jun/12
He is 5'11 not 6 feet.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 9/Jun/12
I just don't see 6 foot for this guy. I could buy a legit 180cm, 5'10.75"-5'11", but that's about it.
Truth said on 8/Jun/12
I saw him today and I'm 5'10, I was right next to him, he is 6foot.
jtm said on 13/Feb/12
that's not true. he usually looks 5'11.
D said on 13/Feb/12
dead on 182cm
Chameleon said on 13/Feb/12
Yes he is below 6 feet. Hes not even 185 after sleeping.
Anon said on 13/Feb/12
Ryan has never looked a strong 5 feet 11 guy...where do people see this stuff, good call on the height Rob!
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m- 1.84 m said on 12/Feb/12
He isn't below 6 feet, I initially thought 185 cm for him, now I think perhaps he's 183 or 184 cm.
Chameleon said on 12/Feb/12
There is evidence all over the place, how anyone can claim hes near 6'1 is beyond me.
Dmeyer said on 12/Feb/12
I âgree Rob 5'11-11.5 in non-sens for Ryan 6'0.25-6'1 more possible
Chameleon said on 12/Feb/12
Oh COME ON, there is noway hes 184cm barefoot, no way I tell you, come on now.
Rickie said on 11/Feb/12
Fantastic actor. But this listing is WAY off. What are you thinking? He's not even portrayed as tall in the movies. Immediate change to 5 9.5

Click Here
Dmeyer said on 11/Feb/12
Hé CAN look 6' , hé CAN look 184cm With Clooney , With gylenhaal whom i met who is ní´ less than my height 5'11.5 Ryan looks 1-1.25 in taller so 184-185cm , Ryan could be 6'0.5 in
[Editor Rob:

6ft 0.5 is a possible, but I don't think I could see 5ft 11-11.5 range.
Chameleon said on 10/Feb/12
He is 181cm max
jz said on 10/Feb/12
Reynolds seems to be a confirmed 6'2 guy, Gosling is 5'11 tops - there'a picture of them online..
Click Here
Lillo Thomas said on 10/Feb/12
He is 6-0 max
Chameleon said on 10/Feb/12
Gosling and Gyllenhaal need an immediate downgrade..
MR.HEIGHT said on 9/Feb/12
i dont understand why some of u think a strong 5'11" is impossible for gosling?
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 9/Feb/12
Click Here

180cm flat for Gosling, no way 185cm range.
Chris said on 9/Feb/12
5'11 is not short, is "weak tall" range and Gosling looks 182 cms (5'11.5-5'11.75) with shoes on would be close to 6'1.
klem said on 9/Feb/12
In my opinion 183 would be fair for him. He could be shorter but at least it is much better listing than 185 cm. There is no evidence where he would look 185 cm.
klem said on 9/Feb/12
Anon so you are saying that 5-11 and even weak 6-0 looks short? Of course he never looks short because he is tallish. 5-11 to 6-0.5 == tallish.
Chameleon said on 9/Feb/12
He's 180-181cm and in Hollywood thats on the tall side so therefor he never looks short. He is noway near 6'1
Hey said on 9/Feb/12
Brooks' footwear looks fishy and Cranston could also be wearing lifts.
Ben said on 9/Feb/12
Anon is right, the guy NEVER looks short. He's at least 6 ft probably 6'1.
Chameleon said on 9/Feb/12
Dmeyer ur being generous again, he looks 180cm with Carell and you know it.
Dmeyer said on 9/Feb/12
Rob i dont think hé could be 5'11 but hé struggles to look over. 5'11.75-6ft in the movie against Carell
Anon said on 9/Feb/12
I wouldn't go any shorter...Ryan G. never looks short, I have no idea where 182 and less is coming from. Watch the movie Drive his no way in hell 5 feet 11, haters are abound Rob. His claimed height 6 feet 1 inches I never doubted. Not all actor have a need to fudge their height
Chameleon said on 8/Feb/12
Your friend is not 182 then because Gosling is no more then a legit 180cm.
doctorabrasiveenema said on 8/Feb/12
good friend of mine worked with him on his new movie Only God Forgives, he is 182 no less and he said Gosling was a touch taller, Id say 184-185 is right, not less, he is a slim man so looks long-bodies, I never would have thought he was '6"1 but it looks as though this correct. '6".75 is exactly right Id say.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 7/Feb/12
@JohnnyRB Nice pics man, especially the one where he's tiptoeing lol. I am now more convinced than ever that this 185cm listing is a comfortable 5cm too high.

Come on Rob, even Dmeyer thinks this guy is overlisted as he looked nowhere near 185cm next to Steve Carell. How much more proof do you want that Gosling is 180 range?
Chameleon said on 7/Feb/12
He looks 180cm with Carell because he is.
JohnnyRB said on 7/Feb/12
btw look another shot with those, more closer this time Click Here
JohnnyRB said on 7/Feb/12
Nice pics, MR KS. but dont forget that Albert Brooks was 5ft10 in his youth(in Taxi Driver, even with his puffy hair he didnt look more than a inch or two taller than De Niro) i guess now, in his 60s he shrunked a little, maybe he is a strong 5ft9.
Dmeyer said on 7/Feb/12
Rob this Guy struggles to look 6 foot flat hé CAN look as much as 4 cm taller than Clooney that is provably 179cm in the evening in 50s i alwais mixtures this Guy at 185cm but might be 183cm
Dmeyer said on 7/Feb/12
Hé dosnt look over 5'11.5-6 ft With 5'9 Carell
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 6/Feb/12
Chameleon is right, Gosling is not 6'0" let alone 6'0.75". He's barely taller than Bryan Cranston and Albert Brooks, who are supposedly 179cm and 178cm respectively:
Click Here
Click Here

In fact, Mr R claims on Cranston's page that Cranston is closer to 5'9.75"/177cm rather than 179cm. This even makes me doubt Gosling reaches 180cm.

No matter how you look at it, this 185cm listing is way off. Gosling should be downgraded to 180cm flat, which in turn means Gyllenhaal/Clooney/Pitt should get a downgrade to 176cm.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.