How tall is Daniel Cudmore ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

Daniel Cudmore's height is 6ft 7in (201 cm)

Canadian Actor best known for playing Colossus in X2 and X-Men: The Last Stand. He has also appeared in The Twilight Saga as Felix. He said in a 4tnz.com interview "I'm 6' 7". We met him at Massive Events Twilight Event in 2011. At that event when the host described him as being 6ft 8, he replied, "Actually, I'm not even that tall". In our shot I had a 1 inch shoe, daniel/jenny had 0.6 inch converse sneakers.

Daniel Cudmore from Twilight
5ft 8 Jenny, Daniel and 5ft 8 Rob
You may be interested in...
Add your opinion on the Height of Daniel Cudmore

Your Comment:

Matthieus says on 18/Apr/14
He looks like a giant! And I'm a bit shorter than you, Rob.
Mathew says on 14/Apr/14
[Editor Rob: it's not impossible, but much more than a little shy of 6ft 7 I'd find hard to believe.]

---

Maybe a 199 - 200 cm listing to split the difference would be fair. Sounds like you'd lean more towards 200 cm having seen him in person.
Andrea says on 13/Apr/14
In fact, i said 6'6 flat is hard to believe but you yourself said 6'6.5 is not impossible so he could have measured near it on a bad day and just went with 6'6... The same way Lance Reddick claimed 6'2...
[Editor Rob: it's not impossible, but much more than a little shy of 6ft 7 I'd find hard to believe.]
Andrea says on 13/Apr/14
Well, if he claimed 6'6, he must have measured that mark! Probably got measured between 6'6 and 6'7 and claimed both heights! Still doubt he's 6'6 flat, but he's not a full 6'7 either (or that claim wouldnt make any sense). 6'6.5-6'7 is definitely his range, over 6'6 but not quite 6'7...
[Editor Rob: he's downplayed it with a 6ft 6 claim (or he could have measured just under 6ft 7 and has dropped the 7/8ths!)...at his height getting roles is a tough business.

I would be shocked beyond belief if he was only 6ft 6 flat...I mean he looked over 6ft 6 and with less footwear I believe the 6ft 7 claim is real.]
Pedro says on 12/Apr/14
In this video-interview he actually said that he is 6'6": Click Here
So he was either understating his height or he is maybe more like 6'6.5".
[Editor Rob: I do think he really is 6ft 7.]
Emmett says on 10/Apr/14
He's very handsome and well proportioned for a man this huge. He's very well built, so he avoids looking lanky, but he's also doesn't give off a 'giant' impression.
avi says on 14/Feb/14
@Lorne
Not a full head but close A 6'6.5 listing is fair but 6'7 is close. There's about 10.25 inches here factor in the .4 advantage for Rob then we are talking 6'6.75 almost. That's his real listing I think.
176,2Tunman says on 9/Feb/14
At least a strong 10in taller than Rob,without footwear disadvantage I would say 10.5.Since Rob is a little over 5'8, Daniel is probably very close to 6'7 maybe 6'6.75 would suit him better.Great actor anyways.
carl199cm says on 7/Feb/14
im 110 kgs for 199 he has to be around that too.
Colossus says on 19/Jan/14
Hey Rob How much do you think he weighs on this photo:
Click Here at least 100kg,no?
Is he a nice guy?
[Editor Rob: yes he was a cool guy to meet and I'd say yeah at least a bit over 100kg, maybe nearer 110 there.]
Chris says on 18/Jan/14
I am 6'4 ft (193-194), where do you think the edge of my head would be at, Rob?
[Editor Rob: normally I would look around the mouth of a 6ft 4 man, even sometimes under his mouth if the camera angle favoured the tall man.

in your case a 6ft 4 man would look about a good inch above daniel's eyebrows ]
avi says on 13/Jan/14
@Rob
Would I get to the middle of his nose?
[Editor Rob: at 6ft you'd probably be end of his nose.]
Arch Stanton says on 12/Jan/14
In the comparison with #15 I guessed Cudmore at 200cm. I think he'd measure very close to the 6'7" mark if not on the nose earlier in the day.
Arch Stanton says on 12/Jan/14
Trust me, I did a sheet comparison during the 15 people contest and Cudmore DEFINITELY had over an inch on Challenger 15 accounting for the footwear. I know #15 can look like 6'7-6'8 at first glance but the lowest you could argue for Cudmore is really 6'6.5".
sigge says on 10/Jan/14
10 inches taller than rob+about 0.5 for shoe disadvantage. He is 6'6.5.
Mathew says on 8/Jan/14
Lorne says on 19/Dec/13
No less than 2 meters. People saying the 196cm challenger looks taller just don't understand height works, Rob is a full head shorter, and the guy is in Converse. People who understand that, you can trust they're estimates ;)

---

Not to be picky, but challenger 15 also appeared a head taller than Rob. I do think Cudmore would measure over 6'6", but in the photo he doesn't look it.
issuetall says on 20/Dec/13
Shaun says on 10/Aug/12
@Hob. Steven = LanJiao =" I'm 6'5"" . Average height in China didn't you know?
@@@
Steven=6'5< Robert Maillet=6'11(210cm), average height in Russia didn't you know? You short chinese ?
issuetall says on 20/Dec/13
Shaun says on 10/Aug/12
@Hob. Steven = LanJiao =" I'm 6'5"" . Average height in China didn't you know?
@@@@
Steven=6'5< Peja Stojaković=6'10(208cm). Average height in Serbia didn't you know? You ****ing chinese dwarfs.
Lorne says on 19/Dec/13
No less than 2 meters. People saying the 196cm challenger looks taller just don't understand height works, Rob is a full head shorter, and the guy is in Converse. People who understand that, you can trust they're estimates ;)
Mathew says on 12/Dec/13
Looking at this photo you see about a 24 cm difference in height (25 including footware), rather than 28. But people can look a little bit taller or shorter than they really are in one photo, especially because I'm sure he's not a guy who is trying to look extra tall for photos.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 11/Dec/13
I'm beginning to lean more toward 199-200cm range for Cudmore.
But, let me say this, being 6ft5 to 6ft7 has more pros than cons.
Manza says on 1/Dec/13
He looks like 6.5
Lorne says on 20/Nov/13
Yeah, guys like this can shrink a lot during the day. 199-200 evening is a possibility, but I just can't see less; he could drop a cm here and still be easily over 6'6.
Arch Stanton says on 19/Nov/13
When you look at Cudmore standing it really is difficult to imagine he's practically the same height as Peter Crouch. Crouch's proportions make him look 6 ft 9, Cudmore's make him look 6'5"-6'6". I wouldn't bet on Cudmore measuring under 200cm, although it is possible his low is 199.
Arch Stanton says on 16/Nov/13
6 ft 7 would generally be a negative height I think but some guys like Cudmore/Peter Jones etc who are good looking and well proportioned for their height it could be a positive thing in the work place and walking in public. Every guy I know at this height though gets negative attention for being lanky, and they don't like being this tall. I still think 6'5" would be a more comfortable very tall height. 6'7" really is excessive.
Lorne says on 15/Nov/13
How can people possibly think he looks 6'5!?! Come on, he has a full 10 inches on Rob, and a half inch footwear disadvantage. If he's not 6'7, then he's just a fraction under. Remember, Rob is a solid 173cm. Rob is 5 ft8 1/8 absolute minimum, and seems to measure 5ft8.25 most days. I really don't see less than 10 inches here, plus footwear, so: Rob 5ft8.2 +10in +0.5in footwear== 6ft6.7, 6ft6.5-6ft7 is arguable, not less. Like I said, to me, he doesn't look much shorter than Nairn, especially factoring footwear.
Jake says on 7/Nov/13
Rob: 5'8.25 + Cudmore's head 10 inches = 6'6.25
Shoe disadvantage: + 0.5 inches = 6'6.75.
Daniel Cudmore is 6'6.75 or 200 cm tall!
Matt 184.7-186.7cm says on 3/Oct/13
If his head is 10 inches, he looks 6ft 6 with rob here +the shoe disadvantage 6ft 6.5, definitely 6ft 7+ at an earlier time of day
Lorne??? says on 26/Sep/13
Considering he is in Converse, I think he looks. Just as tall as Kristen Nairn!!! Seriously, make a line, then Knock half an inch off. Okay, do Nairn's head is bigger, but still, to me he doesn't look more than an inch shorter.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 17/Sep/13
Could very well be a 199cm guy. But for sure nothing 6ft6.
Mathew says on 12/Sep/13
Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13
At worst he's 6'6.5, but 6'7 is spot on in my opinion. Noway in hell he's just 197!

---

He isn't 197, but he sure does look 197 cm with Rob above. He's gotta be at least 199 - 200 cm in reality though.
avi says on 4/Sep/13
@Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13

I think he dips into the 6'6.5 area most of day if not by evening at the worst. Still could be weak 6'7.
Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13
At worst he's 6'6.5, but 6'7 is spot on in my opinion. Noway in hell he's just 197!
Sixseven says on 23/Aug/13
Daniel Cudmore is 197cm tall(6'5.6")
Dean 5ft 9.25 says on 19/Aug/13
Rob what would you rather be 6ft 7 or 5ft 10?
[Editor Rob: 6ft 7 would be interesting if i was doing a height site like this, but living day to day 5ft 10 would be non stand out, nowhere near as many look at or notice you compared to giant heights...]
avi says on 11/Aug/13
@[Editor Rob: cudmore is very tall guy, I can believe he would measure 6ft 7 barefoot]

Theres no doubt hes a very tall guy but i was merely asking if its psosible hes in the 6'6.5 range at night at least. sssuming you are n par with his chin theres no way his head is 11 inches! his head must be 10 inches and he must be a 6'6.5 range. Jenny seems to come 1/4 below his chin or equal with it so about 10.25 difference here.
[Editor Rob: I think his head is a decent 10 inch, so 6ft 6.5 isn't impossible but I think measuring him you'd get 6ft 7]
avi says on 1/Aug/13
@Rob
Rob you may have been too busy to answer this:
"@Rob
im confused a bit. assuming his head is 10 inches and you are at his chin wouldnt this make him 6'6 range?? i think you may be 7.5 inch above his chin.i know you have .4 inch thicker shoe but even so would you consider him a weak 6'7.i mean his head could be 9.5 then difference wouldn't be a solid 10 inches. i see 10 inches here..."
rob can you maybe show me a picture of him next to a 5'10 guy and to 6'1 guy? it may be easier to see the difference there
[Editor Rob: cudmore is very tall guy, I can believe he would measure 6ft 7 barefoot]
avi says on 17/Jul/13
@Rob
im confused a bit. assuming his head is 10 inches and you are at his chin wouldnt this make him 6'6 range?? i think you may be 7.5 inch above his chin.i know you have .4 inch thicker shoe but even so would you consider him a weak 6'7.i mean his head could be 9.5 then difference wouldn't be a solid 10 inches. i see 10 inches here...
fatty joe says on 2/Jul/13
wow Rob is the tallest guy you've taken a photo with?
i think 6ft 7 is too tall if i could be any height it would be 6ft 1
although i would say for life expectancy and day to day life in my opinion the best height range i think is between 5'11 - 6'1
[Editor Rob: a couple of taller guys like ian whyte]
Connor 184cm says on 22/Jun/13
Rob do you think 6ft 7 is a bad height?
[Editor Rob: it's a standout height. More eyes are on you than the average man...for some people that would be a bad thing, but others would like the feeling of that and also taller people are given more leeway in work and are thought of in a better sense than the smaller man.

There can be advantages and disadvantages in general day to day living. Imagine going on the tube/buses/flights/cars regularly - it's more physically challenging being extremely tall than being average in situations like that.]
lelman says on 14/Jun/13
Rob, is he the tallest guy you and Jenny have gotten a photo with?

Real big guy, easily 6'7"
[Editor Rob: there's ian whyte who is tallest so far.]
avi says on 7/Jun/13
the difference between me and my mom is like this so 10 inches probably.
Thor/Johno says on 30/May/13
I rest my point, ian is so tall that i could not tell the difference between 6'11, 7'0, 7'1 or 7'2
Thor/Johno says on 30/May/13
Jimmy, ok compared to challenger 15. 6'5.2 challenger 15 comes about 0.5 inches below ian's eyeline and ian's eyeline seems about 5.5 inches so i would say about 6 - 6'5 inches taller challenger 15 ie 6'11.5 (But that isn't set in stone)

Compare the pictures yourself.
Thor says on 30/May/13
Jimmy, i have no idea. He is to tall and the difference between rob, jenny and him is far to great.

Put it this way, if rob measured him at 7'1, i would say cool he looks it, if measured him at 7'0, i would say cool he looks it and if rob measured him at 7'2 or 7'3, i would say cool he looks it.

You see, if rob was at least 6'5, i could reasonably deduce ian's height but he isn't. The only way round it would be to compared challenger 15 with rob and ian with rob and work out the difference and even then it wouldn't be accurate.

In real life if i saw a 6'7 contender or 6'8, 6.8.5 i would not able to tell. I cannot tell the difference between 6'9 - 7'0 honestly. Similarly, i cannot tell if some is 4'10, 4'11 or 5'0? or eg 3'3 - 3'8 - the height's are just to far out from my height. I doubt those individuals would be able to tell how tall i am but if someone was 5'0 or above, could reasonably predict my height, or someone that was upto 6'5, probably could deduce my height to.

I can tell the difference between someone who is 5'0 - 6'6, those parameters.

Ian is massive guy, i'll leave him at his listed height of 7'1
jimmy says on 29/May/13
Johno how tall do u think this guy is?
Click Here
jimmy says on 17/May/13
So Cudmore looked at least 1.25" taller than #15 who is 6'5.2" at his lowest having 0.4" less footwear than Rob.So he can't be under 6'6.75".And as Rob has said #15 looks taller than he measures.Rob have you seen Joe again? I doubt that he is legit 6'5",but with a tad more footwear he looks closer to 6'5" than 6'3" or 6'4" as Johno insists.He looks clearly taller than a guy like Kevin Sorbo.
johno says on 15/May/13
Cool - if cudmore appeared in the region of 1 - 1.5 inches taller then challenger 15 then i can't argue.

As i said before because he is so tall, even a slight slouch can make him look shorter by 0.5 inches. I was purely using the picture above and considering footwear disadvantage and comparing with challenger 15's picture and cudmore came out a fraction shorter but that's probably due to posture and you can't tell his true length by bit. Yes, cudmore could realistically be 6'6.5 .

rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'6.25 - 6.6.75 (but it's pretty hard to tell since the difference between him and rob is great )
johno says on 15/May/13
Cool - if cudmore appeared in the region of 1 - 1.5 inches taller then challenger 15 then i can't argue.

As i said before because he is so tall, even a slight slouch can make him look shorter by 0.5 inches. I was purely using the picture above and considering footwear disadvantage and comparing with challenger 15's picture and cudmore came out a fraction shorter but that's probably due to posture and you can't tell his true length by bit. Yes, cudmore could realistically be 6'6.5 .

rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'6.25 - 6.6.75 (but it's pretty to tell since the difference between him and robbis great)
johno says on 14/May/13
Jimmy my point is, joe looked a strong 6'3 range with rob rather then strong 6'4 so effectively he could be around 6'3.75 aswell not neccessarily at 6'3.25 in the evening.

With cudmore i put him at upper 6'5 range, lower 6'6 judging by the above picture. Taller then challenger 15 as rob stated. As stated earlier, cudmore is one head length taller then rob ie 9 - 9.5 inches plus shoe deficit. Another approach is to compare this picture with challnger 15's and you will see that he comes a fraction shorter with a footwear disadvantage but obviously taller without. Even from an overall profile perspective, cudmore gives me 6'5 indication but taking account of footwear, a weak 6'6 profile man.

Sure he could measure 6'7 or 6'6.5 by the measuring tape but since he is so tall a 0.75 inches margin of error becomes irrelevant in the context of things. If i didn't have rob's guideline of 6'7 and using challenger 15's picture, head length and general overview i would have put cudmore at a weak 6'6 evening time. I would pretty nervou with a 6'7 or 6'6.5 bet and that's the criteria i go by and it is not fullproof but i am comfortable with my estimation.

joe strong 6'3 range or weak 6'4 (sound better)
cudmore 6'5.75 - 6'6
[Editor Rob: I saw the big height challenger the other day in the supermarket and he definitely gives a bigger look than joe does, but Cudmore is taller in person, at least 1-1.5 inches]
jimmy says on 13/May/13
@Johno Manganiello at 6'.3.25" this guy at 6'5.5".I think u are underestimating heights a big time.
Johno says on 5/May/13
Jimmy, i was scaling the picture of rob with challenger 15 and cudmore comes out a bit shorter. The fact that cudmore has footwear disadvantage would make cudmore about the same height as challenger 15. I have given cudmore an extra 0.5 inches for assurance.

Further, cudmore skull is not any longer then rob's ie 9-9.5 inches. Rob is around his chin level, which would make cudmore about 6'5.5 - 6'6 taking footwear into account. Thats why i put cudmore in the upper 6'5 range.

Rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'5.75 - 6'6 (pretty fair)
jimmy says on 28/Apr/13
Johno says on 26/Apr/13
Compared to challenger 15 (6.5.25) not much difference, i give cudmore 6'5.75 taking footwear disadvantage into consideration

Daniel has longer head than 15.And the angle of the photo makes 15 look taller than he really is.
Johno says on 26/Apr/13
Compared to challenger 15 (6.5.25) not much difference, i give cudmore 6'5.75 taking footwear disadvantage into consideration
John says on 25/Apr/13
Well, at last someone taller then me...
wiltonstilts says on 25/Apr/13
He does appear to be 6'6
jimmy says on 8/Apr/13
His head looks quite long.10"-10.5" Rob?
[Editor Rob: not more than 10 inches]
jimmy says on 2/Apr/13
He looks at least 10.5' taller than Rob who is 5'8.2" and with 0.4 advantage.Minimum flat 6'7".
Arch Stanton says on 17/Mar/13
Click Here

He even looks a respectable height next to 7'1" Ian Whyte!
Arch Stanton says on 16/Mar/13
A legit 6'7" barefoot is just a huge body frame to be carrying around. I feel pretty tall at my height and if I hold a mirror up and see where 6'7" is on my door I always find it amazing how a guy could be that big or more barefoot. Guys like Cudmore must feel extremely tall wherever they go. To the point of being awkward i think. A legit 6'7" and over is an extreme height for a human being, without a doubt!
Elijah says on 10/Mar/13
Legit listing. You two look like his children. lol
Fern194cm-192cm says on 18/Feb/13
No guys, He looks a legit 6,7. First off, Rob is really 5,8 and change (not just 5,8 flat) and second my brother is 6,6.5 at night and beside a 5,8.5 guy he looks about the same!
Nick 189 says on 15/Feb/13
Looks 6'6
Nick 189 says on 15/Feb/13
Looks 6'6
Ramsay says on 21/Jan/13
Aragorn, why do you think you can estimate his height so precisely? Have you stood with him next to a stadiometer?
Aragorn 5\'11 says on 17/Jan/13
Legit 200 cm. (6'6.75) Just a little bit under 6'7.
John says on 9/Jan/13
Tim, well I'd definitely prefer to not be that tall if thats what you mean
Mathew says on 31/Dec/12
Looks 6'5.5" - 6'6" in the picture, although with the 1 cm footware disadvantage. He could be 6'6.5" - 6'6.75" rather than the full 6'7".
truth says on 30/Dec/12
a solid 6ft7. Gigantic.
Lo sgozzatore says on 17/Dec/12
Legit 6'7 guy, i doubt he's anything less than 2 metres
J.J. says on 10/Dec/12
@Larc-186.7-188.6cm I'd say 6'7" or exactly 200cm/2m is when people start to appear extremely tall. because that is over 99.9% on the growth chart
Tim says on 8/Dec/12
Is 6'7" past the point of being reasonably tall? Seems like with that height you'd have a lot of trouble just doing usual things like driving or showering
mId says on 25/Nov/12
Hmm.. I'm 183 cm and have a friend that's 202 cm and somehow this difference between Rob/Jenny and this guy doesn't shock me? I remember me and my friend stood next to eachother in a shopping-mall mirror and I looked like a kid next to him. Rob/Jenny is supposed to be 4" shorter than me.. so adding 4" on them in this photo and they wouldn't look that "towered".. but I thought I did with my friend.. weird :/ I would have guessed maybe 194-195 for this guy based on this pic.
James says on 19/Nov/12
6'6.5. Its not that shocking seeing this guy next too 2 5'8ers.

I think if you stood this guy next too peter crouch there would be a good 1 inch between the 2.
runt says on 19/Nov/12
Not a hair over 6'6.875"
getting_taller says on 17/Nov/12
So this is what a 6'7" looks like standing beside 5'8" footers whew. Clearly taller than Manganiello,Mcpartlin,Momoa.
The Exorcist says on 12/Nov/12
Very tall!
Larc-186.7-188.6cm says on 7/Nov/12
6'6-6'7 starts to appear extremely tall.

He's 6'7 for sure.
Caren says on 5/Nov/12
It's nice to see such a tall person stand up so straight! So many of them slouch!
Steven says on 27/Sep/12
Shuan, 6'2 =Shuan a midget in Holland did't you know?
Shaun says on 19/Sep/12
Looking again that right photo of the Challenger 15 he looks MASSIVE. At first glance you think he's near 6 ft 8.
Shaun says on 19/Sep/12
That's right I think Cudmore had an inch on #15 and adjusting for Rob's shoe advantage I added half an inch and pretty much got 200 cm for him in comparison
Shaun says on 19/Sep/12
Click Here

Here he is next to Jackman. Jackman's posture isn't the best and Cudmore's is almost Stallone like but Cudmore actually makes Jackman looks a 6'1"er here. In that photo its difficult to see him even a hair under 6 ft 7 even accounting for posture differences.
Shaun says on 19/Sep/12
Mathew says on 19/Aug/12
It'd be interesting to see a comparison between Cudmore and Challenger 15. Because Cudmore honestly doesn't look taller to me in this picture for some reason.
[Editor Rob: in person cudmore is definitely a taller guy, although maybe cos the challenger is shot from a different angle it makes him imposing]

I did the comparison Mathew when we were doing the Challenges. Cudmore had about 1.5 inches on Challenger 15 accounting for Rob's footwear advantage. If the big guy is just shy of 6'5.5" Cudmore is pretty much around 6'7" as he claims legitimately. Cudmore does look more 6'6" to the eye here but I think the lowest he could possibly be in comparison to #15 is 199.5-200cm. Cudmore could be 2 metres flat which is virtually 6'7" but for sure he's nothing under 6'6.5".
TNTinFL says on 23/Aug/12
Can't argue with that height. I actually thought he was taller; 6'8". When I first saw him on X2 was during that scene where they were raiding the mansion. He was barefoot and still towered over 6'2" (and change) Jackman.
Mathew says on 19/Aug/12
It'd be interesting to see a comparison between Cudmore and Challenger 15. Because Cudmore honestly doesn't look taller to me in this picture for some reason.
[Editor Rob: in person cudmore is definitely a taller guy, although maybe cos the challenger is shot from a different angle it makes him imposing]
Shaun says on 10/Aug/12
@Hob. Steven = LanJiao =" I'm 6'5"" . Average height in China didn't you know?
Hob says on 7/Aug/12
"Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Does that mean we can downgrade you to at least 6'4.5" then Steven?"

shuan, i don't get you. i did not claim 6'5 by you were think 0.5" shape off to 6'4.5 my height? im tall and not far to reach cudmore claim but i choose not to claim height here. thankful shuan.. by the way cudmore does't not look 6'7 even to pity to him without shoe advantage next to 5'8.25 rob in 1 inch shoe. my guess still 6'6.5 for cudmore or max 6'6.75
matt789 says on 27/Jul/12
he looks a solid 6 foot 6 and a weak 6 foot 7
Mathew says on 7/Feb/12
Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Rob what's the lowest you think he could possibly be? I can see 200cm as possible but he is does look minimum inch and a half taller than Challenger #15 right?

---

I don't think he looks an inch and a half taller than Challenger 15, I know he's loosing a cm to footware though so it becomes closer to that. 6'6.5" is okay to me, but 6'7" is kind of pushing it.
Shaun says on 28/Jan/12
6'6.5" is 199.5 cm right? Yeah I can buy about that or 200cm but I cant see him as a flat 6'6" guy or lower, he looks a couple of inches taller than somebody of Ryan McPartlin's height, as you say Cudmore looks extremely tall and McPartlin a more modest "very tall". He does look close enough to 6'7" to round up half an inch as is common amongst taller guys in Hollywood and in general. He looks well proportioned at this height though, compared to several other English lamposts I can think over LOL...
Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Rob what's the lowest you think he could possibly be? I can see 200cm as possible but he is does look minimum inch and a half taller than Challenger #15 right?
[Editor Rob: well he looked in the 6ft 6 range, and the challenger 15 looked 6ft 5 range, but cudmore of course had converse while i had an inch, so I would doubt he'd measure under 6ft 6.5.]
Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
If you compare this guy to Challenger 15 and then take into account Rob's footwear he's close enough to 6'7" if not on the mark. I can see 200c, but I doubt he under that.
Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Does that mean we can downgrade you to at least 6'4.5" then Steven?

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes by the actors themselves in interviews, resumes or articles.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.