|
Dylan says on 13/Nov/09
He is one of the few shorter celebrities who is totally honest about his height. Many celebs of his height would have claimed 5'7" so all credit and alot of respect to Daniel
Jules says on 13/Nov/09
he did look like 3 inches shorter than ellen! How short is he? He must be 5'4" or 5'5" but that was, what, three or whatever years ago. He must have grown a bit. Anonymous says on 5/Nov/09
looked a lot shorter than ellen on the eleen degenerous show maybe 3 inches and she is 5'7" Mike says on 31/Oct/09
Yeah I think a lot of guys exaggerate their height by at least an inch. In particuar, those who are either just under average will increase their height so they are average, and people who are just shy of 6'0 will often claim 6'0, as it is seen as a 'desirable' height. Parker says on 20/Oct/09
Looks similar build to Michael J Fox, so 5'4/5'5 pretty good estimate. newman says on 12/Oct/09
he is no more than 5.4 and claims 5.5 ... and dont think a guy who is 5.5 would say i am 5.5.. Aleks says on 10/Oct/09
Pretty much every male in the 5'5"-5'7" range claims 5'8". Anonymous says on 19/Sep/09
Yeah, the official heights of celebrities are often ridicoulous. Just like Rupert Grint at 5'10, Tom Felton at 6'1, Skandar Keynes at 6'1...
[Editor Rob: celebheights tries to accumulate quotes from the celebrity about their height - so that I can document what the celebrity 'Officially' claims as their height. You don't get more 'Official' than the height the celebrity claims themselves.
I may or may not agree with half of those claims, but will always put any quote found at the top of the page to let people decide.
So Tom Felton's "official height" is 5ft 9.] Bo says on 16/Sep/09
That sounds right. It's funny how every other website out there says 5'8". Anonymous says on 7/Sep/09
Actually, I think he said a few months ago that he was 1.65 m. No more. I think it's his height. Laura says on 4/Sep/09
I met him february this year in london. I did take a pic, but with my cellphone so that's why I can't put it on my computer.I would've if I could to prove it. I'm 100 % sure that he needs to be upgrated. I think that he probably grew a bit, because the latest statement about his height is two years ago. Anon says on 3/Sep/09
Where and when did you meet him, Laura? Do you have a pic because that would be good evidence that he is a tad taller than even he thinks. Laura says on 3/Sep/09
i'd say he's a little bit taller, 5'6. I met him, I'm 5'2 and barely reached his chin, so he can't be only 5'5, he's at least 5'6. Anonymous says on 2/Sep/09
Well, Daniel is about 5'5. Big deal. He's normal. I mean, it's not like he was 4'11 or something. Anon says on 2/Sep/09
When I saw HBP I was REALLY trying to disregard everyone's heights, but some things were so glaringly obvious that I have to comment on here.
1. Why is Dan stuck in Converse for half of the movie? Sure, they're cool, but those are literally the WORST shoes height wise for an actor to wear and they make him look unnecessarily shorter than he really is (because if you look at Rupert, he's wearing leather boots that give more height than Dan's Converse). Emma was wearing similar shoes, but I didn't catch what Bonnie was wearing...Dan didn't look TOO ridiculously short, but if he were wearing boots instead of Converse at least he'd be given a little lift...
2. Dan is a little shorter than Bonnie, but at times they look about the same height (e.g. Burrow scene where they nearly kiss). Dan looks to have the advantage at times, but same can be said about Bonnie.
3. Why am I hearing reports everywhere that Tom Felton is so much taller in this one? Yeah, he's lanky, but I wouldn't necessarily say taller. I even read a review from someone who met him that said, "Tom seems to have shot up in recent years and now stands above 6 feet...", ah, what? No, I'd say 5'9" tops.
4. I don't think Dan would lie about his height. He's been saying 5'5.5"/5'5" for awhile now and then Rob pointed out that article in which he said he refuses to lie about his height. He could easily say 5'6" or even 5'7", so I think he is a legit 5'5". 5. Most people seem to be in general consensus that Radcliffe and Watson are no longer the same height. She only looked slightly taller than him in OotP, but now the gap is quite noticeable. I've even read reviews in which the critic mentions this; one even mentioned, "You know a series is straining when the actress who plays Hermione is taller than Harry." (Dunno why they said "straining", because it was a fairly positive review, but, nonetheless, she does seem a few inches taller than him now). More on that on the EW page though. Aleks says on 1/Sep/09
Child actors are small today because they were chosen as older kids looking younger.
It's probably much easier to direct, say a 10-year old instead of an 8-year old. Curtis C. says on 1/Sep/09
I agree with you, A&J. That does happen to most child actors. A&J says on 30/Aug/09
i think daniel radcliffe is short, because he is in the show business. while normal kids his age go to school and sleep regularly and eat well, he is making movies, not sleeping enough, long working hours, which means he doesn't rest well and therefore he hasn't grown much. you need to sleep and eat well to grow, plus good genes help as well, clearly daniel radcliffe doesn't have luck on either one. umad80 says on 28/Aug/09
Sorry Jack, I think you're wrong. No offense. My brother was 6'4" to parents who were (they're older now, so they've probably shrunk) 5'10" and 5'5.5". My grandparents, my dad's parents in their day were probably around 5'7" (grandfather; he's only slightly taller than me and I'm 5'5") and a grandmother who was probably barely 5'0". My grandmother on my mom's side was 5'7" in her day. I can't tell you anything about my grandfather on my mom's side, but I can tell you my great grandfather on my mom's side was also a short man. Pretty much everyone in my family, that we know, is/was about 5'10" or shorter. The only thing we *do* know that is my great grandfather on my dad's side was a tall man. So my brother most likely got his height that way. That said, my brother was almost a foot taller than me. That's a huge difference!
My parents were also harder on me because my brother went down a bad path. They didn't want the same for me. I never took after my brother, either. Rather, I learned from his mistakes.
That said, it wouldn't matter much, Dan is an only child. So he probably took over his mom. Jack says on 26/Aug/09
You people only look at the mere material factors that could contribute to his rather limited height. But do consider that psychological aspects really matter!
Let's take an example. Have you never wondered why, if you have 2 brothers, the eldest one is in the large part of all cases the tallest of the two? The youngest is nearly ALWAYS smaller than the oldest. You could explain this due to two reasons; one material: parents are usually less hard on the youngest kid, allowing more, which makes the youngest get in contact with alcochol and junk food more easily. Second, psychologically; the youngest kid looks up to his older brothers or sisters and spontaneously takes over their behaviour and, because his sisters and brothers are older, wants to grow up faster, indulging in alchochol and other bad habits way faster, which affects his height.
This is just a theory i'm working on, but i really believe there is truth in this. Lenad says on 25/Aug/09
164cm is more accurate if you ask me. He looks too short to be 5ft7 let alone 5ft6 Curtis C. says on 25/Aug/09
You might be right, Realme2008. Realme2008 says on 25/Aug/09
I doubt he became short, because of his diet. You know how many overweight tall people there are? A ton. Height comes from genetics, so he probably got his height from his mother. JD says on 25/Aug/09
maya that's a shocking photo, you're right maybe he isn't 5'5 Curtis C. says on 24/Aug/09
I agree with you, Anonymous. That's probably why Dan didn't grow because he eats too much junk food. Reading facts about Dan did say that type of food he eats involves snacks. If he would have eaten proper foods then he would have been much taller than 5'5". I did imagine that Dan would be at least 5'8" or 5'9", but he never made it. Anonymous says on 24/Aug/09
The reason why this dude is so short is because he has a habit of eatin too much junk food, I read in a magazine. If Radcliffe wants to be tall, he should lay off junkies, maybe he might gain like several more inches. Nicole says on 23/Aug/09
I'm a girl and I'm 5'8", I guess he wishes he has my height Maya says on 20/Aug/09
Here's a recent photo of Dan Radcliffe with Alfie Enoch (Dean Thomas in HP): Click Here
Have no idea how tall Alfie is, but he can't be over 6'1, 6'1.5 or so, and yet he's 10 inches taller than Dan! So Dan's 5'4 max, maybe even shorter. vel says on 19/Aug/09
I feel bad for him cuz his dad is actually pretty tall
Click Here Sami says on 19/Aug/09
I almost exactly like Daniel Radcliffe.I'm the same height,only my nose is larger and my eyes are green.I'm still 16 and I REALLY hope I don't end up with his height.Height is only important for looks.Usually the shorter men are the toughest and better street fighters.Also we have large dicks. PFX says on 14/Aug/09
honestly, isnt it a known fact that shorter males have bigger johnson's than taller ones? I thought that was supposed to matter more than the height :p umad80 says on 13/Aug/09
Alright, that's fine. But that means that Rupert is 5'8.5" because those pictures clearly tell the tale of being 4" taller than Dan. They even pretty much had the same footwear for once. lol umad80 says on 12/Aug/09
Seriously Rob... you yourself measured Tom Felton as 5'8.5" and pictures prove that he is at least 4" taller than Dan. So if Dan is not lying, Tom is 5'9" (because clearly there were 4" there) and so is Rupert. In any case, Rupert is the same height as Tom and if Dan is 5'5" because "he refuses to lie" then Rupert and Tom are 5'9". It's as simple as that imo...
[Editor Rob: maybe radcliffe is being honest, but not mentioning he measured himself at 5ft 5 at 8am or something.] Ying says on 11/Aug/09
celebrity is always lie about their height
[Editor Rob: I read an interview where he said he 'refuses' to lie about his height of 5ft 5 and that sophie dahl and lily cole where 6ft giants.] Adamusic says on 9/Aug/09
I don't think that Dan is 5'4"...I would say more like 5'5 to 5'6. It's difficult to say who's taller between him and Emma, because I've seen him looking taller than Emma at some points, and sometimes shorter. I do know that Emma wears generous heels a lot. Radcliffe is definatly short though, shorter than in the books for sure...speaking of which, I have always wondered how tall the characters are at peak hieght in the books. These are my guesses:
Harry - 5'11 (initially small, but had a growth spurt in the later books)
Ron - 6'2 (always tall, probably between 6'1 and 6'2)
Hermione - 5'5
Dumbledore - 6'4 (All I know is that he's supposed to be quite tall and thin)
Neville - 5'8
Ginny - 5'7
James - 5'll (James and Harry are supposed to be the same height)
Sirius - 6'1 or 6'2
Twins - 5'10 (shorter and stockier than Ron)
Lupin - 5'9
Snape - 5'8
Pettigrew - 5'2 (Supposed to be VERY short in book 3)
Tom Riddle - 6'2
Malfoy - 6' (slightly taller than Harry)
Crabbe & Goyle...somewhere like 6'4 or something, they're supposed to be huge...
Dean Thomas - 6'3 supposed to be tall
Seamus - 5'9 (his height is never discussed, I don't think)
Hagrid - a little under twice the hieght of an average man, leads me to think about 9 - 10 feet sSsS says on 9/Aug/09
Poor guy. Must suck to be so small. I mean, I'm a girl and I'm 5'3.5" and I find it a bit hard to be that height, so I bet Daniel feels super insecure. Ingrid says on 5/Aug/09
Sorry, I know it now. Anonymous says on 29/Jul/09
look at how difficult hes trying to stand up here. If you click the picture you'll see some hair there , ekk lol
Click Here umad80 says on 26/Jul/09
The trouble with saying that Dan is 5'4.5" is that Rupert clearly had 4" on him in every photo taken with Tom during the photocall. Pretty much Rupert and Tom are the same height at around 5'8.5". Though I do agree that Dan is roughly around the 5'4.5" area and Emma may be closer to the 5'5" area. Sometimes she tends to be taller than Dan... so I doubt it's much of a difference. Anonymous says on 26/Jul/09
Almost But I'd rather say
Dan: 5'4.5
Rupert:5'8
Emma:5'4.5
Tom:5'8.5
Twins: 6'3
Bonnie: 5'5 or 5'5.5
Matthew: 5'11.5 mesh says on 26/Jul/09
He is petite, i just watched the new harry potter movie and man, even Emma Watson towered him! 165 Cm max! Nik says on 25/Jul/09
Dan is 5'5, Rupert is 5'8.5, Emma is 5'5, Tom is 5'9, James is 6'4, Oliver is 6'3.5, Bonnie is 5'5.5 and Matthew is 6'1. Mike says on 24/Jul/09
Actually I said Rupert was around 5'8, with a probable 4" difference between him and Dan. I think Tom Felton is a fraction taller than Rupert. umad80 says on 24/Jul/09
Mike, for you to be right about Rupert only being 5'7.75" than so would Tom Felton and Dan would have to be 5'2.75"! Look: Click Here Click Here and Click Here - Dan and Rupert seem to be wearing the same type of shoe. It's hard to say if Tom has any advantage. There are tons of pics like this too. It isn't until Rupert is standing with Emma that he starts to lean and it's hard to figure out his height. lol But clearly, there is 5" in every pic he and Tom are standing with Dan. Yes, no way Dan is 5'6" but there is over 4" between them. So 5'4" to 5'4.5" is most likely for Dan with Tom and Rupert at the same height. Which has also been proven since OotP but it seems that no one wants to acknowledge this. (Also I'd pay no attention to Fawn, I'd bet my last dollar she's the same person who has about 15 names here and has also changed their sex. lol) Mike says on 23/Jul/09
In regards to Fawn's comment; I think infact a lot of males can be deceitful when it comes to their own height, many adding an inch or more to their actual height, and I think this site can be proof enough of that.
If Rupert Grint is 5'8 then there is no way Radcliffe is 5'6, as there is a clear 3.5-4 inch height difference between them. So if Rupert's height is corrct, then Daniel must be in the 5'4-5 range. Anonymous says on 23/Jul/09
Click Here
claims to be 5'5" Fawn says on 22/Jul/09
Generally speaking, most males have no reason to lie about their height unless it's to make them sound taller. Any male who claims to be 5'5", is more than likely going to be telling the truth as that's not the ideal height for a man, so why lie about it? I'm not saying I have a problem with it or anything, simply that Daniel has stated several times that he is 5'5" with the exception of one or two times where he said 5'6". He could have just been taking a guess, and happened to overestimate an inch. Big deal.
I'm confident that he is in fact between 5'5" and 5'6", as a mere inch is hard to decipher through photographs alone. Emma Watson is 5'6", herself, which would make sense as to why it's hard to tell if she is taller than Dan or shorter. Like I said, an inch is hard to decipher in photographs as well as on the big screen. Watching the latest Potter film, she isn't wearing heels, she's wearing shoes that probably add an inch to her height, but so is Dan. Judging by the film, they are the same height, at times, Dan looking a bit shorter. Mike says on 22/Jul/09
Radcliffe - 5'4.5
Grint - 5'8
Felton -5'8.25 yel says on 22/Jul/09
His dad is 5'10 - 5'11? Looks the way taller than Daniel... Zn89 says on 22/Jul/09
He has been reported as 165 cm in recent news related to his height. So 5'5. yoyo says on 19/Jul/09
hes even shorter. 5ft3.5 to 5ft4 for him Snape says on 17/Jul/09
Daniel is 5'5 In the Half Blood Prince, even Ginny Weasley (Bonnie Wright) is taller than Harry Potter by like 2 inches. It's kinda cute to see actually. MariA says on 4/Jul/09
Honestly, when you're as gorgeous as Daniel, short or tall doesn't matter. He's a beautiful fellow, whatever his height. umad80 says on 30/Jun/09
That's what I thought too, Anonymous. If Rupert is to continue at 5'7.75" than Dan can't be more than 5'4" (and technically less). So either Dan is 5'4" or Rupert is around 5'9". Either way, one of them can't continue to be listed at the same height... Click Here and for shoe comparison: Dan's: Click Here Rupert has on the same shoes Ron has had for ages now, but: Click Here - Rupert and Dan look to have around the same amount of shoe there... Anonymous says on 27/Jun/09
Looked about 4 inches shorter than 5'8 Rupert Grint in 2007. And I highly doubt he has grown since then. He still looks about 4 inches shorter than Grint in the last DH pictures. dave says on 26/Jun/09
damn, yeah.... sorry! my mistake! umad80 says on 25/Jun/09
Dave, you can just click the link? This website means celebheights. Jason Isaacs is 5'11" and Tom Felton is 5'8.5" LOL crababal says on 25/Jun/09
dave u got it wrong ur thinking of tom felton "the other malfoy" ;) but yeah he is prob less than 5'5 being dwarfed by 5'8 tom felton dave says on 24/Jun/09
umad 80 .......... wrong. check the main page, or look up jason isaacs on this site and youll find a VERY interesting pic of him with 5'8 rob, not a cm over 5'8 for isaacs. Anyway, radcliffes max height is 5'5, he could be less. umad80 says on 23/Jun/09
Heh. "Lucious Malfoy" aka Jason Isaacs is 5'11" per this site: Click Here - Although I'm pretty sure Dan is 5'5" and I think he's one to really lose height at night. dave says on 23/Jun/09
if HE measured himself at 5'5, and considering hes DWARFED by 5'8-ish lucius malfoy, then id say he could be in the 5'4 range ZAQ says on 22/Jun/09
can someone come up with a height chart for this kid?
i think i can figure it out
in 2001 when he was 12
he looked roughly 4'11 judging by when he was on regis and kellys show
so if i can figure it out this is how he grew
11 4'6
12 4'11
13 5'1
14 5'3 1/2
15 5'5
So to answer everyones question he was done growing in early 2005 like around harry potter and goblet of fire.
so when exactly did he stop growing you ask.
at the age of 15 1/2 MissElizabeth says on 22/Jun/09
I'm not sure on Daniels height he looks to be about 5'5 5'6 to me. Either way they cast a character based on looks and talent. And at the beginning of the books Potter is characterized as being scrawny and small for his age. And yes he did have a huge growth spurt in book 5 but putting all that aside he's a great actor and the movies are awesome I don't think anyone will really care that he's not the proper height for the part. Michael says on 21/Jun/09
My father's wife worked with him on a project and said he was shorter than her. She's not a tall woman at all. I'd believe 5'5". Short guy, wouldn't have imagined Harry Potter being that short, as he appears much taller on screen. teddy89 says on 21/Jun/09
i think he's around 5'5 and nothing else. me and daniel were born exactly the same day (july 23, 1989) and i probably will grow max 1 cm (to 5'8 to 5'8,5). The fact that we've got exactly the same years maybe doesn't mean anything but i think that he could go to 5'5,5 max!!! Josh.J says on 17/Jun/09
he's now what 19?20? although he still has a window for growth, its very small. maybe could get 1~2 inches. anyway how tall is harry potter supposed to be at the end of the series? i got the impression that he was fairly tall though he wasnt close to the wealeys. Rika says on 15/Jun/09
He has a chance to grow taller, 3 years left in him. So 5'6 could be possible, but i cant imagine anymore than that. umad80 says on 9/Jun/09
Curtis C., not to add to people proving you wrong here, but while Dan once said he was 5'6" he later recanted and has said several times since then that he's only 5'5". There is actually video of him saying it, so I'd say that's pretty clear on his height... Rika says on 9/Jun/09
Curtis, MAgs and sites say alot of things. Rey Mysterio(WWE) had been listed 5'6 for 20 years.
The man is obviously shorter than that, but he is still listed as that.
Brad pitt had been listed at 6'1, he's 5'10 aswell as Justin Timberlake.
Now would you believe what they tell you, or believe what you see?
5'5 seems right. Curtis C. says on 8/Jun/09
Void or whoever you are, can you and the other people stop trying to prove me wrong about my comments of any of the celeb heights? Who cares? It doesn't really matter as long you make good comments about someone's height and I think Dan is 5'6." That's the height he's listed at. Void says on 7/Jun/09
Curtis C. He has not 5'6 (168) height. Her height is 165 max. Emma has 162 - 165 max height. Daniel is not thaller than Emma. In HP part five Natalia Tena - Tonk (she has 166) is taller than Dan because he has 164 cm max ! Curtis C. says on 3/Jun/09
I always thought that Dan would grow taller to be at least 5'8" or 5'9", but apparently it looks like he will remain at 5'6" 'cause he's nearly about to be 20 in two months. At least he won't considered to be too short though. umad80 says on 29/May/09
Med, when you have two people who are so obviously close to the same height, the angle of the pic will throw it off. That's basically what is happening in your pics. Most of the ones in your first batch, Dan either looks the same height, maybe a half inch smaller, and one he looked really tiny... D & E are basically the same height (I would go with 5'5" for sure) it's just Rupert that seems to be the biggest mystery. lol Koa says on 28/May/09
In HP part five Natalia Tena - Tonk (she has 166) is taller than Dan... He has
164 cm max ! Einstein says on 26/May/09
so to be precise, what is his height ???
im getting confused from so many ppl stating different heights Mike67 says on 21/May/09
Ok, I don't have a problem with him being below average height, but why on earth is he listed as 5'8 on some websites??? I can understand his 5'6 listing on many sites because it's a well know fact most celebs use their height in shoes but 3 inches? cmon! HS says on 20/May/09
what's wrong with being short? I mean, he's prolly 5'5 or so, but whats wrong with that? i am 15 and about 5'6 and im a one of the shorter ppl in my skool.. there's nothing wrong with celebrites being short... jade says on 19/May/09
i think he's just 5'4. but it was just based on his pictures in the internet. not sure about that Shereen says on 18/May/09
Seriously, in the book he got so much taller, I wonder if he wore heels, and is actually shorter than 5'5 Katrina says on 1/May/09
Daniel should wear heels for the remaining Potter movies as Haryy had a growth spurt in book 5 but Daniel never did. Lenad says on 19/Apr/09
He's 166cm max. Probably a weak 5'5 like 164-165cm. umad80 says on 16/Apr/09
LJ, I think that's just a bit absurd. heh. What I mean is, the casting department is going to look for: looks (I mean, more looking right for the part), embodies the part, has chemistry with co-stars, etc. While shortness can derail you from parts - this is a fact - and in todays society, most people will see a 16 year old as tall rather than short. That said, I don't think Dan's height will be a disadvantage for the most part, but there is no denying that it's harder for a shorter person in the business. Take Seth Green for example... he's gotten great parts, but no one considers him a leading man. Now, a lot of this has to do with the parts he's chosen, but him being 5'4" is also a disadvantage. No one is going to really take it seriously if his female co-star looks 6" taller. This is not a slam against Dan or his height, but the fact that it's all visual, and with most people... short guy and tall girl is odd, but tall guy and short girl is more appealing. Sometimes it's even hard for a girl who is tall if the guy is more average. It all has its issues, but sometimes it can be a blessing just with anything else. LJ says on 14/Apr/09
I, wanting to become an actor myself, know that in the acting world, being short is an advantage. Say for example theres a part of a 16 year old boy on offer and theres two people come for the audition ( not very realistic, but just bear with me) . If one of them is a sixteen year old and is quite good at acting - well- he's got a chance. But if the other is a 19 year old who is short and looks a few years younger than their actual age, and he's good at acting, they'll probably choose the nineteen year old because he's probably got more acting experience and more life experience to draw on his emotions and create his character. Clay says on 12/Apr/09
"Anonymous says on 24/Mar/09
Not having grown for a year or two does not mean you will never have a growth spurt again. I was 5'8 from 13 onwards and then at 19 I shot up to over 6 foot. Now I am 6'4. Lenad says on 10/Apr/09
Look at how much shorter than other guys he looks in Harry Potter movies. He's 5'5 at the most. Curtis C. says on 6/Apr/09
Ok, so Dan is all right at being at 5'6." Geoffrey says on 6/Apr/09
Saw him Equus and he's maybe 5'6 tops. Since he was in the altogether for a good part of the play I can also tell you that's he's all man and done most of his growing(our little Harry is actual rather hairy truth be told :-))!)and not likely he will get much taller. Oh well lots of big stars are of diminutive stature.. Tom Cruise, Elijah Wood, All Pacino, Dustin Hoffman.. he in good company. Curtis C. says on 4/Apr/09
Listen, "Lily," it is possible that Dan might grow at least 1 or 2 inches because the height growth ends between 21 to 25. Anonymous says on 2/Apr/09
he's smalL becAuse it'lL be unfair if he's also talL. He's already handsoMe (i thInk so!), a very goOd and talenteD aCtor,, a very rich guy, and a famOus hearthrob, alL over the world. Many woMan in every part in thIs world are dreaming to be with hÌm and knew hIm. He cAn buy what he wanteD. He is almOst perfEct (and nO oNe could be!). I also heard that he cAn play bAsS guitar. So he also have an aditioNal gIft huh!!, and i believe that in anythIng there's a purPose! Curtis C. says on 31/Mar/09
Well, listen here, "Lily." Even though Dan is almost 20, he might will at least grow 1 or 2 more inches. Height growth is until you're 21 to 25. Anonymous says on 24/Mar/09
Actually, Daniel hasn't really grown up since 2003 or 2004, so I don't see why he would suddenly have a growth spurt now at the age of 19(almost 20). He's no taller than 5'5 and he's admitted it. He will never be taller. Maybe 1 cm at most. He was an early bloomer lily says on 19/Mar/09
curtis, there is no way daniel can grow upto 5'9. he's gonna be 20 in july and u should know that a 5'5 guy cant just grow 4 inches at that age. Leon says on 19/Mar/09
I'm 5'8" in my bare feet and I'm still taller than the majority of girls. Daniel, who looks shorter than many of women he poses with in photos, must be around 5'5" or 5'6". I doubt his height will damage his acting career, though. He's talented and he's a good-looking boy. Elijah Wood and Tom Cruise have done reasonably well for themselves, wouldn't you agree? No reason Daniel can't follow in their footsteps. Curtis C. says on 14/Mar/09
Even though Dan is quite a short person, he might be to grow two to three inches, possibly putting him at least 5'9. lily says on 8/Mar/09
that's rubbish. just because he's short doesn't mean "he won't get that much work".
he's good at acting and that's what will keep him getting work. Ali020202 says on 4/Mar/09
It looks like he never realy grew properly. 5ft5 is realy short for a male aily, let alone in films and hollywood. I wonder if this will mean he won't get that much work as most female co-stars will tower over him. Anonymous says on 1/Mar/09
He always looks considerably short. I can't believe some people thought he was 5'8 or 5'9. If he's that tall, then Alan Rickman must be 6'5 and the Phelps brothers must be like 6'7 or 6'8. Daniel is 5'4-5'5. Never looks taller. Comets says on 25/Feb/09
Wow I actually thought he was atmost 5'9 Anonymous says on 22/Feb/09
Click Here
I think he says 5'4" someone earlier said that he said 5'5" I'm not sure... glenn says on 16/Feb/09
linda-its not my site.i respect peoples opinions as long as they dont assume or pass judgement on what i do or say.i unfortunately make a living like this.yes.i have a interest in how tall or short celebrities are.and i contribute cause of this.not take pics for the site.the site had been around for 4 years or so.ive been around for 20 years posing with celebs.your intitial post to me that started this conversation,i found wise ass or snotty.thats the way most would take it.sorry if i stressed you.im very strong in expressing myself as you can see.do enjoy the site if you decide to stick around.i sincerly hope you do.if not,i wish you well.thank you for clarifying which kennedy.not robert kennedy,who was shot as well.i do know.oh,by the way.no,i dont know celebrities personally.but i am an expert on how receptive they are in public.and how tall they are.daniel im sure is a sweet guy.not in public as much. Linda says on 14/Feb/09
Glenn, I apologize for my error in typing. Yes, I do know who PM is because unlike you, I can actually say that I know where I was when Kennedy was shot (President Kennedy - just in case you don't know). Your observation is correct, obtaining a person's autograph does not mean that the autograph seeker "knows" the individual. Which brings me to my next question - "How are you any different?" Aren't you simply getting your picture taken with someone and then assuming that you know them? If you aren't interested or respect other comments, then why do you have this site. I mean unless you take a photo next to a celebrity, have them take their shoes off and put a measuring stick next to them - observations about heights is in the eye of the beholder.
Don't freak out towards other people. It's great that you have the opportunity to meet this people - some of us have lives where we can afford to see them perform and receiving an autograph/picture is no big deal. Not a business or obsession as it seems to be with you. I seriously doubt if Mr. Radclffe or any other celebrity really cares what you or I think of them. I think it's time to get back to reality. Good luck with your job - as I assume this is what you do for work. glenn says on 14/Feb/09
thats paul mccartney.not mcarthy.you know.a beatle.saw him again tonight.the biggest celebrity alive.period.i could give a rats ass about anyones autograph,yet i still read dumb comments below,from the likes of roobz or anyone in the past.i dont make judgements from meeting someone once.your all clueless and missing the point.you only assume,and make trouble for me.none of you people met more than one celebrity or 2,or none at all,yet your all experts on them.or their height as well.those in their stubborn beliefs that is,not the reasonable posters.and your an expert of what i do or who i am.always the same robotic,one dimensional,predictable responses or answers.and i do this all for free,yet still get shat on.sorry to disappoint me.ha,the mere mention of radcliffe makes me yawn when on rare occassion a friend or peer will bring up if i want to go meet him.i usually go home or find a-list or b-list names to go for.ta ta. Linda says on 13/Feb/09
Glenn, I'm rather amused that my comment generated such a dramatic response from you. Sorry to disappoint you but obtaining an autograph from Mr. Radcliffe wasn't all that difficult. Paul McCarthy/Keith Richards? Boring!!!
Now that I know that the heights are simply your observation, I won't bother to check it out. Sean says on 8/Feb/09
I met Daniel at a press junket a year or so ago. I'm 6 ft and he was hovering around my shoulder. So 5ft 5 in borderline 5 ft 6 in, if it really matters. Roobz says on 8/Feb/09
hey every who passes judgement on celebrities 'snob' 'dick' etc. how can you determine whether or not they are a snob if you don't know them personally?
Just because you maybe didn't get an autograph when you were accosting them doesn't mean they are bad people. Glenn. FOR Glenn says on 8/Feb/09
I know you have answered this before (like a million times) but could you tell me if this urban myth of growing after the age of 20 is true? … Thank you for your time. I am 20 and 5 ft 9 in.( male) lily says on 4/Feb/09
Ecurb: even if you're 5'7 and daniel looked 3 inches shorter than you, it doesn't make him 5'2 or 5'3.
do the math!!! Ecurb says on 2/Feb/09
Stood just a few feet from him on 1/29 while he was signing autographs after an Equus performance. I'm 5'7" and am AT LEAST 3 inches taller than Mr. R. I'd guess 5'2" or 5'3". 5 ft 3.2 says on 31/Jan/09
I'm pretty sure that he is 5 ft 5.5 I have a picture somewhere on my computer of Emma and Daniel standing next to each other. She's wearing flipflops and he's wearing regular flats. He's about half an inch taller than her 5 ft 5 frame. Anyways, if he hates his height so much, he can just have an operation to change it. He has enough money for 20 of them. The operation can add 2-3 inches to him. Rituparna Ganguly says on 29/Jan/09
It doesn't matter
wheather Dan's height
is 5'5" or 5'7". What
matters is his talent. He
is a talented actor.
Many people have
rocked the world with
their talent n capability-
height couldn't prevent
them. One of them is
Nepoleon Bonapart. lily says on 25/Jan/09
i don't think 5'4.5 is tall ENOUGH for a guy, but i'll tell you one celebrity who's even smaller than that... RAY MYSTERIO
he's only 5'3 and he's amazing.
there's nothing wrong with ur height and tell those classmates to get off ur case. Bruce says on 23/Jan/09
hes 167 cm a bit over 5 ft 5 in Bashful says on 20/Jan/09
...Ahmm!!...
...Is 5'4.5 tall enough!...
...My classm8s are teasing me,..That im too small in our class,..Tell me some celebrity,..With the same height with me... Anonymous says on 17/Jan/09
glenn... i think for some young people Daniel is a lot cooler then Oaul Mccartney and Keith who-ever. stop the attitude ugly old man. rahul says on 16/Jan/09
i think he is about 5'6 or 5'7 fit, not more than....thats it. glenn says on 15/Jan/09
i could give a rats ass about daniels autograph.it worthless to boot.wouldnt mind a photo with him,but apparently i never put in the time.gee,what does that say? perhaps a could give a toss about him period.he has been in new york for months too.oooo,congrats you obtained his autograph on your napkin.frame it.i spanked(a.k.a,pounded,hammered,went to town,had a signing)paul mccartney today and got the photo with(not my first with him by the way).so i have better things to do.keith richards left me a lovely xmas gift.daniels been nothing but a snob that sneaks out of places nowadays.leave a comment with assuming you know it all,and you get a lovely response from me.i love people like you.ta ta. Linda says on 14/Jan/09
Glenn you originally wrote back 3 years ago that Daniel Radcliffe was polite even though he had passed by you a couple of times. For some reason you seem rather bitter that a busy young actor was unable to stop and give you your photo. I happen to have his autograph and he is a very polite young man. Let it go Glenn. umad80 says on 7/Jan/09
Where is the passage that it says he grew 10cm? It seems like an odd sort of statement considering they're from Harry's POV and I only remember Mrs. Weasley commenting on Harry having grown. So you'll have to quote that part of the book because I honestly just don't recall it...
It is funny how much they are different from their characters in basically height only. lol Anonymous says on 6/Jan/09
Harry grew a lot between books 5 and 6 but he was initially pretty short. I think Harry was about 5'4-5'5 in book 5 and it is said that he has grown about 10 cm. So he's probably 5'9 in book 6 and 5'10 in book 7. Ron has always been way taller than Harry but I don't think he's that extremely tall. Probably 6'2 in book 7. As for Hermione, I'd also say 5'4.
And I think Neville is pretty short in the books, like 5'6, but he's tall in the movies. And Draco is said to be slightly taller than Harry so probably 5'11 for him. lily says on 6/Jan/09
he really is 5'5??? isn't that pretty short compared to the average height in men??? Sean says on 4/Jan/09
I believe judging from what J.K. Rowling wrote that the characters heights are
Harry:5'10" (taking into account he was said to be very skinny) Ron:6'1", Hermione:5'4" umad80 says on 3/Jan/09
It would depend on what JKR considers 'tall'. It's funny, I only remember Mrs. Weasley commenting on Harry getting taller. But that doesn't mean he's 6' because he had "gotten taller" because we don't know how tall he was previously. Now, I haven't read the books in over a year, but I don't ever remember them specifying an actual height. In any case, Dan is definitely shorter than Harry, but we're just not sure of how much shorter... But then, none of the actors are really the heights their suppose to be. Even the twins who are suppose to be short and whatnot. hehe &ierra says on 30/Dec/08
Im taller than him.
damn. Anonymous 2 says on 30/Dec/08
Arikado, Harry couldn't be 5'8. Despite what JKR said in the earlier books in the last three if I ain't wrong he grew a lot and beeing described by being tall in the last book so I guess that he was at least 5'10" and maximum 6' Anonymous says on 23/Dec/08
I think Harry's supposed to be about 5'11". Ron ,6'2"/6'3", Hermione, 5'3"/5'4".
None of the actors are right. Hhaha. Arikado says on 22/Dec/08
5 foot 5 is right for him.. if he was over 6'0 that wouldn't be right for harry. i think harry's maximum height is 5'8. anonymous says on 2/Dec/08
to haze
you really are tall when you wake up in the morning, it's because the ligaments in between your spinal cord strectch when youre lying in bed. your original height will be back few minutes later teddy89 says on 11/Nov/08
in a picture close to ralph fiennes(180cm), he's a head shorter than him. so i think max 1.62 m Evanna says on 5/Nov/08
Dan Radcliffe commenting on his height again (New York Post via Wenn News):
Radcliffe Enjoys Anonymity In NYC
5 November 2008 4:17 AM, PST
Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe is enjoying his run in Broadway play Equus - because he can go unrecognised in the busy New York streets.
The actor, 19, is currently living in the U.S. while starring in the live stage show, and he insists the Big Apple provides welcome relief to his native U.K., where he is constantly spotted by fans.
And Radcliffe is convinced it is his diminutive height - he is 1.6 metres (5 foot, 5 inches) - that keeps him from being noticed.
He tells the New York Post, "The other day, I walked through Battery Park City up around Wall Street for about two hours, and I wasn't stopped once. I'm so short, no one notices me."
Well as we know 1.6m is actually 5'3", not 5'5". But anyway he hasn't grown. Eve says on 2/Nov/08
Ive always thought Daniel is only about 5'2". Emma looks taller than he is in the newest potter series who is supposed to be 5'5". joe II says on 31/Oct/08
Anonymouse3 = uber ignorant.
when was this last updated? Anonymous3 says on 29/Oct/08
tallone I advise you to stfu, just because there are more freaks than USUAL does not classify them as NORMAL. And yes I will visit UCLA sometime. O wait what's the point of wasting my time when I could just live my own wealthy life. No need to get my hands dirty. Roffle
BTW I bench press 325 lbs. So I'm sure I could do quite some damage unarmed. I would indeed last more than a minute because women can't fight. Sorry, I meant women can't fight for $***. I could probably take your whole company of freaks on with a drink in hand (a cooler) and a Cuban cigar. Get over it buddy for there to be normal people in this world, there has to be an elite group of freaks somewhere. thanks for the waste of space with the roster list
Have an nice day. haze says on 29/Oct/08
listing sounds about right. not sure on the shrinking though. im sure it affects everyone differently. im 6'3 on the dot before i go to sleep and have measured 6'3.75 morning. i also weigh 280 pounds and have a vigorous physical schedule. so i cant judge on radcliffe. short for sure though Dave says on 27/Oct/08
Teddy89
No, it's not true, in Hungary the average is 5'6" (170 cm). So WE ARE the shortest in Europe. umad80 says on 27/Oct/08
To be fair, not everyone shrinks at night. Some people do stay the same height all around. For instance, I have measured myself and stay the same height I always am (after the initial waking up of being 5'6"). I don't know the general rule, if most people shrink at night or not. But the point I was making is that if people think Dan is 5'4" at night, but during the day he is 5'5" then you can assume he will definitely look shorter at night and people will get his height wrong. I thought that made perfect sense. Teddy89 says on 27/Oct/08
In italy the average is 5'8.5 (174cm) and we are the shortest in europe! Him, to be english, is quite short! lene says on 27/Oct/08
he really looks short in the Harry Potter series..perhaps it's really the genes, but being in the spotlight at a really young age could also be a reason. i believe that, scientifically, young celebrity stars don't grow as much as they should because they are exposed to the spotlight. i think i heard from a news clip that the heat coming from the spotlight affects the pituitary gland. examples are the olsen twins?.. well, i'm not really sure though. glenn says on 26/Oct/08
ill never forget when he ran by me a few times,3 years ago,ignored my photo requests,and looked 5-4. Anonymous says on 26/Oct/08
It is possible. Daniel's mum is very short, under 5', so in his case the lack of inches is hereditary. teddy89 says on 25/Oct/08
I was born july the 23,1989 (exactly like him!) but i'm 5'8.5 (174 cm) and when i was 15 i was tall 5'3!! How is possible he didn't grow in 3 years? andy says on 24/Oct/08
people add an inch at night, their spine straightens out as they sleep. Thats why everyone is taller in the morning. Anonymous says on 21/Oct/08
Umad, why do you find it necessary to say that he shrinks at night, don't most people shrink a bit at night? Anonymous says on 21/Oct/08
That's a huge growth spurt Kyla, highly abnormal I'd reckon --> 1.5 inches about (assuming that your "littles" count as .25". Lol, and Torny, did you whip out a tape measure because, if you did, that would be awesome. Ahleks says on 16/Oct/08
LOL.
people who grow two inches after reaching age 19 are like one-in-a-million. Kyla says on 13/Oct/08
I was a 1/4" shy of 5'8" all through high school, now at age 24 I am a lil over 5'9", so some females do have small growth spurts after age 18! Torny says on 10/Oct/08
At Mme Tussauds' in London he was around my height (170 cm=> 5f7). They may have lied... umad80 says on 9/Oct/08
Er, I've heard of males growing pass the age of 18, that does happen. But to say all grow pass 18? No, the average, common age is 18 for men and 16 for females. Most females, in fact, stop growing at 15 like I myself did. The growth deal is is a puberty thing, so the idea that everyone grows in their twenties is a bit far fetched, though something that can happen. (I think it's more likely for males for some reason though. I've never heard any female say they've grown pass the age of 18, really... but I'm sure someone, somewhere has.)
But on the subject of Dan - height wise, it's obvious he is 5'5". Though I think it is possible he shrinks at night. Alma Carey says on 7/Oct/08
Males continue to grow in height until about the age of 27. Females until about 25.
Daniel Radcliffe is going to grow AT LEAST 2 more inches, possibly 3. It happened to my brother Epona Cladach says on 5/Oct/08
Just got in from "Equus" at the Broadhurst on Broadway...YES he is that buff...his body looks great...it is not airbrushing....and YES, he is a good 5'4" or 5"...he was almost a full head shorter than both the actor who played his father and Richard Griffiths...and he was about an inch shorter than his female love interest, who was very petite. I was 12 feet from him. And he was AMAZING by the way...I'm almost looking forward to him wrapping up the Potter movies (of which I a fan) so he can move on to other things. Anonymous says on 1/Oct/08
Unknown, you are kind of right, but, I'm telling you guys, look at new photos of Dan, he really seems to have grown in the past year! We'll definitely see when more photos of the cast come out, but I'm telling you, he looks taller and bigger. Anonymous says on 30/Sep/08
Anon, that would put D-Rad at 5'2" or 5'3" and, if you believe he is that short, that's fine, but just remember that that would put Grint at about 5'4"/5'5" and, come one, he's not that short. umad80 says on 30/Sep/08
Matt looks weird with that short hair! Not a good style on him.
Any ways, that person saying Dan was shorter than her (?) whois between 5'4" and 5'5" must be on something. lol I'm not saying Dan is tall, but he's been taller than Devon Murray whois around 5'2" (her estimate would put Dan between 5'1" and 5'2"!) and it would make Emma the same height and Rupert around anywhere from 5'4" to 5'6" and I've seen him in person, and he was taller than me at 5'5" (probably 5'6" or so with shoes) back in 2005. There is no way he's under 5'8". lol! So yes, I'd say Dan's more 5'5" and probably shrinks a bit at night. unknown says on 30/Sep/08
dan's about 5"5 right? maybe he'll grow about 2-3 inches cause he's got two more years to grow..
maybe he'll be 5'7 or 5'8 which is by the way pretty average for a boy's height Anonymous says on 29/Sep/08
How tall did they seem?
[Editor Rob: Miriam peak was 5ft and looks to be maybe a little under that now. She was wearing a running shoe. Lewis is now 19 so he's basically adult height and I didn't think he was a legit 6 footer... (he wore 3/4 inch adidas superstars). I thought more 5ft 11.5, he has quite short hair now - he said he was annoyed and decided it's easier getting up and not having to do anything with it! He's actually a rather cool young man from our brief chat with him...
here is a table shot.
] Anonymous says on 27/Sep/08
Has Rob upgraded Rupes then umad? Oh, wait, as I guessed --> no, I'm not the only delusional one I see. ;). But, I will admit it, Rupert looks bigger physically in those photos, horizontally rather than vertically of course.
[Editor Rob: speaking of Potter I did meet at the weekend Neville Longbottom and professor Sprout.] Anonymous says on 26/Sep/08
"The first thing I noticed was that he is short. I'm about 5'4"-5'5" and he was a few inches shorter than me."
Click Here umad80 says on 23/Sep/08
Hehe I was going to mention that article too, Evanna. And I know if Dan was 5'6" he'd have corrected the guy immediately. (Remember how important that non-existent half inch was?) So Dan is 5'5" and Emma is 5'5" (maybe just slightly taller, but that's pushing it). Looks like the only one still growing is Rupert. He looked a strong 5'9" while filming Wild Target and he was standing next Bill Nighy and around 4" shorter with lesser heel and with Emily Blunt, wearing basically the same heel in footwear was taller and when she was wearing the heels he looked about the same height, give or take a few centimeters. So maybe Dan can still grow after 20 like Rupert. :P Evanna says on 22/Sep/08
Anna, you're delusional. Radcliffe is 5'5" max. Here's a brand new article from Herald Tribune: Click Here
"Radcliffe looks nothing like Harry Potter. He wears no glasses; he has no scar on his forehead. He talks rapidly, with a streetwise London accent. He is buff from "Equus"-related exercise. He is 5 feet 5 inches, or 1.65 meters, shorter than you would think (as so many actors are) but comfortable enough to joke ruefully about it."
Radcliffe's done growing, get over it! Anonymous says on 21/Sep/08
Anon, why do you not have a picture then and why did you not whip out a tape measure if you were standing next to him? And, come on m8, 5'4" is a bit harsh, he's looking closer to 5'6" these days. Anon says on 17/Sep/08
He's short, I want to see him stand in front of a tape measurer because I wouldn't be surprised if he's 5"4... I stood next to him and he's not as tall as he likes to say he is. Anonymous says on 17/Sep/08
Sorry E, that was the link I meant to give, you were just suppossed to find the photos from there, hahaaha and I believe the title was actually called "Equus promo pictures", so much good that does you, right? haha, anyway, there actually are some more stage door photos (paparazzi!) photos on danradcliffe.com and he does indeed look bigger, I don't understand! Evanna says on 16/Sep/08
Erm, dunno what pics you're talking about, your link leads to a news page. But yeah, airbrushing can do miracles - apart from obvious (whiter teeth, flawless skin, thicker hair) it can add you muscles, enlarge boobs, extend limbs, narrow hips and waist, even change facial features. That's why I don't trust promo pictures, they're always airbrushed. Only paparazzi pics show what celebs really look like. Anonymous says on 15/Sep/08
THey can airbrush people to make them look like they have gained more muscle mass, Evana? Is that what you're talking about? I'm not talking about his abs, which would be airbrushed, I'm talking about him actually looking bigger physically.....and they didn't do that with his promos for the last run of Equus, so I just find it strange. Look at some photos here Click Here It's nothing to do with his abs or his height for that matter, I just found it interesting..... Evanna says on 15/Sep/08
Anonymous, that's called airbrushing. Anonymous says on 14/Sep/08
Look at recent Equus promotion, he looks like he has got much more buff, it's weird. erica says on 13/Aug/08
daniel sos need to growww umad80 says on 4/Aug/08
Heh. Right. Rupert so stands as straight as Dan. And please, everyone knows that Dan and Emma are the same height. It's only you who won't see it or admit it. At least when it comes to Rupert most people agree with me... he's just so hard to tell. What's even funnier is you use things like the Paris photocall. If you were absolutely correct, and Emma was 5'7" (LOL) then Rupert would be pretty tall. Taller than he is, at least. Rupert clearly has 3-4" on Emma in every picture at that time so for them to be anywhere near the same height, Emma would have to be losing that much. Of course her shoes clearly give her a half inch advantage over Rupert's.
I like that it's obvious that you're annoyed with me. Names like "Lady" and "have you read them?" (What does that have to do with anything?) "dumb" etc. Everyone here is in agreement that Dan and Emma are the same height (the actual height is still somewhat in question). Is Rupert huge next to them? Definitely not. Like 3-4 inches, no doubt. It would look insignificant, of course. Especially with the shoes Rupert wears versus theirs when they're out It's not really that obvious until you're getting over that in height. Anonymous says on 2/Aug/08
Well, according to this site, a "smidgen" means something! Anyway, I just find you funny. You always give me crap about my wanting Emma to be taller than Dan (which, by the way, I don't want, it's simply the truth - it would be so much better if she were shorter - better for the series!), but then you always talk about how Rupert always slouches and, thus, looks shorter than he really is. Lady, give me a break please. Rupert indeed used to slouch, but these days (look at the Paris photo call from last year) he stands perfectly straight, almost as straight as Dan. It's pretty obvious that he's got over that phase, but Emma has not - she slouches every second and it's not just a "little pressure on her leg", no. She full out slouches - JK has even noted this in the books! Have you read them? Anyway, it's dumb, and pretty obvious that Emma is taller than Dan and Rupert is really not much taller than either Dan or Emma. Emma's above average, Rupert's about average, and Dan's slightly shorter than Rupert. Deal with it. Emma needs to shrink, Dan needs to grow (though I think he has a little) and Rupert needs to take some growth hormones because he is way shorter than Ron should be. :D! stefan says on 30/Jul/08
Dan is 5'4'' (163cm) flat out! Definitely! I mean, the brothers who play Fred and George are 6'3'' (191cm) and he looks a whole foot shorter than them. Maybe he's even 5'3'' (160cm). tallone says on 29/Jul/08
Anonymous3 you don't get out much. If the tallest girls you have ever seen are 5'11" I am going to guess you live in the South. Your comment was one of the most ignorant things I have read in quite some time!
Geena Davis, Brooke Shields, Uma Thurman and American Idol winner Jordin Sparks are all 6'0". Here are a ton of other tall-amazing women...Carol Mann (Hall of Fame Golfer) 6'3" Michelle Norkett (model) 6'3" Gabrielle Reece (beach volleyball player) 6'3" Kerri Walsh (volleyball player) 6'3" Lindsay Davenport (Tennis Player) 6'2-1/2" Amy Acuff (American high jumper) 6'2" Janet Reno 6'2" Adriana Sklenarikova (model) 6'2"
Brigitte Nielsen 6'1" Pam Stone (standup comedian) 6'1" Alexandra Stevenson (tennis player) 6'1" Betty Thomas (of "Hill Street Blues) 6'1" Venus Williams (Tennis Player) 6'1" Dian Fossey 6'0" Allison Janney (of tv's "West Wing") 6'0" Kristen Johnston ("Sally" on tv's 3rd Rock From the Sun) 6'0" Elle Macpherson 6'0" Tyra Banks 5'11" Christie Brinkley 5'11" Mariel Hemmingway 5'11" Claudia Schiffer 5'11" Carly Simon 5'11" Anna Nicole Smith 5'11" Sigourney Weaver 5'11"
...and I would love to have you come to UCLA (roster included below) and tell our women's basketball team that they are freaks. You wouldn't last a minute.
#/Name/Position/Height:
31 Alexander, Moniquee C 6-6
24 Brown, Candice F 6-3
21 Campbell, Doreena G 5-10
1 Earl, Nina F 6-1
2 Henderson, Tierra G 5-10
23 Ibekwe, Chinyere F-C 6-4
4 Nzekwe, Christina F 6-4
14 Pluimer, Lindsey F 6-4
34 Rogers, Regina F-C 6-3
13 Tukiainen, Erica G 6-0 Anonymous3 says on 21/Jul/08
lauren how the hell are you 6'6 as a girl, you're lying through your teeth, tallest girls ive seen are 5'11 and sometime an extreme rare case of a girl being about 6'2, either that or you are some sort of freak umad80 says on 21/Jul/08
She IS NOT taller than Dan. God, all you have to do is look at any picture at the HWF ceremony. Dan is 5'5" and Emma is 5'5". Get it through your thick skull Anna. And if Dan said 5'6" in a Jonathan Ross interview that was *after* he said 5'5" then he's suffering from... something. He said 5'5" at the photocall and then an interview (or two, I don't remember) for DB. He's 5'5". He's admitted it. Get over it.
And hell, if slouching makes you lose 3" than Rupert must be 6'. Seriously. And Emma does NOT slouch more than Rupert, in fact, she never really 'slouches'. She more or less does not stand straight as an arrow. Slouching would be more about shoulders, and back. Emma stands more weight on one leg. That is NOT slouching but a relaxed posture.
And here, the trio (And don't give me rubbish "I can't see their feet!" That's just because you know that Dan and Emma are the same height and you don't want to admit it.) are standing the best, no shoes and Dan and Emma are the same height with Rupert 4" taller: Click Here And here are more: Click Here Click Here and Click Here (this picture right here proves that if Emma is 5'6" or 5'7" like you want to claim, then Rupert is an easy 5'10" to 5'11".)
So yes, it's quite obvious that Emma and Dan are the same freakin' height and Dan is proven to be an average of 5'5" and probably losing height during the night. Emma is not taller and if she is, it's by a smidgen. Anonymous. says on 21/Jul/08
Joe is correct. And you are reading to much into the comments, wow, and I thought I was bad. Also, ".....and even comment on being short, if he's 5'6"?" Ehm, yes, because 5'6" is so much taller than 5'5"! haha, that's what's so funny about people on this site, they think and inch is the most noticeable thing in the world, as I've said, look at a ruler, an inch could easily be made up by one's hair or whatnot, it's not that big (as a matter of fact, I'm watching OotP right now and Radcliffe's hair looks to give him about an inch thus proving that it's not a big amount!). Oi vey. He's probably somewhere between 5'5" and 5'6" which is short for a guy, but honestly not that short, at least he's not 5'2" or something. He's taller than me and that's what we care about. Also, as the film progresses, I find it absolutely hillarious that anyone says that Emma is shorter than Danny! Wow, it's obvious that she's a sloucher. Did you know you can "lose" up to 3 inches if you slouch, somebody said that on one of the pages here whilst having an intense discussion about their height dilemma. Anyway, Emma slouches (more than Rupert, he actually stands now) and JK Rowling even made fun of her for it in the seventh book, so there! When Emma stands up straight she's barely shorter than Rupert and that's quite easy to see. She's taller than Dan, that's dumb. Joe says on 19/Jul/08
on the jonathan ross show, he hesitated as if he was unsure and said "5'6". thats from the horses mouth but hes probably shorter. umad80 says on 17/Jul/08
That's dumb. No offense, but he said "I measured myself this morning and I'm still 5'5". It's very depressing." Or something along those lines. Later on, a few months later, he says it again in a DB interview. I think I posted it sometime ago, so I don't know if it still exists. Why would the boy say he's 5'5" at the photocall and then again mention it several times months later, and even comment on being short, if he's 5'6"? Let's face it, Dan has said it himself, he's 5'5". There is no denying that. He wasn't joking, he was being honest especially if just a month or so prior to that he was claiming 5'6" and during GoF era he said 5'5.5"! And the photos don't lie, unless he loses about 2" at night, or the other guys are freakin' giants, the guy is 5'5". Anonymous says on 17/Jul/08
When has he said 5'5" in "recent months"? Let us not discuss the one at the OotP photocall.....other than that mishap I haven't heard anything. I still say 5'5.5" or 5'6" and Emma is obviously taller.
Bonnie: 5'4"
Katie: 5'4.5"
Evanna: 5'2" or 5'3". (Dan towered over her in OotP even when both were wearing shoes).
Rupert: 5'8" or 5'9"
Emma: 5'6" or 5'7". umad80 says on 16/Jul/08
Well, there are millions out there. Never mind that Dan himself has actually claimed 5'5" a few times in recent months. lol But hell, here is with Daniel Day Lewis: Click Here - if Dan is around 5'6"/5'7" then Daniel Day Lewis must be a giant. And here he is with Richard Griffiths: Click Here who is supposedly 5'9" so if Dan is the 5'6"/5'7" you think, then really, Richard Griffiths must be a giant, too. And if you're going to post promotional images, it's best to put screen shots of behind-the-scenes footage than actual movie stills where camera angles can make someone taller than what they are. Anonymous says on 16/Jul/08
Go on then, mad, share these proper photos that you've got. Rupert's 5'9" at the most and D and E are both around 5'6" and 5'7". And Josephine, if he were 5'4" he could reach about 5'6" easily with certain shoes (I reckon more)! Normal tennis shoes give about an inch..... umad80 says on 13/Jul/08
LOL Interesting? Never mind that Rupert is slumped over and when you look close enough he still has a few inches on them, despite this slump? Might want to get real photos where they're closer to the same shoes and better posture. :P Josephine says on 12/Jul/08
I am a 5'4" and I met him at the last Harry Potter movie premiere(I am a film journalist for the Village Voice in NYC).I swear he looked about my same height and I wasn't wearing high heels.He probably can reach 5'5" when he wears certain shoes. Anonymous says on 11/Jul/08
Man! I think Dan and Emma (especially) are giving Rupert Grint a run for his money as the current "tallest in the trio". Look at these photos of the three from OotP.....hmm.....interesting indeed. Click Here Anonymous says on 10/Jul/08
Click Here
in this video he complains about being 5'5". it's kind of hard to hear but you can hear it if you listen closely. Dani says on 7/Jul/08
i thought he was taller im taller at 5'9" and i a girl and im younger than him Ellie says on 7/Jul/08
Yeah, this dude is pretty short. I think 5'5" is about right. Ahleks says on 6/Jul/08
A 5'6"-7" guy wouldn't claim 5'5".
if he claims 5'5", then he is probably 5'4". umad80 says on 4/Jul/08
Closer to 5'7"? Oh God. You enjoy this, don't you? Talk about laughable! I mean, in less than a year he's grown almost two inches at age 18? I think it's safe to say it... Dan is 5'5" during the day and closer to 5'4" at night. He obviously loses height at night. Recent night events have really started to show how much shorter he is than he claims. But I do think 5'5" during the day is probably accurate. (And mainly because Emma seems pretty much 5'5" herself...) Maya says on 2/Jul/08
Anon I posted some very recent photos of Dan and Richard Griffiths on 17 June. Dan looks no more than 5'4" "tall" there. He hasn't grown. i luv short guys says on 2/Jul/08
Dan looks great at 5'5" which is supposedly his height.Though,I have a strong feeling he can't b taller than 5'4"...& mind u,my gut feelings r ALWAYS CORRECT. Anon says on 1/Jul/08
Has anyone got ANY new photos? You can see some of Dan from the Tonys (at which he, clearly, looked taller than 5'5"), but I have seen nothing of Rupert or Emma.....? Anon says on 29/Jun/08
This is no joke actually, have you seen recent photos of him? He attended the Tonys and was taller than an interviewer, something I've rarely seen and he just looks different. His voice is deeper as well, I dunno, he's had a late spurt or something, but I'm banking on a strong 5'6" at the least. He's pushing 5'7" no doubt. Robbie H says on 28/Jun/08
He look the same height as julie walters, maybe smidge taller- i thinks hes probs closer to 5'4 umad80 says on 28/Jun/08
A strong 5'6". lol Oh Anna, and you even were the one to bring up the video of him saying he's 5'5" and he's said it several times after that. More like 5'4" in the evening and 5'5" during the day. And the reason people call Dan short is because, well, he is. Why deny it? For a guy, he is short. Is it bad? No, there are plenty of actors who are his height or around his height. Michael J. Fox, Seth Green, etc. And even these guys will admit they're short. I mean, 5'5" is the average height for a girl. A guys average height is much taller. I don't think anyone is being rude with stating the obvious - one that Dan even agrees on. Anonymous says on 26/Jun/08
Alice, being short is not bad at all (being short myself, thought not as extremely as you, I'm 5'3") and, as you said, Dan is not "so short" at all. At the very least, he is 5'5" (in the evening) and, in my opinion, he looks a strong 5'6" and some as of late. Does anyone know why we are hearing nothing about the HBP film? Alice says on 25/Jun/08
why are people say "omg he's so short" im here to say that you guys no nothing about short. I'm a girl and im (sort of) proud to say im 18 years old with a height of 4'11". now thats stressing. especially since i have a face of a 12 year old. if Dan is 5'5" its not so bad my dad is the same height. MJlover says on 19/Jun/08
Aimie: ''He wouldn't be as adorable if he was 6 feet tall.'' -Right! umad80 says on 17/Jun/08
I'm still convinced that Dan shrinks at night. I've just noticed that every night event he goes to he looks 5'4" but during the day he always looks taller. Not much, but definitely closer to the 5'5" he claims. Although that is if Richard Griffiths is not 5'9"... he could have measured himself at 5'9" with that particular posture and we wouldn't exactly know it. lol Anonymous says on 17/Jun/08
I think Daniel is about 5-5, emma the same as Dan and Rupert about 5-6 to 5-7.
What's with these ridiculous rumours about Rupert being 5-9 or 5-10??? LOL Maya says on 17/Jun/08
Here are some new photos of Dan and Richard Griffiths (Uncle Vernon in HP): Click Here
Click Here
Dan looks really really short there, about 5'4" max, since Richard Griffiths is only 5'9" and has a rather poor posture due to his obesity. |
