Celia says on 19/Nov/09
Here's a picture of Emma with her boyfriend Jay Barrymore...he's got to be a good 6'4"-6'5" tall. So Emma is definitely around 5'5". Click Here
Jane says on 16/Nov/09
Katie - judging by photographs where Emma and Bonnie are in close proximity from the recent HBP premieres, Bonnie is undeniably at least an inch taller than Emma - even when accounting for heel height, where Emma's shoes are usually towering 4.5-5.5 inch heels which will generally give 3.5-4.5 inches in height.
Actually, both Emma and Bonnie seem rather petite - if we look at Emma free-standing sans heels, she looks between 5'2" and 5'4", and no where near her claimed height of 5'6". I'm not sure if Bonnie has ever stated her approximate height, but I would venture a guess that Bonnie is a genuine 5'5", Emma being from 5'3.5" to 5'4". Either Emma is unsure of her height and is adding on to it (perhaps her agency - Storm - told her to do so?), or she is awkwardly proportioned and simply looks leagues shorter than she is - I think it is the former. And in regards to her slouching - it seems to be a sort of relaxed state for her, particularly when she was younger (I am the same), but she rarely does it now (maybe the abundance of heels are straightening her back, or maybe she's had lessons because she's more in the spotlight now), but Rupert also has the tendency to slouch, more severely than Emma, and although he is relatively the tallest of the trio, he appears to be of a fairly average height, at around 5'8" to 5'8.5" (claims of 5'10" and 5'11" are laughable, really). Dan is likely Emma's height to 0.5in or an inch shorter, at around 5'3" (once again, his 'five-foot-five' is an exaggeration, but really, being insecure about a diminutive or petite stature is ridiculous, because the guy has character and that's the human point) Jules says on 13/Nov/09
@katie she's slouching so she looks two/three inches shorter than Bonnie. Number one problem with Emma is her posture. She already looks so small and short, even on TV and pictures and even with high heels and yet her posture is bad. (Sorry for the comparison) Unlike Megan Fox who is only 5'4" (she said it) but with those heels she looks 5'8. Katie says on 12/Nov/09
Hi, There is picture from half-blood prince set
Click Here
and i dont think Bonnie is taller than Emma just about 0.5inch
your opinions? heights937 says on 7/Nov/09
jules, I didn't know the picture I posted was so long ago, but I really think she's in between 5"4.5 and 5"5. really have no idea though, but I could sit here and calculate measurements with the pictures all day haha Chad says on 4/Nov/09
@Jules: I think you are about right on Emma's height. I think she is closer to 5"5. But here is a little heel height 101 as I understand it. A typical high angle heel with a minimal platform at the front that is 4-4.5 inches at the back of the heel does not actually give you more than about 3 inches additional height over your barefoot height. Check out the heel height truth section for further explaination. Then once you factor in the shoes a man would wear @ a good 1 inch, these types of shoes only give about a 2 inch advantage over a male dress shoe. Even Emma's 5 inches would only give her a 3 inch advantage relative to Rupert. Jules says on 24/Oct/09
@heights937: possibly that she is also 5"4.5 tall but that picture is years ago. And there is also a possibility that she is less taller than Katie leung since she was wearing chuck taylor.
Here's a photo of Emma from HBP premiere in New York Click Here she was wearing 4-5 inch heels (ouch!)and here's a pic of her with Dan and Rupert (who was slouching) Click Here In their UK premiere Rupert (who looks pretty much 5"11 if you compare his height to Dan) looked like he was 1 - 2 inch taller than Emma and she was wearing, again, 4/5 inch heels (it look more like 5 inches) Click Here Click Here if you subtract her heels from Rupert's height (assuming that in the picture he's 5"11) that made her 5"6 (?) and then subtract 2 inches since in the picture Rupert looks like 2 inches taller, that made her 5"4 (?) Jules says on 23/Oct/09
Ooh, late post. I think 5"4 - 5"5. on HP and the Half blood prince premiere where she was standing between Rupert and Dan, she was wearing 4 inch heels and she looked like she was with the same height as Rupert (assuming that Rupert is around 5"8-"9) and only 3 inch taller than Dan. heights937 says on 22/Oct/09
ok, I found a perfect picture, celebheights says that katie leung is 5"4.5, so here's emma right next to her and they've both got flat shoes on so what do you guys think?
Click Here k4556 says on 26/Sep/09
I think 5"5 for her is actually correct, though sometimes she looks a lot shorter than that, she sometimes even looks 5"3, but I agree with andy, because Ginny is about 5"6, and I think dan is 5"4.5, to be honest, but there was that rumor that he grew. So as for dan I'm confused, but emma and bonnie's heights seem accurate. yukti says on 6/Sep/09
hy if u know dat much abt emma watson can u ask her dat will shw cum to india inindia delhi......plzz type the message in yukti.kool@gmail.com andy says on 5/Sep/09
5'5 is about right for her, ginny is a little bit taller, harry is a little smaller than both of them.
ron is 5'10
malfoy 5'9
neville 5'9
dumbledore 6'4
snape 6'1
riddle 6'1
twins 5'11
sirius 6'2
lupin 5'9 Jane says on 4/Sep/09
Free-standing, she looks around 5'2" - perhaps this is simply due to her limb ratio, making her look shorter than she is, or perhaps she genuinely is short. Next to Daniel, who states he is 5'5" (appears to be closer to 5'3" or 5'4", but, okay) she appears 5'4". I understand that celebrities tend to exaggerate their heights, and with Emma always she still doesn't seem to be the tall 5'6" she claims. It would be rather generous to place her at 5'4". Anon says on 3/Sep/09
Emma's definitely taller than Daniel now, after seeing HBP I have no doubt. She had been saying 5'5"/5'6" OotP era, but now she has taken to saying 5'7"....check it. I'll post when I find it, it's on trionetwork.org annie says on 19/Aug/09
adam, you idoit, ginny is not 5'7 sSsS says on 9/Aug/09
5'5" is a good height for a girl. Tall enough for her to not feel insecure, but not tall enough for guys to avoid her. Anonymous says on 6/Aug/09
We can't really know what are the peak height for main caracters in the books. My guess would be a bit different.
Harry: 5'9-5'10 Had a growth spurt but doesn't seem too tall.Just average.
Ron: 6'1 He's tall but I don't think he's THAT tall.He's not a giant like Cormac or Runcorn.
Hermione: 5'4 Like JKR
Twins: 5'9
Dumbledore 6'3
Malfoy: 5'11 Slightly taller than Harry
Snape: 5'8
Ginny: 5'3 She's said to be rather tiny
Neville: 5'8
James: 5'9-'10
Sirius: 5'11-6'0
Lupin: 5'9
Pettigrew: 5'1 Is said to be very small in book 3
Tom Riddle: 6'2 adam says on 5/Aug/09
I doubt she is any more than 5'5.5". This is probably her exact hieght as she did look a tiny bit taller than Radcliffe w/o heels. Radcliffe I believe is also somewhere between 5'5" and 5'6". She may be a tiny bit taller. These I think are the hieghts that the main characters were at peak hieghts in the books:
Harry - 5'11" (he started out small, but then had a growth spurt in year 5-6)
Ron - 6'3"
Hermione - 5'5"
Twins - 5'10"
Dumbledore - 6'5"
Sirius - 6'1"
James - 5'11"
Lupin - 5'9"
Tom Riddle - 6'2"
Hagrid - Somewhere around 9 - 10 feet
Snape - 5'8"
Malfoy - 6'
Ginny - 5'7" Rory says on 2/Aug/09
I remember in an interview a few years back, Daniel Radcliffe said he was 5'5" and a half, the half meant alot to him because it meant that he was half an inch taller than Emma. However, recently Emma looks taller than Daniel in flats. I think 5'6" is accurate. k_4556 says on 31/Jul/09
i really thought she was 5"6, up until a couple of days ago. See when I see her on harry potter and it shows full length shots of them all standing together, she really does look a good 5"6', but I saw her at the premiere, and even in those heels, she looked about 5"4-5"5, but i would have to say 5"5 and no more. It's weird how it just seems so uncertain. Anonymous says on 29/Jul/09
umad80 has impressed me with this response, I appreciate the lack of witty retort. Yous rose above childish slander and I respect that. on behalf of everyone I wish to thank you for your contributions on this, and other pages. Curtis C. says on 27/Jul/09
I agree with J. Emma definitely does look 5'5"-ish. J says on 27/Jul/09
She's definitely 5'5". Not taller. She looks short. 5'7" is so over the top umad80 says on 26/Jul/09
I was going to say something witty in response to Anonymous, but then I thought, it's kinda cool that someone is paying attention enough to me to say such things. I mean, if you think I care too much, you must be hanging onto every word I say. ;) Personally I think someone is just mad that Emma is nowhere near the 5'6" or 5'7" they want her to be at. LOL Anonymous says on 25/Jul/09
umad80 cares too much about harry potter stars heights. umad80 says on 25/Jul/09
Just for the record, if Tom is 5'8.5" as Rob himself has listed him as after taking pics with him, Rupert is the same height. That said, Emma's heels in NYC were at least 3" and she had an extra inch or so with the sole of the shoe so 4"-5" makes sense putting her at a legit 5'5" - give or take. In London she was taller than Rupert giving her a larger heel and you can tell those heels were probably 4" alone. lol With the extra support of the heel, definitely 5"-6". Let's face it, of all the Potter kids, I think this site has Emma just about right. :) Whoever says on 25/Jul/09
Thank you umad80 for your links! They indeed prove beyond doubt that Emma is 5’5.5” or lower. Well, for those who still doubt that, look at the photo in this site- Click Here . Emma has 1 inch over Rupert who is about 5’8”. 0.5 inch has to be subtracted from this 1 inch because Emma is using Rupert’s shoulders for support. In addition, he is definitely in a more relaxed posture than she is. Finally, his shoes give him 1 inch where as Emma’s heels give her 4 inches at least. Hence, Emma’s height=5’8”+1”+0.5”-4”=5’5.5”.
This is the maximum she can be because Rupert could be below 5’8”. Her heels could also be higher. umad80 says on 24/Jul/09
It is well known that someone's height will be inflated to get acting jobs. Rupert's agency lists him as 5'10"!
That said, if Emma was 5'6" to 5'7" she'd have towered over EVERYONE at the premieres with those huge heels. They were at least 4-5 inches! If she was 5'6" she'd be 5'10" to 5'11" in those. If she was 5'7" she'd be 5'11" to 6'! Clearly she'd be towering close to everyone. She'd be dwarfing Tom, Rupert and close to Alan Rickman's height. Let's face it, she isn't above 5'5" and there is a case that she's less than that. I mean, look at these shoes! Click Here - clearly 4-5" extra in height and she still can't tower over 6'1" Rickman or be anywhere close. So please, stop with the 5'6" or 5'7" she's clearly a legit 5'5" or slightly under. She and Rupert tend to be the same height in most premiere pics in NYC. And in London, she was wearing larger heels giving her some height over Rupert! Click Here Whoever says on 24/Jul/09
Actors and actresses usually inflate their heights. Dan and Emma both claim a height of 5'6". So, it is likely that they be shorter. Let us analyze whether their claims are indeed valid: Taking into account his physical build, Dan would not have been confident saying he was 5'6" unless he was around 5'5" which I, hence, consider his true height. However, we all seem to agree that Emma is a tad bit taller than Dan. Consequently, I would put her height at 5'5.5" at least but certainly not over 5'6". Lastly, I would like to say that this analysis makes perfect sense because it also complies with the norm that boys usually inflate their heights more than girls. Therefore, I conclude that her site is fairly accurate. She should get an upgrade. andrea says on 23/Jul/09
Realme2008: You're right< she is taller in that photo. He also has one leg bent which could shorten him a bit and her heels are high. It's really incredible how people could look taller or shorter in different pics. I DO believe that most all celebs lie about their heights (or their publicists do).
I still maintain that Emma is around 5f4. Vampiric says on 23/Jul/09
Emma looks 5'7 tall so I'm gonna BET that her site is accurate. She's as tall as she claims to be people. 5'6 , at least. Fawn says on 22/Jul/09
I agree with arghh, Emma is roughly around Daniels height; Dan seemingly, being a tad bit shorter. Having watched the latest Potter flick, this is the conclusion I come out with. There is no reason for Dan, being technically short for a guy, to lie about being short for a male. I realize everyone has different ideals for height, but considering both Emma and Dan claim to be heights that are very close to each other, it would only make sense to trust their judgment. They appear close in height, and claim to be as such. arghh says on 22/Jul/09
if emma isn't at least 5'5" why would her official site say she's 5'6"? I don't think people usually overcompensate on height.
Society makes us want to be short girls because that's what they say is acceptable. If she were in fact short I'm sure she'd say so.
Dan and Emma are the same height, if not Emma is sliiightly taller than he is. Click Here
This is just my opinion, though, I'm going to say it's fact. If you haven't met her in person and stood next to her, then you have no way of really knowing. Regardless of how much pic evidence you find. Stephanie says on 21/Jul/09
Dan and Emma both claim 5' 6" (Emma's official site lists her as 5' 6"). They might have grown a little since the 2006 heights. I don't think Rupert's more than 5' 8" or 5' 8.5" on a good day. Emma's average height for a woman and Dan and Rupert are on the shorter end of average height range for men. samie says on 20/Jul/09
i'm not sure whether they would have grown since around the release of HP number 5 but in this photo emma and dan look about the same height and they both seem to be standing straight and with flat shoes. if dan is 5ft 5 then emma too would be close to that.
Click Here Jessie says on 15/Jul/09
im just wondering if you guys think rupert and dan are too short or just moderate??? and how about emma? i think she's around 165cm. i wouldnt believe emma's shorter than 5'4'' cuz if so dan and rupert would be toooooooo short!!
(just cant believe the guys are under 165 or so)!!! lee says on 14/Jul/09
considering rupert is around 5'8 and in the 3-4inch heels she wore to the recent harry potter premier, emma was as tall as him, i'm pretty sure she's around the height of 5'4. Realme2008 says on 14/Jul/09
Andrea, she is noticeably taller than Rupert in this picture with very high heels. Click Here & Click Here picture she looks shorter than Rupert do to changing her posture: Click Here event taller than Rupert: Click Here all has to do with her posture and how high her heel is. 5'5" seems like a pretty accurate listing to me.
lillian says on 14/Jul/09
to be frankly, i think emma looks tall, it says she's 5'6'' Click Here do you guys think?
andrea says on 13/Jul/09
Aside from her movies, I have seen so many pictures of Emma with various actors, on the street, and so many interviews and although I have never seen her in person, I do not see her as a tall girl. She looks to be 5'4" tops and weighs 105lbs. She looks to be around Daniel Radcliff's height. Even standing or walking together, a guy and girl that are the same height, the guy appears smaller. Emma does wear heels alot when she is out and about, but heels do not give the same inches in height as its heel. A 5 inch heel with a 1 inch platform, will not give a girl a 5 inch height increase. It will give her about 4 inches extra height.
Even in her heels, Emma is not as tall as some of her mates (Rupert at 5f8).
I don't think she is any taller than 5f4 if fact, I believe she could be just a tad shorter. She is not petite (to me petite means short AND skinny, she is just thin. 5f4 is a good height, an accurate height, and she looks great. guyfrommars says on 12/Jul/09
In younger days she always seemed to wear flats on events, making her look short. Nowadays she's beginning to wear heels much more often, and looks much more mature and taller. On some recent event she had 4 inch heels on, making 5ft5 Daniel Radcliffe appear like some sort of midget next to her. MrsCool says on 12/Jul/09
Umad80, agree for Rupert and Tom but I think Emma and Dan are about same height: look this picture: Click Here Dan is 5'4" then so is Emma...thats what I think. But once again Im saying no one will be sure of it if nobody sees them in real.
Rob, please try to find a way to meet them? umad80 says on 12/Jul/09
Rupert is definitely taller than 5'7". Tom Felton is 5'8.5" and he and Tom were about the same height in pretty much every photo (unless it was an odd angle or one of the boys was leaning weird). Dan and Emma are obviously 5'4"-5'5". I think Emma is pretty much 5'5" and Dan is like 5'4.5". You can't deny this photo from the London photocall: Click Here - seriously. The only problem with this photo is that Tom and Rupert are slightly close to the camera, which is why I say Dan is more 5'4.5". As you can see, Emma's about the same with Rupert and Tom on Dan, but her shoes are huge! Click Here mahsa says on 12/Jul/09
I dont know who i have to believe ?I am 167 .most of my friends are shorter than me .she says that she is 165 cm .if she is telling the truth so my friends would be pretty short in the picturs! MrsCool says on 12/Jul/09
I agree with Eddie, Rupert doesnt seem to be a tall guy, hes a 5'7-5'7" range, and Emma with her platform shoes is only one or two inches taller than him! so how can she be 5'5 with heels of 6 inches heels? I think Dan and Emma are both lying about their height, I say 5'5 for Dan (max) and Emma 5'4". eddie says on 10/Jul/09
i think she is about 5'4 around there. look at this Click Here (daniel radcliffe saying he's 5'5) and this Click Here with emma being at most 2 in taller than daniel. her shoes on that day: Click Here clearly a 5in pair of platforms. that adds about 3.5-4 in to her height. daniel's shoes add at most 1in to his height (seen in the perez link). but i do think that the grp shot of them is abit dodgy because rupert grint is listed as 5'8 here but if you compare him to daniel's self-confessed height, he looks 5'7 at most. same height as emma with platforms. MrsCool says on 10/Jul/09
I totally agree with Daisy! take off Emmas gigantic shoes she would be Dans height, or even less cause I still think shes 5'4-5'5 not more! Daisy says on 9/Jul/09
Josh - considering she is between 5'4" and 5'5", six inch heels (in addition, I think the highest heel she has worn would be around 5" recently - nothing lowering than 3") would make her 5'10" to 5'11", not quite 6 ft.
Click Here She appears to be wearing rather steep heels - minimum 4" - most likely 5". If we take her to be 5'4", she is 5'9" in these high heels.
Click Here Rupert and Dan appear to be wearing fairly average dress shoes. In most of the other photos in the gallery Dan is 3" to 4" shorter than her, taking into account he has relative steady posture, making him 5'5". Rupert and Emma appear the same height in most of the photos, with Emma being an inch taller in the photos where Rupert exhibits his essentially trademark laid-back posture - notice how Emma and Daniel stand rather straight, whilst Rupert is in an almost constant state of slouching?
Reasonable Conclusion: If you consider Rupert to be the 5'7.75" as stated on this site, Emma would be 5'8.75" in 4" - 5" heels and is therefore between 5'3.75" and 5'4.75" - we can be kind and round this up to 5'5". Anything above that is ludicrous. rip says on 8/Jul/09
In the recent world premiere of harry potter and the half blood prince, even with high heels, she looked slightly shorter than Rupert, and not that much taller than Dan.
So I would say:
Dan 5'5"
Emma 5'5"
Rupert 5'7.5"-5'8" Josh says on 7/Jul/09
have you guys heard of heels? She wears 6 inch heels all the time, making her look around 6 ft. Nat says on 5/Jul/09
Dan is closer to the camera in a lot of those pictures is why Emma looks taller than he does. =) umad80 says on 4/Jul/09
Not really. Yes, there are a few, but for instance this one Dan actually looks taller: Click Here though with the right angle, they'd probably look the same height. On this one, Dan seems to be on a downward slope giving Emma the better angle: Click Here plus he has his head down. There are so many where you can actually argue why she looks taller. Closer to the camera, the position on the street, etc. This also explains why Rupert looks shorter in some photos as well. He's even at a worse disadvantage than Dan! Jackie says on 30/Jun/09
Take a look at these new pics from the Deathly Hallows set, Click Here While I completely understand that ground, positioning, angles, etc. really change a picture, what I don't understand is how Emma looks taller than Dan in every single one of these pictures, it's so weird! I was thinking that, if they're both around 5'5", then they'd look around the same even when one's in front and back, but Emma literally always looks taller, take a look for yourself. It's so weird and she's wearing very flat shoes and Dan's wearing Converse-type as well, but they seem to have a good inch of sole on them. Also, check out how close in height Emma is to Rupert (who's wearing heeled clonkers)....when and how did she shoot up like this, she's almost 20 now, isn't she?! It's so weird. mariiee says on 24/Jun/09
i think 5"5 is spot on eric says on 24/Jun/09
lol Emma T is bending a whole lot and emma watson is wearing heels while emma T is wearing FLAT running shoes Denise says on 20/Jun/09
You don't understood me. I think that Emma is 5'5. umad80 says on 19/Jun/09
Oh please. Both times Emma T is bending so much that she's losing a LOT of height. Please. Stop. Now. MrsCool says on 13/Jun/09
umad80, I agree when you say she cant be taller than 5'5" so please people who keeps saying shes 5'6 just STOP! but many of my friends have seen her in premieres and they are like 5'3/4 and they all said she was basically same height... umad80 says on 12/Jun/09
MrsCool, I've been and at the GoF premiere she was the height I am which is 5'5". "hey.", who has many different names, has been determined to make Emma 5'7" even though it's been proven time and time again that it isn't true. Just look at her rubbish pictures to prove it... Even if Kate Bosworth is 5'5", Emma is closer and would definitely get a few inches on her due to that. Sorry, but she failed to be taller than Matthew Broderick with heels, someone needs to give up this illusion of her being taller than 5'5". Heck, she could barely be taller than 5'5" Dustin Hoffman! hey. says on 9/Jun/09
No, I don't so please fill me in on what I'm obviously missing, oh k? I don't see how it would affect Evanna and Emma that much....how's it going to be SO much different? MrsCool says on 8/Jun/09
This girl is a JOKE!!! in her site she says shes 5'6?! WTF?! trust me this girl is barely 5'4... I dont know why do celebs always have to upgrade themselves! especially her, shes a very tiny girl. Period. mahsa says on 7/Jun/09
She is about 161 .she doesnt look 165.I think it is not right Sarah says on 4/Jun/09
I saw her in a club in London and she looked about 5'4. She looked small. umad80 says on 29/May/09
You don't walk on much sand, do you? I've also pointed out several times that Dan shrinks at night, and there is considerable evidence to this. I've also pointed out, several times, that Emma was not even close to 5'8" at the ToD premiere. I don't have a thing against Emma. I think she's lovely... but it's crazy to think she's anything more than 5'5" with all the mounting evidence. At least with Rupert people have said again and again that he's around 5'9". lol
Believe me, I could care less as to where you're going to college at. It's like an IQ test... it's just there to make you feel good. Today's college is who is the riches and who is the poorest - as those are the ones who can actually attend! hey. says on 27/May/09
Well, I assume her feet are attache to her legs...I'm not saying it was a perfect picture, but looking at the photos as a set, it's pretty easy to see that Emma has this Kaya girl by a considerable amount. And, your heels comment, look at the other photos, you'll see that they are "about" the same height. Oh, please, you are seriously saying that Evanna is heavier than Emma? That's ridiculous, the amount they sink in really isn't going to affect the comparison that much. Jeez. And Dan's wearing Converse type things and Emma's wearing Uggs...the last picture wasn't so much for Dan and Emma, more for Dan and Evanna, but it was easy to point out that that girl in the black jacket was Emma and she clearly looked taller than both Evanna and Dan. Also, check out HBP footage, E is taller than D.
And, yeah, I know, how sad we've become, I've started answering the person who still can't get over the fact that Rupert is 5'7.75". And I don't know what you've got against Emma....I mean, I still remember you saying that Dan's shoes were at least the same height as Emma's heels...if that were true, you should be calling Emma 5'8" minimum! She towered over that SoB in those heels, I don't get how you're saying she's his same height again.
Oh, and umad, guess where I'm going to college next year...you'll be amazingly surprised (at least from what I gather you think of me). umad80 says on 26/May/09
'hey' you're really just having fun now, aren't you? lol I mean the first one they are walking. Oh, and let me use your line, "You can't see Emma's feet." For all we know, she's wearing larger heels than the other girl. The beach one... it is a beach and the sand will make one look shorter if they've sunk into it. Plus Emma definitely has boots on but I have no idea about Dan...
This is what happens when I'm bored... I start answering the same person with multiple names who still can't get over that Emma is not more than 5'5". Med says on 24/May/09
Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe is enjoying his run in Broadway play Equus - because he can go unrecognised in the busy New York streets.
The actor, 19, is currently living in the U.S. while starring in the live stage show, and he insists the Big Apple provides welcome relief to his native U.K., where he is constantly spotted by fans.
And Radcliffe is convinced it is his diminutive height - he is 1.6 metres (5 foot, 5 inches) - that keeps him from being noticed.
He tells the New York Post, "The other day, I walked through Battery Park City up around Wall Street for about two hours, and I wasn't stopped once. I'm so short, no one notices me."
Well as we know 1.6m is actually 5'3", not 5'5". But anyway he hasn't grown. hey. says on 23/May/09
Click Here
Kaya Scodelario (from Skins) is listed as 5'6" by a modeling agency and in that pic, Emma's clearly taller. And they're both wearing similar heels. And just click on another JJJ pic if you don't think that one good enough (uamd). :D. Oh, and check this out, Click Here Granted it's an odd angle, Emma is WAY taller than Evanna who looks to be close to Dan's height Click Here And I think that's Emma in the black jacket with jeans....and, wow, even though the angle is in her disadvantage, she still looks slightly taller than Dan, meaning if you tilt it slightly she looks considerably taller. :/ umad80 says on 19/May/09
LOL She's standing on a hill and he's not! umad80 says on 11/May/09
"hey" - you mean a photo where Emma is standing closer to the camera? lol
I mean, geez... Dan looks taller in this photo: Click Here
Of course, then you got this where Emma looks taller: Click Here
They're pretty much the same height which is around 5'5". Taking it into account that it's obvious Dan is the type to lose height at night (not sure about Emma) then it would account for why she looks a little taller at times. And as I said, the ToD premiere already proved she is not 5'6". hey. says on 11/May/09
And here's Emma and Dan (Uggs? vs. "Dan's suspect shoes (definitely the same height as Emma's")....Emma's taller than him clearly.... Click Here hey. says on 8/May/09
Click Here
That's what I'm talking 'bout, umad. hey. says on 5/May/09
R/E, D/E, and, yes, trio photos were not even able to be looked at because the angles were terrible! I mean, yes, Emma is taller than Dan (by quite a bit) when she is wearing heels, but she is not THAT much taller than Dan (talking about the trio photo). I mean, come on, her head is titled and she still looks like she could crush him....Rupert's going to seem taller than he really is as well..... Get good photos and I'll consider your point (though I do think it's pretty obvious that Emma is 5'6"+ and quite noticeably taller than Danny. Hopefully we'll get some good photos with HBP promo. umad80 says on 4/May/09
Oh look! It's our favorite, "Emma is 5'7" person even though that's been proven pretty false during the ToD premiere. lol Grant you, the R/E photo was bad... But you can tell by the trio pic that there is quite a few inches between the two, despite her heels.
Also it's been pretty much noted that Dan definitely shrinks at night. hey. says on 3/May/09
Which official site Stephanie? If it's the one I'm thinking of, it has said 5'6" since OotP promo....but, nonetheless, I would say Emma is around 5'6"-5'7" so, yeah, it is right. Stephanie says on 2/May/09
Her official site says 5' 6" now. That is probably about right. hey. says on 28/Apr/09
umad80....i'm not totally sure, but i think your links may be to the wrong photo because none of those photos are reasonable for comparing heights (IMO)....for example, the one with emma and rupert, you can't even see rupert's feet (and he's way in back of emma), so it looks like he could be on a curb or just a completely different level than emma....she looks about his height/slightly taller from all of the other photos in that set.
Anyway, if you really think dan's shoes are the same height as emma's, then how can you say dan is still 5'5" but emma id definitely not 5'6"? damn, she's like 2 or 3 inches taller than him, it's embarrassing! haa. gotta love him though. :D! umad80 says on 23/Apr/09
And looking at that last photo, Dan's shoes are suspect (but definitely the same height as Emma's) Click Here
Dan and Rupert standing together with those suspect shoes: Click Here
Rupert and Emma standing together: Click Here
Emma and Dan (Emma standing behind him though): Click Here umad80 says on 16/Apr/09
Again, people need to pay attention to my posts. lol There is no way Emma is 5'6" if she looks this short next to a 5'7.5" Matt Broderrick: Click Here with these heels: Click Here It's obvious that her heels give her about 2" advantage or maybe close to 2.5" inches. If they all stood straight, I think it would be about a 1/2 inch difference between Matt and Emma making her in the 5'5" range easily. She is definitely not 5'6" though because she'd be taller than Matt. She may not be standing completely straight, but if she was only 1.5" shorter than him, then she'd be as tall or a little taller with not standing straight and she's an inch or shorter in this picture and her standing straight would probably put her 1/2 inch shorter or closer to the mark. Curtis C. says on 14/Apr/09
Emma does look at least 1 inch taller than Dan Radcliffe. hey. says on 10/Apr/09
In a magazine it said she looked shorter than she actually is....she looks 5'3", but is actually 5'6" (I think somebody posted the link). Perhaps an upgrade is needed. Jamie says on 25/Mar/09
I completely agree with 5 ft 3.2... 5'5" would be my ideal height too. You're not short, you're not tall, but you're above average. I completely agree! I just turned 13 and I'm about 5'4". I'm pretty sure I'll reach 5'5". =) umad80 says on 25/Mar/09
That's because Emma has on her site that she is 5'6", but recent pictures at the ToD premiere especially have proven this claim false. Just look at her with 5'7.5" Matt Broderick: tinyurl.com/54ud5m and these are the heels she was wearing: tinyurl.com/62qqpq RentGirl89 says on 24/Mar/09
It says she's 5'6
Click Here Ella says on 22/Feb/09
also, in recent pictures she's abit taller than daniel Anonymous says on 21/Feb/09
I saw her the other day out in London, i was right next to her and she's pretty small. She looked from about 5'2-5'4 to me. Anonymous says on 6/Feb/09
Hmmm...speaking of the new HBP trailer, she still looks much shorter than Rupert Grint, and maybe even a bit shorter than Dan Radcliffe at the very end...I think she's around 5'4-5'5, but no more than that. Anonymous says on 2/Feb/09
Emma is not 5'6", probably not even 5'5" -- the journalists constantly describe her as "tiny", "small", "petite" etc. Look here: Click Here
"Watson is tiny and pretty and delightfully brought up."
"Small and slim in a pair of jeans and a neat Cacharel V-neck, you probably couldn’t pick Watson out in a crowd." Ella says on 1/Feb/09
She said that in 2006, she's grown an inch since then.
5"6 but no taller. 5 ft 3.2 says on 31/Jan/09
I just found an interview where she says something like, "Yeah, I'm 5 ft 5, so...yeah, I'm not short." chris says on 28/Jan/09
actually lily, a tall male head is about 9.5inches long ( Click Here) so that 5'9 girls head is probably around 8 inches :P guyfrommars says on 23/Jan/09
Emma always seemed quite short next to people, probably because she wore flats all the time on red carpet events during her younger days. Now she's more in a habit to wear heels. 5ft5 is probably right. 5 ft 3.2 says on 20/Jan/09
5 ft 5 would probably be my ideal height. You`re not short, and your not exactly tall, but you are above average. But unlike most short girls, I am okay with my height. It doesn`t match my fierce personality, but I will never date a guy shorter than me. Plus, I`m still growing. I`m having a mini growth spurt, so I`m probably 5`3.5" right now. lily says on 17/Jan/09
it's funny how some ppl never know their own height. i'm 5'1 and girls who're like only 4 inches more than me say they're 5'7 and 5'8. it's even funnier that a girl who's a head taller than me claims she's 5'9. i mean, i'm sure that her head is not 8 inches long.. lol:) Maya says on 3/Jan/09
Here's a recent article: "But in person, the petite, polite Emma Watson comes across shockingly normal." Click Here umad80 says on 3/Jan/09
Then you're not 5'7". Dan has, in several interviews since July of 2007, said that he's only 5'5". Emma and Dan tend to be the same height. And of course if you look at the photos from ToD premiere, she's definitely more or less 5'5". sarah says on 30/Dec/08
she's 5'6, just as daniel radcliffe. i have met both of them, i'm 5'7 and were almost the same. umad80 says on 27/Dec/08
The problem with the teaser pic is that the boys have a little bit of a height advantage with their shoes, from what I can tell of what they make everyone wear. I don't think it's necessarily inconclusive, it's just not entirely accurate. That said, if you go by giving Emma maybe a quarter to a half inch extra, she is definitely closer to 5'5" as she appears to be around 3" taller than the 5'2" Devon Murray. Rupert, if he stood a bit straighter, would clearly be about 6.5" taller than him, give or take, as where he is and sort of leaning sideways, he's clearly 6" taller making him 5'8" but standing up a bit straighter and he clearly has a bit more than that. Just as he would have about 4.5" (give or take) on Emma (counting the shoes). So I stand by the idea that Rupert is around 5'9" and Emma is around 5'5". The Watcher says on 26/Dec/08
That picture is inconclusive as those teaser pics usually are and i stand by the fact she edges dan and also katie Momey says on 26/Dec/08
I think she is tall enough.She is not very short or not very tall.I like this kind of height. Maya says on 26/Dec/08
The Watcher, that is nonsense, Emma is not 5'6. Have you seen the latest HBP promos and stills? Look: Click Here Rupert Grint is 5'8ish, Devon Murray is only 5'2. Emma is somewhere between them, but actually closer to Devon's height, which means that she's not even 5'5. And she is almost 19 now, she was done growing three years ago. The Watcher says on 25/Dec/08
I would say from all the recent publicity pics inc Hoffmann and Broderick i would say emma is 5ft6 and dan r 5ft4.5 that seems fair to me but whas unfair is it means she is taller than me a lad at 5ft5 boo lol Anonymous says on 9/Dec/08
New pictures of her and Dustin Hoffman are out. anonymous says on 9/Dec/08
In recent photo with Dustin Hoffman, she appears to be about the same height as he is, and she is wearing 3-inch heels. Perhaps Hoffman is wearing lifts, but his official height is 5'6". Anonymous says on 9/Dec/08
Emma is no more than 5'4-5'5 tall. She attended the ToD premiere in LA wearing what looks like 3in heels Click Here and looked just a tad taller than Dustin Hoffman (who is a very small man) and shorter than Matthew Broderick. Click Here
Emma 5'6? No way. carrie says on 23/Nov/08
She is basically the same height as Katie Leung. Look at any picture of her with Katie, compare footwear, and you will see they are within 1/2 inch of each other (there are tons of pictures of the both of them in Google Images). Seriously people, she is 5'5 MAX Hi says on 21/Nov/08
I think that she's 5'4-5'5...just doesn't look too tall to me. Rezzzzz says on 1/Nov/08
She looks shorter than maria menounos for about 2 inches in fact..If Maria is 5'7.5, then emma's like 5'5. michael says on 1/Nov/08
oh yeh,at 1.20 at that trailer she looks much taller.
I don't know why people think its inpossible that she grow up,she is 18 now.
She is about 5ft7 now i think. lo says on 31/Oct/08
i'd say 5'5'' - 5'6''ish. you have to bare in mind she has actually grown between goblet of fire and order of pheonix, because she was shorter than daniel, now she appears fractionally taller. Anonymous says on 29/Oct/08
She looks taller than Harry and close to Ron's height in the new HP trailer --> Click Here Holy shizz, it looks amazing, I cannot wait! Also, you have got to love Harry's bit at the end, "but I am the chosen one." hahahahaha it had me laughing for about ten minutes. Anonymous says on 15/Oct/08
Oh, and how brill, Maria is actually listed as 5'7.75" on this site, giving more ammo to Emma - more around 5'6" or 5'7" rather than a mere 5'5". Nice. Anonymous says on 15/Oct/08
Loraine, are you saying she is taller than her listed height or are you saying that this photo proves that she is 5'5" or even under that mark? Also, I think that she looks taller than her listed height (especially in that photo and as of late; that photo she is wearing converse and still looks like she would be close to Maria's height if standing properly). I'd like to hear your input. Do respond Loraine. Thanks! haha says on 13/Oct/08
shes almost ruperts height shes around 5'10 ish or maybe 5'9 Loraine says on 13/Oct/08
look at her with maria menounos which is stated to be 5'7.5
Click Here robin says on 11/Oct/08
She has the build of a small person. I'd be a bit surprised if she was that tall, but it's possible. She's clearly not 5'7'' as some sources claim. Actresses do tend to overstate their height, for whatever reason. Anonymous says on 27/Sep/08
Well, Denise, if she looked 6' in three inch heels, she would be 5'9" barefoot! We can't have that now, can we? Denise says on 11/Sep/08
She usually wears a heels(3inch) now. And She doesnt look as 6'0 with that heels. Anonymous says on 10/Sep/08
Honestly, stop commenting on the HP pages....firstly, nobody listens or comes up with good evidence, secondly, there is really no good evidence out there because they aren't releasing the film until summer '09, & thirdly, Emma is easily 5'6" or 5'7" and Rupert obviously taller than his listed height, but Rob is not going to change it ever, so look at other websites and you'll see that Rupert and Emma are indeed taller than their heights here.....That much is obvious. umad80 says on 10/Sep/08
Brett, she really isn't 'shorter'. When you stop it at that point, she is walking, so her posture would be a little off. I say she's pretty much around 5'5" if not a strong one based on if you stop it about :22 mark, she looks to be the exact same height. brett says on 9/Sep/08
pause the video at :18. she (in flats) is shorter than kelly ripa, who is 5'2, but wearing 3 inch heels, putting her at 5'5 Click Here mizori says on 27/Aug/08
i heard shes about 5'6" or 5'7" idk maybe shes shorter.
i think shes about 5'5" or 5'6". i dont think shes 5'7". umad80 says on 24/Aug/08
JKR has very loose posture, so she's not standing straight, either. Emma's bended knee will barely make you lose an inch there is no way it would make you lose two. It's because one knee is usually still pretty straight. Now if both knees were bent, I'd say yes. That is definitely a possibility. However, one knee is pretty straight while the other isn't. You'd rest all your weight on the straightened knee. So you put JKR at 5'5" which apparently she herself said and Emma at 5'5" then it makes sense. Despite the loose posture, JKR isn't putting all her weight on one knee, so she's standing a bit straighter but only by about an inch. I think really Emma's height is whether she's exactly 5'5" or a tad taller or a tad shorter. But anything about 5'5.5" is a major joke. Hollie says on 24/Aug/08
the pix with emma and jk notice emma's bending one knee, meaning she's not standing up straight and bending a knee like that can take of a good inch or two depending on how much the bend is. And yes it would of been said but at least i didn't say three inches right! jk rowling has been reported to be in the 5'5" to 5'6" range and i had one of my writing teachers meet her and said she was a tall lady. Denise says on 21/Aug/08
Emma Watson and Kate Moss(she is 167cm)
Click Here
Kate look taller than Emma more than a 2cm. umad80 says on 12/Aug/08
Lemme see if I can't imitate a response that will come. "Emma's bending her knee! She'll lose three inches bending her knee! She's slouching! That adds to the 3" theory." Okay, that was mean, but 10 bucks it would've been said.
Any ways, I think both JKR and Emma have loose enough posture that it's the same, and the bent knee just would make them exact height standing up straight. So yeah, I think you can pretty much put it to rest... 5'5" for Dan, 5'5" for Emma, and 5'5" for JKR... (I think JKR is closer to 5'5" imo...) So now all we need is Rupert which I think he's closer to being 5'9" then he is being barely 5'8"... Maya says on 12/Aug/08
Excellent find Denise! Actually JK Rowling is 5'4" according to this website, so... Denise says on 12/Aug/08
Hi, JKRowling is 5'5 and Emma is still same height standing next to JK since HP3 premiere. This pics is from HP5 london after party.
look
Click Here RG says on 7/Aug/08
Maya, i agree with you, Emma is definitely around 5ft 5, in the pics, Emma looks about an inch taller, but emma is only wearin 3 inch heels while natalie is wearin 4 inch heels, this means that natalie stands at 5ft 7 and emma 5ft 8 so all the evidence points to emma watson being around 5ft 5 ish! Maya says on 7/Aug/08
Emma looking barely taller than 5'3" Natalie Imbruglia: Click Here
Nat does have platforms, but Emma's heels are extremely high too: Click Here
Click Here
Emma is 5'5" max, in fact probably shorter. Period. Anonymous. says on 4/Aug/08
Have any of you seen the TV film "Ballet Shoes" that she made a year or so ago? Anyway, I just saw it and Emma is taller than 5'6" Emilia Fox - this is no joke. She's actually taller than most of the females in that film. I'm definitely sure that she is 5'6.5" at the very least. She looked taller at the polo event she attended. Anonymous says on 21/Jul/08
Does anybody know how tall her brother Alex Watson is? If anyone does it would be extremely useful because they posed together at the LA premiere of OotP. So, if you know, speak now. Anonymous says on 20/Jul/08
What about that photo? I've watched the vid - Emma is clearly only an inch or so shorter, both in quite equal footwear mind you. umad80 says on 17/Jul/08
Heh. If you're talking about the "almost kiss" scene in HBP, Bonnie looks a half inch taller than Dan, actually. And the other image doesn't work.
And seriously, there is barely any difference between Dan and Emma in height per the ceremony. So freakin' obvious it's a wonder anyone even argues any inch differences between the two. Katie says on 17/Jul/08
What do you think about this? (It's a pic of Maria Menunos last year with Emma Watson) Click Here Anonymous says on 17/Jul/08
Click Here I mean, face it, this is pretty straightforward stuff. Leung and Bonnie are both 5'4" or 5'4.5, no doubt. Anonymous says on 17/Jul/08
Click Here Even DAN is taller than the "5'5.5"" Bonnie Wright. This site is messed....where did you even come up with that for Bon Bon? Anonymous says on 17/Jul/08
Emma Watson is underestimated on this site, it's the truth. Rob, have you watched OotP yet? Honestly, Emma's taller than Dan and he's nothing less than 5'5". At last upgrade her to 5'5.5" if you have Bonnie at that - Emma's taller than both Bonnie and Katie who are both around 5'4.5" (how do you have Bonnie listed an inch taller than Katie, they've been to events together and Bonnie's Katie's height or shorter). Anyway, Emma's site says 5'6", so I'd say nothing less than that - she's relatively tall dammit. edinand 00 says on 16/Jul/08
She is the most beautiful girl I have ever seen, I certainly dont care about her height....I come from south america and there's only one thing I want to say, "she is hot" Anonymous says on 16/Jul/08
Ellie: who is saying she is 5'6" now? Emma Watson? umad80 says on 7/Jul/08
That's one of the many reasons I'm not really that sure that Evanna is 5'2". I think she is closer to 5'3". It makes more sense because Emma would have to be way shorter than 5'5" because of the heels. And to me, her and Dan look pretty close to 5'5". Elle says on 7/Jul/08
I think that Emma's about the same height as Dan. Look on katieleungfan.com/gallery/index.php and search for the album with the photocall at london. You can kinda see their heights if you look for the right pic. Thanx E :) xxx I believe Emma is about 5'5 more or less. Ellie says on 7/Jul/08
She's actually saying that she's 5'6" now, but I don't think so. I actually think she might be 5'5.5" because Daniel Radcliffe is like 5'5" and she's SLIGHTLY taller than him. Sophie says on 5/Jul/08
I remembere a picture taken not so long ago. Emma, Dan Evanna and Katie were standing together and Katie and Emma were wearing heels. I think they were standing on a side of Thames River
If Evanna is only 5'2''and half a inch, then Emma is not 5'5'. In this picture, she was wearing heels but Evanna was not. Jack says on 3/Jul/08
Click Here
Emma's taller than him in this new HBP still? hehe. Denise says on 3/Jul/08
SHe is smaller than Johnny Borrell(5'8) with min. 4 inch heels.
Click Here Denis says on 30/Jun/08
ok ..so anon ..i wen to see the pic and seriously
she is a little taller than Daniel...
seriously look at the knees..hers is higher than Daniel's
In biology,,the human body 's longest bone is the femur(thigh bone)
apparently she is taller than him because if her knee is a little higher
than his knee her thigh is longer than his...boom!! anon says on 19/Jun/08
lets just say daniel radcliffe is 5'5 (MAX!)...then no way shes 5'5! i wud give her 5'4.5" at MAX!
just look at this pic, both r wearing pretty flat shoes: Click Here
she's at least 1/2" shorter brett says on 18/Jun/08
there is NO WAY she is 5'6. if you look at any pictures of her with katie leung (5'4.5) you can see that they are about exactly the same height. and even in heels she is still barely taller than 5'5 dan. brett says on 18/Jun/08
there is NO WAY she is 5'6. if you look at any pictures of her with katie leung (5'4.5) you can see that they are about exactly the same height. and even in heels she is still barely taller than 5'5 dan. umad80 says on 17/Jun/08
Actually her website says 5'6". It's some crazed lunatic that insists on 5'7". lol Even though that would make Rupert like 6' and the twins 6'5" and Dan 5'7" as well. I think 5'4.5" is not out of the realm of possibility, but if that's Katie's height, it's a bit of an under estimate because Emma always appears just a bit taller than her. Anonymous says on 14/Jun/08
I give her 5 feet 4.5 inches and thats it. No way she is 5'7" as her web site suggests Ariella says on 11/Jun/08
Omg you guys are still arguing about this?? Look Emma is still 5'5, you know how I can confirm this? As you get taller your feet get bigger too, Emma wore the exact same shoes to her B-day that she wore to the GOF Japan premiere, that was 2 1/2 years ago and she can still fit into the shoes, which mean her feet haven't gotten bigger which means she hasn't grown she is still 5'5. She's not getting any taller she'll always be 5'5! She not 5'6 and she's definitely not 5'7 not even close, she's 5'5, she' not even 5'5.5 because in 2005 she said she was about 5'5 which means she's just barely about 5'5 or she's exactly 5'5 and she's still fitting in the exact same shoes, which mean she hasn't grown at all, which means she is STILL 5'5!! And she obviously won't grow anymore it's almost been 3 years and she hasn't grown at all. Aimie says on 30/May/08
she is the same height as Dan Radcliffe. he is 5'5''. Stephanie says on 29/May/08
I think Dan looks ever-so-slightly taller than Emma. They're basically the same height, but Dan looks 1/4" or 1/2" taller, from the ceremony. umad80 says on 27/May/08
There is no way Emma is anywhere near 5'7". And there is no way that she's even close to 5'3". I'd bet more 5'4" than anything below that. And Dan is definitely not taller than her. You could see it at the ceremony... they're basically the same height. michael says on 25/May/08
i think emma is 5'7 to,and im kinda a-shamed with emmas pictures,if u seen her latest pictures from her birthday. Emster says on 25/May/08
I would say she is much shorter maybe around 5'3 or 5'2 because Daniel R. is about 5'5.5 they said on this site and I have a picture with her and Daniel together, she is MUCH shorter, her eyes are at where his mouth is. Jay says on 25/May/08
And in one magazine in 2006, Emma claimed to be 169 cm. My god, thats as much as 5'7". Thats way tall.
There's a link to that interview in google. Jonathon Frost says on 24/May/08
your hot! I live in georgia. you are just the right height, I'm 5'10'' or 5'11'' umad80 says on 27/Mar/08
z, Dan recently admitted to being only 5'5" and any time you see Dan and Emma standing together (in similar footwear at least) they are usually around the same height. I still think Emma believes 5'6" because Dan kept saying he was. lol z says on 26/Mar/08
emma watson is actually 5'6'', she says so on her official website. Daniel Radcliffe is also that Julie says on 25/Mar/08
Brett- I don't reckon Daniel is 5'5" - close to 5'5" perhaps but certainly not precisely 5'5". Anyhow, my point is that Daniel tends to wear rather queer footwear that may or may not 'accentuate' his height. My opinion is that Emma, Daniel and Katie are all at varying points along the 5'4" spectrum. Sometimes one looks taller than the other, given posture and footwear, but all between 5'4" and 5'5". synyster says on 25/Mar/08
how can i meet emma watson.i want to tell her something about my feelings.it had been a long time for me to say the words to her. umad80 says on 20/Mar/08
That's what I figured. They didn't seem to be anywhere near the 4" mark but definitely around what looked to be around what she wore to the NMAs. So she's definitely not 5'4" but maybe not a true 5'5" though I'd wager a guess that she is close enough that there is no sense in arguing. lol brett says on 19/Mar/08
Indeed she is wearing heels, but the point of the picture I posted was that IN HEELS she looks to be just about the same height as Daniel (a wee bit taller), who is 5'5. That would make her shorter than 5'5 without heels. Additionally, she appears to be the same height at 5'4 Katie Leung, also in heels. umad80 says on 18/Mar/08
Ariella, they look 3" to me. What do you think Rob? 3" heels or 4" heels? They look exactly the same size as the ones wore to the NMAs back in September. But obviously I could be wrong. Click Here
[Editor Rob: they are decent size, I'd say not less than true 3.5 inch if her foot size isn't below average.] Ariella says on 16/Mar/08
Yeah but Emma is wearing heels Brett.
And it's not really laughable if she was 5'3, how tall is alfonso?
umad80: if she was 5'8 in those heels, she would be 5'4 not 5'5, and they are 4 inch heels, so she's 5'4. brett says on 13/Mar/08
here is a picture of the whole harry potter crew from this summer Click Here umad80 says on 13/Mar/08
Evanna is 5'2.25" (stated on this site) or more (my thoughts). Definitely obvious she's not under 5'2" but it's debatable how much over she is. Emma was shorter than Alfonso who is almost 6' and if they were 4" heels, which I think they looked more like 3", she is around 5'5" because she looked 5'8" next to Alfonso. Otherwise she's more like 5'3" which is quite laughable imo. Ariella says on 12/Mar/08
At the new Empire Awards Emma is wearing 4 inch heels, and someone in a forum commented that she "must be 6'0 in those shoes" Come on, she is definitely not 6'0 in those heels SO many people are taller than her at that event, so Emma is definitely not 5'6, I don't even think she's 5'5 anymore, Evanna is like 5'0-5'1 and Emma is 4-3 inches taller than her so Emma is 5'4. umad80 says on 5/Mar/08
If Rupert doesn't reach 5'7" then I'm definitely not 5'5", and I can assure you that I'm 5'5" on the nose. Emma and Dan are both around 5'5". Whether it be on the nose or not, they're close enough. Rupert is at least a strong 5'8" and I'm convinced that nearer 5'9" is more accurate. When you look at photos of the trio without shoes at the HWF ceremony, Rupert is clearly 4 inches taller (even Rob admitted to "that point in time" he looked 4" taller). For Rupert to barely reach 5'7", Dan and Emma would have to be barely reaching 5'3" and they are both taller than Devon Murray by a few inches. There are also photos of Rupert and Tom together, and Mr. Felton would have be around 5'7", maybe a little taller, because he and Rupert did not look much different in height and Tom had a bit of a shoe advantage from what I could tell. Jane says on 4/Mar/08
Dan looks to be 5'4" on the nose. Emma seems to be around the same height. 5'5" is a bit of an exaggeration, and the new 'five-foot-six' is utter balderdash. Sometimes I doubt whether Rupert reaches 5'7"- the trio are all rather short, particularly Dan. umad80 says on 2/Mar/08
I think it's obvious that Dan is 5'5" or close enough to it. No way is he only 5'3" (he's taller than Devon Murray) but nothing over 5'5". TJ says on 29/Feb/08
val, Dan himself has conceded that he's not 5'6. After claiming 5'6, he later said he's only 5'5. I agree that he could be shorter though. val says on 29/Feb/08
Dan is soooo not 5'6" like he says...when i saw him he looked at most 5'3" and i think i know what im talking about cuz im only 5'5 1/2" Stephanie says on 22/Feb/08
Either way, they're the same height. Evanna says on 12/Feb/08
TJ that's exactly what I meant - Anna's back...
Stephanie, Radcliffe may claim whatever he wants, but he sooooo isn't 5'6", he's barely 5'5". Stephanie says on 12/Feb/08
Emma's official site says she is 5' 6". She is the same height as Dan now, who also claims 5' 6". But I don't know if she's actually that tall or not. She's at least 5' 5" though. TJ says on 11/Feb/08
Anonymous, Emma is not around the same size or 'slightly shorter' than Rowling at the awards. She is significantly shorter. Probably 2 inches. You remind me of Anna, who used to post on here. Rowling does for sure have a heel advantage though. She had an uncanny ability to ignore or bizarrely misinterpret any evidence that suggested Emma is shorter than generally though. Also, you have an identical writing style. Evanna says on 11/Feb/08
This "Anonymous" sounds a bit familiar... Could s/he be from Minneapolis, Rob? ;) Anonymous says on 10/Feb/08
Well, the problem is we cannot see Jo's or Emma's feet, so we don't know how they are standing, so, basically, your argument is pointless, right? I mean, how can one judge if a person is slouching if the observer cannot even see the bottom half of the people in the photo? Ehm, well, they can't. And that also brings up the footwear issue, how do we know what they are wearing? Are there photos because I've not seen any? It's my bad, but I don't really know where these photos would be, so if any of you have some, would you care to let me know? Gracias. And, Ariella, I know that people do it absentmindedly, but Emma definitely seems to do it purposely because she is just always slouching, I've never seen a photo of her not slouching....if you have got one, please, do post, but until then, I'm convinced she slouches because she is undomfortable with being "tall" (5'4" does not constitute as "tall") and such. And please don't hound me with, "oh, you dumbarse, she's not tall, what are you thinking" blah, blah blah. I put it in quotes, obviously attempting to avoid that ambush. Ariella says on 10/Feb/08
Some people just slouch, I do it, I've noticed Emma does it, but you also see her stand up straight at times too, a lot of the time people don't even realize there slouching, otherwise I doubt they'd do it so much, but at the POB awards Emma was standing up straight and so was JK, I still think Emma is 5'4. Anonymous says on 9/Feb/08
Well, I thought that Rowling was wearing absolutely huge heels whereas Emma was wearing normal sized if not a bit on the small side heels, so it would make sense if the 5'4"/55" Rowling looked around Emma's heihgt, if not slightly taller, especailly if Rowling was standing up properly, which brings me to the next topic, Emma's extreme slouching. No Jane, I suppose I would have to disagree, she slouches way too much, she has not grown out of it. Have you seen the photos of her and Rupert at the Paris train station? LIterally, Emma looks deformed because she is slouching so much, and this is not much of exaggeration. It seems as if she does this slouching at nearly every public appearance and, by the way, I am not the only one who has noted this. Why does she do this? Ariella says on 7/Feb/08
I don't know why Jo Rowling said her height, I just know she did, but Emma was standing up straight and so was JK, and JK is 5'5 and she was a inch taller than Emma, so that would make Emma 5'4, and I think Dan is an inch taller than Emma, so that would make Dan 5'5, but an inch doesn't seem like much when you stand two people next to each other. So I'd say Emma 5'4 and Dan 5'5. TJ says on 7/Feb/08
I said the same thing when I saw the video Jane. Truth is, it's only because she is about the same height as Daniel that I give her 5'5. If going on that video alone, I'd have guessed 5'4. So either Dan is shorter than 5'4, Jo is taller than we think, or the vid is in some way misleading. Jane says on 6/Feb/08
Umad80, Ariella didn't say Jo mentioned anything about Emma's height - Jo said she was 5'5", and Ariella stated Emma was 'definitely an inch shorter than' Jo, and is therefore 5'4". I don't think Jo would be so trivial to be discussing someone's height- if she ever mentioned height she'd be talking about how much her kids have grown or something, not Emma- and I pity the interviewer who manages to run out of good questions and give her one regarding Emma's height.
Anyway, I think Jo must be a tad taller than Emma. At the PoBA, she's quite a bit taller than Emma, yet their shoes can't be all that different (looks to me as though Jo's give about an inch MORE than Emma's- or less- 'cause Emma's wearing pretty good heels there- around 3" in total.). If Jo is 5'5", then she's 5'8" in heels, if Emma is 5'5", she's 5'7" in her heels. Looks like more than an inch difference in their heights. If Jo is actually 5'5", Emma would be 5'4" to 5'4.5". Then again, did anyone notice Em slouching much? You know, I think her posture's gotten a bit better, grown out of the awkwardness and all that.
Rob Pattinson's height, btw, people, may be exaggerated. It's been done before.
He doesn't look 6'1" to me- he looks to be 5'11". When I see a evidence, I'll accept 6'1", because he just does not LOOK it. Ariella says on 3/Feb/08
JK said she's 5'5 and in the video and picture of her and Emma at the Pride of Britain Awards there shoes are the same length and JK is an inch taller than Emma. TJ says on 30/Jan/08
Anon, in the pride of britain awards JK was very noticeably taller than Emma. Probably 2 inches. She had larger shoes, but hard to imagine Emma getting over 5'5 when JK can look that tall next to her. Here's the vid. Click Here You will need to go to about 2mins 20 for a good view. Anonymous says on 30/Jan/08
Yeah, I agree, I dunno, but she looks slightly taller compared to Regis than Dan did. ?? Rad had on Converse like shoes, which would have the same or slightly more "umph" than Emma's sandals. I'd say Regis is 5'6" or 5'7" in those heels and Ripa is 5'7" or so as well? I'm not sure though. And the angle is definitley weird, I'll give you that. But what are these Pride of Britain awards? Have you got any photos? I would like to see them. Anyway, I have no idea how tall Jo is..... Jason says on 29/Jan/08
Ariella, I thought it was an interesting photo because Kate Moss (5'5.75") and Emma (5'5") are supposedly around the same height yet in the photo they don't look close at all. umad80 says on 29/Jan/08
Actually converse only gives you about a half inch. Rob has it up on his shoe height thing. But Emma is definitely around 5'5". It's hard to say if she's exactly 5'5" or pretty close to it. But when did JKR say this? lol That just seems weird to be asked how tall Emma is and for her to say, "She's an inch shorter than me!" Who, according to Rob, is only 5'4" which I have no idea to tell you the truth. But if she's 5'5" then so is Emma. At the Pride of Britain Awards, she had 3" heels on and was taller than Emma who had regular heels on. If JKR is only 5'4", she'd 5'7" in the heels making Emma shorter than 5'5" and even 5'4". So I think JKR and Emma are the same height at 5'5".
Anonymous, Emma is raising herself up and closer to the camera, so she'd appear taller. There were times that Regis looked taller and other times where Emma looked taller. So it's not a good gage either... TJ says on 28/Jan/08
Anonymous, Regis is taller in the clip. He looks comfortably taller as she approaches him, but then fairly even when she is closer to the camera than him. The best angle with them face to face has him looking an inch or so taller. Ariella says on 28/Jan/08
No there are other pictures you just have to look and I believe I gave you the site there on, converse give at least an inch in height, but if you have seen Ballet Shoes the gray haired woman is an inch taller than Emma and she's 5'5 then the brown/redish haired woman is 2 inches taller than Emma and she's 5'6, plus there's the little red haired girl and she's really short and she's a bit passed Emma's eyebrows when standing next to her, the girl is around age 13 and I highly doubt she's 5'4 1/2 she's shorter, I believe Emma is 5'4-5'5 but closer to 5'5 after seeing Ballet Shoes and looking at the pictures and at recent events.
Oh and Jo Rowling is 5'5 she's said so herself and Emma is definitely an inch shorter than her, so Emma is 5'4. Anonymous says on 27/Jan/08
Okay, it's obvious that men's dress shoes are going to give more height than a pair of flat sandals, like, well for example, the shoes Emma is wearing. That is to say, Emma's shoes basically give her nada in the height department, especially compared to Kelly's and Regis's footwear. And, yes, as umad80 said, that picture says little because Emma is leaning into give Regis (the creepy ****) a hug, so one cannot see who is taller, however, this small problem can be fixed by watching the first bit of this youtube click, which is here Click Here . It seems pretty obvious to me, as to who is taller, but I am eager to hear your opinions....who do you think is taller, Regis (5'6"er) or Emma(?)? Ariella says on 24/Jan/08
Emma had heels on in that picture, but why is it interesting?, she took a picture with them, it doesn't mean anything. umad80 says on 24/Jan/08
Ariella, I don't know what other set pics you're talking about then. Those are the only ones available with the older woman.
Emma's shoes would do much of what Rupert's shoes do to him. Give about a half inch in height because they're cons. Robert does have the better shoes which would make him taller thus the 5'5" becomes pretty legit. Also, there are enough pictures there to show that Emma comes up to the same place on Rob pretty consistently. It's about 8 inches and Rob has the better shoe.
Anonymous, how can that picture possibly show anything? Emma is bending in to give him a hug and would make her appear shorter. Plus it's hard to say whose shoe is giving more. :) |
