|
Ali020202 says on 7/Mar/10
This guy i worked said he was 6ft3 and he's about an inch shorter than me, he asked me how tall i was i sed straight 5ft11, kinda awkard, but i mean sum ppl do make rediculous claims.
MD says on 6/Mar/10
No, he doesn't. You guys are plum crazy to put it as kindly as I can. Jackman says on 4/Mar/10
Rob needs an upgrade, 184cm. maximus meridius says on 27/Feb/10
I thought he was taller than that i would say about 6ft 2in or maybe even 6ft 4in. Anonymous07 says on 9/Feb/10
Looks the same height as Rob and Jenny. The 6'1 claim is a complete exaggeration. I think it's his body structure giving him a way taller look. Anonymous says on 5/Feb/10
Michael, read the description above before you jump on him. Christ! He only claimed 5´9" himself so relax. Lenad says on 30/Jan/10
6'1 all the over the internet. Let this be a lesson to how much BS there is on the internet Michael says on 16/Jan/10
So thats what a 6-1 guy looks like next to a 5-8 man.... I have no idea how this guy had his height overestimated by almost 5 inches. Tom Felton says on 12/Jan/10
Spot on, chap! Ville says on 2/Jan/10
****, I always thought he was about 6ft 1. Whaddaya know... bigguyfrommars says on 28/Dec/09
rob is solid 184cm maybe some random loser says on 14/Dec/09
This is really interesting. I could have swear he was taller, judging from the latest Potter-movie. In his private sequences, I think that looks like a solid 6', but with his scenes with 6'1" Alan Rickman I spotted the height gap. I think this is a little strange, all his pfysical features implies a long body (bigh hands, long fingers, big ears etc)but he is actually closer to my height - 172 cm. Mike says on 10/Dec/09
Rob has got it bang on! Hugh 191cm says on 4/Dec/09
5ft 9in Anonymous says on 8/Nov/09
6'1 is nearly ten cm taller than his height Oleg says on 28/Oct/09
wa-wait a minute. can somebody explain WTF is going on here? I can't get why people say he's 6ft1 or so if there's a picture of him with Rob? Maybe I missed smth but what do you want to prove? This picture it just the best proof. Sanne says on 27/Oct/09
Tom Felton is 1.85 cm and Jason Isaacs who plays Lucius Malfoy is 1.80 cm. So that's pretty funny. I have read that he should stand on a stool for longer appear. X'D MD says on 23/Sep/09
Zazzy, which "Tom Felton" are you talking about? Most certainly not this one. lol MOF says on 22/Sep/09
Yes, Tom Felton is obviously 6'1" since he looks the same height as 5'8" Rob and has never looked close to 6' in any movie he's ever been in.
Incredible reasoning you have, zazzy. zazzy says on 22/Sep/09
tom felton is 185cm or 6'1. Anonymous 2 says on 27/Aug/09
Looks the same height as Rob and Jenny. KC says on 12/Aug/09
He's 1,73-1,76m. I did find it somewhere can't remember which website.
He's shorter than the actor who plays Professor Snape....that actor is really 6 foot 1; in the half blood prince, in the scene where he walks next to Snape in the corridor you can clearly see how short Felton is; wishes he was 1,85 m lol KC says on 12/Aug/09
He's 1,73-1,76m. I did find it somewhere can't remember which website.
He's shorter than the actor who plays Professor Snape....that actor is really 6 foot 1; in the half blood prince, in the scene where he walks next to Snape in the corridor you can clearly see how short Felton is; wishes he was 1,85 m lol yoyo says on 12/Aug/09
he looks 6inch lower than phelps brothers.. for my apologies i was posted phelps are under 6ft2. they were real close to 6ft3 but not quite strong 6ft3. sSsS says on 9/Aug/09
Yeah, around 5'9" sounds about right. Mallory says on 31/Jul/09
In HBP I must say he looked quite tall, but thats probably because all the other main actors arent very tall. When I saw 6'1 I though that looked pretty tall, so I would say around 5'9 - 5'10 Anonymous says on 25/Jul/09
He looked about 5'9 in HBP. No taller. There was a big height difference between him and 6'0-6'1 Alan Rickman. Benjamin says on 23/Jul/09
in Half Blood Prince he doesn't look 6'0" tall... are you crazy?! I thought he looked about 5'8" tall in HBP. I kept noticing how short he was compared to the teachers. He just looks tall because he is taller than Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe. But they are both short. My God... people always lie about their height, and the worse thing is most people cannot tell the difference between 5'8" and 6'1".... It's crazy! I'm not particularly tall, but I'm about 5'11"... I wish I was taller though. Like between 6'1" and 6'4". yel says on 21/Jul/09
thats right, in HBP he looks about 5'11"-6'0", very skinny... JJ says on 20/Jul/09
Oh my god Felton is so short! I thought he was 6 feet tall Nik says on 20/Jul/09
I think he might actually be 5'9" though. Not taller but 5'8.5" just seems too short Anonymous says on 20/Jul/09
I think he might actually be 5'9" though. Not taller but 5'8.5" just seems too short yoyo says on 19/Jul/09
taller than daniel radcliff at 5ft4.. Jake says on 15/Jul/09
Felton looked very thin in Half Blood Prince and therefore appeared much taller than this. Jordan says on 11/Jul/09
Rob is it Possible that If he was closer to the camera he would be a full 5'9?
[Editor Rob: he looked eye to eye to me (although of course had a good 1/4 inch less sneaker) and comparing to Jenny - who had similar sneaker height did not look 3/4 inch taller, in fact I couldn't tell noticeable difference...] Joe says on 11/Jul/09
keep in mind compared to Radcliffe, Almost everyone is a giant. Byron T. says on 4/Jul/09
I'd always knew that the 6'1 claims for Tom Felton were outrageous, but 5'8-5'9 seems about right for him. The picture with Rob proves it! thekiddd says on 3/Jul/09
He's not even close to 5'10" let alone 6'1". Bohm says on 29/Jun/09
Looks 5'9. Lenad says on 25/Jun/09
A few sites say 6'1 but he's obviously not anywear near that height Dylan says on 25/Jun/09
Rob looks like he has about a 1/4" advantage over Tom in my opinion. jo says on 24/Jun/09
rob, are you the creator of this site?
[Editor Rob: I made the site yes.] Anonymous says on 24/Jun/09
Actually, the worst claim is 6'1 for Skandar Keynes, the guy who plays Edmund in the Narnia movies. The guy is actually about 5'7. Vibram says on 24/Jun/09
173cm = 5ft8 flat. He's 21 and looks to have stubble so he's pretty much finished gaining height growth me reckon. dave says on 23/Jun/09
he only looks tall in the potte films because a few main members of the cast who hes often seen with are infact very small. Brandon says on 22/Jun/09
I thought he was taller. He looks tall in the Potter films. Anonymous says on 21/Jun/09
He looks 5'8.5, I agree. He's pretty much average. 174 is fine, I think. And that would make Rupert at 172 or so. What are these rumors of Rupert being 5'10 or 5'11? Lol. thekiddd says on 21/Jun/09
The 6'1" claim has simply fooled people on his height. No where near 5'11" let alone 6'1". miko says on 21/Jun/09
Rob, excuse the pun, he doesn't seem to be standing like he had a broomstick up his ass. Anonymous says on 20/Jun/09
what kind of shoes did he wear, Rob?
[Editor Rob: Ivan I had a good 1/4 inch advantage, he had 1.6cm converse low.] Lenad says on 20/Jun/09
6'1 is out there!! Lozzer says on 19/Jun/09
5'7.75! He looks shorter than both, regardless of footwear! Anonymous says on 19/Jun/09
damn these camera angles , they make a person look so tall, i thought he was 6'1'' Anonymous says on 18/Jun/09
This guy was pegged to be over 6-0 on here. I bet Vibram would peg him at 6-0 in person. Maribel says on 18/Jun/09
174cm is right. Alex says on 18/Jun/09
Looks more 5'8 flat with Rob. Paddington says on 18/Jun/09
You wouldn't expect many from the Harry Potter gang to be tall. Child actors are prized for short size, so "they can play younger". Most male child actors end up being in the 5'6" to 5'8" range. miko says on 18/Jun/09
Rob I guess this kind of clears up those 6"1 rumours eh!?
I think barefoot you would probably be very close, but Tom might have a few mm's on you. Anonymous says on 20/Apr/09
he probably just seemed really tall in potter movies because he grew faster than the other main actors. anonymous says on 23/Mar/09
how in the hell is he listed as 6 1 then?? im slightly taller than what hes listed as here and i dont think anyone would ever mistake me for a 6 1 person. Perhaps its really what fame can do Anonymous says on 6/Feb/09
Here's a pic of tom felton with the girls from the H20 series...
Click Here
I know you can't see their shoes. They're probably wearing heels, but Phoebe Tonkin (the dark-haired one) is said to be 5'10"... Mr.X says on 15/Jan/09
nowhere near 6'1...5'85'9 sounds right. linebacker40 says on 13/Jan/09
I thought this guy was at least 6', especially in the harry potter films. But I guess that's the illusion films give. Julie says on 14/Nov/08
I've meet him last year. He was about 5'10. Anonymous says on 25/Oct/08
"he can be 6"0 unknown says on 4/Oct/08
6"1? no way!
maybe 5 "10 yes..but 6"1? miko says on 8/Sep/08
His magic wand can't seem to make him 6"1.
5"9 it is. lara says on 16/Jul/08
all i can say is i have read every single comment on this blog, every picture taken into considration, shoe size...etc.
and i have decided that tom is only just 5'10, rupert 5'9/5'9.5, emma 5'6, daniel 5'5/5'5.5.
i know i am late, but it is always better to be late than never come at all! :)
plus, i miss all the arguments :P Cat says on 5/Jul/08
Cool someone who isnt dissing me for wondering about his weight. I think he might way a little less than 140 lbs Jack, he is really slim.
I wish I had his metabolism. Jack says on 4/Jul/08
He's probably around 140 lbs., what do you reckon Cat? thekiddd says on 16/May/08
We don't talk about weight on this site sorry to announce. This site is called celebheights not celebweights! If this was celebweights, Rob would be modifying this site all the time ROFL. Cat says on 15/May/08
Hey all,
I know this page is supposed to be about Tom`s height, but I was wondering what he might weigh. What do u think guys? thekiddd says on 14/May/08
The Fan who guessed 6'1" was probably wearing a blindfold when submitting it. If he is 6'1", than Alan Rickman is 6'5"! LMAO! umad80 says on 24/Mar/08
Well, if Ben Lyons is 6'3" like he claims and Tom is just under his eyes, then Tom has a better chance of being 5'10". I think that's about right. I mean, in 2005 if he was 5'9" he was 16/17 (depending on when he claimed 5'9" because his birthday is in September) he could've easily grown another inch. Rupert is closer to Tom's height, I think around 5'9", because at the OotP premiere Tom was only about an inch taller. I think Tom had the better footwear, probably only giving him around a half inch more, maybe just a bit less. Click Here , Click Here , Click Here and for good measure, here is Tom's shoes: Click Here - and of course, remember Rupert was wearing chucks. Anonymous says on 24/Mar/08
Oh, but come on, Emma hasn't grown! According to some, she is still 4'10" and I find these sources to be very reliable!...psh, 5'5"; please stop smoking the reefer, we do not know what you are talking about. And those who say 5'6", ah no, please do not even be on the same webpage as them honey; they may contaminate you with their dirty ideals.... thekiddd says on 23/Mar/08
Rupert is basically 5'8". It's funny because all of them have grown expect for Radcliffe lol. mimi says on 23/Mar/08
tom is 5'9.5,emma is 5'5 (she wear heels all the time during red carpet),dan is 5'5,rupert 5'8.5 thekiddd says on 13/Mar/08
People thought Radcliffe was 5'9" so they made that 6'1 guess. But Danny boy is super short. Barely taller than Emma Watson. Autumn Emile says on 25/Feb/08
I met him very briefly and got an autograph, but had no camera for a picture >:( I'm 5'7'' on the dot and was wearing ultra thin flip flops- I'd definately say he was at least 3.5 inches taller than me, but I'd knock off that half inch for his shoes. 5'10'' for sure though. And just for the curious, he's really cute in person and smiles sideways like he's smirking, haha. Very polite and gracious. umad80 says on 22/Jan/08
Tom's height is dependent on how tall Rupert is. I personally believe that Rupert is 5'9" or there about. Click Here - Tom seems to be about a half inch taller than Rupert. Maybe a little over. These are the shoes Tom was wearing that night: Click Here - compared to Rupert's chucks. Looking at those shoes, Tom probably had an advantage. If Tom is 5'9", then so is Rupert (or at least pretty close to it). The only way for Rupert to be at the height listed here is that Tom is in noway near 5'9" but actually more 5'8". But if he was barely 5'8" back in 2003, that means he barely grew since 15/16 years old. Robbie H says on 21/Jan/08
jason issaacs is not even in the prisoner of azkaban, and felton would only of been 15 in that, i think 5'10-11 for tom Anonymous says on 17/Jan/08
maxiumus says on 17/Jan/08 he is actually 6ft 1in in the prisoner of azkaban he was taller than jason isaac who was 5ft 11in michael says on 31/Dec/07
on Click Here u can find tom felton listed 6'0 and here only this? Nik says on 29/Dec/07
There's no way Tom is only 5-9. I'd say he's 5-11 to 6-0 JK says on 3/Nov/07
He looks more 5'8'', close enough to 5'9'' Anonymous says on 2/Nov/07
Rob, you honestly don't think he's grown at all since 2005? He must be a little taller by now, maybe 5'10" Deryck says on 25/Oct/07
eh, you people, why do you keep on arguing about such unrelevant events, for gods sake. I see that Anna is keen on grammar or it turned to a linguistic race? :)umad, you better post a picture of named person with somebody of certain height,could you? umad80 says on 17/Oct/07
Oh, I think there definitely needs to be some adjustment. I know Rob will be fair and if he sees proof of Rupert's height, he'll change it. My only concern is that when I kept showing pictures of them in their barefeet and Rupert had four inches on them both, he only said "that moment in time." :p It'll be interesting though, right? Because we only know Tom gave a 5'9" listing in 2005. He definitely could've grown since then for sure. I know a lot of people don't believe it, but I'm convinced that Rupert is in the 5'9" range. umad80 says on 16/Oct/07
So when I said "Now you're from the UK?" I was correct. She changes everything. Height, age, sex, location... Little did "she" know that Rob could easily check her IP to see where she was posting. I was going to ask him, but I didn't want to seem like I was starting something. I wonder now if "Anna" will come back with a different name, location, gender, age, height since she's leaving. But I bet you she'll be on the bandwagon of Rupert being under 5'7" 'cause she's so ticked that Emma was proven to only be 5'5".
But to be good and keep on topic, I think we can honestly say that Tom is 5'9" and that Rupert is a strong 5'8" and probably close to 5'9" when you take into account the possible shoe difference and Rupert's lean/slouch: Click Here Evanna says on 16/Oct/07
umad80 you're going to absolutely love this. Please check out Eliah Wood's page, especially the latest 4-5 posts! :D umad80 says on 16/Oct/07
But surely, I jest. I mean, that's what you do when attacking, right?
Pay attention. Rupert is leaning in the pic and thus would have less height to Tom and the fact that we don't know what Tom has in shoe to Rupert is another. Gee, someone's surely sore that it got proven that Emma is nowhere near 5'6". I also am amused that now that Emma is proven to be 5'5", your personal mission is to now lower Rupert's height when just not too long ago you thought Tom could be taller than 5'9". Amused. Anna says on 15/Oct/07
Okay, thanks for the fantastic tip umad80, clearly you are from the U.S.. Nevertheless, I will certainly take it to heart. But the thing is, as you clearly jest, I jest not And what I find qutie amusing is the fact that you don't even consider that Tom has got actual, physical, head above his hair line. That's not just spiked hair, that's his actual head. Furthermore, look at Rupert's eyes and then Tom's eyes....Tom clearly is at least one inch taller, thus validating Rupert's current listing. And, you are rather rude. It's one thing to playfully mock (I suggest a laugh or wink be added to the end of the statement, actually) someone's lack of intelligence, but to blatantly say one has not one ounce of intelligence is utterly unacceptable. You ought to know this common respect, surely? And I had better pick it up if that's the way I come across, your comment certainly diminished my self-esteem. But thanks for the lovely compliment nonetheless. :) umad80 says on 8/Oct/07
Evanna, hehe. Someone who lives in a glass house should not throw stones, am I right? Some people should learn that.
Anna, here is a little tip in joking online. No one can see your face or hear your tone, so you should add a laugh or a wink. Otherwise it looks like you're trying to backtrack in order to look better. Then you try to further derail everyone from noticing your rudeness by attacking one's sentence structure and grammatical error on the internet.
Of course if you had one ounce of intelligence, you'd have noticed that I did actually respond to the idea that Rupert isn't much taller than Daniel Radcliffe. I wouldn't have 'freaked out', but would have calmly stated, just as I did, my feelings. And you of course insist that I'm obsessively talking about Rupert being 5'9" when you have not stopped obsessively talking about Emma being over 5'6" when people have proven that she is under said mark.
But clearly I jest.
However, let's get back to the discussion at hand. To prove that Tom is not over 6' here are a few pictures with Rupert which also coincidently should prove that Rupert is over 5'8". This is from a video taken by harrypotterdeluxe.com. Click Here and Click Here - not sure how this works exactly, but yeah, Rupert would probably have the advantage, but you can tell he's taller so he wouldn't be that much shorter than Tom.
Then you have pictures from the UK premiere where Rupert is leaning and Tom sometimes is closer to the camera and most likely has the show advantage. Click Here and Click Here Anna says on 6/Oct/07
Evanna, I was joking and what I absolutely love is how you read my comments to find an error. However, thanks for bringing that awful sentence up, what was I trying to say? That's rubbish. I'm ashamed to have writ that. Evanna says on 4/Oct/07
Anna give us a break with grammar and stuff. Here's a quote from your own comment posted on 3/Oct/07 (Grint's page): "Not that I don't entirely disagree..." etc. Anyway this is not a literacy contest. Anna says on 3/Oct/07
Exactly, although I giggle silently at your grammatical error, "This is suppose to be fun." Incorrect. This is SUPPOSED to be fun and, that's exactly what the case is. I was just having a bit of a laugh with you, you know, joking ever so slightly. Because you must admit, you will not back away from claiming Rupert 5'9" or always taller than he seems to be. Perhaps you have a bet going on? Anyway, i've got a question, is slightly joking with a person no longer permitted on this site? Has Rob said something regarding this new rule? I have not seen anything, so I suppose I am alright for the moment, but, umad80, you must admit, you wanted to freak out and if I hadn't said that, you would have writ something in response to Gaby's claiming Rupert one centimetre above Dan. Am I right or am I correct? umad80 says on 2/Oct/07
Anna, grow up. This is suppose to be fun.
The only way for Rupert to be that height is if Tom is 5'7.5" because Rupert only looked to be about a half inch shorter. So if Tom is 5'8.5" then Rupert is 5'8" and if Tom is 5'9", then Rupert is 5'8.5". I think he's a legit 5'9" and could be around 5'10" and I think Rupert is 5'9". It may not be strong, but it's there.
And of course Dan is 5'5" and Emma is 5'5" or slightly over. It's always Rupert that's a bit hard to tell. And there was also a video of Tom and Rupert shaking hands and they were pretty much eye level. So the only way Rupert could be in the 5'7" range is if Tom is too. JK says on 29/Sep/07
Original, I kind of agree with all of your listings Anna says on 29/Sep/07
No way gaby, no way. Dan 1 cm shorter than Rupert? Umad80 will freak out at you. Just hope she doesn't read this page anytime soon...As for Tom, he's 5'10" at the most. 6'1" is quite ridiculous. That would put Emma Watson at about 5'9" or 5'10", lmao. Original says on 29/Sep/07
6'1" it's IMPOSSIBLE
He's 5'8.5" or 5'9"
Daniel is 5'5" or 5'5.5"
Emma is a 5'5" or slighty under
And Rupert is a 5'7" or 5'7.5" gaby says on 29/Sep/07
i think Tom Felton height is 6'1", like his girlfriend, Melissa...
tom: 185 cm
daniel: 168 cm
emma: 167 cm
rupert: 169 cm
tom you are the best...
Maybe...??? umad80 says on 15/Sep/07
God. Does anyone know how big an inch is? It's not big at all. He is not under 5'8" and the pics with Tom prove that since Tom is definitely a legit 5'9". Anna says on 15/Sep/07
Yeah, that's quite accurate in my opinion umad, quite accurate indeed. He's surely nothing under 5'9". JK says on 15/Sep/07
Im sorry but Rupert just does not give me the impression of being a 5'8'' guy, the more pics i see of him the more he looks shorter... I think 5'7.5'' is generous coming from me umad80 says on 14/Sep/07
JK, I don't think she was starting. Just a little late to the party, so to speak. So, does that mean you're considering that Rupert is indeed taller than 5'7"/5'7.5"?
Anna, I agree that Tom is probably closer to 5'10" by now. I mean, I realize in 2005 he was probably close in not growing, but it is possible to grow beyond 18. Probably not something that happens all the time, but it does happen and I think he was 17/18 in 2005. His birthday is on the later side, so depending on when this fact sheet came out, he may have still be 17 at the time and could have grown. For all we know, it could've been written in 2004 but not published until 2005. Just a few things to throw out there. But nonetheless he does look a legit 5'9"/5'10" to me. JK says on 12/Sep/07
Anna things have cooled down between me and umad80 so don't start arguments like a little kid! Anna says on 11/Sep/07
Yeah umad80, I totally agree with you. I find it very hard to believe that Tom is anything under 5'9", seeing as he definitely looks 5'9" to 5'10" in photos and the new movie. I think he is probably closer to 5'10" now actually. And your photo of Tom and Jamie just proves that JK is being utterly ridiculous because he without a doubt thinks Jamie is 6'2.5" or 6'3". 6'3'' JK says on 12/Jun/07
He must be very close to 6'3'' i think
So he, although he has said he does not have a hatred toward Rupert Grint, must indeed hate him because he is just being totoally crazy and random. And, umad80 you may find this interesting. You know how JK always thinks celebrities lie about their heights and are always shorter than even what Rob has them listed at? Well, he's been commenting quite a bit on Miley Cyrus's page (who is nearly 15 and 5'4", thus most likely nearly done growing) and seems to think she will grow to be 5'8" or 5'9"...isn't that crazy and totally random? I just don't get his logic...do you? umad80 says on 9/Sep/07
Hehe Anna. Don't forget too that Tom's shoe could've given a half inch advantage to him, meaning that the show gave an inch and Rupert's gives a half inch, Tom had a half inch in shoe advantage.
Look, I just think a photo from November 2005 of Jamie and Tom says a lot. In order for the 5'8" to be true, Jamie would not be the 6'2.5" he claimed at that time. He was a solid 4.5"-5" taller, possibly more due to the angle of the pic, than Tom in that picture. He could only actually be 6' or so then for Tom to be only 5'8" now. And that can't possibly be right considering there are pictures of him and the twins around that time and any height difference was barely noticable. Plus he was taller than the 6'1" Robert Pattinson. So the 6'2.5" claim definitely wasn't wrong.
You also used this photo: Click Here just back in late July. You said it proved he was 5'9". lol It really pretty much does. Both he and Jamie are slouching considerably, so they have smiliar posture. You can tell there is not much difference. If Jamie is 6'3" by now... I don't know if 6 inches is really accurate, but he's definitely not 5'8" as 7 inches is rediculous since they have similiar posture. So I think anywhere from 5'9" to 5'10" isn't out of the realm of possibility. JK says on 9/Sep/07
I think things have cooled down between me and umad80, and yes Anna to me Tom looks 5'8'' and no it is not obvuious that Rupert is a strong 5'8'' Anna says on 9/Sep/07
haha, Tom now looks 5'8" maximum to you because Rupert looked no more than an inch shorter than him. That's quite hilarious and peculiar, why do you care if Rupert is not your beloved 5'7"? Is it not obvious that he is easily a strong 5'8"? JK says on 7/Sep/07
Well if did do it before i have apologized for it and now i don't do it, if you think Tom is 5'9'', 5'10'', 5'11'', or even 6'0'' fine i don't care because thats your opinion, but to me Tom does not look more than 5'8'' umad80 says on 7/Sep/07
Exacty JK. But Tom didn't shrink since 2005. I'm not sure I get your point. Heh He probably has him by 7 inches now, but at the time Jamie said he was 6'2.5". And as I said, Tom didn't shrink. So this proves that the 5'9" one is pretty accurate. Even if Tom didn't grow and Jamie did, Tom would still be 5'9".
And I don't get "hot". It just preplexes me that you would go to great lengths to prove that Rupert is 5'7" when it's clear that anyone who has seen him in person puts him well above that. And no, 5'7" is nowhere near 5'8" unless he's 5'7.99" or something. lol
And actually you've disrespected my opinion countless times. "Rupert is not 5'10" LMAO!!!" "You're the one saying he's 5'11"!!" (I still don't where you got that) and don't forget the latest where you started cussing everyone out who didn't agree with you and Rob had to say something to you. So please don't say you haven't disrespected my opinion when you have.
I just think it's pretty obvious that by that picture he is 5'9". It's the same year he gave that exact height listing. Meaning that Rupert could very well be 5'9" or there about. And that's if you don't wonder if he's slouching and whatnot. Sometimes it's hard to tell with him because of he carries himself. But, I think it's pretty obvious that Tom is definitely 5'9". JK says on 7/Sep/07
That picture was from november 2005, I think Jamie has grown more since then because he was only 16 or 17 and nowadays Jamie has Tom by 7 inches minimum, umad80 why do you get hot when i say that Rupert is 5'7''???? I mean isn't 5'7'' close to 5'8''? I don't disrespect your opinions so don't talk trash about me continuously umad80 says on 6/Sep/07
Tom is definitely around 5'9" or 5'10" now. It is possible for him to grow an inch in a year (depending on when that fact file came out). I'd have to agree with Anna that making Tom 5'7" would make Dan just a few inches above 5' and since we know that Devon Murray is 5'2", Dan is definitely around 5'5" because he was taller than him at the GoF London premiere.
Btw Hugo, I wouldn't be too happy about JK agreeing with you. If you look at their past posts they were adament about Tom being 5'9". Until a picture came out with Rupert that showed barely any height difference and shoes could be a factor. Thus proving that Rupert was taller than his 5'6.5" to 5'7" range JK has put Rupert in.
Look at this... we know Jamie is close to 6'3" (give or take) and in this pic he is definitely closer to the camera, but there is like at least 4 inches between he and Tom. Click Here and that was taken during GoF. So I think it's possible to say that Tom is a strong 5'9". Anna says on 1/Sep/07
What a load of rubbish. lol, 5'7" for Tom Felton? What would that put Dan Radlciffe at then, 5'2" or 5'3"? That seems quite unlikely to me, even edging on the brink of impossible. Tom looked absolutely huge compared to Dan in PoA and GoF and like Maya said, he has not looked much smaller than Jason Isaacs since GoF, which makes me believe that he is probably closer to 5'10" now. Hugo says on 29/Aug/07
JK, thanks for agreeing with me. It's not impossible for Felton to be 5'7". He just doesn't look 5'9". Maya says on 29/Aug/07
Tom has been at least 5'9" since GoF. He towered over Dan and was just slightly shorter than his "dad" Jason Isaacs (5'11"). I don't think he's grown, but it is also unlikely that he shrunk. Anna says on 28/Aug/07
Are you two just going off the photos with Rupert Grint? Or were there photos of TOm with other actors? JK says on 28/Aug/07
"In pics mid 2003 he was barely 5ft 8 back then...late 2004 he looked a little taller" - Rob that puts him at 5'8.5'', i doubt he got taller than that because he looked the same height in every potter film since prisoner of azkaban, so i think its time to downgrade him by half an inch, and That would put Rupert Grint at 5'7'' so it all makes sense JK says on 28/Aug/07
Finally someone agrees with me, I think the same thing Hugo Hugo says on 27/Aug/07
Based on seeing the UK premiere OOTP photo's of Felton, I'd say he looks 5'7", 5'8" in shoe. I don't think he is 5'9". anna says on 20/Aug/07
oh and yeah, you made a good point about Devon. He seems to be 5'3" and not going anywhere, so dan should not be too threatened. anna says on 20/Aug/07
haha, yeah, it was a bit funny, he was just randomly dressed in a suit, but still, he absolutely towered over Dan. Dan was in Converse and Tom probably in dress shoes, but Tom probably had a 1/2" to 1" footwear advantage at most. I still think Tom is at least 5'9.5" or 5'10" though. And, what I also found interesting about the train scene, was that Emma, as she does in reliable photos, looked a good inch taller than Dan and she was actually standing up straight. She looked at least 5'6.5" in that scene and was wearing converse-esque shoes. max says on 18/Aug/07
neville's taller than draco, and neville is 5'10. Chip says on 14/Aug/07
Anna, I'm not being a know-it-all, here, but you forgot Devon. Devon is 5'3", and is the shortest of the HP males (at least out of the characters who aren't just random extras, but actual characters, like Dean, Crabbe,, etc.). He's shorter than Dan, too. I agree with you about the train scene, btw. The one thing is that Tom might have been wearing dress shoes.
I never really, thought about it before, but it seems that nobody was in dress robes when they got off of the Hogwarts express in OOTP. It's not a big deal, but it's just funny, in a way. At least, the fact that Malfoy was "dressed-up" was. Anna says on 6/Aug/07
Well, I wouldn't tend to agree with you 'max'. The only Potter kids that aren't very tall are Dan and Rupert. Dan, at around 5'6", is obviously short for a guy and Rupert seems to be around 5'9", which is about average height I believe. All of the other guys are either average or tall and all of the girls, with the exception of Evanna Lynch, are average or above average as well. I still think Tom is 5'10" by now, he looks easily 4 to 5 inches taller than Dan. Train scene in OotP? CT says on 4/Aug/07
He looks like he is slouching in that photo. His shoulders are the same height as Neville's, but his head is bent forward.
Also, I have seen many interviews where Dan Radcliffe says he is 5'6" and I cannot believe that Tom is only 3 inches taller than Dan, it's gotta be at least 5 inches. max says on 31/Jul/07
tom is 5'9. he looks taller bec many potter kids around him are not very tall. Anna says on 24/Jul/07
I too agree that both Emma and Tom are taller than their given heights, but I don't think that's a good photo to judge by 'bebe-one'. 5'9.5", more likely 5'10", at the least for Tom. Are there any photos of Tom and Emma and/or Dan and Tom at some of the latest premieres? bebe-one says on 22/Jul/07
Click Here
i dunno guys, emma watson is a minimum 5'5, but personally i think shes taller, and that looks like a pretty big height difference. not 6'1 for sure, but he's definately taller than 5'9 i mean c'mon now. 6'3'' JK says on 20/Jul/07
I saw a picture of jamie with Joshua herdman (Goyle) who is a legit 6'1'' and Tom Felton, Jamie dwarfed both of them, so Jamie is 6'3'' Joshua is 6'1'' and Tom is 5'9''. Look how much Jamie has on Tom Even with Huge slouch which makes him lose 3 - 4 inches Click Here cool army fad says on 20/Jul/07
Here's a recent picture of him beside Seamus and Crabbe so it is hard for me to believe that he is only 5'9":
Click Here John says on 19/Jul/07
Looks 5'11 in the new movie. Chip says on 19/Jul/07
Tom Felton IS 5'10." He is no less than 5'9". He looks MUCH taller than Dan in OOTP, btw. NO WAY says on 15/Jul/07
HE IS NOT 6'0" or over. He isn't even 5'9"! I would liuke more than anyone for him to be that tall but he's not. There have been recent shots of him with Emma watson at the red carpet event for the new harry potter movie. 5'9" at the MOST! 6'3'' JK says on 10/Jul/07
NO WAY MAN, No way he is 5'10''!!! we seen enough proof so don't start this all over again, Rob is being generous by giving him even 5'9'' Anna says on 9/Jul/07
I think he could be more like 5'10" to 5'11" now, not 6' though, maybe, but we'll have to see, we should be able to in the movie!! dreamer says on 8/Jul/07
I think he at least is a good 180cm guy, for now. Cos he looks really tall in the film.. OR is it cos of the poses and film lightings? Hmmm... He should be 180cm by now.. Considering that he is already quite tall last year. umad80 says on 2/Jul/07
I have to agree with Kelsey. I don't know about 6', but he looks taller than the 5'9" now. Because one of the new promo shots, even though he's in front, he doesn't look that much shorter than the almost 6'3" Jamie Waylett. I think Tom could be bordering on 6' now. Just hard to say... kelsey says on 29/Jun/07
i saw order of the phoenix at the pre-screening last night and he is tall. hes about six feet. maybe a little more or a little less. but hes not short. 6'3'' JK says on 25/Jun/07
Tom is nothing more than 5'9'', it has been proven time after time again! what other proof you want??!! Chip says on 25/Jun/07
It looked like Tom was taller than Jason Isaacs in GoF. Tom is about 5'10", no less in my opinion. He grew loads taller during the filming of CoS. You can see it in some scenes, like in the Flourish and Blotts scene. His voice is heavier and he's looking down at Dan, while in other shots, he is shorter with a higher-pitched voice. bebe-one says on 23/Jun/07
that is the biggest load i've ever heard. no way in hell is tom felton OR rupert grint that short. please, gimme a break. sean biggerstaff (oliver wood) is 5'9" flat, and theres a pic from way back when in 2002...of sean and tom standing next to eachother in a group photo at the CHAMBER OF SECRETS dvd launch, which would make tom about 14 (?) he was practically stooping next to biggerstaf...an that was like 5 years ago...so no way he is as short as you've put him at. i will hunt down that pic and post it to prove it. 6'3'' JK says on 19/Apr/07
No way man! Tom Felton is just a 5'9'' and nothing over it CT says on 19/Apr/07
I think he is taller than 5'9" because he looked much taller than Dan (way more than just 2.5 inches). Emma is 5'7 and he looks at least 4 inches taller than her, so I would agree with Chip on this one (5'11"). 6'2.5'' JK says on 2/Apr/07
No Way Tom as 5'11'', he is 5'9'' and thats even pushing it Chip says on 1/Apr/07
I'd say that Tom is about 5'11" at the max, 5'9" at the least. He looked WAY taller than Dan in GoF. Tom is definitely not 6'1", since Jamie Waylett is about 6'3", and he practically towers over Tom. Dana says on 1/Apr/07
i dont care... he's hot... draco's hot... but personally i dont think he's 6 feet, 5'9" is so much more feasible 6'2.5'' JK says on 29/Mar/07
He is 5'9'' Max! and No way near 6'1''!!! Rupert is 5'6'' and Daniel is probably 5'5.5'' At his Max in shoes antron says on 28/Mar/07
heather are you for real? I hope you are joking. He said he was 5'9," why would he say he was 4 inches shorter than he was? I'll give him 5'10" max, definitely a lot taller than Dan, but he does not look like a 6 footer in any of the movies. Maybe you can change my mind if he's grown more and stands taller in OOTP. heather says on 19/Mar/07
i believe he is 6"1 if it says he is 6"1 if you don't believe it then you are not a true tom felton fan. i love tom felton so im going to believe that it's his height Global says on 23/Feb/07
Tom taller radcliffe 14cm 5.5Inches
Daniel: 164cm
Tom: 178cm
Tom is 5'10" 6'2.5'' JK says on 17/Feb/07
He maybe just about 5'9'', he is really thin so he gives alot of people the impression of a tall guy when he is really average, Rob, what was the highest you had him listed on this site?
[Editor Rob: I can't remember exactly, 5ft 11 I think initially and chopped down after changing potter heights] murko says on 16/Feb/07
yeah this seems to be off, no way he is 6'1" 5-10, or 11 is more like it, he just looks tall because most of the author harry potter actors are quite short Anonymous says on 2/Feb/07
Rob - You don't think he's grown at all since 2005? Surely he must be 5'10" by now... Anonymous says on 15/Jan/07
well it's possible that he's 6'1 now considering he could have had a growth spurt or something. it's possible. 6'2'' JK says on 21/Dec/06
Rob, since when did you downgrade him to 5'9'' and Why?, anyways i think 5'9'' is closer to the truth for him
[Editor Rob: 28 days, 6 hours, 42 mi...] johnny link says on 22/Oct/06
nikki: he really is much taller than dan in the movies, you can really see it in GoF. I am guessing that Tom is 5'10" or 5'11" and Dan is 5'4"/5'5". Dan does not seem to be growing anymore, however, in the new OoTP pictures everyone seems to either be catching up to him or growing even taller than him. 6'2'' JK says on 20/Oct/06
5'10'' isn't very tall, its just an inch above average, he looks 5'9'' to me Emily says on 20/Oct/06
he's a really nice guy, very hot too ;-). I got a hug too *laughs* he is reallly tall though, i like him <3 nikki says on 17/Oct/06
Did you really meet him? lucky! he is very tall indeed! but he is really tall compared to dan in the movie because he is 18 in that one and dan is 16 or 17! when i say their ages i mean in real life in the movie they are only 15! Emily says on 16/Oct/06
I met Tom Felton at the GOF premiere (sp?) and he's quite a bit taller than me, and im 5'7 so..i'm guessing he's around 6' or 6'1 Charlotte says on 30/Sep/06
Tom is around 5'9". Amanda says on 2/Sep/06
Yes, Tom IS a lot taller than Dan. Dan is 5' 5" and Tom is 5' 10". Kourt says on 16/Aug/06
He's gotta be taller than this because he makes dan look quite shrimpy in the gof. or maybe dan is really short. but sometimes this height does seem right. maybe 5'11" at the most. Charlotte says on 21/May/06
Karee- In that pic he was 5 ft 8 in.Emma being about 3-5 inches shorter than him. DFg says on 7/May/06
I am 6'0''and i seen tom felton he was just a hair shorter than me he is quite a tall guy. In that picture Emma looks 5'5''. RentGirl says on 17/Mar/06
There was a picture book for 'goblet of fire' and it had info on all the actors in it. and it stated Tom's height at 5'9. Andrew says on 9/Mar/06
I think that he is about 5'11". In 'Goblet of Fire', the scene where he talks to Harry, he is much taller than Dan. It is like a huge amount, it really revealed how short Dan is. Now, I am not saying that Tom is 6'1" like some think, but I think Dan is shorter than he is saying. That scene really showed that he is not 5'5.5", more around 5'4" to 5'5". Also, in GOF the scenes with him and Cedric show a huge height difference and Cedric is said to be about 5'11" to 6'0". Also, in recent pictures of Emma and Dan, Emma is about 2 inches taller than him. Emma is increasing the gap between her and Dan and closing the gap between herself and Rupert. I think that Dan is definetely done growing and Rupert might grow to be about 5'8" or 5'8.5". On the other hand, Emma is currently about 5'6" to 5'7" (I am not even exaggerating...she has grown) and will grow to be about 5'9" or more. She will definetely be the tallest one of the three. She will keep growing (her parents are really tall and she seems like she isn't as 'mature' as Dan or Rupert. So here are what I think their current heights are and how tall they will grow to be:
Dan: 5'4" to 5'5"...5'4" to 5'5"
Rupert: 5'7.5"...5'8" to 5'8.5"
Tom: 5'11"...5'11" to 6'0"
Emma: 5'6" to 5'7"...at least 5'9" DD says on 5/Mar/06
You're joking 5'8''. Tom felton looks to be a solid 6'0'' tall. benji says on 29/Jan/06
he is 5'8'' ive met i him in real life and im 6 foot 4 inches anonymous says on 12/Jan/06
That's funny! Tom is 5' 10" and it's 2006. That means he's turning 19 this year and is probably done growing. Maybe he'll get to be 5' 11" but that's about it! 6' 1" is ridiculous. Like my brother. He is about 5' 10", maybe 5' 10.5" on a good day, and he says he's 6' 1", but at least Tom didn't actually SAY he was 6' 1"; someone just started that up as a rumo[u]r. meximus says on 6/Jan/06
nice being that 6ft1,hes now 18 dont worry about him hes not going to be more tall ,only if he is not weird Katie says on 1/Jan/06
I think that Tom is 6'1". I mean when you google Tom Felton height, almost every website says he is 6'1". Someone explain this.
[Editor Rob: I'll say this again...
an interviewer was doing Coltrane, David Tennant, guys in the 184-5cm range. Next up was Tom Felton...compared to the previous guys he looked nigh on 3 inches shorter!] Amanda says on 16/Dec/05
Tom Felton's height is 5 ft 10 in (178 cm) Laurel says on 26/Nov/05
To verify, Katie is 5' 5" even (165 cm), Emma is slightly taller (166 cm) and Daniel is just under 5' 6" (167 cm)-- as of the NOVEMBER 2005 GoF premiere date (these photos are the only ones where all three of them are in shoes with soles of the same thickness, the other ones have Katie in boots or Dan in platforms, which make Emma look shorter). And next to the 5' 10" Matthew Lewis, Tom Felton is the same height, and Rupert Grint is still only about 5' 7" Redhead says on 19/Nov/05
I'd fit right in with the Phelps twins. I'm 5'll" too and have red hair, double the fun ;-) AA says on 24/Oct/05
Obviuosly he's 5' 11"! In Harry potter, he seems a LIIITLE BIT taller than Rupert Grint!
I believe he's 5' 11" Emma (Dan's girl) says on 11/Oct/05
Hey,
Did you know that Tom is 6'2?
I thought he was much shorter. Anyway, I wanted to give this info.
BYE
EMMA Carrie says on 2/Aug/05
Stood next to him. I'm 5'11 and he was taller. Not by much. Maybe slightly over 6ft, but not yet 6'1. He might still grow. He's only 17, right? |
