Add a Comment1983 comments
Average Guess (465 Votes)
6ft 0.48in (184.1cm)
6ft 0.48in (184.1cm)
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 25/Nov/16
Rob has met Jesse Eisenberg, and has him listed as 171 CM. Henry Cavill appears 5 1/2" inches taller than him, so 6'0 3/4" seems to be the most plausible.
Rob has met Jesse Eisenberg, and has him listed as 171 CM. Henry Cavill appears 5 1/2" inches taller than him, so 6'0 3/4" seems to be the most plausible.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 24/Nov/16
@Pierre Strong 5'11"? You do realize I would ask Rob to downgrade Chris Pine because he didn't look that much different from Gal Gadot just like Cavill did.
6'0.5"-6'0.75"
@Pierre Strong 5'11"? You do realize I would ask Rob to downgrade Chris Pine because he didn't look that much different from Gal Gadot just like Cavill did.
6'0.5"-6'0.75"
Mark(5'9.25 said on 24/Nov/16
6'0.5"-6'0.75"
6'0.5"-6'0.75"
Pierre said on 23/Nov/16
Strong 5"11'about 181 imo
Strong 5"11'about 181 imo
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 23/Nov/16
I think that I read an article somewhere from a person who has met him describing him as being at least 6'1.5" with the person being 6'2". However, I noticed at least an inch between them.
I think that I read an article somewhere from a person who has met him describing him as being at least 6'1.5" with the person being 6'2". However, I noticed at least an inch between them.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 23/Nov/16
Man of Steel. However, I detested the movie Immortals.
Man of Steel. However, I detested the movie Immortals.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 23/Nov/16
Rob, if you don't mind me asking, what is your favorite movie role of Henry Cavill?
I personally love his Superman in Man of Steel. Dawn of Justice Ultimate Edition was fine too. I can't wait to see return in Justice League.
Editor Rob
Rob, if you don't mind me asking, what is your favorite movie role of Henry Cavill?
I personally love his Superman in Man of Steel. Dawn of Justice Ultimate Edition was fine too. I can't wait to see return in Justice League.
Editor Rob Mark, I've not seen enough of him yet, only a couple of films he's been in.
It's a monumentally tough role to fill, playing Superman or Batman.
It's a monumentally tough role to fill, playing Superman or Batman.
Mark(5'9.25") said on 22/Nov/16
Rob, there is a way you can meet Cavill though I'm not sure if you're open to plane traveling.
Click Here
What do you think Rob?
Rob, there is a way you can meet Cavill though I'm not sure if you're open to plane traveling.
Click Here
What do you think Rob?
Mark(5'9.25" said on 20/Nov/16
Under 6'0" is unlikely. 6'0.5" - 6'0.75" for Cavill.
@Pierre You, let's all downgrade Chris Pine to 5'11" and Bradley cooper to 5'11". Your guesses are nothing short of crap if you ask me.
Then we're downgrading Armie Hammer to just 6'3"
Under 6'0" is unlikely. 6'0.5" - 6'0.75" for Cavill.
@Pierre You, let's all downgrade Chris Pine to 5'11" and Bradley cooper to 5'11". Your guesses are nothing short of crap if you ask me.
Then we're downgrading Armie Hammer to just 6'3"
Mark said on 20/Nov/16
Under 6'0" is unlikely. 6'0.5" - 6'0.75" for Cavill.
@Pierre You, let's all downgrade Chris Pine to 5'11" and Bradley cooper to 5'11". Your guesses are nothing short of crap if you ask me.
Then we're downgrading Armie Hammer to just 6'3"
Under 6'0" is unlikely. 6'0.5" - 6'0.75" for Cavill.
@Pierre You, let's all downgrade Chris Pine to 5'11" and Bradley cooper to 5'11". Your guesses are nothing short of crap if you ask me.
Then we're downgrading Armie Hammer to just 6'3"
Pierre said on 20/Nov/16
Stephen Amel is looking 6"0' next to Rob imo.By considering the picture Stephen/Henry,Henry is probably more a strong 5"11' like a 181 cm guy imo
Stephen Amel is looking 6"0' next to Rob imo.By considering the picture Stephen/Henry,Henry is probably more a strong 5"11' like a 181 cm guy imo
Rory said on 19/Nov/16
I think 184 and 185 guesses are technically both right. I think he would be at or near 185 in the early afternoon, but he'd probably be 184 at night.
I think 184 and 185 guesses are technically both right. I think he would be at or near 185 in the early afternoon, but he'd probably be 184 at night.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 18/Nov/16
Based off of how both Novak Djokovic and Henry Cavill stand with Will Smith, there'd be no more than an inch between them (if not less).
Based off of how both Novak Djokovic and Henry Cavill stand with Will Smith, there'd be no more than an inch between them (if not less).
Mark(5'9.25 said on 18/Nov/16
It's not like Justin Timberlake claiming 6'1" and 6'2" while he's really 5'11.5".
It's not like Justin Timberlake claiming 6'1" and 6'2" while he's really 5'11.5".
Mark(5'9.25 said on 18/Nov/16
@James That's true. I can be wrong too. We never know unless we meet the guy in which case I plan to do so. The problem is, I need to keep track of where to meet Cavill at a certain comic con.
@James That's true. I can be wrong too. We never know unless we meet the guy in which case I plan to do so. The problem is, I need to keep track of where to meet Cavill at a certain comic con.
James said on 18/Nov/16
Mark(5'9.25") Take under consideration that Cavill is NEARER the camera in that pic, look at his right shoulder. With that advantage, he should look taller than Amell if he were 1.85. OK, he had a relaxed/bad neck posture, but with the camera advantadge I think he should look at least the same than Amell.
Mark don't worry 6' 0.75" is also a very rational guess. Maybe I am totally wrong and you are right, or vice versa. I have to admit that this is an interesting debate, but we are getting too passionate for a very little height difference. There is virtually no difference between 6' 0.5" and 6' 0.75".
At least we all agree that Cavill is a tall man.
Mark(5'9.25") Take under consideration that Cavill is NEARER the camera in that pic, look at his right shoulder. With that advantage, he should look taller than Amell if he were 1.85. OK, he had a relaxed/bad neck posture, but with the camera advantadge I think he should look at least the same than Amell.
Mark don't worry 6' 0.75" is also a very rational guess. Maybe I am totally wrong and you are right, or vice versa. I have to admit that this is an interesting debate, but we are getting too passionate for a very little height difference. There is virtually no difference between 6' 0.5" and 6' 0.75".
At least we all agree that Cavill is a tall man.
sa344 said on 17/Nov/16
Mark, there is nothing wrong with you thinking he is 3/4 instead of 1/2
But most of us will agree he is only 184cm
It doesn't matter how much Henry straightens up, he is not going to gain anything there with Amell
It just cancels out 185cm for me
And if you go to Stephen Amells page, there are a ton of people that think Amell is shorter than 185cm!
Mark, there is nothing wrong with you thinking he is 3/4 instead of 1/2
But most of us will agree he is only 184cm
It doesn't matter how much Henry straightens up, he is not going to gain anything there with Amell
It just cancels out 185cm for me
And if you go to Stephen Amells page, there are a ton of people that think Amell is shorter than 185cm!
Mark(5'9.25") said on 17/Nov/16
As much as most wouldn't agree with me, 6'0.75" is better for Cavill.
As much as most wouldn't agree with me, 6'0.75" is better for Cavill.
sa344 said on 17/Nov/16
Rob, why do my comments keep on getting deleted on multiple pages?
Is it some kind of error?
Editor Rob
Rob, why do my comments keep on getting deleted on multiple pages?
Is it some kind of error?
Editor Rob I was altering the comment submission code. Checking it just now, it looks to have dropped a proportion of comments, so I have reverted back to the previous version.
If anybody didn't see their comment appear, apologies, please attempt again.
If anybody didn't see their comment appear, apologies, please attempt again.
Mark(5"9.25") said on 15/Nov/16
Also, i didn't say Cavill is a clear 185 cm. I only agreed that Cavill would be nearer 185 cm, but not 184 cm flat. 6'0.75" for Henry Cavill and 6'1" is fine for Stephen Amell.
Also, i didn't say Cavill is a clear 185 cm. I only agreed that Cavill would be nearer 185 cm, but not 184 cm flat. 6'0.75" for Henry Cavill and 6'1" is fine for Stephen Amell.
Mark(5'9.25") said on 15/Nov/16
@James the difference is rather little when you look carefully. Again, Cavill isn't standing straight while Stephen has his posture forced up. Do you even know how neck posture does affect your height?
Don't give me that "the difference is too big" crap. Cavill did a relaxed neck posture with Luke Evans and when he stood it up, he was taller than Evans. Stephen is standing up as tall as he can while Cavill is leaning on him.
@James the difference is rather little when you look carefully. Again, Cavill isn't standing straight while Stephen has his posture forced up. Do you even know how neck posture does affect your height?
Don't give me that "the difference is too big" crap. Cavill did a relaxed neck posture with Luke Evans and when he stood it up, he was taller than Evans. Stephen is standing up as tall as he can while Cavill is leaning on him.
James said on 15/Nov/16
@Mark(5'9.25") The difference is still too big. Cavill looks 6 ft with relaxed neck posture and 1.84 maximum with normal neck posture. Plus Cavill is nearer the camera, his left shoulder is nearer the camera angle than Amell. So Cavill has even advantadge in that sense. It seems like you never accept ANY evidence refuting the 1.85 claim for Cavill. Whether you like it or not, that pic refute the 1.85 guess for Cavill.
@Booker @sa344 I agree with you guys, he is 1.84.
@Mark(5'9.25") The difference is still too big. Cavill looks 6 ft with relaxed neck posture and 1.84 maximum with normal neck posture. Plus Cavill is nearer the camera, his left shoulder is nearer the camera angle than Amell. So Cavill has even advantadge in that sense. It seems like you never accept ANY evidence refuting the 1.85 claim for Cavill. Whether you like it or not, that pic refute the 1.85 guess for Cavill.
@Booker @sa344 I agree with you guys, he is 1.84.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 13/Nov/16
@sa344 Clearly Taller? Well, If you payed attention more closely with the red arrows I pointed out, Cavill had a more relax neck posture whereas Stephen Amell was standing straight completely while Cavill was tilting his head more.
Click Here
@sa344 Clearly Taller? Well, If you payed attention more closely with the red arrows I pointed out, Cavill had a more relax neck posture whereas Stephen Amell was standing straight completely while Cavill was tilting his head more.
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Nov/16
Same range as Jon Hamm or James Gandolfini, weak 6ft1
Same range as Jon Hamm or James Gandolfini, weak 6ft1
Booker said on 13/Nov/16
184 cm is right for him
184 cm is right for him
sa344 said on 12/Nov/16
I don't think he is low as 6'0''
But I honestly don't think he is anything above 6'0.5''
I mean he is clearly shorter than Stephen Amell who is 185cm
I don't think he is low as 6'0''
But I honestly don't think he is anything above 6'0.5''
I mean he is clearly shorter than Stephen Amell who is 185cm
Mark(5'9.25") said on 12/Nov/16
@James, Cavill had a loose neck posture with Stephen Amell. He wasn't standing straight while Stephen Amell was standing straight.
Oh, let's compare since you do love to compare.
Here's Stephen Amell with Jason momoa. Oh, Momoa is loosing height here and he still is much taller than Stephen.
Click Here
Here's Cavill with Momoa. Cavill has the same posture as Momoa.
Click Here
In that same picture with stephen smell and Henry Cavill, cavill is LOOOOOSSSSING more height and posture while stephen is standing STRAIGHT.
Sorry, but most of us including Rampage, Celebheights 6'1.5", S.J.H, and even joe### agree that 6'0.75" for Cavill.
@James, Cavill had a loose neck posture with Stephen Amell. He wasn't standing straight while Stephen Amell was standing straight.
Oh, let's compare since you do love to compare.
Here's Stephen Amell with Jason momoa. Oh, Momoa is loosing height here and he still is much taller than Stephen.
Click Here
Here's Cavill with Momoa. Cavill has the same posture as Momoa.
Click Here
In that same picture with stephen smell and Henry Cavill, cavill is LOOOOOSSSSING more height and posture while stephen is standing STRAIGHT.
Sorry, but most of us including Rampage, Celebheights 6'1.5", S.J.H, and even joe### agree that 6'0.75" for Cavill.
Mark(5'9.25") said on 12/Nov/16
Seeing Cavill with Armie Hammer, Kellan Lutz, Jason Momoa, Ben Affleck, Elizabeth Debecki, and even Michael Shannon, this guy is more 6'0.75". 6'0.5" is too low.
Seeing Cavill with Armie Hammer, Kellan Lutz, Jason Momoa, Ben Affleck, Elizabeth Debecki, and even Michael Shannon, this guy is more 6'0.75". 6'0.5" is too low.
Dmeyer said on 12/Nov/16
Seing him with Affleck and lutz or Costner the Guy is solid 184cm but no more
Seing him with Affleck and lutz or Costner the Guy is solid 184cm but no more
Mark(5'9.25") said on 12/Nov/16
@sa344 Nolan did have about the sameness thickness on his footwear compared to Cavill. You're assuming that Cavill is just 6'0" flat which is not the case.
Here is Cavill with Jason Momoa at the Justice League Comic Con.
Click Here
By the way, Cavill just has regular footwear too in that same Comic Con.
Click Here
@sa344 Nolan did have about the sameness thickness on his footwear compared to Cavill. You're assuming that Cavill is just 6'0" flat which is not the case.
Here is Cavill with Jason Momoa at the Justice League Comic Con.
Click Here
By the way, Cavill just has regular footwear too in that same Comic Con.
Click Here
James said on 11/Nov/16
According to the poll he is 1.84. The general opinion is clear: he is correctly listed as 1.84.
The reason why he looks tall is because he is tall. He is over 6 ft, 6' 0.5" is already a tall height.
Anyway, this picture with 1.85 Stepehen Amell REFUTE the 1.85 claim for Cavill:
Click Here
Looks 6 flat in this picture. He is not over 1.84 as we can see in the pic.
According to the poll he is 1.84. The general opinion is clear: he is correctly listed as 1.84.
The reason why he looks tall is because he is tall. He is over 6 ft, 6' 0.5" is already a tall height.
Anyway, this picture with 1.85 Stepehen Amell REFUTE the 1.85 claim for Cavill:
Click Here
Looks 6 flat in this picture. He is not over 1.84 as we can see in the pic.
sa344 said on 11/Nov/16
There is no need to be puzzled with the Nolan picture
It just shows that Mr Cavill likes to wear Shoe Lifts on certain occasions
Also look at his posture, he is trying to look tall as he can 'Busting a Gut'
He definitely likes looking tall, and is certainly height concious
There is no need to be puzzled with the Nolan picture
It just shows that Mr Cavill likes to wear Shoe Lifts on certain occasions
Also look at his posture, he is trying to look tall as he can 'Busting a Gut'
He definitely likes looking tall, and is certainly height concious
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 11/Nov/16
There are photos of him by Jamie Dornan who might be 5'11" based off of what I've seen, and he's easily 2" inches taller with Cavill's head tilted. I'm becoming more convinced that he's under-listed.
There are photos of him by Jamie Dornan who might be 5'11" based off of what I've seen, and he's easily 2" inches taller with Cavill's head tilted. I'm becoming more convinced that he's under-listed.
Mark(5'9.25") said on 11/Nov/16
He looks near 6'2" wit His Christopher Nolan!
Rob, I think 6'0.75" would be better for Cavill. Most of us agree that 6'0.75" would be better.
Not a full 6'1", but so close to it that he can pass for it at times.
He looks near 6'2" wit His Christopher Nolan!
Rob, I think 6'0.75" would be better for Cavill. Most of us agree that 6'0.75" would be better.
Not a full 6'1", but so close to it that he can pass for it at times.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 11/Nov/16
Why does he look more than two inches taller than Christopher Nolan in the same footwear, with Henry Cavill possibly losing a bit more height? That photo leaves me puzzled.
Why does he look more than two inches taller than Christopher Nolan in the same footwear, with Henry Cavill possibly losing a bit more height? That photo leaves me puzzled.
S.J.H said on 11/Nov/16
Cavill could be near 185cm but not flat 184cm. He needs an upgrade at 6'0.75 because 6'0.5 way too low
Cavill could be near 185cm but not flat 184cm. He needs an upgrade at 6'0.75 because 6'0.5 way too low
Mark(5'9.25") said on 10/Nov/16
There's a bunch of marks here, so I shall change my name to this who is in the 5'9" range.
Edit: Nevermind, I'm changing my username to this so no one gets confused.
There's a bunch of marks here, so I shall change my name to this who is in the 5'9" range.
Edit: Nevermind, I'm changing my username to this so no one gets confused.
Mark said on 10/Nov/16
6'0.75" is more like it. Worse case, 6'0.5" at the lowest.
6'0.75" is more like it. Worse case, 6'0.5" at the lowest.
Mark said on 9/Nov/16
Tom Hardy would measure similar to me if he stood straight. Still, I easily rule out just 6 feet flat for Cavill with most people.
Also, Cavill looks similar to 6'1.5" Elizabeth Debecki in this picture.
Click Here
We all know by now, Cavill head level is safely above Armie Hammer's eye level with equal footwear.
Tom Hardy would measure similar to me if he stood straight. Still, I easily rule out just 6 feet flat for Cavill with most people.
Also, Cavill looks similar to 6'1.5" Elizabeth Debecki in this picture.
Click Here
We all know by now, Cavill head level is safely above Armie Hammer's eye level with equal footwear.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 8/Nov/16
He looked around 3 1/2" inches taller than Tom Hardy who could be 5'9 1/4" considering that Hardy usually slouches.
He looked around 3 1/2" inches taller than Tom Hardy who could be 5'9 1/4" considering that Hardy usually slouches.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Nov/16
I'd rule out 6ft flat.
I'd rule out 6ft flat.
Mark said on 7/Nov/16
I could argue 6 feet flat, but I ruled it out without question when I watched Man of Steel, Batman V Superman, Man from Uncle and looked at several pictures of him with other actors. I find 6'0.5" - 6'0.75" to be more believable for Cavill's range.
It's really interesting because he never looks short with Ben Affleck, Elizabeth Debecki, Will Smith, Jason Momoa, Armie Hammer, Michael Shannon, and even several pictures with Cavill and Shaquille O'Neal.
A 6 feet flat wouldn't look that tall with those guys.
I could argue 6 feet flat, but I ruled it out without question when I watched Man of Steel, Batman V Superman, Man from Uncle and looked at several pictures of him with other actors. I find 6'0.5" - 6'0.75" to be more believable for Cavill's range.
It's really interesting because he never looks short with Ben Affleck, Elizabeth Debecki, Will Smith, Jason Momoa, Armie Hammer, Michael Shannon, and even several pictures with Cavill and Shaquille O'Neal.
A 6 feet flat wouldn't look that tall with those guys.
Mark said on 7/Nov/16
I agree with you Rob. I'd also rule out 6 ft flat easily for Cavill without question.
Edit: What I'm saying is that I'm having a hard time believing Cavill is just 6 feet flat let alone 5'11". Cavill's listing is 6'0.5", but he can really pull off the 6'0.75" mark at times.
Editor Rob
I agree with you Rob. I'd also rule out 6 ft flat easily for Cavill without question.
Edit: What I'm saying is that I'm having a hard time believing Cavill is just 6 feet flat let alone 5'11". Cavill's listing is 6'0.5", but he can really pull off the 6'0.75" mark at times.
Editor Rob Mark, I think 6ft is probably the lowest you could argue (under it seems impossible), but for me 6ft 0.5 still seems a solid and believable range to estimate him at.
I would be surprised if he wasn't within a small fraction of that zone.
I would be surprised if he wasn't within a small fraction of that zone.
Mark said on 7/Nov/16
I agree with you Rob. I'd also rule out 6 ft flat easily for Cavill without question.
Editor Rob
I agree with you Rob. I'd also rule out 6 ft flat easily for Cavill without question.
Editor Rob Mark, I think 6ft is probably the lowest you could argue (under it seems impossible), but for me 6ft 0.5 still seems a solid and believable range to estimate him at.
I would be surprised if he wasn't within a small fraction of that zone.
I would be surprised if he wasn't within a small fraction of that zone.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 5/Nov/16
I meant Russell Crowe. I apologize for that.
I meant Russell Crowe. I apologize for that.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 4/Nov/16
Rob, what would you estimate his head length and eye level? If I had to guess:
Face length: 9 3/4"
Eye level: At least 5" inches.
His face seems to be on the longer side.
Editor Rob
Rob, what would you estimate his head length and eye level? If I had to guess:
Face length: 9 3/4"
Eye level: At least 5" inches.
His face seems to be on the longer side.
Editor Rob his eyelevel doesn't look huge to me, maybe 4.8-4.9 range is possible and a 9.5-9.75 range head.
S.J.H said on 4/Nov/16
@James said on 2/Nov/16
Kevin costner had 2.25" cowboy boots with henry cavill. They're both 6'0.5 (costner shrink)
@James said on 2/Nov/16
Kevin costner had 2.25" cowboy boots with henry cavill. They're both 6'0.5 (costner shrink)
Mark said on 4/Nov/16
Also, we should downgrade Chris Pine to 5'11.5" if anyone thinks cavill 5'11.5" which is not the case. They were both the same height when we compare them with Gal gadot of who stood taller.
Cavill has always looked above 6'0" and near 6'1", more like 6'0.75"
Also, we should downgrade Chris Pine to 5'11.5" if anyone thinks cavill 5'11.5" which is not the case. They were both the same height when we compare them with Gal gadot of who stood taller.
Cavill has always looked above 6'0" and near 6'1", more like 6'0.75"
Mark said on 4/Nov/16
@James you do realize that Kevin costner had cowboys shoes on and Cavill had regular dress shoes on those days. Also in the picture with at the Katie show, Cavill was bending his knees a lot while Costner was standing straight.
Click Here
Click Here
These two are when Cavill was in his converse sneakers and had about the same worse posture with Costner, yet he still appears taller than costner.
Your guesses are nothing short of a joke since you aren't counting Costner wearing cowboy shoes and looked the same as Michael Shannon and Cavill was still bending his knees that day. I'm not saying you shouldn't guess, but always take in account for Footwear advantage and posture.
@James you do realize that Kevin costner had cowboys shoes on and Cavill had regular dress shoes on those days. Also in the picture with at the Katie show, Cavill was bending his knees a lot while Costner was standing straight.
Click Here
Click Here
These two are when Cavill was in his converse sneakers and had about the same worse posture with Costner, yet he still appears taller than costner.
Your guesses are nothing short of a joke since you aren't counting Costner wearing cowboy shoes and looked the same as Michael Shannon and Cavill was still bending his knees that day. I'm not saying you shouldn't guess, but always take in account for Footwear advantage and posture.
Johno said on 4/Nov/16
@sa344, Amell appears to be 6'1 at his top-end.
@sa344, Amell appears to be 6'1 at his top-end.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Nov/16
@Celebheights 6'1.5: I'm going with 6ft0¾(185cm). Can look almost 6ft1 or even the full 6ft1 more often than 6ft or just over 6ft. If he's only 6ft like a lot of people think he is, he wouldn't be looking close to Ben Affleck and insignificantly shorter than guys like Michael Shannon, Jason Momoa and even Armie Hammer. A 6ft guy just can't do that consistently
@Celebheights 6'1.5: I'm going with 6ft0¾(185cm). Can look almost 6ft1 or even the full 6ft1 more often than 6ft or just over 6ft. If he's only 6ft like a lot of people think he is, he wouldn't be looking close to Ben Affleck and insignificantly shorter than guys like Michael Shannon, Jason Momoa and even Armie Hammer. A 6ft guy just can't do that consistently
sa344 said on 3/Nov/16
He can't be tall as 6'1'', Stephen Amell is taller than him
Rob has met Stephen Amell and has a picture with him
Henry at most is 6'0.5''
Click Here
He can't be tall as 6'1'', Stephen Amell is taller than him
Rob has met Stephen Amell and has a picture with him
Henry at most is 6'0.5''
Click Here
James said on 2/Nov/16
Looks 1.82 with 1.85 listed Kevin Costner.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
@Mark Looks 1.84 maximum with Affleck.
Looks 1.82 with 1.85 listed Kevin Costner.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
@Mark Looks 1.84 maximum with Affleck.
Mark said on 1/Nov/16
Not to mention Cavill can easily look a full 6'1" with Ben Affleck.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I only see barely less than an inch between Cavill and Affleck, let alone two inches.
Not to mention Cavill can easily look a full 6'1" with Ben Affleck.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I only see barely less than an inch between Cavill and Affleck, let alone two inches.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 1/Nov/16
@Rampage Which do you think is more likely for Henry Cavill? 6'0 3/4" or 6'0 1/2"? He could appear 6'0" with bad posture, and 6'1 1/2" with good posture.
@Rampage Which do you think is more likely for Henry Cavill? 6'0 3/4" or 6'0 1/2"? He could appear 6'0" with bad posture, and 6'1 1/2" with good posture.
James said on 1/Nov/16
@Mark It depends on the celebrity. I think Iker Casillas is listed here at his morning/out of bed height. In my view he is 1.81 maximum at afternoon time.
@Mark It depends on the celebrity. I think Iker Casillas is listed here at his morning/out of bed height. In my view he is 1.81 maximum at afternoon time.
Mark said on 1/Nov/16
In all seriousness, I do think that Cavill deserves a 6'0.75" listing. He doesn't dip under 6'0.5". The only time he does is when someone has the thicker heel on their footwear.
In all seriousness, I do think that Cavill deserves a 6'0.75" listing. He doesn't dip under 6'0.5". The only time he does is when someone has the thicker heel on their footwear.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Oct/16
James, your estimates are nothing short of a massive joke...
James, your estimates are nothing short of a massive joke...
Mark said on 29/Oct/16
It's not a joke. Rob lists these celebrities at their afternoon or mostly evening night.
It's not a joke. Rob lists these celebrities at their afternoon or mostly evening night.
James said on 28/Oct/16
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover Good joke.
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover Good joke.
Mark said on 28/Oct/16
Quick question rob, would you consider Cavill's listing an afternoon height of an evening height where that's his absolute worst?
Editor Rob
Quick question rob, would you consider Cavill's listing an afternoon height of an evening height where that's his absolute worst?
Editor Rob I think it might be nearer teatime
Mark said on 25/Oct/16
Cavill would be taller than Tatum due to confident posture.
Cavill would be taller than Tatum due to confident posture.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Oct/16
184-184.5cm evening/night
184-184.5cm evening/night
James said on 24/Oct/16
@Mark Yeah I agree he's taller but not a big difference. Cavill didn't have a terrible neck posture but a normal/relaxed one. Take under consideration that he sometimes have a forced posture.
I agree with the listings of this site. 6' 0.25" for Lutz and 6' 0.5" for Cavill is a good listing to me.
@Mark Yeah I agree he's taller but not a big difference. Cavill didn't have a terrible neck posture but a normal/relaxed one. Take under consideration that he sometimes have a forced posture.
I agree with the listings of this site. 6' 0.25" for Lutz and 6' 0.5" for Cavill is a good listing to me.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 23/Oct/16
Rob, who would guess is taller, Henry Cavill or Channing Tatum? Henry Cavill appears taller to me, but that might be because the latter never stands up straight and is oddly proportioned for his height.
Editor Rob
Rob, who would guess is taller, Henry Cavill or Channing Tatum? Henry Cavill appears taller to me, but that might be because the latter never stands up straight and is oddly proportioned for his height.
Editor Rob really these guys are a toss up at time, I'd find it hard to really pick them apart.
Mark said on 21/Oct/16
@James, you're still dillusional of Cavill being taller than Lutz. You're also using a picture where Cavill has a terrible neck posture and stance.
Facts are facts, when Cavill decides to stand tall, he is taller than Kellan Lutz.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
If that's not enough for you James, then here is a video of the immortals comic con. At 38:47 in the video below, you can see a glimpse of Henry Cavill standing taller than Kellan Lutz.
Click Here
@James, you're still dillusional of Cavill being taller than Lutz. You're also using a picture where Cavill has a terrible neck posture and stance.
Facts are facts, when Cavill decides to stand tall, he is taller than Kellan Lutz.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
If that's not enough for you James, then here is a video of the immortals comic con. At 38:47 in the video below, you can see a glimpse of Henry Cavill standing taller than Kellan Lutz.
Click Here
James said on 20/Oct/16
Click Here
Looks shorter than 184 cm Kellan Lutz. But Lutz is slightly nearer the camera, so Cavill is not shorter than him. Still doesn't look 185 cm to me.
Click Here
Here Cavill has exactly the same position and shoes than Lutz. They are identical, both 184 cm. I don't see 1 cm of difference. Cavill is even listed here slightly taller. Lutz is listed here as 6' 0.25" and Cavill as 6' 0.5". Fair enough.
Click Here
Looks shorter than 184 cm Kellan Lutz. But Lutz is slightly nearer the camera, so Cavill is not shorter than him. Still doesn't look 185 cm to me.
Click Here
Here Cavill has exactly the same position and shoes than Lutz. They are identical, both 184 cm. I don't see 1 cm of difference. Cavill is even listed here slightly taller. Lutz is listed here as 6' 0.25" and Cavill as 6' 0.5". Fair enough.
S.J.H said on 19/Oct/16
Cavill would be 6'0.75 if ben affleck is 6'2.25
Cavill would be 6'0.75 if ben affleck is 6'2.25
Rory said on 14/Oct/16
He's not easy to judge this guy, he can look anywhere from 6ft flat up to 6'1.5. I reckon he's a guy who measures 6'0.5 at his very lowest but in the early afternoon measures 6'0.75.
He's not easy to judge this guy, he can look anywhere from 6ft flat up to 6'1.5. I reckon he's a guy who measures 6'0.5 at his very lowest but in the early afternoon measures 6'0.75.
Tiago said on 13/Oct/16
He looks have 1,83 Max
He looks have 1,83 Max
James said on 10/Oct/16
Click Here
Click Here
Cavill is 2 cm shorter than Smith
CONCLUSION:
Henry Cavill and Nadal= 183.5/184 cm
Will Smith= 185.5cm/186 cm
Djokovic= 187 cm
Based on the evidence, I would say 184 cm is a good listing.
Click Here
Click Here
Cavill is 2 cm shorter than Smith
CONCLUSION:
Henry Cavill and Nadal= 183.5/184 cm
Will Smith= 185.5cm/186 cm
Djokovic= 187 cm
Based on the evidence, I would say 184 cm is a good listing.
James said on 10/Oct/16
@Mark Click Here
In the pic you posted Cavill's RIGHT LEG is one metre nearer the camera than Smith's left leg. In other words, Cavill is nearer the camera than both Smith and Affleck, that's why he looks taller than them. It's only an optical illusion.
Your picture is so invalid as this one:
Click Here
@Mark Click Here
In the pic you posted Cavill's RIGHT LEG is one metre nearer the camera than Smith's left leg. In other words, Cavill is nearer the camera than both Smith and Affleck, that's why he looks taller than them. It's only an optical illusion.
Your picture is so invalid as this one:
Click Here
Mark said on 10/Oct/16
Rob, how tall does Cavill look with elizabeth debicki in these pictures?
Click Here
Click Here
Rob, how tall does Cavill look with elizabeth debicki in these pictures?
Click Here
Click Here
Mark said on 9/Oct/16
@James, the camera angle is actually in favor of Jason Momoa if you did look carefully. I'm not counting affleck because I saw him bending his knees with a snail posture.
@James, the camera angle is actually in favor of Jason Momoa if you did look carefully. I'm not counting affleck because I saw him bending his knees with a snail posture.
James said on 8/Oct/16
@Mark
Click Here
The pic that you posted is NOT valid. Look at Cavill's right leg. Cavill is nearer the camera than both Smith and Affleck. He looks even taller than Affleck but it's only an optical illusion because of his position nearer the camera.
Look what happens when I do the same trick as you, and select a pic where Smith and Affleck are nearer the camera:
Click Here
This is a REALLY neutral picture, because there is no angel advantage for any of them:
Click Here
@Mark
Click Here
The pic that you posted is NOT valid. Look at Cavill's right leg. Cavill is nearer the camera than both Smith and Affleck. He looks even taller than Affleck but it's only an optical illusion because of his position nearer the camera.
Look what happens when I do the same trick as you, and select a pic where Smith and Affleck are nearer the camera:
Click Here
This is a REALLY neutral picture, because there is no angel advantage for any of them:
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Oct/16
He looks near 6ft2 with Armie Hammer
He looks near 6ft2 with Armie Hammer
Mark said on 8/Oct/16
Other credits include Cavill with 6'4.5" Armie Hammer.
Click Here
Click Here
Cavill also looks the same with 6'1.5" Elizabeth Debicki.
Click Here
Click Here
Other credits include Cavill with 6'4.5" Armie Hammer.
Click Here
Click Here
Cavill also looks the same with 6'1.5" Elizabeth Debicki.
Click Here
Click Here
Mark said on 30/Sep/16
Rob, in this video here, does Cavill look 185 cm or 186 cm with Kellan Lutz at 38:47 in the video below?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, in this video here, does Cavill look 185 cm or 186 cm with Kellan Lutz at 38:47 in the video below?
Click Here
Editor Rob a short clip there, but yes he could appear briefly taller than Kellan.
Mark said on 30/Sep/16
6'0.5" is fine, but I do think that Cavill can be safely upgraded to 6'0.75".
6'0.5" is fine, but I do think that Cavill can be safely upgraded to 6'0.75".
Mark said on 30/Sep/16
Rob, is the voting for justifying the final answer for a celebrity's height?
Editor Rob
Rob, is the voting for justifying the final answer for a celebrity's height?
Editor Rob it's to show the overall average guess from visitors. Maybe over time it will help identify possible listings that are further from my guess and it might prompt me to look again.
Also you don't need to add a comment to submit your guess.
You can:
1. continue to submit comments without guesses.
2. submit a comment and your guess at same time. Your vote gets recorded.
3. submit a guess on it's own. Your vote gets recorded.
Your guess (unless you mention your opinion in a comment) is anonymous, so feel free to be honest without the influence of others.
It's only me who sees the votes, and I appreciate every guess submitted.
Also you don't need to add a comment to submit your guess.
You can:
1. continue to submit comments without guesses.
2. submit a comment and your guess at same time. Your vote gets recorded.
3. submit a guess on it's own. Your vote gets recorded.
Your guess (unless you mention your opinion in a comment) is anonymous, so feel free to be honest without the influence of others.
It's only me who sees the votes, and I appreciate every guess submitted.
Mark said on 21/Sep/16
Rob, what category would you put Cavill in? I personally think Cavill would fall in 'the confident person who is actually tall despite his supposedly short arms' category.
Click Here
Rob, In the picture above and most pictures, could Cavill pass for being near 6'0".75" or being 6'0.5" at his worst?
Editor Rob
Rob, what category would you put Cavill in? I personally think Cavill would fall in 'the confident person who is actually tall despite his supposedly short arms' category.
Click Here
Rob, In the picture above and most pictures, could Cavill pass for being near 6'0".75" or being 6'0.5" at his worst?
Editor Rob he can look a strong 6ft up to near 6ft 1 at times, but I put him as a big six footer, enough to give him 6ft 0.5
Mark said on 21/Sep/16
@James who told you that Taylor was taller than Cavill in heels? Because Cavill still was taller than Gal gadot even if she had heels.
@James who told you that Taylor was taller than Cavill in heels? Because Cavill still was taller than Gal gadot even if she had heels.
James said on 20/Sep/16
I am 100% sure that Taylor Swift would never been taller than Henry Cavill even in high heels.
She is even shorter than 182 cm Justin Timberlake with her usual giant heels:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I am 100% sure that Taylor Swift would never been taller than Henry Cavill even in high heels.
She is even shorter than 182 cm Justin Timberlake with her usual giant heels:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Sep/16
185cm flat at mid-day is possible
185cm flat at mid-day is possible
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 19/Sep/16
I've seen photos of Henry Cavill at age 18-19, and he definitely looks taller now than he did then. His posture was wretched back then, so that might be a small part of it. However, I'm sure that he grew taller.
I've seen photos of Henry Cavill at age 18-19, and he definitely looks taller now than he did then. His posture was wretched back then, so that might be a small part of it. However, I'm sure that he grew taller.
Mark said on 19/Sep/16
@Rampage I would put Cavill at 184/186 with the possibility or 184.5/186.5.
@Rampage I would put Cavill at 184/186 with the possibility or 184.5/186.5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Sep/16
184/185cm guy who can pull off 185/186cm look with good posture. In Superman gear at least 187/188cm.
184/185cm guy who can pull off 185/186cm look with good posture. In Superman gear at least 187/188cm.
TJE said on 18/Sep/16
Cavill is certainly a guy who grew after 18. He was no more than 18 when they shot The Count of Monte Cristo and he looked about 5'11 compared to Jim Caviezel and Guy Pearce.
Cavill is certainly a guy who grew after 18. He was no more than 18 when they shot The Count of Monte Cristo and he looked about 5'11 compared to Jim Caviezel and Guy Pearce.
Mark said on 15/Sep/16
Rob, I know Cavill clears 185 in the morning, but how tall is Cavill with the Superman Footwear? Both Morning and evening height with Superman footwear? I would bet 6'2" as an afternoon or morning height in Superman footwear.
Editor Rob
Rob, I know Cavill clears 185 in the morning, but how tall is Cavill with the Superman Footwear? Both Morning and evening height with Superman footwear? I would bet 6'2" as an afternoon or morning height in Superman footwear.
Editor Rob looking at him with Lex Luthor (Eisenberg) he actually didn't seem much taller.
Certainly not in Superman lifts, I think maybe he would measure 187cm at most in gear.
Certainly not in Superman lifts, I think maybe he would measure 187cm at most in gear.
Mark said on 13/Sep/16
Again, it's not 183 as anyone would think. It's more 184-185 cm. Costner did have an edge on Cavill, but that's only because and ONLY because Costner had Cowboy boots on while Cavill had regular footwear in the man of steel premiere.
Again, it's not 183 as anyone would think. It's more 184-185 cm. Costner did have an edge on Cavill, but that's only because and ONLY because Costner had Cowboy boots on while Cavill had regular footwear in the man of steel premiere.
James said on 7/Sep/16
@Johno I think he can be considered a legit 184 cm dude, even if he can 183 cm part of the day.
@Johno I think he can be considered a legit 184 cm dude, even if he can 183 cm part of the day.
Johno said on 5/Sep/16
As i said before, average Cavil at 6'0; Costner has an edge on him.
As i said before, average Cavil at 6'0; Costner has an edge on him.
Mark said on 2/Sep/16
@James in the first picture, Cavill nor Costner were that much further away from each other. Also, Cavill was leaning on the wood and standing on one leg in the first photo, so please use your eyes correctly. Did I also mention that Cavill had neck slightly in the third photo with Costner? Yes I did. Again, Costner is overall taller than Cavill, but in the real world, it's difficult to see it with the naked eye.
This is having an obvious camera advantage.
Click Here
I will admit that Cavill has a camera advantage in the first photo. However, it's not like the picture is crazily distorted.
@James in the first picture, Cavill nor Costner were that much further away from each other. Also, Cavill was leaning on the wood and standing on one leg in the first photo, so please use your eyes correctly. Did I also mention that Cavill had neck slightly in the third photo with Costner? Yes I did. Again, Costner is overall taller than Cavill, but in the real world, it's difficult to see it with the naked eye.
This is having an obvious camera advantage.
Click Here
I will admit that Cavill has a camera advantage in the first photo. However, it's not like the picture is crazily distorted.
James said on 2/Sep/16
Click Here
Again this pic refute the 185 cm claim for Cavill. Cavill is 184 cm, therefore a tall guy.
Click Here
Again this pic refute the 185 cm claim for Cavill. Cavill is 184 cm, therefore a tall guy.
Mark said on 2/Sep/16
No, Cavill is more 184-185 cm. it's not close to barely 6 feet as you call. Cavill already edged out Kellan Lutz who Rob met and confirmed 6'0.25".
No, Cavill is more 184-185 cm. it's not close to barely 6 feet as you call. Cavill already edged out Kellan Lutz who Rob met and confirmed 6'0.25".
James said on 2/Sep/16
@Mark, very interesting pics. The first one you posted, Cavill is nearer the Camera and Costner in horrible posture. The second one, Costner has his legs extremely open, losing height with the posture. In the third one, I agree with you that Costner has a camera advantage, but the difference is too big to say that it is only the angle.
With regard to Will Smith, you said nothing about him being obviously shorter than Djokovic.
@Mark, very interesting pics. The first one you posted, Cavill is nearer the Camera and Costner in horrible posture. The second one, Costner has his legs extremely open, losing height with the posture. In the third one, I agree with you that Costner has a camera advantage, but the difference is too big to say that it is only the angle.
With regard to Will Smith, you said nothing about him being obviously shorter than Djokovic.
Mark said on 1/Sep/16
@James That picture you posted with Roger Federer and Will Smith makes your creditability pointless. The fact you just posted a picture of Will Smith having his legs spread out alot more and Federer having a better posture shows that you really don't know how heights work.
@James That picture you posted with Roger Federer and Will Smith makes your creditability pointless. The fact you just posted a picture of Will Smith having his legs spread out alot more and Federer having a better posture shows that you really don't know how heights work.
Dmeyer said on 1/Sep/16
Hé looks smaller than 184-184,5cm today Costner , à solid 5cm under Affleck i think 183-183,5cm is closer 6 ft 0-0,25
Hé looks smaller than 184-184,5cm today Costner , à solid 5cm under Affleck i think 183-183,5cm is closer 6 ft 0-0,25
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 1/Sep/16
Will Smith is losing a lot of height in the photo with Roger Federer due to wretched posture, despite maybe having a slight footwear advantage, while Roger Federer has impeccable posture.
Will Smith with Rodrigo Santoro who is 187 CM:
Click Here
He's no shorter.
Will Smith is losing a lot of height in the photo with Roger Federer due to wretched posture, despite maybe having a slight footwear advantage, while Roger Federer has impeccable posture.
Will Smith with Rodrigo Santoro who is 187 CM:
Click Here
He's no shorter.
Mark said on 1/Sep/16
Also, you didn't read Celebheights 6'1.5" comment about meeting Will Smith being eye to eye with him exactly.
Also, you didn't read Celebheights 6'1.5" comment about meeting Will Smith being eye to eye with him exactly.
Mark said on 1/Sep/16
@James, you really have no clue how heights here can work.
I never said Cavill's real height was 186. I only said that it was his MORNING height. Rob lists these celebrities' heights as if it was their before bed height or afternoon height. The morning height, Cavill easily clears 185 cm the morning.
Oh and the fact that Will Smith had a TERRIBLE posture in that photo with Federer makes your creditibility pointless. Know what standard or terrible posture is before you actually post pictures.
Again, with not believing Cavill clears 185 cm in the morning.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
The third picture with Cavill and Costner is when Costner is near the camera and Cavill has a disadvantage neck posture. Their levels are so close that it's hard to see who is really taller with the naked eye.
@James, you really have no clue how heights here can work.
I never said Cavill's real height was 186. I only said that it was his MORNING height. Rob lists these celebrities' heights as if it was their before bed height or afternoon height. The morning height, Cavill easily clears 185 cm the morning.
Oh and the fact that Will Smith had a TERRIBLE posture in that photo with Federer makes your creditibility pointless. Know what standard or terrible posture is before you actually post pictures.
Again, with not believing Cavill clears 185 cm in the morning.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
The third picture with Cavill and Costner is when Costner is near the camera and Cavill has a disadvantage neck posture. Their levels are so close that it's hard to see who is really taller with the naked eye.
James said on 31/Aug/16
There is no way Will SMith is 187 cm. Check the celebheights page for him. Most users agree he is in the 185-186 cm range, no one claims he is 187 cm.
He is clearly shorter than Djokovic:
Click Here
And looks kinda similar to 185 cm Federer.
Click Here
Will Smith is no more than 1 cm taller than Federer, they look virtually the same.
There is no way Will SMith is 187 cm. Check the celebheights page for him. Most users agree he is in the 185-186 cm range, no one claims he is 187 cm.
He is clearly shorter than Djokovic:
Click Here
And looks kinda similar to 185 cm Federer.
Click Here
Will Smith is no more than 1 cm taller than Federer, they look virtually the same.
James said on 31/Aug/16
@Cavill has never been 186 cm in his entire life, not even out of bed.
Click Here
Cavill with 185 cm Kevin Cosner. This picture refute the 185 cm claim.
@Cavill has never been 186 cm in his entire life, not even out of bed.
Click Here
Cavill with 185 cm Kevin Cosner. This picture refute the 185 cm claim.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 31/Aug/16
I'm a legit 187 CM/6'1 1/2", and Will Smith and I were exactly eye to eye when I saw him years ago (I bet that he'd measure up at the same height as Matthew Fox who gave off the same impression) and we appeared to the same height according to a friend. 186 CM isn't completely impossible for him, but I wouldn't put my money on it over 187 CM.
I'm a legit 187 CM/6'1 1/2", and Will Smith and I were exactly eye to eye when I saw him years ago (I bet that he'd measure up at the same height as Matthew Fox who gave off the same impression) and we appeared to the same height according to a friend. 186 CM isn't completely impossible for him, but I wouldn't put my money on it over 187 CM.
Flyin said on 31/Aug/16
The more I see him in film the more I think this listing is slightly generous. Is 183 possible here, a flat 6'0 at night, 184 morning?.
The more I see him in film the more I think this listing is slightly generous. Is 183 possible here, a flat 6'0 at night, 184 morning?.
Mark said on 30/Aug/16
James.. Will Smith is a legit 6'1.5". Do you really have to post the same darn picture Again? Will Smith had footwear advantage on Cavill on that day. Besides, here's another picture where Cavill edges out Smith who had terrible posture.
Click Here
it seems like you really want to think 184 cm is your answer. Cavill would clear 185 cm easily in the morning and would be 186 in the morning. You seem like you don't know how heights work. This cute LIST celebrities on their EVENING heights (these heights is if they were barefoot). Each celebrity wakes up taller than their listed height.
For example. I wake up at 177 cm and go to bed at 175.5 cm or 176 cm for my evening height. Will Smith measures 187 cm at night and would wake up as 189 cm for his morning height. Cavill would likely wake up measuring 186 cm and would measure 184 cm before bed.
James.. Will Smith is a legit 6'1.5". Do you really have to post the same darn picture Again? Will Smith had footwear advantage on Cavill on that day. Besides, here's another picture where Cavill edges out Smith who had terrible posture.
Click Here
it seems like you really want to think 184 cm is your answer. Cavill would clear 185 cm easily in the morning and would be 186 in the morning. You seem like you don't know how heights work. This cute LIST celebrities on their EVENING heights (these heights is if they were barefoot). Each celebrity wakes up taller than their listed height.
For example. I wake up at 177 cm and go to bed at 175.5 cm or 176 cm for my evening height. Will Smith measures 187 cm at night and would wake up as 189 cm for his morning height. Cavill would likely wake up measuring 186 cm and would measure 184 cm before bed.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 29/Aug/16
Henry Cavill is above Arnie Hammer's eye level. Here's proof that Arnie's eye level is at least at 6'0" (if not higher up):
Click Here
Henry Cavill is above Arnie Hammer's eye level. Here's proof that Arnie's eye level is at least at 6'0" (if not higher up):
Click Here
James said on 28/Aug/16
Click Here
IMO he looks 2 cm shorter than 186 cm Will Smith
Agree with Mark that we can't have have an ultimate answer to this issue just for seeing some online pictures. Whether he is 184 cm or 185 cm, it's something that we can debate eternally.
Click Here
IMO he looks 2 cm shorter than 186 cm Will Smith
Agree with Mark that we can't have have an ultimate answer to this issue just for seeing some online pictures. Whether he is 184 cm or 185 cm, it's something that we can debate eternally.
Mark said on 27/Aug/16
Don't worry. 6'0.5" can be Cavill's range. Like Celebheights 6'1.5" and I said, Cavill is someone who would easily measure 6'0.75" at times. I do consider 6'0.75" for Cavill, but it's not something I can put as a final answer for everything.
Another good reference for Cavill is him with Armie Hammer. Cavill is standing well with Armie Hammer. Btw, Armie Hammer has the footwear advantage in these pictures.
Click Here
Click Here
Don't worry. 6'0.5" can be Cavill's range. Like Celebheights 6'1.5" and I said, Cavill is someone who would easily measure 6'0.75" at times. I do consider 6'0.75" for Cavill, but it's not something I can put as a final answer for everything.
Another good reference for Cavill is him with Armie Hammer. Cavill is standing well with Armie Hammer. Btw, Armie Hammer has the footwear advantage in these pictures.
Click Here
Click Here
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 26/Aug/16
Another good reference in that photo is Jason Mamoa (who Rob has met and can confirm is around 6'4"). Henry Cavill and Will Smith really don't look that much shorter than him at all, and suggests than Henry Cavill is very close to being 6'1" (so 6'0 3/4" is probably a better listing).
Another good reference in that photo is Jason Mamoa (who Rob has met and can confirm is around 6'4"). Henry Cavill and Will Smith really don't look that much shorter than him at all, and suggests than Henry Cavill is very close to being 6'1" (so 6'0 3/4" is probably a better listing).
James said on 25/Aug/16
First, compare Nadal with Will Smith
Click Here
Click Here
Now compare Cavill with Will Smith
Click Here
Click Here
I don't see any difference. Both Nadal and Cavill are legit 184 cm, but no more.
First, compare Nadal with Will Smith
Click Here
Click Here
Now compare Cavill with Will Smith
Click Here
Click Here
I don't see any difference. Both Nadal and Cavill are legit 184 cm, but no more.
James said on 25/Aug/16
@Mark How many times will you post the same pic? Cavill's feet are NEARER the camera, is not a valid photo to judge.
@Mark How many times will you post the same pic? Cavill's feet are NEARER the camera, is not a valid photo to judge.
Mark said on 25/Aug/16
I'd like to ask Rob if he's considering an upgrade to 6'0.75" for Cavill. He probably won't, but that's fine since its within reach.
Editor Rob
I'd like to ask Rob if he's considering an upgrade to 6'0.75" for Cavill. He probably won't, but that's fine since its within reach.
Editor Rob at the moment I feel 184 legit is a fair mark for him, but then at times he has pulled off the almost 6ft 0.75...maybe he's a man who doesn't drop under 184 much at all at his worst.
Mark said on 25/Aug/16
@Rory Cavill is standing further away from the camera. Regardless of the arm length, Cavill sometimes edges out or looks the same as Costner in some pictures. The arms makes Cavill look shorter, but Cavill hasn't looked under 6'0" at all with a lot of actors. He is least 184 cm or over it without footwear.
@Rory Cavill is standing further away from the camera. Regardless of the arm length, Cavill sometimes edges out or looks the same as Costner in some pictures. The arms makes Cavill look shorter, but Cavill hasn't looked under 6'0" at all with a lot of actors. He is least 184 cm or over it without footwear.
Rory said on 24/Aug/16
@Mark...look how much shorter Cavills arms are compared to Costner in that pic ! Costner literally looks like his arms are about half a foot longer.
@Mark...look how much shorter Cavills arms are compared to Costner in that pic ! Costner literally looks like his arms are about half a foot longer.
Mark said on 24/Aug/16
keep in mind that Cavill's had disadvantage footwear.
keep in mind that Cavill's had disadvantage footwear.
Mark said on 24/Aug/16
James, Like Celebheights 6'1.5" said, Will Smith had an angle advantage in that shot.
James, Like Celebheights 6'1.5" said, Will Smith had an angle advantage in that shot.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 22/Aug/16
Will Smith has an angle advantage in that shot.
Will Smith has an angle advantage in that shot.
James said on 22/Aug/16
@Mark In the pic you posted Cavill is nearer the camera. He is 2 cm shorter than Smith.
Click Here
@Mark In the pic you posted Cavill is nearer the camera. He is 2 cm shorter than Smith.
Click Here
Mark said on 22/Aug/16
@James, Here he edges out Kevin Costner or looks the same height in these pictures (granted in the second picture, Costner has his legs spread and Cavill is only slightly bending his kneels alittle bit.):
Click Here Click Here
Here, Cavill edges out Kellan Lutz in these three pictures (Actually I looked at the footwear again in the third picture zoomed in; Cavill isn't wearing straight up lifts as anyone claims it. if you look at it on the right side of Cavill's footwear in the THIRD picture, he doesn't appear to have a 1/2 heel more than Kellan's footwear):
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Cavill even looks the same with 6'1" Stephen Amell:
Click Here
Finally, Cavill here doesn't look anything under 6'1" and looks virtually 6'2" (Possibly 6'1.25" or 6'1.4") with 6'3.5" Michael Shannon:
Click Here
While he may or may not be 185 cm the whole day, Cavill is one of the few 184 cm actors who easily clears 185 cm in the morning unlike most pretend 6'0"-6'1" actors.
@James, Here he edges out Kevin Costner or looks the same height in these pictures (granted in the second picture, Costner has his legs spread and Cavill is only slightly bending his kneels alittle bit.):
Click Here Click Here
Here, Cavill edges out Kellan Lutz in these three pictures (Actually I looked at the footwear again in the third picture zoomed in; Cavill isn't wearing straight up lifts as anyone claims it. if you look at it on the right side of Cavill's footwear in the THIRD picture, he doesn't appear to have a 1/2 heel more than Kellan's footwear):
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Cavill even looks the same with 6'1" Stephen Amell:
Click Here
Finally, Cavill here doesn't look anything under 6'1" and looks virtually 6'2" (Possibly 6'1.25" or 6'1.4") with 6'3.5" Michael Shannon:
Click Here
While he may or may not be 185 cm the whole day, Cavill is one of the few 184 cm actors who easily clears 185 cm in the morning unlike most pretend 6'0"-6'1" actors.
James said on 21/Aug/16
@Marl I haven't seen any evidence of Cavill being 185 cm. He looks 184 cm to me.
@Marl I haven't seen any evidence of Cavill being 185 cm. He looks 184 cm to me.
Mark said on 19/Aug/16
Not to mention Cavill is further away from the camera.
Not to mention Cavill is further away from the camera.
Mark said on 19/Aug/16
James you do realize that Cavill's had footwear disadvantage and he's slouching with 6'2" Will Smith.
James you do realize that Cavill's had footwear disadvantage and he's slouching with 6'2" Will Smith.
LoganNoll1996 said on 13/Aug/16
Character heights aren't always consistent, Sammy.It's like this in the comics, too. Starfire is listed as a towering 6 feet 4 inches in height. She should be close in height to Cyborg(6'6") and taller than Superman(6'3"). However, she's always drawn as being Dick Grayson's height(5'10") or shorter(5'4" - 5'6"). In some cases she's drawn as Wonder Woman's height(6'0") but this is only when she's in a comic with Wonder Woman or Donna Troy. If I remember correctly she was drawn as being 3 inches shorter than Superman(who she's supposed to be taller than) in one comic centered around the two of them.
Hopefully she's depicted as being 6'4" in the upcoming Rebirth series(barefoot height of course).
I do agree with Superman being too short in recent films. It just looks ridiculous due to him always being depicted as 6'3" range.
Character heights aren't always consistent, Sammy.It's like this in the comics, too. Starfire is listed as a towering 6 feet 4 inches in height. She should be close in height to Cyborg(6'6") and taller than Superman(6'3"). However, she's always drawn as being Dick Grayson's height(5'10") or shorter(5'4" - 5'6"). In some cases she's drawn as Wonder Woman's height(6'0") but this is only when she's in a comic with Wonder Woman or Donna Troy. If I remember correctly she was drawn as being 3 inches shorter than Superman(who she's supposed to be taller than) in one comic centered around the two of them.
Hopefully she's depicted as being 6'4" in the upcoming Rebirth series(barefoot height of course).
I do agree with Superman being too short in recent films. It just looks ridiculous due to him always being depicted as 6'3" range.
Tom B said on 12/Aug/16
I agree he should be upgraded to 6'0 3/4".
I agree he should be upgraded to 6'0 3/4".
Mark said on 8/Aug/16
Sammy Derrick That's not Henry Cavill dude.
THIS IS HENRY CAVILL on the right of Stephen Amell -> Click Here
Sammy Derrick That's not Henry Cavill dude.
THIS IS HENRY CAVILL on the right of Stephen Amell -> Click Here
Allie said on 8/Aug/16
Sammy, out of the core 7 members of the JL, Martian Manhunter and Cyborg arealways taller. They were always drawn taller or tall and the handbooks say the artists intend for them to be around 6'7 (I think Cyborg maybe cause of his costume but his character did play college football before he became a superhero).
Also current WW is 6'0, and her newest Rebirth version is 6'2-3 with heels. In fact, the previous two actors who portrayed WW, were both taller than 5'9-10 Gadot. Gale and Palicki were both 5'11ish. Actually I think the tallest actresses for Diana, no portrayed actress has ever been 6'0 or taller..
Sorry just a big DC fan too. Grew up reading the mid 2000s and New 52 comics haha and I read a guidebook But it's been ages since I've opened it.
Sammy, out of the core 7 members of the JL, Martian Manhunter and Cyborg arealways taller. They were always drawn taller or tall and the handbooks say the artists intend for them to be around 6'7 (I think Cyborg maybe cause of his costume but his character did play college football before he became a superhero).
Also current WW is 6'0, and her newest Rebirth version is 6'2-3 with heels. In fact, the previous two actors who portrayed WW, were both taller than 5'9-10 Gadot. Gale and Palicki were both 5'11ish. Actually I think the tallest actresses for Diana, no portrayed actress has ever been 6'0 or taller..
Sorry just a big DC fan too. Grew up reading the mid 2000s and New 52 comics haha and I read a guidebook But it's been ages since I've opened it.
Sammy Derrick said on 7/Aug/16
This is just my opinion as a DC fanboy/Superman fan.I think that Henry is short considering that Superman is one of the tallest,if not THE TALLEST member of the justice league.
Ben Affleck(Batman)- 6'3
Ray Fisher(Cyborg)- 6'3
Jason Momoa(Aquaman)- 6'4
And while most of the characters(Batman,Wonder woman,Cyborg,Aquaman)are having taller actors playing them,Superman keeps getting portrayed by shorter actors...
Click Here
But what do I know I'm just a 5'8 guy.
This is just my opinion as a DC fanboy/Superman fan.I think that Henry is short considering that Superman is one of the tallest,if not THE TALLEST member of the justice league.
Ben Affleck(Batman)- 6'3
Ray Fisher(Cyborg)- 6'3
Jason Momoa(Aquaman)- 6'4
And while most of the characters(Batman,Wonder woman,Cyborg,Aquaman)are having taller actors playing them,Superman keeps getting portrayed by shorter actors...
Click Here
But what do I know I'm just a 5'8 guy.
Mark said on 7/Aug/16
Agreed, A upgrade to 6'0 3/4 would be nice because anything lower than 6ft is stupid.
Agreed, A upgrade to 6'0 3/4 would be nice because anything lower than 6ft is stupid.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 5/Aug/16
Bradley Cooper and Henry Cavill should both be upgraded to 6'0 3/4". Both can pass for 186-187 CM with impeccable posture, despite the fact that neither of them are (except out of bed).
Bradley Cooper and Henry Cavill should both be upgraded to 6'0 3/4". Both can pass for 186-187 CM with impeccable posture, despite the fact that neither of them are (except out of bed).
Mark said on 2/Aug/16
Even if he claimed 6'1", Cavill would still look exactly like it or very close to it with Jason Momoa, Ben Affleck, Armie Hammer, and Kellan Lutz.
Even if he claimed 6'1", Cavill would still look exactly like it or very close to it with Jason Momoa, Ben Affleck, Armie Hammer, and Kellan Lutz.
Sooperman said on 31/Jul/16
And now he has a TV counterpart exactly an inch shorter than him!
And now he has a TV counterpart exactly an inch shorter than him!
Tom B said on 30/Jul/16
To the people wondering whether he claims 6'0 or 6'1, he definitely claims 6'1. I've heard it from him before during Man of Steel interciews but in promotion for Batman vs Superman recently they asked what surprised him most about meeting Ben Affleck. Cavill said how tall Affleck was surprised him, and that being 6'1 he himself wasn't used to looking up at someone - or something like that. Sure the video is around somewhere. But def claims 6'1. He looks it to me, in the morning at the least.
To the people wondering whether he claims 6'0 or 6'1, he definitely claims 6'1. I've heard it from him before during Man of Steel interciews but in promotion for Batman vs Superman recently they asked what surprised him most about meeting Ben Affleck. Cavill said how tall Affleck was surprised him, and that being 6'1 he himself wasn't used to looking up at someone - or something like that. Sure the video is around somewhere. But def claims 6'1. He looks it to me, in the morning at the least.
Mark said on 30/Jul/16
I don't know the footwear advantage nor I do really see anyone slouching here, but here is Henry Cavill with Jason Momoa
Click Here
I don't know the footwear advantage nor I do really see anyone slouching here, but here is Henry Cavill with Jason Momoa
Click Here
Mark said on 22/Jul/16
He didn't say he was a full 6'1" nor did he say he was a FOOT over 6 feet. Cavill only said he was only 'over six feet tall.'
I can buy a full 6'1" in the morning.
He didn't say he was a full 6'1" nor did he say he was a FOOT over 6 feet. Cavill only said he was only 'over six feet tall.'
I can buy a full 6'1" in the morning.
Johno said on 21/Jul/16
@Celebheights 6'1.5, if he claims 6'0 ----- that would be a good average for him.
@Celebheights 6'1.5, if he claims 6'0 ----- that would be a good average for him.
Mark said on 21/Jul/16
Henry admitted that he was only slightly over 6 feet when he admitted he was doing acting for not just the art but the money is fantastic.
Editor Rob
Henry admitted that he was only slightly over 6 feet when he admitted he was doing acting for not just the art but the money is fantastic.
Editor Rob I'm not sure, in the interview it was "I mean, traveling to New ZeaIand in economy, it sucks. Especially if you’re over six feet."
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 20/Jul/16
John Cena appears to be either a strong 184 CM or 185 CM in person (he definitely downplays his height), but I think that he would appear to be the same height as Henry Cavill if both stood up straight completely. I want to know if Henry Cavill claims to be 6'0" or 6'1"
John Cena appears to be either a strong 184 CM or 185 CM in person (he definitely downplays his height), but I think that he would appear to be the same height as Henry Cavill if both stood up straight completely. I want to know if Henry Cavill claims to be 6'0" or 6'1"
Mark said on 19/Jul/16
Another legit 6'0.5" person is Chris Tucker (who I think is slightly above 6'1").
Rob, I don't know if you're reading this, but who would measure the tallest 6'0.5" of the 6'0.5"?
Henry Cavill (sometimes appears taller than Kellan Lutz and would be taller than Kellan Lutz. He came above Armie Hammer's eye level and can sometimes appear taller than Kevin Costner).
Kellan Lutz (sometimes appears taller than Cavill. Is taller than Robert Pattinson).
Chris Tucker (I saw him with Bradley Cooper and appears taller than him despite footwear disadvantage and disadvantage of posture. He came above Michael Jordan's eye level).
Chris Pine (he isn't under 6'0" by any means and looks taller than Jason and the looks the same with Kevin Costner).
John Cena (Can sometimes look taller and doesn't exaggerate his height. He isn't short next to the Undertaker, Randy Orton).
Editor Rob
Another legit 6'0.5" person is Chris Tucker (who I think is slightly above 6'1").
Rob, I don't know if you're reading this, but who would measure the tallest 6'0.5" of the 6'0.5"?
Henry Cavill (sometimes appears taller than Kellan Lutz and would be taller than Kellan Lutz. He came above Armie Hammer's eye level and can sometimes appear taller than Kevin Costner).
Kellan Lutz (sometimes appears taller than Cavill. Is taller than Robert Pattinson).
Chris Tucker (I saw him with Bradley Cooper and appears taller than him despite footwear disadvantage and disadvantage of posture. He came above Michael Jordan's eye level).
Chris Pine (he isn't under 6'0" by any means and looks taller than Jason and the looks the same with Kevin Costner).
John Cena (Can sometimes look taller and doesn't exaggerate his height. He isn't short next to the Undertaker, Randy Orton).
Editor Rob Pine at times can look the more solid 184 guy, Tucker though is a mystery, sometimes he looks 6ft then up to 6ft 1.
I would put Cavill as very close to an even 6ft 1/2, Lutz isn't really much different though, they may well fall within a 1/4 inch range.
I would put Cavill as very close to an even 6ft 1/2, Lutz isn't really much different though, they may well fall within a 1/4 inch range.
Mark said on 19/Jul/16
Wait a minute... Cavill is crossing his legs and slouching so much. Cooper has one kneel bent and has bigger foot wear in that same photo.
I notice that Cavill's eye level is still slightly higher than Cooper's eye level in that same photo. I'm going to say that Henry would give a taller impression than Cooper.
Wait a minute... Cavill is crossing his legs and slouching so much. Cooper has one kneel bent and has bigger foot wear in that same photo.
I notice that Cavill's eye level is still slightly higher than Cooper's eye level in that same photo. I'm going to say that Henry would give a taller impression than Cooper.
Mark said on 19/Jul/16
I'm sure Cavill would edge Cooper out considering that Cooper usually has larger footwear. Henry Cavill sometimes appears taller than Kellan Lutz while Bradley Cooper is noticeably shorter than Kellan Lutz.
I'm sure Cavill would edge Cooper out considering that Cooper usually has larger footwear. Henry Cavill sometimes appears taller than Kellan Lutz while Bradley Cooper is noticeably shorter than Kellan Lutz.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jul/16
Bradley has bigger shoes. I think back to back they'd be close but maybe Cavill would have a slight edge
Bradley has bigger shoes. I think back to back they'd be close but maybe Cavill would have a slight edge
Johno said on 13/Jul/16
But eitherway, it would be quite interesting to see both Cavil and Cooper stand next to a legit 6'0.5 individual like Chris Pine, they are apparently meant to be the same height as him ...
But eitherway, it would be quite interesting to see both Cavil and Cooper stand next to a legit 6'0.5 individual like Chris Pine, they are apparently meant to be the same height as him ...
Mark said on 11/Jul/16
In that photo, Cavill is actually crossing his legs, lowering himself much more and slouching more than Cooper.
I do think Cavill is taller if both stood up straight.
In that photo, Cavill is actually crossing his legs, lowering himself much more and slouching more than Cooper.
I do think Cavill is taller if both stood up straight.
Johno said on 7/Jul/16
I don't believe Cavil is taller than Cooper.
I don't believe Cavil is taller than Cooper.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 4/Jul/16
With Bradley Cooper:
Click Here
I wish that they were both standing up straight, but they look about the same.
With Bradley Cooper:
Click Here
I wish that they were both standing up straight, but they look about the same.
Mark said on 3/Jul/16
Rob, how would you rate Cavill's Posture? I remember you saying that you did like Henry Cavill's posture.
Editor Rob
Rob, how would you rate Cavill's Posture? I remember you saying that you did like Henry Cavill's posture.
Editor Rob I don't know his personality, but his physical look and posture gives me a sense of a confident man.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 2/Jul/16
While I do believe that Henry Cavill is close to 6'1", I believe that while Henry Cavill is further away from the camera in the photos of him and Kellan Lutz, he's also standing between people which apparently improves posture. Therefore, it balanced out to a tie.
While I do believe that Henry Cavill is close to 6'1", I believe that while Henry Cavill is further away from the camera in the photos of him and Kellan Lutz, he's also standing between people which apparently improves posture. Therefore, it balanced out to a tie.
Mark said on 30/Jun/16
Alex, no. I believe Cavill is six feet and slightly above barefoot. Now I have the wingspan of a 6'0 person, yet I am actually 5'8.9" - 5'9.5". Judging people on frame is not the best idea until you actually measure that person.
Alex, no. I believe Cavill is six feet and slightly above barefoot. Now I have the wingspan of a 6'0 person, yet I am actually 5'8.9" - 5'9.5". Judging people on frame is not the best idea until you actually measure that person.
Alex said on 30/Jun/16
Johno, Cavill doesn't look over 185-186 cm, IMHO can't be over 183 cm without shoes.
Johno, Cavill doesn't look over 185-186 cm, IMHO can't be over 183 cm without shoes.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jun/16
No more like 184-185cm barefoot and 187cm+ in shoes.
No more like 184-185cm barefoot and 187cm+ in shoes.
Johno said on 29/Jun/16
Alex, check him next to Eisenberg and he looks around 4.5-inches taller, pushing 5-inches.
Alex, check him next to Eisenberg and he looks around 4.5-inches taller, pushing 5-inches.
Alex said on 27/Jun/16
his frame suggest an height around 182 cm barefoot, and a weak 185 cm with shoes. he have arms pretty short..next to affleck he seems around 4 or 5 cm shorter..
his frame suggest an height around 182 cm barefoot, and a weak 185 cm with shoes. he have arms pretty short..next to affleck he seems around 4 or 5 cm shorter..
Johnny said on 26/Jun/16
@Rob has he ever claimed his height? Because generally actors playing a superhero character claim their height.
Editor Rob
@Rob has he ever claimed his height? Because generally actors playing a superhero character claim their height.
Editor Rob not heard a specific height from him.
Mark said on 22/Jun/16
I think 183 cm is Cavill's absolute lowest if he had a complete rough day. 184 cm would be his regular low. Now, 185 cm, Cavill clears in the morning easily.
I think 183 cm is Cavill's absolute lowest if he had a complete rough day. 184 cm would be his regular low. Now, 185 cm, Cavill clears in the morning easily.
Dmeyer said on 17/Jun/16
6ft 0,25 at very low 6ft 0,5 1pm
6ft 0,25 at very low 6ft 0,5 1pm
truth said on 15/Jun/16
Strong 6'0"/183 cm in the evening.
Strong 6'0"/183 cm in the evening.
Mark said on 15/Jun/16
Celebheights 6'1.5
Will smith is a good inch taller than Henry Cavill even without the footwear advantage Will Smith had.
Celebheights 6'1.5
Will smith is a good inch taller than Henry Cavill even without the footwear advantage Will Smith had.
Mark said on 13/Jun/16
Celebheights 6'1.5" Again, Kellan doesn't actually really edge out Henry mainly because Kellan stands closer to the camera. Henry actually edges out Kellan in person when both are standing together in an equal angle.
Celebheights 6'1.5" Again, Kellan doesn't actually really edge out Henry mainly because Kellan stands closer to the camera. Henry actually edges out Kellan in person when both are standing together in an equal angle.
grizz said on 12/Jun/16
For all you 6'1 people-I was shocked to see he was in movie Count of Monte Cristo! He was 19 years old and seemed shockingly short next to 6'1 Jim Caviezel. Like 5'11. Is it possible that he hasn't reached his full height at 19?
For all you 6'1 people-I was shocked to see he was in movie Count of Monte Cristo! He was 19 years old and seemed shockingly short next to 6'1 Jim Caviezel. Like 5'11. Is it possible that he hasn't reached his full height at 19?
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 10/Jun/16
Even though he doesn't look near 6'1" by Kellan Lutz, he does look it by Will Smith and Ben Affleck (who are their listed heights in person) so I can't argue that he's anything below what he's listed at.
Even though he doesn't look near 6'1" by Kellan Lutz, he does look it by Will Smith and Ben Affleck (who are their listed heights in person) so I can't argue that he's anything below what he's listed at.
Mark said on 3/Jun/16
He can easily be 6'1" in the morning out of bed.
He can easily be 6'1" in the morning out of bed.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jun/16
He's close to 6ft1
He's close to 6ft1
Mark said on 23/May/16
I think it would be best if Rob met Cavill in person though it would be difficult for Rob to meet Cavill in person.
I think it would be best if Rob met Cavill in person though it would be difficult for Rob to meet Cavill in person.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 22/May/16
Kellan Lutz is the same height as Ryan Lochte in about every photo (or slightly taller), and I don't know if I see Henry Cavill as being taller than Ryan Lochte. Henry Cavill would likely appear taller in a photo of the two, however.
Kellan Lutz is the same height as Ryan Lochte in about every photo (or slightly taller), and I don't know if I see Henry Cavill as being taller than Ryan Lochte. Henry Cavill would likely appear taller in a photo of the two, however.
Mark said on 22/May/16
Actually, now that I saw the pictures carefully, Cavill does actually edge out Lutz overall. If anyone would say Kellan edges out Henry in some photos, it's mainly because the pictures are in favor to the angle Kellan is standing. Again, Kellan is standing in the favor of the camera angle where Cavill is not close to the angle at all.
Johno, Don't automatically assume that Kellan is exactly the same height as Cavill. The reason why I chose that other picture where Cavill edges out Lutz is because they're both standing straight with neither of them on the favored angle of the camera.
Actually, now that I saw the pictures carefully, Cavill does actually edge out Lutz overall. If anyone would say Kellan edges out Henry in some photos, it's mainly because the pictures are in favor to the angle Kellan is standing. Again, Kellan is standing in the favor of the camera angle where Cavill is not close to the angle at all.
Johno, Don't automatically assume that Kellan is exactly the same height as Cavill. The reason why I chose that other picture where Cavill edges out Lutz is because they're both standing straight with neither of them on the favored angle of the camera.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 19/May/16
How much height would you guess that Henry Cavill loses throughout the day? I'd wager 2 CM.
Editor Rob
How much height would you guess that Henry Cavill loses throughout the day? I'd wager 2 CM.
Editor Rob that is likely
Johno said on 19/May/16
Yeh true Rob and i do see Lutz and Cavil very close in height but Lutz looked taller than Bradley Cooper when they met and i find it hard to believe Cavil would be taller than Bradley Cooper but i can reluctantly see them at the same height. I got a rough idea of Lutz's height range and i think he would average close to your listing of him.
Yeh true Rob and i do see Lutz and Cavil very close in height but Lutz looked taller than Bradley Cooper when they met and i find it hard to believe Cavil would be taller than Bradley Cooper but i can reluctantly see them at the same height. I got a rough idea of Lutz's height range and i think he would average close to your listing of him.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/May/16
No Cavill isn't at all. I think Cavill is near 6ft1.
No Cavill isn't at all. I think Cavill is near 6ft1.
Mark said on 18/May/16
Considering that Cavill appears taller with 6'0" and some actual 6'1" people along the fact that he holds well with 6'2.25" and 6'3" guys along with the fact that he comes above the eye level of a 6'4.5" despite the latter having footwear advantages, Cavill easily clears 6'1" in the morning and could measure 6'1.25" in the morning max.
Considering that Cavill appears taller with 6'0" and some actual 6'1" people along the fact that he holds well with 6'2.25" and 6'3" guys along with the fact that he comes above the eye level of a 6'4.5" despite the latter having footwear advantages, Cavill easily clears 6'1" in the morning and could measure 6'1.25" in the morning max.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 17/May/16
Rob, who do you think would measure taller? Kellan Lutz or Henry Cavill? Kellan Lutz appears to be at least the same height as Henry Cavill in my opinion.
Editor Rob
Rob, who do you think would measure taller? Kellan Lutz or Henry Cavill? Kellan Lutz appears to be at least the same height as Henry Cavill in my opinion.
Editor Rob I think with height, there are fractions that can be accounted for and fractions which we can't account for.
What if one shrinks 1.1 inch, the other 0.7 inch...or one guy has been having a 3pm nap in his hotel.
For Lutz/Cavill I'd say they may well be within that 1/4 inch range, but overall I would say Henry had a better chance of 6ft 0.5 range than Lutz.
What if one shrinks 1.1 inch, the other 0.7 inch...or one guy has been having a 3pm nap in his hotel.
For Lutz/Cavill I'd say they may well be within that 1/4 inch range, but overall I would say Henry had a better chance of 6ft 0.5 range than Lutz.
Johan said on 17/May/16
Cavill isn't insecure at all. He just has excellent posture which to me shows confidence . Ofc you can overdo that as well like Vin Diesel but in most cases I think its a positive thing.
Im sure if we met we would be very similar. 1cm is nothing, we also have similar build im just lacking the handsome face:)
Cavill isn't insecure at all. He just has excellent posture which to me shows confidence . Ofc you can overdo that as well like Vin Diesel but in most cases I think its a positive thing.
Im sure if we met we would be very similar. 1cm is nothing, we also have similar build im just lacking the handsome face:)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/May/16
@Truth: Cooper thinks he's 6ft2, so I think the question is "who is more insecure?"
Cavill looks a big 6ft1 w/h Chris Evans (A fraction under 6ft most likely) and just under 6ft2 w/h Michael Shannon
@Truth: Cooper thinks he's 6ft2, so I think the question is "who is more insecure?"
Cavill looks a big 6ft1 w/h Chris Evans (A fraction under 6ft most likely) and just under 6ft2 w/h Michael Shannon
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/May/16
@Truth: Cooper thinks he's 6ft2, so I think the question is "who is more insecure?"
Cavill looks a big 6ft1 w/h Chris Evans (A fraction under 6ft most likely)
@Truth: Cooper thinks he's 6ft2, so I think the question is "who is more insecure?"
Cavill looks a big 6ft1 w/h Chris Evans (A fraction under 6ft most likely)
Elias said on 16/May/16
@Celebheights 6'1.5 , it's Matt Bomer in your pic and he is listed at 5ft 11 here. But I agree that Henry Cavill and Matt Bomer are like twins though ;)
@Celebheights 6'1.5 , it's Matt Bomer in your pic and he is listed at 5ft 11 here. But I agree that Henry Cavill and Matt Bomer are like twins though ;)
Truth said on 15/May/16
Who wants to be 6'1" more, Cavill or Cooper lol
Who wants to be 6'1" more, Cavill or Cooper lol
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/May/16
Cavill looks 1in taller than Mark Strong!
Cavill looks 1in taller than Mark Strong!
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 13/May/16
I think that Kellan Lutz needs an upgrade to 6'0 1/2" at least. He's at worst tied with Henry Cavill.
I think that Kellan Lutz needs an upgrade to 6'0 1/2" at least. He's at worst tied with Henry Cavill.
Mark said on 13/May/16
Rob, do you think you could meet Cavill in person to determine his real height, or is 186/184 cm or 185/183 cm enough to determine how tall he really is?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think you could meet Cavill in person to determine his real height, or is 186/184 cm or 185/183 cm enough to determine how tall he really is?
Editor Rob I'd love to, but I don't know if he'll ever do the kind of events I go to...
Mark said on 13/May/16
@Celebheights 6'1.5 The times Kellan appeared taller was when the camera lens were distorted.
@Celebheights 6'1.5 The times Kellan appeared taller was when the camera lens were distorted.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 12/May/16
@Mark Henry Cavill appears taller than Kellan Lutz in some photos, just as Kellan Lutz edges him out in others. They're likely the same height.
@Mark Henry Cavill appears taller than Kellan Lutz in some photos, just as Kellan Lutz edges him out in others. They're likely the same height.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 12/May/16
By Channing Tatum who could be a full 6'1":
Click Here
They are the same height.
By Channing Tatum who could be a full 6'1":
Click Here
They are the same height.
Mark said on 12/May/16
MrBoots A hair under 6'1" is the lowest he would measure. Slightly over 6'1" is the highest I can give him considering he virtually looks 6'2" with 6'3.5" Michael Shannon.
He's edges out Kellan Lutz, sometimes look taller than Kevin Costner when Costner isn't wearing Cowboys shoes. Cavil safely comes above Hammer eye level despite Armie having a footwear advantage.
MrBoots A hair under 6'1" is the lowest he would measure. Slightly over 6'1" is the highest I can give him considering he virtually looks 6'2" with 6'3.5" Michael Shannon.
He's edges out Kellan Lutz, sometimes look taller than Kevin Costner when Costner isn't wearing Cowboys shoes. Cavil safely comes above Hammer eye level despite Armie having a footwear advantage.
MrBoots said on 10/May/16
If Jim Caviezel is 6'2", Cavill is just a hair under 6'1" then. They looked very close in height in the Count of Monte Cristo. He also looked to have a few inches on 5'10" Guy Pearce. I think his proportions make - shorter arms - make him look shorter than he is. Easily had a half in on Chris Evans when they co-presented at the Oscars.
If Jim Caviezel is 6'2", Cavill is just a hair under 6'1" then. They looked very close in height in the Count of Monte Cristo. He also looked to have a few inches on 5'10" Guy Pearce. I think his proportions make - shorter arms - make him look shorter than he is. Easily had a half in on Chris Evans when they co-presented at the Oscars.
Mark said on 8/May/16
I don't know why, but Henry stands slightly taller and edges 6'1.5" Mark Strong in this picture...
Click Here
Probably Mark Strong has terrible posture and Cavill has a footwear advantage.
I don't know why, but Henry stands slightly taller and edges 6'1.5" Mark Strong in this picture...
Click Here
Probably Mark Strong has terrible posture and Cavill has a footwear advantage.
Mark said on 8/May/16
I think 6'1.5" might be a bit too high for Cavill, but it's still possible. Full 6'1", Cavill clears easily and is likely 6'1.25" in the morning.
It's up to you, Rob. That's just how I see it.
I think 6'1.5" might be a bit too high for Cavill, but it's still possible. Full 6'1", Cavill clears easily and is likely 6'1.25" in the morning.
It's up to you, Rob. That's just how I see it.
Mark said on 5/May/16
Rob, do you mean ship like Cavill could shrink a full inch or do you mean like can clear a full 6'1" in the morning?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you mean ship like Cavill could shrink a full inch or do you mean like can clear a full 6'1" in the morning?
Editor Rob I'm sure he is over 6ft 1 morning...a good chance he could be near 6ft 1.5 if he shrink an inch. But as I say, there are some who would shrink 1 inch, others 0.75, some 1.25, and some 0.5 inch...
the average though is more 0.75
the average though is more 0.75
Mark said on 3/May/16
Rob, I know I've been asking too much, but do you think Cavill can appear just 6'1" in the morning or could he look a fraction over 6'1" in the morning?
Editor Rob
Rob, I know I've been asking too much, but do you think Cavill can appear just 6'1" in the morning or could he look a fraction over 6'1" in the morning?
Editor Rob really depends how much he shrinks, some guys like him could ship a full inch easily, others might be only 0.7 inch...
Mark said on 2/May/16
Plus, I only see a 1-2 inch difference between Cavill and Shannon. Shannon is listed as 6'3.5' here.
Plus, I only see a 1-2 inch difference between Cavill and Shannon. Shannon is listed as 6'3.5' here.
Mark said on 2/May/16
Crane, if that were true, he would not come above armie hammer's eye level which he does. armie has the footwear advantage yet Cavill comes above his eye level a lot.
186/184 cm would suit Cavill with a possible chance of 186.5/184.5 since he edges out Kellan Lutz and can sometimes look taller than Kevin Costner.
Crane, if that were true, he would not come above armie hammer's eye level which he does. armie has the footwear advantage yet Cavill comes above his eye level a lot.
186/184 cm would suit Cavill with a possible chance of 186.5/184.5 since he edges out Kellan Lutz and can sometimes look taller than Kevin Costner.
Crane said on 1/May/16
183 - 183.5 that what he looks in all of his movies.
183 - 183.5 that what he looks in all of his movies.
Mark said on 29/Apr/16
I'm surprised Jourdan downgrades her height.
I'm surprised Jourdan downgrades her height.
Mark said on 29/Apr/16
The only time Kevin Costner edged Henry Cavill out was when Costner was wearing Cowboys shoes while Henry was only wearing regular shoes.
The only time Kevin Costner edged Henry Cavill out was when Costner was wearing Cowboys shoes while Henry was only wearing regular shoes.
Allie said on 28/Apr/16
She was wearing heels obviously. I don't know how big But considering how Jourdan gets listed as low as 5'10, I don't think someone 5'10 would look thst tall next to someone 6'1-2 in dress shoes probably assuming her heels aren't say Lady Gaga crazy.
She was wearing heels obviously. I don't know how big But considering how Jourdan gets listed as low as 5'10, I don't think someone 5'10 would look thst tall next to someone 6'1-2 in dress shoes probably assuming her heels aren't say Lady Gaga crazy.
Peter175 said on 28/Apr/16
Rob, what would be your guess for Zack Synder, the Director of BvS if you had to choose?
After looking through his pictures he looks to be the 5'7" he is listed as or maybe a bit like 171/172
Editor Rob
Rob, what would be your guess for Zack Synder, the Director of BvS if you had to choose?
After looking through his pictures he looks to be the 5'7" he is listed as or maybe a bit like 171/172
Editor Rob he pretty much looks in that 5ft 7 range.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/16
The only time I'd say he looked more like a 6ft flat guy is beside Kevin Costner who did edge him out. That pretty much invalidates 6ft1 for him. But then again he pulls it off easily with other actors who are taller or shorter...strange
The only time I'd say he looked more like a 6ft flat guy is beside Kevin Costner who did edge him out. That pretty much invalidates 6ft1 for him. But then again he pulls it off easily with other actors who are taller or shorter...strange
Mark said on 26/Apr/16
Jourdan Dunn might have been wearing some serious lifts with Henry Cavill.
Jourdan Dunn might have been wearing some serious lifts with Henry Cavill.
Allie said on 24/Apr/16
I'm actually stsrting to believe Jourdan Dunn's 6'0 claim after looking at pictures of her with Henry.
I'm actually stsrting to believe Jourdan Dunn's 6'0 claim after looking at pictures of her with Henry.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Apr/16
"Henry Cavill's height is 6ft 0¾in (184.785cm)"
I never said he was a full 6ft1, although I think he can look over it in pictures! He looks virtually 6ft2 w/h Michael Shannon and his shoes don't look suspicious at all. Looked over 1in taller than Luke Evans (listed 6ft but might be a bit less) and edged out Kellan Lutz (listed 6ft0¼). I think almost 187cm straight out of bed is very possible. He looks safely above 6ft flat and on his way to 6ft1, not barely 6ft like some people here think. 184-185cm is more likely than 183-184cm. There's not quite a full 2in between him and Affleck when they both stand at their tallest...
"Henry Cavill's height is 6ft 0¾in (184.785cm)"
I never said he was a full 6ft1, although I think he can look over it in pictures! He looks virtually 6ft2 w/h Michael Shannon and his shoes don't look suspicious at all. Looked over 1in taller than Luke Evans (listed 6ft but might be a bit less) and edged out Kellan Lutz (listed 6ft0¼). I think almost 187cm straight out of bed is very possible. He looks safely above 6ft flat and on his way to 6ft1, not barely 6ft like some people here think. 184-185cm is more likely than 183-184cm. There's not quite a full 2in between him and Affleck when they both stand at their tallest...
Johan said on 16/Apr/16
I would have said he maybe looks 6'0.25" there next to Kimmel but then we don't see the full shot. Kimmel is noticeably shorter with better posture and who knows what he is wearing. I would just keep him at 184cm. He holds up well next to a solid 6'2" guy.
I would have said he maybe looks 6'0.25" there next to Kimmel but then we don't see the full shot. Kimmel is noticeably shorter with better posture and who knows what he is wearing. I would just keep him at 184cm. He holds up well next to a solid 6'2" guy.
Dmeyer said on 15/Apr/16
Rob looking at him with kimmel And Affleck And evens even considering footwear its hard to see him over 184cm And 183-183,5cm is à very big possibility 184,5-185cm is very unlikely
Rob looking at him with kimmel And Affleck And evens even considering footwear its hard to see him over 184cm And 183-183,5cm is à very big possibility 184,5-185cm is very unlikely
Mark said on 14/Apr/16
186 cm / 184 cm seems more of a reasonable possibility.
186 cm / 184 cm seems more of a reasonable possibility.
BT said on 13/Apr/16
I'd say somewhere between E and D. Nearer 6'0.25 than 6'0.75.
I'd say somewhere between E and D. Nearer 6'0.25 than 6'0.75.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Apr/16
I'd have gone with C with a remote chance of B.
I'd have gone with C with a remote chance of B.
Mark said on 10/Apr/16
187 cm? that's stretching abit too far. With Superman gear, he's that height or he could be 188 cm WITH Superman gear. Now 185 cm? Cavill clears that easily in the morning without the superman gear and can measure more 186 cm than 185 cm without the superman gear. 184 cm might actually be Cavill's lowest at night.
He's taller than Kellan Lutz on the picture I sent. The times Kellan looked taller is when the camera lens were distored and the camera angle was off by alot. With a more equal camera position and nearly equal posture, Henry is taller than Kellan. Cavill comes above Armie Hammer's eye level despite Hammer having a footwear advantage. Cavill is at most 1.5 inches shorter than Affleck and could be at an inch or less shorter than Affleck. There's no question that Cavill is taller than Luke Evans, Chris Evans, and Miles Teller.
187 cm? that's stretching abit too far. With Superman gear, he's that height or he could be 188 cm WITH Superman gear. Now 185 cm? Cavill clears that easily in the morning without the superman gear and can measure more 186 cm than 185 cm without the superman gear. 184 cm might actually be Cavill's lowest at night.
He's taller than Kellan Lutz on the picture I sent. The times Kellan looked taller is when the camera lens were distored and the camera angle was off by alot. With a more equal camera position and nearly equal posture, Henry is taller than Kellan. Cavill comes above Armie Hammer's eye level despite Hammer having a footwear advantage. Cavill is at most 1.5 inches shorter than Affleck and could be at an inch or less shorter than Affleck. There's no question that Cavill is taller than Luke Evans, Chris Evans, and Miles Teller.
Mark said on 10/Apr/16
187 might be abit too high for Cavill. However, He easily clears 185 cms in the morning. He's more like 186 cm / 184 cm like Rob stated.
187 might be abit too high for Cavill. However, He easily clears 185 cms in the morning. He's more like 186 cm / 184 cm like Rob stated.
Jame said on 10/Apr/16
Maybe his height is 183-184 cm in nighg
Maybe his height is 183-184 cm in nighg
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/16
Rob, which of these would Henry get from you?
A) 187.5cm/185.5cm
B) 187cm/185cm
C) 186.5cm/184.5cm
D) 186cm/184cm
E) 185.5cm/183.5cm
Editor Rob
Rob, which of these would Henry get from you?
A) 187.5cm/185.5cm
B) 187cm/185cm
C) 186.5cm/184.5cm
D) 186cm/184cm
E) 185.5cm/183.5cm
Editor Rob stick with D, chance of C..., I would say A-B are too high.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/16
He could be near 187cm out of bed...
He could be near 187cm out of bed...
Elias said on 8/Apr/16
Henry Cavill is not under 184.5 cm . He is anywhere between 184.5 cm - 187cm, and he looks 186 cm a lot
Henry Cavill is not under 184.5 cm . He is anywhere between 184.5 cm - 187cm, and he looks 186 cm a lot
Dude said on 8/Apr/16
Cavill's 6'1, Affleck's 6'3
Cavill's 6'1, Affleck's 6'3
Azulon said on 8/Apr/16
he is 6 ft
he is 6 ft
Johno said on 8/Apr/16
He is only partially taller than Jimmy Kemmel, who himself is partially shorter than Jimmy Fallon.
In terms of proportions, Cavil along with Hugh Jackman have the best proportions and build and size, for any actor out there and ideal for most men.
He is only partially taller than Jimmy Kemmel, who himself is partially shorter than Jimmy Fallon.
In terms of proportions, Cavil along with Hugh Jackman have the best proportions and build and size, for any actor out there and ideal for most men.
Dejavu said on 7/Apr/16
If he is 5'11.5 we should be downgrading alot of actors. Russell Crowe will be 5'9 and Chris Evans probably 5'11 tops.
If he is 5'11.5 we should be downgrading alot of actors. Russell Crowe will be 5'9 and Chris Evans probably 5'11 tops.
Johno said on 6/Apr/16
Is between 4-5 inches taller than 5'7 listed Director Zack Snyder as pictures demonstrate.
Is between 4-5 inches taller than 5'7 listed Director Zack Snyder as pictures demonstrate.
Johno said on 4/Apr/16
I think i'll go one more state what i believe his morning and evening heights are.
6'0.25 -- 5'11.5; i believe he can be as low as 5'11.5 late in the day. Will Smith has a bit to much height on him.
I think i'll go one more state what i believe his morning and evening heights are.
6'0.25 -- 5'11.5; i believe he can be as low as 5'11.5 late in the day. Will Smith has a bit to much height on him.
Johno said on 4/Apr/16
@Knappstern; i would probably classify myself as a Nerd but with a Napoleon Syndrome? I don't believe i have, i am currently wearing shoes that are 0.7-inches thick and i wear similar footwear throughout the year and 2 days was wearing a pair of suedes 0.2-inches thick so i don't really i suffer from any insecurities but everyone does to some extent. I would be considered a large guy i believe but that really doesn't matter when i placing my estimates. "Offending him?" ---- really?
Rampage, the fact that i put down ranges rather than constants alludes to the point that i don't put down facts but rather opinions so your statement is pretty ironic. Arch is personality is there right down below, you can judge it, my response is more of a defensive.
I do often see height cynics on the defensive rather than offensive. I respect some opinions more than others and this is clear. Stick to height estimates rather than politics and on that note, i believe Cavil is a weak-6'0 rather than strong 6-footer.
@Knappstern; i would probably classify myself as a Nerd but with a Napoleon Syndrome? I don't believe i have, i am currently wearing shoes that are 0.7-inches thick and i wear similar footwear throughout the year and 2 days was wearing a pair of suedes 0.2-inches thick so i don't really i suffer from any insecurities but everyone does to some extent. I would be considered a large guy i believe but that really doesn't matter when i placing my estimates. "Offending him?" ---- really?
Rampage, the fact that i put down ranges rather than constants alludes to the point that i don't put down facts but rather opinions so your statement is pretty ironic. Arch is personality is there right down below, you can judge it, my response is more of a defensive.
I do often see height cynics on the defensive rather than offensive. I respect some opinions more than others and this is clear. Stick to height estimates rather than politics and on that note, i believe Cavil is a weak-6'0 rather than strong 6-footer.
Jack said on 3/Apr/16
With lifts he stands 188cm
With lifts he stands 188cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Apr/16
Rob, which would you go for?
A) 187cm/185cm
B) 186.5cm/184.5cm
C) 186cm/184cm
D) 185.5cm/183.5cm
E) 185cm/183cm
Editor Rob
Rob, which would you go for?
A) 187cm/185cm
B) 186.5cm/184.5cm
C) 186cm/184cm
D) 185.5cm/183.5cm
E) 185cm/183cm
Editor Rob stick with C range, possibly a nibble above. I'd rule out E and A.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Apr/16
Well, Johno your posts come across as more matter-of-factly rather than opinions. I for one like Archs opinions, they're very insightful. He posts a lot but he's respectful unlike you.
Well, Johno your posts come across as more matter-of-factly rather than opinions. I for one like Archs opinions, they're very insightful. He posts a lot but he's respectful unlike you.
Mark said on 2/Apr/16
I don't see the 2 inches difference between Henry and Ben in that recent picture SomeGuy posted. I could buy that Henry could definitely pass for 6'0.75" even if he isn't a full 6'1" person.
I don't see the 2 inches difference between Henry and Ben in that recent picture SomeGuy posted. I could buy that Henry could definitely pass for 6'0.75" even if he isn't a full 6'1" person.
lelman said on 1/Apr/16
This listing is bang on, he is definitely somewhere between 6ft and 6ft 1
This listing is bang on, he is definitely somewhere between 6ft and 6ft 1
Knappstern said on 1/Apr/16
@Johno you're a liar and an unpolite person. I've got only one nickname and I'm starting to think you're a frustrated nerd with Napoleon Syndrome. When you tell that you follows Rob rules you're offending him because it's not true and we all know that everyone's height cannot be measured with exact precision just by sight. So please stop breaking our balls and find another hobby!! Hast du verstanden? Aufwiedersehen & Goodbye!!
@Johno you're a liar and an unpolite person. I've got only one nickname and I'm starting to think you're a frustrated nerd with Napoleon Syndrome. When you tell that you follows Rob rules you're offending him because it's not true and we all know that everyone's height cannot be measured with exact precision just by sight. So please stop breaking our balls and find another hobby!! Hast du verstanden? Aufwiedersehen & Goodbye!!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Apr/16
I think 184.5cm at night and you could argue 6ft0¾ for him. Out of bed, he easily hits 186.5-187cm. He really looks no more than 4cm shorter than Affleck.
I think 184.5cm at night and you could argue 6ft0¾ for him. Out of bed, he easily hits 186.5-187cm. He really looks no more than 4cm shorter than Affleck.
datguy said on 29/Mar/16
both henry cavill and ben affleck seemed to be perfectly listed here
both henry cavill and ben affleck seemed to be perfectly listed here
Dmeyer said on 29/Mar/16
Wouldnt be shoked if he was 183,5cm night
Wouldnt be shoked if he was 183,5cm night
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Mar/16
Once again, looks a solid 185cm to Affleck's 189cm.
Once again, looks a solid 185cm to Affleck's 189cm.
Dejavu said on 29/Mar/16
Its not possible that Henry Cavill is under 6'0. He looks at least 6'0.
Its not possible that Henry Cavill is under 6'0. He looks at least 6'0.
Johno said on 28/Mar/16
And readers don't mind Arch Stanton; he suffers from a multiple personality disorder and is currently under his typical form but he does carnate as other forms and he does not actually believe in the estimates he spews; remember, you can accuse height cynics of feeling threatened but remember ---- the deflators actually believe in what they say but shills or inflators such as Arch don't believe in what they estimate rather, they are corrupt and not sincere and i believe should not take their estimates seriously. You offer any viable estimate differing from theirs and they take offense; your basically hindering their job.
So tell me Arch, what do you think of the Will Smith comparisons? Think Cavil is a strong 6'0? I would not question stadiometer measurements but i think you would pictures Arch, say ----- You still believe Joe Manganiello looks near 6'5 with Rob Arch?
I don't believe any reader should take any other reader's opinion as fact but rather as a opinion or a baseline but some opinions you should take as more valid than others.
Henry does look more than an inch shorter than Cavil and we cannot deny that.
Smith 6'0.75, 6'1
Cavil 1-inch+ shorter than Smith
And readers don't mind Arch Stanton; he suffers from a multiple personality disorder and is currently under his typical form but he does carnate as other forms and he does not actually believe in the estimates he spews; remember, you can accuse height cynics of feeling threatened but remember ---- the deflators actually believe in what they say but shills or inflators such as Arch don't believe in what they estimate rather, they are corrupt and not sincere and i believe should not take their estimates seriously. You offer any viable estimate differing from theirs and they take offense; your basically hindering their job.
So tell me Arch, what do you think of the Will Smith comparisons? Think Cavil is a strong 6'0? I would not question stadiometer measurements but i think you would pictures Arch, say ----- You still believe Joe Manganiello looks near 6'5 with Rob Arch?
I don't believe any reader should take any other reader's opinion as fact but rather as a opinion or a baseline but some opinions you should take as more valid than others.
Henry does look more than an inch shorter than Cavil and we cannot deny that.
Smith 6'0.75, 6'1
Cavil 1-inch+ shorter than Smith
Peter175 said on 27/Mar/16
Rob, how tall do you figure the director of BvS Zack Synder is? He is listed at 170, but I think he's a bit below that. Maybe 168 range?
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, how tall do you figure the director of BvS Zack Synder is? He is listed at 170, but I think he's a bit below that. Maybe 168 range?
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob he could be nearer 170cm than 168cm, I think that might be too low.
Johno said on 27/Mar/16
Click Here
Another angle from the same event and even with lean, Smith looks about 1.5 inches taller than Cavil and would be closer to 2 inches if fully straightened however, Smith's shoes do look 1/3- 0.5 inches thicker than Cavil's thus the height difference is between 1-1.5 inches most probably.
Will Smith 6'0.75, 6'1
Henry Cavil, 1-1.5 inches shorter than Smith
Click Here
Another angle from the same event and even with lean, Smith looks about 1.5 inches taller than Cavil and would be closer to 2 inches if fully straightened however, Smith's shoes do look 1/3- 0.5 inches thicker than Cavil's thus the height difference is between 1-1.5 inches most probably.
Will Smith 6'0.75, 6'1
Henry Cavil, 1-1.5 inches shorter than Smith
Johno said on 27/Mar/16
Knappersten you sound like a serial Name-changer on this site; stop changing and stop trolling. Explain the Will Smith comparisons and then talk.
Knappersten you sound like a serial Name-changer on this site; stop changing and stop trolling. Explain the Will Smith comparisons and then talk.
Johno said on 27/Mar/16
Taking those pictures as tbey are Dejavu, Will looks around 1.5 inches taller than Cavil and that is with him Will leaning; straightening it up would be around 2 inches but Will's footwear looks thicker.
I would say Will has around 2 inches on Cavil and that gives you a good clue about Cavil's height.
Will Smith 6'0.75, 6'1
Taking those pictures as tbey are Dejavu, Will looks around 1.5 inches taller than Cavil and that is with him Will leaning; straightening it up would be around 2 inches but Will's footwear looks thicker.
I would say Will has around 2 inches on Cavil and that gives you a good clue about Cavil's height.
Will Smith 6'0.75, 6'1
Mark said on 27/Mar/16
Dejavu. Will Smith did have a footwear advantage over Cavill. Will Smith is still taller, but Cavill isn't that much shorter. Henry could also pass for a 6'1" in the morning or on a good day.
Dejavu. Will Smith did have a footwear advantage over Cavill. Will Smith is still taller, but Cavill isn't that much shorter. Henry could also pass for a 6'1" in the morning or on a good day.
184.3cm (Night) said on 27/Mar/16
Smith looks like he could pass for 6ft 2 there. If he straightens out in that pic with affleck although i think he has more footwear than Cavilll for sure. Puts to bed the under 6'1" claims for Smith anyway.
Smith looks like he could pass for 6ft 2 there. If he straightens out in that pic with affleck although i think he has more footwear than Cavilll for sure. Puts to bed the under 6'1" claims for Smith anyway.
Andrea said on 26/Mar/16
He doesn't look much different than Kellan in photos... Bear in mind that Henry is a guy who has got a perfect posture in almost every photos and sometimes he even raises his eyelevel so he can look taller than he is!
He doesn't look much different than Kellan in photos... Bear in mind that Henry is a guy who has got a perfect posture in almost every photos and sometimes he even raises his eyelevel so he can look taller than he is!
Arch Stanton said on 26/Mar/16
I'm 99% sure Rob employs Johno to entertain the guests as a jester. ;-) He has issues that guy, even if a celeb had been measured on a stadiometer with evidence he'd still be knocking off 1-2 inches!
I'm 99% sure Rob employs Johno to entertain the guests as a jester. ;-) He has issues that guy, even if a celeb had been measured on a stadiometer with evidence he'd still be knocking off 1-2 inches!
Celebheights 6'1.75 said on 25/Mar/16
With Will Smith:
Click Here
Click Here
The footwear:
Click Here
I've seen photos where Henry Cavill appears taller, and others where Will Smith appears to be taller, so there can't be as much as a full inch between them. Maybe Will Smith edges him out by 1 CM?
With Will Smith:
Click Here
Click Here
The footwear:
Click Here
I've seen photos where Henry Cavill appears taller, and others where Will Smith appears to be taller, so there can't be as much as a full inch between them. Maybe Will Smith edges him out by 1 CM?
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.