Hulk Hogan's real Height and Weight

Hulk Hogan's Height

6ft 3 (190.5 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 6 (198.1 cm)

American Wrestler and actor. In Feb 2005 Allure he said: "I used to be 6ft 7, but after knee, neck and back surgeries I'm now about 6ft 4". In 2011 he repeated in an interview he was 6ft 7 barefoot but lost height and was 6ft 4, but now after multiple back surgeries believes he is 6ft 5 again. In 2014 he also mentioned his weight, saying "I weigh 295[lbs]".

Photos by PR Photos

Wrestlers

You May Be Interested

Andre The Giant
7ft 0 (213 cm)

Stone Cold Steve Austin
6ft 1 ¼ (186 cm)

Brooke Hogan
5ft 9 ¾ (177 cm)

The Undertaker
6ft 6 ½ (199 cm)

Add a Comment6057 comments

Average Guess (437 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 5.8in (197.6cm)
Current: 6ft 3.26in (191.2cm)

Daniel reynolds said on 23/Jun/19
Space: if you ment 2000 then i an a real c... when you said at very best i thought you ment prime. I take back everything i said then space. Oh no. I am falling from space. I have landed and dead.😭😭😭😭. I obviously read your message wrong. Not good. But canson, terry did look 6,6.5 against douglas now question about that. Even with the footwear advantage james buster douglas had, he still looks to me 3 inches shorter side by side. He really does and he would of been bare foot 3 inches shorter bare foot anyway. I get my eyes tested all the time and let me just say this canson my eye sight is A1 perfect. I have never worn glasses. Never needed to. Look at those photos again canson. Take a massive look.!!!what may look like 1.5_2 inches is most likely 3 inches instead 100%. I have no shred of doubt in my mind.!!!

62B said on 23/Jun/19
Sotiris. I think the pictures you post are great. A lot of times though they have extreme angles or are not complete body shots. I guess that doesn't make them not good, just not the best when people are trying to guess to the exact fraction.

RoelC said on 23/Jun/19
Daniel reynolds said on 21/Jun/19
Sotiris: the pic looks A1 to me. Bad upward pic.?? Bad upward pic of not. Terry looks same height or slightly taller. John matuszak actual height 6,8 not 6,7. Footwear in 0,s favour so 0_0 there. John would of been wearing 1.5_2 inch footwear himself.
----------------

Daniel Reynolds when John Matuszak was drafted by the Raiders in 1973 they listed his height as 6'7 or 6'7 1/2". A true 6'8" guy wouldn't get listed at those heights. His 6'8" listed height during his playing days are either a round-up or a height in shoes.
The picture of Hogan & Matuszak has been posted here many times, yet you act like you found a smoking gunn. The pic is pretty useless to determine height as we don't see anything from the chest down. We don't see either man's posture, we don't see footwear. To me it looks like Hogan is standing in front of Matuszak and leaning slightly backwards, while Matuszak is leaning forward.

We have a perfectly good picture of Hogan standing next to a 6'7-6'8" NFL player, called Ben Davidson. Hogan obviously wasn't the taller person there, so he wouldn't be taller than Matuszak either, as you seem to be implying. And don't let clowns like Henry cloud your judgment, Hogan isn't standing lightyears behind Davidson there. Davidson has his arm wrapped around Hogan's back & schoulder. I wonder how Davidson managed to pull that off if he was standing way closer to the camera than Hogan.
If someone is standing much closer to the camera, it becomes noticeable because it distorts the persons proportions. The person in the front will have a much bigger head, etc. That doesn't seem to be the case in the pic with Hogan & Davidson. Julius Carry is standing much closer to the camera, but he's leaning backwards towards Hogan. His head is probably at equal distance from the camera as Hogan's head.

Alan32080 said on 23/Jun/19
I won’t argue a 6’3.25 low afternoon measurement. Like I said I dip down to 6’2 3/4” in the afternoon. I won’t argue a 6’5.5” peak measurement either. Between 6’5” - 6’6” peak no more no less. Under 6’5” is crazy and over 6’6” is crazy also. Between 6’3.25” - 6’4” current. No more no less. I’m 6’3” he’s taller barefoot than me. No way he’s under 6’3.25 at low.

Daniel reynolds said on 23/Jun/19
Canson: you can,t prove terry wasn,t a full 6,6. You and everyone is playing a guessing game or you are being on the conservative side yourself. Too many times you say i inflate terrys prime height. But if i wanted to do that i would of said terry was 6,10 prime not 6,7. like i mentioned a while back to you. Being on the conservative side is just as bad as inflating. Because its still incorrect. You may aswell bring in another person. Too bad you sadly don,t see my opinions. You should try to analise what i see in pics yourself.

Daniel reynolds said on 23/Jun/19
Canson: terry never wore lifts. Thats is something i know full well and not all wrestlers did anyway. Which is probably why people would have terry an 1.5_2 inches shorter. This may also be where people go wrong with heights because they assume everyone wore lifts. But like i did say to dan if that was the case he wouldn,t of looked as short if he did where lufts.

Daniel reynolds said on 22/Jun/19
Canson: just Daniel would do magic pls. I am no V.I.P. i just hate being called Dan. Its like, Dan Dan the desperate man. What the F...!!! So sorry canson. Daniel is me. Forget reynolds the business man in the city suited. Oh well there mr reynolds. What!!! Ok.

Sotiris Gravas said on 22/Jun/19
@62B We pretty much agree on Hogan's height (then/now), but as far as the "great and neat old pics that haven't been posted before" not being good for height comparisons, it would help me better understand if you were to elaborate w/ some examples and descriptions. In other words, or word, rather: why? W/o sounding conceited, I daresay my contribution to this site in terms of uploaded photographic evidence has been far more impactful than "lol." You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but I would have to wholeheartedly disagree.

@Daniel reynolds Glad you liked your Christmas gift. BTW, Vitali Klitschko sends his best regards. I told him about you; he's a big fan. VERY BIG, lol.

Daniel reynolds said on 22/Jun/19
Canson: its not that i want to believe what i think isn,t right. No. I have looked at enough decent pics to put my finger on what i am talking about. If you take a careful look at terry behind james buster douglas in the ring that night in a photo, you will see a line drawn between douglas head and terrys forehead. Terry would of been standing 1_2 yards behind making him in the photo 1.5 inches taller instead of the rest. Bring terry forwrd in line like there is with pics of these 2 guys you will see there is a good 2.5 inches between them. Footwear advantage also with james buster douglas 0.5_1 inch there, bringing terrys height to actual 6,6.5. Its simple equastion. Its like working out 4×4+10_6 for example. Its easy to notice. Like i mentioned., the taller the man also the likelyhood more inches. I just wish someone that does agree with me can see it. If you can see canson my point then surely you can agree with what i am pointing out to a degree. Surely.??

Dan Trojan said on 22/Jun/19
Daniel reynolds i think i struck a nerve with you the problem with you is you have nothing to back up your claims and btw i never said hogan was 6'4.5" i honestly think he was at least 6'5" but not the 6'6.5" that you claim also like you i am a big hulk hogan fan him and undertaker are my 2 favorites i've just come to grips with the reality of both their heights especially undertaker seeing as i met him a couple of weeks ago and he seemed no more than 6'6" so my guess is he was probably 6'7" or a little more in his prime which would me hogan again would be in the 6'5" range seeing as he was always around 2 inches shorter than taker

Daniel reynolds said on 22/Jun/19
Dan trojan: let me just say with the lifts thing. I have watched WWF wrestling since i was 7 and i have never come across terry wearing lifts. It has become a trend in the 90,s and 2000,s. In terry and andres day never heard of. Ok big john studd did wear lifts against terry. But that is exactly why john looked bigger in a ring. Bare foot same height 6,6.5. Same thing with sid eurdy, terry looked smaller because of the lifts sid did wear. Again same height 6,6.5 but terry at ultimate best though. Tiny lister looked 6,11 against terry in no holds barred why, well 3 inch lifts. Did terry ever look 6,11 against big john studd...No he didn,t because he wasn,t wearing lifts. Did terry ever look 6,11 against sid eurdy...No he didn,t because he wasn,t wearing lifts. Did terry ever look 6,11 against tiny lister...No he didn,t because he wasn,t wearing lifts. Terry would of be axactly the same height as sid, tiny lister and big john if he was wearing lifts. Well, he would of been taller than lister bare foot anyway. I hope that answers your question. If ever you come across a photo with sid eurdy and big van vador taking a stroll along a resort or beach. You will see that vador isn,t that much shorter that sid and sid doesn,t look as big in the photo as he did in a ring. In a ring he was very tall. You could tell. 6,6.5+footwear boots+lifts. Work that out. Terry prime 6,6.5+1.5 inch boots. Work that out. Dan, i apologise for my outburst in my last message. I am really sorry dude. I am. No hard feelings and sotiris, no hard feelings between me and you. I can be very larey when i want to be. But sorry. Really.

Canson said on 22/Jun/19
@62B: I agree with your estimate in his prime. That’s where I have him 6’5-6’5.5 more likely than 6’5.5-6’6”. Strong 6’5” but I don’t completely rule out the other range. But I do rule out 6’6” flat. But same time I don’t think a peak Hogan was less than 6’5”. I can see Alan32080’s estimate as a good one but Alan has also mentioned he dips to weak 6’3” at a low (6’2 5/8 or 3/4) so with that said Hogan being half inch taller would make him strong 6’3” not weak 6’4 that he guessed him. I’ve actually had a current Hogan as 6’3-6’3.25 range today for a while but this 6’6.5 or 6’7 than Reynolds gives him is too high. Alan32080 even guesses his peak just slightly higher than we do and I mentioned that that range is still very possible for him 6’5.5-6’6”. I think you actually would have more knowledge on his current seeing your grandfather (who’s height you were aware of) next to him. That’s how he appears to me as well in pics is a good 6’5 range guy like Howard Stern in his prime. Bobby3342 another poster here also said he was an inch shorter than his 6’6” father when his dad met him in the 80s

Canson said on 22/Jun/19
@62B: I agree with your estimate in his prime. That’s where I have him 6’5-6’5.5 more likely than 6’5.5-6’6”. Strong 6’5” but I don’t rule out the other range. Either way not 6’6” flat. But same time I don’t think a peak Hogan was less than 6’5”. I can see Alan32080’s estimate as a good one but Alan has also mentioned he dips to weak 6’3” at a low (6’2 5/8 or 3/4) so with that said Hogan being half inch taller would make him strong 6’3” not weak 6’4 that he guessed him. I’ve actually had a current Hogan as 6’3-6’3.25 range today for a while but this 6’6.5 or 6’7 than Reynolds gives him is too high. Alan32080 even guesses his peak just slightly higher than we do and I mentioned that that range is still very possible for him 6’5.5-6’6”

Canson said on 22/Jun/19
@Dan Trojan: the reason he insists that Hogan didn’t wear lifts is because he either wants to be right or won’t admit or acknowledge that Hogan wasn’t his billed height. Don’t get me wrong I do respect Dan Reynolds but he wants Hogan to have been that height when he was not. There was actually another site that is similar to Rob’s where a guy assessed heights and he guessed Hogan 6’5.5 or 6’6 prime. Meaning two people who study height more than the average person guessed him as 6’5-6’6”. You have another poster or two here that swear Hogan was that height but I say he was 6’5 range peak because another person who has met him (3rd or 4th person to me as I don’t know him) said he’s 6’5” as well. I also agree with 62B as he has always been a very credible poster and his estimates are very good typically. He also guessed Taker as 6’7” in person and hogan 6’5 with his grandfather and looking at Hulk with him that’s always been a 1.5-2” difference between them. Could be as low as 1.5 or as high as 2 in their primes whereas today it’s 2.5-3” between them as hulk has lost more height than Taker to date

Canson said on 22/Jun/19
@Dan Reynolds: the site is actually based off afternoon heights but Rob says he considers 5 hours out of bed just that. I typically lose 1/8” from when I’ve been awake 5 hours to my normal low which I hit around 7 hours or so. evening heights and afternoon heights don’t vary unless you stand on your feet for hours on in and hit an extreme low which would be between 1-2 mm above 6’4” although I don’t consider the extreme low my true height. I use my normal low after around 7 hours 193.8ish but I still round down to 6’4”. If I wake up at 5 am like I do I’m at my low by noon maybe 1pm at most. I maintain that height throughout the evening unless I hit the gym which will drop me maybe 1.5mm or if I stand for hours without sitting and hit my extreme low. The 1/8” variance from 5 hours to 7+ is the norm on this site for most of us.

As far as 1” taller, not many people here lose an inch. You have guys my size (6’4.25) or even Jdubbz or Christian’s size 6’5 and change for both that don’t lose a full inch. In my case I may get a 6’4 3/8 listing or 6’4.5 perhaps. But We all lose about 3/4 maybe max 2cm. The only one I’ve seen lose a full inch in recent memory (without hitting or mentioning an extreme low) is CJ Camp who is a brand new poster who is 6’8”. He’s 6’9 out of bed. Or Ellis who is 6’7”. Ellis is 6’8 out of bed. While I don’t rule Hulk losing an inch in his prime it may be more 3/4-7/8. But I also doubt a peak hulk was 6’6.5. Maybe he could hit it out of bed which is iffy but very possible because he could still have been 6’5.5 at his low. I think 6’5.5 is the most that the majority of us on this site would give him in his prime. If that were his low then maybe he would get a 6’5.75 or 6’5 5/8 listing on this site since many of the heights Rob lists here (despite the rule of thumb that he uses) are above their lows. Many of the athletes here, he uses combine measurements which are morning heights

Daniel reynolds said on 22/Jun/19
Dan trojan: dwayne looked about 1 inch shorter than terry in 1999 RAW and smackdown. Now dwaynes footwear looked elevated to me 100%. If terry was wearing lifts against dwayne the he would of been considerably taller than dwayne. They wouldn,t of looked the same height anyway.

Daniel reynolds said on 22/Jun/19
Dan trojan; just to mention lifts. I have never known terry to wear lifts in all the years i have watches WWF. If he did he wouldn,t of looked shorter than sid eurdy and big john studd. These guys did wear lifts against terry which is why they were taller in a ring. Tiny lister wore 3 inches lifts against terry which is why he looked taller. Did terry look 6,10_6,11 to you against sid eurdy, big john studd and tiny lister in rings against these guys....No he didn;t because he never wore lifts. Wearing lifts became a massive trend in 90,s 2000,s. In terry and andres time never and terry didn,t look much shorter than andre really. If you happen to come across a pic with big van vador and sid eurdy taking a stroll on a resort or beach somewhere you will see there is not much height difference between van vador and sid. 6,4.5 terry prime and 6,6.5 sid just doesn,t sound right to me.

Daniel reynolds said on 22/Jun/19
Dan tojan: just 1 last thing. This sight is based on evening heights as canson did tell me 1 time. So with that being the case then the likelyhood is terry would of been maybe 1 inch taller in the morning. Which can,t make me 95% wrong. It is most likely i am 95% right because he would of tipped his peak height in the morning.

Daniel reynolds said on 22/Jun/19
Dan tojan: let me just say this to you. If my comments are 95% inaccurate then i wouldn,t bother posting them for starters. Because well, what would be the point. I don,t post my comments to play silly buggars. I post my thoughts yes for people to look at, but also for people to take on board what i am saying. For you to make that comment about me, lover and insult me like that just shows what a total prat you really must be dan trojan and for you to say my comments are 95% inaccurate shows what an idiot you really must be aswell. Why don,t YOU dan trojan actually read into and try to analise where i am coming from instead of just reading my comments and then just saying my comments are 95% wrong and then you will see that i am most likely 95% correct instead. Analise my height comparisons and you will see for yourself. Obviously everybody sees thing different. I see things different to most. But i doesn,t actually mean i am completely wrong though does it dan trojan. It seems like a man can,t disagree on this sight without being slated for it. If i did agree with the likes of you and sotiris and heisenberg 89 and others to mention then i really would. You have met someone here me daniel that sadly doesn,t. But we have got to have something to talk about on this sight, people with different opinions, otherwise there would be nothing to talk about at all. I post my comments for people to put out on the washing line. Dan trojan, just don,t put my comments in a washing machine to be washed on a 50. What i respect about canson is this ok he doesn,t really agree with me but he will understand my point and that is good enough for me. So i have alot of respect for canson there. Don,t get me wrong, i am sure you, sotiris gravas and all others are lovely people. But i have to disagree with a 6,4_6,4.5 prime measurement prime hogan. Look at space he reckons terry was 6,2.5 prime. For F... sake. I mean, what hulk hogan is he looking at. A model.!!!

62B said on 22/Jun/19
Sotiris, you always seem find these great and neat old pics that haven't been posted before, but really aren't much good for height comparisons. Lol. While I agree Hogan probably wasn't 6'6", I do think he was a solid 6'5" range guy. He could have been as low as 6'4 3/4" or as tall as 6'5.25" in my opinion. 6'5.5" is the max I think I would believe as well as 6'4.5" minimum for evening peaks. Today its obvious he has shrunk quite a bit. Personally I think he would be about my height today (between 6'2"and 6'3" barefoot)Although I do Think Alan32080 probably knows best about Hulks current height of all the posters, even though my guess is a little shorter than his.

Daniel reynolds said on 21/Jun/19
Sotiris: the pic looks A1 to me. Bad upward pic.?? Bad upward pic of not. Terry looks same height or slightly taller. John matuszak actual height 6,8 not 6,7. Footwear in 0,s favour so 0_0 there. John would of been wearing 1.5_2 inch footwear himself. Further more. Take a look at a pic with john matuszak to the left of mr t wearing dungarees with an afo. Mr t wearing sunglasses and terry to the right in a pic on the same batch of pics you would of seen. Terry looking taller than john. Ok terry would be 1 yard closer to the pic. So same height there. So does that look like a 6,4.5 man against a 6,8 man.?? He wouldn,t of looked as tall would he.?? As for douglas, i notice a good difference in height. Douglas having footwear advantage also sotiris. If you can,t tell the difference there then you really should get your eyes tested. Thats all i will say on the douglas account.

Canson said on 21/Jun/19
@Dan Reynolds: there you go using billed heights. Matuszak being billed 6’8 is no different than Hogan being billed that. Possible but I don’t know if he really was. Just because someone lists themself 6’8 doesn’t mean they are. It’s like Shawne Merriman claiming 6’5 when he’s 6’2 range like the Rock does. No one gives a rats a$$ about billed heights in sports or entertainment

Daniel reynolds said on 21/Jun/19
Sotiris: very well done. It took you guts though. There is F all wrong with that pic. 6,8 yes indeed john matuszak not 6,7 and we don,t know what kind of footwear matuszak had. If anything it would of been footwear 1.5 inches. Obviously you see a different kind of pics to the way i look at pics. There is F all wrong with my eyes anyway.

Dan Trojan said on 21/Jun/19
Daniel reynolds why is it that you insist other wrestlers wore lifts and not hulk hogan are you like his lover or something your height guesses are all over thr place and 95% of them are inaccurate i may not agree with a lot of what sotiris says but his guesses are at least reasonable yours are just absurd

Space said on 21/Jun/19
@ Reynolds
I never said hogan was 6’2.5” peak. I believe he was 6’4.75” peak. I then said he was 6’2.5” in the late 90s & early 2000s.

Daniel reynolds said on 21/Jun/19
Canson: john matuszak was indeed 6,8 if you look up his height stats and thats not billed. Ok i was wrong with big bill anderson height of 6,4. I will shoot myself in the head for that. He was 6,2. Like ed leslie and vince macmahan. These guys came up to terrys nose. Look at the eye level for starters. Donald trump again. U have looked at enough decent pics.

Sotiris Gravas said on 21/Jun/19
@Daniel reynolds You said Hogan looked at least 6'6" next to Buster Douglas (who was 6'3.5" peak, not the 6'4" you think he was). This was Hogan next to Buster... which I ALREADY posted. Guess you forgot:
Click Here , Click Here Funny how your "Terry" looks NOWHERE even close to 6'6".

Please do try and remember this time.

Again, this was Hogan next to max 6'3.5" Troy Aikman back in 2010... Click Here Hogan was max 6'2.5" then and is 100% NOT more than that now. I can't stress that enough.

A max 6'2" guy like the Rock still wants fans to think he's 6'5" (LOL). Same goes for a height-loss Hogan and his nonsense. These guys are living in a dream world and so are the ppl who believe their BS.

Sotiris Gravas said on 21/Jun/19
Our good pal, Daniel reynolds, keeps talking about that John Matuszak pic as if it's some kind of smoking-gun pic which proves Hogan was 6'8" -- which it obviously doesn't, lol. First of all, it's taken from a bad upward angle which makes the taller person look shorter than they actually are... that said, this pic has already been posted, but here it is again... HERE IT IS, DANIEL REYNOLDS, LOOK AT IT, ISN'T IT GLORIOUS...?! THIS IS THE PIC HE WANTS, NAY, NEEDS(!!!) YOU TO SEE... BEHOLD IT... LOOK UPON IT... LOOOOOOOOOOK , BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA! Okay, seriously, here it is... Click Here
For all we know, Hogan is wearing his precious cowboy boots.

Matuszak was listed 6'8" and was probably max 6'7.5" peak height. He often looked 6'7", tops.

Here he is w/ 6'5" Bo Svenson (1979)... Click Here , Click Here

W/ 6'5" Merlin Olsen (1986)... Click Here

W/ 6'5" Tiny Lister and 6'1" OJ... Click Here

W/ maybe 6'5.5" Fred Dryer (listed 6'6") in 1986... Click Here , Click Here (Matuszak is closer to the camera.)

W/ Otis Sistrunk (listed 6'4")... Click Here
W/ Otis and Dave Rowe (listed 6'7")... Click Here Rowe actually looks taller here.

W/ 6'3" Mike Farrell (1972)... Click Here
W/ 6'3" David Ogden Stiers... Click Here

W/ 6'2" Michael D. Roberts (1984)... Click Here

W/ 6'2" Ronny Cox... Click Here

W/ 5'11" Joe Piscopoe... Click Here
Piscopoe w/ Boomer Esiason... Click Here
Boomer and 6'5" Peyton Manning (2005)... Click Here

W/ 5'10" Mr. T (1986)... Click Here , Click Here

W/ 5'9" Bronson Pinchot... Click Here

As Sloth, w/ 5'7.5" Steven Spielberg... Click Here , Click Here

So, there you have it. I hope you're happy, Daniel reynolds. Consider it your Christmas gift.
Click Here

Daniel reynolds said on 21/Jun/19
Guys i would love to put your comments in a washing machine and put them on a 100 degree wash and wash out the ink, because things you come out with make no sense what so ever. I don,t get any responses when i point out something valuable. But i guess we have got to talk about something. Otherwise there would be no point in having this sight at all. Hey.

Heisenberg89 said on 21/Jun/19
Reynolds I dont go over 6'5 for your Hogan, but max.

Undertaker was max 6'7". More 6'6.75, he had 2" on Hogan that btw always had suspect shoes.

I'm not conservative, simply I'm not idiot.
I would laugh too for you posts, but most of the times those are to boring to read.

Daniel reynolds said on 21/Jun/19
Heisenberg89: i have got to laugh at your measurements there. Terry was 6,5_6,5.5 in 2000 and you have his prime 6,4.5. He wasn,t as tall in 2000 as he was in 1976. Andre did tip 7,0 sid lifts eurdy looked taller than terry due to sid wearing lifts and terry wasn,t in his prime late 90,s 2000. Now you said on marks sight i am the reason WWF wrestlers have inflated heights or something stupid like that. But you want to be on the conservative side on heights. Well what good is that. Thats just as bad. I am trying to be 100 % accurate by the way. I am not trying to inflate. But by by on the shy side you may as well bring in another man. Oh i will tell you who terry 2010.

Daniel reynolds said on 21/Jun/19
Canson: if this sight is based on evening heights then the very likelyhood is terry was taller. He may of lost an inch in height duren the course of the day. I measured my self recently. Before going to be i was 5,10.3. Got up 10 hours later measured myself again in the morning i was 5,11 exact.

Heisenberg89 said on 20/Jun/19
Hogan 6'4.75/6'2.25
André 6'10.75/6'9.25
Taker 6'6.75/6'5.5
Show 6'10.75/6'9.75
Kane 6'7/6'5.75
Sid 6'6.5/6'5

Daniel reynolds said on 20/Jun/19
As i mentioned also, the bigger the man the more inches you are looking at there because your not looking at a man standing an average height. Conparing heights is a good comparison sight. If you do take a massive look also at douglas and hogan with douglas holding hogans arms in the air, you can see the height comparison. Oh don,t forget footwear advantage to james buster douglas, naturally making him shorter still. Sotiris do take a massive look at hogan and actual 6,8 john matuszak. When you reply then tell me terry was 6,4.5 prime. Hopefully there will come a day when you finally admit terry was infact 6,6_6,7 prime.

Daniel reynolds said on 20/Jun/19
Has anyone looked at the john matuszak pics with terry i have been talking about. I would be very interested to hear both henry and ronsters thoughts on those pics.

Daniel reynolds said on 20/Jun/19
Do take a massive look at a few pics with terry and james buster douglas. Terry in 1 pic standing behind douglas in a ring making douglas look an 1.5 shorter. Bring them together and you will see terrys height comparison. Like i said also douglas having footwear advantage also which would make him even shorter. So i can see terry being 6,6.5. I am not trying to play mind games for the sake of it. I am seeing clearly what i am seeing very clearly. Now if there is anyone that can see what i see and tell.

Daniel reynolds said on 20/Jun/19
Canson: why don,t you look at the pic i have been talking about with terry and john matuszak. Black and white pic with terry wearing sunglasses and john holding up a clentched fist in a pose. John matuszak was 6,8 and terry looked all the same height in that pic. Look up hulk hogan and john matuszak pics and you will see for yourself exactly what i am on about. There is another 1 with john matuszak to the left of mr t as we would see it and terry to the right of mr t. Could anyone post these pics.??? Look these pics up for yourselves fellas. Look them up.

Daniel reynolds said on 20/Jun/19
Terry looks at least 6,6 canson against douglas, he sure does. Douglas had the footwear advantage also. Douglas at close quarters looks up to terrys eye brows and would be less if they had the same footwear. Less as in douglas even slightly shorter again. By the way james buster douglas had a good 6 inches on iron mike tyson if you look at them together in pics and douglas tale of the tape always gave him 6,4 in the ring and in the sun and daily mirror newspapers. Any news papers for that matter. You look up james buster douglas prime height it will give you 6,4. I have known that since he beat mike tyson in feb 1990. Boxers have never had billed heights. I am just trying to explained to you what i have always seen and known by the way. I am not trying to condem you or hate you for it. I have been around. I am 42 now and your 37 my memory goes way back. I can vagily remember certain things myself as a toddler from 1978_1979. Believe me. My memory insn,t clouded. I am not that old just yet.

Daniel reynolds said on 20/Jun/19
Well sadly to say sotiris i think you are completely wrong and there are people that do agree. All the pics you post are to your satisfaction. Do take a massive look at terry standing next to john matuszak a real 6,8 man in a pic i have been pointing out. Terry wearing sunglasses and john holding a clentched fist. A black and white pic and a pic i have mentioned alot about and i have heard nothing back about it.

RP said on 20/Jun/19
@ Sotiris,
Per Mark Canterbury,
Hulk Hogan was 6’5” without shoes & 6’6” & change in his wrestling boots & billed @ 6’7”.
Big John Studd was between 6’6” & 6’6 1/2” without shoes & stood 6’8” & change in his thick wrestling boots & was originally billed @ 6’9”, later was getting billed @ 6’10” by the WWF. He also says that Andre was “supposedly” 7’0” in the 1970’s into the early 1980’s...but, by the time he met him in the late 1980’s he was only “about” 6’10” & could barely stand up straight with a failing back. And was a legit 500 plus lbs in the late 80’s. Yes, Mark is my 2nd cousin. As I’ve mentioned her before. Mark was 6’4” in his prime. He’s only 6’3” now. His son Shane is 6’7.5” and a massive man! Over 300 lbs.

Canson said on 20/Jun/19
@Dan Reynolds: I don’t know how tall Matuszack is or was but if you’re off on his height like you were Rock Taker and Hulk, it explains why you thought he was 6’8”. I will just say that Rob wouldn’t underlist Hulk. If he really thinks he is 6’6.5 then he’d either get 6’6.5 or 6’7”. Rob believes 6’6 max which could mean he drops to 6’5.5 which is reasonable. I personally think he’s 6’6 out of bed 6’5.25 at a low. You see most people here have him around 6’5.5 peak height. That’s believable as is 6’5 flat or up to 6’6 but that’s pushing it. I think best odds are strong 6’5 (6’5.25) to weak 6’6 197cm. Alan32080 met him and said 6’3.5-6’4 but Alan loses height differently rate wise. So if he’s 6’2.75 afternoon Hulk could be 6’3.25. I personally have Hulk today at a 6’3-6’3.5. I don’t think he’s less than 6’3”. But Rob is far more likely to give someone half inch on their listing Before downgrading them. Some guys here are even more than half like Merriman. But hulk is around half or maybe 3/4 while Rock is maybe 1/4-1/2” on his peak

Sotiris Gravas said on 20/Jun/19
YouTube footage of Hogan vs. Studd (1984)... Click Here

Canson said on 18/Jun/19
@Dan Reynolds: I have a peak Andre at 6’11” next to other guys but because you have Taker and Hogan an inch taller than I do I understand your logic. Too bad Hogan was likely not even a full 6’6” at a low and Taker was not above 6’7-6’7.5

Canson said on 18/Jun/19
He does not look 6’6.5 against Buster Douglas, Dan Reynolds. But furthermore, Buster was 6’3.5 at his peak not 6’4”. If you are going to argue the case then go ahead but don’t inflate other people just to make Hogan taller

Sotiris Gravas said on 18/Jun/19
Maybe 6'0" Michael Talbott (listed 6'1" online) w/ 5'6" Phil Collins... Click Here
W/ 5'9" Don Johnson... Click Here
W/ Ronald Reagan (6'0.5" peak)... Click Here
W/ 6'1" Richard Crenna ... Click Here

Talbott w/ Hogan... Click Here

Talbott w/ Hillbilly Jim and Jake "The Snake" Roberts... Click Here
W/ Roberts in loafers... Click Here , Click Here

Talbott w/ Andre the Giant... Click Here

Older Talbott w/ 5'11.25" Honky Tonk Man (2015)... Click Here

Sotiris Gravas said on 18/Jun/19
Video footage of 6'4.5" Bill Fralic and Big John Studd... Click Here

Studd was never the 6'6.5" that Editor Rob lists him as, and Hogan was never the 6'6" that Rob lists him as, let alone 6'6.5" or over.

Daniel reynolds said on 17/Jun/19
Space: if terry in his primen had no space at all then terry would of been a centipede. Very well done space. 6,2.5. Let me turn around. 😂😂😂😂😂😂HAHAHAHEEHEEHEE.i have tears in my eyes with laughter. STOP. TOO FUNNY.

Daniel reynolds said on 17/Jun/19
Foot wear advantage to james buster douglas also. Henry 100% right, making douglas even shorter than the pics look also. 😢😢😢😢

Daniel reynolds said on 17/Jun/19
Comparing heights sight. Terry looks all 6,6.5 against 6,4 james buster douglas 1990. Anyway and forget looking at terry standing behind douglas in a pic that looks 1_1.5 inches in terrys favour. Terry was standing further behind in that pic with james buster douglas making terry look shorter because of that reason also.

Daniel reynolds said on 17/Jun/19
Henry: are you able to post the pic you refer to with terry standing way behind ben davidson because these doubters may not quiet realise what pic you are refering to with the droids. I am with you henry don,t worry. Just wondering henry you have looked at the pic i am seeing with terry next to 6,8 john matuszak. Isn,t it funny henry since i mentioned that pic, nobody has responded about it.

Daniel reynolds said on 17/Jun/19
You know something guys. It seems to me that alot of wrestlers from 2000,s have this thing with wearing lifts. I would so love to know how many inches tiny lister lifts really were. They were so high he looked gothic against terry. Why didn,t he wear high heeled womans shoes at the same time. Im 6,11 he should of said. Pherhaps he was 6,11 in a ring.????

Daniel reynolds said on 17/Jun/19
Sotiris and canson: i have just found out terrys true prime heights fellas. Are you ready 100%. .....hogan 6,0 prime, hulk 6,3 prime and terry 6,9.5 prime. Terry was way bigger than hogan and hulk. ☺☺😊😊😀😀😀😁😁😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. Agreed sotiris and canson, terry was much bigger than hulk and hogan. HEEHEEHEEHEEHAHAHAHA. Yes boys.

Daniel reynolds said on 17/Jun/19
Canson or sotiris: looking at the pic i keep harping on about with terry and john matuszak is appealing. It controdicts doubters. Matuszak was 6,8 bare foot and terry in that pic with john matuszak looks 6,8_6,9. See it for yourself. Terry wrsring sunglasses and matuszak holding up a clentched fist with terry. Embrassing. A great pic. A black and white pic ok. But i am sure you have seen it. Sotiris post that pic when you do find it. People have not replyed back about this photo.

Daniel reynolds said on 17/Jun/19
Canson: Andre for sure would of been 7,0 no less. Looking at him with vince macmahan, terry and the grey haired old boy, terrys mentor, trainer i am not sure wreslemania 1980 on youtube by ringside. Andre was first talking to vince and looked a foot taller almost and andre was looking down on vince speaking to him. So andre would of lost height by looking down and talking to vince. Now vince then would of been 6,1.5_6,2 then. That was a young vince. Terry had a good few inches on vince himself. Vince came to terry nose. So yes. If terry did too many legs drops and was on steroids that fu...d his height in later years then terry did himself no favours at all.

Daniel reynolds said on 17/Jun/19
Henry: try to also look at the pic i mentioned with terry and john matuszak. Terry looking as tall at 6,8. Now as i said john was 6,8. Not 6,8 billed. Henry i see you point based on the pic with john matuszak and terry. Which i also wonder about other wrestlers wearing lifts. Dwayne johnson looked elevated which could be why he looked as tall 2000.

Sotiris Gravas said on 17/Jun/19
@Daniel That was a pretty good impersonation of me, I have to admit.

@Henry All I have to say to you is Click Here

John barrett said on 17/Jun/19
Met Hogan a year ago I say he is around 6'1 bare foot and in foot ware 6'2 - standing next to him his lost a lot of size and height thought it was someone else pretending to be Hogan but it was actually him :(

Canson said on 16/Jun/19
@Dan Reynolds: hulk being listed 6’7” or 6’8 is no different than Andre being listed 7’4 or Taker 6’10”. They’re fake heights. Wrestling is fake and Hogan’s height is fake. He was never that tall nor were any of those three. Andre being even 7’0” in his prime is debatable. He looked max 6’11” in pics. And Taker was 6’7-6’7.5

Canson said on 16/Jun/19
@Cmillz: agreed. absolute most I could see is weak 6’6 peak and that’s a stretch. Really strong 6’5” is where I have him

Henry said on 16/Jun/19
That Ben Davidson photo is LAUGHABLE.
The Hulkster's standing a lightyear behind him. Only people who understand nothing about perspective will be fooled by this attempt to fool people into thinking that the Hulkster was much shorter than he actually was.
For anyone that doesn't understand perspective, just click on this link.
Click Here

Daniel reynolds said on 16/Jun/19
Greg: you don,t have to call me troll or reynolds. Just daniel will do like a lovely cuppa tea. Daniel is my full first and true name guys. I don,t like dan canson or dan reynolds. Sorry daniel is me.😊😊😊😊

Daniel reynolds said on 16/Jun/19
Sotiris gravas: terry would of been no less than 6,6.5 prime😊😊. Sotiris gravas. That is me with a massive smile on my face knowing terry was no less than 6,6.5 bare foot. 😊😊Can you wipe the massive smile off my face.??? Obviously you will never agree. Sid ,lifts eurdy.☺😊😀😁😂. Sotiris i will do an inpersonation of you. HEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEE.

Daniel reynolds said on 16/Jun/19
Yes i am 100% convinced sid eurdy wore lifts. I have just looked at him with big van vador with sid wearing sandals on a beach or resort in a pic. With vador ok wearing trainers but looking only slightly shorter.

Daniel reynolds said on 16/Jun/19
Karl mar: as i said to sotiris gravas terry never wore lifts. Against stallone he didn,t need to because guys wear lifts to gain a height advantage over a guy their own height. If you look at big john studd he wore lifts against terry to gain a height advantage and tony tiny lister also looked taller than terry because he wore lifts. If terry did wear lifts he wouldn,t of looked shorter than these 2 guys. I have never seen any evidence of him wearing lifts.

Daniel reynolds said on 16/Jun/19
Johan_185cm: yes jamescbuster douglas would of been 6,4 1990 when he beat mike tyson. If you look at the tale of his tape and he towered tyson by a good 6 inches if you lookat pics of them 2. That looks 6 inches to me.

Daniel reynolds said on 16/Jun/19
Space: i came across a comment you posted to me on 29 april. You said hogan was 6,2.5 in late 90,s and he was never anymore than that alone with the rock and goldberg. Terry in 1999 was 6,5 for a start nit 6,2.5 and for you to tell me hogan was never over 6,2.5 then you must be in space yourself. What planet are you on in space, space. Its a comment you posted i have only just come across now. But read it. I have been told i am inflating terrys prime height. What the F is this. Well i am glad i don,t think like you.

Daniel reynolds said on 16/Jun/19
Evander holyfield was 6,2_6,2.5 1991 not 6,1. I have always known him to be a good 6,2. I like the way you use that pic with ben davidson and terry to try and say 6,5. But john matuszak was ben davidsosns height 6,8 and terry looks the same height to me.

Sotiris Gravas said on 15/Jun/19
Hulk Hogan in cowboy boots (standing as straight as humanly possible) w/ Ben Davidson (listed 6'8") in cowboy boots/NOT standing straight, Juluis J. Carry III (listed as 6'5" online), and Stephanie Faracy (listed as 5'5" online) from the 1984 TV movie "Goldie and the Bears"... Click Here And here (not standing straight)... Click Here

Davidson and 5'8.75" Tony Curtis... Click Here

Davidson w/ a dude (Joe Ortiz)... Click Here
Ortiz and 6'1 7/8" Marcus Allen... Click Here
Ortiz w/ 6'1" OJ Simpson Click Here
Davidson w/ 6'2" Elliott Gould (1970)... Click Here

Davidson from the 1991 movie "Necessary Roughness"... Click Here He's next to Dick Butkus (listed 6'3") and 6'1" Evander Holyfield. The tall guy on the far right is Ed "Too Tall" Jones (listed 6'9"). Height-loss Hogan and height-loss Jones (2016)... Click Here

Jones (standing on a lower level) w/ 6'1.5" William Perry (1986)... Click Here
Hogan w/ Perry (1986)... Click Here Hogan footwear... Click Here

Davidson w/ 6'1.5" James Earl Jones and 6'3" (not 6'5") Sven-Ole Thorsen from "Conan" (1982):
Click Here

Daniel reynolds said on 15/Jun/19
Canson: look i try not to make excuses seriously. I first said 6,7 anyway months ago and i have been saying that since 1984, not yesterday. I knew then terry would of been his listed height 2.01 m. Like i did say before also look up anyones listed height. Lets look at sugar ray robinson for example, when you google his height it gives you sugar ray robinson 5,11/1.80m. Elvis presley 5,11.5/6,0/1.82m. So are these heights of elvis and sugar ray robinson false.???

Henry said on 15/Jun/19
The Hulkster's mother probably used a step ladder so he was actually much much taller than measured because her pen was at an extremely downward angle.

viper said on 14/Jun/19
When I met 6-3 Lin Dawson he felt a little taller than me and I'm 6-3.

When I met 6-3 Bruce Smith I felt a little taller.

Can't explain it and it happens with a 6-3 co-worker of mine. Sometimes I feel a little taller than him and others he feels a little taller than me.

With that said 6-3 is still hard for me to believe

cmillzz said on 14/Jun/19
Peak height was 6’5.5” at most.

Canson said on 14/Jun/19
@Dan Reynolds: I respect you but you sure do make a bunch of excuses to support Hulk being 6’7” peak

Daniel reynolds said on 14/Jun/19
Alan 32080: for terrys mum to of measured terry she would of had to stand on a chair or stall anyway. If she measured him numerous times then i don,t think she would of made the same mistake twice if she did even make a mistake anyway. Because she would of been standing as tall if not talking on a chair.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/Jun/19
Fellas look up sting who as we all know was 6,2 v big van vador in a match up 1992, i don,t know if it was RAW or smackdown then. It could well of been wrestlemania 1992 anyway. I did come across a pic with these 2 fellas in a ring in a face off pic with big van vador who looked down on sting by about 2_2.5 inches in vadors favour. So with sting being 6,2 bare foot. But then you can look up big van vador against terry in 1994. Terry has the same height advantage over van vador as vador did with sting. I have looked that up. You fellas if you do your researching which is as easy as saying 1_2_3. Will see then that terry was more than 2.5 inches taller than sting.

Jimbo hopper said on 13/Jun/19
Funny how when Sid(6-7) joined wwf hogan was still being billed at 6-8 lol. WWF at one point claimed Sid at 6-10 haha. 1.5 or 2” different from Sid. Hogan was a 6-5 ish wrestler. Now he’s struggling with 6-3.

Alan32080 said on 13/Jun/19
Between 6’3”-6’4” today and 6’5.5”-6’6” prime. My theory on the mom measuring thing is she is shorter so her pencil would be angled up making a mark while on his head so with a slight angle there’s your 6’7” on a 6’6”-6’5.5” person. Just my opinion. I’ve met him several times and become friends with one of his business partners who we meet to shoot with occasionally. Hulk comes sometimes and from my most resent interaction which was 3 weeks ago he’s still taller than me. I’m 6’3”. Feels noticeable but maybe 3/4”-1” max when we have been around each other in the mornings and a little Less in afternoon visits. One afternoon after shooting we went to his house and ate sushi on his back patio. None of us had shoes on. That was around 2 and he was still taller than me by a good 3/4” so he’s still in that 6’3.5”-6’4” range now. He doesn’t stand up straight hardly so it’s really hard to judge height and I’ve noticed he tries to adjust his posture to whoever he’s talking to. I think that’s just the celebrity in him to make that person feel important. Great guy tho. God fearing and humble.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/Jun/19
Henry: thanks alot for your friendly advice. Hearing that means alot. The problem is i am speaking way to much and i do make a nusense of myself at times with the things i come out with i admit. My dad told me years ago when i was about 11 in 1988 there about, when i was in a pub with my dad having a coke he was on the pints of tennents xxx, my dad said to me anyone thats talks way too much is full of e. He was referring to people in pubs that have had a few to drink that would come over to your table and anoy you by ramblin on too much. Thats alot like me i guess on this sight. The difference is this sight gives me the privilage to post my thoughts on a heroes height which isn,t full of e from me neither and i am not on the piss when i post my messages. Henry as i have asked. Please look up some pics of terry and john matuszak and try and post the pic i am seeing. This will prove your point to everyone about terry being 6,8_6,9 prime and i see your point loud and clear when you do mention 6,9. People may laugh. Well they can laugh all they want. Laughing hyenas like greg. Oh sorry, not greg. whats your name.???

Daniel reynolds said on 13/Jun/19
Sorry i said shakin hands. I must be nuts. I meant side by side the 2 of them hogan and john matuszak posing to the camera. Hogan wearing sunglasses of course and john matuszak holding up a clentched fist. A black and white pic. The first pic you see when you do look up hulk hogan and john matuszak pics. I did try posting the pics earlier. Just having a bit of trouble. But all take a look. Because to my suprise hogan does look 6,8_6,9 against a guy who was 6,8. When you guys do look up the pics i am talking about then hopefully you will all see my point and you guys will be scratching your heads. Trust me. Henry and ronster would know already so i don,t need to convince these guys. These 2 fellas and myself are trying to convince you doubters.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/Jun/19
My apologies. John matuszak wasn,t called chunk in goonies.😂😂😂😂😂😂. It has been a long time since i saw that film. He was called sloth. But he was 6,8 no less. Terry looks 6,8_6,9. I see henrys point about 6,8_6,9.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/Jun/19
a big black and white pic you come to face right in front your eyes. the very first pic you see with terry wearing sunglasses and john matuszak doing a big clenched fist posing for the camera imbrassing, i have tried uploading the pic myself but having trouble doing so.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/Jun/19
Canson: i will argue your message as you expected. Sorry but i know terry would of topped 6,8 with 2 inch boots. Yes of course. Now if terry as i am looking at with pics of john matuszak a true 6,8 man with terry looking same height or slightly taller. Look it up for yourself. I found these pics just by typing in on my laptop hulk hogan and john matuszak pics and you will see for yourself terry looks 6,8_6,9. I have never seen these pics before, but it did put a massive smile on my face canson. I thinking yes terry. Henry and ronster may well of come across these pics before. But anyone can look them up just by the touch of a button. Anyone willing to post the pics i am looking at. Doubters. Yes, no, maybe, bollocks.???

Kal Mar said on 13/Jun/19
Hogan was 6ft 5 in his prime (70s and 80s), but shrunk to 6ft 3.5 by 2003. He may have looked 6ft 6 or 7 in the 70s and early 80s because he wore lifts (Rocky III).

Daniel reynolds said on 12/Jun/19
Canson: i am glad you agree with me. Some people need to know terry was no short man in his prime. Some kids would look at terry today and say he,s not that tall. Well go back 40 years and you kids will see the difference for yourselves. Obviously when i say kids i mean teenagers.

Daniel reynolds said on 12/Jun/19
Gravas: i am no troll pal, just a fan like everyone else. If i,m a troll then you must be an even bigger 1 yourself because you have posted far more comments than me and i don,t think my comments are any more ridiculous than yours anyway.

Canson said on 12/Jun/19
@Dan Reynolds: I doubt he was ever 6’8” in any footwear. You may be able to argue that he would just touch 6’8” or over in thick boots out of bed (2” boots). Otherwise 6’7” range in thick boots. I don’t rule out 6’5.5 at a low barefoot but my argument would be 6’5.25 at a low

Daniel reynolds said on 12/Jun/19
What may look like 4 inches between terry and vince 1980 is most likely 6_7 inches instead. I mentioned comparing heights. What does look like 2 inches is most likely 3_3.5. You say terry had 2.5 inches on sting. I would say more. The bigger the man the more inches your looking at there. Terry 1995 had shrunk anyway compared to 1980. Reolc said im keep ramblin about terrys height 1970,s late. I admit i am. But what i am trying to do is try to get you guys to see what i am seeing. Roelc mentioned comparing ben davidson and terry and posted a pic. But i have seen terry in a couple of pics with ben looking the same height as ben. John matuszak as i said was 6,8 which he was indeed terry looking same height side by side. Roelc said terry was never 6,7 prime. Well he really can,t say that because he never met him in his prime and has never come across terrys height measurements prime. It doesn,t matter what doubters tell me now. I made my mind up years ago and i was convinced then and don,t worry canson, my mind isn,t clouded from the past.

Daniel reynolds said on 12/Jun/19
Another thing doubters please whatch youtube with andre the giant firstly talking to vince macmahan and then terry comes into the footage with his trainer. I think his trainer. The fella with grey hair. Now how talldid andre look to vince F...in hell.this is wrestlemania 1980 i am looking at and vince then was 6,1.5 no question. He not that height now. But if you look at terry compared to vince he had a good 6_7 inches on vince himself. So i see henrys point and i would agree with henry. Andre and terry would of been their respected heights.

Daniel reynolds said on 12/Jun/19
Sotiris gravas: or what ever you call yourself, jack the lad, i don,t know. I have watched WWF wrestling since 1980,s and just to let you know, i have never seen terry wearing internal lifts in his boots, because he never wore lifts anyway. I have never seen any evidence of it. I may well of mentioned this to you before because you made a comment like if hogan was 6,8 then its thank goodness for internal lifts. No. Other guys did wear lifts against terry like the great man himself tony tiny lister and big john studd. Oh and by the way, sid eurdy may well of worn lifts himself and i say that simply because his stance did look elevated because i believe terry would of been exactly the same height as sid eurdy and big john studd in his prime. You mentioned terrys 1.25 boot. Well that was all he wore. So if you ever wondered why he looked as big then its simply just his height. Other guys wore elevators to gain a height advantage over terry. Terry never needed lifts anyway, he was tall enough.

Daniel reynolds said on 11/Jun/19
Honestly guys, type in hulk hogan and john matuszak pics and the first pic you see is the pic im talking about. Does anyone dare the post the pics i am talking about. Take a look for yourselves. Ronster and henry if you guys are reading this take a look and you 2 guys will get what i am seeing. I see your points very well.

Daniel reynolds said on 11/Jun/19
The pics henry posted are pics i am sure that others have seen before and they are interesting. But what i have found interesting and pherhaps henry if he is reading this from me is pics i haven,t seen before with terry and john matuszak who was 6,8 standing side by side shaking hands and terry infact looked an inch taller. John matuszak as we all should know was in the goonies 1985, chunk was his name in that film. But i honestly see and agree with henry. If you doubters can type in hulk hogan and john matuszak pics and you guys will see for yourselves a pic with terry and john matuszak side by side shaking hands terry actually looking an 1 taller. If henry is reading he can post the pic himself and that will show you doubters right. People always seem to go on about pics with ben davidson and terry with ben looking taller. But something has to be wrong there and it probably isn,t the height difference, bcause i have seen a pic where terry looks the same height as ben davidson. John matuszak was indeed 6,8 100% fact by the way. The same height as ben davidson. So my point is this, pics don,t always tell the truth, because john matuszak was 6,8 like ben davidson. With terry looking the same height as john matuszak or slightly taller then who is to say terry wasn,t infact 6,8_6,9. I wouldn,t be suprised at all. Henry has obviously found out some way, some how terry was 6,8_6,9 prine and doubters will laugh, but henry would of found out for himself and you guys probably haven,t looked into it.

Daniel reynolds said on 11/Jun/19
Dan trojan: soltiris gravas was the 1 who mentioned my mental state of mind first not me. He was the 1 who spoke. There is F all wrong with my mental state of mind. He was the 1 who stupidly called himself greg on a monday and tuesday a good while ago. Now after many weeks pass he then says he was joking about greg. So who,s being silly then.??? Now you want to take the piss. Forget it, i have got bags of character. I am a humerous sort of fella that can take the piss back also.

Daniel reynolds said on 11/Jun/19
Canson: i will put it like this though, terry would of been 6,8 with thick soled trainers out in public in 79. I think terry would of just tipped 6,8.

RONSTER said on 11/Jun/19
RP, it is not that Hall requires an downgrade like some on here try to do for everyone that has a picture with Hogan proving he is still over 6'4"barefoot when he stands straight, it is that Hogan's current height needs to be adjusted. It will however take Rob getting an in person picture with Hogan and to see him up close for himself to change that I would expect. Hogan said 6'7" in his late 20's (so perhaps 6'6.5" rounded up by mom but no less), and he said himself in the early 2000's when he went to see his mom she measured him for fun and he was down to 6'4" due to multiple knee and hip surgeries where they shaved and removed bone to insert his replacement knees and hips. This is in addition to the FACT that his spine was and still is to a large extent bent like a J at the bottom from 20 plus years of doing that leg drop (yes steroids did not help either). There are pictures to prove the curve of his spine and all the procedures he has had which along with normal height loss of a 65 year old easily amounts to loosing 3 inches of height. Rob has him at 6'6" peak which is in the right ballpark, he was not the 6'8" listed of course but was not that far off either.

Canson said on 11/Jun/19
@Ninja: Rob explained a while back that looking down like he does makes it appear in the mugshot as he is taller than he is next to the lines. But if he measured 6’4 5/8 he’s not taller than that in bare stockings

Canson said on 11/Jun/19
@Ninja: Rob explained a while back that looking down like he does makes it appear in the mugshot as he is taller than he is next to the lines

Canson said on 11/Jun/19
@Dan Reynolds: I agree at their peaks Hogan would’ve edged Barkley. The pics of the two are after Hogan began losing height

Sotiris Gravas said on 11/Jun/19
@Troll reynolds For me to hurt your feelings would imply you're capable of human emotion -- which I seriously doubt. Sociopaths don't have feelings. And crazy ppl don't know they're crazy, 100% fact, no question... Click Here

Henry said on 10/Jun/19
Daniel reynolds, don't let these height reducers get to you. Deep down they know they're wrong and that's why they are personally attacking you and anyone else who dares speak the truth.
Don't stoop to their level. Take the moral high ground and just keep telling the truth.

NINJA said on 10/Jun/19
Google Charles Barkley's mugshot. I am honestly wanting to know how and why his height looks to be so all over the place. I am sure perspective of the camera taking the photo would have something to do with it, but to be measured at 6'4-5/8", look at least 6'5" or more in comparative photos with other basketball players, but look 6'7" at his shortest in the mugshots is confusing to me. Were his mugshots in super tall boots? Not likely. Its confusing to me.

Daniel reynolds said on 10/Jun/19
Greg: matrix is PG 13. watching PG,s it suits you like a sunday best. Keep posting you donald duck cartoon comments about terrys true prime height. Thats the very way you know best. Or better still on terrys sight here keep talking about the heights of MJ charles barkeley

Public Enemy said on 10/Jun/19
Peak 198 cm
Current 192 cm

Daniel reynolds said on 10/Jun/19
Greg: very well done. Thats me in the matrix. You have hurt my feelings.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Jimbo hopper said on 10/Jun/19
6-5 peak. WWF madness as usual 6-8 claim.

Johan 185 cm said on 10/Jun/19
He was never his 6'8" billed height in WWF. The man himself claims he used to be 6'7" and shrunk, or are you guys calling him a liar now?

He was max Rob's listing of 6'6 flat but I can see why some think 6'5". I still believe 6'5.5" and while some people have him at 6'4" range peak, he did at one time measure that during the late 90's so they aren't wrong in a way.

6'3" today.

Henry said on 9/Jun/19
Shaq's sneakers have much thicker soles than normal sneakers. Some of they sneakers of guys like Boban and Shaq may even be custom made.
Since the shoes are so big, they'd look just silly with soles the thickness of regular sneakers. You can see that Shaq's sneakers give him a much bigger lift than Big Show's boots. Shaq is either at least 7'1" barefoot or his sneakers have soles that are so thick that it gives him the appearance of being over 7'1" barefoot in his sneakers.

RP said on 9/Jun/19
@ Johan 185cm
Hogan is actually looking taller than Hall in that recent NWO reunion photo. He looks 1/4” taller than Hall. So, there is NOoooooo Way Scott Hall is 6’4” these days. Rob, Scott Hall needs a current height down grade.

Daniel reynolds said on 9/Jun/19
Vegas: when i say terry was 6,5 that would of been 2000 when he wasn,t in his prime. 1977_early 80,s terry would of stood 6,6.5 6,6 anyway no less.

Daniel reynolds said on 9/Jun/19
Vegas: another thing to. When you look at terry in some pics he looks shorter than he would normally be for what ever reason and in other pics terry would look taller at times but i came across a pic with him and andre and terry looked the same height.a tilted angle pic and the pic alot shorter than both terry and andre. So to answer your question vegas its almosr impossible to prove that terry was charles barkeleys height. Because in his prime terry was taller anyway 100% fact. If your talking 2000 then terry was 6,5. But like i have said too often he was a good 6,6_6,6.5 prime 100% fact.

Daniel reynolds said on 9/Jun/19
Vegas: let me daniel tell you that terry was taller than charles barkeley 100% in his prime terry as i have stated would of been 6,6.5 at least 6,6 anyway. Charles barkeley and i agree with canson would of been 6,4.5 prime. You won,t agree with me i know but hardly anyone does so i really don,t care if you do or don,t to be perfectly honest.

Daniel reynolds said on 8/Jun/19
Henry: a very big thumbs up for you and i respect your claim. I have just seen some pics i have never seen before with john matuszak with terry hulk hogan side by side. Now with john matuszak being 6,8, terry looks exactly same height in pics i am looking at. Wow. So point taken and very well done indeed henry. 👍👍

Sotiris Gravas said on 8/Jun/19
This is what Daniel "Troll" Reynolds looks like as he cracks under the pressure of being exposed as the troll that he is... Click Here

@Troll Never confuse me and Neo for Agent Smith (even though Hugo Weaving and I share a birthday).

RP said on 8/Jun/19
@ Canson, true...NBA Combine measurements have always been very fishy! They are not shown on live television, like The NFL Network covers the NFL Combine. And, I’m still trying to figure out how some guys are 1.75” to 2” taller in sneakers, than they are barefoot. My work boots (which are logger style boots) don’t even give me 2”! They only give me 1.75” go check out Kevin Durant’s Combine year listings. Some fella was a full 2” taller in sneakers than he was barefoot! That’s impossible without lifts! So, these NBA Combine measurements can’t be that accurate. And at this year’s Combine, a few guys were 1.75” taller in sneakers, than they were barefoot. I’m calling hogwash! To confirm...I just measured myself barefoot & in different kinds of footwear. Measurements were taken 6 hours out of bed @ 12:45 PM
Barefoot: 5’10 7/8” (180 cm)
Nike Shocks #1: 6’0”
Nike Shocks#2: 6’0 1/8”
Skechers casual Logger Boots: 6’0 1/2”
Georgia work boots(logger style): 6’0 5/8”
Western Style Cowboy Boots: 6’0 3/4”
So, again...how are these NBA guys gaining anywhere from 1.6” to 2” from basketball sneakers?

Canson said on 8/Jun/19
@Dan Reynolds: it is more ridiculous to say he was 6’8”. At least at some point in his life he was 6’4.5 but he was never 6’8”.

Daniel reynolds said on 8/Jun/19
John matuzak was 6,8. Now when you look at him standing in pics with mr t, i really see no difference in height as apposed to seeing terry standing with mr t.

Henry said on 8/Jun/19
This is a fantastic site with tons of great Hulkster height photos that newbies may not have seen before.
Click Here

Dan Trojan said on 7/Jun/19
Daniel reynolds i think it's funny you keep calling him greg even though clearly he's stated that's not his name when he said it he was clearly joking and apparently you didn't get it so yeah kinda in a way it does even make me wonder about your mental state

Johan 185 cm said on 7/Jun/19
Click Here

Can pull off a good 6'3" next to Nash and Hall. Its funny how their shrinkage seems to be the same throughtout the years with Hogan having slightly more loss.

Canson said on 7/Jun/19
@Sotiris: I bet Baylor was really only 6’4” range peak. He’s probably shrunken today

Canson said on 7/Jun/19
@Sotiris: Wade can look all over the place depending on the picture. But I’ve watched him play up close before when they played the Wizards and it’s clear that Beal is a little taller as were other guys such as DeShawn Stevenson etc. wade can look close to his listed height with Lebron then at times can look 6’2”. But of course most people here make an excuse for the 6’2” picture being “poor” but not the ones where he looks closer to his pre draft height despite some of the clear issues with some of those pics. This has happened with several people on the site. But I think the answer lies in between. Wade is slightly taller than Russell Westbrook or Jason Kidd but not as tall as Beal or Harden. Meaning he’s likely between 6’2.5-6’3 (6’2,75) or he’s right at 6’3” best case at a low. They wouldn’t say he’s 6’4” on a good day or that he’s 6’3” at best according to Lebron and a few others if he’s really close to 6’4”

Canson said on 7/Jun/19
@Sotiris: Wade can look all over the place depending on the picture. But I’ve watched him play up close before when they played the Wizards and it’s clear that Beal is a little taller as were other guys such as DeShawn Stevenson etc. wade can look close to his listed height with Lebron then at times can look 6’2”. But of course most people here make an excuse for the 6’2” picture being “poor” but not the ones where he looks closer to his pre draft height despite some of the clear issues with some of those pics. I think the answer lies in between. Wade is slightly taller than Russell Westbrook or Jason Kidd but not as tall as Beal or Harden. Meaning he’s likely between 6’2.5-6’3 (6’2,75) or he’s right at 6’3” best case at a low. They wouldn’t say he’s 6’4” on a good day or that he’s 6’3” at best according to Lebron and a few others if he’s really close to 6’4”

Canson said on 7/Jun/19
@RP: I actually don’t think that Wade has lost any height at all. Lebron said before 6’3” at best. And Spoelstra and Otis Smith said he’s 6’4” on a good day. A guy measuring 6’3.75 legitimately wouldn’t ever be classified as that. But The NBA doesn’t have 1/8” increments so it is very possible that Wade could’ve been at a morning height of 6’3.5 or a mm over and gotten that. I use morning height loosely as that could also mean he wasn’t on his feet prior to measuring but could’ve been later in the day because other players from that class look closer to their heights in person such as Melo and Keith Bogans. The absolute best I could buy is 6’3” flat peak at a low

@Vegas: The pic with Harden and Wade is no worse (it’s actually a better pic) than your pic with The Rock and Ndamukong Suh that you used to try to say that Suh was only an inch taller than the Rock, but when it was pointed out that there’s a clearly larger difference, remember that you took exception with the photo? As for the difference with Wade/Harden, that’s about how they would look as you are getting the angle from the side of them and Harden is clearly taller. So camera angle is not an issue. Harden’s Head is clearly higher than Wade’s regardless of the camera angle. It’s only about 2cm max

And If we all look closely Bradley Beal is also taller than Wade as well and they’re next to each other. Also if you look at Wade/Barkley vs Harden/Barkley in their commercials, it’s clear that Barkley has less on Harden than he does on Wade. When we talk about Strahan and Wade, yes he doesn’t look 6’2” there but I never said he was 6’2”. I said 6’3” at best or weak 6’3” and in that video he doesn’t look it. But you act is if the video is superior to everything else. Doesn’t look to me as if Strahan is standing up straight or shall I say I don’t know if he is. But in the pics with Harden/Wade and Wade/Beal it’s clear that they all are and they’re on the court. Remember that Ray Allen also edges Wade and he’s at most 6’4”. Strahan and Barkley are very close in height in their pictures together so it means that Strahan is taller than Wade

As for Barkley/Hogan, you put words in my mouth just as you did when you said that I was “accusing you of copping out”. I didn’t say Barkley had a footwear advantage on Hogan. What I said was that in the pics universally posted on this site (Celebheights), people use pics of Barkley being closer to the camera regularly then when a pic depicting his actual height is posted, it’s an excuse about it. And when I mentioned footwear, what I meant is in pics with celebrities as a whole, it wouldn’t surprise me if Barkley had thicker footwear in some of those pics. I didn’t say anything about the pics with Hogan. And notice how I mentioned a peak Hogan. That was not a peak Hogan with Barkley. As for the “Copping out” that you accused me of saying about you, I didn’t say that, again. But remember on the Rock’s page you also accused me of “Believing what I want to believe” all because Christian, Viper, I, and others didn’t agree with you and your estimates. we clearly said that your pics with Rock and Suh where Suh is favored, are not good

Canson said on 7/Jun/19
@RP: I actually don’t think that Wade has lost any height at all. The NBA doesn’t have 1/8” increments so it is very possible that Wade could’ve been at a morning height of 6’3.5 or a mm over and gotten that. The absolute best I could buy is 6’3” flat peak at a low

@Vegas: The pic with Harden and Wade is no worse (it’s actually a better pic) than your pic with The Rock and Ndamukong Suh that you used to try to say that Suh was only an inch taller than the Rock, but when it was pointed out that there’s a clearly larger difference, remember that you took exception with the photo? As for the difference with Wade/Harden, that’s about how they would look as you are getting the angle from the side of them and Harden is clearly taller. If we all look closely Bradley Beal is also taller than Wade. Also if you look at Wade/Barkley vs Harden/Barkley in their commercials, it’s clear that Barkley has less on Harden than he does on Wade

Daniel reynolds said on 6/Jun/19
Giant baba was 6,10.

Daniel reynolds said on 6/Jun/19
Greg: i am starting to see a few cracks in you. When you mentioned my mental state of mind i have just got bags of character. You have never met me before. But every message you post is seeming and sounding very mickey mousey or donald duck a bit like looney tunes cartoonish and you yourself are starting to sound like a 10 year old. Just seeing your messages and the way you put them. It,s like we are on earth, but let me put you on cartoon land. Oh greg the road runner, ME ME. This situation is a bit like that. Give me 5.😂😂😂😂.

Vegas' said on 6/Jun/19
Canson, does Wade look 6'2 range on video with Strahan..yes or no.

Harden is closer to camera, those type of photos are easy to skew difference. I am not going to go through debating a million photos of Wade with various people on this page as it wouldn't be fair to those who want to discuss Hulk Hogan not D Wade. You are simply going to have to come up with much stronger evidence than he said/she said or photos where both guys are exactly in same spot or same erect stance to convince me NBA mis-measured by upwards of an inch.

Re Barkley and Hogan. Well there isn't a video of either together so best we can do in that situation is compare. I have been a pro wrestling fan since the early 80s (started by watching the UK stuff then WWE circa 86). Point being I have never seen Hogan look as tall in-ring as Barkley looked in that 95 clip. So far I have seen one person say Gene lost height by 95 (how exactly, he wasn't a wrestler, he didn't have neck surgery like Bobby Heenan) and that Barkley's footwear could be issue. I am no expert on footwear but they look pretty normal to me.

RP said on 6/Jun/19
Canson,
Wade was most likely 6’3 3/4” peak/prime morning barefoot height...and 6’3 3/8”-ish afternoon height. And is now 6’3 3/8” morning barefoot & 6’3” to 6’2 7/8” afternoon/evening. At least that’s how it looks over the past 2-3 years...IMO

Canson said on 6/Jun/19
Here’s another pic of Harden (6’3.5 max) 6’4 morning height in front of Wade and is taller. Wade struggles at 6’3 let alone 6’3.75. Looks 190cm

Click Here

Canson said on 6/Jun/19
@Vegas: I didn’t accuse you of copping out. I said that that is a cop out to say that the measurement isn’t valid and you aren’t the only one on this site who said that. But all I said is common sense is that they measured Barkley at the Olympics. I highly doubt that they would publicize such a specific measurement if it is not an actual measurement. It’s a bit weird as well to say that the measurement isn’t accurate yet to say that someone’s combine measurement is and Rob even mentioned handshake deals etc. when someone’s future is at stake and money on the line I would expect that one to be embellished. in addition, Shawne Merriman and Kyler Murray’s obviously aren’t accurate measurements of either guy. All I’m saying is his Olympic measurement adds up with how his peers and coaches and analysts have pegged Barkley during his career. As far as Hogan and Barkley, I don’t see pics of them when Hogan was in his true prime in the early 80s or late 70s. If Hogan really was 6’5” or over he was taller than a guy who only measured in at 6’4 5/8 or even if we used Rob’s measurement of 6’4 7/8 (if anything that is the one I question because it came from a reporter who likely heard something third party and it’s the only reference I’ve seen of it). I’ve seen the 6’4 5/8” in Sports Illustrated captioned. Now I don’t rule out Barkley possibly wearing some thicker footwear in some pics he’s in off the court where he can appear taller in addition to him clearly having camera advantage in several pics people have posted here. And while we are on the subject of Wade, here he is with 6’3” range Bradley Beal. Assuming that the 6’3.25 height is not his morning height and I don’t think it is as he looks 6’3” range to others who have met him but he’s clearly taller than Wade. It’s likely that Beal has grown a smidge since his draft as he would’ve only come out around 6’2.5-6’3 himself if he measures 6’3.25 in the early morning.

Click Here

Here is Wade being referred to as 6’4 on a great day. A guy who is really 6’3.75 barefoot and 6’4.75 in sneakers is not 6’4” on a great day. Not even a good day, a great day. He obviously isn’t as tall as advertised. Otis Smith Orlando’s GM and his own head coach Erik Spoelstra also said that he’s 6’4 on a good day and have obviously spent time around him to tell. A guy who measures 6’3.75 will still look 6’4”. Also Lebron who is his best friend said that he’s 6’3” max. He really looks a weak 6’3” next to Beal and to other players in the league but if he somehow managed 6’3” afternoon height it’s likely that the 6’3.75 is a result of an early measurement (rounded up likely from around 6’3.5) or that he was not on his feet prior to measuring

Click Here

Here he says 6’3, 6’4 on a good day. Again a 6’3.75 guy doesn’t say that.

Click Here

Sotiris Gravas said on 6/Jun/19
@Vegas and Canson 5'11" Rick Ross and Dwyane Wade... Click Here

Daniel reynolds said on 6/Jun/19
Greg: 1 thing i urge you to stop doing is looking at terry 1995_2000,s. I have repeated many times terry 1977 was taller than 1995. You can,t tell me seriously that terry couldn,t of lost a 1-1.5 inch between 1977_2000. That is very realistic. In 1999 he was 6,5. In 1992 he was 6,5.5 probably 6,6 then and go back to his debute, 6,6_6,6.5 seems bang on target to me.

Daniel reynolds said on 6/Jun/19
Well done henry, you obviously have found out how tall terry really was prime and alot of people will laugh at you but i won,t. If he was as tall as you say then i wouldn,t of believed it before. I respect your stated height. Pherhaps you could prove to greg terry stood 6,9, Yet greg wants to take the piss out of me when i can do it to him also. Ronster is 100% right. Saying hogan was 6,8 is no more rediculous than saying he was 6,4.5.

Daniel reynolds said on 6/Jun/19
Greg: you can laugh all you want. I am taking the piss and you fell for it. But seriously terry did stand a good 4_4.5 inches taller than ed leslie who was 6,2 100% bang on. Now if you can,t see that then you must be blind. You can never see what i am pointing out. Or you just don,t want to notice my points of view.

Big ed said on 5/Jun/19
When you see Hogan with 6'2 warrior nearly 6'6" earthquake and 6'7" Sid you'd have to put him at 6'5 peak possibly 6'5.5" only really looked 6'6 with with Jake the snake and Andre. Giant Baba looked to have close to 4" on him aswell and Baba would struggle with 6'9"

Canson said on 5/Jun/19
@Sotiris: I think 6’4.5 peak maybe 6’4 5/8 for Barkley like he measured. 6’4.75 a couple hours earlier and over 6’5 by a bit out of bes

Sotiris Gravas said on 5/Jun/19
Our good friend and resident height expert, Daniel reynolds (AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHA), said Hogan was a good 4.5" taller than a 6'2" Brutus Beefcake in the late '70s.

Here's Hogan w/ Beefcake in 1979... Click Here

And Hogan/Beefcake in 1989... Click Here

Reynolds, if you're reading this, my name is Bob now.

Just a reminder... this is what Reynolds said about Vitali Klitschko on his page (19/Apr/19), but obviously wants to take it back now, for obvious reasons:

"But i would know vitali was ft6,11 no question needed. I have watched other vitali fights but for me he was ft6,11. I don,t care what anyone says or trys to prove. I know fact.!!"

There you have it, ladies and gentlemen. Reynolds knows fact. Enough said.

Sotiris Gravas said on 4/Jun/19
6'3.5" Chevy Chase w/ 58-year-old Tommy Lasorda (5'9" peak) in 1985... Click Here , Click Here , Click Here

Chevy and 6'4.5" James Avery (1985)... Click Here

Hogan and Lasorda from WrestleMania 2 (1986)... Click Here

Chevy and Kareem (1985)... Click Here , Click Here

Hogan and Shaq... Click Here , Click Here , Click Here

Kareem was 7'1.75" peak height. Shaq was never more than 7'0" peak.

@Reynolds This is what a real 6'7" guy (Magic) looks like next to a height-loss Lasorda (2015):
Click Here Also, AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAAHHA... anyways, you get it...

Vegas' said on 4/Jun/19
Canson this site is for entertainment purposes not serious discussion so accusing me of copping out is a bit weird.

Again Wade measurement stats are up in the official NBA site, others you listed are not. You are also referring to third party meetings or he said/she said. I have been on here long enough to realize how poor in person estimations often are even things like Tussauds waxworks where I have seen people estimate (incorrectly) the same waxworks I and my friends have stood next to by 2-3 inches and these are people obsessed with height enough to post on a site like this.

You said Hogan was taller at peak than Barkley yet you haven't posted any video comparison to back up that statement yet!

Back to Wade, here he is on video next to Michael Strahan around 6 minute mark Click Here

Sotiris Gravas said on 4/Jun/19
A nice JT composite pic of Andre vs Elgin Baylor (listed 6'5")... Click Here

Hogan and Andre (1979)... Click Here

P.S. This is what a real 6'8' looks like when compared to Andre, by way of James Worthy:
Click Here

6'7" Magic w/ Baylor (2014)... Click Here

Henry said on 4/Jun/19
Prime barefoot Hulk Hogan was close to 6'9". It has been proven time and time again. There's no reason to even argue with these haters who are very short themselves and feel better about themselves by trying to greatly underestimate the height of great men like Hulk and Andre.

Daniel reynolds said on 4/Jun/19
Greg: i was just having a huge laugh to myself when i posted vital standing 6,11 don,t worry about that. I was just having a big craic in posted my claim there. Vitali is 6,7 i always knew that. But it has drawn some laughter.😂😂😂😂 I say great. 6,11 was just a massive joke lol nothing i didn,t know already and you told me your name was greg on a monday and tuesday. So if it isn,t then what on earth is your real name then.???

Daniel reynolds said on 4/Jun/19
Greg: the first time i read this sight on terrys height, i was shocked to of found that people give terry a less than 6,5 prime. I had to intervene and post what i really thought and thats where my debate has escalated, because i know full well myself terry was never less than a 6,6 prime legend and i still stand by that and always will. When you say 6,4.5 prime, im scratching my head thinking WHAT THE F YOU MUST BE F BUZZING. thats my response and to anyone that thinks that. Obviously i am taking terry 1977 6,6_6,6.5 then_and 6,5 2000. Thats not going over the top. That is very respectful and 150% honest. There is nothing silly with that is there??. Just so you know i don,t need mental health assistance. That is going a step too far now. I just got too excited in trying to prove my point thats all which is why i called you a total F prat. I am being deadly serious and i know that canson will tell you also i am being deadly serious with my claim of terry 6,6_6,6.5.prime. He will tell you himself.

Sotiris Gravas said on 4/Jun/19
Here's another pic of a younger Barkley looking tall w/ Flair... Click Here

Yet here, w/ Stallone and Arnie (circa early '90s), he looks way shorter... Click Here Granted, Sly is obviously in elevator shoes, but still...

Barkley and a guy (Stephen Moore)... Click Here
6'4" Dennis Haysbert and same dude... Click Here (Rob has him at 6'4.5" peak.)
6'3.25" Craig T. Nelson and same dude... Click Here

Daniel reynolds said on 4/Jun/19
Mr t was infact 5,11 100% from my deep researches in his prime 1982.

Daniel reynolds said on 4/Jun/19
Greg: listen, i am really sorry if i have come across as really facesty in my messages to you. I have been too facesty and i am truly sorry. I have just got too carried away with terrys height. I will learn to respect your opinions and i just wanted to really say no hard feelings greg. But i will stick to my claim that he was a good 6,6 6,6.5 prime. no question.👍👍

Daniel reynolds said on 4/Jun/19
RP: just wanted to say i did put vitali,s height 6,11 just for the craic. I know he wasn,t so really have no need to worry RP. I just wanted to see my responses. I really was doing it just for the craic. Vital is 6,7. But please let me laugh with you RP.😂😂😂😂👍👍👍👍

Daniel reynolds said on 4/Jun/19
Canson: i do have to agree with you though. I don,t think it would of suited terry if he did stand 7,0 bare foot in his prime. He stood a good decent height and i don,t think he would od been any stronger if he did stand 7,0 bare foot anyway.

Daniel reynolds said on 4/Jun/19
I have been accused of going on the high side of terry and mark oh and dwayne. Sorry i am only trying to be 150% accurate and not 150% false. My apologys goes out to anyone i have offended in my messages. I never ment to offend anyone. Everyone is free to their opinion and i do except that alot. But all i will say is if anyone is trying to be on the conservative side of terry and marks height and i am only saying if they are then it doesn,t and can,t prove anything. I just feel it,s only right to try and be 150% accurate and therefore i am staying with 6,6.5 prime for terry based on the pics i have seen. But like i said also, looking at pics is 1 thing, but standing right up close to that person is another thing.

Canson said on 4/Jun/19
@Sotiris: Barkley measured 6’4 5/8” in 1992 at 29. That was his peak height as others around the league even pegged him at closer to 6’4” when he played. A 6’4.75 guy doesn’t look 6’4” to anyone so chances are he was really 6’4.5 at a low. It’s always been an excuse about the measurement not being proven. I don’t know how much more valid you get than 6’4 5/8. And common sense, when a player is measured at the Olympics there would be no reason to inflate or deflate whereas a player at the combine, their career is on the line even by an inch. I mean let’s be real, look at Shawne Merriman. We know he’s not 6’4 3/8 or Kyler Murray being 5’10 1/8 lol

Daniel reynolds said on 3/Jun/19
Greg: take a very good look at terry with ed leslie in some very old pics, i would say late 70,s for sure. Now ed leslie had a billed height of 6,4. But he was 6,2 late 70,s 100%. When you look at terry and him, i sure can see a good 4_4.5 inches in terrys favour. Both wearing same footwear. So terry couldn,t of been 6,4 back then. You have got to be buzzing to really think so.

Canson said on 3/Jun/19
@Vegas: the article that had Barkley at 6’4 5/8 didn’t mention anything about Larry Bird. The one you are referring to said that Barkley was 6’4. They wouldn’t round 6’4 5/8 down to 6’4”. You’re talking one where they simply knocked two inches off. The only two referenced were Barkley and Magic in the one I’m discussing. And that’s a cop out saying just because Wade’s is “official”. That’s no more official than Shawne merriman’s 6’4 3/8 as we know he isn’t that tall. Wade and others who refer to his height wouldn’t say he’s 6’4 on a good day if he’s really 6’3.75. Common sense would say that Wade had money on the line when he was drafted whereas Barkley was well established and didn’t need to lie about his height at that stage. So saying “it wasn’t confirmed that it took place” is a major cop out. I think there’s been enough 6’4-6’5 references and people saying how he looked who played with him to validate Barkley’s height. I’m sure someone who played with him would’ve called him out at some stage about downplaying his height especially being he wasn’t well liked by all of his peers.

RP said on 3/Jun/19
@ Sotiris...I just saw Daniel’s 6’11” statement on Vitali 😂😂😂 at this point I honestly believe that Daniel Reynolds is a 12 year old internet troll 🤔

Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Jun/19
Hogan's career would have been severely hampered if he went by the name "Terry" rather than Hulk, much to the chagrin of Daniel reynolds, lol, who thinks Vitali Klitschko is 6'11" HAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAA (coughs) HAHAHAHAHAHA (wheezing)!!! Even worse for Edward Leslie, aka Brutus Beefcake.

@Reynolds AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA! Just kidding, bro. It's all good. (I'm lying.)

Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Jun/19
@Vegas and Canson If you look at Brady, his body looks normal... Barkley's waist is too high up; he's 1/3 torso w/ T-Rex/Cee Lo Green arms, and 2/3 legs (yes, I'm exaggerating). Bottom line, something was going on w/ his footwear that day. The first time I saw that video surprised me b/c he definitely looked taller than he should have. That said, Barkley was never more than 6'4.75" peak height, and is max 6'4.5" now.

Sotiris Gravas said on 2/Jun/19
Remember, kids: this was 6'1" Frank Valois w/ Andre (1975)... Click Here

6'4" Don Lane and Andre (1978)... Click Here , Click Here , Click Here

Hogan and Andre (1979)... Click Here , (1984) Click Here

Funny how Hogan doesn't look as tall as ppl think when compared to Valois or Lane. Funny, indeed.

Not as funny as this, mind you. I still can't stop laughing... Click Here Almost as insanely funny as Daniel reynolds.

@Reynolds I think you should change your name to Greg. Legally.

Canson said on 2/Jun/19
@Dan Reynolds: even if Hogan responded with what he claims it believes his true height was in his prime, it doesn’t mean that he was really as tall as he claimed. Not sure if you are aware but most guys lie about their height. It’s no different than a person I know who says he’s 6’3.75 and claims 6’4”. Everyone literally calls him out as he often wears flip flops. The guy would at most be 6’3” perhaps even a weak 6’3”. At 6’4.25 there’s over an inch between us and seeing him next to a 6’3” friend he doesn’t even look as tall at times and other times the same height. But he inflates everyone else to make himself taller but he claims his height so he’s really that height? He’s not

Space said on 2/Jun/19
He was 6’5.25” max in his prime
6’1.5” today

The fact that I’m agreeing with this is crazy

Daniel reynolds said on 1/Jun/19
Greg: just something else. If you took terry from his debute he would of stood eye level with deontay wilder for sure. Practically the same height. Terry prime. You probably wonder why i say terry all the time. Well firstly that is his real name and second calling him hogan or hulk just doesn,t sound impressive to me at all because they are his fake names and as a true fan of terry i like to call him by his first name which is terry. I think terry would much prefer to be called terry anyway as a mark of respect and i do respect terry very much. I do think saying terry sounds so much more impressive to me than calling him hogan or hulk. I mean what rubbish. Hulk, hulk the toy. Hogan the business man. Can you understand where i am coming from. Terry spunds so much greater in the ring or in an interview. Well i sure think so anyway. Terry sounds much more impressive to me 100%.

Sotiris Gravas said on 1/Jun/19
If anyone wants a good laugh, go over to Vitali Klitschko's page and read Daniel reynolds post. This guy actually thinks 6'6.5" (not 6'7") Vitali was 6'11". I kid you not.

@Reynolds Listen to me, and listen good. You are an absolute joke. Also, my name isn't Greg. You have issues, bro. Seriously, get help.

Daniel reynolds said on 1/Jun/19
Greg: andre the giant did tip 7,0 and i agree with robs listing. He was no way less than 6,11 anyway not 6,10. Randy savage just under 6,1 not 5,11.5. Roddy piper was 6,1 not 6,0 he claimed 6,1.5 and you want to say terry was no more than 6,4.5. So then it really does go to show that you do go on the conservative side of true heights and you want to say my comments are a joke and you want to try and take the piss out ofmy comments. You keep looking at terry mid 90,s and say he was in his prime. Well he wasn,t the same height compared to debute terry. He was 6,5 in 2000 and go back 20 years to that. Are you really going to tell me he was a good 6,6_6,6.5 and your comments about terry show alot of biasism to me so if that is the case i can never agree with you. It doesn,t matter how many many pics you post. Facts do speak for themselves and it doesn,t mean your right either.

Daniel reynolds said on 1/Jun/19
Greg: in the message i posted F all wrong with ny mental health i wrote the F word me writing there is F all wrong with my mental health and there isn,t so don,t worry there really isn,t 100% not. What has popped up as i see is there is all wrong with my mental health when i really wrote F all and that isn,t allowed as i have noticed now. But i have now realised you can,t use the F word F all meaning nothing at all.

Sotiris Gravas said on 31/May/19
@reynolds We all know you're really Brutus Beefcake, and only pretending to be Hulk Hogan. It's time to end this charade, Barber.

Canson said on 31/May/19
6’5-6’5.5 peak. He would likely have been a bit over 6’5 peak, but if he were measured today he may come out a hair above 6’3.

Vegas' said on 31/May/19
Canson said on 4/May/19
@Vegas: I’m not seeing what you are I guess. And you hold on to Dwayne Wade measuring 6’3.75 so youre not challenging his measurement so why do you challenge Barkley measuring 6’4 5/8? That seems to me like you’re the one picking and choosing which measurements you want to believe just as you accused me of on the Rock’s page. Barkley measured that at the Olympics in 1992 so he is not taller than that.

-----------

Well as said Wades measurements are up on NBA's official site while that Barkley thing you are referencing was never officially confirmed..same article had Larry Bird at 6'7. That's my issue.

That's Barkley and flair again from 95 Click Here

Kimmel (similar height to Flair 25 years ago) and 6'4 3/8 measured Tom Brady with decent sized footwear too Click Here

Brady and Kimmel is how a 5'11 and 6'4 range person should look next to each other, Barkley and Flair really isn't.

Daniel reynolds said on 30/May/19
I don,t know if terry has responded on this sight himself declaring his true and 100% honest prime height. But i so wish he really did. I say 6,6_6,6.5 prime and mark would of been 6,8 prime himself no less early 90,s.

Daniel reynolds said on 30/May/19
Greg: if terry stood 6,10 bare foot prime you would if listed him 6,7.5 prime. I dont know why but thats you. For you to agree that terry did stand 6,7 bare foot hayday he would of had to of stood 6,10 bare foot. You know, its absolutley nuts when you really come to think about it. But i can,t understand it. I must be 5,7 instead of my real height of 5,10 bare foot. Really insane.

Daniel reynolds said on 30/May/19
Greg: let me just say this, there is all wrong with my mental health and you have no business in saying anything of the sought. There should be enough of that and just to let you really know for a 100% fact, james buster douglas was infact 6,4 not 6,3.5 in his prime. I have always known that since he beat iron mike tyson febuary 1990. He was 6,4, his stats stated it tall of the tape and terry stood 6,5 in 2000 and he wasn,t as tall in 2000 as he was in 1977. He was a good 6,6_6,6.5 back in 1977 so how the hell could terry of be no more than 6,4 in his prime. So if you really think that terry stood no more than 6,4 prime when you see him standing against a man james buster douglas who was infact 6,4 and you can see the height comparison with douglas having the footwear advantage also and you want to judge my mental state of mind then you really must be a total prat seriously.!!!

miko said on 30/May/19
Hulk was 6'5/6'5.25 peak

I think the first time he started looking a fraction shorter was in the mid 90's, shortly after he joined WCW, he looked more 6'4.75/6'5 range at that time. He looked around 5 inches shorter than 6'9.5 Kevin Nash.

Towards the end of his WCW run in around 2000 he seemed to have dropped to more 6'4.25 range, his knees at this point were starting to cause him a lot of issues, and his general posture was more hunched.

His WWE run from 2002/2003, in good posture he looked a very solid 6'4, rarely did he stand tall though so more often than not looked shorter.

After many years of surgeries & ill health with his back, especially in his tenure with TNA he likely dropped to around 6'3 at best from 2010-2013, and could look shorter than that, his posture was a mess... after his large surgery to straighten his back after TNA, he has looked taller since, I do think if measured at full posture he would be over 6'3, not sure by how much though.

One thing with Hulk I've noticed over the years is, hunched he loses a lot of height, similar to The Rock, but when he stands straight, he often looks taller than you'd expect.

RP said on 30/May/19
@ Sotiris,
Yeah, Randy Savage did indeed have on on Western Style Cowboy Boots that day. I was wearing Skechers Logger boots. So, at most, Savage had 0.25” footwear advantage on me. Sid’s boots were nowhere near as big as Kane’s...LOL! Sid’s boots were very comparable to Randy Orton’s.

Canson said on 30/May/19
@Sotiris: I’m not sure it was harsh. Hogan was shorter than Barkley so it’s likely he wasn’t over 6’4” with him at least

viper said on 30/May/19
They don't want to believe Freddie Prinze or Paul Walker either

Sotiris Gravas said on 29/May/19
Here's Hogan looking very thin in 1977, BEFORE STEROIDS... Click Here

Now, here he is on "vitamins" (1979)... Click Here The guy actually says Hogan's neck is 24.75" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA He also says his arms were 26", which is also laughable. The AWA touted his arms as 28" HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA.

Remember, kids, and I can't stress it enough... Click Here

Sotiris Gravas said on 28/May/19
@RP Giving Hogan 6'4" w/ Rodman was too harsh. I should have said at least 6'4.25". I always saw Savage as a 5'11.5" guy who frequently wore cowboy boots, but I could be wrong. To be honest, I never noticed how big Sid's boots were then -- something to think about. How big were they in relation to Kane's enhanced footwear? It's cool that you met Savage. Many guys at my high school would take turns doing their best impression of him; mine was pretty damn good. Still is.

Canson said on 28/May/19
@Johan185: agree with everything you said!

@Sotiris: I could buy 6’5 and change tops but not 6’6 in the afternoon. He may get 6’6 or over out of bed if he loses a full inch or if he is over 6’5” still in the afternoon. But truth is a peak Hogan was never 6’6 or 6’7 in the afternoon. 6’7” is crazy but the people saying that if you look at their other posts here across this site, it’s clear why they do. And The “he said his mom measured him at that is not enough for me to believe him”. It’s funny on this site that people believe when someone claims a shoe height as their barefoot height or some other made up or inflated number but they don’t want to believe a guy like Howard Stern Charles Barkley Ryan Reynolds etc when they claim barefoot measurements.

I still do believe that he would measure a full 6’3” in the afternoon with good posture but prob no higher. I just don’t believe he’s as low as a solid 6’2” like people are saying

RP said on 27/May/19
@ Sotiris,
Having met Randy Savage in person (Summer 1997) when I was 21 years old. I’m right at 5’11” (5’11 1/8”) morning & (5’10 3/4”) evevning (barefoot) I pegged him right at 6’0” even...6’0 1/4” tops. That being said, It truly looks like Hogan was 6’5” even by the late 1980’s.
Hogan 6’5”
Douglas 6’3 1/4” to 6’3 1/2”
Savage 6’0” to 6’0.25”

I actually think Hogan with Rodman in 1995 looks 6’4 1/2”
IMO
Sid had huge boots back then, I think Hogan passes for 6’4 3/4” with Sid, accounting Sid’s huge boots.

Johan 185 cm said on 27/May/19
People in general inflate their height by 1 inch, thats statistically proven. Not all people are bad or lying who do this, many do genuinely believe they are up to 1 inch taller. When people start tacking on 2 inches + though they know full well whats up. Now if Hogan did indeed measure 6'6" at his peak then 6'7" although wrong its understandable. Alot of guys I have met take early measurements and then round up to the nearest inch. That can give 1.5 inches ( 4cm) error which to me is inexcusable and should be commented on.

Some people change their claims and others well....they decide to live in a fantasy where their claim was never challenged.

Canson said on 27/May/19
He was shorter than Studd. Max for him would’ve been 6’5.5. I think anywhere around 6’5/6’5.5 in the afternoon fits him.

Canson said on 27/May/19
@Space: Barkley never measured that tall. His measurements of record are 6’4 5/8 and 6’4 7/8 and his claims are 6’4.5 and 6’4.75

Sotiris Gravas said on 27/May/19
Remember: this was video footage of 6'4" Don Lane w/ Andre in 1978 (both men in cowboy boots):
Click Here Andre looks all of 6'10" here. This was 1978, not the early '90s, proof that Andre was never 7 feet tall... and proof that Daniel (R)eynolds' beloved "Terry" was never more than 6'5", maybe only 6'4.5" peak height. Don't believe me? Go back and watch the video. Still don't believe me...? Keep watching it till it finally sinks in. Hogan was NEVER 6'6", lol.

Sotiris Gravas said on 26/May/19
Buster Douglas was never more than 6'3.5" peak. That said, ppl like to reference silly pics like this which have weird angles and favor Hogan who's looking up, making him look taller: Click Here , Click Here

This was the reality (1990)... Click Here , Click Here Does Hogan look like he's TOWERING(!) over him here? Of course not.

Douglas and Savage... Click Here
Hogan and Savage... Click Here , Click Here , Click Here

This was Hogan next to 6'6.5" peak height Rodman (1995)... Click Here Hogan looked around 6'4" here. Same as he did w/ around 6'6.5" Sid Eudy... Click Here , Click Here

I doubt Hogan was ever more than 6'5" barefoot afternoon height. He was only 42 in 1995 and his surgeries began in 1998. I'm supposed to believe he was closer to 6'6" peak...? Gimme a break. And yes, I'm still one of those crazy ppl who think he might have been as low as 6'4.5" peak, similar to Bruiser Brody. I've already posted pics (footwear visible) of Hogan and Brody next to Stan Hansen -- they looked exactly the same height to my strained eyes. Keep in mind, Hogan is rumored to have worn internal lifts. The same goes for many wrestlers. Bottom line, IMHO, he was max 6'5", not even a sweat droplet more in height. Bruiser Brody was max 6'4.5", and he was billed as 6'8". Hogan was billed as 6'7" and 6'8". Coincidence? Maybe. As for Hogan's current height, he looked all of 6'2.5" next to 6'3.5" Troy Aikman back in 2010, and yet I'm supposed to believe he's now 6'3"...? Sorry, guys, don't think so. Just a reminder, Hogan turns 66 this year.

Something to remember about Aikman... Click Here

@Daniel (R)eynolds I jokingly referred to myself as "Greg." The fact that you can't see that makes me seriously question your mental acuity, as well as your overall mental health. No joke. Also, I never said Hogan is now 6'1.5". Those are your words, not mine. You worry me, bro.

Daniel reynolds said on 26/May/19
Greg: i will say this. Deontay wilder today wouldn,t of been taller than terry when he first joined the wrestling world in my eyes. I honestly think they would of been level eyed and as for sid eurdy being taller well of course terry of say 1977 i think would of been his height. Terry had lost height between 1977_2000 and people have got to know that including yourself greg. Its all well and good thinking he was the same height in 2000 when i am pretty sure you know he wasn,t. Pics posted of dennis rodman again terry of the 1995_2000 time. I am not looking at terry in 2000. He was 6,5 in 2000 yes but was no less than 6,6 1977. RP you say that 90% of my claims are a joke and i should be banned just because i don,t agree with you. I thought people a perfectly free to post their estmations. You shouldn,t go critising my claims.

Stormcoach said on 25/May/19
Hogan was ft 6'6" peak and 6'4.5" currently in shoes. Taker ft 6'7.75" peak.. Kane ft6'6.75" peak.. Sid ft6.6'.75" peak.. I'm ft5'9.5" and 215 lbs (lift heavily) I've seen a few of these guys up close. Scott Hall ft6'.5.25" peak.. Nash ft6.'8.5" -ft6'.9.5" peak big, big dudes, all of them.

Daniel reynolds said on 25/May/19
1 other thing also. If someone looks 6,5 then don,t be suprised if they are infact 6,7. It may see kind of odd, but it can catch is out even when you do actually stand up close to a person like this. It has happened to me before and speaking of which, i know a fella who is 6,9. I remember asking him his height and he told me. I thought he was taking the piss simply because i thought he was a 6,6_6,7 guy. But no he was being as true and honest as can be. He isn,t a wrestler so don,t worry. He is someone i have known for a while and i come across him now and again. This guy is as he told me a 6,9 bare foot fella and what i am telling you here is no word of a lie because i did witness him being measured myself in his sitting room. So what i am saying just goes to show. Looking at someone in pics and vics is 1 thing, but the people themselves known best. When we look at someone big we only guess their heights.

Daniel reynolds said on 24/May/19
Space: this message does go out to you if you are still posting and reading. I mentioned hogan was no less than 6,6.5 prime, you replied by saying a while back that hogan would of been 6,6 wearing sneakers. Well i don,t know what hogan you a really looking at and from what time but if we a looking at a hogan late 20,s then he would of been a good 6,8 wearing sneakers and not 6,6. He wasn,t any less than 6,6 bare foot and you will get those guys that will say he was only 6,4 prime and you could be 1 of those guys i don,t know, but the fact that he has lost so much height just underlines what i have been saying. You find it crazy that hogan has lost so much height to a point its unbelievable. Greg finds it impossible to believe but if terry as greg mentioned is now only 6,1.5 then that just really goes to show what i am saying. He is losing height all the time and had lost a fraction duren 1979_1989 which is what i said before. But 62b doesn,t think thats possible. But it certainly is when you are looking at all the bounces on the head, back and curbed spine with 10 solid years of heavy knocks. Remember terry isn,t alone when it comes to losing height with time in the WWF.

Sotiris Gravas said on 24/May/19
Rico Verhoeven (listed 6'5") vs. Badr Hari (listed 6'6")... Click Here

Verhoeven vs. Guto Inocente (listed 6'3")... Click Here

Stormcoach said on 24/May/19
Hogan ft6'6.5" peak out of bed, ft6'4.5" now

Johan 185 cm said on 23/May/19
James Buster Douglas was 6'3.5". He looks 6'3" in the pic with Rob here on this site Daniel. There is no need to go elsewhere and guess.

I looked up the match where he is the referee and I saw 2" between him and Hogan which brings me back to my listing of 6'5.5" max.

If Douglas didn't lose much then maybe he was only 6'5.25". We can safely say though that Hogan wasn't under 6'5" peak.

Click Here

Here he is next to Rodman who is 6'6" range, he was around 6'3" and change back then and claimed to be again 6'5".

Space@gmail.com said on 23/May/19
A human being doesn’t shrink from even taller than Charles Barkley’s height, to Dwayne Johnson’s height in that picture of them. That height difference is basically how much Hogan would have to have shrunk. I don’t think peak Hogan was quite as tall as 6’5.25” barefoot Charles Barkley. Hogan was 6’5” barefoot at the max, and 6’1.75” barefoot today.

Sotiris Gravas said on 23/May/19
@Heisenberg I never gave Martyn Ford more than 6'6", max. If Rico Verhoeven is really only 6'5", then Ford's under 6'6". W/ Baron Corbin (who's max 6'6", maybe even 6'5.75"), the pic looks to have been taken at an angle... Here it is again, only straightened... Click Here I'm guessing Ford had a footwear advantage.

Daniel reynolds said on 21/May/19
Don,t forget also james buster douglas had the footwear advantage also. So you could of deducted for him.

Daniel reynolds said on 21/May/19
Another thing i would urge doubters to try is look at terry and james buster douglas side by side in pics and then look up comparing heights. Douglas i have always known was 6,4 since he destroyed iron mike in feb 1990. So try a research with comparing heights. Type in 6,4 1 man and then type in 6,6.5 the other man and you will actually see that what looks like 1.5 inches is infact 2.5 inches and this comparison is 100% accurate and can,t lie. The only difference between this comparing heights and peoples opinions is that people can be off with heights. Or people can give biased opinions on what they really thinks isn,t true and then all sorts of people agree. I have looked it up and you will get 2 man symbols top man and bottom. Just type in your estimated heights and press a button that says compare. So greg your estimation of terry being 6,4.5 late 70,s is way off to me anyway.

Daniel reynolds said on 20/May/19
Sometimes old video footages are even better to see someones true prime height rather than a pic itself. I recently watches a vid of hogan v randy savage with james buster douglas being the ref in that contest. Probably 1989 or around that time or possibly the time douglas gave iron mike tyson a horrible beating. Douglas cleary towered tyson by half a feet. Looking at douglas with hogan in that wrestlemania contest with randy savage, when douglas was holding terrys hands in the air, douglas height came up to terrys eye brows and douglas had a footwear advantage also if you look at that vid closely. If in doubt take a look at a few pics of them 2 side by side. Terry is clearly taller. There is another pic where terry is standing further back in a pic with douglas more forward to the camera, which means douglas looked taller just because he was more forward and terry was still taller in that pic. If people aren,t convinced then do please have a look at what i am pointing out. The vid and pics i am pointing out may well have people scratching their heads if they do doubt hogans height.

Heisenberg89 said on 20/May/19
Sotiris gravas

How tall you think is Ford barefoot?

Sotiris Gravas said on 19/May/19
Martyn Ford and Hogan... Click Here

Ford and 6'5" Rico Verhoeven... Click Here
Video "foot-age" (footwear visible) of Ford and Rico... Click Here

Ford w/ 6'1.5" Eddie Hall... Click Here

Ford w/ Baron Corbin... Click Here

Ford w/ Braun Strowman and Jinder Mahal... Click Here

Funny how Ford likes to tell ppl he's 6'8". Ford was never 6'8", and neither was Hogan.

As for Hogan's current height, look at 6'1.5" Eddie Hall (who tells ppl he's 6'3") next to Ford... as compared to Hogan (who tells ppl he's 6'4.5") next to Ford.

Canson said on 19/May/19
@Dan Reynolds: hogan has never claimed 6’6.5. He claimed 6’7” and he also admitted to 6’5”. I have a hard time believing he’s over 6’5-6’6 even at his peak

RP said on 18/May/19
Ha! LOL! If Terry Bollea would’ve been 6’10” to 7’0” , rather than 6’5” & change. Then his character & style would’ve been totally different. There never would’ve been a Hulk Hogan. Vince SR would’ve probably named him something like “The Giant Thor” and Billed him @ 7’2”...
or possibly Thunderslips The Ultimate Make...JK! LOL! 😂😂😂😂

Canson said on 17/May/19
@Dan Reynolds: It would’ve been fun to see he and Show or Andre but other than that I don’t see anything he would’ve gained being 7’. He was damn good at 6’5-6’6 barefoot

Daniel reynolds said on 17/May/19
Canson and greg: i will say this. Its just a massive shame terry didn,t stand ft7,0 exact prime bare foot. Could you imagine fellas if terry did stand ft7,0 1980. I am of course just talking as a fan of terry. But what do you think. Terry ft7,0 1980. That would of been so cool fellas.😊😊

Daniel reynolds said on 17/May/19
I forget who mentioned braun strowman. But terry ultimate best would of been as tall if strowman was his listed height 6,6.5. You couldn,t see a difference from a slight difference of 0.5 inches. Thats pretty much level. Thats nothing. No.??

Daniel reynolds said on 16/May/19
I don,t know want to say. I always believed hogan looked 6,6 and a little plus prime of course and i still stand by it by the pics and vids i have seen. But like i did say, the only fella that could tell you terrys true prime height is terry himself. He knows best. Some wrestlers do lie and now your going to call terry a liar because others lie. But he was around before the rest. Terry actually did say himself he was 6,6.5. I wouldn,t rule that out, but he was never any more than 6,6.5 in my opinion 1976 or not. That would of been it though, unless terry did wear nice soled nike trainers hairing 6,8 morning at brilliant best. I would say yes, but only just. I will stick with 6,6.5 for terry 1979.

Canson said on 14/May/19
@Dan Reynolds: it’s common sense though when it has to do with his claims of 6’5 and 6’7”. One he never looked 6’7” at his peak. Tiny Lister also said that they were the same height and Hogan looked a 6’5-6’6 guy max at his peak. Maybe Hogan edged Lister by a hair but not 2” or even an Inch. Lister was a legit 6’5”. And more importantly it’s less likely a guy who is 6’7 is going to say he’s 6’5 especially a pro wrestler than the opposite. If you took 10 random guys on the street and asked them their height I guarantee you that none of those 10 guys will undercut himself. I’m sure at least 5 of the 10 would add height. You would probably have to repeat that process like 20 times to get close to finding someone who undercuts his height by that much and even then you may find one person out of maybe 200 or even possibly more and that’s if the person is excessively tall. Hogan wasn’t even the tallest in his sport. And anyone who says that it’s highly likely for that to happen (guy claiming 2” less than the opposite) doesn’t know much about height. Rob listing him 6’6” is possible because the interview he had in the 90s was where he claimed 6’5 and he hadn’t lost 2” by that stage. If anything he wouldn’t have ever been a full 6’6 at a low maybe 6’5.5” and over 6’6 out of bed. Not a lot of people know that height varies like that

Canson said on 14/May/19
I agree with Johan that he didn’t wear lifts. They were very large boots which would make him 6’7/6’8 perhaps or maybe 6’7” and a hair. But some people here are saying he was 6’7” all because he claimed it which is nothing to even consider as far as evidence given how many other wrestlers lie about their heights. Was Triple H ever 6’4”? Never. He may have been a sub 6’2” honestly

Johan 185 cm said on 14/May/19
You wouldn't be able to fit lifts in those cowboyboots Hogan wore. The boot was far too narrow and the incline would have been insane. Still those were solid 2 inchers which can make you appear an inch taller than what you actually measure. I still see a good 6'5" guy at his peak but the evidence of him ever being even 6'6" is very slim.

He maybe did an out of bed measurement in his 20's and got 6'6.5 and rounded it up. He has a long spine and so maybe losing an inch max instead of 3/4 like most people of average height.

Daniel reynolds said on 14/May/19
Greg: the pic you posted of roddy piper and mr t face off in the centre of the ring. I do believe that is smokin joe frazier standing behind mr t. Smokin joe frazier was 5,10.5 and he looks shorter than mr t to me. Take a look at that pic you posted and look at smokin joe to mr t. Just so people do actual realise big john studd did infact wear elevators making stand 6,10 in a ring, so he wanted a height advantage over terry. But only had 2 inches on terrance who stood as i believe 6,8 wearing 1.5 inch boots. If you ever look at big john studd against terry in matches you can actual see how studds knees break meaning the elevators in his boots when he is moving around.

Daniel reynolds said on 14/May/19
Melvin jones: this message goes out to you also. Hogan never wore 1.5 inch elevators in his boots. He never wore elevators full stop and i have never seen any evidence of it in all the years i whatched WWF. He would of been 6,9/6,10 if he did because there is no way he was 6,3/6,4 bare foot. So the claim you made of terry possibly being 6,7 with elevators in his boots just doesn,t make any sense. Big john studd stood 6,10 with elevators in a ring with hogan and he had a max 2 inches on him. Hogan wearing1.5 inch boots brings you to his bare foot height.

Daniel reynolds said on 14/May/19
There are alot of people that wouldn,t give hogan 2 metres prime bare foot. People will look at him and say he is lying. But when terry said he was 6,5 in an interview he may well of been piss arseing about by saying that for all we know. Because at the top of this page he said he was 6,7. There are pics where terry looks almost andres height and there of course are pics where he looks shorter than his own height. But for anyone than has met him up close in the 80,s would know the difference between seeing terry on the telly in a ring and standing right next to him. I so wish i could of actually measured terry bare foot 1977. That would put this debate to bed completely.

Daniel reynolds said on 14/May/19
Rob gave roddy piper a prime listing of 6,1 although piper did say he was 6,1.5 prime, but 6,1/1.85m sounds about right.

Daniel reynolds said on 14/May/19
Greg: i will just say this. Hogan never wore internal lifts. There were those others that clearly did. In all the years i watched hogan he wore wrestling boots that is it as all wrestlers did anyway. There was never and elevation in hogans boots. I never saw it and i have watched wrestling since 80,s.

Canson said on 13/May/19
@Dan Reynolds: I don’t mean to say you don’t or do know more than Rob because Rob has been off before but usually it’s within 1/2” or so. In Hogan’s case I would think Rob has him slightly overlisted vs under. Meaning I would believe 6’5.5 at a low or even 6’5.25 before 6’6.5 or 6’7”

Canson said on 13/May/19
@Dan Reynolds: you lost me with many times out of bed and afternoon. Not many people measure themselves that often outside of this site or an athletic measurement that players receive. I know people who get measured in their 20s and don’t ever again unless by chance. As far as out of bed, you’re wrong there. Not many people even know that it varies and I’m not sure that Hogan would know

RONSTER said on 13/May/19
Canson, please post prof in the form of a video where Hogan ever said he was 6’5” in his prime.
Sortis, why do you have to try and belittle anyone who does not agree with your extreme low height guesstimate’s? Someone saying Hogan was 6’8” is no more ridiculous than another saying he was never above 6’4”-5”. The only real debatable height for a prime Hogan is within an inch, do you think he was 6’6” or 6’7” as he has stated numerous times when not in character. If he was trying to inflate his height he would ha e said he was 6’8 or 6’9” just as the announcers like Gorilla stated during numerous matches.
Post your comments, but remember to respect others as well.
Oh, and the Rock is not 6’2”, from everything I see he still is well above 6’3” and was for sure 6’4” at one time IMO. He like Hogan doesn’t seem to worry much about it and doesn’t stand tall most of the time making it easy to drum up pictures making him seem shorter

Daniel reynolds said on 13/May/19
Canson: i am not trying to sound silly. If i didn,t know what i was posting in my comments, then i wouldn,t even bother stating my comments.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/May/19
I can,t see how hogan would of been any less than 6,6 prime.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/May/19
Canson: just remember also. From a distance, people leaning, different postures, different camera angles, bad pics and not to mention guys that are well past their primes. It is very easy to be off by 1_1.5 inches. If we looking at 3 inches however then it is alot easier to tell.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/May/19
Canson: 6,5 range meaning 6,6 and no less. Rob lists hogan 6,6 and i would be going very low if i agreed with you in which i don,t. He pic with chris loyd was a perfect pic. In line with each others height. You will say footwear, but hogan would of been wearing nike trainers 1.5 inches thick. Loyd was wearing 1 inch shoes, so 0.5 inches would really mean nothing. Hogan was looking down meaning he would of lost height by doing so. I know i go on about that pic but it is a perfect pic which you wouldn,t find a better 1. I look at his best pics also. There is more than 1 person that does agree with me on this sight.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/May/19
Canson: i would 100% agree with you on age normally. The only thing is and as you well know. Wrestlers tend to lose height with time. I can only put that down to all the years of bounces on the heads and backs. Stunts where a wrestler can get seriously injured and of course curbed spines. If you look at terry today. Rob gave him a listing 6,3. I would agree with rob. Terry is measured with knees bent 6,3 so he isn,t standing straight where he could be taller than 6,3 still if he could stand straight and terry is 65_66 now. He had 2 discs removed from his spine and has had his spine shortened as a result of it. But i can put height loss down to many years of heavy knocks. There could be 101 reasons why terry lost considerable height between the time i was born march 1977 and now that takes an effect. You would agree that mark isn,t as tall as he was 1991. You may well give mark a morning out of bed listing of 6,8 around early 90,s. Obviously when i say mark i do mean the great mark calloway.

Canson said on 13/May/19
@Dan Reynolds: so if Rock said he’s 6’5 then he must be? Wrong. He’s 6’2” and he lies about his height. How do you know that Hogan is not because he has before when he makes a cheeky remark. As for Barkley and Jordan they’re around the same height you’re correct. Both 6’4.5-.75 barefoot. Yes barefoot because shoes aren’t part of your body like Johan185 just said. Hogan peak was 6’5 range

Sotiris Gravas said on 13/May/19
@Daniel reynolds I'm only "Greg" on Wednesdays and Thursdays. (Not that it matters, but I pronounce "Wednesday" the way it's spelled -- but only on Mondays and Tuesdays.)

I hate the way Jared Leto stole Hogan's look at the this year's Met Gala... Click Here
vs. this... Click Here It's crazy, but they both do this to make themselves look taller. Weird, right?

If you're slightly confused by this post, it encapsulates the brain trauma I feel when trying to grasp your genius. Don't ever stop posting here. Promise me. I used to be a savant until a horse kicked me in the head. Now, sometimes I can smell colors. Purple smells like a bad John Goodman fart; but only from when he was more obese; certainly not now.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/May/19
Greg: if ever you look at pics with hogan and ed leslie who was 6,2 late 70,s with hogan there looks to be a solid 4.5 inches in hogans favour. So terry couldn,t of been any less that 6,6_6,6.5 late 70,s. By the way, when i said stallone was 1.77m_5,10 that was infact his prime height not 5,8 lundren 6,5 prime. I have only known this since 1986 greg. I was 9 in 1986 and rocky 4 came out on VHS autumn 1986 around november_december 1986 and i had a booklet of rocky 4 back in 1986 and it had stallone and lundrens height stated respectfully. 5,10 stallone and 6,5 lundren.

Daniel reynolds said on 13/May/19
Greg and canson: terry would of measured himself many times in his prime out of bed and afternoon. His billed height of 6,8 would of been out in public wearing trainers and i am sure he would of been measured wearing trainers. If you deduct the 1.5 trainers he was wearing it would bring his height to 6,6.5 which is what i have been saying. If you look at big john studd, he had a billed height of 6,10 in a ring. That was due to the fact that inside his boots he would of worn elevators to gain height over terry. But when you look at them there was no more than 2 inches max, in a ring that is. Andre the giant had a billed height of 7,4. But 7,0 was his height plus his frizz, meaning his frizzy hair. Everything makes sense. I agree with editor rob on his stats 100%. Terry never wore elevators in all the years i watched him. He didn,t need to, he was big enough anyway and greg you pointed out the 1.25 inch boots he wore in rocky 3. He would never of worn anything more than 1.5 inches unless he was walking on stilts.

Daniel reynolds said on 12/May/19
Greg and canson: yes probably i did get barkelets height wrong. I was looking at barkeley clise up with michael jordan on a vasketball court. Some pics they look the same height. If either of you guys can post pics of barkeley and MJ on a court close up i would be interesting to see.👍👍

Daniel reynolds said on 12/May/19
Canson: if you read what hogan said at the top of this page where his height is listed he stated he was ft6,7 bare foot. He was asked in 2005 and he responded by saying he was ft6,7 and he said the exact same thing in 2011 as it is stated above. ft6,7 bare foot. Obviously you have read what terry said above yes. So with him saying that, who knows his height better than him. I will tell you nobody. Nobody on this planet knows my height better than me.

Johan 185 cm said on 12/May/19
Your real height is barefoot...I am 100% sure that Hogan was indeed over 6'6" in thick nike's, there is no question about that at his peak. Also 6'7" in his 2 inch cowboyboots I wouldn't argue either but I fail to see why people inc footwear in relation to their height. Its like when women give a heel height its stupidity.

Canson said on 12/May/19
@Dan Reynolds: you have one person here that agrees with you. But it isn’t about that. I’ve been outnumbered on several pages but looking at solid proof and hearing Hogan himself say he’s 6’5 when he was in his prime along with the fact that other guys such as tiny lister said they were the same height. So you dont “know what you’re talking about” if that’s the case

Canson said on 12/May/19
@Dan Reynolds: age has nothing to do with being able to accurately determine height. I’m 37 myself and older than a lot of people here but I still don’t believe that I know more than them. Christian for example is about 10 years younger but I don’t go around saying because I’m older that I know more. Christian actually provides better estimates than me very often as he’s mentioned something and I look closely and realize that I’m wrong. He isn’t the only one either that does that and is younger than me so I don’t know everything. You really should not have even mentioned that because you just sound silly now. It has nothing to do with you having watched them for a long time if you just aren’t good at determining heights which going off of your estimates you clearly are not

Daniel reynolds said on 12/May/19
But i wouldn,t doubt ronsters claims. He met terry in his prime and later on in life. Rob gave andre the giant a prime listing of ft7,0. When we look on andres sight ft7,0 is listed and i have to agree 100% with rob on that because i gave andre ft7,0 also. So rob being the editor would be 100% right. But there are those guys that will say andre was ft6,10 prime. That i have to disagree with. Rob gave kevin nash a height of ft6,9.5 prime. Again i have to agree with rob 100% on listing that also. My point simply being is this. Looking at terrys face off with kevin 1999 on RAW there was the same height difference with andre the giant and terry 1980 wrestlemania as there was with kevin and terry in 1999. Which actually proves terry did in fact lose height between 1980 and 2000. If kevin was ft6,9.5 1999 then terry wouldn,t of been any less than ft6,5_ft6,5.5 1999. So my claim of terry standing ft6,6.5 1980 would be a very good listing. Canson i know i don,t know my stats more the editor rob. I respect that. But this sight allows everyone to post their thoughts on celeb heights. So it,s giving their estimations and i am simply giving mine.

Canson said on 11/May/19
@Dan Reynolds: nope I have not met Hogan. But I know someone who has and he said the same thing that 62B said. He was around 6’5” in his prime or whenever he met him. I doubt he had lost 2” by the time he met him because it was early career. So maybe he was a stronger 6’5 or weak 6’6”. Hogan also admitted during an interview that he was only 6’5” once. As far as not being able to tell 6’5 and 6’7 apart, I doubt that the person I know would have that problem since he himself is about 6’2” himself and has played basketball so he knows what a 6’7 and 6’5 guy look like. Also 62B was a peak 6’3” guy who had a 6’4 grandfather who he said was an inch shorter than him. But for you to say what you did, I completely understand what you meant about not being able to tell differences. However, the same goes for you on that token. You may not be able to tell the difference apart nor did you look at his shoes perhaps. I’m not insulting you saying that either. I’m just using the same logic you did with me and you said below why would a 6’5 guy want to be 6’7? Hogan still claims 6’5 and he’s 6’3 today. Undertaker claimed he used to be 6’10”. The majority of wrestlers lie about their height or WWE lies on their behalf to portray the larger than life image. Remember that Triple H was listed 6’4”. He was maximum 6’2” at his peak maybe 6’15-6’2”. He’s 6’1 range according to Ali Baba another poster here. Wrestling is entertainment

RP said on 11/May/19
**I’ll be my own grammar Nazi...LOL! I really should proof read my post before hitting send. Apple talk & text can’t always be trusted ...LOL🤣🤣🤣

Daniel reynolds said on 11/May/19
Canson: just another thing. I wasn,t trying to inflate terrys real prime height on purpose. I said terry was ft6,7 prime me being honest not false. That was my real opinion. If i wanted to inflate terrys real prime height then i would of said he was ft6,10. Thats being false. Terry was a big fella in his prime that can,t be disputed. I know there have been a good few people bigger over the years in the WWF. But few in the 80,s. But honestly i have seen enough pics of terry in his prime to know exactly what i mean and don,t worry you haven,t hurt my feelings at all. I,m 42 not 2 and i have an answer for everything. I know there is alot of you guys that disagree with me and to be perfectly honest, i really enjoy reading everyones thoughts on terrys prime height. But not everyone thinks terry stood ft6,5 prime. I believe he was no less than ft6,6.5 now and he was most definately more than ft6,6 wearing thick soled nike trainers. Rob gave terry a listing of ft6,6 prime and thats perfectly fine. I personally say now terry stood ft6,6.5 prime. Thats my opinion and i don,t see anything wrong with that. But nobody would know terrys real prime height better than terry himself and that can,t be disputed.

Daniel reynolds said on 10/May/19
Canson: i think it,s more to do with the fact that you and other doubters don,t want to agree with me more than anything else. You see my point. If i am older than you then i would of watched wrestling before you and i would of remembered terry in his prime. So i know exactly what i,m on about.

Daniel reynolds said on 10/May/19
Canson: i know what i am talking about otherwise i wouldn,t bother. I have my opinions. Not everyone disagrees with me and just because i am out numbered doesn,t mean i am completely wrong either.

Daniel reynolds said on 10/May/19
You guys can,t always be right about all heights, especially if your talking prime as in actial prime. The only people that know there real height is the people them selves and now your going to say all wrestlers lie aboit their heights. I don,t understand why anyone that was ft6,5 would want to be ft6,7. Their tall enough.

Daniel reynolds said on 10/May/19
Greg; there would of been 2_3 inches between big van vador and sting in vadors favour n their face off in a ring around 1992. There would of been 2_2.5 inches between terry and big van vador in terrys favour in 1994. Now if vador was wearing elevators in his boots to gain a height on himself then thats probably why he looked so big. But canson i would really love to ask you. You and greg seem so sure on your height stats. Now i don,t know if you guys are stats fellas or just fans. But canson, you seem so sure terry wasn,t ft6,7 late 70,s early 80,s and mark calloway wasn,t ft6,9 in his prime. Did you ever met terry 70,s_80,s yourself. Because if you didn,t then you couldn,t very well say he wasn,t ft6,7 prime. Ok you can look at pics and footages, thats 1 thing. But meeting someone in their prime and pherhaps even witnessing them being measured in their prime is another ball game. Do you get my drift canson. Some people can look at a ft6,7 guy a say he,s ft6,5 range or ft6,5.5. But thats not the way to measure someone. Thats why i wouldn,t doubt what i am saying to you guys. If i thought what i was really saying was a colosal waste of time then i wouldn,t even bother posting my thoughts on this. 1 thing i wouldn,t do either is just call someone a liar without absolute proof.

RP said on 10/May/19
@ Canson,
Barkley’s 6’5” listing I had scene year’s ago on-line from a re-post of 1984 pre draft article describing Chuck’s stature as a shorter, but thicker & explosive player for his position. Mentioning that he was measured at only 6’5” without shoes. But, yes...you are absolutely right. It’s very likely & probably the they rounded up a 6’4-7/8” measurement. I too have never seen the NBA ever list a 1/8 measuremt like the NFL does. They always round up to the next 1/4” listing. The article was actively comparing Larry Johnson, Charles Barkley & Ben Wallace. All being successful while being shorter than most men in the league at their positions. Wallace at the time was playing center for the Pistons.
The article listed all men’s height without shoes as...
Barkley: 6’5”
Larry Johnson: 6’5-1/2”
Ben Wallace: 6’7-1/2”
It was noting Charles as probably the best short forward ever. And briefly touched based on Larry Johnson having listings @ 6’7” & 6’8”...but, actually only being 6’5-1/2” without shoes & etc.

Canson said on 10/May/19
@RoelC: he’s doing the same thing to you that he did to me. Putting words in your mouth because you don’t agree with him. Meaning embellishing your statements you say back to him when you disagree with or correct him. I used to respect him but it’s hard to when he’s putting words in everyone’s mouth and is just a notoripis upgrader who admitted that he’s a fan of Hogan previously. It’s just funny that everyone jumps down Sotiris’s back here but maybe only one other person has said anything to Dan Reynolds about being an upgrader when it’s clear

Daniel reynolds said on 10/May/19
Greg: did you ever meet hogan in his prime late 70,s_80,s. Because if you didn,t then you can,t very well say ronsters claims are complete nonsense. He says he did meet him so there for he would know exactly and would of seen the difference for himself.

Daniel reynolds said on 10/May/19
Sotiris gravas: you said the great khali is now ft6,10. But just so you do realise he was in fact ft7,1 prime and i certainly wouldn,t doubt ronster on saying hogans height prime. You keep looking at hogan in his 40,s 1995_2000. Hogan was taller in late 70,s and to say ronsters claims are nonsence is a real front. It is possible to of lost height between his prime and say 2000. His height was noticeably taller in the 80,s. You tell me and ronster how it is then that wrestlers do lose height with time. If ronster met hogan in 80,s and noticed a difference in hogans height between then and 2000,s then why would he lie. I notice it myself.

Canson said on 9/May/19
@Johan185: I agree with you. Absolute highest peak is Rob’s listing but really I’d cap him out (at a normal low in the afternoon) 6’5.5 with a good possibility at 6’5-6’5.5 range as well. Today I still think he’s 6’3” if he stands straight. Perhaps even a hair over like 6’3-6’3.25 zone. I think his height loss is a bit exaggerated. He’s probably only lost about 2-2.5” and it looks more because of footwear that he used to wear

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.