How tall is Brock Lesnar

Brock Lesnar's Height

6ft 2in (188 cm)

American Professional Wrestler and MMA Fighter. Brock himself stated his height in a 2008 NY Times article as "I'm 6-3 and 277 pounds" but when (briefly) at Minnesota Vikings Football team he was given a 6ft 2 listing.

Brock Lesnar in March 2015

You May Be Interested

The Undertaker
Height of The Undertaker
6ft 7.5in (202 cm)
John Cena
Height of John Cena
6ft 0.5in (184 cm)
Randy Orton
Height of Randy Orton
6ft 4in (193 cm)
CM Punk
Height of  CM Punk
5ft 11.75in (182 cm)

Add a Comment 250 comments

Average Guess (14 Votes)
6ft 2.02in
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 29/Sep/16
He's difficult to get a read on, his build makes him look shorter to me.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Sep/16
May have measured 189cm mid-morning and rounded it up to 6ft3. Looks more of a solid 6ft2 than a weak one. His bulk makes him look shorter...
Ice said on 27/Sep/16
ROB do you think he can Fall to 187 cm at night ?
Editor Rob: I don't think he'd be that short.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Sep/16
Rob, who do you think is tallest out of Goldberg, Lesnar, Reigns and Triple H?
Editor Rob: overall a peak Goldberg probably could have the edge, Reigns I think walks smaller than he actually measured, which suggests it could have been a more earlier in the day measurement.
Liam Boater said on 25/Sep/16
Bray Wyatt: 6ft 2in ( 188cm )
rvd said on 25/Sep/16
brock would be 6ft3 because he taller than people who ate listed 6ft2 like hhh for example
and cena is 6ft1
freak said on 24/Sep/16
if You put Undertaker at 6.75 no way Lesnar is less than 6.25 ..all I got to say .Never more than a 3 inch difference between these two..& I still think today Batista is shorter than Lesnar barefoot IMO..
MDV said on 23/Sep/16
The Rock-6' 2.5
Triple H-6'. 2
Brock Lesnar-6' 2.25
John Cena-6'.05
Dave Bautista-6'.2.25
Sheamus-6'.275
Seth Rollins-6'.1.25
Roman Reigns-6'2.5
Dean Ambrose-6'.1
Rusev-5'11.5
Undertaker-6'.6.5
Kane-6'.7
Bigshow-6'.10
Mark Henry-6'.2
Randy Orton-6'.4
JBL-6'.5
Booker T-6.0.25
Steve Austin-6.1
Kevin Owens-5'.9.5
Chris jericho-5'.9
Bray Wyatt-6.15
Dolph Ziggler-5'.10.5
miko said on 22/Sep/16
Rob have you ever considered adding Paul Heyman to the site? He seems in the 5'9.5/5'9.75 range to me as Brock can usually just about see over his head.
Editor Rob: I've not ruled him out
freak said on 19/Sep/16
My estimates for WWE wrestlers height today barefoot

The Rock-6.3
Triple H-6.2
Brock Lesnar-6.25
John Cena-6.05
Dave Bautista-6.2
Sheamus-6.3
Seth Rollins-6.2
Roman Reigns-6.25
Dean Ambrose-6.1
Rusev-6
Undertaker-6.6
Kane-6.7
Bigshow-6.11
Mark Henry-6.2
Randy Orton-6.4
JBL-6.5
Booker T-6.1
Steve Austin-6.1
Kevin Owens-5.9
Chris jericho-5.85
Bray Wyatt-6.15
Dolph Ziggler-5.10
Dave said on 19/Sep/16
Another underestimated guy... 6'2.75" must be closer to reality
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Sep/16
Lesnar: 188-189cm
Goldberg: 189-190cm
The Rock: 191-192cm

At peak that is…
Kourosh 5'9.5 (176cm-177cm) said on 17/Sep/16
@miko you are right. Brock Lesnar; footwear is usually very thine sole. But, i noticed that he has a habit of going on his toes during staredowns.
Eddie Brock said on 17/Sep/16
6'2" barefoot
265-286lbs
Lesnar
Pita ji said on 16/Sep/16
Just look at his picture with wiz khalifa and you will realize how tall he is .
miko said on 15/Sep/16
One thing to be noted is that when Brock wrestles, his MMA type footwear is very thin, so if he's going into a staredown before a match he's going to be at a disadvantage.
freak said on 15/Sep/16
Brock is a guy with a tremendous size,you can hardly see his neck..Dude is easily 189-190 cm,just cos he was billed 6.2 in both NFL or K1 doesn't mean he is over it..Lesnar has edged out various 6.2 guys like Reigns, Triple H,Shane McMahon with flat footwears..He may look over 6.3-6.4 w big sneakers at times,Lesnar can't be less than 189..Recent staredown with Orton proved it..Hell even guys like Batista and Goldberg will be shorter today,just cos they wore lifts doesn't mean they are taller for real..Easily 2 inches taller than 6.05 Cena +2 =6.25 ..that's it bro..
JJTOM said on 13/Sep/16
Anything under 6'3 for LESNAR is laughable.

Allegedly 6'4 dos santos with overeem
Click Here

With 6'3 or 6'4 Miocic (Miocic has flip flops, dos santos barefooted)
Click Here

Brock with dos santos seems shorter ? Not at all

Click Here
Click Here
Dos santos may have the top of his head Lil bit higher, only beacuse he has huge head.
Arms are on the same level.
My opinion 6'3-6'4 for Brock
MDV said on 11/Sep/16
Orton is 6 ft 6 in his wretling boots...Lesnar 6 ft 3.5 inc
Hight34 said on 6/Sep/16
Orton is a lot leaner then Brock making the inch height difference look 1.5 or 2.
Orton looked around 194/5cm in boots
Lesnar - 192 in boots
Randomdude said on 4/Sep/16
@Freak no he was measured at just over 6'2 and 1/4 by the NFL not 3/4
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Sep/16
Rob, who do you think is taller Lesnar or Triple H?
Editor Rob: Lesnar for me can give a bit taller impression overall.
184guy said on 3/Sep/16
6'2.25
heightjudger said on 3/Sep/16
with 6.7 Undertaker..looks 6.3 to me here like 3 inches difference here
Click Here
freak said on 3/Sep/16
Rob,its high time you give Lesnar an upgrade of atleast .25 ..Orton w an inch boot advantage edges Lesnar by only 1.5 inches & Orton I believe is a legit 6.4
Click Here
freak said on 2/Sep/16
Heard he was measured 6'2'.3/4 in the NFL
BTS14 said on 2/Sep/16
Lesnar is a solid 189cm , 192cm range in shoes
freak said on 2/Sep/16
judging By Orton's boots which gives him more than an inch advantage over Lesnar..in that case Lesnar is 6.25 or even a slight more close to 6.3 while Orton a solid 6.4 so 189-190 cm for Brock while Orton at 193 cm easy..
Christian-196.2cm (6ft5.25) said on 1/Sep/16
Wasn't Brock measured as 6ft2 1/4" in his football draft?
MDV said on 1/Sep/16
@Kourosh 5'9.5 (176cm-177cm)
I agree with you this is not an inch difference; but did you consider the footwear? Lesnar has 1 inch less than Orton big wresling boots, while lesnar boots
are pretty flat... i consider big brock as 6 ft 2.5 inc or 189 cm...
freak said on 1/Sep/16
Don't know if it's barefoot,likely it is
Seen here w 6.3 Alistair Overeem & Brock barely looks short a cm at most..So 6.25 easily for Brock no less..
Click Here
BorkLaser said on 1/Sep/16
Yeah I see what you mean. The problem with that, though, is that Brock's wrestling boots give very little extra height (I have very similar ones; they're pretty much the standard amateur wrestling boots), like maybe 1 cm if that. But Orton wears different boots that easily give an extra inch. Brock's boots: Click Here Click Here Click Here, Orton's boots: Click Here Click Here Click Here
Ice said on 31/Aug/16
Hed get dwarfed by Badr Hari or Alexey Ignashov for sure . I also think Daniel Ghita or Rico Verhoeven would solidly Edge him out by like 5-6 cm . Kickboxers are very tall guys usually .
freak said on 31/Aug/16
...That pic of Lesnar with Orton has Orton no more than an inch on Lesnar,two inches lol..No way Lesnar looks a solid 6.25 if not 6.3 in this pic..
Kourosh 5'9.5 (176cm-177cm) said on 30/Aug/16
@BorkLaser yeah here it is Click Here. Just look at Brock Lesnar's eyes that are level with Randy Orton lower end of Nose and while Randy Orton's eyes are at middle of his forhead.

If it is not 2 inches but very close to it. this is not an inch difference
heightjudger said on 29/Aug/16
lesnar in barefoot should be atleast 189 cm if not 190,he is a cm shorter than rock imo..same as batista as seen in ovw,taller than hhh or reigns..doesnt look 6.3 due to his huge frame bdw nfl pre drafts are known to decrease height by an inch for some reasons..wouldn't be surprised if 6.3 as said by jim ross that lesnar at 6.3 300 lbs is an amazing athlete and uncomparable..
freak said on 29/Aug/16
With 6.3 Rock in 2002
Click Here
freak said on 29/Aug/16
At The Royal Rumble Event 2015,a look at the footwear's of Lesnar,Cena & Rollins

Click Here
freak said on 29/Aug/16
With 6.1 David Schwimmer
Click Here
freak said on 29/Aug/16
With 5.10 Paul Heyman

Click Here
freak said on 29/Aug/16
With 6.2 Triple H(2002)

Click Here
freak said on 29/Aug/16
With 6.3 Dwayne Johnson(Brock in barefoot)
Click Here
freak said on 29/Aug/16
With 6.25 Roman Reigns(probably same footwear)
Click Here
BorkLaser said on 25/Aug/16
Care to share a picture or a screenshot where he looked 2 inches shorter than Orton? freak's image looks good in that it shows Brock at 1 inch less than Randy but no more
Kourosh 5'9.5 (176cm-177cm) said on 24/Aug/16
Brock Lesnar was easily 2 inches shorter than randy.
freak said on 22/Aug/16
Lesnar was an inch taller than Shane o mac who is the same height as Batista,so Lesnar should be 6.25 or 6.3.thin soles looked the same as Orton in height maybe an inch short at most..
freak said on 22/Aug/16
Lesnar is 6.3 in front of a 6.4 Orton here, no footwear advantage
Click Here
freak said on 21/Aug/16
Rob..judging tonight Orton & Brock face to face Lesnar looked 6.3 strong near 6.4 Orton from every angle..same footwear ..
freak said on 19/Aug/16
well Rob Who do you think is taller Lesnar or Batista today?
Editor Rob: I still think Batista is taller
RP said on 18/Aug/16
In the early 2000's Brock wore 1.75" wrestling boots. Now he is often in the ring in 1" sneakers or 1" athletic trainers. That's why it appears many times that he's lost a 1/2" to 1" in height since 2000-2003. He was 6'4" In his old wrestling boots. He stands more like 6'3.25" in ring gear 2012-2016. Documented Barefoot height of 6'2-3/8" in 2004. Rob has him @ 6'2" I assume basing that on an evening height?? Correct Rob? Since 99% of NFL physicals are taken during the morning? And we are all assuming that 6'2.375" measurement in 2004 was a morning measurement ???
Jared said on 17/Aug/16
Smoosh and freak are both wrong. If Slater's only 5'11.5" as Smoosh said, then that would put Brock at only 6'1", which is ridiculous. And if Slater's a legit 6'2" as freak claimed, then Brock would be 6'3.5", which is also ridiculous.

IMO
Brock is 6'2"
Slater is 6'0.5"
freak said on 17/Aug/16
5.11 a bit short for Slater I guess he looks 2.5 inches shorter than a 6.4 Jinder Mahal..6.1 I guess ..Lesnar at times looks 6.3 w guys like Taker,Triple H,Curtis Axel,Show..6.2 w The Rock(maybe Rock a slight taller due to his huge head) Sometimes w Rollins..its really tricky tbh..K1 & NFL had him at 6.2 but NFL are known to reduce the height of their performers not known..Lesnar in 2002 looked the same as Hulk Hogan,taller than Triple H..& W Cena even 6.1 due to bad posture..They really need to measure Lesnar publicly and every other tall celebs IMO..lol
Smoosh said on 16/Aug/16
Freak, heath slater is like 5'11.5
James B said on 16/Aug/16
How tall do you think Heath slater looks next to lesner rob?

I'd guess 6'1 or 6'0.75
Editor Rob: he could look a 6ft 1 guy. He claimed 6ft 3 on twitter!
freak said on 16/Aug/16
first of all,putting Brock anything below 6.2 is absolutely absurd and laughable..secondly,looking at his segment with Slater..he had him by an inch with absolutely thin footwear w no soles.If Slater is a legit 6.2 or even 6.15 Lesnar is absolutely 6.25 spot on..period
The Man said on 14/Aug/16
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Aug/16
-------------------------------------------------
Are you crazy? Lesnar' only 39 and hasn't wrestled enough times to lose any height. He only fights like a few times a year. And I've never heard of anyone losing their height in their 30's unless they have a spinal disorder of some sort or a spinal fusion surgery, neither of which Brock had.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Aug/16
More like 6ft2 today, 6ft2¼-2½ peak
Viktor said on 10/Aug/16
Brock's height is 6'3, I'd say he is 192 cm in boots
James B said on 10/Aug/16
6'1.75 now and legit 6'2 in 2002
SOHIL said on 10/Aug/16
Brock is 188 cm tall,When he stands straight before JOHN CENA and SETH ROLLINS he looks 1 Inch taller.
Nobody said on 5/Aug/16
Is it possible that he could be just a little over 6'2? Triple H and Roman Reigns have never looked taller than him.
James B said on 30/Jul/16
For a large framed 6'2 man I think lesnar would be better off for cutting down to 209 pounds. 209 at 6'2 is still impressive.

Rob do you think Brock is a step above large boned like extra large framed? I
freak said on 30/Jul/16
taller than hhh,reigns ,ambrose today definetly 6.25 if not 6.3 but not 6.2 cos that is hhh..he has him by an inch..want that stare down w 6.4 Randy Orton..
Dave260 said on 29/Jul/16
Is 185.5-186cm possible before bed For a 270lb man like LESNAR Rob?
Editor Rob: can't see him quite that short.
Truth said on 28/Jul/16
Looks a little over 6'2" to me, a big dude.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jul/16
Rob, how likely is height loss for Lesnar?
Editor Rob: if anything it would appear a little fraction that isn't easy to spot, he may well have gone from solid 6ft 2 to just about 6ft 2.
Equin0x said on 27/Jul/16
Lesnar is one of them that's not height conscious due to his massive structure, he never seem to stand as tall as he could but he could really be about 190cm, I can't see the likes of Roman Reigns or Triple H being in the upper 6'2 range and Lesnar is actually taller than them!!?!
Phil said on 27/Jul/16
@ crane
well said. brock is 6 foot 3 in the wwe universe,but 6 foot 2 or 6 foot 1 in real life.
Crane said on 24/Jul/16
He can even pull of 6'4 because of his juiced to the gills size but in reality 6'1.5" - 6'1.75".
Randomdude said on 22/Jul/16
@Derek most definitely 6'2 because he was actually measured by the NFL and K1 at 6'2 he can pull off 6'3 because of his huge body and head but in reality he's a legit 6'2
186.5-185 said on 22/Jul/16
I think in shoes 6'2.5 (189)
Barefoot 186.5
Derek Cuelips said on 18/Jul/16
Brock Lesnar is most definitely 6'3" . The fact is he was also born in 1977 and he looks excellent for 39.
berta said on 16/Jul/16
can see him littel taller than this 188 -189 is his range
James B said on 14/Jul/16
His 6'3 claim was probably in shoes
KKB said on 13/Jul/16
brock lesnar is 190cm for sure coz in nfl most pre-draft measurable heights are 1 inch less.so he would have been listed at 6'3" if he played
B.nash said on 12/Jul/16
It seems UFC heights are all over the place. Cain Valasquez has been listed at 6'1 forever. All the sudden now he's 6'2. Doesn't surprise me that Lesnar got a 6'4 listing.
James B said on 11/Jul/16
There is absolutely no denying that 6ft2 and 6ft3 are tall heights for men in the UK/US but in my opinion they do not stand out as being anything special. In town today I saw someone I knew who is 6'2.5-6'3 range (measures near 6ft4 in shoes) and sure he looked big and tall but he did not stand out in a public setting as being a unusually large person.

I think 6ft4 or 6ft5 is when you stand as being exceptional. When you get to 6ft10 people will want to have there photos taken with you in public which would never happen in England if you were 6ft5 lol. Maybe in a short country like China people would want there photos taken with you if you were 6ft5?
Sammy said on 10/Jul/16
Rob explain how lesnar got a 6'4" listing at ufc 200
Editor Rob: he probably asked with a kind fist, '6ft 4 please'...
MDV said on 10/Jul/16
How tall do you think is Mark Hunt ? From the face off with Lesnar he didn't look 5 ft 10 in
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jul/16
6ft2 is a very decent height. I think it's where you begin to stand out ever so slightly. Certainly one should feel very comfortable at this height.
miko said on 9/Jul/16
He looked at least 4 inches taller than Hunt however tall he really is.
Alex said on 9/Jul/16
Be 6'2 is perfect, is a tall height but not too tall. A man starts to have a dominant height around 6'4-6'5 and above. Of course you need a bulky frame, otherwise you're just tall. You can be 200 cm but if you are skinny, you are not so impressive, you are just super tall.
Ez186.5 said on 8/Jul/16
190cm possible at start of day Rob
Crane said on 7/Jul/16
Thanks Rob! @Mathew190cm Of course, there are tons of evidence to prof that!
jonsnow said on 6/Jul/16
I think he should be upgraded to 6'2,5'' or 6'2,75''. no way he is below 6'2''
James B said on 4/Jul/16
Brock Lesner is the textbook example of a 6'2 man
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 2/Jul/16
6'1.5" - 6'1.75" range more than a solid 6'2", really.
Crane said on 2/Jul/16
Rob, what's your thought on Brock Lesnar vs Mark Hunt @UFC 200 ?
Editor Rob: sometimes these matches really are on a knife-edge and it's a sport I wouldn't bet on!
James B said on 2/Jul/16
Ice- I agree 6'2 is for sure tall but it's not freakish big.
Ice said on 29/Jun/16
And since I am his height I can say that its not impressive to be 6'2 . Cause its not . 6'5" would be impressive for example ..
Ice said on 29/Jun/16
@ Saqib lol , Im a martial artist and athletic / strong , but nowhere near Lesnars level . I know hed destroy me . As for height , Im prob the exact same height as Lesnar . I wake up at 189.5 cm . So Im a legit 6'2" . I measured myself barefoot under a stadiometer .
James B said on 28/Jun/16
I think 6'2.25 in 2002 is fair.
vibhor said on 28/Jun/16
I saw his picture with wiz khalifa . He is looking much shorter than him
Canson said on 24/Jun/16
@saqib: I'm beginning to think that Ice claims his shoes or is clearly insecure about this height. 6'2 is no slouch. It's tall. And Brock at most 6'2.
Randomdude said on 23/Jun/16
@Oscar he was measured by the NFL he is 6'2

yes he's a big guy but he's not 6'3 or maybe 6'4 because if he was he wouldn't have measured in at 6'2.
oscar said on 22/Jun/16
Lesnar is a solid 6'3" maybe 6'4" he's got them german genes haha
Dave260 said on 21/Jun/16
183-188cm is the start of being a decently tall person anywhere
Saqib said on 16/Jun/16
@ice tell that to his face and report back from the afterlife :)


6'2 is impressive height
James B said on 14/Jun/16
Yeah lesner's height of 6'2 is not his most impressive quality. If he was 6'4-6'5 his height it would be a different story.
Dave260 said on 13/Jun/16
@BigJD Yes but there is evidence to suggest he is 6'1.5/6'2 barefoot mate
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Jun/16
Cena I think is just under 6ft1
Ice said on 13/Jun/16
A not very impressive height for a impressive guy .
BigJD said on 13/Jun/16
Honestly laughable st how much people downgrade people's heights on this website. Brock lesnar is clearly 6'3", there's absolutely no way he's 6'1.5" like so many of you claim. Go watch his ufc fights against guys like frank mir and Shane carwin, clearly taller than 6'2" carwin and the same height maybe slightly taller than 6'3" mir.
Ice said on 11/Jun/16
A not - so impressive height for a impressive dude ..
Dave260 said on 11/Jun/16
Lesnar Had an inch on 184cm Shane Carwin. Call brock 186.5cm tall
miko said on 10/Jun/16
Cena is 6'0.5/6'0.75 when he stands up straight, Brock is 6'2.
@Saqib said on 9/Jun/16
There is one inch difference between the two in that video at most 1.5, If cena is 6'0 tall then that would make brock 6'2.
MrTBlack said on 8/Jun/16
Frank Mir is like 6'1" really.
Ice said on 7/Jun/16
@Brad newsflash : almost every MMA fighters height stats get inflated ..
Saqib said on 7/Jun/16
If brock is 6'1.5 then john cena must be 5'11.5 which is absurd.
In this video if you pause at 2:05 you'll see there is 2 inch difference between them.

Click Here


Cena aint shorter than 6ft. He has always been listed at 6'1 and brock at 6'3 on various sites but here cena is listed at 6'0.5 which makes brock 6'2.5 in that video. To me brock has always looked closer to 6'3.


He needs to be upgraded to 6'2.5
191-193 said on 7/Jun/16
NFL has no reason that I can think of to inflate their measurements, which in turn shows that many UFC fighters' heights are probably a bit exaggerated imo.
@Crane: You're right, BL is so jacked that he can easily look taller.
Azmi said on 7/Jun/16
This cannot be possible...You listed Roman reings as 6ft 2.5 and Brock lesnar 6ft 2...You should look at their staredown in which Brock is clearly half an inch taller than roman...If roman is 6ft 2.5 then brock should 6ft 3 and if Brock is really 6 ft 2 then roman reings should be 6ft 1.5
ezz180 said on 6/Jun/16
from looking at his ufc and wwe career id he is 6'1.5" tall. And in an inch or more shoe 6'2.5". (Hence the 6'3 claims).
Crane said on 5/Jun/16
Lesnar is back in action at UFC 200! Click Here
Crane said on 3/Jun/16
@. Nah... Not at all. He's more like a 6'1.5 - 6'1.75 and built like The Incredible Hulk!
Randomdude said on 2/Jun/16
yeah but they where wearing wrestling boots which add about 2 inches
. said on 2/Jun/16
brock lesnar is 6 ft(183cm).
James B said on 31/May/16
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/May/16
@James: I saw Test up close at a house show in 2008 and he looked near 6ft5...


He only had 2 inches on Brock lesner at king of the ring 2002
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/May/16
@James: I saw Test up close at a house show in 2008 and he looked near 6ft5...
Crane said on 26/May/16
You never know, a 285 lbs mountain of a weak 6'2 like Lesnar could pass for being a 6'3.
Ur mom said on 17/May/16
Nope. Brock taller than dos Santos
alexbigguy said on 17/May/16
brock is 6 foot 2. 25 cain velasquez is 6 foot 0.5, fabricio werdum is 6 foot 3, junior dos santos is 6 foot 2.
Phil said on 14/May/16
brock is 6 foot 2. cain velasquez is 6 foot 1, fabricio werdum is 6 foot 4, junior dos santos is 6 foot 3.
Ice said on 13/May/16
Badr Hari would tower over Lesnar
Nobody said on 13/May/16
I think he could be 6'2 1/4 at most. Taller than Roman Reigns and Triple H, the same height as Sheamus while just a tad shorter than guys like Batista, Goldberg, The Rock and Edge.

Brock and Reigns, go to 6:30 of the video:

Click Here

Brock and Triple H:

Click Here
James B said on 12/May/16
I think lesner was 6'2.25 in 2002 so that would mean Test was around 6'4 1/2.

Vegas how tall did test look to you?
Dave260 said on 11/May/16
just below 6'2 barefoot, strong 186.5
Smoosh said on 7/May/16
For everyone posting backstage face to face standoffs etc, Id like to inform you that they stand on blocks of wood, when they want to make someone look bigger in an interview, to give them a 1 or 2 inch advantage, they do this in tv, they do this in movies, so thats where the confusion comes in, I was told this by a couple of ex Wwe guys, when they were working the indies here in England.
Dave260 said on 4/May/16
lesnar had about 1cm on 185cm Carwin
randomdude said on 2/May/16
at John no he's not a legit 6'3 if he has been measured at 6'2 and mir has claimed 6'1 in the past like his old website said

that been said i don't think Lesnar is under 6'2 either
Crane said on 1/May/16
@joe More like Goldberg 6'2.5, Lesnar 6'1.5.
John said on 1/May/16
nope, broc is a legit 6ft 3, hes taller than listed frank mir who claims 6ft 3
joe### said on 28/Apr/16
goldberg 6´2.5
lesnar 6´2
James B said on 27/Apr/16
Brock and tripl h at there peaks were both identical at 6'2.25
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/16
I think his bulk can actually make him look taller...
Jiminy said on 24/Apr/16
Back in 2002 I thought Brock Lesnar was slightly shorter than Triple H because of the posture of Triple H, hunching forward.
Kail said on 22/Apr/16
He is not over 6'1, he is MAX 3 inches taller than 5'9 kurt angle, back in his prime 2003.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Apr/16
I thought 10-15 years ago Triple H could look slightly taller than Lesnar...
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 20/Apr/16
Johan said on 19/Apr/16
He is taller than Roman Reigns who gets a 6'2.5" listing here. Feel free to watch their contest at Wrestlemania 31 when they square off. Lesnar has the edge.

Reign´s isn´t 6´2.5" , not even close. Watch the red carpet Hall of fam 2015 and 2016. Reigns is 6´1.5"-6´1.75".
Johan said on 19/Apr/16
He is taller than Roman Reigns who gets a 6'2.5" listing here. Feel free to watch their contest at Wrestlemania 31 when they square off. Lesnar has the edge.
Crane said on 19/Apr/16
@Dave260 I'd say that too. He mostly sticked around 186-187 since 2001, the NFL measured him as 6'1.5" and probably round him up to 6'2" just like they did with many of their athletes, who'd bother with another .5 add on right ?
John said on 18/Apr/16
With Randy Orton on backstage Click Here
Dave260 said on 18/Apr/16
Lesnar is nothing over 186.5 barefoot
James B said on 17/Apr/16
I'd say tripl h looks 6'1.5 here
Click Here

However perhaps lesners hair could given him a slight height advantage.
John said on 15/Apr/16
Still have some people think triple h is taller than brock WTF ! open your eyes
randomdude said on 15/Apr/16
Junior31 Mir has stated he is 6'1 on his old website but i would say Mir is closer to 6'2 then 6'3,Carwin is no taller than 6'0.5 and he looked about 1.5 inches taller than billed 6'1 valasquez,UFC bill their heights just like the WWE aswell it's been proven.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Apr/16
Goldberg looks minimum 6ft2½ if not a weak 6ft3. He edges out Lesnar and Triple H (both around 6ft2 flat)
joe @@ said on 14/Apr/16
goldberg 6´2.5
lesnar 6´2
hhh 6´2.25
joe @@ said on 14/Apr/16
goldberg 6'2
lesnar 6.2
triple h 6'2.25
joe @@ said on 14/Apr/16
goldberg looked highest 6'2.5 is not possible
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Apr/16
Rob, which zone would Lesnar measure in?

A) 191cm/189cm
B) 190.5cm/188.5cm
C) 190cm/188cm
D) 189.5cm/187.5cm
E) 189cm/187cm
James B said on 13/Apr/16
He made test look no more than a legit 6'4 in 2002 but then maybe test was not standing at his best when squaring up to Brock?
EM185 said on 13/Apr/16
6ft 1.5in Bare foot , 6ft 2.6 In shoes
Jason said on 12/Apr/16
I agree with Brad I tend to think Lesnar is 6'2.5. Abit taller than 6'2. He looks alot taller than Triple h too who is billed at a legitimate height of 6'2
Junior31 said on 11/Apr/16
Brad on Brock Lesnar
Watch Lesnar barefoot in the octagon. He is comfortably over 6'2" Shane Carwin. He is the same exact height as 6'3" Frank Mir. He is actually very close in height to 6'5" Alistair Overeem. He is more than an inch taller than 6'1" Cain Valesquez. A normally proportioned person has a reach that is equal to their height. Its common for athletes (especially fighters) to have greater reach/height ratio. Brock's reach is an astounding 81 inches! It is unlikely that he is 74 in (6'2") or less in height. Couple this with the his weight (265-285 athletic build) and we know we are dealing with a very large man. The barefoot Lesnar is comfortably taller than nearly every man around in footwear. This is not doable for a person that is 6'2" or under. Watch the footage from these UFC fights on youtube. Be aware of camera angles, perspective, footwear etc. Concerning the supposed 6'2"3/8 measurement with the NFL. It is entirely possible that he got a bad measurement or he was having a shorter day/moment. At the doctors office Ive been measured everything from 5'11" (once by a 5 foot nurse) to 6'1" multiple times. (I'm 6'1" waking 6'0.5-.75" through the day, 6'0.25" at my absolute lowest). Brock routinuely does heavy lifting, and impact sports. He jogs with logs on his shoulders. I can image how that might influence your height moment by moment and as you approach middle age.

I nearly always agree with Rob, but the evidence seems to suggest that Lesnar is the height he claims and the height that hes billed at by the UFC. He is a very big person. I cannot see 6'2" even. Somewhere between 6'2, 3/8" and 6'3" is reasonable. Im leaning toward 6'3" prime based upon barefoot footage and multiple claims.

PS-Yes, I know wikipedia pulled him down to 6'2" as well.


Agree with you but overeem is not 6'5. He's 6'3.5. Brock is 6'2.5 at best
sohil said on 11/Apr/16
He is 188 cm tall and 295 lbs.Because he looks only 1 inch taller than 184 cm.Cena and 185 cm.Seth Rollins.
Brad said on 11/Apr/16
I appologize it is the bing search engine that displays 6'2" in the bio. Im not sure where theyre pulling that from. Wiki still has him at 6'3". imdb has 6'2.5"
Editor Rob: should check out the unbiased search engine DuckDuckGo.com:

Click Here

they know a good site when they see it ;)
Brad said on 11/Apr/16
Watch Lesnar barefoot in the octagon. He is comfortably over 6'2" Shane Carwin. He is the same exact height as 6'3" Frank Mir. He is actually very close in height to 6'5" Alistair Overeem. He is more than an inch taller than 6'1" Cain Valesquez. A normally proportioned person has a reach that is equal to their height. Its common for athletes (especially fighters) to have greater reach/height ratio. Brock's reach is an astounding 81 inches! It is unlikely that he is 74 in (6'2") or less in height. Couple this with the his weight (265-285 athletic build) and we know we are dealing with a very large man. The barefoot Lesnar is comfortably taller than nearly every man around in footwear. This is not doable for a person that is 6'2" or under. Watch the footage from these UFC fights on youtube. Be aware of camera angles, perspective, footwear etc. Concerning the supposed 6'2"3/8 measurement with the NFL. It is entirely possible that he got a bad measurement or he was having a shorter day/moment. At the doctors office Ive been measured everything from 5'11" (once by a 5 foot nurse) to 6'1" multiple times. (I'm 6'1" waking 6'0.5-.75" through the day, 6'0.25" at my absolute lowest). Brock routinuely does heavy lifting, and impact sports. He jogs with logs on his shoulders. I can image how that might influence your height moment by moment and as you approach middle age.

I nearly always agree with Rob, but the evidence seems to suggest that Lesnar is the height he claims and the height that hes billed at by the UFC. He is a very big person. I cannot see 6'2" even. Somewhere between 6'2, 3/8" and 6'3" is reasonable. Im leaning toward 6'3" prime based upon barefoot footage and multiple claims.

PS-Yes, I know wikipedia pulled him down to 6'2" as well.
PFG said on 10/Apr/16
Randomdude ok you could be right but i think looking the photos my opinion is overeem:192 lesnar 190/91 cigano 190
Johno said on 9/Apr/16
Not as tall as the Rock and the Rock does seem to be walking around a weak 6'2 or 6'1.75.

6'1.5?
John said on 8/Apr/16
Click Here
James B said on 5/Apr/16
Rob I do think 6'2.25 is possible is possible 12 years ago since he was same height as Goldberg
Editor Rob: it's never not been a possibility, he may well have been depending on time of day.
Alexbigguy said on 5/Apr/16
@Rob you listed bill goldberd at 6ft 2.5 in and he was measured in NFL at 6ft 2in....why you give brock at 6 ft 2 and not 6 ft 2.25 in? he looks a little taller than a flat 6ft 2 inc
James B said on 1/Apr/16
I think 6'2.25 is very likely when younger given that he only looked 2 inches shorter than test at king of the ring 2002.
alexbigguy said on 30/Mar/16
rob you listed bill goldberd at 6ft 2.5 in and he was measured in NFL at 6ft 2in....why you give brock at 6 ft 2 and not 6 ft 2.25 in? he looks a little taller than a flat 6ft 2 inc
Gary said on 29/Mar/16
He looks more 6ft2.5, I still think he's a tad bit taller than triple h.
randomdude said on 29/Mar/16
he does not look bigger than 6'2 he barely looked much taller than 6'0.5 Cena or 6'0 Bob Holly lol show me some proof he was measured at 6'2 by the NFL and K1 he's probably 189cm on a good day
The Ben said on 28/Mar/16
He looks bigger than 6'2. I'd say 6'3 max.
randomdude said on 26/Mar/16
nope how is a pure 6'3 when he was measured at 6'2?

6'2 6'3 in boots
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Mar/16
Click Here

He's got 1-2in on Triple H in this clip!
Viktor said on 21/Mar/16
Lesnar is pure 6'3 and 6'4 in wrestling boots
vaslo singh said on 20/Mar/16
i think that brock lesnar is more than 188cm my height is 198cm
Jim Hopper said on 20/Mar/16
Another lie in the WWE. 6-2" max. Billed @ 6-4+
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Mar/16
192-193cm in wrestling boots
Sohil said on 2/Mar/16
He is 187cm tall,Because cena is 184cm and Beast is about 3 or 4 cm taller than him.
MaxNZ said on 24/Feb/16
Rob - More like an index page of wrestlers, just in the same way you have individual pages for each letter of the alphabet. You could have one index page that had purely all the wrestlers featured on celebheights listed in alphabetical order. Could do similar thing for MMA and Boxing etc I'm often looking at an MMA fighters page and thinking i wonder how many other fighters are listed on this site. I didn't know there was a soccer page?!?
Editor Rob: ah, I understand what you mean. To do that will take time.
191outofbed said on 23/Feb/16
@Ended of debates

could you post this overeem interview here?
Johnny said on 22/Feb/16
On FastLane 2016 Paul Heyman Says he weight in 295 lbs
Johnny said on 22/Feb/16
On FastLane 2016 Paul Heyman Says he weight in 295 lbs
Ended of debates said on 20/Feb/16
I will never forget in an interview Alistair Overeem said he thought Brock Lesnar was taller than him before a face off. This was during the time that they were promoting Overeem vs Lesnar and their heights were constantly mentioned on commercial 6'3" Lesnar vs 6'5" Overeem. Why the hell would Overeem think Lesnar was taller than him at 6'3" unless Overeem himself was under 6'3"? Then only logical conclusion that one could come to was that Overeem is actually under 6'3" himself probably 6'2 - 6'2.5" as he looks in a lot of interviews. After the face off Lesnar talked about how he was shocked to see Lesnar was shorter than he was. Lesnar must be under 6'2.5" if bill Lesnar at 6'1.5" at this point.
Paul said on 19/Feb/16
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover
Most wrestling boots do not give you a solid 2 inches in height. And Brock's boots are especially thinner than most wrestlers, so I don't see it giving him more than 3/4 inch. So 6ft2 barefoot, 6ft2.75 with boots.
miko said on 19/Feb/16
Due to Brock being so wide its hard for him to look legit tall. Put him in the ring with a skinny 6'2 and if they aren't standing close together you'd think the other guy was taller.

His staredowns with HHH and Reigns pretty much confirm he's nothing under 6'2 and if he does drop under it late at night its by the width of a hair.
Johnny said on 19/Feb/16
On 2002 Jim Ross say he 6'3 maybe 6'4 and 300 lbs
MaxNZ said on 18/Feb/16
Hey Rob have you ever thought about adding a feature where similar people featuring on this site are grouped together? For example a wrestling page or a boxing/mma page, i am always interested in comparing the billed to heights to the opinions on her,e would be great if there was a consolidated page of all of them!
Editor Rob: just like a general wrestler page a bit like the soccer page on here? I think there are a few wrestling pages on here that get regular comments like andre/nash/hogan etc.

I'm not sure if there
Jiminy said on 18/Feb/16
During 2002-2004 Brock was always billed at 6'4". Jim Ross would sometimes say that he was 6'3" and I remember Tazz describing him as 6'5" in WWE magazine.
Johnny said on 18/Feb/16
His billed on 2002-2004 is 6'4 and on njpw he still 6'4
James B said on 17/Feb/16
Probably was a bit over 6'2 in his 20s
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Feb/16
He's probably pushing 6ft4 in boots. I think he may have been billed as high as 6ft5 at one stage like Goldberg.

He does look a legit 6ft2 guy in general and sometimes a bit over.
Jimmy said on 17/Feb/16
6'4 with wrestling
James B said on 14/Feb/16
6'4 is not a massive inflation for lesner compared to others like kane
Jim Hopper said on 11/Feb/16
WWE had him at 6-4"...more bull.
James said on 9/Feb/16
For some reason I could see Brock at 189cm
James said on 9/Feb/16
To 6'5 Vinnie : You do know fighters competing in the UFC regularly cut down their weight before the actual weigh in to make it into that weight category? Brock lesnar couldn't even make it into the heavy weight maximum limit of 265 lbs, so before the fight he had to drain all his fluids and cut carbs out losing about 15-20lbs. When it ca me to the actual fight, lesnar walked 20 lbs heavier in weight . Brock Lesnar is easily 286lbs and in the WWE 2004 days he was 300 lbs. I've seen him in person, and he definitley looks like a all round big man.
Johnny said on 9/Feb/16
Look taller than roman reigns abit even he didn't wear wrestling boots
alexbigguy said on 8/Feb/16
@vinnie
Lesnar at his prime looked around 300 pounds of muscles(around 2002-2003)...today more 280....in ufc only 260-265 for the different training with massive cardio and abs....looking now at Brock he has more fat part of body especially in his belly
alexbigguy said on 6/Feb/16
Lesnar looks always taller compared with other wwe superstar. Personally I think he could be 6' 2.5" (189 cm).with undertaker I can see around 4 inches... So 189 and 200 cm are good for both
6 ft 5 Vinnie said on 6/Feb/16
James said on 3/Feb/16
---------------
WWE exaggerates their wrestlers weights as well, not just heights. I don't buy for a second that Lesnar's anything over 270 lbs.
Even when he was in the UFC (as UFC weights are legit) he was measured at 265 lbs, and he looked the same size as he does now in the WWE.
sambit said on 4/Feb/16
why is brock lesnar listed at 6'2 and roman reigns at 6'2 1/2? when everytime the both has appeared face to face it seemed lesnar was the one taller than reigns by about 1/2 inch, and also not to mention that lesnar made reigns looks small and scrawny
Crane said on 4/Feb/16
I also heard that if you whisper "Brock Lesnar" into the ears of little kids before they go to bed they gain 10% more muscle mass when they wake up!
Johnny said on 4/Feb/16
Lol ! Dean Ambrose is billed at 6'4 and Brock Lesnar is billed at 6'3 but during that face off Brock is like 3 inches taller than Dean Ambrose
Johnny said on 4/Feb/16
Look 6'3 on raw taller than triple h and ambrose
Andy 185cm said on 3/Feb/16
Triple H looks alot shorter than Brock here. Click Here
James said on 3/Feb/16
Brock lesnar is really fast for a 286 pound man. He would take you down in a split second. No chance against him..
When he tried out for the NFL, He ran a 4.6 in the 40 yard dash, benched 225 lbs 40 times, and had a 36 or 37 inch vertical. Thats pretty freaking athletic and comparable to great players such as JJ Watt. Brock lesnar never played football since highschool
James said on 2/Feb/16
Also looked taller than Triple h backstage on raw..
James said on 2/Feb/16
Strong 6'2. Looked a good 2 inches taller than 183cm Dean Ambrose on raw
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 1/Feb/16
Eclipse said on 30/Jan/16
Just accept the fact that you'll never beat up Brock Lesnar. Really... is it really that hard to comes to grips with that? It's easy.. watch this: I'm 6'2", 225, lift weights regularly, and I will never, ever be able to beat up Brock Lesnar.

____________________________________________________________________________

You just have to be hard enough to not get knocked...
Brock will dehydrate/acidify pretty fast, looking at his musclemass and how strong he sweats.
James B said on 31/Jan/16
Eclipse said on 30/Jan/16
Just accept the fact that you'll never beat up Brock Lesnar. Really... is it really that hard to comes to grips with that? It's easy.. watch this: I'm 6'2", 225, lift weights regularly, and I will never, ever be able to beat up Brock Lesnar.


Do you do UFC?
Eclipse said on 30/Jan/16
Just accept the fact that you'll never beat up Brock Lesnar. Really... is it really that hard to comes to grips with that? It's easy.. watch this: I'm 6'2", 225, lift weights regularly, and I will never, ever be able to beat up Brock Lesnar.
Alex 6'0 said on 30/Jan/16
Where's the official measurement of 6'2 3/8 for Brock? Yea these NFL combine heights are in the morning but its certainly not out of bed and even if its say 1-2 hrs after waking they'll surely have lost height from out of bed but wont be their low yet.
Alex 6'0 said on 30/Jan/16
CM Punk was at least in the 190lb range id say. 200 possible. No way 175 last I saw him
Crane said on 25/Jan/16
@RP Maybe 6'1.375" ?? Since it's impossible that he went up that high except he woke out of bed immediately and then measured.
RP said on 24/Jan/16
Rob, why not have Brock @ 6'2.375" ? Or, if you feel is now just a flat 6'2"...why not list him a peak height of 6'2.375" ? When there is a known medically documented NFL Physical of him being 6'2.375" & 286 lbs in 2004 ?
Editor Rob: I'm still trying to find the 3/8th's mention.
James B said on 22/Jan/16
CM punk is not a much over 175 pounds and he held his own against lesner too.

Punk had the advantage of speed and intelligence over brock
184.3cm (Night) said on 21/Jan/16
I think he used to take steriods but as of late he doesn't have that "look" anymore. I wouldn't doubt he did in his youth though as during his early WWE run he looked like a freak.

I don't think there is much contest between Kane ( Glenn) and Brock. Glenn is an intelligent guy who seems good natured while Brock is an animal who lives to fight. I wouldn't put much on arm wrestling either, that is more technique than anything else. Ofc guys who are pro Arm wrestlers train their forearms and work on their grip far more than normal gym goers. Look up Thor v Devon Larrat.

One is 6'5 the other is about 6'8 and outweighs him by an easy 100 pounds. Thor is one of the worlds strongest men and he gets destroyed.
Omid said on 20/Jan/16
I read somewhere that according to Lesnar himself, the only guy backstage who he couldn't beat in arm wrestling was Kane, makes you wonder though how would have a real fight went between a physically prime Kane and Lesnar......
James B said on 20/Jan/16
Can I just make the point to some people on here that I don't really consider myself a proper ectomorph. More like a cross between an ecto/ mesomorph. In fact when I was 18 I got quite fat and weighed 168-172 pound range because I would pig out a lot on food. I had a friend in college actually who was the textbook definition of an ectomorph standing at 5'10, weighing 140 pounds and he used to complain how he could not gain weight no matter how much he would eat.

When I was 19-20 I remember I used to lift very heavy weights on the machines at the gym (without doing a lot of cardio) and at my heaviest I weighed 174 pounds. At that time I was not dissimilar to daniel Bryan's build. These days I have slimmed down to 148 pounds by drinking more water, exercising more and not lifting weights that are too heavy. I remember 2 years ago at my lightest I weighed 138 pounds because I was obsessed with having a physique like David beckham or Bruce lee so I would over exercise by cycling miles lol everyday. I looked way too thin in the face at that weight but I am much better of now 12 pounds heavier.

I have narrow shoulders, thick strong legs, a long neck, fairly big chest and naturally big arms so I consider myself a mixture of ecto/meso
James B said on 20/Jan/16
Crane said on 20/Jan/16
@James B Why you can't beat him? - 6'2" and built like the Incredible Hulk
- Two-time NCAA All-American
- 2000 NCAA Heavyweight Champion (Real Wrestling)
- UFC HW champion after just four MMA fights (including two title defenses) One takedown and you're done mate.


You don't believe he takes steriouds then?
Crane said on 20/Jan/16
@James B Why you can't beat him? - 6'2" and built like the Incredible Hulk
- Two-time NCAA All-American
- 2000 NCAA Heavyweight Champion (Real Wrestling)
- UFC HW champion after just four MMA fights (including two title defenses) One takedown and you're done mate.
John said on 19/Jan/16
@James B
Sorry, but your brother's statement was kind of ridiculous. That's like saying what kind of foods you eat determines your race or ethnicity. Lol.

Your bone length and thickness are mostly hereditary.
176.2 said on 19/Jan/16
@James B
Who else goes to street fight without a gun/knife?
Honestly I would give him a nice headshot and he's finished. Bigger is even better more chance of a fatal hit.
James B said on 18/Jan/16
John said on 18/Jan/16
I respect James B's confidence and determination, but I gotta agree with Rampage Clover and Kourosh. The chances of him hurting Brock, let alone defeating him in a street fight would be very slim to none. Based on his height and weight ratio, James is probably an ectomorph, while Brock's either a mesomorph or an endomorph. Their bone structure and frame size is completely different. There's almost no way you can kick a guy's butt twice your weight, especially when the guy's an amateur wrestling champion and a MMA champion.


My brother said there's no such thing as being naturally 'large boned' it's all about what we eat.
184.3cm (Night) said on 18/Jan/16
Anyone has a chance in a streetfight because there are no rules. All it takes is the will to hurt someone badly. Too many people walk away when a guy goes down, thats their mistake.

I don't know though James if you would stand a chance against a trained fighter though given that he is more than 100 pounds heavier.

I've fought bigger guys before but usually they were 50 pounds or so max heavier. 260 pounds to my 210 pounds.

Like many have said the element of surprise works wonders, especially if you are just as strong as your larger opponent. You could win it right there because of their shock.
John said on 18/Jan/16
I respect James B's confidence and determination, but I gotta agree with Rampage Clover and Kourosh. The chances of him hurting Brock, let alone defeating him in a street fight would be very slim to none. Based on his height and weight ratio, James is probably an ectomorph, while Brock's either a mesomorph or an endomorph. Their bone structure and frame size is completely different. There's almost no way you can kick a guy's butt twice your weight, especially when the guy's an amateur wrestling champion and a MMA champion.
Crane said on 17/Jan/16
@Click Here The Great Giant Viking White Warrior!
James B said on 17/Jan/16
Kourosh- I once weighed 140 pounds at my height if 5'7 1/4 and but since now I life more weight I have gotten up to 148 pounds.

Perhaps you should do more weight lifting and get up around to around 157 pounds of muscle.

For your height I think that would be perfect since you can get a bit more power on you without being overweight and I bet that punch from your 6'2 friend would not feel anywhere near as painful if you were 157 lbs
James B said on 17/Jan/16
Crane- why? I think leaner is an okay guy in real life

Don't get wwe confused with real life lol
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jan/16
@James B: No offence but Lesnar has been doing this for over 25 years and he's not obese. He's naturally a large boned guy and he's bulked up the healthiest way possible. Aswell 154lbs up from 148lbs is hardly a transformation.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 17/Jan/16
James B said on 12/Jan/16
Guys I plan on doing a big weightlifting routine workout at gym and I already do lots of kickboxing

I am 5'7 and plan on getting up to 154 pounds of pure muscle (I currently weigh 148 pounds)

Do you reckon I could stand a chance against a guy like lesner in a street fight if I train really hard?



Could Bruce Lee beat him - of course, in a streetfight it´s always hard to foresee a winner...
If you´re hard and strong enough... Size and weight isn´t necessary strength... or punching/kicking power... or how much you can take...
Crane said on 16/Jan/16
@James B Well one thing is for sure, I wouldn't wana be in the same cell with him.
Kourosh said on 16/Jan/16
James B

I am just 5'9 1/4 and weight only 143 pounds so it means im a small guy. In my gym where train they are guys at 6'2 6'3 and over 230Ibs that i spar with. Can you imagine almost double of my size. Not to sound cocky but my kickboxing skills is much much higher than them and during sparring i have been able to hit them and giving them hard times . But due to their longer arms and better reach i took whole alot more punches and kicks and it is very very risky and difficult to reach their face because they are much taller and their long arms can easily counter punch you back. You just need to catch them off guard.


But Remember those big guys i spared with had zero knowledge in grappling and wrestling it was just a stand up fight. Brock Lesnar who is NCAA wrestling champion at 280 pounds, once he takes you down its over for you buddy there is absolutely no way to escape im telling ya.

Back to stand up fighting , I remember one day i was sparring with my partner who is at 6'2 and 230 pounds , i hit him many times and he felt nothing and once he landed a clean punch to my face i couldnt feel my teeth and i almost had my neck broken since he used his body weight for his punch.

My plan for guys who are much bigger than me is just to round around and make them tire once i realize they are out of breath i jump in and kick and punch but still its challenging.


Yes it is possible to beat them but its not going to be easy no matter how much a better fighter you are than them, they still have the edge more power, stronger and bigger buddy, and longer reach .

Good Luck.
James B said on 16/Jan/16
John said on 16/Jan/16
@Eclipse
You never know though, a 7 inch and 130 pound difference may seem a lot, but it's not the size of the dog in the fight, but rather the size of the fight in the dog.

Exactley. And why does height matter that much when it comes to street fighting anyway?

By the way lesner weighing as much as he does for his height of 6'2 is considered obese. Remember when he had problems breathing and went purple in the face at summerslam 2 years ago. People thought he was having a heart attack.

All that extra mass/weight puts a strain on the heart and organs.
John said on 16/Jan/16
@Eclipse
You never know though, a 7 inch and 130 pound difference may seem a lot, but it's not the size of the dog in the fight, but rather the size of the fight in the dog.
James B said on 16/Jan/16
Eclipse said on 16/Jan/16
@James B.... reality check here... no- no way, no how, not ever.


Brock is a human being like me and the rest of us too you u know.
Eclipse said on 16/Jan/16
@James B.... reality check here... no- no way, no how, not ever.
James B said on 12/Jan/16
Guys I plan on doing a big weightlifting routine workout at gym and I already do lots of kickboxing

I am 5'7 and plan on getting up to 154 pounds of pure muscle (I currently weigh 148 pounds)

Do you reckon I could stand a chance against a guy like lesner in a street fight if I train really hard?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 11/Jan/16
Sid was a more impressive figure than Brock, but Sid wasn´t a pro fighter.
Brock would beat him pretty fast.
Crane said on 11/Jan/16
Sid won't last a minute with 2 times NCAA Heavyweight Champ and a UFC Heavyweight Champ. He won't be able to defend Brock's double legs takedown.
James B said on 6/Jan/16
Yeah I think Brock lesner would have not have had a problem beating Him. Sid looked much more tougher and imposing than he really was. A guy who is 6'6 range with monstrous bulk like Sid would make most people feel intimidated.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jan/16
I think Brock would have a fair chance against Sid....he's a real fighter
Renato said on 28/Dec/15
Totally wrong i saw Brock, JDS and Overrem, I´m a 5`11 and Brock ate least 6´2 or more, JDS 6´3 or 6´4 and Overeen 6`4 or more
Crane said on 23/Dec/15
He never been 189cm in his life... I'm sorry. Maximum for him is around 6'1.5 - 6'2. 15 years ago he probably woke up at 189cm.
James B said on 22/Dec/15
6'2.25 is possible for lesner in 2002.

He only looked 2 inches under 6'4.75 test at king of the ring 2002.
Jobber767 said on 19/Dec/15
Rob, Brock might have been a "6'2.5" 189cm when he debuted in mid 2002. I think that bike crash and aging caused him to very well lose a few inches. In 2012, he looked "6'0.75" with a 6'1" Triple H.
Editor Rob: I think although guys like Brock in late 30's might not seem candidates for shrinkage, they've been in wrestling for a decade...not impossible some of the guys in late 30's have lost something, even a small fraction...but a big inch? I'm doubtful brock has lost that.
James B said on 13/Dec/15
Vegas Sid did look very imposing though
Randomdude said on 12/Dec/15
@ PFG he clearly isn't 6'3 when he was officially measured at 6'2 by the NFL and K1,JDS is about 6'2 himself(he's not 6'4) Lesnar had about half an inch on him so he would be 6'2.5 at best while Overeem was slightly taller than him and Overeems about 6'3 so the 6'2 listing is pretty legit plus he looked only about an inch taller than 6'0 Bob Holly and about an inch taller than 6'0.5 John Cena. the guy is 6'2 maybe a hair over
Vegas said on 9/Dec/15
in a real fight sid (prime or not) wouldn't last 10 seconds with a ncaa division 1 and ufc hw champion

sid was never booked anywhere near as strong in pro-wrestling as brock either so would lose that too unless lesnar was on his way out of the company or something.
James B said on 9/Dec/15
True rob but Brock has destroyed guys like big show and tensi. Both big show and tensi actually looked heavier than prime Sid.
James B said on 6/Dec/15
Rob who do you think would win prime Sid eudy or Brock lesner?
Editor Rob: Sid would be hard to beat for Brock
PFG said on 5/Dec/15
Lesnar is clearly 6'3/6'3,5 look him next to overeem, and júnior dos santos
Dylan said on 4/Dec/15
I think guys like Lesnar, Mark Henry, and John Cena are more 'big' than they are 'tall'. Needless to say, Brock is still a very tall man easily above the 5 feets. I'd say he's 6'1.5" and 276lbs.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.