How tall is The Undertaker ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

The Undertaker's height is 6ft 7in (201 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 7.5in (202 cm)
American Wrestler. He once said "I used to be 6-foot-10 but I got dropped on my head a few times so I'm 6-foot-9 now.".
Add your opinion on the Height of The Undertaker

Your Comment:

MikeV10 says on 3/Mar/15
Maybe thats why they bill him at 6'10,5
6'7,5 barefoot peak hight + 1 inch footwear = 6'8,5 + 2 inch overbilling they usually do = 6'10,5
Today I think he is about 200cm or close to 6'7
Junior31 says on 3/Mar/15
Was at raw tonight in jersey 5th row. First of all Kane is massive and looked in unbelievable shape best I've seen in a while. Him and big show 10 feet from me. Big show looked to have 4 inches most on him and closer to 3. Also in the opening science with Rollins and reigns face to face. It would appear they were very similar in height but truth is reigns was slouching a bit. Also his boots aren't straight up boots more athletically made. Rollins looked 6'1 and when reigns stood up straight 6'2 to 6'2.5.

After being so close to the action these are my revised heights for the wrestlers I was 15ft from

Reigns low to mid 6'2
Rollins 6'1 and btw that dude has amazing posture
Kane 6'7
Big show 6'10.5. He's not at his peal anymore
Bray Wyatt 6'2
Ambrose. Tough one has terrible posture and is always bent but at least 6'1
Luke Harper. Easily 6'5
Cena 6'0.5
Ziegler 5'10 and prob a tad more
Tripple H 6'1.75
Daniel Bryan 5'8
Bad news Barrett 6'5.5

Some observations...
Kane was impressively massive the biggest I've seen didn't look a lock under 6'7
Harper was every bit his billed
Big show looked worn but leaner then he was a few years back
Rollins is definitely his billed height and because of his posture appeared taller
Cena is a beast

Hope this helps
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 2/Mar/15
Paul says on 2/Mar/15
JT says on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
With both stretched out Click Here

Firstly wrong match, secondly bad angle, thirdly if you tip your head back as your link shows for GG, strangely enough chin level does rise. Just locate the RR match, you can see a more direct comparison. That said UT is 6'7 at most today, we would probably agree on that or thereabouts.

************************************************************************************************************************************

This is still better than the Rumble pic, GG wasn´t complete straight there, watch WM9 and look how he stretched out.

Giant Gonzalez was listed 229cm in the guinness book and BB wich is just over 7´6" not 7´6.5".

At best GG was 7´7.75" in his boots, that makes Taker barely 6´8.5" in his boots/ around 6´7.25" barfoot, Takers heels are pretty visible there so no flat boots.
Taker in this is my yard claimed 6´8"-6´9" wich turns out to be his height in footwear, depending on how thick the sole is.

Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 2/Mar/15
josey wales says on 1/Mar/15
I think taker was the least likely of the taller guys to wear lifts on account of his inring style...


Look the top rope walk at WM13, clear to see Taker had minimum 3cm sole. In 1989 staredown the footwear was equal and Taker barely edged Sid...

Its clear to see that Taker had thicker footwear than usuall at WM13.
It´s also fact that Taker had more height on Sid at WM13 than in every single staredown before.

I´m not saying Taker had Kanemunsters there, but at least 0.5" footwearadvantage added to his barefoot height advantage of 0.25"-0.5"

With 0.5"-1" more footwear there wouldn´t be any problem with the topropewalk or landing. Taker has the balance and if you have it the footwear doesn´t really matter be it 0.5" or 1.5" sole.
Paul says on 2/Mar/15
JT says on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
With both stretched out Click Here

Firstly wrong match, secondly bad angle, thirdly if you tip your head back as your link shows for GG, strangely enough chin level does rise. Just locate the RR match, you can see a more direct comparison. That said UT is 6'7 at most today, we would probably agree on that or thereabouts.
josey wales says on 1/Mar/15
I think taker was the least likely of the taller guys to wear lifts on account of his inring style. In all his mtches his boots always has a fairly normal flat sole, mebe one inch thick. It must be really hard to do thhat tope rope walk with lifts and then have the cinfidence to land rite. Sid, undertaker and Kane is bare foot and in general body size very very close to ea other. Either could be dressed to make look taller. Its realy a tossup between taker and kane with sid mebe an ich at the most shorter. Nash are noticeably taller but by max 2 inches. In turn he (nash) are no more than two inches shorter than bigshow with khali another inch ontop of that.
James B says on 28/Feb/15
6'6.75 today and 6'7.25 peak is not exactly impossible for undertaker. A weak 6'7.5 would make more sense if Sid was 6'6.5.
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 27/Feb/15
Still have no doubt that Taker had a footwearadvantage at WM13.

Click Here
NCL says on 27/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Feb/15
NCL says on 25/Feb/15


I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid


Never said Sid is taller, Undertaker is also in my opinion the taller man but more 0.25"-0.5" than 1" and the main point I differ with Tuga is that I can´t see Taker at legit 6´8" even at peak.

Oh ok my bad
JT says on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.

With both stretched out Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 27/Feb/15
Frula says on 27/Feb/15
Undertaker is around 196 cm
Lets be honest...


C´mon this site has great evidence with AliBabas pic and information that Taker today is at least 198cm and maximum 200cm.

6´6.5" might be on the money, Robs 6´7" is just a generous round up
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size
roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
184.3cm says on 27/Feb/15
Not 6'5, he edged out Ali Baba who is 6'6 on user heights so how can he be 6'5? i still say 6'7.5 peak and today 6'6.5.
Frula says on 27/Feb/15
Undertaker is around 196 cm
Lets be honest...
Tuga says on 26/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Feb/15
Naah I meant the closeup of their heads ;)

But it is from the same moment of the full body pic, no tip toes on sid or camera advantage, that´s why you see as it is :)

NCL says on 25/Feb/15
I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid.

Thanks NCL, there are pics where the angle favours taker but I won´t even bother to post them.
The thing is sid´s trys really hard but still comes a bit shorter, and if, and I mean if someone has footware advantage is sid, look closer to his boots ;P), but still I would´nt go that way.

I really understand why Rob has them 1 inch apart, could be...still I can´t see peak sid at anything under 6'7, IMO he would rather be a bit over than under it, so I can still see 6'7 1/2 as possible, 6'7 minimum, since I don´t go with minimum I say IMO 6'7 1/2 ;P

Just to change a bit the subject (before everyone becomes bored of this page :D), I was watching the other day an old match with mane and nash teaming up:
Click Here
Look at the start, its problably the best I´ve seen (if anybody has seen better please post it)to compare both men heights, what do you think?
(I know at least you Red have been interested in poiting their differences ;) )
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Feb/15
NCL says on 25/Feb/15


I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid


Never said Sid is taller, Undertaker is also in my opinion the taller man but more 0.25"-0.5" than 1" and the main point I differ with Tuga is that I can´t see Taker at legit 6´8" even at peak.
NCL says on 25/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Feb/15

I think Sid's got the camera advantage on these pictures: Click Here and Click Here

Regarding the second pic, this pic you posted is when Sid finally stood still and the two were equal to the camera: Click Here

This is a video from that Raw (they meet at about 8:43) Click Here

Undertaker's boots 1997: Click Here
Sid's boots 1997: Click Here

I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid.

Here, 'Taker must have a footwear advantage because he's unusually taller than Sid: Click Here

By the way, if anyone is interested, the road to Wrestlemania 13 is my favorite story line and I have a lot of the videos on my youtube page. The Raws that are missing are all on Daily Motion:

Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Feb/15
Tuga says on 23/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)

Yeah, we both are ;)
Still sting´s head top is not over sid´s eye line there, no way, it is what it is :P

"Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam."

Oh you´re not getting away with this...taker is not closer to the camera, his left foot is because...


Naah I meant the closeup of their heads ;)
Just pointed out that he´s closer to the cam, still looked 2cm taller that night, never looked 2cm taller in the road to WM13 staredowns and I believe he had about 0.5" footwearadvantage.

Road to WM13 Staredowns:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Tuga says on 23/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)

Yeah, we both are ;)
Still sting´s head top is not over sid´s eye line there, no way, it is what it is :P

"Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam."

Oh you´re not getting away with this...taker is not closer to the camera, his left foot is because he has a bit of a wider stance, and footware? Really? And the walk?? What? He was back to his old attire, zombie deadman pacing style, did you expect him to dance to the ring? :D
Click Here
No way around it, the middle line represents sid´s top hair (as if tip toes werent enought), still not as tall.
But I see from your arguments alone that you´re seeing the difference and it turned out bigger than you expected.

Other evidence, well, peak sid staredown with jbl and most problaby non peak taker staredown with the same should be enough, as well the 1 inch billing (you´ve mentioned billings before ;P)difference between the 2 in both wcw and wwe(f)...

"Lets just agree to disagree"

I disagree! ;P
Slim says on 22/Feb/15
I agree with Omid!!!! Why would anyone in they're right mind say Kane is shorter than taker? Ok sid and taker looked same height but glen as Isaac Yankem WAS taller than taker. It's clear in they're staredown. Idk if taker wore hidden lifts but it looks like glen was wearing socks! his shoes were so flat. No lifts at all. He never stood straight bc he never had to. Now when he stared down with big show, he stood kind of straight and he was the ONLY person I ever saw come close to shows height. (Kane)
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)
Your line is higher than Sids eyeline in the sting staredown.
Lets just agree to disagree unless we have new evidence ...

@miko
yeah, Sid was a very weak 6´7" peak, Taker in 1991 had imo about 1cm footwear advantage. Also at WM13, Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam.

In the road to WM13 staredowns they look always around the same height.
Omid says on 21/Feb/15
@Josey:

how much difference is between Kane and Taker in their WM14 stare down?

Do You agree, there is a roughly 1.5 to 2 inch difference?

now we consider Kane's boots gave him a 2 inch advantage, that means that Kane looks two inches taller than a barefoot Taker, the issue is that Undertaker didn't wrestle barefoot, he had shoes on that would have gave him roughly one inch so if Taker and Kane were the same height their deference should have been 1 inch whereas its clear there is a good 1.5 to 2 full inches difference between them give or take

That makes Kane 1 to maximum 2 cm taller than Taker

Kane was always Bigger and Taller, however WWE maximized the effect by giving him those shoes, its kinda like the Big Show, he is a giant but still wears huge boots because they want to maximize his largeness
miko says on 20/Feb/15
I think the Sid staredowns alone rule out anything over 6'7.5 for a peak Taker.
Tuga says on 20/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 19/Feb/15
@Tuga
C´mon the WM 13 pic had a crappy low angle, no chance for your lines

Its the best staredown we´ve got of the 2, the low angle is for both, you have far worse staredowndowns pics in your collection, how can you seriously dismiss this? Also remember the difference is the same as here:
Click Here
Line or no line taker is noticeably taller and sid´s streches himself beyond human comprehension :D
And look at your own lines :
Click Here
Sorry, but had to do it :)

"6´2" Sting is slightly over Sids eyeline so max 4.5" shorter, you just proved Robs listing..."

No he is not, sting´s hair is at sid´s eyeline, look again :P
Click Here
6'7 range there easily for sid...

My peak height estimates:
Sid between 6'7 and 6'7 1/2, kane 6'7 1/2, taker 6'8, tyler mane 6'8 1/2, nash at least 6'9 1/2 ;)
josey wales says on 19/Feb/15
@omid
Plausible pics, but i have to raise the point that your last pic doesnt show footware or stance. And takers stance doesnt do him no height favors. Its worth temembeting that wwe always made a point to market kane as bigger . I cannot agree that kanes famous monster boots only gave him half n inch. I still stick to them bring near identical in height at their peak at abt 200cm.
Omid says on 19/Feb/15
@Tuga:

I agree there is maximum 0.5 between Taker and Kane

but in all fairness, if two people are the same height, on TV with Camera angles, at different times each one of the can look taller with Camera angles, meaning if Taker is Kane's height, at least on one occasion he should look taller because of angles, the issue is that the lowest for Kane so far was him being Taker's height, because of that I believe Kane is taller by like 1 or 2 cms

and about the footwear, 2011 Kane was wearing those huge boots for a while but he changed them with a smaller boots now

@James B:

I agree he doesn't look 6'8 today, hell he sometimes can look barely 6'7 but with military posture and a little bit of stretching I think he can measure near 6'8

and have it in consideration that what we see of these wrestlers are their night low
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 19/Feb/15
@Tuga
C´mon the WM 13 pic had a crappy low angle, no chance for your lines...

6´2" Sting is slightly over Sids eyeline so max 4.5" shorter, you just proved Robs listing...

For the Memphis Staredown I always said Taker is max 0.5" taller...

Khali was more like 7´0.5" than a full 7´1", the position favours Taker as you pointed out... I see at least 5" between them, in other staredowns 5.5" so again 6´7"- 6´7.5" for Taker.

Can´t see them taller than this at peak:

Sid 6´6.75"
Taker 6´7"-6´7.25"
Kane 6´7.5"-6´7.75"

Don´t forget even Sarahs Dad said Taker was 6´7"...
Tuga says on 19/Feb/15
Nice try Red with the memphis video, I was expecting that ;P
We can´t really see where is sid´s head top, can we? Tip toes anyone? We really see sid on his tip toes the 2nd time he stares taker, taker is at no point at his best (or even close) posture...and you´ve admmited before sid´d mask gives an illusion of looking taller...so you´ve changed your mind?
Don´t:
Click Here

But what do you know, we do have a full body staredown with no masks both men standing tall:
Click Here
A better quality close up of the same moment:
Click Here

And Red, be greatfull taker wasn´t standing like this:
Click Here

And since you´ve downgraded sid due to one staredown with luger, now I give you the chance to yet ignore this again:
Click Here

And for kane and taker:
Click Here
Pre "lifts kane".

Kane with still footwear advantage (not as big as before) and better posture (notice taker´s neck):
Click Here
Kane´s recent footware:
Click Here

I got to say kane is still in great shape compared with taker and in his "real" kane attire still looks great, a proper monster :)

Eitherway 3 men are close in height, all 3 also share in common "any moment they look shorter instant downgrade" syndrome :D
James B says on 18/Feb/15
Kane could have been 6'7.5-6'8 peak and around 6'9 in wrestling boots whereas kevin Nash was 6'9 1/2 prime.

These days though Kane ain't looking 6'8
Omid says on 18/Feb/15
@Josey:

Kane wore those boots in his early times but after those times his boots weren't that big, besides every Body wears Boots with insoles in WWE specially big guys, even Bigshow wears them now

You could argue Kane might have a 0/5 inch advantage in that pic but there is a clear full inch between those two



take a look at these pics for example:

Click Here

Click Here

Specially this one:

Click Here
Shuvayu says on 18/Feb/15
google undertaker vs glen jacobs 1995 at smw... kane before being kane was always taller than taker
josey wales says on 16/Feb/15
Kane never was obese. The tsker kane staredown at wm 13 kane was wearing monster boots as he was billed as 7 foot vs the his 6'10 brother. Taker lost lot if weight and muscle over the years but kane always had heavier build. Biker taker vs rick flair uses boots with a sole that looks bigger than it ease. Look vloser its the style of boot. Taker had no reason to tower flair even more than he did. Both sre bsre foot too close to call almost in height. Around 6'6 today
Omid says on 16/Feb/15
@James B, Kane is obese!? wow!

you call this obese:
Click Here

also undertaker is in better shape?
Click Here

also this is undertaker in front of Kane both in their 20s
Click Here

and people always say how Kane wears big boots, guess what:

Click Here

about Kane not looking as tall as nash, first:

Nash is 6'9

second, its not about what they look, its about how they measure

you could easily look taller or shorter than your real height, that effect is worsened when you are watching tv angles

Taker has longer legs, therefore he can appear taller but without a doubt and based on the photos I posted Kane is the taller man
Vegas says on 16/Feb/15
taker doesn't look taller than sid in that memphis video from 1989 and footwear is identical

speaking of mabel how tall would people estimate the guy standing with him Click Here
Danimal says on 15/Feb/15
dicksock says on 12/Feb/15
I think Undertaker and Sid were both about 6'7" in their prime.

I think a young and healthy Taker was taller than a flat 6'7". All we need to do is look at him next to 6'6" Mabel/Viscera. That was over 1" of height difference. Peak Taker was from the late 80's to around 2000 or so. After that he began to lose height. I think Sid was a flat 6'7" at his peak, but doesn't look over 6'6" today. While we're at it, I also think that Kane (without his lifts/platform boots) was a flat 6'7" as well. All 3 men were "around" the same height at their respective peaks and possibly Taker having been the tallest of the 3.
James B says on 15/Feb/15
Kane has hardly got a healthy body the guys obese. Undertaker way more injuries but clearly is in better shape.

You never know though Kane could have been 6'8 peak but today i don't think he's that tall i mean kevin Nash is that height now and looks taller than Kane does on TV.
Omid says on 15/Feb/15
Kane was always, and I mean always taller than taker no matter when he was Kane or Issac Yankem

Kane 6'8 peak
Taker6'7.5 peak, however taker has aged terribly, compared to him kane has pretty much kept a healthier body

Today I think Kane can measure "around" 6'8 with military posture, but standing loose and hunching like he does on TV he some times appears barely 6'7

as for Taker I think at 6'6.5 is fair now
Vegas says on 14/Feb/15
Bol was said to have been measured at 7'6.75 and Mureșan at 7'6.5.

Bradley either 7'5 1/2 or 7'5 3/4
Danimal says on 13/Feb/15
Vegas says on 10/Feb/15
232cm would make gonzales the tallest player to ever play in the nba and yet his name is never mentioned regarding that particular record.

What about Manute Bol? Was he not just shy of 7'7"? Shawn Bradley was pretty close to that measurement as well.
dicksock says on 12/Feb/15
I think Undertaker and Sid were both about 6'7" in their prime.
Ali Baba says on 12/Feb/15
Stalker says on 10/Feb/15
@ Ali Baba
How tall were you at the time you took a picture with Taker?
Were you exactly 198 cm or little shorter?
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Could have been anywhere from 197 to 198 CM. Probably closer to 198 that day since I didn't work and have to wear a bunch of gear. But I was on my feet for several hours straight.
James says on 12/Feb/15
6'7 1/2 peak looks questionable if Sid Eudy was 6'6 1/2
JT says on 11/Feb/15
Click Here I read somewhere that Gonzalez's pituitary tumor was discovered in his mid-30s. However, he clearly had the tumor since childhood and in all likelihood was done growing before WCW.

It looks like the Atlanta Hawks did measure him and tippy toes weren't allowed. Click Here If he was measured in shoes, those don't give too much boost. A Sports illustrated article from 1989 said Gonzalez was 7'6 1/2" which may have been his measured height in those shoes.
RoelC says on 11/Feb/15
Frank says on 9/Feb/15
He had a website and true he was 7ft 6 but he grew to 2.32 after wrestling I dont know if that true but thats what his Website said

I remember that website and that's where the 232cm claim came from. Not from an official measurement from Guinness World Records, which a few on here have claimed before.
Vegas says on 10/Feb/15
232cm would make gonzales the tallest player to ever play in the nba and yet his name is never mentioned regarding that particular record.
Stalker says on 10/Feb/15
@ Ali Baba
How tall were you at the time you took a picture with Taker?
Were you exactly 198 cm or little shorter?
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 10/Feb/15
Click Here

This indicates Taker had a footwear advantage over Sid in 1991 as their footwear in 1989 was equal.
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 10/Feb/15
Tuga says on 6/Feb/15
Be generous Red, give taker even just half an inch more, don´t be a taker, be a giver! :D






Sorry 6´7.5" is generous enough, 6´7"peak isn´t out of question
Click Here

Sid was a weak 6´7" and Mark just a tad taller, everything else is footwear, cam angle, kayfabe....



Rob, hard to see the full inch you´re listing between them in their very peak staredown
[Editor Rob: I don't know, I think you could argue anywhere from 1/2 to 1 inch.]
Frank says on 9/Feb/15
He had a website and true he was 7ft 6 but he grew to 2.32 after wrestling I dont know if that true but thats what his Website said
RoelC says on 8/Feb/15
Michael says on 21/Jan/15
Jorge Gonzalez was measured at 2,32 m (7-7,25) by the Guiness Book of Records in 2000.

Click Here

Time to destroy that myth once and for all. Gonzalez was listed as 7ft6 in the 2000 edition of Guinness. Just like he was listed at 7ft6 while playing basketball for the Atlanta Hawks or 229cm while playing basketball in Argentine.
davyyyy says on 8/Feb/15
6'7.5 as his peak height is spot on. Taker and Sid looked to be the same height. Sid had a good 2 inch advantage on Hogan.

Taker 6'7.5
Sid 6'7.25
Hogan 6'5.25
Nash 6'9
just because says on 7/Feb/15
Heres undertaker and the 5.10 mike tyson Click Here
Scotty says on 6/Feb/15
He was billed 7'0 & later 6'10 in his career but he was really 6'8.
Tuga says on 6/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 4/Feb/15
Taker looking more to the cam adds as much to the illusion as his clear footwear advantage...

Looking to the cam? Illusion? So this staredown is an illusion, why, because taker looks taller than you want? ;)

I still can´t see the so big and obvious footware difference you keep mentioning:
Click Here
Click Here
Tried also a pic where both had their feet up so not to be "sunk" in the ring mat.

But I´ll give you footware, but in turn I get jbl higher ground position and taker so obviously bent knees (unlike here: Click Here );P


Be generous Red, give taker even just half an inch more, don´t be a taker, be a giver! :D
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 4/Feb/15
Tuga says on 4/Feb/15
The other pic of the staredown also shows the same considerable height advantage taker has and you can also notice how jbl is looking quite up:

Taker looking more to the cam adds as much to the illusion as his clear footwear advantage...
If Taker looks at JBL the tip of Takers nose is at JBL´s eyelevel, so he´s about 2-2.5" taller nothing more without footwear advantage.

Taker was 6´7.25"-6´7.5" peak and is 6´6.5"-6´6.75" today
Classic Undertaker was 6´8.5"-6´8.75" in wrestlingboots. Master of Pain was in standardboots with less sole 6´8"-6´8.25", billed at 6´8" in 1989....

If peak Mark was legit 6´8" he would been 6´9" in boots and billed at that at least.

He was never billed 6´10" before WWE when he was feuding with 6´8" billed Hogan and visible taller...


Funny looking back at the wcw billings they seem to have had a two inch rule...
Or adding one inch at height in boots...

Tyler Mane was 6´8", 6´9" in boots, billed 6´10" in wcw
Kevin Nash was 6´9", 6´10" in boots, billed 6´11" in wcw
Mark Calaway was 6´7", 6´8" in boots, billed at 6´9" in wcw

same goes for Hogan when he went to wcw:

6´5" barefoot, 6´6" in boots, billed 6´7" ...

Of course not talking about +-fractions and occasionally bigger billings....
Tuga says on 4/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 3/Feb/15
This time Taker has the bigger footwear and is closer to the cam, I can see max 2.5" between them legit, probably just 2"


Red, you should now better, this particular camera angle favours the man on "top", you´ve even used this argument with a staredown between khali and taker putting taker on same horizontal level as khali (without scaling taker´s size ;P).
Here you go:
Click Here

But forget about that, I don´t think either taker or jbl really have any advantage in the staredown when they´re close.

We have used many of this kind of staredowns, we were "lucky" with this one because jbl lifted his title so taker has better posture than he usually has because he was staring the title :)

The other pic of the staredown also shows the same considerable height advantage taker has and you can also notice how jbl is looking quite up:
Click Here

For sure jbl is not suffering from camera angles :P
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 3/Feb/15
Tuga says on 3/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 1/Feb/15
Actually not enough, one with Taker in better posture and unknown footwear and the other is a comparison..


So jbl in cowboy boots and closer to the camera is better, ok so be it :)

You asked for it ;p
Click Here

Click Here

So what do you think ;)


This time Taker has the bigger footwear and is closer to the cam, I can see max 2.5" between them legit, probably just 2"
both in equal footwear Click Here
Tuga says on 3/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 1/Feb/15
Actually not enough, one with Taker in better posture and unknown footwear and the other is a comparison..


So jbl in cowboy boots and closer to the camera is better, ok so be it :)

You asked for it ;p
Click Here

Click Here

So what do you think ;)
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 1/Feb/15
Tuga says on 26/Jan/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 23/Jan/15
Click Here
JT´s pic tells a lot...

Agree, these tell ;D
Click Here
Click Here


Actually not enough, one with Taker in better posture and unknown footwear and the other is a comparison...

No chance against a real life fullbody shot with both in usefull posture ;)
Tuga says on 26/Jan/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 23/Jan/15
Click Here
JT´s pic tells a lot...

Agree, these tell ;D
Click Here
Click Here
my height 188cm says on 23/Jan/15
every time i see taker and big show stare downs it looks 3 inches so if big show is 6ft11 then undertaker is 6ft8 or big show is 6ft10 which makes taker 6ft7
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 23/Jan/15
Click Here

JT´s pic tells a lot...
6´5" JBL in cowboyboots basicly the same height as Taker ~2000
JBL cowboyboots are not the biggest ones, so he would be at best 6´7" but more like 6´6.75" in them.
If Taker was 6´8" barefoot he would be near 6´9" in footwear there... doesn´t look so for sure!
Bob Smith says on 22/Jan/15
If you watch the Royal Rumble from 2009, there are times where he comes near stare down with Big Show and they look almost eye level.
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 22/Jan/15
Michael says on 21/Jan/15
Jorge Gonzalez was measured at 2,32 m (7-7,25)

Yeah but he was still growing after wrestling I read, 7´6"-7´6.5" listed in Basketball
looking at the pic were Gonzalez stands straight it fits with 6´7"-6´7.5" Taker
Michael says on 21/Jan/15
Jorge Gonzalez was measured at 2,32 m (7-7,25) by the Guiness Book of Records in 2000. Taker´s peak of 2,02 (6-7,5) doensn´t fit, he must have been taller: Click Here
Oasis says on 21/Jan/15
Undertaker is 6.6.
James B says on 17/Jan/15
Danimal says on 15/Jan/15
James says on 13/Jan/15
Sid at 6'5-6'6 peak would put lex luger 6'2.25

Sid was 6'7" and Luger was 6'3".


Sid 6'6.5
Lex Luger 6'3.25
Paul says on 15/Jan/15
Yes indeed, Rob generally avoids street pavement heights as the website says.
Frank says on 15/Jan/15
James all I remember is that he did not appear as tall as I thought he'd be
My Friend with me said Sid did not Tower over me & im 5ft 11ish . That day I also seen Charles Wright(Papa Shango) he looked about 6ft 3 to 6ft 4
James says on 15/Jan/15
Frank says on 13/Jan/15
James it was in the 1990's

harder to judge height on the streets i think?
Danimal says on 15/Jan/15
James says on 13/Jan/15
Sid at 6'5-6'6 peak would put lex luger 6'2.25

Sid was 6'7" and Luger was 6'3".
Frank says on 13/Jan/15
James it was in the 1990's
James says on 13/Jan/15
Sid at 6'5-6'6 peak would put lex luger 6'2.25
James says on 13/Jan/15
Frank says on 12/Jan/15
I seen the Picture of Sid in front of the height Chart with his hair he hit about 6ft 6 but if he had shoes on hes 6ft 5 barefoot I seen him up close in street clothes outside Madison Square Garden and he really looked about 6ft 5 to 6ft 6

What year did you see him?
cdk28 says on 12/Jan/15
Undertaker peak height 6'8" barefoot 6'10" in boots
Sid peak height barefoot 6'7.5" 6'9" in boots
Frank says on 12/Jan/15
I seen the Picture of Sid in front of the height Chart with his hair he hit about 6ft 6 but if he had shoes on hes 6ft 5 barefoot I seen him up close in street clothes outside Madison Square Garden and he really looked about 6ft 5 to 6ft 6
Clay says on 11/Jan/15
Speking of Khali it's too bad he got released by WWE, even though his knee's are shot and he was horrid inside the ring. I don't think we're going to see that combination of height, giant proportions and bodybuilder mass for a loong time.
James B says on 10/Jan/15
Both shaq and khaki dont look over 7ft.05
Alex2 says on 9/Jan/15
Khali was the exact same height as Shaq, stop living in denial.
Clay says on 8/Jan/15
LoL Khali 6'11-6'11.5 thats why he was the same height as Shaquille O'Neal who's 7'2.5 in running shoes. I do think Undertaker had a footwear advantage with giant Khali, but I don't believe he's under 6'7'' stretched out either.
James B says on 8/Jan/15
Yes judging by his past stare downs with 6'6.25 Sid Eudy I don't think taker was over 6'7 flat to begin with and there looked more than 1.5 inches between him and legit 6'9 Kevin Nash at mania 96.

6'6.5 might be his barefoot heights today?
josey wales says on 8/Jan/15
Ali isn't over foot anymore. He is a massive man compared to typical other sevnfooters, but probably ducks under 7 foot today, say 6'11". 6'6" for the Taker is spot on. I wonder if Show clears 6'10" today
Mathew says on 8/Jan/15
Danimal says on 5/Dec/14
HOW? Ali is under 6'6" today and Taker was barely taller than him AND Taker had the footwear advantage?

---

If we say Ali is currently a "weak" 6'6" then Undertaker is, maybe, 6'6.5". I wouldn't put him any taller than that. The difference between the two appears to be small, somewhere around a half inch, but to get more precise than that we'd really need to measure. Maybe in his youth Undertaker was a legit 6'7" or even slightly over that, but today I 'd put my money on 6'6.5".
Mathew says on 7/Jan/15
Alex2 says on 1/Nov/14
Taker is slouching in Ali's pic and his eye level is higher. Please explain how he was max 5" shorter than Khali a few years ago

---

Based on Ali Baba's photo the Undertaker is about 6'6.5". Khali would be 6'11" - 6'11.5" then.
6'2 says on 6/Jan/15
sid eudy was 6'7 prime spivey wasnt shorter than 6'6 taker was 6'8
Jadis says on 4/Jan/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 2/Jan/15
Height crazy ? At least he admits to it.
Mid190s says on 3/Jan/15
Ali Baba if you measured 6'5.5 then you have crept down into my range. That's my height after 3 hours. Is it safe to say I'm the same height as you and Undertaker?? (I'm 196 cm avg)
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 2/Jan/15
6'2 says on 2/Jan/15
he was 6'8" he always referred to himself when asked his height as 6'8"

US style giving height in footwear, he was billed 6´8" in 1989 so that was his height in normal wrestling boots.
In their first staredown he was only marginally taller than 6´6.5" Sid Eudy in same footwear.
6'2 says on 2/Jan/15
he was 6'8" he always referred to himself when asked his height as 6'8"
miko says on 20/Dec/14
Swagger is around 6'4.5/6'5.

He's inbetween Orton and Barrett heightwise.
IR says on 17/Dec/14
Jack Swagger 6' 4.5" ( 1.94 m ) - 6' 5" ( 1.96 m ) ?
Junior31 says on 12/Dec/14
CLEMENT says on 19/Nov/14
THE UNDERTAKER 6'4 1/2"



Lmao
184.3cm says on 10/Dec/14
Peak 6ft 7.5
Current 6ft 6.5

The photo from Ali Baba should have put this to rest, i dont get the 6'8 comments even 6'7 is a stretch.
Shuvayu says on 10/Dec/14
Click Here check this... takers got 2 inch advantage... taker was always 6'8"... kane may be half an inch taller
JT says on 9/Dec/14
Click Here The other guy (Tony Longo) claims to be 6'6". Their feet look about the same distance from the camera but the other guy might be leaning back a bit.
6'2 says on 9/Dec/14
he was 6'8" peak he has admitted it a few times not sure about today wouldnt have lost more than 1" in my view
miko says on 8/Dec/14
It is pretty clear that in good posture today Taker is still around 6'7.

Standing in poor posture means nothing in terms of height.
Shuvayu says on 8/Dec/14
Taker was billed 6'8" at memphis as master of pain...
Alex2 says on 7/Dec/14
Danimal, not sure why you are always trying to put the heights of people taller than you down? Maybe to make yourself feel better? How was he MAX 5" shorter than Khali a few years back then? Is Khali 6'11" now too? or how about having around 3" on 6'5" JBL a few years back? His posture is awful in Ali's pic and still looks taller. Absoluetly zero chance he is anything less than a weak 6'7" today full stretched out. People don't loose 2" before 50!
Danimal says on 5/Dec/14
Alex2 says on 1/Dec/14
6'6.75" Today
6'7.75" Peak

HOW? Ali is under 6'6" today and Taker was barely taller than him AND Taker had the footwear advantage?
6'2 says on 4/Dec/14
jackie knife .25" between rock and henry ha ha get a grip what a waste of a list everyone is wrong u shud save your fingers for something else not typing on these pages
josey wales says on 4/Dec/14
Not wishing to get into a weight debacle but i reckon "around" 280 is fair, but thats upper limmit with 270 being the lower end. Taker seems a fair bit larger in build than Ali and when you got a 6'6" frame it ads up quickly
FlameBoy says on 1/Dec/14
i used to be 6 Ft 10 ? undertaker is the Justin bieber Or wrestling
Alex2 says on 1/Dec/14
6'6.75" Today
6'7.75" Peak
Danimal says on 1/Dec/14
josey wales says on 26/Nov/14
People still calling Taker 6'4" etc are obviously trolling. Anything around 6'6", but not less, is the obvious answer. Agree that if Ali is 250 Taker would be around 280lbs.

He's MAX 270 pounds (if that) today.
Danimal says on 1/Dec/14
Around202cm says on 27/Nov/14
Taker is around my height,eventually shorter 1cm...

No, you have 4cm on him (if you truly are 202cm that is).
Danimal says on 1/Dec/14
joe says on 28/Nov/14
Peak(6´7-202 cm)seems exactly right it was a few inches taller than jake snake

A few? Jake was 6'5" legit.
Paul says on 30/Nov/14
blasphey says on 30/Nov/14
Said his billed height is 6'10" but he's actually 7'5".
Crikey!
blasphey says on 30/Nov/14
Said his billed height is 6'10" but he's actually 7'5".
joe says on 28/Nov/14
Peak(6´7-202 cm)seems exactly right it was a few inches taller than jake snake
Danimal says on 28/Nov/14
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 12/Nov/14
Hogan was nothing more than 195cm/ 6´4.75" facing Sid in 1992.

Hogan and 6'3" Lex Luger in the mid 90's: Click Here
Clay says on 27/Nov/14
Weight can be hard to guess as it's just a number. A lot of the time a guy is hiding 30-40 pounds worth of fat which you don't notice, or he's ripped and looks a lot heavier than he is. Ali B says Undertaker felt a little taller and weight 280 lbs sounds right.
Around202cm says on 27/Nov/14
Taker is around my height,eventually shorter 1cm...
josey wales says on 26/Nov/14
People still calling Taker 6'4" etc are obviously trolling. Anything around 6'6", but not less, is the obvious answer. Agree that if Ali is 250 Taker would be around 280lbs.
Frank says on 25/Nov/14
Drummer777, Ali Baba was not the same height as Taker & Mane he Appeared alittle shorter
Drummer777 says on 24/Nov/14
Undertaker & Sid Eudy are within a half inch of each other in pics you see them in.... Kevin Nash comes out a couple inches taller than Sid so it would stand to reason that Kevin Nash would have the same amount of Height over Undertaker.... So how is it that Ali Baba could be the same height as Tyler Mane and Mark Callaway... or so it would seem...
Ali Baba says on 23/Nov/14
A-List, there's no way he only weighs 10 pounds more than me.
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 22/Nov/14
The A-List says on 21/Nov/14
@Ali Baba you seriously think he weighs 280. In that picture Undertaker looks 260 lbs top.


Estimating weight fro that pic is impossible, AliBaba saw him live, as close as you can get...

But even seeing someone in person... very hard to tell weight especially for tall people.

I remember going to a new gym 15 years ago and the coach looked at me and asked about 85kg ~190lbs, I went on the scale and had 102kg 225lbs and I´m not oversized at 6ft.
The A-List says on 21/Nov/14
@Ali Baba you seriously think he weighs 280. In that picture Undertaker looks 260 lbs top.
Vegas says on 20/Nov/14
Jackie Knife, the people you listed i have met in person (or stood very close to) are: khali, show, kane, taker, albert, swagger, goldust, orton, axel, sheamus, henry, batista, austin, cena, miz, bret, cody rhodes, ziggler, christian, hbk, xpac, rvd, bryan and mysterio. i have been in the same room a few feet away from rock, jericho and cesaro...just to say not arguing half inches as my estimates are usually +- half an inch

rock was taller than vader in 1997 so you could probably swap those guys peak heights around. looking at batista with 5'8 mamun recently i don't think he has fallen as low as 186cm although prior to his returning to wwe he would have been a guy i would have said lost height (but not anymore)..hhh doesn't seem as low as 184cm either and he was noticeably taller in dress-shoes than ryback (in gear) at a show i attended last week and i was seated quite far back but still could tell hhh looked taller.

christian is about 5'11.5 in person, cena is a shade over 6ft and rvd is around 5'11. henry isn't as tall as 6'2 out of gear. sheamus looked closer to 6'3 in person but he did have suspicious footwear it must be said, however in those he was identical in height to chris masters whom i saw standing together talking at the bar, a fan about 5 inches taller than both then came over talking them..some "really" tall wrestling fans out there
CLEMENT says on 19/Nov/14
THE UNDERTAKER 6'4 1/2"
Jackie Knife says on 18/Nov/14
hey, Vegas, what do you think about this list?

the great khali — 7'0" (213 cm)
big show — 6'11" peak (211 cm), 6'10,25" now (209cm)
kevin nash — 6'8" peak (204 cm), 6'7,5" now (202 cm)
kane — 6'7" peak (201 cm), 6'6,5" now (199 cm)
undertaker — 6'6,5" peak (199 cm), 6'6" now (198 cm)
sid — 6'6" peak (198 cm), 6'5" now (196 cm)
eric rowan — 6'5,5" (197 cm)
albert — 6'5,5" peak (197 cm), 6'4,5" now (195 cm)
wade barrett — 6'5" (196 cm)
jack swagger — 6'4,5" (194 cm)
hulk hogan — 6'4,5" peak (194 cm), 6'2,5" now (190 cm)
jbl — 6'4,25" peak (194 cm)
billy gunn — 6'4" peak (193 cm)
luke harper — 6'4" (193 cm)
titus o'neil — 6'4" (193 cm)
cesaro — 6'3,5" (192 cm)
goldust 6'3,5" (192 cm)
randy orton — 6'3" (191 cm), wears chunky boots
ddp — 6'3" peak (191 cm), 6'2,5" now (190 cm)
vader — 6'3" peak (191 cm)
damien sandow — 6'2,5" (190 cm)
lex luger — 6'2,25" peak (189 cm)
curtis axel — 6'2,25" (189 cm)
sheamus — 6'2,25" (189 cm), wears chunky boots
the rock — 6'2,25" (189 cm)
mark henry — 6'2" (188 cm)
batista — 6'2" peak (188 cm), 6'1,25" now (186 cm)
roman reigns — 6'1,5" (187 cm)
triple h — 6'1,5" peak (187 cm), 6'0,5" now (184 cm)
goldberg — 6'1,5" peak (187 cm)
sting — 6'1,25" peak (186 cm)
brock lesnar — 6'1,25" (186 cm)
dean ambrose — 6'1" (185 cm)
seth rollins — 6'0,5" (184 cm)
vince mcmahon — 6'0,5" peak (184 cm)
stone cold — 6'0" peak (183 cm)
ryback — 6'0" (183 cm)
john cena — 5'11,5" (181 cm)
the miz — 5'11,5" (181 cm)
bret hart — 5'11" peak (180 cm)
stardust — 5'11" (180 cm)
dolph ziggler — 5'10,5 (179 cm)
christian — 5'10,5" (179 cm)
cm punk — 5'10,5" (179 cm)
shawn michaels — 5'10,5" peak (179 cm)
x-pac — 5'10 peak (178 cm)
rusev — 5'10 (178 cm)
big e — 5'10" (178 cm)
scott steiner — 5'10" peak (178 cm)
kurt angle — 5'9,5" peak (177 cm)
rvd — 5'9,25" (176 cm)
rick steiner — 5'9" peak (175 cm)
chris jericho — 5'9" peak (175 cm)
daniel bryan — 5'7,5" (172 cm)
rey mysterio — 5'1" (156 cm)
BigMe says on 18/Nov/14
@The A-List
I think Kevin Nash is about 204cm and Taker is 200cm...That's a good ratio between them :)
The A-List says on 14/Nov/14
Kevin Nash has about 1.5'' on Taker (imo).
Vegas says on 14/Nov/14
undertaker in memphis wrestling late 80s standing with dave brown (brown btw said he was 6ft on one show i watched) Click Here

the rock standing next to brown a few years later Click Here
BigMe says on 12/Nov/14
Taker is exactly 200cm
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 12/Nov/14
Taker 6´7" fits pretty good, Kane´s advantage is exactly his footwear advantage, so Jacobs also 6´7".

Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 12/Nov/14
Hogan was nothing more than 195cm/ 6´4.75" facing Sid in 1992.
At peak 6´5.25".
Tiny Lister told the truth, both were 6´5" during their feud.

Taker was 2-2.25" taller in 1991/1992 so solid 6´7"
Sid was 1.75" taller than Hogan in 1992, so Rob is right with 6´6.5".
short ass says on 11/Nov/14
Undertaker and 6'2 Triple H 2013. Undertaker can't be 6'7 now, 6'6 even.
Click Here
Height181 says on 11/Nov/14
Danimal it's impossible that Hogan was 6ft 6 in 1990. He looked 2-3 inches shorter than Sid Justice in 1991 and only an inch or so taller than Sgt Slaughter same year and Slaughter was billed 6ft 3 at that time
MikeV10 says on 11/Nov/14
Thats not dead even in my eyes ,look at the top of there Heads Click Here
Tuga says on 11/Nov/14
Danimal says on 10/Nov/14
Sid and Taker in the early 90's in a staredown. Sid at that time was 6'7". They look dead even in height (20 + years ago): Click Here

No they don´t ;)
Click Here
Another one:
Click Here

Note: notice sid´s boots in wm13 staredown.

Winner: taker´s forehead :)
Danimal says on 10/Nov/14
Sid and Taker in the early 90's in a staredown. Sid at that time was 6'7". They look dead even in height (20 + years ago): Click Here
Paul says on 10/Nov/14
What every wrestler who is shorter than they would like to be needs a pair of....
Click Here
Tuga says on 10/Nov/14
Ali vs Taker plain photo:
Click Here

Hair vs hair match:
Click Here
Click Here

Note: taker is leaning his head forward.
Winner: Rob!


Now Ali vs Nash should be next in line! ;)
Kunoichi says on 9/Nov/14
Texas Red (The Undertaker) vs. Bruiser Brody:1984 WCCW
Click Here
Brody's height was 6'4.
Danimal says on 9/Nov/14
Ali Baba says on 5/Nov/14
Mike, I wasn't wearing boots. I was wearing a shoe that gives me 1.125 inches. So I was right around 6'7". Taker was wearing boots. Whether or not they gave him any extra is unknown.

JT, I don't doubt he's taller than me because like I said it felt like he was. But a half inch at the most. Now if his boots gave him a boost over my shoes then even less. But he's obviously not 6'7". Let alone 6'8 to 6'10" as some believe.

Ali, take into account that Taker has been wrestling for 30 years, has had severe injuries, surgeries and is around 50 years old. I can assure you, that if your current self stood next to a young and healthy Taker from circa 1990, things would be different. Hogan was 6'5.5"-6'6" (your current height) legit in 1990 and Taker was noticeably taller than him back then (easily 6'7").
Clay says on 7/Nov/14
Taker is one of those dude's that has 5+ inches above his eye level. I have like 4-4.5 as most do.
Paul says on 5/Nov/14
A peak height LOL Rob ! I knew Nash was 6'10 1/2 once and is now around 6'9. UT 20 years ago was never 3in shorter, shorter yes but never 3in. Still I agree UT is now about 6'7.
MikeV10 says on 5/Nov/14
see it the same way JT,
taker has a very low eyelevel and a huge Forehead.
If ali is the same eyelevel as taker , taker is at least 2- 3 cm taller . If they where the same height ,takers eyelevel would be lower than alis.

In this pic Sids eylevel is heigher than takers , but taker is still a tad taller

Click Here
MikeV10 says on 5/Nov/14
see it the same way JT,
taker has a very low eyelevel and a huge Forehead.
If ali is the same eyelevel as taker , taker is at least 2- 3 cm taller . If they where the same height ,takers eyelevel would be lower than alis.

In this pic Sids eylevel is heigher than takers , but taker is still a tad taller

Click Here
Ali Baba says on 5/Nov/14
Mike, I wasn't wearing boots. I was wearing a shoe that gives me 1.125 inches. So I was right around 6'7". Taker was wearing boots. Whether or not they gave him any extra is unknown.

JT, I don't doubt he's taller than me because like I said it felt like he was. But a half inch at the most. Now if his boots gave him a boost over my shoes then even less. But he's obviously not 6'7". Let alone 6'8 to 6'10" as some believe.
MikeV10 says on 5/Nov/14
Hey Ali Baba what exact height are you at this time with this boots you where wearing when you take the picture with taker ???
JT says on 4/Nov/14
Ali Baba says on 3/Nov/14
Alex2, eye level looks pretty darn even to me. Click Here And posture is the same. So.....

That’s correct but the reason why Taker is still taller in that pic is the length of his head from the eyes up. It’s actually longer than the length from the eyes down, which is very unusual. Click Here
Click Here
Johno says on 3/Nov/14
I believe Ali Baba is the same height or more then Undertaker. Undertaker; it seems to me, can dip below 6'6at some point in the day like Ali.
Ali Baba says on 3/Nov/14
Alex2, eye level looks pretty darn even to me. Click Here And posture is the same. So.....
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 3/Nov/14
WWE time Khali legit 7´0"-7´0.5" - 5" = 6´7-6´7.5" - heightloss = 6´6.5"
Alex2 says on 1/Nov/14
Taker is slouching in Ali's pic and his eye level is higher. Please explain how he was max 5" shorter than Khali a few years ago.
Tim 181 says on 28/Oct/14
@Strahinja95 you should have posted this on general height page, but looking at you two I thought you were 5'5 and 6'1.
Ali Baba says on 27/Oct/14
Strahinja95, considering the posture of both of you, you look 6'6" to 6'7".
Paul says on 27/Oct/14
6'7 1/2 you are
Greenbolt says on 27/Oct/14
@Strahinja95: Looking at that guy's frame and proportions, I highly doubt he's anywhere near 5'11''. If, somehow, he is, then I'd estimate you at 6'7'', but again, judging by frame and proportions I don't think you look anywhere near that height.
Strahinja95 says on 27/Oct/14
What do you think my height is..im in black jacket

Click Here

This guy near me is in 5'11 range
Alex 6'0 says on 25/Oct/14
Stadiometers are typically very good. My results on them are about the same as against the wall. The stadiometer rod on the weight scale I think is pretty good or the tool that Rob has but the one you have to mount against the wall if not mounted totally correct it will be off a bit. One stadio against the wall I measured on was about an inch off!!
[Editor Rob: when using something like the can, it's always worth remembering to go with the highest part of the pencil line and get the line as near to the can as possible so you don't short change yourself a mm, not that it's of any great significance, but still :)]
Enos says on 25/Oct/14
It makes sense that he is between 6'6 1/2'' 6'6 3/4'' barefoot, and could have rounded up to 6'8'' maybe a little more than that in boots. does that make any sense rob?
IR says on 24/Oct/14
6' 8" peak
6' 7" current
George F says on 24/Oct/14
I was measured in the gym with a stadiometer. Maybe the particular stadiometer was not a well made one Rob! I don't trust digital ones too though.
Josey Wales says on 23/Oct/14
Think 6-7 is a bit of a stretch but im sure we can call him a very believable 6'6" making 6'7 1/2" quite possible for peak height
George F says on 23/Oct/14
Rob the stadiometer is not a reliable way to measure your height properly. It happens to me. The most accurate method of measurement i believe is the aerosol method, i have been measured a hundred of times and i have the same result with the aerosol method. Maybe the stadiometer will show you shorter than what you really are. Have you noticed that too Rob?
[Editor Rob: stadiometers are fine, there might be small errors though, but well made ones will be very precise.]
George F says on 22/Oct/14
Rob you said in one post that most people would agree that Dwayne Johnson is from 6ft 2.5 to 6ft 3.5 and I don't understand why you have him at 6ft 3. After all the right thing wouldn't be to have him his night height, the lowest possible which I agree with you is 189 cm?
[Editor Rob: I still think because he stands loose or leans in a lot of photos it creates a shorter impression for him...catch him standing tall and I think he could still knock near the 6ft 3 mark on the stadiometer.]
Mark says on 21/Oct/14
It's a funny site this as people simply won't admit what's glaringly obvious. If Undertaker said he's 6'6,people would dispute this.
Paul says on 19/Oct/14
Shawn Michaels once said in a shoot interview around 1994 that Kevin Nash was 6'10 1/2.
Mark says on 19/Oct/14
Miiiiiighty not more than 2" on Jake Roberts I'm afraid.
Michael says on 19/Oct/14
Now (barefoot, fully streched) 2,01 m (6-7).
Peak 2,03 m (6-8).
Carllll says on 18/Oct/14
Alex2 says on 16/Oct/14

Yeah. Fully stretched out. Maybe if you pull his knees out of socket an inch he'll be 6'7 or more. He looks 6'6" and some change in that picture with Ali. While Kane is looking just under 6'7 these days. That seems about right considering Kane has always shown a complexion of being slightly taller than Taker.
Greenbolt says on 17/Oct/14
I apologize for the name change, Rob, I just realized there was another 'Greg' going to this site, and thought it would be best to switch.

@Alex2: There's nowhere near an inch of difference between the Undertaker and Ali Baba, it's practically no difference at all:

Click Here
KROC says on 17/Oct/14
I had a conversation with my father yesterday about him meeting the Undertaker back in 97. He took a picture with him which I recall seeing when I was kid. My father is 6'7.25 and according to him and Calloway were eye to eye. In his opinion Mark Calloway was 6'7 flat peak. I'm hoping he can find that picture, but I wouldn't hold my breathe considering how disorganized he is lol
Ali Baba says on 17/Oct/14
And there's no where near an inch difference between us, even without any difference in shoes.
Ali Baba says on 17/Oct/14
Alex2 says on 16/Oct/14
These comments are ridiculous, Taker has awful posture in Ali's photos and still looks around an inch taller. I guarantee he is at least 6'7 fully stretched out.


His posture was fine other than his drooping head, which I mimicked. He is not bent at the waist at all. You're making stuff up now.
miko says on 17/Oct/14
Taker was never 6'8 barefoot IMO, he never really looked that tall at any point in the early 90's. A solid 6'7 prime and a weak 6'7 today, might drop a hair below 6'7 late in the day. Half an inch loss, Rob has it nailed.
Miiiiiiighty_- says on 16/Oct/14
No way he was under 6'8 prime.
He was more than 2 inches taller than Jake the Snake who was a strong 6'5 ( almost as tall as Mabel back around 1995 )
6'7 Prime taker doesn't make sense..
That would make a 6'6.5 at best Sid ? How do people explain the difference with Sting etc ???

I personally met Kevin Nash in 1995, was 5'10 back then, asked him his height he said 6'10 and the president of the university (a friend of my father, Tenessee university if I recall correctly ) where he played basket ball said the same thing told me and I quote " Ah Kev? Big guy ! He is 6'11 " I didn't even know his name was kevin back then to me he was just Diesel.
So I guess 6'11 was his "inshoes" measurement so he was 6'10 probably.
Remember he was billed 7' when they told me that..
I think for both taker and nash Billed height - 2 inches = prime standing tall height, so that would make Nash 6'10-6'10.25 and Taker 6'8-6'8.5 which seemed to be the difference between them during their staredown..

I had pics with Nash I try to get them but I don't know where they are ;(
He looked a legit full foot taller than me imo
Alex2 says on 16/Oct/14
These comments are ridiculous, Taker has awful posture in Ali's photos and still looks around an inch taller. I guarantee he is at least 6'7 fully stretched out.
Greg (6'1'') says on 16/Oct/14
@George F: I have to agree with you there, I've noticed the same thing. I think Rob would be the first to admit that he'll generally give people the benefit of the doubt, that's just how he rolls.
Mark says on 15/Oct/14
I agree with George F in that think heights are slightly on high side possibly in not looking to offend anyone.
Jimbob says on 15/Oct/14
No way is he 6'8 barefoot.
George F says on 14/Oct/14
I believe Rob's site is the most accurate for heights but most of the times Rob is too generous. I mean adding 2 cm in celebrities height for being right in guessing and not to underestimate a celeb height is a problem for me. I have noticed when I see a height that Rob has listed I drop 1-1.5 cm and I believe it's closer to the truth. But Rob's ability in height guessing is remarkable anyway.
The A-List says on 13/Oct/14
6'7'' seems about right for big mark.
Markus says on 13/Oct/14
JUST an opinion!

Based atmospheric perspective, shoulders, waist and pelvic levels, I would still say 6'7.5" to 6'8" is possible for Undertaker. Even receded back, he still appears taller.

The bend in the lower torso (stomach) certainly indicated that he isn't even trying to stand up straight. There are too many people who have met him and haven't questioned his own 6'8" claim.

If we have Tyler Mane listed at 6'8" when he appears shorter, Taker should be no lower.
George F says on 13/Oct/14
Rob what's the point of list wrestlers height barefoot? Especially in wrestlers height is important with boots on. I mean nobody cares a wrestler's height barefoot. For example Undertaker can be 6ft 7 with boots on, that counts to me.
[Editor Rob: because barefoot height is the equalizer.]
Tuga says on 13/Oct/14
Great pic Ali Baba, thanks for sharing.

Looks around 6'7, too bad he´s leaning his head forward, but this of course seems consistent with what he looked next to lesnar.

Ali, you should have asked for the classic wrestlemania staredown pic :)

IMO 6'8 peak Rob ;)
Clay says on 12/Oct/14
James B says on 12/Oct/14
Alex- According to my doctor a 6ft man with a small frame should weigh nearer 159 pounds. My doc also said a medium framed 6ft male should aim to weigh 171 pounds and if your large framed nearer to 182 pounds.

My doc also went onto to say even if your large framed at 6feet you shouldn't weigh 187 lbs or over.

That doesn't take into account for any weightlifting and muscle development, WHAT SO EVER. Those BMI's that doc's give you are a joke.
Aza says on 12/Oct/14
Ali Baba - thanks for the great picture. Undertaker is now 6'6.5 (evening height). Still a very large human being (I'm 5'11) but just not as big as he used to be.
James B says on 12/Oct/14
Rob people have been saying taker and sid looked roughly around the same size. Despite that do you still think 6'6.5 peak and 6'6 now for undertaker is unlikely?
James B says on 12/Oct/14
Correction I was told a medium built 6ft should weigh 172 pounds
James B says on 12/Oct/14
Alex- According to my doctor a 6ft man with a small frame should weigh nearer 159 pounds. My doc also said a medium framed 6ft male should aim to weigh 171 pounds and if your large framed nearer to 182 pounds.

My doc also went onto to say even if your large framed at 6feet you shouldn't weigh 187 lbs or over.
Danimal says on 11/Oct/14
Robby says on 11/Oct/14
After seeing the pic with Ali Baba. I have come to this conclusion. that the Undertaker in his prime was about 6'8" IN boots. barefoot a very strong 6'6". between 6'6.5"-6'6.75" I do believe when he played high school basketball he was listed at 6'8"? now we know a lot of basketball players like Derrick Rose and Kevin Love for example are listed with their listed height in shoes. Kevin Love 6'10" in shoes, however was measured at 6'7.75" barefoot. Derrick Rose 6'3" in shoes, barefoot 6'1.5" Ali Baba how tall do you think Taker is?

Taker was noticeably taller than 6'6" Mabel/Viscera in the staredown in the 1990's. I think he was over 6'7" in his prime.
Alex 6'0 says on 11/Oct/14
Technically at about 210lbs I'm overweight but I am good amount of muscle and size. Yea I'm no pro bodybuilder but I'm still a pretty big guy. If I weighed this and didn't have muscle then Id be out of shape. For a 6'0 that doesn't workout and have muscle 160-180lb range seems healthy.
Daddy says on 11/Oct/14
Rob, I'm glad to see you update the deadman as he doesn't seem to measure up, so to speak, anymore. But, I still think 6'6.75"! Keep it it mind. And while you're at it, consider if Kane could use a downgrade too. On Smackdown! A few weeks ago, Erick Rowan (6'6" - 6'7") looked to be the same height.

P.S. Thanks for downgrading Big show to 6'11". But just to satisfy a kid's curiosity, would you say Paul Wight was more 7'0.5" or 6'11.5" as a young man in the then WWF?
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 11/Oct/14
Click Here

Given how Lou looked next to Ali this might be close
Arch Stanton says on 11/Oct/14
Nah, 225 pounds even for 6'4" isn't rake thin, Jimmy Stewart at 130 pounds 6'3" is!!! 225 pounds isn't even on the light side for 6'4". Hasslehoff although slender is pretty well built and is only 191 pounds.
Arch Stanton says on 11/Oct/14
@ Danimal, not exactly anorexic, Peter Crouch is pushing 6 ft 8 and is 170 pounds, that's borderline anorexic weight for that height. 200 pounds for 6 ft 6 is on the skinny side for sure but not anorexic by any means. I think an average build 6'6" guy would be more 220 pounds odd.
James B says on 11/Oct/14
He did look 6ft6 range compared to Sid Eudy
PathfinderCC says on 11/Oct/14
Nash now 6´8.25"
Taker now 6´6.5"

Peak Nash 6´9", Taker 6´7.25", Sid 6´6.75", BigShow 6´11.5", Andre 6´10.75", Hogan 6´5.25", Studd 6´6.5", Khali 7´0.5", Gonzalez 7´6.5"

Khali only WWE World Champion real 7feet +
Danimal says on 11/Oct/14
Clay says on 9/Oct/14
James B says on 8/Oct/14
Chris a 6'6 or 6'7 guy should weigh 200 pounds

According to what?!? Alex is 6'0 205-210 and he has size for sure but he isn't Mr.Olympia or anything. 6'6-6'7 guys unless they are sick and frail should weigh 220-230 at least, thats if they dont lift.

EXACTLY! I have a friend who is 6'4" and he weighs 225 pounds and looks like a rake with some lean muscle. A healthy 6'6" should be about 250 pounds, while carrying some lean muscle and a bit of fat. Even 260-280 isn't obese on a 6'6" guy. 200 pounds is anorexic for someone of that height.
Danimal says on 11/Oct/14
Alex 6'0 says on 9/Oct/14
Ali Baba, you're usually 6'6 flat most of the day or a bit over. UT is 6'6.5 to maybe 6'7 max with better posture.

Don't forget Alex, Taker had the shoe advantage. Could have been .5"-1" more in footwear in Taker's advantage. It's very possible that if you subtract the footwear advantage, they're the same height. Also, Ali supposedly wasn't standing full tall he said.
Danimal says on 11/Oct/14
Ali Baba says on 10/Oct/14
Danimal, if Hogan really has lost that amount of height, which is obviously hotly debated, then his whole perspective has changed. Try dropping down three inches while hanging out with your friends and see how weird it feels. Just the little bit that I'm losing now is noticeable when I'm with other guys I've known for a while who are close to my height.

In all honesty, it's not that debatable. Hogan was taller than legit 6'5" men in the 1980's. Most noticeably Jake the Snake Robert and Hilbilly Jim (both 6'5" guys) and if you go to Hilbilly Jim's website, there is a height comparison of him and Hogan (one from 1985 and one from 1989 where Hogan has minimum 1" on him) and then there's an updated pic from the 2002-2004 where Hogan is a solid 2" shorter than Hilbilly. Even a recent comparison of him next to Nikolai Volkoff where they are the same height today and in the 1980's he had at least 3" on him. I can go on, but that's for the Hogan page. Even a 1992 Hogan was barely shorter than a PRIME Undertaker (maybe 1-2") at that time. Hogan was also 2" shorter than 6'8" Ben Davidson and had 2" on 6'4" King Kong Bundy and Big Bossman and was about 1" shorter than 6'7" Big John Studd. He even had 4" on 6'2" Ed Leslie (Brutus Beefcake) in the '70's and '80's and recent pics show them at the EXACT SAME height. Lastly, he had 2" on 6'4" Buster Douglas in 1990 and was at least 1"-2" shorter than 6'4" Troy Aikman a couple of years ago. So yeah, not very debatable. My point was, he was around your current height today. Just imagine struggling with 6'3" today when you once stood 3" taller.
Robby says on 11/Oct/14
After seeing the pic with Ali Baba. I have come to this conclusion. that the Undertaker in his prime was about 6'8" IN boots. barefoot a very strong 6'6". between 6'6.5"-6'6.75" I do believe when he played high school basketball he was listed at 6'8"? now we know a lot of basketball players like Derrick Rose and Kevin Love for example are listed with their listed height in shoes. Kevin Love 6'10" in shoes, however was measured at 6'7.75" barefoot. Derrick Rose 6'3" in shoes, barefoot 6'1.5" Ali Baba how tall do you think Taker is?
Mr. E says on 10/Oct/14
Ali, what's the tallest you've ever been measured? The best I can give Taker at this point is 6'6.5" That's what makes Nash such an odd one because he looks in the 6'8" to 6'9" range with Rob but he's not a full 2" taller than Taker. I don't think there's any way Taker is a full 6'7" now. He looks identical in height to you.
NCL says on 10/Oct/14
Ali Baba - you're the most popular guy on this site! Along with everyone else, I thank you for the great pic!!

Super interesting too how based on this photo we have such varying opinions!
James B says on 10/Oct/14
Clay I am 5'7 myself and weigh 145 pounds and my doctor told me that a 6'6 man to avoid problems like heart problems should weigh 200 pound.

I have mentioned this before but I knew a 6ft guy who weighed 210 pounds who had a heart attack. He lost weight and got down to 173 pounds and still the docs ordered him to lose an additional 5 pounds and get down to 168 pounds.

Often men let there weight get higher than medically recommended and women often let there weight go under what is healthy.
KROC says on 10/Oct/14
@James B
So a 6'6/6'7 should weigh as much as your average 6footer? Not a chance buddy. 230ish would be better. I weigh 257 at 6'5, but I have a huge frame/structure.
Danimal says on 10/Oct/14
Ali Baba, I'm sure you and a PEAK Hulk Hogan would have been exactly the same height. Today, I'm sure you'd have a good 3" on him. Just imagine shrinking to 6'3" Ali Baba by 60 and you'll know how it feels to be Hulk Hogan today.
Danimal says on 10/Oct/14
JT says on 6/Oct/14
Same basic outcome as my earlier pic Click Here The huge head is the only thing that saves him. I'm actually surprised he still looks this tall (unless his work boots are giving him more boost than we're assuming, which we'll never know).

How tall do you think he was in his prime JT?
Danimal says on 10/Oct/14
Frank says on 8/Oct/14
Undertaker looks Taller than Ali Baba but not by much Even Taker eye level is alittle higher than his Even Ali Baba said he thought Taker was taller
The Shortest I say Taker can be is 6ft 6.5 When I met Taker back in 93 he told me he was 6ft 9 which now I say is NOT TRUE!!

Frank, Undertaker has lost height since you met him. I promise you that.
Danimal says on 10/Oct/14
James B says on 8/Oct/14
Chris a 6'6 or 6'7 guy should weigh 200 pounds

Are you kidding me? Maybe a 15 year old teenager who has absolutely no muscle mass. a healthy 2 meter man with some muscle should be bare minimum 220-230 pounds and that's LEAN.
Frank says on 10/Oct/14
Im just say Ali is that he appears alittle taller than you and you said it yourself
Clay says on 9/Oct/14
James B says on 8/Oct/14
Chris a 6'6 or 6'7 guy should weigh 200 pounds

According to what?!? Alex is 6'0 205-210 and he has size for sure but he isn't Mr.Olympia or anything. 6'6-6'7 guys unless they are sick and frail should weigh 220-230 at least, thats if they dont lift.
Alex 6'0 says on 9/Oct/14
James B, 6'6-6'7 200lbs is pretty thin. I'm about 210 and I'm 6'0!
Alex 6'0 says on 9/Oct/14
Kroc, you're right. When you get to taller heights an inch is harder to tell. 6'6 from 6'5 can look the same to shorter people but obviously someone like you a strong 6'5 range you'll tell the difference.
Alex 6'0 says on 9/Oct/14
Ali Baba, you're usually 6'6 flat most of the day or a bit over. UT is 6'6.5 to maybe 6'7 max with better posture.
Alex 6'0 says on 9/Oct/14
Looks 6'6-6'6.5 with Ali Baba but not good posture. Id say more 6'6.5 to perhaps 6'7 more straight.
JT says on 9/Oct/14
Red183 says on 8/Oct/14
Ali I thought your head is higher with my estimation.
Click Here

I think your line is about right, Red. This is Taker with some hair. Click Here Click Here If the tops of the scalps were at the same level, Taker’s hair (thinner than Ali’s) would not be higher unless Ali’s head is shaved or bald at the crown, which it certainly does not look like. It's just an abnormally long forehead from the eyes up that makes him taller than he appears. Whether Taker had some extra boost in his work boots is a separate question. In the ring he arguably looked 6'8"-6'9" in the corporate ministry days and staredowns with Khali but recently closer to 6’6” with guys like Triple H, Lesnar and Batista. Maybe it’s posture related, maybe it's lifts.
Mark says on 9/Oct/14
Ali Baba so in your estimation how tall would you say Taker is?
James B says on 9/Oct/14
Ali Baba- at your height you should aim to weigh 198 pounds If you want to be as healthy as you can.
Arch Stanton says on 9/Oct/14
James B says on 8/Oct/14
Chris a 6'6 or 6'7 guy should weigh 200 pounds ??

Not an average build guy. A proper 6'6-6'7 and average build would be more 215-220 I think.
Jimbob says on 9/Oct/14
If anything Ali looks to have the edge, probably arguing over fractions. Very close.
miko says on 9/Oct/14
If Taker was measured and stood his tallest he'd still hit 6'7 IMO....

With his posture though I can understand him looking 6'6 on occasion.
Ali Baba says on 8/Oct/14
Frank, Taker's eye level is not higher in that picture. I'm not trying to argue with it, it just isn't.

Chris, I'm 250 pounds. I would bet Taker outweighs me by a good 30 pounds. He's still pretty stout. Just not as fit as he used to be.
James B says on 8/Oct/14
Chris a 6'6 or 6'7 guy should weigh 200 pounds
Red183 says on 8/Oct/14
Ali I thought your head is higher with my estimation.
Click Here

But i believe you and therefore I say Taker isn't over 6'6.5"
Frank says on 8/Oct/14
Undertaker looks Taller than Ali Baba but not by much Even Taker eye level is alittle higher than his Even Ali Baba said he thought Taker was taller
The Shortest I say Taker can be is 6ft 6.5 When I met Taker back in 93 he told me he was 6ft 9 which now I say is NOT TRUE!!
Chris says on 8/Oct/14
Ali Baba.....Just curious what is your current weight? I know 'Taker has dropped quite a bit of weight over the last few years but he appears similar to your body size. I'm guessing 240-250......close??
CARLOS V says on 8/Oct/14
This pic is a dream come true, never though we can have a pic like that with a guy like Ali baba that is so important because his height, My guess is strong 6´6. I always thought taker was 6´5, because his poor posture with all wrestlers (sid,cena,triple h, Lesnar...), when he was in a good posture because the estature of his oponent (very few times) he had shined. (with show, nash, kalhi).
He always have the head bend down, and his back hump. In this pic he has 0.5-1 inch left. I notice his legs are bigger and level of shoulder is taller.
Noway under 6.6. I am very happy that taker is so big.
And I notice Ali baba have a sensation of taker was bigger than him.
Thanks a lot Ali.
Joe says on 8/Oct/14
People are jumping to conclusions regarding this latest pic with Ali Baba, Undertaker hardly ever stands up straight, his posture is very poor, He has had various injuries and operations throughout the year. I would say he is at least 6'7 today when standing fully straight, Peak height was 6'8 / 6'8.5.
KROC says on 8/Oct/14
Andrea a REAL 6'6 doesn't look any different then someone who is 6'5. I mean its only an inch. There are certain heights that look more or less the same to most people. 6'5/6'6 is just that.
Greg says on 7/Oct/14
Yeah, Ali Baba, I was wondering where people were getting the idea that Undertaker was looking an inch taller than you in that pic. Your line shows that it's nothing once you factor in the hat. And then his somewhat poor posture is offset by his footwear advantage.

6'5.75'' fits for the Undertaker, I think he's your height, Ali Baba.
dave says on 7/Oct/14
Undertaker 6'6" TODAY 6'7" PEAK
Kevin Nash 6'7.5" Today 6'9 PEAK
Clay says on 7/Oct/14
Andrea says on 7/Oct/14
Arch, of course he is "seriously" tall, a REAL 6'6 is very very tall/exceptionally tall... And i talk for personal experience because i have this friend who is a solid 198 guy and he's way taller than most of the people! You're probably used to "6'6 hollywood guys", who are basically 6'4-6'5 who attempt to claim 6'6...

Who are these '' 6'6 Hollywood guys '' you're referring to?! The tallest mainstreamers in Hollywood like Vince Vaughn, Goldblum, Bob Saget, Conan, Hasselhoff, Tom Selleck etc. are all legitimtely their 6'4-5'' claims.

Wrestlers are a differen't story, everyone knows they lie about their size - thats been known for Millennia.
James B says on 7/Oct/14
6'8 peak rob?
184.3cm says on 7/Oct/14
I dont think hes more than 2m today. An inch loss for him is perfectly reasonable. Maybe better at 6'6.5 today. Its a small difference noway an inch difference.
Attitude says on 7/Oct/14
Thanks Ali Baba! You're awesome dude!

Undertaker is looking a strong 6'5 there. Work boots typically give a whopping 1.5 inches at least. Dress boots 1.3 to 1.5 inches. I'd say Taker has the footwear advantage easily. But look at shoulder height and it is the same.

I'd give undertaker 6'5 on the dot. Hell, those work boots could give him more lift, so he COULD be shorter. Wow.

I wonder if he is still near peak height
PathfinderCC says on 7/Oct/14
Ali Baba says on 7/Oct/14
Just in case anyone is wondering where my head is under my hair I got a hair cut two days before the picture and made sure it was very short just to try to ease the estimate here. Here's a pretty close mark of where my actual head is Click Here


Undertaker not higher 1,99m very good pic !
Andrea says on 7/Oct/14
Arch, of course he is "seriously" tall, a REAL 6'6 is very very tall/exceptionally tall... And i talk for personal experience because i have this friend who is a solid 198 guy and he's way taller than most of the people! You're probably used to "6'6 hollywood guys", who are basically 6'4-6'5 who attempt to claim 6'6...
Ali Baba says on 7/Oct/14
Just in case anyone is wondering where my head is under my hair I got a hair cut two days before the picture and made sure it was very short just to try to ease the estimate here. Here's a pretty close mark of where my actual head is Click Here
Jimbob says on 7/Oct/14
I now think 6'6 based on Ali's pic is a fair estimation.
Johno says on 7/Oct/14
Ali Baba, excellent pictures as usual. I think rather then stating what height he is; you can ascertain what height he is not -- he does not seem to touch 6'7.

I am surprised you go as low as 6'5.5/ Undertaker quite clearly not taller then you. As a matter fact, I would put you a fraction taller then him. I have rough guess on how much height "workboots" typically add. This new speculative height would go a long way to explain why Cena measures up strongly to Undertaker; as he clearly does and what height Kevin Nash actually maybe [~1.5 inches on taker].

Ali Baba 6'5.5 - 6'6.5
Undertaker strong 6'5 ranger: 6'6 in the mornings.
Johno says on 7/Oct/14
6.6/weak 6.6
JT says on 6/Oct/14
Same basic outcome as my earlier pic Click Here The huge head is the only thing that saves him. I'm actually surprised he still looks this tall (unless his work boots are giving him more boost than we're assuming, which we'll never know).
Mark says on 6/Oct/14
Rob 1/2 downgrade isn't enough. I know you'd take heat from some but best being accurate surely.
[Editor Rob: I think you could argue 6ft 6.5, but based on one photo I'm not as sure]
Michael says on 6/Oct/14
I´ve been watching Taker since 24 years now and I´m a fan since 22 years. I saw tons of pics with him. His peak height is more than 2,02 m (6-7,5) for sure! About 2,03/2,04 m (6-8+) barefoot. He was always a little bit taller than Sid (1-2 cm, 0,5").
Mark says on 6/Oct/14
Bang on Greg. Sticking to the relevant facts. Everything suggests a man of 6'6 but people don't want to admit that. Still damn tall.
James B says on 6/Oct/14
His on screen brother Glenn Jacobs is looking 6ft5 these days
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 6/Oct/14
Not under 6ft7 today
Arch Stanton says on 6/Oct/14
Hehe imagine measuring at "only 6'5.5" after a really long day!!
Arch Stanton says on 6/Oct/14
@ Ali Baba, you're seriously tall!!
Clay says on 5/Oct/14
Thats frustrating both Undertaker and Mane are in tooque's with Ali. Mane looks a little taller to me, Taker is a weak 6'7'' nowadays just as I speculated.
Frank says on 5/Oct/14
Taker looks alittle taller than Mane in Ali Baba's photos
Chris says on 5/Oct/14
Ali Baba, thanks for sharing that photo....Great shot of both of you.
Mark says on 5/Oct/14
Wrote previous post before Ali Baba today. Even states he adjusted his posture to meet Takers. 6'6 maximum.
JT says on 5/Oct/14
Thanks for the great pic, Ali. It looks like he might have you by around an inch but only because of his abnormally long forehead. Click Here His craning his neck forward a bit is probably offset by any footwear advantage he had. In a staredown I bet your eye levels would be about the same.
Greg says on 5/Oct/14
After taking a look at Ali Baba's picture and reading his post describing all the variables, I think Undertaker is 6'6''. Undertaker's got the footwear advantage as well as the hat, and is still struggling to look taller than the 6'5.75'' Ali Baba. As Ali Baba stated, he was doing his best to mimic Undertaker's posture, you can tell neither of them is standing with anything resembling perfect posture.

Rob, don't you think he at least needs to be downgraded to a flat 6'7''?
Red183 says on 5/Oct/14
Rob could you do a current height because Taker is noway 4cm taller than AliBaba
[Editor Rob: he could have lost between half and 1 inch today]
Mark says on 5/Oct/14
Ali Baba has stated himself he's around 6'5 3/4. Minimal difference between him and Undertaker in reality. Face it not 6'8 Kevin Nash realistically that height and he had 2" on Taker.
Ali Baba says on 5/Oct/14
Undertaker definitely felt taller than Mane but he did have a touch more footwear. My shoes give me just under 1&1/8". I'm not sure what Taker's boots gave him. Maybe a little more than than that. I tried to mimic his posture and dropped a little height myself. Taker's posture is actually very good until you get to his neck. He always has his head forward. And I'm not sure where the top of his head is under the hat. I don't think it was pulled tight to actually hug his head. When he first came out and I saw what kind of hat he was wearing I thought we were good to go in that respect, but I'm not sure now.

He was very cordial and shook everyone's hand and said hello and everything. Very soft spoken and relaxed. There were probably close to 500 people there to have a picture taken with him and then at least that many waited to go to his autograph table. He was there a lot longer than originally planned.

And Bob, I assure you I'm not taller than that. After a long day recently I even measured 6'5.5".
Joe says on 5/Oct/14
Thanks for the pic Ali Baba, so what is your official guess on his height? He looks taller than you slightly, depending on foot ware and the fact he probably wasn't standing as tall as he could.. 6'7 ? 6'7.5 ?
vinny says on 4/Oct/14
James B says on 10/Sep/14

Matt Bloom is taller than Test and is very close to Undertaker and Kanes height, and in some cases can even look a bit taller. I'd put him no less than 6'6".

Perhaps..
6'7" peak Kane and Undertaker both
6'4.5" JBL
6'6.5" Albert
6'4.5-6'5" Test
Red183 says on 4/Oct/14
Ali Baba says on 3/Oct/14
He was wearing a work type boot
Click Here

Ali you re a true celebheights hero! Thank you very much!
Taker looks 2-2,5cm taller - footwear ??

Takers body looks strong 6'5" - weak 6'6" type but his head is veeerry long.

If footwear is equal I say Taker is exactly 2,00m today
miko says on 4/Oct/14
Just seen the Ali Baba picture, Taker is looking a solid 6'7 there when you consider his posture (he's leaning his head in a little like he does in most photos) and how much height he has on him already (around an inch).
Mark says on 4/Oct/14
So Ali Baba how tall would you say Undertaker was in your opinion?
cdk82 says on 4/Oct/14
Undertaker looks 6'7.75" in boots
6'6.5" barefoot
1PunchBob says on 4/Oct/14
Ali Baba looked a tad taller than Tyler Mane and a tad shorter than Undertaker (top of head - not hair) but both claim 6-8. Either Ali is taller than 6-6 or both Tyler and Taker are around 6-7ish at best...
cdk23 says on 4/Oct/14
JBL WAS 6'5" PEAK
TODAY HE IS 6'4.5"
miko says on 4/Oct/14
Taker in good posture is still clearly 6'7 range. Has he lost any height? It's possible, but I'd doubt its more than half an inch, his posture is just not what it used to be.
James B says on 4/Oct/14
Nope JBL is no way 6'6

Here at 5:40 with 6'4 randy Orton
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eMTDnnp6Su0
Ali Baba says on 3/Oct/14
He was wearing a work type boot
Click Here
Chris says on 3/Oct/14
I met and was around JBL for a while at the HOF banquet in Waterloo, Iowa a couple of years ago. I didn't get a picture with him but several photos of him. My best guess was 6'6"....He was taller than I expected. He was wearing tennis shoes when I was around him. Fairly nice guy....I asked him if he ever met Andre while he worked in Japan. He said "Yes, but very briefly." Bascially, he said Andre was sitting backstage at an event and JBL walked over to him and introduced himself. He said he was just a quick exchange but he was glad he went over to meet him.
James B says on 2/Oct/14
JBL is a weak 6'5
Clay says on 1/Oct/14
Ryan says on 24/Sep/14
JBL height? 6'6? Rob?

6'5 and change peak weak 6'5'' today.
184.3cm says on 30/Sep/14
Must have been atleast this in the 90's. He easily had 6cm on Hogan in Suburban commando. Hogan had boots on as well so i doubt he had more shoes.
NCL says on 29/Sep/14
Undertaker and Leo Manzano (silver medalist). I read he's 5'5"

scroll down the link:

Click Here
James B says on 27/Sep/14
Taker made Sid look 6ft6.
James B says on 27/Sep/14
Nash could be 6ft8 today and probably a little over that peak.

JBL is 6'4.5 no way is he 6'6.

Also Undertaker made Sid Eudy look 6'6.5.
Aza says on 24/Sep/14
Sid just to clarify think his 6'7 peak height is his evening measurement . Quite possible he was taller first thing in the morning.
Ryan says on 24/Sep/14
JBL height? 6'6? Rob?
sid says on 23/Sep/14
If undertaker was 6'7 peak that would make kevin nash 6'8 peak, there no way undertaker was peak 6'7 he has to be 6'8 peak, and nash 6'10 peak
Ali Baba says on 23/Sep/14
I'll give a better estimate in a couple of weeks.
Daddy says on 22/Sep/14
Rob, Undertaker needs a downgrade! All who watched this man wrestle in 2014 could see he's shorter than he was in his 30s. He's more like 6'6.75"/200cm today. I'm now also thinking Kane might need to be downgraded to 6'7.25" now too.
Ali Baba says on 21/Sep/14
I think his head looks longer than it really is because of the receding hairline.
Aza says on 21/Sep/14
Undertaker is now 6'6. Peak height 6'7
Bud says on 14/Sep/14
Well i had a taught like that,but i wans't sure,ooops sorry.The sizes,height of wrestlers looked so real and logical
Height181 says on 13/Sep/14
Buds picture is photoshopped to the Max LOL. Some people on here though will just believe anything they see or hear. It's just sad.
Ali Baba says on 12/Sep/14
Bud, that looks like a composite picture to me. Meaning each individual wrestler was photographed separately and photoshopped into one picture. Triple H is no where near that short next to Taker in any other pic I've seen them in.
NCL says on 12/Sep/14
Danimal says on 11/Sep/14
NCL says on 11/Sep/14
Treat for you Undertaker fans: Click Here

I'm assuming you were that kid? Early 1990's, right?

haha no I wish!! How are ya Danimal?

I don't have any pics with Undertaker unfortunately but I do have a pic with King Kong Bundy someplace. If I can find it I'll post it here.

Bud says on 11/Sep/14
Looks pretty tall here Click Here

How did you find that?? Awesome pic!!
James B says on 12/Sep/14
With then 6'11.5 big show in that photo undertaker looks 6'8.5 for sure. Takers hair advantage can make him look 6'9 range in the pic.

Either that or big show is 6'10 which is unlikely but taker I am sure would not be over 6'7 in that pic.
James B says on 12/Sep/14
With then 6'11.5 big show in that photo undertaker looks 6'8.5 for sure. Takers hair advantage can make him look 6'9 range in the pic.

Either that or big show is 6'10-6'11 which is unlikely but taker I am sure would not be over 6'7 in that pic.
Bud says on 11/Sep/14
Looks pretty tall here Click Here
Danimal says on 11/Sep/14
NCL says on 11/Sep/14
Treat for you Undertaker fans: Click Here

I'm assuming you were that kid? Early 1990's, right?
James B says on 11/Sep/14
Undertaker looks one huge SOB in NCLs pic
NCL says on 11/Sep/14
Treat for you Undertaker fans: Click Here
James B says on 10/Sep/14
Test looks nearly big as undertaker.

These days bloom looks 6'4.5-6'5 but I think all the weight he carries can make him look shorter. His height is a tricky one.
James B says on 10/Sep/14
Vegas says on 9/Sep/14
i have met orton and test in person and test was taller. if you can find anything with orton and chris masters that would be ideal as test had 1.5-2 inches on him both out of gear.


How tall did Test look to you?
evil says on 10/Sep/14
6'6.5 is right
Alex 6'0 says on 10/Sep/14
Orton ive always thought looked like a legit 6'4. Of course could be a hair less like 6'3.75. Test looks between 6'4 and 6'5. 6'4.5 prob pretty accurate and gets the 6'6 billing
JT says on 9/Sep/14
Click Here Matt Bloom in big footwear could look about as tall as Undertaker and almost Matt Morgan's height. The footwear looks comparable here although Bloom could have something on the inside of his boots. Test to me looked around 6'5". Bloom was listed at 6'6" in college football.
cdk says on 9/Sep/14
ORTON 6'3.75"
TES 6'4.5"
NCL says on 9/Sep/14
I was a few feet away from Orton after a Raw. I didn't get a pic unfortunately but I'd definitely say 6'4" minimum. In the ring, I think he could be nearly 6'6" in his boots. He also gives the impression of being taller than he is because of his lean frame.

Test is a tough one. I think 6'4" is too low for Test - I always thought 6'5". But on the other hand, he did wear chunky footwear. He has pretty chunky footwear in that video with Lesnar that Vegas posted.

I'm sure there are better pics but Test and 6'6" Albert:

Click Here

and

Click Here

Two shots of him with Undertaker:

Click Here

and

Click Here
Bud says on 9/Sep/14
Looked 6'7.5 with Kevin Nash when he was young Click Here
James B says on 9/Sep/14
Miko someone else besides Vegas met Orton and estimated him at 6'3.75.
Guy B says on 9/Sep/14
@Height181

I wasn't really trying to start any sort of argument or lie, I just go off of what I see. I've seen Undertaker in person, both in his prime and just recently. He is at least 6'7" but no taller than 6'8"
Alex 6'0 says on 9/Sep/14
Test was always billed at 6'6 and even sometimes referred to as 6'7 on TV. I personally think he was easily 6'4 and prob a bit taller.
Vegas says on 9/Sep/14
i have met orton and test in person and test was taller. if you can find anything with orton and chris masters that would be ideal as test had 1.5-2 inches on him both out of gear.
Danimal says on 8/Sep/14
Alex 6'0 says on 11/Aug/14
Was watching Summerslam 2002 last night and in the UT vs Test match UT looked 2-3 inches taller. Test I have at least 6'4 and probably closer to 6'5

To me, Taker started looking shorter in the early 2000's.
Height181 says on 8/Sep/14
Some people on this site are just unbelievable. Even when their eyes see the truth, they will still blatantly lie to show that they are ''right''. If only they realised how foolish they seem.
miko says on 8/Sep/14
Orton could be a hair under 6'4. He's usually at least a solid inch taller than Batista who is 6'2.5/6'2.75 range.

As for Taker today its hard to compare unless we get some newer photos with him next to somebody 6'5 plus. I still think he'd be around 6'7.
Danimal says on 8/Sep/14
Guy B says on 2/Sep/14
The Undertaker is still a solid 6'7"-6'8".

Correction: Taker WAS a solid 6'7" guy in the 1990's. He's a little over 6'6" today at best.
James B says on 7/Sep/14
That's a bad video to judge since the camera is set so low and Orton is clearly closer to the camera.

Orton 6'4

Test 6'4.5
James B says on 7/Sep/14
WTF no way in hell is Orton taller than Test. Test gave a bigger impression on TV for sure and would edge Orton out by 1-2cm.
Height181 says on 7/Sep/14
@James B: Test is shorter than Randy Orton!!! Don't ignore the video I posted.
James B says on 6/Sep/14
Test looks a good 2 inches taller in that stare down with Lesner but in reality he was 6'4.5-6'4.75 range. Test is defiantly taller than randy orton that is for certain.
Height181 says on 6/Sep/14
Yes I admit I was wrong, but like I've said I've never checked what height Test was. He looks 6'3.5'' - 6'4'' tops next to Brock.

Look at this video, Go to exactly 3:07 Click Here I know it isn't the best angle, but you can clearly see Orton is taller than Test. No doubt Orton is a solid 6'4''.
Vegas says on 6/Sep/14
Height181 says on 6/Sep/14
@James B: Wasn't Test 6'6'' or something or was that billed
____________

from 1 minute 30 seconds Click Here
Height181 says on 6/Sep/14
@James B: Wasn't Test 6'6'' or something or was that billed? I'm not sure about his height, I've never checked, So I could be very wrong. Orton is a solid 6'4'', I'm sure almost all posters on here would agree with that. I don't know why here appeared shorter to you, when he was the same height as Kane in some angles.
Clay says on 5/Sep/14
Hahaha I've been proven wrong - yet he was 3.5 inches taller than Randy Couture, who had an inch or so over James Toney who we know is in that 5'10'' bracket. Do some simple math.
James B says on 5/Sep/14
Height181 says on 5/Sep/14
@James B: Most likely he's not, but it's not impossible though. He is very tall. In some shots he looked the same height as Kane. In his wrestling boots he is around 6'5.5''

Test was a guy who i would describe as at least 6'4. Test for sure gave a taller impression than Orton.

honestly when I saw him on beginning segement of raw last Monday he looked around 6ft3.
Height181 says on 5/Sep/14
@James B: Most likely he's not, but it's not impossible though. He is very tall. In some shots he looked the same height as Kane. In his wrestling boots he is around 6'5.5''
James B says on 5/Sep/14
Height181 says on 5/Sep/14
James B, I can't see Orton any shorter than 6'4''. He is taller than Edge, Batista, The Rock and more. The guy is atleast 6'4''.


Ok 6'4 is good for Orton but no way is he taller than 193cm.
Height181 says on 5/Sep/14
James B, I can't see Orton any shorter than 6'4''. He is taller than Edge, Batista, The Rock and more. The guy is atleast 6'4''.
James B says on 4/Sep/14
Looked 6'6.5 at times next to Orton on raw last Monday. Does anyone agree randy looked looked significantly under 6'4 that night compared to seth rollins?
Height181 says on 3/Sep/14
Guy B says on 2/Sep/14
''The Undertaker is still a solid 6'7"-6'8". Nobody's height truly changes.''

Just LOL! Wow!!...

To be fair Kane did look around 3 inches taller than Orton once they got in the ring. When the ''Authority'' were on the ramp, Orton did look same height as Kane. I think that was just a bad angle. Kane I think is still about 6'7'' Max.
Guy B says on 2/Sep/14
The Undertaker is still a solid 6'7"-6'8". Nobody's height truly changes. Kane stated himself in an interview that he's about 6'8" and Undertaker is actually around the same height. In late 2002 and early 2003 when kane returned from injury, he wore different boots that didn't have the big heels on them, you could see their similar heights plain and clear.

I think the only reason why Undertaker looks so much shorter now is because his posture has changed. He doesn't appear to be able to stand up fully straight anymore due to his years of wrestling and has a sort of hunch in his stance now.

Undertaker has always been the thinner big man in the wrestling business, which has always made his height deceiving. When he stands next to other big men, you finally realize how tall he truly is. I've seen Undertaker in person and he stood next to a friend of mine who was 6'6" himself and Undertaker was slightly taller.
James B says on 1/Sep/14
Daddy- Corporate Kane doesn't look much over 6'5 in my opinion
IR says on 1/Sep/14
Undertaker
6' 7" ( 201 cm ) today
6' 8" ( 203 cm ) peak
Alex 6'0 says on 31/Aug/14
Could UT be 6'6 today? Its not impossible. I think we need to figure out his peak first. No less than a solid 6'7 peak and 6'7.5 is likely. Not sure about 6'8 peak. Today 6'6 1/2 may be right
Daddy says on 31/Aug/14
James B says on 25/Aug/14

When Kane is wearing dress shoes he looks shorter compared to when he is in ring gear.

I realize that Coorperate Kane looked to be (keyword: LOOKED) barley taller than Ramdy Orton at times, but the Undertaker looked 4" taller than Brock Lesnar (6'2") at Wrestlemania 30. Now I'm not saying I believe Undertaker is "just" 6'6"- I peg him at 6'6.75", or should I say 6'6.5" - 6'7". But are we really saying that a man billed at 7' tall who steps over the top rope with ease is less than 6'6"? I know I know I know I know I know, you're thinking about Kane's huge boots, which is exactly what I want. When Undertaker and Kane worked together one night of Raw is War, Undertaker stepped over the top rope, probably because Kane did and he could too. 'Taker seemed to be doing more shenanagins to facilitate easy stepping than Kane, dispite wearing boots that looked to be similar in size. And if either do, 'Taker looks to have longer legs.

I think if everyone throws out their previous idea of Undertaker and his brother's heights, and looks at the head levels and boots sizes, more would agree with me that back during the Attitude Era, Kane was 6'7.75" - 6'8.25" while The Deadman was 6'7.5"- 6'8". But today, they're more like 6'7.25"- 6'7.75" and 6'6.5"- 6'7", for the big red monster and the now white goateed deadman.
Fair enough?
James B says on 29/Aug/14
There looks more than 4 inches between triple h and taker in those pics.
Height181 says on 28/Aug/14
Taker looks no taller than 6'6'' today. The highest I would give him is 6'6.5'', no more than that. I mean Taker only looks around 4 inches taller than HHH, who isn't a proper 6'2'' himself. Click Here Click Here
James B says on 27/Aug/14
Alex 6'0 says on 26/Aug/14
How much can Kane's wrestling boots give than dress shoes? A smaller fraction unless he has big boots


On the last edition of Raw Kane diet look over 6'6 I thought
Alex 6'0 says on 26/Aug/14
How much can Kane's wrestling boots give than dress shoes? A smaller fraction unless he has big boots
James B says on 25/Aug/14
Daddy says on 24/Aug/14
Guys, I'll keep saying this. People keep on mentioning Kane and saying he wears lifts, but no one wants to aknowlege the fact that Undertaker has worn some pretty substantial boots over the years. The deadman is not as tall as you want to believe. For example, in one of the video Red183 was so nice to provide us the link to, 'Taker had cowboy boots on, which, especially at such large sizes give 2"+. We all agree Kane is not 7', Big Show didn't live up to his 7'2" (7'4-5" in WCW), Triple H isn't 6'4", Sid Vicious isn't 6'9", The Rock isn't 6'5", Viscera isn't 6'10", and Chris Jericho isn't 6'0". Why can't we just accept that he has most likely never been over 6'8", if even that, and today wouldbe lucky to be 6'7.25"?


When Kane is wearing dress shoes he looks shorter compared to when he is in ring gear.
Daddy says on 24/Aug/14
Guys, I'll keep saying this. People keep on mentioning Kane and saying he wears lifts, but no one wants to aknowlege the fact that Undertaker has worn some pretty substantial boots over the years. The deadman is not as tall as you want to believe. For example, in one of the video Red183 was so nice to provide us the link to, 'Taker had cowboy boots on, which, especially at such large sizes give 2"+. We all agree Kane is not 7', Big Show didn't live up to his 7'2" (7'4-5" in WCW), Triple H isn't 6'4", Sid Vicious isn't 6'9", The Rock isn't 6'5", Viscera isn't 6'10", and Chris Jericho isn't 6'0". Why can't we just accept that he has most likely never been over 6'8", if even that, and today wouldbe lucky to be 6'7.25"?
research....first says on 21/Aug/14
Undetaker from 1990 to 2005 was 6'8"-6'7.5". From 2006 til now 6'7.5"-6'6". Due to age and injuries he lost height. And again footwear makes a big difference when comparing to others a bit taller or a bit shorter than Undertaker.
James B says on 19/Aug/14
Alex 6'0 says on 18/Aug/14
In 2002 UT was still at his peak so if he was 6'7.5 peak then Test looked 6'4.5-6'5

Taker could have been 6'7.25 as well as 6'7.5 peak
Alex 6'0 says on 18/Aug/14
In 2002 UT was still at his peak so if he was 6'7.5 peak then Test looked 6'4.5-6'5
Greg says on 16/Aug/14
Does anybody have any idea how tall Taker was listed in B-ball.
Tuga says on 14/Aug/14
NCL says on 8/Aug/14
Tuga says on 5/Aug/14
Tuga says on 8/Aug/14

Awesome posts!!

Thanks NCL :)
James B says on 12/Aug/14
6'4.75 spot on for test
Alex 6'0 says on 11/Aug/14
Was watching Summerslam 2002 last night and in the UT vs Test match UT looked 2-3 inches taller. Test I have at least 6'4 and probably closer to 6'5
Bill says on 11/Aug/14
As Yankem He had a slight footwear advantage.
James B says on 10/Aug/14
In his recent wwe (unmasked) gimmick he looked under 6'7. The ring gear he wears does boost his height.
Vic says on 10/Aug/14
Glenn Jacobs in interview earlier this year (can be seen on youtube), he's 6'75.
NCL says on 8/Aug/14
Tuga says on 5/Aug/14
Tuga says on 8/Aug/14

Awesome posts!!
research...first says on 8/Aug/14
It seems most people on here don't want to accept that kane is a weak 6'7" and that he wear lifts. Again, that's why he most of the time looks abit taller than undertaker. Barefoot Undertaker always been taller than kane. It's not fanboy but facts.
James B says on 8/Aug/14
Although he's not 6'6 Undertaker is probably 6'6.75 today given years of injuries. Peak 6'7-6'7.5 range or a legit 6'7. Kane was probably nearer 6'8 than undertaker.

In a few years down the line will probably be no taller than 6'6 I would imagine.
Tuga says on 8/Aug/14
Taker and sid:
Click Here
Click Here

But still please explain how can he look that tall next to sting, or for that matter next to peak hogan etc.
Peak 6'8 taker and sid 6'7 1/2 (sid 6'7 if he did gain advantage in tip toeing or so).
A 6'7 peak taker would downgrade so many people, don´t even get it started....

miko says on 7/Aug/14
Undertaker at a flat 6'6? I guess Brock Lesnar is barely 6'1 then?

Yes miko, no way "just" 6'6, he might give that impression due to big forehead and ususal bad posture, but its clear he is taller than that, just as he looked next to khali and others in more recent times.
Just look at my posts for evidence.
alex 190 says on 8/Aug/14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwtYt8z2L1s#t=184

I struggle to believe that the undertaker is something more than 6ft4, knowing that lesnar is somewhere at 6ft1
Daddy says on 7/Aug/14
@Tuga well then, how tall would you peg Kane?
@NCL try bending forward when looking at people and notice how little you shrink compared to them. And I recognize that there's a 99.999% chance you are less than 6'6", meaning Undertaker loses more height than the average person (you), but you said he's losing a minimum of 2",so try the "bending forward by a person" test and reevaluate if you really think he's losing that much. And I know you mentioned it, but if you remember the size difference in Lesnar's boots vs Taker's, I feel saying Taker is 6'6.75" (6'6.5"-6'7") is very reasonable.
miko says on 7/Aug/14
Undertaker at a flat 6'6? I guess Brock Lesnar is barely 6'1 then?
research...first says on 7/Aug/14
Robby, you believe everything w tells you? You know what the w stands for.
Alex 6'0 says on 7/Aug/14
Danimal, so 6'7 peak and today 6'6-6'6 1/2 you think?
Alex 6'0 says on 7/Aug/14
Undertaker vs Sid WM 13 UT was barely taller. Looked 1/2 inch at best taller
Robby says on 6/Aug/14
Research First. Undertaker was born in 1965. Not 1962. The Undertaker graduated from Waltrip High School in 1983. Making him 18 when graduated. Research that.
James B says on 6/Aug/14
Danimal - I would have guessed Scott hall at 6'4 always thought 6'5 was extreme for him.
James B says on 6/Aug/14
Taker is still around a flat 6'7 today. He does look that tall as well and I'd say he gives a slightly bigger impression than Kane does today.

Sid still looked huge on his last wwe appearence even though he has lost height.
Danimal says on 5/Aug/14
Clay says on 3/Aug/14
Im thinking 6'8 peak and barely scarping 6'7 today at 50 is more like it.

If Sid was 6'7" at this peak, we know that Taker didn't have a full inch on him in 1989 (at 2:30) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdZmtXMBWn4

So, I doubt Taker was ever much over 6'7" at his peak. Today, he's floating around 6'6" and Sid seems to have lost a lot of height as well (looks about the same height as Scott Hall today) Click Here
Daddy says on 5/Aug/14
Many forget that Issac Yankem was taller than 'Taker by about 1.5". Just throwing that in there again
Iwannaberich says on 5/Aug/14
I don't know what to think sometimes kane looks taller and other times undertaker looks taller. there was one time undertaker looked almost the same height as bigshow. youtube- undertaker makes big show his little b-word. curse word,
research...first says on 5/Aug/14
Fact, Undertaker was taller than Kane. Fact, Undertaker in his prime was 6'8"in his barefeet not bear feet phillymike. Just kidding, not a bad list you have. Fact, Kane in his prime 6'6.75". Fact, footwear does make a difference when comparing heights. Fact, Kane always wore 2 inch and 3 inch lifts. That's why Kane most of the time looked a inch taller than Undertaker. There was a time Undertaker wore 2 inch lifts, the ministry days. Research that and you'll see Undertaker than Kane. Also look up Undertaker and Kane on America's most wanted. Kane wearing sneakers and Undertaker 2" taller than kane. Fact, Undertaker is 52 not 49 and he did shrink due to age. Now he is 6'6.75"-6'6.5". Kane is 47 and lost half inch and know is 6'6.25" and still shorter than undertaker. Fact, Kane still wears lifts. Whomever wants to debate this that's fine, but do research first...
Tuga says on 5/Aug/14
Well, lets get started with the "taller" kane:
Click Here
Full body shot, no mask, no wider stance, excuses?

Alex 6'0 says on 5/Aug/14
UT has a long forehead so his eye level is gonna be a good 5 inches or a bit more from top of his head Id say

Great point Alex:
Click Here
Click Here
Gotta say he can still look 6'7 1/2 at the time of this pics.

Click Here
Sorry but there´s no way a 6'6 range or even flat 6'7 men can pull this with khali, taker really stood straight this time.

A peak 6'7 taker downgrades a lot of wrestlers, like sid for example:
Click Here
6'6 range peak sid? What about sting? ectectetc for now its enough, I´ve given a fair amount of other examples over the years here.


Clay says on 3/Aug/14
Im thinking 6'8 peak and barely scarping 6'7 today at 50 is more like it.

Agree with you with 6'8 peak, nowadays (well, at the time of the pics really ;))at least 6'7 maybe 6'7 1/2...with perfect posture of course.
Alex 6'0 says on 5/Aug/14
Miko, yea that's true he can appear his real height standing better but 6'7 today for UT may be a bit too much. His peak def. 6'7 to maybe 6'7.5. I doubt the 6'8 peak. Today with guys like HHH and Lesnar he has max 5 inches on them. 6'6 1/2 for UT today is my guess. Kane was a bit taller and that's in regular boots.
Alex 6'0 says on 5/Aug/14
Height181, yea sometimes it can look more 4 inch range and sometimes 5. UT has a long forehead so his eye level is gonna be a good 5 inches or a bit more from top of his head Id say.
miko says on 4/Aug/14
He still looked around 6'7 with Lesnar when he stood tall.

If Taker has lost anything its likely minimal. His posture does him no favours.

I don't think he was ever anywhere near a flat 6'8 personally. A hair over 6'7 prime and a flat 6'7 today I'd go for.
Clay says on 3/Aug/14
Im thinking 6'8 peak and barely scarping 6'7 today at 50 is more like it.
Danimal says on 3/Aug/14
Alex 6'0 says on 3/Aug/14
UT is 49 so he naturally lost a little height. 1/2 inch or something seems right. UT always claimed 6'8 as his real height back then when he was being billed 6'10-6'11. 6'8 peak? I'm thinking 6'7 peak really and today 6'6 1/2. Against HHH and Lesnar he has max 5 inches on both of them

I agree with you Alex.
NCL says on 3/Aug/14
Undertaker bent down quite a bit still has a good 3.5" - 4" on 6'2" Lesnar

Click Here

To be fair, Lesnar's footwear seemed to be completely flat in their WM match but I don't think 'Taker had more than an 1" advantage. Bottom line is I think if 'Taker stood straight he'd gain a minimum of 2", which would put him at lowest 6'7" today w/o footwear

Similar shot of them from several years ago:

Click Here

And another older shot of them and Vince, but cant' see shoes here:

Click Here
Alex 6'0 says on 3/Aug/14
UT is 49 so he naturally lost a little height. 1/2 inch or something seems right. UT always claimed 6'8 as his real height back then when he was being billed 6'10-6'11. 6'8 peak? I'm thinking 6'7 peak really and today 6'6 1/2. Against HHH and Lesnar he has max 5 inches on both of them
Alex 6'0 says on 30/Jul/14
Rob, UT appears to def lost a little height. I think he needs a peak height and current height listing on here.
lion says on 29/Jul/14
Taker is 6'7.5 today but only because of his unusual long forehead increasing his height.
lion says on 29/Jul/14
Taker is 6'7.5 today but only because of his unusual long forehead increasing his height.
Daddy says on 28/Jul/14
Alex is 100% right. 'Taker has CLEARLY lost height over the years. He may have been 6'7.5" early in life, but the man has white hair now, and looked to be a mere 4 inches over Brock Lesnar at Wrestlemania 30. Either that or he quit wearing the lifts, and has never been more than 6'7". But I think, and believe most posters will agree with me, that Taker should be listed with a peak he height (6'7.5"/202cm) and current height (6'6.75"/200cm?). Think about it Rob, if you don't mind
NCL says on 27/Jul/14
like the estimates guys thanks!

Height181 says on 23/Jul/14
Rob, is a slight downgrade for Undertaker possible? You need to check this out, Click Here Pause it at EXACTLY 6:11, You don't even need to watch the whole video. Kane is clearly taller than Taker. You have them both at the same height?
[Editor Rob: they are pretty close, kane can look a little taller but are they equal wrestling boots]

Rob makes a good point. It's hard to tell b/c the video isn't crisp but you pause the video at about 5:22 you can see the boots a bit
Alex 6'0 says on 27/Jul/14
Kane was a bit taller in that video. Nowadays he wears normal wrestling boots compared to his old wedges back in the day. UT has lost height though. He needs a peak height and today height listing on here.
Joe says on 27/Jul/14
In regards to Height 181... you do realise Kane is standing above Undertaker right? you can see it on the wide shot. Nice try though.
James says on 26/Jul/14
Kane is 6'6.5-6'7''at max.
Nick says on 26/Jul/14
@lou lou Kane 6'11''LOL there's no way Kane is 6'11'' because he is clearly shorter than Big Show by 3-4 inches
lou lou says on 25/Jul/14
I agree with nick, phillymkike that is a good listing. I only disagree with kane, i met him at a signing. I took a picture with him, i'm 5'11 and he was at least a foot taller then me. So i would say he is 6'11.
Daddy says on 25/Jul/14
NCL says on 10/Jul/14
Daddy says on 9/Jul/14
Rob I agree with NCL: Dean Ambrose, Roman Reigns, and Seth Rollins need pages!!

Tuga says on 4/Jul/14


NCL, yes, the former shield members should be represented here ;)


BELIEVE in the Shield :>)

Well, former Shield anyway. I'm curious of your opinions what do you guys think? They're a little hard to narrow down.

Roman Reigns looks around the same height as Cena or slightly taller, I don't think Ambrose and Rollins are much taller if they are. IMO maybe 6' - 6'1" each

Since we're talking about Harper, I think he's closer to 6'5" too. Barret's a bit further up the stage and has a thinner frame. Whatever Harper is, Rowan looks consistently 2" taller to me.

Give or take an inch either way, they're BIG dudes. I haven't heard weight billings from them yet but I'd bet Harper is probably a legit 270-280 and Rowan has got to be around 300 or more.

@NCL IMO, The former shield member are as follows:
Seth Rollins: 6'0"
Dean Ambrose: 6'1.25"
Roman Reigns: 6'2"

Wade Barret is a relatively slim guy, making him look taller compared to bigger guys. So I'm going to guess he's between 6'4" and 6'5.25"

Luke Harper? He's been billed at 6'4" in the indies, so I'm giving him a flat 6'4". 270lb seems reasonable to me.
And Erick Rowan? Damn, dude's a monster. He stacked up extremely well to Kane, who wears bigger boots, so he could be as tall as 6'6.75". And they don't exaggerate weights that much anymore in WWE, so he could be his billed 315lb. He's both fatter and more muscular than Harper.
Aza says on 21/Jul/14
His listed height was his peak height when he started out in wwe ( hogan looked 6''5 back then). His morning height is 6'6 these days.
Nick says on 19/Jul/14
Philly mike great listings.

In my opinion with much certainty I believe triple h is a legit 6'2.5 but looks shorter due to his neck being craned forward.

Also the big show was definetly between 7'0-7'0.25 in the morning in his prime. I wouldn't be suprised if 4 hours after waking in his absolute prime he would measure in at 6'11 3/4 ths. At that point your talking about the difference of 1/300th of his height off the golden 7 foot mark , totally unnoticeable. Nowadays I definetly wouldn't doubt the big show is 6'10.5-6'11.

If he measured 7 foot right after getting out of bed that would be awesome and impressive..

To take it into consideration about how insignificant a quarter inch to a man I. The 7 foot range it would be equivalent to the length of a pee wee baseball bat the the Titanic ship.
Marc says on 18/Jul/14
Well he is about one inch shorter than Kane who on this site is listed as the same thing as taker. So I think Kane is probably actualy 6ft8 and this is taker's real height
phillymike says on 14/Jul/14
Most of the people on here are pretty close or dead on. A few people are way off. My uncle worked for the wwf/wwe and knew the wrestlers down below. He also knew the footwear they used. He stated there are 3 kinds of footwear: standard wrestling boot is 1.25", and there are 2" and 3" lifts. Another thing to consider is men over 45 can shrink and lose height due to injuries. Here are the wrestlers in there prime, now, and bear feet.

Giant Gonzalez 7'4" he wore the 3" lifts
Great Khali 7'0.25" he wears the 2" lifts
Andre the Giant 6'11.5" retired 6'9"
Big Show 6'10.5" wears the 2" lifts
Kurrgan 6'9.5"
Kevin Nash 6'9.25" now 6'8.5"
Matt Morgan 6'8.5"
Undertaker 6'8" now 6'6.75"
Sid 6'7.25" now 6'6"
Kane 6'6.75" now 6'6" wears 3" lifts
Big John Studd 6'6 wore 2" lefts
Test 6'6"
Albert/tensai 6'5.75" wear 2" lifts
Hulk Hogan 6'5.5" now 6'3.5"
Jake the Snake 6'5" now 6'3.75"
DDP 6'4.5"
Randy Orton 6'3.5"
King Kong Bundy 6'3"
Edge 6'2.75"
Batista 6'2.5" Wears 2" lifts
Rock 6'2.5"
Brock Lesner 6'2" first wwe run 2" lifts now sneakers/mma boots
HHH 6'1.75"
Stone Cold 6'1.5" now 6'0.25" neck injury
Vinny Mac 6'1" now 5'11.5"
John Cena 6'0" wears .75" sneakers
RVD 5'11.25"
Shawn Michaels 5'11" now 5'10"
Chris jericho 5'10" wears 2" lifts
Kurt Angle 5'10" now 5'9"

willom/ER: I agree with your most current roster heights.
willom says on 14/Jul/14
dean ambrose 6'0.5
seth rollins 6'1.5
roman reigns 6'2.5
got to think logical people, would management let these three walk through the audience if they were not big and intimidating. it has to fit the character and look believable in order to sell it.
ER says on 12/Jul/14
UNDERTAKER 6'7, PEAK 6'8.5
KANE 6'7.5, PEAK 6'9
KEVIN NASH 6'10.5
BIG SHOW 6'11.5, PEAK 7'0.5
SCOTT HALL 6'4, PEAK 6'5
JOHN CENA 6'0.5
BATISTA 6'2.75
HHH 6'2
RANDY ORTON 6'4
SETH ROLLINS 6'1.5
DEAN AMBROSE 6'0.75
ROMAN REIGNS 6'2.5
DOLPH ZIGGLER 5'11.5
FANDANGO 6'2
BOTH USOS 6'0
LUKE HARPER 6'6
ERIC ROWAN 6'8
BRAY WYATT 6'0
BIG E 5'10.5
JACK SWAGGER 6'6
WADE BARRETT 6'5.5
PAUL HEYMAN 5'10
BROCK LESNAR 6'2
DANIEL BRYAN 5'7.25
TYSON KIDD 5'9
NCL says on 11/Jul/14
I may have to take back what I said about Reigns being only slightly taller than Cena - looked a good 2" taller on Raw. I could of sworn I saw a show where he was only a bit taller but maybe it was the camera angle
Tuga says on 11/Jul/14
NCL says on 10/Jul/14
"I'm curious of your opinions what do you guys think?"

Not sure but I would say:

Ambrose between 6' 1/2 and 6'1
Rollins between 6'1 and 6´1 1/2
Reigns between 6'2 and 6'2 1/2

Standing next to cena reigns did seem around 2 inches taller when having fairly decent posture.

Rollins next to cena was taller but camera angles were not the best...
Next to HHH, well that´s even harder since they could look identical and following week HHH was considerably taller...
NCL says on 10/Jul/14
Daddy says on 9/Jul/14
Rob I agree with NCL: Dean Ambrose, Roman Reigns, and Seth Rollins need pages!!

Tuga says on 4/Jul/14


NCL, yes, the former shield members should be represented here ;)


BELIEVE in the Shield :>)

Well, former Shield anyway. I'm curious of your opinions what do you guys think? They're a little hard to narrow down.

Roman Reigns looks around the same height as Cena or slightly taller, I don't think Ambrose and Rollins are much taller if they are. IMO maybe 6' - 6'1" each

Since we're talking about Harper, I think he's closer to 6'5" too. Barret's a bit further up the stage and has a thinner frame. Whatever Harper is, Rowan looks consistently 2" taller to me.

Give or take an inch either way, they're BIG dudes. I haven't heard weight billings from them yet but I'd bet Harper is probably a legit 270-280 and Rowan has got to be around 300 or more.
Daddy says on 9/Jul/14
Rob I agree with NCL: Dean Ambrose, Roman Reigns, and Seth Rollins need pages!!
Bubba says on 5/Jul/14
Taker is definitely taller than Luke Harper not sure about Rowan.
Tuga says on 4/Jul/14
Vegas says on 24/Jun/14
i don't see 3.5 inches between barrett and chad

No, but easily 2 inches at least, so 6'5 1/2 for barret should be a safe bet.

Harper IMO is closer to 6'5 than 6'4, sometimes he stands really tall, but that´s one for now I would not bet.

NCL, yes, the former shield members should be represented here ;)
NCL says on 2/Jul/14
Hey Rob - how's about pages for Ambrose, Rollins, and Reigns? They seem to come up in debates and I'm curious as to what everyone else thinks

Sorry to get off topic of Undertaker, but since this page is so popular, I thought I'd post it here.
Vegas says on 24/Jun/14
i don't see 3.5 inches between barrett and chad in those photos. chads eyeline would be alot lower if that were the case.

barrett next to harper whom most here seem to estimate around 6'4? Click Here
Daddy says on 23/Jun/14
WWE has listed him as low as 6'8", so I'm not buying anything over that for him. I'd say 6'7.75" when he was young (people quote the DVD "It's my Yard" as proof he's 6'8.5", but that video also said that Taker actually burned Kane as a child, it's 100% kayfabe BS), and at WM 30, he could have been as low as 6'6.75". Whatcha guys think?
James B says on 20/Jun/14
Barrett looks 6'7 compared to chad

Maybe the 6'3.5 was in the morning?
Vegas says on 16/Jun/14
not taker related but here is wade barrett with a few nfl combine measured players. the taller chap is chad schofield who measured 6'3.5 barefoot, the other guy is brandon stephens who came in at just a hair over 5'10 barefoot Click Here
Patrick says on 14/Jun/14
manny says on 11/Jun/14
Undertaker has no reason to lie about his height. He's already tall, he's not a short celebrity to add a few inches. Rounded up he is a solid 6'8".


I couldn't agree more
TopKek says on 12/Jun/14
He didn't seem to have more than 4 inches on Lesnar recently. I'd say nowadays he's 6'6"-6'6.5" but this current listing at 6'7.5" would be accurate for his peak height
manny says on 11/Jun/14
Undertaker has no reason to lie about his height. He's already tall, he's not a short celebrity to add a few inches. Rounded up he is a solid 6'8".
Vegas says on 8/Jun/14
Nishanth Hegde says on 7/Jun/14
Nopes.
Orton: 6ft2
Cena 5ft10
angle 5ft8
_____________

the editor of this site has a shot with bret hart. thats hart with cena on flat ground @ 1 minute mark Click Here

not sure what to make of your previous post, kane 6'4!
john b says on 8/Jun/14
Have to agree Taker has lost height, a good few years back he was a good 6'7 but now around or just over 6'5 - Here is the tale of the tape....

HHH was billed as tall as 6'5 in WCW, went down to 6'4 in WWE. But for real at max was a 6'2, now looking 6'1 on a good day.

Batista no more then 6'2
Orton 6'3 maybe 6'3 and a half ??
Rock really looking 6'2 - 6'2 and a half to day, like HHH Rock was billed from 6'5 to 6'4 :(
Hulk Hogan has to be one of the crazies wrestler when he comes to his height - billed at 6'9 to 6'8 but for real he couldn't have been more then 6'6 back some years ago, I have spoken with a few people in the last few years who have met him and said he looked a good 6'4.

here is a few surprises if you meet Rowdy Piper his looking very close to 5'9 to day back in the 80' & 90's he was a 6'1 guy. Rick Flair was a true 6 footer in his day, now be lucky if his 5'10 on a good day.
kurt Angle no more then 5'9.


HBK was billed as 6'1 but for real no more then 6 foot - to day about 5'10 and a half.

Steve Austin billed as 6'2 - was 6 foot but fighting to day to maintain that.

Andre the Giant Billed at 7'5 - 7'4 but for real was a 7 foooter and by the time his life was near the end he was lucky if he was 6'9.

Big Show, billed as 7'4, 7'3 and 7'2 for real just under 7 foot could pass for 6'11
Jackie Knife says on 8/Jun/14
2 Nishanth Hegde

it's ridiculous. i stood 2 feet away from john, and he was just a tad shorter than me and i'm 186 cm tall
Rikashiku says on 8/Jun/14
HHH - A weak 6'2" now a days.
RKO - 6'4, maybe a slight bit more.
Batista - 6'2.5 looks about right now. Though in his return appearances, he looked like he wasn't wearing his boots from 2003. Rather, Orton is wearing them.
Undertaker - 6'7.5 or 6'7" flat. Looked taller in past appearances around '99 and '00. In a doco about him, he claimed he was around 6'8" and 6'9". In 2002, WWE had listed him as 6'8" a few times for a build up for his match with Kurt Angle, who was listed at 6'0".

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes in newspapers, books and resumes.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.