How tall is The Undertaker ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

The Undertaker's height is 6ft 7in (201 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 7.5in (202 cm)
American Wrestler. He once said "I used to be 6-foot-10 but I got dropped on my head a few times so I'm 6-foot-9 now.".
Add a Comment on the Height of The Undertaker



HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 27/Aug/15
JT said on 26/Aug/15
Thanks for sharing, Robby. Other than Orton, the others look shorter than how I thought they would next to you.


Actually Orton looks 6´3.5" max imo, Taker could stand more straight but I doubt he would clean the 2,00m mark(6´6.75"), Brian looks weak 5´8" and Sting 6´1"-6´1.25"
JT said on 26/Aug/15
Thanks for sharing, Robby. Other than Orton, the others look shorter than how I thought they would next to you.
Robby said on 25/Aug/15
@ Ali Baba. Yes He was wearing a black work boot type of shoe.
Ali Baba said on 24/Aug/15
Taker looks much healthier this year. Was he wearing the same work boot type shoe?
Robby said on 23/Aug/15
I met Undertaker at the Chicago Comic Con. Not nearly as good as Ali Baba's pic with Taker at the Austin Con, because I am an absolute midget (5'9.5" barefoot height and 5'10.5" in the shoes I was wearing) compared to Taker so he is slouching a bit. Click Here also met Sting Click Here Randy Orton Click Here and Daniel Bryan Click Here (photo was crooked I guess when I put it in the scanner) Paige was there as well. however I met her last year.
[Editor Rob: In case that link above doesn't work.

It's good to see Undertaker actively contributing to the 'How tall is Elvis' thread by wearing his ali/elvis shirt ;)]
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 23/Aug/15
joe said on 21/Aug/15
matt morgan uses elevators I would say it could be something like 6'6.75 barefoot or 6'6.5


Right, Morgan used some heavy lifts Click Here ,these are easy 1.5-1.7" inside lifts with 0.75"-1" wrestlingboots so he was around 6´10" in them, but next to 6´6" Albert he was in normal wrestling boots.
I wouldn´t go under 6´7.5" for Morgan
mj said on 23/Aug/15
thats more than 4 inches...his head is huge
Junior31 said on 22/Aug/15
Just went to a meet and greet for Bray Wyatt at the. Barclays center in Brooklyn. Have a pic with him. Big dude. Awesome guy. Asked him how tall are you? He said right around 6'2 and then "I laugh because rumors saying I'm 5'8 but that's because I'm usually standing next to guys 6'5 6'7" we laughed and took the pic. Will post when I get it
joe said on 21/Aug/15
matt morgan uses elevators I would say it could be something like 6'6.75 barefoot or 6'6.5
James B said on 20/Aug/15
Interesting rob in this dailymotion video taker does not not look over 6'6 1/2 compared to Albert who was listed at 6'6.

Click Here

A train does not look over 4 inches taller than lesner either when they square up here. Click Here


Your opinions rob?
James B said on 20/Aug/15
Albert liked to wear big footware?
enos said on 19/Aug/15
Somethings fishy! I believe ali. Because taker and matt morgan both appeared to be alberts height who was listed at 6'6"
James B said on 19/Aug/15
Probably 6'7-6'7.25 by 2001 since he only edged out 6'6 1/2 A train by a fraction
Ali Baba said on 18/Aug/15
Joe, we've never met each other. We live on the opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean, so it's a bit of a trip.
joe said on 15/Aug/15
Rob, you have viewed Ali baba personally
Alex 6'0 said on 13/Aug/15
UT had like 5 inches on Brock back in 2002
6'2 said on 10/Aug/15
enos he was taller than sid so what was sid 6'5-.5 peak come on. jake roberts is 6'5" he was taller than him bezerker was 6'6 taller shango 6'5 taller scott hall crush earthquake these are all wrestlers who were 6'5-7" and taker was taller id say 6'7 maybe 6'6.5" today but peak has to be 6'8
184.3cm (Night) said on 9/Aug/15
Rob if Ali is ok with it maybe you should put that pic of them both here? Still many people who believe he is 6'8 or even more. He cant be more than 6'7 its impossible unless Ali had massive boots which i dont believe for a second.
Phenom! said on 8/Aug/15
I remember that undertaker had flats during the unholy alliance staredown with the big show who had freaking lifts! Undertaker was at his tallest, and straight posture, he looked only about 3 inches shorter than big show. That would've made undertaker a legit 6'9". I've seen certain times where undertaker apprears taller than Kane. During big evil era, and the ministry era offcourse
Enos said on 8/Aug/15
Rob, Ali, How tall do you guys think taker was peak barefoot and in boots and current barefoot and in boots. im in between 5'10'' and 5'11'' barefoot, and ive been watching taker 91-94. and to be honest, it seems like the "jobbers'' they put him against were about my size but they billed em 6'' to 6'2''. taker didn't look to me like hed even be 6'8'' in boots. feedback please
enos said on 7/Aug/15
Ali and rob.peak height for taker barefoot and current. Id like both your opinions. Watchin old vids from 92-94 with jobbers he didnt look 6'8" even in boots to me. I think he is and always was a true 6'6"
6'2 said on 4/Aug/15
He appeared to have at least 5" on Brock so would be around 6'7 he used to be 6'8
slim said on 3/Aug/15
Where is Moody's quote? Show proof please. Bc kane was still taller in flats as Isaac yankem in the staredown with taker. Longer arms too.
James B said on 2/Aug/15
Looked closer to 6'7 flat peak compared to sid and kevin nash
Nick said on 31/Jul/15
William Moody (Paul Bearer, Percy Pringle III) said that Taker is about an inch taller than Kane and he knew both men well for many years and worked with both. Looking at the boots Kane used he had sizable lifts in them to mak him look much taller whereas Taker's were flat soles. This is the reason Kane looks taller than Taker as he was billed to be but in reality Mr Moody's assessment is probably accurate.
josey wales said on 29/Jul/15
In 2000/2001 he was certainly well over 300 lbs. Reckon close to 330. He was rsther over weight before getting lean again in abt 2003. Nowadays his around 260 or just over. I reckon in 1999 during his ministry days he was a solid 300. Had massive shoulders. Was quite a beast even though was near chronicly injured most of the time
josey wales said on 29/Jul/15
In 2000/2001 he was certainly well over 300 lbs. Reckon close to 330. He was rsther over weight before getting lean again in abt 2003. Nowadays his around 260 or just over. I reckon in 1999 during his ministry days he was a solid 300. Had massive shoulders. Was quite a beast even though was near chronicly injured most of the time
the beast 09 said on 27/Jul/15
Well he looks 6'7
Munna said on 24/Jul/15
Taker was 6'7.5" during his younger days & Kane was about 6'8". But it looks like both of them have lost some height now. So as per my opinion, Undertaker is now 6'6.5" or may be 6'7" & Kane is about 6'7.5"
Robert said on 24/Jul/15
I'd say Taker is now 6'6.5" and about 275lbs. At his biggest, he was 6'8",307lbs.
Height183 said on 23/Jul/15
6'6.5'' Max for me today. Probably hits a flat 6'6'' at his lowest in the evening.
Jay said on 23/Jul/15
taker is 6'11" is he not?
Kunoichi said on 22/Jul/15
Bad angle Taker and Hall,but Their feet seem a little.
blogs.c.yimg.jp/res/blog-63-fb/jackmasayuki74/folder/880174/16/27231116/img_1?1297692214
6'2 said on 22/Jul/15
Unfortunately some people here are a bad judge of height difference the pic with Goldberg would be a 4-5" difference putting taker at still around or close to 6'7 and with hall in the ring he would be 6'8-9" if hall is in fact 6'5" I'd say he lost 1-2" over the crippling years like most past wrestlers
ken-6-4 said on 22/Jul/15
Dude. He is 50 years old and has been wrestling for ages.
The guy looks good for all that he has been through.

animal says on 15/Jul/15
Undertaker today with horrendous posture and a ravaged looking body. His neck/upper back is curving and he's a SHATTERED man today. I personally think he's about 6'5.5" barefoot today at best:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Compared to his PEAK:
ken-6-4 said on 22/Jul/15
Seems like a knee issue with that big brace.
He is not getting any younger. :(


LoganNoll1996 says on 21/Jul/15
What do you think of his health at this point compared to last year, Rob?
Shuvayu said on 22/Jul/15
There is an idiot by the name of Clement who lives in midgetland.... taker really looked tall at raw
joe said on 22/Jul/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft diz em 20 / Jul / 15
it means a demotion for Joe Manganiello it looks the same height hall next to kevin nash, without citing peak height nash
Patrick said on 21/Jul/15
He's 6'7". Peak 6'8", but after Raw last night (07/20/15) he had an easy 4+ inches on everyone in that ring.
miko said on 21/Jul/15
6'5.5 is a disgrace.
Shuvayu said on 21/Jul/15
Sa a recent pic of taker ith khali... no more than a 3 inch difference
Shuvayu said on 21/Jul/15
Check scot hall mug shot...recent 6'5" height... taker still has 2-3" on him...so 6'7.5 min for taker
pablo77bar(184cm) said on 21/Jul/15
Yesterday in RAW he still looked in the 2 meters tall range
LoganNoll1996 said on 21/Jul/15
Just watched RAW in which everyone from the locker room had to come out and separate him and Lesnar. Was easily the tallest guy in that ring and the height difference looked real noticible when a good bit of guys were holding him back including 6'4 Titus O'Niell. Guy looks to be in phenominal shape compared to last year(and earlier this year)by the way.

As for his current height I believe he's a flat 6'7. Just doesn't look to be in the 6'6 range if you ask me.

What do you think of his health at this point compared to last year, Rob?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 20/Jul/15
Great find Kunoichi!

Hall was 6´4.5" - at best 6´5" flat and Taker looks 2-2.5" taller
joe said on 20/Jul/15
Frank
ali baba said he had a boost of boots, I think it barefoot is the same height ali baba 6'6
Kunoichi said on 19/Jul/15
Taker as The Punisher Dice Morgan and Hall in JAPAN.
Click Here
Phenom! said on 18/Jul/15
Peak undertaker was a hair under 6'8". But you have to take into consideration the amount of stress, punishment, and even some pressure that this man took in the past 20 years. His injuries started in 1995, and carried on after that. He lost about 2 inches in this process. However, he is still not under 6'6" either. He seems that way because he slouches and bends his knees. Standing up straight, he is dead on or even taller than 6'6".
Frank said on 17/Jul/15
He appeared alittle Taller then Ali Baba so hes 6ft 6 to 6ft 6.5
joe said on 16/Jul/15
Danimal
also has a recent pictures with 6'2 Sting
Austin said on 15/Jul/15
6'7" (6'7.5" peak) 275-280 lbs
Danimal said on 15/Jul/15
Undertaker today with horrendous posture and a ravaged looking body. His neck/upper back is curving and he's a SHATTERED man today. I personally think he's about 6'5.5" barefoot today at best:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Compared to his PEAK:
onepunchbob said on 13/Jul/15
Taker is 6'6 today. Was same height as Ali. Peak height was 6'7 and no more. Fractionally taller than Sid. Always slightly shorter than Kane.
joe said on 13/Jul/15
still I think scott hall was 6'5 in height
Dougal said on 13/Jul/15
(Hall and UT that is). Taker is likely circa 6'7(2012).
Dougal said on 13/Jul/15
Thanks for these. Looks to be a significant difference between the two.
Danimal said on 11/Jul/15
Taker and 6'2"-6'3" Goldberg in 2012:

Click Here
Danimal said on 11/Jul/15
Not sure why Rob didn't upload my last post, but here is a pic comparison between then 6'5" Scott Hall and Undertaker from 1989:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here
Dougal said on 10/Jul/15
I don't think was quite peak height by this stage as had been wrestling for in excess of 10 years by the year 2000 and during that time had a number of injuries.
Vegas said on 10/Jul/15
Danimal says on 9/Jul/15
Taker (still at his peak height) in street clothes and the Rock probably in around 2000:
________

how many inches difference do you see there?
joe 193cm night said on 10/Jul/15
I think with the footwear difference between taker and Ali, perhaps taker is also about 6'6
Danimal said on 9/Jul/15
Taker (still at his peak height) in street clothes and the Rock probably in around 2000: Click Here
Danimal said on 9/Jul/15
6'5" Scott Hall (at the time) with Taker in the late 80's: Click Here
Danimal said on 9/Jul/15
Take and Dan Spivey in the late 1980's. Judge for yourself: Click Here
VC said on 6/Jul/15
I think Undertaker is somewhat between 6'5"-6'6".
James B said on 6/Jul/15
Vegas says on 3/Jul/15
James B says on 1/Jul/15
Vegas jake looked 6'4-6'5
______

i would have said 6'4. he didn't look taller next to orton than drew galloway did and galloway isn't more than a flat 6'4. jake had about half an inch footwear advantage on orton that night


Bear in mind also that orton could be 6'4.25
Dougal said on 3/Jul/15
UT was neither the Kayfabe 6'10 or 6'10 1/2 at tallest height or merely 6'7 or so as often features on here, (although around that height now). The truth was likely somewhere in between. Although some uncertainty remains, around 6'8 1/2 seems about right taking into account all evidence of early/mid 1990's footage available on well known internet sites and there is an awful lot of it. Jake is right at around 6'5 although typically had a footwear advantage also.
Vegas said on 3/Jul/15
James B says on 1/Jul/15
Vegas jake looked 6'4-6'5
______

i would have said 6'4. he didn't look taller next to orton than drew galloway did and galloway isn't more than a flat 6'4. jake had about half an inch footwear advantage on orton that night
Op said on 1/Jul/15
I wanna see undertaker and Lebron James standing next to each other
James B said on 1/Jul/15
Vegas jake looked 6'4-6'5 compared to legit 6'4 randy Orton 10 years ago in 2005 and that was with poor posture
6'2 Dan said on 1/Jul/15
@dougal, 202 cm peak for taker,what a joke!
Vegas said on 30/Jun/15
Danimal says on 30/Jun/15
All those trying to lower Jake.. yeah I'm looking at you Heightcrazy, he was a LEGIT 6'5" man at his peak.
_________

he doesn't look legit 6'5 in this clip barefoot next to paul bearer who was probably no more than 5'11 in shoes, 2 minute mark Click Here
codeword said on 30/Jun/15
peak 210cm height 208
Danimal said on 30/Jun/15
All those trying to lower Jake.. yeah I'm looking at you Heightcrazy, he was a LEGIT 6'5" man at his peak.
joe 193cm night said on 28/Jun/15
Rob, kane and taker could have been a 6'8 flat when younger
Michael said on 28/Jun/15
More likely is that Calaway´s peak height was 2,03 m and 2,00 m now (fits better compared with guys like Nash).
josey wales said on 26/Jun/15
Them soles of jake makes kanes' 97 monstee heels look tiny
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 24/Jun/15
Dougal says on 23/Jun/15
That link is around Feb 1992 actually, Jake Roberts was renown for wearing chunky boots he bobbed up and down in height some over the years.



Exact Dougal
Click Here

Jake´s munsters gave him 6cm, boosting him from 195cm to 201cm.
Taker was still 4cm taller, so Taker was 205cm (6´8.75") in Footwear.
Takers footwear boosted him no less than 3cm during this time, so 201cm-202cm/ 6´7"-6´7.5" is as good as it gets for Takers peak evening.
Dougal said on 23/Jun/15
That link is around Feb 1992 actually, Jake Roberts was renown for wearing chunky boots he bobbed up and down in height some over the years. Sid towered El Diablo Jake 1991 (albeit maybe the latter barefoot) and UT was then revealed to be taller than Sid in the same footage although Sid a bit more muscle bound.
Danimal said on 23/Jun/15
6'5" Jake the Snake Roberts and the Undertaker in 1990: Click Here
MikeV10 said on 22/Jun/15
Sorry bad link
Click Here
MikeV10 said on 22/Jun/15
Click Here
From an old WWE Magazine 95-96
Danimal said on 20/Jun/15
At 1:39 you can see the height loss in the Undertaker (it's a new pic of him): Click Here
Matthew said on 14/Jun/15
hi says on 6/Jun/15
Click Here
next to the great khaki

---

Wow. Khali might be shorter than he's listed at.
hi said on 6/Jun/15
Click Here
next to the great khali
NCL said on 3/Jun/15
Found an interesting video on youtube comparing the heights of Undertaker, Sid, and Kane:

Click Here

I don't agree with everything on there but it's an interesting video
Paul said on 2/Jun/15
Sid was photo'd folowing arrest in recent times and was measured at a shade over 6'6 although that was at 3am. Taller of course after a subsequent nights rest.
joe 193cm night said on 1/Jun/15
I think Sid peak 6'6.75 "-6'7" a good listing
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 31/May/15
joe 193cm night says on 29/May/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft
these fighters already have a certain age almost everyone has more 50 years


Prime Sid with 6´3" Lex Luger, camera angle is a bit low but it´s rather 3.5" than a full 4 inches there.

barefoot evening height:
peak Sid imo 6´6.75"-6´7"
peak Taker 6´7"-6´7.25"

Click Here
josey wales said on 31/May/15
evilsecondtwin very realistic estimation in my view
joe 193cm night said on 29/May/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft
these fighters already have a certain age almost everyone has more 50 years
josey wales said on 28/May/15
Vader never was near 6'4" . 6'2" peak at best.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 27/May/15
joey says on 27/May/15
... To me Sid is his 6'8" he ever announes that often by himself...




Click Here
Nuff said
josey wales said on 27/May/15
@heihtcrazyred, i really wasnt aware of a visitor or potser called doink .. acyually it was my reference to the doink the clown wrestler of the 90'ies..bit tongue in cheek.. will keep in mind next time.
joey said on 27/May/15
Guys what i experience here is that taker, diesel and others are getting smaller and smaller every time, in the 90-ties i saw the undertaker and diesel live and at that time he had exactly 7-8 inches more than me and i am almost 6'3,5" already. Minimum height therefore is 6'9" for taker and 6'10" for diesel(which diesel and untertaker announced very often during interviews btw). To me Sid is his 6'8" he ever announes that often by himself. Seeing him with 6'4" Vader that is even too low becauyse he is minimum 6 inches taller than him.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 27/May/15
josey wales says on 25/May/15
I see clement you aret it again. Are you the doink the clown of the sight? Seriously bud.


Yeah clement is on the troll side but remember Doink was also a visitor with pretty good informations...
EvilSecondTwin said on 26/May/15
How's 6'6" for taker, 6'6.5" for kane, 6'9" for nash, 6'10" for big show, and 6'4" for someone like orton?
josey wales said on 25/May/15
I see clement you aret it again. Are you the doink the clown of the sight? Seriously bud.
Shuvayu said on 24/May/15
Rubbish...if Kevin Nash was 611" Peak, taker would have to be 6'8" minimum...
clement said on 23/May/15
THE UNDERTAKER IS HARDLY 6'5"...6'4"AND A HALF....
ck said on 14/May/15
Im starting to think his peak height was 6'6.5" and today he is around 6'5.75" barefoot
joe 193cm night said on 12/May/15
Click Here
James B said on 10/May/15
I don't see much evidence to suggest he was 6'7.5 peak
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/May/15
Sam says on 6/May/15
Undertaker referred to as 6'7 in a Muscle and Fitness article about Triple H by trainer Joe DeFranco


Sara´s(Takers Ex-wife) father also said Taker´s 6´7"
Sam said on 6/May/15
Undertaker referred to as 6'7 in a Muscle and Fitness article about Triple H by trainer Joe DeFranco
6'1 dan said on 6/May/15
Soon,6'3 for taker
joe 193cm night said on 3/May/15
he was taller than 6'5 Jake snake I think he was 6'6 yes
James B said on 3/May/15
Jake snake could have been 6'5-6'5.5 range peak. Hall was 6'4.5 peak I think?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 2/May/15
joe 193cm night says on 30/Apr/15
peak undisputed looked taller than hulk hogan 6'6

Take a look at hogans page and listen to "Zeus", Hulk was 6´5"
joe 193cm night said on 30/Apr/15
peak undisputed looked taller than hulk hogan 6'6, hall scoot 6'5, 6'5 jake anake etc.
joe 193cm night said on 30/Apr/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft,Click Here
CDDK said on 26/Apr/15
PEAK HEIGHT WAS 6'8"
TODAY HEIGHT IS 6'7"
James B said on 26/Apr/15
6'7 1/2 is questionable for undertakers peak
James B said on 25/Apr/15
Off topic but do you guys agree that Sid Eudy looked no taller than 6'6.25 compared to lex Luger?
Michael said on 25/Apr/15
Rob has Windham (mid 90ies) at 6-5, with 5-8+ Mamun: Click Here
Sid had about 2,5" on Windham (early 90ies), he was 6-7,5: Click Here
Sid had about 2,5 - 3" on Luger (Sid not fully streched, perhaps 0,5 more): Click Here
6-3 for Luger is a wrong listing, he was about 6-4 in the early 90ies.
Dirk Nowitski (6-11+) was wrong listed at 6-10 and he is taller than Big Show (about 6-11).
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 23/Apr/15
Shuvayu says on 22/Apr/15
Here is a pic that shows taker would be a legit 6'9" in prime...if we consider scot hall 6'6" in his prime.... scot hall is 6'5" today, check his mug shots
just google undertaker height comparison


Scott Hall wasn´t even full 6´5" in his prime, here he´s next to 6´3" Lex Luger Click Here
Looks more 6´4.5" and Taker has about 2.5" on him.
Shuvayu said on 23/Apr/15
was watching sid vs taker from rampage, maina, raw & memphis in all case sid looked bigger... dunno y
Shuvayu said on 22/Apr/15
Here is a pic that shows taker would be a legit 6'9" in prime...if we consider scot hall 6'6" in his prime.... scot hall is 6'5" today, check his mug shots
just google undertaker height comparison
MasterX said on 13/Apr/15
@Sandy Are you a boy or a girl?????
Danimal said on 12/Apr/15
Sandy says on 11/Apr/15
Big Show is 7'0 on the dot. I am 6'8 and have met him twice.

He's under 6'10.75" MAX today. Was 7'0.5" in the mid-late 1990's.
Thomas said on 12/Apr/15
I´ don´t know the height of this guy.

My estimates (barefoot, fully strechted, average day height): Nash 6-9,25 (peak 6-10,5), Taker 6-6,75 (peak 6-8,25), Big Show 6-10,75 (peak 7) and Khali 7 (peak 7-1,5).
Danimal said on 11/Apr/15
Thomas says on 7/Apr/15
Nash, Taker, Big Show, Khali
Click Here

WOW. GREAT pics!! You need to upload those same pics on Big Show and Nash's page also. Those pics reveal A LOT of where these guys stand TODAY.
Sandy said on 11/Apr/15
Big Show is 7'0 on the dot. I am 6'8 and have met him twice.
Phenom! said on 10/Apr/15
How tall do you guys think Kane is today compared to big show, khali, Nash, and undertaker. I think he's about 6'7" today, peak he must have been about 6'7.75", in boots he towered over undertaker, cuz he had 2.5inch lifts in his boots in the old days. Today he wears regular wrestling boots.
joe joe said on 10/Apr/15
i think undertaker is 6'10
Patrick said on 9/Apr/15
im 188 says on 7/Apr/15
@Thomas I say Taker is 6ft7 , Nash is 6ft8 , Big show is 6ft10
And khali is 6ft11

Agreed!

6'7" today, 6'8 1/2" peak.

Minimum of 3.5 inches on Randy Orton as shown:

Click Here

or

Click Here
James B said on 9/Apr/15
Nash I'd say is 6'8.75 today and 6'9.5-6'10 peak.

He's still closer to the 6'9 mark than the 6'8 mark.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Apr/15
Thomas says on 7/Apr/15
Nash, Taker, Big Show, Khali
Click Here


Thx for sharing! What´s your barfoot height and your estimation for them?
Click Here
im 188 said on 7/Apr/15
@Thomas I say Taker is 6ft7 , Nash is 6ft8 , Big show is 6ft10
And khali is 6ft11
Junior31 said on 7/Apr/15
Thomas says on 7/Apr/15
Nash, Taker, Big Show, Khali
Click Here


Sick pics dude. How tall are you and what are your impressions on each guy
joe 193cm night said on 7/Apr/15
the difference is the footwear I think the difference between maximum and there Taker, Taker should be around 1 cm or 1 cm and 5mmde difference taking the footwear.
Taker duty this around 6'6.5 or 6'6.75
just because said on 7/Apr/15
Click Here Heres undertaker and 6ft 4 billy gunn if he stood up straight he wouldnt be much more than 6ft 6 Maybe 6ft 6.5 for taker today.
James B said on 7/Apr/15
I do agree 6'6 1/2 for sid does seem low as well if you see past segments of him with 6'9 or 6'10 kevin nash. Yet with Lex Luger Sid looked barely over 6'6 flat.
Thomas said on 7/Apr/15
Nash, Taker, Big Show, Khali
Click Here
6'1 dan said on 7/Apr/15
Kane had 3 inches footwear in his prime? I don't think so.Don't you know that he was also 300+ pounds? If so,he could not get more than 1,75 inches due to his weight
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 6/Apr/15
skinnykid says on 5/Apr/15
This post can put much to rest.
Domex says on 27/Mar/15
With 6'7 basketball player Tyrone White Click Here



Tyrone looks shorter than 6´6" AliBaba next to Taker so I call the 6´7" listing: maybe in big big Basketball shoes but not barefoot.
Shuvayu said on 6/Apr/15
Bigshot.... sid was 6'7" read arn andersons tale of the scissors incident that transpired between them....
Danimal said on 5/Apr/15
Today's version of Undertaker would have barely edged out a PRIME Hogan (1980's version).
Danimal said on 5/Apr/15
im 188 says on 28/Mar/15
With the 6ft7 Tyrone white he was a tad taller but he had a bent poster which proves he is a tad over 6ft7

All it proves is that Tyrones listing of 6'7" is in basketball shoes.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 5/Apr/15
Thomas says on 5/Apr/15
.... The size of the scala is clearly wrong, ...



Yeah it´s basicly not self-explanatory
Let me explain how it was meant, I put Taker in what I believe was his barefoot height there: 6´7"-6´7.125" range and looked at the outcome:

Big Show 6´11.25"
Great Khali 7´0.75"
Kane in big boots 6´8.5"

Imo No one had less footwear than Taker there, Big Show was in equal boots, Kane had about 1.25" advantage and Great Khali about 0.25"-0.5"

So barefoot:

Big Show 6´11.25"
Great Khali ~ 7´0.5"
Kane ~6´7.25"

I wouldn´t argue about a quater inch but that´s it.


BTW
Few years ago I saw two barefoot listings for Shaq: one 7´0 7/8", the other 7´0 5/8", so Shaq is rather a weak 7´1" himself and IMO a tad taller than Khali in their pic were we can´t see footwear and the cam is to low to show us the actual gap between them.
Ali Baba said on 5/Apr/15
Patrick says on 4/Apr/15
Head Stacking for kicks:
(I did my best in terms of accuracy)

Click Here

It is worth mentioning that Taker's waist appears higher in the original photo.

Click Here
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure what the head stacking thing has to do with anything. As far as the waist height you're incorrect.
Junior31 said on 5/Apr/15
To add to my post before. That was in regards to the early 90s. I think 6'7.5 is on he money but think it's more then plausible for a guy wrestling 30 years + to lose an inch 6'6.75 is where I think he's at today
Junior31 said on 5/Apr/15
Funny story : a friend of mine just turned 70. He used to own a security company that used to do some big security for bars,lounges,clubs and private events. In the 80's and 90's he would provide security for some bars and restaurants guys from the wwf and local shows would hang out st after a show. He was telling some stories of who was cool and who was cold, who had certain "habits" and who didn't. But I won't get Into that lol. I asked him have you ever did anything with the undertaker and his reply was "Mark? (Undertakers real name) sure he was a cool dude" I asked how tall he was and he answered " he was one big dude, awesome guy, he was 6'7 6'8" I trust his judgment as a big guy himself and someone who controls people and sizes them up real well he has a good grip on height. I asked him about others. Said ted dibiase was the best he could drink bourbon like it was water lol he said he was around his own height of 6'2. He said Shawn michaels was about 5'11. He said e berserker aka john nord was 6'5 but with a head like a bears. Said jake the snake was deceptively tall as he put it " about an inch shy of hogan". His stories were awesome.
skinnykid said on 5/Apr/15
This post can put much to rest.
Domex says on 27/Mar/15
With 6'7 basketball player Tyrone White Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 5/Apr/15
Ali Baba says on 5/Apr/15
Although one wrestler did actually joke that I would destroy the illusion of wrestling if I took a picture with him (I'm looking at you, Rob Terry)

Yeah I was jokingly refering to that :)
im 188 said on 5/Apr/15
Look at the royal rumble 2009 undertaker looked 3-2.5 inches shorter than big show so either taker suddenly grew a inch and half (or wore lifts) or big show has shrunk
Thomas said on 5/Apr/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft
At this time, Big Show wore lifts, Kane his monster-boots and Taker not, which was seen more often. The size of the scala is clearly wrong, Khali, Big Show and Undertaker are too small. Khali under 7` in 2006? That makes Shaq under 7` - both men are equal in height. No chance for that.
Ali Baba said on 5/Apr/15
Although one wrestler did actually joke that I would destroy the illusion of wrestling if I took a picture with him (I'm looking at you, Rob Terry) I don't think most people believe wrestling's billed heights, so I'm not really destroying anything. About the only issue is how far off are the billings. I don't know who, if anyone, is coming to comic con this year. It's pretty random so it's hard telling.
6'1 dan said on 4/Apr/15
I think you're wrong heightcrazy.big show in wcw,then the giant,was billed 7'4.do you think he was oversized by 5 inches?o of course not.show was no less than 7'(213cm)
Patrick said on 4/Apr/15
Head Stacking for kicks:
(I did my best in terms of accuracy)

Click Here

It is worth mentioning that Taker's waist appears higher in the original photo.

Click Here
Patrick said on 4/Apr/15
cdk28 says on 12/Jan/15
Undertaker peak height 6'8" barefoot 6'10" in boots
Sid peak height barefoot 6'7.5" 6'9" in boots

Agreed!

Re: the awesome Ali photo! (Thank you Ali!)
Even if we look at the rules of proportions - looking at Undertaker's head and waste tells me he's likely still 6'7" - 6'7 1/2" at the most.

It is said that the human body is 7 1/2 to 8 heads tall.

If you look at the photo and stack the heads, Taker comes out at about 2.5 inches taller. Remove the footwear and you're looking at 6'7" - 6'7 1/2"

The only contention is whatever could have been lost via spinal, hips and knees.

I agree that his peak height was closer to 6'8" but never 6'9" or 6'10".
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 3/Apr/15
Ali Baba says on 29/Mar/15
Domex, not a chance in the world that basketball player is a true 6'7".

Yeah, thats´what I thought too.
Any plans this year to destroy illusion of wrestling again? Who´s your next heightvictim :)
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 3/Apr/15
6'1 dan says on 3/Apr/15
Taker's peak height couldn't be 6'7,5.do you remember how close he was with big show in the ministry of darkness??

************************************************************************

He was 4 inches shorter than 6´11" Big Show, 5.5" shorter than 7´0.5" Great Khali...

Click Here
6'1 dan said on 3/Apr/15
Taker's peak height couldn't be 6'7,5.do you remember how close he was with big show in the ministry of darkness??
big shot said on 3/Apr/15
It makes sense for taker to be 6'6" barefoot. With footwear its possible around 6'7 1/2 6'8". Spivey is 6'5" 6'6" there wasnt much at all between em if any. Sid is around 6'6" maybe even shorter According to mugshot. Taker was the same height as 6'6" a train. Roughly same as mabel in that one photo from king of the ring mabel Had his Head Down. I mean It Does Make Sense. When He Was Younger He Couldve Been Like A Fraction Ta

ller But Not Much.
big shot said on 3/Apr/15
It makes sense for taker to be 6'6" barefoot. With footwear its possible around 6'7 1/2 6'8". Spivey is 6'5" 6'6" there wasnt much at all between em if any. Sid is around 6'6" maybe even shorter According to mugshot. Taker was the same height as 6'6" a train. Roughly same as mabel in that one photo from king of the ring mabel Had his Head Down. I mean It Does Make Sense. When He Was Younger He Couldve Been Like A Fraction Ta

ller But Not Much.
im 188 said on 1/Apr/15
Yeah he is 6ft6.5 when he bends his posture but when he isn't his is a 6ft7
His staredown with Bray he was bending his posture and he looked 4 inches shorter than taker who is 6ft2 but just bet if taker didn't bend his posture he would look 5 inches taller so I still believe he is 6ft7
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 1/Apr/15
NCL says on 31/Mar/15
Undertaker and Bray Wyatt from Wrestlemania:

Click Here

'Taker is leaning here and may be in walking motion but he did look noticeably shorter than usual to me and he had a footwear advantage I think. Not a lot of pictures online yet anyone have more?

Bray Wyatt 6'1"?



Straight Taker would look quite different, Wyatt is at least 6´1" imo
James B said on 1/Apr/15
Downgrade then to 6'6.5 rob?
NCL said on 31/Mar/15
Undertaker and Bray Wyatt from Wrestlemania:

Click Here

'Taker is leaning here and may be in walking motion but he did look noticeably shorter than usual to me and he had a footwear advantage I think. Not a lot of pictures online yet anyone have more?

Bray Wyatt 6'1"?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 31/Mar/15
Danimal says on 28/Mar/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 27/Feb/15
Still have no doubt that Taker had a footwearadvantage at WM13.

Click Here

No, it was his PRE-height loss era.



Yeah Danimal... funny is he looked shorter in each staredown before Wrestlemania 13...

God bless you
James B said on 31/Mar/15
Do you think between 6'6-6'7 he could measure though rob?
[Editor Rob: 6ft 6.5?]
James B said on 30/Mar/15
Do you think 6'6 is possible for undertaker today rob?
[Editor Rob: if you measured him, he probably could still go over it, but how much exactly?]
Ali Baba said on 29/Mar/15
the big shot says on 26/Mar/15
Ali,Straight posture, barefoot, How Tall Would You Give Taker Peak And Now?
--------------------------------------------

Peak height I couldn't tell you. I didn't get to see him in person until early 2013. And this picture was taken later in 2014. Now we're very close in height. He's in the area of 78". As said before he was wearing work type boots. I was wearing 1.25" old tennis shoes. I would guess he had more footwear, but there's no way to be sure. As far as the posture goes it was even. I mimicked his posture as Rob often does to try to make a better comparison. I suppose that from now on I should just stand straight and try to guess how much the other person is losing.

Domex, not a chance in the world that basketball player is a true 6'7".
Danimal said on 28/Mar/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 27/Feb/15
Still have no doubt that Taker had a footwearadvantage at WM13.

Click Here

No, it was his PRE-height loss era.
Danimal said on 28/Mar/15
1punchbob says on 9/Mar/15
Taker is NOT taller than Sid. Both around 6'7 PEAK!!!!

I agree, as was Kane.
im 188 said on 28/Mar/15
With the 6ft7 Tyrone white he was a tad taller but he had a bent poster which proves he is a tad over 6ft7
joe 193cm night said on 28/Mar/15
Ali-197cm-198cm-199cm
taker-198cm-199cm-200cm
Junior31 said on 28/Mar/15
Undertaker has taking a beating over his 30+ year career. People just don't understand how much here body goes through taking bumps 325 days a year for 30 plus.

His first time he stepped in a ring many many moons ago this guy was very close to 6'8 hovering around 6' 7.75ish. Now he might wake up 6'7 but genteelly think he is a hair under more In the 6'6.75 range. Guy is a legend

Find me one 50 something fighter who hasn't lost a good amount of height and I'll be shocked. And it seems the taller/bigger they were the more significant the height loss
Domex said on 27/Mar/15
With 6'7 basketball player Tyrone White Click Here
im 188 said on 27/Mar/15
Taker peak 6ft7.5 inches with boots 6ft8.5
Taker now 6ft7 with boots 6ft8
the big shot said on 26/Mar/15
Ali,Straight posture, barefoot, How Tall Would You Give Taker Peak And Now?
im 188 said on 26/Mar/15
Undertaker's posture was a bit bent to
James B said on 26/Mar/15
I agree Sid could pass for 6'7 peak.
Ali Baba said on 25/Mar/15
I could have, but I didn't. But whatever makes you feel good.
im 188 said on 24/Mar/15
We didn't see that footwear Ali could of wore 1inch boots
Tim181 said on 23/Mar/15
Check the photo with Ali Baba, there shouldn't be any discussions on here after it at all, we won't get a better proof for years now. Taker is slightly taller, and not like 1.5 or 2 in.
im 188 said on 21/Mar/15
So he must be 6ft7-6ft8 I don't agree on the 6ft6 claims maybe in ten years when he is 60
NCL said on 19/Mar/15
I'm not a football guy does anyone know who Undertaker is with here? I think this is a fairly recent pic

Click Here
Tim 181 said on 19/Mar/15
Guest says on 18/Mar/15
Click Here

How about this picture with the great khali?

He is max. 5 in shorter than Khali, unless there is distortion like in Rockstar Spud photo.
im 188 said on 18/Mar/15
@Guest that looks around 4.5 inches it looks closer because of that but if khali is a legit 7 footer then those 6ft6 claims are ridiculous it all depends on posture.When someone like triple h,cm punk or Brock he bends his posture which at least loses an inch and half but when he is facing of with big guys like Kane,big show and khali his posture is up.
So I reckon
Taker is 6ft8 with good posture
Kane is 6ft7.5 and with massive boots 6ft8.5
Big show is 6ft10
Khali is 7footer
Guest said on 18/Mar/15
Click Here

How about this picture with the great khali?
miko said on 15/Mar/15
I don't think Taker had an inch on Sid barefoot. The more photo's I've seen of the two I think they were a lot closer in height than many would believe.

Given how Sid stacked up to most people he either was damn near 6'7 or wore bigger boots to look it.

I'd go with a peak Taker standing 6'7.25 and Sid 6'7 or just a hair under it.
Phenom! said on 14/Mar/15
Kane is not under 6'6", yes he was known to wear 2" lifts back in attitude era, but he wears regular boots now, hell big show who is in ring gear usually only looks about 4in taller than him, when kanes in his corporate shoes.
Undertaker is dead on 6'6", but he lost way more height than Kane cuz undertaker used to be around 6'8".

They both look shorter sometimes because they slouch a lot, and the camera angle never favors their height. Standing straight with a good posture, I repeat, they are not under 6'6"
Junior31 said on 13/Mar/15
Booster says on 11/Mar/15
Kane is 6ft5.5 no more. Kane is known to wear lifts.
Golddust is 6ft3.5
Undertaker is 6ft6
Stood 2 feet away from Undertaker and no way he is over 6ft6. I am solid 6ft4 and his eyes were almost even with me, and I was wearing running shoes he was wearing Harley boots. That being said many people exaggerate their heights. They dont stand flat with no shoes or use a level and measure accurately. Regardless they are bigger than me I am only 240lbs


Wait what lol Kane 6'5.5? That's insane
MikeV10 said on 13/Mar/15
They look very close in height
Click Here
Click Here
Omid said on 12/Mar/15
@Booster, so is everyone in WWE, 99 percent of all wrestlers wear boots to enhance their stature, Kane's boots were big sure but like 0.25 or .5 more advantage that others not more
Booster said on 11/Mar/15
Kane is 6ft5.5 no more. Kane is known to wear lifts.
Golddust is 6ft3.5
Undertaker is 6ft6
Stood 2 feet away from Undertaker and no way he is over 6ft6. I am solid 6ft4 and his eyes were almost even with me, and I was wearing running shoes he was wearing Harley boots. That being said many people exaggerate their heights. They dont stand flat with no shoes or use a level and measure accurately. Regardless they are bigger than me I am only 240lbs
Junior31 said on 9/Mar/15
I'm convinced that Kane Sid and taker are within a quarter of an inch of one another peak height.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 9/Mar/15
Click Here

7:35 onwards
NCL said on 9/Mar/15
Robby says on 7/Mar/15
Another staredown between Undertaker and Sid in 1994 in the USWA. staredown starts at 1:12 Click Here

I've been looking for that video forever thank you!!

Sid appears the slightly taller of the two there. I searched through the video and can't really find any great shots of footwear. The closest I can see is at 1:26 for Sid's shoes but the image is real blurry Click Here

The two are so close that whatever their heights are it really comes down to their boots.

I suppose the video could be similar to this camera angle but I could be wrong: Click Here Sid appears taller but when the angle changes they're much closer in height: Click Here

Another WM13 pic: Click Here
James said on 9/Mar/15
WOW Sid looks more muscular than brock lesner in that video.

Maybe Sid was slightly on tip toes in the video?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 9/Mar/15
Robby says on 7/Mar/15
Another staredown between Undertaker and Sid in 1994 in the USWA. staredown starts at 1:12 Click Here

Great find !
1punchbob said on 9/Mar/15
Taker is NOT taller than Sid. Both around 6'7 PEAK!!!!
miko said on 8/Mar/15
In that 1994 staredown Sid is actually the taller of the two.
Robby said on 7/Mar/15
Another staredown between Undertaker and Sid in 1994 in the USWA. staredown starts at 1:12 Click Here
josey wales said on 3/Mar/15
@heightcrazyred6ft we badicly agree on taker/sid and mebe kanes height and just come from different angles. Mebe taker had a slight foitwear advantage he kinda looked same to sid as always. The guys are yrue big men but offcourse not there ridiculous billed heights.
josh777 said on 3/Mar/15
i think taker is about 6'6 now days
you can see this in pic that he and A-train ( lord tensai )
is in the same height as a-train and that was 12 years ago
josh777 said on 3/Mar/15
i think taker is about 6'6 now days
you can see this in pic that he and A-train ( lord tensai )
is in the same height as a-train and that was 12 years ago
MikeV10 said on 3/Mar/15
Maybe thats why they bill him at 6'10,5
6'7,5 barefoot peak hight + 1 inch footwear = 6'8,5 + 2 inch overbilling they usually do = 6'10,5
Today I think he is about 200cm or close to 6'7
Junior31 said on 3/Mar/15
Was at raw tonight in jersey 5th row. First of all Kane is massive and looked in unbelievable shape best I've seen in a while. Him and big show 10 feet from me. Big show looked to have 4 inches most on him and closer to 3. Also in the opening science with Rollins and reigns face to face. It would appear they were very similar in height but truth is reigns was slouching a bit. Also his boots aren't straight up boots more athletically made. Rollins looked 6'1 and when reigns stood up straight 6'2 to 6'2.5.

After being so close to the action these are my revised heights for the wrestlers I was 15ft from

Reigns low to mid 6'2
Rollins 6'1 and btw that dude has amazing posture
Kane 6'7
Big show 6'10.5. He's not at his peal anymore
Bray Wyatt 6'2
Ambrose. Tough one has terrible posture and is always bent but at least 6'1
Luke Harper. Easily 6'5
Cena 6'0.5
Ziegler 5'10 and prob a tad more
Tripple H 6'1.75
Daniel Bryan 5'8
Bad news Barrett 6'5.5

Some observations...
Kane was impressively massive the biggest I've seen didn't look a lock under 6'7
Harper was every bit his billed
Big show looked worn but leaner then he was a few years back
Rollins is definitely his billed height and because of his posture appeared taller
Cena is a beast

Hope this helps
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 2/Mar/15
Paul says on 2/Mar/15
JT says on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
With both stretched out Click Here

Firstly wrong match, secondly bad angle, thirdly if you tip your head back as your link shows for GG, strangely enough chin level does rise. Just locate the RR match, you can see a more direct comparison. That said UT is 6'7 at most today, we would probably agree on that or thereabouts.

************************************************************************************************************************************

This is still better than the Rumble pic, GG wasn´t complete straight there, watch WM9 and look how he stretched out.

Giant Gonzalez was listed 229cm in the guinness book and BB wich is just over 7´6" not 7´6.5".

At best GG was 7´7.75" in his boots, that makes Taker barely 6´8.5" in his boots/ around 6´7.25" barfoot, Takers heels are pretty visible there so no flat boots.
Taker in this is my yard claimed 6´8"-6´9" wich turns out to be his height in footwear, depending on how thick the sole is.

Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 2/Mar/15
josey wales says on 1/Mar/15
I think taker was the least likely of the taller guys to wear lifts on account of his inring style...


Look the top rope walk at WM13, clear to see Taker had minimum 3cm sole. In 1989 staredown the footwear was equal and Taker barely edged Sid...

Its clear to see that Taker had thicker footwear than usuall at WM13.
It´s also fact that Taker had more height on Sid at WM13 than in every single staredown before.

I´m not saying Taker had Kanemunsters there, but at least 0.5" footwearadvantage added to his barefoot height advantage of 0.25"-0.5"

With 0.5"-1" more footwear there wouldn´t be any problem with the topropewalk or landing. Taker has the balance and if you have it the footwear doesn´t really matter be it 0.5" or 1.5" sole.
Paul said on 2/Mar/15
JT says on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
With both stretched out Click Here

Firstly wrong match, secondly bad angle, thirdly if you tip your head back as your link shows for GG, strangely enough chin level does rise. Just locate the RR match, you can see a more direct comparison. That said UT is 6'7 at most today, we would probably agree on that or thereabouts.
josey wales said on 1/Mar/15
I think taker was the least likely of the taller guys to wear lifts on account of his inring style. In all his mtches his boots always has a fairly normal flat sole, mebe one inch thick. It must be really hard to do thhat tope rope walk with lifts and then have the cinfidence to land rite. Sid, undertaker and Kane is bare foot and in general body size very very close to ea other. Either could be dressed to make look taller. Its realy a tossup between taker and kane with sid mebe an ich at the most shorter. Nash are noticeably taller but by max 2 inches. In turn he (nash) are no more than two inches shorter than bigshow with khali another inch ontop of that.
James B said on 28/Feb/15
6'6.75 today and 6'7.25 peak is not exactly impossible for undertaker. A weak 6'7.5 would make more sense if Sid was 6'6.5.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 27/Feb/15
Still have no doubt that Taker had a footwearadvantage at WM13.

Click Here
NCL said on 27/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Feb/15
NCL says on 25/Feb/15


I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid


Never said Sid is taller, Undertaker is also in my opinion the taller man but more 0.25"-0.5" than 1" and the main point I differ with Tuga is that I can´t see Taker at legit 6´8" even at peak.

Oh ok my bad
JT said on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.

With both stretched out Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 27/Feb/15
Frula says on 27/Feb/15
Undertaker is around 196 cm
Lets be honest...


C´mon this site has great evidence with AliBabas pic and information that Taker today is at least 198cm and maximum 200cm.

6´6.5" might be on the money, Robs 6´7" is just a generous round up
Paul said on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size
roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
184.3cm said on 27/Feb/15
Not 6'5, he edged out Ali Baba who is 6'6 on user heights so how can he be 6'5? i still say 6'7.5 peak and today 6'6.5.
Frula said on 27/Feb/15
Undertaker is around 196 cm
Lets be honest...
Tuga said on 26/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Feb/15
Naah I meant the closeup of their heads ;)

But it is from the same moment of the full body pic, no tip toes on sid or camera advantage, that´s why you see as it is :)

NCL says on 25/Feb/15
I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid.

Thanks NCL, there are pics where the angle favours taker but I won´t even bother to post them.
The thing is sid´s trys really hard but still comes a bit shorter, and if, and I mean if someone has footware advantage is sid, look closer to his boots ;P), but still I would´nt go that way.

I really understand why Rob has them 1 inch apart, could be...still I can´t see peak sid at anything under 6'7, IMO he would rather be a bit over than under it, so I can still see 6'7 1/2 as possible, 6'7 minimum, since I don´t go with minimum I say IMO 6'7 1/2 ;P

Just to change a bit the subject (before everyone becomes bored of this page :D), I was watching the other day an old match with mane and nash teaming up:
Click Here
Look at the start, its problably the best I´ve seen (if anybody has seen better please post it)to compare both men heights, what do you think?
(I know at least you Red have been interested in poiting their differences ;) )
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 26/Feb/15
NCL says on 25/Feb/15


I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid


Never said Sid is taller, Undertaker is also in my opinion the taller man but more 0.25"-0.5" than 1" and the main point I differ with Tuga is that I can´t see Taker at legit 6´8" even at peak.
NCL said on 25/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Feb/15

I think Sid's got the camera advantage on these pictures: Click Here and Click Here

Regarding the second pic, this pic you posted is when Sid finally stood still and the two were equal to the camera: Click Here

This is a video from that Raw (they meet at about 8:43) Click Here

Undertaker's boots 1997: Click Here
Sid's boots 1997: Click Here

I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid.

Here, 'Taker must have a footwear advantage because he's unusually taller than Sid: Click Here

By the way, if anyone is interested, the road to Wrestlemania 13 is my favorite story line and I have a lot of the videos on my youtube page. The Raws that are missing are all on Daily Motion:

Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 24/Feb/15
Tuga says on 23/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)

Yeah, we both are ;)
Still sting´s head top is not over sid´s eye line there, no way, it is what it is :P

"Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam."

Oh you´re not getting away with this...taker is not closer to the camera, his left foot is because...


Naah I meant the closeup of their heads ;)
Just pointed out that he´s closer to the cam, still looked 2cm taller that night, never looked 2cm taller in the road to WM13 staredowns and I believe he had about 0.5" footwearadvantage.

Road to WM13 Staredowns:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Tuga said on 23/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)

Yeah, we both are ;)
Still sting´s head top is not over sid´s eye line there, no way, it is what it is :P

"Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam."

Oh you´re not getting away with this...taker is not closer to the camera, his left foot is because he has a bit of a wider stance, and footware? Really? And the walk?? What? He was back to his old attire, zombie deadman pacing style, did you expect him to dance to the ring? :D
Click Here
No way around it, the middle line represents sid´s top hair (as if tip toes werent enought), still not as tall.
But I see from your arguments alone that you´re seeing the difference and it turned out bigger than you expected.

Other evidence, well, peak sid staredown with jbl and most problaby non peak taker staredown with the same should be enough, as well the 1 inch billing (you´ve mentioned billings before ;P)difference between the 2 in both wcw and wwe(f)...

"Lets just agree to disagree"

I disagree! ;P
Slim said on 22/Feb/15
I agree with Omid!!!! Why would anyone in they're right mind say Kane is shorter than taker? Ok sid and taker looked same height but glen as Isaac Yankem WAS taller than taker. It's clear in they're staredown. Idk if taker wore hidden lifts but it looks like glen was wearing socks! his shoes were so flat. No lifts at all. He never stood straight bc he never had to. Now when he stared down with big show, he stood kind of straight and he was the ONLY person I ever saw come close to shows height. (Kane)
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)
Your line is higher than Sids eyeline in the sting staredown.
Lets just agree to disagree unless we have new evidence ...

@miko
yeah, Sid was a very weak 6´7" peak, Taker in 1991 had imo about 1cm footwear advantage. Also at WM13, Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam.

In the road to WM13 staredowns they look always around the same height.
Omid said on 21/Feb/15
@Josey:

how much difference is between Kane and Taker in their WM14 stare down?

Do You agree, there is a roughly 1.5 to 2 inch difference?

now we consider Kane's boots gave him a 2 inch advantage, that means that Kane looks two inches taller than a barefoot Taker, the issue is that Undertaker didn't wrestle barefoot, he had shoes on that would have gave him roughly one inch so if Taker and Kane were the same height their deference should have been 1 inch whereas its clear there is a good 1.5 to 2 full inches difference between them give or take

That makes Kane 1 to maximum 2 cm taller than Taker

Kane was always Bigger and Taller, however WWE maximized the effect by giving him those shoes, its kinda like the Big Show, he is a giant but still wears huge boots because they want to maximize his largeness
miko said on 20/Feb/15
I think the Sid staredowns alone rule out anything over 6'7.5 for a peak Taker.
Tuga said on 20/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 19/Feb/15
@Tuga
C´mon the WM 13 pic had a crappy low angle, no chance for your lines

Its the best staredown we´ve got of the 2, the low angle is for both, you have far worse staredowndowns pics in your collection, how can you seriously dismiss this? Also remember the difference is the same as here:
Click Here
Line or no line taker is noticeably taller and sid´s streches himself beyond human comprehension :D
And look at your own lines :
Click Here
Sorry, but had to do it :)

"6´2" Sting is slightly over Sids eyeline so max 4.5" shorter, you just proved Robs listing..."

No he is not, sting´s hair is at sid´s eyeline, look again :P
Click Here
6'7 range there easily for sid...

My peak height estimates:
Sid between 6'7 and 6'7 1/2, kane 6'7 1/2, taker 6'8, tyler mane 6'8 1/2, nash at least 6'9 1/2 ;)
josey wales said on 19/Feb/15
@omid
Plausible pics, but i have to raise the point that your last pic doesnt show footware or stance. And takers stance doesnt do him no height favors. Its worth temembeting that wwe always made a point to market kane as bigger . I cannot agree that kanes famous monster boots only gave him half n inch. I still stick to them bring near identical in height at their peak at abt 200cm.
Omid said on 19/Feb/15
@Tuga:

I agree there is maximum 0.5 between Taker and Kane

but in all fairness, if two people are the same height, on TV with Camera angles, at different times each one of the can look taller with Camera angles, meaning if Taker is Kane's height, at least on one occasion he should look taller because of angles, the issue is that the lowest for Kane so far was him being Taker's height, because of that I believe Kane is taller by like 1 or 2 cms

and about the footwear, 2011 Kane was wearing those huge boots for a while but he changed them with a smaller boots now

@James B:

I agree he doesn't look 6'8 today, hell he sometimes can look barely 6'7 but with military posture and a little bit of stretching I think he can measure near 6'8

and have it in consideration that what we see of these wrestlers are their night low
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 19/Feb/15
@Tuga
C´mon the WM 13 pic had a crappy low angle, no chance for your lines...

6´2" Sting is slightly over Sids eyeline so max 4.5" shorter, you just proved Robs listing...

For the Memphis Staredown I always said Taker is max 0.5" taller...

Khali was more like 7´0.5" than a full 7´1", the position favours Taker as you pointed out... I see at least 5" between them, in other staredowns 5.5" so again 6´7"- 6´7.5" for Taker.

Can´t see them taller than this at peak:

Sid 6´6.75"
Taker 6´7"-6´7.25"
Kane 6´7.5"-6´7.75"

Don´t forget even Sarahs Dad said Taker was 6´7"...
Tuga said on 19/Feb/15
Nice try Red with the memphis video, I was expecting that ;P
We can´t really see where is sid´s head top, can we? Tip toes anyone? We really see sid on his tip toes the 2nd time he stares taker, taker is at no point at his best (or even close) posture...and you´ve admmited before sid´d mask gives an illusion of looking taller...so you´ve changed your mind?
Don´t:
Click Here

But what do you know, we do have a full body staredown with no masks both men standing tall:
Click Here
A better quality close up of the same moment:
Click Here

And Red, be greatfull taker wasn´t standing like this:
Click Here

And since you´ve downgraded sid due to one staredown with luger, now I give you the chance to yet ignore this again:
Click Here

And for kane and taker:
Click Here
Pre "lifts kane".

Kane with still footwear advantage (not as big as before) and better posture (notice taker´s neck):
Click Here
Kane´s recent footware:
Click Here

I got to say kane is still in great shape compared with taker and in his "real" kane attire still looks great, a proper monster :)

Eitherway 3 men are close in height, all 3 also share in common "any moment they look shorter instant downgrade" syndrome :D
James B said on 18/Feb/15
Kane could have been 6'7.5-6'8 peak and around 6'9 in wrestling boots whereas kevin Nash was 6'9 1/2 prime.

These days though Kane ain't looking 6'8
Omid said on 18/Feb/15
@Josey:

Kane wore those boots in his early times but after those times his boots weren't that big, besides every Body wears Boots with insoles in WWE specially big guys, even Bigshow wears them now

You could argue Kane might have a 0/5 inch advantage in that pic but there is a clear full inch between those two



take a look at these pics for example:

Click Here

Click Here

Specially this one:

Click Here
josey wales said on 16/Feb/15
Kane never was obese. The tsker kane staredown at wm 13 kane was wearing monster boots as he was billed as 7 foot vs the his 6'10 brother. Taker lost lot if weight and muscle over the years but kane always had heavier build. Biker taker vs rick flair uses boots with a sole that looks bigger than it ease. Look vloser its the style of boot. Taker had no reason to tower flair even more than he did. Both sre bsre foot too close to call almost in height. Around 6'6 today
Omid said on 16/Feb/15
@James B, Kane is obese!? wow!

you call this obese:
Click Here

also undertaker is in better shape?
Click Here

also this is undertaker in front of Kane both in their 20s
Click Here

and people always say how Kane wears big boots, guess what:

Click Here

about Kane not looking as tall as nash, first:

Nash is 6'9

second, its not about what they look, its about how they measure

you could easily look taller or shorter than your real height, that effect is worsened when you are watching tv angles

Taker has longer legs, therefore he can appear taller but without a doubt and based on the photos I posted Kane is the taller man
Vegas said on 16/Feb/15
taker doesn't look taller than sid in that memphis video from 1989 and footwear is identical

speaking of mabel how tall would people estimate the guy standing with him Click Here
Danimal said on 15/Feb/15
dicksock says on 12/Feb/15
I think Undertaker and Sid were both about 6'7" in their prime.

I think a young and healthy Taker was taller than a flat 6'7". All we need to do is look at him next to 6'6" Mabel/Viscera. That was over 1" of height difference. Peak Taker was from the late 80's to around 2000 or so. After that he began to lose height. I think Sid was a flat 6'7" at his peak, but doesn't look over 6'6" today. While we're at it, I also think that Kane (without his lifts/platform boots) was a flat 6'7" as well. All 3 men were "around" the same height at their respective peaks and possibly Taker having been the tallest of the 3.
James B said on 15/Feb/15
Kane has hardly got a healthy body the guys obese. Undertaker way more injuries but clearly is in better shape.

You never know though Kane could have been 6'8 peak but today i don't think he's that tall i mean kevin Nash is that height now and looks taller than Kane does on TV.
Omid said on 15/Feb/15
Kane was always, and I mean always taller than taker no matter when he was Kane or Issac Yankem

Kane 6'8 peak
Taker6'7.5 peak, however taker has aged terribly, compared to him kane has pretty much kept a healthier body

Today I think Kane can measure "around" 6'8 with military posture, but standing loose and hunching like he does on TV he some times appears barely 6'7

as for Taker I think at 6'6.5 is fair now
Vegas said on 14/Feb/15
Bol was said to have been measured at 7'6.75 and Mureșan at 7'6.5.

Bradley either 7'5 1/2 or 7'5 3/4
Danimal said on 13/Feb/15
Vegas says on 10/Feb/15
232cm would make gonzales the tallest player to ever play in the nba and yet his name is never mentioned regarding that particular record.

What about Manute Bol? Was he not just shy of 7'7"? Shawn Bradley was pretty close to that measurement as well.
dicksock said on 12/Feb/15
I think Undertaker and Sid were both about 6'7" in their prime.
Ali Baba said on 12/Feb/15
Stalker says on 10/Feb/15
@ Ali Baba
How tall were you at the time you took a picture with Taker?
Were you exactly 198 cm or little shorter?
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Could have been anywhere from 197 to 198 CM. Probably closer to 198 that day since I didn't work and have to wear a bunch of gear. But I was on my feet for several hours straight.
James said on 12/Feb/15
6'7 1/2 peak looks questionable if Sid Eudy was 6'6 1/2
JT said on 11/Feb/15
Click Here I read somewhere that Gonzalez's pituitary tumor was discovered in his mid-30s. However, he clearly had the tumor since childhood and in all likelihood was done growing before WCW.

It looks like the Atlanta Hawks did measure him and tippy toes weren't allowed. Click Here If he was measured in shoes, those don't give too much boost. A Sports illustrated article from 1989 said Gonzalez was 7'6 1/2" which may have been his measured height in those shoes.
RoelC said on 11/Feb/15
Frank says on 9/Feb/15
He had a website and true he was 7ft 6 but he grew to 2.32 after wrestling I dont know if that true but thats what his Website said

I remember that website and that's where the 232cm claim came from. Not from an official measurement from Guinness World Records, which a few on here have claimed before.
Vegas said on 10/Feb/15
232cm would make gonzales the tallest player to ever play in the nba and yet his name is never mentioned regarding that particular record.
Stalker said on 10/Feb/15
@ Ali Baba
How tall were you at the time you took a picture with Taker?
Were you exactly 198 cm or little shorter?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 10/Feb/15
Click Here

This indicates Taker had a footwear advantage over Sid in 1991 as their footwear in 1989 was equal.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 10/Feb/15
Tuga says on 6/Feb/15
Be generous Red, give taker even just half an inch more, don´t be a taker, be a giver! :D






Sorry 6´7.5" is generous enough, 6´7"peak isn´t out of question
Click Here

Sid was a weak 6´7" and Mark just a tad taller, everything else is footwear, cam angle, kayfabe....



Rob, hard to see the full inch you´re listing between them in their very peak staredown
[Editor Rob: I don't know, I think you could argue anywhere from 1/2 to 1 inch.]
Frank said on 9/Feb/15
He had a website and true he was 7ft 6 but he grew to 2.32 after wrestling I dont know if that true but thats what his Website said
RoelC said on 8/Feb/15
Michael says on 21/Jan/15
Jorge Gonzalez was measured at 2,32 m (7-7,25) by the Guiness Book of Records in 2000.

Click Here

Time to destroy that myth once and for all. Gonzalez was listed as 7ft6 in the 2000 edition of Guinness. Just like he was listed at 7ft6 while playing basketball for the Atlanta Hawks or 229cm while playing basketball in Argentine.
davyyyy said on 8/Feb/15
6'7.5 as his peak height is spot on. Taker and Sid looked to be the same height. Sid had a good 2 inch advantage on Hogan.

Taker 6'7.5
Sid 6'7.25
Hogan 6'5.25
Nash 6'9
just because said on 7/Feb/15
Heres undertaker and the 5.10 mike tyson Click Here
Scotty said on 6/Feb/15
He was billed 7'0 & later 6'10 in his career but he was really 6'8.
Tuga said on 6/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 4/Feb/15
Taker looking more to the cam adds as much to the illusion as his clear footwear advantage...

Looking to the cam? Illusion? So this staredown is an illusion, why, because taker looks taller than you want? ;)

I still can´t see the so big and obvious footware difference you keep mentioning:
Click Here
Click Here
Tried also a pic where both had their feet up so not to be "sunk" in the ring mat.

But I´ll give you footware, but in turn I get jbl higher ground position and taker so obviously bent knees (unlike here: Click Here );P


Be generous Red, give taker even just half an inch more, don´t be a taker, be a giver! :D
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 4/Feb/15
Tuga says on 4/Feb/15
The other pic of the staredown also shows the same considerable height advantage taker has and you can also notice how jbl is looking quite up:

Taker looking more to the cam adds as much to the illusion as his clear footwear advantage...
If Taker looks at JBL the tip of Takers nose is at JBL´s eyelevel, so he´s about 2-2.5" taller nothing more without footwear advantage.

Taker was 6´7.25"-6´7.5" peak and is 6´6.5"-6´6.75" today
Classic Undertaker was 6´8.5"-6´8.75" in wrestlingboots. Master of Pain was in standardboots with less sole 6´8"-6´8.25", billed at 6´8" in 1989....

If peak Mark was legit 6´8" he would been 6´9" in boots and billed at that at least.

He was never billed 6´10" before WWE when he was feuding with 6´8" billed Hogan and visible taller...


Funny looking back at the wcw billings they seem to have had a two inch rule...
Or adding one inch at height in boots...

Tyler Mane was 6´8", 6´9" in boots, billed 6´10" in wcw
Kevin Nash was 6´9", 6´10" in boots, billed 6´11" in wcw
Mark Calaway was 6´7", 6´8" in boots, billed at 6´9" in wcw

same goes for Hogan when he went to wcw:

6´5" barefoot, 6´6" in boots, billed 6´7" ...

Of course not talking about +-fractions and occasionally bigger billings....
Tuga said on 4/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 3/Feb/15
This time Taker has the bigger footwear and is closer to the cam, I can see max 2.5" between them legit, probably just 2"


Red, you should now better, this particular camera angle favours the man on "top", you´ve even used this argument with a staredown between khali and taker putting taker on same horizontal level as khali (without scaling taker´s size ;P).
Here you go:
Click Here

But forget about that, I don´t think either taker or jbl really have any advantage in the staredown when they´re close.

We have used many of this kind of staredowns, we were "lucky" with this one because jbl lifted his title so taker has better posture than he usually has because he was staring the title :)

The other pic of the staredown also shows the same considerable height advantage taker has and you can also notice how jbl is looking quite up:
Click Here

For sure jbl is not suffering from camera angles :P
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 3/Feb/15
Tuga says on 3/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 1/Feb/15
Actually not enough, one with Taker in better posture and unknown footwear and the other is a comparison..


So jbl in cowboy boots and closer to the camera is better, ok so be it :)

You asked for it ;p
Click Here

Click Here

So what do you think ;)


This time Taker has the bigger footwear and is closer to the cam, I can see max 2.5" between them legit, probably just 2"
both in equal footwear Click Here
Tuga said on 3/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 1/Feb/15
Actually not enough, one with Taker in better posture and unknown footwear and the other is a comparison..


So jbl in cowboy boots and closer to the camera is better, ok so be it :)

You asked for it ;p
Click Here

Click Here

So what do you think ;)
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 1/Feb/15
Tuga says on 26/Jan/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 23/Jan/15
Click Here
JT´s pic tells a lot...

Agree, these tell ;D
Click Here
Click Here


Actually not enough, one with Taker in better posture and unknown footwear and the other is a comparison...

No chance against a real life fullbody shot with both in usefull posture ;)
Tuga said on 26/Jan/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 23/Jan/15
Click Here
JT´s pic tells a lot...

Agree, these tell ;D
Click Here
Click Here
my height 188cm said on 23/Jan/15
every time i see taker and big show stare downs it looks 3 inches so if big show is 6ft11 then undertaker is 6ft8 or big show is 6ft10 which makes taker 6ft7
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 23/Jan/15
Click Here

JT´s pic tells a lot...
6´5" JBL in cowboyboots basicly the same height as Taker ~2000
JBL cowboyboots are not the biggest ones, so he would be at best 6´7" but more like 6´6.75" in them.
If Taker was 6´8" barefoot he would be near 6´9" in footwear there... doesn´t look so for sure!
Bob Smith said on 22/Jan/15
If you watch the Royal Rumble from 2009, there are times where he comes near stare down with Big Show and they look almost eye level.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 22/Jan/15
Michael says on 21/Jan/15
Jorge Gonzalez was measured at 2,32 m (7-7,25)

Yeah but he was still growing after wrestling I read, 7´6"-7´6.5" listed in Basketball
looking at the pic were Gonzalez stands straight it fits with 6´7"-6´7.5" Taker
Michael said on 21/Jan/15
Jorge Gonzalez was measured at 2,32 m (7-7,25) by the Guiness Book of Records in 2000. Taker´s peak of 2,02 (6-7,5) doensn´t fit, he must have been taller: Click Here
Oasis said on 21/Jan/15
Undertaker is 6.6.
James B said on 17/Jan/15
Danimal says on 15/Jan/15
James says on 13/Jan/15
Sid at 6'5-6'6 peak would put lex luger 6'2.25

Sid was 6'7" and Luger was 6'3".


Sid 6'6.5
Lex Luger 6'3.25
Paul said on 15/Jan/15
Yes indeed, Rob generally avoids street pavement heights as the website says.
Frank said on 15/Jan/15
James all I remember is that he did not appear as tall as I thought he'd be
My Friend with me said Sid did not Tower over me & im 5ft 11ish . That day I also seen Charles Wright(Papa Shango) he looked about 6ft 3 to 6ft 4
James said on 15/Jan/15
Frank says on 13/Jan/15
James it was in the 1990's

harder to judge height on the streets i think?
Danimal said on 15/Jan/15
James says on 13/Jan/15
Sid at 6'5-6'6 peak would put lex luger 6'2.25

Sid was 6'7" and Luger was 6'3".
Frank said on 13/Jan/15
James it was in the 1990's
James said on 13/Jan/15
Sid at 6'5-6'6 peak would put lex luger 6'2.25
James said on 13/Jan/15
Frank says on 12/Jan/15
I seen the Picture of Sid in front of the height Chart with his hair he hit about 6ft 6 but if he had shoes on hes 6ft 5 barefoot I seen him up close in street clothes outside Madison Square Garden and he really looked about 6ft 5 to 6ft 6

What year did you see him?
cdk28 said on 12/Jan/15
Undertaker peak height 6'8" barefoot 6'10" in boots
Sid peak height barefoot 6'7.5" 6'9" in boots
Frank said on 12/Jan/15
I seen the Picture of Sid in front of the height Chart with his hair he hit about 6ft 6 but if he had shoes on hes 6ft 5 barefoot I seen him up close in street clothes outside Madison Square Garden and he really looked about 6ft 5 to 6ft 6
Clay said on 11/Jan/15
Speking of Khali it's too bad he got released by WWE, even though his knee's are shot and he was horrid inside the ring. I don't think we're going to see that combination of height, giant proportions and bodybuilder mass for a loong time.
James B said on 10/Jan/15
Both shaq and khaki dont look over 7ft.05
Alex2 said on 9/Jan/15
Khali was the exact same height as Shaq, stop living in denial.
Clay said on 8/Jan/15
LoL Khali 6'11-6'11.5 thats why he was the same height as Shaquille O'Neal who's 7'2.5 in running shoes. I do think Undertaker had a footwear advantage with giant Khali, but I don't believe he's under 6'7'' stretched out either.
James B said on 8/Jan/15
Yes judging by his past stare downs with 6'6.25 Sid Eudy I don't think taker was over 6'7 flat to begin with and there looked more than 1.5 inches between him and legit 6'9 Kevin Nash at mania 96.

6'6.5 might be his barefoot heights today?
josey wales said on 8/Jan/15
Ali isn't over foot anymore. He is a massive man compared to typical other sevnfooters, but probably ducks under 7 foot today, say 6'11". 6'6" for the Taker is spot on. I wonder if Show clears 6'10" today
Mathew said on 8/Jan/15
Danimal says on 5/Dec/14
HOW? Ali is under 6'6" today and Taker was barely taller than him AND Taker had the footwear advantage?

---

If we say Ali is currently a "weak" 6'6" then Undertaker is, maybe, 6'6.5". I wouldn't put him any taller than that. The difference between the two appears to be small, somewhere around a half inch, but to get more precise than that we'd really need to measure. Maybe in his youth Undertaker was a legit 6'7" or even slightly over that, but today I 'd put my money on 6'6.5".
Mathew said on 7/Jan/15
Alex2 says on 1/Nov/14
Taker is slouching in Ali's pic and his eye level is higher. Please explain how he was max 5" shorter than Khali a few years ago

---

Based on Ali Baba's photo the Undertaker is about 6'6.5". Khali would be 6'11" - 6'11.5" then.
6'2 said on 6/Jan/15
sid eudy was 6'7 prime spivey wasnt shorter than 6'6 taker was 6'8
Jadis said on 4/Jan/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 2/Jan/15
Height crazy ? At least he admits to it.
Mid190s said on 3/Jan/15
Ali Baba if you measured 6'5.5 then you have crept down into my range. That's my height after 3 hours. Is it safe to say I'm the same height as you and Undertaker?? (I'm 196 cm avg)
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 2/Jan/15
6'2 says on 2/Jan/15
he was 6'8" he always referred to himself when asked his height as 6'8"

US style giving height in footwear, he was billed 6´8" in 1989 so that was his height in normal wrestling boots.
In their first staredown he was only marginally taller than 6´6.5" Sid Eudy in same footwear.
6'2 said on 2/Jan/15
he was 6'8" he always referred to himself when asked his height as 6'8"
miko said on 20/Dec/14
Swagger is around 6'4.5/6'5.

He's inbetween Orton and Barrett heightwise.
IR said on 17/Dec/14
Jack Swagger 6' 4.5" ( 1.94 m ) - 6' 5" ( 1.96 m ) ?
Junior31 said on 12/Dec/14
CLEMENT says on 19/Nov/14
THE UNDERTAKER 6'4 1/2"



Lmao
184.3cm said on 10/Dec/14
Peak 6ft 7.5
Current 6ft 6.5

The photo from Ali Baba should have put this to rest, i dont get the 6'8 comments even 6'7 is a stretch.
Shuvayu said on 10/Dec/14
Click Here check this... takers got 2 inch advantage... taker was always 6'8"... kane may be half an inch taller
JT said on 9/Dec/14
Click Here The other guy (Tony Longo) claims to be 6'6". Their feet look about the same distance from the camera but the other guy might be leaning back a bit.
6'2 said on 9/Dec/14
he was 6'8" peak he has admitted it a few times not sure about today wouldnt have lost more than 1" in my view
miko said on 8/Dec/14
It is pretty clear that in good posture today Taker is still around 6'7.

Standing in poor posture means nothing in terms of height.
Shuvayu said on 8/Dec/14
Taker was billed 6'8" at memphis as master of pain...
Alex2 said on 7/Dec/14
Danimal, not sure why you are always trying to put the heights of people taller than you down? Maybe to make yourself feel better? How was he MAX 5" shorter than Khali a few years back then? Is Khali 6'11" now too? or how about having around 3" on 6'5" JBL a few years back? His posture is awful in Ali's pic and still looks taller. Absoluetly zero chance he is anything less than a weak 6'7" today full stretched out. People don't loose 2" before 50!
Danimal said on 5/Dec/14
Alex2 says on 1/Dec/14
6'6.75" Today
6'7.75" Peak

HOW? Ali is under 6'6" today and Taker was barely taller than him AND Taker had the footwear advantage?
6'2 said on 4/Dec/14
jackie knife .25" between rock and henry ha ha get a grip what a waste of a list everyone is wrong u shud save your fingers for something else not typing on these pages
josey wales said on 4/Dec/14
Not wishing to get into a weight debacle but i reckon "around" 280 is fair, but thats upper limmit with 270 being the lower end. Taker seems a fair bit larger in build than Ali and when you got a 6'6" frame it ads up quickly
FlameBoy said on 1/Dec/14
i used to be 6 Ft 10 ? undertaker is the Justin bieber Or wrestling
Alex2 said on 1/Dec/14
6'6.75" Today
6'7.75" Peak
Danimal said on 1/Dec/14
josey wales says on 26/Nov/14
People still calling Taker 6'4" etc are obviously trolling. Anything around 6'6", but not less, is the obvious answer. Agree that if Ali is 250 Taker would be around 280lbs.

He's MAX 270 pounds (if that) today.
Danimal said on 1/Dec/14
Around202cm says on 27/Nov/14
Taker is around my height,eventually shorter 1cm...

No, you have 4cm on him (if you truly are 202cm that is).
Danimal said on 1/Dec/14
joe says on 28/Nov/14
Peak(6´7-202 cm)seems exactly right it was a few inches taller than jake snake

A few? Jake was 6'5" legit.
Paul said on 30/Nov/14
blasphey says on 30/Nov/14
Said his billed height is 6'10" but he's actually 7'5".
Crikey!
blasphey said on 30/Nov/14
Said his billed height is 6'10" but he's actually 7'5".
joe said on 28/Nov/14
Peak(6´7-202 cm)seems exactly right it was a few inches taller than jake snake
Danimal said on 28/Nov/14
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 12/Nov/14
Hogan was nothing more than 195cm/ 6´4.75" facing Sid in 1992.

Hogan and 6'3" Lex Luger in the mid 90's: Click Here
Clay said on 27/Nov/14
Weight can be hard to guess as it's just a number. A lot of the time a guy is hiding 30-40 pounds worth of fat which you don't notice, or he's ripped and looks a lot heavier than he is. Ali B says Undertaker felt a little taller and weight 280 lbs sounds right.
Around202cm said on 27/Nov/14
Taker is around my height,eventually shorter 1cm...
josey wales said on 26/Nov/14
People still calling Taker 6'4" etc are obviously trolling. Anything around 6'6", but not less, is the obvious answer. Agree that if Ali is 250 Taker would be around 280lbs.
Frank said on 25/Nov/14
Drummer777, Ali Baba was not the same height as Taker & Mane he Appeared alittle shorter
Drummer777 said on 24/Nov/14
Undertaker & Sid Eudy are within a half inch of each other in pics you see them in.... Kevin Nash comes out a couple inches taller than Sid so it would stand to reason that Kevin Nash would have the same amount of Height over Undertaker.... So how is it that Ali Baba could be the same height as Tyler Mane and Mark Callaway... or so it would seem...
Ali Baba said on 23/Nov/14
A-List, there's no way he only weighs 10 pounds more than me.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 22/Nov/14
The A-List says on 21/Nov/14
@Ali Baba you seriously think he weighs 280. In that picture Undertaker looks 260 lbs top.


Estimating weight fro that pic is impossible, AliBaba saw him live, as close as you can get...

But even seeing someone in person... very hard to tell weight especially for tall people.

I remember going to a new gym 15 years ago and the coach looked at me and asked about 85kg ~190lbs, I went on the scale and had 102kg 225lbs and I´m not oversized at 6ft.
The A-List said on 21/Nov/14
@Ali Baba you seriously think he weighs 280. In that picture Undertaker looks 260 lbs top.
Vegas said on 20/Nov/14
Jackie Knife, the people you listed i have met in person (or stood very close to) are: khali, show, kane, taker, albert, swagger, goldust, orton, axel, sheamus, henry, batista, austin, cena, miz, bret, cody rhodes, ziggler, christian, hbk, xpac, rvd, bryan and mysterio. i have been in the same room a few feet away from rock, jericho and cesaro...just to say not arguing half inches as my estimates are usually +- half an inch

rock was taller than vader in 1997 so you could probably swap those guys peak heights around. looking at batista with 5'8 mamun recently i don't think he has fallen as low as 186cm although prior to his returning to wwe he would have been a guy i would have said lost height (but not anymore)..hhh doesn't seem as low as 184cm either and he was noticeably taller in dress-shoes than ryback (in gear) at a show i attended last week and i was seated quite far back but still could tell hhh looked taller.

christian is about 5'11.5 in person, cena is a shade over 6ft and rvd is around 5'11. henry isn't as tall as 6'2 out of gear. sheamus looked closer to 6'3 in person but he did have suspicious footwear it must be said, however in those he was identical in height to chris masters whom i saw standing together talking at the bar, a fan about 5 inches taller than both then came over talking them..some "really" tall wrestling fans out there
CLEMENT said on 19/Nov/14
THE UNDERTAKER 6'4 1/2"
Jackie Knife said on 18/Nov/14
hey, Vegas, what do you think about this list?

the great khali — 7'0" (213 cm)
big show — 6'11" peak (211 cm), 6'10,25" now (209cm)
kevin nash — 6'8" peak (204 cm), 6'7,5" now (202 cm)
kane — 6'7" peak (201 cm), 6'6,5" now (199 cm)
undertaker — 6'6,5" peak (199 cm), 6'6" now (198 cm)
sid — 6'6" peak (198 cm), 6'5" now (196 cm)
eric rowan — 6'5,5" (197 cm)
albert — 6'5,5" peak (197 cm), 6'4,5" now (195 cm)
wade barrett — 6'5" (196 cm)
jack swagger — 6'4,5" (194 cm)
hulk hogan — 6'4,5" peak (194 cm), 6'2,5" now (190 cm)
jbl — 6'4,25" peak (194 cm)
billy gunn — 6'4" peak (193 cm)
luke harper — 6'4" (193 cm)
titus o'neil — 6'4" (193 cm)
cesaro — 6'3,5" (192 cm)
goldust 6'3,5" (192 cm)
randy orton — 6'3" (191 cm), wears chunky boots
ddp — 6'3" peak (191 cm), 6'2,5" now (190 cm)
vader — 6'3" peak (191 cm)
damien sandow — 6'2,5" (190 cm)
lex luger — 6'2,25" peak (189 cm)
curtis axel — 6'2,25" (189 cm)
sheamus — 6'2,25" (189 cm), wears chunky boots
the rock — 6'2,25" (189 cm)
mark henry — 6'2" (188 cm)
batista — 6'2" peak (188 cm), 6'1,25" now (186 cm)
roman reigns — 6'1,5" (187 cm)
triple h — 6'1,5" peak (187 cm), 6'0,5" now (184 cm)
goldberg — 6'1,5" peak (187 cm)
sting — 6'1,25" peak (186 cm)
brock lesnar — 6'1,25" (186 cm)
dean ambrose — 6'1" (185 cm)
seth rollins — 6'0,5" (184 cm)
vince mcmahon — 6'0,5" peak (184 cm)
stone cold — 6'0" peak (183 cm)
ryback — 6'0" (183 cm)
john cena — 5'11,5" (181 cm)
the miz — 5'11,5" (181 cm)
bret hart — 5'11" peak (180 cm)
stardust — 5'11" (180 cm)
dolph ziggler — 5'10,5 (179 cm)
christian — 5'10,5" (179 cm)
cm punk — 5'10,5" (179 cm)
shawn michaels — 5'10,5" peak (179 cm)
x-pac — 5'10 peak (178 cm)
rusev — 5'10 (178 cm)
big e — 5'10" (178 cm)
scott steiner — 5'10" peak (178 cm)
kurt angle — 5'9,5" peak (177 cm)
rvd — 5'9,25" (176 cm)
rick steiner — 5'9" peak (175 cm)
chris jericho — 5'9" peak (175 cm)
daniel bryan — 5'7,5" (172 cm)
rey mysterio — 5'1" (156 cm)
BigMe said on 18/Nov/14
@The A-List
I think Kevin Nash is about 204cm and Taker is 200cm...That's a good ratio between them :)
The A-List said on 14/Nov/14
Kevin Nash has about 1.5'' on Taker (imo).
Vegas said on 14/Nov/14
undertaker in memphis wrestling late 80s standing with dave brown (brown btw said he was 6ft on one show i watched) Click Here

the rock standing next to brown a few years later Click Here
BigMe said on 12/Nov/14
Taker is exactly 200cm
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 12/Nov/14
Taker 6´7" fits pretty good, Kane´s advantage is exactly his footwear advantage, so Jacobs also 6´7".

Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 12/Nov/14
Hogan was nothing more than 195cm/ 6´4.75" facing Sid in 1992.
At peak 6´5.25".
Tiny Lister told the truth, both were 6´5" during their feud.

Taker was 2-2.25" taller in 1991/1992 so solid 6´7"
Sid was 1.75" taller than Hogan in 1992, so Rob is right with 6´6.5".
short ass said on 11/Nov/14
Undertaker and 6'2 Triple H 2013. Undertaker can't be 6'7 now, 6'6 even.
Click Here
Height181 said on 11/Nov/14
Danimal it's impossible that Hogan was 6ft 6 in 1990. He looked 2-3 inches shorter than Sid Justice in 1991 and only an inch or so taller than Sgt Slaughter same year and Slaughter was billed 6ft 3 at that time
MikeV10 said on 11/Nov/14
Thats not dead even in my eyes ,look at the top of there Heads Click Here
Tuga said on 11/Nov/14
Danimal says on 10/Nov/14
Sid and Taker in the early 90's in a staredown. Sid at that time was 6'7". They look dead even in height (20 + years ago): Click Here

No they don´t ;)
Click Here
Another one:
Click Here

Note: notice sid´s boots in wm13 staredown.

Winner: taker´s forehead :)
Danimal said on 10/Nov/14
Sid and Taker in the early 90's in a staredown. Sid at that time was 6'7". They look dead even in height (20 + years ago): Click Here
Paul said on 10/Nov/14
What every wrestler who is shorter than they would like to be needs a pair of....
Click Here
Tuga said on 10/Nov/14
Ali vs Taker plain photo:
Click Here

Hair vs hair match:
Click Here
Click Here

Note: taker is leaning his head forward.
Winner: Rob!


Now Ali vs Nash should be next in line! ;)
Kunoichi said on 9/Nov/14
Texas Red (The Undertaker) vs. Bruiser Brody:1984 WCCW
Click Here
Brody's height was 6'4.
Danimal said on 9/Nov/14
Ali Baba says on 5/Nov/14
Mike, I wasn't wearing boots. I was wearing a shoe that gives me 1.125 inches. So I was right around 6'7". Taker was wearing boots. Whether or not they gave him any extra is unknown.

JT, I don't doubt he's taller than me because like I said it felt like he was. But a half inch at the most. Now if his boots gave him a boost over my shoes then even less. But he's obviously not 6'7". Let alone 6'8 to 6'10" as some believe.

Ali, take into account that Taker has been wrestling for 30 years, has had severe injuries, surgeries and is around 50 years old. I can assure you, that if your current self stood next to a young and healthy Taker from circa 1990, things would be different. Hogan was 6'5.5"-6'6" (your current height) legit in 1990 and Taker was noticeably taller than him back then (easily 6'7").
Clay said on 7/Nov/14
Taker is one of those dude's that has 5+ inches above his eye level. I have like 4-4.5 as most do.
Paul said on 5/Nov/14
A peak height LOL Rob ! I knew Nash was 6'10 1/2 once and is now around 6'9. UT 20 years ago was never 3in shorter, shorter yes but never 3in. Still I agree UT is now about 6'7.
MikeV10 said on 5/Nov/14
see it the same way JT,
taker has a very low eyelevel and a huge Forehead.
If ali is the same eyelevel as taker , taker is at least 2- 3 cm taller . If they where the same height ,takers eyelevel would be lower than alis.

In this pic Sids eylevel is heigher than takers , but taker is still a tad taller

Click Here
MikeV10 said on 5/Nov/14
see it the same way JT,
taker has a very low eyelevel and a huge Forehead.
If ali is the same eyelevel as taker , taker is at least 2- 3 cm taller . If they where the same height ,takers eyelevel would be lower than alis.

In this pic Sids eylevel is heigher than takers , but taker is still a tad taller

Click Here
Ali Baba said on 5/Nov/14
Mike, I wasn't wearing boots. I was wearing a shoe that gives me 1.125 inches. So I was right around 6'7". Taker was wearing boots. Whether or not they gave him any extra is unknown.

JT, I don't doubt he's taller than me because like I said it felt like he was. But a half inch at the most. Now if his boots gave him a boost over my shoes then even less. But he's obviously not 6'7". Let alone 6'8 to 6'10" as some believe.
MikeV10 said on 5/Nov/14
Hey Ali Baba what exact height are you at this time with this boots you where wearing when you take the picture with taker ???
JT said on 4/Nov/14
Ali Baba says on 3/Nov/14
Alex2, eye level looks pretty darn even to me. Click Here And posture is the same. So.....

That’s correct but the reason why Taker is still taller in that pic is the length of his head from the eyes up. It’s actually longer than the length from the eyes down, which is very unusual. Click Here
Click Here
Johno said on 3/Nov/14
I believe Ali Baba is the same height or more then Undertaker. Undertaker; it seems to me, can dip below 6'6at some point in the day like Ali.
Ali Baba said on 3/Nov/14
Alex2, eye level looks pretty darn even to me. Click Here And posture is the same. So.....
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 3/Nov/14
WWE time Khali legit 7´0"-7´0.5" - 5" = 6´7-6´7.5" - heightloss = 6´6.5"
Alex2 said on 1/Nov/14
Taker is slouching in Ali's pic and his eye level is higher. Please explain how he was max 5" shorter than Khali a few years ago.
Tim 181 said on 28/Oct/14
@Strahinja95 you should have posted this on general height page, but looking at you two I thought you were 5'5 and 6'1.
Ali Baba said on 27/Oct/14
Strahinja95, considering the posture of both of you, you look 6'6" to 6'7".
Paul said on 27/Oct/14
6'7 1/2 you are
Greenbolt said on 27/Oct/14
@Strahinja95: Looking at that guy's frame and proportions, I highly doubt he's anywhere near 5'11''. If, somehow, he is, then I'd estimate you at 6'7'', but again, judging by frame and proportions I don't think you look anywhere near that height.
Strahinja95 said on 27/Oct/14
What do you think my height is..im in black jacket

Click Here

This guy near me is in 5'11 range
Alex 6'0 said on 25/Oct/14
Stadiometers are typically very good. My results on them are about the same as against the wall. The stadiometer rod on the weight scale I think is pretty good or the tool that Rob has but the one you have to mount against the wall if not mounted totally correct it will be off a bit. One stadio against the wall I measured on was about an inch off!!
[Editor Rob: when using something like the can, it's always worth remembering to go with the highest part of the pencil line and get the line as near to the can as possible so you don't short change yourself a mm, not that it's of any great significance, but still :)]
Enos said on 25/Oct/14
It makes sense that he is between 6'6 1/2'' 6'6 3/4'' barefoot, and could have rounded up to 6'8'' maybe a little more than that in boots. does that make any sense rob?
IR said on 24/Oct/14
6' 8" peak
6' 7" current
George F said on 24/Oct/14
I was measured in the gym with a stadiometer. Maybe the particular stadiometer was not a well made one Rob! I don't trust digital ones too though.
Josey Wales said on 23/Oct/14
Think 6-7 is a bit of a stretch but im sure we can call him a very believable 6'6" making 6'7 1/2" quite possible for peak height
George F said on 23/Oct/14
Rob the stadiometer is not a reliable way to measure your height properly. It happens to me. The most accurate method of measurement i believe is the aerosol method, i have been measured a hundred of times and i have the same result with the aerosol method. Maybe the stadiometer will show you shorter than what you really are. Have you noticed that too Rob?
[Editor Rob: stadiometers are fine, there might be small errors though, but well made ones will be very precise.]
George F said on 22/Oct/14
Rob you said in one post that most people would agree that Dwayne Johnson is from 6ft 2.5 to 6ft 3.5 and I don't understand why you have him at 6ft 3. After all the right thing wouldn't be to have him his night height, the lowest possible which I agree with you is 189 cm?
[Editor Rob: I still think because he stands loose or leans in a lot of photos it creates a shorter impression for him...catch him standing tall and I think he could still knock near the 6ft 3 mark on the stadiometer.]
Mark said on 21/Oct/14
It's a funny site this as people simply won't admit what's glaringly obvious. If Undertaker said he's 6'6,people would dispute this.
Paul said on 19/Oct/14
Shawn Michaels once said in a shoot interview around 1994 that Kevin Nash was 6'10 1/2.
Mark said on 19/Oct/14
Miiiiiighty not more than 2" on Jake Roberts I'm afraid.
Michael said on 19/Oct/14
Now (barefoot, fully streched) 2,01 m (6-7).
Peak 2,03 m (6-8).
Carllll said on 18/Oct/14
Alex2 says on 16/Oct/14

Yeah. Fully stretched out. Maybe if you pull his knees out of socket an inch he'll be 6'7 or more. He looks 6'6" and some change in that picture with Ali. While Kane is looking just under 6'7 these days. That seems about right considering Kane has always shown a complexion of being slightly taller than Taker.
Greenbolt said on 17/Oct/14
I apologize for the name change, Rob, I just realized there was another 'Greg' going to this site, and thought it would be best to switch.

@Alex2: There's nowhere near an inch of difference between the Undertaker and Ali Baba, it's practically no difference at all:

Click Here
KROC said on 17/Oct/14
I had a conversation with my father yesterday about him meeting the Undertaker back in 97. He took a picture with him which I recall seeing when I was kid. My father is 6'7.25 and according to him and Calloway were eye to eye. In his opinion Mark Calloway was 6'7 flat peak. I'm hoping he can find that picture, but I wouldn't hold my breathe considering how disorganized he is lol
Ali Baba said on 17/Oct/14
And there's no where near an inch difference between us, even without any difference in shoes.
Ali Baba said on 17/Oct/14
Alex2 says on 16/Oct/14
These comments are ridiculous, Taker has awful posture in Ali's photos and still looks around an inch taller. I guarantee he is at least 6'7 fully stretched out.


His posture was fine other than his drooping head, which I mimicked. He is not bent at the waist at all. You're making stuff up now.
miko said on 17/Oct/14
Taker was never 6'8 barefoot IMO, he never really looked that tall at any point in the early 90's. A solid 6'7 prime and a weak 6'7 today, might drop a hair below 6'7 late in the day. Half an inch loss, Rob has it nailed.
Miiiiiiighty_- said on 16/Oct/14
No way he was under 6'8 prime.
He was more than 2 inches taller than Jake the Snake who was a strong 6'5 ( almost as tall as Mabel back around 1995 )
6'7 Prime taker doesn't make sense..
That would make a 6'6.5 at best Sid ? How do people explain the difference with Sting etc ???

I personally met Kevin Nash in 1995, was 5'10 back then, asked him his height he said 6'10 and the president of the university (a friend of my father, Tenessee university if I recall correctly ) where he played basket ball said the same thing told me and I quote " Ah Kev? Big guy ! He is 6'11 " I didn't even know his name was kevin back then to me he was just Diesel.
So I guess 6'11 was his "inshoes" measurement so he was 6'10 probably.
Remember he was billed 7' when they told me that..
I think for both taker and nash Billed height - 2 inches = prime standing tall height, so that would make Nash 6'10-6'10.25 and Taker 6'8-6'8.5 which seemed to be the difference between them during their staredown..

I had pics with Nash I try to get them but I don't know where they are ;(
He looked a legit full foot taller than me imo
Alex2 said on 16/Oct/14
These comments are ridiculous, Taker has awful posture in Ali's photos and still looks around an inch taller. I guarantee he is at least 6'7 fully stretched out.
Greg (6'1'') said on 16/Oct/14
@George F: I have to agree with you there, I've noticed the same thing. I think Rob would be the first to admit that he'll generally give people the benefit of the doubt, that's just how he rolls.
Mark said on 15/Oct/14
I agree with George F in that think heights are slightly on high side possibly in not looking to offend anyone.
Jimbob said on 15/Oct/14
No way is he 6'8 barefoot.
George F said on 14/Oct/14
I believe Rob's site is the most accurate for heights but most of the times Rob is too generous. I mean adding 2 cm in celebrities height for being right in guessing and not to underestimate a celeb height is a problem for me. I have noticed when I see a height that Rob has listed I drop 1-1.5 cm and I believe it's closer to the truth. But Rob's ability in height guessing is remarkable anyway.
The A-List said on 13/Oct/14
6'7'' seems about right for big mark.
Markus said on 13/Oct/14
JUST an opinion!

Based atmospheric perspective, shoulders, waist and pelvic levels, I would still say 6'7.5" to 6'8" is possible for Undertaker. Even receded back, he still appears taller.

The bend in the lower torso (stomach) certainly indicated that he isn't even trying to stand up straight. There are too many people who have met him and haven't questioned his own 6'8" claim.

If we have Tyler Mane listed at 6'8" when he appears shorter, Taker should be no lower.
George F said on 13/Oct/14
Rob what's the point of list wrestlers height barefoot? Especially in wrestlers height is important with boots on. I mean nobody cares a wrestler's height barefoot. For example Undertaker can be 6ft 7 with boots on, that counts to me.
[Editor Rob: because barefoot height is the equalizer.]
Tuga said on 13/Oct/14
Great pic Ali Baba, thanks for sharing.

Looks around 6'7, too bad he´s leaning his head forward, but this of course seems consistent with what he looked next to lesnar.

Ali, you should have asked for the classic wrestlemania staredown pic :)

IMO 6'8 peak Rob ;)
Clay said on 12/Oct/14
James B says on 12/Oct/14
Alex- According to my doctor a 6ft man with a small frame should weigh nearer 159 pounds. My doc also said a medium framed 6ft male should aim to weigh 171 pounds and if your large framed nearer to 182 pounds.

My doc also went onto to say even if your large framed at 6feet you shouldn't weigh 187 lbs or over.

That doesn't take into account for any weightlifting and muscle development, WHAT SO EVER. Those BMI's that doc's give you are a joke.
Aza said on 12/Oct/14
Ali Baba - thanks for the great picture. Undertaker is now 6'6.5 (evening height). Still a very large human being (I'm 5'11) but just not as big as he used to be.
James B said on 12/Oct/14
Rob people have been saying taker and sid looked roughly around the same size. Despite that do you still think 6'6.5 peak and 6'6 now for undertaker is unlikely?
James B said on 12/Oct/14
Correction I was told a medium built 6ft should weigh 172 pounds
James B said on 12/Oct/14
Alex- According to my doctor a 6ft man with a small frame should weigh nearer 159 pounds. My doc also said a medium framed 6ft male should aim to weigh 171 pounds and if your large framed nearer to 182 pounds.

My doc also went onto to say even if your large framed at 6feet you shouldn't weigh 187 lbs or over.
Danimal said on 11/Oct/14
Robby says on 11/Oct/14
After seeing the pic with Ali Baba. I have come to this conclusion. that the Undertaker in his prime was about 6'8" IN boots. barefoot a very strong 6'6". between 6'6.5"-6'6.75" I do believe when he played high school basketball he was listed at 6'8"? now we know a lot of basketball players like Derrick Rose and Kevin Love for example are listed with their listed height in shoes. Kevin Love 6'10" in shoes, however was measured at 6'7.75" barefoot. Derrick Rose 6'3" in shoes, barefoot 6'1.5" Ali Baba how tall do you think Taker is?

Taker was noticeably taller than 6'6" Mabel/Viscera in the staredown in the 1990's. I think he was over 6'7" in his prime.
Alex 6'0 said on 11/Oct/14
Technically at about 210lbs I'm overweight but I am good amount of muscle and size. Yea I'm no pro bodybuilder but I'm still a pretty big guy. If I weighed this and didn't have muscle then Id be out of shape. For a 6'0 that doesn't workout and have muscle 160-180lb range seems healthy.
Daddy said on 11/Oct/14
Rob, I'm glad to see you update the deadman as he doesn't seem to measure up, so to speak, anymore. But, I still think 6'6.75"! Keep it it mind. And while you're at it, consider if Kane could use a downgrade too. On Smackdown! A few weeks ago, Erick Rowan (6'6" - 6'7") looked to be the same height.

P.S. Thanks for downgrading Big show to 6'11". But just to satisfy a kid's curiosity, would you say Paul Wight was more 7'0.5" or 6'11.5" as a young man in the then WWF?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 11/Oct/14
Click Here

Given how Lou looked next to Ali this might be close
Arch Stanton said on 11/Oct/14
Nah, 225 pounds even for 6'4" isn't rake thin, Jimmy Stewart at 130 pounds 6'3" is!!! 225 pounds isn't even on the light side for 6'4". Hasslehoff although slender is pretty well built and is only 191 pounds.
Arch Stanton said on 11/Oct/14
@ Danimal, not exactly anorexic, Peter Crouch is pushing 6 ft 8 and is 170 pounds, that's borderline anorexic weight for that height. 200 pounds for 6 ft 6 is on the skinny side for sure but not anorexic by any means. I think an average build 6'6" guy would be more 220 pounds odd.
James B said on 11/Oct/14
He did look 6ft6 range compared to Sid Eudy
PathfinderCC said on 11/Oct/14
Nash now 6´8.25"
Taker now 6´6.5"

Peak Nash 6´9", Taker 6´7.25", Sid 6´6.75", BigShow 6´11.5", Andre 6´10.75", Hogan 6´5.25", Studd 6´6.5", Khali 7´0.5", Gonzalez 7´6.5"

Khali only WWE World Champion real 7feet +
Danimal said on 11/Oct/14
Clay says on 9/Oct/14
James B says on 8/Oct/14
Chris a 6'6 or 6'7 guy should weigh 200 pounds

According to what?!? Alex is 6'0 205-210 and he has size for sure but he isn't Mr.Olympia or anything. 6'6-6'7 guys unless they are sick and frail should weigh 220-230 at least, thats if they dont lift.

EXACTLY! I have a friend who is 6'4" and he weighs 225 pounds and looks like a rake with some lean muscle. A healthy 6'6" should be about 250 pounds, while carrying some lean muscle and a bit of fat. Even 260-280 isn't obese on a 6'6" guy. 200 pounds is anorexic for someone of that height.
Danimal said on 11/Oct/14
Alex 6'0 says on 9/Oct/14
Ali Baba, you're usually 6'6 flat most of the day or a bit over. UT is 6'6.5 to maybe 6'7 max with better posture.

Don't forget Alex, Taker had the shoe advantage. Could have been .5"-1" more in footwear in Taker's advantage. It's very possible that if you subtract the footwear advantage, they're the same height. Also, Ali supposedly wasn't standing full tall he said.
Danimal said on 11/Oct/14
Ali Baba says on 10/Oct/14
Danimal, if Hogan really has lost that amount of height, which is obviously hotly debated, then his whole perspective has changed. Try dropping down three inches while hanging out with your friends and see how weird it feels. Just the little bit that I'm losing now is noticeable when I'm with other guys I've known for a while who are close to my height.

In all honesty, it's not that debatable. Hogan was taller than legit 6'5" men in the 1980's. Most noticeably Jake the Snake Robert and Hilbilly Jim (both 6'5" guys) and if you go to Hilbilly Jim's website, there is a height comparison of him and Hogan (one from 1985 and one from 1989 where Hogan has minimum 1" on him) and then there's an updated pic from the 2002-2004 where Hogan is a solid 2" shorter than Hilbilly. Even a recent comparison of him next to Nikolai Volkoff where they are the same height today and in the 1980's he had at least 3" on him. I can go on, but that's for the Hogan page. Even a 1992 Hogan was barely shorter than a PRIME Undertaker (maybe 1-2") at that time. Hogan was also 2" shorter than 6'8" Ben Davidson and had 2" on 6'4" King Kong Bundy and Big Bossman and was about 1" shorter than 6'7" Big John Studd. He even had 4" on 6'2" Ed Leslie (Brutus Beefcake) in the '70's and '80's and recent pics show them at the EXACT SAME height. Lastly, he had 2" on 6'4" Buster Douglas in 1990 and was at least 1"-2" shorter than 6'4" Troy Aikman a couple of years ago. So yeah, not very debatable. My point was, he was around your current height today. Just imagine struggling with 6'3" today when you once stood 3" taller.
Robby said on 11/Oct/14
After seeing the pic with Ali Baba. I have come to this conclusion. that the Undertaker in his prime was about 6'8" IN boots. barefoot a very strong 6'6". between 6'6.5"-6'6.75" I do believe when he played high school basketball he was listed at 6'8"? now we know a lot of basketball players like Derrick Rose and Kevin Love for example are listed with their listed height in shoes. Kevin Love 6'10" in shoes, however was measured at 6'7.75" barefoot. Derrick Rose 6'3" in shoes, barefoot 6'1.5" Ali Baba how tall do you think Taker is?
Mr. E said on 10/Oct/14
Ali, what's the tallest you've ever been measured? The best I can give Taker at this point is 6'6.5" That's what makes Nash such an odd one because he looks in the 6'8" to 6'9" range with Rob but he's not a full 2" taller than Taker. I don't think there's any way Taker is a full 6'7" now. He looks identical in height to you.
NCL said on 10/Oct/14
Ali Baba - you're the most popular guy on this site! Along with everyone else, I thank you for the great pic!!

Super interesting too how based on this photo we have such varying opinions!
James B said on 10/Oct/14
Clay I am 5'7 myself and weigh 145 pounds and my doctor told me that a 6'6 man to avoid problems like heart problems should weigh 200 pound.

I have mentioned this before but I knew a 6ft guy who weighed 210 pounds who had a heart attack. He lost weight and got down to 173 pounds and still the docs ordered him to lose an additional 5 pounds and get down to 168 pounds.

Often men let there weight get higher than medically recommended and women often let there weight go under what is healthy.
KROC said on 10/Oct/14
@James B
So a 6'6/6'7 should weigh as much as your average 6footer? Not a chance buddy. 230ish would be better. I weigh 257 at 6'5, but I have a huge frame/structure.
Danimal said on 10/Oct/14
Ali Baba, I'm sure you and a PEAK Hulk Hogan would have been exactly the same height. Today, I'm sure you'd have a good 3" on him. Just imagine shrinking to 6'3" Ali Baba by 60 and you'll know how it feels to be Hulk Hogan today.

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes in newspapers, books and resumes.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.