|
Vladimir says on 29/Jul/10
Does anyone know whats his waist size???
Clay says on 24/Jul/10
Im going to go with 5'9.5-5'10. Alif says on 22/Jul/10
He is 178 cm,it means he stands as tall as natasha henstridge Alif says on 22/Jul/10
He is 178 cm,it means he stands as tall as natasha henstridge SAK says on 21/Jul/10
I personally think Craig's build is that of a short person, he is stocky and has shortish legs. However, he still is 5ft10/178cm. Ryan says on 21/Jul/10
Im not a real expert when it comes to noticing lifts of celebs but it seems alot wear them and when i hear lifts, brad pitt is always the name thats brought up. I look on this page and don't see many comments including lifts and for all we know daniel could have 3 inch lifts in his shoes and putting him down to only 5'5. Not saying he is 5'5 ,but i just used that as an examlpe of how overlooking the use of lifts can effect any opions on his height or anyone elses. Shaun says on 17/Jul/10
Who would be taller, Brad Pitt or Daniel Craig? Pitt looks taller because of lifts but i reckon they'd be the same height barefoot. Christian says on 14/Jul/10
i'd say 5'9.5 for craig. looked a tad under 5'11 in casino royal considering he was wearing dress shoes in most scenes. Jon says on 13/Jul/10
176-177 cm max for DC, and his stocky frame doesn't help, makes him look short. Anonymous says on 18/Jun/10
i"ll just say he looks 6ft in bond film. without his footwear could have been under 5ft10.75 , 178cm maybe still fair James says on 13/Jun/10
5'11 in the morning. Hugh 190-192cm says on 5/Jun/10
Looks near 5ft11in. 179cm-180cm lanky guy says on 3/Jun/10
daniel's 5'9.5" tall in lifts 181cm. Met him loads of times - used to live locally in my area of london before all the Bond fame took off. We shared the same coffee shops etc. I had 5" on the guy. Shaun says on 1/Jun/10
Daniel. That's because he WORE lifts. It was widely reported in the press he wore lifts in Quantum of Solace. That's why he looks close to 6'. guest says on 29/May/10
i have met daniel craig in person and he was definently as tall as me. i am 5ft 10.5 in Daniel says on 25/May/10
Indeed he looked taller than 5'10'' in Quantum of Solace, I would say between 5'11'' and 6'. Ali020202 says on 20/May/10
I think gigi is imagining things. He is 5ft10, his build makes him look shorter (stocky legs). RisingForce says on 16/May/10
Rob is correct, solid 5'10". He's clearly not 5'9" unless he wears lifts 24/7. Daniel says on 6/May/10
Rob, could you please ban such stupid comments as that made by gigi on april 25th? They aren't useful at all, not even funny. gigi says on 25/Apr/10
I saw daniel at 007 premiere in Madrid about 5'6 surprinsingly skinny a tiny tiny guy no muscles in sight he was wearing a suit he looked really small I was shock and I saw him right next to me Im 5'7 Aleks says on 24/Apr/10
He's not 5'11". Weak 5'10". Daniel says on 23/Apr/10
With a good probability of reaching 5'11'' Will says on 19/Apr/10
Craig is a strong 5'10". G says on 18/Apr/10
Seriously Andreas? Thanks for the most unnecessary in-depth conjecture ever. G says on 18/Apr/10
Seriously Andreas? Thanks for the most unnecessary in-depth conjecture ever. Andreas says on 28/Mar/10
My brother met him the other day and got a pic. My brother is 5'6 and Daniel Craig looked at least 5'10.5 My brother said he looked 6' but he always overestimates height. I don't know what kind of shoes he was wearing but i'd say he is between 5'10 and 5'11.5, but probably 5'10.5. Also it was late at night so he might be 5'11 morning height. Johnny says on 27/Mar/10
could be 5´10 morning height and go down to 5´9,5 during the day Nick says on 20/Mar/10
I think 5ft 9.75 is a more accurate listing, even in stacked heels for Quantum of Solace he fails to look taller than 5ft 8 Olga Kurylenko. jelena says on 14/Mar/10
Hollywood is full of very very short people. I'm a woman and I'm a 173 cm tall, if i come their i would be one of the tallest pople theire Hadassah says on 25/Feb/10
"....Shawn says on 19/Feb/10
Daniel is the best choice for playing bond, smart,frank and cool attitude that he carries... Regarding his height , he is tall enough at 5'10.A spy dosen't have to be necessarily a giant....."
LOL
I totally agree Jay says on 20/Feb/10
So many people down below compared him to those other celebs and so far he can't reach 5ft 10. How can 5ft 10 be near Hugh Jackman's chin????? NOT POSSIBLE as that would made Jackman 6ft 5 filip says on 19/Feb/10
Click Here
no doubt he is 180cm here. Shawn says on 19/Feb/10
Daniel is the best choice for playing bond, smart,frank and cool attitude that he carries... Regarding his height , he is tall enough at 5'10.A spy dosen't have to be necessarily a giant.
Rob.... why this discrimination towards other actors?? there are other actors listed at 178 cm and as 5'10 in here except for daniel who is listed here at 5ft 10.25 in and the same 178 cm!! Flyboy says on 16/Feb/10
"Why is he 5'10.25? He clearly looks more 177, 5'9.75 range or a weak 5'10" the quarter inch seems silly to me. Especially compared to say p diddy who is legit 5'10.5 and has him by half an inch or so maybe a little more."
I agree with this. 5'10" and I think most would be satisfied.
In fact, I am not sure if anybody has really made a case for Craig being over 5'10". That's where I think he's at (I certainly don't see him as 5'9 or lower), but there seems little point in having that extra quarter inch when there seems to be a consensus that 5'10 is his limit.
The Jackman/Craig photos are grossly unfair. Jackman is a big, big man, and will make the majority of men and women look small. When we're talking about a difference of several inches, it is easy to throw in that 'extra inch' to make Craig 5'9. It is more honest to measure him up against the likes of Nicole Kidman, Colm Meaney, Jude Law, Ewan McGregor, Paul Newman etc. Jay says on 14/Feb/10
This is a better example standing equal to the camera man
Click Here Jay says on 14/Feb/10
I disagree with Shaun. Craig makes a great Bond even at 5ft 9, much better than Hugh Jackman or other tall contenders could be. It's about personality. Connery would have been the best Bond even if he was 5ft 2! :) Ray Winstone is 5ft 9 and is gigantic because of his power. Jackman just comes across like a damp squid. If he is your classic Bond then there's something wrong about that. Shaun says on 9/Feb/10
Yeah that photo with Hugh Jackman he looks more like a 5'9" er. There's Hugh on the right looking like your classic 6'2" Bond and then there's Craig look nothing like Bond and sporting a rather old fashioned moustache. I can't believe how much women rave over Daniel Craig. Craig would make a good Bourne but I dislike him as Bond. I prefer Bond to be tall, dark, charming with a ruthless dark side above anything else, exactly like Connery was. All Craig has is the cold ruthless killer to him, he lacks the charm, looks and presence of a man like Connery who had everything going for him as Bond. Bond is supposed to have an element of tongue in cheek and charm. Brosnan was the complete opposite to Craig and had too much of it but was lacking in the ruthless killer department. I think all the Bonds have had their strengths, Moore was a little silly but entertaining to watch. Dalton I thought was excellent as Bond but too serious. Connery in my view was easily the best Bond and had the perfect balance of the required traits. Tanner says on 8/Feb/10
I am 5'3" I wish I could be 5'11" inches tall like Daniel Craig the_truth says on 30/Jan/10
5'10 folks, deal with it. Kim says on 29/Jan/10
5'9" is average in England and America, I personally consider 5'10" slightly on the tall side so maybe he's not a perfect spy :P and Craig does look quite tall to me, especially when he's next to the pretty English girl in Quantum of Solace. andrew says on 23/Jan/10
Agree with you JJ, most of us don't even realize that a true spy mustn't stand out from the crowd in appearance... A tall spy is no spy as he cannot hide properly.
This is also a thing that makes DC for me the best Bond (after Connery of course). sheppard says on 22/Jan/10
OMG! What difference does it make? Going on and on about how he looks 5'9" here and 5'10" there.... If any of you can prove you can tell that difference, notify me - I'll sell you a bridge! He's the best Bond since Connery (but not that good) and who cares if he's 5'9' and/or 5'10"/ JJ says on 20/Jan/10
5'10 sounds right. Above average and a fine height for a spy agent I might add :D \\\' says on 16/Jan/10
5'10" flat at the most. Anonymous says on 14/Jan/10
Why is he 5'10.25? He clearly looks more 177, 5'9.75 range or a weak 5'10" the quarter inch seems silly to me. Especially compared to say p diddy who is legit 5'10.5 and has him by half an inch or so maybe a little more. paul says on 12/Jan/10
He needs a downgrade; I met him last year he's 5'10'' even. James says on 4/Jan/10
Lol, MD, yeah true about eeking out every inch. I just think that a quarter inch is also too minute a fraction to distinguish without actually measuring someone - half an inch is different though. MD says on 1/Jan/10
I forgot to add that he may be given the extra quarter inch, because unlike most people, this guy has amazing posture. He shows what 5'10" really looks like when you're eking out every quarter inch of it. MD says on 1/Jan/10
Yeah, I'm also mystified why this quarter inch continues to be tacked on. He looks "just" 5'10" if not even a bit shorter. James says on 30/Dec/09
When is this guy going to be downgraded to 5'10 rather than 5'10.25. He looks just about 5'10" possibly a tiny bit lower. the extra 1/4 inch seems too generous and unecessary Maria says on 26/Nov/09
I just saw both Hugh and Daniel up close in the play "A Steady Rain" and I would estimate Hugh to be 6 ft 2 in. and Daniel at 5 ft 10 in. Hugh is long and lean while Daniel is a bit stocky (not fat, just a big ribcage) in the upper body so even if they were not standing beside each other, Hugh really does appear tall and Daniel nowhere close to 6 ft. zein says on 22/Nov/09
jackman is 6 ft 1,5 inches=186-187. this leaves craig with max 179, more likely 5 10 Vibram says on 3/Nov/09
Pakistani Indian says on 23/Sep/09
He is somewhere between 5 9 and 5 10. You can tell from all these pics.
----------
Agreed. I have him at 176cm (5ft9 1/2) or 177cm. Basically a mid or strong 5ft9 for Craig. The picture of him with 179cm (5ft10.5) P Diddy tells us he' looks 2cm or 3cm below 179cm: Click Here
P Diddy's page on here: Click Here Danny says on 27/Oct/09
He NEVER looks 6 feet tall -- well, maybe in a shot taken from a distance with no one else around. He is not tall and is sensitive about his height. Frankly, I doubt Hugh Jackman is even 6'2" but if he were standing side by side to Daniel, Daniel would look even shorter not taller. Moke says on 20/Oct/09
Craig definately looks his height. The angle sometimes produces a lot of confusion. On that pic for instant he looks like a weak 6-footer: Click Here Danny says on 20/Oct/09
rising force . . that isn't much of a camera advantage at all. I have my doubts that hugh is 6'2" which means Dan is really short (and petite). Daniel says on 17/Oct/09
Well, I'm surprised. Craig looks no taller than 1.75m (5'9'') in that picture with Jackman. RisingForce says on 17/Oct/09
So being further from the camera and looking 4 inches shorter than a solid 6'2" man makes you short? Jackman has the camera advantage and Craig looks like he's above average height when you keep Jackman's height in mind.
Craig is 5'10"-5'10.5". Danny says on 9/Oct/09
Craig is short. Here's a photo with Hugh Jackman: Click Here Pakistani Indian says on 23/Sep/09
He is somewhere between 5 9 and 5 10. You can tell from all these pics. FlyBoy says on 20/Sep/09
Put simply, there is no way Craig could put up a good fight against Kidman, especially when she's in heels, if he was 5'8/5'9. Those are some good links JoshJ. 5'10 seems a very reasonable assumption for Craig. Josh.J says on 14/Sep/09
Ed's link is broken so here are some pics of p diddy (5'10.5") and daniel craig:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
p diddy is wearing boots and mr craig is in dress shoes. safe to say minimum difference in height due to shoes. they look pretty much equal but i reckon p diddy might just be a fraction taller. their listed height seems right. PJ says on 8/Sep/09
IMDC isn't a factual or conclusive listing. I agree with Jay. Jay says on 31/Aug/09
I concluded with myself at least he is about 5ft 9 now and was close to 5ft 10 when younger. He's over 40 now guys. Shrinkage kicks in. Jim says on 28/Aug/09
I'm a film reporter and have met Daniel Craig on several occasions. I'm 5'11" and, while his height has fluctuated a little bit, he's still about the same height as me. The very shortest he probably would be is 5'10". Mathew says on 19/Aug/09
He could be .5" shorter than this, 5'9.75" (177 cm). Taylor says on 19/Aug/09
Harry, do you just ignore the photos of Craig with Zwick? Harry says on 14/Aug/09
He looks from the photos with P diddy, and with other stars to be about 5'10, mhis shoes always seem a little big and maybe he is just ever so slightly shy of 5'10 like 5'9.75"/177cm, but more or less 5'10". The 5'8/9" claims are ridiculous mastadon says on 28/Jul/09
he is infact 5ft 10' Click Here PJ says on 20/Jul/09
Jay's posts and images of DC standing next to Zwick are rather concrete evidence that DC is 5'9 tops, imo. PJ says on 16/Jul/09
The pics of Craig standing next to Zwick are very telling, he's 5'9. He's a known and consistent wearer of lifts, that's how he looks 5'11 next to Winslet, for example. PJ says on 15/Jul/09
Even in the pics where's he's wearing a suit he looks 5'9. You can only look taller if the camera angle assists, or you're wearing lifts. Lebensdorf says on 10/Jul/09
What's with the .25? Has anyone here actually gone up to the guy and measured him to the last fourth of an inch? I assume Rob adds the .25 to suggest that Mr. Craig is what one might call "a strong 5 foot 10", and this is fine by me, but he really is 5'10'' and no more, strong or weak. On a recent YouTube video, I saw Craig's appearance on David Letterman, and David, who is about 6'2'', was at least four inches taller. Whatever the case, I still approve of him as Bond. :) Ed says on 10/Jul/09
Daniel Craig standing next to P. Diddy.
Click Here is listed as 5'10.5'' on this site, and Craig look almost an inch shorter. Lmeister says on 3/Jul/09
I don't see him as low as 5ft9, but I do think that he isn't a legit 5ft10 either, 5ft9.5 would suite him best. Jay says on 16/Jun/09
I still can't see him above 5ft 9 without assistance. I love him as Bond though. He has weak moments but fell into the role much better in Quantum of Solace. He was so good in the Tosca sequence. Perfect perfect perfect and incredible direction and music there. It is just a shame the movie was a bit of a retread of Tomorrow Never Dies. lili says on 15/Jun/09
I saw Daniel Craig promoting th efirst Bond movie he made and he is surprisingly short and very thin, not built like in the movie. I would say 5'8 Anonymous says on 9/Jun/09
Good Day. The cloning of humans is on most of the lists of things to worry about from Science, along with behaviour control, genetic engineering, transplanted heads, computer poetry and the unrestrained growth of plastic flowers.
I am from Bhutan and now teach English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "Movie reviews, new movie reviews, top movie reviews, independent movies, online movie how can you go wrong with a name like song of the lesbian pirates."
Waiting for a reply :), Imperia. MD says on 9/Jun/09
HA! @ Scottjames Scottjames says on 7/Jun/09
I saw Daniel Craig up very close at a promotional pre-release screening tour of Layer Cake around 5 years ago in Glasgow.He is an physically impressive guy I would say at least 6 foot tall,probably more. In the film he is alongside some very tall actors in his "gang" of drug dealers so he looks quite small by comparison.It is very hard to tell on screen how tall actors are.I met Clive Owen once and he is a giant. andrew says on 30/May/09
He cannot be like 5'9" or 5'8". For example, that photo with Kate Winslet doesn't show anything of her footwear, and other photos are not the best evidences either.
His body proportions are simply so confusing (I mean head size and full height, width of shoulders) that he could be anything from 5'7" to 6' if only judging by a glance. RisingForce says on 29/May/09
Yeah, Craig is 5'8"....if you downgrade Arterton's actual height of 5'7" to 5'4". This is absurd, Craig is between 5'10" and 5'11". By the way I have Craig, Cruise and Pitt at the same height Rob does and I have Depp just a half inch higher. So I guess he makes everyone taller too? Daniel says on 29/May/09
You could be right about Rising's tendency to upgrade celebs, Anonymous. But I agree Craig is easily 1.80m to 1.82m Anonymous says on 29/May/09
nice pic and great comment jay, rising makes everybody taller, not only stallone, craig, depp, pitt, cruise.........so thats it. Jay says on 28/May/09
RisingForce man you just make everyone taller and taller! :D
Craig is wearing height boosters in the photo. Previously he was shorter than Sam Mendes' 5ft 10 and closer to Winslet
Click Here
You just can't pretend to ignore his height next to Zwick's confirmed 5ft 7 and Arterton's proven 5ft 4. RisingForce says on 28/May/09
Great pic, Parker. It backs up Craig being in the 5'10", 5'11" range. Parker says on 28/May/09
5'6 Kate Winslet with Craig
Click Here
If Kate is wearing flats (which I doubt) Craig is 5'9. Jay says on 28/May/09
Not ridiculous at all. It is easy to see that compared to Arterton that Craig is the same height in dress shoes as Mackenzie Crook is in Converse. It's impossible to ignore this or that he is not much taller than Tom Cruise and Edward Zwick when footwear and time of day isthe same. 5ft 10 is impossible. 5ft 9 as a barefoot morning height is possible. RisingForce says on 28/May/09
When will the ridiculous downgrading end. Craig is NOT 5'8". I'd bet money that he's atleast 5'10". Jay says on 27/May/09
@Clay
You are saying Gemma Arterton is in the same height range as Zwick and Tom Cruise which is not possible because we can see Daniel Craig is a inch taller than Zwick.
See for yourself. Gemma Arterton is 5ft 7-8 in heels with MacKenzie Crook (in Converse) who is listed between 5ft 8-9 and the same again compared to Colin Firth and Rupert Everett. She is never taller than 5ft 8 in tall heels.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Conclusion is Gemma Arterton is between 5ft 4 to 5ft 5. Clay says on 26/May/09
Gemma Arterton is 5'7 not 5'4. Just look at her arms and legs, she's obviously over 5'4. Jay says on 26/May/09
Sorry didn't read the question you posed Anonymous number 1. Edward Zwick's official height is 5ft 7 and that is how he looks compared to 6 footer Ken Watanabe. Then I compared Watanabe's height to others to confirm that height too. Watanabe is 1 inch shorter than Clint Eastwood's current height 6ft 1 in latest photos. It's safe to say Zwick is 5ft 7. Jay says on 26/May/09
I can only go by what those photos with Zwick say. Those are much newer than the Jacobi movie. JD says on 26/May/09
looks 5'11 in casino royale, 5'9 in quantum of solace, 6'2 with jude law and 5'8 with edward zwick. has he got hydrolic legs or something? Anonymous says on 25/May/09
Daniel Craig under 5ft 9, you must be joking!! I'm watching a film he made with Derek Jocobi and they are both standing together undressed with no shoes and Craig is about 3/4 inch taller at least. Derek Jacobi is listed ast 5ft 10 on this site Anonymous says on 25/May/09
great pics jay, but are you sure ed zwick is 170/5´7?? i could not find him on this page... Jay says on 25/May/09
I can't see 5'10 as his current height at any time of the day for the life of me now I saw Tom Cruise with Edward Zwick too.
Zwick and Craig with better view of Craig's shoes....very natural nothing like Brad Pitt shoe lifts.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Tom Cruise with Zwick. They are both 5ft 7, Cruise not wearing any lifts.
Click Here
Cruise and Zwick with Ken Watanabe.
Click Here
Click Here
Watanabe is 6ft and very much 5 inches taller than Zwick and Cruise.
These photos prove Daniel Craig's night time height when most red carpet events take place is under 5ft 9 without shoe lifts. He is an inch or little more than an inch taller than Tom Cruise in equal circumstances.
Tom Cruise evening height 5ft 7
Daniel Craig evening height 5ft 8 1/4
Add 3/4 of an inch for their morning height. andrew says on 24/May/09
A little more than 5'10". Maybe 179 cm is right, but his posture varies a lot. Hard to estimate. Jay says on 23/May/09
Yeah could be. I think 5ft 10 morning height when he was young. 5ft 9.5 current morning height. In Quantum Of Solace he was the same height as Felix Lighter in the bar before the Shoot out. greg says on 22/May/09
very nice pics jay, you are right, something between 5´8 and 5´10 ( thats my opinion, you said 5´9,5)...well i think 5´9,5 is right for craig Jay says on 21/May/09
That photo of him with Law and Miller is so weird as Jude Law has owned Craig by an inch or more in every other photo of them together.
Click Here
Click Here
Here is some more confusion to get your mind buzzing. Daniel Craig looking 5ft 8 with Edward Zwick who is 5ft 7!!
Click Here
Click Here
Craig an inch shorter than Sam Mendes' 5ft 10 and a lot shorter than Tom Hanks. Rita Wilson in heels is taller than Craig.
Click Here
Craig as short as very old Paul Newman. Also how can Jude Law be 5ft 11 when he is barely taller than the shrunken old Newman?
Click Here
So judging by these photos Craig is anywhere between 5ft 8 (with Zwick) to 5ft 9.5 with Law/Winslet/Mendes/Wilson/Newman Marcelo C. says on 16/May/09
Roger: Thank you for revealing a good opinion and agreement about my post.
Beyond agreements or disagreements, I do think the most valuable stuff about this web purpose, is "being well educated and respectful" about others´opinions, as you are (not everyone´s like you; that´s why, at times, I become somewhat "ironic" about some insolent people´s comments).
Good for you, Roger !!!! The Duck says on 14/May/09
I think the .25 is very important. Marcelo C. says on 14/May/09
Dear Friends: Let´s not quarrell any more about 007 bieng correct or incorrect depending if he´s 5"9.5´ or 6"2´. The most important stuff about a physical look for 007 being that his body is well proportionated, elegant (to be elegant you don´t necessarily have to be "a giraffe") and, most of all, being "a person with virile style, having class with women and self confident. After all, preventing the selected actor ísn´t a "midget", the rest will be made by cameras, privileged angles, other surrounding actors´ heights, etc.. Oh, I was forgetting,......for me Craig is about 5"9´/5"9.25" in his barefoot. anonymous says on 14/May/09
i always knew he was tall. 5 foot 10 to 5 foot 11 is reasonable for someone of his build. Gemma arterton is the tallest 5 foot 4 ever. She had long legs and long upper body but she is only 5 foot 4. That's really surprising. Greg says on 10/May/09
Ian: First...I do not care what´s written in the book. Second...if he´s described as 183cm/6 feet, well...neither sean connery nor george lazenby nor roger moore nor timothy dalton nor pierce brosnan could play james bond, because all of them are or were taller than 183/6 feet...what do you say now?? RisingForce says on 10/May/09
craig looks taller than jude law because it's a mid-stride picture and law's posture is poor. that's not accurate. craig may very well be 5-11 or close to it, but not because of that picture. Mr Me says on 9/May/09
Isn't 5'10.25 pretty much 5'10. I mean I am 5'9.86" taken from an average of 3 measurements very accurately (10.2 morning, 9.8 afternoon and 9.6 at night), and I guess you could place me at 5'9.75" but it may as well read 5'10". Maybe same for Daniel Craig? Daniel says on 7/May/09
If the guy in the left is Jude Law, then Craig should be upgraded to 1.82m GUK says on 6/May/09
I think Craig needs a slight upgrade to 179, possibly 180, look at the pic with Jude law, he's at least 179 there in very flat shoes littlesue says on 6/May/09
I would say nearer 5ft 11, look at him in the Bond films, he towers over Judy Dench who is supposedly 5ft 1 plus 3 inch heels, unless she has shrunk a few inches which could be possible if she is in her 70's Greg says on 5/May/09
first of all, i like to say that these people who say james bond must be a tall and dark guy who stands 6´1 to 6´3....thats bullsh...why james bond could not be under 6´ oder even under 5´11?????????
and now my opinion about daniel´s hight...i think he is something between 175 and 180, maybe 176, maybe 178...who knows????? i think his morning hight could be 179-180 and his night hight 177-178...that would be right i think Greg says on 5/May/09
craig is a height cameleon, it´s not easy to say how tall he is, but i would say 178-180 morning height, 176-178 day height and maybe 175-176 at night Greg says on 5/May/09
nice photo kate, but this would mean that craig must be 6´1, if jude law is 5´11 to 6...and thats wrong. so, in this photo craig is 6´1. Kate says on 4/May/09
More photographic evidence. This is a paparazzi shot so presumably lifts not being worn.
Click Here
If Jude is 5'11 as listed on this site then how can DC be 5'10. It doesn't add up - he's in converse and they can't conceal lifts. Sienna is supposedly 5'5. Daniel says on 4/May/09
People don't seem to understand the fact that the producers wanted to change the Bond stereotype by casting Daniel Craig. It's just his lack of humor and cold appearance, among other virtues, that bring a new profile to the character, more brutal, crude, tough, just a hardened soldier as needed by the role, and he doesn`t need to be tall (though I think he's not less than 1.80m either). Just accept this, Craig is the early 21st century James Bond, and a model for those new Bonds to come in the future. Doug says on 3/May/09
I agree with Hugh. I'd favour Clive Owen as first choice for Bond, he fits the steroetype and looks like he could be pretty brutal. Eric Bana or Hugh Jackman would also be excellent candidates. All are 6'2" and dark as Bond should be. Jackman looks as if he would add much neded humor to the role which Craig lacks. Doug says on 3/May/09
what i like about Craig is that he is comfortable in himself at 5'10" and unlike other action stars doesn't feel compelled to wear lifts to look 6'. he always wear flat dress shoes. Daniel says on 1/May/09
Schreiber is listed 6'3'' on celebheights Zac says on 30/Apr/09
Watch him in Defiance, Liev Schreiber is easily 2-3 inches taller, and hes approx 6'2"
so my bet, is Craig is about 5'10"-5'11" Thomas says on 28/Apr/09
She is 5'4. She looks tall but so do Girls Aloud on the screen. They are all tiny except Sarah Harding. Daniel says on 25/Apr/09
I still believe he reaches 5'11'' anonymous says on 22/Apr/09
No way arterton is 5 foot 4, she looked at least 5 foot 6 in quantom of solace. She looked tall. 5 foot 4 is just too short for someone of her physique. He is definately 5 foot 10. Any shorter is unrealistic. Thomas says on 20/Apr/09
lol
Arterton is 5'4. My work mate went to school with her and is still buddies with her on Facebook Kate says on 19/Apr/09
I think that thing about Gemma Arterton supposedly saying he wore lifts in Quantum because she was taller in heels is made up.
Click Here
There is no way he's wearing lifts in this photo, the shoes are too flat on top. And she's in huge heels yet at 5'7 she's still a fair bit shorter than him. I think 6 foot might be about right, he just seems to work with tall women (Cate Blanchett, Nicole Kidman) who wear heels. tim says on 18/Apr/09
i dont think hes quite 5'11, but he really isnt that short. there are actors that are listed as 5'10 and appear a bit lower, wesley snipes, owen wilson, ewan mc gregor, jason statham, sly stallone etc. but with craig he really does seem average, he doesnt seem sort at all. so anywhere from 5'9.75-5'11.5 is beleivable. i reckon 5'10-5'10.5 most likely. tim says on 18/Apr/09
i dont think hes quite 5'11, but he really isnt that short. there are actors that are listed as 5'10 and appear a bit lower, wesley snipes, owen wilson, ewan mc gregor, etc. but with craig he really does seem average, he doesnt seem sort at all. so anywhere from 5'9.75-5'11.5 is beleivable. i reckon 5'10-5'10.5 most likely. Thomas says on 13/Apr/09
Mickey Rourke stands in the background looks 3 inches taller but is dressed as a cowboy so like could be wearing cowboy boots. Craig is about 2-3 inches taller than Ben Stiller frosty says on 11/Apr/09
i think 5,10 suits daniel you can just tell he is around that height by looking at him linebacker40 says on 10/Apr/09
I'd still say Daniel is a solid 5'10" who gives off a 5'11" look, and when the time comes for a new actor to play Bond, Hugh Jackman or Gerard Butler would be the top candidates I'd say. Hugh 190cm says on 6/Apr/09
A good guy to play bond would be either Clive Owen, Mark Strong (with hair!), Eric Bana or Hugh Jackman. All possess the tall dark and handsome look. I'm not gay when I say that. mamonazo says on 6/Apr/09
Ace, its a MOVIE. Its about how u look. Obviously real "bonds" have nothing to do with looks or muscles. So Roger Moore kicks ass with just one ironic smile while daniel has to do lots of stupid unreal action. Bond HAS to be tall. Same as Bond cannot be gay. Daniel says on 4/Apr/09
He is really the shortest Bond ever, but never looks less than 1.80m (5'11'') to me. Ace says on 3/Apr/09
Mamonazo, i would say that daniel craig is certainly not unqualified to play Bond. In fact, he is probably the best actor to play Bond ever. Josh says on 2/Apr/09
I heard that craig did were lifts in some scenes in the two bond films to look taller beside the tall actors on one site. mamonazo says on 2/Apr/09
craig is too short to be james bond at his 5-10. At least he has the muscles...All Bond represent the real masculine tall man. They should hire some other bigger actor. mel Gibson was too short for the role. leonari says on 30/Mar/09
Almaric could be shorter than 5'6 or Craig is wearing lifts. There are more than 4 inches between them. leonari says on 30/Mar/09
Almaric could be shorter than 5'6 or Craig is wearing lifts. There are more than 4 inches between them. leonari says on 30/Mar/09
Comments like double B's should be banned. There are enough morons running on the street. Get rid of those fools rob. Sam says on 30/Mar/09
um double D im 6'0.25 and am more a man than you. Go away. RisingForce says on 30/Mar/09
Double B, you're a moron. How you even managed to turn on your computer is beyond me. Would you have gone up to 5'7.5" Bruce Lee and told him he wasn't a real man? How about 5'6" Jet Li or 5'9" Chuck Norris? Didn't think so. Double B says on 28/Mar/09
Bond needs to be at least 6'1" or tall. Height is a must for a real man. Daniel says on 27/Mar/09
I've read Amalric is 5'6'', and Craig seems 5 inches taller in "Quantum of Solace". Doug says on 23/Mar/09
Any estimates about Mathieu Amalric's height? He looked noticeably short I thought, 5-6 likely. sodapop says on 19/Mar/09
I agree Daniel Craig is the best Bond period!! He also has the best body. 5'10" is a great height for a man, He looks pretty tall on screen. Who the hell says you have to be 6'1" to be James Bond, gimme a freakin break!! I wouln'dnt want to be that tall anyway, its abnormal italian boy says on 18/Mar/09
he is a solid 5.10 ft guy maybe something more |
