How tall is Tim Robbins ?

Home :: About  Latest :: Comments :: Top 50 

Tim Robbins Height is 6ft 4.75in (195 cm)

American actor best known for roles in films like The Shawshank Redemption, The Player, Mystic River, Bull Durham, Jacob's Ladder, Bob Roberts, The Hudsucker Proxy, High Fidelity and War of the Worlds. He said in a 1992 edition of Playboy magazine "I'm six foot four and a half and I have a temper", but also claimed in a 2010 edition of RTE Lateshow "I'm 6 foot 5".

How tall is Tim Robbins
Photos by PR Photos
You May Be Interested
Morgan Freeman
Height of Morgan Freeman
6ft 2.25in (189 cm)
Kevin Costner
Height of Kevin Costner
6ft 1in (185 cm)
Clint Eastwood
Height of Clint Eastwood
6ft 3.75in (192 cm)
David Morse
Height of David Morse
6ft 4in (193 cm)
Comment on the Height of Tim Robbins

195.5cm said on 15/Nov/15
he's about 6'7 peak

proberly still on the upper end of 6'6 today. definetly wasn't 6.4.5 IMAO
Goose said on 4/Nov/15
I posted this on this site before - dude is way way tall. He ain't no 6'5. Saw him sitting at the bar at a restaurant in Soho in about 1998'. Looked 6'7 to me and big boned. I've seen Conan too who I put at 6'5 (big guy as well) and there was a huge difference. BTW, extremely tall actors will downgrade their heights as 6'7 public ally would limit their roles/appeal.
Darren510 said on 21/Oct/15
6'4.5 - 6'4.75 and 6'5 peak. Looked minimum 6'5 in Shawshank redemption next to Morgan Freeman
Ice said on 18/Oct/15
1.95 , the most alpha height for a guy , f**k 6'2 ..
Gonzalo said on 21/Aug/15
To me they both look the same height. Robbins is mínimum 1`94.
Sam said on 20/Aug/15
I actually don't think that Robbins looks taller...but it doesn't surprise that Robbins and Schreiber would measure a very similar height.
Alex V. said on 18/Aug/15
Robbins is taller...

Click Here
Alex V. said on 18/Aug/15
Tim Robbins... Pablo Schreiber.

Both 1m95.

Click Here
Sam said on 17/Aug/15
Would be surprised if he was a couple inches taller than Conan but could buy him looking roughly an inch taller. At times he looks potential to be a bit shorter, height loss possible but a early, like with Stern and some other recent photos.
jujwa said on 23/Jul/15
Wow i never noticed heights but i assumed he must be 5'6-5'7 because he has a slight baby fce imagine my surprise finding out he is nearky a foot taller lol
bobbyh said on 23/Jun/15
6 3.75 to flat 6 4bf in shoes mos def 6 .5 overlisted a tiny bit
Matthew said on 20/Jun/15
Bishop says on 5/Jun/14
@Ed Kline, I found a pic of him and 6'5" listed Howard Stern:

Click Here


Howard looks taller obviously.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jun/15
He really doesn't look like he's lost height
Ferrous said on 9/Jun/15
He looked surprisingly tall with Conan tonight - seemed to have as much as a couple of inches on the 6-3.5 Conan.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Jun/15
Danimal says on 9/May/15
Tim looking at least 6'6" if not 6'7" with Craig Ferguson in 2009 (at 20:52) and YES, Craig is around 6'2". To claim that Tim Robbins is only 6'4.75 is a tragedy, but its Rob's site: Click Here

That's got to be one of the dumbest comments I've ever read on this site
Sam said on 22/May/15
His performance in Mystic River really deserved the Oscar...really sold the haunted shell of a man, simultaneously hulking & scary as well as pathetic. Out of all things in the film his work there has aged the best so far.
Sam said on 20/May/15
Rob, can you add to his credits?: Bull Durham, Jacob's Ladder, Bob Roberts, The Hudsucker Proxy, High Fidelity and War of the Worlds.
Sam said on 19/May/15
"6'4.5 is still very tall in Hollywood", very tall everywhere except perhaps in the NBA or Dinaric Alps.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/15
Danimal says on 9/May/15
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 28/Nov/14
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4˝ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need?

Proof??? MANY tall people low end their height in Hollywood to get more roles.

Umm...the quote above
Danimal said on 9/May/15
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 28/Nov/14
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4˝ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need?

Proof??? MANY tall people low end their height in Hollywood to get more roles.
Danimal said on 9/May/15
Dejavu says on 20/Feb/15
He had close to 3 inches on Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption.

Close to???? Try minimum 4" on him.
Danimal said on 9/May/15
Tim looking at least 6'6" if not 6'7" with Craig Ferguson in 2009 (at 20:52) and YES, Craig is around 6'2". To claim that Tim Robbins is only 6'4.75 is a tragedy, but its Rob's site: Click Here
Jeffery said on 26/Apr/15
Never 6'5" today. Out of bed maybe.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Apr/15
@moe: and I think you're loser troll who wastes time and energy trying to denigrate other people's opinions.
moe said on 29/Mar/15

I think you're speculating. And your speculation is wrong.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Mar/15
@Dejavu: I think they may have shot Shawshank a certain way to make him look more convincing as the self-confidant inmate who beat the system and serves as a hero to the other inmates. His towering presence naturally served the part.

Somewhat similar to what they did with Michael Clark Duncan in The Green Mile a few years later.
Dejavu said on 20/Feb/15
He had close to 3 inches on Morgan Freeman in Shawshank Redemption.
moe said on 7/Feb/15
What the guy below me said. Saying Tim Robbins is under 6'5 is absolute nonsense. I've seen him twice. Anyone who wants to catch a glimpse of him should go by the Actors Gang in Culver City. He's got to be 6'6.
jsmithe said on 15/Jan/15
Rob Tim is about 6ft6, this is wrong. Tim is taller than 6ft5 Vince Vaughn
Andrea said on 9/Jan/15
What if he really has never been over 6'4.5? After all, a big 6'4.5 is still very tall in Hollywood...
Judd said on 9/Jan/15
in my opinion he was 6'4.75-5" at his peak and today a strong 6'4.5"
Andrea said on 7/Jan/15
Rob, what do you think about his 6'4.5 claim? You think that's possible? I mean, if Morgan freeman was really a bit over 6'2 at his peak, it's hard to believe Tim was under 6'5!
[Editor Rob: well he could genuinely have measured that, but maybe didn't stand quite at his tallest. Or he measured 6ft 5 and just dropped the half inch to be part of the 6ft 4 range crowd.]
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Dec/14
I don't think he's really lost anything to be perfectly honest...
Dmeyer said on 6/Dec/14
Click Here , looks near 6 ft 6 in near 6ft 1.25-1.5 in gunton peak height , also looked easy 3in over 6'2.25-2.5in peak Morgan freeman defenetly 6'5-5.25 peak today 6'4.5
Bishop said on 4/Dec/14
I think he's at least this. He towers over Charlize Theron in heels: Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Nov/14
Oh my god...he claimed 6ft4˝ in 1992 when he would have been 34. How much more proof do you guys need? He more than likely got measured at that mark (probably later in the day). Rob has him nailed. 6ft5 of course you could argue but 6ft6+ is just pure trolling. You clearly have no clue how big a legit 195cm man is in the flesh if that's the road you're gonna to take even in the face of evidence.

Click Here
Click Here this definitely helps Danimal's case,
Click Here
bob h said on 4/Sep/14
nobody saw bull durham? I guess? costners calls him a 6foot 3 stud
berta said on 2/Sep/14
i could not see him shorter than vince vaughn. He is probably 196 AND VINCE 195
Maximus said on 30/Aug/14
He is one of those actors that is obviously tall. I do believe that he states his height a little shorter to avoid being type cast. I believe he is at least 6'5" minimum without shoes.....he is obviously taller than Morgan Freeman in ShawShank and not many actors can to that to Freeman.
Danimal said on 14/Aug/14
Saw him on Conan about a decade ago. Had more than 2" on him. He was giving Conan presents for Christmas and they stood side by side. Conan was bare minimum 6'4" and has also claimed 6'4.5" for himself. Robbins had at least 2" on him. Robbins imo at his peak was 6'5" and change at night and a solid 6'6" (if not slightly over that) in the morning. 6'4.75" is just not true for his peak. He had several inches on Morgan Freeman, who was close to 6'3" 20 years ago.
Arch Stanton said on 13/Aug/14
Howard Stern can look taller than 6 ft 5 as he's rail thin.
Sam said on 13/Aug/14
Don't forget that Vaughn looked about the same as Michael Strahan, who admitted he wasn't the full 6'5"...Robbins has a slightly leaner build I think so at times he can seem taller, but I'd guess there's not a whole lot difference between Vaughn and Robbins with good posture. Stern definitely seems a little taller than that.

I get guessed at 6'7" or even 6'8" at times and I'm 6'5" tops (about 6'5.25" morning height).
Bishop said on 12/Aug/14
Rob, who do you think would be the tallest out of these three, Howard Stern, Vince Vaughn, or Tim Robbins?
[Editor Rob: Howard Stern never really looks a sub 6ft 5 and could be a guy who has rounded down from a fraction above it.]
James B said on 11/Aug/14
Arch Stanton says on 9/Aug/14
Be honest though James, how many guys of that sort of impressive height do you see in public though who look good though? All I know if that if you really measure near 6 ft 5 barefoot after a long day with relaxed posture then first thing in the morning with good footwear you'll probably look 6 ft 7 to most people and stand out in public as a massive bloke. I think a lot of people underestimate how tall a proper guy this height really is as you often get guys who are more like 6'3" claiming 6'5".

I agree and even 6'3 guys claim 6'6
Arch Stanton said on 9/Aug/14
Be honest though James, how many guys of that sort of impressive height do you see in public though who look good though? All I know if that if you really measure near 6 ft 5 barefoot after a long day with relaxed posture then first thing in the morning with good footwear you'll probably look 6 ft 7 to most people and stand out in public as a massive bloke. I think a lot of people underestimate how tall a proper guy this height really is as you often get guys who are more like 6'3" claiming 6'5".
James B said on 1/Aug/14
Arch Stanton says on 31/Jul/14
He must be pretty huge in person James as every show host says that same thing "very very big man" whenever he's on a show!! Just goes to show how tall a proper barefoot guy of this height actually is!

True. Someone like Ralf Möller who is a very strong 6'5 would look t VERY big in person even more so than robbins.

However there very impressive statures can't really compensate for there not so good 'looks' can it? That said you get huge guys like Dolph lundgren, steven seagal and darius Danish who have looks as well. I mean how smug and cocky can you be to be massive in height and good looking? They really did hit the genetic jackpot.
Sam said on 1/Aug/14
My brother in NYC, not the most reliable source given, said when he met Robbins he was big but not exceptional, would fit in with our family and about my size, but our family in made of ginormously tall people.
Arch Stanton said on 31/Jul/14
He must be pretty huge in person James as every show host says that same thing "very very big man" whenever he's on a show!! Just goes to show how tall a proper barefoot guy of this height actually is!
James B said on 22/Jul/14
Yeah I though in shawshank looked bang on this listing here or a weak 6'5.
Realist said on 10/Jul/14
Rob i think he wears absolutely flat shoes. 6'3 guys come very close to him. Sean Penn almost looks 5'9 with him (who definitely wears 2.75 inch lifts). For a 5'7 guy you should be a head shorter than a 6'3 guy or 6'4 guy. I just about touch the lip of a 192 cm guy.
177cmGuy said on 8/Jul/14
He looked a weak 6'5 in the Shawshank redemption. Not sure if he has actually lost any height today though.
Alex V. said on 24/Jun/14
With 6'8'' Jalen Rose Click Here
Alex V. said on 24/Jun/14
Robbins seems a bit taller than Vaughn...

Robbins Click Here

Vaughn Click Here
Dago Red said on 24/Jun/14
add shoes and hair to 6'4.75" and you get a 6'6" appearance.
James B said on 23/Jun/14
196cm not out of the question rob?
[Editor Rob: he might have been at his absolute low almost 6ft 5 but in Hollywood anybody who is a genuine 6ft 5 is going to really stand out.]
James B said on 20/Jun/14
Arch Stanton says on 17/Jun/14
Looks 6 ft 6 in that clip James!

Rob could Jonathan Ross be a weak 6'1 judging by that clip? Like you did with Michael Jordan maybe upgrade Robbins to 196cm? He really does look over 195cm in that clip for sure.
[Editor Rob: he can look an honest 6ft 5 there]
Alex 6'0 said on 19/Jun/14
6'4.5 Id say. If he claims 6'4.5 and 6'5 likely he measures 6'4.5 and sometimes rounds up as most would. Its like my tall friend I posted a pic with. He claims 6'5 but has said he's been measured 6'4.5-6'4.75 too
Arch Stanton said on 17/Jun/14
Looks 6 ft 6 in that clip James!
James B said on 15/Jun/14
Rob with johnathan Ross here claims 6'5
Click Here

He really does tower over him
Sam said on 6/Jun/14
Ed, actually he has posed with James Cromwell. Here I think Robbins looks around 6'4.5" next to Cromwell.
Click Here
Bishop said on 5/Jun/14
@Ed Kline, I found a pic of him and 6'5" listed Howard Stern:

Click Here
Ed Kline said on 4/Jun/14
It's actually kind of strage I can't find any pics of Robbins with a really tall actor. Not one pic with Vince Vaughn, Randy Quaid, Cromwell, Noonan etc... A couple of good solid pics like that would explain so much.
mike said on 3/Jun/14
Tim Robbins peak: 6ft 5 (196 cm) still around 194-195 today agree with Rampage. Morgan Freeman peak: 6ft 2 (188 cm) Tim had three inches on him in Shawshank.
moe said on 3/Jun/14
I've met him twice. He runs the Actor's Gang in Culver City, Ca. He's closer to 6'6 then 6ft5. Anyone who thinks he's as low as 6'4 hasn't met him. Don't take my word for it. Go check out the Actor's Gang yourself. I've also seen Jason Segel, Zachary Levi and Kevin Sorbo. They're all 6'3. Tim Robbins makes them all look like bitches.
JayofNJ said on 9/May/14
Tim is easily six foot five inches. He is one of the tallest actors around. Probably almost as tall as Fred Gwynn.
Sam said on 17/Apr/14
Yes, pretty implausible with almost no struggle to be heard either...Robbins probably easily has 50 pounds and 9 inches on Cruise. When did Cruise's construction worker (haha) suddenly become a ninja? WOTW is not Spielberg's finest hour, maybe I'm biased since I'm not a fan of Cruise, outside of Tropic Thunder.
Ted said on 24/Mar/14
Seems about right.

Btw, anyone else find that scene in War of the Worlds where 5'7" Tom Cruise 'takes out' 6'5" Tim Robbins in a closed door brawl pretty implausible?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jan/14
Around 194-195cm today. In his 20s and 30s he might've scraped 196cm. But, in Shawshank I think they just made him look even bigger. That cast had other legitimately tall actors (i.e. Morgan Freeman, Clancy Brown, Bob Gunton) who looked average at best next to Tim.
Goose said on 3/Jan/14
I sat next to him at the bar of a French Bistro in Union Square 15 years ago. I've got news for you guys - he's 6'7. Ignore the fact he lists his height lower, he'd get less acting jobs if he did because he'd be typecast which I'm sure his publicist told him years ago. JI'm 5'10 and have a couple of 6'5 buddies and he appeared to be 1.5 - 2 inches taller than them. Abnormally tall.
Lenad is sexy said on 8/Dec/13
194cm nowadays
Dejavu said on 27/Oct/13
This guy has to be 6'5. He looks 3 inches taller than legit 6'2 tall guys like John cusack and Morgan freeman
Arch Stanton said on 9/Oct/13
He did look a proper 6'5" in the Shawshank Redemption (arguably the best film ever made) but looked really weedy/skinny of frame back in '94 and looked probably 170 pounds at that height. He had about 3 inches on Morgan Freeman anyway, that's true.
Rusty said on 17/Sep/13
I bet 6'4.5" was a typical afternoon height but he likely scraped 6'5" in the morning and got his claim that way.
Dejavu said on 6/Sep/13
He was easily the tallest in Shawshank Redemption, looking 6'5 next to Morgan Freeman.
jtm said on 21/Aug/13
i'm not sure if mystic river is the right movie to judge his height from and he was 3 inches taller than freeman.
Blaze said on 11/Aug/13
195cm, same as me, but he's pretty old... and I'm 15
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Jul/13
If he had just claimed 6ft4, I wouldn't doubt 6ft5 for a second. I think Vince Vaughn mightve done it aswell. But I reckon he got measured at 6ft4.5in/194cm at some point.

But could he have been 196cm?
Arch Stanton said on 24/Jul/13
Didn't really look a full 6'5 or more in Mystic River. He looked 6'4" range I think..
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jul/13
Yeah Lorne I agree.
Freeman was at least a strong 6"2" peak, probably 6"2.5"/189cm.
Still looks 6"2" on the dot now
Lorne said on 20/Jul/13
If you upgraded him to 195cm, you should really upgrade Morgan Freeman. Say 6ft2.25in peak, 6ft1.75 now?
avi said on 5/Jun/13
big 6'4
Lenad is sexy said on 26/Apr/13
looks to be 2.5-3inches taller than morgan freeman.
Mathew said on 24/Apr/13
Tim Robbins is 194 - 195 cm range, same as Vince Vaughn. Michael Jordan is probably the same height too tbh
lenad is sexy said on 10/Apr/13
He might be closer to 6'4 now. But back when younger, to me he always looked 6'5ish
Two Jakes said on 9/Mar/13
Looked massive in The Shawshank Redemption. The height posted above is bare minimum. He's a legit 6'5!
James said on 27/Feb/13
In pics recently he's not looking 6'5
BEASTMAN said on 23/Feb/13
If you look at the pictures too quickly, there's an illusion Tim's much taller, but he isn't if you add a straight line from the tip of Morgan's head to somewhere along the forehead of Tim's head. Don't get fooled by Tim's hair. There is no more than 7 cm difference in the 1st photo, where Tim's posture is slightly better than Morgan's. 2nd photo looks a 5cm difference and 3rd photo looks a 5-6cm difference. Therefore, I average it out at 6'4.25-6'4.5 with a possible 6'4.75 peak. By the way, here is the interview where Tim claims 6'5. He also says that Morgan is 6'3, admitting he was less than 3 inches taller than him. Since Morgan is 6'2 and not 6'3 though, Robbins can't be closer to 6'5 than 6'4.
Click Here (4:25-4:35)
James said on 21/Feb/13
Actually in the first pic Robbins looks 197cm IF freeman is still 6'2, 196cm in the second 194cm in the third photo.

If Robbins is still 195cm then there is a chance he could have been 196cm in his 20s.
BEASTMAN said on 30/Jan/13
Doesn't look quite 6'4.75 judging by these pics with Freeman (6'2). I reckon he's 6'4.25-6'4.5. I take back my previous comment, because I think it's possible he MAY have been 6'4.75 at his peak when younger. Doubt he was ever a complete 6'5 though.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 4/Nov/12
No way, he's still 195cm, he's only 54y and in very good shape.
BEASTMAN said on 21/Oct/12
I absolutely doubt he's lost any height.
James said on 12/Oct/12
Could be 193-194cm range these days
avi said on 29/Jan/12
solid 6'4
Franco said on 8/Oct/07
1st pic he looks 195cm, 2nd pic looks 193cm.

looks like he lost at least 2cm since last time.

but yes 194cm as his average is acceptable.
Marcelo C. said on 5/Oct/07
Absolutely agree about 6´4" or 5" (it´s the same). Always the tallest in the scenes. Congratulations for you, Glenn !!!!! If compared to Tim, you look 1" or 2" more. May be you stand straight and with good posture.
glenn said on 3/Oct/07
casual shoes on with no heel on bottom.that was the event i was at.the zodiac pic with jake.
Korben said on 2/Oct/07
Another way to judge his height is by looking where his mouth comes at the top of glenns head, saying glenn in the bottom photo is 175cm tall or so (do you remember your shoes glenn?). Im 6'4" and in normal dress shoes (an inch or so), my mouth comes to about 173cm, so judging that our heads are about the same size, it says robbins is around 195cm, which is very belivable. Hes definatly taller then 6'4" as hes said in interviews, and looks it.
Gonzalo said on 2/Oct/07
Robbins dwarfing Jake Gyllenhaal
Click Here
Robbins looking huge next to director Michel Gondry, listed 5`10 :)
Click Here
Big guy Robbins, very big
Anonymous said on 25/Sep/07
I met him in person one time and wouldn't be suprised if he was 6'6 I'm 6'1 and he towered over me I think when you're as tall as him in hollywood you want to round down as much as possible or you will start getting clumped into "tall guy roles"
dmeyer said on 19/Sep/07
i think tim is 6'5.25 to 6'5.5 but rounds down
Gonzalo said on 11/Sep/07
He had more than an inch over Clancy Brown, the prison guard. At least two inches
James said on 11/Sep/07
Cantsop25 he only had an inch on that prision guard who is 6ft3.5
thelondonman2 said on 10/Sep/07
He is not 6 feet 4 and a half inches. Hes about 6'6 legit
cantstop25 said on 7/Sep/07
im gonna have to disagree with you there james, he towered over that big prison guard who was said to actually be a legit 6'3"
Alex V. said on 1/Sep/07
My guess is at least five inches.
Adam Brennon said on 31/Aug/07
Many inches taller does person A have to be than peron B in order to tower over them?
Korben said on 30/Aug/07
I think its safe to say a true 6'5 in the morning and 6'4-6'4.5 in the afternoon, hes even mentioned 6'5 before in interviews.
Adam Brennon said on 28/Aug/07
Kevin Bacon (5' 10") and Laurence Fishbourne (6' 0") look like Tim Robbin's children being walked to school by him in one scene in Mystic River.
J-Dog said on 15/Aug/07
I saw him today as he stopped by the store I work at in Soho, looked 6'4.5" - 6'5" he was with his son and his soon is also tall looked around 6'3". Tim is also a big broad guy which I think makes him look even taller on many occasions. To me he seemed more 6'5"ish.

I didn't get as close to him as I got to Tom Hanks when he walked right by about 2 feet away from me.
James said on 2/Aug/07
No in the Shawshank Redemption looked his claim 6f4 and a half. Did not really look taller than this in the film. In fact when I watched the film for the second time I was quite suprised he did not look as quite as tall as I expected.
JanJ said on 30/Jul/07
He looked about 6'5-6'6 in shawshank
Croat said on 9/Jul/07
Very close to 6'5''.
James said on 5/Jul/07
I dont know how tall his farther is but juding from recent photographs Tim's son is around 6ft5.
Gonzalo said on 27/Jun/07
I agree with you Anonymous in the first pic. But I don´t in the second one. Glenn is closer to the camera and Robbins isn´t standing straight
Anonymous said on 26/Jun/07
Robbins looks exactly 6'3" in the top picture with Glenn and 6'3 1/2" in the bottom picture with Glen. However, I firmly believe that without shoes Mr. Robbins is his stated 6'4 1/2"
Alex V. said on 14/Jun/07
Ok 5'11.5 guy, I misunderstood...
5'11.5 guy said on 13/Jun/07
Alex, I never said he WAS two inches taller. I said "in one pic" he "looks" two inches taller. I don't believe Tim is actually 6'6.
Alex V. said on 12/Jun/07
Yeah, 1m95 (between 6'4.5 and 6'5) for Robbins seems correct...
James said on 12/Jun/07
Glenn, if Philip Noyce is slighly over 6f4 then Tim Robbins must be more 195cm because judgin from photos of them together he looks a good inch taller if not more so i thik u should upgrade his height a cm more. Although i suppose he could be a lift wearer lol
Alex V. said on 11/Jun/07
Not a chance 5'11.5 guy, Tim is close to 6'5" (He said that he is "6-feet, 5-inches on a good day") , and if you check other pictures from Tim with Philip Noyce you will see that Robbins is just a bit taller than 6'4.25" Noyce. (For me Tim is close to 1m95 (similar to Craig Kilborn) and Noyce 1m93-1m94)
5'11.5 guy said on 10/Jun/07
In one pic I've seen, Robbins looks 2' taller than 6'4 Philip Noyce.
Craiger said on 4/Jun/07
he looks even tallrr then 6'5" in the movies, sometimes he can come acros as being 6'8" guy! but that is probably becasue he normally works with shorter actors/actresses, nevertheless I think he is a legit 6'5"
BigBen said on 1/Jun/07
One of my favourite tall guys. He is a brilliant actor. maybe 6'5 in his young days
Arjun said on 1/Jun/07
I agree Alex, Robbins only looks 6'3.5" - 6'4" max in the bottom picture, but as editor Rob says, it seems as though Glenn is slightly in front, given the position of their shoulders.
James said on 25/May/07
Have you seen Tims son he is exactley the same height as him if not a hair taller which would make him about 6ft5.
Alex said on 24/May/07
Robbins looks 6'4 in the bottom picture with Glenn.

[Editor Rob: sometimes its harder to decipher, but it wouldn't shock me if glenn was a little closer in both photos.]
Puqqo said on 14/May/07
Tim is only 6'4" to 6'5"??? He looked like a giant in Nothing to loose.
Korben said on 11/May/07
huge dude, looks 6'5 in those pics, considering his mouth is at the top of your head, and with say steven segal or neeson its a bit below
James said on 11/Apr/07
He looks about 6ft6 when stood next to Jake Gylenall
TheJerk said on 10/Apr/07
Im gonna start calling you gleen now apparently its the thing to do.
TheJerk said on 10/Apr/07
Well, he did say he had a temper so you cant expect him to be overly friendly Glenn. He can look 6-5 in the famous 94' movie especially so.
Gonzalo said on 16/Mar/07
Duncan`s character in The Green Mile was supposed to be around 7 feet and he was shot to look that height. Movies can be decieving. Hollywood is the land of make-believe.
By the way, Morse looked so tall in that movie. At least 4 inches, maybe five. That would make him 6`4 minimum
Anonymous said on 15/Mar/07
Ok Viper, it's true. But for instance, Vincent D'onofrio is a big dude (almost 6'4") but in the pic with Gleen, he looks much shorter than that (give a look), now confront the pic of Vincent with the 1st pic of Pete Steele... The difference between D'onofrio and Stelle isn't that much, 2.5 inches (+- 6.5 cm) max.. Duncan in "The Green Mile" looks much taller than David Morse however is not more than one inch.... some photos can be deceiving. Good idea from Rob & company put more than one pic. (Alright Gleen...)
glenn said on 15/Mar/07
who says i dont have more pics of me and joey? its a matter of finding them is the tough part.
Viper said on 15/Mar/07
Alex, Pete is slouching big time in that 2nd picture still.
Alex V. said on 14/Mar/07
Another good example is Gleen with Pete Steele from Type O, in the first pic of them, Pete looks like a 6'9" guy, in the second one, Pete is to me, a bit more than 6'6".
Alex V. said on 14/Mar/07
Yeah Danimal you're right, one photo is not enough to judge someone's height. In this last pic of Gleen-Robbins, Tim is not supposed to be, more than 6'5" (i think Cromwell with 6'5" "too", is a bit taller). Sadly, Gleen can´t make a second photo with Joey Ramone...
Danimal said on 13/Mar/07
What about the The Ramones guy. He looks as tall as Novoselic does next to Glenn.
glenn said on 13/Mar/07
yes,you have a point alex v.
Anthony said on 13/Mar/07
Alex, Krist is standing bolt upright in Glenn's pic with him, but in the pic Glenn has with Brad, Brad is slouching big time. If Garrett were standing up straight he'd be taller than Krist for sure.
Alex V. said on 13/Mar/07
Ok Gleen, but you have to admit that Novoselic seems extremely tall in that pic of yours, more than you with Brad Garrett. And I know either that photos can be deceiving but he looks like a giant tower.
glenn said on 13/Mar/07
i dont know what the fuss or mystery is about,krist is 6-7.period.tim is 6-5.period.
Alex V. said on 13/Mar/07
Even Brad Garrett,(6'8" or plus), doesn't look that tall next to Gleen as Novoselic does.
Gonzalo said on 13/Mar/07
Novoselic looks taller than Robbins, a couple of inches. But he is not 6`9; remember him next to Charles Barkley. He was barely taller. Unless BArkley wears lifts which is mad.
Alex V. said on 13/Mar/07
The pic of Gleen with Novoselic is kinda strange... i don't believe Novoselic being that tall next to guys like Robbins or Cromwell (the same happened with Barkley and Novoselic). Krist is around 6'7", not 6'9" or more as the picture suggest. Maybe Gleen has an answer to that...
glenn said on 12/Mar/07
robbins isnt too friendly.
Danimal said on 12/Mar/07
Compare this pic to that of Glenn and Chris Novoselic (bassist for Nirvana) where the top of Glenn's head doesn't even reach his chin and people only claim 6'6" for him.
Antin said on 12/Mar/07
looks 6-4
Gonzalo said on 12/Mar/07
Well, now Robbins looks as tall as I`d imagined. Around 6`5, as I always thought. Is he a nice guy, Glenn?
Anthony said on 11/Mar/07
Cool. And I agree. I think Robbins is between 6'5 and 6'6. 6'5.25 is my guess, if I had to get to the most exact I can think of. 6'7 looks accurate for Cromwell's peak. 6'5 looks right for today.
glenn said on 11/Mar/07
i think tim is more 6-5 and cromwell is 6-7.or was.anthony is correct.
Anthony said on 11/Mar/07
Films and photos are not always the best way to judge a peson's height. There are many factors associated with movies and photographythat can easily distort the perception of a person's height. That being said, I agree that Robbins has never looked as tall as 6'7 to me. I'd believe 6'6, though, or close to it.
Viper said on 11/Mar/07
Hes never looked 6-7. The tallest hes ever looked was in Shawshank appearing 6-6. In other movies and pictures he looks 6-5 max.
Anonymous said on 11/Mar/07
Hi Glenn,
Like the new pics. WOW, I was under the impression that both Tim Robbins and James Cromwell were around 6'4". It is more like 6'6" or 6'7". Tall boys!
Anthony said on 10/Mar/07
Tim looks 6'5 minimum in the second pic.
Danimal said on 10/Mar/07
It's been said that he was actually 6'7" in the past. In this new pic with Glenn, Tim's posture is bad. He's not straightening out.
Viper said on 10/Mar/07
Tim is looking more his height in the 2nd picture.
Anthony said on 26/Feb/07
I agree that he did look 6'6 in the film.
Viper said on 26/Feb/07
Well, he certaintly appeared it. He had a good deal of height over Freeman in that movie.
Anthony said on 25/Feb/07
Glenn is a bit closer to the camera.

Viper, I remember him wearing flats and even slippers at time in "The Shawshank Redemption". I don't think he'd wear lifts if he was already a legit 6'5.
Viper said on 25/Feb/07
Robbins looked 6-6 in Shawshank. I wonder what his footwear is.
hoops said on 24/Feb/07
i saw tim robbins today at a high school basketball tournament in manhattan that his son was playing in. he's a legit 6'5", probably a short 6'6"
Viper said on 18/Feb/07
Gonzalo, a 5-8 person looks like that next to me and Im just a flat 6-3. I dont know, I think maybe Glenn might have an advantage there.
ed said on 17/Feb/07
Tim Robbins and Phillip Noyce:
Click Here
Click Here
Gonzalo said on 14/Feb/07
It has always surprised me that Robbins doesn`t look as tall as I expected next to Glenn. I even compare that pic with the pic of Glenn next to Forrest Whitaker. Forret looks as tall or even taller than Robbins next to Robbins. Well, I have found a pic of both actors together and Robbins looks around two inches taller. It is clear that Robbins is not under 6`4.5.
Click Here
Try this and write Tim Robbins in search. You will also find that Robbins is again taller than 6`4 Philip Noyce
Gonzalo said on 31/Jan/07
In this pic Robbins looks more than an inch taller than Phillip Noyce, who stands tall at around 6`4.
Click Here
Anthony said on 21/Jan/07
I read somewhere Penn stood next to John Cleese and looked taller than Cleese. Cleese is undoubredly a legit 6'5, so that make 6'4 for Penn somewhat unbelievable. But you never know.
Viper said on 21/Jan/07
Penn looks taller than just 6-4 on TV.
Viper said on 20/Jan/07
Cantstop, I saw a guy today who I thought looked around 6-5 from a distance, but as I got up close he looked 6-8. Its hard to judge from a distance.
Glenn said on 19/Jan/07
Penn was around 6-4 to me.Tim around 6-5.6-3.5 and 6-4.5 might be more accurate.
Glenn said on 19/Jan/07 how much? not sure.
dmeyer said on 16/Jan/07
that guy could be 195 6'4.75
Gonzalo said on 16/Jan/07
Tim Robbins next to Madrid`s mayor, Alberto Ruiz Gallardón, who is at least 1`80.
Click Here
Glenn said on 11/Dec/06
I get your point Cant stop,but I can tell the difference.
Markus said on 11/Dec/06
You can't always tell someone's height down to the inch from just ONE photo.
I've seen photo's of Robbins looking taller, next to taller people than Glenn.

Judging from this pic I would say Robbins looks about 6'2,5" but I am damn sure the guy is AT LEAST 6'4", and from everything I've seen from him, even over 6'4".

Also Robbins body stands in a half turn towards the camera, while Glenn is more fronted to the cam. That can also be deceiving because the shoulders look different. Ideal would be two of them in exactly the same angle, which is not entirely the case here.
Glenn said on 11/Dec/06
Yes,photos and MOVIES can be decieving.he seemed 6-5 to me.
Gonzalo said on 11/Dec/06
You guys rely too much on Glenn`s pic with Robbins. Pictures can be deceiving. Why don`t you rely on Glenn`s opinion about Robbins height? Are you suggesting he is not even 6`4? I always thought he was 6`5. Robbins himself says 6.4`5. He is very tall anyway, taller than 90% of the people
Editor Rob said on 6/Dec/06
"But then I met Tim Robbins, who's about 6 foot 5, and next to him I looked like a midget" - Walter Matthau
Glenn said on 6/Dec/06
Never mind that,some say 6-7!
Derek said on 5/Dec/06
I don't get it. Everyone says he's a legit 6'5", but Tim himself claims 6'4 1/2".
DocHolliday said on 4/Dec/06
I just passed by him walking on 16th street last week in NY, and he is a legit 6-5
Anonymous said on 2/Dec/06
To my eyes Robbins looks to have a an inch or so on the 6'4'' guy in the photo posted by Ed below. Robbins height is always given as 6'5'' in the press and I think for once they might be right. When your that tall you don't need to add on any extra inches in your publicity bio.
Viper652 said on 30/Nov/06
I think Tim looks bare minimum 6-4 in that picture.
Franco said on 16/Nov/06
a strong 6.5 imho.
Alex V. said on 14/Nov/06
Even with "that" kind of hair, Robbins is a little taller than Noyce. This pic (nice one Ed) and the other one featuring Andre Leon Talley, put Tim in the 6'4.5" - 6'5" mark, no more doubts for me anymore...
Viper652 said on 14/Nov/06
Somebody posted that Cusack was measured at the doctors office at 6-0 even.
Anthony said on 13/Nov/06
No, Cusack is a legit 6'2. There are enough sightings of him psoted on his page to confirm that.
Fifi said on 9/Nov/06
Tim Robbins is 6'4.5, I take his word for it.
Anthony said on 30/Oct/06
Then it that case, Tim might really be 6'6. There is about 4 inches between them. Tim to me has never looked only 6'4.5.
Gus said on 17/Oct/06
I agree that he will be something between 6'5 and 6'6. 6'7 is too much, even for him. By the way, happy birthday, Mr. Robbins!
Gonzalo said on 17/Oct/06
I don´t think Tim Robbins is 6`7. I think he is 6`5, 6`6 at the most.
Danimal said on 16/Oct/06
I agree Viper, but it just seems that Jason knew that Tim WAS 6'7", as if he'd told him so.
Anthony said on 16/Oct/06
6'7 is too big. I'd buy 6'6, but nothing over that.

As a side note, today's Tim's birthday. Happy birthday, big guy!
Viper652 said on 16/Oct/06
6-7 is to far out there for Robbins. Danimal, a 6-5 Robbins could look 6-7 to somebody as short as Priestley.
Alex V. said on 15/Oct/06
It's the "problem" with Robbins, no one believes that is only 6'4.5" or 6'5". He is taller than Conan Obrien, D`Onofrio, Stephan Fry, all of them in the 6'4" mark, a little bit shorter than Andre Leon Talley who is 6'7", i said some posts ago that if he claims his height of being 6'4.5" or 6'5" we should take it serious but now i dont have any sure...
Danimal said on 15/Oct/06
Jason Priestley was on Conan Obrien a few years back and he told Conan that he was filming a movie with Tim Robbins and that Robbins is 6'7". I always believed that. He never looked the 6'4.5" or 6'5" he claimed.

[Padraig: I'd have a hard time believing anything over 6 feet 5 for Robbins]
Viper652 said on 13/Oct/06
Duncan is actually closer to 6-3. 6-4 Dwayne Wade and David Hasselhoff are taller than him in pictures.
Gus said on 13/Oct/06
Yesterday, Michael Clarke Duncan was on Conan O'Brian's show (here in Portugal there is some delay...). They discuss heights and Michael claimed to be 6'5" and Conan 6'4". When they initially shaked hands, they were standing next to each other and the difference between them wasn't clear. They appeared the same height. But, you know, they weren't still or straight, posing for a photo, therefore, is dificult to judge.
Anthony said on 11/Oct/06
I think Robbins might actually be something like 6'5.5 or 6'5.25.
Alex V. said on 11/Oct/06
I follow the tip above from Editor Rob and i saw "The Player" movie. There is a lineup scene in there, and seems that Robbins is close to 6'6" mark, however he's not full straight and his wearing flat shoes, one thing that is scary... a person with 6ft is a dwarf next to him. D`Onofrio is very tall too, but even with his cowboy boots, Tim is taller. Conclusion: For me, Tim Robbins is a 6'5"(maybe 1m95)barefoot. (It would be great to see a "clash" with these figures: Robbins, Stiles, Vaughn, Cromwell, Cleese)
sam said on 11/Oct/06
I've never bought him as being anything under 6'5". Of course, fractions of an inch are difficult to estimate, especially when someone is skying over everyone. The Andre Leon guy is the first time I've seen anyone taller next to Robbins, including in films.
Bob said on 6/Oct/06
he really looks to be at least 6-4.he can't be shorter.i have heard about tall tales about ceelebs, but not for him.he looks certainly at least 6-4.
Gonzalo said on 2/Oct/06
In the pic with Andre Leon Talley Robbins looks just two inches taller.
In this page there are some Robbins`pics in which he looks extremely tall. 6`5 at least. I don`t know he appears that "short" next to Glenn.
Click Here
Anonymous said on 2/Oct/06
Robbins seems to have a very high forehead. His eyes are set really low down in his face compared to most people.
George H said on 2/Oct/06
About Duncan: it was said when The Green Mile was first out, by the stars themselves, that he wasn't really that big and only differed about an inch with Morse. They used camera trickery and some digital trickery to make him appear extremely big. The guys muscles are massive, though.
Alex V. said on 30/Sep/06
So do you think that Morse is taller than him? I agreed when you say that Duncan is not 6'4/6'5 (even if is mentioned almost everywhere), for me, not a chance he could be so tall as Robbins.
patrina said on 30/Sep/06
tim looks kind of 194~195cm tall range..and his about 190pounds nowadays..
Viper652 said on 29/Sep/06
Duncan is closer to 6-3 in reality.
Alex V. said on 29/Sep/06
Well Cantstop25, indeed the picture proves that Tim is not that big however he is really very tall(seems to me that André is not more than 5 cm taller). Gus the name of the man is Michael Clarke Duncan and his height is estimated between 6'4 and 6'5, in "The Green Mile" movie there is another actor (David Morse) that is less than one inch short than Duncan.
Gus said on 29/Sep/06
Well, there's always a bigger fish...:-))
Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Shaquile O'Neal, etc. are all above 2.00m (over 6ft7) and are in the movie business (maybe just because they made success anywhere else first). What about the afro guy o made the convicted in Tom Hank's "Green Mile". He's BIG (in all directions). What's his name?
Viper652 said on 27/Sep/06
Why are you using transitive property Mario? Thats what he looked like to me in Shawshank. Not saying hes truly only 6-1.
Mario said on 27/Sep/06
And what height would you give James Woods and Keanu Reeves if Morgan Freeman is 6 ft 1? 5 ft 8 1/2 to woods and 5 ft 11 to reeves? It just doesn't make sense.
Viper652 said on 27/Sep/06
Morgan Freeman looked 6-1 next to him.
Alex V. said on 26/Sep/06
I have seen that there is another user named "Alex", very sorry to you didn´t know... (His comment: "Alex says on 10/Jul/06...")

J. said on 25/Sep/06
I'm just saying, respect the guy for the height he wants to be known as. If he says he's under 6'5", then let's just take his word for it.
Viper652 said on 25/Sep/06
Hes nothing below his stated 6-4 1/2, thats for sure.
Alex said on 25/Sep/06
J. has said what i was trying to say. 6'5" or 6'6" has a certain impact but he is not that height so why keep forcing?! For instance when he tells "I'm six foot four and a half and I have a temper" (with an "effort"...), "6-feet, 5-inches on a good day"... It´s all here...
Zach said on 25/Sep/06
Why someone might round down their height, Dolph Lundgren explains:

In impact magazine he revealed that height caused him a problem initially: "I was turned down at my first audition for Rocky 4 for being too tall, I was 6ft 5in and you were supposed to be 6ft 3in maximum. I didn't know what the casting call was for and I just showed up, they asked me how tall I was, I said 6ft 5in and they said "Next!".
Zach said on 25/Sep/06
This guy towered over Morgan Freeman, he's 6'5 at least.
Jason said on 25/Sep/06
Why would he downgrade his height to 6'4 1/2'' if he's 6'5''? 6'4 1/2'', 6'5'' - what's the difference? :) If he was concerned about his height, he'd downgrade by more than half an inch I think.
Glenn said on 25/Sep/06
Ok J.I guess Im stupid.6-4.5 or 6-5,who cares,he fukin tall.I mean its cool to have the exact stat.but I dont call that honest.
J. said on 25/Sep/06
Well, for some reason people are insisting he's a solid 6'5" or taller, when he's saying that he's UNDER that figure or just barely around it. That's how he is being honest. It wasn't like I had to explain.
Mario said on 24/Sep/06
Some people who is really tall tend to round there height down. I'm not saying that Robbins is lying, but renember that he has once said that he was also 6 ft 5. And to be honest he looks taller than 194 cm, next to legitimate 188cm guy's like Del Toro.
Glenn said on 23/Sep/06
I dont get it.whats so honest when your around 6-5?
Mr. E said on 23/Sep/06
I think that Robbins may be 6'5" maybe even 6'6"....hard to say. He towers over Eastwood who was once a legit 6'4" coould be a "Hollywood" thing where Tim undercuts himself to get more leading man roles. Sounds stupid, I know, but I say Robbins could be 6'5"
J. said on 22/Sep/06
I agree, Alex. People try to dispute but Tim's just being honest. A Hollywood rarity.
Alex said on 21/Sep/06
I think that he is one of the rare people that tells his right height (barefoot)...
Gus said on 21/Sep/06
Last night, it the Biography channel, was Sean Penn's life. On a picture about Mystic River, I saw, side by side, Tim, Sean and Clint (Eastwood, who directs the film). Tim seamed - at least - 2 inches above Clint. I'm beeing very conservative, it may be 3 inches. The difference was that clear!
George H said on 20/Sep/06
From all the photographic material and few movies I've seen of this guy, he strikes me as one long, lean fella. He sure gives the impression to be well above 6'4", possibly even above 6'5" or in the 6'6" range. That last thing might be because he has a rather narrow built. I mean, he's not as massive looking as for instance Rock Hudson was when he was Robbins' age. Hudson had much bigger shoulders compared to the narrowness of his hips, whereas Robbins' more has the physique of a ruler rofl. Either way, if he describes himself as 6'5" on a good day, I think he's downplaying his height by about an inch. I know plenty of 6'5" guys (both my sons hover around that height) and although their built is more similar to Hudson's than Robbins', they usually don't give the beanstalk impression in photos that Robbins does. JMO
Gus said on 19/Sep/06
Ok. 6'6" is 1.98m. I agree with 6'5". Is realistic and Tim himself mention this figure. But again, the guy is never vertically stretched! Why? Why is he always looking so shy? If he move the shoulders backwards, chest forward, chin up, then we'll be closer to the truth, don't you agree?
dmeyer said on 19/Sep/06
i dont think he is less than 195
Anonymous said on 19/Sep/06
I think that this guy should be knocked back to 6'5''. He was in the film IQ with the English actor Stephen Fry who is himself 6'4.5''. Robbins was I seem to recall a little taller. Not by much but you could see a difference.
Viper652 said on 19/Sep/06
Gus, 6-7? Thats a huge stretch man.
Gonzalo said on 19/Sep/06
Gus, the guy you mention in the player is Vincent D`Onofrio, listed here at 6`3 1/2. There is also a pic of him next to Glenn. He looked slightly shorter than Robbins in thta movie. However, there are people in this site who says D`Onofrio was taller. Different opinions
Gus said on 19/Sep/06
The film in wich he does a lineup scene is Robert Altman's "The Player". Incidentally, in that movie, the guy he fights and almost kills (is a suspect in the murder) is about his height. I don't know the name of the actor but I've seen him in other movie and he's really tall! But again, Tim never stand straight up alongside no one. He's allways bended forward like is a shame about being so much tall than anyone around him. That's my theory. The man looks at his height as a curse, or something like that (sorry for the misspelling, I'm portuguese...)
J. said on 18/Sep/06
This article, has Robbins describing himself as "6-feet, 5-inches on a good day": Click Here

[Editor Rob: good find]
Gus said on 18/Sep/06
All the info on the net is very inaccurate. We can only judge by comparaison. He looks taller than Vaughn, Conan, Freeman, Will Ferrel, who are - definetly - all above 6"2/6"3. And taller than the tallest guy on 90's SNL (I don´t remember his name, I think is Kevin Nealon?). I saw one episode where Tim hosted and he was the tallest guy around. And bearfooted! In the final farwell he offered flowers to his wife (who was in the audience) and was barefooted among everyone and (much more) taller than all the people on stage. I thing is shy about is heigth (he may consider it as an handicap in is business) and is always bended or bear footed. If he stands vertically, chin up, he could near to 2 meters high (almost 6"7)
Viper652 said on 13/Sep/06
I would consider Ryan Styles to be huge.
Alex said on 14/Aug/06
If you all try seeing by google you will see that everything is almost correct... For example: 6 ft 4.5 inch = 194.31 centimeters ;
6 ft 5 inch = 195.58 centimeters ; 6 ft 6 inch = 198.12 , centimeters and so on... You can see that the difference between 6ft4.5 inch and 6ft5 is irrelevant but is enough for us to see when two person are close to each other
J. said on 20/Jul/06
What convinced you to downgrade him, Rob?

[Editor Rob: just giving him what he wants to be known as, 4.5 not 5.]
Jake said on 19/Jul/06
I think he would be the same height as Vince Vaughn too - 6'4.5"+.
sam said on 11/Jul/06
Unfortunately, in Robbins's and Vaughn's only film as a co-stars, Anchorman, they do not appear in the same shot (although they do appear in the same scenes).
Larry said on 11/Jul/06
Well, "half baked" is like most of my cooking, but Tim surely looks at least 6'4.5". Can't say I've ever seen him standing by Vince Vaughn... would be interesting.
Alex said on 10/Jul/06
He looks 6'5. I think him and Vince Vaughn would be the same height.
Larry said on 10/Jul/06
Rob - INTERESTING!!! Good experiment. In photographs where our footwear is similar (as it usually is) that's the difference between my wife & me. When we were married., she wore 3" heels, but doesn't like them. So, you have a graduated series of these (known as a linear progression)? Neat! :-)

[Editor Rob: yeah, a half-baked linear progression, I'd meant to put the person taking photos slightly higher, althought it doesn't really make that much difference]
leonari said on 8/Jul/06
k77: so 5 inches is 20 cm....YEAH. Sorry but did you went to school at all?? or were bad at math in school or what?? 5 inches is 12, 7 cm and 20 cm are 7.8 inches so almost 8 inches!!!!!! FOOL. I don't want to be rude but idiotic claims like these are just proof ignorance and lack of education. Thats a fact and quite sad.
k77 said on 8/Jul/06
e posture glenn stand next to tim..makes tim looks to be just 20cm(5inches) taller than glenn.. anyone agree?? that makes tim looks more like 6"3.5(1.92m)..
Anthony said on 9/Jun/06
I jsut watched "The Shawshank Redemption" for the first time today, and now I'm starting to think he may be 6'6 on the nose. In the movie, he looks 3 - 4 inches taller than Freeman, even when he's hunching. Either Freeman is only about 6'1 rather than 6'2.5 or Tim's 6'6. And considering that in "Batman Begins" Freeman had a good 2 inches on 6' Christian Bale, I'd say that Robbins being bigger than 6'5 is a disticnt possibility.
Viper652 said on 23/May/06
I would love to see Robbins and Vince Vaughn together in a picture. I bet Tim would be an inch taller.
Viper652 said on 22/May/06
Gonzalo, I dont think he could be under 6-5. I find it hard to beleive he is his stated 6-4.5.
Gonzalo said on 22/May/06
To say Tim Robbins is 6`3 is ludicrous. Check the movies, the pics. Compare him to his co-stars. He can`t be under 6`4
Anonymous said on 20/May/06
Tim Robbins is the tallest 6'3'' guy I've ever seen.
Viper652 said on 19/May/06
I cant see Tim Robbins being as short as 6-3.
dmeyer said on 19/May/06
i can see the guy less than 6'5"
rj said on 19/May/06
I was on set with Tim Robbins and stood next to him. He is a solid 6'3", but with a pair of boots on he would be 6'5". In the picture of Glenn and Tim, it appears that Tim is indeed 6'5" IN SHOES. The camera makes skinny people seem taller.
Frank2 said on 3/May/06
Tim Robbins is 5'10" and borrows Arnold's lifts in order to look 6'5".
Anonymous said on 22/Apr/06
In Zathura, he is almost to the top of the door frame (the scene at the beginning where he walks into his daughter's room), and I think standard door frames are 6'8". So yeah, 6'5" or even more.
Mikex said on 21/Apr/06
This guy is not under 6'5''. He made a film with the English comic actor Stephen Fry who is a very big man at over 6'4'' himself. Robbins I seem to remember appeared a little taller.
JackByrd said on 18/Apr/06
I just went thru about 60 Tim Robbins photos and folks, I'm gonna say that he is averaging down his height. He is a solid 6-6 IMHO. In many photographs, he was not just slouching, he was literally bending into the picture frame. You dont see that with slightly above average individuals, this is reserved for people in the 6-6 range. I also noticed the difference in height between him and his wife Susan Sarandon who is above average height for a female. With heels on she would more than likely be approximately 5-10+. She is barely above shoulder level. If he were only 6-4.5 as many here suggest there would not be such a disparity. I truly believe Robbins has had to round down his height as it is near impossible to cast actors 6-5 and above with a few notable exceptions. Vince Vaughn is one of them.
Gonzalo said on 11/Apr/06
He looks 6`5, that`s for sure. He towers over everybody. However, I expected him to be taller next to Glenn. I have cousins who are 1`92-94 cm and I feel like dwarf next to them. Glenn doesn´t look that short next to Robbins. Glenn, he was 6`5, wasn`t he?

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.