How tall is Tom Cruise - Page 3

Add a Comment4141 comments

Average Guess (915 Votes)
5ft 7.21in (170.7cm)
Imbo said on 4/Sep/19
Click Here yeah, look at the minute 4:52 there is no way 171,5 Tom and 173 James.
Imbo said on 4/Sep/19
Click Here yeah, look at the minute 4:52 there is no way 171,5 Tom and 173 James.
Pierre said on 24/Aug/19
Click Here = here Tom with James Corden .This time i think they have around the same heels because they do parachute jumping so i think elevator shoes are bad for this exercise(landing). they are standing close one to the other one at around 5:04 .James corden is looking a little bit taller than him.

Now James Corden and 5"8'Michael Douglas = Click Here

James Corden tiptoeing next to Samuel Anderson slouching = Click Here

Rob next to Samuel Anderson standing straight = Click Here

Tom is clearly under 5"7' to my eyes
YautjaMk said on 24/Aug/19
Click Here
Solid 1.71. with 1.66 peak Dustin Hoffman
Aaron Rosales said on 12/Aug/19
My aunt saw him walking close her house in lake Tahoe. She says he used to live quite close. She says he was a bit shorter than me and I'm 175 cm. My guess is 171.5
Pierre said on 11/Aug/19
But the particularity of sophisticated elevator shoes is that they don't look really suspicious...
Parker said on 9/Aug/19
Tom is looking taller in every picture with Zico
Click Here

IMO, Tom's shoes do not look suspicious at all

I'll let people judge for themselves.
Pierre said on 8/Aug/19
Tom can look sometimes taller than Zico but he wear high shoes in this event and has probably an advantage = Click Here .I agree with Mrs Castro ,sometimes football listings are a little bit generous.Pics with Tom date from 2013 Zico is 60 here ,with a long career as a footballer and has maybe lost height.
Click Here = Zico next to Guido Buchwald listed 6"2'=looks a weak 5"7' here imo
Mrs. Castro said on 6/Aug/19
Parker, yes, football listings are incorrects, and usually overrated. Zico, probably, was shorter than 172cm.
Parker said on 6/Aug/19
In 2010 photos, Zico (probably shorter than 1980's) was taller than Tom Cruise.
Click Here

No chance of estimating who is taller in that pic, and where does 172 for Zico come from.? Football listings? Notoriously incorrect
cmillzz said on 4/Aug/19
yep, he’s nothing more than a solid 5’7.
Mrs. Castro said on 3/Aug/19
Zico was 172cm in 1980's.

In 2010 photos, Zico (probably shorter than 1980's) was taller than Tom Cruise.
Click Here

171cm max to Cruise today.
viper said on 3/Aug/19
He's listed too high here.

He's 5-7.

I can believe 5-6 3/4 at an absolute low at night
Bradley said on 31/Jul/19
The wolfer is wrong, he's been as listed or 5-8 for decades. The press won't ask his height or his management would 86 them next Scientology questions.
mande2013 said on 31/Jul/19
@Wolfman: I believe you. I'm also short: less than an inch taller than you are. I've also seen Vincent Cassel in person, ran into him by an ATM machine in Paris. I swear he's only average height. Nothing like the 6'1+ Rob has him at. Actress heights tend to be less inflated I think. I've crossed paths with Sophie Marceau, as well, and she seemed Rob's listing more or less. I've seen Tom Cruise in person, but I was a small kid at the time so couldn't really judge, although even then, I could make out he was shorter than average.
Wolfman said on 27/Jul/19
Go with two guys who had no stake in the game: Bill Goldman and Gore Vidal. They both spent years in H'wood writing screenplays and both remarked constantly about the shocking shortness of male movie stars. (Read Vidal's seven-novel US history cycle and in the latter four books he spends a lot of page time on this, with fictional movie settings and fictional stars discussing this phenomenon.) … I grew up next door to a guy who went on to spend ten seasons in the NBA, about half that in Sacramento and Oakland. The first party I went to with him, in L.A., was in 1994. Cruise was there. I'm short: 5-feet-5 and one-half inches, barefoot. Cruise was maybe an inch taller than me. Eddie Murphy was there, too; also a very short guy, just slightly taller than Cruise. In New York one night we got on an elevator and there was Bruce Willis. Smaller frame than I imagined, thinner through the shoulders, and a big head. Didn't look six feet tall. My NBA buddy is 6-feet-9, and his brother is a legit 5-11, played tailback at Syracuse. Willis was not as tall as the brother, who was there with us. … Unless these actors were former athletes, like Dwayne Johnson, they're almost always tiny people.
Pierre said on 26/Jul/19
@Leo =Another with Sean Penn slouching and bare-head= Click Here Sean Penn " 5"8' " next to Georges Harrison 5"10' = Click Here Click Here next to Gary Oldman 5"8.5' = Click Here Click Here
Leo2001 said on 24/Jul/19
With Sean Penn(173cm):Click Here
Voiceless Dental said on 24/Jul/19
It's amazing to me that Tom Cruise hasn't seemed to have ever addressed or been asked about his height since that quote in 1988.
Voiceless Dental said on 24/Jul/19
Danimal 5'9 3/4": So? how would a random magazine from 30 years ago be privy to any special knowledge
Danimal 5'9 3/4" said on 21/Jul/19
I've said it dozens of times in the past and I'll say it again, I had a magazine in the late 80's, that had an article on celebrities TRUE heights and they had Tom Cruise at 5'6 3/4". That is what Tom WAS 30 years ago. He's probably around 5'6" today, barefoot.
Danimal 5'9 3/4" said on 21/Jul/19
The tale of the tape has Tom at 5'5" (at 10:50): Click Here
Johan 185 cm said on 14/Jul/19
Click Here

Cruise and Corden

Click Here

How he can LOOK with bigger footwear.

He seems to be pretty similar to Corden.
Bradley said on 11/Jul/19
Add a quarter and that makes cents and sense to Spence.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 8/Jul/19
@ houss - Too right I do! Well said!
Warren said on 8/Jul/19
He's definitely one of the youngest looking of fifties for actor ever!
houss said on 6/Jul/19
@miss sandy cowell , do you think he deserve an Oscar after all this years?
Pierre said on 4/Jul/19
Without his helps he's probably shorter than Mimi Rogers...Do the maths
Arslan 6'10 210 CM said on 4/Jul/19
Tom gets 5’8 from me
Parker said on 3/Jul/19
Original said on 2/Jul/19
Average Guess is about correct imo, 171 Peak, closer to 170 nowadays if not 170 flat. 172 is just too much

If 172 is too much, what about Felix Baumgartner.? He is listed at 5'7 on most sites (not here tho). Unfortunatley his web designer cannot convert imperial to metric so he is listed at 5'7 and 5'8 on his own website Click Here

Here is Felix with 5'11 (now) listed John Travolta Click Here
With Harrison Ford Click Here

Couple with Tom Click Here Click Here

172 is not too much for Tom IMO, in fact I would not be surprised if he was 173.
Johan 185 cm said on 3/Jul/19
5'7.5" today, maybe 5'7.75" peak.

Morning out of bed in his youth : 5'8.5" and he rounded to 5'9". Nowadays he will be lucky to hit 5'8" out of bed with age causing his disks to expand less.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 3/Jul/19
💝😁🎁🎂 Happy Birthday Tom! 🎂🎁😁💝

Yes, it's one of our biggest film star's Birthdays today; it happens to be that of Tom Cruise. Today, our boy turns 57, and still looks the bee's knees! 🐝

My favourite films of his are 'Rain Man' and the Christmassy movie 'Eyes Wide Shut', in which he stars with his one-time wife, Nicole Kidman. It opens with the married couple getting stoned on cannabis, and Nicole becoming well and truly spiteful, verbally, which is so often the worst kind. Tom puts on a fine performance as a deeply hurt man, and his actions thereafter endanger his very life. That scene in which all the conglomerates are in a circle - in masks - is really frightening and mysterious. They are REVOLTING masks, but I find Tom's to be quite amusing!

Of course, when people are in a circle, opportunities abound to make height comparisons, but this film stars lots of women too - beautiful, model-type girls, who seem on the tall side, so Tom still looks rather below average, but nothing outrageous, by any means. I'd say Tom looked around 5ft7.5 in this.

As for 'Rain Man', this film was truly a one-of-a-kind. It was the first movie to go into detail with the subject of autism, and though there have been others since, and perfectly good ones, nobody dealt with the subject quite as well as Dustin Hoffman and Tom Cruise. Both actors are below average, Dustin being shorter than Tom, but they made for a realistic-looking couple of brothers, height-wise, some two decades or so apart in age.

The latter of the films I described, 'Eyes Wide Shut', was the last film to be made by Stanley Kubrick.

Have a great Birthday Tom!


Original said on 2/Jul/19
Average Guess is about correct imo, 171 Peak, closer to 170 nowadays if not 170 flat. 172 is just too much.
Parker said on 1/Jul/19
5'9 in footwear is what I put for Cryer, so yes we agree again. 5'8.5 barefoot, 5'9 range in footwear.
Pierre said on 1/Jul/19
0Parker = Jon Cryer has no pics with Rob or Josh and is listed 5"8.5' here not 5"9'(36 votes are giving him easily more 5"8'than 5"9'),and Mimi is not the left girl in little heels but the girl next to her in massive heels in your pic.In all the pics Mimi /Milo, Milo is always easily taller than her and you can see in the complete vue i posted Click Here Milo's legs are not perfectly straight too and even his neck isn't straight...And she's closer to the camera...I don't talk about the angle of the pic that is in favor of Mimi(see the angle of the wall behind them)She's never looking like Rob next to Milo if both are standing straight,she's never 5"8' range
Parker said on 30/Jun/19
@Pierre - Yes I agree on 5'8 for Mimi
Here's another pic of Mimi and Milo
Click Here Mimi with loose posture dropping height as in your pic, with Milo bolt upright in enhanced footwear, possibly tiptoeing like he was with Rob

Here's Mimi looking slightly taller than 5'9 in footwear Jon Cryer Click Here
Pierre said on 29/Jun/19
@Parker Very interesting.If you want to search a little bit in web you will find the height of Chris Ciaffa on multiple sites.Tom Berenger slouch here and what are Mimi's heels...Well you will say me thank you probably for this pics too... = Click Here = Here in the top pic from 2007 with Rob/Milo ventimiglia in same posture(and no mention of advantageous shoes like the recent pic from 2012) you can see how Rob (so a real 5"8') is looking next to him ,and Milo is standing closer to the camera here(long hairs don't count of course...)= about the same height even with the advantage of the camera for Milo = Now Mimi Rodgers and Milo about the same posture like the 2007 top pic with Rob but this time Mimi standing closer to the camera(hairs don't count here too of course) ...Click Here Click Here = Click Here she looks a little bit like Milo next 5"10.25' Josh but both at the same distance to the camera ...
Johan 185 cm said on 28/Jun/19
Hmm so 5'8" Mimi Rogers is same height roughly as Cruise who would have thought. I will eat my hat if that producer is really 5'7", she is at least 5'9.5" in heels there and he is an inch taller. Noway under 5'10" in shoes, lowest I would guess him is 5'9".
Parker said on 28/Jun/19
@Pierre - Thanks for the pics, Tom looks very close to 5'8 listed Mimi Rogers there.

Mimi with 6'3 Peter Coyote looks close to 5'11 in her heels
Click Here

Not sure where you got that ridiculous listing of 5'7 for Chris Ciaffa, I cannot believe you would have got it from this site, but happy to be proved wrong.
Chris looks 5'10/5'11 to me. Same as 5' 11 Tom Berenger with Mimi here
Click Here
Pierre said on 26/Jun/19
Tom Cruise and Mimi Rogers in sneakers (Mimi slouch in the first and second pic but watch the difference of height of their shoulders) = Click Here Click Here Click Here
Now Chris Ciaffa listed 5"7' and Mimi with an advantage of heels = Click Here Click Here here probably the same heels = Click Here
Aaron r said on 23/Jun/19
I think he is 171
cmillzz said on 20/Jun/19
Not quite sure how tall Arnie is today, but I’d be surprised if he’s a full 5’11 still.
Peter175 said on 18/Jun/19
Tom Cruise probably has around 15-20 lbs on Bieber.

I wouldn't go under 160lbs for Tom's weight in the last movie he did (Mission Impossible)
Warren said on 18/Jun/19
I can't quite believe that Tom is almost 57 y/o.
Pierre said on 18/Jun/19
Waow Arnold is very probably under 5"11' now! Here is Arnold next to Kristanna Loken = Click Here . Kristanna Loken and 5"10.25' Josh = Click Here Young Arnold and a 5"11' guy, Chet Yorton,not even perfectly straight = Click Here .
Johan 185 cm said on 17/Jun/19
Click Here

Tom next to a shrunken 5'11" Arnie. Has to be 5'6" right? What a joke.
Pierre said on 14/Jun/19
Sean Penn slouching and Tom Cruise with a cap = Click Here Sean Penn and 5"10'Georges Harrison = Click Here .Sean Penn and Gary Oldman 5"8.5' = Click Here . Click Here =Next to Mimi Rogers (don't know her shoes) Click Here .Chris Ciaffa listed 5"7' next to her= Click Here
Johan 185 cm said on 14/Jun/19
Guest66 said on 13/Jun/19
@MD, I think that Bieber’s proportions and build benefit him to look taller over Cruise in public’s eyes, even though most likely they’re super close in height. Plus Bieber didn’t fight any big guys on the screen lol, and btw I hope that Bieber’s call to fight Cruise is a joke, otherwise it’s really a dick move to call out a 57 year old guy to fight when you’re 25.


That old guy is in better shape than he is. If its not a joke he is in for a public humiliation.
cmillzz said on 14/Jun/19
Yes, Cruise would easily win against Bieber.
TheBat said on 13/Jun/19
Tom would easily win against Justin. Tom is probably 5'7.75" still, maybe 5'7.5".
Guest66 said on 13/Jun/19
@MD, I think that Bieber’s proportions and build benefit him to look taller over Cruise in public’s eyes, even though most likely they’re super close in height. Plus Bieber didn’t fight any big guys on the screen lol, and btw I hope that Bieber’s call to fight Cruise is a joke, otherwise it’s really a dick move to call out a 57 year old guy to fight when you’re 25.
Bradley said on 12/Jun/19
Cruise would edge out Biebs by 1/2". In a race on the Ventura Freeeway on one of those Agoura Hills st8-aways Biebs would win, he's had lots of practice.
Johan 185 cm said on 12/Jun/19
You wouldn't be able to tell who was taller if they stood next to one another. I would bet on Tom though, that people believe 5'9" for Bieber is just a joke. His gf is 5'6" and he isn't even 2 inches taller.

Tom would destroy him in a fight, doesn't say much my grnadmother would destroy Bieber.
Y07 said on 11/Jun/19
Hey Rob, who do you think will win in a facedown? Tom or JB? Or do you think the height difference will be hard to tell?
Editor Rob
They might be so close that it is hard to tell.
cmillzz said on 11/Jun/19
Bieber would have a slight edge on Cruise imo, but obviously not two inches.
viper said on 11/Jun/19
Gotta love the fake news media.

Love him or hate him, Trump was so right about that
MD said on 10/Jun/19
So, Justin Bieber jokingly challenged Tom Cruise to an MMA fight on Twitter:

Click Here

But that's not what interested me. As you can see, someone came up with an estimated Tale-of-the-Tape. If you read the the comments, it's not the ridiculous 5'9" Bieber estimate that keeps getting brought up, but the 5'7" listing for Cruise. It was just interesting that all these years later how much of the public has bought into the propaganda of Tom Cruise as being unusually short. I'm of the mind that he's closer to 5'7" than 5'8", but it was funny how much taller the general public thought Bieber was than Cruise, when we have Cruise taller (barely) than Bieber here. lol
Pierre said on 10/Jun/19
@Parker=Then take in consideration Leonardo is standing in a poor posture and he's maybe not exactly 5"11' or more= here next to 6"0.75' Barack he looks under 5"11' = Click Here .
Parker said on 8/Jun/19
Pierre said on 6/Jun/19
@Parker = you think elevator shoes don't give you a big help?

Depends what you mean by big help. Here with 6' in shoes Decaprio Click Here Cruise looks to be standing at 5'10. Do I think he's getting 3-4 inches from his shoes? Absolutely not. 2.5 inches,? possible.

Rob started out with Cruise listed at 171 before increasing it to 172. I think this listing is spot on IMO
Pierre said on 6/Jun/19
@Parker = you think elevator shoes don't give you a big help? = Click Here = here Georges Clooney slouching next to Brad Pitt (wearing very probably with little helps but...)=his eyes are comfortably higher than Brad's eyes especially by considering his poor posture.Other event = Click Here ....
Parker said on 5/Jun/19
Ok - Lets go with Pena in 1 inch footwear standing next to Cruise. So Pena will be standing at 5'8 in footwear.
Click Here
What's Cruise standing height in the above pic?

IMO, impossible for Cruise to be under 5'7 barefoot.
Pierre said on 3/Jun/19
@Parker = Like Rob said Michael shoes are looking nothing more than classic skate shoes ,then big max 1 inch help imo .Generally Tom looks under 5"10' if considering Michael Pena is a full 5"7'= Click Here = here Tom closer to the camera Michael slouching a little bit .Here Michael closer to the camera= Click Here .Here Tom forces his posture = Click Here .5"10' here?Hum...
Parker said on 31/May/19
Pierre said on 30/May/19
Tom has some"little" help in your pic

Pierre - A 5'6 guy would need 4 inches 'little help' to go from 5'6 to 5'10. If you think those shoes he's wearing with Pena are giving him 4 inches, we'll just have to agree to disagree. No worries.
Pierre said on 30/May/19
@Parker=And Tom Cruise classic shoes here???Hum... Click Here when he's taller than Michael Pena he looks nearly the same height as Andrew garfield listed 5"10.5'....(Andrew is probably a little bit shorter than his list imo)Imo Tom has some"little" help in your pic.
jriggs said on 29/May/19
Now he's probably 5'7 (170cm) peak was no doubt 172cm
Parker said on 28/May/19
5'7 listed Michael Pena and Tom.
Click Here

Looking at the footwear, Pena's looks suspicious.
Editor Rob
I think those are just one of the skate shoes that have a well-padded tongue, like an inch thick padding, making them look bulky.
Pierre said on 27/May/19
My opinion is =Tom Cruise wear massive helps here next to Pablo Motos...And Pablo is maybe not exactly 5"4.75' ... = here next to Ryan Reynolds(listed 6"2') Ryan looks comfortably one head taller than him = Click Here Click Here
Arthas said on 27/May/19
I don't see more than one inch difference in RainMan with Dustin Hoffman.. I think 170 should be accurate
Parker said on 26/May/19
Johan 185 cm said on 23/May/19
There are people who even say he is 5'4"-5'5" and they are being serious.

There are people that think he's under 5'7 and are being serious.

Here's Pablo Motos with 5'4/5'5 Daniel Radcliffe
Click Here

Here he is with Cruise
Click Here

You will now get people replying that Cruise has 4 inch hidden lifts in those shoes, and be serious.
Editor Rob
Pablo in air max over 1 inch and Cruise in not much different boots.
Arthas said on 25/May/19
Rob, could you list him as a flat 170cm instead of 172?
Editor Rob
If I thought he was only 170cm I'd put him at it, but I'm still not convinced he was as short as that.
Shortkid said on 23/May/19
170-171 no more no less
Johan 185 cm said on 23/May/19
Bobby 5ft 10 said on 18/May/19
I can't understand all this consensus about Tom Cruise being little. Family Guy makes fun of him all the time making him seem like he's as tall as a little kid, when that's not true at all. If anything, I'd call Tom weak average but certainly not short, not anywhere close to that in fact.


There are people who even say he is 5'4"-5'5" and they are being serious. Josh Hutcherson or Daniel Radcliffe in particular who is 5'4.5" and believes Cruise is little...not realising that Cruise would be towering over him.

Cruise just has been saddled with that image partly because of his marriage to Kidman a legit 5'10 ranger and Holmes a 5'9" range woman. Those are tall women and they also wore heels so ofc a guy under average would look short.
Pierre said on 20/May/19
@Bobby = I personnally just try to guess his real height here nothing more than that,you can see generally in my comments i explain why i guess x or y height.But if you're not ok with my guess and you guess Tom is even 5"11' it's your right and i have personally no problems with that.
Bobby 5ft 10 said on 18/May/19
I can't understand all this consensus about Tom Cruise being little. Family Guy makes fun of him all the time making him seem like he's as tall as a little kid, when that's not true at all. If anything, I'd call Tom weak average but certainly not short, not anywhere close to that in fact.
Pierre said on 16/May/19
@Johan = Jeremy Renner is about the same height as Rob in the pic but imo was wearing big high shoes in this event with maybe something in that=his shoes were looking like this= Click Here .Curiously when he walk with a good step like here his rear right heel always touch the floor or is just a little bit higher than the floor.When a guy walk with a good step like him his heel (with a classic shoes without internal heel) is easily higher than the floor like here = Click Here .
Johan 185 cm said on 15/May/19
Click Here

Here he is with 5'8.5" Jeremy Renner, how anyone can think he measures under 5'7" boggles the mind.

Click Here

Tom with self claimed 5'10" Simon Pegg ( reality weak 5'9")
Click Here

Does he get a boost from footwear? Yes he does but its not 3-4 inches.
Erik C. said on 9/May/19
I'll give this lil fella 5'7"- 5'7.5" range. And he might wake up at the 3/4 that Rob list him at. And then dips down to a flat 5'7" at his low.
Denali said on 8/May/19
5'7" flat peak, and maybe a fraction less now as he is starting to hit his late '50s.
Pierre said on 6/May/19
@Ong= Katie Holmes compared to Robert Patrick or Serena Williams is under 5"9' range,she's max 5"8' to my eyes
cmillzz said on 5/May/19
No taller than 170cm. Especially these days.
Jay Ong said on 4/May/19
@Pierre = Yes it will be very hard to judge ones person's height with footwear because even if he was only wearing vans or chuck taylor converse shoes which only gives us 0.5 to 0.6 inch additional height, we can still put lifts inside of it. Like mine, when i wear vans shoes I can put a lift inside like folded socks which will give me instant 0.5 to 0.75 additonal boost aside from vans itself. But, I see a photo of Tom Cruise with Katie Holmes barefoot at the boat in Sydney. I see no more than 1.5 to 1.75 inch difference. Katie at 5'9". Making Tom at 5'7 1/4" at worst.
Pierre said on 2/May/19
@Ong = Of course it will be hard to post a pic with Tom 5"6' because you probably know very well he wear lots of times advantageous shoes.His partner in Top Gun gave an interview inwhich she said Tom was wearing lifts in the scenes next to her,i think it's very easy to try this interview in web.I posted recently my guess with pics of Sean Penn next to others celebrities and next to Tom...Show me your pics now if you want.
Parker said on 2/May/19
Pierre said on 1/May/19
There is a big probability he's max 5"6'

Its all about opinions Pierre - IMO its a zero chance he's max 5'6. He is minimum 5'7, Max 5'8, again IMO.
Jay Ong said on 2/May/19
@Pierre = Sean Penn is at 5'8". Cruise is atleast 5'7". Also, difference between them is half inch to 3/4 inch. I don't see a full inch difference. That makes Tom a 5'7.25" to 5'7.5". Can you please post a photo that can support your 5'6" claim on Cruise?
Pierre said on 1/May/19
@Jay =Why not chance?Next to some Guys Sean Penn looks max 5"7' and Tom looks a little bit shorter than Sean...Do the maths again...There is a big probability he's max 5"6'
Jay Ong said on 29/Apr/19
@Pierre = Weak 5'6" for Cruise??? Not chance. You state that meaning he could be around 5'5.5" to 5'5.75" and there's no way he is that short. He is a minimum 5'7" and worst is at 5'6.75" and that will only happen to him if he had a bad day. Meaning less sleep and restless days. Tom Cruise is really a 5'7" guy. In a reality he's 5'7.25" now as before he is 5'7.5".
RichardSpain said on 29/Apr/19
Short to be a Hero!

To me Tom Cruise is 171/172 cm barefoot not more than that
Pierre said on 27/Apr/19
@Jay Ong=For me Tom looks around one inch shorter than Sean Penn and Sean Penn seems to me a weak 5"7'.My guess is Tom is around a weak 5"6'.
Jay Ong said on 26/Apr/19
@Pierre = What would you guess Tom Cruise height? Honestly for me 5'7" is the smallest he can APPEAR in the public and highest would be 5'7 1/2". Depending on the situation. Good sleep 5'7 1/2" bad sleep would be 5'7" to 5'7 1/4".
Pierre said on 25/Apr/19
@Jay Ong = Tom Cruise is know to wear advantageous shoes so compare him to Mimi Rodgers is just another comparison.And she's maybe not exactly 5"8' range = Click Here = here next to Crhis Ciaffa listed 5"7' when around the same heels ...Other= Click Here
Pierre said on 25/Apr/19
@Johan = She never looks 5"9' if Patrick Stewart is 5"8',you have to take in consideration her hairs(Patrick has no hairs),and next to Serena Williams who is standing in a poor posture she looks max 5"8'.
Jay Ong said on 25/Apr/19
I think Rob has pinned TC right on. My mistake on my previous post. Everyone please google "Tom Cruise and Mimi Rogers pictures" and you will see it in getty image page a lot of pictures of them together. I see TC's peak height at 5'7 1/2" next to 5'8" Mimi Rogers. As for now, Tom mis at 5'7 1/4" since he lost a quarter of inch during his stunt works in his action films.

Conclusion: peak height: 5'7 1/2"
current height: 5'7 1/4"
Johan 185 cm said on 25/Apr/19

Katie is wearing ballerina flats there next to Patrick Stewart. Thats just a good example of her looking indeed 5'9".

Click Here

Here he is in lifts but she has a good heel as well, no less than 6' with that heel. I would give him 179 cm in shoes there possibly even close to 180 cm. How would a guy 170 cm get that high?

That last pic I showed

Click Here

Katie is looking down, she is still 3cm + taller than him.

Anywhere between 171-172cm is fair for Tom.
Pierre said on 22/Apr/19
@Dave = Dave why is it so important for you i give my guess?I don't understand?
Dave98 said on 21/Apr/19
@Pierre So what is your current stand on Tom Cruise's height?? Just Curious to know as I think Tom is around 171 cm flat!
Mister lennon said on 21/Apr/19
Penn could be 5'7 range. Yes.
But i dont see a peak oldman so short as 5"8. He looked everu bit of 5,'9.
Pierre said on 21/Apr/19
@Mister Lennon=yeah,or Gary Oldman is really 5"8.5' and then Sean Penn is max 5"7'.Next to Georges Harrison Sean looks always 5"7' max.But we can think Georges harrison's height is not good too...
Mister lennon said on 20/Apr/19
Penn could be a weak or flat 5'8 and oldman a solid 5'9
Pierre said on 20/Apr/19
@Johan =but Tom is standing closer to the camera and the floor isn't regular but looks always shorter than her....And Katie holmes 5"9'...Here next to Patrick Stewart listed 5"8' = Click Here by considering he has no hairs and probably a fraction more heels,she looks very similar to him .Click Here = here easily closer to the camera.Here closer to the camera than Serena Williams in cool posture Click Here .Here Serena closer to the camera always in relax posture = Click Here .
Pierre said on 20/Apr/19
@Mister Lennon= you really see Sean Penn 5"8' even if Gary Oldman was 5"9'?!There is easily more than only one inch by this pics!
Johan 185 cm said on 20/Apr/19
Click Here

Out running with his 5'9" ex wife, very much doubt he had lifts because when she is in heels he still manages this :

Click Here
Mister lennon said on 20/Apr/19
Oldman was more 5'9 peak.

Harrison weak 5'10 peak, as john lennon or maybe a little bit shorter.

Penn 5'8 peak.
Pierre said on 18/Apr/19
Tom Cruise and Sean Penn = Click Here Click Here .Sean Penn and Gary Oldman listed 5"8.5' = Click Here Click Here Click Here .Sean and Georges Harrison listed 5"10' = Click Here
mohammad said on 16/Apr/19
5 foot 7 , with a 90 percent chance of certainty .
Ricky muliawan hansyar said on 16/Apr/19
Michael pena is perfect 170 cm but not tom cruise
Kimblemur said on 14/Apr/19
5’7 flat
Ricky muliawan hansyar said on 13/Apr/19
5ft7.75 inch is final prediction for him
Ian C. said on 13/Apr/19
How could it have been possible that Tom Cruise was cast as Jack Reacher? The Reacher of the novels is six foot five and heroically strong, and Reacher's size and strength often figure in the plots, so casting Cruise as Reacher was essentially a rebuke to the fans of the books.

Casting Cruise as Reacher would be like, I dunno, casting Gary Oldman as Dracula, or Julie Andrews as Mary Poppins. You take a beloved character from a series of popular books and cast someone completely physically inapt as the character.
Ricky muliawan hansyar said on 12/Apr/19
172 cm is best fit for him
William_O'Jell said on 12/Apr/19
Tom was about 5 feet 7 inches when younger but is now probably 5 feet 6. That makes him roughly the same height as 'the short Beatle' Ringo.
Pierre said on 9/Apr/19
Sorry,i made a mistake,the second video with Dustin = Click Here .I have watch another time the first video and i think the difference between Guy Montagné and Christophe Dechavanne is at least 2.5 inches=imo the guy without hairs has a strong head and forehead and lots of time slouch a little bit to talk to the other guy.
Pierre said on 9/Apr/19
Yes Tom is taller than Dustin in Rain Man but watch that = Click Here =at around 3:06 and 3:20 = i think the left guy without hairs(Guy Montagné) is 2 or 2.5 inches taller than the right man(Christophe Dechavanne).I know approximately the height of the left guy because i was standing next to him in a supermarket one time.I'm around 5"11.25' during the day and i'm around one forehead taller than him.He's listed 172 in France(around 5"7.75')and then i think this list is good.Now the right guy next to Dustin(Dustin wear comfortable heels imo,watch them at around 2:58) = Click Here =they are standing in around the same posture at around 3:43 /3:46
cmillzz said on 8/Apr/19
always been a 5 ft 7 guy, only 172 cm maybe straight out of bed.
Bora said on 7/Apr/19
His peak height can be even 5'11" but in fact he is almost 5'8", he can peak 3 inches for sure
Ricky muliawan hansyar said on 7/Apr/19
Imposible tom cruise only 5ft7inch (170cm) come on he is hollywood superstar.5ft7.5 inch is golden standar height for man to be sexy hero.
Jimhopper said on 7/Apr/19
5-7 no more.
Parker said on 7/Apr/19
Man in Black said on 5/Apr/19
Just watching Rain Man as I type this. Cruise is at best 1 inch taller than Hoffman in most scenes

I felt it was at least 2 inches as in dance scene below - The escalator scene 3-4 inches

Click Here
Man in Black said on 5/Apr/19
Just watching Rain Man as I type this. Cruise is at best 1 inch taller than Hoffman in most scenes, both wearing standard dress shoes. Hoffmans posture is slightly slumped as well. In the famous coming down the elevator shot though, Cruise is probably wearing a slightly more generous heel.
Jay Ong said on 5/Apr/19

There's no way Tom is 5'7 3/4". In lifts or elevator shoes he only appears at 5'9 1/2" to 5'9 3/4" max. He never appear looking 5'10". Fact, without lifts or elevator shoes he is only 5'7" to 5'7 1/4" max barefeet. Just compare him to Lewis Hamilton and Zac Efron, he never appears taller to both of them even with boost.
Jay Ong said on 5/Apr/19
Hi Rob,

Is Lewis Hamilton really a 5'7 1/2" guy? If that's so then Tom must be really 5'7" flat. Whatever Hamilton's is Cruise is 1/2 inch shorter. Unless Lewis Hamilton has more lifts than Tom. But in comparison to Zac Efron, Cruise look 5'7 1/2". What's your thought on this Rob? For me I see Tom Cruise a strong 5'7" guy to 5'7 1/4" max.
Editor Rob
I don't know if the road they were on gave either favour, but we know lewis did come in around that range for a measurement - of course it could have been 172cm, a height he has looked too...whether he wears lifts, or just has great posture is debatable.
Ricky muliawan hansyar said on 4/Apr/19
I'm sure average height (General) for man is 5ft7.5-7.75 inch (not 5ft8 inch) .Hollywood superstar Tom cruise,teen idol Justin bieber, Bollywood superstar shah rukh khan, top singer from england zayn malik and popular host Ryan seacrest is Good example for 5ft7+ range guys.this sample is come from different country superstar
Bradley said on 3/Apr/19
Angus needs to go back to the Scottish bog (Lost In Space episode). Cruise is as listed. G supported figure.
Angus said on 2/Apr/19
Both cruise and Hammond are 5'7" tom wears lifts to reach 5'9" 5'10" and up to 6ft
Ricky muliawan hansyar said on 2/Apr/19
I think at low condition he is 171.5 cm, wake up in the morning he is 173.5-174cm range and then in normal condition he is 172-3 cm range. That's my opinion,so 172 cm is perfect list for Holywood Superstar Mr Tom cruise.tq
Pierre said on 1/Apr/19
Another = Click Here
Xpac99 said on 30/Mar/19
Click Here
170 cm is more realistic i think
Johan 185cm said on 28/Mar/19
I still think 5'7.5" is a possibility but no way he is less than that.
cmillzz said on 24/Mar/19
@TheBat, even if he was weak 5’8, that wouldn’t be considered short compared to the average American. “Short” would be like 5’6 or 5’5.
TheBat said on 23/Mar/19
Yeah this listing seems right. He's short but not tiny like Daniel Radcliffe or Jerry Ferrara.
Bradley said on 20/Mar/19
As listed today and back in the day. The G had this right. G approved. I saw it myself.
billionaireslayer said on 18/Mar/19
5'6 he was shorter than Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men, with Jack having 25yrs on him, and Jack maybe being a strong 5'7 or very weak 5'8 in his prime. Did not look much taller than a 5'4ish Dustin Hoffman.
cmillzz said on 16/Mar/19
Without his lifts, he’s 5’7 flat at most.
Paul Wood said on 14/Mar/19
I've always thought he's not 172cm. I think he's 171.5cm (5ft 7.5in)
Mister lennon said on 14/Mar/19
I still think 173 mnimum.
Man in Black said on 13/Mar/19
I was watching The Color of Money last night. Obviously Cruise was a young guy in that, but interesting to see. In the scene where Newman visits Cruise at his job, Cruise's footwear is decently visable, a kind of cuban chelsea boot with a strong 2" heel. In this scene he's probably got about a half inch on Newman, but Newman is slouching by comparison and a much older man at this stage in his career. Newman is wearing more normal looking footwear though.
JD 5'9" said on 13/Mar/19
Does he always wear lifts. He seems to edge out Simon Pegg who I don't think is under 5'8". I guess he's a strong 5'7" guy without lifts.
khaled taban said on 13/Mar/19
He is no taller than 170cm
Lee dytcher said on 12/Mar/19
He scuba dived with my company for 3 day's when I lived in Barbados. Bare foot on my boat he was shorter than me and I'm only 5ft 7ins
Bradley said on 10/Mar/19
I met myself and he told me as listed in '93 a foot away.
Ethan Couch said on 9/Mar/19
I met a movie producer that said he was 5’4! Do you think it’s true Rob?!
Editor Rob
I think some people like to exaggerate for dramatic effect, including the producer.
burnitdownhomies said on 26/Feb/19
Flat 5'6. Maybe 5'5.75 at worst.
Pierre said on 20/Feb/19
@Parker=In your pic Tom is standing closer to the camera and Ben Stiller does not look to me very straight.In this pic the difference seems to me slimer between them = Click Here .Tom's shoes have a vertical angle in the laces portion and seems to me advantageous like he had a lift in these .Jonah Hill listed 5"6.25' looks sometimes taller than Ben Stiller depending where is the camera = Click Here Click Here .Jonah hill and James Corden who is imo a weak 5"8' = Click Here
Bradley said on 19/Feb/19
In Jerry MaGuire he does look his "shortest".
Parker said on 18/Feb/19
Long time posters have all seen the barefoot pictures often posted here of Katie & Tom together, In my opinion, there is not more than 1 inch between them in Katie's favour, so that puts Tom in the 5'7-5'8 range. Split the difference and go for 5'7.5. Explains why he can look 5'9+ in footwear.

Click Here
mande2013 said on 14/Feb/19
I'm not a massive fan. In any case, I could certainly believe he's potentially like 5'6.75 barefoot or something, but I seriously doubt he's anywhere near as low as 167.
Pablis96 said on 13/Feb/19
Personally I think he can be a little below 170 so something between 167 and 169.I truly belive that.He is using constantly different kinds of elevator shoes from more discreet to elevators with huge input.Without all this height miracles he is a little bit below 170 for sure :) by the way ,great actor ,icone of Hollywood :)
Vat said on 6/Feb/19
Tom Cruise=172cm (5'8) for sure.
You know.
hridoy said on 6/Feb/19
true 5'7".
Pierre said on 31/Jan/19
Click Here = Imo 5"8' 3/4 for Katie Holmes is debatable = here next to Patrick Stewart listed 5"8'(At Patrick Stewart page 31 votes are giving him 5"7.9') they are looking on the same step/posture and she looks at most the same height as Patrick imo(by considering hairs of course). Click Here .Here their shoes= Patrick has classic heels and Katie slimer heels but Patrick has not a big advantage on her imo(in the last pic she's clearly closer to the camera ).At Patrick Stewart page 31 votes are giving him 5"7.9'.By this comparison with Patrick Stewart i would guess Katie holmes more 5"8' or weak 5"8'.
Peter175 said on 28/Jan/19
Tom at flat 5'7 doesn't make sense.

This guy is every bit a weak 5'8 now that I've seen his older films where I know for a fact he didn't have lifts
ArjunaKorale said on 26/Jan/19
Tom is the MOST DYNAMIC ACTOR of our generation. People can criticise his personal beliefs as much as they like but when his time is ‘up’ & he is gone from cinema, people will realise what they have lost. However, I don’t believe that he is a tall (or even average height) American man. I know your site lists him as almost 5 ft 8 but I care to disagree with that. I think 5 ft 7.5 inches (closer to 171 cm) tall for Tom is an ever so slightly more accurate estimate!
Rising - 174 cm said on 9/Jan/19
@Parker: In fairness, they seem like they could be a bit thicker than 1" even without lifts. I'd say 1.2" range is pretty likely, but that extra fraction is a wash since Rob still lists Katie at a full 5'9" as opposed to 5'8.75". I see more 3" difference in the pic, though, but you can't tell from that angle how big Katie's heels are. If you ask me -- and admittedly no one did -- they look like possible 3" heels from the back: Click Here They're also not completely flat in the front making 3" all the more plausible. but I don't see more than a 2.5" difference in this pic from the same event: Click Here It was getting rare for Tom to appear without some sort of lifts or elevators by 2011, but the boot itself looks pretty normal from that last side angle.
Parker said on 8/Jan/19
Lawson said on 7/Jan/19
5'8 3/4" katie with 2.5" heels = a 5'11.25" Katie in the pic above. Cruise is 2.5" shorter in that pic above beside her. So Cruise is standing 5'8.3/4" with 1. 3/4" (lift shoes)/heels. Cruz is 5'7-5'7.25" tops when barefoot and Katie is 5'8 3/4" barefoot. Do we really need to carry on the argument with that pic above ? I don't think so.

The argument would be the shoes only look standard 1 inch - How do you know they give 1.75"?
Timson said on 26/Dec/18
5-7.5 max. Probably under
Rising - 174 cm said on 16/Dec/18
I haven't seen enough myself to agree with Rob and MJKoP that Cruise edged Spielberg without shoes. I couldn't find any on set pic fitting MJKoP's description, but the Minority Report Berlin premiere is a bit tough for me to overlook because there's a series of pics that day and Cruise is dropping some height in the full pics, but looks half an inch shorter so is Cruise really dropping more than half an inch? Also, the pics with Clinton aren't perfect, but I don't get the impression Cruise was taller there either: Click Here Click Here I get why some will give the edge to Cruise, though. He has looked taller than Spielberg more often than vice versa, but that could be Tom's shoes and posture. With that said, I wouldn't be surprised if Spielberg was 172 cm peak either. I still have Tom more like 171.5, but I'd be less surprised if Tom was a full 172 than a flat 171. He's not a particularly short guy, but his footwear makes him tricky.

@Junior: I don't see how Cruise could be a flat 5'7" if Jamie Foxx is 5'9.5" minimum because Foxx has never looked a full 2" taller than Cruise, much less 2.5". Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Here's shots of their shoes from the side: Click Here Click Here Click Here Tom's shoes look pretty normal that night, imo. He has often worn 5-6 cm elevators the last decade as you say(more 5 cm the last few years), but he can pass for a 174, even 175 cm guy at times and has looked like he'd measure 176-177 cm in them making him 171-172 range barefoot.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 13/Dec/18
Always 170cm and always put on 5-6cm lift under his feet.
hridoyham58 said on 13/Dec/18
5'7" and nothing
JamesB172cm said on 9/Dec/18
Rob 5ft7.7/8 peak?
Editor Rob
You wouldn't be surprised at that. There will come a time when Tom falls to 5ft 7 and under and the argument will be that he never was above it.
michael loughrie said on 6/Dec/18
Good listing!
NewFace said on 28/Nov/18
I am not sure he's as tall as 172cm. The reason being I always thought he looked pretty small in one of his first movies, Risky Business. There was another small actor I can't remember the name of in it that didn't even seem much shorter at all in comparison.

Secondly, even in converse it is very viable to be 6cm taller quite easily if you stick some decent lifts in the high tops. This would mean he would easily clear 178cm in his lifts. Does he ever look that tall? With hair this would mean he would look comparable to some 5'10" or 5'11" guys lacking in the bonce department with his decent posture.

178cm might be a limit though in normal looking footwear for 172cm, but it would be very easy to achieve in almost any sort of footwear. It gets increasingly harder to walk after that. I'm sure Rob can also easily get to 179cm quite comfortably but will have problems walking when he gets to 180cm....
NewFace said on 28/Nov/18
I am not sure he's as tall as 172cm. The reason being I always thought he looked pretty small in one of his first movies, Risky Business. There was another small actor I can't remember the name of in it that didn't even seem much shorter at all in comparison.

Secondly, even in converse it is very viable to be 6cm taller quite easily if you stick some decent lifts in the high tops. This would mean he would easily clear 178cm in his lifts. Does he ever look that tall? With hair this would mean he would look comparable to some 5'10" or 5'11 guys lacking in the bonce department with his decent posture.
Bradley said on 28/Nov/18
As listed in '18.
Michael, 5'10" 178 cm said on 26/Nov/18
He can’t be as tall as 5’8” in real life. Tom almost always looks short in movies he stars in. He only looks taller in the Mission Impossible films because he wears lift and because they use special camera angles to give the illusion of him being taller. Tom can’t possibly be taller than 5’7”, why could I say this? Well, if he was as tall as 5’8”, then the media wouldn’t be calling him short and they wouldn’t be listing him as 5’7” on every website instead of 5’8”. He looks more than an inch shorter than Jeremy Renner who is listed as 5’8 1/4” on here and just look at how comically short he is compared to his ex-wives Nicole Kidman and Katie Holmes who are 5’10 1/2” and 5’9” respectively. Yeah, so I’m not buying into the fact that Tom can be that close to 5’8”. He is 5’7” flat imo.
Fabrizio said on 14/Nov/18 e'172 cm
MJKoP said on 13/Nov/18
There was as full-bodied picture from the set of War of the Worlds where Tom was more than just slightly taller than Steven. Glenn(yeah, I know) even described Cruise as "towering" Spielberg. Perhaps uneven terrain? Can someone possibly find it???
MJKoP said on 13/Nov/18
I'd give Cruise a slightly higher peak height than Spielberg. Rob described him as "marginally taller"(as reflected in his listings) and I agree with such an assessment.
Rising - 174 cm said on 10/Nov/18
@Greg99: Rob has Spielberg 5'7.5" peak. The 5'7" is his estimate for his current height. Tom only looks slightly shorter in some pics, but can also look slightly taller. It probably depends on shoes, posture and angle, but the fact that neither ever seems to look more than a little taller than the other tells me they're very close to the same height. I'd give both 5'7.5" peak and Cruise is probably still that tall while Spielberg is likely 5'7" max now at over 70.

2002 Minority Report Berlin premiere: Click Here Click Here
2002 Showest Awards Gala: Click Here Click Here
2005 War of the Worlds premiere: Click Here Click Here
2005 War of the Worlds photocall: Click Here
Short 2006 video: Click Here
Greg99 said on 10/Nov/18
Tom looks slightly shorter than Steven Spielberg (whom Rob has pegged at 5'7") in the many on-set stills of the two of them.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 9/Nov/18
5'9 - 5'9 1/2 with lift. 5'7 def a barefoot height.
TheBat said on 5/Nov/18
Everyone now agrees that Tom is around 5'7", the added 3/4 is very solid.
savfdfff said on 26/Oct/18
idk. Could have been a weak 172 cm at peak. I would say he is around 171 these days if that.
Anonynon said on 18/Oct/18
I find it funny as hell how google has Tom Cruise at 5'7", and you also have Bow Wow at 5'7". No wonder everyone thinks 5'7" is short. If his height is actually what is listed here, Cruise is definitely not what I'd call short, just below average. Everyone takes a shot at Cruise for being so short which is stupid. I think it's just a case of Cruise constantly taking pictures with women taller than him (with heels) which makes him look short.
HonestSlovene said on 12/Oct/18
172 cm peak and strong 171 cm now.
Editor Rob
He still holds up well in films, look at Never Go Back (well, don't look too's not that good) but with a guy like Aldis Hodge or Cobie Smulders, he just doesn't look a short guy.
Rising - 174 cm said on 6/Oct/18
I don't believe Cruise is taller than Downey, but they could be the same height. @Pierre: Glad we agree on that. That event is one of the best for determining Tom's real height. Aside from Katie, I think there might be a few decent pics to compare Tom to McConaughey and Stiller. His shoes often looked pretty normal promoting Lions for Lambs too, but he may have worn small lifts then.
Legit 6'2 said on 6/Oct/18
@Jonas Valanciunas
Surely he is taller than rdj
The listing is good,
171,5 cm for Tom Cruise
Jonas Valanciunas said on 27/Sep/18
Rob,I think he is taller than 5'7 lift wearer Robert Downey Jr
He should be 171,5/172 cm
Good listing Rob,great job
Pierre said on 24/Sep/18
@Rising =I agree with you Rising his shoes in this event"Tropic Thunder Premiere" were looking very classic and flat,i think if he had a gain with this, it was not a big gain.
Rising - 174 cm said on 20/Sep/18
Tom does seem like he's always wearing elevators/thick boots these days and since at least 2010, but it wasn't that uncommon to see him with normal shoes for much of the 2000's with the most striking example being the Converse-type sneakers he wore to the Tropic Thunder premiere with Katie in 3" heels. Sly wore elevator boots or those thick Hogan sneakers(which come with 2 cm insoles) almost 24/7 from 2003-2008, but actually wore normal shoes often from 2009 through early 2017 and had been wearing low cut dress shoes to every event for 2+ years before he conspicuously began wearing lifts to most events again the past year. I was surprised to see Banderas in flat, low cut shoes a few years ago, but even when he doesn't have his obviously big heels, his shoes often have an angle, are higher in the back or have a bit extra heel. Pitt will spend thousands on a pair of boots, but if he's the constant lift wearer many on this forum think then he's much better at hiding it than these other guys.
Ruben Bosco said on 20/Sep/18
Max 5 ft 7, absolutely not over
Hijoputamos said on 18/Sep/18
Allie, these guys NEVER wear regular shoes on events, believe me. If there are cameras, be sure they are on special shoes lifts boots etc. It’s part of their job. And I’m talking about guys like Tom, Brad, Banderas, Sly, etc
Custom elevators are hard to detect and they look like regular shoes, that’s why they are so expensive, hello!
Rising - 174 cm said on 17/Sep/18
@Allie: No problem. That style of elevator can be difficult to spot from some angles. In fact, Tom fooled me at the Rogue Nation NY premiere. I thought he had normal shoes until I saw them from the side. Tom would actually wear normal shoes during the early years of his marriage to Katie, but it's been a while since I've seen him at an event or on a talk show without elevators or a thick boot of some kind.
Pierre said on 17/Sep/18
If Big Jay has seen him the same height as himself,with the emotion,Tom's generous hairs....,i think he was probably one hair shorter than Big Jay, and was probably wearing shoes a little bit sophisticated. Probably a little bit under 5"7' barefoot, around 5"6'range,i see him around this height.Not very important,you can stand at 5"6' or 5"3' or ... by looking beautiful and charismatic as him.
Allie said on 13/Sep/18
@ Alex B - Thanks! On further inspection I think that Alicia A is probably 5'7 range (and 5'8 at the absolute very most) and not near the 5'11 or 5'9.5-10.5 listings I've seen.

@Rising - 174 cm - I suspected Tom was wearing more elevated shoes, but I also just shrugged it off and assumed that it was just normal dress shoes. Thanks for telling me that!
Rising - 174 cm said on 11/Sep/18
@Allie: Tom is wearing elevators to that premiere: Click Here Look at the angle at the laces. You often have to see a 1.8"-2" elevator from the side to tell, but there's more room for his foot than a normal dress shoe. It's unmistakable from the right angle once you know what to look for. Even so, as Dmeyer said, they're not huge.
Alex B said on 10/Sep/18
Looks around 5/7 ft tall
Allie said on 7/Sep/18
OOPS, in the pic of Alicia Aylies and Tom, she appears to be tilting her head and her posture doesn't look the best, so the height difference could be closer to 4 inches..? Maybe she could be closer to 5'9..
Allie said on 7/Sep/18
To anyone who sees this, how tall does this French beauty queen look next to Tom Cruise at the Paris premiere of MI? Her name's Alicia Aylies and I've seen ludicrous 180 listings at one point but it seems to be just 177/5'9.5 right now. I'm not so sure I believe that because the height difference looks probably 3 inches max despite the footwear:

Click Here

He seems to be wearing normal dress shoes:
Click Here

Her heels:
Click Here
Dmeyer said on 6/Sep/18
rising 174 vey interesting quote it is clear tom look about 5 ft 8.5-9in with 5 ft 11-11.25 leo while his shoes with the angle you showed will give at max 2 in as the outside heels isnt so big and there isnt room for more than 1 in lifts that give no more than 0.6-0.65 in in reality so very likely give just 1.7 in total yet he looks aleast 176-176.5cm shoes on so has to be not far off 5 ft 8 , also cruise has pulled off 5 ft 10 shoes in some bigger elevator 2.25 in types, i met jamie and he is defenetly solid 5 ft 9 in
Rising - 174 cm said on 4/Sep/18
@Junior: Tom can't be 5'7" flat if Jamie Foxx is anywhere near the 5'9.6" you give him: Click Here Click Here Click Here Tom's shoes even look normal: Click Here Click Here If he did have lifts, they'd be far too small to make a 2.6" difference between Tom and Jamie possible. Remember, this was 2004 and it wasn't unheard of for Tom to wear normal shoes to events at that time. You can see how short Tom looked that same night with solid 5'11" Bruce Willis with a camera disadvantage, but better posture: Click Here You can also see how much taller Tom can look with another solid 5'11" man in 2016: Click Here And you can see he did have a roughly 2" elevator that night: Click Here If Jamie is even 176 then I can't see Tom less than the 172 Rob gives him.

@Brad: Tom didn't look 2" taller than Glenn. More 1", maybe 1.5" tops.
Bradley said on 2/Sep/18
RobH met him. You meet and and look at his feet. In posture you are about correct. Jr. must think G is 5' 5" with the cruiser.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 1/Sep/18
@Dmeyer You're too thoughtful on Tom. But truth he is 5'7 and never wear less than a 2" lift in his movie after the late 80s. So Tom is 5'9 with "shoes" on.
RobH said on 1/Sep/18
I stood next to him at a charity beach event on solid ground. We were both wearing flip flops of identicle 1" sole. I am exactly 5'8.25 and we were eye to eye while just about everyone else was taller than us. I did notice he leans when he stands which can give the impression of being smaller by a few inches.
Tod Charming said on 30/Aug/18
Tom Cruise is a 5'7 actor who looks 5'10. Why? Because he's an actor!
Rising - 174 cm said on 30/Aug/18
@Dmeyer: I agree. He wears elevators that add around 5 cm a lot, but occasionally elevator boots around 2010-2013 that may have been pushing 6 cm: Click Here Click Here He might have measured 177 in them or at least close and I'd think they're around 2.3". He also wore some clunky 90's boots with Nicole Kidman and probably had an extra lift in them at times.

@Peter: Cruise gives a pretty average 5'8" appearance more than a short 5'7" impression with the exception of a few early films and 80's photos, but I'd be more surprised if he measured a flat 5'7" too. As I've said before, the Tropic Thunder premiere is one of the best events to judge Tom's barefoot height since he has sneakers about as thin as Converse. Click Here Click Here Click Here Katie's heels don't really seem to have a platform and aren't sky high, but I'd think a decent ladies heel like that should give her a good 2" footwear advantage over Tom's 0.6"-0.7" shoes so the figures the media used of 5'7" for Tom and 5'9" for Katie are very unlikely since she doesn't look 4" taller to me. I think she could be 5'8.5" since she's claimed both 5'8" and 5'9", but she may not be much more than an inch taller than Tom judging by how she looked in sandals with Tom barefoot.
Dmeyer said on 28/Aug/18
Cruise on occasion looks 175cm but many Times looks 5'8,25-8,5in 174cm while in shoes that Can give so much so has to be 171-2cm
Jim hoppa said on 26/Aug/18
Id say 5-7. In the new MI he looks tiny next to Cavill.
Hijoputamus said on 26/Aug/18
Rising, bang on.
Bradley said on 25/Aug/18
Weak 5-8 peak, no impossible mission here.
Peter175 said on 22/Aug/18
Agreed with everything Rising said.

I think 5'8 flat is more possible than 5ft7 flat peak heights.
Rising - 174 cm said on 22/Aug/18
@CDS: That was my first thought too. Baldwin has a pretty healthy ego and might have wanted to make sure Cruise didn't look artificially close to his height. Sort of like Michael Caine mentioning people thought he was short because Liz Taylor was on a box for their scenes. But Baldwin did that with Jeremy Renner too and I don't think Renner was wearing lifts and he was doing it in photos with his wife too and she's not particularly tall. And yeah, Alec has always been about 5'11" rather than the 6 feet he wants people to believe he is, though I don't recall seeing him with suspect shoes. I think Hanks was close to 6', but is now in that 5'11"-5'11.5" range. I don't think Alec has lost more than maybe a small fraction. He was only slightly taller than Orlando Bloom in his mid 40's and maybe an inch taller than Kevin Bacon back in the 80's.
Dmeyer said on 22/Aug/18
Standing neat 6 FT 1/2 inch with shoes on i oftenly feel tall in France , i Guess average hère is 177cm and if counting women and older men then less
CDS said on 20/Aug/18
@rising: that's crazy, I wonder if Baldwin notices someone like cruise wearing lifts, so he tip toes to compensate?? He must be height conscious too, must wear lifts himself. How else did he pull off looking an inch taller than tom hanks on that episode of Saturday night live a few yrs ago?? While I wouldn't say hanks is a solid 6', I'd still give him from 5'11" to 5'11.5", be Baldwin only 5'10.5" to 5'11", not sure either one has lost any height?
cmillzz said on 18/Aug/18
He doesn’t give off a short impression at all to me. Maybe it’s his lifts though LOL. I’m not really sure on his height, so I’ll have to go with Rob’s listing I guess, but there is a tangible possibility that it could be under this.
Sandy Cowell said on 17/Aug/18
@ MJKoP - I like your directness. Very funny!!! 😄👍

Tom can have 5ft7.75. You've convinced me! He's a smashing actor, and my Mum was very complimentary towards his looks.
Rising - 174 cm said on 17/Aug/18
I'd say 172 max, but 171 minimum so the 5'7" flat and 5'8" stuff are both wrong, imo. He's taller than someone like Michael Pena, but shorter than Sean Penn and Jeremy Renner. He typically looks about 174 when he wears lifts, but you can put him at basically the same height as Lewis Hamilton, Spielberg and Bruckheimer without them.

@Hijo: I only saw Oprah say Pitt was 6 feet, but I've never seen Brad say it himself. I've seen others claim that, though and I remember one poster saying Pitt even claimed 6'1" on Oprah. He's also supposed to have claimed 6 feet in commentary for Fight Club. But every time I've tried to check this stuff I've never found it, though I'm impatient and will sometimes skim through. I'd be surprised if either Cruise or Pitt got measured on TV. And yeah, Letterman doesn't hesitate to make his guests uncomfortable lol.

@CDS: I do want to see the new one as it looked good. Tom generally pulls off looking average to me in those films, especially from the 2nd one on. And yeah, Baldwin has always been about 5'11", but the funny thing was seeing him at the Rogue Nation premiere tip-toeing in pictures with Tom: Click Here He did the same thing with Jeremy Renner too. Don't know why as he's easily taller than both. Cruise would wear lifts in the films, but not when doing stunts. Michael Douglas wore boots with obvious lifts for some scenes in Basic Instinct yet there's a photo of his stuntman jumping out of the way of the car and he's supposed to be dressed the same yet clearly has flat sneakers instead of the boots Douglas wore. Generally, doing stunts in lifts is probably not advisable lol.
MJKoP said on 17/Aug/18
Aiden said on 14/Aug/18
No way he's over 5'6"


Ruben Bosco said on 15/Aug/18
No way 172 cm at most 5ft 7

(172.1 is his bare minimum).
Mister lennon said on 16/Aug/18
I see him 172 minimum today. Clearly.
CDS said on 16/Aug/18
Just seen "mission impossible: fallout", amazing action film with some incredible stunt work by cruise! Tom can easily pass for 5'9" or 5'10" in this around 5'11" alec baldwin, who he only looks around an inch or 2 shorter. But then, when he's around 6' Henry cavill, he appears 3 or even 4 inches shorter at times?? I assume cruise is "lifting" in this, except if course in the action/stunt scenes?
Hijoputamus said on 16/Aug/18
Rising, Pitt said he was 6 feet to Oprah. That’s why Letterman said what he said. He just doesn’t take s**** from guests. Same thing to MM at his face.
I’m confident Tom wouldn’t have a problem being measured on tv as Luke Perry and I would bet all my money Brad would never do it.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 16/Aug/18
Tom was never 172cm. He was ever 170.5cm bigger chance. Tom is 5'7 flat of less nowadays.
Ruben Bosco said on 15/Aug/18
No way 172 cm at most 5ft 7
Mister lennon said on 15/Aug/18
I thinl 172-173 peak.
Stil solid 172 now.
Aiden said on 14/Aug/18
No way he's over 5'6"
Rising - 174 cm said on 14/Aug/18
@CDS: Well most I've seen mentioned it assumed Letterman was talking about height. He could have meant both, but it'd be odd for Letterman to just make fun of Pitt's build as he was a fit guy regardless and far more women preferred Pitt's build to Letterman's build! That'd be weird since most were referring to Pitt as tall by that time, but who knows? As I've said, I'm far from convinced of Pitt being height-obsessed and a lift wearer, but he's often worn boots going back to the early/mid 90's so I find myself saying once again who knows? And Letterman was certainly the guy to call McConaughey out! He never worried about making his guests feel comfortable to say the least! I'd love to see Jeremy Piven try his 5'10" claim with Letterman. My grandfather always use to say he was 5'11.75" and if you'd say "so you're 6 feet then", he'd say "Nope. five eleven and three quarters." The difference is, he actually did look that height.

And I agree with Rob that Cruise doesn't look to have lost much, if anything. He's at an age where it's possible, but not inevitable regardless of stunts, especially since shorter men tend to lose less. Cruise is fit and has excellent posture, plus he certainly doesn't look shorter than he did in Losin' It or even A Few Good Men. Height loss should be determined by how someone looks and while Tom's elevator shoes make it more difficult, he's a good 10 years before you assume he must have lost something.
Lapinux said on 14/Aug/18
At age 56 and doing stunts for decades I believe he might have lost 5 mm or so. 172 - 172.5 cm peak
171.5 - 172 cm nowadays
CDS said on 12/Aug/18
I realize this is more Pitt related than cruise related, but is it possible that letterman was referring to Pitt being thin, not his height?😂 as for mcconaughey, yes it was awkward, just funny someone finally called him out on it...if you're saying you're 5'11.75", you're saying you're SIX FEET!??😂😂
grizz said on 11/Aug/18
@Rob, are you absolutely sure he hasn't lost any height,not even a quarter of inch? He's 56 and has been doing stunts for decades.
Editor Rob
He might have lost a few mm's, but I don't think he really has lost anything noticeable.
Rising - 174 cm said on 10/Aug/18
@CDS: I think Letterman said it about Pitt to Julia Roberts when Julia was promoting the film. The McConaughey thing was awkward lol. Letterman making the face and interrupting him with "five ten!" while Matthew pretended he didn't hear it, but got quieter and said "never been 6 feet." He's actually said that exact quote for years. There's an interview he did for U-571 where he makes a point of saying he's "5-11 3/4, not 6 feet." At least he's consistent lol.
CDS said on 9/Aug/18
@rising: what's this about letterman calling him tiny when "the Mexican" came out?? I totally don't remember that? But it reminds me of the infamous incident with Matthew mcconaughey not too long ago, when Dave said to his face, he thought he was only 5'10", right after Matthew told him he was 6 ft (or his monogrammed bathroom robe height of 5'11.75") 😂
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 9/Aug/18

Almost a couple inches, she's 6'0" and he's 5'10.5"
houss said on 8/Aug/18
One of the best actors in history he's so underestimate , he doesn't look short in movies he looks around 175 cm which is normal
ABD said on 8/Aug/18
for me he is 5'8 and not shorter at all ...
I like this man a lot
cmillzz said on 7/Aug/18
@Christian, didn’t you say your mother is a couple inches taller than your father?
viper said on 6/Aug/18
Thats funny. Jagger looks tallish because he's so skinny
Rising - 174 cm said on 6/Aug/18
@Hijo: That's a good point. I think Tom just wants to promote his films for the most part. I'd say Pitt looks 13-14 cm taller there. I've seen Cruise and Katie barefoot at the beach back when she was pregnant. I don't know what Pitt would or wouldn't do, but it's possible things like Letterman calling him tiny when The Mexican came out and Kelly Brook calling him short have made him height conscious. Sometimes he's worn normal shoes to events like the Okja NY premiere, but he seems to favor heeled boots. If he wears internal lifts often then he hides them well or they're small enough to remain subtle.
MJKoP said on 6/Aug/18
Canson said on 5/Aug/18
@Brad: how tall did you think Pitt was when you met him?

Look at the 1/Aug comment very carefully...Brad met Cruise, not Pitt. :)
Bradley said on 6/Aug/18
I've never met Brad Pitt. I saw him at the Palm Springs film affair years ago. Wore custom whoppers in Pap shots I saw later...explained how he appeared 6 foot easy. Cruise I met in Denver at a Starcon 25 years ago, one foot away....5-8.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 6/Aug/18

Like Rob said, I think it's more about guys having taller wives/girlfriends. Look at guys like Mick Jagger and Rod Stewart, they're both about 5'10" yet they've gotten flak by the media about their height at some point. A 5'10" celebrity without a taller wife or girlfriend would never get described as short.
Hijoputamus said on 6/Aug/18
Rising, Tom is surely sick about people asking his height. Obviously when you are short that question is not a nice one and especially if asked too many times. Yeah, Pitt doesn’t look 17cm taller than Jen, does he? Even when he has foot advantage. You are proving me right. Search Tom Cruise barefoot and see what I mean. Pics of him barefoot at Disney. Also There were pics of Tom barefoot beside his wife and a lot of people all in shoes. I posted it long time ago. That’s what I mean, Pitt would never do that. You say Pitt wears regular shoes at events? Really? Lol
Canson said on 5/Aug/18
@Brad: how tall did you think Pitt was when you met him?
Rising - 174 cm said on 4/Aug/18
@Hijo: I don't know, isn't Achilles supposed to be tall like most Greek heroes? Sometimes that comes from the star, but other times that's the directors idea. If he is that insecure, it's just odd to me he'd wear normal dress shoes promoting that film on Conan's show no less. Would being barefoot reveal much more than low cut shoes with no socks like this?: Click Here Pitt might very well be as height conscious as you and others think, but if anything, I find it much more strange we haven't seen a height claim from Pitt since 1987. Though Tom's last known claim is '88 and it's even been alleged interviewers agree not to ask him about his height as a condition of interviewing him. I do believe Tom's only issue with height is due to the press and his image and I could imagine him not caring in private.

@Arch: Which part of the video are you talking about? They look pretty close to me in general. I don't think Tom looked taller in the 80's than he does now seeing him back then with Robin Williams, Frank Sinatra and Robert Duvall or in early films like Losin' It and even A Few Good Men where you could say he looks around 5'7" with Kevin Bacon. I think you could always argue he was no taller than Lewis Hamilton, Spielberg and even Bruckheimer. He's an age where height loss could go either way.
Arch Stanton said on 3/Aug/18
On Youtube check out Cruise and Corden's skydiving video. If Corden is 5 ft 8 and a bit of change Tom honestly looked nearer 5 ft 7 flat to me. Doesn't he do his own stunts? He's mid 50s now, not impossible he's lost some height.
Hijoputamus said on 3/Aug/18
@Rising, you don’t get it. Cruise does not hide his real height and Pitt does for some reason.
Cruise has been barefoot in public and You will never see Brad barefoot in public beside people. Not even that one time in Montecarlo with Damon and Clooney both barefoot. In Troy he worse boots instead of sandals as absolutely everyone else. That’s what I meant. Cruise wears lifts elevators etc but he can be barefoot no problem...Pitt would never ever do that.
Westworlder said on 3/Aug/18
The amount of height shaming he gets for being borderline-5'8 is just pathetic/horrible. If that's what Hollywood thinks of guys at 5'8, I can't imagine what they (so far, secretly) think of guys like Bruno Mars.

Completely unfair.
Editor Rob
Height has always been an easy target and was more visible because of taller partners like Katie and Nicole.
MJKoP said on 2/Aug/18
freelegion said on 1/Aug/18
how tall are former members of the Brat Pack like Emilio Estevez, Charlie Sheen, Rob Lowe, Sean Penn? All pals of Cruise from the 80's.

They are all upper right hand corner of screen feet and 'Google Custom Search' inches tall.
Rising - 174 cm said on 2/Aug/18
Tom has worn outright elevators and lifts much more than Pitt who prefers boots with heels a bit bigger than typical or about 1.5" on average and near 2" on occasion. Tom has been more height conscious the last decade and was during his marriage to Nicole and transition to more of an action star. He did surprisingly wear only 1.5 to 2 cm sneakers to the Tropic Thunder premiere even with Katie in at least 8 cm heels and you can see him liftless for films like A Few Good Men, but he also wore cowboy boots in the early 90's and Cuban heels in The Color of Money. Ironically, Tom wore lifts in Interview with the Vampire specifically so he wouldn't look short next to Pitt.
freelegion said on 1/Aug/18
how tall are former members of the Brat Pack like Emilio Estevez, Charlie Sheen, Rob Lowe, Sean Penn? All pals of Cruise from the 80's.
Kev said on 1/Aug/18
i do find it weird how a supposedly 5'11 Brad Pitt or Jude Law wear lifts despite being average height.

Cruise is 5'7. Lower end of average. A lot of guys his height.
Bradley said on 1/Aug/18
The Hippo is correct,he was not wearing anything Pitt wears when I met him about 25 years ago. Von wears whoppahs 24/7 365.
Hijoputamus said on 31/Jul/18
Tom is a legit guy. He wears all kinds of tricks to be taller BUT he doesn’t have height issues at all. He has been barefoot many times with people in shoes around him and in public. The one with height issues is Brad Pitt. You will never see him barefoot beside anyone. He even wears lifts in the beach!
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 30/Jul/18
Tom, Hnery Cavill and Simon Pegg recently went to Korea promote latest M.I movie and they three was on the popular Running Man show we can see whats on their feet. Def a 2" lift on Tom and that 6'4 1/2 listed slender tall Lee Kwang Soo look massive edging Cavill really a 4" and Tom look shrimpy next to him.
Big Jay said on 30/Jul/18
Hey Rob! It's been forever. Hope you and Jenny have been well. Was just going through the internet the other day and found this. I'm still 171/172 CM! Click Here
Editor Rob
Yeah, you ain't at the stage of height loss quite yet! Tom though is now in that 55-60 range, but he looks 5-10 years younger, and physically probably fitter and more agile than most 40 year old men!
Son Goku said on 30/Jul/18
Tall Sam said on 29/Jul/18
Interesting he looks really closer than expected to 5'7" with Sean Penn in Taps, Penn rarely looks tall near his co-stars.
Jaison said on 27/Jul/18
Rob do you think he wears elevator shoes when filming movies? Like in action scenes?
Editor Rob
more normal for action shots. Lifts are out of the question for some stunts.
Leo2001 said on 27/Jul/18
Sean Penn and Tom Cruise in Taps(1981)

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Warren said on 27/Jul/18
But you can't prove it with a picture
Rising - 174 cm said on 25/Jul/18
@Peter175: I agree, but Tom was also wearing his elevator shoes: Click Here Click Here They're not huge, but a classic elevator shoe nonetheless. Tom wears those a lot the last few years. Fallon is definitely in the 5'11"-5'11.5" range(I've seen him next to people I know) and Tom looks at least 3" shorter. Tom didn't look any taller in the 80's, here he is with Robin Williams: Click Here Robin was never any taller than 5'7" flat. I think Tom has always been 5'7.5" since he finished growing.
Peter175 said on 24/Jul/18
Latest vid of him with 5'11.5 (At most) Jimmy Fallon

Click Here

Don't think he's lost much height, still looks a strong 5ft7
Rourke said on 24/Jul/18
Thought he was gonna be like 5’6”

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.