How tall is Amanda Seyfried ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

Amanda Seyfried's height is 5ft 2.5in (159 cm)

American actress best known for roles in movies like Mamma Mia, Red Riding Hood and In Time.

5ft 11.5 Justin Timberlake with Amanda
Photo by PR Photos
Add a Comment on the Height of Amanda Seyfried

mariam1 said on 14/Aug/15
Short girls with long legs/hands and thin body are always look taller than they actually are. And high heels is a best way to hide your real height. Amanda is one of them...def 5'2", maybe 5'3" in the morning.
A6'1Guy said on 1/May/15
@Meredith Don't you think "incredibly petite" is a bit of an exaggeration seeing as though she is only 1.5" under average?
Meredith said on 1/Apr/15
I've stood beside her in line (getting coffee) and she is not a smidge over 5'2". I'm 5'4" and was in ballet flats, she was in running shoes, and she still seemed almost two inches shorter than me. She's incredibly petite -- fine boned, very slender, but still nicely proportioned -- which is why I think she comes across as taller than she is.
Winnie said on 5/Mar/15
She looks tall in photos and 160cm.She may be short and petite body but at least she has sexy looks.
butter said on 24/Feb/15
Click Here mila is taller than her. Mila's eye hits JT's lips while Amanda's eyes hit his chin. i think Amanda is 1'60
ish said on 9/Oct/14
I saw some of her pictures she looks pretty tall in those .... She has long legs but I guess she might be 5'2.5
Sam said on 27/May/14
What a gorgeous, perfectly proportioned woman. Doesn't get much better. 5'3'' is my guess, but appears to be much taller. Beautiful!
Diva said on 18/May/14
I used to think she was 5'8 or taller.. WHY does she look so tall?!
gd said on 8/May/14
There's no way she can be 5'3.5".
5'2.5" is already a generous measurement.
In this pic with Timberlake she wears at last 11 cm heels.
Dom said on 5/May/14
Just going by this pic, she would like 5'3,5", Justin with shoes on has no more about 6" over her.
Chris 182 cm said on 12/Feb/14
I thought she was shorter than that. She's known for her short stature.
gd said on 14/Oct/13
If Justin Timberlake is 182 cm, than Amanda Seyfried is no more than 157 cm. It is sufficient to look at the photo with Timberlake so assume undestand that.
Petrus said on 5/Sep/13
Tallness just like muscles are a male trait so yes being too tall relative to the society you live in is a male trait and you are man sized.Foot size is relative to height so tall girls always have big feet another negative trait in a female.
Lala said on 30/Aug/13
Petrus your comment is a bit offensive to be honest. Just because you prefer petite women doesn't mean tall women are "man sized" and out of balance. Your preference is your preference but don't talk like its fact....some people may prefer a leggy woman...doesn't mean it's "insane".
shiffu said on 26/Aug/13
how much heel is she wearing?
Petrus said on 24/Aug/13
Amanda is 5'2" and weighs about 110 lbs. Smaller women were always the ideal and considered more feminine and better proportioned before this insane age where tall man sized models are in vogue where their extra height is all in the legs and neck. Out of proportion and balance. Amanda is a beautiful girl with nice full natural breasts.
CoolMan said on 22/Jul/13
Rob how tall is Amanda with heels in the picture above?
[Editor Rob: nearly 5ft 6]
LOLA said on 12/May/13
Hey Rob, why did you change her height ?
Joey said on 25/Dec/12
How funny people are quoting a medical chart in a movie for her height and weight assessment. Seriously? Ad no way does she weigh 120 unless she was 8 months pregnant.
marla singer said on 4/Dec/12
Rob then why aren't you upgrading her? You said yourself on Megan Fox's page that Amanda is not that shorter than Megan... 5'2.5"? :)
[Editor Rob: 5ft 2.5 might be a good shout for her, i will have a look again and see ]
BellaK said on 12/Nov/12
My friend was lucky enough to meet her because she was filming a movie in her neighborhood and she was invited to lunch by Amanda. My friend said that she was pretty short. (And I had to find out over Facebook that she met her! And she's my favorite actress!!! >.<)
Leon said on 10/Nov/12
If mae whitman is almost 5'1 then Amanda must be 5'3. In Jennifer's body 5'2 is the height of the character and it doesn't mean hers.
Marie said on 1/Oct/12
In Jennifer's Body, it says that she's 5'3. If you look closley on the hospital sheet in the beginning of the film, you can see it.
Romy said on 29/Sep/12
Sorry Rob but can you do something about Agnes comment? It's kinda rude, there's nothing wrong with being slighthly shorter than average. I'm 5'2 so from experience I can tell Amanda isn't more than 5'2 or maybe 5'3. As someone pointed out before in Jennifer's body you can see "her" chart. So I guess 5'2 is just right. Such a pretty girl :)
marla singer said on 6/Sep/12
She looks just a little bit shorter than 5'4ish Megan Fox, she has to be at least 5'3"
theblacklab said on 26/Jul/12
Agnes, you're 12? I can tell. You don't have to be tall to be beautiful. There are beautiful tall girls and beautiful short girls. Height has nothing to do with whether you are "hot" or not. Taller girls tend to have longer legs, whilst shorter girls tend to have the feminine curves. And 5'2" isn't tiny. You have a lot of maturing to do, and in that time you should reflect how hurtful your comment could be to short girls, implying that short girls can't be beautiful, when it's obvious just from looking around you that they can just as easily as tall girls.
amandj said on 25/Jul/12
@Jahanna Actually, Megan Fox is bending over slightly and she still looks taller than Amanda. Megan Fox is 5'4". 5'2" for Amanda seems about right.

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes in newspapers, books and resumes.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.