|
Silent d says on 29/Jan/12
184cm.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP says on 24/Jan/12
He's 180-181cm, 182cm at the absolute MAX. This guy is around the same height as Ryan Gosling, who is overlisted as well. I could live with a 182cm listing, but nothing over that. Aie says on 21/Jan/12
Is he bow legged anyway? Chris says on 19/Jan/12
5'11 is too low for him. He tends to tilt the head down in the photos. I'd give him 5'11.75 - 6' (182-183 cms). But definitely needs a half inch downgrade. ChiasmataX says on 17/Jan/12
Rob, just check out Pattinson's barefoot picture that I posted with Kristen Stewart down below on Dec 4, is that really how a near 6'1 guy look with a 5'4? I believed I saw a picture that you posted on the height challenge page that have the guy from height challenge # 10 with the girl from height challenge# 11 and he had a whole head on her. The point is if Pattinson is truly 184cm barefoot he will not look 180cm with Kristen in that barefoot picture. The max I can buy is 182-183cm for Pattinson. If he's 6'1 barefoot, he would've claim 6'2 since it's Hollywood.
[Editor Rob: challenger 10 was on his tip toes in the photo with the 5ft 5 girl] Chameleon says on 11/Jan/12
180cm range, no way 184cm. Silent d says on 10/Jan/12
Kellan lutz looks huge. He must be wearing lifts. Pattinson never looked shorter than 6 foot. 184cm. I'm assuming everyone is wearing lifts. Btw i am not a fan of robert. Don't like the guy but he is tall. 184cm. Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP says on 7/Jan/12
Yes you are right mId, he is below 6'. He appears taller in movies because of his thin build and tricky camera angles. He's around 180cm flat. mId says on 6/Jan/12
maybe this can be of some help. Click Here he sure doesn't look over 6'here in my eyes. Attila _194cm. says on 5/Jan/12
182 for Pattinson is a joke... Chris says on 2/Jan/12
Check Patel's page. The guy needs an upgrade. Pattinson looks 182-183 cms, but then again the guy has bad posture. Chameleon says on 1/Jan/12
Click Here
with 186cm Patel, no way is Pattinson ever 184cm. Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP says on 1/Jan/12
@Bob Granted that is a better picture to judge, but I still don't think there is a 10cm difference with 174cm Lautner. And even if there is a 10cm difference, that would still not convince me as many people including myself don't buy Lautner at 174cm. You also have to factor in that Pattinson seems to be wearing thicker shoes. Bottom line is that I still think Pattinson isn't 184cm, 182cm I can buy. Attila_194cm. says on 1/Jan/12
He is a strong 6 ft 1 in(185) 100%,in twilight i think he is 188-189 with shoes,i'm sure. Bob says on 1/Jan/12
this is a better picture to judge
Click Here @Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP Chris says on 29/Dec/11
That pic is horrible to judge Pattinson's height, the ground is tilded, makes Lautner looks taller and Pattinson shorter. Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP says on 27/Dec/11
@J In that picture Lautner's shoes look pretty normal to me - if anything, Pattinson seems to have the footwear advantage, not Lautner. J says on 26/Dec/11
@Mr-Killer Shrimp Lautner is known to wear huge platform shoes. Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP says on 21/Dec/11
This picture was posted on the Kristen Stewart page:
Click Here
The difference between 174cm listed Taylor Lautner and Pattinson is at most 5-6cm. In fact many people don't buy Lautner being 174cm - he's probably closer to 170. No effing way Pattinson is 184cm, he's struggling with 180cm in that picture. Robert says on 21/Dec/11
Yeah he looks so tall in Twillight. And He is 185 cm Chameleon says on 21/Dec/11
Pattinson 180
Lutz 183 max. Chameleon says on 21/Dec/11
@ Mr KS: Lutz I can buy as 6' ... 6'1? Not convinced. He was visbly taller than Pattinson I remember so Pattinson 180 flat, Lutz 6'0 range. But not 6'1 range. ChiasmataX says on 20/Dec/11
@ Valjiu not everybody on here is " tiny insecure people", there are some just base their assumptions of celebrities' height on real legit pictures. Just look the barefoot picture of Rob and Kristen I posted down below. That's is not how a 184-185cm guy look next to a 163cm person. I am 178cm barefoot and I looked just as tall with my 163cm friend. Rob is somewhere between 180-182cm not over 183cm...maybe in dress shoes. ChiasmataX says on 20/Dec/11
@ Mr KS and Chameleon, yeah lots of height inflation on this site, although there are some accurate height listings. Hopefully Rob will be in the mood for downgrades soon. Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP says on 18/Dec/11
@Chameleon - Lol yeah, 180 flat for Pattinson is not impossible at all judging from all the pictures that have been posted on here. Chameleon what is your opinion on Kellan Lutz' height? The more pictures I see of him, the more I think he's no more than 182-183 MAX, and even that might be too generous. Chameleon says on 18/Dec/11
Not even that, 181 MAX for Pattinson. More likeley 180 flat lol.... Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP says on 17/Dec/11
@Valjiu - Lol dude, how do you explain the pictures of Pattinson with Gil Birmingham? That is NOT how a 6'1+ guy (like you suggest) looks next to a 5'11 range guy. He also doesn't look 6'1 next to Kristen Stewart in the barefoot picture posted by ChiasmataX on 4/Dec/11. 182 MAX for Pattinson, end of story. Godred says on 17/Dec/11
@Valjiu - it works both ways though with the fangirls trying to bump up the height of the celebs they are attracted to,to meet their magic height number needs,even if it doesn`t have any basis in reality.No I don`t think he`s under 6 ft,but he`s nothing over it either in the photos with the other celebs. Chameleon says on 16/Dec/11
Lol, open your eyes and see he is clearly below 6'. Valjiu says on 15/Dec/11
I'm just gonna assume everybody here who says he is under 6 feet are tiny insecure people who got dropped on their heads. Even with the terrible posture he has, he is clearly a solid 6'1, probably even slightly taller tahn that. Chris says on 13/Dec/11
Wow in that pic posted by mr killer shrimp, Lautner looks so small, like five - six inches shorter than Pattinson. But the year was 2009. Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP says on 13/Dec/11
182 is the absolute MAX that I could buy for Pattinson. MsKitty says on 13/Dec/11
Noticably taller than Jimmy fallon... lol93 says on 9/Dec/11
he has bad posture... i think he is little over 6'0 so 184cm is right Sean73 says on 8/Dec/11
Hey shrimp killa-i agree with you,birmingham is wearing lifts again.God, this guy is really insecure about his height. Godred says on 7/Dec/11
If he`s under 6 ft,it`s not by much,I don`t believe he is anything over it though. Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP says on 7/Dec/11
Another picture of Pattinson and Gil Birmingham:
Click Here
Judging from the pictures of Birmingham and Rob on Birmingham's page, Birmingham is 179-180 MAX. Pattinson is about the same height, he's 180-181 at best, he needs a downgrade. Chris says on 6/Dec/11
I think he could be the 6'1 that he claims, but i believe that he has a bad posture, so he looks a 6' guy. 6'0.5 is fair enough. Chameleon says on 4/Dec/11
Indeed, a lot of evidence suggest he is 181 MAX and now I believe so. ChiasmataX says on 4/Dec/11
These pictures with Kristen will show that he's under 183cm.
Click Here Rob was in Nike air max? So he had footwear advantage with Kristen.
Click Here Here they both in barefoot and he looks about 178-180cm (tip toe on one leg?) at most if Kristen is 163cm. Godred says on 3/Dec/11
@Daniella Davis - Who are you talking to? Daniella Davis says on 29/Nov/11
You should of been a little shorter so that Taylor aka Jacbo been taller than you. But my friends love you. Maio says on 29/Nov/11
According with rob, Robert Pattinson is 6 ft 0.5 in/184 cm. Chameleon says on 27/Nov/11
Yeah this guy is 181 at best.. xyz.reg(186cms-187cms) says on 27/Nov/11
A legit 181cms guy...nothing more than this..!! Godred says on 26/Nov/11
@pete - yes more than average,6 ft max. ChiasmataX says on 25/Nov/11
Robert looks 1cm shorter than the supposedly listed 182cm Gil Birmingham on this site). It is even questionable if Gil is a legit 182 cm too he might be 180-181cm at most.
Click Here Robert says on 25/Nov/11
Looks no more than 5´11.5", I think that´s unlikely as well, 5´11" flat would be my best barefoot guess for him. pete says on 25/Nov/11
to me, he looks pretty tall. more than average. As I didnt know his height, and I only saw him in television I thought hes 6´2 or something. Silent d says on 22/Nov/11
He is taller than peter. Kellan must be wearing lifts. I never seen pattinson as 5 foot 10. He always looked at least 6 foot.184cm. ChiasmataX says on 21/Nov/11
He's 179-180cm at best and maybe 6 feet in dress shoes. He looks 1cm shorter with Gil Birmingham who is about 180cm. Canopus says on 18/Nov/11
5'10ish He was maybe an inch shorter than Peter Facinelli (6' but listed here at 5'10.25") and at least 3 inches shorter than Kellan Lutz who is listed at 6'1". This was on Ellen Degeneres today. Chameleon says on 17/Nov/11
I used to think he was a legit 6', now I think hes 181/182 at best. Silent d says on 16/Nov/11
He looked huge on letterman but maybe he was wearing lifts. 184cm. Lutz and brosnan are at least 6 foot 1. He always looked tall. I am not a fan but i respect him. jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m says on 12/Nov/11
Probably 183 cm flat. Captain Howdy says on 11/Nov/11
Was shorter than Jimmy Fallon on his show tonight... Carl says on 10/Nov/11
Click Here
He looked no taller than Kimmel last night. His interviews have him at 6'1" but he can't be taller than 6'0" by even a millimeter. 5'11" or shorter in bare feet easily. 6'1" in large shoes. Chameleon says on 9/Nov/11
No he is 182 at the absolute max as he is shorter than Lutz and Brosnan. Godred says on 7/Nov/11
@Karl - Then you have terrible perception, as he is clearly shorter than the 6`1 and 6`2 celebrities he has been photographed stood right next to.He`s still barely hovering around the 6 ft flat mark,anywhere from 182 - 184. :D says on 6/Nov/11
6'2 in your dreams... Karl 189cm 6\'2.5 says on 6/Nov/11
Robert is no shorter than 6'1, I met him in Sydney Airport, he is probably 6'2.5 in shoes and 6'2 bare foot. You guys should be more objective, and yeah he is tall. Chameleon says on 4/Nov/11
Indeed Pattinson needs a downgrade. 181 I can buy. He certainly isnt 184cm. wolverine says on 2/Nov/11
he is around 179-181 probably max 182;dev patel is 186cm and pattinson is around 2-2.5 inches smaller than him . Click Here thebad7 says on 31/Oct/11
This guy isn't 6'1"--the 6'1" and 6'2" claims for him are good for a laugh. If anything he's a strong 5'11"/weak 6'0". Don't let the illusion his thin frame creates fool you. 6'0" flat at the most for Pattinson.
tb7 matt says on 30/Oct/11
well i thaught he might be like 201cm tall, but 184_185is sure for the taking, but he looks much taller in twilight series Aiden says on 24/Oct/11
is it possible to look taller than you really are, cuz i am 5ft 11.5 but most people always tell me i look like ft 2 which is ridiculous. i dont even have that skinny guy thing as am pretty bulked could being more muscular effect the appearance of height? LAN Jiao says on 20/Oct/11
184cm in dress shoe. 185cm in hollywood style dress shoe. he is 181-182cm , i don even will bet him 1mm over 182cm afternoon. Jason says on 19/Oct/11
Yeah he'd be about 5'11 6'0 Shaun says on 12/Oct/11
Inception says on 23/Sep/11
Guys, i get that some of you might be jealous over this guy. He is succesful and everything. But does it make you feel better about yourselves when you write that an actor is shorter than he really is, just because you want him to be?
I'm jealous of his level of success and stud status among women but I wouldn't claim he is under 6' and I certainly wouldn't want to look like him... Chameleon says on 10/Oct/11
Clearly shorter then Brosnan AND Lutz, that makes him below 6'0..... LAN Jiao says on 10/Oct/11
i just don see 6ft for this guy. 5ft11.5 at best. weak 6ft Larc 6 ft 1.75 in says on 10/Oct/11
182-183 is more realistic, he's clearly shorter than Pierce Brosnan. 177cmmm says on 8/Oct/11
I think 182 or 3 evening Godred says on 8/Oct/11
@inception - He`s 184 max,only 6`1 in shoes,are you a teenage girl? - the jealousy argument usually spews from them, are we jealous of Mr T aswell? JACM says on 5/Oct/11
@Inception. Lautner is not 178 cm, check any photos. Hes 5'9" at the HIGHEST. They even had to make him stand on a box for a photoshoot so that he could tower over Kristen Stewart whos like 5'5" or so. If he was 178cm he wouldnt need the box, his boots would have sufficed. So yeah, Rob is a hair under 6" Lautner 5'8" -5'9".... Inception says on 23/Sep/11
Guys, i get that some of you might be jealous over this guy. He is succesful and everything. But does it make you feel better about yourselves when you write that an actor is shorter than he really is, just because you want him to be?
Robert must be at least 183 cm. And so he is a tall guy. Taylor Lautner is not 173-174, he is 178 cm tall. And you can clearly see in Twilight scenes that Robert has a couple of centimeters on him. He looks tall all the time. And stop the bull**** about lifts. He wears flat shoes that would never gime him much if he would be a liftwearer.
I am 183 myself, and i also wear flat shoes, like Converse, and im like 184 maybe in them, so he cant be a liftwearer, i guess there is no place for lifts in really flat shoes. I would even dare to say that he is 6'1. Moke says on 10/Sep/11
@Menace 195cm
Please stop judging other peoples heights if you really believe in your last statement. Chameleon says on 10/Sep/11
Gaga: 180 flat for Pattison would not suprise me as he is shorter than Lutz who people dont buy being 6'1, and also in another pic he was exact same height as Gil which was posted in the past. Gaga says on 10/Sep/11
Look at this photo, no way pattinson is over 6, even if he had loose posture in the photo.
Click Here
That gil guy is no higer than 5'11 if you look at the photos with rob, also he has perfectposture in every photo. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 6/Sep/11
184cm out of bed and 182-183cm at night.
Overall that puts him at 6"0... truthman says on 21/Aug/11
He is 6ft. Could looks even under that because of his bad posture. He looks 4 inches shorter than Ken Foree in "Water for Elephants" (really good movie btw) Gained weight instead says on 17/Aug/11
Menace 195cm
Lautner is 173-174cm and Pattinson is more like 178-179cm, he looks taller due to his hair and physique. Godred says on 2/Aug/11
I could buy a minimum of 182 and a absolute maximum of 184. Menace 195cm says on 2/Aug/11
He looks similar in height with Taylor Lautner (who is a legit 5'10 178cm) thats why Robert must be around 177cm - 179cm.
Even Karl Urban (1,88m) is taller than Robert by nearly a head. Godred says on 29/Jul/11
@Joe - he still don`t look it - 184 max. Joe says on 27/Jul/11
He probably is 6-1, I am in 6-1 in the morning, and I lose a quarter to a half an inch by the evening. When doctors measure your weight and height, they take your morning weight and height which is you real weight and height. anon says on 22/Jul/11
Imy, all of those wax work models are several inches taller than the actual person. Godred says on 21/Jul/11
183 or 184. whooodini says on 19/Jul/11
can look anywhere from 6ft to 6'2 probably in the middle is right A says on 19/Jul/11
Modeling agencies add 1-2 inches on a lot of their male models heights. Pattinson is probably more 5'11"-6'0" area than 6'1". stoodnext2 says on 14/Jul/11
Well we ALL should know by now that Modeling agencies LIE about height, by even SEVERAL Inches so I don't doubt as a young Model his height was exaggerated. But as of now, this kid is the same age as me 25, I think he may be 6' and some change out of bed barefoot. I doubt 6'1, BUT good sneaker could easily place him from 6' and some change to 6'2. At that point I get why he looks 6'1 barefoot marvel 184 says on 14/Jul/11
He does look like a 183 cm or 184 cm compared to Kellan Lutz. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 12/Jul/11
183cm on the nose |
