How tall is Robert Pattinson

Robert Pattinson's Height

6ft 0.25in (184 cm)

British Actor best known for playing Edward Cullen in the Twilight films. Other roles have been in Harry Potter and Goblet of Fire, Cosmopolis and Water for Elephants. Robert has been describe as high as 6ft 2 by his modelling agency, although his acting agency list him 6ft 1 and 11 stones (154 pounds).

How tall is Robert Pattinson
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Kristen Stewart
Height of Kristen Stewart
5ft 4in (163 cm)
Emma Watson
Height of Emma Watson
5ft 4.75in (164 cm)
Ashley Greene
Height of Ashley Greene
5ft 4.5in (164 cm)
Taylor Lautner
Height of Taylor Lautner
5ft 8.5in (174 cm)

Add a Comment 250 comments




berta said on 27/May/16
184 it to mutch the other muscle guy from twiligt who is 183-84 is 1-2 cm taller. I Think he is weak 6 footer
Appe 6ft 0.5 said on 20/May/16
183cm x 70kg
berta said on 10/May/16
dont remember the name of the Movie but he and pierce Brosnan was in a Movie together and if pierce Brosnan is 186 then this is the absolute tallest i can se this guy. it looked to be around 3 cm between them. More 3,5 cm than 2,5. but then again Brosnan could be/ have been 187. I Think pattiosnson is 183 on the dot
Helen said on 19/Feb/16
Rob, do you have any thoughts about FKA Twigs height? she's Robert's girlfriend. i'd love it if you could make a page for her too. p.s. keep doing the awesome job you do
Editor Rob: having a look at her she can look maybe 5ft 2.5
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 16/Feb/16
A legit 180cm guy.
Appe 6ft 0.5 said on 1/Dec/15
@joe joe I've never met him as you did, but from the photos you posted he looks easily 183cm with the chance of being 184cm.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 25/Nov/15
He was 6'0 1/2"-6'0 3/4" when I met him in person. He just had awful posture which makes him appear shorter than he is. He was also 2"-2 1/2" inches taller than Andrew Garfield who is 5'10 1/2" (he's easily 1 1/2" inches taller than Jamie Foxx who could even be taller than 5'9").
joe joe said on 23/Nov/15
As I have said before. He is not a 184 IMO. I'm 185 and have always had an inch or so on him when I've met him. I would peg him at 181/182 at best guys who are 184 usually feel the same height as me but he was noticebly shorter. Here he is with 1m78 listed Guy Pearce on the far left of the shot
Click Here
again with 1m78 guy pearce in similar foot ware but Pattinson has the better posture
Click Here
I can't see 6 cm difference here

in this next photo Pearce has the better posture and Pattinson has a relaxed posture
Click Here

As I've said I've met him and he didn't look a full 6ft to me. I would peg him at 5'11.5 in these pics I can not really see 6cm between him and pearce.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 5/Nov/15
180-181cm. Joe joe's and Dan's eyewitness accounts are spot on IMO.
joe joe said on 20/Oct/15
@Dan Agreed. I've met him a few times and he's, he is definitely not over 6ft bare foot
Dan said on 15/Oct/15
I saw him at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport in 2012, he clearly looked 5'11 to me, no more.
Matt said on 13/Oct/15
154 pounds at 6.1. Must look like a bean pole
S.J.H said on 1/Oct/15
I'm not convince on the 0.25 , i think lots of time he apear half inch shorter than kellen lutz which rob listed same height as pattinson
joe joe said on 16/Sep/15
@6ftMagician I'm not in the business of asking people to stand up straight and take a picture with them when i'm out and about. Like I said. I am saying it like I see it. and people can believe it or not.
Pete said on 7/Sep/15
@6ft magician
at what time did u measure arnie?
6ftMagician said on 6/Sep/15
@ joe joe

Yeah mate, and just yesterday I had dinner with Arnie. He was still over 183cm barefoot, I kid you not. I measured him twice and nearly had a stroke in disbelief.

Get real. No one will believe your claims without evidence.
Anton said on 2/Sep/15
He always looked 5' 11.75" (182 cm) to me.
joe joe said on 27/Aug/15
I hate having to justify the fact that I've met someone on here. Obviously I cannot prove it but people will have to take my word for it. I work in the entertainment industry so I meet alot of people on this site. Funnily enough I have worked very closely with his current girlfriend, Twigs. Ive known her for years and produced records for her. You will also have to take my word that when I have met him I have always had around 1.5/2 inches on him and I am always measured at 1m85 therefore I would peg him at around 181. Just saying it how I see it. no body needs to get offened by it.
joe joe said on 26/Aug/15
Ive met him many times. He is not 184 He is around 181/182. people can say it's nonsense that I have met him etc, and everyone is entitled to their opinion but I will keep saying that with my self at 185 everytime i have met him I have been over an inch taller than him. BTW I am a record producer and I've worked with his current girlfriend Talia. I'm guessing 99% of the people thinking he is for sure 6'1 haven't seen him in person. Well I have and he is not a 1m84 man
Alex said on 22/Aug/15
Dude I'll downgrade people when need be, which is about half the time, but Hal is right – no matter who he's cast against, seen against, his proportions, whatever... he's an easy 6'1, worst case scenario a 6'0.
hal said on 3/Jun/15
It's not surprising to see people saying he's 5'11". Some of you downgraders are pathetic. Robert's either a strong 6'0" or a weak 6'1". Probably the former.

And I'd bet that 99% of the "I've seen him/her in real life" stories on this site are BS.
cozypowell said on 30/Mar/15
He is 1.85 no doubt idiots...
joe 193cm night said on 10/Mar/15
I also already said that I had met jared padalacki
joe 193cm night said on 7/Mar/15
it is impossible to say that without evidence
joe joe said on 6/Mar/15
againhe is not 184 I am 185 and had a clear 2 inch advantage over him. He is 5'11 at best. Rob if you met him you would know a 184 listing for him is nonsense. No offense but he just is no where near 1'84
Judd said on 5/Mar/15
joe, it's hard to make a perfectly measurement of the height that you have just out of bed, if you consider also that yu lose like 40-50% of it during the first hour...but i agree he might be a true 6'0.5", so 6'1.25" just out of bed!
joe 193cm night said on 3/Mar/15
surely your agency the measured 186 cm in the morning I think
Hypado said on 2/Mar/15
I agree with Jake,

Robert Pattinson's height is 6ft 0.5in (184 cm)

184,3 cm or maybe 184,5
Jake: 1.84 m- 1.85 m said on 1/Mar/15
I believe he's right around the 6ft 0.5in/184 cm mark.
heightism said on 26/Feb/15
Robert's footwear looks suspicious
Hypado said on 18/Feb/15
With 174 cm/5ft 8.5in listed here, Dane DeHaan, Robert Pattinson looks a legit 184 cm/6ft 0.5in guy.
Celebheights 188 CM said on 15/Dec/14
@Plonk I agree with you there, but the weight claim might be outdated (I don't know when he claimed to be this weight). He used to appear thin like 6-7 years ago, with him now appearing like he has gained some weight. I would guess that he's maybe 175-180 pounds at 6'1" today.
plonk said on 29/Oct/14
Im sure if he was 6ft 1" and 11stone then he would look a hell of a lot thinner than he is, im 5ft 10" and 11stone and im really skinny! But he always looks about average. He is either shorter or heavier
Joe said on 26/Oct/14
Weak 6'1".
Max said on 13/Oct/14
He actually looks 6'1
Danny said on 16/Sep/14
I've noticed that most modeling agencies list their models as at LEAST an inch taller than they actually are, some even going as far as two inches. Robert looks like a pretty tall guy, I would say hes about 5'11.25 without shoes on.
Jay 184cm said on 16/Sep/14
This is a good listing in my view. He looks a fraction off Kellan Lutz (185cm?) but a fraction over legit 183cm Jamie Campbell Bower. He looks 184cm. Pictures of Pattinson and Campbell Bower to illustrate:
Click Here
joe joe said on 8/Sep/14
I will say again. When I met him which was about 1 month back. I felt I had a clear 2 inches on him. I'm am measured at 185 so I would give him no more than 181/182 at a push. His frame and look can give the impression of 6'1 but he really isnt. This is coming from someone who is only just 6'1
shaz said on 29/Aug/14
Okay people some of these baseless, tactless claims need to stop.

Rule # 1 about models and actors: you give your tallest height possible in shoes. They're not technically lying, i'm positive his head can touch 185 at some point in the day with the right footwear.

He's 182 flat, i've met him in person. He is the EXACT same height as me- I wake up at at around 183.5 cm (6".25 range) and I go to be at around 5'11.5 range. I dont care what people say, because frankly, im considered tal wherever I go. Am I a giant? a beast amongst men? No. But I am considered Tall.

Hell, because i dress preppy, my Shoes alone make me at the VERY LEAST, ABSOLUTE MINIMUM 6".5... Normally i'm just a fraction of an inch (less then .5 inches) off 6"1 with shoes (for that matter-joggers, boots, sneakers, etc etc).

The only time I'm 6 flat is when im wearing slippers or flats..

I digress. back to the point. People think.. no, people SWEAR, that I am 6"1 or 6"2. Its ALL about proportions. He has the same physique as me as well.. My wing span is 6"5 so my feet are almost a foot long each.. My proportions make me look tall, and I model too just btw.

He's 182 Barefoot and @Rob should definitely look into adjusting that. This 185 isnt his barefoot height, its is height in shoes in the morning or early afternoon.
dante said on 23/Aug/14
@Joe Joe I saw him once from a distance myself, too. It was in London, indeed. He was walking on the pavement just in front of me, approx. 20 m away. I couldn't tell he was taller than I am, and I'm 6' spot on in the morning ( approx. 181.5 - 182 cm during the day ).
Pedro said on 22/Aug/14
@dude1e To answer your question, just take a look at pictures of Rob next to 5'3" or 6'1" people: Click Here
dude1e said on 21/Aug/14
What would a 5ft7 come on a 6ft person?
Pedro said on 17/Aug/14
@Arch I think that Theo Kingma must be at least 6'5" or taller. Here on the minute 31:00 of this video he is shaking hands with Jason Segel and you can clearly see that Theo is taller than him: Click Here
By the way, I repeated my post before because I thought the first one didn't reached the site. Sorry for that!
Arch Stanton said on 17/Aug/14
Kingma can look a weak 6'5" and similar sort of height to Tim Robbins in some photos. Somewhere around 194-95 would look about right. Very tall range.
Arch Stanton said on 17/Aug/14
Difficult angle but Kingma looks like he could be a strong 6'4" guy.
Pedro said on 16/Aug/14
Here is Robert next to the president of the "Hollywood Foreign Press Acossiation", Theo Kingma: Click Here
How tall do you estimate Theo Kingma? He is Dutch, by the way.
Pedro said on 15/Aug/14
Here is Robert next to the president of the "Hollywood Foreign Press Acossiation", Theo Kingma: Click Here
How tall do you estimate Theo Kingma? He is dutch, by the way.
Adam said on 13/Aug/14
This Guy Has to be 182 cm Maximum. What do you Think Rob, He Gives the Impression of Being 6'2' But Still.
joe joe said on 8/Aug/14
there is no way he is 1m84. I saw im last night at Shorditch house and he was a clear 2inches shorter than me at least. Im 1m85. I would give im 1m80 seriously the guy is not anywere near 6'1.
Womkey said on 2/Jul/14
@ -
My height decreases 1.5 to 1 cm throughout the day
Peter said on 23/Jun/14
@ Seahawksfan

So is he 6'0.75 as you mentioned or 187+cm?
A lady said on 13/Jun/14
I think he is 185cm tall as listed everywhere on net so this makes him 6'1" approximately
kevin said on 7/Jun/14
after seeing pics with hemsworth, pearce and cusack i dont think hes over 6ft.
lara said on 28/May/14
I swear I remember him saying when he first became huge when Twilight was released that he was 6ft. He doesn't really look any taller than that.
Guy said on 25/May/14
He looks like 183 here with 188 John Cusack. Click Here
Pete said on 20/May/14
Click Here
Bammer said on 19/May/14
I've just seen a pic with Robert Pattinson and Liam Hemsworth in Cannes.
You claim Liam to be 6'3" and if that's correct, Pattinson can't be more than 5'11,5" because Liam is at least 3,5 in. higher than Robert on that pic.
berta said on 13/May/14
kellan lutch strong six footer and robert pattinson weak six footer. zachary levi. who is 191 ( i believe he is 192 because he always have shoes on that give him nothing in heigh) look almost 4 inches taller.
No Surprises said on 3/May/14
yeah he looks tall at this height.
JA said on 21/Mar/14
Is it part of the "actors guideline to success" to lie about your height. I can understand lying by 2cm, but by 4-5 really? If you're 6 feet tall why say 6-2?
gian92 said on 10/Mar/14
he is max 6'0 barefoot
MD said on 6/Mar/14
Part of this can be claimed to a difference in footwear not being able to see the footwear, but it is still kind of surprising to see that 5'11.5" Jimmy Kimmel looks the same height if not slightly taller.

Click Here
Chris 182 cm said on 12/Feb/14
I don't think his posture is that bad
- said on 11/Feb/14
people only loss 6mm with the vertebrae constriction during the day, its nonesense to say that a person can actually shorten more than 1cm in the course of the day...
Anon said on 11/Feb/14
I would trust site curator Rob's gauging of height more than most people's estimations on this site. I believe the 6'0.25 listing is accurate but what is Pattinson's posture like? And if a person does have bad posture would you give them an extra 0.5cm/0.25in based on what their posture would be like if it was normal ..because that seems fairer.
[Editor Rob: for 3 years from 2004-6 I kept asking the events company who I get most photos from to do photoshoots. Eventually they did in 06, but there's a number of guests they got from 2003-2006 that I'm sure they are kicking themselves over by not having photoshoots with - namely a guy like Pattinson who did 2 events! They missed the boat on that one...of course 'over the table' pics are generally crap for height...]
Natasha said on 10/Feb/14
Maybe 6'0.5"??
Realist said on 8/Feb/14
At 18 he looked 5'11 in Harry Potter, same height as Stanislav Ianevski(victor krum). Probably gained a few cms to reach 185.
Hannah said on 23/Jan/14
He's 6'1" end of
Lenad is sexy said on 14/Jan/14
to me pattinson is a strong 6'0, mayyybe a weak 6'1!
avi said on 7/Jan/14
@Sophie says on 5/Jan/14

its harder for a female to guess height if they are way shorter. you may just feel he is a lot taller than he is. i assume you are between 5'1-5'7 so most people are taller than you. even so at 6'0 i feel like many men are 6'2-6'4 but in reality if they stood next to me in a picture the difference is not as great as it may feel.
Sophie said on 5/Jan/14
Rob is definitely 6'1 I saw him at the water for Elephants premiere in 2011 and he was very tall, and he's listed as 6'1 in many places, and everyone who meets him always say how he's much taller than they think, and behind the scenes in movies they say he is 6'1. Plus Rob has bad posture so it might make him appear shorter in some photos.
SixFeetTwoInches said on 29/Dec/13
Ofc, anything at or over 6'0'' is considered rather "tall", definitely "above the average". The average world height for a man is approx. 5'9'', at the same time in Europe it would be around 5'11 and in the US, also 5'11''. So still, 6'0'' and above is indeed rather "tall". There are some place which show a deviation from this range, e.g. the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway and some other places, both in Europe world regions, but this are only FEW places, where the average height for a man is 6'0''.
It doesn't change the fact that 6'0'' and above is "rather tall", "tallish", or at least "above the average".
The most important thing, to remember, is always the referencing part. With 6'0'' you are taller than approx. 75% of men out there in the world, and approx. 95% women out there.
So yes, it is still "tall", I'd lean to say. My bro is that height and he gives a "tall" impression amongst most of the people out there.
rkc_cat said on 29/Dec/13
Just noticed how Ed Gathegi, Kellan Lutz and Pattinson are all listed at 6'0.25". I agree with Gathegi and Lutz's listing, but Pattinson is visibly shorter than both, so it's just impossible for him to be the listed height. He's consistently 0.5" shorter than them (sometimes even a bit more, but never more than 1"), so that puts him in the 5'11.5"-5'11.75" range, definitely under 6', eventhough he can give off that impression sometimes. A legit 182 cm is my guess.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Dec/13
6ft0.25/184cm max and Kellan Lutz is 6ft0.75/185cm.
Really, this guy can appear 5ft11 range in Remember Me opposite Brosnan.
MD said on 17/Dec/13
Kind of off topic, but how tall does director Adam Shankman look here with Robert Pattinson?

Click Here

I was surprised by how short he looked. I always thought he was below average, but he looks short, here.
Lenad is sexy said on 14/Dec/13
strong 6'0
Hypado said on 22/Nov/13
183/184cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Sep/13
"Robert Pattinson's height is 6ft 0in (183cm)"

Not more or less. Solid 184cm out of bed
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 25/Aug/13
5'11", 180cm for Pattinson. I think this listing is 1.25" too high. His thin frame makes him look taller than he really is.
cole said on 9/Aug/13
Rob don't you think he looks shorter than this next to 5'7 Christoph Waltz?
Dr JJ said on 30/Jul/13
Doesn't look the full 6' 0". Probably 5' 11'. However, he is a posho public schoolboy, and they're usually tall.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jul/13
6ft on the nose while Kellan Lutz is 6ft0.5/184cm, Billy Burke is 6ft1.25/186cm and Chaske Spencer is 6ft1.5/187cm
ross said on 11/Jul/13
How does his height keep getting downgraded while Lautner's BS stats have stood for years, despite even the wardrobe girl on his new film saying he's 5'8"?

Pattinson still looks a solid 6'1" to me. You can see here that in sneakers, and not standing totally straight, he still has inches on Facinelli and looks around the same height as Lutz.

Click Here
Dasher said on 7/Jul/13
186-7 cm He doesn't look so much shorter than Michael Strahan so I think he is not that short that most of you say in the comments
avi said on 21/Jun/13
hmmmm how is 6ft really "tall" anymore when it seems to be a dime a dozen. everyday i see men between 5'11-6'3 easy. i admit 6'4-6'6 is rare but anything between 6'0 and weak 6'3 is pretty common. just saying.
Jimmy said on 1/Jun/13
Lol I am a solid 192 cm tall guy and I quite tower Robert, explain that?
Europe said on 25/May/13
Avg. height for males around the whole Europe is 5'11. For the USA, for example, it is 5'10.5. Therefore, it can be safele assumed that someone who is 6'0 and above is considered above average/tall, whereas above 6'2 - very tall. Anything below 5'10 for a man is rather short, with the example of Tom Cruise being very short for a man.
George said on 18/May/13
As for the photo with Richard gere well done you've found a photo of a 177/178cm man who is closer to the camera with his arm over Robert pattinsons neck and Robert has bad posture...ummm let's all say he's 5ft11!!! No sorry guys he is a person that would measure between 6ft and 6ft1 in height. Just imagine if Robert stretched out his spine and stood eye to eye with Richard? I think most of you could imagine rob standing 2 inches taller of not slightly more. Rest my case.
George said on 18/May/13
As for the photo with Richard gere well done you've found a photo of a 177/178cm man who is closer to the camera with his arm over Robert pattinsons neck and Robert has bad posture...ummm let's all say he's 5ft11!!! No sorry guys he is a person that would measure between 6ft and 6ft1 in height. Just imagine if Robert stretched out his spine and stood eye to eye with Richard? I think most of you could imagine rob standing 2 inches taller of not slightly more. Rest my case.
lelman said on 13/May/13
@ice lol, any 15 year old who was legit 6'0.5 would never consider himself short, no matter where in the world he is. Average height in Europe for a grown adult is like 5'10", so especially not there. True you're not that tall, but way above average.
Anon said on 26/Apr/13
Pattinson compared to Lutz he has loose posture but I never see dominated by Lutz...if both are described as 6 feet 1 then 6 feet plus seems ok by me no matter the haters
5ft10guy said on 26/Apr/13
@ice its tall probably the people around you are really tall but lets not be naive its above average once your 6ft1 its legit tall .
ice said on 20/Apr/13
wow wtf this guy is considered tall ? at 6'0.5 ?? Im that height and 15 years old and feel pretty damn short for my age lol but i live in Europe
Linebacker28 said on 20/Apr/13
Yeah, anything between 182-185cm is fair game for Pattinson. Has consistently looked a good 6' to my eye. Though, did have some strong 6'1" looks in Harry Potter but most were generally quite a bit shorter than him in that.
Shell said on 14/Apr/13
i just looked at a bunch of pictures of pattinson and lutz together. In most of the pictures they look about the same height. In some Robert looks a little taller and in some kellen looks a little taller. I would say they seem pretty close in height, although robert Pattinson does have bad posture, he always looks hunched over so he might actually be a little taller.
Chuckyb said on 13/Apr/13
I have seen a few pictures where it appears that he is wearing elevator shoes. I can tell because the pants do not fit properly over the top of the shoe. This is an issue with dress pants since they normally don't come in a boot cut. Some of the pictures posted on here also show this.
Arch Stanton said on 14/Mar/13
Pedro says on 23/Jan/13
Rob whats the meaning of strapping? means strong 6 feet 1 or weak
[Editor Rob: it's 'strong']

I've been called "a strapping young lad". It been well built/muscular/robust. Not exactly Robert Pattinson when those words spring to mind...
LG69 said on 11/Mar/13
My coworker saw him up close when he came to San Francisco. She said, "He's not as tall as i thought he was, but he's not short...about 5'11"." He looks about 2"-2.5" shorter than 6'2" Jaime Waylett. Not quite a 6 footer. I'd give him 5'11.5" peak out of bed height.
Dmeyer said on 20/Feb/13
This Guy CAN Look 1-1.25 in under lutz and then stands tall and CAN Look 0.5 in taller than luts from 5'11 to 6'0.75 with posture ,
thc-182 said on 20/Feb/13
he is not really shorter than gil birmingham, i would even say they are the same height...but pattinson has a bad posture.
6'0" is right
Bo said on 5/Feb/13
Definately not "strapping"
Lo sgozzatore said on 25/Jan/13
Yeah, this height is about right. He always looked a 6'-6'0.5 range guy to me.
Balrog said on 24/Jan/13
Rob, honestly you think Pattinson and Lutz are same height? Kellan is taller than Rob in every single pic.
[Editor Rob: I think pattison standing with excellent posture is rarer than him standing loose]
Pedro said on 23/Jan/13
Rob whats the meaning of strapping? means strong 6 feet 1 or weak
[Editor Rob: it's 'strong']
orion said on 20/Jan/13
I think he is tall, 6 feet=182.88cm,I believe that. For the pictures that Alex is showing you can see that easily Robert can be 6f and little bit more, the pictures compare the height of Rob with two taller men.
Godred said on 14/Jan/13
@lolo - How can someone his age have had a peak height?
Pedro said on 14/Jan/13
He is probably 185 look him he is tall and im not sure he is shorter than lutz
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 11/Jan/13
Hew is right, Pattinson needs a downgrade to 180cm flat.
Hew said on 11/Jan/13
HOW can he still be listed 6'0.25 when he's shorter than Lutz and Gil Birmingham??
Xina said on 9/Jan/13
He has a leg length discrepancy so sometimes he will look shorter. During those times, you'll see one leg is slightly bent. Plus his mother never taught him to stand up straight!
lolo said on 7/Jan/13
height: 6' (183cm)
(peak height was 6'1.5 (187cm))
Original said on 24/Dec/12
5'11.5" i believe.
Aragorn 5\'11 said on 23/Dec/12
I saw him up-close at the Twilight Saga Breaking Dawn Part 2 premiere in Los Angeles. He's probably 5'11.5 because in shoes he looks a little over 6' feet. His claim 6'1 is true if he's talking about himself in shoes. My guess...

5'11.5 in the morning
5'11.25 in the day
5'11 before bed
173 said on 17/Dec/12
@thc-182: Not so, I've seen PLENTY of times where he looks ~180cm but like I mentioned in my last comment, it's because of his terrible posture. He often looks shorter than Kellan Lutz who also is listed here at 6'0.25" (184 cm)...
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 14/Dec/12
Indeed, another 180cm MAX listed at 6'+.
Chameleon said on 13/Dec/12
180 max hes shorter than Lutz.
Hew said on 13/Dec/12
He's obviously not this tall, as he's noticably shorter than 6ft Kellan Lutz and 5'11.25/.5 Gil Birmingham. Barely taller than 5'10 (or less) Richard Gere. 5'11 for Pattinson is a safe bet.
balrog said on 3/Dec/12
A 182 guy, looks shorter due bad posture.
Chameleon said on 2/Dec/12
He is 180 flat like Gosling..
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 1/Dec/12
180cm flat.
173 said on 1/Dec/12
@Arch: Yeah he looks ~180cm there with Richard Gere.
Arch Stanton said on 1/Dec/12
Click Here

With Richard Gere who is mostly likely under 5'10" today, does he look 184cm? Not sure he does.. ~~~~
Arch Stanton said on 1/Dec/12
Click Here

With Richard Gere who is mostly likely under 5'10" today, does he look 184cm? Not sure he does.. ~~~~
Truthman said on 24/Nov/12
Only 154 pounds? He doesn't looks that skinny.
173 said on 24/Nov/12
So, you're telling me he loses about an inch in posture? Looks noticeably shorter than Kellan Lutz but both are listed at 6'0.25"?
Arch Stanton said on 15/Nov/12
Click Here

Really don't know what people see in him. There are truckloads of better looking American actors. I wouldn't want to look like him put it that way but for some reason a lot of women seem to think he's super handsome. He looks around 6'.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 14/Nov/12
He looked 180-181cm next to Gil Birmingham and Dev Patel. Clearly shorter than 182-183cm Lutz and Brosnan as well. Nothing over 182cm barefoot for Pattinson.
178 said on 13/Nov/12
The question is: is the height in the evening or in the morning? Because we are measuring 2 cm less in the evening ...
Robert pattinson, I do not see it below 182 cm EVENING those who say otherwise are probably jealous ... I myself 178 cm 180 cm at night so in the morning, and I see much bigger than me (well it may be a llusion ...).
In any case, there is nothing to discuss, pattinson = 182 cm and 184 in the evening in the morning!
In any case many liars regarding height. Do not forget that the true height is:
The later-possibe (12h after waking)
-Barefoot
-We do not count the hair :)))
alex said on 12/Nov/12
Next to Michael Strahan - 6 ft 5 in (1.96 m)
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Next to Kevin Durend - 6 ft 6 in (1.98 m)
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Romy said on 11/Nov/12
I think the height's correct. When you see him next to Kristen when she's wearing really frigging high heels she doesn't even reach above his eyes and she's about 5'3 /5'4. To me 6 foot and a half maybe would be about right. Plus he doesn't look really shorter than my 6'1 friend, Rob has an awful posture though so he looks shorter.
Ua said on 7/Nov/12
He was on Jimmy Kimmel couple of days ago and looked about the same heoght as him.
Tony said on 6/Nov/12
This is more proof that modeling heights are bogus.
Pedro said on 5/Nov/12
WTF? Robert pattinson its about 184cm min at night..so he is about 185 at least see him in pictures he is really tall
Chameleon said on 2/Nov/12
No, will smith is 6'1 maximum. Better chance he is 6' than he is over 6'1
173 said on 1/Nov/12
@Chameleon: so you think Will Smith is also below 6'1" aswell? If so, I don't agree. Will Smith is at least 6'1".
Chameleon said on 1/Nov/12
@173: He is not over 184cm. I posted lots of evidence showing he's 6' back in November and some other times but Its all gone. 6 feet is what he looks but standing tall he might be 184cm but no way is he taller then that. Im sticking to 6'. Just like Will Smith he is not 6'1.
Ed said on 31/Oct/12
I was near him 2 weeks ago almost i'm a STRONG 6 foot tall and he was surely at least half an inch taller than me. The height provided it's correct
173 said on 30/Oct/12
@Chameleon: You sure Jim Carry is only 6ft though? I mean he does look pretty tall, taller than 6ft at least...
Chameleon said on 29/Oct/12
Im the one that proved Carrey is 6 feet. The tallest he can be is 184cm and thats it.
Anyway, if Pattison is 6 feet I guess Lutz is at least 6'1 and Gil over 6' right? No sir.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 28/Oct/12
@Chameleon:
I changed my mind, I think that Dave Patel could be a bit above 6'2 actually, he looks close to the very tall mark.

Pattinson is just 6'0 but is slouching a lot, that's wht he looks shorter, upstraight he's not far away from Pierce Brosnan.

You're the one that thinks that Jim Carrey is 183cm, I hope you're joking, 180cm for Pattinson is a big joke, the lowest I see this guy is actually 182cm.
And Jim Carrey isn't under 185cm.
173 said on 25/Oct/12
I agree Chameleon. If Kellan Lutz is really 6ft, then Robert Pattinson is in the 5'11" range and not in the 6'0" range. In every photo I've seen of Robert and Kellan together, Kellan is ALWAYS taller.
Chameleon said on 24/Oct/12
Ehm Larc, u admit he was shorter than Brosnan and 'destroyed' by Pavel yet u say this listing is correct? He is also smaller than Kellan Lutz and max same height as Gil Birmingham, in other words what the hell are u thinking? Pattison is a 180 guy.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 23/Oct/12
Pattinson at 6'2? Maybe if you count also his big hair...without counting the hair he's 6'0-6'0.25, the listing is correct.
JohnDosen said on 16/Oct/12
If Uma Thurman is 5'11, then Robert is max 5'11,5.

Look at this pic from the recent ELLE event, were Robert standing with Uma, who's leaning towards him. She's wearing approx. 3" heels, Robert approx. 1" still she stands taller than him. I'll say Robert is max. 5'11,5 no more.

Click Here
balrog said on 15/Oct/12
IMO: Lutz 183-184 cms
Pattinson 182-183 cms (looks shorter because doesn't has good posture but I'm sure he's closer to 6'0'' than 5'11'' )
Lautner 172-173 cms
173 said on 15/Oct/12
Rob, I wasn't talking about a downgrade from Pattinson's 6'2" modelling claim, I mean from this 6'0.25" listing. Kellan Lutz who you have at 6ft is always taller than Robert. If Kellan is 183cm, Robert is around 180cm.
173 said on 13/Oct/12
Rob, if you downgraded Kellan Lutz, shouldn't you downgrade Rob Pattinson and Taylor Lautner aswell? Kellan Lutz is taller than Robert pattinson.
[Editor Rob: maybe not so much taylor, but robert 6ft or 6ft 0.25 is a lot more likely than 6ft 2 modelling claim yeah.]
crrrrr said on 10/Oct/12
183 cm
BEASTMAN said on 7/Oct/12
182cm.
Dean said on 6/Oct/12
He looks as tall as Peter Facinelli who's around 5'10"
Silent d said on 5/Oct/12
181cm.
John Dosen said on 29/Sep/12
I say max. 180 cm too. As Louis said, he's def. shorter than Kellan Lutz, who's listed as being 183 cm, so Robert is max. 180 cm.

Click Here
Chameleon said on 28/Sep/12
Yep, 180 max
Louis said on 28/Sep/12
shorter than 183 kellan lutz, 180 max
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 23/Sep/12
@Toby:
You don't even deserve a reply for a stupid and offensive comment like that.
daryl said on 22/Sep/12
Any one know how tall his bestfriend and fellow actor tom strurridge is?
spot on said on 21/Sep/12
1.83cm spot on, a legit 6 footer, he doesn't have a good posture that's why people mistake him for being 5'11"
Lawyer123 said on 20/Sep/12
Rob is definitely at least 183 cm, but saying that Taylor Lautner is 178 cm is a joke. Compare him to his ex-girlfriend, that American girl Taylor Swift - she towers over him by approx 3-5 cm. I'd say he's somewhere in between 173-175 cm range.
Pattinson defo 183 cm or 185 cm.
Chameleon said on 13/Sep/12
No way 6'0 he's like 180cm scroll down and watch some of the evidence left.
zero said on 12/Sep/12
Patel is taller than 6'1.5'', Dev should be upgraded, go to his page and you'll see that's he's pretty close in height with Nicholas Hoult who is listed at 6'2.75'' and looks it. Patel gotta be at least a solid 6'2'' if not more and Pattinson looks a 6'0'' guy but could be taller because he always has poor posture, the listing is okay.
Toby said on 10/Sep/12
Larc you are one of those pathetic people who think's being taller then someone else means you "destroy" them
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 8/Sep/12
lol...Dave Patel is 6'1.5-6'1.75 and clearly destroys this guy, he made him look 5'11.5 in their pic together.

To not count the fact that he looked also noticeably shorter than 6'1.25 Pierce Brosnan in "Remember Me".

6'1 in Hollywood means 6'0 flat in truth, and that's his real height.
TrueGuessing said on 8/Sep/12
No, I'm not a girl. I'm just tired of guys who cant accept that some celebs are tall, without wearing lifts. Pattison is not a liftwearer, he is tall! Robert 6'1 and Taylor 5'10. We do have some celebs that wears lifts, some bigger lifts then others. One of the biggest liftwearers being Brad Pitt. He's about 5'10 - 5'11, and is desperate about being 6'1
Chameleon said on 28/Aug/12
Lol he sure didnt look more than 180cm with Gil and that 186cm guy that someone posted a pic of with him. He is not 184cm.
Shaun said on 24/Aug/12
He never looks anything under 6 ft. 6'-6'1" range.
zalo said on 20/Aug/12
He can't possibly be 5'11. He's 6 and that's that. Rob put him at 6 feet for a reason folks! :D Doesn't matter what kind of footwear he wears, he's tall.
Tim said on 16/Aug/12
Someone show me a picture where he looks under 6ft.

There isn't one.

Fact is, when he wakes up he's 184cm. So He'll look 6ft all day.

Show me a picture where at anytime he looks below that and you win all my internets. Rob has this one right.
Godred said on 4/Aug/12
@TrueGuessing - I`m betting you`re a girl,right?
Chameleon said on 2/Aug/12
Kidding me he aint taller than Gil who is below 6' and taylor is noway near 178cm tall who are you trying to fool.
TrueGuessing said on 30/Jul/12
Guys, stop downgrading him, he is 185 cm tall, and Taylor is 178 cm tall, are you jealous of Pattison? Since you downgrade him so much?
Ricky said on 30/Jul/12
Defo 6ft 1 tall look at this picture

Click Here!image-number=12
bill said on 29/Jul/12
183cm
Chameleon said on 14/Jun/12
180cm
Silent d said on 29/Jan/12
184cm.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 24/Jan/12
He's 180-181cm, 182cm at the absolute MAX. This guy is around the same height as Ryan Gosling, who is overlisted as well. I could live with a 182cm listing, but nothing over that.
Aie said on 21/Jan/12
Is he bow legged anyway?
Chris said on 19/Jan/12
5'11 is too low for him. He tends to tilt the head down in the photos. I'd give him 5'11.75 - 6' (182-183 cms). But definitely needs a half inch downgrade.
ChiasmataX said on 17/Jan/12
Rob, just check out Pattinson's barefoot picture that I posted with Kristen Stewart down below on Dec 4, is that really how a near 6'1 guy look with a 5'4? I believed I saw a picture that you posted on the height challenge page that have the guy from height challenge # 10 with the girl from height challenge# 11 and he had a whole head on her. The point is if Pattinson is truly 184cm barefoot he will not look 180cm with Kristen in that barefoot picture. The max I can buy is 182-183cm for Pattinson. If he's 6'1 barefoot, he would've claim 6'2 since it's Hollywood.
[Editor Rob: challenger 10 was on his tip toes in the photo with the 5ft 5 girl]
Chameleon said on 11/Jan/12
180cm range, no way 184cm.
Silent d said on 10/Jan/12
Kellan lutz looks huge. He must be wearing lifts. Pattinson never looked shorter than 6 foot. 184cm. I'm assuming everyone is wearing lifts. Btw i am not a fan of robert. Don't like the guy but he is tall. 184cm.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 7/Jan/12
Yes you are right mId, he is below 6'. He appears taller in movies because of his thin build and tricky camera angles. He's around 180cm flat.
mId said on 6/Jan/12
maybe this can be of some help. Click Here he sure doesn't look over 6'here in my eyes.
Attila _194cm. said on 5/Jan/12
182 for Pattinson is a joke...
Chris said on 2/Jan/12
Check Patel's page. The guy needs an upgrade. Pattinson looks 182-183 cms, but then again the guy has bad posture.
Bob said on 1/Jan/12
this is a better picture to judge
Click Here @Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP
Chris said on 29/Dec/11
That pic is horrible to judge Pattinson's height, the ground is tilded, makes Lautner looks taller and Pattinson shorter.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 27/Dec/11
@J In that picture Lautner's shoes look pretty normal to me - if anything, Pattinson seems to have the footwear advantage, not Lautner.
J said on 26/Dec/11
@Mr-Killer Shrimp Lautner is known to wear huge platform shoes.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 21/Dec/11
This picture was posted on the Kristen Stewart page:
Click Here
The difference between 174cm listed Taylor Lautner and Pattinson is at most 5-6cm. In fact many people don't buy Lautner being 174cm - he's probably closer to 170. No effing way Pattinson is 184cm, he's struggling with 180cm in that picture.
Robert said on 21/Dec/11
Yeah he looks so tall in Twillight. And He is 185 cm
Chameleon said on 21/Dec/11
Pattinson 180
Lutz 183 max.
Chameleon said on 21/Dec/11
@ Mr KS: Lutz I can buy as 6' ... 6'1? Not convinced. He was visbly taller than Pattinson I remember so Pattinson 180 flat, Lutz 6'0 range. But not 6'1 range.
ChiasmataX said on 20/Dec/11
@ Valjiu not everybody on here is " tiny insecure people", there are some just base their assumptions of celebrities' height on real legit pictures. Just look the barefoot picture of Rob and Kristen I posted down below. That's is not how a 184-185cm guy look next to a 163cm person. I am 178cm barefoot and I looked just as tall with my 163cm friend. Rob is somewhere between 180-182cm not over 183cm...maybe in dress shoes.
ChiasmataX said on 20/Dec/11
@ Mr KS and Chameleon, yeah lots of height inflation on this site, although there are some accurate height listings. Hopefully Rob will be in the mood for downgrades soon.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 18/Dec/11
@Chameleon - Lol yeah, 180 flat for Pattinson is not impossible at all judging from all the pictures that have been posted on here. Chameleon what is your opinion on Kellan Lutz' height? The more pictures I see of him, the more I think he's no more than 182-183 MAX, and even that might be too generous.
Chameleon said on 18/Dec/11
Not even that, 181 MAX for Pattinson. More likeley 180 flat lol....
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 17/Dec/11
@Valjiu - Lol dude, how do you explain the pictures of Pattinson with Gil Birmingham? That is NOT how a 6'1+ guy (like you suggest) looks next to a 5'11 range guy. He also doesn't look 6'1 next to Kristen Stewart in the barefoot picture posted by ChiasmataX on 4/Dec/11. 182 MAX for Pattinson, end of story.
Godred said on 17/Dec/11
@Valjiu - it works both ways though with the fangirls trying to bump up the height of the celebs they are attracted to,to meet their magic height number needs,even if it doesn`t have any basis in reality.No I don`t think he`s under 6 ft,but he`s nothing over it either in the photos with the other celebs.
Chameleon said on 16/Dec/11
Lol, open your eyes and see he is clearly below 6'.
Valjiu said on 15/Dec/11
I'm just gonna assume everybody here who says he is under 6 feet are tiny insecure people who got dropped on their heads. Even with the terrible posture he has, he is clearly a solid 6'1, probably even slightly taller tahn that.
Chris said on 13/Dec/11
Wow in that pic posted by mr killer shrimp, Lautner looks so small, like five - six inches shorter than Pattinson. But the year was 2009.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 13/Dec/11
182 is the absolute MAX that I could buy for Pattinson.
lol93 said on 9/Dec/11
he has bad posture... i think he is little over 6'0 so 184cm is right
Sean73 said on 8/Dec/11
Hey shrimp killa-i agree with you,birmingham is wearing lifts again.God, this guy is really insecure about his height.
Godred said on 7/Dec/11
If he`s under 6 ft,it`s not by much,I don`t believe he is anything over it though.
Mr-KILLER-SHRIMP said on 7/Dec/11
Another picture of Pattinson and Gil Birmingham:
Click Here
Judging from the pictures of Birmingham and Rob on Birmingham's page, Birmingham is 179-180 MAX. Pattinson is about the same height, he's 180-181 at best, he needs a downgrade.
Chris said on 6/Dec/11
I think he could be the 6'1 that he claims, but i believe that he has a bad posture, so he looks a 6' guy. 6'0.5 is fair enough.
Chameleon said on 4/Dec/11
Indeed, a lot of evidence suggest he is 181 MAX and now I believe so.
ChiasmataX said on 4/Dec/11
These pictures with Kristen will show that he's under 183cm.
Click Here Rob was in Nike air max? So he had footwear advantage with Kristen.
Click Here Here they both in barefoot and he looks about 178-180cm (tip toe on one leg?) at most if Kristen is 163cm.
Godred said on 3/Dec/11
@Daniella Davis - Who are you talking to?
Daniella Davis said on 29/Nov/11
You should of been a little shorter so that Taylor aka Jacbo been taller than you. But my friends love you.
Maio said on 29/Nov/11
According with rob, Robert Pattinson is 6 ft 0.5 in/184 cm.
Chameleon said on 27/Nov/11
Yeah this guy is 181 at best..
xyz.reg(186cms-187cms) said on 27/Nov/11
A legit 181cms guy...nothing more than this..!!
Godred said on 26/Nov/11
@pete - yes more than average,6 ft max.
ChiasmataX said on 25/Nov/11
Robert looks 1cm shorter than the supposedly listed 182cm Gil Birmingham on this site). It is even questionable if Gil is a legit 182 cm too he might be 180-181cm at most.
Click Here
Robert said on 25/Nov/11
Looks no more than 5´11.5", I think that´s unlikely as well, 5´11" flat would be my best barefoot guess for him.
pete said on 25/Nov/11
to me, he looks pretty tall. more than average. As I didnt know his height, and I only saw him in television I thought hes 6´2 or something.
Silent d said on 22/Nov/11
He is taller than peter. Kellan must be wearing lifts. I never seen pattinson as 5 foot 10. He always looked at least 6 foot.184cm.
ChiasmataX said on 21/Nov/11
He's 179-180cm at best and maybe 6 feet in dress shoes. He looks 1cm shorter with Gil Birmingham who is about 180cm.
Canopus said on 18/Nov/11
5'10ish He was maybe an inch shorter than Peter Facinelli (6' but listed here at 5'10.25") and at least 3 inches shorter than Kellan Lutz who is listed at 6'1". This was on Ellen Degeneres today.
Chameleon said on 17/Nov/11
I used to think he was a legit 6', now I think hes 181/182 at best.
Silent d said on 16/Nov/11
He looked huge on letterman but maybe he was wearing lifts. 184cm. Lutz and brosnan are at least 6 foot 1. He always looked tall. I am not a fan but i respect him.
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m said on 12/Nov/11
Probably 183 cm flat.
Captain Howdy said on 11/Nov/11
Was shorter than Jimmy Fallon on his show tonight...
Carl said on 10/Nov/11
Click Here

He looked no taller than Kimmel last night. His interviews have him at 6'1" but he can't be taller than 6'0" by even a millimeter. 5'11" or shorter in bare feet easily. 6'1" in large shoes.
Chameleon said on 9/Nov/11
No he is 182 at the absolute max as he is shorter than Lutz and Brosnan.
Godred said on 7/Nov/11
@Karl - Then you have terrible perception, as he is clearly shorter than the 6`1 and 6`2 celebrities he has been photographed stood right next to.He`s still barely hovering around the 6 ft flat mark,anywhere from 182 - 184.
Chameleon said on 4/Nov/11
Indeed Pattinson needs a downgrade. 181 I can buy. He certainly isnt 184cm.
wolverine said on 2/Nov/11
he is around 179-181 probably max 182;dev patel is 186cm and pattinson is around 2-2.5 inches smaller than him . Click Here
thebad7 said on 31/Oct/11
This guy isn't 6'1"--the 6'1" and 6'2" claims for him are good for a laugh. If anything he's a strong 5'11"/weak 6'0". Don't let the illusion his thin frame creates fool you. 6'0" flat at the most for Pattinson.

tb7
matt said on 30/Oct/11
well i thaught he might be like 201cm tall, but 184_185is sure for the taking, but he looks much taller in twilight series
LAN Jiao said on 20/Oct/11
184cm in dress shoe. 185cm in hollywood style dress shoe. he is 181-182cm , i don even will bet him 1mm over 182cm afternoon.
Jason said on 19/Oct/11
Yeah he'd be about 5'11 6'0
Shaun said on 12/Oct/11
Inception says on 23/Sep/11
Guys, i get that some of you might be jealous over this guy. He is succesful and everything. But does it make you feel better about yourselves when you write that an actor is shorter than he really is, just because you want him to be?

I'm jealous of his level of success and stud status among women but I wouldn't claim he is under 6' and I certainly wouldn't want to look like him...
Chameleon said on 10/Oct/11
Clearly shorter then Brosnan AND Lutz, that makes him below 6'0.....
LAN Jiao said on 10/Oct/11
i just don see 6ft for this guy. 5ft11.5 at best. weak 6ft
Larc 6 ft 1.75 in said on 10/Oct/11
182-183 is more realistic, he's clearly shorter than Pierce Brosnan.
177cmmm said on 8/Oct/11
I think 182 or 3 evening
Godred said on 8/Oct/11
@inception - He`s 184 max,only 6`1 in shoes,are you a teenage girl? - the jealousy argument usually spews from them, are we jealous of Mr T aswell?
JACM said on 5/Oct/11
@Inception. Lautner is not 178 cm, check any photos. Hes 5'9" at the HIGHEST. They even had to make him stand on a box for a photoshoot so that he could tower over Kristen Stewart whos like 5'5" or so. If he was 178cm he wouldnt need the box, his boots would have sufficed. So yeah, Rob is a hair under 6" Lautner 5'8" -5'9"....
Inception said on 23/Sep/11
Guys, i get that some of you might be jealous over this guy. He is succesful and everything. But does it make you feel better about yourselves when you write that an actor is shorter than he really is, just because you want him to be?

Robert must be at least 183 cm. And so he is a tall guy. Taylor Lautner is not 173-174, he is 178 cm tall. And you can clearly see in Twilight scenes that Robert has a couple of centimeters on him. He looks tall all the time. And stop the bull**** about lifts. He wears flat shoes that would never gime him much if he would be a liftwearer.

I am 183 myself, and i also wear flat shoes, like Converse, and im like 184 maybe in them, so he cant be a liftwearer, i guess there is no place for lifts in really flat shoes. I would even dare to say that he is 6'1.
Moke said on 10/Sep/11
@Menace 195cm
Please stop judging other peoples heights if you really believe in your last statement.
Chameleon said on 10/Sep/11
Gaga: 180 flat for Pattison would not suprise me as he is shorter than Lutz who people dont buy being 6'1, and also in another pic he was exact same height as Gil which was posted in the past.
Gaga said on 10/Sep/11
Look at this photo, no way pattinson is over 6, even if he had loose posture in the photo.
Click Here

That gil guy is no higer than 5'11 if you look at the photos with rob, also he has perfectposture in every photo.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Sep/11
184cm out of bed and 182-183cm at night.
Overall that puts him at 6"0...
Gained weight instead said on 17/Aug/11
Menace 195cm Lautner is 173-174cm and Pattinson is more like 178-179cm, he looks taller due to his hair and physique.
Menace 195cm said on 2/Aug/11
He looks similar in height with Taylor Lautner (who is a legit 5'10 178cm) thats why Robert must be around 177cm - 179cm.
Even Karl Urban (1,88m) is taller than Robert by nearly a head.
Godred said on 29/Jul/11
@Joe - he still don`t look it - 184 max.
Joe said on 27/Jul/11
He probably is 6-1, I am in 6-1 in the morning, and I lose a quarter to a half an inch by the evening. When doctors measure your weight and height, they take your morning weight and height which is you real weight and height.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.