|
archs says on 16/Nov/09
Looks solid 6 footer to me, i'd buy 6'0.5in.
He used to be a model, so i think 5'11 is pushing it.
hehe says on 16/Nov/09
dnno wat you guys make of this, but jason issacs is apparently 5,11 but looks like hes majorly leaning, plus robs hair, what do you think rob? please comment? Click Here Jacob says on 14/Nov/09
@ Callu
You should have done your homework... it is well-known that models often get added extra height on their resumé by their agency, heidi klum as example is always listed a half an inch too big (as she revealed herself). bet says on 12/Nov/09
i think hes just got a big head! callu says on 10/Nov/09
Can someone who knows about height whos actually met himm quote cs this is such a waste of time otherwise, his hair and skinniness dont change anything, i think he is prob 6,1 look his agent quote it! hope this helps rob? what do you think??? Click Here please do your homework people before sying hes definatly 5,11 without evidence! J.J. says on 10/Nov/09
Robert Pattinson does have an I don't care posture that makes him come across as a very strong 5'11" but I think he is a solid 6'0" Tamarelle says on 5/Nov/09
I think Rob is probably at least 6 feet. I do know that he is TALLER than Kellan Lutz, for those who are saying otherwise. Someone posted a photo of them standing on GRASS which as we all know can make a huge difference in height. Here is one which clearly proves for once and all that Rob is at least an inch taller than Kellan who seems to have on boots with heels.
Click Here Gg says on 3/Nov/09
this is getting boring. seems that the majority will go for the height of 5'11- 6 ft. then fine. so be it. beside from his height do you have any other size of Robert's that you would like to debate? something interesting... lol Lenad says on 25/Oct/09
183-184cm. Strong 6ft0. Strong 6ft1 in shoes hatt says on 22/Oct/09
do you think robert pattinson is 6 ft 2 rob? imean the modelling height quote? or is it abit to generous? i think 6 ft flat.
[Editor Rob: I don't think anybody believes 6ft 2.] Rika says on 20/Oct/09
The character Jake is supposed to be 6'2 and 6'8 and this other vampire(forgot his name) is supposed to be 6'5.
But Lautner is 5'8 and Lutz is 6'1.
So no. Just because the characer is 6'1, doesnt mean the actor is. Don says on 19/Oct/09
The character of Edward Cullen is supposed to be 6'1'....I am not really sure so Robert must be around that. Rika says on 19/Oct/09
0_< are they mad Clay? His personality is actually more slack than Brooding. Clay says on 18/Oct/09
rike, well I'm a guy but from what i hear they like his chiseled face and his "brooding" personality. Kindashort says on 16/Oct/09
I'd say 5,11-5,11.5 for Robert. Rob, downgrade. flash_of_eden says on 16/Oct/09
Robert is lanky, which doesn't always mean skinny. It just means tall with long limbs. Rika says on 15/Oct/09
Gahh...what do girls find so good looking about him?.
They could be the same height in that pic Goodfella. goodfella says on 13/Oct/09
also ben barnes on this site is listed as 5,11.75 i give up. Click Here goodfella says on 13/Oct/09
def nothing lower than 6 ft, if i knew how to upload photos i could prove, but his friend tom sturridge is 5,11 listed with his agent and robert pattinson is taller than him by 2 inchs i think. Rika says on 12/Oct/09
I wouldn't say solid Hugh, but he is definitely 6'0, 5'11 without standing right. Hugh 191cm says on 10/Oct/09
A solid 6ft goodfella says on 7/Oct/09
any chance you coulod meet him rob? lol would be great to put to rest lol
[Editor Rob: he did do a couple of conventions a few years ago here in the UK...but because of the insanity surrounding twilight he won't do any for another few years.] Rika says on 7/Oct/09
No one said very skinny, just skinny and thin making him look long. derek d says on 6/Oct/09
I don't know why everyone is saying he is so skinny and is using it as an excuse for him looking tall. He isn't skinny, his body is actually very average. Google Robert Pattinson shirtless. Far from thin. Someone who is very skinny and appears taller would be lets say Adrian Grenier. Rika says on 6/Oct/09
I've seen him Harry. He's definitely around 5'11-6'0. He looks tall but he isn't tall upclose. true says on 5/Oct/09
this guy is definatly 6 ft 0.5 as the claim, if you take the time to look at a few images on google, you can clearly see, i think people want him to be shorter than he really is, rob could you comment or add a few words, this is a real big debate lol. harry says on 5/Oct/09
5,11 5,11, all over the board?? has anyone ever seen him to confirm? rob says he doesnt think hed be shorter than 6 ft and hes the expert so im real confused?? alexiel says on 5/Oct/09
yes,5-11 Anonymous 2 says on 4/Oct/09
He needs to be downgraded to 5-11. Robert's body frame and hair makes him project a taller image. Jacob says on 30/Sep/09
@ josh
he's no 6ft1, we know that, but he is definitely not smaller than 6 foot as well. He's a legit 6 footer. Josh says on 30/Sep/09
Hes between 5'11-6'0 I would say 5'11.5 (182cm) max says on 29/Sep/09
rob do you think he could be 5 ft 11.50 or 75? im really interested to know your opinion, as many who have met and general comments agree at betweeen 5,11 and 6 ft??? please comment. thanks.
[Editor Rob: I don't think he'd be under 6ft.] mike says on 28/Sep/09
5,11 1/2 AOA says on 27/Sep/09
the only person who is taller than in twilight him turns out to be 6-1(1.85).
and he is obviously shorter than him.there is nothing left to discuss.
if i were you rob,i would downgrade him to 5-11,5(1.82) MD says on 25/Sep/09
Clay, I do understand that. And Tyson is one of those exceptions I was talking about. Clay says on 25/Sep/09
For example, Tyson Beckford is said to be 6'2 but everyone who has met him when he is not wearing boots says he's more like 5'11 and a half. MD says on 24/Sep/09
Clay, not sure I agree with that. Model heights are usually far more accurate than heights given in the average populace for the sole fact that they have to be closer to the truth because these men and women are actually measured for actual clothes.
Model heights, for the most part, are about as accurate as they come in any one group. Really, the only time model heights are fugded is when you have someone exceptionally beautiful or handsome but aren't quite the height models are supposed to be. Clay says on 23/Sep/09
Meg, model's heights are always 1 or 2 inches higher than their actual heights. meg says on 20/Sep/09
in a autobiography of robert pattinsons, it mentions him used to do some modeling, and the women who shot him says hes 6 ft 2? so im really confused, would be really good if rob could meet him, or he himself claimed his height! meg says on 18/Sep/09
rob is there any chance he could be shorter than 6 ft0.5? he is very thin and has alot of hair, but not sure?
[Editor Rob: he does have a 'don't care' posture about him. I'm not sure he's just 6ft although he can look that in many photos.] JayB says on 16/Sep/09
5'11" with slouching. Bradi says on 16/Sep/09
Rob, I think we need a downgrade here.
He's 6ft at the MAX. Hes between 5'11''-6'0'' given the evidence we have shown here Original says on 14/Sep/09
6' and no taller. Lenad says on 13/Sep/09
Thanks for the downgrade Clay says on 12/Sep/09
Laura 20 cm is about 7.9 inches.... that's too small for most male heads, usually male heads are around 9 inches or more from top point of head to bottom of chin. Rika says on 12/Sep/09
6'0-5'11 probably. He doesnt look that tall when you see him in person. Kellan Lutz is definitely 6'1 and he's taller than Pattinson.
Since he's claiming 6'1 then that would mean he would be 6'0. According to Clay that is. IF someone claims a height, they're really an inch shorter.
So he's listed everywhere as 6'1 so it must be true? You mean sites that really TRY to make him look good. Well we dont know if Patel is 6'3 yet. Since he's already over 6'1 then he'd probably reach 6'2 max by his 20's.
He's listed at 6'1...so it must be true huh.
Ryan Reynolds is 6'2.5 probably and he was much taller than 1.5inches His forehead towered over Robs Forehead. Whats that like 2-3 inches? Clay says on 11/Sep/09
Laura, 20 cm is about 7.9 inches. A man's head is usally around 9 and a half inches, am I right Rob ? Laura says on 9/Sep/09
he seems to be between 182-185 cm. he's one head taller than 163 cm tall Kristen Stewart, I think his head is about 20 cm. that means he has to be about 183 cm. Kellan Lutz is taller than him, Ryan Reynolds as well, so he can't be over 185 cm. Clay says on 3/Sep/09
Ellie, he himself claimed 6'1 in the past and if he was 6'1 he would have claimed 6'2. He's listed everywhere at 6'1 and if that was his height without shoes then Patel would be 6'3 and Ben Lyons would be closer to 6'4. 6'1 in Hollywood for a stand in or actor means 6 foot without shoes. Look at my past posts on this page, i always defend him and I've met him(by met I mean he signed autographs for my sister and the rest of the screaming girls there). He looked 6'1 with shoes so he would be .75 less without them. I'm sorry but the evidence does not lie, he is probably no more than 6 foot without shoes(still tall). He's not in the same height range as guys like Patel and Will Smith and Benecio and Ryan Reynolds(who Rob was at least 1.5 inches shorter than when they were on stage together). Anonymous says on 2/Sep/09
I believe he's 5-11 barefeet, 6,0.5-6,1 in shoes. Ellie says on 2/Sep/09
Except for that fact that a call sheet went out looking for a standin for him for Remember Me and the guy had to be 6'1"...if you are part of the business you would know that standins have to be exact for lighting and all...and his agency actually has him listed at 6'2". Phoenix says on 2/Sep/09
robert pattinson is weak 6 footer and lutz legit 184 cms Clay says on 2/Sep/09
Ellie, sweetheart I am a huge fan of Pattinson's. I defend him when other guys bash him. Really short ? I'm 6'4, would you consider that very short ? I am not making him shorter than he is, I am using logic. If he was a legit 6'1 he would not be listed at 6'1 by his agency, he would be listed as 6'2 or 6'3. That's the way the agencies operate, I know from experience. Look at pics of him next to Ben Lyons or Dev Patel, he cannot be 6'1, you fangirls need to accept that. Jack says on 2/Sep/09
@romanticfool
shoe size is really irrelevant to someone's height i'm afraid. I know someone with shoe size 9 US, which is avarage, and he's about 6'4" Ellie says on 1/Sep/09
Clay I think you have issues with Robert being taller than you think he is? Are you really short??? That's all I can guess considering your so set on making him shorter than he actually is. Clay says on 1/Sep/09
taelyn, the camera angles and their postures are terrible in the pics you gave. I think Lutz himself is about 6 foot and a half. Taelyn says on 31/Aug/09
Here's a pic of Robert and Kellan at Comic Con and Rob has a hat on so his hair isn't throwing the height off and him and Kellan are exactly even... Click Here Clay says on 31/Aug/09
romanticfool, Ryan Reynolds is 6'2 and was about 2 inches taller than Rob. alexiel says on 31/Aug/09
6ft 0.5 in shoes Jayb says on 30/Aug/09
Jay Leno is not 5'9", he's 5'11. If Jay Leno and Rob Pattinson are the same height, that would make Rob Pattinson 5'11". RomanticFool says on 30/Aug/09
Rob is over 6'1" now. He said his shoe size is 10 or so UK which is 12 -13 US. Ryan Reynolds is nearly 6'3" and Rob looked shorter than him on stage for the big non kiss when Ryan Reynolds gave him the award. Rob was much taller than Sandra Bullock on stage too who is 5' 8" and Camilla Belle is the same height as her. I have seen pics of him with her. He was way taller than Harry Potter and crew too years ago. Come over to igossip.com and post your own stuff and polls. meg says on 30/Aug/09
5 foot 11 defo! maybe and 5,11.25 or 50 but i think the hair bulks alot of his height. Catherine says on 30/Aug/09
i'd say that rob and kellan are both 6'1.And i don"t believe that jay leno is only 5'9.He's the same height as robert Ace20 says on 27/Aug/09
Oh come on, come on, come on. . . . the proof is here gentlemen, take a look at the pictures below and consider the facts. Stop believing a lie and take the truth for what it is. . . .HE IS 5'11' tops(barefoot). Maybe it's time to visit the optometrist, for some of you. yeah maybe Clay says on 27/Aug/09
Also look at Rob when he was face to face with 6'2 Ben Lyons at comic con, he was clearly 1.5 to 2 inches shorter despite them both wearing normal sneakers. Clay says on 27/Aug/09
Sel, look at other pics of the event, they were both wearing 1 inch dress shoes. Look at Rob next to Jay Leno on the Tonight show, he is 6 foot barefoot, if he was a legit 6'1 barefoot that would make Patel 6'3 which he is not as he is shorter than Will Smith and Benecio. I don't know why you fangirls refuse to accept facts ? 6 foot is still tall. If he was a legit 6'1 without shoes his listed height from his agency would be 6'2. Sel says on 26/Aug/09
clay i have seen that picture about 100 times. show me one with someone else please. you have no idea about the shoe/ground level situation in that picture. Clay says on 25/Aug/09
Here you go Sel, Click Here
If Rob is a legit 6'1 without shoes that makes Patel 6'3 and Will Smith 6'3 and Benecio 6'4. Clay says on 25/Aug/09
sel, he cannot be a full 6'1 without shoes, he's atleast 2 inches shorter than Dev Patel, Patel is not more than 6'2 as he is the same height as Will Smith and a little less than Benecio. Clearly a full 6'1 ? Look at pics, without his big hairdo Rob looks 6 foot next to other 6'1 and 6'2 people. In Hollywood everyone lies about their height. alexiel says on 25/Aug/09
180-183 sel says on 24/Aug/09
agreeing with taelyn. clay stop trying to downgrade someone who is clearly a full 6'1 Clay says on 24/Aug/09
Taelyn, Dev is smaller than Benecio and Will Smith so he isn't more than 6'2. You guys need to accept the fact that Rob is not 6'1 barefoot. Look at him next to 5'10 Leno, Rob is at the most 6 foot and a half without shoes. Taelyn says on 23/Aug/09
I agree with Ellie...look at other pics of Rob and Peter...Rob is definately at least 3 inches taller...and Patel and Lutz could be the ones that are actually taller than they say...the one thing for sure is that Rob is NEVER standing completely straight...Lutz always does. Clay says on 23/Aug/09
Ellie, Rob is much closer to the camera than Peter in the pic you gave. He is not a legit a 6'1, he cannot be, the pics with Patel and others proves this. He is about 6 foot barefoot and maybe 6'1 in shoes. Ellie says on 22/Aug/09
He's got at least 3 inches on 5'10" Peter Facinelli in this pic... Click Here
...Robert is at least 6'1" Sheila says on 21/Aug/09
why don't you people look at some pictures online and such, Pattinson is really not 6'. He is 5'11" at most, i rest my case :) lonewolf says on 21/Aug/09
I put my money on 5'11", still tall. No way is he over 6'. I mean if you review the TCA footage you can see Rob looking up at Kellan when he turns around. . . not eye to eye, and not down. . . Karina says on 21/Aug/09
I think standing up he's a strong 6'1. He's definetely a sloucher being around 5'3 Kristen Stewart all the time Rika says on 20/Aug/09
Kellan Lutz is taller than Pattinson. Clay says on 20/Aug/09
Mg, if Rob was 6'2 that would make Dev Patel 6'4. Rob is no more than 6 foot and a half. Jay says on 20/Aug/09
He seems to have questionable posture and looks 5'11" when slouching, but 6'0" when standing straight. MG says on 19/Aug/09
i met rob and kellan in vancouver back in april, both in sneakers rob was slightly taller. id say 6'1.5 - 6'2. Ace20 says on 19/Aug/09
Rob is 5'11". here is the proof:
Click Here
kellan has his legs spread, as if he is trying to be the same height as rob lol
Click Here Clay says on 19/Aug/09
corrdry, look at him next to 6'2 Dev Patel, he is obviously not a elgit 6'1. Corrdry says on 19/Aug/09
Difficult to decide. But in the end, if you look him up, you see way more pictures where he looks quite tall, than you do where he would appear shorter.
Look at any picture he's usually wearing low heel sneakers of some sort, and he still looks pretty tall. I believe he's a solid 6'1. I think rob is wrong. william says on 18/Aug/09
met kellan lutz and robert and kellan is taller Ace20 says on 17/Aug/09
Ok look at the Rob and Dev pic, from eye to eye or shoulder to shoulder there is more than 2" for sure. I would even say 3", that really puzzles me. Clay says on 17/Aug/09
taelyn, if he was 6'2 that would make Dev Patel 6'4(look at recent pics of him on the Airbender set, he is no more than 6'2). I met Rob outside of a radio station interview he did(by met I mean he signed autographs and said hello), he is 6'1 in shoes, which means he's about 6 foot barefoot, at best 6 foot and a half. Why do you fangirls want to give him an extra 2 inches of height ? taelyn says on 16/Aug/09
Robert Pattinson is not anything under 6ft 1in...I actually think he might be 6ft 2in...has anyone taken into account that Dev Patel is only 19...who knows when his height of 6'1.5" came out...he could have grown since then....and look at pics of Rob with Emilie de Ravin who is 5'2"....if you keep shortening Rob you have to shorten Emilie to under 5 feet which she is most definately not...and in all the pics of him and Kellan Lutz...Kellan usually is wearing a heeled shoe. MD says on 15/Aug/09
Rob with Dev Patel:
Click Here Ace20 says on 14/Aug/09
has anybody got a pic of him in shorts, flip-flops or barefoot w/ somebody. . .would be harder to hide lifts. Cailin says on 14/Aug/09
Clay: Im actually not a fan girl..
Editor Rob: do you think kellan lutz is a full 6'1 then? because Pattinson does seem taller..
[Editor Rob: I think pattinson's hairstyle adds to his height.] Dylan says on 14/Aug/09
^'1 is right for him definetly 6' or more Clay says on 14/Aug/09
Cailin, look at Rob next to Denzel or anyone, he is obviously not more than 6'1. Why would Dev wear lifts ? Just look at the pics of him in his flip flops, he is a tall kid, taller than Rob by about 1.5 to 2 inches. You fangirls need to calm down. kartik ramachandran says on 14/Aug/09
6'1".... hes the same height as I am...
still hes quite tall... considering there is nobody above 5'10" in my family Cailin says on 13/Aug/09
You also might want to take into consideration that Rob has TERRIBLE posture, and slouches in basically every picture ever taken of him. Cailin says on 13/Aug/09
I cannot believe you downgraded him, he is 6'1. Maybe even taller. Did you ever think that in the picture with dev patel, dev could be wearing huge lifts? uneven ground? because of one picture you downgraded him? wtf
[Editor Rob: I said the picture wasn't good because dev was closer but I've met numerous people from twilight and potter people he's stood with and do think 184cm is fair.] MD says on 13/Aug/09
Flash of Eden,
I'm not yelling. I'm genuinely curious as to why this hasn't been remedied as these two are easily two of the more bogus descrepencies on the site. Dev is clearly two or more inches taller than Pattison. One of the two are listed incorrectly, period.
[Editor Rob: having looked more at him and other twilight folk I think 184cm is fair] Ace20 says on 12/Aug/09
I'm suspicious that he might be wearing lifts, it seems like the angle of his foot position is a little high. . . . what do you guys think?
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here Styx says on 12/Aug/09
Everyone knows that Hollywood adds inches to make the actors seem "larger than life". Pattinson is not taller than Kellan Lutz by any stretch... just take a look at the TCA's... he just has big hair. I'd put him at 6' barefoot so with shoes he'd appear to be 6'1" to 6'1.5". Still tall regardless. flash_of_eden says on 12/Aug/09
MD, chill brother. Ace20 says on 11/Aug/09
I think he is definitely no less than 5'11. But look at his footwear in this photo
Click Here MD says on 11/Aug/09
Can anyone tell me why Editor Rob still has Pattinson at 6'1" and Pev Patel at 6'1.5" when it's clear Dev has at least two full inches on Pattison? One of these two is listed incorrectly. Leighton says on 11/Aug/09
Rob is actually about 6'1.5 . Everyone thinks he is shorter though because she has terrible posture. Basically in everyone photo of him he is slouching. He is actually taller than 6'1 Kellan Lutz. vtec says on 11/Aug/09
this guy is 5'11 J.J. says on 10/Aug/09
6'0" is definately his height but Taylor is definately 5'7.75" to 5'8" i'd be suprised if he is 5'9" even though he looked it next to Tyra in that picture. Robert looked short in that picture but I would'nt argue anything under 5'11.5" FOR HIM i DO BELIEVE HE IS THE 6'0" CCLUB BUT NOT 6'1" Clay says on 9/Aug/09
Marina, both Stewart and Greene are about 5'4. Marina says on 9/Aug/09
Okay, I know I am just another obssessive little girl who loves Rob, but I really do. He's just a normal guy who is just living life, and I love his personality. And yes I do believe he is 6'1", he towers over Kristen Stewart and Ashley Greene who are in the range of being only 5'5"-5'7". italian boy says on 6/Aug/09
5.11-6 foot barefoot no more,he doesn't look as tall as keanu reeves or josh holloway or paul walker 6.2 of course for example..celebrity height is always a mistery...for example cache crawford listed between 178-185 cm...it's incredible. Clay says on 28/Jul/09
Patel is 6'2 while Rob is 6 flat. MD says on 27/Jul/09
Yes, the Dev Patel and Robert Pattinson needs remedying. Either Patel is taller than listed or Pattinson is shorter than listed because Patel easilu has two inches on Pattinson, now. Clay says on 26/Jul/09
GG, you have to be kidding. Have you seen him next to Dev Patel or other tall guys ? Rob is 6 foot barefoot. 6'5 ? LMAO. In your pics he is far ahead of Sheilds, if he was 6'5 that would make Dev Patel 6'7 and Jay Leno 6'4 and Ben Lyons 6'8 and Kristen Stewart 5'9. You kids are funny. flash_of_eden says on 24/Jul/09
GG - Is this the picture you're talking about? Click Here
She's further away than Robert. There's no way he's 6'5". tahnee says on 23/Jul/09
i met him in new york im 5'10 and he was taller than me id put him at 6 foot MC says on 23/Jul/09
On the models1 website, he is listed as 6'2. Click Here Doesn't look it! Gui says on 23/Jul/09
He's no less than 6'1'' GG says on 23/Jul/09
There is a picture of Rob walking next to Brooke Shields and he is half a head taller than she is. Brooke Shields stands exactly 6'0, so Rob is close to 6'5". He was 6'1 when he filmed Harry Potter as Cedric when he was 17. Click Here flash_of_eden says on 22/Jul/09
I don't mean to come off as over-confident in this guy's height, but the idea that he could be as low as 178 is... delusional. Like for real. JJ says on 20/Jul/09
A weak 6'1 184 maybe? Anonymous 2 says on 17/Jul/09
Made a mistake, I meant between 178cm-180cm. Anonymous 2 says on 17/Jul/09
Here's a pic of him and Camilla Belle, who's 172-173cm and is wearin flats and Pattinson is wearin like a 1 inch sneakers, he didn't look much taller than Camilla. He could be more like between 179cm-180cm. Could be his large hair givin him 5-6cms more.
Click Here apo says on 15/Jul/09
I don't know about him being 6'2, but even if he is a legitimate 6'1, no way in hell he's above 170 lbs. I'm 200 lbs with 6', and I look big and wide. Anna says on 12/Jul/09
I met him in newyork and i'm 6"1 and we're about the same height... so yeah i would say he's def a "strapping 6"1" Clay says on 8/Jul/09
Conrad, if he looked 5'11 or 6 that would be looking tall(the lower end of tall). The average height for a male in America is 5'9.5 so 5'10 would be above average and anything above that would be tall. zephyr says on 7/Jul/09
flash_of_eden and MD:
Yeah if he straightened up he might be as tall as Tyra but the thing is if you look at that second picture she's not standing up fully straight either.... and her heel's were your standard 4 inch heels. Clay says on 5/Jul/09
Flash_of_Eden, look at the pic of Pattinson next to Dev Patel, Pattinson is an easy 2 inches shorter, my guess is 6 foot and a half barefoot for Pattinson. Clay says on 5/Jul/09
MWa!, if you don't care about height why are you on here ? To whine and complain ? JillyC says on 4/Jul/09
Some people's maths is just appalling. Tyra was wearing at least 5 inch heels. He's 6'1 ish on my opinion. Robert pattinson has nothing to do with Warner darling. Conrad says on 4/Jul/09
He doesn't look tall at all if you ask me. Looks 5'11" or 6' at best. Mwa! says on 3/Jul/09
Okay,
In the first place why would you guys waste you time argueing how tall an actor is? It doesnt matter that much. Just say somewhere between 6-6'2 the majoraty is saying that he is 6'1. All I know for a fact is that he is really fricking tall. Plus, why would it matter how tall he is barefoot? Why the hell would you care? And as for the weight thing. All i can say is WTF? Why would it matter. And plus i really doubt he is @ 200. I agree, he is lucky to be around 160. Why does it matter how tall Rob is or how much he weigts? Really can anyone answer me that? Lmeister says on 2/Jul/09
He looks 6ft1, but he is def. not strapping. Ryan says on 1/Jul/09
He described himself as gangly, so that made me think he was pretty tall. He looks to be 6'1". MD says on 1/Jul/09
Zephyr,
That first pic is actually pretty nice, though, I think if he straightend up, he'd be as tall as her. What it does show, to me, is Taylor's height, who is stretching every last inch not to look so short next to her. lol flash_of_eden says on 1/Jul/09
In that second photo, it looks like he would be as tall as her if he stood up straight. But one must wonder how tall those heels are? Not to mention, if Tyra Banks is a full 6'2" in those heels and Pattinson is a legit 6'1", she'd still have an inch on him as is. zephyr says on 30/Jun/09
More proof that Robert is not as tall as a 6'1"-6'2" Tyra Banks in heels.
Click Here
Click Here
I say he's somewhere between 5'11" and 6'0". MD says on 29/Jun/09
Rika, where in the world did you get the 60 pound number from? It's been reported quite a bit that Taylor struggled to add 30 lbs. flash_of_eden says on 29/Jun/09
Rika- Ok... um... what? You're stating opinions too. Not facts. Hello. zephyr says on 29/Jun/09
Here's the youtube link that I eluded to where you can see Robert is not as tall as a 6'1"-6'2" Tyra Banks in heels. Click Here flash_of_eden says on 28/Jun/09
hey.- Nice. That should be enough for anybody. They're both standing straight up, are the same distance from the camera, footwear is visible, and still he tops her by a foot if not more. In fact I'd say it's proof that Pattinson is closer to 6'2". raquel says on 28/Jun/09
this is so spot on 6"0 to 6'1 is perfect Rika says on 28/Jun/09
@JJ. Lautner added 60lbs to his frame from 135lbs. PAttinson is really skinny, which is why he has a rather big head for a thin guy.
Opinions dont matter when we're talking about facts dude.
5'11 seems like a good height for barefoot, especially since he doesnt really look taller than i do.
Dev Patel, i dont think he gained height after Slum Dog Millionaire. He might in the future but i dont think he did now.
6'2 maybe his full height. But not his height at the moment. orangy says on 26/Jun/09
@JJ, have you seen that Lautner kid lately? He's probably 160 if he's 5 8 and Pattinson's still fairly skinny so he's 160 too. hey. says on 26/Jun/09
Emile de Ravin's 5'1.5" on this site and here's a pic of them (granted not the best, uneven ground), but Rob absolutely DWARFS her, it's kinda ridiculous. Click Here katie says on 26/Jun/09
id agree with 5"11 to 6"0 all of his twilight and harry potter co-stars are in the 5"3 /5"6 range zephyr says on 22/Jun/09
He's not 6'1". He is 5'11" - 6'0" tall. He was on the Tyra Banks show and she was taller than him in her heels. She is 5'10" and in her 4 inch heels she should be around 6'1" - 6'2" which meant Robert and her should have been around the same height since he was wearing shoes that would put him at 6'2". However Tyra was still taller than him which means he's not 6'2" with shoes on which mean's he's not 6'1" barefoot. He's either 5'11" - 6'0" tall. Clay says on 21/Jun/09
tallchick, Dev Patel is 6'2 and Rob was about 1.5 inches shorter. Same thing with Ryan Reynolds, Rob was shorter. He is absolutely not 6'2. His barefoot height is around 6 foot and a half. Don't believe everything you read online, he is obviously not over 6'1. Kristen Stewart is in the 5'4 range which is why Rob towers over her. tallchick says on 20/Jun/09
i read online that rob pattinson is 6'2". i would say that is how tall he, because he TOWERS over kristen stewart and all the extras in twilight. he's VERY tall. J.J. says on 16/Jun/09
I watched this Tyra show & they said him & Taylor's combined weight is 320 exactly. I was just guesing that Taylor might be 130 & pattinson 190 at 6'0" that's cos some people look skinny but quite heavy. But if indeed their
combined weight is 320 then being 4" taller than Taylor he
might be 190 max & 165 minimum. Everyones' entitled to their own opinion so get out!
Don't know just guessing! Am entitled to my own opinions. So get out flash_of_eden says on 16/Jun/09
JJ- Seriously, lay off the pot. Some of the statements you make are just... asinine. MD says on 16/Jun/09
Who looks heavy, JJ? I hope you're not saying Pattinson looks anything close to 200 lbs, because he's not. He's lucky if he's 160 lbs. Clay says on 15/Jun/09
JJ who is heavy ? Rob ? He seems very skinny. J.J. says on 14/Jun/09
He must be really heavy about 190 -200. But looks very 6'0" I really don't see 6'1" barefeet he rather looks 6'1" in shoes. kelsey says on 14/Jun/09
6"0 is perfect he always looks taller then everyone because alot of his cast is short J.J. says on 10/Jun/09
He is 6'0" max nothing more Taylor Lautner is 5'7.75" / possibly 5'8" Clay says on 9/Jun/09
Rika, someone who is in the 6 foot, 6'1 range would look taller than most people, the average height for a male in America is 5'9 and a half. Rika says on 9/Jun/09
He doesnt look that tall when you get a good look at him. Compared to other people he doesnt. But with girls he would.
He's shorter than 6'2 Ryan Renolds.
6'0-6'1 seems alright. Maximus says on 8/Jun/09
Well, he definetly doesnt come across as being short. Definetly 6' or 6'1"..nothing below that. In twilight it is obvious he is avove average height. J.J. says on 7/Jun/09
I think he is nothing shorter than 5'11.5" & nothing taller than 6'0" he had less than an inch on Jay Leno who is 5'11" nicole says on 7/Jun/09
id say his a solid 6"0 Clay says on 6/Jun/09
"I'm not sure who the male presenter is (he doesn't look familiar), but I'm sure he isn't 6'1 and yet he's taller than R. Pattinson"
Leah, the presenter is Ryan Reynolds who is a strong 6'2. Even with bad posture Pattinson looks 6 foot next to him. Catherine says on 3/Jun/09
I would say he is over 6 foot.I have seen him on loads of you tube clips and he looks tall to me.Makes him even hotter in my opinion Clay says on 3/Jun/09
Once again Reynolds looked taller because Pattinson has horrible posture. Reynolds is only about 1.5 inches taller. Having met Pattinson I guarantee he is not under 6 foot but no more than 6'1.5. john says on 3/Jun/09
watched the mtv movie awrds and yeah ryan reynolds looked to be 2-3 inches over this guy!
it was very noticeable,never tohought he looked 6ft 1 in twilight neither,bella's dad looked taller than him in the movie and that actor is listed as 184cm hey. says on 2/Jun/09
Yeah, Ryan Reynolds is over 6'1"...lol, he's 6'3". He looked HUGE compared to KStew in her film Adventureland so it's no revelation that he looked slightly taller than Robert. But, good thing to bring up the awards....Rob looked taller than almost everyone he stood next to throughout the night and he was wearing Nikes! haha. He looked noticeably taller than Gigandet and Facinelli and here Click Here he had an edge over the 6'1" Lutz who was wearing dress shoes with a heel. I'd say the awards more than proved that Pattinson is nothing under 6'1.5"....he towered over both Lautner and Stewart, it was kinda ridiculous....:D! Leah says on 2/Jun/09
Actually, Flash_of_eden, Ryan Reynolds is listed as 6'2" on this very site. Clay says on 2/Jun/09
I just watched the video of Pattinson and Ryan Reynolds and Pattinson is slouching while RR is standing up very straight. Clay says on 2/Jun/09
Ryan Reynolds is 6'2.25, 6'3 in most shoes. flash_of_eden says on 2/Jun/09
The presenter is Ryan Reynolds, who is 6'3". Leah says on 1/Jun/09
Anyone who believes he is more than 6ft - go to youtube and watch a clip of him with K Stewart at the MTV Awards 2009. When they get up to accept their "best kiss" award for Twilight, the male presenter is much taller than Robert Pattinson. I'm not sure who the male presenter is (he doesn't look familiar), but I'm sure he isn't 6'1 and yet he's taller than R. Pattinson. Here's the link: Click Here and the video owner is: Cullensxblacks, for reference.
Clay: while I don't suggest R. Pattinson is short, I do not believe he is 6'1". I would estimate that he is no taller than 6ft. My best friend is "in love" with him and I am subjected view many of her pictures of him (photoshoots with other castmates, etc). From these pictures I can tell he is definitely not 6'1. Clay says on 1/Jun/09
In that Pattinson/Patel pic I wonder what the footwear situation is. if they are wearing the same shoes than Pattinson is no more than 6 foot flat with shoes on... because Patel is absolutely not more than 6'2.... at least not yet. cinemagoer says on 30/May/09
comparing him to dev patel ( who is supposed to be 6'2'' ), robert looks more like 6'0'' than 6'1'' Clay says on 23/May/09
Well Leah how tall do you think he is ? He's absolutely not less than 6 foot. And those girls he met were probably wearing heels. Clay says on 23/May/09
In that pic with Patel he looks more than an inch shorter but we don't know what type of shoes Patel is wearing. Patel is no more than 6'2 now so Rob would have to be about 6 foot, maybe 6 foot and a half. love tall guys says on 22/May/09
i think 6,1 is correct. he is soo hot. He's got really long legs flash_of_eden says on 16/May/09
He's definitely 6'1" at the very least, probably nearer 6'2" first thing in the morning. MD says on 13/May/09
That's actually far more than a 'tad' and definitely more than half-and-inch, for sure. Buga says on 12/May/09
Click Here
he is a tad smaller than dev patel. I'd say 6ft1 sounds correct Leah says on 11/May/09
OMG, 6ft 1?! Are you kidding me? Just go to perez hilton's site and look up Rob Pattinson. There's a bunch of entries with teenaged girls who met him in London and took their pictures with him. Almost every single one of them is only one inch shorter. Just because he's taller than his castmates doesn't mean he's a giant (in Hollywood standards of course). Leah says on 11/May/09
OMG, 6ft 1?! Are you kidding me? Just go to perez hilton's site and look up Rob Pattinson. There's a bunch of entries with teenaged girls who met him in London and took their pictures with him. Almost every single one of them is only one inch shorter. Just because he's taller than his castmates doesn't mean he's a giant (in Hollywood standards of course). hiya. says on 6/May/09
he is 6'2 i have the official robert pattinson book and it said in there hey. says on 5/May/09
He really would not lie about his height... lillie says on 3/May/09
he towers over the twilight cast,
i doubt he'd lie about his height anyway. stella says on 28/Apr/09
i love robert pattinson(L) miana says on 28/Apr/09
i thought he was a short. well.. he looked in the picture like that but i might be mistaken because cameras always enlarge. Clay says on 20/Apr/09
In LA, outside a radio station where he was coming to do an interview.... my sister dragged me along. He was just as tall as his body guards. hey. says on 19/Apr/09
Nice Clay, where did you meet him? Clay says on 16/Apr/09
John, hate to burst your bubble but he's a legit 6'1 guy, at the worst he's 6 foot a half without shoes. I've met him and trust me.. saying he's below 6 foot is beyond stupid. hey. says on 12/Apr/09
Lol, he lost 5 cm because of his hair? No, I'd say, still, he looks a good 6'1.5"/6'2". Big guy. Alternateuniverse says on 10/Apr/09
Now with his haircut, I'd say 1m80 max. T.L says on 5/Apr/09
Rob is around 6.1 and a half cuz he's not that much taller then Kellan when their beside each other and in most pics one is either slunching of the camera is in favor of one person. I'd say no taller then 6.1 1/2 Ace says on 1/Apr/09
He does look 6`1 next to Rupert Grint: Click Here
He looks near 6`1 (considering he is farther from the camera) next to Jason Isaacs: Click Here
Although, he doesn't look 6`1 here: Click Here Anonymous says on 29/Mar/09
It's really quite simple people. go find a cardboard cutout of him! I just bought one and I was totally boggled as to why it's huge next to me (I'm 5'4"). That's why I came here to figure out what his height is and if the cutout is actual size. Now I see, he's totally 6'1". (And I wish my cutout was real...) John says on 26/Mar/09
this guy's 6-0 max. or even lower. sprint84 says on 25/Mar/09
In any cast photos from Twilight, he's shorter than Billy Burke. Burke's listed here as 6'1", though he may be taller. Even so, Pattinson is AT MOST 6'1" and likely just under that.
I think the reason he seems so tall (besides the hair) is that in both Harry Potter and Twilight, most of his costars were around 5'4"-5'6". amela says on 19/Mar/09
hey robert pattison can never be 185com,he is much shorter then "emmet"..kallen lutz?are u blind??? ameriknujr says on 13/Mar/09
6ft1.5 surely pink floyd says on 12/Mar/09
hahahaha yeah he reminds me to chuck bass too strong 6' near to 6'1 Anonymous says on 10/Mar/09
Ah, well, Ace, that's easily explained -- he's standing in back of him (and the angle is favoring Lutz). Ace says on 9/Mar/09
He sure doesn't look 6`1 here: Click Here
Although its odd, they usually look similarish in height. |
