How tall is Hugh Jackman

Hugh Jackman's Height

6ft 1 ½ (186.7 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 2 (188 cm)
Australian actor best known for his role as The Wolverine in the X-Men series of movies. Other notable films include The Prestige, Les Miserables, Australia, Prisoners and Swordfish.
The problem is my Height. I'm 6ft 2in and lean, but in the books [Wolverine is] 5ft 3in and stocky...James Marsden, who played Cyclops, who is only 10cm shorter than me, was put on boxes and platforms in our scenes together. You'll notice that every character in X-Men looked taller than me.

How tall is Hugh Jackman
5ft 10.5 Nicole Kidman with Hugh
Photos by PR Photos
Before I had any kind of acting profile I was encouraged to lie about my height. I was told to say I was about six foot [1.83m] tall. I was worried about it when I first had my audition because pleasing fans of the franchise is important.. My height was brought up on the Internet. They didn't think it was right. A lot of people who never met me think I'm very short.

If someone's going to spend their time saying, 'You're really not 6' 2"; you're 5' 10",' I'll tell them once, 'I am 6' 2".' Then, whatever you want to believe, it's up to you. Am I going to waste energy going, 'I'm so mad that this person says I'm 5'10"? We really only get mad when there's an element of truth, right?
-- Good Housekeeping, 2013

You May Be Interested

Height of Russell Crowe
Russell Crowe
5ft 10 ½ (179 cm)
Height of Gerard Butler
Gerard Butler
6ft 1 ¼ (186 cm)
Height of Ben Affleck
Ben Affleck
6ft 2 ¼ (189 cm)
Height of Ryan Reynolds
Ryan Reynolds
6ft 2 (188 cm)

Add a Comment1234 comments

Average Guess (264 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 2.07in (188.1cm)
Current: 6ft 1.51in (186.7cm)
Vincent Caleb said on 23/Jan/21
6’2” is the absolute most I would guess for his peak. Current is 186ish.
Yharnamman said on 21/Jan/21
If anyone is curious, this is what Hugh looks like when people estimate him at 90/91 KG: Click Here

He looks very aesthetic as a late 40s older lifter. And he could easily look like that again if he went back on the TRT.
Yharnamman said on 19/Jan/21
@grizz Thats a very recent photo, might be like a couple months old. Hes likely off TRT and lost a lot of muscle since hes not doing any roles right now. Given a guy in his early 50s might naturally produce around 400 ng/dl compared to men under 35 producing 500-900 ng/dl.
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 18/Jan/21
@grizz that guy looks strange. Like his chest is too big for the rest of him. If not for his weird looking pecs he’s look like an ectomorph
6ft6 said on 18/Jan/21
Now 6'1
grizz said on 16/Jan/21
With all due respect, that's not how a 90+ kg 6'1.5 guy looks like Click Here
He's close to that listed weight (82-85). As Wolverine he probably was in 90 kg ballpark, but not anymore.
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 14/Jan/21
@Rampage wouldn’t go as high as 95+, more 93-95. I hover around that range myself (currently 94.3kg) so I’ve got a very good picture of how it looks
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Jan/21
When training for Wolverine I wouldn't surprised if he was 95kg+....
Yharnamman said on 12/Jan/21
@K.A Yes hes definitely not 82 KG, thats what an average 6'2" guy would weigh. I think he usually hovers around 90 or 91 KG, but when you see those screenshots of him insanely lean at 7% body fat, hes likely 86 KG there.
ALEXIZ/180cm said on 12/Jan/21
184 cm.
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 11/Jan/21
@K.A I can see him being over 93kg during his Wolverine days
Vincent Caleb said on 10/Jan/21
Agree with slim. Weak 6’2” peak, 6’1.25” current.
slim 6'1 said on 8/Jan/21
He’d definitely edge Gerard butler
K.A said on 7/Jan/21
Rob,any idea of his weight??,I often see 82kg or 85kg but I am sure as wolverine he weighed closer to 90 kg ,I mean he looks more muscular than a guy like CR7 and they both are close to each other heigh wise.
Editor Rob
I could believe 90kg at times
Slim 6'1" said on 30/Dec/20
Weak 6’2 prime and now 186 current 👍
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 27/Dec/20
187/188cm range peak.
Animus said on 23/Dec/20
Rob, I wasn’t really thinking of herniated discs. To my understanding activity makes you feel worse when you have a herniated disc. When I have “popped” my lower back doing deadlifts, usually activity has made my back feel better, so I don’t think I have a herniated disc. I was just wondering whether I could have lost 1/8th of an inch. I am usually 182.6cm at night (just shy of 6’0). I really hope I’m not creeping towards 182cm flat already, I’m only 25!
Editor Rob
an MRI could tell if the discs had any sort of change like thinning or degeneration, which can happen through regular heavy lifting for years.
Animus said on 22/Dec/20
Rob, how significant does an injury have to be for someone to lose as little as say 1/8th of an inch? Can a guy in his 20s that has messed up and popped his back a few times lifting weights expect to have lost a slight amount of height? We're not talking massive injuries, just "pops" in the lower back that causes some pain and stiffness for a few weeks, which then disappears. What do you think?
Editor Rob
with some herniation small fractions could be lost.
Slim 6'1" said on 16/Dec/20
Agree aj, the full 6’2” is a tad too high for Jackman
Long overdue for a 187 downgrade. He wouldn’t edge out the likes of Ben Affleck or Chris pratt
Aj06 said on 14/Dec/20
I think when he was younger he was defently a weak 6'2 now I would say 6'1.5 as of now.
Sean95 said on 13/Dec/20
Hiya Rob I was wondering in your opinion apart from Deadlifts and back exercises are there any other barbel lifts that risk height loss and in your opinion what do you think the limit you can weight train without sacrificing any height? Thanks for reading
Editor Rob
It's more forms of lifting that are putting tremendous strains on the spinal discs...repeated over many years raises the risk of damage occuring.
Slim 6'1" said on 9/Dec/20
187 max never the solid 6’2” like bana and Reynolds
Vsquad said on 26/Nov/20
Rob, do you think Hugh had already fallen to 6'1.5 by 2013/when he filmed Prisoners?

There just doesn't seem to be 3 inches between himself and Gyllenhaal, both in the movie and during press rounds.
Editor Rob
a fraction maybe by then yeah
Leesheff85 said on 25/Nov/20
Does hugh have the edge on nicole Kidman in the photo rob? If hes 6ft 2-3 in the shoes hes wearing and her heels are only small here shouldn't she look shorter next to him than she does?
Editor Rob
yeah I'd have said Hugh looks taller than Nicole in heels
Genau said on 25/Nov/20
6ft1.75 Peak
6ft1.25 now
Slim 6'1" said on 11/Nov/20
187 prime
186 current
VitoCheng said on 8/Nov/20
Slim 6'1@ said on 5/Nov/20
Like Ben Affleck he can pull off solid 6’2” but he’s actually 187CM max
Slim 6'1@ said on 4/Nov/20
6’1.25” current
Canson said on 25/Oct/20
@6’2 5/8: yep Rob assumes Lunch or afternoon. I feel Goldblum would be very similar with me. I’m around 6’5 or a (mm) over the Mark and 6’4.25 or a (mm) over in the afternoon. If anything maybe I’d have a mm on him or around that. I use my afternoon height too and I also just claim 6’4 like I mentioned for Goldblum only saying he was 6’4”. At an extreme low I’m a mm over 6’4 usually and got all the way down there once when I measured to a flat 6’4”
Slim 6'1" said on 25/Oct/20
187 better peak listing now 185.5-186
6'2 5/8ths said on 24/Oct/20
@Canson that's true, and yes Goldblum was probably a bit over 6'4. But isn't this website based on afternoon/evening heights? I always use my afternoon height after a busy day, otherwise I'd be claiming the 6'3 mark that I clear in the morning. Btw I'm the same guy who you responded to below, just changed my name since I got my measurement slightly wrong.
Canson said on 22/Oct/20
@6’2 and 3/5ths: not necessarily. If he were say 6’2.25” he would be 188.6 and may just be rounded to 189 from there. Some guys if they measure later in the day may stick with 6’2” if they are 6’2.25”. I can see that being the case with a peak Jeff Goldblum.
6'2 3/5ths 189.5 said on 22/Oct/20
@wiles190 why on earth would women care whether he's 188 or 189 lol? Also 189cm is 6'2, most people don't use fractions. Most people do round up to at least the nearest inch though, so maybe if be was 189 he'd claim 6'3.
Willes190 said on 14/Oct/20
Well, Jackman was actually listed as 189cm by CelebHeights long ago, most websites did back then did now that I think about it. I don’t know why, since Hugh himself has consistently claimed 6’2” throughout his career. Maybe there’s some women out there that who would like him to be 189-190cm? I’m speculating, but a lot of these websites dedicated to celebrities have a strong female presence.
Eric W. Tam said on 13/Oct/20
He's been listed as 6'4 before if I wasn't going crazy. He was then listed as 6'2 which seems right, hell that's what he claims, but now he magically shot up to 6'3 smh. Lol, wonder if Jackman ever claimed 6'3, probably did once or twice during his peak. Probably was 6'3 during his prime in the morning. But he's no taller than 6'2 ever now.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 12/Oct/20
🎊🎈🎁🎂 Happy Birthday Hugh! 🎂🎁🎈🎊

Wishing popular actor Hugh Jackman a fantastic 52nd Birthday today. BTW, I just found all of 190cm for Hugh; the man himself admits to 6ft2.

He's a bit young to have already suffered height loss for a fit specimen like himself, but I guess it happens.

Peak - 6ft2
Today - 6ft1.5 😄👍🍻

Brandon(Aspiring 7 Footer) said on 9/Oct/20
@rob why is google listing Jackman as high as 190 cm now? Was he ever 6'2¾" in his life?
Editor Rob
there's several quotes from Hugh saying he was 6ft 2, so I wouldn't list him 190cm when he never seemed that tall.
Slim 6'1" said on 27/Sep/20
187.5cm prime
186cm today

Will ur guess is reasonable & close enough to the truth but I still think Jackman was 187 instead of solid 6’2”
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Sep/20
187cm now, 188-188.5cm peak
Willes190 said on 25/Sep/20
I do think a lot of users forget how tall he could look in the 90s and early 00s. I actually think Hugh has shrunk about 2cm. I’d go with 185.5-186cm today and 187.5-188cm when younger.
Fede187 said on 24/Sep/20
I think Hugh Jackman is 6’, maybe his peak height was 6’1”. If he was 6’2”, he wouldn’t look a couple of centimeters shorter than Obama, who is 6’1”, or around 4 centimeters shorter than Dev Patel, who is a weak 6’2”.
TheDon1528 said on 24/Sep/20
around 6'1.5"
Willes190 said on 23/Sep/20
Jackman is now listed as 1,9 m by Google.
QM6'1QM said on 23/Sep/20
He still standing tall maximum at 6'1.25" as his evening height. Something taller else ?! Stay be funny on tip toes!

P.S. He did really badass commercial for a "Lipton" :)
berta said on 20/Sep/20
i think maybe 187-187,5 peak and 186,5-187 now
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Sep/20
He would edge Gerard butler
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Sep/20
Jackman peak was 187.5-187.8max
6'4'' Guy! said on 5/Sep/20
Alexander Skarsgård and 192cm Danilo Gentili: Click Here

Hugh Jackman and 192cm Danilo Gentili: Click Here

Zachary Levi and 192cm Danilo Gentili: Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Aug/20
Ian555, both looked like very solid 6ft2 guys peak hard to tell really...but I think Reynolds height is getting a little overestimated.

Jackman in the first X-Men and Swordfish looked more 189cm than 187cm, IMO.
Ian555 said on 22/Aug/20
Rob who do you think may have a greater chance of measuring taller: Hugh Jackman peak or Ryan Reynolds?
Editor Rob
Could be a slightly better chance for Ryan, but really I think it is quite close.
Lenad 5ft9.75in stud said on 22/Aug/20
In a video with neil patrick harris he looked no less than 2 inches taller and no more than 3 inches taller than neil. I'm betting before spine problems etc, hugh generally was a weak 6ft2.
Mehmer said on 14/Aug/20
He looks shorter than Ryan Reynolds
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Aug/20
Willes190, well 187.95cm is actually 6ft2 on the nose.
Slim 6'1" said on 9/Aug/20
will, jackman is tall but proably same heigt as andy murray 187.5 before spine degeneration
Slim 6'1 said on 8/Aug/20
@Rob, who have the edge between andy murray and this guy
Editor Rob
Today I think Murray measures taller, but at peak he may well have just smidged Murray, however Andy can pass for 6ft 2 with most folk anyway.
Willes190 said on 6/Aug/20
Who would be taller peak, Hugh Jackman or Sean Connery? I know it’s a random question but I think they are pretty much indistinguishable from one another. I personally believe both would land just – and i do mean JUST – shy of 188cm, at around 187.95cm; I wouldn’t be surprised however if they measured a full 188cm or even 188.1-188.2cm like many others believe.

Hugh Jackman - 187.65-188.25cm – Anything between those two figures is possible, I’ll go with the middle and say 187.95cm.

Sean Connery - Same as Jackman.
Editor Rob
I'm still curious if Connery did say this 6ft 1.5, if it exists, maybe one day will surface...
Slim 6'1" said on 6/Aug/20
185cm today is possible
Slim 6'1" said on 6/Aug/20
6 1 7/8 downgrade necessary even 6 1 3/4
TheBat said on 5/Aug/20
Definitely 6'2" peak, 6'1.5" at a low today.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Aug/20
@Slim 6’1”: I think now he can look that range
Slim 6'1" said on 3/Aug/20
Rampage I’m no downgrader but he may have been 187.75
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jul/20
Ian, I think in his prime years he had a better chance at a little over 6ft2 than under
Ian555 said on 6/Jul/20
Rob for Jackman’s peak height, if he stood as straight and tall as he could on the stadiometer, would you not be shocked if he measured 6’ 2 1/8” or 6’ 2 1/4”? He generally never looks under 6’ 2” back in the day.
Editor Rob
I think right around the 6ft 2 mark in his 20's and 30's is believable for him, I mean at 10-11am he may well have got a little over the mark. I don't think Hugh is a guy who poses 'tall' like your Stallone's, he tends to drop height...but I do think he's lost half inch over last 5 years or so.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jul/20
His legs wouldn’t look disproportionate on a 6ft4 guy so yeah I can appreciate he can look taller than he really is
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jul/20
6ft2 at his absolute low peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jul/20
Strong 187cm currently
Tall Sam said on 1/Jul/20
I think Hugh held up surprisingly well doing a silly bit with Chris Hemsworth, maybe the latter is standing a little looser but Jackman still looks comfortably in the 6'2" range.
Click Here
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 31/May/20
I think generally he was a weak 188cm at peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/May/20
I don't see it, Canson.
Canson said on 20/May/20
@Rampage: peak yes but today is actually possible. I’ve seen pics with other actors like Ryan Reynolds etc where he looks smaller than he used to
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/May/20
185cm is a joke today forget peak.
Val. said on 19/May/20

Definitely not, you have not done any analysis or measurements properly. Look up Zac Efron and Jackman in same footwear standing both with perfect posture side by side on even footing and same angle, Efron is 5'8 minimum,and looked that with a strong 6'2 Jackman, that was at least 6 inches there,possibly even 7. Not claiming Jackman is 6'3,more likely Efron is shy of 5'8 perhaps,but Jackman is a strong 6'2 in the evening. He has looked same height as Reynolds in the 2009 film and at premieres consistently,and Reynolds is a shade over 6'2. Jackman was taller than Obama by a strong inch at least, and that angling of that photo you saw was obvious in Obamas favor,tilted. You can't judge height. You have no idea what 1 inch or 5 centimeters(2 inches) actually is side by side.
Willes190 said on 19/May/20
Peak 185cm for Jackman is a bad joke at best, only in a alternate universe would that be possible.
Willes190 said on 18/May/20
Hugh Jackman is like a Leonardo DiCaprio, Clint Eastwood or even Brad Pitt type of guy for me, meaning that I almost find it impossible to pin his height down... I’ve changed my opinion regarding him 2-3 times now, which is uncommon for me since I’m unusually consistent. I think in the end however barely 188cm peak like Berta suggested is the most accurate guess. He could look 188cm+ a lot in the 90s and early 00s, but that was probably due to his thick shoes at the time, as well as a slim frame and short cast members (like in early X-Men)

He is and always has been a very talented and humble actor that’s for sure.
HeightRealist said on 16/May/20
Hi Rob.I'm pretty convinced that Hugh Jackman is not as tall as listed. He is clearly and inch or more shorter than Ryan Reynolds. Ryan actually never stands completely straight so he might be slightly taller than 6'2. 188-189cm for Ryan and 184cm for Hugh. Hugh was shorter than Obama who is 185-186.

Peak 185, nowadays 184 for mr Jackman. Mr Jackman never looked 6'2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/May/20
I think more 187-187.5cm now and 188-188.5cm peak
berta said on 8/May/20
his small head can make him look legit 6´2 when standign alone but in reality i think barely 188 peak maybe 187,5 and today he can looks 186-187
6footTom said on 6/May/20

Reynolds is easily taller than Jackman these days.
Nik said on 5/May/20
He can come across as being under 6'1.5" in the above photo!
HypoMarkeble said on 4/May/20
@Ulf Jonas Hiller

Hugh is 51 what are you on about?
jano said on 2/May/20
He is taller than ryan reynolds or at least the same height, there is something wrong with these two listings.
Ulf Jonas Hiller said on 28/Apr/20
The guy has shrunk remarkably considering he's not even 50! A full inch, I believe.
Just compare pictures of him next to Ryan Reynolds, who too is over 40, but I don't believe he's lost a millimeter.
James B 172cm said on 26/Apr/20
i dont see anything wrong with erics comment
K.A 188.4! said on 21/Apr/20
@Eric W. Tam

Your last phrase was very unnecessary
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Apr/20
Eric W Tam silly statement
Eric W. Tam said on 1/Mar/20
6'2 is a perfect height for men, I know a 6'2 son of a gun who thinks he is a wax figure while I'm a peasant (despite me not being much shorter than him, stronger and more intelligent than him, but that's a conversation for another day) because he has that extra couple inches and change on me. So yeah don't get why Jackman is encouraged to lie about his height. Anyway, I swear he was once listed as 6'3 or 6'4. 6'3 would have been a white lie though 6'4+ would definitely be an embellishment. 6'1.5 now, 6'2 in his prime, has yet to lose a lot of height since he's in his early 50s, it would be interesting to see if he still stands over 6'0 in his eighties. I'd say he'd be 1.81 to 1.84 during Jackman's final, peaceful days.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Feb/20
VitoCheng, yeah those aren’t impossible
VitoCheng said on 21/Feb/20
Jkiller said on 4/Feb/20
188cm peak, 187cm nowadays
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Dec/19
Definitely not an inch between him and Ryan
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Dec/19
Peak: 6ft2⅛
Current: 6ft1⅝
185vietnamese said on 23/Dec/19
@Johan 185 cm
That’s one of just some picture of him and Ryan that i can rely on. Others picture that posted here is just Hugh standing further from the camera which can easily tell cuz his head look obviously smaller than Ryan. In the movie, he can olso look as tall as Ryan. And i don’t think that arm over shoulder should make Ryan lose any height unless he’s leaning or something.
Ryan Reynolds has a really good posture most of the time.
But probably that he maybe a little shorter than Ryan.
Johan 185 cm said on 23/Dec/19
185 Vietnamese said on 22/Dec/19
As tall as Ryan Reynolds
Click Here


Its obvious from that pic that he is holding Ryan down as some celebs do at times in pics. Ofc I don't think that is Hugh's intention but you can see from his arm that this is the case.
185 Vietnamese said on 22/Dec/19
As tall as Ryan Reynolds
Click Here
Animus said on 18/Dec/19
Rob, you say that doing heavy deadlifts causes greater levels of height loss than would otherwise be expected. Is that statement based on research? I see where you are coming from, especially if the lift is executed with bad form (too much rounding in the back). However, if someone practices good form and refrains from doing overly strenuous squats and deadlifts, is it possible/likely to avoid that kind of height loss?
Editor Rob
there have been a couple of studies I've seen in the past on athletes which suggest weightlifting is one discipline which increases risk of damage and disc issues.
James B said on 16/Dec/19
6ft2 peak and maybe 6ft1.25 today
Willes189 said on 2/Dec/19
I used to believe that Jackman was 189cm at his peak, but I’ve been skeptical last year... He didn’t look over 6’1.5 while hosting the oscars 09. Although he looked like a solid 6’2 in the 90s and early 00s. Maybe he started shrinking at an early age due to his lifting?
viper said on 26/Nov/19
Don't think he was ever more than
Big dave said on 24/Nov/19
He's been looking 186 cm range these days , used to be a strong 6'2"
TheBat said on 22/Nov/19
6'2" peak, currently 6'1.5"
Nearly 180cm guy said on 14/Nov/19
Here are photos of Jackman next to Claudia Karvan from 1999: Click Here Click Here Click Here
Jackman looked like a giant then. Rob, isn't there really a chance for Jackman's peak height to be a fraction of over 6'2"?
Editor Rob
He did look a more solid 6ft 2 earlier in his career like 15-20 years ago.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Nov/19
Jackman actually looked 189-190cm in The Prestige beside Bale and Caine..
Uriel said on 30/Oct/19
Kidman wears 10 cm heels while men shoes heel around 2-3 cm. So if Kidman height 180 cm Jackman's height suppose to be around 187-188 cm at that picture. Michael Caine listed at the same height with Jackman but if you see them at the Prestige Jackman suppose to be 5-7cm taller than Caine (listed as 188 cm), but I think Jackman can't be more than 193 cm.
Tessa Van Nunen said on 24/Oct/19
Dev Patel looks more atleast 2-3cm taller than him. Dev Patel has a very similar build to me, I am 189cm and skinny. I think Hugh Jackman is 186cm max, and Dev patel is 188-189cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Oct/19
Jackman would’ve beaten out a guy like Brosnan by a couple of centimeters. Personally I think Brosnan was near 187cm and Jackman near 189cm
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 12/Oct/19
🎁🎈🕯️🎂 Happy Birthday Hugh! 🎂🕯️🎈🎁

Many Happy Returns to Hugh Jackman, who turns 51 today.

6ft2 peak; 6ft1.5 today.

pov said on 11/Oct/19
I think hugh jackman and piers brosnan were the same height peak. Solid 6”1
viper said on 23/Sep/19
Titus looks 6-2 a lot
viper said on 23/Sep/19
Where did Titus measure 6-4?
Sotiris Gravas said on 23/Sep/19

Actually, it looks like Titus is under 6'3", given that this is him next to Jameis Winston:
Click Here , Click Here Jameis is listed 6'4", but I'm told is 6'3.5". Titus might be 6'2.5".
Gaspergoo said on 21/Sep/19
After seeing the picture of him next to David Beckman, I would say s fair height is 6'1"....the person who is comparing them in height is allowing Beckman a higher height with hair.... stilly... obvious 2" differences
185 said on 16/Sep/19
@Sotiris Gravas
How do you know Titus O'Neil is just 6'3. He listed at 6'6 and measured at 6'4.
Tall Sam said on 11/Sep/19
Jackman does look like he's quickly heading for the 6'1" mark, more than a decade ago he could look taller to be sure.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 11/Sep/19
Hugh looks 6'0"-6'0.5" in that pic to be honest.
Sotiris Gravas said on 10/Sep/19
6'1" Jackman w/ 6'3" Titus O'Neil (2014)... Click Here
Meltdown said on 6/Sep/19
I'd give Hugh a solid 6'1.75" peak height and 6'1"flat now at 50.
Jackson said on 6/Sep/19
Looked 6’2” to me his entire career. You can maybe argue he’s 6’1.75” these days. Nothing under.
185 said on 4/Sep/19
I have an inseam of about 34-45 inches. Is that can considered long.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 4/Sep/19
6'1 1/2 with 6'3-6'4 guys legs it seem rare.
185 said on 2/Sep/19
I really doubt that his leg could be as long as conan’s leg
Click Here
His leg obviously longer than ryan reynolds and liev
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Aug/19
He does have very long legs. They wouldn’t look out of place on a 6ft4 guy
Ian555 said on 18/Aug/19
Rob I’m curious but when did you think Jackman started shrinking and what would be the highest you would estimate him at?
Editor Rob
Somewhere in 40's, the years of weight lifting I think have effected his back. As mentioned before, he's dead lifting massive don't magically get up to that range without years of doing it, and you are lucky by mid 40's not to have done some disc damage.
Importer said on 16/Aug/19
Pause 2:24 Click Here
How is his legs looking so long ?!
Jammes said on 11/Aug/19
If he was a legit 6'2 twenty years ago,I wonder if Famke is actually 5'10 or a very weak 5'11
It seems like there is a bit more than 2.5 inches between them like a full 3 or 4 unless his footwear gave him some more height.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

I feel like here Famke can be in the 5'10 range
Click Here
Importer said on 7/Aug/19
He looked atleast 6'2" in swordfish.
185 said on 6/Aug/19
he's really about ryan reynolds and liev schreibe in movie, not sure in picture. I still think the list is spot on.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Jul/19
6ft1 is too low and 6ft is just nonsense
Blahhh said on 11/Jul/19
Jackman looked hardly any taller than 5’10.5” Jake gylenhaal, and decently shorter than 6’1.75” Ryan Reynolds.

I thought Jackman always cleared 6’1” easily until I saw that picture with gylenhaal and reynolds. Jackman looks 6’0” flat now...
berta said on 6/Jul/19
dosent look a mm over 186 today beside weak 189 Ryan reynolds. COuld be like 3,5 cm beetween them
Alex 6'3.25 said on 29/Jun/19
He's just 50, he didn't lose even an half centimeter, he never was a real 188 cm as they said, but more like 186-187 cm. Simply enough.
Laura Buckley-Bertolissi said on 15/Jun/19
I honestly believe Hugh Jackman when he was told to lie about his height earlier on in his Career and I believe him when he says his real Height is 6'2.
As for the for the photo with Nicole they aren't even standing exactly side by side if anything Hugh is a little more forward than Nicole.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 11/Jun/19
I can see 188.3cm peak and still keeping 187cm now.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 3/Jun/19
@Dream Peak he can. But he doesn't look much over 6'1.5" nowadays.
Aus said on 5/May/19
189cm at peak, he seems masive in the prestige
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 28/Apr/19
⭐️ Sorry guys! I should have mentioned that the film was 'Asylum'.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 28/Apr/19
I could see going on for 6ft2 for this sturdily-built actor when I had the first chance to view him again properly since I saw him in 'Swordfish' eons ago!

Hugh gets 6ft2 peak and half-an-inch less now. 💪
Dream said on 26/Apr/19
Honestly, I can see a case of 6’2 1/8th” for Jackman.
Dante said on 26/Apr/19
@Jammes. 5’11 is still too tall for wolverine, he is supposed to be even shorter than an average man, Marvel needs to find someone who is under 5’7 or 5’8, and quite grizzled looking dude, Hugh Jackman imo was way too tall and too much of a pretty boy to play wolverine, who is supposed to be short, ridiculously hairy and not very good looking?

I think Scott Caan would be a better fit for the character he is short, young, kinda good looking but not pretty boy level of looks.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Apr/19
181-182cm is just stupid talk
Jammes said on 21/Apr/19
Sadly I doubt we will ever get a wolverine actor thats 5'3,but they shouldn't go taller than 5'11 imo.
Sceptic said on 21/Apr/19
186 cm is too much for Jackman.
On this photo Jackman and Kidman have the same heels, and Hugh looks only 3 cm taller than Nicole, who is claimed to be 178-179 cm - Click Here
So Jackman can't be more than 181-182 cm.
And according to alternative estimation Kidman may be only 175-177 cm - Click Here
mohammad said on 16/Apr/19
Age 25 = 188 cm

Age 51 = 187 cm
Bora said on 7/Apr/19
Sure in this photo Nicole Kidman has a little bit high heels but not even 3 inches, and they look equal, that's why lets say Jackman's peak height is 186 cm
Edgar Ignacio Sanchez said on 27/Mar/19
Do long legs make you look feminine???
Editor Rob
I am not sure, but on women I'm sure they are seen as more attractive.
billionaireslayer said on 20/Mar/19
Good 6'1 peak
James Brett 172cm said on 9/Mar/19
Rob the majority of votes have the rock at a peak height of 6ft2 1/8.......
Editor Rob
Well 6ft 3 and 1/8th yeah, it's believable.
GRIT said on 6/Mar/19
I think he just about about made up 6ft2 at his peak, maybe 6ft1.5 or a bit aover now
Sceptic said on 1/Mar/19
Hugh Jackman is about 5'11.5". He is only a half inch taller then David Beckham, who is listed as 5'11" here - Click Here
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 19/Feb/19
Deadpool had current Wolverine by 1.25 inch. Can't denied it. Click Here Click Here 2" difference from those pictures but probably 1.25" in reality. I can buy Jackman being 6'1 1/2 now but 6'2 flat for Reynolds is out.
Christian 6'5 3/8 said on 13/Feb/19
I don't believe he has shrunk as much as like someone like The Rock did though. I can maybe see a 1cm loss for Hugh but I believe 2cm for Rock.
Editor Rob
Rock potentially can look like he's shrunk more, especially as many have him a peak height of 6f 3.25
Fred994 said on 12/Feb/19
Hi did you notice he shrink?? Do you think that most of us will shrink around 50 years old or there is a chance it is possible to keep height even after 60 if exercising everyday?
Editor Rob
Jackman I believe is an exception due to his physical roles and his weight-lifting. Doing deadlifts to the point of getting over 400 pounds, puts tremendous strain on the discs for the years of working out to get to that stage..
Bobby 5'10 (178cm) said on 7/Feb/19
Brett got to meet Hugh Jackman? That's awesome sauce! Yeah, Hugh still looks pretty much 6'2 with Brett.
Brett said on 15/Jan/19
Sorry guys,

Just saw the questions re my height... I usually say 185cm... I can still hit around that at night, so maybe im technically more... but ive never done the full morning to evening measure-athon to try 😂

The picture of Hugh and me is from maybe 3-4 years ago, so I think he has shrunk more since then - from what Rob says... I was looking at some older shots of him, and he defintely looked taller a few years ago... eg this shot with Ryan Reynolds, he actually looks taller than Ryan here, but in more recent years, he tends to look shorter.

Click Here
GRIT said on 5/Jan/19
Weak 6ft2 peak, 6ft1.5 now
Rising - 174 cm said on 2/Jan/19
It's not "haters", it's Ryan himself who said 6'1"-6'2". And come on, Ryan is definitely not 190 cm. He's definitely not taller than 6'2"-6'2 1/8" measured Brett Favre and he's shorter than Terry Crews, who is also a legit 6'2", maybe 6'2.25" as listed. If Ryan were 6'2.5"+, that would mean the NFL draft downplayed Favre and Crews. As for Hugh, he did look taller early to mid 2000's and could look a good 6'2" at times. Now he often looks closer to 6'1", but some of that seems to be how he stands.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 24/Dec/18
@Avillax True. Reynolds had Jackman by 3cm and Peak Jackman is legit 188cm. 185cm Samuel L.Jackman had clearly 5cm lower than Reynolds in Hitmans Bodyguard but haters will keep denied it with every excuses to make Deadpool guy 6'2 even. Lol.
Jordan87 said on 19/Dec/18

Anyway for you to confirm your height for us?

Rob can he do a height measuring video?
Editor Rob
I think he had claimed his height over a decade ago and hasn't really given reason to think he wasn't.
hridoyham58 said on 18/Dec/18
he is 6'0" tall and nothing
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 7/Dec/18
@Brett I’ll take your word that he’s leaning, but even considering that, he certainly doesn’t look to be 6’2” there.
6'2" gamer said on 4/Dec/18
He looks shorter than 6'2 right now but not shorter than 6'1 for sure.
Michael, 5'10" 178 cm said on 27/Nov/18
He was undeniably 6’2”, he looks that tall next to everybody else in the X-Men movies. He also looked to be that tall in the Greatest Showman and the Prestige. Whoever that guy was who said he was 5’10” was full of rubbish. Hugh was definitely 6’2” at peak, maybe a little bit shorter than that now.
Tall Sam said on 22/Nov/18
Rob already has his height-loss represented in Hugh's listing, and the recent photos with Reynolds may have had Jackman at some sort of slight disadvantage. At this time I'd doubt the current listing should be any lower unless there's a lot more proof.
Brett said on 21/Nov/18

I sent Rob a picture with me and Hugh, in a gym together... I'm 185-186cm, and he probably had a cm or so on me... I think if he stood up super straight he may still be 187-188cm.

Happy for Rob to show the pic, if he wants :)
Editor Rob
Here is a link to your Photo.
Sotiris Gravas said on 17/Nov/18
Here's "Wolvie" next to his pal, Ryan Reynolds, from May of this year... Click Here , Click Here

Jackman just turned 50 and suffice it to say, I was shocked by these height-loss pics (assuming both had equal footwear).

Maybe it's time for a downgrade...
TheBat said on 27/Oct/18
Definitely 6'2" peak and I can agree with his current height at 6'1.5".
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 11/Sep/18
Ryan Reynolds is 100% not under 189cm and peak Jackman 100% 188cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Sep/18
Today looks a strong 187cm
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 27/Aug/18
The shortest Id ever give hugh, would be a weak 187cm.
Animus said on 22/Aug/18
Down below there was a discussion of the relationship between lifting "massive" weights and height loss, specifically that lifting massive weight could cause either premature or above-average height loss.

The thing to take into consideration is that what constitutes massive weight differ depending on body frame and various other factors. As a weightlifter it's hard to know when one has crossed the line of lifting "normal" weights into lifting "massive" weights.

Rob, do you have any suggestions as to how can ascertain for oneself where that line is?
Editor Rob
I think pushing things that you are just managing to lift, and doing that over the course of years to build up to bigger and very heavy weights might cause more issues than lifting weights that are hard but you have a fair bit left in the tank.
vinny said on 7/Aug/18
Monkey knees she is pushing 6'0 theres a 2' shoes and there are a lot of pics with they together and Nicole always look at least 2 inches smaller with similar shoes they wearing on that photo. But thats 10 years ago today i think he is in the spot Rob put him.
Dejavu said on 5/Aug/18
He has definitely lost height. He looked the same height as Ryan Reynolds in the first Wolverine premiere.
berta said on 2/Aug/18
to me, a guy like ryan reynolds is 100 procent taller than peak jackman
Monkey knees said on 15/Jul/18
Almost exact same, top of head, height as Kidman in the above pic. She is pushing 5'11 and he is wearing big heels there, and almost level. Claims of 6'2.5 and above are ridiculous.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Jul/18
Junior, I think those estimates could be spot on. Hugh still looks no less than 187cm today
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 28/Jun/18
Posture do apart in deceiving someones height. I still think Rob under list Jackman peak and now. He still look solid 187cm when standing straight on Jimmy Fallon show and look a wee bit over 6'2 peak with John Travolta and Halle Berry.

6'2 1/8 peak
6'1 5/8 now
Warren said on 18/Jun/18
First time I saw this page and little shocked 6’2" was his peak height!
Robinson said on 8/Jun/18
Actually he looks 187 cm top in his peak for me.
MAD SAM said on 4/Jun/18
I don’t disagree to the fact that he would had been 188-189 cm in the past, sadly now though he’s lost almost an inch of it gonna give him 186 cm presently
Westworlder said on 3/Jun/18
John Cena (self-claimed and pretty much confirmed 6ft/184 guy) looked barely an inch shorter than Jackman on James Corden's show, and other pictures they've taken together recently. I think Jackman is definitely in the 186-187 range these days.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 1/Jun/18

I agree with you on this one.
Gracian said on 1/Jun/18
Many people want to argue at 6'2.25" for peak height Jackman. I think it really is fired." Rob, look at this picture from 1995: Click Here
I believe in that 6'2.25" was the peak height of Hugh before any loss height of Jackman. Rob, what do you think about it?
Andrea said on 28/May/18
He certainly doesn't look over 6'0.5 in that picture with Ryan. How much of that is due to posture and/or footwear is harder to say, but Hugh can certainly look barely 6'1 a lot in the last years...
gian said on 27/May/18
Rob, How tall is the girl?: Click Here Click Here
Here the heels: Click Here Click Here
Here with Mel Gibson : Click Here
Editor Rob
She might be close to 5ft 9
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 26/May/18

Ryan's posture isn't that great either. No way that's only a 1.5cm difference. At worst I can see 3cm but no less. That doesn't mean I believe Hugh's only 185cm, maybe he had less shoes than Ryan.
SHANTANU SANJAY 156 said on 24/May/18
Those who are getting confused about ryan and hugh pic, hugh posture was horribly bad in that pic and camera angle could tell the difference. Ryan is 188.5 cm and hugh is almost 187 cm . That is my assumption so dont get confused about that pic.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 24/May/18
Looks about 6'0.5" with 6'2" listed Ryan Reynolds Click Here I don't know how Rampage can say the difference doesn't even look an inch.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 22/May/18
Wolverine 6'1 5/8

Deadpool 6'2 5/8

Hawkeye 5'8 1/8

Thor from Asgard 6'2 7/8

Hulk 5'7 3/8 before turning green

Spiderboy Tom 5'7

Ant Man in its real form 5'8 1/2

Thanos and Cable 5'8 7/8

Captain America 5'11 7/8

Iron Man 5'7 3/4

Loki 6'1 3/4

Nick Fury 6'1

Falcon 5'10.5"

Black Widow 5'3

Scarlet Witch 5'4
berta said on 21/May/18
yeh in that photo with reynolds there is alot beetween them but it looks like ryan is standing afraction better. but still ryan looks his 189 cm as usuall and Hugh is looking 6 foot 1 flat alot. I dont believe hugh is that short but he never looks 188 anymore, not in one single photo it really start to look like minimum half inch loss.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/May/18
There's definitely is not as much as 2in Reynolds and Jackman, not even 1in...
JB - 5'9 said on 17/May/18
@editor rob: on Ryan Reynold’s instagram profile, a recent picture of him a Hugh shows a 2 inch difference in my eyes. So, either Ryan had thick boots on or one of these two are under/overlisted.

Your thoughts?
Editor Rob
It's possible Jackman is dropping height on his hip (which he does do a bit) and the camera is more on Ryan's side, these might help explain extra difference.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/May/18
In the 90’s-00’s he probably was 188-188.5cm
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 6/May/18
I atually found out more chance Jackman is atually 6'2 1/8 peak (188.3) and current height 6'1 5/8 (187), i remember when very first time i visit this site 13years ago i saw Jackman was listed at 6'2.5" and he don't look far from it.
Dejavu said on 30/Apr/18
He was a strong 6’2 10 years ago. Check out his photos with Justin Timberlake who is a bit over 5’11. He looked 3 inches taller. Nowadays he probably lost height due to the constant weight lifting.
Dream(5'9.5 said on 30/Apr/18
Rob, could I make a case for 6'2 1/8ths" for Hugh Jackman.
Editor Rob
He had a chance in the 90's of that figure, though I'm happy with 6ft 2 flat for him.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Mar/18
Jackman was a very solid 6ft2 at least 15-20 years ago. He looked more like a 6ft3 guy in Swordfish standing w/h Travolta and Vinnie Jones.
Berta said on 16/Mar/18
Yeah rob i agree that dwayne could have been 191 but i think your listings is good. He cant really lost more than half inch at this age with no real injuries. Jackman also is fair to have at 188 peak its either that or very strong 187. If you look at the clip with him and john cenå dancing, its reålly haŕd to see moŕe thån 2 cm beetween them .
berta said on 14/Mar/18
i just realized that its now possible to see every old post since the celeb was added. jackman was listed 189 in the beginning. And dwayne johnson was listed 192 for a short period.I think like this before internet had all those photos we could compare their exact height with others it was probably easy to think they were those heights. Now in 2018 its easier. dwayne at best 191 peak and hugh jackman at best 188 probably 187,5 and now a fraction shorter because he is pretty skinny. He have muscles but it looks like he have very small bones and i think that makes people lose height easier than a guy like john cena.
Editor Rob
In Rock's case, it's not entirely implausible he might have over 6ft 3, although Jackman was pretty consistant with saying 6ft 2.
Gracian said on 7/Mar/18
Hey Rob! Here are Jackman's pictures from 6'1.25" Gerard Butler: Click Here
Butler looks taller than Jackman, maybe Jackman has lost more than half an inch? What do you think about Rob? Please answer me.
Canson said on 27/Feb/18
@Rampage: yea Junior definitely isn’t downgrading if he’s calling Ryan Reynolds 6’2.5 possibly. Reynolds himself claimed 6’1/6’2” before and is listed 6’2”. The verdict is out on Reynolds to be honest. I think he’s an honest 6’2” but if he said 6’1/6’2 that raises eyebrows honestly and now 6’3 when he’s famous. That points to shoes
Snowman said on 19/Feb/18
Rob, do you think doing compressive exercises like squats or deadlifts two times per week at normal weights would make one lose height over time? Or do you think only professional weightlifters (or people who lift massive weights in general, as Hugh Jackman) will have a noticeable height loss?
Editor Rob
Normal weights at a lower frequency may not do as much damage as trying for massive weights.
Psychedelic Earth said on 3/Feb/18
No rampage, junior competed to upgrade Leto and Macht. (Who are both a tad underlisted imo).
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 2/Feb/18

I don't think Junior's trying to downgrade anyone. He just sees it from a different perspective than yours most likely.
Junior Hernandez said on 2/Feb/18
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jan/18
Junior, I back up my statements...You just love to downgrade people

No rampage i'm not. I going with logic we could see Reynolds is an easy 189cm guy not flat 6'2 just because he claim it so 6'2.5" and Jackman peak 6'2 and 6'1.5" now is fine and there is at least half inch different when Reynolds wear converse with Jackman in dress shoes and the shoe heels differences is not under half inch you should know it. Disadvantage shoes and the half inch added up is obviously 6'2.5" fine for Reynolds unless you insist they were eye to eye same height i would go for 6'1 for Jackman nothing more. Then we call Reynolds as honest 6'2 so everyone were half inch down.
Willes said on 14/Jan/18
Either 187 or 188 peak, now 186-187
popo said on 10/Jan/18
Peak was definitely 6.2 ft no doubt.....currently is between 6.1-6.175 ft he looked almost an inch taller than John cena who's definitely almost 6.1 ft
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jan/18
Junior, I back up my statements...You just love to downgrade people
Tremo Kapast said on 30/Dec/17
His shoe size is 12, no doubt, he is definitely in the 6'2 - 6'1 range
alex953 said on 27/Dec/17
If he was in WWE they would say he was 6'5

So I'd say he is still about 6'2
Mike said on 24/Dec/17
I doubt he was ever over 6ft 2, and more likely 6ft 1.5 or 6ft 1.75 peak and 6ft 1, 6ft 1.25 today.
berta said on 23/Dec/17
he was 2- cm taller than cena in james corden show. lets say cena is 184,8 . i guess about 187 seems right for him today.
Johno said on 17/Dec/17
Hmmm, Huge Jacked'man seemed to have a edge on John Cena on the James Corden show, 6'1 might cover most ranges.
Elektrafans said on 14/Dec/17
He is in the full 1.87-1.88 area, big guy.
Click Here
Click Here

I would say he's current height is 6'1.5 but he recovers the strong 6'2 for some times, same range than Reynolds.
Junior said on 13/Dec/17

Stop lying. Reynolds with converse still edge out Jackman with dress shoes on. Just accept the truth.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Dec/17
Back to back he'd probably have the edge over DDL (who might be 6ft1 flat now)

6ft1 max nevermind barely over 6ft is just rubbish Jackman. He looked practically eye to eye with Reynolds at Comic Con...
FatBoySlim185 said on 10/Dec/17
Hi, Rob. What do you make of this? Click Here
Editor Rob: Jackman at times doesn't look over 6ft 1, sometimes even not that much over 6ft, but I don't beleive he is always standing that good in photos.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Dec/17
I think he's currently a weak 6ft2 down from a strong 6ft2 at peak , I stick by that that.
Sam said on 22/Nov/17
Googling Daniel Craig with Jackman can show what a difference perspective can make, in some Jackman can seem over 4 inches taller, in others where the angle favors Craig, it can look like barely 2 inches between them, which is just not the case.
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Nov/17
At least 1in taller than Michael Caine (probably still at least 6ft1 then) in The Prestige
Edimar1.84 said on 9/Nov/17
In movies I can see him at 6ft2.5/6ft3 range some times... But In real life always looks 6ft2 for me at Past. Now no more than a 6ft1.5 guy, in the picture with Mrs Kidman he looks at weak 6ft1.
Jack said on 6/Nov/17
6'2 peak and 6'1.5 now but returns to 6'2 for moments.
Edimar1.84 said on 1/Nov/17
6ft2.25 at peak, now 6ft1.5.
kurtz said on 28/Oct/17
Click Here
Kurtz said on 27/Oct/17
Click Here:
Kurtz said on 27/Oct/17
a bilion of "fake" 6 2 that is the most "abused" height ever.
6 1 now and his prime.
Slim 6' said on 25/Oct/17
Rob, I don't mean to sound pressuring, but we added x-men universe Reynolds to the marvel page, can we please do the same for Jackman?

As listed.
Editor Rob: yesterday I was doing another category, but I will look at the marvel universe soon and put more people in it from X-Men...
Joshua said on 25/Oct/17
He is still 6’2 now!!
Grit said on 25/Oct/17
Reynolds would have edged out a prime jackman
Slim 6' said on 22/Oct/17
Please add to marvel universe. Like we did for Reynolds.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Oct/17
I think a prime Jackman (pre X-Men days) would have been pretty much bang on the same as Reynolds
Slim 6' said on 20/Oct/17
Checkmate, go to the "general page" and announce your new and old username. @mark5'9.5" changed to dreampuffe and did it. My suggestion of course. 👍🏻
Checkmate said on 17/Oct/17
He could have been 188cm max in his youth but i wouldnt go over it. Today in his 50s and after a lifetime of unhealthy lifting a 1-1.5cm height loss isnt shooking.

Rob, is my ban permenent? I would like to use my original username but take away 188

I feel like my behavior has been explained, it was a once in a lift time crazy rant after a really bad week, and comments truley getting under my skin. I defenitly see why the reactions were so strong... Im sorry if anyone got offended.
Editor Rob: no, just stick with Checkmate and if we stick away from politics, it makes it simpler.
Some Guy said on 14/Oct/17
Rob, I don't think this downgrade is really that necessary. I just watched Logan and he was an inch taller than Boyd Holbrook. I think he was around the same height as Richard E. Grant.
Junior said on 14/Oct/17
Jackman must be 188.5cm peak and still at least myabe a few mm overr 187cm now. 186.7cm sound abit too low.
Bobby said on 4/Oct/17
IMDB listed him at 6'2.5 once, I'm not sure if they still do. Hugh has also been listed at 6'3 before.
Dejavu said on 30/Sep/17
He still looks above 6'1 for sure.

He looked similar height to Ryan Reynolds maybe at most a tad shorter. He also looks above 6'1 with Channing Tatum. I think he is 186 or 187 still.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Sep/17
HHH possibly by a hair. He could look a solid 189cm guy in the 90's.
Dejavu said on 18/Sep/17
He looked closer to 189cm next to John Travolta.
John Cena said on 17/Sep/17
Rob who will win the stadiometer. Peak Jackman or Triple h?
Editor Rob: couldn't pick one.
Raza said on 9/Sep/17
Come on guys, I really don't think Jackman has dropped from 188. His pictures with Ryan Reynolds, Ben Affleck and more recently Boyd Holbrook (in Logan) prove it. 188 AT LEAST.
Mark(5'9.5") said on 7/Sep/17
@Lol, going by your logic, I would have been 6'0.75" since in one photo, I managed to appear taller than a 6'0.5" best friend of mine. (While he's clearly taller than me in person.) At times, I managed to look only 1-2 inches shorter than someone who edged out Barack Obama in several pictures. (I won't post pictures of him and Obama out of respect.)

Don't focus everything on one picture.
Willes188 said on 5/Sep/17
Flat 186cm seems too low for Jackman today, this listing is spot on
Slim said on 5/Sep/17
Hi rob, I've compared jackman to Crowe and Kidman,
They're less than 3 inches apart. This would make Jackman 6'1.25" or crowe and Kidman 5'10.75"
This is current btw not peak.
Willes188 said on 1/Sep/17
Yes I believed or wanted to believe that a young Jackman could stand 6'2.25, but as Rob himself says opinions change over time.

6'2 prime is good in my opinion but 6'1.75 is not unthinkable, I don't think he was as tall as Reynolds who most agree are 188-189cm
Mark(5'9.5") said on 31/Aug/17
I honestly think Jackman is a solid legit 6'2" maybe a fraction over it at peak. He sometimes looked taller than Ryan Reynolds back then.
Tom said on 30/Aug/17

That was a joke interview, so it should probably be taken with a grain of salt.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Aug/17
Willes188 said on 27/Mar/17
More 188-189cm at peak than 187-188cm. He probably measured 190cm on the dot in the morning. Nowadays he looks 186.5-187cm, and probably measures 188-188.5cm in the morning

Ring any bells, Will?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Aug/17
Looked similar to Reynolds at comic con, maybe at worst Ryan edged him slightly but in other photos Hugh actually looked taller! Can't be more than a centimetre between them. 10-20 years ago Jackman would have been no shorter than Reynolds.
Willes188 said on 25/Aug/17
Slim I've always said that Reynolds was taller than peak Jackman, Hugh 6'1.75-6'2 peak and Reynolds 6'2.25
Slim183 said on 23/Aug/17
Willes188 said on 21/Aug/17
Hugh is admitting that Reynolds is taller does this mean Hugh is over listed or Reynolds under listed?

1:15 Click Here

That movie is from 09 Hugh was still peak height.
I do believe Reynolds might maintain the 6'2" mark when going to sleep, the same can't be said for peak Jackman.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.