How tall is Tom Selleck ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

Tom Selleck's height is 6ft 3.5in (192 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 4in (193 cm)
American actor best known for his tv series Magnum PI and Blue Bloods. In movies he has appeared in Three Men and a Baby, Quigley Down Under and Her Alibi. He said in the NY Times, "I'm 6'4".

Ever met Tom Selleck? Add your own contribution about their height below.
Add your opinion on the Height of Tom Selleck

Your Comment:

Alan R says on 18/Mar/14
Taller than Ted Danson, who is 6'2". Taller than Dennis Weaver who was 6'2". Think about this: Did you EVER see him riding in the Ferrari with the top ON? Nope. If he wasn't 6'4", he was danged close.
James B says on 15/Mar/14
I cant picture this guy being a full 2 inches above 6'2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 30/Dec/13
His father was 6ft6
Thomas says on 16/Dec/13
I stood next to him 4 years ago. I am 6ft2 (188 cm) and I was slightly taller than him. I would guess he is about 6ft 1 now and his peak height was 6ft2.
Lenad is sexy says on 14/Dec/13
was at most 1.5 inches taller than ted danson
Dave618 says on 13/Dec/13
Watched an old Magnum rerun today and came here to see how tall ol' Tom was/is. I have no problem whatsoever believing he was 6'4" at his peak. He looks freaking' huge in that series, and he usually wore boat shoes or sneakers, or barefoot on the beach and he still looks extra-tall. Maybe a half-inch or so less now, or maybe not even that. Still looms at or near 6'4".
Xhavier says on 13/Nov/13
His peak should be downgraded to 6'3.5, since that's what he claimed.

Also in Mr. Baseball (1992), he appears to be 1 full inch shorter (at least) than co-star Dennis Haysbert (6ft 4.5in).
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 22/Sep/13
"Tom Selleck's height is 6ft 3.25in (191cm)"

Might still be 192cm. Not under 6ft3 flat
Brooke says on 20/Aug/13
Why is peak height listed 6'4 when he claimed 6'3.5?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 14/Aug/13
"Peak height was 6ft 3.75in (192cm)"

Reasonable since he claimed 6ft3.5 aswell as 6ft4. Usually looked either of those. Still a strong 6ft3 at least today.
jeff dan says on 23/Jul/13
Roger Mosley with the Hoff

Click Here
TSM says on 27/May/13
In the Magnum series, Roger Mosely regularly wore lifts that added a good 3 to 3.5 inches to his height. There were many scenes with them standing together, Selleck in his bare feet or in sneakers, and he was never less than at least three inches taller than Mosely who was wearing those lifts; that would put Mosely at 5'10 at the most.... but he was a very powerful looking man.
Jer1 says on 12/May/13
Maybe shorter now with age, but he was an easy 6-4 during his Magnum stardom and well into his time on Friends. Sometimes people are exactly what they look like and that was the case with Selleck.
b says on 31/Mar/13
no he 6'4 or 6'5
James says on 22/Feb/13
6'4 I can defnintly believe for tom selleck. He can look 6'3 as well I guess.

He never looks as low as 6'2 though.
Arch Stanton says on 17/Jan/13
Watched Monte Walsh the other day and Selleck look the same height as John Wayne in the cowboy boots. At time he could look 6'2" but when they showed him at a differenyt camera angle compared to some of the other guys you could see he is very tall. 6'3.5" I think, but his height isn't obvious like several other western actors of that height. He can look 6'2 a lot on screen like Eastwood and Wayne.
Trent says on 16/Jan/13
They weren't actually both barefoot, Arch. Here, look at this: Click Here
It's very briefly onscreen, but you can see there Selleck is actually in slippers--probably only taking 1/4" or so from them, but every bit counts. Later the scene cuts away though and this time you can see Selleck is barefoot now for some reason, but it seems when they were standing face-to-face like that Selleck did take a bit of footwear advantage.

Click Here

I'd say, accounting for the footwear advantage, Schwimmer could be 6'0.25. And I'll crosspost this to his page.
Arch Stanton says on 14/Jan/13
If Selleck was 6'3.5" peak, David Schwimmer is struggling with even 6'0.5". Selleck had between 3 and 4 inches on him., both barefoot on Friends.
Mathew says on 12/Jan/13
Trent says on 29/Dec/12
His peak should be downgraded to 6'3.5, since that's what he claimed.

---

Yeah if he said 6'3.5" in '87 that's probably what he should be listed at, not higher.
Jay says on 3/Jan/13
His peak is 6'4.
Trent says on 29/Dec/12
His peak should be downgraded to 6'3.5, since that's what he claimed.
Hondo says on 26/Dec/12
In this article Click Here he is described as "The 6 foot 3inch tall actor".
Johnnyfive says on 3/Dec/12
Now that i think about it, 192 is considerably taller than 184 thus why i felt short close to him. You're right, Shaun. Also Tom might've had slight ground advantage.
Trent says on 1/Nov/12
I found him him claiming "about 6-foot-3 1/2" back in 1987.

Click Here
James says on 11/Oct/12
No way was tom selleck over 193cm peak shaun
Silent d says on 27/Sep/12
The funny thing was craig ferguson was a couple on inches shorter than tom but he does have terrible posture. 192cm easy.
Ajax says on 15/Sep/12
Mosley was never anything close to 6'2". He's like 5'11".
Shaun says on 9/Sep/12
Well if he was the same height/fractionally taller than Josh he surely can't be under 6'3.5" nowadays.
Shaun says on 9/Sep/12
3 inches is not towering. But if he is near 4 inches I can see how you could feel noticeably shorter and view him as very tall. I think he's nearer 6'3" today but looked at least 6'4" in his prime.
Johnnyfive says on 2/Sep/12
I saw Tom Selleck around 2005 when I was working security and he walked about 7 feet away from me. I'm 6'0.5 and Tom totally towered me by more than 3 inches. I think he really is 6'4 and perhaps taller in the 80s.
Johnnyfive says on 2/Sep/12
I saw Tom Selleck around 2005 when I was working security and he walked about 7 feet away from me. I'm 6'0.5 and Tom totally towered me by more than 3 inches. I think he really is 6'4 and perhaps taller in the 80s.
JIMMYV says on 27/Aug/12
In the picture with Whalberg he is not standing up straight and still has about 506 inches.. He was probabably 6-4 6-4 and a half during Magnum, but now at 67 is more like 6'3and a half-6'4...
Jonas says on 12/Jun/12
Just saw him on Conan Show and he was definitely 1 inch shorter than Conan who is listed as 6'4. So Selleck nowadays is more 6'3-ish
LG69 says on 14/Feb/12
@jake, Roger Mosley was usually listed at 6'2", but was closer to 6'1"-6'0 at his peak. He was at Thunder Valley Casino with some of the cast of Magnum P.I. for autograph signing. Roger looked no more than 5'11". Btw, Larry Manetti looked about 5'6"...doesn't look like he lost height from his Magnum days.
Tommy says on 9/Feb/12
He did claim 6'3.5 in some old magazine. It was posted here a while back. I wonder if someone has a picture of it. I'd go with 6'3.5.
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m- 1.84 m says on 29/Jan/12
I'd estimate for the cast members of Magnum: 193 cm for Selleck, 169 cm for Hillerman, 170 cm for Manetti and 184 cm (6" 0.5 at peak) for Mosley.
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m- 1.84 m says on 27/Jan/12
Rob did you ever watch Magnum PI? If so, how tall do you think his co-star Roger E. Mosley was? He is listed 6' 2" yet looks 4 inches shorter than Selleck.
[Editor Rob: not seen it for so long I can't remember much about Roger. It is very probable he's lost a bit of height now as in photos a few years ago he doesn't look near 6ft 2.]

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes by the actors themselves in interviews, resumes or articles.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.