How tall is Tom Selleck

Tom Selleck's Height

6ft 3.5in (192 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 4in (193 cm)
American actor best known for starring in TV series Magnum PI and Blue Bloods. In movies he has appeared in Three Men and a Baby, Quigley Down Under, High Road to China and Her Alibi. He said in the NY Times, "I'm 6'4". In a 1983 Time magazine article it also mentioned his peak weight: "6-ft. 4-in, 200-lb. star".

How tall is big Tom Selleck
Tom with Bridget Moynahan
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of David Hasselhoff
David Hasselhoff
6ft 4in (193 cm)
Height of Ted Danson
Ted Danson
6ft 2.5in (189 cm)
Height of Burt Reynolds
Burt Reynolds
5ft 9in (175 cm)
Height of Steve Guttenberg
Steve Guttenberg
5ft 10in (178 cm)

Add a Comment 250 comments

Average Guess (24 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 3.76in (192.4cm)
Current: 6ft 3.08in (190.7cm)
RisingForce said on 21/Mar/17
That makes sense. Unfortunate for me since it made it so much easier to search, but I can't fault anyone for trying to make money off something people demand. I do at least wish they'd still turn up the article in the search results so you'd know of its existence and give you the option of paying to view the article.
RisingForce said on 20/Mar/17
He claimed 6'3.5" twice in the 80's. In a 1987 interview with the Houston Chronicle Tom said he was "about 6-foot-3 1/2"
Unfortunately, the link is dead. He can look more 190 cm today, but maybe it's posture. The "about" leaves open the possibility he was more like 6'3 5/8" if he want to get super precise. Or possibly a 6'3.75" midday and 6'3.5" evening guy.
RisingForce said on 20/Mar/17
I can't find the quote right now since Google book and archive search is nowhere near as good as it use to be, but the TV Guide issue had to have been December 27, 1980-January 2, 1981, Volume 28, No. 52, Issue #1448)
Editor Rob: I have seen it myself years ago, the search facility did get worse, well not so much worse as many papers want money for archive searching.
S.J.H said on 9/Mar/17
I don't think tom selleck was solid 6'4 than jeff goldblum. He might be 6'3.75 peak and 6'3.25 now. Peak selleck is taller than conan o'brien who was more like 6'3.25 peak and claim 6'4
RisingForce said on 8/Mar/17
Yeah, I have to find the quote again and check the exact year, but it was after Magnum started and long after he had gotten the role of Lance on the Rockford Files. Is there anything out there that suggests Selleck was uncomfortable with his height beyond merely the possibility of losing supporting roles? If that was the case, I'd expect him to take off a full inch like Rock Hudson sometimes did. A legit 6'3.5" is really tall and towers over most similar to how a 6'4" man will. I bet there'd be virtually no difference between Selleck, Clint Eastwood and John Wayne at their peaks.
RisingForce said on 7/Mar/17
6'3.5" was his peak height. He claimed it in a TV Guide interview from around 1981. He has no reason to lie. Probably down to 6'3" flat today.
Editor Rob: RisingForce, it could have been that he didn't want to claim 6ft 4 and used the 3.5...but that would make more sense at the start of a career, by early 80's he was already very famous and saying 6ft 4 wouldn't have been an issue.
Canson said on 5/Mar/17
I agree with christian. Maybe he's 6'3.25 today tops but I can see just about a solid 6'4 maybe 6'3.75 peak. He looks 2" shorter than peter hermann does. But the question now becomes if he is taller than Conan as is Hasselhoff and Lithgow why hasn't Conan been downgraded yet? He has never been 6'4 he's a legit 6'3 guy
Canson said on 5/Mar/17
I agree with christian. Maybe he's 6'3.25 today tops but I can see just about a solid 6'4 maybe 6'3.75 peak. He looks 2" shorter than peter hermann does
Adam said on 26/Feb/17
The pictures of Selleck with his father and brothers are interesting. His brothers must be 6ft7 and his father 6ft5. He could never have grown up being aware of his height, exactly the opposite actually. His posture in most pics also suggestes that. He doesn't even think he is tall and he doesn't try to stretch himself to make the point.
Allie said on 2/Feb/17
Looked really tall in Friends.
Adam said on 31/Jan/17
Just for fun, who is taller : Knight Rider standing here with TC, or Magnum standing with TC?

Click Here

In the picture with Selleck Mosley wears a cap. Does the cap perhaps add a centimeter or so to the top of his head?
Adam said on 23/Jan/17
I read an interesting piece in an old magazine where Selleck mentions that in his earlier career he downplayed his height for character interviews. Will try and find it.
heelshealheight said on 17/Jan/17
Yes, genuinely tall man, and he hasn't lost much height with age. Seems to be about the same height with Conan o'Brien and David Hasselhoff.
Keithg said on 8/Jan/17
Looked rather tall in magnum
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Jan/17
I'd guess 6ft3 today
Christian-196.2cm (6ft5.25) said on 23/Dec/16
"Tom Selleck's Height is 6ft 3in (190.5 cm)"
"Peak Height was 6ft 3.75in (192.4 cm)"

I think his current height especially needs to be downgraded Rob. He doesn't look much over 6ft3 nowadays, if any.
FRANK said on 9/Dec/16
Probably around 6´4" or 192-193 cms in his peak and almost 6´3" or 190 cms now
Lance said on 5/Dec/16
I was in the gym at Valley College where he played Volleyball before going to USC. His height there was listed at 6'7". Keep in mind that sports teams sometimes are generous with their stats. I played football at 5'10" and 165 but when I saw the football program, I was listed at 6'0" and 175.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Dec/16
Rob, could he be dipping a bit under 6ft3 now?
Editor Rob: Rampage, I think with some guys his age, he could be looking a weak 6ft 3 at times, but when you measure him, he could still be 6ft 3 range.
newbie said on 28/Nov/16
Considering the number of photos of him with guys in the 6'2-6'4 range and he measures up as you'd expect for a genuine 6'4 in those photos, plus he was never one for big footwear, I don't see any reason to doubt he was a genuine 6'4, that may be flat and others like Neeson may be 6'4 and a bit over but that doesn't change Selleck's height.
Booker said on 12/Nov/16
190-192 cm range
berta said on 24/Oct/16
in my eyes tom selleck was a big 193 guy peak looked taller than conan o brien and looked atleast 193 with ted danson who i tihnk was more 190 than 189. i think he was 193,5 peak and even today he look 192
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Oct/16
I mean Mario Lopez looks like a kid next to him

Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Oct/16
Arch, I think his height is only noticeable when he's standing with guys in the 6ft to 6ft2 range. In Three Men and A Baby he didn't look particularly towering...But then there are scenes in Magnum where he's on the beach and his height is the first thing I notice. He's a good head above everyone ...almost like Hasselhoff was on Baywatch. 6ft4 is fine for his peak but he more likely scraped it at best rather than cleared it. His posture wasn't great though
Adam said on 12/Oct/16
Josh, the problem with Selleck is his posture. In that picture with Chevy (who stands very straight) Selleck almost looks as if he is trying to hide his true height. No doubt his edge over Chevy Chase would be even more noticeable if he had stood straighter.
Arch Stanton said on 11/Oct/16
It is kind of obvious when you look into it, the above photo for instance still noticeably taller than a 5 ft 10 lady in big heels, but hide her in the photo and look at him, you'd not guess him as high as 6'4 standing by himself!!
Arch Stanton said on 11/Oct/16
Selleck is a guy though who on film often doesn't look as big as this. If I didn't know his height I'd have thought about 6'2 in picturing, not a big 6'4. I suppose like Clint Eastwood peak he has that look where he's often not stand out tall on screen but taller than you think.Like Andrea often says there seems to be a lot of variation in how tall a 6'4 guy can really look. Might be his build, I don't know. but guys like Seagal and peak Goldblum for some reason I'd think of as 1-2 inches than somebody like Selleck, but when you look into it he's definitely around this barefoot with Schwimmer in Friends.
josh jeffords said on 10/Oct/16
Tom has looked 6 4 back in the day like 70s or 80s but he usually doesnt even look 6 3 anymore.
It may be proportions unlike most freakishly tall guys tom still has a normal build even above average.
He does tower over 6ft guys even guys who say they are 6 1 barely had the edge on chevy so 6 3 .75 rounded up sounds right.
He was noticeably taller than sam elliot assuming he was 6 2 back then and most every other late 70 western guy.
As for the Clint Walker argument Id say he was much bigger in his prime heavy build and made most folks look like kids.
Clint looked over 6 6 on tv in boots well into the 70s Tom never looked much over 6 4 on tv.
Arch Stanton said on 4/Oct/16
Clint Walker will be 90 next year, of course he's lost 2-3 inches!!! Still super tall for nearly 90! How often do you see a 90 year old guy that tall?
Streichs said on 20/Sep/16
This is Selleck with Conan. In this interview Conan asks Selleck if he is 6ft4 or 6ft5. If you look at the screenshot maybe Conan had good reason to estimate Selleck at 6ft5.
Click Here
Adam said on 19/Sep/16
Rampage, even at his age Walker absolutely towers over everybody else in that picture, Selleck excluded. He is still very very tall. And even if you allow three inches lost over the years, Walker's footwear gives him a big advantage over Selleck, perhaps an inch. So, three inches lost through age (if that is really the case) and one inch gained in footwear Selleck, who looks to be right at Walker's height in that picture, stands at 6ft4 at least.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Sep/16
@Streichs: I imagine Clint Walker is down at least 2in from his peak if not 3in...but the photo with Tony Robbins (whose actually 6ft7!) really does catch my eye.

Rob, what do you make of that photo?
Editor Rob: he doesn't look much different than Walker, if you knock the footwear advantage off...but then, at that age he would be a couple of inches off his peak.
Canson said on 8/Sep/16
Legit 6'4 prime no doubt
Streichs said on 25/Aug/16
Have a look at Selleck with 6ft6 Clint Walker and with Walker having a clear footwear advantage :
Click Here
Click Here

Also check out Selleck with 6ft6 Tony Robbins, not much difference there:
Click Here

Selleck is 6ft4 at least.
Adam said on 24/Aug/16
This is Selleck with boxer Frank Bruno who is listed at 6ft 3. The difference seems to be at least an inch.
Click Here
Xhavier said on 21/Aug/16
Also, if you look at season 2 of Magnum Pi, episode 16, when Magnum is standing with the young hawaiian student, he is looking 1.5in to 2in shorter, and that young actor was 6ft 5in tall, so 6ft 3.5in peak may be much more reasonable.
Xhavier said on 21/Aug/16
In Mr. Baseball he was described as 6ft 3in in articles and the character/baseball player he was being was listed at 6ft 3in. And further to other comments below and pictures it does seem that his peak may have been 6ft 3.5in instead of 6ft 4in, but he still could have been 6ft 4in peak. Either way, a tall fellow, indeed.
grizz said on 3/Aug/16
I think he's strong 6'3 guy now. In Killers Katherine Heigl described him as "freakishly tall". That's strange, coming from a 5'8.5" girl.
The Man said on 3/Aug/16
Even in his prime, Selleck never gave off an impression of being a solid 6'4" man unlike Neeson, Seagal, Hasselhoff etc. Selleck needs a peak listing of 6ft 3.5in and a current height of 6ft 3in
Ejel Khan said on 20/Jul/16
14/1/16 clover inquired about Selleck's family, namely the pic with his dad and brothers. Tom was the runt of the litter and the shortest. His dad being 6'5" in his peak and his brothers 6'6.5 ".
Ian C. said on 17/Jul/16
Selleck did a pretty good job of playing Dwight Eisenhower, who was five foot ten. If you watch that show, you never get a sense that Selleck is unusually tall. This is an excellent example of how perceptions of height can be manipulated in movies.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jul/16
His shoes look normal enough, Streichs.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jul/16
His shoes look normal enough
Streichs said on 1/Jul/16
Rampage, just have a look at Hank's shoes.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jun/16
That's a strange photo, Adam. Selleck does look every inch of 6ft4 there..but what really grabs me is Tom Hanks looking taller than Harrison Ford, John Candy and Ray Liotta!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Jun/16
I think 6ft3 flat today is definitely closer from watching Blue Bloods and can look a bit less at times. You could give him 6ft3½ peak since he did claim it but he usually claimed 6ft4. Between them I think is spot on. We don't have many weak 6ft4 guys.
Adam said on 22/Jun/16
Mathew, if Chevy Chase was 6ft3.5 in his prime, Selleck was certainly a "legit" 6ft4 and more.

Click Here
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 21/Jun/16
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jun/16
A prime Hasselhoff back to back with a prime Selleck would have the edge, as would a Neeson, Goldblum, Morse or Lithgow


I agree all in their prime, Selleck would be edged out by the legit 6'4" crowd. I think today he's in the 6'2.75" - 6'3" zone at best, but back in his day he was 6'3.5" legit. You can even see in the picture with Moynahan on this page, he just looks under a legit 6'3" to me there.
Streichs said on 14/Jun/16
Here's Selleck with 6ft2,5 Jon Voight :
Click Here
and with 6ft3,5 Josh Duhamel where he was already becoming older :
Click Here
and with 6ft4,5 Dennis Haysbert where his huge head takes him to almost exactly the same level as Haysbert :
Click Here

I would say he was a genuine 6ft4.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jun/16
A prime Hasselhoff back to back with a prime Selleck would have the edge, as would a Neeson, Goldblum, Morse or Lithgow
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 6/Jun/16
I'm sorry, I think he struggles with 6'3" flat even today. 190 cm would be my guess. I would give him a 6'3.5" peak height though (although not the full 6'4").
Niggurd said on 11/Apr/16
At 6'3.5, maybe 6'3.75, he's the perfect example of what a "tall, dark and handsome" man would look like. How much would you say he weighs, Rob?
Alex said on 18/Jan/16
I assumed that 193 cm for Tom was with the shoes, because without it, would be something like 194 or 195 cm in this photo. So, with the shoes he should reach 193, so Tom should be 190-191 barefoot. Almost all the heights on this site are calculated with footwear, it is obvious.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jan/16
He probably should have been taller. His dad was 6ft5 and his two brothers are 6ft6+.
John said on 16/Jan/16
In the above photo, Selleck's a mere 4cm taller than 177cm Moynahan (who is wearing 10cm high heels), while he's wearing 2-3cm dress shoes. Given that she has 7-8cm more footwear advantage, that should put Selleck at only 188-189cm, maybe 190 maximum. Selleck clearly needs a major downgrade. Sorry, but I'm not buying the 192 listing at all.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jan/16
Rob, could 6ft3¾ be closer for his peak?
Editor Rob: in one interview he did come out with the 3.5 range, but mostly says 6ft 4...always a possiblity of being a bit under 6ft 4. A guy like Hoff I don't think was under 6ft 4 at all, but Selleck maybe could have been a fraction.
James B said on 14/Jan/16
Good actor and a handsome man back in the day (no homo).

Still looks good for his age actually
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jan/16
Click Here

Rob, any guesses on how tall his father and brothers were?
Editor Rob: his Dad might have shrunk a bit by then, maybe he was 6ft 3-4 range himself and brother a few inches taller 6ft 6-7 range
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jan/16
Moynahan looks 6ft2-3 in that photo w/h Selleck.
johnnyfive said on 16/Nov/15
I think Selleck is still 6'4. I saw him. I'm 6'0.5 and he completely towered over me when he walked by me (in sandals, no less).
Canson said on 9/Nov/15
Thanks Matt. I was wrong myself I always thought that was when Joe Manginello was on when the "wee bit comment came out". Either way it shows Conan really is 6'3 and not 6'4 like he claims. He has insisted more than one 6'4 person was 6'5.
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 8/Nov/15
Sam said on 19/Aug/15
Selleck appeared many times with Conan O'Brien back when I watched that in the late 90s/early 00s. He always appeared to be a smidge taller than Conan and I vaguely remember height came up and Selleck said 6'4" and Conan pressed him and Selleck clarified that he was a bit over it...don't have a link right now unfortunately.


I know that happened with Liam Neeson, maybe that's what you're thinking of? They compared heights, Liam was taller, Conan insisted he must be 6'5" and Liam admitted to 6'4" "and a wee bit".

As for Selleck, he never looked a solid 6'4". 6'3.5" peak, 6'3" today.
Jesse Stone said on 28/Oct/15
Mr. Tom Selleck is a 70 year old man. It's no shame to loose height within this age. And I can definitely believe that Selleck stood 6'4 Fall in his prime.

But looking at him nowadays he has not a good posture and apparently he has shrunk -which is again no shame-
Wie see him in this recent Video next to Michael Strahan who stated himself as "a bit oder 6'4 but not quite 6'5”
I see he has clearely more than an inch, maybe two in Selleck.

Click Here
Adam said on 5/Oct/15
There's a whole series of fairly recent pictures of Selleck with 6'3,5" Josh Duhamel, footwear showing (just Google "Selleck Duhamel"). Selleck seems to have the edge in each one of those pictures.
neil craig said on 2/Oct/15
I saw that Rockford Files episode too, but remember that James Garner was 20 years older than Tim and had several injuries too.
jtm said on 30/Sep/15
i think that's more proof garner wasn't 6'2.
jimbo said on 28/Sep/15
Just saw him dwarfing 6'2 James Garner on The Rockford Files - 6'5 may be good for Tom. Rick was in this episode too.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Sep/15
Ron, is 6ft3 flat possible now at 70?
[Editor Rob: yes he could be heading to around 6ft 3.]
Adam said on 15/Sep/15
Dave, you can actually watch the Conan episode (1998-02-17) on Youtube where Selleck gives his height, 6ft4, and Conan says he is "about" Selleck's height (at 6 min 22). Right at the beginning when Selleck comes on stage, he seems to be noticeably taller than Conan.
Dave618 said on 11/Sep/15
Sam, you may be thinking of Liam Neeson; Conan was mentioning how Neeson looked taller than 6'4" and Neeson responded he was actually a bit over 6'4". I don't remember a Selleck appearance on Conan where Selleck mentioned his height,
Sam said on 19/Aug/15
Selleck appeared many times with Conan O'Brien back when I watched that in the late 90s/early 00s. He always appeared to be a smidge taller than Conan and I vaguely remember height came up and Selleck said 6'4" and Conan pressed him and Selleck clarified that he was a bit over it...don't have a link right now unfortunately.
Shane said on 31/May/15
He and Jeff Goldblum are both very tall.

He plays volleyball in the sand when he visits Hawaii at a private court and sure seems to still be 6'r around my 6'1 brother and other friends. He is definitely over 6'3, probably still about 6'4".

Just saw Jeff Goldblum at the airport, also a very tall man, though not as solidl in build as Selleck.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Mar/15
He's still very tall on Blue Bloods...
Adam said on 17/Mar/15
Selleck is clearly taller than 6'2 Jon Voight.
Jesse Stone said on 8/Mar/15
Rob, do you know the height of Kohl Sudduth, the Co-star in Tom Selleck's "Jesse Stone"? In some scenes he appears taller than Selleck, in some scenes about the same height and in some he seems to be just a bit smaller:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Thank you!
[Editor Rob: not really aware of him so not sure!]
John said on 7/Feb/15
Looks about the same as 6'2 David Ramsey on Blue Bloods.
Gonzalo said on 3/Feb/15
Not the best picture to judge but in it Selleck looks very close in height to Jeff Goldblum
Click Here
Jesse Stone said on 29/Jan/15
Happy Birthday Mr. Selleck! Today with 70 I still believe he has a decent height and is around 6'3.
Ed Kline said on 21/Jan/15
Boomer Esiason is 6'5. At least his peak height was, and he is enough younger than Selleck (16 years) that he probably hasn't shrunk as much as Selleck.
Barker said on 28/Dec/14
Tom is 6' 2 1/2" in barefeet.
Western Star said on 27/Nov/14
I've just watched an old episode of The Rockford Files and Tom towers over Jim Garner.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Nov/14
Rob, could 6ft3¾ be closer for his peak since he's claimed both 6ft3½ and 6ft4?
Jesse Stone said on 12/Nov/14
@Rob! Do you belive that Mr. Selleck lost 2 inches as described below? Well, it's right that he wears boots that make him a little taller, but really what height do you give him nowadays in 2014?

Thank you.
[Editor Rob: no I think 2 inches is too much, but losing an inch isn't impossible]
mike said on 24/Oct/14
I'd give 6ft 3.5-3.75 peak.
184.3cm said on 12/Oct/14
At least 192cm in his prime, very tall man. Looked similar to Hasselhoff when he did Knight Rider.
Jesse Stone said on 11/Oct/14
Rob, how tall is Boomer Esiason by the way? Is he 6'4 or 6'5?
If he is 6'4, Selleck is about 6'2.75 or 6'2 1/2.

--> Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
[Editor Rob: not really sure on Boomer's height, but today big Tom could be heading nearer 6ft 3 flat.

Here's an amusing photo of Tom with Wahlberg Click Here.

I'm going to call that a 'Donnie Bag'. Whenever your needing a few inches boost just put it on the ground and stand on it.]
Jesse Stone said on 10/Oct/14
I saw many movies with Selleck and I belive his peak height was 6'4. He could still be about 6'2 - 6'3. Loosing height in his age is not uncommon.

Here a photo of him in "Jesse Stone: Thin Ice" from 2009. In that scene he is at the airport and is a lot taller than everybody else there.

--> Click Here
Flyboy said on 10/Oct/14
I saw the Ferrari from Magnum on sale on an auction site a few years back and the description of the car said it had the driver's seat modified to accommodate Tom Selleck's height.
James said on 7/Oct/14
I have seen Tom Selleck many times in the recent past. (later years, after losing some height to "father time") I give him 6'2.75." He wears boots a lot and those make him a tad under 6'4." Based on his age and poor posture, I'd guess that he was a strong 6'4" back in his P.I. days. He loomed over everyone in that show! A few super random notes about Selleck. He was 35 years old when Magnum began in 1980. He was in either 6 or 8 failed TV shows before he hit gold with Magnum. He was first offered the role, over H. Ford, as lead in "Raiders of the Lost Ark" but had to turn the role down because he had a contract to do the Magnum pilot. Magnum was only able to start shooting after a writers' strike and, during the strike, Tom was so poor that he worked as a handyman. He stayed the last 2 seasons of Magnum because he was worried about the cast and felt guilty over killing their income and disappointing fans. Selleck's father was 6'5" and his brother, Dan, is 6'7" so he is the runt. Owns and often works on his avocado ranch. Super nice guy. He will sign autographs until everyone, who wants one, is pleased.
Rey said on 5/Oct/14
Tom is another gent who has lost about 2 inches. He does not have the posture or stature of his Magnum P.I. days. There is a recent pic of him and Boomer Esiason. Boomer has him by an 1-2 inches.
Rey said on 5/Oct/14
Tom is another gent who has lost about 2 inches. He does not have the posture or stature of his Magnum P.I. days. There is a recent pic of him and Boomer Esiason. Boomer has him by an 1-2 inches.
Jesse Stone said on 2/Sep/14
Rob, do you know how tall Kohl Sudduth, his co actor in Jesse Stone is? Seems To be At least AS tall AS Selleck.
James B said on 20/Jun/14
Donnies a probably on tip toes
Guy said on 11/Jun/14
I dont know why Rob, but here looks like 186 with 178 Donnie Wahlberg Click Here
[Editor Rob: looks short there yeah, well, 2 inches shorter than he should]
dbinaz said on 11/Jun/14
Anyone know what size shoe he wears?
zackstra said on 8/Jun/14
The guy was 6'4" peak.
Alan R said on 18/Mar/14
Taller than Ted Danson, who is 6'2". Taller than Dennis Weaver who was 6'2". Think about this: Did you EVER see him riding in the Ferrari with the top ON? Nope. If he wasn't 6'4", he was danged close.
James B said on 15/Mar/14
I cant picture this guy being a full 2 inches above 6'2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Dec/13
His father was 6ft6
Thomas said on 16/Dec/13
I stood next to him 4 years ago. I am 6ft2 (188 cm) and I was slightly taller than him. I would guess he is about 6ft 1 now and his peak height was 6ft2.
Lenad is sexy said on 14/Dec/13
was at most 1.5 inches taller than ted danson
Dave618 said on 13/Dec/13
Watched an old Magnum rerun today and came here to see how tall ol' Tom was/is. I have no problem whatsoever believing he was 6'4" at his peak. He looks freaking' huge in that series, and he usually wore boat shoes or sneakers, or barefoot on the beach and he still looks extra-tall. Maybe a half-inch or so less now, or maybe not even that. Still looms at or near 6'4".
Xhavier said on 13/Nov/13
His peak should be downgraded to 6'3.5, since that's what he claimed.

Also in Mr. Baseball (1992), he appears to be 1 full inch shorter (at least) than co-star Dennis Haysbert (6ft 4.5in).
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Sep/13
"Tom Selleck's height is 6ft 3.25in (191cm)"

Might still be 192cm. Not under 6ft3 flat
Brooke said on 20/Aug/13
Why is peak height listed 6'4 when he claimed 6'3.5?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Aug/13
"Peak height was 6ft 3.75in (192cm)"

Reasonable since he claimed 6ft3.5 aswell as 6ft4. Usually looked either of those. Still a strong 6ft3 at least today.
jeff dan said on 23/Jul/13
Roger Mosley with the Hoff

Click Here
TSM said on 27/May/13
In the Magnum series, Roger Mosely regularly wore lifts that added a good 3 to 3.5 inches to his height. There were many scenes with them standing together, Selleck in his bare feet or in sneakers, and he was never less than at least three inches taller than Mosely who was wearing those lifts; that would put Mosely at 5'10 at the most.... but he was a very powerful looking man.
Jer1 said on 12/May/13
Maybe shorter now with age, but he was an easy 6-4 during his Magnum stardom and well into his time on Friends. Sometimes people are exactly what they look like and that was the case with Selleck.
b said on 31/Mar/13
no he 6'4 or 6'5
James said on 22/Feb/13
6'4 I can defnintly believe for tom selleck. He can look 6'3 as well I guess.

He never looks as low as 6'2 though.
Arch Stanton said on 17/Jan/13
Watched Monte Walsh the other day and Selleck look the same height as John Wayne in the cowboy boots. At time he could look 6'2" but when they showed him at a differenyt camera angle compared to some of the other guys you could see he is very tall. 6'3.5" I think, but his height isn't obvious like several other western actors of that height. He can look 6'2 a lot on screen like Eastwood and Wayne.
Trent said on 16/Jan/13
They weren't actually both barefoot, Arch. Here, look at this: Click Here
It's very briefly onscreen, but you can see there Selleck is actually in slippers--probably only taking 1/4" or so from them, but every bit counts. Later the scene cuts away though and this time you can see Selleck is barefoot now for some reason, but it seems when they were standing face-to-face like that Selleck did take a bit of footwear advantage.

Click Here

I'd say, accounting for the footwear advantage, Schwimmer could be 6'0.25. And I'll crosspost this to his page.
Arch Stanton said on 14/Jan/13
If Selleck was 6'3.5" peak, David Schwimmer is struggling with even 6'0.5". Selleck had between 3 and 4 inches on him., both barefoot on Friends.
Mathew said on 12/Jan/13
Trent says on 29/Dec/12
His peak should be downgraded to 6'3.5, since that's what he claimed.


Yeah if he said 6'3.5" in '87 that's probably what he should be listed at, not higher.
Jay said on 3/Jan/13
His peak is 6'4.
Trent said on 29/Dec/12
His peak should be downgraded to 6'3.5, since that's what he claimed.
Hondo said on 26/Dec/12
In this article Click Here he is described as "The 6 foot 3inch tall actor".
Johnnyfive said on 3/Dec/12
Now that i think about it, 192 is considerably taller than 184 thus why i felt short close to him. You're right, Shaun. Also Tom might've had slight ground advantage.
Trent said on 1/Nov/12
I found him him claiming "about 6-foot-3 1/2" back in 1987.

Click Here
James said on 11/Oct/12
No way was tom selleck over 193cm peak shaun
Silent d said on 27/Sep/12
The funny thing was craig ferguson was a couple on inches shorter than tom but he does have terrible posture. 192cm easy.
Ajax said on 15/Sep/12
Mosley was never anything close to 6'2". He's like 5'11".
Shaun said on 9/Sep/12
Well if he was the same height/fractionally taller than Josh he surely can't be under 6'3.5" nowadays.
Shaun said on 9/Sep/12
3 inches is not towering. But if he is near 4 inches I can see how you could feel noticeably shorter and view him as very tall. I think he's nearer 6'3" today but looked at least 6'4" in his prime.
Johnnyfive said on 2/Sep/12
I saw Tom Selleck around 2005 when I was working security and he walked about 7 feet away from me. I'm 6'0.5 and Tom totally towered me by more than 3 inches. I think he really is 6'4 and perhaps taller in the 80s.
Johnnyfive said on 2/Sep/12
I saw Tom Selleck around 2005 when I was working security and he walked about 7 feet away from me. I'm 6'0.5 and Tom totally towered me by more than 3 inches. I think he really is 6'4 and perhaps taller in the 80s.
JIMMYV said on 27/Aug/12
In the picture with Whalberg he is not standing up straight and still has about 506 inches.. He was probabably 6-4 6-4 and a half during Magnum, but now at 67 is more like 6'3and a half-6'4...
Jonas said on 12/Jun/12
Just saw him on Conan Show and he was definitely 1 inch shorter than Conan who is listed as 6'4. So Selleck nowadays is more 6'3-ish
LG69 said on 14/Feb/12
@jake, Roger Mosley was usually listed at 6'2", but was closer to 6'1"-6'0 at his peak. He was at Thunder Valley Casino with some of the cast of Magnum P.I. for autograph signing. Roger looked no more than 5'11". Btw, Larry Manetti looked about 5'6"...doesn't look like he lost height from his Magnum days.
Tommy said on 9/Feb/12
He did claim 6'3.5 in some old magazine. It was posted here a while back. I wonder if someone has a picture of it. I'd go with 6'3.5.
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m- 1.84 m said on 29/Jan/12
I'd estimate for the cast members of Magnum: 193 cm for Selleck, 169 cm for Hillerman, 170 cm for Manetti and 184 cm (6" 0.5 at peak) for Mosley.
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m- 1.84 m said on 27/Jan/12
Rob did you ever watch Magnum PI? If so, how tall do you think his co-star Roger E. Mosley was? He is listed 6' 2" yet looks 4 inches shorter than Selleck.
[Editor Rob: not seen it for so long I can't remember much about Roger. It is very probable he's lost a bit of height now as in photos a few years ago he doesn't look near 6ft 2.]
steven said on 14/Jan/12
he is 0.5" taller than josh duhamel.
Silent d said on 19/Nov/11
He was tall next to 192cm josh duhamel. Probably the same height. He towered over 164cm courtney cox. She was a little above his shoulder. He has bad posture though.
Shaun said on 4/Nov/11
Danson 6'1" er?? Pushing 190cm peak, looks a legit 6'2.5" . Danson has an inch on Pierce Brosnan. Maybe 6'2" flat today. Why must you downgrade EVERYBODY by an inch LAN Jiao, its getting tiresome. You'd claim Rob Paul is 5'7.25" too!
Shaun said on 4/Nov/11
Selleck had 3-3.5 inches in his socks next to David Schwimmer so he was close to 6'4" as I can't see Schwimmer under 6'0.5".

LAN Jiao says on 17/Oct/11
selleck is solid 1^9m he is 3cm top over ashton kutcher. selleck father is 6'5

Kutcher is 189cm!!! SO that;s why he looked 3cm taller as he's 192cm range now.
Sasha said on 1/Nov/11
Click Here
Tom Selleck has a 0.5 inch over 6'2" Ted Danson. He stands not so straight, so, maybe, the real difference is 1 inch. So, Selleck is 6'3".
LAN Jiao said on 26/Oct/11
selleck is 6'3.25 now.
LAN Jiao said on 20/Oct/11
ted danson always look 3cm shorter than selleck. ted is 6'1.5 and selleck 6'3
Mr. R said on 19/Oct/11
@ Curt

Can you post the pic of Tom's niece's wedding with the whole family? It will be interesting to see Tom as "the runt"!
LAN Jiao said on 17/Oct/11
selleck is solid 1^9m he is 3cm top over ashton kutcher. selleck father is 6'5
joe said on 12/Oct/11
the comments on selleck and being the runt in a pic, from a rather tall family, most 6 foot plus, what makes us look even bigger is most are 230 pounds and up
Suzan said on 18/Sep/11
I love tall men. My husband was 6'4". I'm only 5'7". That made us a nice fit for each other.
James said on 2/Sep/11
Mr. R well its not like its easy too tell 6'3 from 6'3 1/2 :)

At his peak he was defnintly 6'4. no more and no less.
Mr. R said on 22/Aug/11
I saw Tom Selleck a few years ago at Robert Urich's funeral. He was 6-3.
Joakim Ã…gren said on 20/Aug/11
Tom Selleck was never taller then 6'3.5" (192cm) tall in his prime. Now days he is no more then 6'3" or 190.50cm barefeet. Look at this photo where he is next to 6'1" Keith Carradine who is 6'1"(185.5cm): Click Here you can see there is only a couple of inches in difference making Selleck 6'3". Here is another shoot where he is next to 6'2" (188cm)Ted Danson: Click Here you can see there is no more then 1" or a couple of centimeters between them once again confirming the 6'3" estimate. So he is not 6'3.5"(192cm) as he is listed as here, more like 6'3"(190.5cm). He might have been 6'3.5" max in his prime but never 6'4".
Reality said on 19/Aug/11
It's really correct.6'3.5-6'4 is right.
James said on 18/Aug/11
Ashton Kutcher 6'2 3/4 Tom Selleck 6'3 1/2
Hansen said on 17/Aug/11
by compare selleck next to ashton kutcher reality height 186-187 , i think selleck is about 190-191. definitely weak 6ft4 now.
James said on 18/Jul/11
True Shaun that is unusual that a very tall height like 6'4 u can feel like a runt.....

Anyway i think 6'4 (193cm) is okay for Sellecks peak nothing more and nothing less. today probably somewhere in the 191-192cm range.
Shaun said on 16/Jul/11
Curt says on 12/May/11
I saw some Selleck family wedding pics taken in Jan 2011. His niece married a former U.S. National Vollebally Team player who is 6'6". In the photo, Tom at 6'3" is one of the shorter people in the whole family, very tall brothers, and sisters, former volleyball players.

I thiuk he said his said was 6'7". Crazy tall family. I mean to consider yourself the runt of the family at 6'4" is quite something!!! In the vast majority of families 6'4" would be considered the real big guy of the family.
James said on 27/Jun/11
Sometimes in the Three Men and a Baby films he didn't look over 190cm and sometimes he could pull of looking 192cm but still i struggled to see the full 193cm in those films..... then again there just movies and he did seem taller than Ted Danson who some belive is 190cm.
Cranberries (17m, 193.75-191.25) said on 23/Jun/11
He's looking more like 6'2" these days, especially on Blue Bloods. Starting to get grampa-like.
James said on 22/Jun/11
Terryman says on 21/Jun/11
dead on 1,92m(6'3.5) nothing over it even in his earlier career!

i woulden't doubt that
Terryman said on 21/Jun/11
dead on 1,92m(6'3.5) nothing over it even in his earlier career!
Mark said on 16/Jun/11
...definitely either 6'3 or 6'4 in Magnum, where he towered over James Garner.
James said on 15/Jun/11
Yeah he did look 6'4 in Magnum
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jun/11
Quite the badass in Magnum...although I doubt he's ever been taller than 6ft4, in his early career he could from time to time appear close to 6ft5 because he was so lean.
James said on 6/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 4/Jun/11
Lol i wouldnt call him a pussycat, James.

Maybe i have not seen enough of his films or Magnum PI but on screen he comes across like a very gentle kind of guy not violent or menacing at all.

I have only seen him in the Three Men and a Baby films.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Jun/11
Lol i wouldnt call him a pussycat, James.
James said on 31/May/11
Yeah phyiscally he seems big and imposing but you can kinda tell at the same time he is a gentle family kind of guy and a bit of a pussycat.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/May/11
Despite the comical genius that he displays so well in Three Men & a Baby and Magnum, he doesn't come across as the type of bloke you'd want to mess with. I think 6ft4 is fine for his peak
James said on 18/May/11
Remember the photo of Selleck with glenn? He looked nowhere near 6'4.
Robert Jay said on 18/May/11
Appearing on the Travis Smiley Show yesterday Selleck said that being 6'-4" and good looking may have hindered his ability to get acting work during the anti-hero (i.e. Richard Dreyfuss, Dustin Hoffman etc.) period of the 1970's.
James said on 17/May/11
i still maintain that he might have been 6'3 1/2 at his peak. 6'4 does seem extreme when you the three men and a baby movies.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/May/11
He was most likely 6"4.5 out of bed at his peak
Lenad is sexy said on 14/May/11
Actually probably never been over 6'4. Today hes 6'3ish.
Lenad is sexy said on 14/May/11
6'4ish younger days. Today 6'3ish.
James said on 13/May/11
Selleck is still very tall though even if he looks small compared to his family
hey i know that guy said on 13/May/11
he comes from a tall family. his dad was like 6-6. tom, in his young adult days, was 6-4. he did a cheesy B film in the phillipines when he was in his 20s called Daughters of Satan and he towered over everyone in that film. most of us however know the middle age/older tom, who is 6-3.
Curt said on 12/May/11
I saw some Selleck family wedding pics taken in Jan 2011. His niece married a former U.S. National Vollebally Team player who is 6'6". In the photo, Tom at 6'3" is one of the shorter people in the whole family, very tall brothers, and sisters, former volleyball players.
James said on 8/May/11
looked more 6'3 in Three Men and a Baby. Not easy to belive 6'4 for Selleck in that movie.
TJ said on 7/May/11
Rob, watch Blue Bloods and you will start doubting 6ft 3.5. He looks 6ft 2.5 maximum against Wahlberg.
James said on 4/May/11
looks between 6'2-6'3 these days
Lenad is sexy said on 25/Apr/11
He had 1-1.5 inches on Kutcher in Killers. 6'3.5 min
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Apr/11
What Rob has him at is bang on
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Apr/11
Not under 6"3 today...
Jimbo said on 21/Apr/11
I think Tom at his peak was 192cm 6'3.5, I would like to know what shoes Don,Sly and Patrick were wearing in your photos James because for Guys around the 5'8 to 5'9 range they looked no more than 3 inches shorter than Tom at most.
James said on 27/Mar/11
Rob do you think 192cm is not improbable for his peak and maybe today he has shrunk and is 6'3 (191cm)?

In the three men and a baby films never struck me as a legit 6'4 guy more like 6'3 but maybe his build makes him look shorter than he is? i don't know i mean he might have been 6'4 but he just comes across as a 6'3 guy in his films.
James said on 10/Mar/11
I guess 192cm is not impossbile as well when he was younger. probably more 192cm than 194cm if you get what i mean.
Bon_ said on 8/Mar/11
a fraction under 6'4 at peak, 6'3.75 would be my best guess.
James said on 5/Mar/11
Tom Sellecks dad looks like 6'6 (probably more when younger)
Click Here
Click Here
Viper said on 27/Feb/11
Well, he sure looked a solid 6-4 with 6-2 Ted Danson.
James said on 26/Feb/11
I don't think he was an "An easy 6'4" an easy 6'4 guy would be tim robbins. Selleck was just 6'4 flat at his peak, thats it. Never striked me as looking over 6'4 in three men and a baby etc..... if anything at times he looked a weak 6'4 esspecially in three men and a little lady.

Today Selleck is between 6'3-6'3.5.

Vegas I disagree look at Wight square up to the great khali he still looks roughly around 7ft.

Click Here
Viper said on 25/Feb/11
I thought he looked an easy, solid 6-4 on Magnum PI. Same has David Hasselhoff
Viper said on 25/Feb/11
So hes at least 6-3.5 minimum today If he looked 7 inches shorter than 6-11 Show.
Vegas said on 24/Feb/11
wight was 6'11 when i met him 10 years ago, selleck looked about 7 inches shorter in the clip, not sure on year ain't recent because wight has hair in it, so that rules out anything after 2006
James said on 24/Feb/11
Yeah but the big show ain't 7ft these days more like 6'11 1/2.
Vegas said on 23/Feb/11
looks about 6'4 standing next to paul wight (big show) in wights new dvd
James said on 22/Feb/11
Probably 191-192cm range today.
Anonymous said on 21/Feb/11
Looks 6ft 3in to 6ft 3.5n at most with Wahlberg
James said on 9/Feb/11
Yeah he dwarfs 5'10 Donnie Walhberg in Blue Blood.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Feb/11
He's in this new show called Blue Blood and he still looks very tall...

It's likely he's still close to 6"4. 192cm now and 193cm peak
James said on 16/Jan/11
Kutcher is 6'2.5......
5'7.37 said on 15/Jan/11
Man, Sly uses full boxes to stand next to Tom. Isn't Ashton Kutcher 6'3? Tom must then be 6'4.
James said on 4/Jan/11
Actually even though he could have been 6'4 at his peak 6'3 1/2 (192cm) is also possible as well. he does not look over 6'3 today.
James said on 1/Jan/11
With Ted Danson who is a legit 6'2.5 he did look a true 6'4.
MichaelinDenver said on 17/Dec/10
He used to live in NW Montana. I am from MT, and met him a couple times. I'm 6'4" also, and see him eye-to-eye.
James said on 16/Dec/10
In Three Men and a Little Lady may have been 6'3.75?
Anonymous said on 15/Dec/10
Went on the blue bloods CTV website, and did the tom selleck quiz.

The question asking about what he got his scholarship for has some good insight for this site:

You selected: b) Basketball
Good decision!

Tom Selleck is a tall man, at close to 6 feet four inches. He is a natural on the court.

Notice: "at close to 6 feet four inches" (so 6ft 3.5in it is!)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Dec/10
Rob has this guy nailed.

Has lost quite a considerably small amount of height
sue said on 3/Dec/10
Saw him in an airport, looked about 6'2" to 6'3" compared to my friends 6'8" boyfriend who was with us.I think he may have lost some height but not aging badly.His parents could be shorter than their genes say they should be, their heights stunted by illness or malnutrition as kids.Height is influanced by what you eat and having enough to eat in childhood.
James said on 19/Nov/10
Not looking as high as 6'3.5 with 5'10 Donnie Wahlberg.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
RT said on 5/Oct/07
Watched the new season of Vegas. He looks a tad shorter than Josh Duhamel, who is 6'3". Has he lost 1 or 2 inches due to aging?
sam said on 1/Oct/07
Wow, way to class up the joint, Giant. Your both a gentleman and a genius...I can tell by the way you spell "retarted".
Viper said on 1/Oct/07
Tom Selleck at 6-2 is funny to me. Hes looked 6-4 consistently more times than not. Looked an easy 6-4 in Magnum PI. He might have shrunk down to the 6-3 range these days. Or he could still be a full 6-4. Duhammel looked the same height or a little taller due to the camera angle.
Gonzalo said on 1/Oct/07
Yes, Rob and you censored my comment about Jake Gyllenhaal looks. I feel discriminated :)

[Editor Rob: were you calling him ugly or something. He's far from it man!]
glenn said on 1/Oct/07
go fuc your family, you small giant.what do you look like? i look better than you for sure.pop off to me in person.easy to hide in front of a computer.keep your mouth shut next time.i didnt do anything to you.if this site is for retards as you say,what the fuc are you doing on here? you have no life then.this is our site.fuc off.
leonari said on 1/Oct/07
RoB: I hope he is banned by now. I have a temper myself but this guy needs to leave.

[Editor Rob: of course the giant has become a midget and quashed from the site.]
Giant said on 30/Sep/07

[Editor Rob: for anybody wondering why I have to moderate this site, here is an example of garbage I read every few days.]
Anonymous said on 30/Sep/07
I see that he was given a peak height and current height. Why 6'3 1/2" because at times he looked the same height as the young fellow on Vegas. Makes sense to me.
leonari said on 30/Sep/07
Giant: **** YOU morron! ROB: please closed the asshole down. Please.
Giant said on 29/Sep/07
No Duhamel wasn't wearing lifts cause Duhamel is at least 2 inches taller then the fellow that plays Mike Cannon and has been at least 2 inches taller then the fellow that plays Mike cannon throughout the shows history while Tom Selleck looked about the same height or an inch taller maximum with the fellow that plays Mike Cannon. I think Selleck has been 6'2 thorughout his career. Also, i think Tom Selleck is one of the worst actors also and this site celebheights is a retarted sight for retarts. Fuc* you celeb heights u fuc*in idiots. Fuc* glenn, hes prolly 5'0 anyway, that ugly bastar&
mark said on 29/Sep/07
just saw the vegas episode with him standing beside Josh Duhamel. Duhamel is listed as 6' 3 1/2. Well he must have been wearing high heels because he was taller than Tom.
Giant said on 29/Sep/07
He looks like he is 6'0 or 6'1 cause he was smaller than Duhamel in Las Vegas and was a little taller then Mike Cannon from Vegas. There is no way he is 6'4. He is 6'2 at tops.
Anonymous said on 28/Sep/07
Based on comparing him to the Duhamel fellow and the fellow that plays Mike, although camera angles could play a role and such, the following would appear to be the case:

2" taller than the fellow that plays Mike.

1" shorter than the Duhamel fellow.

Sometimes looks either the same height as the Duhamel fellow, or just under (so as a guess 1/2" under).

Therefore it would appear to be the case that it would be safe to say that:

Peak Height = 6ft 4in

Current Height = 6'3" (taking all things into consideration) with the possibiilties of being either 6'3 1/2" at most or 6'2 1/2" at least
Anonymous said on 26/Sep/07
Just compare him to that Duhamel fellow in Vegas if you all are really wanting to contest that.
spike said on 17/Sep/07
If you remember the episode of Friends when Tom was in it. When he stood next to Ross he looked at least 6'4 as Ross is supposed to be 6'3.
Scott B. said on 13/Sep/07
He is unquestionably 6'4". Taller than Ted Danson and a class guy and
a great actor. I wish he would star in Magnum PI the movie.
anonymous said on 2/Aug/07
I had the chance to sit and talk with tom selleck when he was doing a movie about IKE. I am 6'3" without shoes. He was 1-2" taller than me. He also weighs in my opion about 250. If anything he's closer to 6'5". Very nice guy to boot. I have worked with a lot in the industry and he was by far the most normal seeming. I don't know him personally so he could be a jerk in his day to day life so i can't say for sure. Also I worked with sam elliot--also a class guy from what i know. In the pic linked below selleck is standing behind connors and elliot which i think gives the illusion of him being shorter than elliot. As far as chuck connors goes never met him but judging by the pic he is clearly taller than both. Also met steve mcqueen and he was tiny which was a big surprise. Hope this helps.
Anonymous said on 22/Apr/07
I have worked with Tom and he is such a nice guy and a great family man. Which is rare in hollywood. I would say that he is 6'3 easy. And has great blue eyes. Tom good luck with the show Las Vegas.
Viper said on 28/Mar/07
He sure looked 6-4 on Magnum PI.
Ray said on 27/Mar/07
Antron; I said a tad over 6'3". I think its quite possible to see 3/4 inches up to an inch difference, especially on tv. That's just my opinion. Cheers.
antron said on 26/Mar/07
how can you eyeball that half an inch on tv??
Ray said on 26/Mar/07
I dunno about 6'4" barefoot for Tom. I'd say he rounds up. He's maybe a tad over 6'3". In an episode of Magnum, Ted Danson was in it and there only seemed to be at most an inch between them, similar footwear I think. I'd put Selleck at 6'3.5" tops if Danson is supposed to be 6'2.5".
Ted said on 4/Feb/07
talking about R. Mosely (TC) he seemed only my height 6'1 in 86. In the photos he looks 3 inches shorter than magnum, not 2 inches.
Braullius said on 21/Dec/06
He is bending.
David Kramer said on 11/Nov/06
I saw Tom in person. He is unquestionably 6'4". Remember, he was a male model before he acted and they are always extremely tall.
Viper652 said on 21/Oct/06
Hes slouching big time.
ralph said on 20/Oct/06
6'4" is a very high height. Next to Glenn he looks more 6'1.5"-6'2"
Brad said on 12/Sep/06
I heard a story where somebody asked him if he dated Johnny Crawford and got really mad til his buddy asked him what's making him mad and he fell on the ground laughing so hard saying "I just can't say!". Hilarious story.
Glenn said on 22/Jul/06
I forgot 3 men and baby.well when I think hard about it,he did have a serious attitude before I spewed venom.
Glenn said on 21/Jul/06
He didnt really deserve it,and I give him credit being a man about it.
Gotxo said on 21/Jul/06
Tom Selleck must be a humble guy them, wheter he's not on the center of the business now or not i guess that many guys who have scored much less would verbally fight you in some manner or another, plus i guess he had some reasons for being angry.
Some of those guys react in a way similar to the wild animals Larry meets, not so dangerous (but less inteligent too) :D.
Glenn said on 21/Jul/06
Oh,you mean Phoenix.I approached a limo that Miro Sorvino just entered,when Leaf(his real early career name),who I didnt notice or knew who he was yelled at me from the other side of the limo outside "leave her alone man".I say in classic venom tone "I aint talking to you,mind your business".he then gets in my face and we stand off.he appeared friend gets in between us and breaks it friend then tells me that was River Phoenixes brother.I had the same exact words and situation with Stephen Dwarf 5-6,uh Dorph and Liv Tyler.1994.the Leaf story was late 1996 or early 97.
Glenn said on 21/Jul/06
I never met Johnny Cash.he was too sweet to fight.the other fight was Mad Max.anyway,the Magnum PI fight is as follows.its was him signing after a play let out,and I was with 2 friends,one nuttier friend was getting yelled at by me and my other friend,cause he kept getting in our way getting multiple autographs.and we didnt get one.I usually go for photo OP first,thank God,in this case cause I let my forked tounge loose! Magnum didnt realise we knew this greedy guy and proceeds to yell at me and my friend by saying "You guys are rude,Im not signing anything for the 2 of you".I let the venom spew and ripped him a new asshole.I said in exact words"who the fuck is you? your washed up,nothing.what have done since Magnum PI? your in a shitty play,your not an A-list star".now he might not have deserved all that,but he got me at the wrong time.he assumed wrong and shouldve minded his business.he surprisingly ate it all up and stood shut.whats meeting celebs without a good fight once in awhile?
sam said on 21/Jul/06
Yeah, what happened Glenn? And what's the Johnny Cash thing, Rob?

[Editor Rob: joaquin pheonix, well I think it was 'nearly a fight' as glenn put it...I think]
leonari said on 20/Jul/06
Please GLENN share the you had a fight against Rocky and Magnum!! Amazing. Please tell the story how it came to the fight and who won! thanks man. appreciate it.

[Editor Rob: don't forget Johnny Cash aswell!]
Glenn said on 20/Jul/06
I actually got into a fight with him after this photo was taken.

[Editor Rob: how come, care to elaborate...I hope you didn't insult his moustache!!!]
Gonzalo said on 20/Jul/06
He looks 6`4. He was clearly taller than Kevin Kline in "In and out" and taller than Ted Danson.
He appeared in a movie with Robert Satck and he looked at least four inches taller.
Nelson Heights said on 26/Jun/06
The Duke even wore lifts to bed!
Xhavier. said on 25/Jun/06
Although I really don't care, I noticed that when Tom worked with Denny Miller (also 6'4") he was a full inch shorter than Miller.
Viper652 said on 9/May/06
I really cant see Tom anything under 6-4. He looks it 99 percent of the time in pics and on TV.
jon said on 9/May/06
I think he's 6'4. all these comparisons with other performers get nowhere-posture, shoe's , angle of shot, lots of factors make comparing photo's untenable. also, since everyone contests everyones listed height then whats the point of saying 'well he's 6'4 so then Selleck or whoever can't be. Sure prowrestling ups their "wrestlers" heights"(andre stood on a chair in interviews with Vince Mcmahon) but this view that every celebritites height is raised is crazy. Also, this is just a fun game people-it's not scientific research.
Charlie said on 10/Apr/06
Unless there is some trick photography or a bad angle involved, Chuck Connors looks a lot more than an inch taller than Selleck. Connors was supposed to be 6'5". Selleck 6'4"
Xhavier said on 19/Mar/06
look at selleck in the picture with Sam Elliot and Chuck Connors!
Click Here
That's one of the few times I've seen him look short.
Xhavier said on 25/Feb/06
Something important to note with all taller people is that they tend to unconsciously slouch down when standing beside someone significantly shorter.

Tom Selleck is 6'4". At shortest I would say Selleck is 6'3.5". Roger Mosely (T.C.) was supposedly 6'2" (and at times look 6'2" or 6'1"), but looks 6'0" now.
CelebHeights Editor said on 1/Feb/06
If Selleck straightens up in this picture beside Glenn he can still look tall.
Buzz said on 11/Dec/05
Right David, the whole world is wrong. Take the lifts off pal.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.