|
LG69 says on 14/Feb/12
@jake, Roger Mosley was usually listed at 6'2", but was closer to 6'1"-6'0 at his peak. He was at Thunder Valley Casino with some of the cast of Magnum P.I. for autograph signing. Roger looked no more than 5'11". Btw, Larry Manetti looked about 5'6"...doesn't look like he lost height from his Magnum days.
Tommy says on 9/Feb/12
He did claim 6'3.5 in some old magazine. It was posted here a while back. I wonder if someone has a picture of it. I'd go with 6'3.5. jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m- 1.84 m says on 29/Jan/12
I'd estimate for the cast members of Magnum: 193 cm for Selleck, 169 cm for Hillerman, 170 cm for Manetti and 184 cm (6" 0.5 at peak) for Mosley. jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m- 1.84 m says on 27/Jan/12
Rob did you ever watch Magnum PI? If so, how tall do you think his co-star Roger E. Mosley was? He is listed 6' 2" yet looks 4 inches shorter than Selleck.
[Editor Rob: not seen it for so long I can't remember much about Roger. It is very probable he's lost a bit of height now as in photos a few years ago he doesn't look near 6ft 2.] steven says on 14/Jan/12
he is 0.5" taller than josh duhamel. Silent d says on 19/Nov/11
He was tall next to 192cm josh duhamel. Probably the same height. He towered over 164cm courtney cox. She was a little above his shoulder. He has bad posture though. Shaun says on 4/Nov/11
Danson 6'1" er?? Pushing 190cm peak, looks a legit 6'2.5" . Danson has an inch on Pierce Brosnan. Maybe 6'2" flat today. Why must you downgrade EVERYBODY by an inch LAN Jiao, its getting tiresome. You'd claim Rob Paul is 5'7.25" too! Shaun says on 4/Nov/11
Selleck had 3-3.5 inches in his socks next to David Schwimmer so he was close to 6'4" as I can't see Schwimmer under 6'0.5".
LAN Jiao says on 17/Oct/11
selleck is solid 1^9m he is 3cm top over ashton kutcher. selleck father is 6'5
Kutcher is 189cm!!! SO that;s why he looked 3cm taller as he's 192cm range now. Sasha says on 1/Nov/11
Here
Click Here
Tom Selleck has a 0.5 inch over 6'2" Ted Danson. He stands not so straight, so, maybe, the real difference is 1 inch. So, Selleck is 6'3". LAN Jiao says on 26/Oct/11
selleck is 6'3.25 now. LAN Jiao says on 20/Oct/11
ted danson always look 3cm shorter than selleck. ted is 6'1.5 and selleck 6'3 Mr. R says on 19/Oct/11
@ Curt
Can you post the pic of Tom's niece's wedding with the whole family? It will be interesting to see Tom as "the runt"! LAN Jiao says on 17/Oct/11
selleck is solid 1^9m he is 3cm top over ashton kutcher. selleck father is 6'5 joe says on 12/Oct/11
the comments on selleck and being the runt in a pic, from a rather tall family, most 6 foot plus, what makes us look even bigger is most are 230 pounds and up Suzan says on 18/Sep/11
I love tall men. My husband was 6'4". I'm only 5'7". That made us a nice fit for each other. James says on 2/Sep/11
Mr. R well its not like its easy too tell 6'3 from 6'3 1/2 :)
At his peak he was defnintly 6'4. no more and no less. Mr. R says on 22/Aug/11
I saw Tom Selleck a few years ago at Robert Urich's funeral. He was 6-3. Cranberries (18m, 193cm) says on 20/Aug/11
Can anyone link to those Selleck family wedding pics? At my height, I'm just about average for a guy in my extended family, so I'm interested what Selleck's looks like. Joakim Ågren says on 20/Aug/11
Tom Selleck was never taller then 6'3.5" (192cm) tall in his prime. Now days he is no more then 6'3" or 190.50cm barefeet. Look at this photo where he is next to 6'1" Keith Carradine who is 6'1"(185.5cm):
Click Here you can see there is only a couple of inches in difference making Selleck 6'3".
Here is another shoot where he is next to 6'2" (188cm)Ted Danson:
Click Here you can see there is no more then 1" or a couple of centimeters between them once again confirming the 6'3" estimate.
So he is not 6'3.5"(192cm) as he is listed as here, more like 6'3"(190.5cm). He might have been 6'3.5" max in his prime but never 6'4".
Reality says on 19/Aug/11
It's really correct.6'3.5-6'4 is right. James says on 18/Aug/11
Ashton Kutcher 6'2 3/4
Tom Selleck 6'3 1/2 Hansen says on 17/Aug/11
by compare selleck next to ashton kutcher reality height 186-187 , i think selleck is about 190-191. definitely weak 6ft4 now. James says on 18/Jul/11
True Shaun that is unusual that a very tall height like 6'4 u can feel like a runt.....
Anyway i think 6'4 (193cm) is okay for Sellecks peak nothing more and nothing less. today probably somewhere in the 191-192cm range. Shaun says on 16/Jul/11
Curt says on 12/May/11
I saw some Selleck family wedding pics taken in Jan 2011. His niece married a former U.S. National Vollebally Team player who is 6'6". In the photo, Tom at 6'3" is one of the shorter people in the whole family, very tall brothers, and sisters, former volleyball players.
I thiuk he said his said was 6'7". Crazy tall family. I mean to consider yourself the runt of the family at 6'4" is quite something!!! In the vast majority of families 6'4" would be considered the real big guy of the family. James says on 27/Jun/11
Sometimes in the Three Men and a Baby films he didn't look over 190cm and sometimes he could pull of looking 192cm but still i struggled to see the full 193cm in those films..... then again there just movies and he did seem taller than Ted Danson who some belive is 190cm. Cranberries (17m, 193.75-191.25) says on 23/Jun/11
He's looking more like 6'2" these days, especially on Blue Bloods. Starting to get grampa-like. James says on 22/Jun/11
Terryman says on 21/Jun/11
dead on 1,92m(6'3.5) nothing over it even in his earlier career!
i woulden't doubt that Terryman says on 21/Jun/11
dead on 1,92m(6'3.5) nothing over it even in his earlier career! Mark says on 16/Jun/11
...definitely either 6'3 or 6'4 in Magnum, where he towered over James Garner. James says on 15/Jun/11
Yeah he did look 6'4 in Magnum Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 12/Jun/11
Quite the badass in Magnum...although I doubt he's ever been taller than 6ft4, in his early career he could from time to time appear close to 6ft5 because he was so lean. James says on 6/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 4/Jun/11
Lol i wouldnt call him a pussycat, James.
Maybe i have not seen enough of his films or Magnum PI but on screen he comes across like a very gentle kind of guy not violent or menacing at all.
I have only seen him in the Three Men and a Baby films. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 4/Jun/11
Lol i wouldnt call him a pussycat, James. James says on 31/May/11
Yeah phyiscally he seems big and imposing but you can kinda tell at the same time he is a gentle family kind of guy and a bit of a pussycat. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 29/May/11
Despite the comical genius that he displays so well in Three Men & a Baby and Magnum, he doesn't come across as the type of bloke you'd want to mess with. I think 6ft4 is fine for his peak James says on 18/May/11
Remember the photo of Selleck with glenn? He looked nowhere near 6'4. Robert Jay says on 18/May/11
Appearing on the Travis Smiley Show yesterday Selleck said that being 6'-4" and good looking may have hindered his ability to get acting work during the anti-hero (i.e. Richard Dreyfuss, Dustin Hoffman etc.) period of the 1970's. James says on 17/May/11
i still maintain that he might have been 6'3 1/2 at his peak. 6'4 does seem extreme when you the three men and a baby movies. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 15/May/11
He was most likely 6"4.5 out of bed at his peak Lenad is sexy says on 14/May/11
Actually probably never been over 6'4. Today hes 6'3ish. Lenad is sexy says on 14/May/11
6'4ish younger days. Today 6'3ish. James says on 13/May/11
Selleck is still very tall though even if he looks small compared to his family hey i know that guy says on 13/May/11
he comes from a tall family. his dad was like 6-6. tom, in his young adult days, was 6-4. he did a cheesy B film in the phillipines when he was in his 20s called Daughters of Satan and he towered over everyone in that film. most of us however know the middle age/older tom, who is 6-3. Curt says on 12/May/11
I saw some Selleck family wedding pics taken in Jan 2011. His niece married a former U.S. National Vollebally Team player who is 6'6". In the photo, Tom at 6'3" is one of the shorter people in the whole family, very tall brothers, and sisters, former volleyball players. James says on 8/May/11
looked more 6'3 in Three Men and a Baby. Not easy to belive 6'4 for Selleck in that movie. TJ says on 7/May/11
Rob, watch Blue Bloods and you will start doubting 6ft 3.5. He looks 6ft 2.5 maximum against Wahlberg. James says on 4/May/11
looks between 6'2-6'3 these days Lenad is sexy says on 25/Apr/11
He had 1-1.5 inches on Kutcher in Killers. 6'3.5 min Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 23/Apr/11
What Rob has him at is bang on Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 22/Apr/11
Not under 6"3 today... Jimbo says on 21/Apr/11
I think Tom at his peak was 192cm 6'3.5, I would like to know what shoes Don,Sly and Patrick were wearing in your photos James because for Guys around the 5'8 to 5'9 range they looked no more than 3 inches shorter than Tom at most. James says on 27/Mar/11
Rob do you think 192cm is not improbable for his peak and maybe today he has shrunk and is 6'3 (191cm)?
In the three men and a baby films never struck me as a legit 6'4 guy more like 6'3 but maybe his build makes him look shorter than he is? i don't know i mean he might have been 6'4 but he just comes across as a 6'3 guy in his films. James says on 10/Mar/11
I guess 192cm is not impossbile as well when he was younger. probably more 192cm than 194cm if you get what i mean. Bon_ says on 8/Mar/11
a fraction under 6'4 at peak, 6'3.75 would be my best guess. James says on 5/Mar/11
Tom Sellecks dad looks like 6'6 (probably more when younger)
Click Here
Click Here Viper says on 27/Feb/11
Well, he sure looked a solid 6-4 with 6-2 Ted Danson. James says on 26/Feb/11
I don't think he was an "An easy 6'4" an easy 6'4 guy would be tim robbins. Selleck was just 6'4 flat at his peak, thats it. Never striked me as looking over 6'4 in three men and a baby etc..... if anything at times he looked a weak 6'4 esspecially in three men and a little lady.
Today Selleck is between 6'3-6'3.5.
Vegas I disagree look at Wight square up to the great khali he still looks roughly around 7ft.
Click Here Viper says on 25/Feb/11
I thought he looked an easy, solid 6-4 on Magnum PI. Same has David Hasselhoff Viper says on 25/Feb/11
So hes at least 6-3.5 minimum today If he looked 7 inches shorter than 6-11 Show. Vegas says on 24/Feb/11
wight was 6'11 when i met him 10 years ago, selleck looked about 7 inches shorter in the clip, not sure on year ain't recent because wight has hair in it, so that rules out anything after 2006 James says on 24/Feb/11
Yeah but the big show ain't 7ft these days more like 6'11 1/2. Vegas says on 23/Feb/11
looks about 6'4 standing next to paul wight (big show) in wights new dvd James says on 22/Feb/11
Probably 191-192cm range today. Anonymous says on 21/Feb/11
Looks 6ft 3in to 6ft 3.5n at most with Wahlberg James says on 9/Feb/11
Yeah he dwarfs 5'10 Donnie Walhberg in Blue Blood. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 6/Feb/11
He's in this new show called Blue Blood and he still looks very tall...
It's likely he's still close to 6"4. 192cm now and 193cm peak James says on 16/Jan/11
Kutcher is 6'2.5...... 5\'7.37 says on 15/Jan/11
Man, Sly uses full boxes to stand next to Tom. Isn't Ashton Kutcher 6'3? Tom must then be 6'4. James says on 4/Jan/11
Actually even though he could have been 6'4 at his peak 6'3 1/2 (192cm) is also possible as well. he does not look over 6'3 today. James says on 1/Jan/11
With Ted Danson who is a legit 6'2.5 he did look a true 6'4. Jimbo says on 29/Dec/10
Tom is a really tall guy in his prime 191-192cm 6'3.5in at the very least, not quite 193cm 6'4. MichaelinDenver says on 17/Dec/10
He used to live in NW Montana. I am from MT, and met him a couple times. I'm 6'4" also, and see him eye-to-eye. James says on 16/Dec/10
In Three Men and a Little Lady may have been 6'3.75? Anonymous says on 15/Dec/10
Went on the blue bloods CTV website, and did the tom selleck quiz.
The question asking about what he got his scholarship for has some good insight for this site:
You selected: b) Basketball
Good decision!
Tom Selleck is a tall man, at close to 6 feet four inches. He is a natural on the court.
Notice: "at close to 6 feet four inches" (so 6ft 3.5in it is!) Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 3/Dec/10
Rob has this guy nailed.
Has lost quite a considerably small amount of height sue says on 3/Dec/10
Saw him in an airport, looked about 6'2" to 6'3" compared to my friends 6'8" boyfriend who was with us.I think he may have lost some height but not aging badly.His parents could be shorter than their genes say they should be, their heights stunted by illness or malnutrition as kids.Height is influanced by what you eat and having enough to eat in childhood. |
