How tall is Liam Neeson

Liam Neeson's Height

6ft 3 ½ (191.8 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 4 (193 cm)
Irish actor, best known for starring in films such as Schindler's List, Taken, Batman Begins, Michael Collins and Star Wars: The Phantom Menace. In The Item (1/9/1991) he said "At the age of 16 I started to sprout up; I'm 6-foot-4 now.". On the Conan show, when O'Brien said he must be 6ft 5, Liam said "I'm Six Four and a wee bit".

You May Be Interested

Height of Ewan McGregor
Ewan McGregor
5ft 9 ½ (177 cm)
Height of Liam Hemsworth
Liam Hemsworth
6ft 3 ¼ (191 cm)
Height of Harrison Ford
Harrison Ford
5ft 11 (180 cm)
Height of Jason Statham
Jason Statham
5ft 8 ¾ (175 cm)

Add a Comment891 comments

Average Guess (135 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 4.17in (193.5cm)
Current: 6ft 3.36in (191.4cm)
Canson said on 29/Jul/20
Because Conan is not a true 6’4”. He’s a weak 6’4 at best if not 6’3.5”
James roy said on 28/Jul/20
Hey Rob why did Liam neeson look 6'5" with Conan o'Brien?
Editor Rob
Could he have had a little better camera position?
Wedged said on 22/Jul/20
Liam took Conan by surprise by staunching as soon as they met which affected the level of posture Conan would have
Canson said on 16/Jul/20
RJT said on 11/Jul/20
Hey Conan I think he needs an upgrade

Click Here

Watch from 0.36 to 0.39, Neeson clearly edge Conan by about an inch! And later at 1.15 Conan said he thoughts Liam is around 6ft 5. This coming from a guy whose height is legit 6'4 mind you. This video was taken in 2004 so Conan was in his prime were and Neeson just entered his 50s.

Here's some screenshots
Click Here
Click Here

He needs upgrade to at least 6'4" 1/2 at peak or even 6 ft 4 3 quarters, look at Conan's eyelevel only around Neeson mid nose.

So because Conan called him 6’5 means he is? Conan isn’t a full 6’4” is what the problem is
RJT said on 11/Jul/20
Hey Conan I think he needs an upgrade

Click Here

Watch from 0.36 to 0.39, Neeson clearly edge Conan by about an inch! And later at 1.15 Conan said he thoughts Liam is around 6ft 5. This coming from a guy whose height is legit 6'4 mind you. This video was taken in 2004 so Conan was in his prime were and Neeson just entered his 50s.

Here's some screenshots
Click Here
Click Here

He needs upgrade to at least 6'4" 1/2 at peak or even 6 ft 4 3 quarters, look at Conan's eyelevel only around Neeson mid nose.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jul/20
Hasselhoff can still look 6ft4 today, I wouldn’t say he’s dipped much under that. Don’t understand why Lincoln is in the conversation as he’s a historical figure. Can’t compare him to anyone else on that list. For Conan I think there’s always been a case that hes a weak 6ft4. Neeson can look 6ft3 now but I’m not convinced that’s all he can manage when measured. Hoff has better maintained his height over the years I will say. Peak they were the same range. Corbett I wouldn’t say has lost anything noticeable, weak 6ft5 is arguable. Stern was likely a bit over 6ft5 and just rounded down, still looks 6ft5 today. Skarsgaard does look a very strong 6ft4, similar to how Goldblum looked peak.
Canson said on 21/Jun/20
James roy said on 17/Jun/20
Here are others that I compiled

Neeson 6'3" peak height 6'4"

O'Brien 6'3.5 peak height 6'4"

Corbett 6'4.5 peak height 6'5"

Lincoln 6'3.25 peak height 6'3.75

Alexander Skarsgard 6'4.25

Hasselhoff 6'3" peak height 6'4"

Howard stern 6'5.25 peak height weak 6'6"

My guesses:

Neeson: agreed.

Conan: 6’3.5 peak 6’3.5 today (if he’s lost any it’s not noticeable. Maybe he was 1/8” taller peak or 1/8” shorter today)

Corbett: not sure

Hoff: disagree. He was definitely 6’4 peak or 1/8” over but still looks a weak 6’4” today. Not as low as 6’3”

Abe Lincoln: maybe

Skarsgaard: agreed maybe 1/8” taller max

Stern: 6’5.25-.5 peak height and 6’5” to 6’5.25 today
Canson said on 21/Jun/20
@Rampage: John Larroquette honestly gave off a taller impression than Rob lists him when I saw him. However it was in the mid 90s when I was a teen and hadn’t reached 6’4”. My father was 6’4” and I thought he was slightly taller when he walked past him but maybe it was a combination of posture and maybe a footwear advantage that went undetected. I could’ve actually said 6’4.5 for Larroquette but then I see him on Night Court next to Moller and he could actually look under 6’4” on occasion. Then again the angles may have either favored Moller or even magnified him at times. Moller I think we can agree wasn’t under 6’8” in his prime
Willes190 said on 19/Jun/20
Updated list with some more interesting names, starting from the tallest and going down. I would like serious feedback if possible.

Howard Stern - 6ft 5¼
Vince Vaughn - 6ft 5
Joe Manganiello - 6ft 4⅞
Randy Quaid - 6ft 4⅝
John Corbett - 6ft 4½
Jeff Goldblum - 6ft 4⅜
Alexander Skarsgård - 6ft 4¼
Dolph Lundgren - 6ft 4⅛
Jared Padalecki - 6ft 4⅛
Liam Neeson - 6ft 4⅛
David Hasselhoff - 6ft 4⅛
David Morse - 6ft 4
Conan O’Brien - 6ft 4
Tom Selleck - 6ft 3⅞
Stephen King - 6ft 3¾
Matthew Lillard - 6ft 3¾
Doug Jones - 6ft 3½
Chevy Chase - 6ft 3½
Paul Bettany - 6ft 3½
Michael Shannon - 6ft 3¼
Liam Hemsworth - 6ft 3¼
Willes190 said on 19/Jun/20
@Rampage – I would say that is a very accurate list. I personally Don’t see Dolph Lundgren as being 6’4.25 or above like many others; I don’t think he looked over 6’4 after rewatching Showdown in little Tokyo. I would also put Selleck at 6’3.75 or 6’3 7/8, he looks slightly below 6’4. O’Brien I’ve always believed to be 6’4 though, he can look slightly below on a few occasions but mostly he looks comfortable 6’4 IMO.
James roy said on 17/Jun/20
Here are others that I compiled

Neeson 6'3" peak height 6'4"

O'Brien 6'3.5 peak height 6'4"

Corbett 6'4.5 peak height 6'5"

Lincoln 6'3.25 peak height 6'3.75

Alexander Skarsgard 6'4.25

Hasselhoff 6'3" peak height 6'4"

Howard stern 6'5.25 peak height weak 6'6"
James roy said on 17/Jun/20
Hey rob dont you think at today that he is 68 years old 6 foot 3 flat would be more reasonable for him
Editor Rob
He could be getting nearer 6ft 3, maybe by 70 he will go down to that mark.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jun/20
Here are some I’ve compiled

Goldblum - 6ft4⅜
Neeson - 6ft4¼
Hasselhoff - 6ft4¼
Kotto - 6ft4¼
Larroquette - 6ft4¼
Lundgren - 6ft4⅛
Morse - 6ft4⅛
Lithgow - 6ft4⅛
O’Brien - 6ft3⅞
Begley - 6ft3⅞
Selleck - 6ft3⅞
King - 6ft3⅞

All just rough guesses...opinions welcome
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jun/20
Willes190 yeah those are strong possibilities. Goldblum overall takes 1st in my book aswell as the tallest...although there no pictures of them with one another. Very hard to choose between Neeson and Hasselhoff though...and if you throw Seagal in there aswell you have even more competition. All were born in 52’
James B 172cm said on 10/Jun/20
jeff goldblum tallest for sure
Willes190 said on 10/Jun/20
I’m interested to know who users on celebheights thinks is the tallest out of these 3 (peak) Hasselhoff, Neeson or Goldblum. I think it’s almost impossible to distinguish from the first two but this is how I see it it...

Jeff Goldblum – 6’4 3/8
Liam Neeson – 6’4 1/8-6’4 1/4
David Hasselhoff – 6’4 1/8
Jam Cherry said on 10/Jun/20
@James B he was not at his prime height in 2004 obviously
Canson said on 10/Jun/20
@Junior: 190 is possible for Neeson but I think 6’3 today but a legit 6’4 peak
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 7/Jun/20
🎂🎁🎈🎊 Happy Birthday Liam! 🎊🎈🎁🎂

Here's wishing the terrific Liam Neeson a wonderful 68th Birthday. While looking just now at a list of his films, it occured to me just how many I have actually got in my collection! Liam's films are a guaranteed 'I'll definitely be seeing that again' sort. Apart from, of course, 'Schindler's List', I particularly recommend his movie 'The Grey', a story about a tragic plane crash, Liam taking over as protector and mentor to the survivors. They land in a Polar bear region, so the weather is icy and they are frought with danger.

Have a fantastic day, Liam! XXX

6ft4 and half-an-inch less today. 😁

James B 172cm said on 5/Jun/20
rob in the film 'Taken' at times they did a good job of making him look under 6'4 didn't they?
Jam Cherry said on 1/Jun/20
193.5 cm peak now he’s about 192 cm
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 21/May/20
@Canson I doubt if he is only 190cm when stand straight. 6'3 1/4 measurement would be lowest while poorer posture suggest he look more a weak 6'3 now. 6'3 1/2 is somehow over listed for sure. 2cm height lost is possible than full inch. Chris Hemsworth i might have under estimate him the more i look into him stack with a weaker 6'1 3/4 Tom Hiddleston so i could have buy 6'3 for Chris now, Neeson with poor posture can make him look taller. I still feel that Neeson could edge out solid 6'3 Dwyane Wade.
Rich137 said on 26/Apr/20
Watched the new Men In Black film where he stands next to Chris aka Thor who is billed at 6.3ft.liam looks a good inch shorter making him 6.2 or 6.3 depending on footwear?
James B 172cm said on 20/Apr/20
He didn’t really look a strong 6’4 next to Christian bale
Canson said on 18/Apr/20
@Junior: he’s another one with poor posture. He probably doesn’t walk as tall as he could potentially stand for a measurement but I’d say 190 standing tall would be as low as he’d measure. I think Rob has him overlisted and he should be listed 6’3 today. He and Seagal are similar. Peak is undisputed 6’4”. Hes one of the few legit 6’4 peak guys here
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 17/Apr/20
6'3 1/4 is a 50/50 chance, 6'3 1/2 is a lower chance. But i don't think he is 6'3 flat if pull out a measurement although legit 190cm Chris Hemsworth can look taller with impeccable posture next to Neeson.
James B 172cm said on 15/Apr/20
6’5 out of bed for a peak Neeson maybe
cmillz said on 12/Apr/20
6’4.75” out of bed for peak Neeson is the most I’d give him. Peak Goldblum may have literally been the exact same height as Canson.
berta said on 11/Apr/20
maybe time to give him a wee bit extra for peak. hes not the lying type and he always looked it.
James B 172cm said on 29/Mar/20
exactley cmillz
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Mar/20
Prime Neeson out of bed: 6ft5 on the dot
Prime Goldblum out of bed: a little over 6ft5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Mar/20
A little 193cm peak is liklier for Neeson than under. But Goldblum had a better shot atl the full 194cm
Canson said on 28/Mar/20
@Cmillz: it’s possible that he was 6’4 1/8”. But I agree Goldblum was more my height 6’4.25-.3 afternoon height
cmillz said on 28/Mar/20
He wasn’t over 193cm peak. Goldblum would have edged him out.
OriginalAnon said on 15/Mar/20
I don't think he is as low as a half inch, maybe 3/4. He is still close to 6'4'', and he may have been over that during his peak.
Clarke Flynn said on 6/Mar/20
Liam neesons peek height was over 6'4, he was taller than Conan during their interview. Id guess 6'4.5, as his shortest. Nowadays maybe 6.2 or 6.3, depending on what he's doing, he slouches a lot naturally, so can make guys his own height, seem taller.
Canson said on 16/Feb/20
@Rampage: I tend to agree. I remember when I first measured on this site I thought it was higher by a couple mm but it may have been a variety of things
Linke said on 15/Feb/20
His sons appear much shorter. One of the appear well under 6'
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Feb/20
Canson, at 38 I wouldn’t say you’ve lost anything
Canson said on 14/Feb/20
He definitely has 6’4 proportions. Peak height definitely not less than 6’4”

Click Here
Canson said on 13/Feb/20
@Rampage: that’s interesting. Yea out of bed I’m a hair over 6’5, almost 196cm. Precisely 195.7 cm out of bed and 193.8 normal days with less activity then a solid 6’4.25 other days. Not sure if I’m still at my peak or if I lost a mm or two at age 38. But my extreme low is 6’4” like 193.1
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Feb/20
Well, Canson...I’ve got a short upper body for my height so there isn’t as big a fluctuation...I measured my extreme low once (well after midnight) as 192.92cm. I always have said “about 6ft4” when asked. Those are the only times I’ve been measured...never during the day

I reckon you hit 6ft5 straight out of bed, no?
Canson said on 9/Feb/20
@Rampage: what’s your afternoon height? Assuming you’d be about 192.9. Mine is 193.8 if I’m not very active then 193.6-.7 on days I go to the gym. Usually bang on 6’4.25 those days
Canson said on 9/Feb/20
@Rampage: what’s your afternoon height? Mine is 193.8 if I’m not very active then 193.6-.7 on days I go to the gym. Usually bang on 6’4.25 those days
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Feb/20
I scrape 195cm straight out like 194.8cm
Canson said on 7/Feb/20
@Rampage: possible. I know in my case I am about 195.7 out of bed and about 6’4.25 Or a hair over afternoon height depending on the day. A guy measuring 6’5 out of bed that I could def see is Goldblum. He’d prob be my height. Not sure if Liam was exact with me but it’s possible. If not he’s def no less than 6’4” peak
Canson said on 7/Feb/20
@Rampage: possible. I know in my case I am about 195.7 out of bed and about 6’4.25 afternoon height. A guy measuring 6’5 out of bed that I could def see is Goldblum. He’d prob be my height. Not sure if Liam was but it’s possible
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Feb/20
James, by 05’ maybe a tiny fraction at most but I think he still looked 6ft4 up until at least 10 years
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Feb/20
Canson I think out of bed peak Liam would’ve hit 6ft5
CDS said on 31/Jan/20
I'm watching "men in black international", and I could swear 6'3" Chris Hemsworth looks taller than Liam? Has he shrunk?
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 28/Jan/20
Sorry that again i have to justify some correctness for Liam Neeson height with the 5'11 korean star that make him look 6'1-6'2 Click Here Click on the link and look at one of the picture 5'11 Lee Jung Jae with Neeson. I finally figure why Neeson look 6'1-6'2 with him when camera angle did not help Neeson wasn't much link to his posture. Lee's shoes highly suspicious to be solid 2" lift and Neeson had 1" on feet which indicate like a 6'3 Liam Neeson standing with "6'0" Lee Jung Jae here Click Here So when posture up Neeson could still be quite close to 6'3 1/2 worse 6'3 1/4. Previous my 6'3 flat estimate went wrong thought of Lee footwear it's just a thick 3.5-4cm regular shoes but like i say before Lee might be 5'11 1/4 guy since 6'0 listing happen to him once from yahoo and google listing. Still 6'3 1/2 a little chance for Liam Neeson but posture wise he did really drop down sometimes looking like weak 6'3 nowadays.
James B 172c, said on 24/Jan/20
Rampage by 2005 when he starred in Batman Begins do you agree he could have been just shy of 6’4 like 6ft3 7/8ths?
Canson said on 23/Jan/20
@Rampage: I think Neeson was probably more Near 195 range out of bed. Maybe worst case 194.9 and came down to around 193. Possibly even 1/8 over
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jan/20
James, I think Neeson was a guy that could've hit 194cm earlier in the day but dropped to 193cm range before bed (never below though) while Goldblum held that mark a little it longer. So I agree with you
Personally, if we were gonna get real technical I think Neeson at 6ft4⅛ and Goldblum at 6ft4⅜ could be argued with 6ft4⅞ for Tim Robbins also (Still unsure on the full 6ft5 given that he's claimed 6ft4½ a few times)

Giving Neeson the full 6ft4½ would be a little bit of a stretch even though he could look it a fair bit in the 80's-90's (and would have measured at an earlier time of the day) whereas Goldblum was probably closer to it overall. Alternatively, you could also just give Liam 6ft4¼ which is what Jeff is at currently. Interesting that they're aren't any photos of them together
James B 172c, said on 20/Jan/20
I don’t think he was ever a proper 194cm. A strong 193cm range I’d sat him prime
Deep Purple said on 19/Jan/20
He can looks 6'2.5" - 6'2.75" with bad posture.
With good posture 190.5 cm-191.5 cm
6'3.25 is the shoot.
Jkiller said on 17/Jan/20
Peak 194cm, about 191.5cm these days.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 28/Dec/19
Bad posture more like making him 6'2-6'2 1/2. The most i feel he could be measure 6'3 1/8 now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Dec/19
With bad posture he can appear barely 6ft3 now but for a measurement he’d clear it easily
Canson said on 25/Dec/19
I don’t know Rob. He can look 6’3 at times or a bit less but that may be his posture
James B 172cm said on 22/Dec/19
rob 6ft3.25 today?
Editor Rob
Not that low, 6ft 3.5 still I feel at least if measured
Canson said on 20/Dec/19
@JamesB: maybe by 1/4”
James B 172c, said on 19/Dec/19
Canson- do you agree that a peak Steven seagal looked shorter than goldblum?
Johan 185 cm said on 19/Dec/19
James B said on 16/Dec/19
6’4 flat is fine for his peak. 6’4 max by the mid 2000s.

People who say he was 6’4.25 don’t realise how large a flat 6’4 is.


You wouldn't be able to tell the difference James. I think 6'4.25" is max for a peak Neeson but after rewatching Rob Roy i think 6'4 1/8 is definetly worth considering. He only went over 6'4" after being pushed by Conan on his claim. He doesn't seem to care so why would he lie?
Canson said on 18/Dec/19
@Editor Rob: but on that same token, proportions/build play a huge part. So a very lanky 6’4” can look 6’4.5 or 6’5 at times garnering a 6’4.25 listing when in reality they’re just a plain 6’4”. I don’t think Goldblum is the case but I can look at a friend who is a solid 6’7” at a low. He has good posture for someone extremely tall and he has a very muscular build. He often can pull off looking taller even to me if I see him from a distance. That’s more because I’ve seen a 6’8” guy or two that have different proportions such as more torso and shorter legs where he’s the opposite. But that’s from a distance and me trying to be objective in assessing height. He gets it from many others but we know how tall he actually is because face to face it’s a weak 3” he has on me. And I’ve known him for over 20 years now, roomed with him in college one year, and am very close with him even today, so I know how tall he actually is.
Canson said on 17/Dec/19
@James B: agreed again. I could see some mm over like maybe 193.3 but not a 6’5 guy out of bed like people are making it sound. Shows that guys like Conan are only max 192cm if even that full mark. More 191.5-192 as thats 6’3.5 range
James B 172c, said on 17/Dec/19
Rob can you tell the difference between 6’4 and 6’4.25?
Editor Rob
Sometimes 1/4 inches are given from an overall 'look', you know maybe years of seeing footage/stills of somebody, you think the odds are better for say 1/4 rather than 6ft 4 flat or 6ft 4.5 for someone.
James B said on 16/Dec/19
6’4 flat is fine for his peak. 6’4 max by the mid 2000s.

People who say he was 6’4.25 don’t realise how large a flat 6’4 is.
Canson said on 13/Dec/19
I think he’s less than this today. His peak was for sure 6’4” like Rob lists him but today he’s max 6’3”
James B 172cm said on 11/Dec/19
a peak goldblum would have edged out seagal and neeson
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Dec/19
Anywhere between 6ft4-4½ range peak is arguable. Right between Modine/D’Onofrio and Vaughn/Robbins.

Neeson, Hasselhoff and Seagal were all roughly about the same. Goldblum overall I think had better odds of hitting the full 6ft4½
James B said on 5/Dec/19
He didn’t look 6’4.25 in Batman Begins
Nearly 180cm guy said on 2/Dec/19
Please Rob, consider giving Liam 6'4.25" as his peak height again. Here are photos of Liam next to Helen Mirren from 1983: Click Here Click Here
However, it is difficult to assess the difference in height between them because we can't see their footwear. However, look at their other 1984 joint photos: Click Here Click Here Click Here
In these photos, the height difference between them looks huge, besides I found another photo which suggests that Liam could have normal shoes and Helen could wear heels: Click Here
The difference between them could really be more than just a foot! Liam met Stephen Dorff and Bill Paxton in 1992: Click Here Click Here
His posture looks bad in these photos. In addition, we must remember about footwear, Liam shoes looked flat and Stephen shoes looked thick, but unfortunately I couldn't find a photo with Bill's shoes: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Another example of his poor posture are several of his photos next to Natalie Portman from 1999: Click Here Click Here
But now look at their other photos together when his posture is a bit better: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Also, Natalie had very large heels at the time and Liam had normal shoes: Click Here Click Here
Natalie was 18 at the time and probably reached her full height by then. After all I've seen, I really believe Liam was 6'4.25". Rob, what do you say about it?
Editor Rob
Neeson might have measured 6ft 4 and 1/8th
Canson said on 30/Nov/19
Liam did edge Conan our. But that speaks more to Conan not being 6’4”. He’s more 6’3.5 peak height
Nearly 180cm guy said on 27/Nov/19
Rob, I think Liam really deserves you to upgrade his peak height to 6'4.25". In 1998, Liam looked like a giant next to Claire Danes, he also looked at least 5 inches taller than Uma Thurman and about 5 inches taller than Geoffrey Rush: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Their footwear: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
And now look at his photos next to Edward Norton from 1997, Liam looked definitely over 4 inches taller than him: Click Here Click Here Click Here
Their footwear was similar at the time: Click Here Click Here
Then you can look at the photos of Liam next to Kathryn Bigelow and Harrison Ford from 2002, Liam looked much taller than Kathryn even when she was wearing heels and he looked easily over 4 inches taller than Ford who was 6 feet tall at that time: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
In 2002, Liam also looked a good 3 inches taller than Daniel Day Lewis: Click Here Click Here Click Here
Their footwear: Click Here Click Here
Even in 2004, Liam still looked 6'4" because he didn't seem like a shortet than Rupert Everett: Click Here
Their footwear looked similar: Click Here Click Here
Although sometimes his posture was just weak. Look again at this 2004 video next to Conan O'Brien from 0:35: Click Here
Liam was taller than Conan! Rob, I really think 6'4.25" suits him better in his prime.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Nov/19
Neeson clearly edged out Conan on his show
Canson said on 8/Nov/19
@Junior: tough to say if he stood straight. In his prime I believe he was 6’4” but today 6’2 range st times. Maybe 6’3 when he does stand straight
Canson said on 8/Nov/19
@Junior: tough to say if he stood straight. In his prime I believe he was 6’4” but today 6’2 range st times. 6’3 when he does stand straight
Dream said on 6/Nov/19
With Keegan Michael Key, Liam looked a lot shorter than Bo Burnham. Understandable Liam lost a lot of height from there.

Then again, I should expect Bo to be at least one inch taller than a Peak Liam Neeson.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 4/Nov/19
@Canson Can imagine how a 180-181cm korean actor makes him look under 6'2 Click Here look at the top area of their ear maybe 6cm tops difference. Some say this actor Lee Jung-Jae is only 5'10 3/4-5'11 and some say 5'11 1/2 but mostly listed 5'11 from the internet. I give it 181cm for this guy and could have 1/2 inch more shoes than Neeson so take him at 182cm and Neeson is about 6'2 with him. But if Neeson posture adjust up he could be close to 6'3. Anything 191-192cm is impossible.
James B said on 18/Oct/19
Looked more 6ft3 1/2 in Batman begins
Canson said on 17/Oct/19
@Junior: surprisingly he can look 6’2” range now at times
Canson said on 17/Oct/19
@Johan: if he was over 6’4” peak it’s tough to tell just how much. I can easily say he wasn’t less than 6’4” afternoon height at his peak Rob’s listing. I could go with maybe 1/8” over in fact. I would say that he’s a candidate for being underlisted perhaps but at worst he lines up to his listing. He edged Conan in his prime but Conan was more 6’3.5” peak
Canson said on 17/Oct/19
@Johan: if he was over 6’4” peak it’s tough to tell just how much. I can easily say he wasn’t less than 6’4” afternoon height at his peak Rob’s listing. I could go with maybe 1/8” over in fact. I would say that he’s a candidate for being underlisted perhaps but at worst he lines up to his listing
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 16/Oct/19
6'3 now. He isn't over 6'4 a low at peak. Even David Hasselhoff may not be over 6'4 a low during his peak.
Canson said on 16/Oct/19
Neeson was taller than Conan in his prime. They stood right next to each other and both guys acknowledged it
AAAA said on 5/Oct/19
Pretty cool series of photos from Gangs of New York really hammering home how hard it is to get accurate estimates from photos.

Neeson with Lewis same event, two angles
Click Here Lewis looking tall next to Neeson.
Click Here Lewis looking dwarfed
Ian555 said on 24/Sep/19
Rob do you actually think Neeson could be taller than Conan O'Brien?
Editor Rob
It's tough to tell the guys apart, you'd need measuring them.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 16/Sep/19
@185 said on 26/Aug/19
@Chris Junior Hernandez 1990
He nearly 70, 1-2 inches lost is understandable.

Not 2" lost bro. He may well lost posture getting loose and a full inch that impact him to look 6'2 max with a 5'11 actor like Lee Jung Jae with good posture and little shoe advantage on him. Stand tall i believe he still hit 6'3 but not quite a chance over.
Canson said on 12/Sep/19
@Rising: agreed!
Rising174cm said on 11/Sep/19
@Canson: Neeson has lost a lot of height the last few years, much like Goldblum. Some of it is posture, but it still has to be more than just a half inch lost. I do think Neeson more or less maintained 6'4" through the Taken film and the A-Team film, but like many, has lost height fast in his 60's and his posture certainly hasn't helped.
Johan 185 cm said on 11/Sep/19
There are people actually arguing sub 6'4" peak???

Go watch Schindlers list or Rob Roy and then say he wasn't 6'4". I have him at 6'4.25" peak I believe him when he said 6'4" and a wee bit.

Today he looks near 6'3" at 67 years old. He also doesn't stand with good posture, I am sure he would surprise people when standing for a measurement.
Shane minton said on 10/Sep/19
Exactly same height as Hemsworth in men in black . Hemsworth might even had a cm on him but very close
Dmeyer said on 7/Sep/19
Can look 6'1 flat in some pics , in person 15 years back looked aleast 191cm 6'3,25 , has a hard time looking over 6'1,5 in pictures
Canson said on 6/Sep/19
He was definitely a legit 6’4” in his prime. I wonder if he’s really lost a lot of height or if he just has poor posture today
185 said on 26/Aug/19
@Chris Junior Hernandez 1990
He nearly 70, 1-2 inches lost is understandable.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 25/Aug/19
If John Travolta had lost an inch at 65 now then higher chance Neeson had also lost an inch but before him. Neeson really doesn't look over 6'3 since 2016 with 5'11 korean actor Lee Jung Jae and worst he can look only between 6'1-6'2 max with Lee. Lee footwear is arguable but doesn't look over 1/2 inch over Neeson shoes.

Click Here Look 185cm with a 180cm Lee Jung Jae here

Click Here Footwear heel can be seen here its around 1/2 inch.

Click Here It's weir Neeson had quite good posture and still look max 2" here

More chance given Lee a 5'11 1/4 guy with thicker footwear gain advantage but Neeson still could not be over 6'3 with better posture.

Click Here At most 2.5" between them here added 1/2" lesser shoes so Neeson could be 6'2 max understand his posture wasn't that good nowadays so 6'3 is already the best. Also already exist of proof he look at most 6'3 with 189cm Adam Driver.
berta said on 30/Jul/19
i thought he looked atleast 10 cm taller than christian bale with bad posture. In reality maybe 11,5 cm
MalcomStreet said on 24/Jul/19
This guy was 6'2 peak cuz Christian bale who is 6'0" Liam has only like 2" on him and now he is prob 6'1.5"
berta said on 23/Jul/19
couple mm over 193 at peak and today maybe not mutch over 191 cm
Canson said on 19/Jul/19
@Bobby3342: he was definitely a legit 6’4. Conan was around 6’3.25 and Liam was always taller in his prime
Canson said on 19/Jul/19
He was for sure taller than Clint Eastwood peak. Liam was a legit 6’4” peak afternoon height. Clint was a 6’3” range guy barefoot peak
Erik12 said on 17/Jul/19
Seemed like the same height as Clint Eastwood in The Dead Pool so 6'3 as peak is probably spot on.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 11/Jul/19
@Canson Conan did not look lower than a peak Tom Selleck. Selleck once claim that he is 6'3 1/2 and mostly claiming 6'4, to me Tom look just weak 6'4 more chance he is atually 6'3.75" just go with 6'4 and round down once at 6'3 1/2. Lets just say Conan wear thicker footwear a fraction more so he look 192.4-192.5cm same peak as Tom Selleck but he is more 6'3 5/8. About Jared Padalecki look 1/4 lower than Conan that episode of Conan show they shook hans we can clearly sees a 2cm Vans on Jared footwear vs 1.5" looking Conan heels and 100 percent Conan is taller but we know it's the shoes stuff, Jared is more unbeatable low side at 193cm and Conan maybe right on 6'3 1/2 now. 191.5cm is the absolutely low he could be i don't see 190-191cm coming that low for him. Conan peak is still closer to 6'3.75" if anything he had lost today he is still nearly 6'3 1/2.
Canson said on 10/Jul/19
@Junior: his 6’4 1/2” claim is a shoe claim. And He didn’t say he was 6’4 1/2” to Neeson either. He said he was 6’4 and that Neeson must be 6’5”. Conan has never been a legit 6’4”. He was always a 6’4 range guy in shoes. Maybe he eeked out 6’3.5 at a low peak but that’s iffy. He has very long hair. Go back and watch and you’ll see he said 6’4”. He implied that there is an inch between them or close enough to it. Neeson was more than just 1/2” taller than him that was clear as day. Remember that Conan also thought Tom Selleck was 6’4/6’5. Selleck was 6’3.5 by his own admission. He had boots on which probably gave maybe 1/4” if even that much. If Conan were in dress shoes they may have been the same As some dress shoes give 3cm. Then you have Hasselhoff. He was 6’4 flat and clearly taller. Conan has to stand on his tippy toes to be taller. Padalecki is also taller than Conan. Neeson has poor posture today which gives the appearance of that but he was definitely what Rob lists him in his prime
Canson said on 10/Jul/19
@Junior: his 6’4 1/2” claim is a shoe claim
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 10/Jul/19
@Canson Conan open up and claim he is "atually 6'4 1/2" which he think he is, when he meet up close facing Liam Neeson he ask is he 6'5 which opposed a half inch difference not full inch, Conan is solid 192cm peak and more on solid 6'4 for Liam, but today Conan is taller than Liam Neeson. Neeson look as low as 6'2 1/2 and standing straight also not quite looking over 6'3.
Canson said on 6/Jul/19
@Berta: he maybe 1/8 over but it’s possible it was earlier in the day that he got the wee bit or that he did that to shut Conan up because he probably knows Conan was not a legit 6’4”
berta said on 6/Jul/19
i really think he is a guy that should ahve 1/8 upgrade. He really claimed it one time and most other times didnt bother and just went with 6 foot 4 . I dont think he lies. average guess seems spot on. Maybe closer to 191 thn 192 today. His posture is the worse you can have for his age.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 2/Jul/19
I don't know if he really lost an inch now but it looks like it is. Peak i'm not gonna argue under 6'4.
Alex 6'3.25 said on 1/Jul/19
You generally lose around 1 cm when you are 67 years old, if he looks around 191-192 today, then he was 193 in his prime, for sure.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 29/Jun/19
I can seee alot of people are noticing Neeson peak could be little bit over 6'4 but i am more interested on his current height he can look under 6'3 with 6'2.25" Adam Driver. I can even believe he is only 6'3 now. Looking 6'1-6'2 range with 5'11 Lee Jung Jae but we can suspect Lee wear lift problem is doesn't look much like footwear near 2" and Liam comfirm wear at least 1" footwear.
Click Here Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 20/Jun/19
@ Andrea - Good grief! Your English is so hot that I bet you can watch any English films! I draw the line at French and German! 😉

The fantastic Liam can have 6ft4.25 peak as he looked huge in 'Schindler's List', and 6ft3.5 now, as he still looks huge!
Andrea said on 18/Jun/19
Back to the first Taken, I'm sure he already looked AT LEAST an inch shorter than 6'4.5 George Hertzberg...
Canson said on 11/Jun/19
@Johan185: I agree. Conan thought Wlad was 6’6/6’7 and that Selleck was 6’4/6’5. In reality the former is what Rob lists him at best 6’5.25 and Selleck peak 6’3.5 like he claimed. Conan was never 6’4. Maybe 6’3.5 peak and he claimed his shoes but 6’3.25 doesn’t surprise me either
Johan 185 cm said on 7/Jun/19
Canson said on 5/Jun/19
@Johan: depends on when he measured in his peak (time of day). I don’t doubt being 6’4 1/8 perhaps but I doubt higher for his afternoon height. I also doubt under 6’4” flat


I am not sure about his height peak or current. He never has been a guy to stand with good posture but back in his prime ( Schindlers list/Rob roy) he didn't look anything under 6'4". I am inclined to believe him he claims 6'4" but only added the "bit" because Conan was pushing him. So we can write off anything over 6'4.25" anyway even for peak.

Today he can sometimes look 6'3" but he drops height alot. He still looks 6'4" in that pic above with Cooper and Rampage. They are all 6' guys and I would doubt him measuring under there.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 7/Jun/19
🎂😁🎁 Happy Birthday Liam! 🎁😁🎂

Wishing this great actor a very enjoyable Birthday. Ironically, I saw my last Birthday in watching 'Schindler's List'. When I told my Dad, he said, "That's my favourite film!"

I didn't really need telling that!😃

Anyway, Liam gets Birthday guesses of 6ft4 peak and 6ft3.5 for nowadays.

Canson said on 5/Jun/19
@Johan: depends on when he measured in his peak (time of day). I don’t doubt being 6’4 1/8 perhaps but I doubt higher for his afternoon height. I also doubt under 6’4” flat
Johan 185 cm said on 4/Jun/19
@James Brett

In Taken 2, he is easily 4 inches taller than Famke Janssen and he isn't even fully straight in some scenes. Famke is minimum 5'11.25. Then there is footwear to be considered. Fully straight he is still holding 6'3.5" and I don't doubt a hair over 6'4" for his peak. How much is a "wee bit"? 1/8 , a 1/4? who knows.
James Brett 172cm said on 1/Jun/19
Rob do you think in 2004 Liam neeson could have shrunk too 6’3.75 or 6’3 7/8ths? Or do you think he was still 193cm at that stage?
Editor Rob
Maybe a small fraction which could be hard to spot...maybe a 1/4 (if you say he was just over 6ft 4 in his 30's and then by 50's just under).
James Brett 172cm said on 1/Jun/19
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/May/19
He could certainly look more 6ft4½ and sometimes even 6ft5 in his early roles like Excalibur, Krud and The Bounty...a good 3in on DDL (who many argue 6ft1½) and just generally dwarfs everyone the way a real 6ft4 range guy should

I wouldn’t hesitate to tweak his peak height to a little over 6ft4. I agree with Rob, in his youth he had a better chance of measuring over rather than under 6ft4. Nowadays he probably can still measure 6ft3½

In taken and Batman begins he certainly didn’t seem over 6’4 too me maybe by that stage he could have even been just shy of 193cm like 6’3 7/8ths?. Not long ago I watched the movie Big Man from 1990 and yeah i’d say 6’4 seems totally believable for him at that point.
Canson said on 30/May/19
For his low in his prime maybe 6’4 or 1/8 over
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/May/19
He could certainly look more 6ft4½ and sometimes even 6ft5 in his early roles like Excalibur, Krud and The Bounty...a good 3in on DDL (who many argue 6ft1½) and just generally dwarfs everyone the way a real 6ft4 range guy should

I wouldn’t hesitate to tweak his peak height to a little over 6ft4. I agree with Rob, in his youth he had a better chance of measuring over rather than under 6ft4. Nowadays he probably can still measure 6ft3½
Arthas said on 28/May/19
Do you think a weak 194 cm should be possible for him? (193.5-193.7)
Editor Rob
I think if Liam turned up for a 10.30am appointment at age 25 at the Doctor's, he has a greater chance of measuring 6ft 4.25 than 4 flat.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/May/19
Rob, who do you think was taller peak Neeson or Randy Orton?
Editor Rob
Both could be argued to be 6ft 4 and a few mm
bobbh3342 said on 11/Apr/19
never was 6'4 solid 6'3.25 but never 6'4
berta said on 2/Apr/19
Yeah a 1/8 upgrade would be the absolute best peak height. Thats probably what he meant in his claim. 1/4 over could be to mutch and this could be to low. He never looked under 193 and never over 194. Thats the range. But he i Think he looks to short today to have ever been 194. 193-193,5 is my guess
Jdubbz 196cm said on 25/Mar/19

Definitely nothing less than legit 193, though 6'4 1/8 peak is also possible.
Canson said on 20/Mar/19
Peak 6’4 is correct. Not less than 193 if not maybe a mm or two over
billionaireslayer said on 19/Mar/19
6'4 peak, very tall
James Brett 172cm said on 23/Feb/19
Rob will you maybe uprgrade Liam’s peak too 6ft4 1/8?
Editor Rob
It's 50/50 on that.
Dream said on 7/Feb/19
@Arch Stanton

Honestly, I don’t hold any grudge against Liam Neeson, even when he told his story.
James Brett said on 7/Feb/19
was liam really dead on the same as a peak jeff goldblum?

6'4.5 for a peak jeff is possible though if vince vaughn was 6'5
Arch Stanton said on 6/Feb/19
There's irony in the above photo, somebody should post it on Twitter of him cuddling a black man!
Arch Stanton said on 6/Feb/19
Man I'd hate to be a celebrity today. The media have got worse too, twisting everything anybody says or does all for clicks. The Elon Musk weed smoking thing and now this. He was trying to make a point that he was ashamed of it!! I'm not surprised people like Brad Pitt don't use social media and rarely give interviews, it's the most sensible thing to do to evade it.
Ian555 said on 4/Feb/19
Rob do you think he could’ve been 6’ 4.25”? He did seem taller than Conan.
Editor Rob
He had a chance of 6ft 4 and a big the bit is another matter, 1/8th or 1/4 you might say would be possible.
Rising - 174 cm said on 2/Feb/19
I think the Seagal photo is Neeson's posture and possibly Seagal wearing his cowboy boots because I doubt Seagal was taller than 6'4" and I doubt Neeson was shorter after seeing Neeson stand tall next to Conan in 2004 or even Neeson as recently as 2010 with 5'11.5" Rampage in the photo above. Neeson also had what looked like a full inch on Clint Eastwood in The Dead Pool back when Clint was still about 6'3". Actually, I'd probably give Neeson the 1/8" over 6'4" though I don't think it's necessary for Seagal. Neeson had lost little to no height by his late 50's, but started shrinking fast some time fairly shortly after that A-Team film since by 2014, Neeson seemed shorter than Conan at an event they appeared at and we know Neeson was taller when they compared a decade earlier. I'd guess Seagal is currently taller since I'm not sure Neeson is taller than a flat 6'3" and 191 is the most I'd currently guess while 191 is still the minimum I'd guess Seagal at with a chance of 6'3.5" since that's what Rob thought he looked, though Seagal only looked 189-190 cm range with Rob's 6'2" friend Big Dale.
Canson said on 31/Jan/19
@Jordan: I think peak they were the same or similar. Today both have lost height and are 6’3 range
Jordan87 said on 30/Jan/19
@ Zahid,

Then Neeson must have been Under 6'4 if he was shorter than Seagal my friend.
Canson said on 27/Jan/19
@James Brett: Neeson has horrible posture today. Not sure who would be taller but wouldn’t surprise me if Neeson edges him if he stands straight. Seagal doesn’t look any taller than 6’3” next to Rob or Charles Barkley although 6’4” at his peak is extremely likely for him as he looked it
James Brett said on 23/Jan/19
Actually Seagal looks close too 1 inch taller than Neeson. But Liam’s posture doesn’t look great on the photo.
Canson said on 22/Jan/19
@Zahid: they would be close in height. Not sure who would edge who. Maybe the one whos been on there feet for less time.
Zahid said on 20/Jan/19
A peak Liam was pretty close to Steven Seagal in height: Click Here
Dream said on 18/Jan/19

To be fair, Nonso is also tilting his head down with Rob. I wouldn’t put him under 6’5”, either.
Canson said on 14/Jan/19
@Dream: he did look taller. In the pic with Rob Nonso looks at least 6’5”
Dream said on 13/Jan/19

I would say Nonso Anozie looked visibly taller than Liam Neeson in a movie.
Canson said on 9/Jan/19
@Michael 5’10: Liam May have just been an honest 6’4”-6’4.25 guy. That adds up as Conan appeared close to an inch shorter. Conan May have been as high as 6’3.5 but 6’3.25 is possible. I agree prime he wasn’t a flat 6’3” either
Michael 5'10", 178 cm said on 9/Jan/19
Yeah, Liam is a strong 6'4" and Conan might be a weak 6'4", but if Conan was a flat 6'3" or something like that, then a lot of people would need HUGE downgrades. Liam isn't that much taller than Conan, I'm saying like less than a inch difference. He looked very tall in the Phantom Menace and made Ewan McGregor look really short. Liam just towered over everybody on the Star Wars set and they even had to make the doors taller to accommodate for his height. He is definitely taller than a flat 6'4", but a little bit shorter than 6'5". Name someone that looked taller than him in a movie he was in. He towered over Ben Kingsley and even Ralph Fiennes in Schindler's List. In Nonstop and the Commuter, he again looked super tall. Liam is 6'3" nowadays and a fraction over 6'4" at peak.
Canson said on 2/Jan/19
He was never higher than maybe 6’4 or 6’4-6’4.25 range. Rob’s listing looks fair for his peak because he surely wasn’t less than 6’4”. Just more evidence Conan was never a legit 6’4”.
185 said on 31/Dec/18
He only look 6'1" or 6'2" in his recently movies, he has a poor posture. He could look peak 6'5 or strong 6'4 back then in schindler's list or with conan.
Andrea said on 28/Dec/18
I've recently seen that movie too, and while I can agree that he looked (much) taller than most people (a bit less about the "excellent film"), I wouldn't have guessed him over 6'2-6'3 in it. Which is certainly not surprising as that's what he can often look in (recent) pics, when he doesn't look even under. How much of that is due to his posture is the question, but maybe he really isn't much over 6'3 today?
About his peak, funnily enough, he never struck me as being a big 6'4 guy, but then again, the oldest movie of him I've seen is, if I'm not mistaken, Taken, so maybe he had already shrunk a bit by then...
Arch Stanton said on 21/Dec/18
Saw The Commuter recently, he still has it. Excellent film and still much taller than most people.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 17/Dec/18
@187cm guy said on 24/Nov/18 If you're telling the truth then i would have thought editor Rob himself were not above 5'7 and always look close to 5'9 with all celebrities, well the worst part is Rob have to closed this "shop" for retirement soon. Lol..
Dream(5'9.5") said on 8/Dec/18
@Canson and @Junior

I would’ve thought that Instagram guy (with Neeson) would be similar to Bo Burnham or Wladimir.

He’s high orbit of 6’4” without question and could be 6’5” really.
Canson said on 7/Dec/18
Liam doesn’t look as low as 187cm even today. You sure he wasn’t slouching? That would be over just a 2” height loss for him if he did. He was a legit 6’4 peak
187cm guy said on 24/Nov/18
I've met Liam neeson and he's my height: we both had low flat shoes on. He's a lot slighter, which like Clint makes him appear far taller. Of course, I met him last year. It is possible that he was 190cm at peak in his heyday. He's in his 60's now don't forget. So he's probably lost 2.5 cm.
berta said on 19/Nov/18
I agree with JUnior Hernandez 1990 that liam could be down to 191 flat.I dont think he could make his back straight even if he tried to stand tall. Hes got a very big hunch now. He have probably lost just over 2 cm by now.
Gracian said on 19/Nov/18
Rob, can I argue about a fraction of a shorter or taller rating of both the peak height and the current height of some people? Here is my opinion:
Liam Neeson peak height was 6'4.25" and current height is 6'3.25".
Danny Glover peak height was 6'3.25" and current height is 6'1".
Jon Voight peak height was 6'2.75" and current height is 6'1.25".
Morgan Freeman peak height was 6'2.5" and current height is 6'1.75".
Samuel L. Jackson peak height was 6'2.25" and current height is 6'1.25".
Denzel Washington peak height was 6'0.5" and current height is 5'11.5".
Christopher Walken peak height was 6'0.25" and current height is 5'11.25".
John Travolta peak height was 6'0.25" and current height is 5'11.25".
Rob, do you see these numbers as possible for them?
Editor Rob
I think there are many listings in which somebody could argue a 1/4 above or below. I am not sure I would change any of the above this moment. I do think the Denzel at 6ft 1/2 is quite a possible.
Canson said on 11/Nov/18
@Junior: yea to me he looked over 6’4” with Neeson. I would’ve said at least 6’5 if not taller
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 9/Nov/18
@Canson It's not the thin build or long face problem helps the guy look alot taller. The boy atually have claim 6'5 which i remember from his instagram not sure about 6'4 but look solid 6-6.5cm taller than Neeson in picture. Understand Neeson slouch a little that doesn't help him to be much over 6'2 1/2 when getting up straight. Neeson is 66 now and might have deeping into 6'3 1/4.
Canson said on 15/Oct/18
@Sarim: are you sure that guy is 6’4? And Neeson appears to be slouching a bit. You could be right that the guy is 6’4” since he is very thin but he has a long face which might suggest he’s taller than 6’4”. Possible Neeson is only 6’3” today
Sarim said on 10/Oct/18
He's no where near 6'3.5", here he's with 6'4 boy Click Here
who is atleast couple of inches taller than him, he need to be downgraded for sure
Canson said on 2/Oct/18
@Dream: yep but also shows Conan isn’t as tall as he’s listed. I agree with Mickie when he said Conan was around his height when he met him. Mickie says he measures 6’3 3/8 at a normal low and 6’3.25 at extreme low and said Conan may be within 1/4” each direction. I’ve never had Conan above 6’3.25 ever
Dream(5'9.5") said on 23/Sep/18
@Some Guy

If that's the case, an upgrade for 6'4 1/8ths" would be better for Neeson, if not the full 6'4.25".
Sandy Cowell said on 31/Aug/18
🤣 Correction Time! 🤣

That should have been 'as TALL as ever', not 'as ALL..'!
Sandy Cowell said on 29/Aug/18
Last night I saw a film with Liam in it called 'A Million Ways to Die in the West'.

One of the ways was to drop dead as a direct result of one of your own farts! It was hilarious! I haven't seen Liam in a comedy before, so it was quite an eye opener!

6ft4 peak and 6f3.5 now. Liam still looked as all as ever.
Some Guy said on 28/Aug/18
Apparently, they had to build higher sets during the shooting of Phantom Menace so that Neeson's eye line was in frame.
Canson said on 31/Jul/18
I think he’s always looked 6’4 or my size 6’4.25 and that Conan claims a shoe height and really is 6’3.25
Canson said on 31/Jul/18
@Dream: I think so. Imho 193-193.5 is where his prime would be
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 30/Jul/18
I believe Neeson lost 2cm. 193.5cm a peak and 191.5cm now if he manage to keep his back straight. I saw picture that Neeson look as low as 6'0-6'1 with 5'10 7/8 (180cm) Lee Jung Jae.
Click Here not sure if Lee wear elevator shoes but that is many camera angles benefits Lee more than Neeson.
Dream(5'9.5") said on 30/Jul/18
@Junior That's true, but here's an old video where Liam Neeson does look near 6'5" with Conan O'Brien. For once, Liam stood with good posture.

Click Here

It's maybe the camera angles, but Liam is certainly the taller one.

Rob, is there a chance of 6'4 1/8" for Liam? At peak, he always looks an easy 6'4" guy.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/18
He makes Bradley Cooper look under 6ft in the photo above
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/18
Looked 194/195cm in Excalibur...
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 25/Jul/18
@Dream(5'9.5") That was a peak height more of 193.5cm. Neeson recently years have being edge out 1/2 inch by Conan O'brien.
Dream(5'9.5") said on 7/Jul/18
Liam Neeson did look like the biggest guy in Schindler's List.

He made a lot of people look average or even small!

I don't question a little over 6'4". Just over 6'4" wouldn't bug me one bit.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 2/Jul/18

Most height loss can be minimized through a good diet, excercise and maintaining good posture and overall a healthy lifestyle.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 2/Jul/18
Aging did to people was bad health and some height loss no matter how you takecare of yourself. I can say Neeson peak was 193.5cm but he look to have loss an inch now.
James B 171.5cm said on 21/Jun/18
rob do you think he was slowly creeping under 6ft4 like 6ft3.75 in 2005?
Editor Rob
Maybe, but because at times he has a loose posture, it is hard to tell precisely the period he lost a fraction.
James B 171.5cm said on 21/Jun/18
clint was not over 6ft3 in Deadpool.

Oh by the way rampage both james avery and vince vaughn lost height in there 40s. Neeson certainly didnt look a big 6ft4 in batman begins and taken.
MAD SAM said on 20/Jun/18
He looked like a giant in Schindler’s list, perhaps 194 cm peak possibility and seems to have lost some height to 191.5-192 cm but still can look 6’4” on a good day
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/18
Neeson still looked 6ft4 a few years ago. In 2005 he was only 53.

In Deadpool he looked 6ft4½ and Clint was probably still at least 6ft3. Had about 2in on Jim Carrey
James B 171.5cm said on 19/Jun/18
in batman begins looked barely 6ft4 so 6ft3.5-6ft3.75 back in 2005.

In deadpool didnt look over 6ft4. clint eastwood was probably 6ft2.75 when he acted alongside liam back then as well.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jun/18
I personally give Goldblum a solid 194cm peak and Neeson 193.5cm
berta said on 17/Jun/18
it would have been interesting to se liam neeson and jeff goldblom back to back 30 years ago and today. i think a guy like jeff probably was as close to 194 as you could get while liam was 193,5 today jeff is almost 192 and liam could be heading to 191 in 1-2 years
Sid 186.1cm said on 13/Jun/18
I think he was 193.5 cm peak..cause he was taller than conan at one point...maybe as tall as goldblum was
Canson said on 9/Jun/18
He has poor posture today so this listing may fit him. Peak he was definitely 6’4” or a hair over
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 7/Jun/18
Aging did to Neeson maybe took off an inch now. 6'4 and wee bit when young and 6'3 and wee bit now.
Taxi Driver 101 said on 5/Jun/18
One of the most honest 6’4 guys in hollywood. He looked 6’4.25 in Schindler’s List, might’ve lost a bit but not much. Tall dood.
YL07 said on 27/May/18
Hey Rob, do you think it's an exception he could be 6'4 and an eighth in his prime? Since he himself claimed to be "Six Four and a wee bit".
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 25/May/18
I can't see Neeson much over 6'3 today. He might have lost nearly a full inch. May not be taller than Liam Hemsworth.
Micky said on 24/May/18
You gotta bump Neesons's peak up a little bit or bring down Conan's height a fraction. Possibly both. I mean, I've seen Conan in person and I thought between 6ft 3 and 6ft 4. I think Neeson deserves a 6'4 1/8".
tree said on 11/May/18
Rob this guy sad its difficult to be in lead role at 6ft4,and he is right,very few people over 6ft4 get leading roles,they get turned down.
Why Hollywood doesnt want very tall man in leading roles?
Editor Rob
worth remembering that for each inch above average the percentage of actors will decrease in proportion. When you add in casting considerations of say 6ft 6 leading man in terms of framing then it is a smaller percentage who are 6ft 6 and will be going for lead roles.
berta said on 29/Apr/18
yeah canson i agree anywhere beetween 6 foot 4 -6 foot 4 1/4. I think 6 foot 4 1/8 is best overall listing for liam. always looked atleast 6 foot 4
Canson said on 21/Apr/18
@Berta: he could’ve been 6’4.25 at his peak. I’d say anywhere in the 6’4-6’4.25 range. He said 6’4 and a wee bit but not sure when he was measured. However, if it were a reasonable measurement, meaning anything after about 5 hours from when he woke up, that’s likely the case
berta said on 20/Apr/18
yeah liam is for shore one of the guys that looked the 6 fot4 1/8 at peak he practically calimed that to.
Dream(5'9.5 said on 22/Mar/18
Rob, would you upgrade Liam Neeson to 6'4" 1/8ths if not 6'4" 1/4ths?
Canson said on 16/Feb/18
At his peak was at least a full 6’4”. No denying his peak height. I’m not so sure he is that far below 6’4 today if he straightens up his posture but maybe 6’3.5 is accurate
Junior Hernandez said on 1/Feb/18
Neeson started to lose some posture than height in photos. He can look 6'2 range with Adam Driver but more proper posture he can clear 6'2.5" not much over. Maybe standing straight he is only 6'3 1/4 now by losing 0.75" upon peak.
jonas said on 27/Jan/18
Think he was 194 prime and still close to 6"4
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 8/Jan/18
Rampage Cloger, I suggest you watch Schindler’s List.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jan/18
Peak today he's around 192cm but 80's-90's looked a 194cm guy
HonestSlovene said on 3/Jan/18
Peak 193 cm and now 192 cm or 191.5 cm, hasn't lost much.
Canson said on 19/Dec/17
@Rampage: not peak but today he can look that. Peak height prob as tall as I am or maybe half cm shorter. If not 193.5-194 he was at least 193-193.5 peak
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 18/Dec/17
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Dec/17
192cm peak is a disservice

key words, i said anywhere in between 6'3.75"-6'4.75".

plus YOURE disservice.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Dec/17
192cm peak is a disservice
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Nov/17
I think he brushed 194cm in his prime (i.e. 193.8cm)
Slim 185 said on 21/Nov/17
Ras al ghul was 192-194.5 in physical prime and has lost some height now. 😉
Slim 185 said on 20/Nov/17
We also need a nolanverse The dark knight trilogy page imho.
Scoobydoo said on 20/Nov/17
Between 193 -194 cm in peak, barefoot.

192 cm nowadays. Barefoot.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Nov/17
Had close to 6in on Mickey Rourke in that dreadful IRA glorifying movie
Jeremy said on 4/Nov/17
194 peak but he’s a lost a bit since then, I’d say 191-192 nowadays
Junior said on 30/Oct/17
Peak 193.5cm and now 192.5cm.
PB said on 26/Oct/17
6'4.25 peak but looks about 6'3 now
berta said on 24/Oct/17
he i sstarting to look more and moore like a 190 cm guy beside other actors. he have bad posture so maybe he still could be 192 cm but i really dont think he is taller than a guy like liam hemsworth now.coul be fraction shorter.he is about 65 years old now i guess so maybe 193 cm peak is better than fraction over. 2 cm loss at 65 seems about right for him.
Grit said on 23/Oct/17
6'4.25 peak
Joshua said on 22/Oct/17
He is still tall now
Matthew Robinson said on 6/Oct/17
6'4"-6'4.25" zone at his peak. Not quite as tall today but he was certainly a proper 6'4" years ago.
James B said on 7/Sep/17
6'3.75 in batman begins rob?
James B said on 6/Sep/17
Rob i don't think he looked a legit 6'4 compared to Christian Bale in batman begins. Would you agree?
Editor Rob: yeah, he still looked near 6ft 4 then, but in last 5 years I think he succumbed to a bit of loss.
Ali said on 5/Sep/17
191cm peak. 189cm nowadays.
Canson said on 27/Aug/17
@Junior: agreed and could've been a hair over just as easy like jefg goldblum who looked more 193.5 at his lowest. He's a good 6'4.
Rent said on 25/Aug/17
Still very tall, good listing for Liam. And BTW, Bradley Cooper just looks a weak 6' here. At most...
Junior said on 15/Aug/17
Maybe he didn't lost this much of height and still sustain 6'3.75" when standing straight. Poor posture could make some delusion to people that you look shorter than you get measure. Peak 6'4 will not be asked for Neeson.
berta said on 12/Aug/17
good to hear!!! :D
Canson said on 10/Aug/17
@Berta: you didn't offend anyone!
Canson said on 9/Aug/17
@Sandy: I think using deserves makes it sound like one height is better than the other (the taller of the two) and sounds like someone "deserves" to be listed taller than they are. In short, I feel that using it makes it subjective like inflating someone is better than just listing them what they really should be or as opposed to downgrading them if they really aren't what they're listed or claim. I don't think "deserves" has any place in a height discussion or when assessing a height. That's just me because I'm not with all of that inflation stuff or thinking someone should be given a special fraction or telling them they're taller than they really are
berta said on 9/Aug/17
sory guys didnt new people would get offended by using that word :P haha.What i meant and i think you now is that i believe he was little over 6 foot 4 at his peak not that he would be given that height on this site just because he have made some good movies or something.
Sandy Cowell said on 9/Aug/17
@ Canson - I agree with the 'deserves' bit! 👍
Canson said on 7/Aug/17
@Berta: I never use the word "deserves" when it comes to height
berta said on 7/Aug/17
i still think he cold deserve 1/4over 6 foot 4 at his peak. this guy have the worst possible posture you can have and still looked 193-94 range in movies. today he can still be 192. but he looks 191 to me.But then again he have that posture so 192 is still very very possible.
Canson said on 31/Jul/17
@Rob: im surprised you still have Conan and Liam and Selleck the same height when Both were taller than Conan
Canson said on 27/Jul/17
Peak height no less than 193. Maybe a full 194 tho
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
195.9cm out of bed
Spencer said on 26/Jul/17
195 cm peak 6'4.5 today 6'3.5 192 193
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Jul/17
No, 192cm peak is underselling him. He was looking down at 6ft2-3 guys by a noticeable amount...194cm peak
RichardSpain said on 22/Jul/17
A strong 192cm in peak.

191cm nowadays.

Excellent actor
even said on 7/Jul/17
peak is 6 4
now is 6 3.25
John Galt said on 29/Jun/17
Came face to face with him at a resort in New Mexico about 10 years ago. He had horrible BO, I am a confirmed 6'2" via college athletics. He was NOT taller than me. No way.
Canson said on 15/Jun/17
I highly doubt if Liam stood straight that he would measure much under 6'4" maybe 6'3.75 today but he has horrendous posture and if he cleaned it up still is 192cm prob. Peak was def a strong 6'4 193-194
James said on 11/Jun/17
Legit 6'4 in his prime. A bit over 6'4 I could see.

Now a days in the 6'3 range.
BillisaLefty said on 9/Jun/17
Now he's a weak 6'3''. Peak, he was a legit 6'4''.
Canson said on 3/Jun/17
Peak height: 195-196 out of bed/ 193-194 at his lowest like I measure. Today he's prob still close to 6'4" when he stands right
BillisaLefty said on 9/May/17
Looks like he was a legit 6'4''. A little shorter now, though.
Canson said on 6/May/17
@Berta: I think he could still potentially measure 192 or maybe 193. He's very tall with poor posture these days. He in his prime was likely close to my height within a 1/4" or even less
berta said on 5/May/17
yeah i agree canson he could still be 192 but he can really look 189 range with adam driver and joel kinnaman in some photos but thats the posture. in 5 years i think he will lose height fast and be down to 190 flat
Canson said on 29/Apr/17
What rob just alluded to saying just over 6'4 (6'4.25) not 4.5 should tell you Conan was never a legit 6'4 at his peak since Liam is taller peak
Canson said on 28/Apr/17
Berta I agree with Rob. His posture doesn't look good. I honestly believe today he is still if he stands straight close to 6'4". That may be a health issue as I also know someone older who was once 6'4 (as tall as I am just about) that walks around at 6'2" tops today because he has scoliosis. He can't stand completely straight but even when he tries gets close to within 2" of me that's all
Jin said on 26/Apr/17
Rob, 194 cm at peak is possible?
Editor Rob: just over 6ft 4 is certainly a possibility...but I don't think 6ft 4.5 range.
berta said on 26/Apr/17
rob what are the chanses of maybe 191 todaya? i mean adam driver doesnt really look more than 1 cm shorter but neeson have horrribel posture so lets say there is 2,5 cm beetween them and driver is 188,6 in my eyes
Editor Rob: 6ft 3.5 I feel today is believable, but 6ft 3-3.25, I feel he hasn't shrunk that much yet...maybe posture wise, at times he is looking it though.
Canson said on 13/Apr/17
Peak height 193-194
Today he walks 6'3" range but if he straightened up may still be able to eek close to 6'4"

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.