Taylor Lautner's Height
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
American actor, best known for playing Jacob Black in the Twilight Saga.
Photos by PR Photos
You May Be Interested
Add a Comment365 comments
Average Guess (118 Votes)
5ft 8.18in (173.2cm)
TheHawk said on 5/Jan/20
5’8 fine 172.5cm
Estirpe Divina said on 23/Dec/19
lhj said on 14/Dec/19
TheBat said on 22/Jul/19
Agreed, Taylor looks about 5'8" max from what I can tell.
khaled taban said on 19/Jun/19
This guy is barely 5'8", he looks an inch shorter than Tom Hardy.
174cm is too high for him.
Bobby 5ft 10 said on 18/May/19
I always thought he looked tall, but I guess he's around average height.
Ricky muliawan hansyar said on 16/Apr/19
Anychance he is 173 cm?
abdi said on 16/Mar/19
he looks tall but is short...
Nebi Keskin said on 2/Mar/19
173 cm - 174 cm is fair I guess
Angelo Sanchez said on 11/Feb/19
Need a downgrade to 1,72 m
jriggs said on 31/Jan/19
Need a downgrade to 172/173cm
NvrPaysAtttn said on 5/Jan/19
He looks about 5’8 with shoes on only. He’s probably barely 5’7 barefoot.
Michael 5'10", 178 cm said on 12/Dec/18
I think he's actually shorter than this, he looks taller than 5'8" and I don't doubt that he could be even shorter than that, he is not as tall as listed. He can't be if he's like the same as Efron. They both have something in common. They're both attractive guys that make women swoon over them, even though in real life women prefer tall guys and both of them are pretty short, but despite their lack of height, they can still catch the eyes of ladies. I think he could actually be shorter than 5'8".
cmillzz said on 14/Aug/18
blckkkp said on 29/Jul/18
Efron edges him out so no way he can be this listing
RedFire said on 29/Jul/18
5'7.5 morning, night 5'7.
Mark182 said on 2/May/18
5'7.5 is spot on.
said on 7/Apr/18Click Here
Hello rob ☺
What do think.. I don't think that's 1 cm difference ..i think Taylor is only 172 cm
There can look an inch between them.
aaron1 said on 4/Apr/18
5'7 - 5'7.5 barefoot at night
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 19/Jan/18
The top 3 comments are from the same person. 😂
Height said on 9/Jan/18
174 cm closer
Pope said on 30/Dec/17
174 cm yes
Kevin said on 24/Dec/17
5'8 on the dot
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 18/Dec/17
172 before bed. pattinson kinda towers him
LOGAN said on 9/Dec/17
Probably almost exactly Rob's height.
Tallish89 said on 4/Dec/17
That picture makes it looks like he's 5'7.5/5'7.75 but Wilmer tends to wear boots & lifts. But Taylor preferred footwear are mostly oxfords which gives him an inch also. My bet is a strong 5'7
The Shredder said on 15/Nov/17
He looks taller than Wilmer , but not much. If Wilmer is 5'7.5 than Taylor is 5'8 flat and no bigger.
said on 15/Nov/17
With him and 5'7.5" Wilmer Valderrama again, this time in 2016:
It's going to keep getting harder to stop brushing these meetings of the two off.
Quoter86 said on 11/Nov/17
Looks only 10" shorter than 6'8 Greg Davies. I would say 5'9.
Sacred said on 6/Nov/17
I think he is 174-175-176 cm i m not sure...
Nik said on 21/Oct/17
@ Sandy Cowell - Hey!
...And Pinkpoo is such an ace name!
I may give Taylor 5'8.25" next time I vote!
Nik said on 20/Oct/17
Classic 5'8" guy.
Sandy Cowell said on 18/Oct/17
@ Pinkpoo - Hi! Like the name! He he he he he! 😹💩😻
Now that I'm on his page, I've
decided that Taylor can have 5ft8.5!
Pinkpoo said on 18/Oct/17
He is like 5ft 8. He has pictures with Jamie Foxx who is 5ft 9. Taylor is way shorter. Robert Pattinson is 6ft
5'11.25 at noon said on 10/Oct/17
If you ask google everybody is 1 inch taller than they really are I'd be 6'0.25 anyways I'd say this guy is 5'9 max.
Trutru said on 2/Oct/17
Lautner can't be that short. He's taller than 5ft 8.5in (174 cm) listed Michael Welch.
said on 19/Sep/17
I don't think he is even 174cm, (more 172-173) he pulls off the 174cm by consistently wearing oxford shoes and boots.
Barely 3 inches taller than Kristen Stewart (5'4 163cm)
Kristen wearing heels taller than him by a bit
Taylor with Zac Efron who is same almost exact as Joe Jonas (171cm)
Should be downgraded.
Creates illusion of being taller with his choice of footwear.
My guess strong 172cm barefoot
oliver said on 23/Aug/17
Swift is a flat 5ft 9 girl. In moat pics, Lautner is wearing sneakers that are a bit thicker than Swift's shoes and he still looks slightly shorter. So, Lautner must be 5ft 8.
Slim183 said on 20/Aug/17
Celebrity Life said on 17/Aug/17
Rob, Taylor Lautner's height is 5ft 10in, according to the book 'Taylor Lautner: Film Superstar' by Ally Azzarelli (p. 6) and Men's Health Magazine.
And Johnny Depp has claimed 5'11", so it doesn't really mean much.
Taylor is 5'8 absolutely maximum.
said on 17/Aug/17
Rob, Taylor Lautner's height is 5ft 10in, according to the book 'Taylor Lautner: Film Superstar' by Ally Azzarelli (p. 6) and Men's Health Magazine.
Rising - 174 cm
said on 14/Aug/17
"Jacob Black" was named by an elevator shoemaker as a client and I've been informed Taylor Lautner is Jacon Black, as confirmed by Rob above, so I'm more convinced of 5'8" max for Taylor. Maybe not much, if anything under this, but his "official" height of 5'10" is probably with those shoes! @JC1994: I believe Sandler is 5'9.5", but has some of the worst posture I've seen from a relatively young, presumably healthy man. It's probably why he seems taller or shorter in different films. But he can look a couple of inches taller than Taylor in some pics.
The difference is more like 3-4 cm in a couple of those pics, but Sandler has terrible posture as always. I'm not saying he actually is 2 inches taller than Taylor, but it's easily an inch and a half, imo. Lautner looks much closer in height to Kevin James and he doesn't seem taller than 5'8" Zac Efron to me. But if Rob is convinced he's not under 5'8" then I'd give him the flat 5'8", but definitely more 5'8" than 5'9", imo.
5'11.25 at noon said on 7/Aug/17
News flash miugg Pattinson isn't a full 6'1 so Lautner is 5'9 max it is what it is
JC1994 said on 3/Aug/17
In ridiculous 6 I thought he looked like this or 5'8" he was way shorter then Adam sandler then I thought I thought they would look eye to eye he was closer to rob Schneider then he is with Adam sandler and Adam sandler at times can seem more 5'9" he gives off that vibe though at the same time would look way taller then guys who are comfortably or just over 5'8" he would look like just about 5'9 at one point then look like he is 6'0 at another time like he looks 5'9 in happy Gilmore and looks 6ft in like click
andre said on 30/Jul/17
174cm with shoes
Bee123 said on 20/Jul/17
Legit 5'8 guy
Tom said on 16/Jul/17
Not necessarily, I've seen more people who downgrade ridiculously. Heck, I've already seen one guy estimate Hugh Jackman at 5'10". Usually the average guess is lower than the actor's listed height on here by Rob.
Miug666 said on 15/Jul/17
Taylor Lautner is 5'10'', Robert Pattinson 6'1''. Shut Up Haters!!!!
Canson said on 13/Jul/17
Wow The average here is a little below 5'8" which should be a possible indicator of sorts because typically the estimates are higher than what the person actually averages for a height (usually closer to one's claim vs their actual height).
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 12/Jul/17
5'8" at best, not 5'8.5"
Slim 181 cm
said on 11/Jul/17
Shredder, I stand corrected, tell him to get f*ck*d. I'm serious. Let's change the topic back to lautners height shall we? Strong 5'8.
Editor Rob: come on guys, let's be civil.
with taylor, you could make a case for anywhere from 5ft 8 to 8.5, below or above that range, I'm not so sure.
Shredder said on 9/Jul/17
Slim 181 cm , this is MD we are talking about here. The biggest narcissist on here or the internet. He is always right , will never apologize , will always talk down to others and will always play victim. He is the textbook definition of one.
So yes , I was too nice if anything.
Slim 181 cm said on 9/Jul/17
the man certainly has the shoulder width of a taller man, it's why just looking at his face and torso, he can appear 5'9.5. But in reality 5'8.5 is in the middle of potential truths
Decent 5'8-5'8.75 guy.
@shredder, i appreciate you defending rob but telling users to F off isn't the way to go. Perhaps try something nicer first 👍🏻
Shredder said on 7/Jul/17
"Is there any convincing reason why Rob still has him hanging on to this half-inch? Because I don't see it. "
Because Rob thinks he is that height that is why. If you don't like it or respect rob's opinion ( which you don't) than leave.
MD said on 6/Jul/17
Is there any convincing reason why Rob still has him hanging on to this half-inch? Because I don't see it.
even said on 3/Jul/17
be fair man hes 5 feet 8 inches tall .
Johnny Blaze said on 28/May/17
I agree with delancey's post Launter looks about 5'7 maybe half Tom Hardy looked 2 inches taller.
said on 1/May/17
Don't know if there's any shoe advantage but look at Lautner with Hardy (175 cm).
He's definitely under 5'8, I think he needs an adjustment to at least 172 cm Rob.
No way there is 1 cm difference between them even if Hardy had a shoe advantage...
Link: Click Here
Link: Click Here
therock said on 26/Apr/17
At the first I thought his height is same as his ex Taylor Swift or bit shorter, but when I saw the movie Grown Up 2 I saw that he is more like 5'6 to 5'7
berta said on 19/Apr/17
i dont know if this guy really is taller than a guy like zac efron?. to me it looks like it could almost be the other way around that this dude is 173,5 and efron 174
Bobby said on 14/Apr/17
He's 5'8!? I always thought he was taller as a wee teen.
said on 2/Apr/17
Next to 5'9.5'' listed Austin Mahone: Click Here
Unless Mahone had near an inch of footwear advantage I can't see how Lautner looks 5'8.5'' next to him. This guy is just 5'8''.
said on 30/Mar/17
Hey Rob, based on current listings. Do you think Taylor would edge out Conor McGregor or would it be the other way around?
Editor Rob: Levi, both have had the ability to look 5ft 8 flat and taller...at times I think maybe Lautner is a between 5ft 8-8.5 guy too.
Blake said on 25/Mar/17
How tall was this guy at 16?
said on 22/Mar/17
Smidge taller than James Corden @ 3.50
RisingForce said on 11/Mar/17
Seeing all the pics posted here, 5'8" flat seems like the most he could be and maybe more likely 172 cm. He can frequently look 5'7" range.
divincodino92 said on 25/Feb/17
He looks under 5 feet 6.5 XD Probably 1,68 guy
Bakra99 said on 21/Feb/17
Rob, what do you think his height would be at night?
SQ said on 1/Feb/17
5ft 10in Taylor Lautner
6ft 1in Robert Pattinson
ok said on 25/Jan/17
5'10 to me due to his solid posture
joe### said on 13/Dec/16
Josh Jeffords said on 30/Oct/16
Funny didn't realize he was so small would guess average to high average.
Looks as listed by Kimmel must wear lifts on screen.
Leonardo 1.73m said on 11/Oct/16
I know he is 5'8 but not a fraction more than that.
patron said on 6/Oct/16
I've met him and he is 5'7
said on 4/Oct/16
Rob why people here that claim to have see him in real life say he is 5ft5 ?
is he real that short ?
Editor Rob: I think it is very doubtful he is that short. I do believe some would have seen him look 5ft 7 range though and be surprised he looked short.
Jason said on 3/Oct/16
Just met Taylor two weeks ago and his footwear was vans I'm certain and honestly I'm leaning more on a weak 5'7 for him. I'm 5'8.5 and I was a rad bit taller than him.
Breh said on 7/Sep/16
@ Naomi Lowy Those must have been some huge slippers.
Naomi Lowy said on 11/Aug/16
I stayed at the W hotel in San Fancisco and Taylor L was there. I went to the lobby in slippers and he was arguing about his view. I stood next to him and was shocked that I'm an inch or two taller. I'm 5'4". He was wearing boots.
said on 3/Aug/16
Neither of them is standing straight, but here he is recently with 5'10.5" John Stamos:
To be honest, I'm not sure the footwear (though Taylor has a pechant for boots: Click Here
), and you can't tell much, but something else to add to the pile.
NangaParbat said on 1/Aug/16
@Linx for sure he is not 5'5'' BUT pay attention to the pic you posted: they are walking both so they are not straight, he is wearing sneakers (quite thick this type) and she is in ballerina shoes which they are flat; moreover she has a bent knee. I 'd say 172.5 cm max for HIM!
Charizard said on 16/Jul/16
More like 172cm
said on 30/May/16
Alyssa he can't be that short, he looks just a little smaller than 5ft 9.5in (1,77cm) Taylor Swift
Alyssa said on 24/May/16
I've met Taylor in person, he's 5'5" max.
said on 19/May/16
By 6'0 1/2" listed Patrick Schwarzennegger (taken in late 2014):
In earlier photos, he towered over Taylor Lautner for some reason.
realheight said on 17/May/16
he is shorter than 5'8.5". I think 5'7"-5'7.5", 5'8" max.
said on 2/May/16
Huh? His neck is long in proportion to the rest of him. It's one of his defining features. Here he is next to someone of similar height:
That's a long neck.
Ronald said on 2/May/16
Taylor Lautner is 5'8-5'8.25. That is perfect for him.
He has normal size of neck
Simsimi said on 30/Apr/16
Long Neck? Wd... He has short neck.
said on 27/Apr/16
Rob, why Taylor looks taller than 5ft 10 (178 cm) model Raina Lawson???
I'd say it's unlikely Raina to be near 5ft 10, she doesn't look much taller than Bella Thorne
said on 17/Apr/16
I initially thought he was shorter, like 170cm but here he is next to 159cm Kelly Rippa and 194cm Michael Strahan. They're both in sport shoes but his shoes don't really seem to give an advantage. But I'm not sure. What do you guys reckon?
He does look about 15cm taller than Kelly and about 20cm shorter than Michael so 174cm seems right if no shoe advantage.
By the way, doubt he wears lifts. He's always doing flips and stuff.
said on 4/Apr/16
You're right. He is quite a bit shorter than however tall Jimmy actually is:
Aaron Zamora said on 1/Apr/16
Taylor Lautner looks close to 4 inches shorter than Jimmy Fallon he's 5'7.75-5'8 at best.
Jeff said on 25/Mar/16
There's no way he's 172cm. He has the proportions of a 5'8 guy but then his super long neck makes him 174cm easily
Dame said on 12/Feb/16
I am sorry but he is only 172cm tops and wears massive lifts.
said on 17/Dec/15
Rob, do you think he could get out of the bed at 177? (5'9.5)
Personally I don't think he's less than 5'8. I would have guessed around 5'8.25 range
Editor Rob: out of bed we kind of are guessing a lot more that someone shrinks around average, but some might shrink only half inch while others shrink a good inch or more.
5ft 9.25 out of bed might be more possible a range.
MD said on 4/Dec/15
I'd take off at least half-an-inch. The picture with 5'9"(ish) Austin Mahone is proof enough.
Blink said on 30/Nov/15
Looking at some picks I'd definitely say 5'8.5 is a bit too much... Maybe 5'7.5-5'8?
roberto vicente said on 28/Nov/15
let's say that Taylor really is 5'8" or 5'9". He has SIZE 11 1/2 feet!. Those aren't feet, they're water skis. now don't get me wrong. his feet are BEAUTIFUL.
oliver said on 28/Nov/15
Rob, I've seen many photos of Taylor and him and they look about the same height. Taylor claimed she grew taller in recent years but I can't believe it. Why do you have her at 177?She is 174 for sure.
oliver said on 28/Nov/15
Rob, I've seen many photos of Taylor and him and they look about the same height. Taylor claimed she grew taller in recent years but I can't believe it. Why don't you have her at 177. She is 174 for sure.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 8/Nov/15
Taylor Lautner is taller than him. Wilmer is closer to the camera, and has a hat on which makes him appear taller.
said on 24/Sep/15
Okay, it's finally time to list a more accurate height for Taylor. Here he is with 5'7.5" Wilmer Valderamma and Taylor might even have a very slight footwear advantage, or at the very least has no disadvantage:
He's not even a full 5'8".
Der Echte said on 23/Sep/15
How tall is Taylor now? he don't look small but i think he is..
said on 23/Sep/15
BTW, here is Mahone's footwear at that same event:
It's very unlikely then - unless Lautner is barefoot - that Mahone has any kind of footwear advantage. So, either Mahone has grown of Lautner is listed incorrectly. Even in the case Mahone has grown, it appears it'd have only been by no more than a half-inch, which still wouldn't explain this 5'8.5" listing to Taylor. Lautner is clearly under 5'8".
MD said on 23/Sep/15
Oops! Yes, that's the picture I meant to post.
said on 15/Sep/15
@MD Is this the pic you're talking about? Click Here
We can't see shoes there but Mahone is looking 2in taller than Lautner. On a side note, it also seems that Taylor is going bald very young.
said on 14/Sep/15
Sorry for all the personal call outs, but the new batch of Austin Mahone pictures seems to be a small treasure trove of sorts. Anyway, here is Taylor with the 5'9" singer:
Even taking into account a possible growth for Austin, it'd only seem to be a quarter inch or so, and Austin is clearly at least an inch taller. The difference between Austin and Taylor in this pic looks close to the difference between Austin and 5'7.5" Big Sean in that same set of pics. I'd take a half-inch off this listing to be quite honest.
Ed Kline said on 15/Aug/15
This is the one listing that drives me crazy. Lautner isn't close to this height.
an anonymous peach said on 12/Aug/15
He can look anywhere between 171-173cm but 174cm is definitely pushing it, I don't think he's quite that tall.
I bet Rob would edge him out.
6'6" guy said on 28/Jul/15
in all his pics with zack effron he is always clearly shorter with similar shoes. With lifts he's barely pushing 5'9" funny guy... trying to be taller.
Dmeyer said on 10/Jul/15
In all pics hère he looks 172cm so 174cm is too height
TomC said on 10/Jul/15
172 cm. My wife has a photo of herself in heels, she's 167cm and she is the same height and he is wearing shoes so perhaps shorter
AV said on 9/Jul/15
this guy might be about 5.8 feet tall
Ricky muliawan hansyar: 5ft 7.5in (171cm)
said on 8/Jul/15
Rob,new moon on the set beetween march to may 2009,at the times he is 17 years old and 2 mounts,you say he is 174cm in 2009 at 19 years old in the second movie (new moon),in comic international con on july 2009 he can look 5ft8.25in ,are you agree he is regulary 5ft8in 1/8 in the second movie?
[Editor Rob: I think he pulled off 5ft 8 in new moon.]
Ricky muliawan hansyar: 5ft 7.5in (171cm)
said on 29/Jun/15
Rob,you say he was done growing in the second movie and finish at 18-19 range,I agree about that,if I say my feelling at the second movie he is 5ft8in,are you agree? ,because many people in the world shocks about talyor launer body transformers,what is your comment?
[Editor Rob: I think second movie he looked somewhere in 5ft 8 range and obviously had improved physique a bit more!]
charlie said on 23/Jun/15
shes 5 foot 10 inches not 5 foot 11. in heels well maybe 6 foot 4 if she wears 6 inch heels. that's very tall.i dotn enourage any females over 5 foot 6 to wear high heels or they will appear freakishly tall at 5 foot 10 even in heels people will stare.
Ricky muliawan hansyar 171(cm)
said on 22/Jun/15
So,your opinion,taylor lautner height finish at age 17-18?
[Editor Rob: I think from 16 to age 18 he gained a bit of height and by 18-19 looked done.]
Ricky muliawan hansyar 171(cm)
said on 20/Jun/15
Rob,are you agree if I say taylor lautner is 5ft7.5inch,in new moon movie 2009?what is your comment
[Editor Rob: I think he was done growing in the second movie ]
Rolls said on 6/Jun/15
He's surely 178 or more. I'm 175 and he looked taller than me
egocelebs said on 3/Jun/15
If Taylor Lautner is only 5'8.5 why is Taylor Swift listed as 5'11? She's slightly shorter than Lautner.
anon said on 31/May/15
Just funny how Google can list Justin Bieber taller than Taylor Lautner and Zac Efron or guys of One Direction
Zach Parker said on 19/Apr/15
5'6 and nothing more
In grown ups 2 there's a scene where he's at least 3 inches shorter than 5'8.5 listed milo ventimiglia
which explains it all.
Bishop said on 18/Apr/15
Sure, I can accept this.....for a morning measurement. This guy is very obviously not taller than a flat 5'8". I wouldn't be surprised if you yourself edged him out, Rob. You seriously need to look more into this one.
Peruvian Boy said on 10/Apr/15
It looks 5'7.5 in the picture with Foxx and Bon Jovi at times, max 5'8.
AJ said on 5/Apr/15
You do have a point, a 174 guy should not look that short. He looks max 173 there.
MD said on 3/Apr/15
said on 1/Apr/15
With the 5'9" actor Jamie Foxx:
Looks like you have been generous with his listing, rob
time for a (late) downgrade?
fsd said on 4/Feb/15
looks 5'7 ft range
quizy said on 3/Feb/15
Lautner is 174cm - 100%
blue said on 23/Jan/15
I'm agree with rob that Taylor is about 5ft8:)
to blue said on 6/Jan/15
Breaking dawn part 2 is a movie, the passport can say anything they want it to say
blue said on 5/Jan/15
In the movie breaking dawn part 2, we can see on his passport: height 5ft10 and weight 165lbs
S.J.H said on 3/Jan/15
Taylor Lautner is 5'8 and nothing
Clay said on 7/Oct/14
Anon88 says on 22/Mar/14
Looks 5'7 in this picture, and the Facebook comments are pretty interesting on the importance of height:
First of all, how can you say he looks 5'7 in that picture when you have no idea how tall those two chicks are or what they're wearing. This just shows how people see 5'8'' as small in reality.
Miiiiiiighty_- said on 10/Aug/14
5'8 at best, and seems to be wearing thicks 'boots' most of the time.
Would be surprised if he was as low as 5'7 because his body proportion look really like the ones of someone who's 5'7ish and he is often towered by male actors
jasmine said on 26/Jun/14
He is having gr8t height may be btw 5'8-5'9..whatever it is but he is amazing and also cute....
Bobby said on 7/Jun/14
I think 1.74cm
Clay said on 19/May/14
Thats not a great pic to judge with but he looks his usual 5'8.5 next to Spade and Sandler there I would say.
Realist said on 19/May/14
@Robert Sometimes get the feeling he is more 171-172. But with Pattinson he looks almost 5'9. Unsure. A difficult case.
Bran said on 14/May/14
Cheers, so seems a late ish bloomer.
Realist said on 11/May/14
Looked 5'6 at 16 so about 2-3 inches till 20.
Bran said on 10/May/14
how much did he gain from 16, just a fraction or 2-4 inches ish, anyone know ?
Pitt Chang said on 5/May/14
He is just no more than 174cm .. Not tall but not short.
said on 2/May/14
Rob, what is more likely; Taylor Lautner being 174cm at night or me being eaten by sharks?
[Editor Rob: there's more chance of Lautner being that mark, 5ft 8-8.5 is a range that is probably fair for him.]
Robert said on 29/Apr/14
How tall do you think this guy is Rob? No way does he look 174cm, have you seen pictures of him with other people? And his movie stunts. He looks around 170cm.
said on 5/Apr/14
I don't think he's taller than 5'8 flat Click Here
chrisssss said on 25/Mar/14
In griwn ups 2 lautner looked a good bit shorter than sandler, almost 2 inches, if andler sandler is 177cm, then lautner is max 173cm
said on 22/Mar/14
Looks 5'7 in this picture, and the Facebook comments are pretty interesting on the importance of height:
Realist said on 19/Mar/14
Lautner: 173 Efron: 172 Taylor Swift: 175 Josh Hutcherson: 165 Jennifer Lawrence:169
said on 24/Jan/14
Rob, when you estimate heights do you use morning height or midday about 1200 or so.
[Editor Rob: I'm not thinking about morning, but more by lunchtime. Generally I'd be standing about 5ft 8.25 or 5ft 8 1/8th when seeing a celeb myself.]
Adam said on 12/Jan/14
he's 5'7.5 max, always wearing boots and presumably lifts
Fox999 said on 2/Jan/14
I have met him in us .. I am 174cm and he was exactly as tall as me with both wearing shoes of same heels (heels of same height)
lol93 said on 28/Nov/13
He is not wearing lifts he just wears boots,if he wore lifts he would look a lot taller ,he is 5'8
LG69 said on 20/Nov/13
I meant he is not 5'8.5". At best, I see is 5'7". Looks a full 2" shorter than 5'9" Tom Hardy.
LG69 said on 20/Nov/13
He is not 5'9"! He looks 2" shorter than a legit 5'9" Tom Hardy. Rob, I usually don't say this, but you have to lower his height.
MarcusTheSwede said on 16/Nov/13
Taylor Lautner is maxiumum 173cm. He wears lift.
sean said on 19/Oct/13
I don't get the point why are you guys judging by movies? he wears huge lifts at least 3 inches so I would say he's hardly 5'8 might be less but not more.
Balrog said on 18/Oct/13
Stop upgrading the guy if anything he looks more 5'8" flat next to Hardy and MacFarlane.
nirva said on 16/Oct/13
I think he is taller than that I think he is 175
BeeinglexXc said on 29/Sep/13
HE 's 5'9 ! It's shown by the. Film Abfuction .
BeeinglexXc said on 29/Sep/13
HIs official Height is 5,9 ft.!!
In The film Abduction, there is Nathan(Taylor Lautner) shown as 5,9ft at the CIA . I recognized it by the way :-))
reynoffire said on 16/Sep/13
taylor lautner is 5'7 i have a picture with him standing together promoting his diff movie im 5'7 so case closed
said on 5/Sep/13
He is shorter that 5'9" Tom Hardy Click Here
said on 30/Aug/13
Before saying that taylor is 5'9 watch this video Click Here
I agree though that he looks taller than 5'8 easily
Jasmine said on 28/Aug/13
Um.... He's at the very least 5'9 have you seen him standing with Rob Pattinson? He doesn't look too much shorter than him and rob is 6'1, and you can't use old photos of him he's grown a lot. And if you watch abduction he's a good half a head taller than lily Collins and she is 5'5
Rusty said on 22/Aug/13
my mom met him and she is a legit 5'8.5" and she said their eye levels were equal. this listing is right on
Elfoersaan said on 9/Aug/13
I've seen Grown Ups 2 and could have sworn that Ventimiglia is an easy 3 cm's taller than Lautner. Lautner is definitely in the 170-171 range. I'm damn sure about this since we all can guess the height of Ventimiglia pretty accurete thanks to Rob's pictures with him. The camera crew of the Twilight series made use of camera angels to let Lautner apear taller. Or maybe Ventimiglia has grown in height by practising yoga as he claimed it would. Your call rob!
Ed Kline said on 25/Jul/13
Rob, there is conclusive evidence that he is at least an inch shorter than Milo Ventimiglia in Grown Ups 2. They stand next to each other in nearly every scene together, and Ventimiglia is solidly taller. If Ventimiglia is the 5'8 1/2 you have him at ( with a picture of you), then Lautner needs a serious downgrade to 5'7-5'7 1/2 max.
On a separate note, this guy is one hell of an athlete. He spends the entire movie doing crazy kicks and flips.
Balrog said on 23/Jul/13
I agree Arch he's no way near to his 179 cm - 180 pounds listings. I think 5'8'' 160 pounds would be okay, although he can look under 5'8'' in some pics.
said on 23/Jul/13
He's grown a lot last years now He's like 5'11 you need to remeasure Robb Click Here
said on 21/Jul/13Click Here
Seems more like a 5 ft 7 range guy here. Looks no more than 150 pounds to me
lol93 said on 19/Jul/13
Brayn that's heightism twitter account its for trolling and its funny.In studies women do not prefer very tall guys they prefer slightly taller with 2.7 inches being ideal
said on 19/Jul/13Click Here
Lautner's officially listed here as 5'8 1/2, Swift is listed here as 5' 9 1/2. However, people here on Lautner's wall argue 5'7 - 5'8 mostly, while people on Swift's wall argue 5'10-5'11. What's with this huge discrepancy, while in the photographs, their heights are almost equal, while both standing relatively close to eachother on even ground.
truth178cm said on 18/Jul/13
Taylor is 172cm MAX.
truth178cm said on 18/Jul/13
@Byran man who gives a ****, girls think 178cm is 183cm, 175cm 180cm or at least 178cm. They cannot judge ****. The average girl is only 165cm range or something.
Bryan said on 17/Jul/13
You should see that twitter heightism page...any guy under the 5'10 or 6' mark is vulnerable to be called "short". Those girls commenting must've expected tl to be 6'1 or something
said on 16/Jul/13
5'7" max! check him out standing on a box Click Here
upgrade like Gatorade all you want folks, ain't gonna change a sweet thang :-D
Balrog said on 15/Jul/13
Still think he's 5'8'' max and could be under.
lol93 said on 14/Jul/13
Mike T that's a photoshop picture and he is there with chace crawford
Duhon we dont know the height of those girls,but they seem really tall compared to average american woman and probably they are wearing heels,I would guess the left girl might be around 5'9 and the girl on the right might be around 5'11
satchy said on 14/Jul/13
that wasn't very nice of them to post such offensive comments, definitely not good...
said on 13/Jul/13
Interesting photo of taylor meeting some fans and them commenting on his height.Click Here
said on 9/Jul/13
I think he's more like 5'6" Zac Efron looks like he has 2 inches on Taylor.
said on 18/Jun/13
The stylist for his new film tweeted this...
@chancetaughtyou 11 Jun
If you guys didn't know already, he's 5'8 and wears a size 10.5 in sneakers #CreepLife
superman said on 18/Jun/13
he is shorter than zac efron by an inch, and zac efron is listed on your site at 5'8 i just cant see him that tall he is closer to 5'7 than 5'9.
Makavel said on 14/Jun/13
Yeah I still growing and I am 18 years old. May dad say, he stop to grow in height on 20 years old.. soo ? pp: sorry for the english :(
5'11 er said on 12/Jun/13
everyone's different. I am 20 and I was 5'10" few months ago. Got measured again and I'm 5'11. Was 5'7 in grade 8. Been growing about 0.5 inches every year
Makavel said on 12/Jun/13
Go ask this one Rob's page, here, or the General Height page. Thanks.
Makavel said on 10/Jun/13
lol I've heard that grows to 19-20 years old what you think about that.. ?
said on 9/Jun/13
Hey Rob, I wanna ask just one question at what age you stopped to grow in height ? pp; sorry for my bad English..
[Editor Rob: age 14]
Balrog said on 2/Jun/13
He was also more than an inch shorter than Taylor Swift who is 175-177 range.
Dany said on 29/May/13
Well we can never be too sure whether or not the other celebs in all the photo's are wearing 'elevated' shoes and what not.
Evie said on 29/May/13
As an professional photographer, and editor, I can say that Lautner is 5-10-5'10.5. It has to do a lot with different angles and lights, and aperture. The camera can manipulate height as well as weight. Plus, guys can still grow as a mid teenager.
Balrog said on 26/May/13
He doesn't look 174 cm next to Chris Hemsworth, Seth McFarlane or Zac Efron. Rob Pattinson when stand up straight towers him by 4in +
Andre 5'9.5" said on 22/May/13
Lol93 brought enough proof, Taylor is 5'8.5" just as listed here.
Shahrukh said on 21/May/13
His height is 5ft10 see the pic with tylor swift .tylor swift height is 5ft10 na leautner looks exactly same with her head
said on 19/May/13
Taylor is 173-174cm out of bed.With this video I ve proved it Click Here
also the pictures with zach when taylor is not wearing boots prove that also
said on 18/May/13
Rob you are an expert at judging height I don't do doubt that but that photo doesn't show their foot ware. Also you can see th floor is sloping upwards away from the other guy. If you look closely you can see a guy in the background who's foot is actually bent upwards showing the slope on the floor sweeping across that part of the set. Knowing Taylor is most likely wearing boots as he did through that film and knowing the other guy is most likely wearing trainers, that coupled with the sets sloping floor that isn't a good photo.
[Editor Rob: they had a scene inside the movie theatre, I thought they could be very close in height, with other twilight people Taylor to me looks always in the 5ft 8 range, maybe when he was age 16 and just landed the role he could look sub 5ft 8 at times.]
said on 16/May/13
Rob why are you still listing actors at their morning heights? Is it because your afraid of making big Hollywood names shorter in stature? Peter Andre height listed on this sight before measurment 174cm. After he was measured on telivision 172cm. Gordan Ramsey height listed before measurement 188cm after measurement on telivision 186cm. Can you see the pattern? Its the same for many of the actors here most are a cm or 2 too high. But hey you will all probably jump to Robs defense but this is most likely the truth. I thought this sight was meant to be accurate? Oh and Rob just take a look at the photo with Ryan Seacrest a little lower down this page and tell me you see a solid 3cm difference? Yeah thought not.
[Editor Rob: Ramsey had always claimed 6ft 2 and if I didn't pay attention and listened to the model who said he was 6ft 2 I might not have spotted the bar was 6ft 1 3/8ths ;)
as for Taylor, see the Guy with Taylor here
, he's not under 5ft 8.5 himself, in fact I don't think I've got him on the site yet]
Average weight said on 13/May/13
I would say 172-173. His long athletic build makes him look taller.
Ree said on 13/May/13
He's taller than most girls(which is all that really matters)...and he's TAYLOR LAUTNER. Who cares about his height?! He's ****ing beautiful.
said on 13/May/13
interesting photo here from grown ups 2 Seems He is taller then Kevin.. but is slightly a inch shorter then Adam.. Seems about the right height..
John said on 2/May/13
he is listed as 5'10-5'11 lol thats the biggest joke ive ever seen.
Taylor lautner = 5'8 max
samuraininja said on 28/Apr/13
I think he is 5'7.5" bare footed... With shoes on around 5'8".
Balrog said on 20/Apr/13
Rob, I think there's enough evidence pointing he's not 174 cm.
lol93 said on 20/Apr/13
Jamie foxx can appear taller than 5'9 easily,I my guess now for taylor is 174-173 out of bed I am 100%
satchy said on 18/Apr/13
looks more than 2 inches shorter than Jamie Fox, you're deluded lol93...he is not even 5ft 8
lol 93 said on 18/Apr/13
Zac had better footwear and better posture in the pics than Taylor lautner.Sethe Rogen looked 2 inches taller than zac efron so we can forgett zac wearing lifts.
Pol2001 said on 17/Apr/13
Efron have Lifts On! Efron ist 170cm + Lifts 173-175. Lautner is 168-169cm!
MBH said on 15/Apr/13
clearly shorter tan 5'8 zac efron, he is 5'7
Arch Stanton said on 15/Apr/13
His height is all over the place, can look anything from a weak 5'8" to 5'10. There aren't many actors I really show a strong dislike to but there is something I find abhorrent about this guy, real smug.
Balrog said on 8/Apr/13
I always thought he was 172-174 range but with MacFarlane he's struggling to look 5'8''.
satchy said on 5/Apr/13
Balrog..great pic, proves that he IS 5ft 7
said on 2/Apr/13
Rob, take a look at this pic if you can. He really doesn't look 174, not even near it. Click Here
mandy said on 20/Mar/13
I met this guy in person and he is very short, I am petite and when I met him he was barely a head taller than me. I would say at best he is 5'7. That is really pushing it. :)
said on 15/Mar/13
Sehan he has more footwear than Kristen and he wears a hat
With 5'9 self claimed Bon jovi Click Here
I ve proven that with this video Taylor is a weak 5'8
said on 14/Mar/13
Looks 5'8.5 - 5'9 with Kristen Stewart in these new photos Click Here Click Here
doit said on 9/Mar/13
Hotfortaylor, you are really stupid because of your comment,Taylor is 21 now, he won't still growing, and we should say that he took a hard training with gym and diet when he was 17, so it's difficult that after that he could grow a little.
I think he is 5.9, it's said in a movie and nobody answer to my question: has he said by himself how tall he is? or any credible way to know his height? thanks.
Hotfortaylor said on 8/Mar/13
That's because he is still growing you idiots. He was 5'9 and now he grew to 5'10 and will continue growing because he's 17
John said on 25/Feb/13
existential.man height is not so important really. girls wants to feel feminim thats all, therefor its important the guy is atleest equal height. i think those who care most is the ones with really bad confidence. a top model wont care as much because i think they are more confident then the average girl, they know they are feminim and attractive no matter how tall they are.
doit said on 22/Feb/13
Someone knows if he has said himself how tall he is? or any evidence to say that he is 174 cm? I think he could be perfectly 178 cm, minimum 175 cm.
Balrog said on 4/Feb/13
His character was listed 5'9'' at the movie. Not him.
Knight92 said on 4/Feb/13
LOLL !!! He got listed as 5' 10 " ???!!
there's no way he can be more than 5.8 ! maximum 5' 8.5" . His height is almost like Jason Statham .
truth(176-178cm) said on 2/Feb/13
haha this guy is clear as day 173cm max yet he gets listed at 178cm ROFL what a joke.
Nay said on 29/Jan/13
NO HES 5-10"
existential.man said on 19/Jan/13
he is the proof that even with a weak average height, you can get the attention of every girl, even if you are in competition with a 6ft Pattinson. yeah he is around 5'8.
Josh said on 9/Jan/13
Balrog said on 8/Jan/13
He's actually listed 5'10'' or more everywhere when he's not even near that. Min height I'll give him is 171 cm and max as listed 174 cm. Around 5'8'' for sure.
lol93 said on 8/Jan/13
No Kpl he has not said about how tall he is and he is not been asked actually, although in the movie abduction he is listed at 5'9 so he might ve been asked by the producers how tall he is and he might said 5'9,but people lie about their height so you dont if they are telling the truth
kpl said on 5/Jan/13
Someone knows if he has said himself how tall he is?
Balrog said on 5/Jan/13
Sorry Britt but he ain't 5'9''. Max height for Lautner is the current listing.
Britt said on 2/Jan/13
I hope he is 5'9 or 6'0 or taller
lol93 said on 31/Dec/12
He is not under 172cm I agree too
185-186 said on 31/Dec/12
173.5-174.5 no more no less
173 said on 30/Dec/12
the shredder says on 24/Dec/12
Whatever he is to the mm , I bet big cash it is closer to 5'8 than 5'7 or 5'9
I agree. 172cm is minimum, 5'8" is on the money! I don't care what "hey" says.
hey said on 28/Dec/12
Exactly my point, the shredder. I'm the one who stated that a range is needed, from 5'8" to 5'9", because no matter what you are doing, you are still ESTIMATING. and lol93, it doesnt matter how accurate some of them are, because if you can't bet your own life on that EXACT amount, then it's called an ESTIMATE. Like I said, Taylor could be exactly 5'8.2", but an estimate could give or take .2 inches if you have extensive experience guessing from pictures. What gives you the right to state that he is not over a "weak 5'8"? He could very well be 5'8.4" or higher, and NOBODY on this forum would take your word for it unless you cite a reputable source, which you still HAVE NOT. So in the end, you still NEED A RANGE. Unless you cite a reputable source in your next comment, then you are doing nothing but merely restating your fruitless statements. Face it, dude, the end of the argument is that a range of between two different heights are needed, and you stating "he is nothing more but a weak 5'8" is a statement backed up by no professional studies or proof. This is the year 2012, not the mid 1300's, where you could accuse your neighbor of witchcraft without proof, and he would be killed. Unless you have undeniable proof, then you are WRONG.
lol93 said on 28/Dec/12
you are talking about mm's now?ok he could be under or a little over 5'8 in mm's but as I said he is not more than a weak 5'8
also see the link about Height Challenge height and see how accurate estimates some people had on people's height by just looking pictures
hey said on 27/Dec/12
Dude. You even stated your mistake. You can come close, but not 100%. Thank you for proving my argument correctly. What if Lautner's theoretically proven height is 5 ft 8.2 inches tall, but due to educated guesses, you put him between 5 ft 8.4 or 5 ft 8 inches tall? You even stated that you CANNOT get his true height, but close. However, on your December 20, 2012 post, I quote the end, where you sau that "DO YOU STILL BELIEVE HE IS TALLER THAN 5'8???
Well he is not he is 5'8." Look at that ignorant behavior of yours. You conclude that he is exactly 5 feet 8 inches tall, without the attempt to realize the fact that you DONT KNOW THE GUY NOR HAVE YOU CONDUCTED MEASUREMENTS ON HIM. Thank you for discrediting yourself in your last post, and ultimately proving my argument true that you need a height RANGE, not a specific height, if you conduct educated GUESSES from photos and videos.
said on 25/Dec/12
Hey man just look the Height Challenge height in this site to see if people can guess and judge height only from pictures and see how accurate some members were here and how close some other were Click Here
This I think proves that you can judge height and estimate a height of person from pictures not 100% but very very close to his true height
balrog said on 25/Dec/12
I agree with the shredder. I'll put Lautner between 5'7.5''-5'8.5''. I'd shave the half inch and just put him at 5'8'' flat.
hey said on 24/Dec/12
If you lose your morning height within one hour, then you have some serious issues. What? Do you do 6 rep squats at the gym for 5 sets or something at 10AM in the morning? And it's logical because you just went to the extremes. Two inches of height is a huge different, on either end of the spectrum. I'm saying Bon Jovi can rationally be .5 of an inch more or less than 5'9", but I'm not jumping to say that he can be 5'7", which is a HUGE difference. Taylor Lautner CANNOT be as low as 5'6", because that is just a radical assumption. Him standing to many celebrities who state that they're around, lets say, 5'8" or 5'9" can be used to ESTIMATE his height, like I said, but cannot give a definite conclusion. You don't see him standing next to an estimated 5'9" Bon Jovi, and then conclude that he's 5'6". Are you mentally insane? You can estimate based on your information that he's somewhere between 5'8" and 5'9". As I said many times before, can you cite research that clearly shows Lautner's exact height increments and measurements, down to the tenth of an inch? Unless you can do so, you are not pinpoint accurate. YOU are still using scales of reference to ESTIMATE a person's height, BASED ON NOTHING but photographs and videos. I think this whole forum can accept that his height is somewhere between 5'8" and 5'9". There's some rationally incapable people who go on to state that he's 5'6" or so.
hey said on 23/Dec/12
First mistake. Your argument that you lose your morning height one hour after you wake up. Looks good on paper, but awful in actuality. Why? Wake up one day at 10AM. Take your height. Then, take your height at 11AM. See the difference. THEN, take your height at 9PM. you WILL see a change in that height from 11AM to 9PM. In fact, there will be a change from 11AM to 9PM that is drastically immense compared to the difference from 10AM to 11AM. The fluid does not simply disperse out of the spinal discs in merely one hour. Do the experiment yourself, all of you, you will find that I am, in fact, correct. Plus, it does not matter what you believe. What are your credentials? Are you majoring in Photo-citing evidence for pinpoint height? (Joke) The truth of the matter is, like I stated, you cannot be sure of a person's height unless professionally conducting tests. I am not refuting your claim that his height is around 5'8", which is probably on the lower spectrum, but I will not, nor will anyone on this website, accept your answer as indefinitely correct. Plus, your scale of reference is questionable. Why? How do you know Bon Jovi is not 5'9.25," or 5'8.5," give me a citing of a STUDY that cannot be proven wrong. Same goes for Robert Pattinson. Who's to say he's not a flat 5'11.8", 6", or 6'0.3", can you cite a study? You can compare Lautner to an object that is tested and madeto be of a certain height, but you cannot compare him to another human being and say that Lautner is EXACTLY one height, and cannot be another. The logical response is that he is somewhere between 5'8" and 5'9". I'm telling you, quit wasting your time debunking his height, which does not benefit you at all. Watch. Next post you're going to tell me that he's still a "weak 5'8" just because it's based on your observations and "educated guesses." It might be true that he is that height,and it might be true that he is 5'8.5," but unless you personally know the guy, put him next to a measuring device, or can use professional studies to prove your answer correct, you cannot be "99%" sure of something.
hey said on 21/Dec/12
@lol93, did you not see me refute "173" on whether to believe self-claimed height reports? I'm mocking him on his approach, which is to compare Lautner to people who claim themselves to be a certain height. On other words, my argument is that "why do you not believe lautner is self-claimed to be 5 foot 9, when you compare him to a guy who is self-claimed to be 5 foot 9?" I'm the one who says that using self-claimed height reports are very inaccurate. Take basic college writing before you attempt to refute anything I say. Maybe you'll understand my actual approach to the issue, instead of rushing head-first into assuming I believe something that I clearly do not.
lol93 said on 21/Dec/12
Yeah Right we should believe what people selfclaim about their height,example mark wahlberg claims he is 5'10 while he looks shorter by two inches with other 5'10 people who claim theimselves that they are 5'10
So acording to hey is mark wahlberg is 5'10 because he says so
hey said on 20/Dec/12
@173, note how you used the word "self-claimed," as in other terms, you're basically stating that they estimate their own height. Isn't everyone's height self-claimed? For example, I claim to be of a certain height because my height range fluctuates near it. I'm taller by about an inch in the morning. It's the fluids being compressed out of the spinal discs. Maybe in one picture, he's taller because it's in the morning, and one around the evening, where he's shorter than in the morning? I'm just saying, unless you're in a laboratory conducting a professional height recording examination every single hour for a day, you will never know his height down to the tenth of an inch. Even the slightest posture problem can cause a discrepancy in a person's real height. Maybe Bon Jovi has better posture? Too many factors.
173 said on 20/Dec/12
@hey: Well, I can conclude he is NOT 5'9" because he's shorter than every legit self-claimed 5'9" guy.
tmf said on 20/Dec/12
Goood argument "hey", I'm agree with you, but do you know if he has said himself in any interview or video how tall he is? That would be the best way to know his height. Thanks.
hey said on 19/Dec/12
Let's just leave his height range at somewhere between 5'8" and 5'9". You cannot debate his height 100% correctly to the very 10th of an inch. You guys seriously need to realize you're doing nothing but citing photos and videos, and based off them, merely guessing through using a scale of reference. This can be used to conclude that his height is between a certain range, but you CANNOT conclude as a result that he is nothing but, let's say, 5'8.5." Yes, obviously his height isnt 5'11," but you cannot say that he is not 5 foot 9 inches, because you simply did not conduct tests and collected fail-proof data that can be used professionally.
173 said on 14/Dec/12
@lol93: Yeah, I can see 5'8.5"/174cm for Taylor in the morning aswell and he probably drops to 5'7.75"/172cm by night.
@shreds: Is the Rob Schneider and Martin Lawrence SNL video already posted on one of their pages?